Abstract
Three pigeons were trained in an upright conditioning chamber to peck a key transilluminated by a vertical line. This training was followed by a line orientation generalization test. During the test, the chamber was tilted laterally 22.5 degrees from upright. The chamber floor remained horizontal with respect to gravity. Under these conditions, the subjects responded more often in the presence of a visually vertical (parallel to chamber walls) line orientation than in the presence of a gravitationally vertical line orientation. Subsequent reinforcement of pecking in the presence of a line that was always gravitationally vertical but not always visually vertical temporarily abolished this “visual field dependency” and resulted in generalization gradients with peak responding in the presence of the gravitationally vertical line orientation. The results are discussed in terms of selective attention to the gravitational and visual components of line orientation.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- GUTTMAN N., KALISH H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. doi: 10.1037/h0046219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REYNOLDS G. S. Attention in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:203–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray B. A. Selective attention: the effects of combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):539–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas D. R., Lyons J. Visual field dependency in pigeons. Anim Behav. 1968 Apr-Jul;16(2):213–218. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(68)90002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WARREN J. M. Additivity of cues in visual pattern discriminations by monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Dec;46(6):484–486. doi: 10.1037/h0055613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]