Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1969 Jan;12(1):73–80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-73

Variability of response location for pigeons responding under continuous reinforcement, intermittent reinforcement, and extinction1

David A Eckerman, Robert N Lanson
PMCID: PMC1338576  PMID: 16811341

Abstract

The effect of several reinforcement schedules on the variability in topography of a pigeon's key-peck response was determined. The measure of topography was the location of a key peck within a 10-in. wide by 0.75-in. high response key. Food reinforcement was presented from a magazine located below the center of the response key. Variability in response locus decreased to a low value during training in which each response produced reinforcement. Variability increased when fixed intervals, variable intervals, random intervals, or extinction were scheduled.

Full text

PDF
76

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANTONITIS J. J. Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Oct;42(4):273–281. doi: 10.1037/h0060407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HERRICK R. M., BROMBERGER R. A. LEVER DISPLACEMENT UNDER A VARIABLE RATIO SCHEDULE AND SUBSEQUENT EXTINCTION. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Jun;59:392–398. doi: 10.1037/h0022063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HERRICK R. M. LEVER DISPLACEMENT UNDER A FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULE AND SUBSEQUENT EXTINCTION. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Apr;59:263–270. doi: 10.1037/h0021849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Stereotypy and intermittent reinforcement. Science. 1961 Jun 30;133(3470):2067–2069. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3470.2067-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MARGULIES S. Response duration in operant level, regular reinforcement, and extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:317–321. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MILLENSON J. R., HURWITZ H. M., NIXON W. L. Influence of reinforcement schedules on response duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:243–250. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MILLENSON J. R., HURWITZ H. M. Some temporal and sequential properties of behavior during conditioning and extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4:97–106. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. STEBBINS W. C., LANSON R. N. Response latency as a function of reinforcement schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jul;5:299–304. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES