Abstract
Background
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary condition that almost invariably leads to colorectal cancer. While TP53 inactivation is well established as a late event in the adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence, its functional role during the early stage of colorectal polyp development remains unclear.
Methods
Three lines of FAP pigs were generated: APC1311/+, APC1311/+/TP53+/-, and APC1311/+/TP53-/-. Colonic polyp development was evaluated by colonoscopy at 3 and 9 months of age. Mucosal goblet cell and mucin content were assessed using periodic acid-Schiff/Alcian blue (PAS-AB) staining. Immunohistochemistry for Ki67 and IBA1 was performed to assess epithelial proliferation and macrophage/monocyte-like cell infiltration, respectively. Quantitative PCR was used to measure mRNA expression of macrophage/monocyte - and complement-related genes, including CCL2, FCGR3A, ITGAM, and members of the C1q family.
Results
Macroscopic adenomatous polyp burden and growth dynamics were comparable across genotypes. However, APC1311/+/TP53-/- pigs exhibited significantly reduced epithelial proliferation within polyp crypts, as indicated by decreased Ki67+ expression. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry revealed a significant reduction of stromal IBA1+ macrophage/monocyte-like cells in polyps from APC1311/+/TP53-/- animals. Consistently, expression levels of CCL2, ITGAM, FCGR3A, and complement components C1QB and C1QC were significantly downregulated.
Conclusions
Loss of TP53 did not accelerate early-stage adenomatous polyp progression in the FAP pig model. However, TP53 deficiency was associated with significant alterations in the polyp microenvironment, particularly characterized by reduced C1q-associated macrophage remodeling and diminished expression of macrophage/monocyte- and complement-related genes. These findings suggest a role for TP53 in modulating the inflammatory tumor microenvironment during colorectal tumorigenesis.
Keywords: p53, Pig model, Polyposis, C1q+ macrophage, Tumor microenvironment
1. Introduction
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a severe hereditary disease caused by germline mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, is characterized by a high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) development (1). In humans, somatic APC gene mutations are considered the initiating event in the vast majority of sporadic CRC cases (2). These mutations lead to aberrant activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thereby facilitating the conversion of normal colorectal epithelial cells into adenomas (3, 4). In FAP, a wide spectrum of germline APC mutations has been identified, and these mutations are associated with distinct clinical phenotypes, including variation in disease severity and polyp burden (5). The human APC1309 results in a truncated APC protein and drives early, severe, profuse colorectal polyposis (6). In pigs, the APC1311 mutation, orthologous to human APC1309, closely recapitulates human FAP including polyp location and disease severity (7, 8). In addition, pigs share important anatomical and physiological similarities of the gastrointestinal tract with humans, enhancing their value as a model for studying intestinal diseases. In contrast, commonly used APC mutant mouse models have provided important insights into FAP pathogenesis but predominantly develop tumors in the small intestine rather than the colon and rectum (9, 10). This lesion distribution limits their utility for studying early colorectal tumorigenesis.
The development of CRC is widely recognized as a multistep evolutionary process driven by the sequential accumulation of mutations and/or inactivations in tumor suppressor genes (3, 11). In addition to APC alterations, the tumor suppressor p53 (encoded by TP53) plays a pivotal role in maintaining intestinal epithelial homeostasis by regulating cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and apoptosis (12). In the colonic epithelium, rapid and continuous cell turnover is essential for tissue renewal (13). p53 acts as a critical safeguard against uncontrolled proliferation by limiting the expansion of genetically damaged cells. Mutated or inactivated p53 impairs these regulatory mechanisms, leading to increased epithelial proliferation and contributing to colorectal tumor initiation and progression (12–14). In addition, p53 deficiency is associated with changes in epithelial remodeling and tumor microenvironment (TME), involving goblet cells secretion (15) and macrophage differentiation (16).
The p53 plays an important role in cell homeostasis, including immune homeostasis, through regulation of both innate and adaptive immune signaling pathways (12). Additionally, p53 suppresses inflammation (17), mainly by modulating the tumor secretion of cytokines (18). In response to cellular stress, p53 activation induces the secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines, including CCL2, a key mediator of monocyte/macrophage recruitment (19). Following recruitment to the TME, macrophages/monocytes undergo context-dependent phenotypic reprogramming that shapes their pro-tumor or anti-tumor functional properties (20). Recent single-cell transcriptomic studies have identified a distinct and highly immunosuppressive subset of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) characterized by expression of markers such as ITGAM (CD11b), FCGR3A (CD16), and members of the C1q family (C1QA, C1QB, and C1QC) (21, 22). ITGAM serves as a critical integrin and complement receptor (CR3), facilitating myeloid cell adhesion, migration, and phagocytosis (23). Concurrently, FCGR3A encodes a low-affinity Fc-gamma receptor that mediates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and the robust phagocytosis of immune complexes (24). ITGAM and FCGR3A are functionally specialized for cellular clearance, while they are strongly linked to immunosuppression and tumor progression in the TME (21–24). C1q, the recognition subcomponent of the classical complement pathway, is predominantly produced and secreted by macrophages (25). Accumulating evidence indicates that C1q+ TAMs are enriched across multiple malignancies, and their presence within the TME strongly correlates with tumor progression and metastasis. Functionally, these macrophages contribute to the establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhancing tumor cell proliferation, and attenuating cytotoxic T-cell activity via the production of complement components that modulate immune cell infiltration (26, 27).
We previously generated transgenic pigs carrying the APC1311/+ mutation (7) and a TP53 knockout (TP53-KO) allele (28). Notably, our earlier work revealed increased TP53 mRNA expression in adenomatous polyps (APC1311/+ pigs) (29), suggesting a potential role for p53 during early polyp development. However, while the role of TP53 alterations in the late stages of CRC progression has been extensively investigated (3, 11), its contribution to the early stages of APC-driven polyp development remains unclear. In this study, we further explore the functional contribution of p53 in early adenoma formation. APC1311/+ and TP53-KO lines were crossed to generate compound mutant pigs. These models enable a systematic evaluation of the effects of TP53 loss on the TME in adenomatous polyps.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Ethical statement
All pig experiments were performed at Technical University of Munich (TUM) following the principles outlined in the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes and the German Animal Welfare Law. Ethical approval was granted by the Committee on Animal Health and Care of the local government body of the state of Upper Bavaria (Permission No. 55.2-2532.Vet_02-18-33).
2.2. Animal models
The porcine APC1311/+ model, carrying a truncating mutation in the APC gene that results in hundreds to thousands of polyps in the colon and rectum (7), and the TP53-KO model, generated using a loxP-STOP-loxP transcriptional termination cassette to silence TP53 expression (28), were used to generate APC1311/+/TP53+/- and APC1311/+/TP53-/- pigs. These genotypes were analyzed to model the stepwise inactivation of p53 and to determine whether 50% loss of p53 functionality is sufficient to accelerate the APC-driven oncogenic phenotype. For genotyping, genomic DNA was extracted from ear biopsies using the GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The genotyping PCR for APC and TP53 was performed using GoTaq G2 DNA polymerase (Promega, USA) using primer pairs: Fwd: (5' gagcaacggctacaatca 3'), Rev: (5' tgagcaccactctttgatgg 3') and the following PCR program: 94 °C for 2 min; 40 × [94 °C for 20 s, 59 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 45 s]; 72 °C for 1 min, and Fwd: (5' tgaggaatttgtatgccaagg 3'), Rev: (5' ttccaccagtgaatccacaa 3') detected by following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min; 30 × [95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s]; 72 °C for 5 min, respectively (7, 28). Representative genotyping results are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
2.3. Endoscopic assessment of polyps
To assess polyp development, animals underwent colonoscopic examination (KARL STORZ endoscopy system, Germany) at 3 and 9 months of age. For the procedure, pigs were anesthetized by intramuscular administration of ketamine (Ketamidor®, 100 mg/mL; Richter Pharma AG, Wels, Austria; 20 mg/kg BW) in combination with azaperone (Stresnil®, Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN, USA; 2 mg/kg BW). During colonoscopy, the colorectal mucosa was examined for the presence of polypoid lesions, and the number and size of detected polyps were recorded. Several animals had polyp burden exceeding 200 lesions, in some cases rendering precise quantification impractical. For standardization and clarity of presentation, a threshold of 200 polyps was therefore applied.
2.4. Tissue sampling
All pigs were housed and managed at the TUM Animal Research Center (ARC). At 9 months of age, animals were sacrificed for sample collection. For euthanasia, pigs were first anesthetized via intramuscular injection of ketamine (Ketamidor®, 100 mg/mL; 20 mg/kg body weight; Richter Pharma AG, Wels, Austria) in combination with azaperone (Stresnil®, 2 mg/kg body weight; Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN, USA). Following anesthesia, animals were euthanized by bolt shooting followed by exsanguination. Polyp and normal mucosa (NM) samples from APC1311/+ (n = 16), APC1311/+/TP53+/- (n = 10) and APC1311/+/TP53-/- (n = 10) pigs were collected and stored at -80 °C until further analysis. Polyp samples for histological and immunohistochemical analysis were rinsed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 24 hours at room temperature. After fixation, specimens were transferred into 70% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and then embedded in paraffin for further processing.
2.5. Histology and immunohistochemistry
Serial sections (3.5 µm) of paraffin specimens were prepared using a MICROM HM 355 S rotary microtome (MICROM GmbH, Germany) for subsequent processing (30). Periodic Acid-Schiff-Alcian Blue (PAS-AB) staining was performed as previously reported (31) with minor modifications. Briefly, deparaffinized sections were stained with 1% Alcian blue (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) prepared in 3% acetic acid (pH 2.5; AppliChem GmbH, Germany), oxidized with periodic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), incubated with Schiff’s reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), dehydrated through graded ethanol and xylene, and mounted. AB+ blue acidic signals were quantified from 10 selected regions containing aberrant crypts at the same magnification from each polyp using ImageJ 1.48v (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). PAS+-AB+ purple acidic/neutral mixed mucin signals were assessed from 10 regions containing aberrant crypts within a polyp at the same magnification using a semi-quantitative method: PAS+-AB+ areas were first quantified using ImageJ, and the final results were then manually reviewed to ensure accuracy (32). For protein expression analysis, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect Ki67 (cell proliferation) and IBA1 (macrophage/monocyte marker) In brief, sections were incubated with the following primary antibodies: Anti-Ki67 (clone SP6; 1:100 dilution; Invitrogen, MA5-14520, USA) and Anti-IBA1 (rabbit polyclonal; 1:2000 dilution; Wako Fujifilm, 019-19741, Japan); Signal detection was achieved using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP; 1:200 dilution; Southernbiotech, 4030-05, USA) and a biotinylated secondary antibody (Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG; 1:100 dilution; Vector, BA-1000, USA), respectively (33). Ki67+ and IBA1+ cells were quantified by counting positive (stained cells: brown) and negative (unstained cells: blue) cells in 10 aberrant crypts and stroma selected from each polyp using ViewPoint 1.0.0.9628 (PreciPoint, Germany). The specificity of both antibodies was established in our previous studies (33, 34).
2.6. RNA extraction and quantification
Total RNA was isolated from NM and polyps using a Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit (New England Biolabs, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the LunaScript RT Master Mix Kit (New England Biolabs, USA). Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using qPCRBIO SyGreen Mix Lo-ROX (Biosystems, UK) on a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with default thermal cycling parameters. Reactions were conducted in a 10 µl volume. Specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) were selected from Sus scrofa (Sscrofa11.1) nucleotide sequences retrieved from the GenBank database. Samples were assayed in triplicate, and relative expression levels were normalized to GAPDH (Supplementary Table 1). Relative gene expression was calculated by the ΔΔCt method (35).
2.7. Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were assessed using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. For comparisons among three groups, one-way ANOVA was used, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. For two-group comparisons, the Independent Samples t-test was employed. When data were not normally distributed, the Kruskal-Wallis H test or Mann-Whitney U test was used accordingly. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (IBM Corp., USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data visualization was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.
3. Results
3.1. p53 loss does not accelerate the malignant progression of polyps in APC1311/+ mutant pigs
To investigate the effect of p53 loss on polyp development in APC1311/+, APC1311/+/TP53+/- and APC1311/+/TP53-/- mutant pigs, colonoscopy was performed at 3 and 9 months of age, no detectable differences among the three genotypes were observed (Figure 1a; Supplementary Figure 1). At 3 months of age, the total number of polyps was comparable across the three genotypes, with mean counts ranging from 53 to 62 (Figure 1b). Each group exhibited considerable inter-individual heterogeneity. At the 9-month of age, a decline in polyp number across all genotypes was observed (Figure 1b). The APC1311/+/TP53-/- animals showed a marginally higher number of polyps at 9 months than the other two groups, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 1b). The average polyp size increased from 3 to 9 months of age, with the maximum diameter reaching 20 mm; however, no significant difference in polyp size among the genotypes was observed (Figure 1c).
Figure 1.
Summary of TP53-dependent colon polyposis in porcine FAP models. (a) Representative macroscopic images of colon polyps at 3 and 9 months of age were shown from APC1311/+/TP53-/- pig. (b) The number of polyps at 3 and 9 months of age counted in the colon of APC1311/+, APC1311/+/TP53+/- and APC1311/+/TP53-/- pigs. (c) The size of polyps at 3 and 9 months of age in APC1311/+ (blue dots), APC1311/+/TP53+/- (green dots) and APC1311/+/TP53-/- (orange dots) groups. The Kruskal-Wallis H test and Dunn’s post hoc test were applied to non-normally distributed data. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 pigs).
3.2. p53 loss alters epithelial proliferation and macrophage/monocyte-lineage cell infiltration in polyps
Since p53 knockout did not affect polyp number, we next asked whether it influences polyp histopathology. First, we focused on assessing the mucosal barrier integrity by using PAS-AB staining. This analysis revealed no significant differences among polyps from the three groups (Figures 2a, b), suggesting that p53 deficiency does not markedly alter mucus production or epithelial barrier in early adenomatous polyps.
Figure 2.
Histopathological and immunohistochemical characterization of adenomatous polyps in FAP pig lines. (a) Representative histological (PAS-AB) and immunohistochemical (Ki67 and IBA1 staining) images with corresponding statistical quantifications for APC1311/+ (blue dots), APC1311/+/TP53+/- (green dots) and APC1311/+/TP53-/- (orange dots) groups. Scale bar = 100 or 200 μm. (b) Quantification of AB+ signal (blue: black arrow), semi-quantification of PAS+-AB+ signal (purple: red arrow), and quantification of Ki67+ and IBA1+ cells. For AB+ staining, each data point represents the mean of positive signal quantified from 10 regions containing aberrant crypts within a polyp at identical magnification using ImageJ. For PAS+AB+ staining, each data point represents the mean of positive signal semi-quantified from 10 regions containing aberrant crypts within a polyp at identical magnification using ImageJ and manual method to ensure accuracy. For immunohistochemical analyses, Ki67+ epithelial cells and IBA1+ macrophages (positive cells: brown staining) were quantified in crypt and stromal compartments. Each data point represents the mean number of positive cells determined by counting stained (brown) and unstained (blue) cells in 10 aberrant crypts and corresponding stromal regions per polyp using ViewPoint. Normal mucosa served as the reference control across all staining assays. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test for normally distributed data with homogeneous variances. For non-normally distributed data, the Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test was employed for pairwise comparisons. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4–10 pigs, 1–3 polyps selected for staining from each pig); * means P < 0.05, *** means P < 0.001.
Epithelial proliferative activity was subsequently assessed by Ki67 expression. Quantitative analysis revealed a significantly greater number of Ki67+ cells within the polyp crypts of APC1311/+ pigs compared to APC1311/+/TP53-/- pigs (P < 0.05; Figures 2a, b). No significant differences in Ki67+ cells in the stroma among the genotypes were detected (Figures 2a, b).
We further studied IBA1+ macrophage/monocyte frequency, an important component of the TME and a predominant immune cell population that contributes to immunosuppressive signaling in colon cancer (36). Immunohistochemistry revealed a significantly reduced frequency of IBA1+ macrophage/monocyte in polyp stroma of APC1311/+/TP53-/- pigs compared to APC1311/+ (P < 0.001; Figure 2b) and APC1311/+/TP53+/- pigs (P < 0.05; Figure 2b). In contrast, no significant differences in IBA1+ cell frequency in polyp crypts among the three groups were observed (P > 0.05; Figures 2a, b).
3.3. p53 loss suppresses macrophage/monocyte-associated chemotactic and complement gene expression
To unravel the molecular profile driving the observed stromal macrophage depletion, we investigated the expression of pro-inflammatory and complement-associated genes. The mRNA expression of the key mediator of monocyte/macrophage recruitment: CCL2; macrophage functional receptors: FCGR3A and ITGAM; and complement system components: C1QA, C1QB and C1QC was studied. The APC1311/+ and APC1311/+/TP53+/- pigs were pooled, as no phenotypic differences between these genotypes were found.
Transcript levels of CCL2 (Figure 3a), FCGR3A (Figure 3b), and ITGAM (Figure 3c) were significantly downregulated in both normal mucosa and polyps of APC1311/+/TP53-/- pigs compared with APC1311/+ pigs. Among the complement system components, the C1QA (Figure 3d) expression was similar between genotypes in both normal mucosa and polyps, whereas C1QB expression was significantly decreased in APC1311/+/TP53-/- pigs compared to APC1311/+ pigs in both normal mucosa (P < 0.05) and polyps (P < 0.001) (Figure 3e), and C1QC expression was decreased in the normal mucosa (P < 0.05), but not in polyps (Figure 3f), suggesting TP53 loss induced a suppression of macrophage-associated immune responses in TME.
Figure 3.
qPCR analysis of macrophage- and complement-related genes ((a) CCL2, (b) FCGR3A, (c) ITGAM, (d) C1QA, (e) C1QB, f. C1QC) in normal mucosa and polyp from APC1311/+ (blue dots) and APC1311/+/TP53-/- (orange dots) pigs. The Independent Samples t-test was used for normally distributed data, while the Mann-Whitney U test was applied for non-normally distributed data. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4–16 pigs, 1–3 polyps were selected for qPCR from each pig); * means P < 0.05, ** means P < 0.01, *** means P < 0.001.
4. Discussion
Sporadic CRC often originates from adenomatous polyps (37, 38). The transition from adenomatous polyps to malignant carcinomas typically requires additional genetic alterations, with TP53 inactivation being a hallmark of late-stage progression in human patients (3). Building on our previous findings demonstrating elevated TP53 expression in early adenomatous polyps (29), we generated APC/TP53 knockout pigs to elucidate the functional role of p53 in the initiation of colorectal polyposis in FAP pigs. The loss of TP53 expression in the TP53-/- pigs has been comprehensively demonstrated in several of our previous studies (28, 39–41).
More importantly, among the persistent polyps at 9 months, we found p53 inactivation did not significantly accelerate their morphological or malignant progression in FAP pigs, consistent with the canonical CRC model in which p53 exerts its functional impact predominantly in later stages of tumor progression (42). As no macroscopic phenotypic changes were observed in the polyps among pig lines, we further investigated the pathological modifications and immune remodeling in the TME. Our results suggest that TP53 loss suppresses epithelial proliferation in early polyps. This finding is distinct from the view that TP53 loss drives the transition from the late stage of adenoma to malignant carcinoma (3). TP53 loss typically drives tumor progression by promoting cell proliferation (43). However, a previous study revealed that to sustain cell proliferation, p53-deficient cells exhibit a heightened reliance on certain survival factors, such as TERT or specific kinases; disruption of these dependencies drives them into growth arrest more rapidly than wild-type counterparts (44). Accordingly, remodeling of the TME may perturb key survival signals, thereby contributing to reduced epithelial cell proliferation in polyps in the context of p53 loss. Colorectal tumorigenesis is accompanied by substantial infiltration of immune cells (45, 46), with macrophages representing a highly plastic cell population capable of exerting both pro- and anti-tumorigenic effects (22, 47–49). Therefore, characterization of macrophage-associated immune infiltration is important for understanding the development of FAP-related colorectal lesions. In the present study, inactivation of TP53 in APC-driven polyps was associated with a marked reduction in IBA1+ macrophage-associated infiltration, suggesting that p53 may contribute to the regulation of chemokine-driven recruitment and the maintenance of local macrophage-associated cell survival in early adenomas. Furthermore, the decrease in macrophage-associated cell abundance may disrupt early immunomodulatory signals, potentially shifting the TME balance and influencing adenoma progression. These findings align with prior evidence that p53 regulates immune cell recruitment (50, 51) and suggest a previously unrecognized role for p53 in shaping the macrophage-associated cell compartment of the early colonic TME.
Analysis of the molecular mechanisms driving macrophage-related cell depletion revealed a pronounced downregulation of macrophage-associated genes governing chemotaxis and immune activation, including CCL2, ITGAM, and FCGR3A. The reduction of CCL2, a key chemokine mediating monocyte/macrophage recruitment to the tumor stroma (19, 52), provides a plausible molecular explanation for the impaired infiltration of IBA1+ macrophages/monocytes in the p53-deficient polyp microenvironment. Concurrently, decreased expression of ITGAM (CD11b) and FCGR3A (CD16), established markers of macrophage abundance and functional engagement, highlights a diminished macrophage presence and activity within the TME, which are processes known to influence tumor initiation and pro-tumorigenic macrophage function (53, 54). In parallel, complement components C1QB and C1QC were downregulated, reflecting suppression of innate immune surveillance pathways essential for the clearance of stressed or transformed cells (55). Given that macrophages can both promote tumor progression and facilitate immune evasion (56), their depletion alongside reduced complement activity indicates that TP53 loss disrupts early immune-mediated tumor remodeling, demonstrating that macrophage-related reprogramming is not merely a late-stage consequence, but an early event in tumor progression.
This study has inherent limitations. Human studies have shown that IBA1 can mark not only monocytic/histiocytic cells but also dendritic cell–lineage populations (57). In pigs, however, IBA1 is widely accepted as a marker of the mononuclear phagocyte system, and we therefore interpreted IBA1-positive cells primarily as macrophage/monocyte-lineage cells, while recognizing potential overlap with dendritic cell–related populations (33, 58–60). Further resolution of myeloid heterogeneity, including DC-associated (IRF8, CD40, CD80, CD86) and angiogenesis-related (VEGFA, FGF2, PROK2, MMP9) programs, will benefit from future studies using porcine-validated markers and high-resolution approaches such as scRNA-seq or spatial transcriptomics.
Despite these limitations, our findings suggest that TP53 inactivation attenuates macrophage-related recruitment and innate immune surveillance in early adenomas, potentially depriving the C1q-macrophage-to-T cell immunosuppressive crosstalk necessary for tumor immune evasion. Consequently, this altered immune landscape sets the stage for the later transition from adenoma to malignant carcinoma, reinforcing its canonical role in the late stages of colorectal tumorigenesis.
5. Conclusion
In early FAP, TP53 loss does not accelerate polyp progression but profoundly reshapes the tumor microenvironment, suppressing epithelial cell proliferation and depleting macrophage infiltration. These results indicate that p53 inactivation initiates immune and stromal remodeling, which may mechanistically explain the insufficient acceleration of CRC initiation upon p53 loss in FAP pigs.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Peggy Müller-Fliedner and Marlene Stummbaum for their excellent technical assistance. We also thank the TUM Animal Research Center for their support in providing experimental infrastructure and assistance with animal experiments.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG) (project no. 395357507 -SFB1371 “Microbiome signatures” to TF, KF, and FE) and the German Ministry for Research and Education (BMBF) (consortium project Mi-EOCRC, grant no. 01KD2102D to KF).
Footnotes
Edited by: Zhitao Qi, Yancheng Institute of Technology, China
Reviewed by: Xiaobo Zhang, Zhejiang University, China
Nan Wu, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Marco Antonio Hernández-Luna, University of Guanajuato, Mexico
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by the Committee on Animal Health and Care of the local government body of the state of Upper Bavaria (Permission No. 55.2-2532.Vet_02-18-33). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
QC: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. WL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. TF: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. FE: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. KF: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1837646/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1. Hendren JR, Dabaghi E, Sommovilla J, Liska D. Review of familial adenomatous polyposis: current understanding and clinical management. Jco Oncol Pract. (2026):OP-25-00553. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-00553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Fodde R, Smits R, Clevers H. APC, signal transduction and genetic instability in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2001) 1:55–67. doi: 10.1038/35094067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. (1990) 61:759–67. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-I [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rubinfeld B, Souza B, Albert I, Müller O, Chamberlain SH, Masiarz FR, et al. Association of the APC gene product with β-catenin. Science. (1993) 262:1731–4. doi: 10.1126/science.8259518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Balaguer F, Leoz M, Carballal S, Moreira L, Ocaña T. The genetic basis of familial adenomatous polyposis and its implications for clinical practice and risk management. Appl Clin Genet. (2015) 8:95–107. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S51484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Newton K, Mallinson E, Bowen J, Lalloo F, Clancy T, Hill J, et al. Genotype–phenotype correlation in colorectal polyposis. Clin Genet. (2012) 81:521–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01740.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Flisikowska T, Merkl C, Landmann M, Eser S, Rezaei N, Cui X, et al. A porcine model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology. (2012) 143:1173–1175.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Flisikowski K, Perleberg C, Niu G, Winogrodzki T, Bak A, Liang W, et al. Wild-type APC influences the severity of familial adenomatous polyposis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2022) 13:669–671.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Oshima H, Oshima M, Kobayashi M, Tsutsumi M, Taketo MM. Morphological and molecular processes of polyp formation in ApcΔ716 knockout mice. Cancer Res. (1997) 57:1644–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Su LK, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Preisinger AC, Moser AR, Luongo C, et al. Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. Science. (1992) 256:668–70. doi: 10.1126/science.1350108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Smit WL, Spaan CN, Johannes De Boer R, Ramesh P, Martins Garcia T, Meijer BJ, et al. Driver mutations of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence govern the intestinal epithelial global translational capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2020) 117:25560–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912772117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Efe G, Rustgi AK, Prives C. p53 at the crossroads of tumor immunity. Nat Cancer. (2024) 5:983–95. doi: 10.1038/s43018-024-00796-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhu G, Hu J, Xi R. The cellular niche for intestinal stem cells: a team effort. Cell Regener. (2021) 10:1. doi: 10.1186/s13619-020-00061-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Morral C, Ayyaz A, Kuo HC, Fink M, Verginadis II, Daniel AR, et al. p53 promotes revival stem cells in the regenerating intestine after severe radiation injury. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:3018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47124-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jain P, Mondal S, Sinha S, Mukhopadhyay M, Chakraborty I. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of different mucin expression, preoperative CEA, and CA-125 in colorectal carcinoma: a clinicopathological study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. (2014) 5:404. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.136207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Matas D, Milyavsky M, Shats I, Nissim L, Goldfinger N, Rotter V. p53 is a regulator of macrophage differentiation. Cell Death Differ. (2004) 11:458–67. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gudkov AV, Komarova EA. p53 and the carcinogenicity of chronic inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2016) 6:a026161. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shi D, Jiang P. A different facet of p53 function: regulation of immunity and inflammation during tumor development. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9:762651. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.762651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tang X, Asano M, O’Reilly A, Farquhar A, Yang Y, Amar S. p53 is an important regulator of CCL2 gene expression. Curr Mol Med. (2012) 12:929–43. doi: 10.2174/156652412802480844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Veschi V, Verona F, Di Bella S, Turdo A, Gaggianesi M, Di Franco S, et al. C1Q+ TPP1+ macrophages promote colon cancer progression through SETD8-driven p53 methylation. Mol Cancer. (2025) 24:102. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02293-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cheng S, Li Z, Gao R, Xing B, Gao Y, Yang Y, et al. A pan-cancer single-cell transcriptional atlas of tumor infiltrating myeloid cells. Cell. (2021) 184:792–809.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhang X, Li W, Sun J, Yang Z, Guan Q, Wang R, et al. How to use macrophages to realise the treatment of tumour. J Drug Target. (2020) 28:1034–45. doi: 10.1080/1061186X.2020.1775236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lukácsi S, Gerecsei T, Balázs K, Francz B, Szabó B, Erdei A, et al. The differential role of CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (CD11c/CD18) in the adherence, migration and podosome formation of human macrophages and dendritic cells under inflammatory conditions. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0232432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kang TH, Lee CH, Delidakis G, Jung J, Richard-Le Goff O, Lee J, et al. An engineered human Fc variant with exquisite selectivity for FcγRIIIaV158 reveals that ligation of FcγRIIIa mediates potent antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis with GM-CSF-differentiated macrophages. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:562. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bohlson SS, O’Conner SD, Hulsebus HJ, Ho MM, Fraser DA. Complement, C1q, and C1q-related molecules regulate macrophage polarization. Front Immunol. (2014) 5. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Reis ES, Mastellos DC, Ricklin D, Mantovani A, Lambris JD. Complement in cancer: untangling an intricate relationship. Nat Rev Immunol. (2018) 18:5–18. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Roumenina LT, Daugan MV, Petitprez F, Sautès-Fridman C, Fridman WH. Context-dependent roles of complement in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2019) 19:698–715. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0210-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Leuchs S, Saalfrank A, Merkl C, Flisikowska T, Edlinger M, Durkovic M, et al. Inactivation and inducible oncogenic mutation of p53 in gene targeted pigs. PloS One. (2012) 7:e43323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sikorska A, Flisikowska T, Stachowiak M, Kind A, Schnieke A, Flisikowski K, et al. Elevated expression of p53 in early colon polyps in a pig model of human familial adenomatous polyposis. J Appl Genet. (2018) 59:485–91. doi: 10.1007/s13353-018-0461-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Albl B, Haesner S, Braun-Reichhart C, Streckel E, Renner S, Seeliger F, et al. Tissue sampling guides for porcine biomedical models. Toxicol Pathol. (2016) 44:414–20. doi: 10.1177/0192623316631023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yamabayashi S. Periodic acid- Schiff- Alcian Blue: a method differential staining of glycoproteins. Histochem J. (1987) 19:565–71. doi: 10.1007/BF01687364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Mou R, Cui XY, Luo YS, Cheng Y, Luo QY, Zhang ZF, et al. Adult hymenolepis nana and its excretory–secretory products elicit mouse immune responses via tuft/IL-13 and FOXM1 signaling pathways. Parasit Vectors. (2025) 18:100. doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06719-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Winogrodzki T, Metwaly A, Grodziecki A, Liang W, Klinger B, Flisikowska T, et al. TNFΔARE pigs: a translational crohn’s disease model. J Crohns Colitis. (2023) 17:1128–38. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Osswald A, Wortmann E, Wylensek D, Kuhls S, Coleman OI, Peuker K, et al. Secondary bile acid production by gut bacteria promotes western diet-associated colorectal cancer. Gut. (2025):gutjnl-2024-332243. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. (2001) 29:45e–45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Xiang J, Wang J, Xiao H, Huang C, Wu C, Zhang L, et al. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages in colon cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1573917. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1573917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Mokarram P, Albokashy M, Zarghooni M, Moosavi MA, Sepehri Z, Chen QM, et al. New frontiers in the treatment of colorectal cancer: autophagy and the unfolded protein response as promising targets. Autophagy. (2017) 13:781–819. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1290751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yurgelun MB, Masciari S, Joshi VA, Mercado RC, Lindor NM, Gallinger S, et al. Germline TP53 mutations in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer in the colon cancer family registry. JAMA Oncol. (2015) 1:214. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Saalfrank A, Janssen KP, Ravon M, Flisikowski K, Eser S, Steiger K, et al. A porcine model of osteosarcoma. Oncogenesis. (2016) 5:e210. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2016.19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Niu G, Bak A, Nusselt M, Zhang Y, Pausch H, Flisikowska T, et al. Allelic expression imbalance analysis identified YAP1 amplification in p53- dependent osteosarcoma. Cancers. (2021) 13:1364. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Niu G, Hellmuth I, Flisikowska T, Pausch H, Rieblinger B, Carrapeiro A, et al. Porcine model elucidates function of p53 isoform in carcinogenesis and reveals novel circTP53 RNA. Oncogene. (2021) 40:1896–908. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01686-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. (1988) 319:525–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198809013190901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. Surfing the p53 network. Nature. (2000) 408:307–10. doi: 10.1038/35042675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Xie L, Gazin C, Park SM, Zhu LJ, Debily M, Kittler ELW, et al. A synthetic interaction screen identifies factors selectively required for proliferation and TERT transcription in p53-deficient human cancer cells. PloS Genet. (2012) 8:e1003151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Arlauckas SP, Garren SB, Garris CS, Kohler RH, Oh J, Pittet MJ, et al. Arg1 expression defines immunosuppressive subsets of tumor-associated macrophages. Theranostics. (2018) 8:5842–54. doi: 10.7150/thno.26888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Szabo PA, Levitin HM, Miron M, Snyder ME, Senda T, Yuan J, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of human T cells reveals tissue and activation signatures in health and disease. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:4706. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12464-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hull MA, Cuthbert RJ, Ko CWS, Scott DJ, Cartwright EJ, Hawcroft G, et al. Paracrine cyclooxygenase-2 activity by macrophages drives colorectal adenoma progression in the ApcMin/+ mouse model of intestinal tumorigenesis. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:6074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06253-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Soncin I, Sheng J, Chen Q, Foo S, Duan K, Lum J, et al. The tumour microenvironment creates a niche for the self-renewal of tumour-promoting macrophages in colon adenoma. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:582. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02834-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hisano K, Mizuuchi Y, Ohuchida K, Kawata J, Torata N, Zhang J, et al. Microenvironmental changes in familial adenomatous polyposis during colorectal cancer carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. (2024) 589:216822. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Blagih J, Buck MD, Vousden KH. p53, cancer and the immune response. J Cell Sci. (2020) 133:jcs237453. doi: 10.1242/jcs.237453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Zhu K, Su F, Yang J, Xiao R, Wu R, Cao M, et al. TP53 to mediate immune escape in tumor microenvironment: an overview of the research progress. Mol Biol Rep. (2024) 51:205. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-09097-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. O’Connor T, Heikenwalder M. CCL2 in the tumor microenvironment. In: Birbrair A, editor. Tumor Microenvironment. Springer International Publishing, Cham: (2021). p. 1–14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-62658-7_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Guo W, Cai Y, Liu X, Ji Y, Zhang C, Wang L, et al. Single-exosome profiling identifies ITGB3+ and ITGAM+ exosome subpopulations as promising early diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer. Research. (2023) 6:41. doi: 10.34133/research.0041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Wang Z, Fu J, Zhu S, Tang H, Shi K, Yang J, et al. Identification of M2 macrophage-related genes for establishing a prognostic model in pancreatic cancer: FCGR3A as key gene. Oncol Res. (2024) 32:1851–66. doi: 10.32604/or.2024.055286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Merle NS, Noe R, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Roumenina LT. Complement system part II: role in immunity. Front Immunol. (2015) 6. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Yang LX, Zhang CT, Yang MY, Zhang XH, Liu HC, Luo CH, et al. C1Q labels a highly aggressive macrophage-like leukemia population indicating extramedullary infiltration and relapse. Blood. (2023) 141:766–86. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zhang X, Wang LP, Ziober A, Zhang PJ, Bagg A. Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA1). Am J Clin Pathol. (2021) 156:86–99. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Meyerholz DK, Lambertz AM, Reznikov LR, Ofori-Amanfo GK, Karp PH, McCray PB, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of markers for translational studies of lung disease in pigs and humans. Toxicol Pathol. (2016) 44:434–41. doi: 10.1177/0192623315609691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. D’Annunzio G, Muscatello L, Tugnoli C, Pesaro S, Luppi A, Fiorentino M, et al. Bright-field multiplex immunohistochemistry in swine PCV2 and PRRSV lymphadenopathies. Animals. (2025) 15:1682. doi: 10.3390/ani15121682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Donovan KM, Leidinger MR, McQuillen LP, Goeken JA, Hogan CM, Harwani SC, et al. Allograft inflammatory factor 1 as an immunohistochemical marker for macrophages in multiple tissues and laboratory animal species. Comp Med. (2018) 68:341–8. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-18-000017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.



