Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1994 Dec 15;151(12):1713–1719.

Variations in hysterectomy rates in Ontario: does the indication matter?

R E Hall 1, M M Cohen 1
PMCID: PMC1337451  PMID: 7994690

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine variations in rates of hysterectomy for the five main indications for the procedure in regions of Ontario. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based analysis of hospital discharge abstracts. SETTING: All acute care facilities in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All 65,599 women whose hospital record contained a procedure code indicating that a hysterectomy was performed between Apr. 1, 1988, and Mar. 31, 1991. Duplicate cases, records of cancelled procedures and nonresidents were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and age-adjusted rates of hysterectomy, by indication, for each region of Ontario. RESULTS: Five indications accounted for more than 80% of hysterectomies performed. The median age-adjusted rate of hysterectomy for Ontario regions during the study period was 6.25 per 1000 women, with a 2.7-fold variation among regions. The regions with rates of hysterectomy in the highest quartile tended to be rural, and those with rates in the lowest quartile tended to be urban areas with teaching hospitals. When rates of hysterectomy for specific indications were examined, they showed substantial variations among regions in the rate of the procedure for menstrual hemorrhage (18-fold variation), uterine prolapse (9.3-fold) and endometriosis (6.3-fold). A smaller but still significant variation was shown in the rate of hysterectomy for leiomyoma (2.3-fold). Regional variation in the rate of hysterectomy for cancer (2.5-fold) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: There are large interregional variations in rates of hysterectomy, especially for indications that are more discretionary than others (i.e., menstrual hemorrhage, uterine prolapse and endometriosis) and less variation in rates when treatment options and diagnosis are clear-cut. This result suggests the need for more definitive practice guidelines on treatment of the indications for which the rate is more variable.

Full text

PDF
1715

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blais R. Variations in surgical rates in Quebec: does access to teaching hospitals make a difference? CMAJ. 1993 May 15;148(10):1729–1736. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlson K. J., Nichols D. H., Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 25;328(12):856–860. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303253281207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Diehr P., Cain K., Connell F., Volinn E. What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis. Health Serv Res. 1990 Feb;24(6):741–771. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diehr P. Small area statistics: large statistical problems. Am J Public Health. 1984 Apr;74(4):313–314. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.4.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Domenighetti G., Luraschi P., Casabianca A., Gutzwiller F., Spinelli A., Pedrinis E., Repetto F. Effect of information campaign by the mass media on hysterectomy rates. Lancet. 1988 Dec 24;2(8626-8627):1470–1473. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90943-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dyck F. J., Murphy F. A., Murphy J. K., Road D. A., Boyd M. S., Osborne E., De Vlieger D., Korchinski B., Ripley C., Bromley A. T. Effect of surveillance on the number of hysterectomies in the province of Saskatchewan. N Engl J Med. 1977 Jun 9;296(23):1326–1328. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197706092962306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gambone J. C., Reiter R. C., Lench J. B., Moore J. G. The impact of a quality assurance process on the frequency and confirmation rate of hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;163(2):545–550. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91195-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Olive D. L., Schwartz L. B. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 17;328(24):1759–1769. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306173282407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pokras R., Hufnagel V. G. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1965-84. Am J Public Health. 1988 Jul;78(7):852–853. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.7.852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roos N. P., Roos L. L., Jr Surgical rate variations: do they reflect the health or socioeconomic characteristics of the population? Med Care. 1982 Sep;20(9):945–958. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198209000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vessey M. P., Villard-Mackintosh L., McPherson K., Coulter A., Yeates D. The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 May;99(5):402–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walker A. M., Jick H. Temporal and regional variation in hysterectomy rates in the United States, 1970--1975. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Jul;110(1):41–46. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wennberg J. E. Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action. Health Aff (Millwood) 1984 Summer;3(2):6–32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wennberg J. E., McPherson K., Caper P. Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs? N Engl J Med. 1984 Aug 2;311(5):295–300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198408023110505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982 Apr;246(4):120–134. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0482-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Westphalen J. B., Fraser S., Rea E. E., Coulthard A. C., Ng K. H., Walters W. A. Medical audit of hysterectomy in the Hunter Area of New South Wales. Aust Clin Rev. 1992;12(3):125–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES