ABSTRACT
We sequenced and annotated the genome of Lactobacillus iners SPIN 2503V10-D, a human vaginal isolate previously sequenced as a reference genome for the Human Microbiome Project, to refine its existing genomic data.
KEYWORDS: Lactobacillus, Lactobacillus iners, vaginal microbiome, genome
ANNOUNCEMENT
Lactobacillus iners is among the most prevalent species in the cervicovaginal microbiome (1, 2). Although Lactobacillus-dominated microbiomes are generally associated with gynecologic health (3, 4), L. iners is paradoxically associated with both health and disease across observational studies (5–13). Its conflicting role in gynecologic health is postulated to be partially attributable to strain-level variation (14, 15).
The genome of L. iners SPIN 2503V10-D, a human vaginal isolate, was sequenced as a reference genome for the Human Microbiome Project (16). This assembly was noted to have many frameshifted proteins and has been suppressed from the RefSeq database. To refine existing genomic data on this strain, we sequenced its genome utilizing hybrid long- and short-read approaches.
L. iners SPIN 2503V10-D was obtained from Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI Resources) and grown anaerobically on tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep’s blood at 37°C for 48 hours. Colonies were scraped off a pure culture, washed twice by suspension in 1 mL sterile Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline followed by centrifugation at 6,000 × g, resuspended in 500 μL DNA/RNA Shield (Zymo Research, cat. R1100-50), and sent to Plasmidsaurus, Inc., for genomic DNA extraction, sequencing, and assembly, described as follows. Additional technical documentation can be found at https://plasmidsaurus.com/technical-documentation/genome; however, some information is proprietary and was not shared with the research team. DNA was extracted using Zymo Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (cat. D4069). The genome was sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) R10.4.1 flow cells and Illumina NovaSeq X Plus. Basecalling was done using Dorado v4.3 Super-Accurate Basecalling with default Q10 quality filtering (17). Multiple subsampled read sets were generated using Autocycler v0.5.2 with optimal coverage for each subsample (18). Assembly was performed using Autocycler with three different assemblers: Flye v2.9.6 with parameters optimized for high-quality ONT reads (19), Hifiasm-0.25.0-r726 for generating high-quality assemblies from long reads (20–22), and Plassembler v1.8.0 for detecting plasmids (23). The ONT assembly was polished with Illumina reads using Polypolish v0.6.0 (24, 25). The species was identified using Sourmash v4.6.1 (26, 27) against Genome Taxonomy Database Release 226 (28). Annotation and subsystem analysis were performed using default parameters of the Comprehensive Genome Analysis (CGA) service of the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC) (29) and submitted to GenBank utilizing NCBI PGAP (30). PATRIC provided the reference and representative genomes and included them in the phylogenetic analysis that was part of the CGA utilizing Mash/MinHash v2.3 (31, 32). Other software utilized in the BV-BRC pipeline included Racon v1.4.3 (33) and Circos v0.69-5 (34).
The assembled genome comprised two contigs, without plasmids, a total length of 1,332,666 bp, and a GC content of 33.15%. Our new assembly exhibits higher contiguity with an N50 of 1,328,851 bp, compared to the previous assembly’s N50 of 93,034 bp. Seventy tRNA genes, 18 rRNA genes, and 1,232 protein-coding sequences (CDSs) were annotated, of which 1,002 had functional assignments. PATRIC annotated 41 more CDSs compared to PGAP, likely due to PGAP’s more conservative gene prediction process (30, 32). Protein processing was identified as the largest functional group (192 genes). In contrast to the larger contig, the smaller contig contained only one hypothetical protein and one repeat region. Table 1 and Fig. 1 summarize genome characteristics and annotations.
TABLE 1.
Summary of genome characteristics for L. iners SPIN 2503V10-D
| Genome characteristics | This study | Previous genome assembly | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RefSeq | BV-BRC | RefSeq | GenBank | |
| Raw reads | 395,599 (ONT) 16,437,177 (Illumina) |
312,929 | ||
| Genome size (bp) | 1,332,666 | 1,283,897 | ||
| Number of contigs | 2 | 31 | ||
| Contig N50 (bp) | 1,328,851 | 93,034 | ||
| Contig L50 | 1 | 6 | ||
| GC content (%) | 33.15 | 32.57 | ||
| Genome coverage | 101.5× (assembly coverage) 3,724.0× (raw read coverage) |
52× | ||
| Annotation details | NCBI PGAP 8 December 2025 |
PATRIC 9 September 2025 |
NCBI PGAP 11 July 2021 |
Annotation submitted by J. Craig Venter Institute 7 June 2013 |
| Number of tRNAs | 70 | 70 | 48 | 46 |
| Number of rRNAs | 18 | 18 | 3 | 1 |
| Number of protein-coding sequences | 1,191 | 1,232 | 1,095 | 1,273 |
Fig 1.
Circular graphical representation of the distribution of genome annotations for L. iners SPIN 2503V10-D. Outer to inner rings represent contigs, protein-coding sequences (CDSs) on the forward strand, CDSs on the reverse strand, RNA genes, CDSs with homology to known antimicrobial resistance genes, CDSs with homology to known virulence factors, GC content, and GC skew. Colors of CDSs on the forward and reverse strands represent the subsystem to which these genes belong.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The following reagent was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH, as part of the Human Microbiome Project: Lactobacillus iners, Strain SPIN 2503V10-D, HM-704. We acknowledge Dr. Paweł Łaniewski for providing support with bacterial cultivation through funding from the Arizona Biomedical Research Center New Investigator Award (RFGA2022-010-05). Additional funding support was provided by the University of Arizona Health Sciences Strategic Plan Initiative 4.1. Personalized Defense (M.M.H.-K.). T.R.D.T. was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Philippine Council for Health Research and Development, through the Research Enrichment Program. N.R.J. was supported by the American Cancer Society Postdoctoral Fellowship (PF-24-1316926-01-MM). N.R.J. is part of the Guiding U54 Investigator Development to Sustainability shared resource through the Partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention. The partnership is funded under the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute U54CA143924 (M.M.H.-K.), which partially supported this work and supports early-stage investigators by providing funding for the publication of this report.
Contributor Information
Melissa M. Herbst-Kralovetz, Email: mherbst1@email.arizona.edu.
Karthik Anantharaman, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The whole-genome sequences of L. iners SPIN2503V10-D were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession numbers SRR36298223 (Illumina) and SRR36298224 (ONT), under BioProject PRJNA1373291. The BioSample identification number is SAMN00115035. The NCBI PGAP annotation can be found at GenBank JBSSWT000000000.1. The polished assembly and additional information on genome assembly, annotation, and subsystem analysis are available at BV-BRC (https://www.bv-brc.org/workspace/jimeneznr@patricbrc.org/Lactobacillus%20iners%20SPIN%20250310-D), accessible upon free account creation. Additional technical details on Plasmidsaurus, Inc.’s sequencing and assembly pipeline are available at https://plasmidsaurus.com/technical-documentation/genome.
REFERENCES
- 1. Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. 2017. Lactobacillus iners: friend or foe? Trends Microbiol 25:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ. 2011. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Anahtar MN, Gootenberg DB, Mitchell CM, Kwon DS. 2018. Cervicovaginal microbiota and reproductive health: the virtue of simplicity. Cell Host Microbe 23:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jimenez NR, Maarsingh JD, Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2023. Commensal lactobacilli metabolically contribute to cervical epithelial homeostasis in a species-specific manner. mSphere 8:e0045222. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00452-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kamble A, Naik S, Talathi M, Jadhav D, Sakharkar M, Yang J, Prakash O, Kaul-Ghanekar R. 2024. Exploring the diversity of vaginal microbiota between healthy women and cervical cancer patients in India. J Med Microbiol 73. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zheng X, Hu N, Liu J, Zhao K, Li H, Wang J, Zhang M, Zhang L, Song L, Lyu Y, Cui M, Ding L, Wang J. 2023. Cervicovaginal microbiota disorder combined with the change of cytosine phosphate guanine motif- toll like receptor 9 axis was associated with cervical cancerization. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149:17371–17381. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05453-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Fan Q, Wu Y, Li M, An F, Yao L, Wang M, Wang X, Yuan J, Jiang K, Li W, Li M. 2021. Lactobacillus spp. create a protective micro-ecological environment through regulating the core fucosylation of vaginal epithelial cells against cervical cancer. Cell Death Dis 12:1094. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04388-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhang Y, Wu X, Li D, Huang R, Deng X, Li M, Du F, Zhao Y, Shen J, Chen Y, Zhang P, Hu C, Xiao Z, Wen Q. 2024. HPV-associated cervicovaginal microbiome and host metabolome characteristics. BMC Microbiol 24. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03244-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lee JE, Lee S, Lee H, Song Y-M, Lee K, Han MJ, Sung J, Ko G. 2013. Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLoS One 8:e63514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chao X, Sun T, Wang S, Tan X, Fan Q, Shi H, Zhu L, Lang J. 2020. Research of the potential biomarkers in vaginal microbiome for persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Ann Transl Med 8:100. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zhang Y, Xu X, Yu L, Shi X, Min M, Xiong L, Pan J, Zhang Y, Liu P, Wu G, Gao G. 2022. Vaginal microbiota changes caused by HPV infection in Chinese women. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.814668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Qingqing B, Jie Z, Songben Q, Juan C, Lei Z, Mu X. 2021. Cervicovaginal microbiota dysbiosis correlates with HPV persistent infection. Microb Pathog 152:104617. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chao X, Wang L, Wang S, Lang J, Tan X, Fan Q, Shi H. 2021. Research of the potential vaginal microbiome biomarkers for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Front Med 8:565001. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.565001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Holm JB, Carter KA, Ravel J, Brotman RM. 2023. Lactobacillus iners and genital health: molecular clues to an enigmatic vaginal species. Curr Infect Dis Rep 25:67–75. doi: 10.1007/s11908-023-00798-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nori SRC, Walsh CJ, McAuliffe FM, Moore RL, Van Sinderen D, Feehily C, Cotter PD. 2025. Strain-level variation among vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners as identified by comparative metagenomics. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 11:49. doi: 10.1038/s41522-025-00682-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. NCBI . Lactobacillus iners SPIN 2503V10-D genome assembly ASM14914v1. J. Craig Venter Institute. Accessed 11 December 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_000149145.1/. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Oxford Nanopore Technologies . 2025. Dorado. C++. Oxford Nanopore Technologies. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wick RR, Howden BP, Stinear TP. 2025. Autocycler: long-read consensus assembly for bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics 41:btaf474. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cheng H, Asri M, Lucas J, Koren S, Li H. 2024. Scalable telomere-to-telomere assembly for diploid and polyploid genomes with double graph. Nat Methods 21:967–970. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02269-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, Zhang H, Li H. 2021. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods 18:170–175. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cheng H, Jarvis ED, Fedrigo O, Koepfli K-P, Urban L, Gemmell NJ, Li H. 2022. Haplotype-resolved assembly of diploid genomes without parental data. Nat Biotechnol 40:1332–1335. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01261-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bouras G, Sheppard AE, Mallawaarachchi V, Vreugde S. 2023. Plassembler: an automated bacterial plasmid assembly tool. Bioinformatics 39:btad409. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wick RR, Holt KE. 2022. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol 18:e1009802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bouras G, Judd LM, Edwards RA, Vreugde S, Stinear TP, Wick RR. 2024. How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford Nanopore bacterial genome assemblies. Microb Genom 10:001254. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ondov BD, Starrett GJ, Sappington A, Kostic A, Koren S, Buck CB, Phillippy AM. 2019. Mash Screen: high-throughput sequence containment estimation for genome discovery. Genome Biol 20:232. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1841-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Titus Brown C, Irber L. 2016. sourmash: a library for MinHash sketching of DNA. J Open Source Softw 1:27. doi: 10.21105/joss.00027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Parks DH, Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Hugenholtz P. 2026. GTDB release 10: a complete and systematic taxonomy for 715 230 bacterial and 17 245 archaeal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 54:D743–D754. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf1040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, Davis JJ, Dempsey DM, Dickerman A, Dietrich EM, Kenyon RW, et al. 2023. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2016. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol 17:132. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, Bun C, Conrad N, Dietrich EM, Disz T, Gabbard JL, et al. 2017. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D535–D542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. 2017. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 27:737–746. doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. 2009. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 19:1639–1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The whole-genome sequences of L. iners SPIN2503V10-D were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession numbers SRR36298223 (Illumina) and SRR36298224 (ONT), under BioProject PRJNA1373291. The BioSample identification number is SAMN00115035. The NCBI PGAP annotation can be found at GenBank JBSSWT000000000.1. The polished assembly and additional information on genome assembly, annotation, and subsystem analysis are available at BV-BRC (https://www.bv-brc.org/workspace/jimeneznr@patricbrc.org/Lactobacillus%20iners%20SPIN%20250310-D), accessible upon free account creation. Additional technical details on Plasmidsaurus, Inc.’s sequencing and assembly pipeline are available at https://plasmidsaurus.com/technical-documentation/genome.

