Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1967 Nov;10(6):545–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-545

Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination1

Rosemary Pierrel, Scot Blue
PMCID: PMC1338426  PMID: 6080833

Abstract

In order to assess possible confounding of discriminative stimulus effects with those produced by the reinforcing stimulus, three groups of four rats each were trained for 45 hr on a variable-interval 1-min reinforcement program. Two groups were run on a multiple variable-interval extinction schedule in which the reinforcement stimulus (SD) and the nonreinforcement stimulus (SΔ) were two intensities of a 4-kHz (cps) tone separated by 40 or 10 db. The third group was run on a mixed schedule with a single intensity constantly present. The mixed-schedule animals showed no discrimination of the reinforcement program. Under the multiple schedule, the highest SΔ rates were obtained after SD intervals, regardless of the reinforcement availability in the SD interval. These local rate variations in SΔ were small in proportion to those produced by the SD versus SΔ intensities.

Full text

PDF
550

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boneau C. A., Holland M. K., Baker W. M. Color-discrimination performance of pigeons: effects of reward. Science. 1965 Sep 3;149(3688):1113–1114. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3688.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DINSMOOR J. A. A quantitative comparison of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of a stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1950 Aug;40(4):458–472. doi: 10.1037/h0056266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GUTTMAN N., KALISH H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. doi: 10.1037/h0046219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jenkins H. M. Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning. Psychol Bull. 1965 Nov;64(5):365–376. doi: 10.1037/h0022537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PIERREL R., SHERMAN J. G. Generalization and discrimination as a function of the S-D-S delta intensity difference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5:67–71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. PIERREL R., SHERMAN J. G. Generalization of auditory intensity following discrimination training. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:313–322. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES