Abstract
Despite decades of study, MYC's physiological role in adult tissues remains obscured by the models used to investigate it. Most work relies almost exclusively on chronic or constitutive MYC induction that recapitulates the sustained activity found in tumorigenesis and expectedly produces pathological outcomes. What has gone largely untested is how MYC operates when induced in a controlled and physiologically relevant manner, as it is during adaptive processes such as exercise. Using a recombination-independent strategy in adult skeletal muscle, transient MYC bursts drive coordinated hypertrophic-metabolic reprogramming followed by a shift in myosin fiber type, recapitulating adaptations characteristic of concurrent endurance and resistance training. A single pleiotropic transcription factor governing several aspects of muscle health reframes perspectives on a gene understood almost entirely in the context of pathology. We uncover a previously unrecognized muscle-specific role for MYC in controlling muscle cell composition and present a multi-timepoint multi-omic resource for interrogating MYC: data.myoanalytics.com/study/myc_transient/gene.
Keywords: Hypertrophy, fiber type transitioning, RNA sequencing, snRNA-seq, proteomics, oncogene
Introduction
c-MYC is among the most studied genes in mammalian biology. Dysregulated in an estimated 70% of human cancers 1, MYC/Myc encodes a transcription factor (MYC) that drives proliferative cell growth across virtually all cell types 2,3. Despite decades of investigation, however, the physiological role of MYC in differentiated adult tissues remains poorly understood. This gap is not for lack of effort but rather a consequence of the experimental models used to study MYC. In vivo work relies almost exclusively on chronic or constitutive MYC induction; approaches that, by design, recapitulate the sustained and unregulated activity characteristic of pathology 4. Under these persistent conditions, deleterious outcomes from MYC are not surprising but predetermined by the model 5. What has gone largely untested is how MYC functions when expressed on a physiological timescale in vivo: transiently induced then rapidly degraded, as occurs during normal adaptive processes in adult tissues.
The distinction between the effects of acute and chronic induction of a transcription factor is not merely quantitative. In transcription factor biology, the temporal pattern of activation can determine qualitatively different cellular outcomes 6. One salient example is what happens with in vivo expression of the Yamanaka reprogramming factors OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC (OSKM) 7. Consistent expression causes teratomas 8 whereas cyclic short-term induction of the same factors can ameliorate hallmarks of aging and extend lifespan without oncogenic transformation 9. MYC is a component of this reprogramming cassette and among the most tightly regulated and rapidly turned over transcription factors in the cell 10–12. MYC has architectural and functional features at the gene locus that actively suppress spurious expression 13–15. The stringency of endogenous MYC regulation suggests that the duration and magnitude of its induction are intrinsic to its normal functioning 11; and yet, the vast majority of experimental studies override these precise regulatory parameters 5.
Skeletal muscle provides a uniquely informative system to explore the function of MYC. As the largest organ by mass, its most voluminous cells (muscle fibers) are a post-mitotic syncytium that are resistant to primary tumor formation 16,17; however, MYC transcript and protein is prominently upregulated in muscle fiber nuclei (myonuclei) in response to stress 18–22. MYC is transiently enriched in muscle following both resistance and endurance exercise in humans, peaking within hours and returning to baseline within a day 23. It is the most influential transcription factor governing the late-stage transcriptional response to a bout of resistance exercise in human skeletal muscle 24, and is the Yamanaka factor most induced by exercise 25,26. As expected, chronic induction of MYC in murine skeletal muscle is deleterious for muscle health and function but does not cause oncogenesis 4,5. Short-term induction of the full OSKM cassette (including MYC) specifically in myofibers promotes muscle regeneration by remodeling the stem cell niche 27. These observations reinforce skeletal muscle as a tissue in which controlled transient transcription factor activity drives adaptive rather than pathological outcomes. In the aforementioned contexts, MYC operates in cells that do not proliferate, removing the dominant confound of cancer-prone cell types and models.
Here, we use a skeletal muscle fiber-specific recombination-independent non-constitutive doxycycline-inducible system (called HSA-MYC) to deliver controlled transient bursts of MYC in adult mice. We hypothesized that repeated transient MYC over an extended time course would result in hypertrophy that is dominantly defined by ribosome biogenesis-related processes across omic layers 23,28–31. Instead, we reveal that pulsatile MYC is sufficient to drive oxidative and biosynthesis-oriented metabolic changes that culminate in a myosin heavy chain (MyHC) fiber type transition, concomitant with muscle hypertrophy. We therefore expose MYC as a single exercise-induced transcription factor that coordinates several aspects of muscle health via repeated short bursts. The MYC-conditioned muscle phenotype captures cellular, metabolic, and molecular hallmarks of combined endurance+resistance exercise training 32–34. Multi-timepoint transcriptomic, proteomic, and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing data define the temporal architecture of MYC-mediated adaptation. These data are provided as an open interactive resource for the skeletal muscle and MYC biology communities.
No longer obscured by the very models used to investigate it, we recast MYC as a gene with potent and multifaceted functions in a differentiated tissue that are only demystified by replicating its natural physiological cadence. Our approach reveals MYC’s previously unrecognized muscle-specific role in controlling the proportional composition of contractile proteins pursuant to a shift in metabolism. The data we provide are a platform for understanding the effects of transient MYC in a non-proliferative cancer-resistant cell type. This information could open new possibilities for harnessing the powerful effects of MYC via canonical as well as unique downstream targets in skeletal muscle.
Results
A single transient pulse of MYC in murine soleus muscle causes transcriptional changes related to translational enhancement, metabolism, and muscle identity
To define the acute transcriptional consequences of myofiber-restricted MYC induction, we delivered doxycycline in drinking water to young adult female HSA-MYC mice for 48 hours and harvested soleus muscle 12 hours following doxycycline removal (Figure 1A). We previously established that 12 hours after the removal of doxycycline in drinking water is when MYC protein is elevated in skeletal muscle 25. MYC protein returns to baseline levels within 24 hours of doxycycline removal in our model 24,25. Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on soleus muscle from MYC-induced (HSA-MYC) and control doxycycline-treated littermate HSA-only mice (n=3/group). The soleus was chosen due to the hypertrophy we observe in this muscle with MYC pulses in our previous work 24, but also because the soleus is the only murine hindlimb skeletal muscle with a MyHC fiber type proportion analogous to most human leg muscles: approximately equal parts MyHC I and IIa without pure IIx or any IIb 35,36. Using the soleus adds a translational aspect to our analyses. Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed a large separation between groups: PC1 and PC2 explain 42.8% and 20.3% of total variance, respectively. MYC samples clustered tightly and distinctly from controls along the primary axis of variance (Figure 1B). This degree of separation indicates that myofiber-restricted MYC imposes a dominant and coherent transcriptional shift, consistent with MYC's role as a powerful transcription factor that influences an appreciable proportion of the genome 37.
Figure 1. Acute MYC induction rapidly remodels the soleus transcriptome.
(A) Experimental design schematic depicting acute MYC induction protocol and bulk RNA sequencing on MYC-induced (n = 3) and control (n = 3) mice. (B) Principal component analysis of DESeq2-normalized soleus transcriptome. (C) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in MYC-induced versus control soleus. Genes meeting thresholds of adj. p < 0.05 and |log2 fold change| > 1 are colored red (upregulated, n = 1,817) or blue (downregulated, n = 1,150); representative genes are labeled. (D-E) Heatmaps of the top 25 upregulated (D) and downregulated (E) differentially expressed genes ranked by adjusted p-value, displaying row Z-scored expression across individual control and MYC-induced samples. (F-G) Gene ontology biological process (GO:BP) gene set enrichment analysis of downregulated (F) and upregulated (G) programs in MYC-induced soleus. Point size reflects gene set size and point color reflects −log10 adjusted p-value; pathways with adj. p<0.05 are shown.
Differential expression analysis using DESeq2 at an adjusted p-value threshold of less than 0.05 identified 2,967 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MYC versus control soleus: 1,817 upregulated and 1,150 downregulated (Figure 1C). From the current experiment involving a 48-hour induction of MYC (~3,000 genes regulated), our prior experiments involving 12 hours of MYC (~1,500 genes) 25, and experiments where MYC was induced constitutively for ≥4 days (>8,000 genes) 5,22, we can infer that the extent of altered gene expression pursuant to MYC induction is at least in part dependent on the duration of MYC exposure. Prolonged MYC exposure could directly or indirectly control a much higher percentage of the genome compared to the 15% reported in humans 38. The scale of altered gene expression with a 48-hour induction approach is similar to what we find with acute hypertrophic mechanical overload in mice as well as during the 24 hours after a bout of resistance exercise in human skeletal muscle 39. Our approach is therefore comparable to exercise according to the overall magnitude of effect on the transcriptome. The 48-hour pulsing strategy aligns with what has been used to induce partial epigenetic reprogramming in skeletal muscle with Yamanaka factors 27 and is consistent with our previous approach 24.
Gene-level expression following MYC induction is shown in heatmaps of the top 25 up- and down-regulated DEGs ranked by adj. p value (Figure 1D&E). There is a consistent effect of MYC that spans ribosome biogenesis factors (Gnl3, Ncl, Ftsj3, C1qbp, Rrp12, No1c1, Noc21, Rpl32, Npm1, Nop56, Wdr77), RNA modification enzymes (Ftsj3, Mettl1, Prmt3, Nsun2, Nolc1), telomerase complex components (Dkc1, Nhp2), and translation-associated genes (Eif5a, Rpl32, Cct5). There is also consistent gene repression across all mice following MYC induction, anchored by muscle identity genes (Myorg, Mybph, Itgb1bp2/Melusin, Tcap), acetylcholine receptor subunits (Chrnb1), and fatty acid and lipid-associated genes (Slc27a1, Acadl, Cidea, Slc25a20, Enho). We previously showed that downregulation of muscle-specific Melusin 40 is common to transient MYC induction, Yamanaka factor expression, and endurance+resistance exercise adaptation in murine soleus muscle 25. A repression (but not elimination) of certain muscle identity genes is not necessarily deleterious and seems characteristic of the “rejuvenation” signature mediated by exercise-induced MYC in muscle 25,26.
A broader gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed with clusterProfiler against the GO Biological Process database ranked against a background of all 16,105 detected transcripts. The upregulated GSEA landscape (Figure 1F) was dominated by canonical MYC targets such as ribosome biogenesis, rRNA processing, cytoplasmic translation, and ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis. These data are consistent with the established role of MYC in activating rDNA transcription and ribosome biogenesis in skeletal muscle during hypertrophic loading 24,41. Using the same samples used here for RNA-sequencing, we confirm the induction of ribosome biogenesis in the soleus via ~2-fold upregulation of 45S-ETS, 45S-ITS, and 5.8-ITS after 48 hours of MYC induction 42. Enhanced translation via ribosome biogenesis independent from mTORC1 activation, as reported by others in muscle 28,29, is the likely predominant contributor to MYC-mediated hypertrophy that we find with repeated transient pulses 24.
Beyond the core ribosome biogenesis program, macromolecule methylation and RNA modification (Mettl1, Nsun2, Trmt61a, Trmt1, Rnmt, Nsun5) were enriched and may represent a layer of epitranscriptomic and translational control beyond MYC’s influence on overall transcription, as has been found in cancer cells 43. Telomere maintenance via telomerase and protein localization to the telomeric region (Dkc1, Nhp2, Gar1, Nop10, Nat10) were also enriched, which is consistent with MYC being a known transcriptional activator of telomerase in non-muscle cell types 44. The downregulated GSEA landscape (Figure 1G) was organized around three distinct themes. The first was suppression of neuromuscular signaling, with acetylcholine receptor signaling as the most significantly downregulated term (Chrna1, Chrna2, Chrnb1). Transient MYC-mediated repression of muscle identity is unsurprising given MYC’s role in epigenetic reprogramming toward pluripotency as a Yamanaka factor 7,45. The second theme was repression of immune-related programs and antigen processing and presentation (H2-Ab1, H2-Aa, H2-Eb1, Tapbp, Psme1). MYC is a known regulator of tumor immunity regulation and evasion 46–48. We now extend these MYC-mediated processes to skeletal muscle. The third theme was a coordinated suppression of lipid catabolic programs (Slc27a1, Acad1, Fabp3, Acadvl, Hadha, Hadhab, Cd36), in agreement with our prior work and the work of others 5,22 and pointing to an effect of MYC on skeletal muscle metabolism (expanded on below).
In vitro MYC induction captures in vivo muscle hypertrophic and transcriptomic changes
We speculate that soleus hypertrophy caused by repeated MYC pulses over four weeks we previously observed is due to the cell-autonomous effect of MYC in muscle fibers 24; however, indirect (e.g. paracrine) pro-growth effects of muscle-fiber MYC induction on supporting cell types (e.g. immune cells, fibrogenic cells, muscle stem cells) cannot be discounted. MYC transcript is expressed cell-autonomously during myotube contraction and independent from calcium signaling, suggesting its induction is triggered by loading and/or autocrine actions of released cytokines/myokines 21. To isolate the cell autonomous effects of MYC induction on muscle fibers, we used a primary cell culture model. Myogenic progenitor cells (MPCs) were isolated from limb muscles of HSA-MYC-GFP mice (n=5 biological replicates) and littermate HSA-GFP mice (no MYC, n=4 biological replicates) using fluorescent activated cell sorting, as previously described by us 49–52 (Figure 2A). The sorting strategy uses positive selection for VCAM and a negative selection for non-myogenic cells resulting in high purity myogenic cells 53. We have independently validated this antibody-based cell sorting approach using a satellite cell-specific fluorescent reporter mouse model and found high specificity of the antibody to satellite cells using flow cytometry 50. After proliferative expansion of MPCs where GFP (and therefore HSA transgene activation) was completely absent, we performed a pilot experiment to determine when the HSA (human skeletal muscle ⍺-actin) promoter becomes active in the presence of doxycycline during primary cell differentiation (Figure 2B). During differentiation with doxycycline in the culture media, GFP (a readout of HSA activation) was scarce at 24 hours when myoblast fusion was not appreciable. By 48 hours, once myoblast fusion had become more pronounced, GFP became more abundant in nascent myotubes. By 72 hours and beyond, when large multinuclear myotubes were present, GFP was enriched in the myotubes (Figure 2B). Thus, HSA does not become active until myotubes begin to form (i.e. upon differentiation). We then assayed for MYC protein after 96 hours of differentiation in doxycycline-treated HSA-MYC-GFP myotubes and found it to be significantly induced, with very low levels in the control condition (doxycycline-treated HSA-GFP MPCs from littermate mice) (Figure 2C). In this model, MYC is present for a similar amount of time as in our in vivo approach described above.
Figure 2. A primary myotube MYC induction model recapitulates in vivo growth and transcriptional remodeling.
(A) Experimental design schematic for primary myogenic cell isolation and in vitro cell culture experiment. (B) GFP fluorescence during primary myotube differentiation, showing progressive activation of the HSA-driven reporter as myoblasts fuse and mature from 24 to 96 hours. (C) Representative western blot and quantification of MYC protein abundance expressed as fold change relative to control. (D-E) Representative myotube immunofluorescence (D) and quantification of myotube area normalized to myonuclear number (E). (F) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in MYC-induced versus control primary myotubes. Genes with Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p<0.05 are colored red for upregulated genes (n = 225) or blue for downregulated genes (n = 167); representative genes are labeled. (G) Curated pathway-level transcriptional shifts in MYC-induced primary myotubes organized into ribosome biogenesis/rRNA processing, anabolic/biosynthetic, ECM/extracellular remodeling, and patterning/signaling suppression modules. Dot size reflects −log10 adjusted p-value and dot color reflects log2 fold change. All experiments performed with biological replicates. Bar graphs show mean ± SEM.
Once establishing our cell culture system as a tractable method for studying MYC in myotubes, we evaluated myotube size in the presence of MYC induction using several biological replicates. Doxycycline was provided in the media for the duration of differentiation (HSA only becomes active upon differentiation in the presence of doxycycline, see above). Consistent with what we observe in muscle fibers in vivo 24, the induction of MYC causes myotube hypertrophy by 96 hours, measured as MyHC area normalized to GFP+ myonuclei (Figure 2D&E). MYC is known to inhibit differentiation in proliferating myoblasts 54,55, again suggesting that MYC’s influence on hypertrophy is attributable to its role in differentiating myotubes following HSA activation. We conclude that MYC can act cell-autonomously to cause myofiber growth and phenotypically reproduces the in vivo MYC response 24.
Differential expression analysis identified 225 upregulated and 167 downregulated genes (adj. p<0.05) (Figure 2F). The most dramatically upregulated gene was Eef1a2, encoding eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2. EEF1A2 is a muscle-enriched translation elongation factor 56 whose strong induction is consistent with the capacity for MYC to drive translational elongation machinery. A coordinated multi-gene Eef response was identified as common to the human resistance exercise muscle transcriptome and MYC induction in the mouse soleus in our prior work 24. Among other significantly upregulated genes were Ak4, encoding adenylate kinase 4, which supports mitochondrial energy transfer and nucleotide homeostasis 57 and Shmt1, encoding serine hydroxymethyltransferase 1, a folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism enzyme that supports nuclear DNA synthesis and DNA methylation. The latter is a recognized MYC transcriptional target in proliferating cells 58. Both Ak4 and Shmt1 were also significantly upregulated in the acute soleus transcriptome (see Figure 1). The primary myotube model therefore captures a reproducible subset of the MYC-sensitive biosynthetic program observed in muscle tissue in vivo.
The curated pathway-level analysis organized the transcriptome response into four modules (Figure 2G). The ribosome biogenesis and rRNA processing module, comprising Nop56, Imp4, Wdr12, Polr1a, and Heatr1, reflects coordinated induction of nucleolar factors and RNA polymerase I machinery. This set of genes overlaps with the canonical MYC target genes we identified in the in vivo acute soleus transcriptome 24,25 and aligns with RNA Pol I regulon activation at the onset of loading-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy 41, where Myc is strongly induced in myonuclei 19. The anabolic and biosynthetic module highlights genes associated with nucleotide metabolism described above, alongside Gmpr2 and Srm which are involved in purine metabolism and polyamine synthesis, respectively. The extracellular matrix (ECM) and extracellular remodeling module contained Col6a1, Fn1, Col4a1, Col3a1, and Lamb1. MYC induction in differentiating myotubes drives upregulation of basement membrane and interstitial matrix components regulating the ECM. We reported previously on how myofibers can contribute considerably to ECM-related transcription during muscle hypertrophy, including collagen gene expression 19,59. The fourth module captured the dominant downregulated effects, with the most strongly suppressed genes including Lrrn2, Pycard, Hoxc8 and Hoxc5, Chrd, Trpc3, Sema3f, and Tlr1. Suppression of Hoxc8 and Hoxc5, which encode HOX-patterning transcription factors often expressed in skeletal muscle precursors, is consistent with MYC-mediated repression of developmental patterning programs in differentiated cells 60. Our laboratory 61–63 and others 64,65 report how changes to Hox genes are a prominent feature of exercise adaptation and muscle remodeling across multiple omic layers in mice and humans; again, implicating MYC in the molecular response to exercise 5,23–26. Downregulation of Chrd and Sema3f points to suppression of extracellular morphogenetic and axon guidance signaling. The coordinated repression of Pycard and Tlr1 suggests that MYC induction in primary myotubes suppresses inflammatory and innate immune receptor gene expression.
Single nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) after a transient pulse of MYC reveals myonucleus-specific programs related to hypertrophic adaptation and substrate metabolism
To define the potential cell-autonomous effects of pulsatile MYC induction in muscle fibers in vivo, we performed single nucleus RNA-sequencing. Soleus muscle nuclei were isolated using fluorescence activated nuclear sorting (FANS) as we have described previously 19,62,66–69 (Figure 3A). We pooled tissue from three mice per group following the same 48-hour doxycycline induction and 12-hour washout design in HSA-MYC and control mice (doxycycline-treated littermate HSA only) used in Figure 1. Raw reads were aligned to a custom mouse reference genome that included the human MYC transgene sequence 70,71, enabling direct detection of transgene-expressing nuclei at single-nucleus resolution. Our data processing workflow is shown in Figure 3B. Because the experiment required pooling of three mice per group to achieve sufficient nuclear yield for library preparation, pseudoreplication was performed prior to pseudobulk differential expression by binning approximately 500 to 1,000 nuclei per bin with a minimum of three bins per condition.
Figure 3. The nucleus type-specific response to a single pulse of MYC in the soleus.
(A) Experimental design schematic for acute single-nucleus RNA-seq of soleus muscle following a single 48-hour doxycycline exposure and 12-hour washout in MYC-induced and control mice. (B) Bioinformatic workflow for snRNA-seq processing. (C) UMAP of integrated soleus nuclei colored by annotated nucleus type. (D) Feature plots showing human MYC transgene expression overlaid on the integrated UMAP in acute control, acute MYC 12-hour washout, and acute MYC 24-hour washout conditions. (E) Volcano plot of pseudobulk differential gene expression in myonuclei from acute MYC-induced versus control soleus. Genes meeting thresholds of adjusted p<0.05 and |log2 fold change| > 0.30 are colored red for upregulated genes (n = 2,694) or blue for downregulated genes (n = 1,077); representative genes are labeled. (F-G) Top 10 downregulated (F) and upregulated (G) GO Biological Process pathways enriched in acute MYC-induced myonuclei. Pathways are plotted by normalized enrichment score (NES), with point size reflecting gene set size and point color reflecting −log10 adjusted p-value; pathways shown meet adj. p<0.05. (H) Violin plots showing myonuclear log-normalized expression of selected MYC-regulated genes grouped into telomerase complex genes, lncRNAs, circadian genes, slow/oxidative/anabolic signaling genes, fatty acid/substrate metabolism genes, senescence/TGFβ/hypertrophy-repressive genes, and sarcomeric/muscle identity genes.
The integrated unified manifold approximation projection (UMAP) resolved eleven major populations, including three myonuclear subtypes (MyHC I [Myh7 also known as β myosin], MyHC IIa [Myh2], and MyHC IIx [Myh1]) and nuclei from fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs), endothelial cells, muscle stem cells (muscle satellite cells, MuSCs), immune cells, perivascular cells, tenocytes, lymphatic endothelial cells, Schwann cells, and adipocytes (Figure 3C). MyHC IIb myonuclei were not identified in the dataset, consistent with the well-established near-complete absence of MyHC IIb fibers from the mouse soleus 72. Again, adult human limb skeletal muscle only expresses MyHC I, IIa, and IIx isoforms, and not IIb 35, similar to the murine soleus muscle. As expected, the largest number of DEGs following MYC induction was in myonuclei.
Plotting the human MYC transgene across the acute MYC induction and control conditions showed that transgene expression was almost entirely restricted to myonuclear clusters; 27% of myonuclei were positive for MYC transcript compared to near zero detectable expression in other nuclei (Figure 3D; Supplemental Table 1). MYC myonuclear transgene expression would intuitively be more abundant across myonuclear types immediately after the cessation of doxycycline, but protein is high at 12 hours after doxycycline cessation in muscle tissue 24. This information motivated our tissue collection time point. Our data collectively affirm, at single-nucleus resolution, that transgene induction in the HSA-MYC model is myofiber-specific. Among myonuclear subtypes, MyHC I myonuclei had the highest MYC transgene positivity at 34%, compared to 24% in MyHC IIx and 19% in MyHC IIa nuclei. This nucleus-type-specific pattern of MYC expression corresponds to the fiber type-selective hypertrophic response we reported previously with pulsatile MYC induction 24. Perhaps preferential Type I fiber hypertrophy is due to greater induction and/or sensitivity to MYC in MyHC I myonuclei. This time course of MYC expression in myonuclei relates to the rapid return of MYC protein to baseline within 24 hours of doxycycline removal in muscle tissue established in our previous work 25, and validates the 12-hour washout as an appropriate window for capturing the active MYC regulatory state.
Pseudobulk differential expression in myonuclei from the acute MYC versus control comparison revealed a substantial transcriptional response: 2,694 genes were significantly upregulated and 1,077 downregulated at an adjusted p-value of less than 0.05 (Figure 3E). Among the most significantly upregulated protein-coding genes after MYC induction were several with well-established roles in nucleolar function and ribosome assembly. Taf1d, a TATA-box binding protein-associated factor involved in RNA polymerase I transcription initiation at rDNA promoters, was the most significantly upregulated gene in the dataset. Gnl3 was highly enriched after MYC induction and is required for ribosome biogenesis and pre-rRNA processing 73. Nop56 and Nop58 are core components of the box C/D small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein complex involved in rRNA modification and processing 74, and Wdr43 participates in ribosomal small subunit biogenesis 75. Ncl is a multifunctional nucleolar protein with roles in rDNA transcription and pre-rRNA processing 76 and Mdn1, an AAA-ATPase essential for pre-60S ribosomal subunit maturation, is a gene we have previously reported to be upregulated with both MYC induction and late-life exercise training in aged mouse soleus 25. Altogether, several aspects of rDNA transcription were induced by MYC at the myonuclear level. These gene-level findings are reinforced by GSEA (Figure 3F&G).
MYC is known to activate telomerase 44. The telomerase complex genes Dkc1, Gar1, and Nhp2 were induced by MYC in myonuclei, consistent with our prior observations that a single MYC pulse upregulates these H/ACA snoRNP components across murine skeletal muscles 25 (Figure 3H). The lncRNAs Snhg4, Gas5, and Pvt1 were among the more strongly induced non-coding transcripts (Figure 3H). Gas5 is a growth arrest-specific lncRNA that sequesters glucocorticoid receptor binding activity and is regulated by MYC in other contexts 77. Pvt1 is a well-established MYC-amplified lncRNA target that post-translationally stabilizes MYC protein 78. We recently reported that Pvt1 is upregulated in an Atf3+ myonuclear population during acute hypertrophic mechanical overload in adult mice 66, and is therefore relevant to skeletal muscle growth. Circadian genes were also strongly regulated by MYC in myonuclei. Cry2 and Per1 were induced while Nr1d1/Reverb⍺ was repressed, indicating that MYC induction in myonuclei influences circadian clock gene balance in myofibers (Figure 3H). Regulation of circadian genes by MYC is consistent with what we observed in plantaris tissue after MYC induction 19, as well as the known influence of MYC on circadian output in cancer settings 79–82.
The dominant signature for downregulated genes was organized around substrate metabolism, sarcomeric identity, and glucocorticoid-responsive programs. Pdk4 was the second most significantly suppressed gene in the dataset (Figure 3H). PDK4 phosphorylates and inactivates the pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex to restrict glucose oxidative flux. Fabp3, Cd36, Acadl, and Acsl1, which together mediate aspects of long-chain fatty acid import, intracellular trafficking, and activation for beta-oxidation, were all repressed, as were Ucp3, Hadha, Hadhb, Eci2, Acaa2, and Cpt2 (Figure 3H). Cdkn1a encoding p21, a well-known marker of cellular senescence, was among the most strongly downregulated genes (Figure 3H). In human skeletal muscle, p21 (as opposed to p16) is the senescence-related marker that is upregulated with aging in myonuclei and causes deleterious outcomes 83,84. MYC is implicated in both the progression and elimination of senescence programs in various contexts 85–90. MYC modulation of the p21 encoding gene Cdkn1a points to the potential for transient MYC to reduce or suppress a senescent-like transcriptome in myofibers. The sarcomeric proteins Tcap, Tpm1, Ankrd2, and Atp2a1 were also suppressed by MYC (Figure 3H). The downregulation of Atp2a1 at the myonuclear level by MYC may indicate a downward shift in the fast-type SERCA isoform. Smad3, a canonical mediator of TGF-beta and myostatin signaling that limits skeletal muscle hypertrophy, was also significantly repressed, further supporting the interpretation that MYC creates a broad myonuclear program that supports hypertrophy (Figure 3H).
Other genes of interest that are modified by MYC induction in myonuclei include Mef2c, a master transcriptional regulator of slow fiber type identity and oxidative gene programs in skeletal muscle 91–93 (Figure 3H). The early induction of Mef2c following a single MYC pulse may represent a myonuclear ‘priming’ event toward an eventual slower, more oxidative phenotype. Vgll2, a co-activator expressed preferentially in slow oxidative muscle that is associated with gene programs for mitochondrial function and contractility in skeletal muscle 94, was also strongly induced (Figure 3H). Irs2, which encodes insulin receptor substrate 2 and connects insulin and IGF-1 signaling to downstream anabolic pathways, was among the most significantly upregulated signaling genes (Figure 3H). Together, the induction of these transcripts suggests that even a single acute MYC pulse initiates both metabolic and fiber-type-identity remodeling at the level of individual myonuclei.
A shift in myonuclear proportion and nucleus type-specific metabolic gene expression after repeated bouts of transient MYC induction
Following our “acute” MYC pulse experiment above, we sought to understand how repeated pulses of MYC could alter the molecular landscape in skeletal muscle at single nucleus resolution. We applied the same snRNA-seq approach and workflow outlined above to soleus muscle collected from mice following four weeks of cyclic pulsatile MYC induction (five total pulses, Figure 4A). We used the same 48-hour on, five-day off dosing strategy that we previously showed is sufficient for soleus hypertrophy 24. In this experiment, a 24-hour washout period was used to capture the MYC-habituated state, reminiscent of a repeated bout “training” or “lingering” effect. We compared the short-term “MYC trained” response to an acute pulse snRNA-seq experiment that also featured a 24-hour washout to assess the MYC transgene (next paragraph). We then compared an acute MYC pulse (12-hour washout) versus the repeated MYC pulse experiment (24-hour washout after the final doxycycline treatment) to understand the effect of a MYC “bout” versus that of MYC “training”.
Figure 4. Repeated transient MYC induction over four weeks produces persistent myonuclear transcriptional remodeling and a shift in myonuclear proportion toward MyHC 1.
(A) Experimental design schematic for snRNA-seq of soleus muscle following four weeks of repeated pulsatile MYC induction and 24-hour washout in MYC-induced and control mice. (B) UMAP feature plots showing human MYC transgene expression after a 24-hour washout following acute induction and repeated four-week induction. (C) Stacked bar plots showing acute-specific, repeated-specific, and shared differentially expressed genes across myonuclear and non-myonuclear populations. DEGs were defined using adj. p<0.05 and |log2 fold change|>0.30. (D) Conserved upregulated myonuclear GO:BP pathways across acute (12-hour washout) and repeated MYC induction, organized into ribosome biogenesis and translation/transcription machinery modules. Circles represent acute induction and triangles represent repeated induction; point color reflects normalized enrichment score (NES) and point size reflects −log10 adjusted p-value. (E) Nucleus-type composition in repeated MYC-induced and control soleus, expressed as the percentage of total nuclei per condition across annotated myonuclear and non-myonuclear populations. (F) Myonuclear subtype composition in repeated MYC-induced and control soleus, expressed as the percentage of total myonuclei assigned to MyHC I, MyHC IIa, and MyHC IIx populations. (G) Myh7 (MyHC I) expression in MyHC IIa myonuclei from repeated MYC-induced versus control soleus, shown as log-normalized expression. (H) Chord diagram linking repeated MYC-regulated MyHC I myonuclear genes to enriched pathway modules, with gene color indicating differential expression direction and magnitude. (I) Major GO Biological Process pathways enriched in repeated MYC MyHC I myonuclei, organized into mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation/electron transport, lipid and fatty acid oxidation, and telomere/nuclear maintenance modules. Point size reflects −log10 adjusted p-value, and pathways shown meet adjusted p < 0.05.
A notable feature of the repeated pulse dataset was the behavior of the MYC transgene following the 24-hour washout period preceding tissue collection. In the acute condition, MYC was not a DEG after a 24-hour washout following 48 hours of induction versus the no-MYC control. Mean normalized transgene expression in myonuclei fell to 0.007 24 hours after an acute MYC pulse, with <1% of myonuclei registering as MYC-positive (Figure 4B). After four weeks of repeated pulsatile induction with the same 24-hour washout, however, MYC remained a significant DEG versus controls. Mean normalized expression in myonuclei was 0.227, with 15% of myonuclei registering as MYC-positive (Figure 4B, Supplemental Table 1). Within the myonuclear subtypes, MyHC I myonuclei retained the highest MYC positivity at 26% compared to 5% in MyHC IIa, while MyHC IIx nuclei showed no detectible MYC signal. Whether this persistence of MYC reflects slower transgene mRNA turnover, altered chromatin accessibility at the transgene locus, or changes in the nuclear environment that support sustained transcription following repeated induction remains to be determined. A buildup of doxycycline with repeated pulses is not a likely explanation given the length of washouts after each treatment (five days) and the half-life of doxycycline in mice only being a matter of hours 95. Combined with more prevalent MYC expression in MyHC I myonuclei, the persistence of MYC after repeated pulses may also explain the MyHC I fiber-biased hypertrophy we observe at four weeks 24.
Comparing DEGs in the acute (12-hour washout) versus repeated pulse conditions (24-hour washout after final doxycycline treatment) revealed substantial transcriptional remodeling that was both shared and condition-specific across myonuclear populations (Figure 4C). When evaluating all myonuclei irrespective of MyHC type, 1,192 upregulated and 440 downregulated genes were common to both acute and repeated induction. A core transcriptional program is therefore initiated by MYC that is maintained with repeated exposure. Alternatively, 1,478 upregulated and 1,063 downregulated genes were exclusive to the repeated pulse state. This unique pattern was broadly conserved across fiber-type-resolved myonuclear populations: MyHC I myonuclei had 907 upregulated and 490 downregulated DEGs shared with the acute pulse and 1,292 upregulated and 1,004 downregulated genes unique to the repeated pulse condition. MyHC IIa myonuclei had 886 upregulated and 248 downregulated genes shared with acute and 1,246 and 890 repeated-only genes. MyHC IIx myonuclei had the smallest overall transcriptional response: 107 shared upregulated and 59 shared downregulated genes. The primary pathway shared between acute and repeated MYC induction in myonuclei was related to the ribosome and translation, with a stronger effect in the repeated MYC condition (Figure 4D).
Focusing on repeated MYC induction, the nuclear composition of the soleus myonuclear compartment was shifted toward a higher proportion of MyHC I-enriched myonuclei relative to controls (Figure 4E-G). MyHC I-enriched myonuclei comprised 51% of all myonuclei in MYC muscle compared to 45% in controls. MyHC IIx myonuclei represented 9% with MYC versus 11% in controls. The MyHC IIa fraction accounted for the remainder with no MyHC IIb myonuclei represented (Figure 4F). The shift in myonuclear composition toward a slower myosin-type identity is consistent with a progressive remodeling of the myonuclear landscape driven by repeated MYC pulses. This shift is not apparent with an acute MYC pulse. Myonuclear compositional shifts could reflect differential nucleus selection or genuine transcriptional reprogramming of individual myonuclei. Figure 4G provides evidence for the latter by showing Myh7 (MyHC I) expression specifically within MyHC IIa myonuclei, the myosin class that would be most informative for detecting a genuine “fast-to-slow” transcriptional shift as an “intermediate” myonuclear population. Myh7 was significantly upregulated in MyHC IIa myonuclei of MYC mice relative to controls (Figure 4G). This shift was accompanied by suppression of Myh2 in the same population. Even within the MyHC IIa myonuclear compartment, transcriptional identity is biased toward a higher representation of a slower isoform independent from any change in gross nuclear classification according to predominant MyHC type.
We interrogated the repeated pulse MYC state through pseudobulk differential expression and GSEA in MyHC I myonuclei, which had the largest transcriptional response to repeated MYC pulsing. Aside from ribosome pathways (see Figure 4D), three major pathway modules emerged, each represented by the five most significantly enriched GO:BP terms in the analysis (Figures 4H&I). The first and most strongly upregulated module was mitochondrial gene expression and oxidative phosphorylation programs: electron transport chain, mitochondrial gene expression, mitochondrial translation, ATP synthesis coupled electron transport, and protein import into mitochondrial matrix were all significantly enriched. At the gene level, the leading contributors to this module were predominantly mitochondrial ribosomal proteins and oxidative phosphorylation units, including Mrpl28, Lars2, Cox7c, Cox4i1, Iscu, Ndufa12, and Ndufb3 (Figure 4H). The large effect for mitochondrial ribosomal subunit genes suggests that a consequence of repeated MYC pulsing in MyHC I myonuclei is mitochondrial remodeling. The second module was composed of lipid and fatty acid oxidation pathways that were downregulated in MyHC I myonuclei: fatty acid catabolic process, fatty acid beta-oxidation, lipid catabolic process, lipid oxidation, and regulation of lipid catabolism were all suppressed (Figure 4I). The primary genes anchoring this downregulation included Irs1, Acacb, Lpin1, Eci1, Eci2, Decr1, Ehhadh, Acadl, Hadha, and Ppard (Figure 4H). Downregulation of fatty acid genes may represent metabolic reprogramming toward a glucose utilization-biased gene program geared toward biosynthesis and growth 96,97. The third module was comprised of upregulated telomere maintenance and nuclear homeostasis in MyHC I-enriched myonuclei (Figure 4H). The genes anchoring this module included the H/ACA snoRNP components Nhp2 and Dkc1 alongside Gar1 and Gnl3, which were also among the most significantly induced genes in the acute dataset (see Figure 3). Telomere complex gene induction is a persistent and defining feature of the MYC response in slow myonuclei across both acute and repeated pulse timepoints. The chaperonin complex members Cct2, Cct6a, Cct7, and Tcp1 were also significant contributors (Figure 4H). Cct gene regulation is a shared feature of muscle MYC induction in adult mice and the resistance exercise response in human skeletal muscle 24; we now show that this signature is enriched in MyHC I myonuclei. The repeated pulse MyHC I transcriptome also featured significant downregulation of Dnmt3a, a DNA methyltransferase. Reduction of Dnmt3a in myonuclei is consistent with partial epigenetic reprogramming of the DNA methylome we describe in the context of exercise and MYC induction in the soleus muscle 24,98. Dnmt3a knockdown and overexpression influences adult skeletal muscle biology 99,100 as well as mitochondrial function 101. MYC is also known to bind with DNMT3A to repress gene expression 102. The functional consequences of Dnmt3a suppression specifically in repeatedly MYC-exposed MyHC I myonuclei requires further investigation but may be one additional mechanism through which MYC enhances transcription in skeletal muscle.
Long-term repeated transient MYC induction causes a faster-to-slower fiber type transition in the soleus
An increase in the proportion of MyHC I-expressing myonuclei revealed by snRNA-seq after four weeks of MYC pulses in the soleus points to a potential fiber type transition from a faster to a slower MyHC phenotype. We report that four weeks of MYC pulses caused muscle fiber hypertrophy but not a fiber type transformation 24; however, there was higher variability in fiber type proportion in the MYC pulse group versus controls 24. To explore whether MYC can drive a faster-to-slower fiber type transition, we extended MYC pulsing to eight weeks (48 hours on doxycycline, five days off doxycycline for nine total pulses) (Figure 5A). In addition to enhancing soleus muscle mass (Figure 5B, Supplemental Figure 1), extended MYC pulsing caused a significant MyHC IIa-to-MyHC I fiber type transition (Figure 5C and D). The magnitude of this faster-to-slower transition in the soleus is commensurate with what we observe after eight weeks of combined high-volume endurance+resistance progressive weighted wheel running (PoWeR) in the soleus muscles of adult mice 32,98, which also induces Myc 98. MYC therefore represents a single molecular trigger that is sufficient for both muscle hypertrophy as well as fiber type transitioning, driving aspects of a resistance+endurance exercise trained phenotype. Contractile myosin heavy chains are proteins that are unique to striated muscle. Our observation is therefore evidence of a muscle-specific role for MYC that has yet to be observed in the literature. Other hindlimb muscles enriched in MyHC IIb fibers (a feature unique to rodents) and lacking MyHC I, such as the plantaris, do not hypertrophy at the whole muscle level with repeated MYC pulses (Supplemental Figure 2), consistent with our prior report 24. The plantaris muscle also experienced a fiber type transition away from MyHC IIa. In contrast to the soleus, the shift was to MyHC IIx - an ultrafast fiber type that does not typically appear in pure form in healthy human muscle 35,103. Fiber type transitioning is therefore a conserved feature of MYC pulsing but differs according to muscle type. MyHC IIb fibers are generally much larger than all other fiber types in rodent skeletal muscle 36. Plantaris MyHC IIa fibers experienced a modest rightward shift in fiber size but MyHC IIb fibers tended to be smaller (p<0.10) after eight weeks of MYC pulses (Supplemental Figure 2). MyHC IIb atrophy could be a sign that IIb fibers are less tolerant than MyHC I and IIa fibers to elevated MYC levels 5,22. MyHC IIb fibers are generally less resilient to robust hypertrophic stimuli as they become smaller in the initial phases of muscle mechanical overload 104,105 as well as constitutive mTORC1 activation in muscle 106.
Figure 5. Repeated MYC induces a fast-to-slow fiber type transition in the soleus.
(A) Experimental design schematic for 8-week repeated MYC induction and endpoint soleus phenotyping. (B) Soleus mass normalized to body weight in control and MYC-induced mice. (C) Soleus fiber-type composition from MyHC immunofluorescence. (D) Representative soleus cross-sections stained for MyHC isoforms, showing the fiber-type distribution in control and MYC-induced mice. (E) Quantification of SDH staining intensity categories, expressed as the proportion of low-, medium-, and high-SDH fibers relative to total SDH-positive fibers. (F) Representative soleus SDH histochemistry images from control and MYC-induced mice. Bar graphs show mean ± SEM with individual biological replicates overlaid.
In mice, soleus MyHC IIa fibers are more oxidative than MyHC I fibers 36. After eight weeks of pulsatile MYC induction, there was no change in the gradient of SDH+ fibers (Figures 5E&F). MYC may at least preserve muscle oxidative potential despite the obvious fiber type shift toward a less oxidative fiber type. Since MyHC fiber type has not shifted significantly by four weeks of MYC pulsing 24, but a metabolically reprogrammed signature was clear in myonuclei at this time, we suggest that metabolic changes precede the switch in MyHC type.
Beyond changes in myonuclear proportion revealed by snRNA-seq, the repeated pulse condition produced transcriptional responses in non-myonuclear populations, including fibro-adipogenic progenitors and SCs, that were absent or minimal in the acute dataset (see Figure 4C). Repeated MYC pulses in muscle fibers may therefore have consequences that extend beyond the myonuclear compartment over time. Our results complement those showing that Yamanaka factor induction in muscle fibers remodels the muscle microenvironment to enhance muscle adaptive potential 27. MYC induction can reshape the secretome in various cell types 107–109. Perhaps MYC in muscle fibers alters cells of the microenvironment via secreted factors, which deserves further exploration. To preliminarily interrogate possible changes in the muscle niche with repeated periodic MYC induction, we performed additional skeletal muscle histology. PAX7+ satellite cell number did not differ between eight-week MYC induced muscle and controls, nor did myonuclear number (Supplemental Figure 3). These data suggest that MYC-mediated hypertrophy may occur independent from satellite cell-mediated myonuclear accretion, which has been reported in a variety of other settings such as mechanical overload, exercise, myostatin depletion, AKT overexpression, and testosterone supplementation 110–116. ECM content and muscle lipid content also did not differ between MYC and control conditions (Supplemental Figure 3). This is evidence that there was not pathological disruption to the muscle niche with pulsatile MYC. In response to constitutive MYC induction, muscle fiber damage ensues as evidenced by embryonic myosin heavy chain (eMyHC) expression and IgG infiltration 22. We found neither occurrence in our MYC pulsed muscles (Supplemental Figure 3, eMyHC not shown as it was completely absent). Capillary content per fiber was higher with MYC induction concomitant with the fiber type transition (Supplemental Figure 3). MYC drives angiogenesis in tumors via several mechanisms 117–123, but how it does so in the context of muscle adaptation is not yet clear and deserving of further investigation.
Soleus transcriptomics and proteomics shows coordinated responses to MYC pulses are conserved across omic layers and time points
Bulk RNA-seq of the soleus following eight weeks of MYC pulses (24-hour washout after final pulse) revealed 3,172 upregulated and 2,974 downregulated DEGs versus time point-matched controls (Figure 6A); a substantially larger transcriptional signature than the acute response (see Figure 1). We speculate that this is in part due to the persistence of MYC transcript specifically in MyHC I-enriched myonuclei after repeated pulses (see Figure 4), causing an augmented transcriptome profile. While this long-term MYC response comprises fewer altered genes relative to recombination-dependent constitutive MYC induction in skeletal muscle 22, ~6,000 DEGs is still a relatively large number. Nevertheless, this level of MYC induction did not result in a muscle damage transcriptional profile 124 that is found with chronic constitutive MYC (i.e. no induction of Actn2, Cdc42, Flnc, Hspb1, Myh10, or Dysf) 5,22. We have hypothesized that there is a “goldilocks zone” for MYC induction that is most beneficial for muscle adaptation 5. The large amount of transcriptional regulation after eight weeks of pulsing may be approaching the limits of that zone. Perhaps this high level of transcriptomic alteration explains why the hypertrophy we observe in the soleus is not as substantial as we had expected at the muscle fiber level relative to what is observed at four weeks 24 (see Supplemental Figure 1). With repeated pulsing of MYC, the early phase of adaptation heavily prioritizes ribosome biogenesis (growth), whereas the latter phases may incorporate mitochondrial adaptations to an increasing extent, resulting in a potential “tradeoff” between adaptive priorities. It is also worth mentioning that high and chronic levels of MYC induction produce a much stronger mitochondrial signature in skeletal muscle 22 relative to what is found with acute and transient MYC induction 5,19,25. A supraphysiological level of mitochondrial transcriptomic regulation could be a sign of severe metabolic stress 5,125.
Figure 6. Repeated MYC induction causes coordinated RNA and protein remodeling in 8-week soleus.
(A) Volcano plot of bulk RNA-seq differential gene expression in 8-week MYC-induced versus control soleus. Significantly upregulated genes are shown in red (n = 3,171) and significantly downregulated genes are shown in blue (n = 2,972); non-significant genes are shown in gray and representative genes are labeled. (B) Principal component analysis of DESeq2-normalized bulk RNA-seq data from 8-week MYC-induced and control soleus samples, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 35.7% and 11.4% of total variance, respectively. (C) Principal component analysis of mass spectrometry-based protein abundance from 8-week MYC-induced and control soleus samples, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 44.1% and 11.7% of total variance, respectively. (D) Venn diagrams comparing significantly upregulated and downregulated genes from acute soleus RNA-seq with significantly differentially abundant proteins from 8-week soleus proteomics. (E) Venn diagrams comparing significantly upregulated and downregulated genes/proteins from sample matched 8-week soleus RNA-seq and proteomics. Overlap analyses used adjusted p<0.05 and |logFC| > 0.1. (F) RNA-protein concordance plot for differentially abundant proteins and genes at 8 weeks, with RNA-seq log2 fold change on the x-axis and proteomics log2 fold change on the y-axis. Points are colored by concordance class: upregulated in both datasets, downregulated in both datasets, discordant, or background. (G) Curated GO Biological Process pathway remodeling across 8-week RNA-seq and proteomics, organized into mitochondrial/OXPHOS/ETC, ECM/collagen remodeling, chromosome/nuclear maintenance, and metabolic reprogramming/redox modules. Circles represent RNA-seq and triangles represent proteomics. Point color reflects normalized enrichment score (NES), point size reflects −log10 adjusted p-value, and gray symbols denote pathways that were not significant in that omics layer.
We next sought to understand how eight-week MYC pulse adaptations related to transcriptional and translational profiles in the soleus. Principal component analysis of the transcriptome and proteome from the same samples revealed clear separation between MYC and control samples (Figures 6B&C). We first asked whether the protein-level remodeling evident after eight weeks of repeated transient MYC induction relates to the transcriptional programs that MYC initiates acutely (i.e. a single pulse followed by a 12-hour washout, see Figure 1) (Figure 6D). Of the 620 differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) upregulated by MYC pulses at eight weeks, 244 were also upregulated acutely at the transcriptional level (39%). Of the 608 downregulated DAPs, 106 had correspondingly lower mRNA levels after an acute pulse (17%). We then compared the eight-week MYC pulsed transcriptome to the proteome (Figure 6E). Of the 620 upregulated DAPs, 325 had correspondingly upregulated mRNA levels (52%). Of the 608 downregulated DAPs, 143 had lower mRNA levels (24%). The repeatedly pulsed MYC proteome is therefore more related to the repeat pulse transcriptome than the acute response, especially in the upregulated direction. An RNA-to-Protein fold-change correlation plot quantifies this relationship and shows a positive association with Pearson r=0.35 and Spearman rho=0.34 (both p<2.2 × 10−16, Figure 6F). The moderate but significant correlation means that when a transcript changes significantly at eight weeks, the protein encoding it tends to move in the same direction and with a generally proportional magnitude.
To identify the biological programs shared across omic layers at the eight-week endpoint, we performed GSEA on both the RNA-seq and proteomics ranked gene lists (Figure 6G). The most strongly and consistently enriched upregulated block was mitochondrial gene expression and translation (e.g. MRPL and MRPS proteins, NDUFAF1, NDUFB3, OPA1, TFAM, TOMM40). The second major upregulated set of pathways at the transcriptomic and proteomic levels comprised chromosome and nuclear maintenance functions. The telomere and chromosomal maintenance signature is consistent with the acute response to MYC described above, where Dkc1, Nhp2, and Gnl3 were among the most prominently induced transcripts following a single MYC pulse. Four weeks of MYC induction in the MyHC I-enriched myonuclei reveal this same program. The chromosome and nuclear block is anchored by DKC1 and the CCT chaperonin complex, including TCP1, CCT2, CCT3, CCT4, CCT5, CCT6A, CCT7, and CCT8, alongside XRCC5. CCTs are also essential for actin folding 126 and are regulated by resistance exercise in human skeletal muscle 24. Shared transcriptomic-proteomic downregulated pathways were dominated by extracellular matrix and collagen remodeling programs. The ECM and collagen block is characterized by COL1A1, COL1A2, COL6A1, MFAP4, COMP, LAMB2, CAV1, FBLN5, and FLOT1. This downregulated program contrasts what we observe in our cell culture model where ECM components were upregulated by MYC. The discordance could be related to the in vitro environment and myogenic differentiation program, and/or the effects of MYC on non-muscle cells outside of the muscle fiber in vivo. The final set of pathways was metabolic reprogramming and redox, which included amino acid activation as a shared program across molecular layers and a shared suppression of superoxide metabolic processes (MAPT, SOD3, PON3, NQO1, NRROS/LRRC33, CYGB, GSTP1). Metabolic reprogramming pathways featured SHMT1 among the top-ranked targets. The serine synthesis pathway, via the SHMT1 gene, was recently implicated in appendicular lean mass in humans 127.
Soleus proteomics shows global maintenance of the mitochondrial proteome in response to long-term repeated MYC pulses and provides evidence of metabolite diversion for hypertrophic and membrane anabolism
With the emergence of the MyHC I fiber-type switch after eight weeks of repeated MYC pulses, we were particularly interested in understanding changes to the muscle mitochondrial proteome (mitoproteome). Using a focused analysis approach, we quantitively evaluated mitochondrial content using the ‘mitochondrial enrichment factor’ (MEF). The MEF is an integrated metric that compares the summed abundance of all mitochondrial proteins (i.e., MitoCarta 3.0 proteins) to total protein abundance determined by proteomics 128. This analysis revealed no difference in relative mitochondrial abundance between control and MYC soleus muscles (Figure 7A). We then expanded our analysis to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) proteins, quantifying the summed abundance of all subunits within each OXPHOS complex 128. The relative complex expression between control and MYC soleus muscles was not different for any of the five multi-enzyme complexes of the mitochondrial OXPHOS system (Figure 7B). Consistent with the SDH histology results in the eight-week MYC-pulsed muscles, the proteomics suggest that mitochondrial and OXPHOS content is maintained in response to repeated MYC pulsing, despite the MyHC fiber type shift. Given unique coordinated changes to the mitochondrial transcriptome and mitoproteome as a result of repeated MYC pulsing, however (see above and Figure 4G), these data do not exclude the possibility of changes in mitochondrial efficiency and remodeling. We experimentally explore this possibility below.
Figure 7. Repeated MYC induction remodels metabolic protein programs toward biosynthetic pathways and enhances oxidative metabolism.
(A) Relative mitochondrial protein abundance in 8-week soleus proteomics, expressed as mitochondrial enrichment factor (MEF). (B) Summed abundance of proteins assigned to each oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex (Complexes I-V), expressed as percent of the maximal signal within each complex. (C) Curated proteomic violin plots showing normalized abundance of metabolic proteins altered by repeated MYC induction. Adjusted p-values from differential abundance analysis are shown above each comparison. (D) Schematic summary of fatty acid uptake, activation, mitochondrial entry, β-oxidation, and phospholipid synthesis pathways altered in eight-week MYC soleus proteomics. Upward and downward arrows indicate the direction of significant protein abundance changes with repeated MYC induction from the proteomics data. (E) Schematic summary of glucose uptake, pentose phosphate pathway activity, NADPH-linked metabolism, and nucleotide synthesis proteins altered in eight-week MYC soleus proteomics. Upward arrows indicate increased protein abundance with repeated MYC induction from the proteomics data. (F-J) Seahorse XF analyses of differentiated control and MYC-induced primary myotubes showing: kinetic data (F), basal respiration (G), ATP-coupled respiration (H), and extracellular acidification rate (I), indicating that MYC increases oxidative and glycolytic metabolism in myotubes. (J) Citrate synthase activity in control and MYC myotubes. (K) Total PDH, (L) Phospho-to-total PDH, (M) and PDH activity in MYC-induced myotubes. Bar graphs represent mean ± SD with individual biological replicates overlaid. Violin plots display normalized protein abundance with individual replicates overlaid and central tendency indicated. Exact p-values are shown on the plots; OXPHOS complex comparisons were analyzed by unpaired t-tests with false discovery rate correction, Seahorse summary measurements and citrate synthase activity were analyzed by unpaired t-tests, and proteomic protein-level differences reflect adj. p-values from differential abundance analysis.
Similar to the snRNA-seq analyses with repeated MYC pulses, fatty acid metabolism pathways were among significant DAPs after eight weeks of MYC pulses. Proteins responsible for fatty acid cellular entry (FABPs), activation (acyl-CoA ester synthesis, ACSL1, ACSF2), and entry into the mitochondria (CPT1B) were all up-regulated in MYC soleus muscle (Figure 7C). Transient myonuclear transcriptional responses revealed downregulation of similar fatty acid genes and therefore differs from the repeated pulse proteomic response. The disparate signature could be due to a “training effect” of repeated MYC induction and/or be related to the timing of transcriptomic measures (12 hours after MYC induction) versus proteomic measures (24 hours after the final induction).
The enzyme responsible for the first step of fatty acid beta oxidation (dehydrogenation, ACADVL) was upregulated, but enzymes catalyzing the second (hydration, ECHS1) and final steps (thiolysis, ACAA1A, ACAT1, ACAA2, and HADHB) of beta oxidation were downregulated with repeated MYC induction (Figure 7C). Enzymes responsible for the synthesis of phophatidylethanolamine, a vital component of cell membranes from acyl-CoA esters (GPAM and PISD), were up-regulated (Figure 7C). Lipid metabolism is often overlooked in the context of MYC, but is a key feature of MYC-mediated cell growth 129–132 as well as somatic cell reprogramming 133. Membrane synthesis is a crucial element of cell growth 134. As massively voluminous cells, muscle fibers have appreciable membrane surface area that must scale with contractile protein accretion for coordinated and successful MYC-induced hypertrophy. We interpret these findings to mean that pulsatile MYC induction in skeletal muscle may channel fatty acid flux into cell membrane remodeling and/or biogenesis (Figure 7D). Also consistent with an anabolic program, enzymes responsible for cellular glucose entry and metabolism (GLUT1, HK2) and nucleotide synthesis via the pentose-phosphate pathway (PPP) were also upregulated with repeated MYC induction (PGD, PRPS1) (Figure 7C). This signature is indicative of nucleotide synthetic processes that are characteristic of cell growth and are implicated in hypertrophying skeletal muscle 39,127,135,136 (Figure 7E). Finally, MYC appreciably increases RPL3 protein (adj. p = 0.02) (Figure 7C). The induction of RPL3 is implicated in skeletal muscle growth and plasticity 137–139 and may enhance mitochondrial activity in the heart 140. MYC regulation of RPL3 is consistent with our prior reports suggesting transient MYC influences this ribosomal protein at the mRNA level across different muscles 19,25,42 but is in contrast to what occurs with chronic and constitutive MYC induction that is deleterious to skeletal muscle 22.
Omic responses to MYC induction are corroborated by a coordinated change in oxidative metabolism
We have established that repeated transient MYC pulses are sufficient to induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy in vivo and in vitro. Our lab and others indicate that muscle hypertrophy with resistance training is in part due to MYC’s role in driving ribosome biogenesis 19,23,28,29,41,141–143. The transcriptomic and proteomic data above support this hypothesis. Aside from ribosome biogenesis, however, reprogramming of muscle metabolism by MYC is another prominent feature across the assays we performed, especially following repeated inductions. MYC may affect oxidative metabolism, which is especially compelling based on our snRNA-seq, histochemistry, and proteomic data. Induction of genes such as Ak4, Bcat, Gpt2, Shmt1, Mthfd1l, and Suclg2 also suggest metabolic reprogramming in MYC-induced myotubes. We therefore returned to our in vitro platform to determine how MYC may influence metabolism in muscle.
Using a similar experimental approach to what is shown in Figure 2, we induced MYC in differentiating primary myotubes and performed oxygen consumption rate measurements via Seahorse XF Analyzer on myotubes (Figure 7F). MYC was sufficient to promote an appreciably more oxidative muscle phenotype according to basal respiration and ATP-coupled respiration using glucose, pyruvate, and glutamate as substrates (Figures 7G&H). Extracellular acidification rate was also higher with MYC, indicative of augmented glucose usage overall (Figure 7I). In context with the proteomic and histochemical data, MYC induction seemingly improves muscle oxidative potential despite a fiber type transition, combined with muscle growth. The increase in oxidative metabolism could be due to increased mitochondrial efficiency rather than increased mitochondrial content, as citrate synthase enzyme activity (a proxy for mitochondrial mass) did not increase in MYC-induced myotubes (Figure 7J). Total pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) abundance was increased, the ratio of phospho-PDH to total PDH (marker of enzyme inactivation) was decreased, and PDH activity was increased in MYC-induced myotubes (Figures 7K-M), collectively supporting increased glucose utilization. There was no difference in Myhc gene expression between MYC and control myotubes (all Myhcs including developmental and adult, adj. p<0.05), again suggesting that a shift in metabolism precedes or is uncoupled from changes in MYHC composition.
An open access web browser for exploring transient MYC multi-omic data in skeletal muscle
As a resource for the skeletal muscle and MYC biology fields, we provide an open access web browser of all omics data presented in the manuscript:
These data can be queried with a user-friendly interface to promote a deeper understanding of how pulsatile MYC affects skeletal muscle across all the numerous tissue, nucleus, and omic layers we analyzed. This resource will provide new understanding on how an oncogene functions in a highly differentiated cell type and its effect on neighboring non-muscle cells, leading to new insights on cancer resistance as well as exercise adaptation.
Discussion
In 2012, it was hypothesized that MYC was a central mediator of exercise responses that controlled muscle adaptation, and specifically metabolic adaptations to endurance training 144. Since that time, most of the work on MYC in muscle has involved inference and speculation about MYC’s role in loading-induced hypertrophy, and not metabolism per se 19,23,28,29,41,141–143. This focus seems intuitive since MYC is an oncogene that drives rapid cellular growth in cancer as well as enhanced protein translation via ribosome biogenesis 2,37,145; however, MYC-driven growth in cancer is primarily a result of proliferation and not cellular hypertrophy. Skeletal muscle fibers use many of the same anabolic pathways as proliferating cancer cells to grow in response to a hypertrophic stimulus such as resistance exercise 39; however, adult muscle fibers typically do not “replicate” to cause muscle fiber growth (e.g. hyperplasia) 146–148. We were the first to show evidence that controlled pulses of MYC – mimicking the MYC response to a bout of exercise – was sufficient to induce cellular hypertrophic growth in highly differentiated and non-proliferative muscle fibers in vivo 24. We further corroborate this finding here in vitro. Through our multi-omics explorations, we show that a transient MYC pulse is sufficient to reproduce molecular signatures canonically attributed to exercise adaptation beyond growth, including telomere regulation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and aspects of immunity. We find that processes long described as distinct, parallel adaptations to exercise are each sufficiently influenced by transient MYC. A single pulsatile transcription factor therefore contributes to adaptations previously attributed to multiple independent exercise-sensing pathways. The most striking phenotype we observed was an induction of MyHC I-expressing myonuclei with repeated pulses of MYC. Repeated MYC pulses increased the proportion of myonuclei expressing MyHC I as well as the amount of MyHC I transcript expressed in MyHC IIa-enriched myonuclei. After an eight-week period of MYC pulses, fiber type shifted to a higher proportion of MyHC I fibers at the expense of MyHC II fibers in the soleus. Since myosin heavy chains are not ubiquitously expressed, our work reveals a muscle-specific role for MYC in controlling the proportions of contractile proteins.
Perhaps the most pertinent question based on our findings is: how does MYC control fiber type? We offer several possible explanations. The first is the transcriptional upregulation of Mef2c specifically in myonuclei after an acute pulse of MYC. Mef2c is a well-documented and powerful regulator of a slow-twitch phenotype in skeletal muscle 91–93. After eight weeks of transient MYC pulses, MEF2C was not a significantly upregulated protein. We also cross-referenced our proteomics data against numerous known mechanistic regulators of fast-to-slow fiber type transitioning (including PGC1⍺, Calcineurin, etc.) 149 in our proteomics dataset and did not find enrichment of any after long-term repeated MYC induction. Other possible drivers of fiber type transitioning, such as PERM1 150, were downregulated at the protein level with repeated MYC induction. If MEF2C and/or other fiber type-controlling proteins are driving a MYC-mediated induction in MyHC I fibers, it may be a rapid and transient event that cannot be captured by a proteomic snapshot at our chosen time point, or the protein abundance was too low to be detected. Another potential explanation for how MYC may control fiber type transitioning is via changes that are secondary to alterations at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). In the acute RNA-seq data, acetylcholine receptor signaling was the most significantly downregulated term. While speculative, MYC may induce NMJ remodeling which could possibly contribute to fiber type transitioning 151–153. A third explanation is that MYC directly controls MyHC genes by binding MyHC promoters to drive expression or unbinding from promoters to lower expression. MyHC IIa, IIx, and IIb genes all contain E-boxes 154 - the known binding motif for MYC - whereas MyHC I has MCAT sites 155. MyHC I expression may be mediated by cis mechanisms such as enhancers 156,157, epigenetic modifications 158, g-quadruplexes 159, and/or post-translationally 160,161. A fourth possibility is that all events are occurring simultaneously. Future investigations will explore these possibilities.
Recent evidence suggests myosin heavy chains can direct muscle metabolism 162, implying contractile identity leads metabolism. Our data suggest the opposite: that metabolic changes precede the change in fiber type. A MYC-mediated myonuclear signature of oxidative metabolism genes appears prior to the fiber type transition detected by histology 24. We observe signs of metabolic reprogramming towards biosynthesis, which is associated with muscle hypertrophy in mice and humans 127,135,163,164. We find an induction of HK1, HK2 and SLC2A1 (GLUT1) in the soleus proteome pointing to increased glucose handling potential in the presence of MYC, as well as increased PPP/nucleotide synthesis enzymes; however, there are also indicators of enhanced oxidative metabolic potential across omic layers and time points that can be traced to changes in myonuclear transcription. We corroborated a MYC-mediated increase in oxidative metabolism using oxygen consumption rate analysis in MYC-induced myotubes and PDH activity assays. In addition to ribosome biogenesis, MYC is strongly implicated in mitochondrial biogenesis 165–168. We observe an appreciable 1.3-fold induction of MT-CO1 (Complex IV subunit, 1.3 LogFold, adj. p=0.0001) in our proteomics data. MT-CO1 tightly correlates with mitochondrial translation and biogenesis from endurance training in mice 169. Furthermore, MYC induction in fibroblasts agrees with our in vitro mitochondrial respiration experiments concomitant with increased mitochondrial mass 166; however, our in vitro data and in vivo proteomics both point to mitochondrial remodeling versus mitochondrial biogenesis with MYC induction in skeletal muscle. In the adult murine heart, MYC induction alters mitochondrial and fatty acid oxidation markers, all seemingly independent from PGC1⍺ induction, which collectively contributes to cardiac stress resilience 167. Altogether, it appears that transient MYC induction results in both greater aerobic glucose metabolism for energy production and greater anaerobic glucose metabolism for biomass production in skeletal muscle. Combined with signs of a shift in fatty acid prioritization toward membrane synthesis, our data establish a unified metabolic framework that involves several biosynthetic pathways to support muscle adaptation via transient MYC. Future investigations involving flux analyses and tracers can validate metabolic shifts and the potential shunting of fatty acids towards membrane synthesis, as well as more granular measures to determine mitochondrial volume, density, and size distribution using high-resolution microscopy. We conclude that MYC, which is transiently but strongly induced by exercise in human skeletal muscle, mediates hypertrophic, metabolic, and perhaps stress-resilience benefits associated with chronic exercise training.
Limitations of the Study
It will be important to identify the ideal “dose” of MYC and to mechanistically tease out the most deterministic features downstream of MYC activation that mediate hypertrophic, metabolic, and MyHC fiber type adaptations. This information could aid in the development of skeletal muscle therapies that do not carry the risk of off-target oncogenesis. From a functional standpoint, testing whether transient MYC-induced muscles are more adaptive to endurance or resistance exercise training, have enhanced performance, are resistant to atrophy, can combat nutrient stress, and/or are refractory to aging across biological sexes 5,26 will be revealing. While questions about MYC in muscle remain, our work implicates MYC as a central regulatory node in exercise-induced skeletal muscle adaptation 170.
Resource Availability
Raw and processed RNA-sequencing data from all bulk and single-nucleus experiments reported in this study will be deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). All analyzed data are found here: data.myoanalytics.com/study/myc_transient/gene
Methods
Ethical Approval and Animal Housing
All animal procedures were approved by the University of Arkansas IACUC (AUP 21037 and AUP 24032). Mice were housed in a temperature and humidity-controlled room maintained on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle with food and water provided ad libitum throughout experimentation. Animals were euthanized via cervical dislocation following deep anesthesia induced by inhaled isoflurane. All mice for in vivo experiments were females >4 months of age but <10 months of age.
Skeletal Muscle Fiber-Specific MYC Induction Model
The doxycycline-inducible, skeletal muscle fiber-specific MYC induction mouse model (Human skeletal muscle ⍺-actin reverse tetracycline transactivator tetracycline response element [Tet-On] MYC, or HSA-MYC) used throughout this study was generated as previously described by us 19,24,25 (Jackson Laboratory Strains 038301 and 19736). All mice were heterozygous for each transgene, and doxycycline was used as the tetracycline analog to induce muscle fiber-specific MYC expression in vivo. Littermate HSA-only mice treated with doxycycline served as controls for all in vivo experiments. A subset of HSA-MYC mice was crossed with a tetracycline response element green fluorescent protein mouse (Jackson Laboratory Strain 005104) to generate HSA-MYC-GFP mice, which were used for primary cell culture experiments with littermate HSA-GFP as controls.
Acute MYC Induction
HSA-MYC and littermate control mice (n = 3 females per group) were given doxycycline in their normal drinking water with sucrose (0.5 mg·mL−1 with 2% sucrose) for 48 hours at 6–8 months of age. Doxycycline-supplemented water was then replaced with normal drinking water in the morning, and mice were euthanized 12 hours after the removal of doxycycline unless otherwise specified (a subset were analyzed after a 24-hour washout for snRNA-seq).
Repeated Pulsatile MYC Induction
To explore the outcome of long-term repeated MYC induction in skeletal muscle, we repeated (four week) and extended the repeated pulsatile induction design (eight week) first described in our prior work 24. Adult female HSA-MYC and littermate control mice (n = 8 and n = 9 respectively) were given doxycycline in their normal drinking water with sucrose (0.5 mg·mL−1 with 2% sucrose) for 48 hours, followed by five days of normal drinking water. This pulse approach was repeated for a total of five or nine inductions over four or eight weeks. All mice were euthanized 24 hours following the final doxycycline treatment, in the morning before 11:00 AM (a subset were analyzed after a 12-hour washout for snRNA-seq).
Primary Myoblast Isolation then Differentiation with MYC Induction
Primary myogenic progenitor cells were isolated from several juvenile (9–13 weeks of age) male HSA-MYC-GFP and HSA-GFP mice using a protocol adapted from the Rando laboratory 53. Briefly, limb muscles were dissected, minced, and enzymatically dissociated using collagenase and dispase, and filtered through a 40 μm strainer to generate a single-cell suspension. The cell suspension was then incubated at 4°C with antibodies against VCAM, CD31, CD45, and SCA1, on ice and a biotinylated secondary antibody was used for VCAM. Cells were pelleted (500 × g for 5 minutes), re-suspended, and sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) on the MACSQuant Tyto Cell Sorter (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Primary myogenic cells were identified and sorted based on viability detected by an absence of propidium iodine (PI) (non-viable cells) and negative for CD31/CD45/SCA1 (FITC, “dump” channel). The sorted positive selection was for VCAM-1 high cells (PE-Cy7). Debris were excluded using back/side scatter profiles.
Sorted cells were plated on culture dishes coated with 1% extracellular matrix (ECM) gel (Sigma-Aldrich E1270; derived from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm murine sarcoma) diluted in serum-free DMEM (Gibco 11965–092) supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Corning 30–002-CI). Cells were expanded in growth medium, which was replaced daily, consisting of Ham’s F-10 medium (Gibco 11550–043), 10% horse serum (Gibco 16050–122), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin, supplemented with 25 μg/mL fibroblast growth factor (FGF; Sigma F0291) prepared in 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells from passages 2–4 were used for protein analysis, RNA extraction, and myotube area normalized to myonuclear number. Cells were plated at 700 cells/cm² density and allowed to reach ~65% confluence before differentiation. Differentiation was induced by replacing growth medium with differentiation medium consisting of DMEM, 5% horse serum, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 2 μg/mL doxycycline. Cells were maintained under differentiating conditions for 72 or 96 hours.
For protein abundance, cells were harvested in 2X sample buffer and assessed by Western blotting using an anti c-MYC primary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, D84C12, 1:500). To measure myotube area, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained for myosin heavy chain (MyHC; DHSB, MF20, 1:100 in 2% BSA/PBS). Myotube area was quantified from fluorescence images acquired at a constant intensity in the AF555 channel using a Zeiss microscope and normalized to the number of GFP-positive myonuclei. Statistical comparisons for MYC protein abundance and myotube area per myonuclear number were performed using one-tailed Welch’s t-tests, n = 4–5 biological replicates per group, with values presented as mean ± SEM.
Bulk RNA Isolation, Sequencing, and Analysis
TRIzol Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to isolate RNA from primary myotubes and for soleus muscle. For tissue, RNA was isolated from approximately half of each soleus (4–6 mg) for the acute induction experiment and from 2–4 mg of soleus tissue for the 8-week endpoint experiment using. Myotubes and tissue were homogenized using zirconia beads and a Fisher Bead Mill (Fisher, Hampton, NH, USA). Following homogenization, RNA was isolated via phase separation by addition of chloroform then centrifugation. The aqueous phase was transferred to a new sterile tube and further processed on spin columns using the Direct-zol Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). For the 8-week soleus samples, poly-acryl carrier was added to improve RNA yield from lower input tissue mass (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA). Concentration and purity were determined using a BioTek Take3 micro-volume microplate with a BioTek PowerWave XS microplate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, US).
Isolated RNA from all samples was sequenced by Novogene (Sacramento, CA, USA) on an Illumina HiSeq platform using 150 bp paired-end sequencing. Raw FASTQ files were processed in Partek Flow. Reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (GRCm39) using STAR 2.7.8a and quantified against the mm39 annotation model. Features with a maximum count < 5 across all samples were removed prior to downstream analysis for noise reduction. Normalization and differential expression analysis were performed using DESeq2, with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified at a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate adjusted p-value < 0.05 with no fold-change cutoff was applied for DEG classification. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed in R using the clusterProfiler package 171 against the Gene Ontology Biological Process database. All expressed genes passing the low-expression filter were included in the ranked input to avoid false pathway enrichment. Gene sets with a Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value of < 0.05 are reported.
Fluorescence-Activated Nuclear Sorting and Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing
Soleus muscle nuclei were isolated via Fluorescent Activated Nuclear Sorting (FANS) on a MACSQuant Tyto Cell Sorter (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Soleus muscle from three mice per condition were pooled in 1mL of homogenization buffer (500 μL HEPES [1 M], 3 mL KCl [1 M], 250 μL spermidine [100 mM], 750 μL spermine tetrahydrochloride [10 mM], 10 mL EDTA [10 mM], 250 μL EGTA [100 mM], 2.5 mL MgCl [100 mM], 5.13 g sucrose) with 4 μL of Propidium Iodide (PI), and 0.2U/μL RNAse inhibitors (Protector RNase Inhibitor, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). The muscle was initially minced in buffer with scissors on ice in a low-bind 1.5 mL tube until a slurry, dounced ~20 times with a plastic pestle with a gentle twist at the bottom, then strained through a 20-μm MACSQuant pre-separation filter (Cat #: 130–101-812) directly into MACSQuant Tyto high-speed sorting cartridge (Cat #: 130–121-549). FANS gating was established to exclude debris and identify nuclei positive for PI (intrinsic DNA label), then sorted directly into PBS/1% BSA/RNase inhibitors to minimize dilution. Nuclei suspension concentration was measured using the automated Countess II (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), aiming to load ~20,000 nuclei within the optimal range for the 10X chromium chip. Master mix (MM) solution was combined with up to 36.6 μl of the nuclei suspension + PBS, then loaded into the GEM-X 3’ chip for GEM formation. Library was prepared using the Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kit v4 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Following library construction, libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Nova NextSeq X Plus System by Novogene to 200 million reads per library.
Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Analysis
Raw FASTQ files were aligned and quantified using Cell Ranger v9.0.0 (10X Genomics) against a custom mouse reference genome (GRCm39) augmented with the full coding sequence of the human MYC transgene. Inclusion of the transgene in the reference was necessary to enable direct detection and quantification of transgene-expressing nuclei at single-nucleus resolution, consistent with the myofiber-specific MYC overexpression design of the experiment. Following alignment, gene-barcode matrices were subjected to ambient RNA correction using CellBender (v0.2.0) 172, which applies a deep generative model to distinguish true biological transcripts from background contamination.
Corrected .h5 feature files were imported into R (v4.5) and processed using Seurat v5. Nuclei were filtered to remove low-quality barcodes based on total UMI counts, detected gene counts, and mitochondrial transcript fraction, with a mitochondrial read cutoff of < 5%. Doublets were identified and removed using scDblFinder. Data were normalized using log-normalization, and highly variable features were identified for dimensionality reduction. Principal component analysis was performed, and the number of PCs retained for downstream graph construction was selected using an automated elbow and cumulative variance criterion, with a minimum of 15 PCs and an 85% cumulative variance target. A shared nearest-neighbor graph was constructed using k = 30.
Unsupervised clustering was performed using the Leiden algorithm implemented via igraph v2.2.2 173. The Leiden algorithm was selected over the more commonly used Louvain algorithm because it provides explicit guarantees of well-connected communities and prevents the formation of disconnected or weakly connected partitions. Multiple resolutions were evaluated, and the final resolution of 0.4 was selected from candidates with modularity within 95% of the maximum observed modularity, prioritizing highest mean silhouette width in PCA space and then fewer clusters. Cell type identity was assigned using a two-step consensus annotation workflow. UCell (v2.14) 174 enrichment scores were computed from normalized RNA expression using curated marker gene panels canonical to the various nuclei types in skeletal muscle. These marker-based scores were then reconciled with cluster topology and used to label cluster identity.
Because the experiment required pooling of nuclei from three biological replicates per group to achieve sufficient nuclear yield for the library preparation described above, direct single-nucleus differential expression testing would treat individual nuclei as independent observations, inflating type I error rates 175. To address this, pseudoreplicates were generated using a dynamic binning strategy that aggregated nuclei within each biological sample. For each nuclei type and condition, nuclei were partitioned into bins targeting approximately 500 to 1,000 nuclei per replicate as larger binning experiences diminishing returns to the strength of the differential expression testing 175, with a minimum of three pseudoreplicates per group required for inclusion in differential expression analysis.
Pseudobulk count matrices were converted to edgeR DGEList objects (edgeR v4.4.2) and normalized using TMM with low-abundance genes removed using filterByExpr. Count data were transformed using the voom method and fitted with limma (v3.62.2) linear models. Differential expression was tested using limma::treat at a primary absolute log2 fold-change threshold of 0.30, with a secondary high-confidence threshold of 0.585 also applied. Genes were considered significant at Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 0.05. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed using fgsea (v1.32.4) with mouse-native MSigDB C5 Gene Ontology Biological Process gene sets obtained via msigdbr (v26.1.0). Genes were ranked by moderated t-statistic, and enrichment was performed using fgseaMultilevel. All expressed genes passing the low-abundance filter within each nuclei type stratum served as the background gene list for each comparison, consistent with other pathway analyses in this study. Enriched pathways were considered significant at FDR < 0.05 and were separated into positive and negative normalized enrichment score categories. All analyses were performed in R (v4.5) with Bioconductor (v3.21).
Histology
Soleus muscles were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound, frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane, and stored at −80°C until sectioning. Transverse cryosections of 8 μm thickness were cut using a cryostat and air dried for a minimum of one hour prior to staining. Fiber cross-sectional area and fiber type distribution were assessed by immunohistochemistry as previously described 32,105. Soleus sections were incubated in primaries for MyHC I (BA-D5, DSHB), MyHC IIa (SC-71, DSHB), dystrophin primaries. Plantaris sections were stained using MyHC IIa, MyHC IIb (BF-F3, DSHB), and dystrophin then the appropriate isotype-specific for MyHC I, MyHC IIa, MyHC IIb) before applying DAPI. All images were captured using an upright fluorescent microscope at 20X magnification (Zeiss Axiolmager M2, Oberkochen, Germany) where whole muscle sections were imaged using the mosaic function in Zeiss Zen 3.8.3 for Microsoft.
For succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme histochemistry, 7 μm sections from the soleus muscle were air dried and incubated in a succinate buffer containing 50mM Sodium Phosphate pH at 7.6, 50mM sodium succinate, and 0.5mg/ml nitroblue tetrazolium for 45 minutes at 37°C. After incubation, tissues were rinsed in deionized water and then processed for fiber typing using the same protocol previously described. Analysis was conducted using MyoVision v2.1 which simultaneously assesses fiber type and SDH intensities using bright field and fluorescent microscopy images taken at the same time. Pixel intensities for each fiber were exported and assessed using 8-bit grey scale from 0–255 where black pixels are given a value of zero (arbitrary units) representing darker SDH staining and lighter pixels are given higher values representing weaker staining. For binning of SDH staining, arbitrary thresholds of 0–100 for dark staining, 101–175 medium staining, and greater than 175 for light staining of fibers were applied. Fibers were counted and summed across full soleus cross-sections and assessed for group differences.
Sirius Red staining was performed to evaluate extracellular matrix organization and collagen deposition as described 113,176. 7 μm soleus sections were incubated in Bouin’s fixative (Biolyst inc., 15990) for 1 hour at 56°C and rinsed with deionized water for 2 minutes followed by a 2-hour incubation period in PicroSirius Red solution (Biolyst inc., 26357–02) and washed in 0.5% acetic acid, dehydrated in 95% and 100% ethanol, and equilibrated in xylene for ~5 minutes before mounting with cytoseal (Biolyst Inc.,18009). Regions of interest were then imaged using an inverted Nikon (Eclipse Ti) microscope at 10x. Images were then analyzed using ImageJ software for percentage of red area.
Satellite cell abundance was assessed by staining for PAX7+ nuclei as previously described 113. Briefly, soleus tissue sections were fixed with 4% PFA for 7 minutes and washed for 3 rounds of 3 minutes in PBS, treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide to block endogenous peroxides for 7 minutes, followed by an epitope retrieval step in sodium citrate (2.94 g/L pH 6.8) at 92°C for 11 minutes and allowed to cool to room temperature and washed for 3 rounds of 3 minutes in PBS. Sections were then blocked with mouse-on-mouse IgG blocking reagent (Vector, #MKB-2213) for 45 minutes followed by 3 rounds of PBS washes, and then with 1% TSA with 0.1% Triton at room temperature for 1 hour. Anti-Pax7 (ab_528428, DSHB) and laminin (Sigma L9393) primary antibodies were then applied overnight at 4°C. Following biotinylated secondary antibody (1:1000) treatment in 1% TSA (Jackson Immunoresearch, 115–065-205) for 70 minutes and 3 rounds of 3 minutes PBS washes, tissues were then treated with SA-HRP (1:500; Thermo Fisher, S-911) and laminin (anti-rabbit AF647; 1:200) secondaries for 1 hour at room temperature before another round of PBS washes and applying the TSA AF594 amplification for PAX7 for 15 minutes. Nuclei were stained with Prolong Diamond anti-fade mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen, P36962). Nuclei that were both PAX7+, DAPI+ and resided withing the laminin boarder were manually counted as satellite cells with relative counts calculated as PAX7+ nuclei per fiber where fibers were assessed using the semi-automatic image analysis tool MyoVision 177,178.
IgG staining was performed as a negative control to confirm the absence of myofiber membrane damage as described by Ham et al. 22. Briefly, 7 μm sections from the soleus were cut and allowed to air dry before incubating in cold acetone fixing for 10 minutes followed by 3 washes for 3 minutes each in PBS. Sections were then blocked in 5% BSA for 20 minutes followed by an IgG anti-rat secondary antibody (Jacksonimmuno, 112–165-143 ) in 1% BSA over night at 4°C.
For lipidspot (Biotium Inc., cat #70065) staining, ~7 μm sections were cut and stained according to the manufacture’s recommendations. Briefly, the tissues were removed from −80°C storage and allowed to dry for at least 1 hour before fixing in 4% PFA. The tissues were then washed in PBS and incubated in a PBS and triton-X (0.5%) solution for 20 minutes. The same primary antibody for dystrophin was applied as the above IHC stains overnight at 4°C. Tissues were then rinsed in PBS before the dystrophin secondary antibody was applied for 1 hour at room temperature. Before the lipidspot incubation there was another round of PBS rinses. The lipidspot stain was diluted in 1:100 in PBS and 0.1% triton-X and applied to the tissues for 30 minutes, rinsed in PBS, and mounted with a glycerol-based media before imaging. For a positive control, we used an aged (~22 month) high fat fed mouse 179 (60% of kcal from fat) tibialis anterior muscle that was cut and stained at the same time as the HSA-MYC and HSA-rtTA (no MYC control) tissues.
For immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of capillarity, PECAM-1 (Cat#: 2H8-supernatant) monoclonal antibody developed and deposited to the DSHB by Bogen, S.A., created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242 was used for determination of soleus capillarization markers (capillaries per mm2, capillaries per myofiber, and capillaries in contact with each fiber (CCEF)). Muscle sections air dried for 15 mins then fixed in cold acetone (−20°C) for 10 mins followed by 2×5 min washes in PBS. Sections were then blocked for 30 min in 5% normal horse serum (NHS) in PBS. Primary antibodies for PECAM-1 (1:5) and dystrophin (1:250, PA1–37587, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in PBS with 5% NHS were completed for 1 hour at room temperature then overnight at 4°C. The following day sections were washed 3×5 min in PBS and then incubated in secondary antibodies against PECAM-1 (1:500, AF594, goat anti-Armenian hamster IgG, Invitrogen) and dystrophin (1:200, AF350, donkey anti-rabbit IgG, Invitrogen) for 1 hour at room temperature. Following secondary incubation, sections were washed 3×5 mins with PBS and mounted with 50/50 glycerol and PBS solution for imaging. Images were captured at 20x total magnification at room temperature with a ZEISS upright microscope (Axio Imager M2, Oberkochen Germany). For analysis of capillarization, each sample had multiple ROIs (225×225μm) captured (2–4 per sample) for analysis of capillary density. Image analysis was performed by the same investigator who was blinded to sample condition throughout the analysis using Zeiss ZEN microscopy software. Capillaries per myofiber were calculated only with completely visible myofibers (i.e. myofibers cut off at the edges were not included in analysis) within each ROI. All capillaries that were in contact with the complete myofibers were counted and then divided by the total myofiber count in each ROI. Unpaired t-test with test for normality and significance value set at p<0.05 were used to determine differences in soleus muscle capillarization with and without 8 weeks of muscle-specific MYC induction.
Proteomics Sample Preparation
Proteomics was performed on soleus tissue from the same animal used for 8-week bulk RNA-seq in each biological replicate, with approximately two-thirds of each soleus allocated to proteomics and the remaining one-third used for RNA isolation, enabling a within-animal matched multi-omic design. Frozen soleus tissue was cryopowdered and homogenized in 1X RIPA buffer. Protein concentration was determined using Pierce 660 protein quantification assay (Thermo Scientific). Sixty micrograms of total protein per sample was desalted by acetone precipitation overnight at −20°C. The protein pellet was resolubilized in Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad) with 50mm DTT and 20 μg of protein per sample was resolved by SDS-PAGE. Gels were fixed and stained with GelCode Blue Stain Reagent (Thermo Scientific). To reduce the dominance of high-abundance structural proteins inherent to skeletal muscle, including titin and myosin heavy chain, the lower portion of each gel lane was excised for downstream analysis. A standard in-gel digestion method was used. The gel pieces were washed to remove the GelCode Blue Stain and then reduced in 10 mg/mL DTT, alkylated in 35 mg/mL iodoacetamide, dried, and then rehydrated and digested overnight with 1 μg trypsin per sample in 200 μL 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The mixture of peptides was extracted from the gel, evaporated to dryness in a SpeedVac, stored at −20 °C until resuspended for liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS) analysis.
Proteomics Analysis
Mass spectrometry acquisition and protein identification were performed by the UAMS National Proteomics Core. Proteins were identified by searching against the mouse UniProt/Swiss-Prot reference proteome. Protein intensities were normalized using variance stabilizing normalization (VSN). Differential abundance analysis was performed using a limma-based linear modeling framework with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Proteins with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 were considered significantly differentially abundant, without imposition of a hard fold-change cutoff, consistent with the approach described above for bulk RNA-seq differential expression analysis in this study.
All downstream visualization and pathway analyses were performed in R (v4.5). Gene set enrichment analysis of differentially abundant proteins was performed using fgsea (v1.32.4) with mouse-native MSigDB C5 Gene Ontology Biological Process gene sets obtained via msigdbr (v26.1.0). Proteins were ranked by moderated t-statistics and enrichment was performed using fgseaMultilevel. Enriched pathways were considered significant at FDR < 0.05. Mitochondrial protein content was quantified using the mitochondrial enrichment factor (MEF), calculated by comparing the summed abundance of all MitoCarta 3.0-annotated proteins to total protein abundance 128. Oxidative phosphorylation complex abundance was assessed by quantifying the summed abundance of all detected subunits within each of the five OXPHOS complexes 128.
Mitochondrial Stress Test and Citrate Synthase Activity
Cellular respirometry of myotube cells was measured using the Seahorse Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Agilent Technologies) as previously described 180. Briefly, control and MYC myoblast cells were seeded in extracellular matrix-coated XFe24 cell culture microplates in growth medium at a density of 6×104 cells per well, as described above. Following a 24-hour incubation, growth medium was replaced with differentiation medium and doxycycline, and cells were allowed to differentiate for 72 hours as described above. On the day of the assay, cells were washed once with prewarmed Seahorse XF DMEM assay medium supplemented with 1 mM pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine and 25 mM glucose, pH 7.4 (Agilent Technologies), then incubated in assay medium in a non-CO2 incubator at 37°C for 1 hour. The mitochondrial stress test was conducted using consecutive injections of 2.5 mM oligomycin (Cayman Chemical), 2 mM carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (Cayman Chemical), and 0.5 mM rotenone/0.5 mM antimycin A (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) as the final concentrations. Measurements were normalized to protein concentrations as determined by the BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Citrate Synthase (CS) Activity Assay (Cayman Chemical) was performed to assess mitochondrial mass in CON and MYC cells following 72 hours of differentiation (as described above). Briefly, cells were washed with PBS, detached from the plate with a cell lifter, and pelleted by centrifugation. Pellets were resuspended in the CS assay buffer, sonicated for 3 seconds and incubated on ice for 10 minutes. Cell suspensions were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C to remove insoluble material. Cellular extracts were diluted 1:50 prior to the assay in CS assay buffer and the assay was performed and quantitated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. CS activity was normalized to total protein concentrations as determined by the BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Western Blotting
For Western blotting, samples were separated by SDS-PAGE using 4–15% Criterion TGX Gels (Bio-Rad). Total protein stains were visualized using a Revert Total Protein Stain Kit (LI-COR Biosciences) for total protein normalization of target bands. Total PDH was assessed using a PDHE1a antibody (1:1000, NBP2–33922, Novus Biologicals), and phosphorylated PDH was assessed using an anti-phospho-PDHE1a (Ser293) (1:1000, NB110–93479, Novus Biologicals). IRDye fluorescent secondary antibodies were used, and membranes were visualized using an Odyssey Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences). Target band densitometry was quantified using Image Studio Software (LI-COR Biosciences).
PDH activity was assessed using a microplate assay kit (ab109902, Abcam). Briefly, wells of the microplate were coated with an anti-PDH monoclonal antibody to capture fully-intact, functionally-active PDH enzyme complexes. PDH activity was determined as the reduction of NAD+ to NADH, coupled to the reduction of a reporter dye and monitored as the absorbance at OD450 nm for 30 minutes, using a Biotek Synergy H1 Multimode reader. Equal amounts of protein from each sample were added to wells in duplicate, and data are presented as the change in absorbance over time.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed in R and GraphPad Prism, as appropriate for each assay. For non-omic two-group comparisons, data were analyzed using unpaired t-tests unless otherwise specified. Welch’s correction was applied when variance assumptions were not met. Two-tailed tests were used unless a directional one-tailed test was prespecified, as in the primary myotube MYC protein abundance and myotube area per myonuclear number analyses. For assays involving multiple related endpoint comparisons, including OXPHOS complex abundance and fiber type or staining-bin comparisons, individual group comparisons were performed with multiple-testing correction where indicated. Significance for non-omic assays was defined as p < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± SEM unless otherwise stated. Bulk RNA-seq differential expression was performed using DESeq2, with Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p < 0.05 used to define differentially expressed genes. Single-nucleus pseudobulk differential expression was performed using edgeR/limma-voom with limma::treat, using a primary absolute log2 fold-change threshold of 0.30 and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 0.05. Proteomic differential abundance analysis was performed using a limma-based linear modeling framework following variance-stabilizing normalization, with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 0.05 defining differentially abundant proteins. Gene set enrichment analyses were performed using preranked approaches as described above, and pathways were considered significant at FDR < 0.05.
Supplementary Material
Supplemental Figure 1. Muscle mass and fiber cross sectional area (CSA) in the soleus muscle after eight weeks of repeated transient MYC pulses. Absolute muscle mass (A) and fiber CSA (B) in MyHC I, MyHC IIa, MyHC-negative (IIx) fibers from eight-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. Bars show mean ± SEM with individual biological replicates overlaid. *p<0.05, #p<0.10.
Supplemental Figure 2. Muscle masses of hindlimb muscles and plantaris muscle histology after eight weeks of repeated transient MYC pulses. Quantification of absolute (A) and normalized mass (B) across hindlimb muscles after eight weeks of transient MYC pulses. Plantaris fiber type distribution (C) and muscle fiber size distribution (D). Bars show mean ± SEM with individual biological replicates overlaid.
Supplemental Figure 3. Satellite cell abundance, myonuclear number, ECM content, immune infiltration, and capillarity after 8 weeks of transient MYC pulses in the soleus. (A) PAX7+ nuclei frequency in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (B) Myonuclear number in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (C) Sirius Red-positive ECM content in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (D) Representative images or quantification of lipid accumulation in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (E) Representative IgG staining assessing immune/injury-associated infiltration in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (F) Quantification of capillaries per myofiber in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. MYC induction increased capillaries per myofiber (unpaired two-tailed t-test, p = 0.0019). Bar graphs show mean ± SEM with individual biological replicates overlaid.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by NIH grants AG063994, AG080047, and AG088465 to K.A.M. This work was performed while KAM was a Glenn Foundation for Medical Research/American Federation for Aging Research Junior Investigator Awardee. Proteomics was funded by a voucher from the IDeA National Proteomics Resource (R24GM137786) to RGJ. SE was supported by the Swedish Society for Medical Research postdoctoral grant (PG-24–0429), the Swedish Research Council for Sports (P2025–0154 & P2026–0203), and the Wenner-Gren Foundations. FvW was supported by the Swedish Research Council (no. 2022–01392) and the Swedish Research Council for Sport Science (P2024–0102; P2025–0171). BFM was supported by a VA Research Career Scientist award (IK6BX007150). Thank you to Tyrone A. Washington, PhD for providing tissue from high fat-fed mice as a control for one of the experiments. The TRE-MYC mice were provided as a generous give from Andrew P. McMahon, PhD.
Footnotes
Declaration of Interests
YW is the owner of MyoAnalytics LLC.
Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies
AI was not used for the development of any aspect of this work.
References
- 1.Madden S.K., de Araujo A.D., Gerhardt M., Fairlie D.P., and Mason J.M. (2021). Taking the Myc out of cancer: toward therapeutic strategies to directly inhibit c-Myc. Molecular cancer 20, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dang C.V. (2012). MYC on the path to cancer. Cell 149, 22–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dhanasekaran R., Deutzmann A., Mahauad-Fernandez W.D., Hansen A.S., Gouw A.M., and Felsher D.W. (2022). The MYC oncogene—the grand orchestrator of cancer growth and immune evasion. Nature reviews Clinical oncology 19, 23–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ham D.J., Semeraro M., Berger B.M., McGowan T.J., Lin S., Maino E., Oliveri F., and Rüegg M.A. (2025). Muscle fiber Myc is dispensable for muscle growth and its forced expression severely perturbs homeostasis. Nature communications 16, 3190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones III R.G., Edman S., Serrano N., Wen Y., McCarthy J.J., Fry C.S., von Walden F., and Murach K.A. (2025). Making sense of MYC in skeletal muscle: location, duration, and magnitude. American Journal of Physioloy - Cell Physiology 329, C624–C629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yosef N., and Regev A. (2011). Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription. Cell 144, 886–896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takahashi K., and Yamanaka S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.de Lázaro I., Cossu G., and Kostarelos K. (2017). Transient transcription factor (OSKM) expression is key towards clinical translation of in vivo cell reprogramming. EMBO molecular medicine 9, 733–736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ocampo A., Reddy P., Martinez-Redondo P., Platero-Luengo A., Hatanaka F., Hishida T., Li M., Lam D., Kurita M., and Beyret E. (2016). In vivo amelioration of age-associated hallmarks by partial reprogramming. Cell 167, 1719–1733. e1712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jaenicke L.A., von Eyss B., Carstensen A., Wolf E., Xu W., Greifenberg A.K., Geyer M., Eilers M., and Popov N. (2016). Ubiquitin-dependent turnover of MYC antagonizes MYC/PAF1C complex accumulation to drive transcriptional elongation. Molecular cell 61, 54–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sears R.C. (2004). The life cycle of C-myc: from synthesis to degradation. Cell cycle 3, 1131–1135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jones T.R., and Cole M.D. (1987). Rapid cytoplasmic turnover of c-myc mRNA: requirement of the 3′ untranslated sequences. Molecular and cellular biology 7, 4513–4521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chung H.-J., and Levens D. (2005). c-myc expression: keep the noise down! Molecules and cells 20, 157–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Levens D. (2013). Cellular MYCro economics: Balancing MYC function with MYC expression. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine 3, a014233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jha R.K., Kouzine F., and Levens D. (2023). MYC function and regulation in physiological perspective. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 11, 1268275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seely S. (1980). Possible reasons for the high resistance of muscle to cancer. Medical hypotheses 6, 133–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Crist S.B., Nemkov T., Dumpit R.F., Dai J., Tapscott S.J., True L.D., Swarbrick A., Sullivan L.B., Nelson P.S., and Hansen K.C. (2022). Unchecked oxidative stress in skeletal muscle prevents outgrowth of disseminated tumour cells. Nature cell biology, 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alway S.E. (1997). Overload-induced C-Myc oncoprotein is reduced in aged skeletal muscle. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 52, B203–B211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murach K.A., Liu Z., Jude B., Figueiredo V.C., Wen Y., Khadgi S., Lim S., da Silva F.M., Greene N.P., Lanner J.T., et al. (2022). Multi-transcriptome analysis following an acute skeletal muscle growth stimulus yields tools for discerning global and MYC regulatory networks. Journal of biological chemistry, 102515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Armstrong D.D., and Esser K.A. (2005). Wnt/β-catenin signaling activates growth-control genes during overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. American journal of physiology - cell physiology 289, C853–C859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sidorenko S., Klimanova E., Milovanova K., Lopina O.D., Kapilevich L.V., Chibalin A.V., and Orlov S.N. (2018). Transcriptomic changes in C2C12 myotubes triggered by electrical stimulation: Role of Ca2+ i-mediated and Ca2+ i-independent signaling and elevated [Na+] i/[K+] i ratio. Cell calcium 76, 72–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ham D.J., Semeraro M., Berger B.M., Lin S., Maino E., Oliveri F., and Rüegg M.A. (2025). Muscle fiber Myc is dispensable for muscle growth and forced expression severely perturbs homeostasis. Nature communications 16, 3190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Figueiredo V.C., Wen Y., Alkner B., Fernandez-Gonzalo R., Norrbom J., Vechetti I.J. Jr, Valentino T., Mobley C.B., Zentner G.E., Peterson C.A., et al. (2021). Genetic and epigenetic regulation of skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis with exercise. Journal of physiology 599, 3363–3384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Edman S., Jones Iii R.G., Jannig P.R., Fernandez-Gonzalo R., Norrbom J., Thomas N.T., Khadgi S., Koopmans P.J., Morena F., and Chambers T.L. (2024). The 24-hour molecular landscape after exercise in humans reveals MYC is sufficient for muscle growth. EMBO reports 25, 5810–5837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones III R.G., Dimet-Wiley A., Haghani A., da Silva F.M., Brightwell C.R., Lim S., Khadgi S., Wen Y., Dungan C.M., and Brooke R.T. (2023). A molecular signature defining exercise adaptation with ageing and in vivo partial reprogramming in skeletal muscle. The Journal of physiology 601, 763–782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jones III R.G., von Walden F., and Murach K. (2024). Exercise-induced MYC as an epigenetic reprogramming factor that combats skeletal muscle aging. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 10.1249/JES.0000000000000333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang C., Rabadan Ros R., Martinez-Redondo P., Ma Z., Shi L., Xue Y., Guillen-Guillen I., Huang L., Hishida T., and Liao H.-K. (2021). In vivo partial reprogramming of myofibers promotes muscle regeneration by remodeling the stem cell niche. Nature communications 12, 3094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.West D.W., Baehr L.M., Marcotte G.R., Chason C.M., Tolento L., Gomes A.V., Bodine S.C., and Baar K. (2016). Acute resistance exercise activates rapamycin-sensitive and-insensitive mechanisms that control translational activity and capacity in skeletal muscle. The Journal of physiology 594, 453–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mori T., Ato S., Knudsen J.R., Henriquez-Olguin C., Li Z., Wakabayashi K., Suginohara T., Higashida K., Tamura Y., and Nakazato K. (2021). c-Myc overexpression increases ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis independent of mTORC1 activation in mouse skeletal muscle. American journal of ohysiology - endocrinology and metabolism 321, E551–E559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Murach K.A., and Bagley J.R. (2025). A primer on global molecular responses to exercise in skeletal muscle: Omics in focus. Journal of sport and health science, 101029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chambers T.L., and Murach K.A. (2025). A history of omics discoveries reveals the correlates and mechanisms of loading-induced hypertrophy in adult skeletal muscle. 2024 CaMPS young investigator award invited review. American journal of physiology- cell physiology 328, C1535–C1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Murach K.A., Mobley C.B., Zdunek C.J., Frick K.K., Jones S.R., McCarthy J.J., Peterson C.A., and Dungan C.M. (2020). Muscle memory: myonuclear accretion, maintenance, morphology, and miRNA levels with training and detraining in adult mice. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Murach K.A., and Bagley J.R. (2016). Skeletal muscle hypertrophy with concurrent exercise training: Contrary evidence for an interference effect. Sports medicine 46, 1029–1039. 10.1007/s40279-016-0496-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ferguson C., Furrer R., Murach K.A., Hepple R.T., and Rossiter H.B. (2025). Power and Endurance: Polar Opposites or Willing Partners? Medicine & science in sports & exercise, 10.1249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Murach K.A., Dungan C.M., Kosmac K., Voigt T.B., Tourville T.W., Miller M.S., Bamman M.M., Peterson C.A., and Toth M.J. (2019). Cores of reproducibility in physiology (CORP): Fiber typing human skeletal muscle with fluorescent immunohistochemistry. Journal of applied physiology 127, 1632–1639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bloemberg D., and Quadrilatero J. (2012). Rapid determination of myosin heavy chain expression in rat, mouse, and human skeletal muscle using multicolor immunofluorescence analysis. PloS one 7, e35273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dang C.V. (1999). c-Myc target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and metabolism. Molecular and cellular biology 19, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Patel J.H., Loboda A.P., Showe M.K., Showe L.C., and McMahon S.B. (2004). Analysis of genomic targets reveals complex functions of MYC. Nature reviews cancer 4, 562–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Burke B.I., Ismaeel A., von Walden F., Murach K.A., and McCarthy J.J. (2024). Skeletal muscle hypertrophy: cell growth is cell growth. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 327, C614–C618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brancaccio M., Guazzone S., Menini N., Sibona E., Hirsch E., De Andrea M., Rocchi M., Altruda F., Tarone G., and Silengo L. (1999). Melusin is a new muscle-specific interactor for β1integrin cytoplasmic domain. Journal of biological chemistry 274, 29282–29288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.von Walden F., Casagrande V., Östlund Farrants A.-K., and Nader G.A. (2012). Mechanical loading induces the expression of a Pol I regulon at the onset of skeletal muscle hypertrophy. American journal of physiology - cell physiology 302, C1523–C1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cui M., Edman S., Jude B., Jannig P.R., Horwath O., Shorter E., Koopmans P.J., Chambers T.L., Jones III R.G., and Nilsson A. (2026). Ribosome dynamics during skeletal muscle repair and regeneration in mice and humans. American journal of physiology - cell physiology. 10.1152/ajpcell.00184.2026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Qiu Z., Lin A.-P., Jiang S., Elkashef S.M., Myers J., Srikantan S., Sasi B., Cao J.Z., Godley L.A., and Rakheja D. (2020). MYC regulation of D2HGDH and L2HGDH influences the epigenome and epitranscriptome. Cell chemical biology 27, 538–550. e537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang J., Xie L.Y., Allan S., Beach D., and Hannon G.J. (1998). Myc activates telomerase. Genes & development 12, 1769–1774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nakagawa M., Takizawa N., Narita M., Ichisaka T., and Yamanaka S. (2010). Promotion of direct reprogramming by transformation-deficient Myc. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 107, 14152–14157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li J., Dong T., Wu Z., Zhu D., and Gu H. (2023). The effects of MYC on tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Cell death discovery 9, 103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Casey S.C., Baylot V., and Felsher D.W. (2017). MYC: master regulator of immune privilege. Trends in immunology 38, 298–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Spranger S., Gajewski T.F., and Kline J. (2016). MYC - a thorn in the side of cancer immunity. Cell research 26, 639–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Murach K.A., Peck B.D., Policastro R.A., Vechetti I.J., Van Pelt D.W., Dungan C.M., Denes L.T., Fu X., Brightwell C.R., and Zentner G.E. (2021). Early satellite cell communication creates a permissive environment for long-term muscle growth. Iscience 24, 102372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Murach K.A., Vechetti I.J. Jr, Van Pelt D.W., Crow S.E., Dungan C.M., Figueiredo V.C., Kosmac K., Fu X., Richards C.I., Fry C.S., et al. (2020). Fusion-independent satellite cell communication to muscle fibers during load-induced hypertrophy. Function 1, zqaa009. 10.1093/function/zqaa009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Padmaswari M.H., Bulliard G., Agrawal S., Jia M.S., Khadgi S., Murach K.A., and Nelson C.E. (2024). Precision and efficacy of RNA-guided DNA integration in high-expressing muscle loci. Molecular therapy-nucleic acids 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ismaeel A., Goh J., Mobley C.B., Murach K.A., Brett J.O., de Morrée A., Rando T.A., Peterson C.A., Wen Y., and McCarthy J.J. (2024). Division-independent differentiation of muscle stem dells during a growth stimulus. Stem cells 42, 266–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu L., Cheung T.H., Charville G.W., and Rando T.A. (2015). Isolation of skeletal muscle stem cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Nature protocols 10, 1612–1624. 10.1038/nprot.2015.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Luo W., Chen J., Li L., Ren X., Cheng T., Lu S., Lawal R.A., Nie Q., Zhang X., and Hanotte O. (2019). c-Myc inhibits myoblast differentiation and promotes myoblast proliferation and muscle fibre hypertrophy by regulating the expression of its target genes, miRNAs and lincRNAs. Cell death & differentiation 26, 426–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xiong L., Lazzari E., Pacor S., Dal Monego S., Piovesan E., Licastro D., and Meroni G. (2025). TRIM32 controls timely cell cycle exit in muscular differentiation through c-Myc down-regulation. FEBS J. 10.1111/febs.70619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Péladeau C., Adam N., Bronicki L.M., Coriati A., Thabet M., Al-Rewashdy H., Vanstone J., Mears A., Renaud J.M., Holcik M. and Jasmin B.J., (2020). Identification of therapeutics that target eEF1A2 and upregulate utrophin A translation in dystrophic muscles. Nature communications 11, 1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang S.-M., Luo H., Li Z., Du M., Chen J., Jiang D.-S., Zhang Y., Li C., Yang X., and Wang X.-S. (2025). Adenylate kinase 4 (AK4) deficiency prevents vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching by regulating mitochondrial dysfunction through AMPKα inactivation. Atherosclerosis, 120399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nilsson L.M., Plym Forshell T.Z., Rimpi S., Kreutzer C., Pretsch W., Bornkamm G.W., and Nilsson J.A. (2012). Mouse genetics suggests cell-context dependency for Myc-regulated metabolic enzymes during tumorigenesis. PLoS genetics 8, e1002573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Brightwell C.R., Latham C.M., Thomas N.T., Keeble A.R., Murach K.A., and Fry C.S. (2022). A glitch in the matrix: The pivotal role for extracellular matrix remodeling during muscle hypertrophy. American journal of physiology - cell physiology, 10.1152/ajpcell.00200.02022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Alvares L.E., Schubert F.R., Thorpe C., Mootoosamy R.C., Cheng L., Parkyn G., Lumsden A., and Dietrich S. (2003). Intrinsic, Hox-dependent cues determine the fate of skeletal muscle precursors. Developmental cell 5, 379–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chambers T.L., Dimet-Wiley A., Keeble A.R., Haghani A., Lo W.-J., Kang G., Brooke R., Horvath S., Fry C.S., Watowich S.J., and Murach K.A. (2024). Methylome-proteome integration after late-life voluntary exercise training reveals regulation and target information for improved skeletal muscle health. The Journal of physiology 03, 211–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Murach K.A., Dungan C.M., von Walden F., and Wen Y. (2021). Epigenetic evidence for distinct contributions of resident and acquired myonuclei during long-rerm exercise adaptation using timed in vivo myonuclear labeling. American journal of physiology - cell physiology 32, C86–C93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chambers T.L., Wells J., Koopmans P.J., Morena F., Malik Z.B., Greene N.P., Filareto A., Franti M., Sini P., and Weinstabl H. (2025). At the nexus between epigenetics and senescence: The effects of senolytic (BI01) administration on DNA methylation clock age and the methylome in aged and regenerated skeletal muscle. Aging cell, e70068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Seaborne R.A., Strauss J., Cocks M., Shepherd S., O’Brien T.D., van Someren K.A., Bell P.G., Murgatroyd C., Morton J.P., Stewart C.E., and Sharples A.P. (2018). Human skeletal muscle possesses an epigenetic memory of hypertrophy. Scientific reports 8, 1898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Turner D.C., Gorski P.P., Maasar M., Seaborne R.A., Baumert P., Brown A.D., Kitchen M., Erskine R., Dos-Remedios I., and Voisin S. (2020). DNA methylation across the genome in aged human skeletal muscle tissue and muscle-derived cells: the role of HOX genes and physical activity. Scientific reports 10, 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Koopmans P.J., Jones III R.G., Cabrera A.R., Morena F., Greene N.P., McCarthy J.J., Ismaeel A., Wen Y., and Murach K.A. (2026). The age-dependent resident myonuclear multi-omic response to an acute skeletal muscle hypertrophic stimulus in mice. Advanced science, e21633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wen Y., Dungan C.M., Mobley C.B., Valentino T., von Walden F., and Murach K.A. (2021). Nucleus type-specific DNA methylomics reveals epigenetic “memory” of prior adaptation in skeletal muscle. Function, zqab038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.von Walden F., Rea M., Mobley C.B., Fondufe-Mittendorf Y., McCarthy J.J., Peterson C.A., and Murach K.A. (2020). The myonuclear DNA methylome in response to an acute hypertrophic stimulus. Epigenetics 15 (11), 1151–1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wen Y., Englund D.A., Peck B.D., Murach K.A., McCarthy J.A., and Peterson C.A. (2021). Myonuclear transcriptional dynamics in response to exercise following satellite cell depletion. iScience 24. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Felsher D.W., and Bishop J.M. (1999). Reversible tumorigenesis by MYC in hematopoietic lineages. Molecular cell 4, 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rutledge E.A., Lindström N.O., Michos O., and McMahon A.P. (2020). Genetic manipulation of ureteric bud tip progenitors in the mammalian kidney through an Adamts18 enhancer driven tet-on inducible system. Developmental biology 458, 164–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Timson B.F., Bowlin B.K., Dudenhoeffer G.A., and George J.B. (1985). Fiber number, area, and composition of mouse soleus muscle following enlargement. Journal of applied physiology 58, 619–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lin T., Meng L., Lin T.-C., Wu L.J., Pederson T., and Tsai R.Y. (2014). Nucleostemin and GNL3L exercise distinct functions in genome protection and ribosome synthesis, respectively. Journal of cell science 127, 2302–2312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gagnon K.T., Biswas S., Zhang X., Brown B.A., Wollenzien P., Mattos C., and Maxwell E.S. (2012). Structurally conserved Nop56/58 N-terminal domain facilitates archaeal box C/D ribonucleoprotein-guided methyltransferase activity. Journal of biological chemistry 287, 19418–19428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Gallenberger M., Meinel D.M., Kroeber M., Wegner M., Milkereit P., Bösl M.R., and Tamm E.R. (2011). Lack of WDR36 leads to preimplantation embryonic lethality in mice and delays the formation of small subunit ribosomal RNA in human cells in vitro. Human molecular genetics 20, 422–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fremerey J., Morozov P., Meyer C., Garzia A., Teplova M., Tuschl T., and Borkhardt A. (2016). Nucleolin controls ribosome biogenesis through its RNA-binding properties. Blood 128, 5056. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hu G., Lou Z., and Gupta M. (2014). The long non-coding RNA GAS5 cooperates with the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E to regulate c-Myc translation. PloS one 9, e107016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tseng Y.-Y., and Bagchi A. (2015). The PVT1-MYC duet in cancer. Molecular & cellular oncology 2, e974467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Shostak A., Ruppert B., Ha N., Bruns P., Toprak U.H., Eils R., Schlesner M., Diernfellner A., and Brunner M. (2016). MYC/MIZ1-dependent gene repression inversely coordinates the circadian clock with cell cycle and proliferation. Nature communications 7, 11807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Altman B.J., Hsieh A.L., Sengupta A., Krishnanaiah S.Y., Stine Z.E., Walton Z.E., Gouw A.M., Venkataraman A., Li B., and Goraksha-Hicks P. (2015). MYC disrupts the circadian clock and metabolism in cancer cells. Cell metabolism 22, 1009–1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Repouskou A., and Prombona A. (2016). c-MYC targets the central oscillator gene Per1 and is regulated by the circadian clock at the post-transcriptional level. Biochimica et biophysica acta - gene regulatory mechanisms 1859, 541–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cazarin J., DeRollo R.E., Shahidan S.N.A.B.A., Burchett J.B., Mwangi D., Krishnaiah S., Hsieh A.L., Walton Z.E., Brooks R., and Mello S.S. (2023). MYC disrupts transcriptional and metabolic circadian oscillations in cancer and promotes enhanced biosynthesis. PLoS genetics 19, e1010904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Perez K., Ciotlos S., McGirr J., Limbad C., Doi R., Nederveen J.P., Nilsson M.I., Winer D.A., Evans W., and Tarnopolsky M. (2022). Single nuclei profiling identifies cell specific markers of skeletal muscle aging, frailty, and senescence. Aging 14, 9393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Englund D.A., Jolliffe A., Aversa Z., Zhang X., Sturmlechner I., Sakamoto A.E., Zeidler J.D., Warner G.M., McNinch C., and White T.A. (2022). p21 induces a senescence program and skeletal muscle dysfunction. Molecular metabolism 101652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wu C.-H., Van Riggelen J., Yetil A., Fan A.C., Bachireddy P., and Felsher D.W. (2007). Cellular senescence is an important mechanism of tumor regression upon c-Myc inactivation. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 104, 13028–13033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Guney I., Wu S., and Sedivy J.M. (2006). Reduced c-Myc signaling triggers telomere-independent senescence by regulating Bmi-1 and p16 INK4a. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 103, 3645–3650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Campaner S., Doni M., Hydbring P., Verrecchia A., Bianchi L., Sardella D., Schleker T., Perna D., Tronnersjö S., and Murga M. (2010). Cdk2 suppresses cellular senescence induced by the c-myc oncogene. Nature cell biology 12, 55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hydbring P., and Larsson L.-G. (2010). Cdk2: a key regulator of the senescence control function of Myc. Aging 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Grandori C., Wu K.-J., Fernandez P., Ngouenet C., Grim J., Clurman B.E., Moser M.J., Oshima J., Russell D.W., and Swisshelm K. (2003). Werner syndrome protein limits MYC-induced cellular senescence. Genes & development 17, 1569–1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ko A., Han S.Y., Choi C.H., Cho H., Lee M.-S., Kim S.-Y., Song J.S., Hong K.-M., Lee H.-W., and Hewitt S.M. (2018). Oncogene-induced senescence mediated by c-Myc requires USP10 dependent deubiquitination and stabilization of p14ARF. Cell death & differentiation 25, 1050–1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Anderson C.M., Hu J., Barnes R.M., Heidt A.B., Cornelissen I., and Black B.L. (2015). Myocyte enhancer factor 2C function in skeletal muscle is required for normal growth and glucose metabolism in mice. Skeletal muscle 5, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Alexander M.S., Shi X., Voelker K.A., Grange R.W., Garcia J.A., Hammer R.E., and Garry D.J. (2010). Foxj3 transcriptionally activates Mef2c and regulates adult skeletal muscle fiber type identity. Developmental biology 337, 396–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Potthoff M.J., Wu H., Arnold M.A., Shelton J.M., Backs J., McAnally J., Richardson J.A., Bassel-Duby R., and Olson E.N. (2007). Histone deacetylase degradation andMEF2 activation promote the formation of slow-twitch myofibers. The Journal of clinical investigation 117, 2459–2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Honda M., Inoue R., Nishiyama K., Ueda T., Komuro A., Amano H., Sugisawa R., Dash S., Shirakawa J., and Okada H. (2024). Vgll2 as an integrative regulator of mitochondrial function and contractility specific to skeletal muscle. Journal of cellular physiology 239, e31436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lucchetti J., Fracasso C., Balducci C., Passoni A., Forloni G., Salmona M., and Gobbi M. (2019). Plasma and brain concentrations of doxycycline after single and repeated doses in wild-type and APP23 mice. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 368, 32–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Liberti M.V., and Locasale J.W. (2016). The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends in biochemical sciences 41, 211–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Vazquez A., Liu J., Zhou Y., and Oltvai Z.N. (2010). Catabolic efficiency of aerobic glycolysis: the Warburg effect revisited. BMC systems biology 4, 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dungan C.M., Brightwell C., Wen Y., Zdunek C.J., Latham C., Thomas N.T., Zagzoog A.M., Brightwell B.D., VonLehmden G.L., Keeble A.R., et al. (2022). Muscle-specific cellular and molecular adaptations to late-life voluntary concurrent exercise. Function, zqac027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Damal Villivalam S., Ebert S.M., Lim H.W., Kim J., You D., Jung B.C., Palacios H.H., Tcheau T., Adams C.M., and Kang S. (2021). A necessary role of DNMT3A in endurance exercise by suppressing ALDH1L1-mediated oxidative stress. The EMBO journal 40, EMBJ2020106491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Oyabu M., Ohira Y., Fujita M., Yoshioka K., Kawaguchi R., Kubo A., Hatazawa Y., Yukitoshi H., Quiroga H.P.O., and Horii N. (2025). Dnmt3a overexpression disrupts skeletal muscle homeostasis, promotes an aging-like phenotype, and reduces metabolic elasticity. iScience 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Young K.A., Hosseini M., Mistry J.J., Morganti C., Mills T.S., Cai X., James B.T., Nye G.J., Fournier N.R., and Voisin V. (2025). Elevated mitochondrial membrane potential is a therapeutic vulnerability in Dnmt3a-mutant clonal hematopoiesis. Nature communications 16, 3306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Brenner C., Deplus R., Didelot C., Loriot A., Viré E., De Smet C., Gutierrez A., Danovi D., Bernard D., and Boon T. (2005). Myc represses transcription through recruitment of DNA methyltransferase corepressor. The EMBO journal 24, 336–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Moreno-Justicia R., Van der Stede T., Stocks B., Laitila J., Seaborne R.A., Van de Loock A., Lievens E., Samodova D., Marín-Arraiza L., and Dmytriyeva O. (2025). Human skeletal muscle fiber heterogeneity beyond myosin heavy chains. Nature communications 16, 1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.You J.-S., Dooley M.S., Kim C.-R., Kim E.-J., Xu W., Goodman C.A., and Hornberger T.A. (2018). A DGKζ-FoxO-ubiquitin proteolytic axis controls fiber size during skeletal muscle remodeling. Science signaling. 11, eaao6847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Serrano N., Koopmans P.J., and Murach K.A. (2025). Displaced myonuclei are attributable to both resident myonuclear migration and stem cell fusion during mechanical loading in adult skeletal muscle. Skeletal muscle, 10.1186/s13395-13025-00407-13390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Bentzinger C.F., Lin S., Romanino K., Castets P., Guridi M., Summermatter S., Handschin C., Tintignac L.A., Hall M.N., and Rüegg M.A. (2013). Differential response of skeletal muscles to mTORC1 signaling during atrophy and hypertrophy. Skeletal muscle 3, 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Pocsfalvi G., Votta G., De Vincenzo A., Fiume I., Raj D.A.A., Marra G., Stoppelli M.P., and Iaccarino I. (2011). Analysis of secretome changes uncovers an autocrine/paracrine component in the modulation of cell proliferation and motility by c-Myc. Journal of proteome research 10, 5326–5337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Kilinc S., Paisner R., Camarda R., Gupta S., Momcilovic O., Kohnz R.A., Avsaroglu B., L’Etoile N.D., Perera R.M., and Nomura D.K. (2021). Oncogene-regulated release of extracellular vesicles. Developmental cell 56, 1989–2006. e1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Tokgün O., and İnci K. (2022). Myc manipulates the miRNA content and biologic functions of small cell lung cancer cell-derived small extracellular vesicles. Molecular biology reports 49, 7953–7965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Murach K.A., Fry C.S., Dupont-Versteegden E.E., McCarthy J.J., and Peterson C.A. (2021). Fusion and beyond: Satellite cell contributions to loading-induced skeletal muscle adaptation. The FASEB journal 35, e21893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Murach K.A., Fry C.S., Kirby T.J., Jackson J.R., Lee J.D., White S.H., Dupont-Versteegden E.E., McCarthy J.J., and Peterson C.A. (2018). Starring or supporting role? Satellite cells and skeletal muscle fiber size regulation. Physiology 33, 26–38. 10.1152/physiol.00019.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang Q., and McPherron A.C. (2012). Myostatin inhibition induces muscle fibre hypertrophy prior to satellite cell activation. The Journal of physiology 590, 2151–2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Englund D., Figueiredo V., Dungan C., Murach K., Peck B., Petrosino J., Brightwell C., Dupont A., Neal A., Fry C., et al. (2020). Satellite cell depletion disrupts transcriptional coordination and muscle adaptation to exercise. Function 2, zqaa033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Murach K.A., White S.H., Wen Y., Ho A., Dupont-Versteegden E.E., McCarthy J.J., and Peterson C.A. (2017). Differential requirement for satellite cells during overload-induced uscle hypertrophy in growing versus mature mice. Skeletal muscle 7. 10.1186/s13395-017-0132-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Englund D., Peck B., Murach K., Neal A., Caldwell H., McCarthy J., Peterson C., and Dupont-Versteegden E. (2019). Resident muscle stem cells are not required for testosterone-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. American journal of physiology - cell physiology. 10.1152/ajpcell.00260.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Blaauw B., Canato M., Agatea L., Toniolo L., Mammucari C., Masiero E., Abraham R., Sandri M., Schiaffino S., and Reggiani C. (2009). Inducible activation of Akt increases skeletal muscle mass and force without satellite cell activation. The FASEB journal 23, 3896–3905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Shchors K., Shchors E., Rostker F., Lawlor E.R., Brown-Swigart L., and Evan G.I. (2006). The Myc-dependent angiogenic switch in tumors is mediated by interleukin 1β. Genes & development 20, 2527–2538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Brandvold K.A., Neiman P., and Ruddell A. (2000). Angiogenesis is an early event in the generation of myc-induced lymphomas. Oncogene 19, 2780–2785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Baudino T.A., McKay C., Pendeville-Samain H., Nilsson J.A., Maclean K.H., White E.L., Davis A.C., Ihle J.N., and Cleveland J.L. (2002). c-Myc is essential for vasculogenesis and angiogenesis during development and tumor progression. Genes & development 16, 2530–2543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Dews M., Homayouni A., Yu D., Murphy D., Sevignani C., Wentzel E., Furth E.E., Lee W.M., Enders G.H., and Mendell J.T. (2006). Augmentation of tumor angiogenesis by a Myc-activated microRNA cluster. Nature genetics 38, 1060–1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Knies-Bamforth U.E., Fox S.B., Poulsom R., Evan G.I., and Harris A.L. (2004). c-Myc interacts with hypoxia to induce angiogenesis in vivo by a vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent mechanism. Cancer research 64, 6563–6570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Zhang J., Sattler M., Tonon G., Grabher C., Lababidi S., Zimmerhackl A., Raab M.S., Vallet S., Zhou Y., and Cartron M.-A. (2009). Targeting angiogenesis via a c-Myc/hypoxia-inducible factor-1α–dependent pathway in multiple myeloma. Cancer research 69, 5082–5090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ngo C.V., Gee M., Akhtar N., Yu D., Volpert O., Auerbach R., and Thomas-Tikhonenko A. (2000). An in vivo function for the transforming Myc protein: elicitation of the angiogenic phenotype. Molecular cancer research. 11, 201–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Roman W., Pinheiro H., Pimentel M.R., Segalés J., Oliveira L.M., García-Domínguez E., Gómez-Cabrera M.C., Serrano A.L., Gomes E.R., and Muñoz-Cánoves P. (2021). Muscle repair after physiological damage relies on nuclear migration for cellular reconstruction. Science 374, 355–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Haikala H.M., Anttila J.M., and Klefström J. (2017). MYC and AMPK–save energy or die! Frontiers in cell and developmental biology 5, 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Vallin J., and Grantham J. (2019). The role of the molecular chaperone CCT in protein folding and mediation of cytoskeleton-associated processes: implications for cancer cell biology. Cell stress and chaperones 24, 17–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Baumert P., Mäntyselkä S., Schönfelder M., Heiber M., Jacobs M.J., Swaminathan A., Minderis P., Dirmontas M., Kleigrewe K., and Meng C. (2024). Skeletal muscle hypertrophy rewires glucose metabolism: An experimental investigation and systematic review. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 15, 989–1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.McLaughlin K.L., Hagen J.T., Coalson H.S., Nelson M.A., Kew K.A., Wooten A.R., and Fisher-Wellman K.H. (2020). Novel approach to quantify mitochondrial content and intrinsic bioenergetic efficiency across organs. Scientific reports 10, 17599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Gouw A.M., Margulis K., Liu N.S., Raman S.J., Mancuso A., Toal G.G., Tong L., Mosley A., Hsieh A.L., and Sullivan D.K. (2019). The MYC oncogene cooperates with sterol-regulated element-binding protein to regulate lipogenesis essential for neoplastic growth. Cell metabolism 30, 556–572. e555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Morrish F., Noonan J., Perez-Olsen C., Gafken P.R., Fitzgibbon M., Kelleher J., VanGilst M., and Hockenbery D. (2010). Myc-dependent mitochondrial generation of acetyl-CoA contributes to fatty acid biosynthesis and histone acetylation during cell cycle entry. Journal of biological chemistry 285, 36267–36274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Singh K.B., Hahm E.-R., Kim S.-H., Wendell S.G., and Singh S.V. (2021). A novel metabolic function of Myc in regulation of fatty acid synthesis in prostate cancer. Oncogene 40, 592–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hall Z., Ament Z., Wilson C.H., Burkhart D.L., Ashmore T., Koulman A., Littlewood T., Evan G.I., and Griffin J.L. (2016). Myc expression drives aberrant lipid metabolism in lung cancer. Cancer research 76, 4608–4618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Prieto J., García-Cañaveras J.C., León M., Sendra R., Ponsoda X., Izpisua Belmonte J.C., Lahoz A., and Torres J. (2021). c-MYC triggers lipid remodelling during early somatic cell reprogramming to pluripotency. Stem cell reviews and reports 17, 2245–2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Baenke F., Peck B., Miess H., and Schulze A. (2013). Hooked on fat: the role of lipid synthesis in cancer metabolism and tumour development. Disease models & mechanisms 6, 1353–1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wackerhage H., Vechetti I.J., Baumert P., Gehlert S., Becker L., Jaspers R.T., and de Angelis M.H. (2022). Does a hypertrophying muscle fibre reprogramme its metabolism similar to a cancer cell? Sports medicine 52, 2569–2578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Valentino T., Figueiredo V.C., Mobley C.B., McCarthy J.J., and Vechetti I.J. Jr (2021). Evidence of myomiR regulation of the pentose phosphate pathway during mechanical load-induced hypertrophy. Physiological reports 9, e15137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Chaillou T., Zhang X., and McCarthy J.J. (2016). Expression of Muscle-Specific Ribosomal Protein L3-Like Impairs Myotube Growth. Journal of cellular physiology 231, 1894–1902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Chaillou T. (2019). Ribosome specialization and its potential role in the control of protein translation and skeletal muscle size. Journal of applied physiology 127, 599–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Kao B.R., Malerba A., Lu-Nguyen N.B., Harish P., McCarthy J.J., Dickson G., and Popplewell L.J. (2021). Knockdown of muscle-specific ribosomal protein L3-like enhances muscle function in healthy and dystrophic mice. Nucleic acid therapeutics 31, 457–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Milenkovic I., Santos Vieira H.G., Lucas M.C., Ruiz-Orera J., Patone G., Kesteven S., Wu J., Feneley M., Espadas G., and Sabidó E. (2023). Dynamic interplay between RPL3-and RPL3L-containing ribosomes modulates mitochondrial activity in the mammalian heart. Nucleic acids research 51, 5301–5324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Stec M.J., Kelly N.A., Many G.M., Windham S.T., Tuggle S.C., and Bamman M.M. (2016). Ribosome biogenesis may augment resistance training-induced myofiber hypertrophy and is required for myotube growth in vitro. American journal of physiology - endocrinology and metabolism 310, E652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kirby T.J., Patel R.M., McClintock T.S., Dupont-Versteegden E.E., Peterson C.A., and McCarthy J.J. (2016). Myonuclear transcription is responsive to mechanical load and DNA content but uncoupled from cell size during hypertrophy. Molecular biology of the cell 27, 788–798. 10.1091/mbc.E15-08-0585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Viggars M.R., Sutherland H., Lanmüller H., Schmoll M., Bijak M., and Jarvis J.C. (2022). Adaptation of the transcriptional response to resistance exercise over 4 weeks of daily training. The FASEB journal 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Gohil K., and Brooks G.A. (2012). Exercise tames the wild side of the Myc network: A hypothesis. American journal of physiology - ndocrinology and metabolism 303, E18–E30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Dang C.V., O’Donnell K.A., Zeller K.I., Nguyen T., Osthus R.C., and Li F. (2006). The c-Myc target gene network. In 4. (Elsevier; ), pp. 253–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Murach K.A., Dungan C.M., Peterson C.A., and McCarthy J.J. (2019). Muscle fiber splitting is a physiological response to extreme loading in animals. Exercise and sport sciences reviews 47, 108–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Jorgenson K.W., and Hornberger T.A. (2019). The overlooked role of fiber length in mechanical load-induced growth of skeletal muscle. Exercise and sport sciences reviews 47, 258–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Jorgenson K.W., Phillips S.M., and Hornberger T.A. (2020). Identifying the structural adaptations that drive the mechanical load-induced growth of skeletal muscle: a scoping review. Cells 9, 1658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Yaghoob Nezhad F., Verbrugge S.A., Schönfelder M., Becker L., Hrabě de Angelis M., and Wackerhage H. (2019). Genes whose gain or loss-of-function increases endurance performance in mice: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in physiology 10, 262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Cho Y., Hazen B.C., Gandra P.G., Ward S.R., Schenk S., Russell A.P., and Kralli A. (2015). Perm1 enhances mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative capacity, and fatigue resistance in adult skeletal muscle. The FASEB journal 30, 674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Barany M., and Close R. (1971). The transformation of myosin in cross-innervated rat muscles. The Journal of physiology 213, 455–474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Buller A., Eccles J.C., and Eccles R.M. (1960). Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their responses. The Journal of physiology 150, 417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Romanul F.C., and van der Meulen J.P. (1966). Reversal of the enzyme profiles of muscle fibres in fast and slow muscles by cross-innervation. Nature 212, 1369–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Allen D.L., Sartorius C.A., Sycuro L.K., and Leinwand L.A. (2001). Different pathways regulate expression of the skeletal myosin heavy chain genes. Journal of biological chemistry 276, 43524–43533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Iwaki H., Sasaki S., Matsushita A., Ohba K., Matsunaga H., Misawa H., Oki Y., Ishizuka K., Nakamura H., and Suda T. (2014). Essential role of TEA domain transcription factors in the negative regulation of the MYH 7 gene by thyroid hormone and its receptors. PloS one 9, e88610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Long K., Su D., Li X., Li H., Zeng S., Zhang Y., Zhong Z., Lin Y., Li X., and Lu L. (2022). Identification of enhancers responsible for the coordinated expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms in skeletal muscle. BMC genomics 23, 519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Gacita A.M., Fullenkamp D.E., Ohiri J., Pottinger T., Puckelwartz M.J., Nobrega M.A., and McNally E.M. (2021). Genetic variation in enhancers modifies cardiomyopathy gene expression and progression. Circulation 143, 1302–1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Angrisano T., Schiattarella G.G., Keller S., Pironti G., Florio E., Magliulo F., Bottino R., Pero R., Lembo F., and Avvedimento E.V. (2014). Epigenetic switch at atp2a2 and myh7 gene promoters in pressure overload-induced heart failure. PloS one 9, e106024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Singh A., and Kukreti S. (2018). A triple stranded G-quadruplex formation in the promoter region of human myosin β (Myh7) gene. Journal of biomolecular structure and dynamics 36, 2773–2786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Zuo J., Wu F., Liu Y., Xiao J., Xu M., Yu Q., Xia M., He X., Zou S., and Tan H. (2015). MicroRNA transcriptome profile analysis in porcine muscle and the effect of miR-143 on the MYH7 gene and protein. PloS one 10, e0124873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.de Oliveira Silva T., Lino C.A., Miranda J.B., Balbino-Silva C.S., Lunardon G., Lima V.M., Jensen L., Donato J. Jr, Irigoyen M.C., and Barreto-Chaves M.L.M. (2022). The miRNA-143–3p–Sox6–Myh7 pathway is altered in obesogenic diet-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Experimental physiology 107, 892–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Sharma J., Mondal S., Rai A., Kumari M., Bharadwaj A., and Mathew S.J. (2026). The skeletal muscle slow myosin heavy chain regulates mammalian metabolic homeostasis through the NRF2 pathway. Science advances 12, eaed2478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Verbrugge S.A., Gehlert S., Stadhouders L.E., Jacko D., Aussieker T., MJ de Wit G., Vogel I.S., Offringa C., Schönfelder M., and Jaspers R.T. (2020). PKM2 determines myofiber hypertrophy in vitro and increases in response to resistance exercise in human skeletal muscle. International journal of molecular sciences 21, 7062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Stadhouders L., Smith J., Gabriel B., Verbrugge S., Hammersen T., Kolijn D., Vogel I., Mohamed A., de Wit G., and Offringa C. (2024). Myotube growth is associated with cancer-like metabolic reprogramming and is limited by phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase and pyruvate kinase M2. Physiology 39, 634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Morrish F., and Hockenbery D. (2014). MYC and mitochondrial biogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine 4, a014225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Li F., Wang Y., Zeller K.I., Potter J.J., Wonsey D.R., O'Donnell K.A., Kim J. w., Yustein J.T., Lee L.A., and Dang C.V. (2005). Myc stimulates nuclearly encoded mitochondrial genes and mitochondrial biogenesis. Molecular and cellular biology 25, 6225–6234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Ahuja P., Zhao P., Angelis E., Ruan H., Korge P., Olson A., Wang Y., Jin E.S., Jeffrey F.M., and Portman M. (2010). Myc controls transcriptional regulation of cardiac metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis in response to pathological stress in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation 120, 1494–1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Kim J., Lee J. h., and Iyer V.R. (2008). Global identification of Myc target genes reveals its direct role in mitochondrial biogenesis and its E-box usage in vivo. PloS one 3, e1798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Yokokawa T., Kido K., Suga T., Isaka T., Hayashi T., and Fujita S. (2018). Exercise-induced mitochondrial biogenesis coincides with the expression of mitochondrial translation factors in murine skeletal muscle. Physiological reports 6, e13893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Smith J.A.B., Murach K.A., Dyar K.A., and Zierath J.R. (2023). Exercise metabolism and adaptation in skeletal muscle. Nature reviews molecular cell biology 24, 607–632. 10.1038/s41580-023-00606-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Yu G., Wang L.-G., Han Y., and He Q.-Y. (2012). clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics: a journal of integrative biology 16, 284–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Fleming S.J., Chaffin M.D., Arduini A., Akkad A.-D., Banks E., Marioni J.C., Philippakis A.A., Ellinor P.T., and Babadi M. (2023). Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender. Nature methods 20, 1323–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Traag V., Waltman L., and Van Eck N. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific reports. 9, 5233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Andreatta M., and Carmona S.J. (2021). UCell: Robust and scalable single-cell gene signature scoring. Computational and structural biotechnology journal 19, 3796–3798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Zimmerman K.D., Espeland M.A., and Langefeld C.D. (2021). A practical solution to pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies. Nature communications 12, 738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Englund D.A., Murach K.A., Dungan C.M., Figueiredo V.C., Vechetti I.J. Jr, Dupont-Versteegden E.E., McCarthy J.J., and Peterson C.A. (2020). Depletion of resident muscle stem cells negatively impacts running volume, physical function and muscle hypertrophy in response to lifelong physical activity. American journal of physiology - cell physiology 318, C1178–C1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Viggars M.R., Wen Y., Peterson C.A., and Jarvis J.C. (2022). Automated cross-sectional analysis of trained, severely atrophied, and recovering rat skeletal muscles using MyoVision 2.0. Journal of applied physiology 132, 593–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Wen Y., Murach K.A., Vechetti I.J. Jr, Fry C.S., Vickery C.D., Peterson C.A., McCarthy J.J., and Campbell K.S. (2017). MyoVision: software for automated high-content analysis of skeletal muscle immunohistochemistry. Journal of applied physiology 124, 40–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Schrems E.R., Cabrera A.R., Jones III R.G., Morena F., Murach K.A., Greene N.P., and Washington T.A. (2025). Transcriptomic analysis demonstrates moderators of muscle quality are altered in age-related sarcopenic obesity. BMC genomics 26, 898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Fiddler J.L., Blum J.E., Heyden K.E., Castillo L.F., Thalacker-Mercer A.E., and Field M.S. (2023). Impairments in SHMT2 expression or cellular folate availability reduce oxidative phosphorylation and pyruvate kinase activity. Genes & nutrition 18, 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental Figure 1. Muscle mass and fiber cross sectional area (CSA) in the soleus muscle after eight weeks of repeated transient MYC pulses. Absolute muscle mass (A) and fiber CSA (B) in MyHC I, MyHC IIa, MyHC-negative (IIx) fibers from eight-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. Bars show mean ± SEM with individual biological replicates overlaid. *p<0.05, #p<0.10.
Supplemental Figure 2. Muscle masses of hindlimb muscles and plantaris muscle histology after eight weeks of repeated transient MYC pulses. Quantification of absolute (A) and normalized mass (B) across hindlimb muscles after eight weeks of transient MYC pulses. Plantaris fiber type distribution (C) and muscle fiber size distribution (D). Bars show mean ± SEM with individual biological replicates overlaid.
Supplemental Figure 3. Satellite cell abundance, myonuclear number, ECM content, immune infiltration, and capillarity after 8 weeks of transient MYC pulses in the soleus. (A) PAX7+ nuclei frequency in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (B) Myonuclear number in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (C) Sirius Red-positive ECM content in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (D) Representative images or quantification of lipid accumulation in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (E) Representative IgG staining assessing immune/injury-associated infiltration in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. (F) Quantification of capillaries per myofiber in 8-week control and MYC-induced soleus muscle. MYC induction increased capillaries per myofiber (unpaired two-tailed t-test, p = 0.0019). Bar graphs show mean ± SEM with individual biological replicates overlaid.







