Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1992 Dec 1;147(11):1671–1678.

Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice.

I G Stiell 1, I McDowell 1, R C Nair 1, H Aeta 1, G Greenberg 1, R D McKnight 1, J Ahuja 1
PMCID: PMC1336591  PMID: 1362372

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficiency of the current use of radiography in patients with acute ankle injury. To study the judgements and attitudes of experienced clinicians in their use of ankle radiography and to thereby assess the potential for improved efficiency. DESIGN: Two-stage study: retrospective chart review and prospective survey. SETTING: Emergency departments of two adult teaching hospitals and one community hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The records of 1831 adults presenting with acute blunt trauma to the ankle over 5 months were examined; another 732 patients were seen by 21 full-time emergency staff physicians over a subsequent 6-month period. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1831 patients with an ankle injury in stage 1, 94.9% had had at least one radiographic series; the yield for clinically important fractures was 12.8%. In stage 2, experienced physicians predicted the probability of fracture to be 0% or 10% in 57.8% of cases. The kappa (kappa) level for interobserver agreement in 98 patients seen independently by two physicians was 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 0.72). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for physicians' predicted probability was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.92), reflecting good discrimination between fracture and nonfracture cases. Likelihood ratios for predicted probabilities ranged from 0.08 for the 0% level to 151 for the 100% level. The physicians indicated that they would feel comfortable or very comfortable in not ordering radiography in 45.9% of cases (kappa level 0.52; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians order radiography for most patients with ankle injury even though they can accurately discriminate between fracture and nonfracture cases and clearly expect most of the radiographs to give normal results. These findings suggest great potential for a more efficient use of radiography in patients with ankle injury, possibly through the use of guidelines.

Full text

PDF
1678

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrams H. L. Sounding board The "overutilization" of x-rays. N Engl J Med. 1979 May 24;300(21):1213–1216. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197905243002110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angell M. Cost containment and the physician. JAMA. 1985 Sep 6;254(9):1203–1207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell R. S., Loop J. W. The utility and futility of radiographic skull examination for trauma. N Engl J Med. 1971 Feb 4;284(5):236–239. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197102042840504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brand D. A., Frazier W. H., Kohlhepp W. C., Shea K. M., Hoefer A. M., Ecker M. D., Kornguth P. J., Pais M. J., Light T. R. A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 11;306(6):333–339. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202113060604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks S. C., Potter B. T., Rainey J. B. Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Feb 21;282(6264):607–608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6264.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cockshott W. P., Jenkin J. K., Pui M. Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries. Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Jul 15;129(2):129–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diehr P., Highley R., Dehkordi F., Wood R., Krueger L., Teitz C., Hermanson B. Prediction of fracture in patients with acute musculoskeletal ankle trauma. Med Decis Making. 1988 Jan-Mar;8(1):40–47. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8800800106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dunlop M. G., Beattie T. F., White G. K., Raab G. M., Doull R. I. Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):603–605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feinstein A. R. The 'chagrin factor' and qualitative decision analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1985 Jul;145(7):1257–1259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gleadhill D. N., Thomson J. Y., Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 11;294(6577):943–947. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6577.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gratton M. C., Salomone J. A., 3rd, Watson W. A. Clinically significant radiograph misinterpretations at an emergency medicine residency program. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 May;19(5):497–502. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82175-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kramer M. S., Feinstein A. R. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Jan;29(1):111–123. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lloyd S. Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation. CMAJ. 1986 Nov 1;135(9):973–974. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Long A. E. Radiographic decision-making by the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1985 Aug;3(3):437–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Masters S. J., McClean P. M., Arcarese J. S., Brown R. F., Campbell J. A., Freed H. A., Hess G. H., Hoff J. T., Kobrine A., Koziol D. F. Skull x-ray examinations after head trauma. Recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel and validation study. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jan 8;316(2):84–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198701083160205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moloney T. W., Rogers D. E. Medical technology -- a different view of the contentious debate over costs. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 27;301(26):1413–1419. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197912273012603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Montague A. P., McQuillan R. F. Clinical assessment of apparently sprained ankle and detection of fracture. Injury. 1985 Sep;16(8):545–546. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(85)90082-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stiell I. G., Greenberg G. H., McKnight R. D., Nair R. C., McDowell I., Worthington J. R. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384–390. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stother I. G. Incidence of minor fractures in twisting injuries of the ankle. Injury. 1974 Feb;5(3):213–214. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(74)80007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sujitkumar P., Hadfield J. M., Yates D. W. Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries. Arch Emerg Med. 1986 Jun;3(2):101–106. doi: 10.1136/emj.3.2.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Svenson J. Need for radiographs in the acutely injured ankle. Lancet. 1988 Jan 30;1(8579):244–245. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91098-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vargish T., Clarke W. R., Young R. A., Jensen A. The ankle injury--indications for the selective use of X-rays. Injury. 1983 May;14(6):507–512. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(83)90053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES