Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1967 May;10(3):281–289. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-281

A method for increasing the reinforcement magnitude of intracranial stimulation1

Stanley S Pliskoff, T Daryl Hawkins
PMCID: PMC1338282  PMID: 4861901

Abstract

Schedules of intermittent brain-stimulation reinforcement have been shown to maintain performances when a reinforcement is defined as several response-produced, brief trains of stimulation. The present experiments show that the number of response-produced trains permitted per reinforcement is a variable analogous to amount or magnitude of reinforcement in the conventional food-reinforcement experiment. Systematic effects were obtained when that variable was manipulated within a multiple schedule and also on variable-interval schedules programmed concurrently.

Full text

PDF
285

Images in this article

284Fig. 1.
on p.284

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOWER G. H., MILLER N. E. Rewarding and punishing effects from stimulating the same place in the rat's brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1958 Dec;51(6):669–674. doi: 10.1037/h0038925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CATANIA A. C. Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:299–300. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cruse D. B., Vitulli W., Dertke M. Discriminative and reinforcing properties of two types of food pellets. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):293–303. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HAWKINS T. D., PLISKOFF S. S. BRAIN-STIMULATION INTENSITY, RATE OF SELF-STIMULATION, AND REINFORCEMENT STRENGTH: AN ANALYSIS THROUGH CHAINING. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:285–288. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HODOS W. MOTIVATIONAL PROPERTIES OF LONG DURATIONS OF REWARDING BRAIN STIMULATION. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Apr;59:219–224. doi: 10.1037/h0021818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. PLISKOFF S. S., WRIGHT J. E., HAWKINS T. D. BRAIN STIMULATION AS A REINFORCER: INTERMITTENT SCHEDULES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Mar;8:75–88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. VALENSTEIN E. S. PROBLEMS OF MEASUREMENT AND INTERPRETATION WITH REINFORCING BRAIN STIMULATION. Psychol Rev. 1964 Nov;71:415–437. doi: 10.1037/h0040694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES