ABSTRACT
In recent years, the use of bacteriophages as biocontrol agents has gained renewed attention, especially for targeting major phytopathogenic genera like Xanthomonas. However, their potential against Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians, the causal agent of bacterial leaf spot of lettuce, remains largely unexplored, with only two virulent phages reported to date. In this study, eight novel virulent tailed phages were isolated from wastewater samples, including three jumbophages, which are the first known to infect this pathovar. These jumbophages define a new viral genus and exhibit distinct biological characteristics, including broader host ranges, but lower burst sizes and slower lytic cycles compared with the five smaller-genome phages. Together, the newly isolated phages exhibited lytic activity against nearly all X. hortorum pv. vitians strains tested while remaining highly specific to the pathovar. Genomic analyses revealed strictly lytic profiles, and absence of virulence or resistance genes, supporting their biosafety for agricultural use. Furthermore, the isolation of a phage infecting a bacterial mutant previously shown to be resistant to the virulent phage PhiXhv-1 highlights the potential for designing robust phage cocktails to mitigate resistance emergence. All phages demonstrated high stability across a wide range of pH and temperature conditions but remained highly sensitive to UV exposure. These findings provide a valuable foundation for developing phage-based biocontrol strategies against bacterial leaf spot of lettuce.
IMPORTANCE
Ranked among the leading plant pathogenic bacterial genera, Xanthomonas species affect a wide range of crops and contribute to major agricultural losses worldwide. Among these, Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians, the causal agent of bacterial leaf spot of lettuce, poses a serious threat to lettuce production worldwide. Currently, no effective disease managements strategies are available to reduce this foliar hemibiotropic phytopathogen. Bacteriophage-based biocontrol has shown promising results against Xanthomonas spp. However, its application against this pathogen remains largely unexplored, with only two phages isolated to date. Successful phage application in agriculture requires careful selection and through characterization to ensure safety and efficacy. In this study, the phage diversity targeting this phytopathogen was expanded through the isolation of eight novel virulent phages, including the first jumbophages infecting this species. Their genomic and biological properties provide a valuable foundation for developing future phage-based treatment against this challenging pathogen.
KEYWORDS: bacteriophage, Xanthomonas hortorum, jumbophage, biocontrol, environmental stability, phage genomics, host range
INTRODUCTION
Ensuring global food security in light of the projected population growth to 9.6 billion by 2050 will require an estimated 70%-80% increase in agricultural production, according to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). However, plant pathogens are already responsible for up to 41% yield losses in major crops, resulting in an estimated annual economic impact of US$220-290 billion and affecting approximately 10% of the global food supply (1, 2). To date, more than two hundred bacterial plant pathogens have been identified. Reported yield losses caused by these bacteria vary widely depending on the crop and region, ranging from 10% to 40% (3, 4). Climate changes, particularly rising temperatures, are expected to exacerbate this burden by altering pathogen life cycles, expanding their geographic range, and increasing the severity of plant-pathogen interactions (5, 6). In this context, biocontrol strategies using microbial agents are emerging as promising and sustainable alternatives to chemical pesticides, especially copper-based compounds, whose persistence in soil, negative impact on beneficial microbiota, and contribution to bacterial resistance raise significant concerns (7, 8). The development and implementation of these environmentally friendly approaches are increasingly supported by public policies, such as the European Green Deal, which aims to reduce synthetic pesticide use by 50% by 2030. Faced with these new challenges, growing attention has been directed toward bacteriophages, viruses that specifically infect bacteria. First discovered by Frederick Twort and Félix d’Herelle in the early 20th century, phages have a long-standing history in biocontrol applications (9, 10). Their potential was recognized as early as 1924, when Hemstreet and Mallmann used a filtrate from decomposed cabbage containing phages to inhibit soft rot-associated bacteria (11). The first documented success in field application reportedly occurred in 1935, when phage treatment was used to control Stewart’s wilt diseases, caused by Pantoea stewartia (12).
Despite this early interest, phage-based biocontrol has since remained marginal for decades due to technical limitations, regulatory gaps, and a lack of genomic resources. However, recent advances in phage genomics, combined with the growing demand for sustainable agriculture, have renewed scientific and industrial interest in isolating and characterizing novel phages targeting key pathogens. Indeed, phages, and specifically virulent phages, present unique biological features for biocontrol applications: (i) high specificity toward bacterial targets, (ii) safety for eukaryotic cells, (iii) natural abundance and genetic diversity, enabling the identification of specific phages for virtually any bacterial host, and (iv) ability to multiply exponentially within bacteria through successive lytic cycles, making them potentially cost-effective to produce and apply (2, 13, 14). Since 2005, several private companies (e.g., OmniLytics Inc., Enviroinvest Corp., A&P Inphatec, APS Biocontrol Ltd.) have developed and commercialized phage-based biopesticides for both preventive and post-harvest applications targeting major phytopathogenic bacteria. Among these pathogens, Xanthomonas ranks among the ten most important phytopathogenic bacterial genera, causing diseases in over 400 plant species, including economically critical crops such as rice, tomato, and cabbage (7, 15, 16). Among its pathovars, X. hortorum pv. vitians is the causal agent of bacterial leaf spot of lettuce (Lactuca sativa, Asteraceae) (17). This bacteriosis is characterized by the development of water-soaked lesions on leaves, which expand and coalesce, ultimately leading to the necrosis of entire leaf (18). This phytopathogen is present worldwide and infects all cultivated types of lettuce (19). Symptomatic lettuces are often unmarketable, and under favorable conditions, particularly cool and wet weather, several outbreaks have been reported to affect up to 100% of field-grown lettuce. In the absence of effective preventive or curative measures, this disease remains a serious threat to lettuce producers, causing substantial yield and economic losses (20). Current management practices rely mainly on prophylactic measures such as crop rotation, cultivar selection, and sanitation, underscoring the urgent need for alternative solutions (21, 22). Recent studies have demonstrated the biocontrol efficacy of phages against Xanthomonas spp. phylogenetically related to X. hortorum pv. vitians under both greenhouse and field conditions. For example, a phage cocktail (FoX2–FoX6) reduced the proportion of plants infected by X. campestris pv. campestris by up to 30% in field trials (23). Against X. oryzae pv. oryzae, phage Xoo-sp2 reduced disease symptoms by one-third (24), while phage X3 achieved a reduction of 83.1% (25). Additional successful phage applications are reviewed by Holtappels et al. (7). In contrast, phages active against X. hortorum pv. vitians remain largely overlooked, with only two virulent phages described to date (26). This marked underrepresentation highlights a broader gap in phage research for this pathovar. Expanding this limited phage collection and thoroughly characterizing their biological and genomic properties are crucial steps toward the development of a robust and sustainable phage-based biocontrol solution.
In this study, we report the isolation of eight novel bacteriophages targeting X. hortorum pv. vitians, including three jumbophages which are the first known to infect this pathovar. To assess their potential for biocontrol application, we performed phenotypic and genomic characterization. This included host range profiling across the genetic diversity of the pathovar vitians and other Xanthomonas, bacterial growth inhibition assays, adsorption kinetics, and one-step growth curve analysis. In addition, their environmental stability under key abiotic stresses, including pH, temperature, and UV exposure was also evaluated. Finally, whole-genome sequencing was used to assess their genetic features, taxonomic classification, and biosafety compliance criteria relevant to agricultural applications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and growth conditions
Xanthomonas strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. Strains were routinely streaked onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates and incubated at 28°C for 48–72 h. Single colonies were used to inoculate tryptic soy broth (TSB) and cultured overnight at 28°C with shaking at 160 rpm. Strains of X. hortorum pv. vitians used for phage isolation were listed in Table S1. Semi-solid agar overlays consisting of TSB with 0.6% agar (or 0.4% for jumbophages), supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2 to promote phage adsorption, were used for plaque assays. For phage infection experiments, overnight bacterial cultures were diluted in TSB supplemented with 10 mM CaCl2 to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.15 (7.5 × 107 CFU.mL−1) and incubated at 28°C with shaking at 160 rpm for 1 h to reach the early logarithmic phase prior to phage addition. All strains were kept at −80 °C in 30% (v/v) glycerol vials for long-term storage.
Phage isolation, purification, and propagation
A total of 42 samples were collected between November 2022 and December 2024 from various wastewater treatment plants located in the Occitanie region (France) for the isolation of X. hortorum pv. vitians phages. Phages were isolated using an enrichment-based approach and a screen by the double-layer agar technique as adapted from Plumet et al. (27). Effluent samples were first centrifuged (5,000 × g, 10 min, room temperature) and filtered through 0.2 µm pore-size membrane to remove debris. Filtered samples were then mixed with early logarithmic-phase cultures of different X. hortorum pv. vitians strains and reprocessed by centrifugation and filtration steps after an overnight incubation. For each enrichment series, a host-only control was included, in which the bacterial strain was incubated without any environmental sample under identical conditions. The presence of phage was evaluated using the double-layer agar technique, where the appearance of individual plaques indicated successful phage isolation. Individual plaques were purified through two successive re-isolation steps. After incubation at 4°C for 1 h and filtration through a 0.2 µm filter, phage stocks were stored at 4°C in SM buffer. Plaque morphology (i.e., size, clarity, turbidity, edge definition) was evaluated using the single agar layer method. Unless otherwise specified, all phage suspensions used in the following experiments were filtered through 0.2-µm pore-size filters.
Phages were propagated using the double-layer agar technique. Plates with confluent lysis were flooded with SM buffer, and the resuspended soft top agar were collected and centrifuged 10 min at 5,000 × g at 4°C. Supernatants were filtered through a 0.2-µm filter before storage at 4°C.
For large-scale production, each phage was amplified in liquid bacterial culture. An early logarithmic-phase culture of the production strain was mixed with phage at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 and incubated for up to 16 h at 28°C. Following lysis, cultures were centrifuged and the clear supernatants were filtered. Phage titers (in PFU/mL) were determined by the spot assay method on double-layer agar.
Phage morphological characterization by transmission electronic microscopy (TEM)
The preparation of phages samples for TEM observation was performed following the protocol previously described by Plumet et al. (27), with minor modifications. Briefly, phage particles were concentrated by centrifugation and washed twice in acetate ammonium buffer (NH4-acetate 0.1 M). Grids were negatively stained using 2% uranyl acetate and visualized with a JEOL 1400 Flash transmission electron microscope operated at 120 kV. Virion dimensions (capsid diameter, tail length/width) were measured from at least 10 individual virion micrographs using ImageJ software (v.154d [28]). Results are reported as a mean value ± standard error.
Phage whole-genome sequencing and analysis
Phage DNA was extracted and purified as described previously by Gendre J (29) without addition of SDS and proteinase K. Libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-Free and Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kits, and sequencing was performed on an Illumina Miseq or NovaSeq 6000 S4 platforms (paired-end, 150 bp), depending on the phage sample. Reads quality was assessed using FastQC v0.12.1 (30), followed by cleaning using PRINSEQ 0.20.4 (31). Reads were assembled using SPAdes 4.0 (32). Contigs sequences were queried against the NCBI nucleotide (nt) database using BLASTn (33) to confirm viral origin and exclude contaminant sequences. Assembly quality was evaluated by read mapping using Bowtie2 v2.5.4 (34), followed by processing with Samtools v1.20 (35). Structural and functional annotation was carried out using the rTOOLS pipeline (RIME Bioinformatics). Transfer RNAs were identified using tRNA scan-SE v2.07 (36). Phage lifestyle was predicted using PhageAI (37). Comparative genomic analysis among phage isolates was performed using CLINKER (38). To explore functional genomic divergence within the two proposed phage genera, predicted protein sequences were compared using an all-versus-all BLASTp approach. Sequences were clustered into protein families using SiLiX based on pairwise similarities (39). Proteins were assigned to the same family if their high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) covered at least 80% of the protein length and shared ≥35% sequence identity, as previously described (40). Partial sequences were included if they were ≥100 amino acids in length or represented at least 50% of the full-length protein. Presence/absence matrices were generated using custom scripts. Phylogenomic relationships were inferred with ViPTree (41), which constructs a proteomic tree based on genome-wide tBLASTx similarities against reference viral genomes. Intergenomic similarities among complete phage genomes were calculated using VIRIDIC with Blastn default settings (42).
Host range determination
The plaquing host range of the phages was assessed by spot assays on 41 Xanthomonas strains, including 34 X. hortorum pv. vitians, five strains from other pathovars, and two from other species (Table S1). Briefly, 10-fold serially diluted phage suspensions were spotted onto log-phase bacterial cultures in soft agar overlays and incubated overnight at 28°C. A strain was considered susceptible if clear, countable plaques were observed upon phage application. Lysis from without (halo without plaques) or absence of lysis indicated resistance. Efficiency of plating (EOP) was calculated as the ratio of the phage titer (in PFU/mL) on the test strain to the titer on the production host. Strains were classified as highly sensitive (EOP >0.5), sensitive (0.1−4 < EOP < 0.5), or resistant (EOP <10 0.1−4). This classification was adapted from previously established EOP categories (43, 44), using a lower resistance threshold (EOP <10−4 instead of 1−3). All experiments were done in duplicate, with two technical replicates per phage dilution. The relationship between phage genome size (categorized as small or large) and host range breadth was analyzed using a chi-squared test of independence. To evaluate whether genetic diversity among X. hortorum pv. vitians strains influenced phage susceptibility, differences in overall susceptibility scores across MLSA-defined groups (A, B, and C) were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. Group-specific biases in susceptibility at the individual phage level were assessed using Fisher’s exact tests with Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 replicates, to approximate P values), followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
Bacterial growth inhibition assay
The ability of phages to inhibit the growth of their production strain was assessed by monitoring OD600 using a Bioscreen C MBR BACTERIO (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, early exponential-phase (OD600 ~0.2, equivalent to 108 CFU/mL−1) host cultures were inoculated with phage suspensions at MOIs ranging from 0.00001 to 50 in 100-well Honeycomb plates. After a 30-min adsorption period at room temperature, OD600 was recorded every 20 min for 24 h at 28°C under continuous orbital shaking. TSB only and the bacterial strain without phages served as negative and bacterial growth controls, respectively. Four technical replicates per treatment were performed.
Adsorption assays
Phage adsorption kinetics were determined by quantifying non-adsorbed phages over time. Early-log-phase bacterial cultures (OD600 ~0.2, ~108 CFU.mL−1) were mixed with phages at a MOI of 0.01. Co-cultures were incubated at 28°C without agitation, except for jumbophages, which were incubated with gentle shaking at 50 rpm. This condition was selected based on preliminary observations showing that static incubation significantly reduced jumbo phage adsorption efficiency. Aliquots were collected at defined intervals, filtered through 0.2-µm pore-size filters to separate free phages, and then quantified by spot assay. The percentage of free phages was calculated relative to the initial titer, defined as the phage concentration measured immediately after phage addition. The adsorption rate constant (k) was calculated as described previously (45). Two independent experiments were performed, each comprising three technical replicates.
One-step growth curves
One-step growth curves were performed to assess phage infectivity and replication dynamics. Phages were added at a MOI of 0.1 or 0.001 (for jumbophages) to early log-phase bacterial cultures (OD600 ~0.2, ~108 CFU.mL−1) and incubated at 28°C (with gentle agitation of 50 rpm for jumbophages) for a pre-determined adsorption time. The co-cultures were centrifuged (5,000 × g, 21°C, 10 min), the supernatant was discarded, and the pellets were resuspended in 35 mL of TSB supplemented with 10 mM CaCl2. This wash step was performed twice to remove non-adsorbed phages. Resuspended co-cultures were incubated at 28°C with shaking at 160 rpm, and aliquots were collected at various time points for free phage quantification by spot assay. Burst size was calculated as the ratio of phages released after the rise period to the number of adsorbed phages. Two independent experiments were performed, each with three technical replicates per time point.
Effect of temperature, pH, and ultraviolet irradiation on phages’ stability
To assess phage stability, suspensions were subjected to various abiotic conditions, including temperature, pH, and UV-B irradiation. For thermal stability, phages were incubated in the dark for 1 h at temperatures ranging from 4°C to 75°C in a thermal cycler (Analytik Jena). pH stability was evaluated by incubating phages in SM buffer adjusted to pH values from 2 to 12 at room temperature, in the dark, for 1 h. For UV sensitivity assays, phage suspensions were poured into sterile empty Petri dishes, left uncovered, and exposed to UV-B light emitted by a Bio-Link Crosslinker BLX-E312 (Vilber Lourmat) at a 16 cm distance for 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, or 30 min. Following each treatment, phage viability was assessed by plaque counting using the double-layer agar method. The phage survival rate (%) was calculated relative to the initial titer measured under optimal storage conditions (4°C, pH 7.5, in the dark). Each abiotic condition was tested in two independent experiments, each with three technical replicates.
Data analysis and visualization
All figures were generated using R (v4.3.3; R Core Team) within RStudio (version 2023.12.1.402 “Ocean Storm” Release; RStudio Team), unless otherwise specified. Visualizations were primarily created using the ggplot2 package (v3.5.1), with additional packages including readxl (v1.4.3) for data import, dplyr (v1.1.4) for data manipulation, and patchwork (v1.3.0) for figure assembly. Specific visualizations, such as heatmaps, employed ComplexHeatmap (v2.18.0) and circlize (version 0.4.16). Other packages used for figure-specific processing include scales (v1.3.0), tidyr (v1.3.1), purr (v1.0.2), cowplot (v1.1.3), and viridis (v0.6.5). When specified, figures were post-processed for layout optimization and labeling using Inkscape (v1.4). Figures were exported in high resolution (1,200 dpi) in SVG, PNG, and/or PDF formats for publication purposes.
Additional methodological details are provided in the Supplemental material.
RESULTS
Eight phages isolated from wastewater show distinct plaque morphologies and myovirus-like morphotypes
Eight novel phages infecting X. hortorum pv. vitians were isolated from wastewater samples. The phages PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, PhiXhv-7, PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, PhiXhv-16, PhiXhv-18, and PhiXhv-28 were isolated on different bacterial strains representative of the pathovar’s genetic diversity, complemented by a LPS mutant lacking the side branches of the O antigen (i.e., AB16734 ∆LPS3) (Table S1). For each phage, the strain yielding the highest titer during enrichment was used as its production host in subsequent analyses: CFBP8642 (PhiXhv-2), CFBP8639 (PhiXhv-5), CFBP8641 (PhiXhv-7), CFBP8640 (PhiXhv-12,-15, −16), CFBP8643 (PhiXhv-18), and AB16734∆LPS3 (PhiXhv-28). All phages formed clear plaques on their respective production strains, except for PhiXhv-16, which produced slightly turbid plaques (Fig. 1A). Plaque morphology and diameter are summarized in Table S2 and ranged from 0.6 ± 0.1 mm (PhiXhv-15) to 2.4 ± 0.1 mm (PhiXhv-7). Notably, phages PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 formed smaller plaques, with a mean diameter of 0.7 mm, which were barely detectable when using standard overlay concentration (0.6% agar). Improved plaque visibility for these three phages was achieved by reducing the top agar concentration to 0.4%, likely facilitating better diffusion through the semi-solid medium. In contrast, the five other phages produced larger plaques averaging 2 mm in diameter, corresponding to approximately a 2.8-fold size difference. TEM micrograph analysis revealed that all eight phages had a myovirus-like morphology, characterized by an icosahedral capsid and a contractile tail (Fig. 1B). Capsid diameters of phages PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 (Table S2) exceeded 110 nm, making them almost twice as large as those of the other five phages, which ranged from 61 ± 1 nm (PhiXhv-28) to 74 ± 1 nm (PhiXhv-7). Tail lengths ranged from 86 ± 7 nm to 119 ± 1 nm, with no major differences observed across the phage set.
Fig 1.

Morphological characterization of novel bacteriophages infecting X. hortorum pv. vitians. Strain names used for phage propagation are indicated in brackets. (A) Representative plaque morphologies of eight phages (PhiXhv-2, -5, -7, -12, -15, -16, -18, and -28) isolated from sewage and propagated on X. hortorum pv. vitians strains. Plaques were observed after overnight incubation at 28°C on tryptic soy broth (TSB) supplemented with 0.6% agar (PhiXhv-2, -5, -7, -18, and -28) or 0.4% agar (PhiXhv-12, -15, -16). Scale bars = 1 cm. (B) Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of the corresponding phages, negatively stained with uranyl acetate. All display a typical myovirus morphotype. Scale bars = 50 nm.
Genomic features highlight two distinct phage lineages
Whole-genome sequencing analysis of the novel X. hortorum pv. vitians phages is summarized in Table 1. All phage genomes were linear, double-stranded DNA molecules. Based on their similar genome sizes, the phages were grouped into two categories: the smaller-genome phages PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, PhiXhv-7, PhiXhv-18, and PhiXhv-28 (46,786-47,861 bp), and the jumbophages PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 (227,648-229,124 bp). To ensure the robustness of downstream genomic analyses, sequencing depth was assessed for each genome. The average genome depth coverage ranged from 3,676× (PhiXhv-7) to 40,794× (PhiXhv-28), confirming the high quality and reliability of the assemblies (Table S3). The averages of GC contents were 61.8% and 55.1% for the two groups, respectively. The small-genome phages encoded between 72 and 76 predicted CDSs, with over half annotated as hypothetical or unknown proteins. In contrast, the jumbophages harbored between 238 and 330 CDSs, of which more than 75% encode proteins of unknown function (Table S4). Functionally categorized proteins were classified into five categories: replication-related, structural and morphogenesis, lysis and host interaction, hypothetical, and other proteins (Fig. 2). A single tRNA gene encoding asparagine (Asn), with the anticodon GTT, was identified in the jumbophage genomes. The preferred Asn codon in both phages and their bacterial host was AAC, corresponding to this anticodon. Differential codon usage analysis revealed that AAC was the second most overrepresented, with a usage frequency 1.5 times higher in phages PhiXhv-15 and PhiXhv-16 than in the host (Fig. S1). On average, 59.56% of CDSs in the phage genomes either exclusively used AAC for Asn or showed a bias toward AAC over the codon AAT. Among annotated genes, those with the strongest AAC bias were mostly associated with structural and morphogenesis roles, including tail proteins, the major head protein, baseplate hub subunits, head maturation proteases, and minor tail proteins (Table S5). No antibiotic resistance genes, virulence factors, or toxins were detected in the genomes based on analyses using the CARD, ResFinder, and VFDB databases. A virulent lifestyle was predicted for all phages, which is consistent with the absence of lysogeny-related genes, such as integrases. Together, these genomic features support the potential suitability of these phages for biocontrol applications.
TABLE 1.
Genomic features of eight novel Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians phages
| Phage name | Accession number | Production strain | Genome size (bp) | GC content (%) | No. of CDSa | % of known functions | No. of tRNAa | Lifestyle predictionb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhiXhv-2 | PV702347 | CFBP8642 | 47,229 | 61.88 | 74 | 51 | 0 | Virulent (99.66%) |
| PhiXhv-5 | PV764598 | CFBP8639 | 47,720 | 61.64 | 76 | 46 | 0 | Virulent (99.95%) |
| PhiXhv-7 | PV764599 | CFBP8641 | 46,786 | 62.05 | 72 | 36 | 0 | Virulent (99.91%) |
| PhiXhv-18 | PV764600 | CFBP8643 | 47,861 | 61.60 | 73 | 49 | 0 | Virulent (99.60%) |
| PhiXhv-28 | PV754127 | AB16734∆LPS3 | 46,883 | 61.86 | 72 | 51 | 0 | Virulent (97.64%) |
| PhiXhv-12 | PV764601 | CFBP8640 | 227,648 | 55.11 | 330 | 24 | 1 | Virulent (100%) |
| PhiXhv-15 | PV764602 | CFBP8640 | 228,725 | 55.17 | 328 | 23 | 1 | Virulent (100%) |
| PhiXhv-16 | PV764603 | CFBP8640 | 229,124 | 55.09 | 330 | 23 | 1 | Virulent (100%) |
Structural and fonctional annotation was carried out using the rTOOLS pipeline (RIME Bioinformatics). Coding sequences (CDS) and tRNAs were predicted using Prodigal v2.6.3, Phanotate v1.5.0, Glimmer v3.02, GeneMarkS v1.14, and tRNA scan-SE v2.0.7. Functional annotation of all predicted CDS was performed using a combination of databases: CARD (2023.11), ResFinder (2023.04), VFDB (2023.11), Phantome (2021.03), Swiss-Prot (2023.11), NCBI_virus (2023.11), VOG (2020.05), pVOG (2021.03), RefSeq (2023.11), and PHROGs (2023.02).
Phage lifestyle was predicted by the machine-learning-based program PhageAI and, further, confirmed by the absence of integrase genes.
Fig 2.

Comparative genomic organization of X. hortorum pv. vitians bacteriophage genomes. The figure displays the genomic organization, synteny, and sequence similarity among bacteriophages infecting X. hortorum pv. vitians. Phages are grouped by genome size into smaller-genome phages (top panel) and jumbophages (bottom panel). Arrows represent predicted open reading frames (ORFs) and indicate transcriptional orientation. ORFs are color-coded by predicted function: DNA packaging (blue), structural protein (magenta), DNA replication and nucleic acid metabolism (yellow), lysis-related protein (red), and hypothetical protein (green). Shaded connectors between genomes show pairwise amino acid sequence identity, with gradient intensity representing identity from 0% (white) to 100% (black); only identity ≥90% are displayed. GenBank accession numbers for each phage genome are provided on the left. Genome comparisons were generated using Clinker and edited in Inkscape v1.4.
Broad host range and distinct infectivity profiles highlight two major phage groups
The host range of these eight phages was assessed using a panel of 34 X. hortorum pv. vitians isolates and seven strains from other pathovars or species of Xanthomonas (Fig. 3). Together, the phages lysed 94% (32 out of 34) of the vitians isolates. Only two strains (LM17692 and LM17388) were resistant to all tested phages. Based on EOP values, the phages grouped into three distinct infectivity profiles. The jumbophages (i.e., PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16) exhibited the broadest host ranges, each infecting more than 25 X. hortorum pv. vitians isolates with moderate to high EOP values (>10−3). This broad host range was significantly associated with their larger genome sizes, as confirmed by a chi-squared test (χ2 = 84.294, df = 1, P value = 2.2 × 10−16). In contrast, PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, PhiXhv-7, and PhiXhv-18 displayed narrower host ranges, infecting between 3 (PhiXhv-2) and 12 (PhiXhv-5) isolates, corresponding to 8% to 35% of the tested panel. A third highly specific profile was represented by PhiXhv-28, which exhibited lytic activity exclusively against the LPS3 mutant strain (AB16734 ∆LPS3). The potential influence of X. hortorum pv. vitians’ genetic diversity on phage susceptibility was evaluated by comparing sensitivity across MLSA-defined groups. A first analysis based on overall phage susceptibility scores revealed no significant difference between groups A, B, and C (H = 3.36, df = 2, P-value = 0.186), suggesting a similar average response to the phage panel across the genetic groups. To explore potential group-specific interactions at the individual phage level, each phage was then analyzed individually. Among the eight phages tested, only PhiXhv-5 displayed a statistically significant bias, preferentially infecting strains from group C (adjusted P-value = 0.02 after Bonferroni correction). Due to limited representation in some categories, potential effects of strain isolation year and geographic origin could not be assessed. None of the phages exhibited lytic activity against non-vitians strains supporting their high level of pathovar specificity. This nearly complete lytic activity within X. hortorum pv. vitians, combined with the absence of off-target effects, underscores the potential of these phages for targeted biocontrol applications.
Fig 3.

Host range and efficiency of plating of novel phages active against X. hortorum pv. vitians. The heatmap shows the efficiency of plating (EOP) of eight phages (PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, PhiXhv-7, PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, PhiXhv-16, PhiXhv-18, and PhiXhv-28) tested against a panel of 41 Xanthomonas strains, comprising 34 strains of X. hortorum pv. vitians and 7 strains of other Xanthomonas species (bottom rows). EOP values were calculated as the ratio of the phage titer obtained on a given test strain to the titer of phage obtained on the individual production strain of each phage, which was defined as the strain yielding the highest titer during initial isolation (EOP = 1). The color scale ranges from red (≥1) to light yellow (10−4) for high to moderate levels of infection. Gray indicates resistant strains or no lysis (including lysis from without, LFW), and white color indicates the detection limit. The bar chart above the heatmap depicts the genome size (in kb) of each phage, as determined by genome sequencing. The left-side annotation columns provide metadata for each bacterial strain, including multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) group (A, B, or C) (17), year of isolation (1949–1995 in yellow, 2008–2017 in red, unknown in gray), and geographic origin (France or other). Production strains used as EOP reference for each phage were: CFBP8642 (PhiXhv-2), CFBP8639 (PhiXhv-5), CFBP8641 (PhiXhv-7), CFBP8640 (PhiXhv-12, -15, and -16), CFBP8643 (PhiXhv-18), and AB16734∆LPS3 (PhiXhv-28). All experiments were performed in two independent biological replicates, each with two technical replicates, and representative data are shown.
Phages infection kinetics reveal differences in adsorption and lytic efficiency
Growth inhibition assays confirmed the virulent nature of the eight phages on their respective isolation strains across a range of MOIs (Fig. S2). For all newly isolated phages, bacterial growth inhibition was dependent on phage concentration. PhiXhv-5 and PhiXhv-7 exhibited the fastest lytic activity, fully suppressing bacterial growth within 3 h even at low MOI (i.e., 0.01), demonstrating the high efficiency of their lytic cycle. Even lower MOIs (down to 0.0001) achieved complete inhibition of growth in over 5 h without any regrowth. For PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-18, and PhiXhv-28, a higher MOI (≥ 1) was required to rapidly lyse the entire bacterial population. Lower MOI (< 0.1) were insufficient to fully inhibit bacterial growth within 10 h for PhiXhv-18 and PhiXhv-28. In contrast, jumbophages PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15 and PhiXhv-16 exhibited a much slower lytic cycle. Bacterial growth was observed for more than 2 h even at high MOIs (>1), with inhibition occurring only after more than 5 h at MOIs above 0.1. To gain further insights into the phage infection process, adsorption efficiency and kinetics parameters were measured. Adsorption efficiency varied among the phages. Phages PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, and PhiXhv-7 exhibited rapid adsorption, with over 90% of virions adsorbed within 20 min (Fig. 4A). Adsorption was slightly slower for PhiXhv-18 and PhiXhv-28, which required 30 to 40 min to reach similar levels. In contrast, PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 displayed slower and incomplete adsorption dynamics (Fig. 4B). For PhiXhv-12, only ~45% of virions were adsorbed after 30 min of incubation. PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 were the slowest, with more than one-third of the phage population remaining unabsorbed even after 60 to 90 min of incubation. Adsorption constants, kinetic parameters, and burst sizes, calculated from one-step growth curves (Fig. S3) are summarized in Table 2. For PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, PhiXhv-7, PhiXhv-18 and PhiXhv-28, the complete replication cycles (including adsorption) ranged from 95 min (PhiXhv-7) to 135 min (PhiXhv-5). Latent periods were short, ranging from 10 and 20 min, followed by a rise period lasting 40 to 80 min for phages PhiXhv-28 and PhiXhv-5, respectively. Burst sizes varied considerably, from 5 (PhiXhv-28) to 31 (PhiXhv-5) virions per infected cell. In contrast, the jumbophages exhibited notably longer replication cycles (190-205 min), with latent periods approximately equal to the duration of the burst phase (60 min to 80 min). Burst sizes were low for these phages, ranging from 4 (PhiXhv-12) to 6 (PhiXhv-15) virions per infected cell. These results were consistent with the infection curves and highlight notable differences in the lytic efficacy and infection dynamics of the newly isolated phages.
Fig 4.

Adsorption kinetics of two distinct genomic groups of bacteriophages to X. hortorum pv. vitians. The adsorption efficiency of eight phages to their host was assessed by monitoring the percentage of free phages remaining in the supernatant over time. Assays were conducted at a MOI of 0.01 at 28°C. At each time point, aliquots were collected, filtered to separate free phages from adsorbed ones, and quantified using a standard spot assay. Data points represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from two independent biological replicates, each with three technical replicates. Strain names used for phage propagation are indicated in brackets. (A) Adsorption curves of the smaller-genome phages: PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, PhiXhv-7, PhiXhv-18, and PhiXhv-28. These phages exhibited rapid adsorption kinetics, with over 90% of phages adsorbed within 20 to 30 min for most. (B) Adsorption profiles of the three jumbophages (PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16) exhibiting slower adsorption kinetics, characterized by a substantial proportion of free phages remaining unabsorbed even after 60 min.
TABLE 2.
Biological and kinetic parameters of Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians phages
| Phage name | Adsorption rate constant K (mL·cell−1·min−1) | Latent period (min)a | Rise period (min) | Lytic cycle duration (min) | Burst size | Titer after liquid culture (PFU/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhiXhv-2 | 2.1 × 10−7 | 10 | 70 | 115 | 7 | 2.93 × 1010 | ||
| PhiXhv-5 | 1.3 × 10−7 | 20 | 80 | 135 | 31 | 2.05 × 1010 | ||
| PhiXhv-7 | 1.3 × 10−7 | 10 | 50 | 95 | 28 | 2.85 × 1010 | ||
| PhiXhv-18 | 3.8 × 10−7 | 10 | 50 | 105 | 6 | 1.2 × 1010 | ||
| PhiXhv-28 | 5.6 × 10−7 | 20 | 40 | 115 | 5 | 8.93 × 109 | ||
| PhiXhv-12 | 7.5 × 10−7 | 60 | 80 | 205 | 4 | 2.88 × 109 | ||
| PhiXhv-15 | 9.1 × 10−7 | 80 | 60 | 205 | 4 | 3.51 × 109 | ||
| PhiXhv-16 | 5.7 × 10−7 | 80 | 60 | 190 | 6 | 7.25 × 109 | ||
The reported durations do not include the 20-min washing step used to remove non-adsorbed phages. Actual latent periods may therefore be longer.
Phages exhibit high stability under environmental stress but are sensitive to UV exposure
Phage stability was assessed under different physicochemical conditions, including variations in pH, temperature, and UV exposure (Fig. 5). All phages remained highly stable across a broad pH range (pH 6 to 10), with survival rates generally above 82%. Except for jumbophages PhiXhv-15 (at pH 12), as well as PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-16, the newly isolated phages also survived in even more acidic (pH 4) and alkaline (pH 12) conditions, with moderate reductions in viability (less than 36%). However, survival dropped at pH two with near-complete or total inactivation (Fig. 5A). Temperature tolerance profiles revealed that all phages remained highly viable at 28°C but were completely inactivated at 65°C and above, with survival rates falling below detection limits. At 28°C, survival ranged from 65% for PhiXhv-16 to an average of 95.5% for the other phages. A reduction in phage viability was observed at 37°C for PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16. At 55°C, these three phages were fully inactivated, while a slight decrease in survival was also detected for PhiXhv-5 and PhiXhv-18 (Fig. 5B). UV exposure led to a rapid decrease in phage viability. After 2 min of exposure, a significant reduction was observed, with survival dropping close to zero between 5 and 10 min for all phages. PhiXhv-2, PhiXhv-5, PhiXhv-18 and PhiXhv-28 appeared slightly more UV-tolerant, retaining over 40% viability at 2 min, whereas PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 were more rapidly inactivated (Fig. 5B). Overall, these results indicate that the phages are relatively stable under a range of conditions compatible with environmental applications, regarding pH and temperature. However, all phages showed marked sensitivity to UV exposure.
Fig 5.

Abiotic stability of X. hortorum pv. vitians phages. The survival of eight bacteriophages was evaluated following exposure to various abiotic stress conditions, including temperature, pH, and UV radiation. In all assays, phage survival was quantified by spot assay and expressed as the percentage of infectious particles remaining relative to untreated controls (set as 100%, corresponding to initial phage titers at 4°C, in the dark, in SM buffer at pH 7.5). Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of two independent biological replicates, each with three technical replicates. (A) Thermal and pH stability. Each panel corresponds to an individual phage’s survival profile. Temperature stability (red dotted line) was evaluated after 1-h incubation in the dark at temperatures ranging from 4°C to 75°C (with temperature values indicated on the upper x-axis). pH stability (blue box plots) was determined after 1-h incubation at room temperature in the dark, in SM buffer across a pH gradient ranging from 2 to 12 (pH values indicated on the lower x-axis). (B) UV sensitivity. Phage survival following exposure to UV-B radiation (312 nm) was monitored over a 30-min period. Survival rapidly declined with increasing exposure time.
Comparative genomics confirm lineage divergence and suggest a new jumbophage genus
To provide an overview of the whole proteomic relationships of the newly isolated phages with other phages, a proteomic dendrogram was generated with ViPTree using reference genomes from the virus-host DB (46) (Fig. S4). The phages clustered into two major groups, consistent with their genome sizes and divergence in biological properties. The jumbophages were related to phages infecting various bacterial hosts, such as Pseudomonadota (Ralstonia, Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, Dickeya), Actinomycetota (Propionibacterium), and Bacillota (Clostridium). In contrast, the smaller-genome phages clustered more closely with other Xanthomonas phages and other Pseudomonadota-associated phages. These observations were further refined by VIRIDIC analysis, which quantified the intergenomic similarities between the eight novel phages and closely related genomes available in GenBank (Fig. 6). The smaller-genome phages shared a high percentage of intergenomic similarity (>82%) with each other and with the previously described phage PhiXhv-1 (PV408261), a virulent phage infecting X. hortorum pv. vitians LM16734, forming a coherent genus (47). These phages also displayed moderate similarity (i.e., 45% to 50.5%) with virulent Xanthomonas sp. phages BsXeu269p/3 (ON996340.1), KPhi1 (NC_054460.1), and MYK3 (OK275494.1). Although these phages belong to a distinct phage genus according to the ITCV guidelines, their genomic relatedness suggests a common evolutionary lineage. This genomic proximity, combined with divergence in sequence, may contribute to explain their narrow host range strictly limited to pathovar vitians strains. In contrast, the jumbophages exhibited high similarity within their group (> 95%), consistent with their clustering in the proteome-based three. However, they shared no detectable identity with the five smaller-genome phages or with any other phages in the database. According to ICTV thresholds, this supports their classification as members of a novel phage genus, tentatively named Xanthorvitianjumbovirus, with Xanthorvitianjumbovirus xhv12like as the proposed species name. Whole-genome synteny analysis using Clinker revealed conserved modules within each of the two phage groups (Fig. 2), further supporting the genomic coherence of the distinct phage lineages. The jumbophage genomes (PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16) displayed near-perfect synteny and high nucleotide identity, consistent with their classification as members of the same phage species. This genomic similarity may also underlie their similar infection profiles.
Fig 6.

Intergenomic similarity analysis of X. hortorum pv. vitians phages and related bacteriophages. Pairwise genome comparisons between the novel X. hortorum pv. vitians phages and their closest known relatives were generated with VIRIDIC and edited using inkscape v1.4. The matrix displays comparative genomic metrics for each phage pair. The upper-right triangle of the matrix (white to green color scale) represents intergenomic similarity (%), with darker green indicating higher similarity. The lower-left triangle (peach scale) shows the aligned fraction of each genome pair. The bar chart above the matrix displays the genome length of each phage. The right panel lists the predicted bacterial host of each phage. Phages are labeled with their names and corresponding GenBank accession numbers.
Despite their high intergenomic similarity and synteny, comparative protein clustering revealed limited but detectable differences in gene content among closely related phages. Among the jumbophage lineage (PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16), the vast majority of protein families were conserved, supporting their classification within the same species. However, a small number of phage-specific protein families were identified. Most of these encoded hypothetical proteins, suggesting that functional divergence primarily involves poorly characterized accessory regions. Notably, PhiXhv-15 encoded a distinct terminase large subunit compared with the other two jumbophages and harbored a glycoside hydrolase absent from PhiXhv-12 and PhiXhv-16. Conversely, PhiXhv-16 uniquely encoded an additional ATPase-related protein, while PhiXhv-12 displayed several exclusive gene families, including one predicted DNA-binding protein and one membrane protein. A similar pattern was observed among the smaller-genome phages, which shared a conserved genomic backbone but differed by a limited number of protein families, again predominantly annotated as hypothetical proteins. Some differences involved genes potentially related to DNA modification (e.g., methyltransferases) or nucleases (e.g., HNH endonucleases), potentially pointing toward subtle diversification in host-interaction or defense-counterdefense strategies (Table S6).
In summary, these results reveal two distinct phage lineages, small-genome phages and jumbophages, which differ in their infection dynamics, host range, biological properties, and genomic architecture.
DISCUSSION
The isolation and characterization of bacteriophages are critical steps for developing effective biocontrol strategies against phytopathogenic bacteria. To date, 195 complete genome sequences of phages infecting Xanthomonas have been reported, of which only nine are classified as jumbophages (GenBank database, last accessed 2 August 2025). In this study, we report on eight newly isolated phages active against X. hortorum pv. vitians, including three jumbophages, the first known to infect this pathovar. Through detailed analysis of their host range, lytic cycle parameters, genetic features, and stability under physicochemical stress conditions, this study provides a comprehensive framework to assess the potential of these phages for biocontrol applications.
The jumbophages PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 were classified into a new lineage due to the complete absence of genome homology with phages available in public databases. Jumbophages remain underrepresented in current databases, accounting for fewer than 1% of sequenced phages, which may partly explain the lack of close genomic relatives for these isolates (48, 49). This underrepresentation primarily stems from the technical challenges inherent in their isolation, notably limited diffusion though standard agar concentration and physical retention during typical filtration steps (50). These inherent difficulties underscore the critical importance of adapting standard isolation protocols to ensure the effective detection and characterization of jumbophages, as exemplified by strategies employing lower agar concentrations or larger-pore filters for improved recovery.
These three new jumbophages share biological characteristics similar to those of jumbophages infecting phytopathogenic bacteria, although it remains unclear whether these traits reflect specific adaptations associated with their genome size. For instance, the phage vB_XciM_LucasX, which infects Xanthomonas citri and X. fuscans, has been reported to exhibit similar survival characteristics under abiotic stresses: (i) stability across pH ranges, with inactivation at pH 3 and 11; (ii) significant UV sensitivity, with only 25% survival observed after 80 s of exposure; and (iii) inactivation at temperatures above 50°C (51). Other jumbophages, such as Xac1 and Xbc2, which infect Xanthomonas vesicatoria, as well as RsoM2, infecting Ralstonia solanacearum, have been found to be more thermotolerant (52, 53). Compared with the small-genome phages isolated in this study, most jumbophages described to date, including PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16, have demonstrated broader host spectra (54–56). Indeed, PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 lysed 74% of tested X. hortorum pv. vitians strains, and other jumbophages, such as RsoM2, vB_XciM_LucasX, and XacN1 (57), have been reported to lyse on average more than 90% of their respective target hosts. As highlighted by a recent large-scale study in E. coli, host range is influenced by the genetic and structural diversity within the target bacterial species, particularly through polymorphisms in surface receptors (58). However, the broader host spectra observed here among jumbophages compared with smaller-genome phages targeting the same species suggest an additional contributing factor: a reduced dependence on host cellular machinery for genetic replication. This hypothesis is supported by the enriched gene content typically found in jumbo genomes. Jumbophages have been shown to encode a wider array of genes related to DNA replication, nucleotide metabolism, cell wall degradation (e.g., endolysine, glycoside hydrolase, chitinase), and tRNAs (49, 59, 60). In the present study, the jumbophages contained a greater number of replication-associated genes, including three DNA polymerases, four helicases, and five endonucleases, compared with only one of each gene type in the smaller-genome phages. In contrast to previously characterized jumbophages, which typically harbor around 15 tRNAs, PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16 each encoded only one tRNA gene. Phage-encoded tRNAs are thought to play multiple roles. Several studies have proposed that phage-encoded tRNAs compensate for differences in codon usage by supplementing codons more frequently utilized by the phage than by the host (61). Other studies have also demonstrated that they can serve as a mechanism to evade host antiphage defense systems, such as retrons and tRNA-targeting nucleases, thereby facilitating successful infection and phage propagation (62, 63). In PhiXhv-12, PhiXhv-15, and PhiXhv-16, the single tRNA identified, targeting the AAC codon for asparagine, corresponds to a notable codon usage bias observed in these phages and is predominantly associated with structural genes. While this suggests some degree of translational optimization, the limited tRNA repertoire of these phages may partly explain the slower infection kinetics with low burst sizes observed, as their translation efficiency remains more constrained compared with jumbophages that possess a more extensive set of tRNA. Consistently, the infection dynamics of these three jumbophages were characterized by long replication cycles, comparable to those reported for other jumbophages such as vb_XciM_LucasX (52, 53) and low burst sizes ranging from only two to five virions per infected cell. These values are among the lowest ever reported for phages infecting Xanthomonas (64, 65) and are comparable to those observed in other jumbo myophages, such as Deimos-Minion and RAY, which infect Erwinia sp. (~5 virions per infected cell) (66) or KTN4 (~6–8 virions) infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (67). Other factors may also contribute to their slow replication dynamics. For instance, although a nucleus-like structure has not yet been described for jumbophages infecting phytopathogenic hosts, such compartments have been described in other jumbo myoviruses such as KTN4. This proteinaceous structure protects the phage genome from the bacterial defensome while imposing a fitness cost on replication efficiency (68). A similar mechanism could potentially operate in the jumbophages of this study, which might explain their observed low burst sizes.
In contrast to jumbophages, the smaller-genome phages isolated in this study exhibited biological and kinetic parameters consistent with Xanthomonas phages reported by Nakayinga collaborators (64). Indeed, most of the phages described in their review exhibited short latent periods ranging from 20 to 45 min and burst sizes varying from 4.6 to 350 virions per infected cell. Similar characteristics were observed for the five new phages characterized in our study, which demonstrated even shorter latent periods of 10 to 20 min and burst sizes ranging from 5 to 31 virions per cell. Although parameters such as burst size and latent period are commonly considered when selecting phages for biocontrol applications, there is currently limited experimental evidence demonstrating a direct correlation between lytic cycle parameters measured in vitro and the level of protection achieved under greenhouse or field conditions. Phage efficacy in complex environments depends on multiple interacting factors, including environmental stability, host accessibility, and phage-host population dynamics (69). Interestingly, their high survival rates at pH values above 10 are uncommon but have also been reported for the phage BsXeu269p/3, which is active against X. vesicatoria and represents the closest genetic relative of the phages isolated in this study (70). A second phage, Kф1, which is also active against X. vesicatoria and shares over 40% of intergenomic similarity with the phages isolated in this study, has been reported to exhibit higher UV resistance and thermal tolerance up to 70°C compared with the maximum survival temperature of 55°C observed in phages infecting vitians (71).
Although regulatory frameworks governing the use of bacteriophages as biocontrol agents remain under development and vary between countries, several critical criteria have been proposed to ensure the safe and effective use of phages in agriculture (72). From a genetic perspective, phages selected for biocontrol applications should be strictly virulent, as confirmed by the absence of lysogeny-associated genes, such as integrases or site-specific recombinases. In addition, these phages must not carry any known toxin or antibiotic resistance genes (8). Ideally, they should also encode endonucleases to minimize their role as “superspreaders” by degrading bacterial DNA released during infection, thereby reducing the risk of horizontal gene transfer through natural transformation (73). These genetic requirements are fully met by the newly isolated phages described in this study. No genes associated with lysogeny, toxins, or antibiotic resistance were detected, consistent with a virulent lifestyle. Furthermore, nearly all phages encode at least one endonuclease, with up to three endonucleases identified in the genomes of the jumbophages.
For successful biocontrol, phages must retain biological activity and stability in environmental conditions (14). Tailed phages in particular are known to exhibit higher stability when exposed to adverse environmental conditions (74, 75). In this study, the phages demonstrated thermal stability up to 55°C and maintained infectivity across a broad pH range of 4 to 10. However, they were rapidly inactivated by UV exposure, with complete loss of activity occurring within 5 min. Since X. hortorum pv. vitians is a foliar pathogen, improving phage persistence on leaf surfaces is crucial for ensuring their efficacy in field conditions (16). Various strategies have been explored to address this challenge, including late-evening applications (76), co-application with non-pathogenic carrier bacteria or plant extracts, and protective formulations to mitigate UV inactivation (77–79). Among these, Balogh et al. (80) showed that a formulation containing 0.5% Casecrete NH-400 (a water-soluble casein protein polymer), 0.5% sucrose, and 0.25% pregelatinized corn flour increased phage survival on the tomato phyllosphere by approximately 1,000-fold compared with unformulated phages. Similarly, the addition of skim milk and sucrose improved phage persistence and contributed to disease reduction in citrus canker (78, 81). More recently, innovative strategies, such as incorporating a food-grade dye (brilliant blue FCF) or encapsulation in nanoparticules (e.g., NAC-ZnS or chitosan-coated Ca-alginate nanoparticles) have been reported to protect phages from UV inactivation (82–84).
While such formulations have been developed to enhance phage persistence on the phyllosphere, some genetically related phages to those isolated in this study, such as BsXeu269p/3 and Kф1, have already demonstrated promising biocontrol efficacy without requiring protective formulations. For instance, BsXeu269p/3 effectively reduced the spread of X. euvesicatoria in pepper plants by limiting pathogen transmission via aerosols and decreasing bacterial loads in local lesions (85). Similarly, Kф1 persisted on pepper leaves for up to seven days under greenhouse conditions, and significantly reduced disease severity with dual applications administered before and after pathogen inoculation (86).
Finally, effective phage biocontrol requires both high infectivity and specificity against the target pathogen (8). The complementary infection profiles of our newly isolated phages highlight the potential of phage cocktails to broaden the host range while maintaining specificity to the pathovar. The design of phage cocktails must also address the potential emergence of bacterial resistance, a major challenge in phage-based biocontrol (87). One promising approach involved targeted isolation of phages against resistant bacterial mutants (88) or the use of evolved phages exhibiting expanded host ranges (89). Consistent with this strategy, PhiXhv-28 was isolated using a bacterial mutant resistant to PhiXhv-1. Resistance in this mutant is mediated by mutations in the O-antigen side chains, the primary receptor of PhiXhv-1. Although PhiXhv-28 has a narrow host range restricted to this resistant mutant, its ability to specifically recognize altered receptor structures underscores its potential to complement broader-spectrum phage cocktails, supporting robust biocontrol of X. hortorum pv. vitians.
Conclusion
Despite the recognized potential of bacteriophages in agricultural biocontrol, their diversity and utility against many plant pathogens remain largely underexplored. This study characterizes a collection of eight novel virulent phages, including the first three jumbophages identified as active against Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians. Distinct biological and genomic profiles have been revealed among these phages. The newly identified jumbophages, classified into a novel lineage, exhibit broad host ranges and low burst sizes, which may be linked to their minimal tRNA repertoire and possible formation of intracellular compartmentalization. In contrast, the five smaller genome phages demonstrate classic lytic cycles with shorter latent periods and higher burst sizes. Both groups have exhibited good thermal and pH stability compatible with foliar field application, though all phages were highly sensitive to UV irradiation. Crucially, the genetic profiles of all isolated phages fully comply with established biocontrol criteria, confirming their virulent nature and absence of lysogeny-associated, toxin, or antibiotic resistance genes, while encoding endonucleases. The complementary biological features of our jumbophages and smaller-genome phages, especially their diverse host ranges and burst sizes, highlight their combined potential in tailored phage cocktails for robust management of X. hortorum pv. vitians infections. To fully harness this potential, further studies are warranted to characterize phage-host interactions at the molecular level, including detailed receptor identification, which is crucial to anticipate and mitigate the emergence of bacterial resistance. In parallel, formulation strategies should be investigated to enhance phage persistence under UV exposure, a known limitation for many phages. Rigorous efficacy trials in greenhouse and field settings will also be essential to validate the practical effectiveness of these phages for crop disease management. Overall, this study significantly expands our understanding of bacteriophages infecting X. hortorum pv. vitians, providing a critical foundation for developing effective, phage-based solutions against this important foliar pathogen.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to the FNX and Phages.fr networks for their insightful discussions during scientific meetings. We acknowledge Concepcion Sanchez-Cid Torres for preparing the library and performing the sequencing run of phage PhiXhv-7. We also thank Danis Abrouk for his preliminary sequence analyses of PhiXhv-7 and for his valuable advice on statistical analyses. Finally, we warmly thank Laurène Robert and Hanane Amari for their valuable contribution to the isolation and characterization of certain phages included in this study.
The PhD of Anaelle Baud was funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and Innovation. This research was conducted as part of the PHAG2-S project funded by FranceAgriMer - CASDAR Connaissance 2022.
A.B. conceptualized the study, conducted the investigations, curated and analyzed the data, created the visualizations, and wrote the original draft. I.R. participated in all experimental work and contributed to data analysis. N.T. was involved in phage isolation, purification, and production. M.G.B. coordinated R&D activities at GREENPHAGE, contributed to experimental design, ensured the quality and reproducibility of results, and performed TEM imaging. D.C. contributed to methodology development and provided specific resources. F.B. supervised the manuscript, acquired funding, and managed the overall project. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Anaelle Baud, Email: anaelle.baud@univ-lyon1.fr.
Franck Bertolla, Email: franck.bertolla@univ-lyon1.fr.
Olaya Rendueles, Centre de Biologie Integrative, Toulouse, France.
Alexander N. Ignatov, Rossijskij universitet druzby narodov Agrarno-tehnologiceskij insitut, Moscow, Russia
DATA AVAILABILITY
The assembled and annotated genomes of the eight novel phages described in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PV702347, PV754127, and PV764598 to PV764603. All data sets supporting the conclusions of this article are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. In addition, raw experimental data from wet lab assays have been made publicly available on Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/18890250) (90).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00846-26.
Fig. S1 to S4.
Additional experimental details.
List of Xanthomonas strains used in this study.
Morphological features of eight novel Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians phages.
Sequencing summary and genome coverage for the eight phages infecting X. hortorum pv. vitians.
Table S4. Predicted coding sequences and functional annotations of phage genomes.
Asparagine codon bias in coding sequences of Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians jumbophages.
Protein family clustering and presence-absence matrix for X. hortorum pv. vitians phages.
An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Savary S, Willocquet L, Pethybridge SJ, Esker P, McRoberts N, Nelson A. 2019. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol Evol 3:430–439. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nawaz A, Zafar S, Shahzadi M, Bukhari Smaus, Khan N, Shah AA, Badshah M, Khan S. 2023. Bacteriophages: an overview of the control strategies against phytopathogens. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 33:108. doi: 10.1186/s41938-023-00751-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mulungu E. 2024. Unmasking the hidden threat: a review of damage and losses due to phytopathogenic bacteria. J Current Opinion Crop Sci 5:250–263. doi: 10.62773/jcocs.v5i4.277 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Greer SF, Rabiey M, Studholme DJ, Grant M. 2025. The potential of bacteriocins and bacteriophages to control bacterial disease of crops with a focus on Xanthomonas spp. J R Soc N Z 55:302–326. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2345315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lahlali R, Taoussi M, Laasli S-E, Gachara G, Ezzouggari R, Belabess Z, Aberkani K, Assouguem A, Meddich A, El Jarroudi M, Barka EA. 2024. Effects of climate change on plant pathogens and host-pathogen interactions. Crop and Environment 3:159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.crope.2024.05.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Singh BK, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Egidi E, Guirado E, Leach JE, Liu H, Trivedi P. 2023. Climate change impacts on plant pathogens, food security and paths forward. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:640–656. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00900-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Holtappels D, Fortuna K, Lavigne R, Wagemans J. 2021. The future of phage biocontrol in integrated plant protection for sustainable crop production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 68:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Czajkowski R, Roca A, Matilla MA. 2025. Harnessing bacteriophages for sustainable crop protection in the face of climate change. Microb Biotechnol 18:e70108. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Twort FW. 1936. Further investigations on the nature of ultra-microscopic viruses and their cultivation. J Hyg (Lond) 36:204–235. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400043606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. D’Herelle F. 2007. On an invisible microbe antagonistic toward dysenteric bacilli: brief note by Mr. F. D’Herelle, presented by Mr. Roux. 1917. Res Microbiol 158:553–554. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mallmann WL, Hemstreet C. 1924. Isolation of an inhibitory substance from plants. In Journal of Agricultural Research:599–602. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Thomas RC. 1935. A bacteriophage in relation to Stewards disease of Corn. Phytopathology 25:371–372. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Vila MMDC, Balcão LMN, Balcão VM. 2024. Phage delivery strategies for biocontrolling human, animal, and plant bacterial infections: state of the art. Pharmaceutics 16:374. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16030374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fernández L, Gutiérrez D, García P, Rodríguez A. 2019. The perfect bacteriophage for therapeutic applications-a quick guide. Antibiotics (Basel) 8:126. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mansfield J, Genin S, Magori S, Citovsky V, Sriariyanum M, Ronald P, Dow M, Verdier V, Beer SV, Machado MA, Toth I, Salmond G, Foster GD. 2012. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13:614–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Dia NC, Morinière L, Cottyn B, Bernal E, Jacobs JM, Koebnik R, Osdaghi E, Potnis N, Pothier JF. 2022. Xanthomonas hortorum - beyond gardens: current taxonomy, genomics, and virulence repertoires. Mol Plant Pathol 23:597–621. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Morinière L, Burlet A, Rosenthal ER, Nesme X, Portier P, Bull CT, Lavire C, Fischer-Le Saux M, Bertolla F. 2020. Clarifying the taxonomy of the causal agent of bacterial leaf spot of lettuce through a polyphasic approach reveals that Xanthomonas cynarae Trébaol et al. 2000 emend. Timilsina et al. 2019 is a later heterotypic synonym of Xanthomonas hortorum Vauterin et al. 1995. Syst Appl Microbiol 43:126087. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bull CT, Koike ST. 2005. Evaluating the efficacy of commercial products for management of bacterial leaf spot on lettuce. Plant Health Progress 6:3. doi: 10.1094/PHP-2005-1121-01-RS [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Koike ST, Gilbertson RL. 2017. Chapter 25, Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians in lettuce seeds, p 173–178. In Detection of plant-pathogenic bacteria in seed and other planting material, Second. The American Phytopathological Society. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Carisse O, Ouimet A, Toussaint V, Philion V. 2000. Evaluation of the effect of seed treatments, bactericides, and cultivars on bacterial leaf spot of lettuce caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians. Plant Dis 84:295–299. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Subbarao KV, Davis RM, Gilbertson RL, Raid RN. 2017. Part IV: Postharvest diseases and disorders, p 136–140. In Compendium of lettuce diseases and pests, Second. The American Phytopathological Society. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zboralski A, Biessy A, Ciotola M, Cadieux M, Albert D, Blom J, Filion M. 2022. Harnessing the genomic diversity of Pseudomonas strains against lettuce bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol 13:1038888. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1038888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Holtappels D, Fortuna KJ, Moons L, Broeckaert N, Bäcker LE, Venneman S, Rombouts S, Lippens L, Baeyen S, Pollet S, Noben J-P, Oechslin F, Vallino M, Aertsen A, Maes M, Van Vaerenbergh J, Lavigne R, Wagemans J. 2022. The potential of bacteriophages to control Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris at different stages of disease development. Microb Biotechnol 15:1762–1782. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Dong Z, Xing S, Liu J, Tang X, Ruan L, Sun M, Tong Y, Peng D. 2018. Isolation and characterization of a novel phage Xoo-sp2 that infects Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J Gen Virol 99:1453–1462. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ogunyemi SO, Chen J, Zhang M, Wang L, Masum M, Yan C, An Q, Li B, Chen J. 2019. Identification and characterization of five new OP2-related myoviridae bacteriophages infecting different strains of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J Plant Pathol 101:263–273. doi: 10.1007/s42161-018-0188-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Boyer M, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Combrisson J, Bally R, Duponnois R, Costechareyre D. 2022. Nettle manure: an unsuspected source of bacteriophages active against various phytopathogenic bacteria. Arch Virol 167:1099–1110. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05391-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Plumet L, Morsli M, Ahmad-Mansour N, Clavijo-Coppens F, Berry L, Sotto A, Lavigne J-P, Costechareyre D, Molle V. 2023. Isolation and characterization of new bacteriophages against staphylococcal clinical isolates from diabetic foot ulcers. Viruses 15:2287. doi: 10.3390/v15122287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH image to imagej: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Gendre J, Ansaldi M, Olivenza DR, Denis Y, Casadesús J, Ginet N. 2022. Genetic mining of newly isolated salmophages for phage therapy. Int J Mol Sci 23:8917. doi: 10.3390/ijms23168917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Andrews S. 2015. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics. Available from: https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=de674375-ab83-4595-afa9-4c8aa9e4e736 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Schmieder R, Edwards R. 2011. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27:863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, McLean JS, Lasken R, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 20:714–737. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 1000. Genome project data processing subgroup. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chan PP, Lin BY, Mak AJ, Lowe TM. 2021. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 49:9077–9096. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tynecki P, Guziński A, Kazimierczak J, Jadczuk M, Dastych J, Onisko A. 2020. PhageAI - bacteriophage life cycle recognition with machine learning and natural language processing. Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.11.198606 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gilchrist CLM, Chooi Y-H. 2021. Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 37:2473–2475. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Miele V, Penel S, Duret L. 2011. Ultra-fast sequence clustering from similarity networks with SiLiX. BMC Bioinformatics 12:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Penel S, Arigon A-M, Dufayard J-F, Sertier A-S, Daubin V, Duret L, Gouy M, Perrière G. 2009. Databases of homologous gene families for comparative genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 10 Suppl 6:S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S6-S3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Nishimura Y, Yoshida T, Kuronishi M, Uehara H, Ogata H, Goto S. 2017. ViPTree: the viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics 33:2379–2380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Moraru C, Varsani A, Kropinski AM. 2020. VIRIDIC-a novel tool to calculate the intergenomic similarities of prokaryote-infecting viruses. Viruses 12:1268. doi: 10.3390/v12111268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wang R, You X, Liu X, Fei B, Li Y, Wang D, Zhu R, Li Y. 2024. Characterization of phage HZY2308 against Acinetobacter baumannii and identification of phage-resistant bacteria. Virol J 21:283. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02556-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mirzaei MK, Nilsson AS. 2015. Correction: Isolation of phages for phage therapy: a comparison of spot tests and efficiency of plating analyses for determination of host range and efficacy. PLoS One 10:e0127606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Adams MH. 1959. Bacteriophages. Available from: https://archive.org/details/bacteriophages00adam/page/n5/mode/2up
- 46. Mihara T, Nishimura Y, Shimizu Y, Nishiyama H, Yoshikawa G, Uehara H, Hingamp P, Goto S, Ogata H. 2016. Linking virus genomes with host taxonomy. Viruses 8:66. doi: 10.3390/v8030066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Baud A, Morinière L, Idrissi IE, Clavijo-Coppens F, Lacroix E, Taveau N, Costechareyre D, Bertolla F. 2025. Unveiling host interactions and evolutionary constraints of a novel bacteriophage infecting Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians. Environ Microbiol Rep 17:e70171. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.70171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Harding KR, Kyte N, Fineran PC. 2023. Jumbo phages. Curr Biol 33:R750–R751. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Yuan Y, Gao M. 2017. Jumbo bacteriophages: an overview. Front Microbiol 8:403. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Serwer P, Hayes SJ, Thomas JA, Hardies SC. 2007. Propagating the missing bacteriophages: a large bacteriophage in a new class. Virol J 4:21. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-4-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Marquioni V, Rossi FPN, Mendonça DC, Martins LF, Behlau F, Setubal JC, da Silva AM, Novo-Mansur MTM. 2022. Isolation and characterization of vB_XciM_LucasX, a new jumbo phage that infects Xanthomonas citri and Xanthomonas fuscans. PLoS One 17:e0266891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Villicaña C, Rubí-Rangel LM, Amarillas L, Lightbourn-Rojas LA, Carrillo-Fasio JA, León-Félix J. 2024. Isolation and characterization of two novel genera of jumbo bacteriophages infecting Xanthomonas vesicatoria isolated from agricultural regions in Mexico. Antibiotics (Basel) 13:651. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13070651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ahmad AA, Addy HS, Huang Q. 2021. Biological and molecular characterization of a jumbo bacteriophage infecting plant pathogenic Ralstonia solanacearum species complex strains. Front Microbiol 12:741600. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.741600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kwon J, Kim SG, Kim HJ, Giri SS, Kim SW, Lee SB, Park SC. 2020. Isolation and characterization of Salmonella jumbo-phage pSal-SNUABM-04. Viruses 13:27. doi: 10.3390/v13010027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ranta K, Skurnik M, Kiljunen S. 2025. Isolation and characterization of fMGyn-Pae01, a phiKZ-like jumbo phage infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Virol J 22:55. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02679-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Zhang B, Sun H, Zhao F, Wang Q, Pan Q, Tong Y, Ren H. 2022. Characterization and genomic analysis of a novel jumbo bacteriophage vB_StaM_SA1 Infecting Staphylococcus aureus with two lysins. Front Microbiol 13:856473. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.856473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Yoshikawa G, Askora A, Blanc-Mathieu R, Kawasaki T, Li Y, Nakano M, Ogata H, Yamada T. 2018. Xanthomonas citri jumbo phage XacN1 exhibits a wide host range and high complement of tRNA genes. Sci Rep 8:4486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22239-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gaborieau B, Vaysset H, Tesson F, Charachon I, Dib N, Bernier J, Dequidt T, Georjon H, Clermont O, Hersen P, Debarbieux L, Ricard J-D, Denamur E, Bernheim A. 2024. Prediction of strain level phage-host interactions across the Escherichia genus using only genomic information. Nat Microbiol 9:2847–2861. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01832-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Yuan Y, Gao M. 2016. Characteristics and complete genome analysis of a novel jumbo phage infecting pathogenic Bacillus pumilus causing ginger rhizome rot disease. Arch Virol 161:3597–3600. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-3053-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Nazir A, Ali A, Qing H, Tong Y. 2021. Emerging aspects of jumbo bacteriophages. IDR 14:5041–5055. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S330560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bailly-Bechet M, Vergassola M, Rocha E. 2007. Causes for the intriguing presence of tRNAs in phages. Genome Res 17:1486–1495. doi: 10.1101/gr.6649807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. van den Berg DF, van der Steen BA, Costa AR, Brouns SJJ. 2023. Phage tRNAs evade tRNA-targeting host defenses through anticodon loop mutations. eLife 12:e85183. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Azam AH, Kondo K, Chihara K, Nakamura T, Ojima S, Nie W, Tamura A, Yamashita W, Sugawara Y, Sugai M, Cui L, Takahashi Y, Watashi K, Kiga K. 2024. Evasion of antiviral bacterial immunity by phage tRNAs. Nat Commun 15:9586. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53789-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Nakayinga R, Makumi A, Tumuhaise V, Tinzaara W. 2021. Xanthomonas bacteriophages: a review of their biology and biocontrol applications in agriculture. BMC Microbiol 21:291. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02351-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Sutton MD, Katznelson H, Quadling C. 1958. A bacteriophage that attacks numerous phytopathogenic xanthomonas species. Can J Microbiol 4:493–497. doi: 10.1139/m58-053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Sharma R, Pielstick BA, Bell KA, Nieman TB, Stubbs OA, Yeates EL, Baltrus DA, Grose JH. 2019. A novel, highly related jumbo family of bacteriophages that were isolated against Erwinia. Front Microbiol 10:1533. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Danis-Wlodarczyk K, Vandenheuvel D, Jang HB, Briers Y, Olszak T, Arabski M, Wasik S, Drabik M, Higgins G, Tyrrell J, Harvey BJ, Noben J-P, Lavigne R, Drulis-Kawa Z. 2016. A proposed integrated approach for the preclinical evaluation of phage therapy in Pseudomonas infections. Sci Rep 6:28115. doi: 10.1038/srep28115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Guan J, Bondy-Denomy J. 2020. Intracellular organization by jumbo bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 203:e00362-20. doi: 10.1128/JB.00362-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Baud A, Rougis I, Bertolla F. 2026. A century-old solution for 21st century challenges: current applications with a focus on biocontrol, environmental impacts, and regulatory perspectives. Antibiotics (Basel) 15:180. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics15020180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Kizheva Y, Urshev Z, Dimitrova M, Bogatzevska N, Moncheva P, Hristova P. 2023. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of newly isolated Xanthomonas euvesicatoria-specific bacteriophages and evaluation of their biocontrol potential. Plants (Basel) 12:947. doi: 10.3390/plants12040947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Gašić K, Ivanović MM, Ignjatov M, Calić A, Obradović A. 2011. Isolation and characterization of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria bacteriophages. Journal of Plant Pathology 93:415–423. [Google Scholar]
- 72. Toussaint B, Munoz PA, Pirnay J-P. 2024. JRC Publications Repository. Overview and outlook of phage therapy and phage biocontrol. Available from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC135367
- 73. Keen EC, Bliskovsky VV, Malagon F, Baker JD, Prince JS, Klaus JS, Adhya SL. 2017. Novel “Superspreader” bacteriophages promote horizontal gene transfer by transformation. mBio 8:e02115-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02115-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Jończyk E, Kłak M, Międzybrodzki R, Górski A. 2011. The influence of external factors on bacteriophages—review. Folia Microbiol 56:191–200. doi: 10.1007/s12223-011-0039-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Ackermann H-W, Tremblay D, Moineau D. 2004. Long-term bacteriophage preservation. WFCC Newsl 38:35–40. [Google Scholar]
- 76. Balogh B. 2002. Strategies for improving the efficacy of bacteriophages for controlling bacterial spot of tomato, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E1/00/01/06/00001/UFE1000106.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Born Y, Bosshard L, Duffy B, Loessner MJ, Fieseler L. 2015. Protection of Erwinia amylovora bacteriophage Y2 from UV-induced damage by natural compounds. Bacteriophage 5:e1074330. doi: 10.1080/21597081.2015.1074330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Iriarte FB, Balogh B, Momol MT, Smith LM, Wilson M, Jones JB. 2007. Factors affecting survival of bacteriophage on tomato leaf surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1704–1711. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02118-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Jones JB, Jackson LE, Balogh B, Obradovic A, Iriarte FB, Momol MT. 2007. Bacteriophages for plant disease control. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45:245–262. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Balogh B, Jones JB, Momol MT, Olson SM, Obradovic A, King P, Jackson LE. 2003. Improved efficacy of newly formulated bacteriophages for management of bacterial spot on tomato. Plant Dis 87:949–954. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.8.949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Ibrahim YE, Saleh AA, Al-Saleh MA. 2017. Management of asiatic citrus canker under field conditions in Saudi Arabia Using bacteriophages and acibenzolar- S -methyl. Plant Dis 101:761–765. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-16-1213-RE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Wdowiak M, Magiera A, Tomczyńska M, Adamkiewicz W, Stellacci F, Paczesny J. 2025. Protecting bacteriophages under UV irradiation with brilliant blue FCF for targeted bacterial control. Biofilm 9:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Choudhary M, Pereira J, Davidson EB, Colee J, Santra S, Jones JB, Paret ML. 2023. Improved persistence of bacteriophage formulation with nano N -acetylcysteine–zinc sulfide and tomato bacterial spot disease control. Plant Dis 107:3933–3942. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-23-0255-RE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Silva EC, Rodrigues LMR, Destefano SAL, Guerreiro Filho O, Braghini MT, Baldo DÂ, Oliveira JM Jr, Vila M, Balcão VM. 2025. Control of coffee canker associated with Pseudomonas coronafaciens pv. garcae using a cocktail integrating two virulent polyvalent bacteriophages encapsulated in nanoparticles: in planta studies. J Appl Microbiol 136:lxae310. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Shopova E, Brankova L, Ivanov S, Urshev Z, Dimitrova L, Dimitrova M, Hristova P, Kizheva Y. 2023. Xanthomonas euvesicatoria-specific bacteriophage BsXeu269p/3 reduces the spread of bacterial spot disease in pepper plants. Plants (Basel) 12:3348. doi: 10.3390/plants12193348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Gašić K, Kuzmanović N, Ivanović M, Prokić A, Šević M, Obradović A. 2018. Complete genome of the Xanthomonas euvesicatoria specific bacteriophage KΦ1, its survival and potential in control of pepper bacterial spot. Front Microbiol 9:2021. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Martinez-Soto CE, McClelland M, Kropinski AM, Lin JT, Khursigara CM, Anany H. 2024. Multireceptor phage cocktail against Salmonella enterica to circumvent phage resistance. Microlife 5:uqae003. doi: 10.1093/femsml/uqae003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Liu M, Tian Y, Zaki HEM, Ahmed T, Yao R, Yan C, Leptihn S, Loh B, Shahid MS, Wang F, Chen J, Li B. 2022. Phage resistance reduced the pathogenicity of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae on rice. Viruses 14:1770. doi: 10.3390/v14081770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Rabiey M, Grace ER, Pawlos P, Bihi M, Ahmed H, Hampson GE, Al Riyami A, Alharbi L, Sanchez-Lucas R, Korotania N, Ciusa ML, Mosley O, Hulin MT, Baxter L, Dhaouadi S, Vinchira-Villarraga D, Jackson RW. 2024. Coevolutionary analysis of Pseudomonas syringae-phage interactions to help with rational design of phage treatments. Microb Biotechnol 17:e14489. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Baud A, Bertolla F. 2026. Dataset belonging to genomic and phenotypic characterization of novel jumbo and small bacteriophages infecting Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians. https://zenodo.org/records/18890250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S4.
Additional experimental details.
List of Xanthomonas strains used in this study.
Morphological features of eight novel Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians phages.
Sequencing summary and genome coverage for the eight phages infecting X. hortorum pv. vitians.
Table S4. Predicted coding sequences and functional annotations of phage genomes.
Asparagine codon bias in coding sequences of Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians jumbophages.
Protein family clustering and presence-absence matrix for X. hortorum pv. vitians phages.
An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.
Data Availability Statement
The assembled and annotated genomes of the eight novel phages described in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PV702347, PV754127, and PV764598 to PV764603. All data sets supporting the conclusions of this article are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. In addition, raw experimental data from wet lab assays have been made publicly available on Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/18890250) (90).
