Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Jul 25;25(4):120. doi: 10.1007/s12311-026-02054-7

Advancing Cerebro-cerebellar Network Imaging with Ultra-high Field (7T) MRI: Progress and Future Challenges

Amina Zohor Zidane Burgess 1,2,✉, Jackson Tyler Boonstra 2,3, Yoshifumi Mori 1,4, Sheeba Anteraper 5,#, Wietske van der Zwaag 1,4,✉,#
PMCID: PMC13401556  PMID: 42501259

Abstract

Ultra-high field (UHF) MRI (≥ 7T) is increasingly used to study the cerebro-cerebellar networks, offering substantial gains in signal-to-noise ratio and blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) sensitivity that enable submillimeter functional and structural imaging. These advantages are particularly relevant for the cerebellum, whose tightly folded cortex and small deep nuclei have historically been difficult to resolve in vivo. In this targeted review, we synthesize recent progress in UHF-MRI applied to cerebro-cerebellar network mapping and critically examine the methodological challenges that accompany these developments. We highlight how UHF-MRI has enabled more precise delineation of cerebellar functional territories, improved visualization of the dentate nucleus and its connectivity, and facilitated integration of cerebellar nodes into whole-brain network models. We also discuss the technical challenges, including RF-field inhomogeneity, susceptibility-induced distortions, and the trade-off between spatial resolution and signal strength. These issues are compounded in the cerebellum due to its anatomical location and fine-scale organization, increasing the risk of spatial biases and misinterpretation if not carefully addressed. Beyond acquisition, we identify key gaps in analysis methodologies, including the need for cerebellum-specific preprocessing pipelines, segmentation tools that preserve mesoscale anatomy, and frameworks that treat the cerebellum and cerebrum as a unified system. We also discuss emerging opportunities, such as neurostimulation, integration with postmortem imaging and deep learning-based methods that may help bridge microstructural and in vivo findings. Overall, we argue that while UHF-MRI holds transformative potential for cerebellar systems neuroscience, translational progress will depend on rigorous methodological standardization and awareness of its limitations.

Keywords: Ultra-high field MRI, Cerebro-cerebellar networks, Cerebellum

The Cerebro-cerebellar Network

The cerebellar and cerebral cortices are part of an extensive cerebro-cerebellar network. The cerebellum receives input from the body through the inferior olive in the brainstem, from where climbing fibres pass through the inferior cerebellar peduncles to project to the Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex (Fig. 1) [1, 2]. Output from the cerebellar cortex passes through the cerebellar dentate nucleus (DN) and thalamus to the cerebral cortex along the dentatothalamic tract. Feedback from the cerebral cortex makes its way back to the cerebellum through the pons along the mossy fibres which enter the cerebellum via the middle and inferior cerebellar peduncles, closing the cerebro-cerebellar loop [2, 3]. All known networks in the brain contain these loops, and each part of the cerebellar cortex is linked to a specific cerebral cortical area through cerebro-cerebellar loops [4]. In humans, both resting-state and task-based fMRI at conventional field strengths have demonstrated that the DN and cerebellar cortex are functionally connected with widespread cerebral regions, including motor, prefrontal, and parietal association areas [5–7]. Motor networks map on to roughly one-third of the cerebellar cortical area, whereas the fronto-parietal networks map on to larger cerebellar areas, highlighting the cerebellum’s role in cognition and affect [8]. Using ultra-high field (UHF, ≥7T) MRI, the nodes of these extensive networks can be visualised and probed to reveal their inner functional organisation. In this targeted review, we will highlight the progress and challenges associated with UHF-MRI, and provide directions for future research.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of the brain regions and pathways of the cerebro-cerebellar network. Adapted from [1]

Technical Advantages and Challenges for UHF-MRI in Cerebro-cerebellar Network Imaging

Visualisation of fine structural detail of the human cerebellum benefits from high, submillimeter spatial resolution. A current lack of spatial detail at conventional field strengths is partially responsible for the tendency in the field of cognitive neurosciences to ignore the cerebellum in fMRI studies [9]. Cerebellar imaging is challenging: for a delineation of the cerebellar cortex at the level of individual folia, a spatial resolution of well below the millimeter, even down to 0.2 mm, is required [10]. To approach such resolutions in-vivo, researchers and clinicians have turned to UHF-MRI, as the increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) offered by higher field strength can be traded for spatial resolution [11, 12]. Using 7 Tesla (7T) or higher field strengths, the human cerebellum has been successfully visualised in vivo in fine detail (Fig. 2) [13–17]. However, cerebro-cerebellar network imaging requires both full brain coverage and functional imaging, while sufficient resolution remains a challenge. The use of UHF-MRI itself additionally comes with its own challenges:

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Importance of resolution in cerebellar imaging. Fine detail of the human cerebellum is only visible at the highest spatial resolution. GRE images acquired at 7T and 11.7T (different participants), bottom-right panel: 0.2x0.2x1 mm resolution. Adapted from [15]

B1+-inhomogeneity

Although the increase in main magnetic field strength (B0) provides the SNR to support the spatial resolution pursued for cerebellar imaging, a challenge arises in the specific shape of the radio frequency (RF)-field generated by transmit coils (B1+). An area of low B1+ is found in the posterior lobes of the cerebellum, specifically affecting the right posterior lobe due to the typical human anatomy and coil design [18]. For general neuroimaging, sequence adaptations or new acquisition strategies may provide a viable alternative [13, 19], but for larger heads and specifically for the most inferior regions of the posterior cerebellar lobe, the signal and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) may still be affected by the low local B1+. Although the design of cerebellum-specific coils can provide much higher SNR in the cerebellum [20–22], these tend to come at a cost of signal elsewhere, and do not necessarily provide a solution for cerebro-cerebellar network visualisation. The addition of dielectric pads to the standard coils [23], or universal parallel transmission (pTx) solutions, which do not require time-consuming patient-specific preparation steps [18, 24, 25] provide more flexible signal increases for true whole-brain imaging. When done successfully, even higher field strengths can yield high-quality cerebellar images, despite the shorter RF wavelength [15, 26].

Functional Imaging at 7T

For functional imaging of the cerebro-cerebellar networks, an additional benefit of UHF-MRI is the increased blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) sensitivity [27–29]. 7T cerebellum inclusive whole-brain acquisitions at moderate (~ 1–2 mm) resolution yield reliable BOLD maps even in individual participants, increasing the range of tasks or conditions that may be studied in humans [30]. While the sensitivity to physiological noise in fMRI also increases with B0 [31], this is not problematic for cerebellar imaging at high spatial resolution [32]. In the DN, the shorter T2* and stronger susceptibility effects associated with its high iron content may require specific acquisition parameter choices to be made. A short TE helps to retain signal locally [33]. Multi-echo fMRI may be an appropriate choice for connectivity studies involving tissues with different optimal TEs, because an early echo can help preserve signal in short-T2* regions such as the DN, while later echoes can provide stronger BOLD sensitivity in cortical gray matter. The increased sensitivity of 7T to tissue susceptibility differences also benefits quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), which is a useful contrast to anatomically delineate the DN and smaller cerebellar nuclei (globose, emboliform and fastigial nuclei) [17, 34].

One technical aspect to consider when starting cerebellar 7T-fMRI is the quality of the B0-shim. Susceptibility-induced distortions always affect the echo planar imaging (EPI) used in typical fMRI acquisitions, and these are more severe if the field homogeneity over the cerebellar area is poorer. Static image-based B0 shimming is the current standard in the field [35]. Further improvements in field homogeneity and image quality could be expected from dynamic B0 measures, local shim coils or dedicated software tools for B0 shimming [36, 37].

Diffusion MRI at 7T

Visualising the structural component of cerebro-cerebellar networks using diffusion MRI is challenging at 7T, especially at the spatial resolution desired in cerebellar imaging [38]. At UHF, increased SNR may reduce uncertainty in fitted diffusion metrics such as fractional anisotropy (FA) and principal eigenvectors and support higher-resolution acquisitions, which could be valuable for resolving small cerebellar structures such as the DN [39, 40]. However, these benefits are counterbalanced by the shorter local T2 and T2*, increased B1+ inhomogeneity, and EPI-related distortions.

Nevertheless, advances in coil design and pTx techniques may prove beneficial, especially in low- B1+ areas such as the cerebellum [41, 42]. New hardware developments at 7T including gradient coils are particularly encouraging for diffusion MRI and may also bring advantages to cerebellar diffusion imaging [43]. The multi-synaptic connections to the cerebral cortex, through the dentate and thalamus or back to the cerebellum through the pons, pose a serious challenge for cerebro-cerebellar network visualisations using diffusion MRI [44]. For a full description of the cerebro-cerebellar networks it is essential to look beyond the cerebellum and cerebrum to the brainstem, which also shapes the cortical functional architecture [45], reflecting the closely linked origin and evolution of the cerebellum and brainstem. So far, interactions between the human brainstem and cerebellum remain terra incognita [46].

Challenges in Cerebellar Image Analysis

The improved spatial resolution available at 7T drives a need to optimize image analysis for accurate cerebro–cerebellar network mapping. The cerebellum’s intricate foliation and distinctive fine-scale organization bring additional challenges for analysis [47]. Analysis pipelines are required that preserve and exploit the submillimeter detail and cope with the different noise behavior in submillimeter data, as well as specialized segmentation strategies tailored to cerebellar anatomy. Appropriate representation frameworks, such as foliation-preserving surface or flatmap models, along with cerebellum-specific templates, are necessary for accurate inter-subject normalization. Another challenge lies in the need for analysis pipelines that treat the cerebellum and cerebrum as a single, integrated network rather than as independent targets of study.

The spatial resolution necessary to resolve fine cerebellar structure comes at the cost of reduced voxel-wise SNR and increased sensitivity to motion, as well as residual artifacts from parallel-imaging reconstructions. This resolution–SNR/artifact trade-off poses consequences for quality control and preprocessing methods [48]. Although spatial smoothing effectively increases SNR, it is generally avoided in submillimeter imaging to reduce mislocalization [49]. Promising alternatives include anatomically informed smoothing [50], use of the signal phase in image reconstruction [48] or a thermal noise removal such as NORDIC [51]. Data acquired at higher temporal resolution are expected to benefit further from preprocessing approaches that explicitly model physiological contamination [52, 53]. Thus, use of a dedicated, noise-conscious pipeline is highly recommended for cerebellar imaging.

Cerebellar Segmentation for Cerebro–cerebellar Network Definition

To study cerebro–cerebellar networks, robust segmentation pipelines are required for both the cerebrum and the cerebellum. The segmentation modules of widely used neuroimaging packages [54–56], primarily focus on the neocortex and may therefore fall short in capturing cerebellar structure with the required precision. Cerebellum-specific tools provide automated cerebellar isolation, and lobular parcellation [57–59]. However, these methods generally do not resolve the fine anatomical details to the level of the individual folia. Recent work has addressed these limitations by combining UHF-MRI with automated, topology-preserving cerebellar segmentation pipelines capable of retaining fine cortical detail at the mesoscale in vivo [10, 16].

Segmentation of the DN, the principal output hub of the cerebellum and an essential part of the cerebro-cerebellar network, is typically based on QSM data rather than the T1-weighting used to isolate the cerebellar cortex. Recently, deep-learning–based segmentation pipelines have been developed to isolate the DN, making it feasible to include the DN as a node in cerebro–cerebellar network analyses [60, 61]. In parallel, whole-brain analysis approaches such as NextBrain have been proposed to provide integrated, high-resolution segmentation across the entire brain [62]. Without such fine-grained segmentation frameworks, cerebro–cerebellar network models risk being asymmetrically defined.

Surface Reconstruction of the Cerebellar Cortex

Reconstructing the cerebellar surface is considerably more complex than reconstructing the neocortex due to high intrinsic curvature and extreme foliation. Until recently, no computational reconstruction had resolved the full complement of individual cerebellar folia (Fig. 3A) [63]. Sereno et al., [10] first achieved this in postmortem 9.4T MRI, extending the FreeSurfer package [54] to reconstruct, unfold, and flatten the entire cerebellar cortical surface at folia-level detail. This framework also enabled detailed reconstruction of the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN), including the DN, thereby providing anatomically precise definitions of cerebellar output structures.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Cerebellar surface and atlas examples. (A) Cerebellar surface reconstruction derived from a postmortem scan, figure from [63] (B) Functional atlas with medium-level granularity from [66]

Building on this foundation, recent 7T frameworks have enabled high-fidelity in vivo cerebellar surface reconstruction, recovering approximately 90% of the postmortem surface area within clinically feasible acquisition times [16]. Together, these advances enable practical integration of cerebellar surfaces into cerebro–cerebellar network analyses.

Cerebellum-specific Atlas Frameworks

Inspection of functional network analysis results requires atlases and a standard space. Task-evoked or resting-state BOLD responses can then be projected onto cerebellar flatmaps and compared to functional atlases. For cerebellar images, the SUIT toolbox provides an atlas template and flatmap deformation tailored to the human cerebellum [57]. This enables more accurate alignment of lobular anatomy and functional parcellation compared to traditional whole-brain normalization methods, despite remaining limitations in fissure registration [47, 64]. King et al. introduced a task-based multi-domain functional parcellation in SUIT space spanning motor, cognitive, and affective domains [65]. More recently, a hierarchical atlas with three nested levels of granularity has been introduced (Fig. 3B) [66]. These tools allow cerebellar BOLD patterns to be interpreted in terms of specific functional territories and their putative counterparts in large-scale cerebral networks [47, 65, 66].

Despite their utility, flatmap-based atlases necessarily simplify complex three-dimensional foldings and the fine fissural organization of the cerebellum. Lyu et al., [67] introduced a surface-based cerebellar atlas derived from high-resolution MRI that adheres closely to fissural boundaries when delineating cerebellar subregions. Even more recently, a digital atlas based on high-resolution cerebellar surface reconstructions has been developed, enabling accurate delineation of the subfolial contours [63]. These advances improve anatomical precision and incorporate structural connectivity information, potentially offering a refined framework within which functional parcellations can be interpreted.

Together, these advances can help tackle a longstanding debate in the field: how a cerebellar cortex with remarkably uniform microstructure can give rise to distinct functional domains across motor, cognitive, and affective tasks [68]. In addition, the exploration of mesoscale information on the cerebellar surface, whether structural, vascular or functional can be further refined [16, 69, 70]. Two main types of Purkinje cells, subdivided based on protein expressions and intrinsic firing frequencies, have been identified in preclinical work and may reflect functional subunits [71]. For successful clinical translation, 7T MRI can be used to perform structural profiling in patients with different cerebellar disorders and provide functional read-outs that are necessary to design and test targeted interventions.

Cerebellar Nodes as Targets for Circuit-specific Neuromodulation

Although 7T provides detailed cerebellar maps, current neuromodulation studies have not yet exploited them. UHF-MRI at 7T is increasingly utilized to enhance precision of deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting, as it offers superior spatial resolution, SNR, and tissue contrast for visualizing the deep brain nuclei including the DCN and their associated networks. Multi-institutional recommendations, drawing on experience from more than 1,000 surgical procedures [72], emphasize the clinical value of 7T MRI for patient-specific surgical planning and postoperative programming. Optimized acquisition and postprocessing techniques, including QSM, fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery (FGATIR), and advanced diffusion imaging of tracts such as the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract, enable improved delineation of midbrain targets including the subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus internus, and thalamus while mitigating field distortions and artifacts.

The principles of high-resolution, individualized anatomical, and connectivity-guided targeting apply equally to cerebellar neuromodulation. The cerebellum provides accessible nodes within cerebro-cerebellar circuits that can be modulated non-invasively to influence distributed cerebral networks. Rohira and colleagues demonstrated that MRI-neuronavigation, combining structural T1-weighted imaging with the SUIT template, significantly outperforms traditional scalp landmark-based approaches (e.g., inion-lateral or inion-mastoid) for cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [73]. Electric field modeling across 20 participants confirmed that 7T based neuronavigation-guided coil placement produces stronger E-fields in intended cerebellar territories (such as Crus II) and reduces unintended spill-over into adjacent regions (e.g., occipital cortex), with effects modulated by coil type (figure-of-8 versus double-cone) [73].

Translational Implications of High Resolution Cerebellar Targeting

Although many contemporary cerebellar TMS studies continue to rely on 3T MRI for functional connectivity mapping and targeting, UHF-MRI provides clear advantages for refinement. A 7T-inclusive protocol has been implemented to examine repetitive TMS effects on fatigue in multiple sclerosis, incorporating high-resolution structural, functional, and spectroscopic imaging [75]. UHF-MRI delivers enhanced BOLD sensitivity for individualized resting-state network mapping, superior visualization of cerebellar cortical subregions, and direct assessment of the DCN. Anteraper and colleagues [76] highlight how 7T MRI can advance functional parcellation of the DN and support targeted non-invasive stimulation of specific cerebro-cerebellar territories to refine therapeutics for psychotic disorders.

Collectively, UHF structural and functional imaging, advanced nuclei segmentation, and connectivity mapping enables more reliable subject-specific targeting, better verification of engagement of intended cerebro-cerebellar networks, and a hopeful minimization of off-target effects. In translational contexts such as schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, post-stroke recovery, and other disorders involving disrupted cerebro-cerebellar circuitry, integration of 7T MRI promises to improve reproducibility, mechanistic understanding, and clinical efficacy of cerebellar neuromodulation [77]. Future progress will benefit from standardized UHF-inclusive pipelines that maintain compatibility with widely available 3T systems for broader clinical translation.

Cerebellar Circuitry Across the Lifespan

Early cerebellar damage has long been implicated in a spectrum of developmental cognitive and affective disorders [78, 79]. In the brain of infants born preterm, the cerebellum is particularly susceptible to hemorrhage resulting in motor delays and cognitive impairments [80]. Compared to other brain injuries, however, cerebellar hemorrhage has largely been under-studied in this population, leaving a significant gap in the mechanistic understanding of, and developing therapies for, preterm cerebellar damage. Importantly, early cerebellar damage is known to result in altered development of functionally connected regions in the cerebral cortex [81–84]. For example, patients with right cerebellar damage may develop a hypoplastic left cerebral cortex. Prior studies report ten-times higher rates of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and five-times higher rates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), as well as increased likelihood of epilepsy, ataxia and anxiety, and mood disorders in preterm births, posing a significant healthcare burden [85]. On the other hand, potentially because of cerebellar reserve, the cerebellum’s remarkable capability to reconfigure, compensate, and restore itself after pathological injury, speaks to developmental strength. Leveraging the strength of 7T, specialized head coils, and motion-corrected acquisitions, investigating this dichotomy can usher new opportunities for investigating and identifying preventive measures for developmental arrest, intervening at possible critical periods, and limiting potential long-term consequences of cerebellar damage.

Adolescence has the second fastest rate of neurodevelopment after infancy, yet cerebro-cerebellar circuitry remains under-examined in this population. Anxiety disorders are the most common mental illnesses among adolescents, with a median age of onset at only 11 years old. Early detection is key as anxiety disorders may predispose adolescents to other psychiatric disorders. Resting state 3T-fMRI studies reveal cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity alterations in adolescent anxiety and point to the DN as a potential target for disease prediction [74].

Considering cerebellar involvement in higher-order cognitive processes, research efforts that specifically target the cerebellum to enhance cognitive reserve may play a critical role in delaying the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD). By modulating cerebellar activity—through approaches such as neurostimulation or cognitive training—cerebro-cerebellar networks that compensate for early pathological changes can be strengthened. Importantly, such investigations can also contribute to the identification of early biomarkers and structural or functional signatures of cognitive decline and neurodegeneration. Changes in cerebellar connectivity, volume, or activity patterns may serve as sensitive indicators of preclinical or prodromal stages of AD/ADRD. Thus, targeting the cerebellum not only offers a potential therapeutic pathway to build resilience against neurodegeneration but also enhances our ability to detect and monitor disease progression at earlier, more actionable stages. The likelihood of early-onset AD and related dementias among adults with ASD is 2.6x higher than in the general population [86], which calls for lifespan studies in individuals with ASD.

Deep cerebellar nuclei such as the DN, neuronal bodies embedded in cerebellar white matter, link the cerebellum to cerebral, thalamic and basal ganglia circuits [87, 88] but their role in AD is only emerging [89]. Employing 7T-fMRI can improve the understanding of the cerebello-dentato-thalamo-cortical circuitry leading to improvements in sensitivity and specificity of currently available neurophysiological instruments and potentially allow early detection method improvement [76].

An Outlook From Postmortem Imaging for In-vivo 7T MRI

Postmortem MRI of the human cerebellum can offer a unique outlook into ultra–high-resolution structural and microstructural mapping. In postmortem specimens, the absence of motion and possibility of hours-to-days long scanning enable images with voxel sizes around 0.1 mm3, revealing cerebellar fissuration patterns, cortical lamination, and gray-white matter architecture in far greater detail than is feasible in vivo [90, 91]. Multimodal acquisitions help segment small subregions in the extra-cerebellar structures of the cerebro-cerebellar networks, including the parvocellular and magnocellular portions of the red nucleus, accessory olive nuclei, and pontine nuclei [92]. Parvocellular red nucleus links to cerebral cortical M1 and magnocellular links to motor and associative cortical areas and DN. Diffusion-weighted imaging at such resolutions allows tractography of major cerebellar white-matter pathways and even intracortical fibres within the cerebellar cortex, to visualize, using micro-tractography, the fibres between the cerebellum and pontine nuclei and red nucleus [93, 94]. A major advantage of postmortem imaging is the further possibility of histological validation, allowing correlations of MR signal to be made with myelin content, cell density, and microvascular architecture at the level of individual folia [90, 95, 96].

Formalin fixation, however, modifies MRI contrast and must be taken into account when interpreting postmortem cerebellar data [97–100]. Changes in T1 and T2 relaxation times reflect chemical cross-linking, temperature differences, and altered water mobility [101, 102]. Diffusion indices are also affected, although in a somewhat more moderate fashion; basic patterns of anisotropy in fine white-matter bundles remain clearly detectable (Fig. 4AB) [94].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Post-mortem 7T cerebellar MRI. Exquisite detail in anatomy (A) and structural connectivity (B), which is currently unattainable in-vivo. Combinations of 7T data with histological staining provide added insight in the underlying tissue microstructure (C, D). Figures taken with permission from [94] (A, B) and [103] (C, D)

To link postmortem and in vivo MRI, recent quantitative protocols combined high-resolution postmortem MRI with standardized in vivo acquisitions in the same donors, enabling direct comparison of relaxation times, diffusion metrics, and morphometry across the two states [96]. Histology-registered postmortem datasets are used to anchor MRI contrasts to underlying cyto- and myeloarchitecture, creating a three-way mapping between in vivo MRI, ex vivo MRI, and microscopy (Fig. 4CD) [103]. This is particularly valuable in the cerebellar cortex, where thin laminae and tightly folded folia pose challenges for purely in vivo work [90, 95] .

Deep-leaning Helps Bridge MRI and Histology

Deep learning has recently emerged as an important tool to strengthen the bridges between postmortem and in vivo imaging. Convolutional neural networks trained on co-registered multi-contrast MRI and histology can infer voxelwise histological staining intensities from MRI signals, effectively providing ‘virtual histology’ for axons and myelin [104]. Similar approaches have been used to translate high-resolution ex vivo MRI into histology-like contrasts and to generate in vivo-like images from postmortem datasets [105, 106]. More integrated pipelines that combine in vivo MRI, in vivo optical imaging, and ex vivo super-resolution microscopy at near-voxel accuracy allow deep learning models to predict disease-relevant histopathology from MRI alone, suggesting a route by which cerebellar postmortem data could inform interpretation of in vivo human scans [104]. As high-resolution postmortem atlases of the human cerebellum and whole brain expand and are integrated with deep learning-based virtual histology, the role of postmortem MRI as a bridge between microstructure and in vivo cerebellar imaging is likely to grow substantially.

Methods and Materials: Scope, Literature Identification and Writing Process

We conducted a targeted literature search in online scientific databases including PubMed and Google scholar. Searches combined ultra-high-field terms (“7T”, “ultra-high field”) with cerebellar and technique-specific keywords (e.g.“cerebro-cerebellar connectivity”, “diffusion imaging human cerebellum”, “quantitative susceptibility mapping”). Only English-language publications were considered. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance to cerebro–cerebellar network mapping at 7T, with emphasis on acquisition advances, preprocessing, and denoising, cerebellum-specific normalization or parcellation. When relevant, full texts were reviewed and additional papers were identified via backward/forward citation tracking. Authors discussed the emerging themes and drafted conclusions during regular meetings between August 2025 and March 2026.

Conclusion and Outlook

For future experiments on cerebellar MRI at UHF, in terms of the acquisition, it is recommended to employ a form of pTx to ensure high local SNR. True whole-brain analysis tools are required for cerebro-cerebellar network analysis with such segmentation and visualisation tools now starting to become available. We can draw on knowledge gathered from postmortem work to identify imaging and treatment targets in-vivo, such as substructures within the cerebellum including the DCN.

With current developments, UHF MRI can provide a window to biology though myelin- and iron-sensitive contrast at submillimeter resolution. In future, these developments can help access cerebellar substructures characterised by myelination differences and provide further insight into the cerebro-cerebellar networks. Additionally, continued progress in specificity and resolution will allow the inclusion of other nodes in the cerebro-cerebellar networks, including those in the brainstem, pons and DCN.

For the cerebellum to truly become part of standard neuroimaging, there is an urgent need for (i) increasingly robust and reliable cerebellum-inclusive research methodologies, protocols, and collaborative platforms for researchers, including standardized imaging at UHF; (ii) neuroimaging analysis tools that ensure the cerebellum is incorporated routinely into whole-brain cognitive and disease models; (iii) imaging of the cerebro-cerebellar contributions in the context of cerebellar reserve and disease; (iv) real-world translation of biomarkers to serve as outcome measures in clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases; (v) inclusion of the cerebellum as a novel treatment option for non-invasive transcranial stimulation. Only through coordinated effort will the cerebellum move from a frequently overlooked structure to a routinely interrogated node in systems-level models of brain function and disease.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Nikos Priovoulos from Maastricht University for sharing materials.

Author Contributions

Each author wrote a thematic section of the manuscript and led the editing thereof. All authors jointly discussed the figures and selected figure panels. W.Z. constructed Figures 2 and 4, A.B. constructed Figure 3. All authors contributed to cross-editing of the full text and reviewed the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from NWO (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek) to WZ: NWA.1518.22.136 (SCANNER) and TTW VI.Vidi.198.016.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Clinical Trial Number

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Sheeba Anteraper and Wietske van der Zwaag contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Amina Zohor Zidane Burgess, Email: a.burgess@nin.knaw.nl.

Wietske van der Zwaag, Email: w.vanderzwaag@spinozacentre.nl.

References

  • 1.Cho HJ. Is essential tremor a degenerative or an electrical disorder? Electrical disorder. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2022;163:103–28. 10.1016/bs.irn.2022.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buckner RL. The Cerebellum and Cognitive Function: 25 Years of Insight from Anatomy and Neuroimaging. Neuron. 2013;80:807–15. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rousseau P-N, Bazin P-L, Steele CJ. Pontine functional connectivity gradients. Cerebellum. 2025;25:1. London, England. 10.1007/s12311-025-01943-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Castellanos A, Diaz JC, Yeo BTT. The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:2322–45. 10.1152/jn.00339.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Küper M, Dimitrova A, Thürling M, Maderwald S, Roths J, Elles HG, et al. Evidence for a motor and a non-motor domain in the human dentate nucleus–an fMRI study. NeuroImage. 2011;54:2612–22. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guell X, D’Mello AM, Hubbard NA, Romeo RR, Gabrieli JDE, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, et al. Functional Territories of Human Dentate Nucleus. Cereb Cortex N Y NY. 2020;30:2401–17. 10.1093/cercor/bhz247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bernard JA, Peltier SJ, Benson BL, Wiggins JL, Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, et al. Dissociable Functional Networks of the Human Dentate Nucleus. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:2151–9. 10.1093/cercor/bht065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marek S, Siegel JS, Gordon EM, Raut RV, Gratton C, Newbold DJ, et al. Spatial and Temporal Organization of the Individual Human Cerebellum. Neuron. 2018;100:977–e9937. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang B, LeBel A, D’Mello AM. Ignoring the cerebellum is hindering progress in neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2025;29:318–30. 10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sereno MI, Diedrichsen J, Tachrount M, Testa-Silva G, d’Arceuil H, De Zeeuw C. The human cerebellum has almost 80% of the surface area of the neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:19538–43. 10.1073/pnas.2002896117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pohmann R, Speck O, Scheffler K. Signal-to‐noise ratio and MR tissue parameters in human brain imaging at 3, 7, and 9.4 tesla using current receive coil arrays. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:801–9. 10.1002/mrm.25677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Le Ster C, Van de Grant A, Monreal-Madrigal A, Adriany G, Vignaud A, et al. Magnetic field strength dependent SNR gain at the center of a spherical phantom and up to 11.7T. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:2131–8. 10.1002/mrm.29391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marques JP, Kober T, van der Krueger G, Gruetter R. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. NeuroImage. 2010;49:1271–81. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Priovoulos N, Bazin P-L. Methods for cerebellar imaging analysis. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2023;54:101328. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101328. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boulant N, Mauconduit F, Gras V, Amadon A, Le Ster C, Luong M, et al. In vivo imaging of the human brain with the Iseult 11.7-T MRI scanner. Nat Methods. 2024;21:2013–6. 10.1038/s41592-024-02472-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Priovoulos N, Bazin P-L, Brouwer EJP, Mejias JF, de Buck MHS, Alkemade A, et al. Mesoscale imaging of the human cerebellum reveals converging regional specialization of its morphology, vasculature, and cytoarchitecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2026;123:e2516608123. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 10.1073/pnas.2516608123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rice LC, Plotkin MR, Parodi D, Ojuri B, Barnwal M, Pekar JJ et al. Detailed mapping of the cerebellar dentate nucleus using ultra-high field (7T) susceptibility-weighted imaging. Cerebellum. 2025;24:122. London, England. 10.1007/s12311-025-01870-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Padormo F, Beqiri A, Hajnal JV, Malik SJ. Parallel transmission for ultrahigh-field imaging. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:1145–61. 10.1002/nbm.3313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oran OF, Klassen LM, Gilbert KM, Gati JS, Menon RS. Elimination of low-inversion-efficiency induced artifacts in whole-brain MP2RAGE using multiple RF-shim configurations at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4387. 10.1002/nbm.4387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Priovoulos N, Jacobs HIL, Ivanov D, Uludağ K, Verhey FRJ, Poser BA. High-resolution in vivo imaging of human locus coeruleus by magnetization transfer MRI at 3T and 7T. NeuroImage. 2018;168:427–36. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pfaffenrot V, Brunheim S, Rietsch SHG, Koopmans PJ, Ernst TM, Kraff O, et al. An 8/15-channel Tx/Rx head neck RF coil combination with region-specific B1 + shimming for whole-brain MRI focused on the cerebellum at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80:1252–65. 10.1002/mrm.27125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clément J, Gruetter R, Ipek Ö. A combined 32-channel receive‐loops/8‐channel transmit‐dipoles coil array for whole‐brain MR imaging at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82:1229–41. 10.1002/mrm.27808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vaidya MV, Lazar M, Deniz CM, Haemer GG, Chen G, Bruno M, et al. Improved detection of fMRI activation in the cerebellum at 7T with dielectric pads extending the imaging region of a commercial head coil. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48:431–40. 10.1002/jmri.25936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Der Brouwer EJP, Heij J, Priovoulos N. Easy-to‐use B1 + shims for human brain imaging at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2025;94:2010–22. 10.1002/mrm.30617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oliveira ÍAF, Roos T, Dumoulin SO, van der Siero JCW. Can 7T MPRAGE match MP2RAGE for gray-white matter contrast? NeuroImage. 2021;240:118384. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.n der Zwaag W, Tse DHY, Poser BA, Priovoulos N. Cerebellar imaging for neuroscience at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med. 2025;94:2129–39. 10.1002/mrm.30596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.n der Zwaag W, Francis S, Head K, Peters A, Gowland P, Morris P, et al. fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: characterising BOLD signal changes. NeuroImage. 2009;47:1425–34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cai Y, Van Der Hofstetter S, Zuiderbaan W, Dumoulin SO. Individualized cognitive neuroscience needs 7T: Comparing numerosity maps at 3T and 7T MRI. NeuroImage. 2021;237:118184. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gizewski ER, De Greiff A, Maderwald S, Timmann D, Forsting M, Ladd ME. fMRI at 7 T: Whole-brain coverage and signal advantages even infratentorially? NeuroImage. 2007;37:761–8. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cai Y, van der Hofstetter S, Zuiderbaan W, Dumoulin SO. Individualized cognitive neuroscience needs 7T: Comparing numerosity maps at 3T and 7T MRI. NeuroImage. 2021;237:118184. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Triantafyllou C, Hoge RD, Krueger G, Wiggins CJ, Potthast A, Wiggins GC, et al. Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. NeuroImage. 2005;26:243–50. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.n der Zwaag W, Jorge J, Butticaz D, Gruetter R. Physiological noise in human cerebellar fMRI. Volume 28. New York, N.Y.: Magma; 2015. pp. 485–92. 10.1007/s10334-015-0483-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Küper M, Wünnemann MJS, Thürling M, Stefanescu RM, Maderwald S, Elles HG, et al. Activation of the cerebellar cortex and the dentate nucleus in a prism adaptation fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;35:1574–86. 10.1002/hbm.22274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bazin P-L, Deistung A, Schäfer A, Turner R, Reichenbach J, Timmann D. Automated segmentation of cerebellar nuclei from ultra-high-field quantitative susceptibility maps with multi-atlas shape fusion. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med [Internet]. 2018. p. 0695. https://cds.ismrm.org/protected/18MProceedings/PDFfiles/0695.html
  • 35.Fillmer A, Kirchner T, Cameron D, Henning A. Constrained image-based B0 shimming accounting for local minimum traps in the optimization and field inhomogeneities outside the region of interest. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:1370–80. 10.1002/mrm.25248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Robinson SD, Bachrata B, Eckstein K, Bollmann S, Bollmann S, Dymerska B, et al. Improved dynamic distortion correction for fMRI using single-echo EPI and a readout-reversed first image (REFILL). Hum Brain Mapp. 2023;44:5095–112. 10.1002/hbm.26440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pinho Meneses B, Stockmann JP, Arango N, Gapais P-F, Giacomini E, Mauconduit F, et al. Shim coils tailored for correcting B0 inhomogeneity in the human brain (SCOTCH): Design methodology and 48-channel prototype assessment in 7-Tesla MRI. NeuroImage. 2022;261:119498. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gallichan D. Diffusion MRI of the human brain at ultra-high field (UHF): A review. NeuroImage. 2018;168:172–80. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.n der Zwaag W, Schäfer A, Marques JP, Turner R, Trampel R. Recent applications of UHF-MRI in the study of human brain function and structure: a review. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:1274–88. 10.1002/nbm.3275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Steele CJ, Anwander A, Bazin P-L, Trampel R, Schaefer A, Turner R et al. Human cerebellar sub-millimeter diffusion imaging reveals the motor and non-motor topography of the dentate nucleus. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:4537–48. New York, N.Y.: 1991. 10.1093/cercor/bhw258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang M, Ding B, Dragonu I, Liebig P, Rodgers CT. Dynamic parallel transmit diffusion MRI at 7T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;111:35–46. 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Subramaniam V, Frankini A, Al Qadi A, Herb MT, Verma G, Delman BN, et al. Radiofrequency Enhancer to Recover Signal Dropouts in 7 Tesla Diffusion MRI. Sensors. 2024;24:6981. 10.3390/s24216981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Feinberg DA, Beckett AJS, Vu AT, Stockmann J, Huber L, Ma S, et al. Next-generation MRI scanner designed for ultra-high-resolution human brain imaging at 7 Tesla. Nat Methods. 2023;20:2048–57. 10.1038/s41592-023-02068-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lundell H, Steele CJ. Cerebellar imaging with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: approaches, challenges, and potential. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024;56:101353. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101353. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hansen JY, Cauzzo S, Singh K, García-Gomar MG, Shine JM, Bianciardi M, et al. Integrating brainstem and cortical functional architectures. Nat Neurosci Nat Publishing Group. 2024;27:2500–11. 10.1038/s41593-024-01787-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Voogd J. What we do not know about cerebellar systems neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:227. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Boonstra JT. The cerebellar connectome. Behav Brain Res. 2025;482:115457. 10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pais-Roldán P, Yun SD, Shah NJ. Pre-processing of sub-millimeter GE-BOLD fMRI data for laminar applications. Front Neuroimaging [Internet]. Frontiers; 2022;1. [cited 2026 Feb 7] 10.3389/fnimg.2022.869454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Turner R. Uses, misuses, new uses and fundamental limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in cognitive science. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371:20150349. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huber L, Handwerker DA, Jangraw DC, Chen G, Hall A, Stüber C, et al. High-Resolution CBV-fMRI Allows Mapping of Laminar Activity and Connectivity of Cortical Input and Output in Human M1. Neuron. 2017;96:1253–e12637. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vizioli L, Moeller S, Dowdle L, Akçakaya M, De Martino F, Yacoub E, et al. Lowering the thermal noise barrier in functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Commun Nat Publishing Group. 2021;12:5181. 10.1038/s41467-021-25431-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Power JD, Plitt M, Gotts SJ, Kundu P, Voon V, Bandettini PA et al. Ridding fMRI data of motion-related influences: Removal of signals with distinct spatial and physical bases in multiecho data. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:E2105–14. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 10.1073/pnas.1720985115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Agrawal U, Brown EN, Lewis LD. Model-based physiological noise removal in fast fMRI. NeuroImage. 2020;205:116231. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fischl B, FreeSurfer. NeuroImage. 2012;62:774–81. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Friston KJ, editor. Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of funtional brain images. 1st ed. Amsterdam ; Boston: Elsevier/Academic; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage. 2004;23:S208–19. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Diedrichsen J, Balsters JH, Flavell J, Cussans E, Ramnani N. A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum. NeuroImage. 2009;46:39–46. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Faber J, Kügler D, Bahrami E, Heinz L-S, Timmann D, Ernst TM, et al. CerebNet: A fast and reliable deep-learning pipeline for detailed cerebellum sub-segmentation. NeuroImage. 2022;264:119703. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Han S, Carass A, He Y, Prince JL. Automatic cerebellum anatomical parcellation using U-Net with locally constrained optimization. NeuroImage. 2020;218:116819. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shiraishi DH, Saha S, Adanyeguh IM, Cocozza S, Corben LA, Deistung A, et al. Automated Deep Learning–based Segmentation of the Dentate Nucleus Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping MRI. Radiol Artif Intell Radiological Soc North Am. 2025;7:e240478. 10.1148/ryai.240478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kim J, Patriat R, Kaplan J, Solomon O, Harel N. Deep Cerebellar Nuclei Segmentation via Semi-Supervised Deep Context-Aware Learning from 7T Diffusion MRI. IEEE Access Pract Innov Open Solut. 2020;8:101550–68. 10.1109/access.2020.2998537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Casamitjana A, Mancini M, Robinson E, Peter L, Annunziata R, Althonayan J, et al. A probabilistic histological atlas of the human brain for MRI segmentation. Nat Nat Publishing Group. 2025;648:678–85. 10.1038/s41586-025-09708-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Samuelsson JG, Schmahmann JD, Sereno MI, Rosen B, Hämäläinen MS. A Digital Anatomical Atlas of the Human Cerebellum at Subfolial Resolution. Hum Brain Mapp. 2026;47:e70497. 10.1002/hbm.70497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Diedrichsen J, Maderwald S, Küper M, Thürling M, Rabe K, Gizewski ER, et al. Imaging the deep cerebellar nuclei: A probabilistic atlas and normalization procedure. NeuroImage. 2011;54:1786–94. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.King M, Hernandez-Castillo CR, Poldrack RA, Ivry RB, Diedrichsen J. Functional boundaries in the human cerebellum revealed by a multi-domain task battery. Nat Neurosci Nat Publishing Group. 2019;22:1371–8. 10.1038/s41593-019-0436-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nettekoven C, Zhi D, Shahshahani L, Pinho AL, Saadon-Grosman N, Buckner RL, et al. A hierarchical atlas of the human cerebellum for functional precision mapping. Nat Commun Nat Publishing Group. 2024;15:8376. 10.1038/s41467-024-52371-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lyu W, Wu Y, Huynh KM, Ahmad S, Yap P-T. A multimodal submillimeter MRI atlas of the human cerebellum. Sci Rep. 2024;14:5622. 10.1038/s41598-024-55412-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Diedrichsen J, King M, Hernandez-Castillo C, Sereno M, Ivry RB. Universal Transform or Multiple Functionality? Understanding the Contribution of the Human Cerebellum across Task Domains. Neuron. 2019;102:918–28. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Boillat Y, Bazin P-L, O’Brien K, Fartaria MJ, Bonnier G, Krueger G, et al. Surface-based characteristics of the cerebellar cortex visualized with ultra-high field MRI. NeuroImage. 2018;172:1–8. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Brouwer EJP, Priovoulos N, van der Hashimoto J. Proprioceptive engagement of the human cerebellum studied with 7T-fMRI. Imaging Neurosci Camb Mass. 2024;2:imag–2. 10.1162/imag_a_00268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yamamoto T, Yoshida Y, Ose T, Murata Y, Hayashi T, Higo N. Cerebellar Molecular Signatures in Non-Human Primates. J Comp Neurol. 2024;532:e25678. 10.1002/cne.25678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Middlebrooks EH, Bot M, Patriat R, Lau JC, Grewal SS, Zhou X, et al. Multi-institutional recommendations on the use of 7T MRI in deep brain stimulation. J Neurosurg. 2025;143:1165–75. 10.3171/2025.3.JNS243024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rohira V, Corominas-Teruel X, Ouarab S, Popa T, Gallea C, Valero-Cabré A, et al. Improving cerebellar TMS targeting: MRI-neuronavigation and landmark-based approaches assessed by E-field modeling. Brain Stimulat. 2025;18:1052–5. 10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lee YJ, Guell X, Hubbard NA, Siless V, Frosch IR, Goncalves M, et al. Functional Alterations in Cerebellar Functional Connectivity in Anxiety Disorders. Cerebellum Lond Engl. 2021;20:392–401. 10.1007/s12311-020-01213-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nygaard S, Madsen MAJ, Wiggermann V, Cabras C, Christiansen L, Svatkova A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to alleviate fatigue in multiple sclerosis—study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Front Neurol. 2026;17:1759679. 10.3389/fneur.2026.1759679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Anteraper S, Guell X, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Big contributions of the little brain for precision psychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:1021873. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1021873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Joncas E, Payne E, Lee E, Demo I, Nye M, Chouinard V-A, et al. Personalization and network specificity of cerebellar TMS in schizophrenia [Internet]. Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2025. 10.64898/2025.12.19.25342404. [cited 2026 June 5]. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Leiner HC, Leiner AL, Dow RS. Does the cerebellum contribute to mental skills? Behav Neurosci. 1986;100:443–54. 10.1037/0735-7044.100.4.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain J Neurol. 1998;121(Pt 4):561–79. 10.1093/brain/121.4.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Brossard-Racine M, du Plessis AJ, Limperopoulos C. Developmental cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in ex-preterm survivors following cerebellar injury. Cerebellum Lond Engl. 2015;14:151–64. 10.1007/s12311-014-0597-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Limperopoulos C, Soul JS, Haidar H, Huppi PS, Bassan H, Warfield SK, et al. Impaired trophic interactions between the cerebellum and the cerebrum among preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116:844–50. 10.1542/peds.2004-2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bolduc M-E, Du Plessis AJ, Evans A, Guizard N, Zhang X, Robertson RL, et al. Cerebellar malformations alter regional cerebral development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:1128–34. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04090.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Limperopoulos C, Chilingaryan G, Sullivan N, Guizard N, Robertson RL, du Plessis AJ. Injury to the premature cerebellum: outcome is related to remote cortical development. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:728–36. New York, N.Y.:1991. 10.1093/cercor/bhs354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hughes DE, Kunitoki K, Elyounssi S, Luo M, Bazer OM, Hopkinson CE, et al. Genetic patterning for child psychopathology is distinct from that for adults and implicates fetal cerebellar development. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26:959–69. 10.1038/s41593-023-01321-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wang SS-H, Kloth AD, Badura A. The Cerebellum, Sensitive Periods, and Autism. Neuron. 2014;83:518–32. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Vivanti G, Tao S, Lyall K, Robins DL, Shea LL. The prevalence and incidence of early-onset dementia among adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res Off J Int Soc Autism Res. 2021;14:2189–99. 10.1002/aur.2590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Carta I, Chen CH, Schott AL, Dorizan S, Khodakhah K. Cerebellar modulation of the reward circuitry and social behavior. Volume 363. New York, N.Y.: Science; 2019. p. eaav0581. 10.1126/science.aav0581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Low AYT, Goldstein N, Gaunt JR, Huang K-P, Zainolabidin N, Yip AKK, et al. Reverse-translational identification of a cerebellar satiation network. Nature. 2021;600:269–73. 10.1038/s41586-021-04143-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Olivito G, Serra L, Marra C, Di Domenico C, Caltagirone C, Toniolo S, et al. Cerebellar dentate nucleus functional connectivity with cerebral cortex in Alzheimer’s disease and memory: a seed-based approach. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;89:32–40. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Edlow BL, Mareyam A, Horn A, Polimeni JR, Witzel T, Tisdall MD, et al. 7 Tesla MRI of the ex vivo human brain at 100 micron resolution. Sci Data. Nat Publishing Group. 2019;6:244. 10.1038/s41597-019-0254-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Dell’Acqua F, Bodi I, Slater D, Catani M, Modo M. MR Diffusion Histology and Micro-Tractography Reveal Mesoscale Features of the Human Cerebellum. Cerebellum Lond Engl. 2013;12:923–31. 10.1007/s12311-013-0503-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Donatelli G, Emmi A, Costagli M, Cecchi P, Macchi V, Biagi L, et al. Brainstem anatomy with 7-T MRI: in vivo assessment and ex vivo comparison. Eur Radiol Exp. 2023;7:71. 10.1186/s41747-023-00389-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Mollink J, van Baarsen KM, Dederen PJWC, Foxley S, Miller KL, Jbabdi S, et al. Dentatorubrothalamic tract localization with postmortem MR diffusion tractography compared to histological 3D reconstruction. Brain Struct Funct. 2016;221:3487–501. 10.1007/s00429-015-1115-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hanalioglu S, Bahadir S, Ozak AC, Yangi K, Mignucci-Jiménez G, Gurses ME, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution 7-Tesla anatomic magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of ex vivo formalin-fixed human brainstem-cerebellum complex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024;18:1484431. 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1484431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Iglesias JE, Crampsie S, Strand C, Tachrount M, Thomas DL, Holton JL. Effect of Fluorinert on the Histological Properties of Formalin-Fixed Human Brain Tissue. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2018;77:1085–90. 10.1093/jnen/nly098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schilling KG, Grussu F, Ianus A, Hansen B, Howard AFD, Barrett RLC, et al. Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2-Ex vivo imaging: Added value and acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2025;93:2535–60. 10.1002/mrm.30435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tovi M, Ericsson A. Measurements of T1 and T2 over time in formalin-fixed human whole-brain specimens. Acta Radiol. 1992;33:400–4. Stockholm, Sweden:1987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dawe RJ, Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Vasireddi SK, Arfanakis K. Postmortem MRI of Human Brain Hemispheres: T2 Relaxation Times during Formaldehyde Fixation. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:810–8. 10.1002/mrm.21909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Birkl C, Langkammer C, Golob-Schwarzl N, Leoni M, Haybaeck J, Goessler W, et al. Effects of formalin fixation and temperature on MR relaxation times in the human brain. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:458–65. 10.1002/nbm.3477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Shatil AS, Uddin MN, Matsuda KM, Figley CR. Quantitative Ex Vivo MRI Changes due to Progressive Formalin Fixation in Whole Human Brain Specimens: Longitudinal Characterization of Diffusion, Relaxometry, and Myelin Water Fraction Measurements at 3T. Front Med. 2018;5:31. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E, Garrick T, Harper C. Postmortem MR imaging of formalin-fixed human brain. NeuroImage. 2004;21:1585–95. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Haga Y, Hata J, Uematsu A, Seki F, Komaki Y, Mizumura M, et al. MR Imaging Properties of ex vivo Common Marmoset Brain after Formaldehyde Fixation. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019;18:253–9. 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Agostinelli LJ, Seaman SC, Saper CB, Fykstra DP, Hefti MM, Koscik TR, et al. Human Brainstem and Cerebellum Atlas: Chemoarchitecture and Cytoarchitecture Paired to MRI. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2023;43:221–39. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0587-22.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Liang Z, Lee CH, Arefin TM, Dong Z, Walczak P, Shi S-H, et al. Virtual mouse brain histology from multi-contrast MRI via deep learning. In: Jbabdi S, de Lange FP, Jbabdi S, editors. eLife. Volume 11. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd; 2022. p. e72331. 10.7554/eLife.72331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 105.Christiansen EM, Yang SJ, Ando DM, Javaherian A, Skibinski G, Lipnick S, et al. In Silico Labeling: Predicting Fluorescent Labels in Unlabeled Images. Cell. 2018;173:792–e80319. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bai B, Yang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Pillar N, Ozcan A. Deep learning-enabled virtual histological staining of biological samples. Light Sci Appl. 2023;12:57. Nature Publishing Group. 10.1038/s41377-023-01104-7 Edit with Zotero. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Cerebellum (London, England) are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES