Skip to main content
Cancer Cell International logoLink to Cancer Cell International
. 2026 Jul 22;26:269. doi: 10.1186/s12935-026-04414-z

The oral microbiota in oral squamous cell carcinoma: unravelling mechanisms and clinical potential

Amany Hany Mohamed Kamel 1,✉, Nourhan El-Tantawy 2, Sarah Ahmed 3, Al-Hassan Soliman Wadan 4, Nermeen AbuBakr 1
PMCID: PMC13390213  PMID: 42482202

Abstract

Originating in the mucosal lining of the mouth, oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the head and neck regions. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving environmental exposures, genetic susceptibility, and lifestyle-related risk factors. Increasing evidence indicates that oral microbial dysbiosis contributes to the initiation and progression of OSCC. Under healthy conditions, the oral cavity harbors a diverse and functionally balanced microbial ecosystem that maintains mucosal integrity, supports immune homeostasis, and prevents colonization by pathogenic species. Disruption of this equilibrium, known as oral dysbiosis, is increasingly recognized as a key event in oral carcinogenesis. In OSCC, a shift toward pathogenic and pro-inflammatory microbial communities has been consistently observed, particularly involving periodontal bacteria such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. These organisms contribute to tumor progression by activating inflammatory and oncogenic signaling pathways, including NF-κB, STAT3, and PI3K/Akt; suppressing apoptosis; inducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition; and immune evasion, thereby creating a tumor-promoting microenvironment. In addition to bacterial dysbiosis, viral and fungal components of the oral microbiome may act as important cofactors in OSCC. High-risk Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) have been implicated in disrupting tumor suppressor pathways, causing genomic instability, and modulating the immune response. Fungal species, particularly Candida albicans, may further contribute by producing carcinogenic metabolites and inducing chronic inflammation. This review provides an integrated overview of the oral microbiome in OSCC, focusing on the composition and protective roles of the core microbiota, factors influencing microbial stability, and mechanisms by which dysbiosis contributes to carcinogenesis. It also highlights the oral microbiome as a potential source of non-invasive biomarkers and discusses microbiome-targeted strategies, including prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics, as promising adjunctive approaches to restore microbial balance and reduce tumor-promoting inflammation.

Keywords: Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Oral microbiome, Dysbiosis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Treponema denticola, Oncogenic viruses

Background

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a malignant epithelial neoplasm originating from the squamous cells of the oral mucosa, most commonly affecting the floor of the mouth, tongue, and inferior lip [1]. It may develop from de novo clinically normal mucosa or from premalignant lesions such as erythroplakia, leukoplakia, submucous fibrosis, and lichen planus [2]. According to global estimates for 2020, oral cancer accounted for over 377,713 new cases and nearly 177,757 deaths, with notable disparities in incidence and survival rates among different regions [3]. The disease predominantly affects males and is most commonly diagnosed in individuals between the fifth and sixth decades of life [4].

Despite advances in therapy, prognosis remains poor. While early-stage detection can yield five-year survival rates exceeding 80%, survival drops below 30% in advanced disease. Unfortunately, more than 60% of cases are diagnosed late, reflecting the asymptomatic nature of early disease, limited awareness, and diagnostic challenges in primary care [5]. Early lesions may present as red, white, or mixed mucosal patches or as non-healing extraction sockets; however, pain usually arises only in advanced stages. Primary care diagnostic accuracy remains suboptimal due to variable presentations and inadequate training. Biological heterogeneity further complicates outcomes; for example, even small tongue tumors can show aggressive invasion, underscoring the strong correlation between late diagnosis, advanced stage, and poor prognosis [6].

Prognosis is strongly influenced by clinical and pathological factors, including tumor thickness, depth of invasion, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, lymphovascular invasion, and cervical lymph node involvement. Neck metastasis is particularly critical, as it reduces survival by up to 50% [7]. Although surgical and adjuvant therapies continue to advance, prevention remains the most effective strategy. Primary prevention centers on modifying risk factors (tobacco, alcohol, betel quid), while secondary prevention emphasizes screening and timely referral for suspicious lesions [8].

The pathogenesis of OSCC arises from a complex interaction between environmental exposures (tobacco, alcohol, betel quid chewing, and radiation) and host factors, including genetic susceptibility and poor oral hygiene. Increasing evidence implicates chronic inflammation and oral microbiome dysbiosis as important contributors to carcinogenesis [1, 9]. According to the Expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database, the human oral cavity contains 774 bacterial species-level taxa. Among these, approximately 58% are officially named species, 26% are known only as uncultivated phylotypes identified by molecular sequencing, and 16% are unnamed but cultivated taxa [10].

Commensal microorganisms within the oral cavity form complex, multispecies biofilm communities that maintain oral and systemic health. Early colonizers such as Streptococcus salivarius establish the initial microbial ecosystem, followed by Lactobacillus, Actinomyces, Neisseria, and Veillonella, which co-adhere and interact to stabilize the microbial community. These microorganisms contribute to host homeostasis by regulating local environmental conditions, facilitating nutrient metabolism, and preventing pathogen colonization through competitive exclusion and maintenance of mucosal barriers [11]. Nitrate-reducing bacteria, including Neisseria, participate in oral nitrate metabolism, which can influence nitric oxide availability and support systemic cardiovascular and immune functions [12]. Beyond local effects, the oral microbiota influences systemic immunity; for example, certain Lactobacillus strains enhance interferon responses via dendritic and T cell interactions [13].

Although several reviews have discussed the compositional structure of the oral microbiome and its links with oral diseases, a comprehensive overview of its mechanistic and translational relevance to OSCC remains limited. This review provides an integrated perspective on how oral microbial dysbiosis contributes to OSCC development through interconnected mechanisms, including immune modulation, chronic inflammation, and microbial metabolite-mediated signaling. In addition, it highlights emerging evidence supporting the oral microbiome as a source of potential diagnostic biomarkers and as a target for preventive and therapeutic interventions. By linking microbial ecology with carcinogenic mechanisms and clinical applications, this review offers an updated framework for understanding the role of the oral microbiome in OSCC and identifies key directions for future research.

Methods

A structured literature search was performed to identify studies on the oral microbiota and OSCC. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to December 2025. Search terms included combinations of: “oral microbiome”, “oral microbiota”, “oral dysbiosis”, “oral squamous cell carcinoma”, “periodontal pathogens”, “Fusobacterium nucleatum”, “Porphyromonas gingivalis”, “Treponema denticola”, “oral cancer biomarkers”, “microbial biomarkers”, “probiotics”, and “oral microbiome therapy”. Original research, clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in English were considered. Priority was given to studies addressing microbial composition, mechanisms linking dysbiosis to OSCC, microbial biomarkers, and microbiome-targeted therapies. Articles were screened by title and abstract, followed by full-text review; duplicates, studies lacking methodological detail, or unrelated work were excluded. Additional relevant references were identified through manual searches of cited literature.

Core microbial communities and ecological balance

The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) initially defined the “core human microbiome” as genes shared across individuals within a body site and later expanded this to include common, temporal, ecological, functional, and host-adapted cores [14, 15]. The oral core microbiome encompasses the microbial community and its genomes within the oral cavity across these categories. Following the gut, it represents the second largest and most diverse microbiota, comprising over 700 bacterial species, as well as fungi, protozoa, and viruses that contribute to ecosystem stability. Minimal inter-individual variation supports using the oral core microbiome as a reference for microbial balance, or eubiosis [16].

Predominant bacterial taxa in healthy oral microbiota, identified by 16 S ribosomal DNA (16 S rDNA) analyses, include Actinomycetota (formerly Actinobacteria; includes the genera Rothia, Actinomyces and Corynebacterium), Bacteroidota (formerly Bacteroidetes; includes the genera Prevotella, Porphyromonas and Capnocytophaga), Bacillota (formerly Firmicutes; includes the genera Granulicatella and Streptococcus), Fusobacteriota (formerly Fusobacteria; includes the genus Fusobacterium), and Pseudomonadota (formerly Proteobacteria; includes the genera Haemophilus and Neisseria) [15].

In addition to bacteria, the oral mycobiome is dominated by the fungal genus Candida, particularly Candida albicans (C. albicans), along with other genera such as Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Malassezia. The oral virome includes bacteriophages and eukaryotic viruses such as Human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus, which may interact with bacterial communities and host immunity and have been implicated in oral carcinogenesis [17].

Distinct oral niches, such as saliva, mucosa, and tooth surfaces, harbor site-specific microbial communities. Saliva is rich in Firmicutes. The continuously renewing mucosal epithelium limits colonization, whereas the tongue’s papillae favor anaerobes such as Porphyromonas, Actinomyces, Veillonella, and Prevotella. Non-shedding tooth surfaces enable microbial accumulation and plaque formation, with supragingival and subgingival plaques differing due to oxygen and nutrient gradients. For instance, anaerobic bacteria, including Fusobacterium, Actinomyces, and Veillonella, are mainly found in subgingival plaque. The microbial communities on tooth surfaces are shaped by the teeth’s physiological and anatomical characteristics. Even different sites on the same tooth can host distinct microbial populations. Additionally, the oral microbiome changes at different life stages and dentition phases, highlighting the importance of defining the core microbiome in the context of host development and specific ecological niches [15].

Ecological balance reflects a stable, mutually beneficial host-microbe relationship that supports systemic and oral health through niche-specific colonization, metabolic cooperation, and mutualistic interactions among microorganisms and the host. Salivary buffering systems, including bicarbonate and phosphate ions, maintain pH homeostasis and protect the oral environment from acidification. In parallel, nitrate-reducing bacteria within the oral microbiome convert dietary nitrate into nitrite and nitric oxide, which contribute to antimicrobial activity and modulation of host inflammatory responses. These combined mechanisms help maintain microbial equilibrium and reduce the risk of dysbiosis. Salivary buffering capacity and microbial adaptability further enhance ecosystem resilience, enabling recovery after disturbances such as antibiotic exposure or dietary changes [18] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Oral microbial homeostasis versus dysbiosis in the development of OSCC. In a healthy state, a balanced and diverse oral microbiota maintains epithelial integrity, immune tolerance, and tissue homeostasis through controlled host signaling pathways. In contrast, microbial dysbiosis, characterized by enrichment of pathogenic taxa such as P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, and T. denticola, promotes OSCC development via virulence factors and microbial metabolites that activate TLR-mediated oncogenic pathways, including NF-κB, PI3K/Akt, STAT3, and TGF-β signaling. These alterations drive chronic inflammation, immune evasion, EMT, extracellular matrix degradation, and angiogenesis, ultimately facilitating tumor initiation and progression. All figures have been created using BioRender.com

Protective roles of the oral microbiota

The physiological stability of the oral cavity relies upon its resident microbial communities for immune modulation, the structural maintenance of the mucosal epithelium, and resistance against pathogenic colonization. Under healthy conditions, commensal microorganisms interact with epithelial and immune cells to maintain a balanced microbial ecosystem (eubiosis). These host-microbe interactions contribute to immune priming by enhancing microbial recognition pathways and supporting controlled inflammatory responses that protect oral tissues from pathogenic invasion [19].

Commensal oral microorganisms also modulate the immune system by producing bioactive metabolites and signaling molecules. Metabolic products generated within oral biofilms, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and other microbial metabolites, can influence inflammatory signaling pathways, regulate immune cell activity, and promote mucosal immune tolerance. Through these interactions, the oral microbiota helps maintain an immune environment that balances antimicrobial defense with controlled inflammation [20, 21].

In addition to immune modulation, the oral microbiota helps maintain the physical and immunological barriers of the oral mucosa. Commensal microbes stimulate the production of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), antimicrobial peptides, and anti-inflammatory cytokines that help preserve mucosal integrity and limit pathogen adhesion [22, 23]. Furthermore, many oral commensal species produce bacteriocins and other antimicrobial compounds that inhibit the growth of opportunistic pathogens and contribute to colonization resistance within oral biofilms [24]. Dysbiosis of this microbial balance can impair mucosal barrier function and promote chronic inflammation, creating a microenvironment that may increase susceptibility to OSCC and alter the oral microbial ecosystem.

Factors affecting oral microbiome stability

1. Host factors

Oral health results from the dynamic back-and-forth of host and environmental factors throughout life. The diversity and stability of the oral microbiota are shaped by host genetics, immunity, age, and lifestyle [25]. Host genetics accounts for at least 10% of microbial variance, as shown by metagenomic analyses and twin studies demonstrating greater similarity among monozygotic twins [18]. Saliva and gingival crevicular fluid provide essential nutrients and protective molecules, including peptides, glycoproteins, heme, and albumin, that sustain microbial communities and maintain equilibrium. Reduced salivary flow, as in xerostomia, promotes colonization by opportunistic microbes and dysbiosis [26].

2. Environmental factors

Environmental exposures can significantly influence oral microbial composition. Indoor air pollutants, including mycotoxins, and contaminated food may suppress beneficial microbes, encourage pathogenic species, and impair immune defenses. Diet is a major determinant. High consumption of processed grains, refined saccharides, and animal fats promotes the proliferation of acid-producing and acid-tolerant bacteria, consequently driving the pathogenesis of cariogenic and periodontal diseases. By contrast, less industrialized diets, such as those of hunter-gatherer or agrarian populations, are associated with healthier oral microbiomes and lower disease prevalence [18].

3. Lifestyle factors

Smoking disrupts oral microbial balance. Nicotine upregulates bacterial virulence genes and promotes biofilm formation via interactions with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [27]. Tobacco smoke generates hypoxic conditions that favor anaerobes, increase free iron availability, and inhibit protective enzymes, such as oral peroxidases, resulting in dysbiosis with decreased Pseudomonadota and increased Bacillota and Actinomycetota [27, 28]. Oral hygiene is also critical. Poor hygiene allows plaque accumulation, which supports pathogens such as Streptococcus mutans and F. nucleatum, increasing the risk of caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis [27, 29]. Conversely, the prolonged administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics or oral antiseptics can cause a non-selective reduction of the oral microbiome, creating an ecological void that promotes opportunistic colonization [27].

4. Systemic diseases

Systemic diseases can influence the stability of the oral microbiota by altering the local oral environment and host physiological conditions. For example, diabetes mellitus is associated with elevated glucose levels in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva, which can favor the growth of acidogenic and pathogenic microorganisms and alter the overall microbial composition. Diabetes is also associated with impaired immune responses and increased inflammatory mediators in the periodontal environment, creating conditions that facilitate the expansion of periodontopathogenic species [30].

Sjögren’s syndrome represents another condition that can significantly disrupt oral microbial balance. Changes in salivary composition and reduced salivary flow limit the natural cleansing and buffering functions of saliva, promoting the proliferation of opportunistic microorganisms such as C. albicans and cariogenic bacteria, including Streptococcus mutans [31].

Cardiovascular diseases have also been associated with alterations in oral microbial communities. Studies have reported shifts in the relative abundance of major bacterial phyla, including increased Bacillota/Bacteroidota ratio, reflecting changes in microbial ecology linked to systemic inflammatory states [32].

Together, these systemic conditions modify the oral environment by altering salivary composition, nutrient availability, and the inflammatory status, thereby disrupting microbial equilibrium and promoting oral dysbiosis.

Microbial dysbiosis in OSCC

Oral dysbiosis is defined as an adverse alteration in the composition of the oral microbiome, wherein the established stability between host-compatible and pathogenic microorganisms is destabilized. Dysbiosis occurs when ecological disturbances promote the expansion of pathogenic taxa and the loss of protective microbial species, resulting in altered microbial composition and functional activity that may contribute to oral disease [19, 26]. The enrichment of periodontal pathogens, including P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, and T. denticola, is a well-recognized example of oral dysbiosis. These microorganisms produce virulence factors that disrupt epithelial barriers, alter host signaling pathways, and stimulate chronic inflammation. Persistent colonization by such pathobionts creates a pro-inflammatory microenvironment, favoring epithelial proliferation, genomic instability, and tissue remodeling, processes that contribute to the initiation and progression of OSCC [18, 33].

Lipopolysaccharides (LPS), structural components of Gram-negative oral pathogens, further enhance the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activate inflammatory signaling pathways, thus sustaining a tumor-promoting microenvironment. Moreover, bacterial chemotaxis, flagellar assembly, and peptidases are enriched in the tumor tissue, confirming the role of inflammation in carcinogenesis [33].

High-throughput molecular techniques, specifically 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing and whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing, bypass the limitations of traditional cultivation, enabling comprehensive taxonomic mapping of the oral microbiome across all microbial kingdoms [11]. Multi-omics approaches integrating metagenomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic data have further improved understanding of microbial functional activities and their interactions with host carcinogenic pathways [34].

Host-microbe signaling at the mucosal barrier is mediated by specific pattern-recognition receptors, namely TLR2, TLR4, and NOD1/2, which are expressed by both healthy oral epithelium and OSCC cells to facilitate engagement with local pathobionts. Their activation triggers downstream signaling pathways, including NF-κB, leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, the activation of matrix metalloproteinases, and modulation of immune responses that contribute to tumor progression [35, 36]. Notably, microbial components, such as bacterial LPS, can induce PD-L1 expression in OSCC cells, and enrichment of bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, in oral tumors has been linked to elevated PD-L1 levels, thereby contributing to immune evasion and tumor progression [37, 38].

Gene expression patterns supporting these mechanisms have been revealed by analyzing publicly available RNA-sequencing datasets using TNMplot, which enables comparative visualization of transcriptomic profiles from normal and tumor tissues. These analyses show upregulation of genes involved in microbial sensing, inflammatory signaling, and oncogenic pathways, alongside reduced expression of tumor suppressor genes [39]. The main mechanisms linking oral dysbiosis to OSCC are summarized in (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Overview of oral microbial dysbiosis and host-microbe interactions in OSCC. (a) Illustration of oral microbiome imbalance associated with OSCC and the workflow of culture-independent sequencing approaches, including sample collection, DNA extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis for microbial community profiling. (b) Major components of the oral microbiome, including viruses, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protozoa, normally exist in ecological balance. (c) Representative microbial taxa altered in OSCC-associated dysbiosis. Pathogens such as P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, and C. albicans are frequently enriched, whereas commensal genera including Aggregatibacter, Neisseria, and Leptotrichia are often reduced. (d) Host-microbe interactions at the epithelial interface, where microbial virulence factors activate pattern-recognition receptors and downstream pathways (e.g., ERK1/2 and NF-κB), promoting inflammation, immune modulation, and extracellular matrix degradation that facilitate tumor progression. (e) RNA-seq gene expression profiles derived from TNMplot comparing normal, tumor, and metastatic tissues in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, highlighting genes involved in microbial sensing, inflammatory signaling, and oncogenic pathways. All figures have been created using BioRender.com

Key taxa and mechanisms linking dysbiosis to OSCC

Several microbial taxa, notably P. gingivalis, T. denticola, F. nucleatum, and others, have been strongly implicated in OSCC pathogenesis (Table 1) [40].

Table 1.

Key microorganisms implicated in OSCC and their mechanisms of action

Microorganism Isolation source Key mechanism(s) Key molecular pathways / Effects Primary evidence type / Strength
Porphyromonas gingivalis [42, 43, 48, 57] Tumor tissue, saliva Invades epithelial cells, suppresses apoptosis, and induces a pro-inflammatory microenvironment promoting proliferation and invasion Activates PI3K/Akt, STAT3, and NF-κB signaling; upregulates MMP-9 and Bcl-2; increases IL-6 and IL-8 expression Strong clinical association; animal and in vitro evidence; potential prognostic marker
Fusobacterium nucleatum [33, 50, 51, 81, 87, 88, 113] Tumor tissue, saliva Promotes chronic inflammation, immune evasion, EMT, and tumor cell proliferation; inhibits apoptosis via adhesin (FadA) Activates E-cadherin/β-catenin and NF-κB signaling; induces IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α release; enhances oncogenic transcription and anti-apoptotic pathways Strong clinical association; supported by ex vivo mechanistic studies; potential diagnostic/prognostic biomarker

Treponema denticola

[54–58]

Tumor tissue, saliva Degrades host proteins via CTLP, promotes EMT, immune evasion, inflammation, and dysbiosis with other pathogens Activates TLR-2/4 signaling and MMP pathways; promotes inflammatory responses and epithelial invasion Ex vivo, animal model evidence and preliminary clinical evidence; enriched in OSCC tissues and saliva; implicated in immunomodulation and inflammatory pathways contributing to carcinogenesis.
Prevotella intermedia [15, 33, 34, 41, 88] Tumor tissue, saliva Enhances chronic inflammation and epithelial proliferation; associated with dysbiotic biofilms Activates NF-κB and IL-6/STAT3 axis; induces COX-2 and MMP expression; promotes tumor progression Preliminary clinical evidence; mechanistic support in vitro
Peptostreptococcus [80] Tumor tissue Alters immune responses and promotes oxidative stress and metabolic reprogramming Activates NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways; stimulates IL-8 secretion and DNA-damage-related carcinogenesis Ex vivo / animal model mechanistic studies
Capnocytophaga (e.g., C. gingivalis) [17, 113] Tumor tissue, saliva Associated with dysbiotic oral biofilms and increased abundance in OSCC samples; may contribute indirectly to tumor-associated inflammation Linked to microbial community shifts rather than specific oncogenic pathways; limited evidence for direct signaling effects Preliminary clinical association; observational microbiome studies without strong mechanistic validation
Streptococcus spp. (e.g., S. mitis, S. salivarius) [41, 78, 87] Saliva Strain-dependent effects: some protective, others promote nitrosamine formation and inflammation Nitrosamine formation; acetaldehyde production (strain-dependent properties among Streptococcus species); immune modulation and cytokine regulation; strain-specific effects on epithelial and immune responses. Preliminary clinical evidence; strain-specific mechanistic studies
Human papillomavirus [59–61, 114] Tumor tissue Viral oncoproteins contribute to malignant transformation primarily in oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC); limited role in OSCC E6/E7 inactivate p53 and Rb pathways → cell-cycle dysregulation; p16 overexpression used as a surrogate marker (validated in OPSCC) Strong evidence in OPSCC; limited and inconsistent evidence in OSCC
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)[62, 63, 114] Tumor tissue Promotes epithelial proliferation and immune modulation LMP-1 activates NF-κB and JAK/STAT signaling; induces pro-survival and inflammatory pathways Preliminary clinical evidence; mechanistic in vitro support
Candida albicans [67–72, 74, 75] Tumor tissue, saliva Produces acetaldehyde and Candidalysin causing epithelial damage and inflammation Induces oxidative stress, DNA double-strand breaks, and p53 activation; increases IL-1β and IL-8 expression Strong clinical association; mechanistic in vitro evidence; implicated in malignant transformation

1. Porphyromonas gingivalis

P. gingivalis is considered a representative periodontal pathogen in oral carcinogenesis. It promotes tumor survival and progression through multiple mechanisms: activation of NF-κB signaling pathways, PKB, Jak/Akt/STAT3, leading to upregulation of anti-apoptotic protein (Bcl-2), the apoptosis-inhibiting gene (Survivin), and oncogenes such as c-Myc [40–43].

Additionally, P. gingivalis modulates microRNA expression (e.g., miR-203) to suppress SOCS3, a cytokine signaling inhibitor, while secreting nucleoside diphosphate kinase that hydrolyzes extracellular ATP, disrupting ATP-mediated apoptosis. Together, these mechanisms synergistically enhance tumor cell survival [40, 42]. P. gingivalis produces LPS that interacts with the TLR4 receptor on human cells. This interaction initiates the NF-κB signaling pathway, enabling it to move into the nucleus and stimulate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6), thereby establishing a microenvironment that promotes inflammation and tumor growth [41].

P. gingivalis also produces bioactive molecules involved in the proliferation, survival, and aggressiveness of OSCC, such as cyclin D1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), MMP-9, and heparinase, and promotes immune evasion by increasing co-inhibitory molecules B7-H1 and B7-DC, expanding Tregs that suppress cytotoxic responses [44, 45]. Gingipains, the cysteine proteases of P. gingivalis, modulate protease-activated receptors (PARs) signaling, induce pro-inflammatory mediators such as CXCL8, and impair host immune responses, including macrophage function and phagocytosis, thereby promoting tissue damage and disease progression (Fig. 3) [46, 47].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Overview of the multifaceted mechanisms by which P. gingivalis contributes to tumor survival and progression in OSCC. (a) depicts P. gingivalis activating key intracellular signaling pathways, including JAK/AKT/STAT3, PKB, and NF-κB, which leads to the upregulation of anti-apoptotic (BCL-2), apoptosis-inhibiting (Survivin), and oncogenic (c-MYC) genes in the cell nucleus, thereby promoting tumor survival. (b) shows the bacterium upregulating miR-203 to inhibit SOCS3, alongside other mechanisms involving nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK) and extracellular ATP (eATP), which together are indicated to synergistically enhance tumor cell survival. (c) outlines how P. gingivalis LPS interacts with the cell-surface receptor TLR4 to activate NF-κB, triggering the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and creating a pro-inflammatory, tumor-promoting microenvironment. (d) indicates that P. gingivalis induces the expression of tumor-promoting molecules such as MMP-9, TNF-α, Cyclin D1, and heparinase, while also fostering immune evasion through the induction of co-inhibitory molecules B7-H1 and B7-DC and Tregs that suppress cytotoxic immune responses. (e) demonstrates how gingipains from the bacterium modulate protease-activated receptors (PARs) to release pro-inflammatory mediators, which subsequently act on macrophages to inhibit phagocytosis, thus impairing the host immune response and leading to tissue destruction and degradation. All figures have been created using BioRender.com

2. Fusobacterium nucleatum

F. nucleatum contributes to OSCC by stimulating TLR-mediated IL-6/STAT3. It also induces key molecular markers of oral tumor growth, including heparinase, TNFα, cyclin D1, and MMP-9. It also upregulates IL-8, MMP-1, MMP-9, cell survival markers (JAK and MYC), and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers (TGF-β and ZEB1), driving tumor proliferation and promoting cell cycle progression [48, 49].

Metabolically, F. nucleatum accumulates at tumor margins, enhancing glycolysis and lactate production via GLUT1-dependent pathways, acidifying the microenvironment, supporting tumor invasiveness, and polarizing immunosuppressive M2-like macrophages [50].

Recent studies indicate that F. nucleatum contributes to OSCC progression through multiple mechanisms, by enhancing tumor cell proliferation by interacting with E-cadherin. It modulates the CDH1/β-catenin pathway, increasing nuclear β-catenin, thereby increasing Ki-67 expression and promoting cell growth [51].

The bacterium also promotes a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, in part through NF-κB–mediated signaling, which supports tumor progression and survival [52]. Additionally, the F. nucleatum Fap2 protein can bind and attach to the inhibitory receptor TIGIT on T cells and natural killer cells, facilitating immune evasion and suppressing their anti-tumor activity [52, 53]. Collectively, these findings highlight the multifaceted role of F. nucleatum in promoting immune suppression, proliferation, and microenvironment remodeling in OSCC (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Overview of the mechanisms by which F. nucleatum and T. denticola contribute to OSCC progression. (a) F. nucleatum Signaling: F. nucleatum promotes tumor progression through the activation of TLR2/4 and IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) signaling. TLR2/4 activation induces IL-6 production, which binds to IL-6R to establish an autocrine signaling loop that activates the PI3K and JAK/STAT3 pathways. This amplified STAT3 activation promotes EMT—associated with adherens junctions (AJS) and microvascular changes (MVC)—as well as metabolic reprogramming (glycolysis) and M2 macrophage polarization. Ultimately, these interconnected pathways enhance tumor proliferation and invasion. (b) T. denticola Signaling: T. denticola contributes to carcinogenesis by secreting CTLP, which disrupts epithelial integrity via the β-catenin/CDH1 axis. This disruption enhances glycolysis and lactate production, fostering a tumor microenvironment characterized by chronic inflammation and driven by cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6. Additionally, T. denticola activates the TGF-β/SMAD2/3 pathway. The translocation of the SMAD2/3 complex into the nucleus leads to Cyclin-D1 upregulation and increased expression of the cellular proliferation marker Ki-67, further driving tumor growth and invasion. All figures have been created using BioRender.com

3. Treponema denticola

T. denticola promotes OSCC through proteolytic activity, cellular invasion, and oncogenic signaling. Its chymotrypsin-like proteinase (CTLP) degrades the extracellular matrix by activating MMP-9 and MMP-8, facilitating invasion. CTLP has also been linked to TLR-9 signaling, which correlates with greater invasion depth and more aggressive clinicopathological features. CTLP also disrupts immune surveillance by cleaving complement components, sustaining inflammation [54].

T. denticola has been shown to promote OSCC progression through activation of the TGF-β signaling pathway, leading to cell cycle progression, enhanced tumor cell proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, and increased Ki-67 expression [55]. Its dentilisin can influence matrix remodeling and inflammatory processes by degrading cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-8, while also activating matrix metalloproteinases such as MMP-9 and MMP-8. In addition, it may counteract the inhibitory action of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2), thereby creating conditions that favor epithelial invasion [56].

Emerging multi-omics and mechanistic evidence indicate that T. denticola promotes OSCC progression by activating TLR/MyD88 signaling, driving tumor cell migration, invasion, and inflammatory responses, partly through integrin/FAK signaling pathways [57, 58]. In parallel, T. denticola can produce hydrogen sulfide, which has been shown to promote OSCC cell proliferation by activating the COX-2/AKT/ERK1/2 signaling pathway (Fig. 4) [58].

Viral content of tissue and saliva samples in OSCC

Viral involvement in OSCC has been extensively studied, particularly regarding the presence of viral DNA in tissue and saliva. Viral material is frequently detected in the tongue and palatine tonsils, likely due to their proximity to the oropharynx, a site of high viral exposure [17].

Human papillomavirus (HPV), especially high-risk genotypes HPV16 and HPV18, is a well-established carcinogen in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, with emerging evidence regarding its role in OSCC [59]. HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 disrupt cell cycle regulation by degrading tumor suppressors p53 and retinoblastoma protein (pRb), impair DNA repair, promote genomic instability, and inhibit apoptosis [60]. Overexpression of p16, a surrogate marker of HPV oncogenic activity, is commonly observed in HPV-associated oral cancers [61]. HPV is considered etiologically involved in approximately 3–4% of OSCC cases. However, reported HPV detection rates in OSCC vary substantially worldwide, ranging from about 6% to 58%, with high-risk types, particularly HPV-18 and HPV-16, being the most commonly identified [17].

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), prevalent in human saliva, has been detected in 45% of OSCC cases [62]. EBV proteins, mRNA transcripts, and viral DNA (including the BamHIW and EBNA2 genomic regions) are infection biomarkers. Using these molecular indicators, cumulative evidence has demonstrated a consistent positive association between OSCC and EBV infection [63]. EBV has been associated with shifts in periodontal and peri-implant microbiota, including increased prevalence of pathogens such as P. gingivalis, suggesting synergistic microbial effects in tumor promotion [64]. EBV can trigger pathways associated with tumor development. The EGFR/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is dysregulated in EBV-positive tumors. This pathway plays a fundamental role in cancer progression by enhancing NF-κB activity, suppressing pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bad and Bax, and thereby increasing the expression of genes that prevent apoptosis [62].

Emerging evidence links both HPV and EBV infections to oral microbial dysbiosis. Co-expression of HPV oncoproteins (E6, E7) and EBV latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) has been reported to cause DNA damage, potentially enhancing precancerous lesions progression [65]. While these observations support potential virus–bacteria interactions in tumor progression, the precise mechanistic links remain under investigation.

Fungal content of OSCC tissue

Elevated levels of Candida species, particularly C. albicans, are frequently observed in OSCC and are associated with oral dysbiosis [66–70]. C. albicans is the predominant fungal species in OSCC patients, while non-albicans species such as C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. guilliermondii, and C. glabrata are also detected in dysbiotic oral communities and are recognized as pathogenic fungi [67]. Normal commensal C. albicans can become pathogenic under conditions of compromised host defenses or altered local environments, such as in cancer patients or areas of mucosal damage. This pathogenic transition is linked to tissue invasion, chronic inflammation, and production of carcinogenic factors [71, 72].

Different C. albicans genotypes exhibit variable distribution patterns, with genotype C enriched in Candida-associated leukoplakia lesions. The presence of Candida in leukoplakia has been associated with increased epithelial dysplasia and a higher risk of malignant transformation, suggesting a potential contributory role of fungal superinfection in oral carcinogenesis [72, 73].

Recent multi-omics studies integrating metagenomic and metabolomic analyses have further highlighted C. albicans’s metabolic contribution to oral carcinogenesis. It was demonstrated that C. albicans can metabolize ethanol to acetaldehyde, a recognized carcinogen that induces DNA damage and mutagenesis in oral cells [41, 74].

C. albicans may also promote cancer through immune modulation, inflammation, and production of carcinogenic substances [41]. It generates nitrosamines, which damage DNA, impair DNA repair mechanisms, and increase mutation rates [41, 71]. It also stimulates proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-8, IL-6) and activates T helper 17 (Th17) responses (IL-17, IL-23), which enhance tumor growth and angiogenesis and weaken antitumor immunity, ultimately supporting carcinogenesis [41].

C. albicans contribute to pathogenicity and cancer progression through several additional mechanisms. It produces virulence factors, such as acid aspartyl proteinases and the toxin candidalysin, while also suppressing protective molecules, such as β-defensins. Its presence is associated with increased expression of markers linked to malignancy, including p53, Ki-67, and COX-2, which are related to enhanced cell proliferation and inflammation. Moreover, C. albicans can interact with P. gingivalis, altering its gene expression and potentially enhancing bacterial infectivity. These combined effects are associated with greater tumor invasiveness and poorer prognosis [75].

Oral microbiota as biomarkers in OSCC

Microbial dysbiosis in the oral cavity is increasingly recognized as a source of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for OSCC. Integrated microbial profiling studies have identified specific microbial signatures associated with OSCC. Genera such as Gemella, Capnocytophaga, Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Rothia, and C. albicans have been consistently detected in tumor samples, highlighting their potential as recurrence monitoring and non-invasive biomarkers for OSCC detection [33, 34, 41]. A recent review of 82 studies published between 2016 and 2024 further highlights the growing research interest in the relationship between the oral microbiome and OSCC [76]. Ahmed et al. [77] demonstrated that saliva-derived DNA can detect somatic mutations in OSCC patients, emphasizing its diagnostic potential. Similarly, Lan et al. [78] reported increased abundance of Gemella morbillorum, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Gemella haemolysans in OSCC tissues, linking these microbes to cysteine- and methionine-metabolic pathways that may contribute to carcinogenesis. Tumor samples also frequently show elevated Parvimonas and reduced Actinomyces, with these microbial shifts correlating with tumor stage and disease progression [79]. Takahashi et al. [80] analyzed saliva from 60 Japanese OSCC patients and reported a higher prevalence of Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Capnocytophaga, and Alloprevotella, while Rothia and Haemophilus were less abundant compared with healthy controls. Another study has observed overrepresentation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and F. nucleatum in tumor tissues [81]. Investigations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma have revealed enrichment of several microbial taxa, including P. gingivalis, Prevotella spp., F. nucleatum, Streptococcus spp., Capnocytophaga gingivalis, and Peptostreptococcus species. These microorganisms are implicated in OSCC progression through mechanisms such as immune evasion, chronic inflammation, EMT, and the production of carcinogenic metabolites, including acetaldehyde and nitrosamines, as summarized in Table 1.

Metagenomic analyses further reveal functional differences in salivary microbiomes between OSCC, oral leukoplakia, and healthy controls, suggesting altered metabolic potential in disease states [78]. For example, Rothia mucilaginosa, enriched in leukoplakia lesions, can produce acetaldehyde from ethanol at levels that induce DNA damage and oxidative stress in oral epithelial cells [82]. Additionally, oral nitrate-reducing bacteria can convert dietary nitrates to nitrites and related metabolites, which under certain conditions can form potentially carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds [83]. Recent studies also highlight microbial activation of inflammatory and oncogenic signaling pathways, which are critical for OSCC initiation and progression.

Salivary biomarkers further complement microbial profiling and provide promising non-invasive tools for OSCC detection and monitoring. Several inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-6, have been reported to be elevated in the saliva of OSCC patients, reflecting tumor-associated inflammation and the influence of microbial dysbiosis within the oral cavity [76, 84–86]. In addition to cytokines, microbial and metabolic biomarkers have also been proposed, including increased F. nucleatum abundance and its flagella, as well as microbial production of carcinogenic metabolites such as nitrosamines and acetaldehyde, which can induce oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mutagenesis in oral epithelial cells [33, 48, 81, 87]. Alterations in microbial composition, such as increased Fusobacteriota and decreased Bacillota and Streptococcus in saliva, have also been associated with OSCC and may serve as potential indicators for early detection or recurrence monitoring [88]. Furthermore, host molecular markers related to tumor progression, including p53 dysregulation, Ki-67 proliferation index, and activation of signaling pathways such as ERK/MAPK, have been linked to microbial-induced inflammation and metabolic alterations in OSCC tissues [89–91]. A summary of these salivary and tissue biomarkers associated with microbial dysbiosis, and their diagnostic or prognostic relevance, is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Salivary, tissue and microbial biomarkers linked to microbial dysbiosis in OSCC

Biomarker Type Sample type Associated microbes Diagnostic/ prognostic/ monitoring use Evidence level Clinical relevance
IL-6 [41, 48, 84] Pro-inflammatory cytokine Saliva P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum (dysbiosis) Diagnosis Moderate Elevated salivary IL-6 reported in OSCC; promising non-invasive biomarker in multiple studies and meta-analyses; requires further validation.
IL-1β [41, 75] Cytokine Saliva / tissue

F. nucleatum,

C. albicans, P. gingivalis

Monitoring inflammation Moderate Key mediator of inflammatory and Th17 responses; contributes to tumor-promoting microenvironment.
TNF-α [44, 48, 115, 116] Cytokine Saliva / tissue P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum Prognostic Moderate Chronic TNF-α elevation contributes to a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment and correlates with OSCC progression and severity.
C-reactive protein (CRP)[117] Acute-phase protein Serum (mainly) / saliva (less reliable Mixed dysbiotic flora Monitoring systemic inflammation Moderate (Salivary CRP has limited clinical validation compared with serum CRP). Reflects systemic inflammatory burden; associated with advanced stage and poorer prognosis in OSCC and head & neck cancers.
p16 protein [118] Tumor suppressor surrogate Tumor tissue HPV (mainly HPV16/18) Prognosis / diagnosis High in OPSCC / Limited in OSCC Validated surrogate marker for HPV-driven OPSCC; reduced specificity and limited utility in OSCC.
Candidalysin (ECE1 peptide) [119] Fungal virulence factor Tissue / epithelium C. albicans Mechanistic marker Emerging Mediates epithelial damage and inflammation; implicated in carcinogenic potential in experimental studies.
TRAIL [93] Apoptosis ligand OSCC cell lines (in vitro) Microbial/ probiotic exposure Preclinical therapeutic marker Not clinical Upregulated in experimental models after bacterial/probiotic exposure; induces apoptosis in vitro (not validated biomarker).
Nitrosamines/ N-nitroso compounds [41] Carcinogenic metabolites Saliva / mucosa (Candida spp., oral microbiota) Mechanistic / risk marker Low Microbial nitrosation may contribute to DNA damage and carcinogenesis; evidence mainly experimental.
Acetaldehyde (ACH) [82] Oncometabolite Saliva / mucosa Oral bacteria (e.g., Rothia mucilaginosa) Risk marker Low/ moderate Microbial acetaldehyde production induces oxidative stress and DNA damage in oral epithelium.
F. nucleatum abundance (DNA) [33, 50, 51, 81] Microbial DNA marker Saliva/ tissue F. nucleatum Diagnosis / Prognosis Moderate Increased abundance associated with OSCC and early recurrence risk; study-dependent variability.
Firmicutes / Bacteroidetes ratio [15, 32, 66, 120] Microbial composition index Saliva Broad microbiota Diagnosis (exploratory) Low Phylum-level shifts reported in OSCC cohorts; findings are heterogeneous across studies; not validated as a biomarker.
DNA methylation profile (CpG) [121] Epigenetic marker Tumor tissue Microbial dysbiosis association Prognosis / Mechanistic Emerging Microbiome-associated epigenetic alterations observed in integrative multi-omics studies.
SCFAs (short-chain fatty acids) [20, 113] Microbial metabolites Saliva /biofilms Anaerobic commensals Mechanistic Emerging Modulate immune responses, epithelial metabolism and signaling (e.g., via GPR41/43, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition), their direct mechanistic role and clinical utility in OSCC are still under investigation.
p53 [60, 91, 122] Tumor suppressor Tissue Dysbiosis-associated DNA damage Prognostic High p53 alterations reflect DNA damage and inflammatory stress linked to microbial metabolites.
Ki-67 [89, 91] Proliferation marker Tissue Microbial inflammatory signaling Prognostic Moderate–high Correlates with tumor proliferation; influenced by inflammatory and microbial stimuli.
ERK1/2 / MAPK [38, 90] Signaling protein Tissue Microbial dysbiosis association Mechanistic/ Prognostic Moderate Microbe-induced activation promotes proliferation, invasion, and survival signaling.
GLUT1 / Lactate [50] Metabolic marker Tissue Dysbiotic flora Prognostic Moderate Tumor metabolic reprogramming with lactate accumulation contributes to immunosuppression and progression.

Strategies to restore microbial balance in OSCC (Fig. 5)

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Therapeutic strategies to restore microbial balance and mitigate OSCC progression. The schematic illustrates five primary intervention pathways: (a) Prebiotics stimulate the proliferation of beneficial taxa (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus), leading to the production of SCFAs that drive immune modulation and reinforce mucosal barrier integrity. (b) Probiotics, such as Lactobacillus species, exert anti-tumorigenic effects by upregulating TRAIL to induce cancer cell apoptosis and by promoting macrophage polarization to increase anti-inflammatory cytokine production. (c) Postbiotics derived from L. reuteri, including bacteriocins and reuterin, maintain bacterial homeostasis through the targeted membrane disruption of opportunistic pathogens. (d) Targeted antimicrobials directly reduce the burden of carcinogenic pathogens like P. gingivalis, thereby attenuating chronic oral inflammation. (e) Small molecules, such as dietary polyphenols, reduce oxidative stress and downregulate TGF-β1 signaling, effectively suppressing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Ultimately, these targeted, microbiome-modulating strategies converge to achieve microbial homeostasis, preserve mucosal barrier integrity, and decrease the overall progression of OSCC. All figures have been created using BioRender.com

1. Probiotics

Probiotics are defined as viable microbial preparations that, upon administration in sufficient quantities, exert beneficial physiological effects on the host [92]. In OSCC, probiotics such as Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus Salivarius has demonstrated antiproliferative and chemo-preventive effects in vitro and in animal models. These effects include induction of apoptosis in OSCC cells through upregulation of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and the conversion of carcinogenic metabolites into non-toxic derivatives [93, 94]. Probiotics can also modulate host immune responses by enhancing anti-inflammatory cytokine production, promoting macrophage polarization, and activating antioxidant pathways, which may help restore microbial balance and reduce tumor-promoting inflammation [95–97].

2. Prebiotics

Prebiotics function as indigestible dietary substrates that selectively promote the proliferation and metabolic output of commensal microorganisms. In the oral cavity, compounds such as fructooligosaccharides and inulin promote the proliferation of beneficial taxa, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, thereby supporting microbial homeostasis. These effects are associated with increased production of SCFAs, which modulate the immune response and may support epithelial barrier integrity [98–100]. In addition, several dietary compounds, including the polyphenols Epigallocatechin gallate and Curcumin, as well as the carotenoid Lycopene, exhibit prebiotic-like properties by modulating oral microbial communities and reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling pathways such as TGF-β1. These compounds have shown therapeutic potential in precancerous oral lesions and may help reduce the risk of malignant progression [101–103].

3. Postbiotics and antimicrobial peptides

Postbiotics encompass the biologically active byproducts secreted by probiotic strains, comprising a diverse array of metabolites such as SCFAs, bacteriocins, and functional proteins or peptides [104]. Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides produced primarily by Gram-positive bacteria, particularly lactic acid bacteria. They typically exhibit a narrow inhibitory spectrum and act primarily by membrane disruption or pore formation, thereby limiting collateral effects on non-target microbial communities [105]. Other postbiotic metabolites, such as reuterin, exert broad antimicrobial and immunomodulatory effects that help maintain microbial homeostasis by suppressing pathogen overgrowth while supporting beneficial microbial populations [106]. In the context of OSCC-associated dysbiosis, these bioactive molecules may inhibit opportunistic pathogens enriched in oral cancer, while promoting restoration of mucosal barrier integrity and microbial balance [104, 107].

4. Oral hygiene and restoration of microbial balance

Maintaining good oral hygiene remains a cornerstone in preventing dysbiosis-associated inflammation and OSCC progression. Mechanical plaque control, regular professional dental care, and appropriate antimicrobial interventions can significantly reduce colonization by pathogens strongly associated with oral carcinogenesis, including P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum [108]. These preventive measures help limit chronic inflammation, preserve epithelial barrier integrity, and support a balanced oral microbiome, thereby complementing microbiome-targeted therapeutic strategies.

Challenges in precision targeting of oral microbiota in OSCC

1. Microbial heterogeneity

Extreme variability in the oral microbiome between individuals and within different oral sites complicates the targeting of universal treatments. Disease stage and sample type further affect microbial profiles [109].

2. Microbial resistance

As with antibiotics, microbes may develop resistance to targeted therapies, including phage therapy, through mechanisms such as receptor mutations and CRISPR-Cas systems, thereby reducing the long-term effectiveness of treatment. Additionally, misuse or overuse of antimicrobials can exacerbate dysbiosis and negatively impact oral microbial balance [110].

3. Impact of conventional cancer treatments

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy markedly change the oral microbiota, frequently causing dysbiosis. This dysbiotic state is marked by a higher presence of opportunistic pathogens, which play a role in the development of oral mucositis. Emerging evidence indicates that interactions between the microbiome and cancer therapies influence treatment-related toxicity and clinical outcomes, highlighting the importance of pharmacomicrobiomics in optimizing therapeutic strategies [111].

4. Need for advanced analytical tools

Reliable microbiological biomarkers for OSCC risk, progression, and response remain elusive. Improved sequencing methods and artificial intelligence are being explored to address this gap [112].

Limitations and gaps in research on the relationship between OSCC and oral microbiota

Several important limitations constrain research on the oral microbiome in OSCC. Small cohort sizes reduce statistical significance and power, increasing the likelihood of false-negative or false-positive associations and limiting the generalizability of findings across diverse populations. Sampling variability is another key challenge: saliva, oral rinses, and tumor biopsies capture distinct microbial communities, with saliva reflecting transient populations and biopsies providing direct insight into the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, many studies fail to adequately account for confounding factors such as alcohol consumption, smoking, diet, oral hygiene, treatment history, and disease stage, all of which profoundly influence microbial composition. Technical inconsistencies, including bioinformatic pipelines, sequencing platforms, and DNA extraction methods, further complicate cross-study comparisons [27, 112]. Furthermore, most available studies are cross-sectional, limiting the ability to determine temporal relationships and causal associations between microbial alterations and OSCC development. Well-designed prospective longitudinal studies are therefore needed to establish causality and to characterize microbiome dynamics throughout disease initiation, progression, and treatment.

Future perspectives

Future priorities in oral microbiome research in OSCC include identifying reliable microbial biomarkers for early detection, clarifying interactions between the microbiota and host immunity, and exploring how age-related dysbiosis contributes to oral carcinogenesis. Advanced experimental models, such as organoids and “organ-on-a-chip” platforms, offer promising tools for studying host-microbe-cancer interactions in a controlled environment, allowing mechanistic insights that cannot be captured in conventional in vitro or animal studies. Furthermore, the development and adoption of standardized protocols for the generation, culture, and analysis of these models will be essential to improve reproducibility, facilitate cross-study comparisons, and accelerate translation of research findings into clinical applications.

Microbiota-targeted interventions, including postbiotics, probiotics, microbiota transplantation, prebiotics, and phage therapy, have the potential to restore oral eubiosis and improve treatment outcomes in OSCC. However, these approaches require well-designed clinical trials and rigorous preclinical validation to confirm efficacy and safety. Ethical and technical considerations, such as invasive sampling, consent for biobanking, and regulatory requirements, must be addressed before clinical implementation.

A summary of key challenges, research gaps, and future directions in oral microbiota-targeted strategies for OSCC is presented in Table 3. This table highlights microbial heterogeneity, resistance, therapy impact, lack of validated biomarkers, oncogenic mechanisms, causality ambiguity, sample/population variation, ethical challenges, and the need for intervention validation. It serves as a roadmap for prioritizing research and designing targeted, effective, and safe microbiome-based interventions in OSCC management.

Table 3.

Challenges, research gaps, and future directions in oral microbiota and OSCC

Aspect Key issues / Findings Implications Future directions
Microbial heterogeneity [123] Interindividual and site-specific variability in microbiota, influenced by disease stage and sampling method. Hinders standardization and universal microbiome-targeted therapies. Develop site-specific diagnostic models; use machine learning for personalized profiling.
Microbial resistance [124] Resistance to targeted therapies (e.g., phage therapy) worsens by antimicrobial misuse. Reduces the long-term efficacy of microbial interventions. Explore phage engineering, combination therapies, and stewardship guidelines.
Cancer therapy impact [125] Chemotherapy/radiotherapy disrupts oral microbiota, causing mucositis and dysbiosis. Increases the risk of secondary infections and reduces treatment efficacy. Integrate microbiome-preserving strategies during cancer treatment.
Lack of biomarkers [112] Absence of validated microbial markers for OSCC risk, stage, or recurrence. Limits early detection and monitoring. Apply multi-omics and artificial intelligence to identify robust biomarkers.
Microbial oncogenic mechanisms [51 ,52] Bacteria (e.g., F. nucleatum) activate NF-κB, Wnt/β-catenin, and TLR pathways. Promotes EMT, stemness, inflammation, and immune evasion. Target microbiota-driven pathways in therapy development.
Causality ambiguity [66] Current evidence is predominantly derived from cross-sectional and association-based studies, making it unclear whether microbial dysbiosis is a driver or a consequence of OSCC. Limits causal inference and challenges the establishment of microbiota as true etiological factors in carcinogenesis. Conduct longitudinal, prospective, and mechanistic studies to clarify temporal dynamics and establish causal relationships between microbiome alterations and OSCC development.
Sample/population variation [123, 126] Results vary due to geography, lifestyle, sampling technique, and sequencing method. Reduces reproducibility and comparability across studies. Standardize protocols; increase global and multi-ethnic cohorts.
Ethical challenges [123] Concerns over invasive sampling, consent, and privacy in microbiome biobanking. Hinders inclusion of vulnerable populations (e.g., elderly). Establish ethical frameworks for microbiome-based diagnostics and interventions.
Intervention validation [112] Limited clinical trials on probiotics, postbiotics, or microbiota modulation in OSCC. Restricts clinical adoption of microbiome-based therapies. Conduct large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess safety, efficacy, and sustainability.

Conclusion

Oral microbial dysbiosis is increasingly acknowledged as both a factor that contributes to the development and progression of OSCC, and as a result of tumor-related changes in the oral microenvironment. Current evidence indicates a two-way relationship in which dysbiosis, marked by increased pathogenic bacteria such as P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and F. nucleatum, drives chronic inflammation, modulates the immune response, leads to metabolic reprogramming, and activates oncogenic signaling pathways. These processes collectively support tumor development and progression. Conversely, OSCC-associated alterations in tissue architecture, immune responses, and local metabolic conditions further disrupt microbial homeostasis, reinforcing a pro-carcinogenic environment. Beyond bacteria, viral and fungal components of the oral microbiome, including human papillomavirus, Epstein–Barr virus, and C. albicans, may act as additional cofactors that amplify inflammatory and genotoxic processes, contributing to malignant transformation. Collectively, these findings highlight the oral microbiome as an integrated ecological system actively involved in OSCC pathobiology rather than a passive bystander. Importantly, emerging evidence suggests that microbial signatures and associated host inflammatory mediators may serve as promising non-invasive biomarkers for early detection, prognosis, and disease monitoring. In parallel, microbiome-targeted strategies, such as probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and optimized oral hygiene practices, represent potential adjunctive approaches for restoring microbial balance and reducing tumor-promoting inflammation. However, current evidence is limited by methodological heterogeneity, sampling variability, and lack of longitudinal data, and causality has not yet been fully established. Future research should focus on multi-omics, mechanistic, and longitudinal studies to validate microbial signatures and clarify host–microbe interactions. Integrating microbiome data with host molecular profiling may ultimately support the development of personalized preventive and therapeutic strategies, improving early detection and clinical outcomes in OSCC.

Abbreviations

Akt

Protein Kinase B

CDH1

Cadherin-1, also known as E-cadherin

c-Myc

Cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene

COX-2

Cyclooxygenase-2

CTLP

Chymotrypsin-like proteinase

EMT

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

ERK

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase

EBV

Epstein–Barr virus

FadA

Fusobacterium adhesin A

GLUT1

Glucose transporter type 1

HPV

Human papillomavirus

IL

Interleukin

JAK

Janus kinase

Ki-67

Marker of cellular proliferation

LMP-1

Latent membrane protein-1

LPS

Lipopolysaccharides

MAPK

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MMP

Matrix metalloproteinase

MyD88

Myeloid differentiation primary response 88

NF-κB

Nuclear Factor Kappa-B

OPSCC

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OSCC

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

PI3K

Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase

Rb

Retinoblastoma

SCFAs

Short-chain fatty acids

SOCS3

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3

STAT3

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

TGF-β

Transforming growth factor-beta

Th17

T helper 17

TLR

toll-like receptor

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

TRAIL

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand

Tregs

regulatory T cells

VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor

Wnt

Wingless-type MMTV integration site family

Author contributions

**AHMK, NET, SA and NA: ** wrote the main manuscript text and prepared the tables. **AHSW: ** prepared the figures. **AHMK, AHSW and NA: ** read and edited the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Imbesi Bellantoni M, Picciolo G, Pirrotta I, Irrera N, Vaccaro M, Vaccaro F, et al. Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Update of the Pharmacological Treatment. Biomedicines. 2023;11(4):1112. 10.3390/biomedicines11041112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Markopoulos AK. Current aspects on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Open Dent J. 2012;6:126–30. 10.2174/1874210601206010126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Singh MP, Kumar V, Agarwal A, Kumar R, Bhatt ML, Misra S. Clinico-epidemiological study of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A tertiary care centre study in North India. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016;6(1):31–4. 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Flügge T, Gaudin R, Sabatakakis A, Tröltzsch D, Heiland M, van Nistelrooij N, et al. Detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma in clinical photographs using a vision transformer. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):2296. 10.1038/s41598-023-29204-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.González-Moles M, Aguilar-Ruiz M, Ramos-García P. Challenges in the Early Diagnosis of Oral Cancer, Evidence Gaps and Strategies for Improvement: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(19):4967. 10.3390/cancers14194967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim MJ, Ahn KM. Prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of recurrence and pTNM stage. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;46(1):8. 10.1186/s40902-024-00410-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jain AKJCS. Oral Cancer Screening: Insights into Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Screening Programs for Improved Early Detection. Cancer Screen Prev. 2024;3(2):97–105. 10.14218/csp.2023.00029s. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yu X, Shi Y, Yuan R, Chen Z, Dong Q, Han L, et al. Microbial dysbiosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9(2):e13198. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Escapa IF, Chen T, Huang Y, Gajare P, Dewhirst FE, Lemon KP. New Insights into Human Nostril Microbiome from the Expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (eHOMD): a Resource for the Microbiome of the Human Aerodigestive Tract. mSystems. 2018;3(6):e00187. 10.1128/msystems.00187-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Deo PN, Deshmukh R. Oral microbiome: Unveiling the fundamentals. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23(1):122–8. 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_304_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rosier BT, Johnston W, Carda-Diéguez M, Simpson A, Cabello-Yeves E, Piela K, et al. Nitrate reduction capacity of the oral microbiota is impaired in periodontitis: potential implications for systemic nitric oxide availability. Int J Oral Sci. 2024;16(1):1. 10.1038/s41368-023-00266-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weiss G, Rasmussen S, Zeuthen LH, Nielsen BN, Jarmer H, Jespersen L, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus induces virus immune defence genes in murine dendritic cells by a Toll-like receptor-2-dependent mechanism. Immunology. 2010;131(2):268–81. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03301.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449(7164):804–10. 10.1038/nature06244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li X, Liu Y, Yang X, Li C, Song Z. The Oral Microbiota: Community Composition, Influencing Factors, Pathogenesis, and Interventions. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:895537. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.895537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Caselli E, Fabbri C, D’Accolti M, Soffritti I, Bassi C, Mazzacane S, et al. Defining the oral microbiome by whole-genome sequencing and resistome analysis: the complexity of the healthy picture. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20(1):120. 10.1186/s12866-020-01801-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Di Spirito F, Di Palo MP, Folliero V, Cannatà D, Franci G, Martina S, et al. Oral Bacteria, Virus and Fungi in Saliva and Tissue Samples from Adult Subjects with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Umbrella Review. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(23):5540. 10.3390/cancers15235540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bostanghadiri N, Kouhzad M, Taki E, Elahi Z, Khoshbayan A, Navidifar T, et al. Oral microbiota and metabolites: key players in oral health and disorder, and microbiota-based therapies. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1431785. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1431785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moreno CM, Boeree E, Freitas CMT, Weber KS. Immunomodulatory role of oral microbiota in inflammatory diseases and allergic conditions. Front Allergy. 2023;4:1067483. 10.3389/falgy.2023.1067483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tsuda H, Mikami Y. The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids Produced by Oral Bacteria in Modulating Oral Immunity. In: Rezaei, N., Ziaei, H, editors Oral Immunology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2026;1492:59–80. 10.1007/978-3-032-03176-1_4 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Porbahaie M, Hummel A, Saouadogo H, Coelho RML, Savelkoul HFJ, Teodorowicz M, et al. Short-chain fatty acids inhibit the activation of T lymphocytes and myeloid cells and induce innate immune tolerance. Benef Microbes. 2023;14(4):401–19. 10.1163/18762891-20220113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miranda V, Laarej K, Cavaliere C. The Oral Microbiota: Implications in Mucosal Health and Systemic Disease—Crosstalk with Gut and Brain. Cells. 2026;15(1):82. 10.3390/cells15010082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sultan AS, Kong EF, Rizk AM, Jabra-Rizk MA. The oral microbiome: A Lesson in coexistence. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(1):e1006719. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Akimbekov NS, Digel I, Yerezhepov AY, Shardarbek RS, Wu X, Zha J. Nutritional factors influencing microbiota-mediated colonization resistance of the oral cavity: A literature review. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1029324. 10.3389/fnut.2022.1029324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chattopadhyay I, Verma M, Panda M. Role of Oral Microbiome Signatures in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Oral Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819867354. 10.1177/1533033819867354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cornejo Ulloa P, van der Veen MH, Krom BP. Review: modulation of the oral microbiome by the host to promote ecological balance. Odontology. 2019;107(4):437–48. 10.1007/s10266-019-00413-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rajasekaran JJ, Krishnamurthy HK, Bosco J, Jayaraman V, Krishna K, Wang T, et al. Oral Microbiome: A Review of Its Impact on Oral and Systemic Health. Microorganisms. 2024;12(9):1797. 10.3390/microorganisms12091797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beghini F, Renson A, Zolnik CP, Geistlinger L, Usyk M, Moody TU, et al. Tobacco exposure associated with oral microbiota oxygen utilization in the New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;34:18–e253. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Abebe G. Oral Biofilm and Its Impact on Oral Health, Psychological and Social Interaction. Int J Oral Dent Health. 2021;7:127. 10.23937/2469-5734/1510127. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Graves DT, Corrêa JD, Silva TA. The Oral Microbiota Is Modified by Systemic Diseases. J Dent Res. 2019;98(2):148–56. 10.1177/0022034518805739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Singh M, Teles F, Uzel NG, Papas A. Characterizing Microbiota from Sjögren’s Syndrome Patients. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021;6(3):324–32. 10.1177/2380084420940623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pisano M, Giordano F, Sangiovanni G, Capuano N, Acerra A, D’Ambrosio F. The Interaction between the Oral Microbiome and Systemic Diseases: A Narrative Review. Microbiol Res. 2023;14(4):1862–78. 10.3390/microbiolres14040127. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Perera M, Al-Hebshi NN, Perera I, Ipe D, Ulett GC, Speicher DJ, et al. Inflammatory Bacteriome and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Dent Res. 2018;97(6):725–32. 10.1177/0022034518767118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu Y, Li Z, Qi Y, Wen X, Zhang L. Metagenomic Analysis Reveals a Changing Microbiome Associated With the Depth of Invasion of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:795777. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.795777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sugawara Y, Uehara A, Fujimoto Y, Kusumoto S, Fukase K, Shibata K, et al. Toll-like receptors, NOD1, and NOD2 in oral epithelial cells. J Dent Res. 2006;85(6):524–9. 10.1177/154405910608500609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rich AM, Hussaini HM, Parachuru VP, Seymour GJ. Toll-like receptors and cancer, particularly oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2014;5:464. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Omori Y, Noguchi K, Kitamura M, Makihara Y, Omae T, Hanawa S, et al. Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide Induces PD-L1 Expression and an Invasive Phenotype of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(2):343. 10.3390/cancers16020343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Michikawa C, Gopalakrishnan V, Harrandah AM, Karpinets TV, Garg RR, Chu RA, et al. Fusobacterium is enriched in oral cancer and promotes induction of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Neoplasia. 2022;31:100813. 10.1016/j.neo.2022.100813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bartha Á, Győrffy B. TNMplot.com: A Web Tool for the Comparison of Gene Expression in Normal, Tumor and Metastatic Tissues. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):2622. 10.3390/ijms22052622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Peng X, Cheng L, You Y, Tang C, Ren B, Li Y, et al. Oral microbiota in human systematic diseases. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14(1):14. 10.1038/s41368-022-00163-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vyhnalova T, Danek Z, Gachova D, Linhartova PB. The Role of the Oral Microbiota in the Etiopathogenesis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Microorganisms. 2021;9(8):1549. 10.3390/microorganisms9081549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zheng S, Yu S, Fan X, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Lin L, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis survival skills: Immune evasion. J Periodontal Res. 2021;56(6):1007–18. 10.1111/jre.12915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Singh S, Singh AK. Porphyromonas gingivalis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review. Microbes Infect. 2022;24(3):104925. 10.1016/j.micinf.2021.104925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Starska-Kowarska K. The Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis in Oral Carcinogenesis and Progression by Remodelling the Tumour Microenvironment: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17(21):3478. 10.3390/cancers17213478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Groeger S, Domann E, Gonzales JR, Chakraborty T, Meyle J. B7-H1 and B7-DC receptors of oral squamous carcinoma cells are upregulated by. Porphyromonas gingivalis Immunobiol. 2011;216(12):1302–10. 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jayaprakash K, Khalaf H, Bengtsson T. Gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis play a significant role in induction and regulation of CXCL8 in THP-1 cells. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:193. 10.1186/1471-2180-14-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang D, Li S, Hu L, Sheng L, Chen L. Modulation of protease-activated receptor expression by Porphyromonas gingivalis in human gingival epithelial cells. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):128. 10.1186/s12903-015-0105-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Binder Gallimidi A, Fischman S, Revach B, Bulvik R, Maliutina A, Rubinstein AM, et al. Periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum promote tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model. Oncotarget. 2015;6(26):22613–23. 10.18632/oncotarget.4209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Harrandah AM, Chukkapalli SS, Bhattacharyya I, Progulske-Fox A, Chan EKL. Fusobacteria modulate oral carcinogenesis and promote cancer progression. J Oral Microbiol. 2020;13(1):1849493. 10.1080/20002297.2020.1849493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sun J, Tang Q, Yu S, Xie M, Zheng W, Chen G, et al. F. nucleatum facilitates oral squamous cell carcinoma progression via GLUT1-driven lactate production. EBioMedicine. 2023;88:104444. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li Z, Liu Y, Huang X, Wang Q, Fu R, Wen X, et al. F. Nucleatum enhances oral squamous cell carcinoma proliferation via E-cadherin/β-Catenin pathway. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):518. 10.1186/s12903-024-04252-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.McIlvanna E, Linden GJ, Craig SG, Lundy FT, James JA. Fusobacterium nucleatum and oral cancer: a critical review. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1212. 10.1186/s12885-021-08903-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gur C, Ibrahim Y, Isaacson B, Yamin R, Abed J, Gamliel M, et al. Binding of the Fap2 protein of Fusobacterium nucleatum to human inhibitory receptor TIGIT protects tumors from immune cell attack. Immunity. 2015;42(2):344–55. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Listyarifah D, Nieminen MT, Mäkinen LK, Haglund C, Grenier D, Häyry V, et al. Treponema denticola chymotrypsin-like proteinase is present in early-stage mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma and related to the clinicopathological features. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(8):764–72. 10.1111/jop.12729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Peng RT, Sun Y, Zhou XD, Liu SY, Han Q, Cheng L, et al. Treponema denticola Promotes OSCC Development via the TGF-β Signaling Pathway. J Dent Res. 2022;101(6):704–13. 10.1177/00220345211067401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sukmana BI, Saleh RO, Najim MA, Al-Ghamdi HS, Achmad H, Al-Hamdani MM, et al. Oral microbiota and oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of their relation and carcinogenic mechanisms. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1319777. 10.3389/fonc.2024.1319777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kamarajan P, Ateia I, Shin JM, Fenno JC, Le C, Zhan L, et al. Periodontal pathogens promote cancer aggressivity via TLR/MyD88 triggered activation of Integrin/FAK signaling that is therapeutically reversible by a probiotic bacteriocin. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(10):e1008881. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nikolić N, Pucar A, Tomić U, Petrović S, Mihailović Đ, Jovanović A, et al. Oral Microbiota and Carcinogenesis: Exploring the Systemic Impact of Oral Pathogens. Pathogens. 2025;14(12):1233. 10.3390/pathogens14121233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nokovitch L, Maquet C, Crampon F, Taihi I, Roussel LM, Obongo R, et al. Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Risk Factors: State of the Art. J Clin Med. 2023;12(9):3264. 10.3390/jcm12093264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ganguly N, Parihar SP. Human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncoproteins as risk factors for tumorigenesis. J Biosci. 2009;34(1):113–23. 10.1007/s12038-009-0013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Di Spirito F. Human Papillomavirus: Oral Lesions and Vaccination. Cancers. 2023;15(10):2711. 10.3390/cancers15102711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Núñez-Acurio D, Bravo D, Aguayo F. Epstein–Barr Virus—Oral Bacterial Link in the Development of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Pathogens. 2020;9(12):1059. 10.3390/pathogens9121059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.She Y, Nong X, Zhang M, Wang M. Epstein-Barr virus infection and oral squamous cell carcinoma risk: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186860. 10.1371/journal.pone.0186860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kato A, Imai K, Sato H, Ogata Y. Prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus DNA and Porphyromonas gingivalis in Japanese peri-implantitis patients. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):148. 10.1186/s12903-017-0438-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Uehara K, Tanabe Y, Hirota S, Higa S, Toyoda Z, Kurima K, et al. Co-expression of low-risk HPV E6/E7 and EBV LMP-1 leads to precancerous lesions by DNA damage. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):688. 10.1186/s12885-021-08397-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Crispino A, Varricchio S, Esposito A, Marfella A, Cerbone D, Perna A, et al. The oral microbiome and its role in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of microbial alterations and potential biomarkers. Pathologica. 2024;116(6):338–57. 10.32074/1591-951x-n867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tasso CO, Ferrisse TM, de Oliveira AB, Ribas BR, Jorge JH. Candida species as potential risk factors for oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2023;86:102451. 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Alnuaimi AD, Wiesenfeld D, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Reynolds EC, McCullough MJ. Oral Candida colonization in oral cancer patients and its relationship with traditional risk factors of oral cancer: a matched case-control study. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(2):139–45. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bansal R, Pallagatti S, Sheikh S, Aggarwal A, Gupta D, Singh R. Candidal Species Identification in Malignant and Potentially Malignant Oral Lesions with Antifungal Resistance Patterns. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(Suppl 2):S309–13. 10.4103/ccd.ccd_296_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Safdar A, Chaturvedi V, Cross EW, Park S, Bernard EM, Armstrong D, et al. Prospective study of Candida species in patients at a comprehensive cancer center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(7):2129–33. 10.1128/aac.45.7.2129-2133.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ayuningtyas NF, Mahdani FY, Pasaribu TAS, Chalim M, Ayna VKP, Santosh ABR, et al. Role of Candida albicans in Oral Carcinogenesis. Pathophysiology. 2022;29(4):650–62. 10.3390/pathophysiology29040051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sankari SL, Mahalakshmi K, Kumar VN. A comparative study of Candida species diversity among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):488. 10.1186/s13104-020-05336-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Abdulrahim MH, McManus BA, Flint SR, Coleman DC. Genotyping Candida albicans from Candida leukoplakia and non-Candida leukoplakia shows no enrichment of multilocus sequence typing clades but enrichment of ABC genotype C in Candida leukoplakia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73738. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gainza-Cirauqui ML, Nieminen MT, Novak Frazer L, Aguirre-Urizar JM, Moragues MD, Rautemaa R. Production of carcinogenic acetaldehyde by Candida albicans from patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders. J Oral Pathol Med. 2013;42(3):243–9. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2012.01203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Di Cosola M, Cazzolla AP, Charitos IA, Ballini A, Inchingolo F, Santacroce L. Candida albicans and Oral Carcinogenesis. Brief Rev J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(6):476. 10.3390/jof7060476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dumitrescu R, Bolchis V, Fratila AD, Jumanca D, Buzatu BLR, Sava-Rosianu R, et al. The Global Trends and Advances in Oral Microbiome Research on Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Microorganisms. 2025;13(2):373. 10.3390/microorganisms13020373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ahmed AA, Sborchia M, Bye H, Roman-Escorza M, Amar A, Henley-Smith R, et al. Mutation detection in saliva from oral cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2024;151:106717. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lan Q, Zhang C, Hua H, Hu X. Compositional and functional changes in the salivary microbiota related to oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma: a case control study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):1021. 10.1186/s12903-023-03760-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang H, Funchain P, Bebek G, Altemus J, Zhang H, Niazi F, et al. Microbiomic differences in tumor and paired-normal tissue in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):14. 10.1186/s13073-017-0405-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Takahashi Y, Park J, Hosomi K, Yamada T, Kobayashi A, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Analysis of oral microbiota in Japanese oral cancer patients using 16S rRNA sequencing. J Oral Biosci. 2019;61(2):120–8. 10.1016/j.job.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Al-Hebshi NN, Nasher AT, Maryoud MY, Homeida HE, Chen T, Idris AM, et al. Inflammatory bacteriome featuring Fusobacterium nucleatum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa identified in association with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1834. 10.1038/s41598-017-02079-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Amer A, Whelan A, Al-Hebshi NN, Healy CM, Moran GP. Acetaldehyde production by Rothia mucilaginosa isolates from patients with oral leukoplakia. J Oral Microbiol. 2020;12(1):1743066. 10.1080/20002297.2020.1743066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Feng J, Liu J, Jiang M, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Yang M, et al. The Role of Oral Nitrate-Reducing Bacteria in the Prevention of Caries: A Review Related to Caries and Nitrate Metabolism. Caries Res. 2023;57:119–32. 10.1159/000529162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rani NAJ, Vardhan BGH, Srinivasan S, Gopal SK. Evaluation of Salivary Interleukin-6 in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders, Chronic Periodontitis and in Healthy Controls - A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2023;13(1):70–5. 10.4103/ams.ams_240_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Márton IJ, Horváth J, Lábiscsák P, Márkus B, Dezső B, Szabó A, et al. Salivary IL-6 mRNA is a Robust Biomarker in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1958. 10.3390/jcm8111958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Rezaei F, Mozaffari HR, Tavasoli J, Zavattaro E, Imani MM, Sadeghi M. Evaluation of Serum and Salivary Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 Levels in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2019;39(12):727–39. 10.1089/jir.2019.0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Saikia PJ, Pathak L, Mitra S, Das B. The emerging role of oral microbiota in oral cancer initiation, progression and stemness. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1198269. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1198269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hashimoto K, Shimizu D, Ueda S, Miyabe S, Oh-Iwa I, Nagao T, et al. Feasibility of oral microbiome profiles associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Microbiol. 2022;14(1):2105574. 10.1080/20002297.2022.2105574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Khalesi S, Maleki L, Eskandari S, Dehabadi FZ, Kohpaee AY. Cyclin D1 and Ki-67 expression and its correlation with histopathological parameters and cervical lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023;20:112. 10.4103/drj.drj_621_22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Cheng Y, Chen J, Shi Y, Fang X, Tang Z. MAPK Signaling Pathway in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Biological Function and Targeted Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(19):4625. 10.3390/cancers14194625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Humayun S, Prasad VR. Expression of p53 protein and ki-67 antigen in oral premalignant lesions and oral squamous cell carcinomas: An immunohistochemical study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011;2(1):38–46. 10.4103/0975-5950.85852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zendeboodi F, Khorshidian N, Mortazavian A, Cruz A. Probiotic: conceptualization from a new approach. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2020;32:103–23. 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.03.009. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Al-Asfour A, Bhardwaj RG, Karched M. Growth Suppression of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells by Lactobacillus Acidophilus. Int Dent J. 2024;74(5):1151–60. 10.1016/j.identj.2024.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhang M, Wang F, Jiang L, Liu R, Zhang L, Lei X, et al. Lactobacillus salivarius REN inhibits rat oral cancer induced by 4-nitroquioline 1-oxide. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013;6(7):686–94. 10.1158/1940-6207.Capr-12-0427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Meurman JH. Probiotics: do they have a role in oral medicine and dentistry? Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(3):188–. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00191.x.  96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Jones SE, Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:35. 10.1186/1471-2180-9-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Patel S, Goyal A. Evolving Roles of Probiotics in Cancer Prophylaxis and Therapy. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2013;5(1):59–67. 10.1007/s12602-012-9124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Parveen S, Alqahtani A, Aljabri M, Dawood T, Khan S, Gupta B, et al. Exploring the Interplay: Oral–Gut Microbiome Connection and the Impact of Diet and Nutrition. Eur J Gen Dentistry. 2024;13:165–76. 10.1055/s-0044-1786154. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Doucette H, Ward R, Wheeldon C, Whelan A. The impact of prebiotics and probiotics on the oral microbiome of individuals with periodontal disease: a scoping review. Can J Dent Hyg. 2024;58(3):182–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Nireeksha M, Luke A, Kumari NS, Hegde MN, Hegde NN. Metabolic interplay of SCFA’s in the gut and oral microbiome: a link to health and disease. Front Oral Health. 2025;6:1646382. 10.3389/froh.2025.1646382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Mehta CH, Paliwal S, Muttigi MS, Seetharam RN, Prasad ASB, Nayak Y, et al. Polyphenol-based targeted therapy for oral submucous fibrosis. Inflammopharmacology. 2023;31(5):2349–68. 10.1007/s10787-023-01212-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kumar A, Bagewadi A, Keluskar V, Singh M. Efficacy of lycopene in the management of oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(2):207–13. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hazarey VK, Sakrikar AR, Ganvir SM. Efficacy of curcumin in the treatment for oral submucous fibrosis - A randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015;19(2):145–52. 10.4103/0973-029x.164524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ji J, Jin W, Liu SJ, Jiao Z, Li X. Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics in health and disease. MedComm (2020). 2023;4(6):e420. 10.1002/mco2.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Eijsink VG, Axelsson L, Diep DB, Håvarstein LS, Holo H, Nes IF. Production of class II bacteriocins by lactic acid bacteria; an example of biological warfare and communication. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002;81(1–4):639–54. 10.1023/a:1020582211262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Widyarman AS, Halim LA, Jesslyn, Irma HA, Richi M, Rizal MI. The potential of reuterin derived from Indonesian strain of Lactobacillus reuteri against endodontic pathogen biofilms in vitro and ex vivo. Saudi Dent J. 2023;35(2):154–64. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mohd Fuad AS, Amran NA, Nasruddin NS, Burhanudin NA, Dashper S, Arzmi MH. The Mechanisms of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics in Oral Cancer Management. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2023;15(5):1298–311. 10.1007/s12602-022-09985-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Talapko J, Erić S, Meštrović T, Stipetić MM, Juzbašić M, Katalinić D, et al. The Impact of Oral Microbiome Dysbiosis on the Aetiology, Pathogenesis, and Development of Oral Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(17):2997. 10.3390/cancers16172997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Tian S, Ding T, Li H. Oral microbiome in human health and diseases. mLife. 2024;3(3):367–83. 10.1002/mlf2.12136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Panneerselvam VP, Kagithakara Vajravelu L, Harikumar Lathakumari R, Baskar Vimala P, Thulukanam DMN. Bacteriophage-based therapies in oral cancer: A new frontier in oncology. Cancer Pathog Ther. 2025;3(6):453–65. 10.1016/j.cpt.2025.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Boksa FA, Leinbach LI, Mody DP, Ganesan SM, Mays JW. Oral microbiome alterations after cancer treatment: a scoping review and analysis. Med Oncol. 2025;42(10):432. 10.1007/s12032-025-02998-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Soghli N, Khormali A, Mahboubi D, Peng A, Miguez PA. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence-powered cancer prediction from oral microbiome. Periodontol 2000. 2025;98(1):181–213. 10.1111/prd.70000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gopinath D, Menon RK, Wie CC, Banerjee M, Panda S, Mandal D, et al. Differences in the bacteriome of swab, saliva, and tissue biopsies in oral cancer. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1181. 10.1038/s41598-020-80859-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Rahman R, Shaikh MH, Gopinath D, Idris A, Johnson NW. Human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus co-infection in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2023;38(4):259–74. 10.1111/omi.12412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ferrari E, Pezzi ME, Cassi D, Pertinhez TA, Spisni A, Meleti M. Salivary Cytokines as Biomarkers for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13):6795. 10.3390/ijms22136795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Babiuch K, Kuśnierz-Cabala B, Kęsek B, Okoń K, Darczuk D, Chomyszyn-Gajewska M. Evaluation of Proinflammatory, NF-kappaB Dependent Cytokines: IL-1α, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in Tissue Specimens and Saliva of Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):867. 10.3390/jcm9030867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chen Y, Cong R, Ji C, Ruan W. The prognostic role of C-reactive protein in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2020;9(24):9541–53. 10.1002/cam4.3520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Fakhry C, Lacchetti C, Rooper LM, Jordan RC, Rischin D, Sturgis EM, et al. Human Papillomavirus Testing in Head and Neck Carcinomas: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the College of American Pathologists Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(31):3152–61. 10.1200/jco.18.00684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Engku Nasrullah Satiman EAF, Ahmad H, Ramzi AB, Abdul Wahab R, Kaderi MA, Wan Harun WHA, et al. The role of Candida albicans candidalysin ECE1 gene in oral carcinogenesis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;49(9):835–41. 10.1111/jop.13014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Intini R, Balsells S, Bagan L, Fortuna G, Sroussi H, Bagan J. Comparative analysis of oral microbiome in saliva samples of oral leukoplakia, proliferative leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oral Health. 2025;6:1600090. 10.3389/froh.2025.1600090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Chen Z, Wong PY, Ng CWK, Lan L, Fung S, Li JW, et al. The Intersection between Oral Microbiota, Host Gene Methylation and Patient Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(11):3425. 10.3390/cancers12113425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kondo Y, Yoshikawa K, Omura Y, et al. Clinicopathological significance of carbonic anhydrase 9, glucose transporter-1, Ki-67 and p53 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2011;25(5):1227–33. 10.3892/or.2011.1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Špiljak B, Ozretić P, Andabak Rogulj A, Lončar Brzak B, Brailo V, Škerlj M, et al. Oral Microbiome Research in Biopsy Samples of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Challenges. Appl Sci. 2024;14(23):11405. 10.3390/app142311405. [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Zhang W, Xiang Y, Ren H, Liu Y, Wang Q, Ran M, et al. The tumor microbiome in cancer progression: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Mol Cancer. 2025;24(1):195. 10.1186/s12943-025-02403-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Shebbo S, Alateyah N, Yassin E, Mahmoud DES, Tamimi F, Anweigi L, et al. Unravelling molecular mechanism of oral squamous cell carcinoma and genetic landscape: an insight into disease complexity, available therapies, and future considerations. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1626243. 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1626243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kamel AHM, AlKindi F, AlHarrasi R, AlKindi N. The Role of Dental Oncology in Cancer Care: a Critical Component of Comprehensive Treatment, Education, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration- a Narrative Review. J Cancer Educ. 2025. 10.1007/s13187-025-02639-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Cancer Cell International are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES