Skip to main content
BMC Medicine logoLink to BMC Medicine
. 2026 May 18;24:390. doi: 10.1186/s12916-026-04931-8

Mpox severity and mortality in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fabrice Zobel Lekeumo Cheuyem 1,2,✉, Jude Tsafack Zefack 3,4, Chabeja Achangwa 5, Rick Tchamani 6, Constantine Tanywe Asahngwa 7,8
PMCID: PMC13353000  PMID: 42152055

Abstract

Background

Mpox presents a significant public health threat with variable severity driven by viral clades and host factors. After over 50 years of outbreaks, this study aimed at providing a comprehensive continent-wide assessment of its severity and mortality for evidence-based public health planning and clinical management.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251133745), aggregated data from studies on mpox severity and mortality in Africa from 1970 to 2025. A systematic search of multiple databases was performed. The primary outcomes were the mpox severity rate (proportion of severe cases among confirmed cases) and the case fatality rate (CFR). Random-effects models were used due to high heterogeneity.

Results

The pooled severity rate among confirmed mpox cases in Africa was 43.8% (95% CI: 36.3–51.6; n = 5,417; 37 reports). The pooled CFR was 3.8% (95% CI: 1.9–7.6; n = 6,877; 43 reports) for confirmed cases and 2.5% (95% CI: 1.3–4.6; n = 3,815; 47 reports) for suspected cases. A significant temporal decline was observed; after the 2022 global outbreak, the CFR for confirmed cases dropped to 1.04% from 6.50% beforehand. Substantial geographical disparities existed, with the Central African region bearing the highest burden (severity: 45.51%; CFR: 5.44%), compared to West Africa (severity: 25.43%; CFR: 0.97%). Infections with Clades Ia and Ib were associated with higher severity, whereas Clade II was linked to milder disease. Key risk factors for severe outcomes and death included young age (< 10 years), HIV coinfection, lack of prior smallpox vaccination, and pregnancy. Community-based studies reported higher CFRs than hospital-based studies. No significant publication bias was detected, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimates.

Conclusions

This study confirms a high but declining burden of severe and fatal mpox in Africa, characterized by significant temporal, geographic, and clade-specific variations. While a global shift towards milder disease is evident, Central Africa remains disproportionately at risk due to the persistent circulation of more virulent clades and underlying health inequities. Sustained investment in surveillance, vaccination, and strengthened healthcare capacity in endemic regions is crucial to reduce future morbidity and mortality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-026-04931-8.

Keywords: Epidemiology, Mpox, Monkeypox, Severity, Mortality, Africa, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

Background

Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) is a zoonotic disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), a member of the Orthopoxvirus genus and closely related to the variola virus that caused smallpox. Since its first identification in humans in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 1970, mpox has remained endemic in several African regions, particularly Central and West Africa [1]. Over the last fifty years, the disease has evolved from isolated outbreaks to a pervasive public health concern, characterized by recurring waves of epidemics. Following the end of routine smallpox vaccination in 1980, the population’s cross-protective immunity declined, which paved the way for the reappearance of mpox [2]. Furthermore, its endemicity in Africa has been maintained by growing urbanization, deforestation, wildlife contact, and inadequate healthcare infrastructure.

Although human-to-human transmission of mpox has increased, the disease is essentially a zoonotic one, spread by contact with infected animals such as rodents, primates, and bushmeat. A significant turning point was the global outbreak in 2022, which spread to more than 120 countries and demonstrated the virus’s ability to spread outside endemic areas persistently [3, 4]. Recurrent outbreaks have been documented in Africa, including Nigeria, Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the Central African Republic, underscoring the disease’s tenacity and geographic spread. The World Health Organization recorded 142,151 confirmed cases and 328 deaths worldwide as of May 2025. The global case fatality rate (CFR) was 0.09%, although CFRs in African nations (0.32–0.38%) were significantly higher [1].

According to recent genomic studies, the majority of monkeypox virus (MPXV) circulating in Africa belong to two distinct clades: Clade I, which has historically been prevalent in Central Africa, and Clade II, which is more common in West Africa [5]. In the DRC, novel sub-lineages of Clade I, such as Clade Ib, have been discovered. They are linked to improved transmissibility but exhibit marginally lower virulence compared to Clade Ia [6]. Clade I infections have traditionally been linked with more severe disease presentations and higher mortality, with CFRs reaching 10% or more in specific outbreaks [7]. Conversely, Clade II, which caused the global 2022–2024 epidemic, has generally been associated with milder disease, lower hospitalization rates, and mortality below 1% [8]. Understanding these clade-specific differences is crucial for informing regionally tailored interventions and clinical management.

Despite mpox’s lengthy history in Africa, there are still few accurate estimates of its severity and fatality rate. Numerous studies currently available are small, geographically limited, and vary in their methods. For instance, hospital-based studies can underrepresent community-level deaths that take place outside of the healthcare system, and surveillance data frequently depend on syndromic or clinical criteria without laboratory validation [9]. Consequently, the actual burden of severe and fatal mpox in Africa remains uncertain, with reported CFRs ranging from below 1% in Nigeria to over 11% in the DRC and Central African Republic [10]. Furthermore, socioeconomic disparities, healthcare access, and vaccination coverage contribute to regional variability. Central Africa continues to report disproportionately higher mortality due to the continued circulation of more virulent Clade I strains and fragile healthcare systems [11].

The severity of mpox and their death rate depend on several host-related factors. Studies reported that children under the age of 10 remain the most vulnerable, with the highest rates of hospitalization and fatality [12, 13]. Immunocompromised individuals, especially those with advanced HIV infection, are also at increased risk for severe illness due to impaired viral clearance [14]. Similarly, pregnant women are more likely to experience negative consequences, such as miscarriage, fetal death, and problems for the mother [15]. Another important factor influencing the severity of the sickness is the lack of protection from prior smallpox immunization [16]. Malnutrition and co-infection with other endemic diseases, such as chickenpox or malaria, are examples of environmental factors that exacerbate the course and outcome of the disease [17].

The epidemiology of mpox in Africa has undergone a significant transformation between 2022 and 2025, as evidenced by changes in transmission dynamics, as well as a decline in severity and fatality rates. According to surveillance statistics, the percentage of severe cases and fatalities has dropped, even though the total number of confirmed mpox cases has grown [18]. The prevalence of less virulent viral lineages, better clinical therapy, earlier diagnosis, and enhanced case detection are probably the causes of this shift [9]. However, with a pooled CFR of roughly 0.38 − 0.32% compared to less than 0.09% globally, the African continent still has the highest severity of the illness [1]. These discrepancies highlight ongoing inequality in public health infrastructure, vaccine access, and antiviral availability.

Comprehensive research on mpox outcomes across the continent is desperately needed, given the continuous endemic transmission and frequent outbreaks. This information vacuum can be filled by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature, which can provide pooled estimates of severity and mortality, examine regional and temporal variations, and identify risk factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. This study aims to generate robust data to inform clinical management recommendations, public health initiatives, and resource allocation by combining over 50 years of research (1970–2024). Furthermore, measuring variations in outcomes among viral clades and health environments can help inform adjustments to response strategies and surveillance priorities in the most affected areas of Africa. By doing this, this study not only sheds light on the historical development of mpox but also helps guide future international readiness initiatives for re-emerging zoonotic illnesses.

Methods

Study design

This meta-analysis assesses the epidemiology of the Mpox outbreak in Africa from 1970 to 2024, representing the first such study to evaluate disease severity and mortality on the continent. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251133745) [19, 20].

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

This systematic review and meta-analysis included community- and hospital-based studies (including cohort, cross-sectional, case series, and case report designs) that provided data on mpox severity and/or mortality rates in Africa. Studies were eligible if they reported clinical outcomes or epidemiological surveillance data, such as severe or grave cases, deaths, or case fatality rates. No restrictions were applied on publication year; however, only articles published in English or French were considered.

Exclusion criteria

Studies were excluded if they were single case reports, reviews, commentaries without original data, or focused on other viruses or unrelated outcomes (e.g., genetic analyses without clinical correlates). Duplicate publications were removed after title and abstract screening. Studies that lacked clearly defined measures of severity or mortality were also excluded.

Article searching strategy

A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect, was conducted to identify relevant published studies. The search strategy involved querying terms in the titles and abstracts of records. A combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) was utilized, employing Boolean operators (“AND” and “OR”) to refine the search. The core search string was as follows: (“Mpox” OR “Monkeypox” OR “mpox” OR “monkey pox” OR MPXV) AND (“Disease Severity” OR “severity” OR “severe” OR “complicated” OR “mortality” OR “case fatality” OR “death” OR “died” OR “outcome”) AND (“Africa” OR “Central Africa” OR “West Africa” OR “East Africa” OR “African countries”). To ensure comprehensiveness, a supplementary search was performed using Google Scholar to locate any further relevant publications not indexed in the primary databases. Additionally, the reference lists of all identified studies were screened for other potentially eligible articles. The final search for all sources was completed on June 29, 2025.

Data extraction

Data were extracted from all eligible articles using a predefined form in Microsoft Excel 2016 to collect study characteristics. The data extraction sheet captured details including the first author’s name, publication year, country, study design, setting, sampling technique, gene sequencing classification, and the number of suspected, confirmed, severe, and fatal mpox cases. Two reviewers (FZLC and JTZ) independently assessed each article and extract data. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer (CTA) to reach a consensus.

Data quality assessment

The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools [21]. The risk of bias was evaluated using design-specific predefined criteria. Each criterion was scored as “1” (yes) or “0” (no or unclear). The overall risk of bias for each study was then categorized as low (> 50% of criteria met), moderate (25–50%), or high (< 25%). Two reviewers (FZLC and CA) independently conducted the assessments, and any disagreements were resolved through consensus discussion.

Outcome measurement

This study’s primary outcomes were the mpox severity rate and CFR. The severity rate was calculated as the proportion of severe or grave cases among all confirmed mpox cases. The CFR was calculated as the proportion of deaths among populations of suspected or confirmed mpox cases.

Operational definition

A case was defined as laboratory-confirmed mpox if at least one specimen yielded a positive result in the rapid Orthopoxvirus-specific assay, or MPXV-specific real-time PCR, or MPXV in culture [13]. A suspected mpox case was defined as an individual presenting with a vesicular or pustular rash—characterized by deep-seated, firm lesions—accompanied by at least one of the following symptoms: fever preceding the rash, lymphadenopathy (inguinal, axillary, or cervical), or lesions on the palms or soles. A case was defined as severe or grave if it required hospitalization and presented with one or more of the following: extensive lesions (> 100 lesions); hemorrhagic or pustular lesions; mucosal involvement (oral, genital, conjunctival); or systemic complications such as high fever (> 39 °C), altered general state (e.g., bedridden), sepsis, encephalitis, secondary bacterial infections, hypotension, septic shock, severe dehydration, or keratitis with potential for corneal scarring and blindness [13, 22].

Statistical analysis and synthesis

Heterogeneity between studies was quantified using the I² statistic and categorized as low (< 25%), moderate (25–75%), or high (> 75%). Given the anticipated high heterogeneity, a random-effects model was employed for all meta-analyses. To explore potential sources of heterogeneity, we conducted subgroup analyses based on study period (defined as pre- and post-2022 global outbreak), country, WHO African region, clade, study design, and setting. Countries were categorized into WHO African regions as follows: Western (Sierra Leone, Liberia, Nigeria), Eastern (Burundi, Sudan), and Central (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon, Congo, and the DRC). Furthermore, meta-regression was performed to assess the association between these study characteristics and the variability in effect sizes [23].

Univariable and multivariable meta-regression models were employed to evaluate the association between study-level covariates and the pooled severity and CFR. We used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with a probit-logit transformation (PLOGIT), which are recommended for synthesizing binomial proportion data as they directly model the binomial distribution, incorporate random effects to account for between-study heterogeneity, and naturally handle proportions of 0% and 100% without ad-hoc correction [24]. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted in R Statistics version 4.4.2 using the “meta” package [25].

Publication bias and sensitivity test

Publication bias was assessed both visually and statistically. Funnel plots were generated for visual inspection, where symmetry suggests a low risk of bias. Statistical evaluation was performed using Egger’s linear regression test and Begg’s rank correlation test, with a p-value < 0.05 indicating potential publication bias. To assess the robustness of the pooled estimates, a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was conducted by iteratively removing each study and recalculating the summary effect.

Results

A total of 12,766 records were retrieved from the database search (n = 12,759) and from other sources (n = 7). After removing 4,281 duplicate records, 8,485 records remained. Titles/abstracts, followed by full text articles were then screened for eligibility. Ultimately, 47 study reports met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PRISMA diagram flow from study identification to inclusion in the meta-analysis

Studies selection

Characteristic of reports included

This dataset aggregated evidence from 37 records across 10 African countries, documenting mpox severity from 1970 to 2024. The DRC was the most frequently studied country (n = 15 records). The majority of reports (n = 28 records) were cross-sectional in design and conducted in community settings (n = 27 records). MPXV sequencing data, reported in 12 studies, indicates the presence of Clades Ia, Ib, and II, with Clade Ib being the most commonly reported in recent years (2022–2024). The risk of bias was predominantly low (n = 33 records) (Additional File 1 : Table S1) [6, 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 26–54].

The second outcome derived from 43 records across 11 African countries, documenting mpox case fatality from 1970 to 2024. The DRC and the Central African Republic (CAR) are the most frequently studied countries. Study designs were predominantly cross-sectional (n = 30 records) and conducted in community settings (n = 28 records). Gene sequencing data, reported in 11 records, indicates the presence of Clades Ia, Ib, and II. The risk of bias was mostly low (n = 32 records) or moderate (n = 11 records) (Additional File 1 : Table S2) [7, 11, 12, 15, 26–33, 36–43, 45–48, 50–53, 55–59].

The third outcome resulted from 47 records on suspected mpox cases across 11 African countries, spanning 1970 to 2024. The DRC, Nigeria, and the Central African Republic (CAR) are the most frequently studied regions. Study designs are predominantly cross-sectional (n = 31 records) and were conducted in both community (n = 28 records) and hospital (n = 10 records) settings. The risk of bias was primarily low (n = 30 records) or moderate (n = 15 records) (Additional File 1 : Table S3) [6, 7, 15, 16, 30–33, 36–43, 46–48, 50, 52, 53, 55–64].

Disease severity among confirmed mpox cases

This study found that the pooled disease severity rate for mpox in Africa was 43.8% (95% CI: 36.3–51.6), based on 37 records. The analysis demonstrated high heterogeneity among the included studies (I² = 87.5%) (Fig. 2and Fig. 3A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Pooled severity rate of mpox cases in Africa

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Mapping of mpox severity (A) and case fatality rates among confirmed (B) and suspected (C) mpox cases across African countries

A non-significant decrease in severity was observed between the period before the 2022 global outbreak (49.22%; 95% CI: 41.44–57.04%; n = 26 records) and the period after (34.11%; 95% CI: 22.61–47.84%; n = 11 records). Furthermore, a significant difference in severity was found among confirmed mpox cases across WHO African regions [p(χ²) < 0.001]. Countries in the Central African region exhibited the highest pooled proportion of severe cases (45.51%; 95% CI: 36.55–54.77%; n = 23 records), while the lowest proportion was observed in West African countries (25.43%; 95% CI: 6.49–62.64%; n = 10 records). The most affected countries included Congo (90%; 95% CI: 53.28–98.61%; n = 2 records) and the Central African Republic (60.92%; 95% CI: 47.54–72.83%; n = 5 records). Stratification by viral clade showed that cases infected with Clades Ia and Ib had a significantly higher severity rate (30.30%; 95% CI: 7.15–47.74%; n = 5 records) compared to those infected with Clade II (0%; n = 3 records) (Table 1 and Additional File 1 : Fig. S1-S6).

Table 1.

Subgroup meta-analysis of mpox severity rate pooled estimates in Africa

Subgroup Confirmed cases Event rate1 (%) 95% CI limits 1 Number of studies Heterogeneity statistic1 Subgroup difference
Lower Upper I2(%) p-value p-value2
Study period 3 0.059
˂2022 3561 49.22 41.44 57.04 26 84.2 ˂0.001
2022–2024 1856 34.11 22.61 47.84 11 91.9 ˂0.001
Region 4 ˂0.001
Eastern 166 29.52 23.08 36.89 3 0.0 -
Central 4985 45.51 36.55 54.77 23 90.8 ˂0.001
Western 135 25.43 6.49 62.64 10 0.0 -
Multi-region 78 59.54 50.62 68.02 1 - -
Clade 0.056
Ia 33 30.30 17.15 47.74 5 0.0 -
Ib 1516 30.75 16.56 49.84 5 96.3 ˂0.001
II 8 0.00 0.00 100.00 3 0.0 -
I & II 32 37.50 21.10 56.31 1 - -
Not reported 3828 52.10 44.73 59.39 24 86.9 ˂0.001
Setting 0.364
Community 3798 41.47 32.67 50.85 26 84.4 ˂0.001
Hospital 773 50.79 33.77 67.63 9 92.9 ˂0.001
Community and hospital 846 43.77 36.27 51.58 2 36.5 0.210
Design 0.353
Cohort 487 43.68 18.34 72.80 2 97.1 ˂0.001
Cross-sectional 4899 45.61 38.05 53.38 26 88.4 ˂0.001
Case series 22 30.72 1.37 93.41 5 0.0 -
Case report 9 11.11 1.54 49.99 4 0.0 -

1Random effects model; CI: Confidence Interval

2Difference between tested subgroups (p (χ2)

3 Period before and after the global outbreak

4Eastern: Burundi and Sudan; Central: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, and the Democratic Republic of Congo; Western: Benin, Liberia, and Nigeria

Disease mortality among confirmed mpox cases

The CFR among confirmed mpox cases was 3.8% (95% CI: 1.9–7.6; n = 43 records) with high heterogeneity between studies (I² = 84.2) (Fig. 4 and Fig. 3B).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Pooled case fatality rate among confirmed mpox cases in Africa

A significant reduction in the case fatality rate was observed between the period before (6.50%; 95% CI: 3.35–12.23; n = 35 records) and after the 2022 global mpox outbreak (1.04%; 95% CI: 0.30–3.51; n = 8 records) [p(χ²) = 0.009].

Studies from community settings reported a significantly higher case fatality rate (6.11%; 95% CI: 2.68–13.20; n = 30 records) than those conducted in hospital settings (1.77%; 95% CI: 0.49–6.21; n = 11 records) [p(χ²) < 0.001].

Although not statistically significant, Clade II demonstrated a higher case fatality rate (5.56%; 95% CI: 2.67–11.20; n = 4 records) compared to Clade Ia (0.00%; n = 4 records) and Clade Ib (0.91%; 95% CI: 0.20–4.07; n = 5 records). Similarly, the WHO African regions of Western (6.20%; 95% CI: 3.89–9.75; n = 15 records) and Central Africa (5.44%; 95% CI: 2.37–12.01; n = 24 records) had higher mortality rates than the Eastern African region (0.00%; n = 3 records) (Table 2 and Additional File 1: Fig. S7-S12).

Table 2.

Subgroup meta-analysis of case fatality rate pooled estimates for confirmed mpox cases in Africa

Subgroup Confirmed cases Event rate1 (%) 95% CI limits 1 Number of studies Heterogeneity statistic1 Subgroup
Difference
Lower Upper I2(%) p-value p-value2
Study period 3 0.009
˂2022 1292 6.50 3.35 12.23 35 49.8 ˂0.001
2022–2024 5585 1.04 0.30 3.51 8 71.5 ˂0.001
Region 4 0.097
Eastern 166 0.00 0.00 100.00 3 0.0 1.000
Central 6306 5.44 2.37 12.01 24 90.0 ˂0.001
Western 274 6.20 3.89 9.75 15 0.0 1.000
Multi-region 131 12.98 7.74 19.96 1 - -
Clade 0.170
Ia 19 0.00 0.00 100.00 4 0.0 1.000
Ib 5545 0.91 0.20 4.07 5 83.0 ˂0.001
II 126 5.56 2.67 11.20 4 0.0 1.000
I & II 32 3.12 0.08 16.22 1 - -
Not reported 1155 7.25 3.61 14.03 30 56.8 ˂0.001
Setting ˂0.001
Community 1160 6.11 2.68 13.30 30 45.9 0.004
Hospital 790 1.77 0.49 6.21 11 56.1 0.012
Community and hospital 4927 0.99 0.75 1.31 2 24.5 0.250
Design 0.794
Cohort 487 3.82 1.88 7.60 2 92.2 ˂0.001
Cross-sectional 6357 4.51 2.38 8.38 31 87.1 ˂0.001
Cases serie 24 0.00 0.00 100.00 6 0.0 1.000
Case report 9 0.00 0.00 100.00 4 0.0 1.000

1Random effects model; CI: Confidence Interval

2Difference between tested subgroups (p (χ2)

3Period before and after the global outbreak

4Eastern: Burundi and Sudan; Central: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, and the Democratic Republic of Congo; Western: Benin, Liberia, and Nigeria

Disease mortality among suspected mpox cases

Suspected mpox case fatality rate was 2.5% (95% CI: 1.3–4.6) based on 47 records (Fig. 5 and Fig. 3C). The subgroup analysis revealed significant temporal and geographical disparities in mpox severity. The case fatality rate was significantly higher in the period before the 2022 global outbreak (4.33%, 95% CI: 2.65–7.01; n = 39 records) compared to the period after (0.31%, 95% CI: 0.08–1.14; n = 8 records) [p(χ²) < 0.001]. Geographically, the Central African region significantly bore the highest burden with a fatality rate of 4.04% (95% CI: 2.15–7.45; n = 28 records), contrasting with the lower rates in Western Africa (0.97%, 95% CI: 0.08–10.33; n = 15 records) [p(χ²) < 0.025] (Table 3 and Additional File 1: Fig. S13-S17).

Table 3.

Subgroup meta-analysis of case fatality rate pooled estimates among suspected mpox cases in Africa

Subgroup Confirmed cases Event rate1 (%) 95% CI limits 1 Number of studies Heterogeneity statistic1 Subgroup
Difference
Lower Upper I2(%) p-value p-value2
Study period 3 ˂0.001
˂2022 2282 4.33 2.65 7.01 39 50.5 ˂0.001
2022–2024 1533 0.31 0.08 1.14 8 0.0 0.470
Region 4 0.025
Eastern 628 0.00 0.00 100.00 3 0.0 1.000
Central 2545 4.04 2.15 7.45 28 70.2 ˂0.001
Western 487 0.97 0.08 10.33 15 0.0 0.977
Multi-region 155 10.97 6.52 16.98 1 - -
Setting 0.250
Community 2770 3.71 1.97 6.90 34 57.1 ˂0.001
Hospital 908 1.06 0.28 4.00 12 43.9 0.051
Community and hospital 137 0.00 1.32 4.62 1 - -
Design 0.002
Cohort 511 0.39 0.05 1.41 1 - -
Cross-sectional 3167 2.40 1.22 4.66 36 59.3 ˂0.001
Cases serie 128 6.25 3.16 12.00 6 0.0 0.999
Case report 9 0.00 0.00 96.31 4 0.0 1.000

1Random effects model; CI: Confidence Interval

2Difference between tested subgroups (p (χ2)

3Period before and after the global outbreak

4Eastern: Burundi and Sudan; Central: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, and the Democratic Republic of Congo; Western: Benin, Liberia, and Nigeria

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Pooled case fatality rate among suspected mpox cases in Africa

Meta-regression analysis

According to multivariate meta-regression, no study-related factors significantly influenced the pooled severity rate. However, for case fatality, study design and setting were significant predictors. Case series designs were associated with higher fatality rates (β = 1.7165; p = 0.044), while in-hospital studies were associated with lower rates (β = -1.6932; p = 0.007). Among suspected cases, case reports predicted higher fatality (β = 2.5908; p = 0.007) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate meta-regression analysis of Mpox disease outcome metrics in Africa

Epidemiological estimate Moderator Univariate Multivariate
Unadjusted coefficient (β) p-value Adjusted coefficient (β) p-value
Severity rate
 Study year1 2022 + vs. ˂ 2022 -0.5639 0.056 -2.5524 0.061
 Clade Clade II Ref Ref
Clade Ia 1.0721 0.319 0.2599 0.630
Clade Ib 1.0033 0.313 0.3969 0.784
Clade I & II 1.3261 0.263 -0.0697 0.968
Not reported 1.9261 0.045 2.0085 0.137
 WHO Afro region2 Western Ref Ref
Eastern -0.6311 0.340 0.9974 0.276
Central -0.0618 0.879 0.4669 0.388
Multi-region 0.5215 0.522 0.9303 0.277
 Design Cross-sectional Ref Ref
Cohort -0.1160 0.835 -0.2511 0.731
Cases serie -0.0317 0.964 0.0100 0.993
Case report -1.0916 0.199 0.1475 0.837
 Setting Community Ref Ref
Hospital 0.3728 0.303 0.8628 0.096
Hospital & community 0.0398 0.943 1.3844 0.079
Confirmed case fatality rate
 Study year1 2022 + vs. ˂ 2022 -1.7795 < 0.001 -1.2269 0.495
 Clade Clade II Ref
Clade Ia 0.1231 0.914 0.4507 0.765
Clade Ib -1.7988 0.043 0.6282 0.788
Clade I & II -1.1196 0.468 1.8092 0.519
Not reported 0.3702 0.624 1.3434 0.186
 WHO Afro region2 Western Ref
Eastern -1.2879 0.269 -1.7353 0.276
Central -0.0533 0.920 -0.7100 0.231
Multi-region 0.3433 0.786 -0.7129 0.494
 Design Cross-sectional Ref
Cohort -1.2911 0.150 1.4951 0.370
Cases serie 1.2575 0.102 1.7165 0.044
Case report 0.7141 0.462 2.0746 0.110
 Setting Community Ref
Hospital -1.0776 0.024 -1.6932 0.007
Hospital & community -2.3339 0.003 -0.7727 0.633
Suspected case fatality rate
 Study year1 2022 + vs. ˂ 2022 -1.8301 < 0.001 -1.2157 0.067
 WHO Afro region2 Western Ref Ref
Eastern -1.3954 0.213 -1.8935 0.094
Central 0.0978 0.844 0.2310 0.653
Multi-region 0.738 0.522 0.6188 0.544
 Design Cross-sectional Ref Ref
Cohort -2.6730 0.022 -1.1185 0.430
Cases serie 0.4175 0.495 0.5414 0.374
Case report 1.9678 0.032 2.5908 0.007
 Setting Community Ref Ref
Hospital -0.6685 0.174 -0.7232 0.202
Hospital & community3 -3.0092 0.083 -1.9191 0.280

1Period before and after the global outbreak

2Eastern: Burundi and Sudan; Central: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo and the Democratic Republic of Congo; Western: Benin, Liberia and Nigeria); Bold: (p ˂0.05)

3Redundant predictors dropped from the model

Publication bias and sensitivity test analysis

No evidence of publication bias or undue influence from any single study was found for the mpox severity rate and no study significantly influence the pooled estimate reflecting the robustness of the finding (Additional File 1: Fig. S18-S19).

Using the trim and fill method to account for 18 potentially unpublished studies yielded a case fatality rate of 3.27% (95% CI: 2.01–5.58) among confirmed mpox cases, which was not significantly different from the initial estimate of 3.9% (95% CI: 1.9–7.6) derived from 43 records. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the overall pooled case fatality rate remained robust and was not disproportionately affected by any single study (Additional File 1: Fig. S20-S22).

For the pooled case fatality rate among suspected mpox cases, the trim and fill analysis did not impute any missing studies, despite a significant sign of publication bias indicated by Begg’s test (p = 0.019). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis showed that no single study significantly influenced the pooled estimate, reflecting the robustness of this finding (Additional File 1: Fig. S23-25).

Review of severity and mortality-related factors

Age

Children, particularly those under 10 years of age, have been identified as an at risk population for mpox, associated with a more severe disease prognosis and a higher mortality rate [12, 13, 16, 26, 28, 35, 55, 60]. Vulnerability is highest among young children aged 0–4 years, who consistently present an increased risk of severe complications, including death [6, 12, 13, 26, 28]. In adults, severe forms of the disease and mortality are frequently observed in individuals of reproductive age, particularly in cases of HIV co-infection, which is a major factor in worsening the prognosis [7, 40].

HIV coinfection

Coinfection with HIV, especially in individuals with advanced immunosuppression (low CD4 counts), is a strongly risk factor for both severe mpox manifesting as extensive and prolonged skin lesions, higher complication rates, and significantly increased mortality [6, 7, 15, 40, 43, 50].

Viral clade

Infection with Clade I (Congo Basin) is a major demographic and virological risk factor associated with more severe clinical disease, including higher lesion counts and complication rates, and a significantly higher case fatality rate (CFR) historically up to 10% or more, compared to the milder disease and lower mortality (< 1% CFR) associated with Clade II [11, 31, 47, 50].

Vaccination status

The absence of cross-protective immunity from prior smallpox vaccination is associated with more severe mpox disease, a higher rate of sequelae, and a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to vaccinated individuals [12, 16, 26, 28].

Pregnancy

Mpox infection during pregnancy is a risk factor for severe maternal morbidity and poses a high risk of vertical transmission, placental infection, fetal demise, and in some cases, maternal mortality [11, 15].

Route of exposure and inoculum

Severe cases were often linked to severe initial exposure, such as from hunting, skinning, or preparing bushmeat from infected animals, suggesting a high inoculating viral dose [12, 27, 28].

Viraemia

Detection of the virus in the blood indicates systemic infection and is associated with severe disease [11].

Sexual transmission and genital lesions

Genital lesions, which constitute both a severity factor and a transmission vector for mpox, facilitate the virus’s sexual spread [6, 11].

Coinfections with other pathogens and sepsis

Concurrent infections (e.g., with Varicella-Zoster Virus or malaria) can complicate the clinical picture, delay diagnosis, and exacerbate systemic illness, leading to severe disease [17, 34, 51]. Secondary bacterial infections of skin lesions are a common pathway to sepsis, a frequent cause of death [12, 17, 34].

Hemorrhagic manifestations

The development of hemorrhagic symptoms is a rare but grave prognostic sign indicative of severe systemic involvement and coagulopathy, and it is often associated with a fatal outcome [12].

Underlying immunosuppressive conditions and malnutrition

Conditions such as malnutrition, untreated tuberculosis, or iatrogenic immunosuppression impair the host response and are common background factors associated with severe disease, particularly in pediatric cases, and contribute to poorer outcomes [13, 36].

Delay in presentation and critical organ involvement

Patients presenting late in the disease course, or with evidence of critical complications such as encephalitis, bronchopneumonia, or extensive organ involvement, have a markedly poorer prognosis and higher risk of mortality [40, 59].

Nosocomial transmission and hospitalization

Outbreaks in healthcare settings can expose vulnerable populations (e.g., malnourished children, immunocompromised individuals). The reason for hospitalization is often itself an indicator of severity [38].

Health status

Poor health status of the population was a contributing factor to the high mortality observed [29].

Discussion

This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of mpox severity and mortality in Africa from 1970 to 2024. The pooled estimates indicate that 43.8% of confirmed mpox cases were severe, with CFR of 3.9% among confirmed cases and 2.5% among suspected cases. These findings confirm that mpox remains a significant public health threat, with a substantial burden concentrated in the Central Africa region where the disease is endemic. However, a declining trend in both severity and mortality in recent years suggests positive developments, potentially due to improved disease recognition, enhanced clinical management, and the increased prevalence of less virulent viral clades.

Temporal trends in mpox severity and mortality in Africa

This meta-analysis demonstrates a clear temporal decline in disease severity. Before the 2022 global outbreak, severity was 49.22%, declining to 34.11% after 2022, while the confirmed case CFR (Case Fatality Rate) dropped from 6.50% to 1.04%. These results are consistent with earlier literature, which reported higher fatality during the 1980s and 1990s in the central African region [12].

In contrast, our post-2022 estimate closely aligns with global surveillance data showing a CFR below 0.3%, based on more than 114,000 cases across more than 120 countries during 2022–2024 [1, 8]. The reduction of cases globally coincides with the predominance of Clade IIb, which is linked to milder clinical presentation and low hospitalization rates in non-endemic regions [3]. Yet, Africa’s pooled CFR of 3.9% remains markedly higher than global averages (< 0.3%), underscoring persistent disparities in viral clade distribution, healthcare access, surveillance capacity, and poor vaccination coverage across the African continent [8].

However, recent data from the WHO as of 2024 indicate a substantial decline in CFRs, with contemporary estimates of approximately 0.5% in 2024 across endemic African regions. This improvement likely reflects enhanced diagnostic capacity, expanded surveillance (with > 95% of suspected cases laboratory-confirmed in most countries), earlier clinical management, and the gradual shift in circulation toward Clade Ib mpox virus, which appears less virulent than the historical Clade I lineage [1].

Importantly, recent field investigations in the DRC reveal outbreaks dominated by Clades I and Ib, associated with increased transmissibility and severe outcomes among children [9]. These findings confirm that while mpox severity and mortality are declining globally, endemic African regions remain at disproportionately high risk due to persistent Clade I circulation and limited immunization coverage.

Regional and demographic disparities

Our review also identified substantial geographical heterogeneity. The Central African region had the highest severity (45.51%) and CFR (5.44%), compared to West Africa (25.43% severity; 0.97% CFR) and Eastern Africa, where no deaths were reported. These findings are consistent with the well-established higher virulence of Congo Basin (Clade I) viruses compared to West African (Clade II) strains [5, 65].

The highest pooled severity rates were observed in Congo (90%) and the Central African Republic (60.9%). This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting high case fatality rates (CFR) of up to 11% in these countries [2, 10]. In contrast, outbreaks in Nigeria (2017–2019), which were associated with the less virulent Clade II, exhibited lower CFRs of approximately 2.8% [59]. Collectively, these distinct regional patterns reflect underlying differences in the circulating viral lineage, frequency of zoonotic exposure, and healthcare infrastructure. Central Africa, in particular, continues to experience repeated zoonotic spillovers of more virulent clades coupled with limited diagnostic capacity [66, 67].

Viral clade–specific outcomes

Furthermore, our subgroup analysis reinforces the clade-specific differences in MPXV virulence. Infections with Clades Ia and Ib were associated with a higher severity rate (~ 30%) and measurable mortality. In contrast, Clade II infections were predominantly less severe, with a 0% severity rate and a lower CFR, though estimates for the latter are based on small sample sizes. These clinical trends are supported by molecular studies indicating that Clade I isolates cause higher viremia, broader tissue dissemination, and more efficient human-to-human transmission [68].

Our findings align with recent genomic studies documenting an evolutionary transition toward strains with reduced virulence. The emergence of Clade IIb, characterized by mutations that attenuate disease severity while enhancing transmissibility, provides a biological explanation for the observed global decline in severe disease [69]. Consequently, while the global mpox burden is decreasing due to this viral attenuation, severe outcomes remain concentrated in regions where the historically more virulent Clade I persists.

Study setting & design differences

Both study setting and design significantly influenced the estimates of mpox outcomes. Community-based studies reported a significantly higher case fatality rate (6.11%) than hospital-based studies (1.77%) (p < 0.001). This pattern is likely because community-based surveillance captures a broader spectrum of disease, including more severe and late-presenting cases that may not reach healthcare facilities. Similarly, cross-sectional studies, which constituted the majority of the included evidence, yielded higher estimates for both severity (45.6%) and CFR (4.5%) compared to cohort or case series designs. These observations are consistent with earlier meta-analyses that also noted an overrepresentation of severe outcomes in community-based designs [66, 70]. Our meta-regression confirmed these findings, identifying a case series design as a significant predictor of higher mortality (β = 1.72; p = 0.044) and a hospital setting as a predictor of lower mortality (β = −1.69; p = 0.007).

Host-related and clinical determinants

Our analysis confirms that host-related risk factors for severe and fatal mpox align with those established in prior literature. HIV co-infection was strongly associated with severe disease and mortality. An analysis from 19 countries revealed that severe complications were more common in people with a CD4 cell count of less than 100 cells per mm3 than in those with more than 300 cells per mm3, including necrotizing skin lesions (54% vs. 7%), lung involvement (29% vs. 0%) occasionally with nodules, secondary infections and sepsis (44% vs. 9%) [14]. In addition, a meta-analysis showed that people living with HIV who get infected with mpox had a higher hospitalization rate than those who only had mpox ( odds ratio = 1.848; 95% CI : 0.918–3.719) [71]. Pediatric age was another critical risk factor, with children under 10 years, and particularly those under 5, facing the highest risk of severe outcomes and death. This echoes historical data where pediatric case fatality rates (CFR) exceeded 15% [12] and is reinforced by recent DRC surveillance indicating that over 80% of mpox deaths occur in children under 15 years [72].

Furthermore, pregnancy and malnutrition were confirmed as significant determinants of poor prognosis [73]. Finally, the absence of smallpox vaccination-derived immunity remains a key driver of susceptibility. This is well-documented by Bunge et al. (2022), who reported higher incidence and severity in younger, unvaccinated cohorts following the cessation of routine smallpox vaccination in the 1980s [2].

Public health and global implications

Our analysis indicates that despite recent temporal improvements, mpox remains a major endemic challenge in Africa. The continent’s CFR of approximately 4% is an order of magnitude higher than the global average, highlighting persistent and profound inequities in access to vaccines, antivirals, and diagnostic capabilities. To address this, immediate public health priorities must include: (1) expanding genomic surveillance to track the evolution of Clades I and Ib; (2) strengthening vaccination programs in endemic zones using third-generation vaccines; (3) improving diagnostic and clinical management capacity, particularly in rural communities; (4) implementing targeted interventions to protect high-risk groups (children, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals); and (5) sustaining international funding and research collaborations to prevent resurgence as global attention wanes.

Strengths & limitations

This meta-analysis has several key strengths. It is the most comprehensive synthesis of mpox outcomes in Africa to date, covering five decades (1970–2024) across 11 countries, allowing temporal, regional, and genomic comparisons. The inclusion of subgroup and meta-regression analyses, integration of clade-specific data (Ia, Ib, II), and low-to-moderate bias across most studies strengthen the reliability and validity of the findings. Additionally, linking African data with global mpox trends provides valuable context on shifting disease dynamics.

However, the study also has limitations. High heterogeneity (I² > 80%), limited genomic data constrain comparability. Some regions remain underrepresented, and variations in study design and diagnostic capacity may have influenced estimates. Despite these limitations, the findings offer a robust, continent-wide understanding of mpox severity and mortality trends. Additionally, the small sample sizes in some subgroup analyses result in wide confidence intervals, therefore limiting the precision of the findings. Study in other language than English and French were not searched.

Conclusions

In comparison with previous literature, this meta-analysis confirms a declining but persistent burden of severe and fatal mpox in Africa, characterized by temporal, geographic, and clade-specific variation. The shift toward milder disease since 2022 mirrors global viral evolution and improved surveillance, yet Central Africa remains at greatest risk due to ongoing Clade I circulation and structural health inequities. Sustained investments in surveillance, vaccination, and health system capacity are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality from mpox in the years ahead.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12916_2026_4931_MOESM1_ESM.docx (5.5MB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1. Additional File 1: Table S1–S3. Fig. S1–S25.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CFR

Case fatality rate

CI

Confidence interval

DRC

Democratic Republic of Congo

HCW

Healthcare worker

HIV/AIDS

Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

MeSH

Medical subject headings

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

Author contributions

FZLC conceived the original idea of the study; FZLC conducted the literature search; FZLC, JTZ, CA, and CTA selected the studies, extracted the relevant information, and synthesized the data; FZLC performed the analyses; FZLC, JTZ, CA, and RT wrote the first draft of the manuscript; FZLC, JTZ, CA, RT, and CTA critically reviewed and revised successive drafts of the manuscript, FZLC, JTZ, CA, RT, and CTA read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ social media handles

Fabrice Zobel Lekeumo Cheuyem (X: @DrZobel), Jude Tsafack Zefack (X: @JudeZefack), Chabeja Achangwa (X: No account), Rick Tchamani (X: @rick_manel), Constantine Tanywe Asahngwa (X: @Asahngwa).

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.WHO. Multi-country outbreak of mpox, External situation reports #53 – 29. May 2025. 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/multi-country-outbreak-of-mpox--external-situation-report--53---29-may-2025. Accessed: 2025 Aug 23.
  • 2.Bunge EM, Hoet B, Chen L, Lienert F, Weidenthaler H, Baer LR et al. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox—A potential threat? A systematic review. Gromowski G, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(2): e0010141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, Rockstroh J, Antinori A, Harrison LB, et al. Monkeypox Virus Infection in Humans across 16 Countries — April–June 2022. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(8):679–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.WHO. First meeting of the International Health Regulations. (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the upsurge of mpox 2024. 2024. https://www.who.int/news/item/19-08-2024-first-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-upsurge-of-mpox-2024. Accessed 2025 Aug 23.
  • 5.Americo JL, Earl PL, Moss B. Virulence differences of mpox (monkeypox) virus clades I, IIa, and IIb.1 in a small animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(8):e2220415120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vakaniaki EH, Kacita C, Kinganda-Lusamaki E, O’Toole Á, Wawina-Bokalanga T, Mukadi-Bamuleka D, et al. Sustained human outbreak of a new MPXV clade I lineage in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Nat Med. 2024;30(10):2791–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brosius I, Vakaniaki EH, Mukari G, Munganga P, Tshomba JC, Vos ED, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of mpox during the clade Ib outbreak in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2025;405(10478):547–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yadav R, Chaudhary AA, Srivastava U, Gupta S, Rustagi S, Rudayni HA, et al. Mpox 2022 to 2025 Update: A Comprehensive Review on Its Complications, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Viruses. 2025;17(6):753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ndembi N, Folayan MO, Komakech A, Mercy K, Tessema S, Mbala-Kingebeni P, et al. Evolving Epidemiology of Mpox in Africa in 2024. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(7):666–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheuyem FZL, Zemsi A, Ndungo JH, Achangwa C, Takpando-le-grand DR, Goupeyou-Youmsi J et al. Mpox severity and mortality in the most endemic focus in africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1970–2024). medRxiv; 10.1101/2025.04.07.25325410v2
  • 11.Malembi E, Escrig-Sarreta R, Ntumba J, Beiras CG, Shongo R, Bengehya J, et al. Clinical presentation and epidemiological assessment of confirmed human mpox cases in DR Congo: a surveillance-based observational study. Lancet. 2025;405(10490):1666–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jezek Z, Szczeniowski M, Paluku KM, Mutombo M. Human Monkeypox: Clinical Features of 282 Patients. J Infect Dis. 1987;156(2):293–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Whitehouse ER, Bonwitt J, Hughes CM, Lushima RS, Likafi T, Nguete B, et al. Clinical and Epidemiological Findings from Enhanced Monkeypox Surveillance in Tshuapa Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo During 2011–2015. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(11):1870–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mitjà O, Alemany A, Marks M, Mora JIL, Rodríguez-Aldama JC, Silva MST, et al. Mpox in people with advanced HIV infection: a global case series. Lancet. 2023;401(10380):939–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pittman PR, Martin JW, Kingebeni PM, Tamfum JJM, Mwema G, Wan Q, et al. Clinical characterization and placental pathology of mpox infection in hospitalized patients in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Bowman N, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17(4):e0010384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hutin YJF, Williams RJ, Malfait P, Pebody R, Loparev VN, Ropp SL, et al. Outbreak of Human Monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(3):434–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoff NA, Morier DS, Kisalu NK, Johnston SC, Doshi RH, Hensley LE, et al. Varicella Coinfection in Patients with Active Monkeypox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. EcoHealth. 2017;14(3):564–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mpox Still a Continental Emergency, Africa CDC Advisory Group Recommends, Africa CDC, Addis-Abeba. 2025. https://africacdc.org/news-item/mpox-still-a-continental-emergency-africa-cdc-advisory-group-recommends/. Accessed 2025 Oct 25.
  • 19.Cheuyem FZL, Zefack JT, Chabeja A, Tchamani R, Asahngwa C. Accessed. Mpox Severity and Mortality in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251126033. 2025 Oct 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. The Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide. 2017. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. Accessed 2024 Dec 3.
  • 22.Breman JG, Steniowski MV, Zanotto E, Gromyko AI, Arita I. Human monkeypox, 1970-79. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58(2):165. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.ESPEN. WHO | Regional Office for Africa. 2023. https://espen.afro.who.int/maps-data/regional-maps-data/afro. Accessed 2025 Jul 14.
  • 24.Stijnen T, Hamza TH, Ozdemir P. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Stat Med. 2010;29(29):3046–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2024. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 2024 Dec 19.
  • 26.Breman JG, Kalisa-Ruti, Steniowski MV, Zanotto E, Gromyko AI, Arita I. Human monkeypox, 1970-79. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58(2):165–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arita I, Jezek Z, Khodakevich L, Ruti K. Human monkeypox: a newly emerged orthopoxvirus zoonosis in the tropical rain forests of Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985;34(4):781–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jezek Z, Marennikova SS, Mutumbo M, Nakano JH, Paluku KM, Szczeniowski M. Human Monkeypox: A Study of 2,510 Contacts of 214 Patients. J Infect Dis. 1986;154(4):551–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meyer H, Perrichot M, Stemmler M, Emmerich P, Schmitz H, Varaine F, et al. Outbreaks of Disease Suspected of Being Due to Human Monkeypox Virus Infection in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(8):2919–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boumandouki P, Bileckot R, Ibara JR, Satounkazi C, Wassa Wassa D, Libama E, et al. [Simian smallpox (or monkey smallpox): study of 8 cases observed at Impfondo Hospital in Republic of Congo]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 1990. 2007;100(1):17–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Formenty P, Muntasir MO, Damon I, Chowdhary V, Opoka ML, Monimart C, et al. Human Monkeypox Outbreak Caused by Novel Virus Belonging to Congo Basin Clade, Sudan, 2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(10):1539–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Damon IK, Roth CE, Chowdhary V. Discovery of Monkeypox in Sudan. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):962–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Berthet N, Nakouné E, Whist E, Selekon B, Burguière AM, Manuguerra JC, et al. Maculopapular lesions in the Central African Republic. Lancet. 2011;378(9799):1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hughes CM, Liu L, Davidson WB, Radford KW, Wilkins K, Monroe B, et al. A Tale of Two Viruses: Coinfections of Monkeypox and Varicella Zoster Virus in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;104(2):604–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Osadebe L, Hughes CM, Shongo Lushima R, Kabamba J, Nguete B, Malekani J et al. Enhancing case definitions for surveillance of human monkeypox in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Kasper M, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(9): e0005857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Kalthan E, Dondo-Fongbia JP, Yambele S, Dieu-Creer LR, Zepio R, Pamatika CM. Epidémie de 12 cas de maladie à virus monkeypox dans le district de Bangassou en République Centrafricaine en décembre 2015. Bull Société Pathol Exot. 2016;109(5):358–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kalthan E, Tenguere J, Ndjapou SG, Koyazengbe TA, Mbomba J, Marada RM, et al. Investigation of an outbreak of monkeypox in an area occupied by armed groups, Central African Republic. Médecine Mal Infect. 2018;48(4):263–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakoune E, Lampaert E, Ndjapou SG, Janssens C, Zuniga I, Van Herp M, et al. A Nosocomial Outbreak of Human Monkeypox in the Central African Republic. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(4):ofx168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Doshi RH, Guagliardo SAJ, Dzabatou-Babeaux A, Likouayoulou C, Ndakala N, Moses C, et al. Strengthening of Surveillance during Monkeypox Outbreak, Republic of the Congo, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(6):1158–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ogoina D, Iroezindu M, James HI, Oladokun R, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Wakama P, et al. Clinical Course and Outcome of Human Monkeypox in Nigeria. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(8):e210–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vaughan A, Aarons E, Astbury J, Balasegaram S, Beadsworth M, Beck CR, et al. Two cases of monkeypox imported to the United Kingdom, September 2018. Eurosurveillance. 2018;23(38):1800509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ogoina D, Yinka-Ogunleye A. Sexual history of human monkeypox patients seen at a tertiary hospital in Bayelsa, Nigeria. Int J STD AIDS. 2022;33(10):928–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Echekwube PO, Mbaave PT, Abidakun OA, Utoo BT, Swende TZ. Human monkeypox and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection: a case series in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. J Biomed Res Clin Pract. 2020;3(2):375–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mande G, Akonda I, Weggheleire AD, Brosius I, Liesenborghs L, Bottieau E, et al. Enhanced surveillance of monkeypox in Bas-Uélé, Democratic Republic of Congo: the limitations of symptom-based case definitions. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;122:647–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hobson G, Adamson J, Adler H, Firth R, Gould S, Houlihan C, et al. Family cluster of three cases of monkeypox imported from Nigeria to the United Kingdom, May 2021. Eurosurveillance. 2021;26(32):2100745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Amao LK, Olatunji DI, Igbodo G, Okoli SC, Amaechi I, Goni MI, et al. Trend and enhanced surveillance of Monkeypox during COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. J Public Health Afr. 2022;13(1):2184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Djuicy DD, Sadeuh-Mba SA, Bilounga CN, Yonga MG, Tchatchueng-Mbougua JB, Essima GD, et al. Concurrent Clade I and Clade II Monkeypox Virus Circulation, Cameroon, 1979–2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(3):433–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yadouleton A, Faye M, Tchibozo C, Oke M, Faye O, Lawale T, et al. Introduction of monkeypox virus in Benin, 2022. Mil Med Res. 2022;9(1):63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Besombes C, Gonofio E, Konamna X, Selekon B, Gessain A, Berthet N, et al. Intrafamily Transmission of Monkeypox Virus, Central African Republic, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(8):1602–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kibungu EM, Vakaniaki EH, Kinganda-Lusamaki E, Kalonji-Mukendi T, Pukuta E, Hoff NA, et al. Clade I–Associated Mpox Cases Associated with Sexual Contact, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(1):172–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mmerem JI, Umenzekwe CC, Johnson SM, Onukak AE, Chika-Igwenyi NM, Chukwu SK, et al. Mpox and Chickenpox Coinfection: Case Series from Southern Nigeria. J Infect Dis. 2024;229(Supplement2):S260–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nizigiyimana A, Ndikumwenayo F, Houben S, Manirakiza M, van Lettow M, Liesenborghs L, et al. Epidemiological analysis of confirmed mpox cases, Burundi, 3 July to 9 September 2024. Eurosurveillance. 2024;29(42):2400647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mukadi-Bamuleka D, Kinganda-Lusamaki E, Mulopo-Mukanya N, Amuri-Aziza A, O’Toole Á, Modadra-Madakpa B, et al. First imported Cases of MPXV Clade Ib in Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Implications for Global Surveillance and Transmission Dynamics. medRxiv. 2024. 10.1101/2024.09.12.24313188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kombozi, YDMerci et al. Singa Valentin. B, Ley. BL, Antoine. ET, Guild. AK, Lwanga. K,. MPOX: EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ITS EMERGENCE IN THE ISANGI TERRITORY, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. Int J Appl Sci Eng Rev. 2024;5(5):27–43.
  • 55.Durski KN. Emergence of Monkeypox — West and Central Africa, 1970–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6710a5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ogoina D, Izibewule JH, Ogunleye A, Ederiane E, Anebonam U, Neni A, et al. The 2017 human monkeypox outbreak in Nigeria—Report of outbreak experience and response in the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0214229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ita OI, Amuzi C, Udo U, Uwa A. Descriptive epidemiology of monkeypox outbreak in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria—5th October to 7th November 2017. East Afr Sch J Med Sci. 2019;2(5):224–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Reynolds MG, Wauquier N, Li Y, Satheshkumar PS, Kanneh LD, Monroe B, et al. Human Monkeypox in Sierra Leone after 44-Year Absence of Reported Cases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(5):1023–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yinka-Ogunleye A, Aruna O, Dalhat M, Ogoina D, McCollum A, Disu Y, et al. Outbreak of human monkeypox in Nigeria in 2017-18: a clinical and epidemiological report. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(8):872–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Aplogan A, Mangindula V, Muamba P, Mwema G, Okito L, Pebody R, et al. Human monkeypox -- Kasai Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo, February 1996-October 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46(49):1168–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dagovetz M, Momchilov K, Blank L, Khorsandi J, Rizzo A, Khabbache H, et al. Global COVID-19 vaccination challenges: Inequity of access and vaccine hesitancy. J Med Surg Public Health. 2025;6:100197. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ibegu M, Numbere TW, Balogun M, Nguku P. Descriptive epidemiology of Monkeypox outbreak in Bayelsa State South-South Nigeria, November 2017. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;101:255. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ngbolua KteN, Ngambika GK et al. Blaise Mbembo-wa-Mbembo, Kohowe Pagerezo Séraphin, Kogana Kapalata Fabrice, Gédéon Ngiala Bongo,. First Report on Three Cases of Monkey pox in Nord Ubangi Province (Democratic Republic of the Congo). Br Int Exact Sci BIoEx J. 2020;2(1):120–5.
  • 64.Besombes C, Mbrenga F, Malaka C, Gonofio E, Schaeffer L, Konamna X, et al. Investigation of a mpox outbreak in Central African Republic, 2021–2022. One Health. 2023;16:100523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hutson CL, Carroll DS, Self J, Weiss S, Hughes CM, Braden Z, et al. Dosage comparison of Congo Basin and West African strains of monkeypox virus using a prairie dog animal model of systemic orthopoxvirus disease. Virology. 2010;402(1):72–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Petersen BW, Kabamba J, McCollum AM, Lushima RS, Wemakoy EO, Muyembe Tamfum JJ, et al. Vaccinating against monkeypox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Antiviral Res. 2019;162:171–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.2025. WHO, Multi-country outbreak of mpox, External situation reports #53 – 29, Geneva. May. 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/multi-country-outbreak-of-mpox--external-situation-report--53---29-may-2025. Accessed 2025 Jul 1.
  • 68.Otieno JR, Ruis C, Onoja AB, Kuppalli K, Hoxha A, Nitsche A, et al. Global genomic surveillance of monkeypox virus. Nat Med. 2025;31(1):342–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Isidro J, Borges V, Pinto M, Sobral D, Santos JD, Nunes A, et al. Phylogenomic characterization and signs of microevolution in the 2022 multi-country outbreak of monkeypox virus. Nat Med. 2022;28(8):1569–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Beer EM, Rao VB. A systematic review of the epidemiology of human monkeypox outbreaks and implications for outbreak strategy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(10):e0007791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Taha AM, Elrosasy A, Mahmoud AM, Saed SAA, Moawad WAE, Hamouda E, et al. The effect of HIV and mpox co-infection on clinical outcomes: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. HIV Med. 2024;25(8):897–909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Multi-country outbreak of mpox, External situation report#44 – 23. December 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/multi-country-outbreak-of-mpox--external-situation-report-44---23-december-2024. Accessed 2025 Oct 11.
  • 73.Mungmunpuntipantip R, Wiwanitkit V. Monkeypox, pregnancy, and evidence of vertical transmission: reply. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(3):366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12916_2026_4931_MOESM1_ESM.docx (5.5MB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1. Additional File 1: Table S1–S3. Fig. S1–S25.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


Articles from BMC Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES