Abstract
Background
Balantioides coli is a zoonotic intestinal protozoan distributed at the human–animal interface, with pigs recognized as its principal hosts and reservoirs. Despite its broad occurrence, gaps remain regarding its genetic diversity and its interactions with associated microbial communities. This study investigated the genetic and phylogenetic diversity of B. coli and the impact of in vitro culture on the structure of these communities using Sanger and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in xenic isolates and their original fecal samples.
Methods
A total of 39 fecal samples from pigs were collected between 2023 and 2024 from 15 farms located in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais, Brazil. Samples were subjected to direct microscopy, xenic culture, Sanger sequencing of the ITS1–5.8SrDNA–ITS2 region, and NGS targeting the 18S and 16S rRNA regions.
Results
Direct examination revealed a higher frequency of trophozoites (64.1%) compared with cysts (48.7%). In vitro isolation was successful from fecal samples obtained from pigs at all farms. Molecular ITS analysis confirmed the presence of B. coli in both isolates and fecal samples, with predominance of the B0 variant. Metabarcoding revealed that the abundance and genetic diversity of other eukaryotes did not differ significantly between feces and cultures (p > 0.05), although fecal samples exhibited greater taxonomic richness, particularly Blastocystis spp. and Entamoeba spp., including E. suis, E. polecki, E. moshkovskii, and E. hartmanni. In contrast, prokaryotic communities showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). In correspondence analyses, the eukaryotic dataset showed a diffuse distribution of B. coli ASVs, without marked associations with other eukaryotic taxa. In contrast, the prokaryotic dataset showed more structured associations, with a large cluster of B. coli ASVs grouped near bacterial genera such as Bacteroides, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia–Shigella.
Conclusions
Balantioides coli remained genetically stable after in vitro establishment, with predominance of the B0 variant in both fecal samples and xenic cultures. Xenic culture preserved part of the eukaryotic diversity but significantly restructured the prokaryotic community, selecting bacterial taxa potentially linked to parasite persistence under in vitro conditions. These findings indicate that B. coli persists within a complex intestinal microbial consortium rather than as an isolated protozoan.
Graphical Abstract
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-026-07513-y.
Keywords: Balantioides coli, Pigs, Gut microbiota, Metabarcoding, Genetic diversity
Background
Balantioides coli is a neglected zoonotic intestinal protozoan widely prevalent at the human–animal interface, specifically within pig farms, where elevated infection rates likely drive continuous environmental transmission [1, 2]. Pigs and non-human primates are considered its main natural reservoirs, and it remains the only known ciliate capable of infecting humans, preferentially colonizing the large intestine [2–4]. In humans and non-human primates, infection may cause severe disease, including dysentery and extraintestinal involvement [4–6]. Transmission occurs predominantly via the fecal–oral route, through ingestion of water or food contaminated with environmentally resistant cysts, highlighting its One Health relevance [2–4].
Within pig production systems, infection dynamics may be influenced by differences in husbandry practices and sanitary management. Industrial farms generally adopt stricter biosecurity measures, whereas family-based systems often are characterized by less standardized practices and greater environmental exposure, which may affect parasite circulation and associated microbial communities [7–11].
Although detection has traditionally relied on microscopic detection of trophozoites and cysts, these methods are limited by low sensitivity and poor taxonomic resolution [12–17]. Consequently, molecular approaches based on PCR and sequencing of ribosomal markers, particularly the ITS regions, have become essential for accurate identification and genetic characterization [16, 18]. Such investigations have uncovered significant intraspecific diversity within humans and various animal hosts, comprising variants A0, A1, A2, B0, and B1 as well [18–20].
In parallel, in vitro xenic culture, in which the parasite is grown in the presence of an undefined microbiota, has become an important tool for increasing parasite biomass and enabling downstream morphological and molecular investigations, with Jones’ modified Pavlova medium remaining one of the most widely used systems [3, 17, 21]. However, because B. coli is commonly maintained in association with other microorganisms, microbial interactions may play a critical role in parasite survival and successes in these cultures, although these relationships remain poorly understood.
Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and metabarcoding targeting the 18S and 16S rRNA genes have enabled the simultaneous characterization of eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities associated with the parasite [22–24]. Nevertheless, comparative studies between fecal samples and corresponding xenic cultures remain scarce, limiting our understanding of whether in vitro culture preserves the genetic diversity of B. coli and its associated microbiota or promotes selective shifts.
Therefore, this study aimed to compare the genetic diversity of B. coli in pig feces and corresponding xenic cultures, assess culture-driven microbial shifts and co-occurrence patterns, and evaluate these dynamics across different pig production systems.
Methods
Sampling and Balantioides coli isolation
Fecal samples were collected between July 2023 and July 2024 from pig farms located in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais, Brazil. A total of 15 farms were included, comprising four industrial and eleven family-based production systems, anonymized as farms A–O (Additional file 1: Table S1). Samples were collected directly from the rectal ampulla using lubricated gloves [1].
Immediately after collection, samples were diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline and microscopically examined for Ciliophora trophozoites and cysts. For each municipality, two fecal samples were selected for in vitro isolation. In industrial farms with herds larger than 100 animals, additional samples were included to improve herd representativeness (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Priority was given to samples with the highest number of ciliates-compatible forms, whereas in farms with no positive samples, two fecal samples were randomly selected and inoculated blindly into the culture medium. The original fecal sample corresponding to each isolate was simultaneously processed for DNA extraction.
For in vitro isolation, fecal material was inoculated into Pavlova medium [25], modified according to Jones [26] and supplemented with fetal bovine serum. Inoculation procedures and isolate evaluation followed our previous protocols [20, 21]. An antibiotic solution containing penicillin (final concentration: 10,000 IU/mL) and streptomycin sulfate (final concentration: 10,000 µg/mL) was added to the culture medium to control excessive bacterial growth.
The inoculum was prepared from fresh feces diluted in sterile buffered saline solution. Samples were inoculated in duplicate into tubes containing 8 mL of fresh culture medium supplemented with 60 µL of sterile rice starch suspension. Approximately 180 µL of fecal suspension was added to each tube using a sterile Pasteur pipette. Culture tubes were maintained hermetically sealed throughout the incubation period, without active gas exchange or controlled atmospheric supplementation. No anaerobic jars or specific gas mixtures were used. Cultures were incubated in a bacteriological incubator at 36 °C based on the aerotolerant characteristics of B. coli. Under these conditions, oxygen availability was likely gradually reduced by microbial and protozoan metabolic activity within the closed culture system, generating a microenvironment favorable for trophozoite maintenance and proliferation. All cultures were processed simultaneously under identical experimental conditions to minimize technical variability.
Cultures were examined after 24 h of incubation by microscopic observation of a sediment aliquot under 100 × magnification (Primo Star, Zeiss®). Culture viability was determined by the presence of motile trophozoites. Positive cultures were subcultured into fresh medium, whereas negative cultures were reincubated and re-evaluated every 24 h for up to 72 h. Cultures remaining negative after this period were discarded. Positive isolation was defined by the detection of motile trophozoites during the initial verification stage.
Successfully isolated parasites were maintained and subcultured in fresh medium every 24 h until the fifth day of incubation. At this time point, material from two culture tubes of each isolate was subjected to DNA extraction. Routine subculturing was subsequently continued according to the previously established protocol [20, 21] for further analyses and evaluation of long-term maintenance under xenic conditions.
DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and Sanger sequencing
DNA was extracted from both cultured isolates and the corresponding original fecal samples using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen®), following the manufacturer’s instructions with previously described modifications [19].
All extracted DNA samples were subjected to PCR using Platinum Hot Start Master Mix (Invitrogen®) and the primers B58D and B58RC, targeting the ITS1–5.8SrDNA–ITS2 region of Ciliophora and generating amplicons of approximately 500 bp, as previously described by Ponce-Gordo et al. [27]. Each reaction contained 5 μL of template DNA. PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with GelRed (Biotium®) and bromophenol blue (LGC®), then purified using ExoSAP-IT (Invitrogen®), and submitted for Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3730xL automated sequencer (Additional file 1: Table S1). Negative controls (ultrapure water) and positive controls consisting of B. coli culture material from our research group were included in all extraction and PCR runs.
Sequences were edited in ChromasPro® v.1.7.5 and combined with reference sequences retrieved from GenBank, including B. coli sequences from domestic pigs from different countries representing well-defined genetic variants (326–600 bp). Sequences of Balantidium entozoon, Buxtonella sulcata, and Buxtonella-like organisms were included as outgroups, while sequences with ambiguous variant annotations were excluded.
The final dataset (n = 288) was aligned using MAFFT [28] and refined with GBLOCKS [29] to remove poorly aligned regions, followed by visual inspection in SeaView v.5.0.5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction was performed in the IQ-TREE software [30] with 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates using the best-fit substitution model automatically selected by the software.
Library preparation and Illumina sequencing
DNA from 15 pig fecal samples and corresponding cultured isolates was subjected to metabarcoding (Additional file 1: Table S1). A total of 30 paired samples were processed, comprising 15 raw fecal samples and 15 corresponding culture isolates obtained from the same properties. Due to the high financial costs associated with large-scale sequencing analyses, one representative sample per property was selected for cultivation and subsequent metabarcoding analysis.
Sequencing was performed by Genone® (Illumina HiSeq 2500) after PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA (V3–V4; 341F/806Rb) and 18S rRNA (V4; TAReuk454FWD1/TAReukREV3) regions [31, 32].
Following initial quality control by the sequencing provider, all downstream analyses were performed in QIIME 2 [33]. Adapters were removed and paired-end reads were demultiplexed using q2-cutadapt [34] and q2-demux, respectively. Reads were then merged, denoised, and dereplicated using q2-dada2 [35]. Sequences with < 20 bp overlap, reads shorter than 225 bp, and chimeric sequences were excluded. The resulting amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were taxonomically assigned using the feature-classifier plugin with the sklearn module trained on the PR2 database [36].
Statistical and bioinformatic analyses
Nucleotide sequences of B. coli obtained by Sanger sequencing were phylogenetically compared with reference sequences from domestic pigs available in GenBank, considering the country of origin and genetic variant classification. Relative abundance analyses and Venn diagrams were used to explore the taxonomic composition of eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities, as well as potentially pathogenic parasites detected in pig fecal samples and B. coli xenic cultures. These plots were generated in Python using Matplotlib [37], Plotnine [38], and Pandas [39].
Microbiota diversity and dissimilarity between fecal samples and xenic cultures were assessed by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and Weighted UniFrac distance, with significance tested by PERMANOVA using 999 permutations (p ≤ 0.05) in the q2-diversity plugin of QIIME 2 [33].
Potential interactions between B. coli and other prokaryotic and eukaryotic genera were investigated through Correspondence Analysis (CA) in Python. For this analysis, ASV abundance data for both prokaryotes and non-balantidiid eukaryotes were agglomerated at the genus level. To ensure robust statistical patterns, only genera with a total cumulative abundance exceeding 1000 reads across all samples were retained for downstream analysis. Data processing and visualization were performed using Pandas [39], SciPy [40], Statsmodels [41], NumPy [42], and Matplotlib [37].
The geographic distribution of sampling sites was mapped in QGIS v.3.34.14 “Prizren” [43]. Pie charts representing the composition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities in fecal and culture samples were generated in Python and overlaid onto the geographic coordinates of each farm.
Results
Direct examination, in vitro culture, and molecular characterization of Balantioides coli genetic variants
In direct examination, trophozoites and cysts were observed with variable frequencies among samples. Trophozoites were detected in 25 of the 39 samples analyzed, with counts ranging from 1 to 180 forms per slide. Cyst detections were less frequent (19/39), with counts ranging from 1 to 57 structures per slide (Table 1).
Table 1.
Direct examination, culture, and molecular results of Balantioides coli-positive pig fecal samples from Brazil
| City (farm) | Sample ID | Direct examination | Culture | PCR and Sanger | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trophozoites (count) | Cysts (count) |
Maintenance (days) | Fecal variant | Culture variant | ||
| Maricá (A) | 71 | 2 | 0 | 111 | B. coli B0 (LC899043) | B. coli B0 (LC899042) |
| Maricá (B) | 77 | 6 | 57 | 11 |
B. coli B0 (LC899045) |
B. coli B0 (LC899044) |
| Cachoeiras de Macacu (C) | 82 | 2 | 0 | 55 |
B. coli A0 (LC899047) |
B. coli A0 (LC899046) |
| Cachoeiras de Macacu (D) | 119 | 3 | 6 | 16 |
B. coli B0 (LC899049) |
B. coli B0 (LC899048) |
| Silva Jardim (E) | 129 | 3 | 11 | 19 |
B. coli B0 (LC899051) |
B. coli B0 (LC899050) |
| Silva Jardim (E) | 150 | 38 | 0 | 16 |
B. coli B0 (LC899053) |
B. coli B0 (LC899052) |
| Rio Bonito (F) | 157 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
B. coli A0 (LC899055) |
B. coli B0 (LC899054) |
| Rio Bonito (G) | 158 | 0 | 5 | 12 |
B. coli B0 (LC899057) |
B. coli B0 (LC899056) |
| Itaboraí (H) | 177 | 0 | 0 | 380 |
B. coli B0 (LC899059) |
B. coli B0 (LC899058) |
| Itaboraí (H) | 181 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
B. coli B0 (LC899061) |
B. coli B0 (LC899060) |
| Saquarema (I) | 251 | 1 | 1 | 23 |
B. coli B0 (LC899063) |
B. coli B0 (LC899062) |
| Saquarema (I) | 257 | 0 | 8 | 32 |
B. coli B0 (LC899065) |
B. coli B0 (LC899064) |
| Casimiro de Abreu (J) | 717 | 2 | 0 | 33 |
B. coli B0 (LC899086) |
B. coli B0 (LC899085) |
| Casimiro de Abreu (J) | 719 | 0 | 50 | 15 |
B. coli B0 (LC899088) |
B. coli B0 (LC899087) |
| Tanguá (K) | 745 | 0 | 5 | 17 |
B. coli B0 (LC899090) |
B. coli B0 (LC899089) |
| Tanguá (K) | 760 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
B. coli B0 (LC899091) |
NI |
| Pinheiral (L) | 18 | 28 | 0 | 31 |
B. coli A0 (LC899039) |
B. coli B0 (LC899038) |
| Pinheiral (L) | 27 | 21 | 0 | 73 |
B. coli B0 (LC899041) |
B. coli A0 (LC899040) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 283 | 0 | 2 | 33 |
B. coli B0 (LC899067) |
B. coli B0 (LC899066) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 284 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
B. coli B0 (LC899069) |
B. coli B0 (LC899068) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 379 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
B. coli B0 (LC899070) |
NI |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 383 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
B. coli B0 (LC899072) |
B. coli B0 (LC899071) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 418 | 0 | 3 | 20 |
B. coli A0 (LC899076) |
B. coli B0 (LC899075) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 458 | 18 | 0 | 24 |
B. coli A0 (LC899078) |
B. coli B0 (LC899077) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 462 | 26 | 0 | 33 |
B. coli A0 (LC899080) |
B. coli B0 (LC899079) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 565 | 30 | 0 | 13 |
B. coli B0 (LC899082) |
B. coli B0 (LC899081) |
| Nova Friburgo (M) | 586 | 30 | 0 | 13 |
B. coli B0 (LC899084) |
B. coli B0 (LC899083) |
| Rio Pomba (N) | 803 | 0 | 1 | 30 |
B. coli A0 (LC899093) |
B. coli B0 (LC899092) |
| Rio Pomba (N) | 822 | 180 | 0 | 14 |
B. coli A0 (LC899095) |
B. coli A0 (LC899094) |
| Rio Pomba (N) | 826 | 60 | 0 | 326 |
B. coli A0 (LC899097) |
B. coli A0 (LC899096) |
| Rio Pomba (N) | 849 | 5 | 5 | 16 |
B. coli B0 (LC899099) |
B. coli B0 (LC899098) |
| Rio Pomba (N) | 851 | 3 | 0 | 14 |
B. coli B0 (LC899101) |
B. coli B0 (LC899100) |
| Rio Pomba (N) | 852 | 30 | 0 | 14 |
B. coli B0 (LC899103) |
B. coli B0 (LC899102) |
| Rio Pomba (N) | 862 | 15 | 0 | 14 |
B. coli B0 (LC899105) |
B. coli B0 (LC899104) |
| Barbacena (O) | 927 | 0 | 30 | 8 |
B. coli B0 (LC899109) |
B. coli B0 (LC899108) |
| Barbacena (O) | 930 | 3 | 30 | 13 |
B. coli B0 (LC899111) |
B. coli B0 (LC899110) |
| Barbacena (O) | 959 | 30 | 0 | 6 |
B. coli B0 (LC899113) |
B. coli B0 (LC899112) |
| Barbacena (O) | 961 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
B. coli B0 (LC899115) |
B. coli B0 (LC899114) |
| Barbacena (O) | 970 | 0 | 30 | 8 |
B. coli B0 (LC899117) |
B. coli B0 (LC899116) |
A–O indicate the pig farms included in the study; NI, not isolated
In vitro culture was successful for samples originating from all evaluated localities, and parasite isolation was achieved in at least one sample per farm. Of the 39 samples subjected to in vitro isolation, 37 were successfully isolated. Most isolates (27/39) remained viable for 12 to 33 days (Table 1).
Molecular analysis confirmed the presence of B. coli in all fecal samples and their corresponding cultured isolates. Variant B0 was predominant, being detected in 76.9% (30/39) of fecal samples and 84.6% (33/39) of cultured isolates and was present in nearly all farms (14/15). Variant A0 occurred at a lower frequency, being identified in 23.0% (9/39) of fecal samples and 10.2% (4/39) of cultures (Table 1). Additionally, one sample that was negative by direct microscopy yielded successful isolation after blind inoculation and was subsequently confirmed as positive by PCR in both the original fecal material and the corresponding culture.
Differences between the variant detected directly in fecal samples and that recovered after culture were observed in 17.9% (7/39) of the samples, specifically in feces–culture pairs originating from the farms F, L, M and N (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis based on the ITS region corroborated the molecular findings, suggesting that variant B lineages (B, B0, and B1) constitute a well-supported monophyletic group (Fig. 1). The B. coli sequences generated in the present study clustered together with reference sequences deposited in GenBank, showing nucleotide identities ranging from 96.4% to 99.7% for A0 and from 98.3% to 100% for B0 (Fig. 1). For most feces–culture pairs derived from the same host, nucleotide sequences generated from cultured isolates clustered within the same subclade as their corresponding fecal sequences. These clusters were predominantly associated with the B0 variant (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Maximum likelihood phylogeny of ciliates inferred from ITS1–5.8S rDNA–ITS2 sequences. Sequences generated in this study are highlighted in blue for Balantioides coli isolates established in vitro and in green for Balantioides coli-positive fecal samples. These sequences, obtained from pig fecal samples and in vitro cultures, are shown together with reference sequences representing different countries and genetic variants. Concentric rings indicate: (i) country of origin, outermost ring; and (ii) genetic variant, innermost ring. The scale bar represents 0.1 substitutions per site
The genetic distance matrix (Additional file 2: Table S2) further supported this pattern, showing that, in most cases, intra-host genetic distances between feces–culture pairs were close to zero or substantially lower than the distances observed among samples from different farms. However, specific exceptions were confirmed by both phylogenetic reconstruction and the distance matrix, involving the pairs 18F/18C, 27F/27C, 157F/157C, 418F/418C, 458F/458C, 462F/462C, and 803F/803C. In these cases, genetic distances between fecal and culture-derived sequences were higher than those observed for the remaining intra-host pairs and were consistent with a shift between the A0 and B0 variants.
Unicellular eukaryotic communities associated with Balantioides coli: comparison between fecal samples and xenic cultures, and between family-based and industrial farms
The Venn diagram showed that xenic cultures contained the highest number of exclusive ASVs (n = 242), whereas fecal samples presented 184 distinct eukaryotic ASVs, with 80 ASVs shared between both matrices. Notably, cultures exhibited more than twice the number of shared ASVs relative to their corresponding fecal samples (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2.
Eukaryotic ASV composition in feces and xenic cultures of Balantioides coli across pig production systems. A Venn diagram illustrating shared and exclusive unicellular eukaryotic ASVs between pig fecal samples and in vitro xenic cultures of Balantioides coli. B Overall relative abundance of ASVs corresponding to the main unicellular eukaryotic taxa detected in in vitro xenic cultures of Balantioides coli and in the corresponding pig fecal samples from which these isolates were obtained. C Relative abundance of ASVs corresponding to the main unicellular eukaryotic taxa identified from xenic in vitro cultures of Balantioides coli and in pig fecal samples from family-based and industrial farms, presented individually for each sample
In xenic cultures, B. coli represented the largest proportion of the detected eukaryotic community, followed by Blastocystis spp., Entamoebidae, and Colpodellaceae. Fecal samples exhibited a similar overall pattern, maintaining the dominance of B. coli, but with a proportionally greater contribution of Blastocystis spp. and Entamoebidae compared with in vitro cultured isolates. In addition, a greater diversity and abundance of Entamoebidae ASVs were observed in fecal samples, including the identification of Entamoeba suis, E. polecki, E. moshkovskii, and E. hartmanni; however, ASVs assigned to the latter species were not detected in culture-derived isolates (Fig. 2B).
Comparison of corresponding feces–culture pairs across farms revealed a consistent pattern of structural shifts in unicellular eukaryotic communities between the two matrices. In cultures, B. coli showed marked dominance in most isolates (10/15). In contrast, some feces–culture pairs (6/15) showed predominance of ASVs assigned to Blastocystis spp. (119C–119F, 158C–158F, 181C–181F), Entamoebidae (927C–927F), and other eukaryotes (129C–129F) (Fig. 2C).
Principal coordinates analysis showed differences in the unicellular eukaryotic community between B. coli xenic cultures and the corresponding fecal samples, with several B. coli ASVs detected at high abundance exclusively in cultures, whereas Entamoebidae ASVs were predominantly associated with fecal material (Fig. 3A, B). This pattern was supported by Bray–Curtis PERMANOVA, which indicated a trend toward differentiation between matrices (Pseudo-F = 2.26; p = 0.054). In contrast, the Weighted UniFrac analysis revealed a more subtle separation, and PERMANOVA showed no statistically significant difference (Pseudo-F = 1.72; p = 0.159) (Fig. 3C, D).
Fig. 3.
Beta diversity of unicellular eukaryotic communities in feces and xenic cultures of Balantioides coli. A Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, showing the distribution of fecal and culture samples obtained from family-based and industrial farms. Axes represent the percentage of explained variance. B Boxplots of within-group Bray–Curtis distances for fecal and culture samples. C Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Weighted UniFrac distance, showing the separation between fecal and culture samples while considering phylogenetic relationships among taxa. D Boxplots of within-group Weighted UniFrac distances for fecal and culture samples
The composition of unicellular eukaryotes differed between pig production systems. Samples from family-based farms showed greater heterogeneity, with fluctuating dominance of B. coli and higher representation of Blastocystis spp. and Entamoebidae ASVs, whereas industrial farms displayed a more homogeneous profile, strongly dominated by B. coli (≥ 90%) with only occasional low-abundance detections of other taxa. Low-abundance ASVs of other protozoa with zoonotic potential, including Cryptosporidium scrofarum and C. struthionis, were also detected (Additional file 3: Table S3).
Despite these contrasting local patterns, global beta diversity analyses did not reveal statistically significant differences between production systems (Bray–Curtis: Pseudo-F = 0.343643; p = 0.922; Weighted UniFrac: Pseudo-F = 0.684081; p = 0.551), indicating overall similarity in both taxonomic composition and phylogenetic structure. However, samples from family-based farms showed greater dispersion, whereas those from industrial farms clustered more cohesively (Fig. 3B, D).
Prokaryotic communities associated with Balantioides coli: comparison between fecal samples and xenic cultures, and between family-based and industrial farms
The Venn diagram analysis of prokaryotic ASVs showed pronounced divergence between the profiles obtained from fecal samples and xenic cultures. Of the total ASVs detected, 5,992 were exclusive to fecal samples, whereas 8,063 were exclusive to xenic cultures containing B. coli. Only 579 ASVs were shared between both matrices (Fig. 4D).
Fig. 4.
Comparative prokaryotic community structure between Balantioides coli xenic cultures and pig fecal samples by ASVs. The most abundant taxa are shown at the phylum (A), family (B), and genus (C) levels. The Venn diagram (D) illustrates the number of shared and exclusive ASVs between fecal samples and xenic cultures
Overall, the composition of the prokaryotic community varied substantially between pig feces and B. coli xenic cultures (Fig. 4A–C). Fecal samples showed greater representation of the phyla Bacteroidota and Firmicutes, followed by Proteobacteria, regardless of farm type. However, feces from family-based farms exhibited greater heterogeneity in the relative abundance of these phyla, whereas the profile from industrial farms was more homogeneous across individuals.
In contrast, B. coli xenic cultures displayed a more simplified community, characterized by a relative increase in Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota, together with a marked reduction in Firmicutes, a pattern consistently observed across both pig production systems (Figs. 4A and 5A).
Fig. 5.
Pig farming system shapes prokaryotic ASVs in feces and Balantioides coli xenic cultures. Relative abundance of the most abundant prokaryotic phyla (A), families (B), and genera (C) in Balantioides coli xenic in vitro cultures and their corresponding pig fecal samples from family and industrial farms, shown individually for each sample
At the family level, fecal samples were mainly dominated by Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Spirochaetaceae, with greater interindividual variability observed among family-based farms. In contrast, industrial farms showed a more homogeneous profile, particularly characterized by Prevotellaceae and Enterobacteriaceae, whose ASVs were detected in fecal samples from all animals included in the metabarcoding analyses.
In B. coli xenic cultures, a clear selection for specific families was observed, with a relative increase in Bacteroidaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae (Figs. 4B and 5B).
Among the most abundant genera, fecal samples exhibited greater ASV taxonomic diversity, with predominance of Prevotella, Treponema, and Succinivibrio. These taxa were particularly frequent in feces obtained from family-based farms. By contrast, B. coli xenic cultures were characterized by a greater relative abundance of Bacteroides, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia–Shigella (Figs. 4C and 5C).
Beta diversity analyses revealed significant structural differences in the prokaryotic community between pig fecal samples and B. coli xenic cultures, irrespective of farm type, based on both Bray–Curtis and Weighted UniFrac distances (Fig. 6A–D). PCoA showed clear separation between fecal and culture samples, particularly in the Weighted UniFrac analysis. These visual patterns were statistically confirmed by PERMANOVA for both metrics (Bray–Curtis: Pseudo-F = 4.242; p = 0.001; Weighted UniFrac: Pseudo-F = 16.401; p = 0.001) (Fig. 6A–D).
Fig. 6.
Prokaryotic compositional differences between feces and Balantioides coli cultures from family and industrial pigs. A Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distance, showing the distribution of fecal and culture samples obtained from family and industrial farms. The axes represent the percentage of variance explained. B Boxplots of within-group Bray–Curtis distances for fecal and culture samples. C Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Weighted UniFrac distance, highlighting the separation between fecal and culture samples while considering phylogenetic relationships among taxa. D Boxplots of within-group Weighted UniFrac distances for fecal and culture samples
In contrast, the comparison between samples obtained from family and industrial farms did not reveal statistically significant differences in prokaryotic community composition. Although some taxa showed higher relative frequencies in samples from specific farm types, PERMANOVA analysis did not indicate segregation between groups when all ASVs were considered, for either Bray–Curtis (Pseudo-F = 1.016; p = 0.373) or Weighted UniFrac (Pseudo-F = 1.228; p = 0.266).
Spatial distribution of eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities associated with Balantioides coli-positive fecal samples
The mapping of pig farms with fecal samples positive for B. coli, based on metabarcoding data, revealed spatial heterogeneity in the composition of the associated eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities, both among municipalities and across different production systems (Additional file 4: Fig. S1). In family farms, greater variability was observed in the relative composition of eukaryotic taxa, with predominance of B. coli ASVs associated with different proportions of other intestinal protozoa, including representatives of Blastocystis spp., Entamoebidae, and other eukaryotes, in addition to variation in the associated bacterial composition. In contrast, industrial farms showed more homogeneous microbial community patterns in fecal samples positive for B. coli, with lower relative variation among the detected taxonomic groups (Additional file 4: Fig. S1).
Spatial analysis also revealed differences in bacterial community composition, with variation in the relative abundance of the main phyla across locations. Farms located in different municipalities exhibited specific bacterial signatures, suggesting the influence of local factors, such as management practices, environment, and production system, on the structure of the communities associated with B. coli-positive fecal samples (Additional file 4: Fig. S1).
Correspondence analysis of cultured Balantioides coli ASVs and associated eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities
Correspondence analysis showed that the first two dimensions explained 34.08% of the total variability in the eukaryotic dataset and 49.01% in the prokaryotic dataset (Figs. 7 and 8).
Fig. 7.
Correspondence analysis of Balantioides coli ASVs and associated eukaryotic taxa detected in xenic cultures. Orange points represent Balantioides coli ASVs, whereas blue points correspond to associated eukaryotic ASVs. The analysis was performed using a high-abundance cutoff (≥ 1000 ASVs) to highlight the taxa most strongly associated with Balantioides coli isolates maintained under in vitro culture conditions.
Fig. 8.
Correspondence analysis of Balantioides coli ASVs and associated prokaryotic taxa detected in xenic cultures. Orange points represent Balantioides coli ASVs, whereas blue points correspond to associated prokaryotic ASVs. The analysis was performed using a high-abundance cutoff (≥ 1000 ASVs) to highlight the taxa most strongly associated with Balantioides coli isolates maintained under in vitro culture conditions.
Balantioides coli ASVs exhibited heterogeneous distribution patterns and variable associations with surrounding eukaryotic taxa (Fig. 7). In the eukaryotic dataset, distinct B. coli ASVs were positioned near representatives of Dinophyceae (Dino Group I and II), fungi (Dipodascus), copepods (Acrocalanus and Paracalanus), and protists such as Blastocystis, Cercomonas, Tetratrichomonas, and Entamoeba. Additional associations were observed with environmental and free-living taxa, including Blastodinium, Litholophus, Apostichopus, Lecythium, and representatives of Cercozoa (Fig. 7).
Correspondence analysis of the prokaryotic dataset revealed the formation of three major co-occurrence structures involving B. coli ASVs and bacterial taxa within xenic cultures. One large cluster comprised multiple B. coli ASVs positioned in close linear association with bacterial genera such as Bacteroides, Pseudomonas, Escherichia–Shigella, and Enterobacter. In contrast, a second prominent group of B. coli ASVs occupied relatively isolated positions in the ordination space and did not cluster closely with dominant bacterial taxa, considering the established cutoff threshold of at least 1000 ASVs. Additionally, a third and smaller cluster composed of fewer B. coli ASVs was positioned near bacteria including Firmicutes (Lactobacillus and Exiguobacterium), Bacteriodota (Prevotella and Muribaculaceae) and Actinomycota (Saccharopolyspora) (Fig. 8).
Discussion
Overall, structures morphologically compatible with B. coli were detected by microscopy and successfully isolated in xenic culture from fecal samples obtained from all farms included in this study. Priority was given to samples with higher numbers of compatible forms, including viable trophozoites, as recommended in previous studies [20, 21, 44]. Nevertheless, successful isolation was achieved from one fecal sample that tested negative by microscopy after blind inoculation into culture medium immediately following microscopic examination. Direct microscopic examination is widely used for the detection of intestinal parasites such as B. coli; however, only a small fraction of the fecal material is examined, which may limit detection in low-intensity infections. After the fifth day of incubation, the cultured isolate was confirmed as positive for B. coli by PCR, and molecular analysis also confirmed the presence of the parasite in the original fecal sample, demonstrating that the negative microscopic result likely reflected the limited sensitivity of direct examination. These findings reinforce the value of complementary molecular approaches and support blind inoculation as a useful strategy for parasite recovery, particularly in preferred hosts such as pigs.
Most isolates remained viable in vitro for short periods, generally between two and four weeks, consistent with previous reports [20, 21, 45, 46]. Even so, some isolates showed prolonged viability, suggesting that both isolate-specific characteristics and culture conditions may influence persistence. Given the absence of consolidated cryopreservation protocols for B. coli [2], in vitro maintenance remains labor-intensive and requires frequent subculturing, which should be considered when designing experimental studies involving this protozoan.
Molecular and phylogenetic analyses confirmed the presence of B. coli in all fecal samples and corresponding cultured isolates, with clear segregation of sequences into the A0 and B0 clades and high topological support. The sequences generated in this study clustered with reference isolates previously reported from Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas [12, 14, 15, 18, 20, 27, 47–50], reinforcing the genetic conservation and broad geographic distribution of these lineages. The predominance of the B0 variant in both fecal samples and cultures is consistent with previous reports indicating that this is the most widely distributed lineage in pig populations [19, 20], whereas A0 was detected at a lower frequency and showed a more restricted distribution.
Although the ecological adaptive advantages of the B0 variant remain unclear, its predominance in both fecal samples and xenic cultures in the present study may suggest greater adaptation to pig hosts and/or higher tolerance to in vitro conditions. From a One Health perspective, this finding deserves attention because pigs are recognized as the main reservoirs of B. coli and maintain close contact with humans in rural production systems. Supporting this hypothesis, our research group recently detected the A0, B0, and atypical variants of B. coli in fecal samples from pig farmers occupationally exposed to infected pigs in Brazil, reinforcing the zoonotic potential and possible interspecies transmission of these lineages at the animal–human interface [2].
The analysis of matched feces–culture pairs allowed direct assessment of lineage stability after in vitro establishment. In most cases, fecal and culture-derived sequences clustered within the same phylogenetic subclade and showed minimal within-host genetic distances, indicating high genetic concordance and suggesting that the culture process largely preserved the original genetic identity of the variants. However, specific exceptions were observed in some feces–culture pairs, in which the genetic variant detected after in vitro establishment differed from that identified directly in the original fecal sample. This pattern suggests that xenic culture may favor the differential expansion of pre-existing parasitic subpopulations, acting as a selective environment for variants with greater adaptation to in vitro conditions. Similar observations were previously reported for B. coli isolates maintained in xenic culture systems differing only in serum composition and originating from the same pig fecal sample [20].
In addition, fecal samples may contain genetically heterogeneous populations of B. coli, and mixed infections cannot be excluded. Likewise, intragenomic polymorphism of rRNA genes should also be considered, given the coexistence of at least two ribosomal gene types previously described in the B. coli genome [18, 51]. Conjugation events in ciliates should also be considered, as they may contribute to genetic recombination and sequence variation after culture establishment. Although no double peaks were observed in the electropherograms, preferential amplification of the most abundant variant cannot be excluded. Additional approaches such as variant-specific qPCR, cloning, or deep sequencing will be necessary to confirm mixed infections and better understand the dynamics of B. coli variants during in vitro establishment.
Metabarcoding analysis comparing the eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities present in B. coli xenic in vitro cultures and in the corresponding pig fecal samples showed that parasite isolation and maintenance promoted a reconfiguration of the unicellular microeukaryotic community originally present in feces. Although part of the ASVs was shared between both matrices, the high proportion of culture-exclusive ASVs indicates that the in vitro environment acts as an ecological filter, selecting organisms capable of surviving and proliferating under the culture conditions.
In this context, B. coli and Blastocystis spp. were the most frequently detected eukaryotes in cultures, which was expected given their routine microscopic detection during subculture procedures and the recognized suitability of the medium for intestinal protozoa [12, 20, 21, 52, 53]. The culture system also favored the multiplication of these organisms, resulting in their predominance within the isolates. In contrast, fecal samples exhibited greater eukaryotic diversity, particularly of representatives of the family Entamoebidae. The identification of E. suis, E. polecki, E. moshkovskii, and E. hartmanni highlights the complexity of the pig intestinal microeukaryotic community. The lower recovery of these taxa in culture may be related to the scarcity of established in vitro protocols for most Entamoeba species, unlike what is available for E. histolytica and E. moshkovskii [44, 54].
The present study was not primarily designed to investigate the epidemiology of Entamoeba spp. in pigs; nevertheless, these findings are highly relevant, as they represent the first molecular evidence of Amoebozoa members in pig feces in Brazil. Similar observations have been reported in weaned pigs from Denmark [55]. From an epidemiological perspective, this detection deserves attention because some species, such as E. polecki and E. moshkovskii, have recognized zoonotic potential and may represent a risk at the animal–human interface [56–58]. In addition, evidence suggests that E. suis and E. polecki may also be associated with clinically relevant intestinal lesions in pigs, including mucosal invasion and hemorrhagic colitis [59–61].
Overall, culture reduced part of the original diversity of ASVs from other protozoa; however, Blastocystis spp. and members of Entamoebidae remained detectable in some isolates. This pattern suggests that certain intestinal eukaryotes exhibit greater tolerance to xenic conditions and may persist alongside B. coli in culture, possibly by exploiting similar metabolic niches or benefiting from bacterial activity within the medium. Correspondence analyses further supported this interpretation, as some—but not all—B. coli ASVs clustered near intestinal protists such as Blastocystis, Entamoeba, and members of Parabasalia, indicating recurrent co-occurrence patterns among intestinal eukaryotes within xenic cultures. However, the scattered distribution and relatively isolated positioning of several B. coli ASVs suggest that the ciliate does not depend on specific eukaryotic taxa for persistence in vitro, despite its ability to coexist with diverse protists and environmental eukaryotes within the same culture system.
Marked proliferation of other protozoa in the culture medium, particularly Blastocystis spp., was observed in some isolates and frequently compromised the viability of B. coli, requiring successive and labor-intensive subcultures to maintain viable isolates. Similar difficulties have previously been reported in xenic cultures involving Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar, in which Blastocystis interfered with culture stability [20, 62–64]. Frequent subculturing may therefore have contributed to maintaining these mixed eukaryotic communities while minimizing the deleterious effects of protozoan overgrowth on ciliate viability.
Beyond its methodological impact, the recurrent detection of Blastocystis spp. is also epidemiologically relevant. This protozoan is widely distributed in pigs and has recognized zoonotic potential [65–67]. Although its pathogenic role in humans remains controversial [68, 69], blastocystosis remains poorly explored in veterinary parasitology, with limited information regarding its epidemiology and possible implications for animal health.
The separation between fecal samples and cultures observed in the Bray–Curtis-based PCoA indicates that culture substantially altered the relative abundance of the eukaryotic community. In contrast, the less pronounced separation in the Weighted UniFrac analysis suggests that the main phylogenetic groups, including B. coli, Blastocystis spp., and Entamoeba spp., remained partially shared between matrices, despite changes in abundance. Thus, culture appears to restructure the community rather than introduce entirely new protozoan clades.
Additionally, the detection of other parasites, such as Cryptosporidium scrofarum and C. struthionis, even at low ASV abundance, reinforces the epidemiological relevance of the pig intestinal protist community. However, it is important to note that NGS-based approaches still present limitations for precise species-level identification of Cryptosporidium [55]. In Brazil, C. scrofarum has already been reported in domestic and feral pigs [70, 71], whereas the detection of C. struthionis represents an unusual finding, previously described in cattle feces in China [72]. In the present study, its occurrence was restricted to family farms (C and K), suggesting possible environmental contamination by bird feces or other host species, potentially associated with less stringent sanitary management.
The structure of the prokaryotic communities associated with B. coli showed marked differences between pig feces and xenic cultures. This selective pattern was expected, as xenic cultures naturally favor microorganisms capable of persisting and multiplying under artificial in vitro conditions. However, to our knowledge, no previous studies have directly compared the microbiota of intestinal protozoan xenic cultures with that of the original fecal samples. Thus, the present findings provide a novel contribution to understanding the interactions between B. coli and associated bacterial communities under culture conditions.
The prokaryotic community detected in culture did not fully reflect the original intestinal microbiota, but rather a functionally adapted subset of microorganisms suited to the in vitro environment, potentially involved in protozoan maintenance, nutrition, or metabolism. This interpretation is supported by previous observations of bacteria within food vacuoles in the cytoplasm of B. coli, suggesting their possible role as a nutritional source or metabolic partner [73].
Beta diversity analyses reinforced these structural differences, showing consistent separation between fecal and culture matrices in both Bray–Curtis and Weighted UniFrac metrics. The higher Pseudo-F value observed for Weighted UniFrac indicates that xenic culture altered not only the relative abundance of bacterial taxa but also the phylogenetic composition of the community, suggesting selection of lineages evolutionarily distinct from those predominant in the original intestinal environment.
At a broad taxonomic level, fecal samples were dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidota, followed by Proteobacteria, consistent with the classical gut microbiota profile previously reported in pigs infected with B. coli [74, 75]. Among the most abundant genera, fecal samples showed greater taxonomic diversity, with predominance of Prevotella, Treponema, and Succinivibrio. These genera are involved in the production of metabolites involved in host energy metabolism and intestinal homeostasis [76–81]. In pigs, Prevotella has been linked to both beneficial productive traits and diarrheic conditions, particularly in animals coinfected with enteric pathogens, including B. coli [74–76]. Despite the recognized ecological importance of these genera, their potential association with B. coli remains poorly understood, highlighting an important gap in the study of protozoan–bacterial interactions in pigs.
In contrast, xenic cultures showed lower taxonomic diversity, with enrichment of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota. The predominance of families such as Bacteroidaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae, together with genera including Bacteroides, Pseudomonas, Escherichia–Shigella, and Enterobacter suggests selective growth of metabolically versatile bacteria able to rapidly adapt to the culture medium. The marked presence of these bacterial taxa in B. coli xenic cultures was further supported by correspondence analyses, in which multiple ASVs of the ciliate co-occurred with prokaryotes belonging to this group under in vitro conditions, highlighting not only their overall abundance but also their predominance across different ciliate isolates.
Bacteroides may support protozoan maintenance through the production of short-chain fatty acids and other fermentation metabolites that help sustain a low-oxygen microenvironment compatible with the facultatively anaerobic physiology of B. coli [74]. The high abundance of Pseudomonas likely reflects its metabolic versatility and competitive advantage in Pavlova medium, consistent with the bluish–greenish coloration observed in some cultures [21, 82, 83]. Likewise, the persistence of Escherichia–Shigella probably reflects successful establishment of enterobacteria originating from fecal material, preserving microbial interactions relevant to protozoan physiology [44].
Furthermore, the spatial analysis of pig farms, integrating both geographic location and production system, revealed heterogeneity in the composition of eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities associated with fecal samples positive for B. coli ASVs, in agreement with previous findings reporting greater parasite diversity in family-based systems [84]. However, despite local differences in taxon abundance and spatial variability, no statistically significant overall segregation was observed between production models, indicating that the broader microbial community structure remains largely shared across systems. This pattern likely reflects the recurrent detection of B. coli across all farm types and suggests that, although stricter sanitary management may reduce the circulation of specific microorganisms, it may be insufficient to interrupt the transmission of B. coli and other taxa potentially involved in its intestinal colonization and persistence.
Due to the high costs of large-scale sequencing, one representative sample per farm was selected for cultivation and metabarcoding analyses. Although this approach enabled the inclusion of all farms, the non-random sampling design may have underestimated within-farm microbial variability and limits broader generalization of the observed patterns. Likewise, comparisons between family-based and industrial farms should be interpreted with caution, as the sampling design did not allow a comprehensive assessment of potentially associated factors, including stocking density, diet, biosecurity practices, and medication history. Therefore, the differences observed between production systems remain exploratory and highlight the need for future studies using expanded and pooled sampling strategies to better disentangle how management practices and environmental variables may shape microbial communities potentially associated with B. coli colonization.
Conclusions
Taken together, our findings show that B. coli circulates widely in pigs from distinct production systems in southeastern Brazil and can be successfully maintained in xenic culture using fecal samples from naturally infected animals. Although the parasite remained relatively genetically stable after in vitro establishment, culture acted as a selective filter for both parasite variants and the associated microbiota. These results indicate that B. coli should be interpreted as part of a complex intestinal microbial consortium rather than as an isolated parasite, reinforcing the need for an integrative ecological approach to better understand its transmission, adaptation, and zoonotic relevance.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1. Table S1 Fecal samples and cultured isolates by municipality and farm for sequencing analyses in southeastern Brazil. A–O correspond to the pig farms included in the study. Values are expressed as the number of fecal samples and corresponding cultured isolates analyzed
Additional file 2. Table S2. Distance matrix showing the estimated values of evolutionary divergence between sequences, expressed as the number of base substitutions per site. Values represent pairwise genetic distances among sequences. Sequence identifiers correspond to sample IDs
Additional file 3. Table S3 Amplicon sequence variantsdetected in fecal and in vitro culture samples, with read counts per sample. Columns represent sample IDs, and rows correspond to unique Feature IDs. Taxonomic classification is provided from domain to species level. “Confidence” indicates the taxonomic assignment score
Additional file 4. Fig. S1. Spatial distribution of eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities in Balantioides coli-positive pig feces. Spatial distribution of eukaryoticand prokaryoticcommunities associated with Balantioides coli-positive fecal samples obtained from family and industrial pig farms in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais, Brazil. Letters A to K indicate family farms located in Maricá, Cachoeiras de Macacu, Silva Jardim, Rio Bonito, Itaboraí, Saquarema, Casimiro de Abreu, and Tanguá, whereas industrial farms are represented by Pinheiral, Nova Friburgo, Rio Pomba, and Barbacena. Pie charts represent the relative composition of the main eukaryoticand bacterialgroups detected by metabarcoding in B. coli-positive fecal samples.
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank the pig farmers and the Federal Institutes of Education for their collaboration and support throughout the development of this study.
Author contributions
CSCC and ASB conceived and designed the study. CSCC, RSF, and ASB collected the biological samples. CSCC and ASB supervised the experiments. CSCC, RSF, ISR, LLC, BTS, GRVC, and ASB performed the laboratory analyses and processed the data. CSCC, PMS, and ASB analyzed and interpreted the results. CSCC, PMS, RJPD, and ASB drafted the manuscript. CSCC, PMS, ASB, FBK, and RJPD critically revised the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Rio de Janeiro State Research Support Foundation (FAPERJ) through the Support Program for Young Female Scientists with Links to ICTs in the State of Rio de Janeiro (E-26/210.041/2024) and the Young Scientist of Our State Grant (E-26/204.492/2024); the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) through the Productivity Grant (312037/2022–8) and additional grants (310625/2025–4, 404708/2024–2, and 406171/2025–4); and the Minas Gerais State Research Support Foundation (FAPEMIG, APQ-02984–24).
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards established for animal research and were approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal Fluminense (CEUA/UFF; Protocol No. 8394191222). Additional ethical approval was obtained from the Animal Use Ethics Committees of the Federal Institutes of Education, Science and Technology (Protocols No. 03/2022 and No. 02/2023).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Class CSC, Souza Ferreira R, Araujo ALS, Silva Reis I, Silva BT, Knackfuss FB, et al. Gastrointestinal parasites in pigs in Brazil: prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis, and extension activities. Parasitol Res. 2025;124:100. 10.1007/s00436-025-08536-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Class CSC, Souza PM, Ferreira RS, Reis IDS, Corrêa LL, Silva BTD, et al. One health approach to Balantioides coli: molecular and metabarcoding evidence of zoonotic transmission. PLoS ONE. 2026;21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0338487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barbosa AS, Dib LV, Uchôa CMA. Balantidium coli. In: Lui D, editor. Handbook of foodborne diseases, vol. 1. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. p. 531–40.
- 4.Silva RKM, Dib LV, Amendoeira MR, Class CC, Pinheiro JL, Fonseca ABM, et al. Balantidiasis in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop. 2021;223. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim JC, Abee CR, Wolf RH. Balantidiosis in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Lab Anim. 1978;12:231–3. 10.1258/002367778781088620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lankester F, Mätz-Rensing K, Kiyang J, Jensen SA, Weiss S, Leendertz FH. Fatal ulcerative colitis in a western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). J Med Primatol. 2008;37:297–302. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2008.00287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thanasuwan S, Piratae S, Thaowandee K, Amporn C. Prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal parasites on pig farms in Kalasin Province. Thailand Vet World. 2024;17:273–81. 10.14202/vetworld.2024.273-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pinto JMS, Costa JO, Souza JCA. Ocorrência de endoparasitos em suínos criados em Itabuna, Bahia. Brasil Ciênc Vet Tróp. 2007;10:79–85. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Amadi AN, Ubiaru PC, Ugagu GM, Ibediugha BN, Obeagu IA, Njikeonye A. Preliminary study on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of pigs managed and slaughtered in Umuahia north local government area of Abia State. Nigeria Anim Res Int. 2018;15:3013–9. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abonyi FO, Njoga EO. Prevalence and determinants of gastrointestinal parasite infection in intensively managed pigs in Nsukka agricultural zone, Southeast. Nigeria J Parasit Dis. 2019;44:31–9. 10.1007/s12639-019-01158-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Omoruyi Z, Agbinone I. Gastrointestinal parasites among swine bred in Edo State, Nigeria. Afr J Clin Exp Microbiol. 2020;21:349–53. 10.4314/ajcem.v21i4.12. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barbosa AS, Ponce-Gordo F, Dib LV, Antunes Uchôa CM, Bastos OMP, Pissinatti A, Amendoeira MRR. First molecular characterization of Balantioides coli (Malmsten, 1857) isolates maintained in vitro culture and from feces of captive animals, Rio de Janeiro. Brazil Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2017;10:102–13. 10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yan W, Sun C, He K, Han L, Lv C, Qian W, et al. Prevalence and molecular identification of Balantioides coli isolates from pet guinea pigs in Central China. Parasitol Res. 2020;119:3763–70. 10.1007/s00436-020-06875-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li YH, Yao Q, Dong HP, Wang SS, Chen RR, Song JK, et al. Molecular characterization of Balantioides coli in pigs from Shaanxi province, northwestern China. Parasitol Res. 2020;119:3075–81. 10.1007/s00436-020-06800-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Byun JW, Park JH, Moon BY, Lee K, Lee WK, Kwak D, Lee SH. Identification of zoonotic Balantioides coli in pigs by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and its distribution in Korea. Animals (Basel). 2021;11:2659. 10.3390/ani11092659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barbosa CCA. Balantidiasis. In: Tarun KB, editor. The diagnosis and treatment of protozoan diseases. Oxford: Academic Press; 2024. p. 203–13.
- 17.Class CSC, Souza Ferreira R, Silva Reis I, Corrêa LL, Silva BT, Assis JA, et al. Optimizing Balantioides coli in vitro maintenance: effects of temperature and lipid supplementation in modified Pavlova medium. BMC Vet Res. 2026;22:143. 10.1186/s12917-025-05282-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ponce-Gordo F, Fonseca-Salamanca F, Martínez-Díaz RA. Genetic heterogeneity in internal transcribed spacer genes of Balantidium coli (Litostomatea, Ciliophora). Protist. 2011;162:774–94. 10.1016/j.protis.2011.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pinheiro JL, Bruno SF, Dib LV, Santos CR, Class CSC, Corrêa LL, et al. Zoonotic parasites in artiodactyls with emphasis on the feral boar in the Atlantic Forest, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Animals (Basel). 2023;13:3611. 10.3390/ani13233611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Class CSC, Corrêa LL, Knackfuss FB, Amendoeira MRR, Gordo FP, Barbosa ADS. The phylogenetic characterization of Balantioides coli isolated in the Pavlova culture medium supplemented with coconut water and animal serum. Pathogens. 2024;13:476. 10.3390/pathogens13060476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barbosa AS, Bastos OM, Uchôa CM, Pissinatti A, Ferreira Filho PR, Dib LV, et al. Isolation and maintenance of Balantidium coli (Malmsteim, 1857) cultured from fecal samples of pigs and non-human primates. Vet Parasitol. 2015;210:240–5. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fitri LE, Candradikusuma D, Setia YD, Wibawa PA, Iskandar A, Winaris N, Pawestri AR. Diagnostic methods of common intestinal protozoa: current and future immunological and molecular methods. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022;7:253–253. 10.3390/tropicalmed7100253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kang D, Choi JH, Kim M, Yun S, Oh S, Yi MH, Kim JY, et al. Optimization of 18S rRNA metabarcoding for the simultaneous diagnosis of intestinal parasites. Sci Rep. 2024;14:25049–25049. 10.1038/s41598-024-76304-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stensvold CR. Metabarcoding in gut protozoology. Trends Parasitol. 2024;40:1173–82. 10.1016/j.pt.2024.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pavlova EA. Sur les méthodes de la culture d’Entamoeba histolytica. Parazitol Med. 1938;7:224–7. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jones WR. The experimental infection of rats with Entamoeba histolytica; with a method for evaluating with the anti-amoebic properties of new compounds. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1946;40:130–40. 10.1080/00034983.1946.11685270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ponce-Gordo F, Jiménez-Ruiz E, Martínez-Díaz RA. Tentative identification of Balantidium from ostriches (Struthio camelus) as Balantidium coli-like by analysis of polymorphic DNA. Vet Parasitol. 2008;157:41–9. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–6. 10.1093/bib/bbx108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;4:540–52. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W232–5. 10.1093/nar/gkw256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yu Y, Lee C, Kim J, Hwang S. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;89:670–9. 10.1002/bit.20347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stoeck T, Bass D, Nebel M, Christen R, Jones MDM, Breiner H-W, et al. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:21–31. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, AlGhalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7. 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–2. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3. 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Guillou L, Bachar D, Audic S, Bass D, Berney C, Bittner L, et al. The protist ribosomal reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D597–604. 10.1093/nar/gks1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hunter JD. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9:90–5. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kibirige H, Lamp G, Katins J, gdowding, austin, Florian Finkernagel, et al. has2k1/plotnine: v0.15.0. Zenodo; 2025. 10.5281/zenodo.15939762.
- 39.McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in python. Proc. of the 9th Python in Science Conf. 2010;56–61. 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a.
- 40.Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, et al. SciPy 10: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 2020;17:261–72. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Seabold S, Perktold J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with python. In: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference; 2010.
- 42.Harris CR, Millman KJ, van der Walt SJ, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D, et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020;585:357–62. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.QGIS Development Team. QGIS geographic information system: version 3.34.14 “Prizren”. Beaverton (OR): Open Source Geospatial Foundation; 2024.
- 44.Clark CG, Diamond LS. Methods for cultivation of luminal parasitic protists of clinical importance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:329–41. 10.1128/CMR.15.3.329-341.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nilles-Bije ML, Rivera WL. Ultrastructural and molecular characterization of Balantidium coli isolated in the Philippines. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:387–94. 10.1007/s00436-009-1673-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Barrett HP, Yarbrough N. A method for the cultivation of Balantidium coli. Am J Trop Med. 1921;1:161–5. 10.4269/ajtmh.1921.s1-1.161. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dashti A, Rivero-Juárez A, Santín M, George NS, Köster PC, López-López P, et al. Diarrhoea-causing enteric protist species in intensively and extensively raised pigs (Susscrofadomesticus) in Southern Spain. Part I: prevalence and genetic diversity. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69:e1051–64. 10.1111/tbed.14388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mega J, Moreira R, Moreira G, Silva-Loureiro A, Gomes da Silva P, Istrate C, et al. Multicentric study on enteric protists occurrence in zoological parks in Portugal. Pathogens. 2024;13:874–874. 10.3390/pathogens13100874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pomajbíková K, Oborník M, Horák A, Petrželková KJ, Grim JN, Levecke B, et al. Novel insights into the genetic diversity of Balantidium and Balantidium-like cyst-forming ciliates. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang T, Dou G, Yan W, Zhang L, Han L, Ding K, et al. Population characterization of Balantidium coli from pigs using ITS1–5.8S rRNA-ITS2 sequence. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2011;51:828–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Preer LB, Rudman B, Pollack S, Preer JR Jr. Does ribosomal DNA get out of the micronuclear chromosome in Paramecium tetraurelia by means of a rolling circle? Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:7792–800. 10.1128/MCB.19.11.7792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Melo GB, Roldan W, Malta FM, Lescano SAZ, Castilho VL, Gonçalves EMDN, Melo GBd, Malta FdM, et al. Culture isolation and molecular identification of Blastocystis sp. in Brazilian human isolates: preliminary results. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2020;62. 10.1590/s1678-9946202062051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dib L, da Silva B, Correa L, Pissinatti A, Moreira S, Tavares MC, et al. Diversity of the Amoebozoa and Ciliophora groups in non-human primates kept ex situ and in their handlers in different institutions in Brazil. Pathogens. 2025;14:56. 10.3390/pathogens14010056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Félix-Silva E, Mayrink W. Studies on Entamoeba moshkovskii . II – New foci in different types of water collections in Brazil and Uruguay. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1974;16:203–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Stensvold CR, Jirků-Pomajbíková K, Tams KW, Jokelainen P, Berg RPKD, Marving E, et al. Parasitic intestinal protists of zoonotic relevance detected in pigs by metabarcoding and real-time PCR. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1189. 10.3390/microorganisms9061189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Servián A, Zonta ML, Navone GT. Differential diagnosis of human Entamoeba infections: morphological and molecular characterization of new isolates in Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2024;56:16–24. 10.1016/j.ram.2023.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sardar SK, Ghosal A, Haldar T, Maruf M, Das K, Saito-Nakano Y, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Entamoeba moshkovskii in diarrheal patients from Eastern India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Calegar DA, Monteiro KJL, Bacelar PAA, Evangelista BBC, Almeida MM, Dos Santos JP, et al. Epidemiology, species composition and genetic diversity of tetra- and octonucleated Entamoeba spp. in different Brazilian biomes. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:160. 10.1186/s13071-021-04672-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Matsubayashi M, Suzuta F, Terayama Y, Shimojo K, Yui T, Haritani M, Shibahara T. Ultrastructural characteristics and molecular identification of Entamoeba suis isolated from pigs with hemorrhagic colitis: implications for pathogenicity. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:3023–8. 10.1007/s00436-014-3965-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Matsubayashi M, Murakoshi N, Komatsu T, Tokoro M, Haritani M, Shibahara T. Genetic identification of Entamoeba polecki subtype 3 from pigs in Japan and characterisation of its pathogenic role in ulcerative colitis. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;36:8–14. 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Matsubayashi M, Sasagawa Y, Aita T, Tokoro M, Haritani M, Shibahara T. First report of mixed Entamoeba polecki (ST1) and E. suis infection in piglets shedding abnormal feces by histopathological and molecular surveys. Acta Parasitol. 2016;61:665–70. 10.1515/ap-2016-0093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dobell C, Laidlaw PP. On the cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and some other entozoic amoebae. Parasitology. 1926;18:283–318. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Smedley SR. A method of freeing cultures of Entamoeba histolytica from contamination with Blastocystis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1956;50:232–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gonçalves AQ, Viana JC, Pires EM, Bóia MN, Coura JR, Silva EF. The use of the antifungal agent miconazole as an inhibitor of Blastocystis hominis growth in Entamoeba histolytica / E. dispar cultures. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2007;49:201–2. 10.1590/s0036-46652007000300013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rudzińska M, Kowalewska B, Szostakowska B, Grzybek M, Sikorska K, Świątalska A. First report on the occurrence and subtypes of Blastocystis in pigs in Poland using sequence-tagged-site PCR and barcode region sequencing. Pathogens. 2020;9:655. 10.3390/pathogens9080655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Asghari A, Sadrebazzaz A, Shamsi L, Shams M. Global prevalence, subtypes distribution, zoonotic potential, and associated risk factors of Blastocystis sp. in domestic pigs ( Sus domesticus ) and wild boars ( Sus scrofa ): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog. 2021. 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rehena J, Harun AB, Karim MR. Epidemiology of Blastocystis in farm animals: a review. Vet Parasitol. 2025;334. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Stensvold CR, van der Giezen M. Associations between gut microbiota and common luminal intestinal parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:369–77. 10.1016/j.pt.2018.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Aykur M, Malatyalı E, Demirel F, Cömert-Koçak B, Gentekaki E, Tsaousis AD, Dogruman-Al F. Blastocystis: a mysterious member of the gut microbiome. Microorganisms. 2024;12:461. 10.3390/microorganisms12030461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Pinto MDS, Neto JABC, Sapatera NS, Florentino BF, Wingter GB, Nakamura AA, et al. First detection of Cryptosporidium scrofarum, an agent with zoonotic potential, in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in the Americas. Acta Trop. 2025;267. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2025.107679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Machi IG, Pinto MDS, Nakamura AA, Meireles MV. Molecular detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in semi-intensive pig production systems in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Res Commun. 2025;50:37. 10.1007/s11259-025-10985-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhang X, Jian Y, Li X, Ma L, Karanis G, Qigang C, Karanis P. Molecular detection and prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. infections in two types of domestic farm animals in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau area (QTPA) in China. Parasitol Res. 2018;117:233–9. 10.1007/s00436-017-5697-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Barbosa ADS, Barbosa HS, Souza SMO, Dib LV, Uchôa CMA, Bastos OMP, et al. Balantioides coli: morphological and ultrastructural characteristics of pig and non-human primate isolates. Acta Parasitol. 2018;63:287–98. 10.1515/ap-2018-0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.He K, Yan W, Sun C, Liu J, Bai R, Wang T, et al. Alterations in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota in weaned piglets infected with Balantioides coli. Vet Parasitol. 2020;288. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.He K, Xiong J, Yang W, Zhao L, Wang T, Qian W, et al. Metagenome of gut microbiota provides a novel insight into the pathogenicity of Balantioides coli in weaned piglets. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:10791. 10.3390/ijms241310791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Amat S, Lantz H, Munyaka PM, Willing BP. Prevotella in pigs: the positive and negative associations with production and health. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1584. 10.3390/microorganisms8101584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cwyk WM, Canale-Parola E. Treponema succinifaciens sp. nov, an anaerobic spirochete from the swine intestine. Arch Microbiol. 1979;122:231–9. 10.1007/BF00411285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Stanton TB, Canale-Parola E. Treponema bryantii sp. nov, a rumen spirochete that interacts with cellulolytic bacteria. Arch Microbiol. 1980;127:145–56. 10.1007/BF00428018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Paster BJ, Canale-Parola E. Treponema saccharophilum sp nov, a large pectinolytic spirochete from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;50:212–9. 10.1128/aem.50.2.212-219.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nordhoff M, Taras D, Macha M, Tedin K, Busse HJ, Wieler LH. Treponema berlinense sp. nov. and Treponema porcinum sp. nov., novel spirochaetes isolated from porcine faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:1675–80. 10.1099/ijs.0.63388-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hespell RB. The genera Succinivibrio and Succinimonas. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH, editors. The Prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1991. p. 3979–82.
- 82.Auerbach E. A study of Balantidium coli Stein 1863, in relation to cytology and behavior in culture. J Morphol. 1863;93:405–45. 10.1002/jmor.1050930302. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Abdelaziz AA, Kamer AMA, Al-Monofy KB, Al-Madboly LA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa’s greenish-blue pigment pyocyanin: its production and biological activities. Microb Cell Fact. 2023;22:110–110. 10.1186/s12934-023-02122-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Abbas G, Lee YO, Mitchell H, Ghafar A, Stevenson MA, Gauci CG, et al. Integrative use of conventional and DNA metabarcoding methods reveals high diversity, prevalence and intensity of gastrointestinal parasites in pigs from Victoria, Australia. Res Vet Sci. 2025;196:105902–105902. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1. Table S1 Fecal samples and cultured isolates by municipality and farm for sequencing analyses in southeastern Brazil. A–O correspond to the pig farms included in the study. Values are expressed as the number of fecal samples and corresponding cultured isolates analyzed
Additional file 2. Table S2. Distance matrix showing the estimated values of evolutionary divergence between sequences, expressed as the number of base substitutions per site. Values represent pairwise genetic distances among sequences. Sequence identifiers correspond to sample IDs
Additional file 3. Table S3 Amplicon sequence variantsdetected in fecal and in vitro culture samples, with read counts per sample. Columns represent sample IDs, and rows correspond to unique Feature IDs. Taxonomic classification is provided from domain to species level. “Confidence” indicates the taxonomic assignment score
Additional file 4. Fig. S1. Spatial distribution of eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities in Balantioides coli-positive pig feces. Spatial distribution of eukaryoticand prokaryoticcommunities associated with Balantioides coli-positive fecal samples obtained from family and industrial pig farms in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais, Brazil. Letters A to K indicate family farms located in Maricá, Cachoeiras de Macacu, Silva Jardim, Rio Bonito, Itaboraí, Saquarema, Casimiro de Abreu, and Tanguá, whereas industrial farms are represented by Pinheiral, Nova Friburgo, Rio Pomba, and Barbacena. Pie charts represent the relative composition of the main eukaryoticand bacterialgroups detected by metabarcoding in B. coli-positive fecal samples.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.









