Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1992 Sep 1;147(5):627–633.

Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

PMCID: PMC1336384  PMID: 1521208

Full text

PDF
632

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bakketeig L. S., Eik-Nes S. H., Jacobsen G., Ulstein M. K., Brodtkorb C. J., Balstad P., Eriksen B. C., Jörgensen N. P. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet. 1984 Jul 28;2(8396):207–211. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90492-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett M. J., Little G., Dewhurst J., Chamberlain G. Predictive value of ultrasound measurement in early pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 May;89(5):338–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berwick D. M., Weinstein M. C. What do patients value? Willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Med Care. 1985 Jul;23(7):881–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eik-Nes S. H., Okland O., Aure J. C., Ulstein M. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1984 Jun 16;1(8390):1347–1347. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91834-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ewigman B., LeFevre M., Hesser J. A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;76(2):189–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lyons E. A., Dyke C., Toms M., Cheang M. In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: a 6-year follow-up. Radiology. 1988 Mar;166(3):687–690. doi: 10.1148/radiology.166.3.3277240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moore R. M., Jr, Diamond E. L., Cavalieri R. L. The relationship of birth weight and intrauterine diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;71(4):513–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Neilson J. P., Munjanja S. P., Whitfield C. R. Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1179–1182. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Saari-Kemppainen A., Karjalainen O., Ylöstalo P., Heinonen O. P. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. Lancet. 1990 Aug 18;336(8712):387–391. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91941-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thacker S. B. Quality of controlled clinical trials. The case of imaging ultrasound in obstetrics: a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 May;92(5):437–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ultrasound in pregnancy. Consensus statement, 1986. Norwegian Institute of Hospital Research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1987;3(3):463–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Waldenström U., Axelsson O., Nilsson S., Eklund G., Fall O., Lindeberg S., Sjödin Y. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1988 Sep 10;2(8611):585–588. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90636-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES