Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2026 Jul 21;27(14):6483. doi: 10.3390/ijms27146483

Empagliflozin, Linagliptin, and Metformin Differentially Affect Renal PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK Signaling Pathways in db/db Diabetic Mice

Anton I Korbut 1, Elizaveta A Ananishnikova 1, Nikolai B Orlov 1, Nataliya P Bgatova 1, Natalia A Muraleva 2, Evgenii L Zavyalov 2, Vladimir I Konenkov 1, Vadim V Klimontov 1,*
Editors: Natalija Filipović, Nobuya Sasaki
PMCID: PMC13409939  PMID: 42511826

Abstract

Accumulating data indicate a role for the dysregulation of the cell cycle, autophagy and apoptosis in diabetic kidney disease. We aimed to evaluate the mediators of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways in the kidney of db/db mice, a model of type 2 diabetes, treated by the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin, the DPP4 inhibitor linagliptin, and metformin. Eight-week-old male db/db mice were randomly assigned to treatment by these agents or vehicle for 8 weeks. Age-matched db/+ mice acted as controls. AMPKα1 and PI3Kp110β were evaluated in the renal cortex and medulla by Western Blot. Phosphorylated forms of principal molecules involved in the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK pathways were assessed by multiplex analysis. Db/db mice had decreased PI3Kp110β, increased phospho-PTEN, HSP27 and MEK1 in the renal cortex and medulla, BAD in the renal cortex and decreased phospho-rpS6 in the renal medulla. Empagliflozin prevented the changes in the levels of cortical PI3Kp110β, phospho-MEK1, and medullar phospho-PTEN. Linagliptin restored PI3Kp110β levels. Both agents further decreased medullar phospho-rpS6. Metformin upregulated cortical AMPKα1, medullar PI3Kp110β, phospho-GSK-3α/β and MEK1, and increased phospho-HSP27 in the renal cortex and medulla. The data may provide further explanation of the mechanism underlying the development of diabetic kidney disease, as well as the renal protective effect of anti-diabetic agents.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, PI3K/Akt signaling, MAPK/ERK signaling, empagliflozin, linagliptin, metformin

1. Introduction

Diabetes is a driver of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide [1,2]. Studying the mechanisms of development and identifying new molecular targets are essential to define new therapeutic approaches for diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Among the cellular mechanisms of DKD, much attention is paid to impaired proliferation and differentiation of podocytes, mesangial, endothelial and epithelial cells in the kidneys, as well as abnormalities of apoptosis and autophagy in these cells [2,3]. In recent years, significant progress has been made in identifying signaling pathways that regulate the above-mentioned processes.

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) pathway is pivotal for renal pathology. This pathway is involved in apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), inflammation, oxidative stress, and autophagy [4,5]. PI3K is activated by insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and is suppressed by phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) [6]. Further, Akt suppresses glycogen synthase kinase 3 α and β (GSK-3α/β), activates mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and deactivates B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)-associated death promoter (BAD). The latter stimulates apoptosis and autophagy, while GSK-3 modulates autophagy [7,8]. mTOR leads to activation of ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6), a component of the 40S ribosomal subunit that regulates cell size, proliferation, and glucose homeostasis [9]. PI3K/Akt signaling interacts with the 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway. The primary implication of AMPK signaling in diabetes is the reduction in apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress. In addition, AMPK activates autophagy and downregulates mTOR [8,10,11].

The extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are key members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family. MAPK/ERK signaling is rapidly activated in response to injury and coordinates important pro-regenerative cellular processes, such as cell survival, migration, proliferation, and growth [12]. Dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) is a positive regulator of ERK1/2 [13]. Subsequently, ERK1/2 activates the subfamily p90 ribosomal s6 kinase (p90RSK) and suppresses cellular tumor antigen p53 [14,15]. Additionally, activation of MAPK/ERK signaling increases phosphorylation of heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) [16]. Both p53 and HSP27 are involved in the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy [8,17,18].

An accumulating body of evidence indicates that dysregulation of PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling is involved in the development and progression of DKD. In cell cultures and animal models of diabetes, the activation of PI3K/Akt was associated with endothelial dysfunction, extracellular matrix accumulation, EMT, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis [5,19]. The inhibition of AMPK in podocytes and tubular epithelial cells has been previously reported in diabetes. The inhibition of AMKP in the kidney was associated with obesity-induced lipotoxicity and suppression of glucose transport through tubular cells [20]. In glomeruli, suppression of AMPK is associated with podocytopathy and glomerular fibrosis [21].

Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors opened up new possibilities in the management of DKD. In the Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME), and in the Study of Heart and Kidney Protection With Empagliflozin (EMPA-KIDNEY), the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin retarded CKD progression in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) [22,23]. It was demonstrated that empagliflozin decreases the incidence of macroalbuminuria and retards decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with T2D or other CKD-promoting conditions [24,25]. Beneficial cardiac and renal effects were significant for 12 months after the discontinuation of empagliflozin treatment [24,26]. In the Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study With Linagliptin (CARMELINA) trial, the DPP4 inhibitor linagliptin lowered the risk of development and progression of albuminuria, but had no effect on eGFR decline when compared to the placebo [27,28]. In the treatment of T2D, SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors are usually combined with metformin [29,30]. This agent is widely accepted to be neutral for renal outcomes [31]. However, some data indicate a lower incidence of ESRD in patients with T2D who received metformin [32].

The protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is explained by antihyperglycemic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-hypoxic actions, improving tubule–glomerular feedback and glomerular hemodynamics, as well as indirect impacts on autophagy and apoptosis [33]. The renal-beneficial effects of DPP4 inhibitors are attributed to antihyperglycemic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant activities [34,35]. The impact of metformin could be associated with a decrease in blood glucose, activation of AMPK, and anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects, as well as mitigation of apoptosis and autophagy abnormalities in the kidney [21,36,37]. The specific role of different signaling pathways in the renal effects of the above-mentioned antihyperglycemic drugs remains to be clarified.

Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of empagliflozin, linagliptin, and metformin on the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK pathways in the kidney of db/db mice, a model of T2D.

2. Results

2.1. Animal Weight and Biochemical Parameters

By the start of the experiment, db/db mice had developed obesity and hyperglycemia (Table 1). Throughout the experiment, body weight increased in vehicle-treated, empagliflozin-treated and linagliptin-treated mice (all p < 0.05), but not in the metformin group (p = 0.42).

Table 1.

Body weight and laboratory parameters of non-diabetic db/+ mice and diabetic db/db mice treated by vehicle, empagliflozin, linagliptin or metformin.

Week of the Experiment db/+ Group,
N = 8
db/db Groups
Vehicle,
N = 8
Empagliflozin,
N = 8
Linagliptin,
N = 8
Metformin,
N = 8
Body weight, g
0 22.4
(21.9–23.4)
30.7
(23–33.1) ***
33.5
(26.1–38.3) ***
31.3
(25.7–36.2) ***
28
(23.9–32.4) **
4 26.5
(25.3–41.1) ++
37.9
(28.6–38.4) ***++
38.1
(33.3–38.8) ***++
38.2
(32.4–42.3) ***++
32.9
(28.3–34.7) ***#^
8 27
(25.65–27.75) ++
40.2
(26.7–42.6) ***+++
40.3
(38.5–40.6) ***+++
39.2
(33.6–44.3) ***+++
29.7
(27–34.7) **#^
Blood glucose, mmol/L
0 5.8
(4.9–6.8)
11.8
(7.2–16.7) ***
16.7
(14–25.7) ***
18.9
(13–25.7) ***
13.5
(8.6–20.4) ***
4 6.3
(5–7.4)
24.1
(20.9–33.1) ***++
17.2
(9.8–26.3) ***
24.4
(22–33.1) ***^++
15.9
(12.7–23.3) ***#‡+
8 6.6
(5.6 –7.5)
22.2
(18.6–33.3) ***+++
16.7
(9.4–21.1) ***#
26.7
(21.2–33.3) ***^+++
17.3
(14–23.3) ***#‡+
Plasma fructosamine, µmol/L
0 232
(213–243)
453
(422–516) ***
442
(407–585) ***
448
(367–574) ***
438
(402–582) ***
8 234
(221–286)
616
(512–654) ***
462
(320–498) ***#‡
625
(511–682) ***^
460
(322–584) ***#‡
Plasma creatinine, µmol/L
0 64.4
(44.2–78.5)
73.6
(54.2–86.1)
70.2
(52.6–86.3)
72.6
(53.7–90.2)
70.8
(56.9–88.2)
8 62.3
(52.4–79.9)
76.2
(61.8–89.2) **
71.8
(55.8–91.2) *
74.4
(57.6–93.5) *
72.6
(55.6–89.4) **
Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, mg/mmol
0 0.40
(0.01–1.50)
12.5
(8.2–20.4) ***
14.2
(11.4–21.8) ***
16.4
(9.4–24.7) ***
13.6
(10.2–21.9) ***
8 0.50
(0.02–1.60)
11.4
(7.4–21.8) ***
6.4
(2.40–11.2) ***###+++
5.8
(3.4–12.7) ***###+++
12.8
(8.5–18.9) ***^^^‡‡‡
Kidney weight, g
8 0.49
(0.46–0.53)
0.52
(0.45–0.56) *
0.48
(0.37–0.56)
0.47
(0.41–0.49)
0.43
(0.42–0.5)
Kidney weight/body weight, g/g
8 0.019
(0.018–0.019)
0.014
(0.012–0.021)
0.013
(0.011–0.014) #
0.012
(0.011–0.012) #
0.014
(0.01–0.017)

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 vs. control (db/+ mice); # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated db/db mice; ^ p < 0.05 and ^^^ p < 0.001 vs. empagliflozin-treated db/db mice;  p < 0.05 and ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. linagliptin-treated db/db mice (Mann–Whitney test); + p < 0.05, ++ p < 0.01, and +++ p < 0.001 vs. Week 0 (Wilcoxon test). The data are presented as medians, minimum and maximum values.

Blood glucose and plasma fructosamine were further elevated in mice that received vehicle and linagliptin (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). Empagliflozin-treated and metformin-treated animals demonstrated no significant changes in these parameters (p = 0.23 and p = 0.42, respectively).

The baseline plasma levels of creatinine did not differ between the groups of db/db and db/+ mice. However, by the end of the experiment, vehicle-treated db/db mice had higher levels of plasma creatinine compared to db/+ controls (p = 0.009). Similarly, higher plasma creatinine was noted in the empagliflozin, linagliptin, and metformin groups in comparison with db/+ mice (p = 0.04, p = 0.04, and p = 0.009, respectively).

All db/db mice were characterized by an elevated urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) by the start of the study (all p < 0.001 vs. db/+ mice). In vehicle- and metformin-treated mice, the UACR remained unchanged (p = 0.8 and p = 0.9 vs. baseline levels, respectively). However, we noted a decrease in UACR in empagliflozin-treated and linagliptin-treated animals (both p < 0.001 vs. baseline levels).

2.2. Kidney Weight and Morphology

We revealed increased kidney weight in vehicle-treated db/db mice (p = 0.04), but not in the actively treated animals (Table 1). The kidney/body weight ratio was decreased in the empagliflozin and linagliptin groups (both p = 0.04 vs. vehicle group).

Vehicle-treated db/db mice exhibited typical morphological features of diabetic glomerulopathy, including an increase in mesangial fractional volume (MFV), thickening of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), and podocytopathy. We also observed a decrease in the height of the epithelial cells of the tubules, which may be a sign of their atrophy (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kidney structure in non-diabetic db/+ mice and diabetic db/db mice treated with vehicle, empagliflozin, linagliptin, or metformin. In db/db mice, thickening of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM, white arrows), effacement of the podocyte processes (black arrows), tubular atrophy, and mesangial expansion (white asterisks) were observed. Empagliflozin, linagliptin and metformin decreased mesangial fractional volume and the width of GBM; an increase in the height of collecting duct epithelial cells was observed in empagliflozin-treated db/db mice only. Light microscopy (Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin, H&E), scale bars 50 and 100 μm; transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scale bar 1 μm.

These structural changes were assessed by morphometric analysis (Figure 2). In vehicle-treated diabetic db/db mice, we found higher glomerular, mesangial and interstitial fractional volumes (p = 0.01, p < 0.001, and p = 0.007, respectively), thickening of GBM, effacement of podocyte foot processes (FPs), thickening of tubular basement membrane (TBM), and lower volume of the distal tubules in the renal cortex (all p < 0.05). In addition, these mice demonstrated a decrease in epithelial cell height (p = 0.03) and an increase in the width of the basal membrane of collecting duct epithelial cells (CDECs) in the renal medulla compared to control mice (p = 0.003).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Morphometric parameters in non-diabetic db/+ mice and diabetic db/db mice treated by vehicle, empagliflozin, linagliptin, or metformin. The raw data, averaged for each animal, are presented as points with medians, minimum and maximum values. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Statistically significant differences are shown in the figures. BM, basement membrane; CD, collecting duct; CDEC, collecting duct epithelial cell; DTEC, distal tubular epithelial cell; GBM, glomerular basement membrane width, nm; FPs, foot processes; MFV, mesangial fractional volume; NL, lineal number density; PTEC, proximal tubular epithelial cell; TBM, tubular basement membrane, nm; VV, volumetric density; C, control (db/+ mice); V, vehicle-treated db/db mice; E, empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; L, linagliptin-treated db/db mice; M, metformin-treated db/db mice.

Diabetic mice treated with empagliflozin, when compared to the vehicle group, had lower glomerular and interstitial VV (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively), TBM thickness in the renal cortex (p = 0.04), and width of the basement membrane of collecting ducts in the renal medulla (p = 0.008). Similarly, in linagliptin-treated mice, we found lower MFV (p = 0.03), GBM and TBM widths (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively), and renal interstitium fractional volume (p = 0.04) and a higher height of CDECs (p = 0.04) compared with the vehicle group. Meanwhile, metformin-treated db/db mice demonstrated diminished mesangial expansion (p = 0.01), GBM thickening (p = 0.04), and CDEC height (p = 0.04) when compared with the vehicle-treated group.

Plasma glucose and fructosamine demonstrated positive correlations with MFV (r = 0.43, p = 0.04 for glucose; r = 0.53, p = 0.002 for fructosamine) and width of GBM (r = 0.57, p = 0.01 for glucose; r = 0.42, p = 0.04 for fructosamine). Both biochemical parameters correlated negatively with the kidney/body weight ratio (r = −0.63, p < 0.001 for glucose; r = −0.53, p = 0.002 for fructosamine), podocyte FP NL (r = −0.39, p = 0.04 for glucose; r = −0.45, p = 0.04 for fructosamine), and height of CDECs (r = −0.38, p = 0.04 for glucose; r = −0.43, p = 0.02 for fructosamine).

Plasma creatinine correlated positively with MFV (r = 0.45, p = 0.04) and the fractional volume of renal interstitium (r = 0.46, p = 0.03). The UACR positively correlated with MFV (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and GBM width (r = 0.56, p = 0.01). Contrarily, there were inverse correlations between UACR and the podocyte FP NL (r = −0.46, p = 0.03) and the height of CDECs (r = −0.44, p = 0.04).

2.3. Markers of Autophagy, Apoptosis and EMT in the Kidney: Results of WB

The content of Beclin-1 and caspase-3 p17 subunit in the renal medulla was higher in vehicle-treated db/db mice compared to non-diabetic control mice (p < 0.01, Figure 3). All treated groups were characterized by higher levels of medullar microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3B (LC3B) lipidated form (LC3-II) and Bcl-2, as well as lower medullar caspase-3 p17 subunit, as compared to the vehicle group (all p < 0.05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Protein level of Beclin-1, LC3-II, caspase-3 p17 subunit, and Bcl-2 in the renal medulla, arb. units; representative immunoblots of Beclin-1, LC3-II, caspase-3 p17 subunit, Bcl-2, and GAPDH as the control. The raw data, averaged for each animal, are presented as points with medians, minimum and maximum values. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Statistically significant differences are shown in the figures. C, control (db/+ mice); V, vehicle-treated db/db mice; E, empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; L, linagliptin-treated db/db mice; M, metformin-treated db/db mice.

The additional elevation in Beclin-1 was significant in the empagliflozin- and metformin-treated groups when compared to vehicle-treated animals (both p < 0.05). The highest level of Beclin-1 was noted in the renal medulla of metformin-treated mice (p = 0.007 vs. the empagliflozin group), and the highest levels of LC3-II were revealed in linagliptin-treated and metformin-treated mice (p = 0.03 vs. the empagliflozin group). The increase in Bcl-2 content was greater in the empagliflozin and linagliptin groups compared with the metformin group (p = 0.007 and p = 0.03, respectively).

The height of distal tubular epithelial cells (DTECs) correlated negatively with medullar Beclin-1 and caspase-3 p17 subunit (r = −0.31, p = 0.04 and r = −0.46, p = 0.03). We also found associations between CDEC height and medullar LC3-II (r = 0.44, p = 0.03), Bcl-2 (r = 0.55, p = 0.02), caspase-3 p17 subunit (r = −0.49, p = 0.03), and Beclin-1 (r = −0.44, p = 0.03). The baseline body weight was a significant confounder for the medullary expression of LC3-II according to the analysis of covariance results (ANCOVA, F = 9.35, p = 0.01, η2 = 0.51, Table S1).

Placebo-treated animals demonstrated lower expression of E-cadherin in the renal cortex than db/+ mice (p = 0.007; Figure 4). The cortical expression of E-cadherin was also lower in empagliflozin-treated mice compared to control mice (p = 0.03), but it was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (p = 0.03). Higher levels of N-cadherin were revealed in the renal cortex of placebo-treated mice as compared to control mice (p = 0.007). In the empagliflozin group, there was a decrease in the level of N-cadherin in the renal cortex (p = 0.007), which corresponded to that in control animals (p = 0.45). Treatment by linagliptin and metformin reversed the DKD-associated changes in the expression of both canderins in the renal cortex (all p < 0.05 vs. the vehicle group).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Protein expression of E-cadherin and N-cadherin in the renal cortex and renal medulla, arb. units; representative immunoblots of E- and N-cadherins, and GAPDH as a control. The raw data, averaged for each animal, are presented as points with medians, minimum and maximum values. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Statistically significant differences are shown in the figures. C, control (db/+ mice); V, vehicle-treated db/db mice; E, empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; L, linagliptin-treated db/db mice; M, metformin-treated db/db mice.

In placebo-treated mice, the content of E-cadherin in the renal medulla was 1.8-fold lower than in the control group (p = 0.007; Figure 4). In mice treated with empagliflozin, the medullar E-cadherin level exceeded that in the vehicle group (p = 0.007) and corresponded to that of the control group. The expression of N-cadherin in the renal medulla of vehicle-treated mice was higher than in the control group (p = 0.007; Figure 4). Empagliflozin-treated mice demonstrated lower medullar levels of N-cadherin compared to the placebo group (p = 0.007). Both linagliptin and metformin mitigated the changes in cortical canderins (all p < 0.05 vs. the vehicle group).

Cortical E-cadherin positively correlated with the height and VV of distal tubules (r = 0.53, p = 0.04 and r = 0.58, p = 0.02).

2.4. AMPKα1 and PI3Kp110β in the Kidney: Results of WB

The expression of 5′-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase catalytic subunit α1 (AMPKα1) tended to be lower in db/db mice that received vehicle than in db/+ animals (p = 0.11, Figure 5). Empagliflozin-treated db/db mice did not differ from vehicle-treated ones in the content of AMPKα1. Linagliptin-treated db/db mice had higher expressions of AMPKα1 in the renal cortex and medulla compared to vehicle-treated animals (both p = 0.03). When compared with vehicle-treated animals, metformin-treated mice demonstrated significantly increased AMPKα1 levels in the renal cortex, but not in the renal medulla (p = 0.03 and p = 0.22, respectively).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Protein expression of AMPKα1 and PI3Kp110β in the renal cortex and renal medulla, arb. units; representative immunoblots of AMPKα1, PI3p110β and GAPDH as the control. The raw data, averaged for each animal, are presented as points with medians, minimum and maximum values. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Statistically significant differences are shown in the figures. C, control (db/+ mice); V, vehicle-treated db/db mice; E, empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; L, linagliptin-treated db/db mice; M, metformin-treated db/db mice.

The content of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit β isoform (phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110β, PI3Kp110β) in the renal cortex and renal medulla was decreased in vehicle-treated db/db mice compared with non-diabetic db/+ control mice (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively, Figure 5).

We observed significantly higher expression of PI3Kp110β in the renal cortex of empagliflozin-treated animals compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.03), while we did not find this difference in the renal medulla (p = 0.89). Linagliptin treatment was associated with higher levels of PI3Kp110β expression in the renal cortex and medulla compared with the vehicle group (p = 0.03 and 0.007, respectively). Metformin-treated db/db mice had higher levels of PI3Kp110β in the renal medulla but not in the renal cortex compared to vehicle-treated db/db mice (p = 0.03 and p = 0.29, respectively).

We found negative correlations between cortical PI3Kp110β and UACR (r = −0.60, p = 0.01), MFV (r = −0.44, p = 0.047), and GBM width (r = −0.46, p = 0.03). Medullar PI3Kp110β expression correlated positively with the proximal tubular epithelial cell (PTEC) height (r = 0.57, p = 0.01). In the renal cortex, the expression of PI3Kp110β correlated negatively with the level of N-cadherin (r = −0.44, p = 0.01). In the renal medulla, the expression of PI3Kp110β demonstrated a positive correlation with Bcl-2 (r = 0.54, p = 0.01).

2.5. PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathways in the Kidney: The Results of Multiplex Analysis

A higher level of the phosphorylated form of BAD was observed in the renal cortex of db/db mice compared to db/+ control mice (all groups of db/db mice vs. db/+ mice: p < 0.001, Figure 6). The differences were also significant for all db/db groups (vehicle group: p = 0.002; empagliflozin group: p = 0.004; linagliptin group: p = 0.002; metformin group: p = 0.02). However, no differences were found between the three actively treated groups of diabetic animals. We also found no significant differences in phosphorylated BAD levels in the renal medulla between vehicle-treated db/db mice and db/+ control mice, or between actively treated db/db mice and the vehicle group (all p > 0.05).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Figure 6

Phosphorylated proteins of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in the kidneys of diabetic db/db and non-diabetic db+ mice. Arbitrary units. The raw data, averaged for each animal, are presented as points with medians, minimum and maximum values. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Statistically significant differences are shown in the figures. The following samples were excluded as outliers by Grubbs’ test: phospho-IRS-1, renal cortex, control group (N = 1); phospho-mTOR, renal cortex, control group (N = 1) and renal cortex and medulla, metformin-treated db/db mice (both N = 1); phospho-PTEN, renal medulla, vehicle-treated db/db mice (N = 1); and phospho-rpS6, renal cortex and medulla, metformin-treated db/db mice (both N = 1). The original sample size was N = 8 animals per group. The final sample size after exclusion is shown in the figures. An outlier criterion was specified before examining group differences. C, non-diabetic db/+ mice (control); E, empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; L, linagliptin-treated db/db mice; M, metformin-treated db/db mice; V, vehicle-treated db/db mice.

Metformin-treated db/db mice had significantly elevated levels of phosphorylated GSK-3α/β as compared with db/+ controls in the renal medulla (p = 0.03). We found no other significant differences in this parameter between the groups (all p > 0.05).

Phospho-IRS-1 tended to be lower in db/db mice as compared to the db/+ control group in the renal cortex (p = 0.096). However, the differences between each specific db/db group and db/+ controls were not significant (p = 0.24 for the vehicle group, p = 0.15 for the empagliflozin group, p = 0.23 for the linagliptin group and p = 0.28 for the metformin group). There was no difference in phospho-IRS-1 in the renal medulla.

We noticed no significant differences in the levels of phosphorylated mTOR in the renal cortex and renal medulla between the studied groups of db/db and db/+ mice (all p > 0.05).

Db/db mice had higher levels of phosphorylated PTEN in the renal cortex compared to db/+ control mice (p = 0.03), with no differences between the diabetic groups. There was an increase in the level of phosphorylated PTEN in the renal medulla of vehicle-treated db/db mice (p = 0.03). Empagliflozin-treated mice had lower levels of phosphorylated PTEN in the renal medulla compared with vehicle-treated animals (p = 0.008). Among actively treated animals, the highest levels of phosphorylated PTEN were revealed in the metformin-treated group (p = 0.03 vs. control).

We found no difference between the groups in the levels of phosphorylated rpS6 in the renal cortex (all p > 0.05). The content of this molecule was decreased significantly in the renal medulla of db/db mice when compared to db/+ (p < 0.001). Empagliflozin-treated and linagliptin-treated mice demonstrated more pronounced lowering of phospho-rpS6 in the renal medulla (p < 0.01 vs. controls and p < 0.05 vs. placebo); meanwhile, metformin did not significantly change the levels of phosphorylated rpS6 (p = 0.04 vs. control group and p > 0.05 vs. vehicle).

In db/db mice, body weight positively correlated with the content of phosphorylated BAD in the renal cortex and medulla (r = 0.49, p = 0.009 and r = 0.56, p = 0.002, respectively). We also found an association between kidney weight and phosphorylated BAD (r = 0.39, p = 0.03), GSK-3α/β (r = 0.57, p = 0.02), IRS-1 (r = 0.45, p = 0.03), and mTOR (r = 0.53, p = 0.001) in the renal medulla. The height of PTECs correlated negatively with the level of phosphorylated PTEN and IRS-1 in the renal cortex (r = −0.61, p = 0.003 and p = −0.49, p = 0.02, respectively). The levels of medullar phosphorylated PTEN and rpS6 were associated with the UACR (r = 0.56, p = 0.008 and r = 0.43, p = 0.049). In the renal medulla, phosphorylated BAD correlated negatively with Bcl-2 (r = −0.54, p = 0.04). Additionally, medullar phospho-PTEN correlated with E-cadherin and N-cadherin levels (r = −0.55, p = 0.02 and r = 0.5, p = 0.04, respectively).

In db/db mice, cortical and medullary phospho-BAD were associated with baseline body weight (the results of ANCOVA: F = 8.27, p = 0.01, η2 = 0.41 and F = 8.01, p = 0.02, η2 = 0.4, respectively, Table S1). The levels of phospho-BAD in the renal medulla were also independently associated with baseline blood glucose (F = 8.14, p = 0.01, η2 = 0.4). The contents of cortical phospho-PTEN and medullary phospho-IRS-1 were significantly associated with baseline body weight (F = 6.18, p = 0.03, η2 = 0.34 and F = 9.8, p = 0.009, η2 = 0.45, respectively).

2.6. MAPK/ERK Signaling Pathways in the Kidney: The Results of Multiplex Analysis

A higher level of phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2, MEK1 and HSP27 was found in the renal cortex of db/db mice compared to db/+ control mice (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.02, respectively, Figure 7). The maximum content of phosphorylated MEK1 was revealed in the renal cortex of vehicle-treated db/db mice (p = 0.04 compared to db/+ controls). We observed significantly decreased levels of phosphorylated MEK1 in empagliflozin-treated db/db mice when compared to the vehicle group (p = 0.03). Meanwhile, animals treated with metformin demonstrated higher cortical levels of phosphorylated HSP27 (p = 0.03 compared to db/+ controls).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Figure 7

Phosphorylated proteins of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in the kidneys of diabetic db/db and non-diabetic db+ mice. Arbitrary units. The raw data, averaged for each animal, are presented as points with medians, minimum and maximum values. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Statistically significant differences are shown in the figures. The following samples were excluded as outliers by Grubbs’ test: phospho-ERK1/2, phospho-MEK1 and phospho-HSP27 in the renal cortex and medulla in linagliptin-treated db/db mice (N = 2 for phospho-ERK1/2 in the renal medulla and N = 1 for other groups); phospho-p90RSK, renal cortex, empagliflozin- and metformin-treated db/db mice (both N = 1). The original sample size was N = 7 animals per group. The final sample size after exclusion is shown in the figures. An outlier criterion was specified before examining group differences. C, non-diabetic db/+ mice (control); E, empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; L, linagliptin-treated db/db mice; M, metformin-treated db/db mice; V, vehicle-treated db/db mice. Some samples were excluded as outliers.

Similar to the renal cortex, we found increased levels of phosphorylated MEK1 and HSP27 in the renal medulla of db/db mice compared to db/+ (both p = 0.03). These changes were more significant in the metformin group (p < 0.01 vs. controls).

We found no difference in the level of medullar phosphorylated ERK1/2, p53 and p90RSK between db/db and db/+ mice (all p > 0.05). However, we noticed decreased phosphorylated p53 and p90RSK in the renal medulla of empagliflozin-treated db/db mice. However, these differences reached statistical significance only when compared with the linagliptin group (p53: p = 0.002) or with the linagliptin and metformin groups (p90RSK: p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively), not when compared with the vehicle group (p > 0.05 for both).

In db/db mice, the height of PTECs negatively correlated with the levels of phosphorylated HSP27 (r = −0.63, p = 0.003) and p90RSK (r = −0.64, p = 0.002) in the renal cortex. The VV of interstitium in the renal cortex negatively correlated with the cortical level of phosphorylated MEK1 (r = −0.49, p = 0.03). Cortical phosphorylated MEK1 also demonstrated positive relationships with MFV and UACR (r = 0.52, p = 0.04 and r = 0.48, p = 0.03, respectively). We also found an association between kidney weight and expression of phosphorylated HSP27 in the renal medulla (r = 0.40, p = 0.04). The medullar level of phospho-HSP27 demonstrated associations with EMT markers (E-cadherin: r = 0.53, p = 0.03; N-cadherin: r = −0.63, p = 0.007). The expression of N-cadherin positively correlated with phospho-p53 and p90RSK in the renal medulla (r = 0.49, p = 0.04 and r = 0.56, p = 0.02, respectively). Finally, both phospho-HSP27 and phospho-MEK1 showed positive correlations with LC3-II (r = 0.61, p = 0.01 and r = 0.65, p = 0.005, respectively).

We found associations between the cortical phospho-MEK1 and baseline body weight in db/db mice (the results of ANCOVA: F = 5.64, p = 0.04, η2 = 0.36, Table S1). The levels of phospho-HSP27 in the renal cortex were also independently associated with baseline body weight and blood glucose (F = 22.4, p = 0.0008, η2 = 0.69 and F = 19.9, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.67, respectively).

3. Discussion

The results of our study indicate that the development of diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice, a model of T2D, is associated with a dysregulation of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways in the renal cortex and medulla. This dysregulation is associated with abnormal expression of some markers of autophagy, apoptosis, and EMT. We also demonstrate differences in the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin, the DPP4 inhibitor linagliptin, and metformin on renal PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling.

3.1. Effects of Empagliflozin, Linagliptin, and Metformin on Body Weight, Blood Glucose, Renal Function and Structural Parameters in db/db Mice

In the experimental model of obesity and T2D we used, the three anti-diabetic drugs studied had different effects on metabolic parameters and body weight. Specifically, metformin-treated and empagliflozin-treated db/db mice demonstrated lower blood glucose as well as plasma fructosamine levels, while linagliptin had no effect on hyperglycemia. These findings are generally consistent with literature data. The antihyperglycemic potential of metformin and empagliflozin in db/db mice was demonstrated previously [38,39,40,41]. However, no glucose-lowering effect of linagliptin was observed in this model [42,43]. In humans, DPP4 inhibitors demonstrate modest antihyperglycemic activity and are used in patients with mild or moderate hyperglycemia [30,44]. On the contrary, db/db mice demonstrate severe hyperglycemia due to leptin receptor deficiency [45,46]. Therefore, we can consider the lack of glucose-lowering effects of the DPP4 inhibitor in our study to be expected.

We observed no influence of empagliflozin or linagliptin on the body weight of db/db mice. At the same time, metformin prevented further weight gain in these animals. In previous studies, it was noted that DPP4 inhibitors have no significant effect on body weight in db/db mice [47,48]. The results for SGLT2 inhibitors are quite contradictory. Some studies reported slower body weight gain in db/db mice during treatment by empagliflozin [48,49,50,51]. Other studies have found no effect of empagliflozin on animal weight in this model [52,53]. Moreover, an increase in body weight was reported in db/db mice treated with empagliflozin [40,54,55,56]. In clinical trials, SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce body weight in humans [57]. The exact mechanism behind the effect of empagliflozin on body weight in db/db mice needs future research.

We did not find any differences in creatinine levels between the groups of animals treated with empagliflozin, linagliptin, and metformin. This may be due to the timing of the experiment: a decline in kidney function in db/db mice usually occurs after the age of 16 weeks [58,59]. At the same time, we observed a significant antialbuminuric effect of empagliflozin and linagliptin, but not metformin, in db/db mice in our experiment, which is consistent with the results of clinical studies [24,28,32].

We observed protective effects of empagliflozin, linagliptin, and metformin on the renal structural changes in db/db mice. Specifically, treatment by empagliflozin was associated with mitigation of mesangial expansion, signs of podocytopathy and tubular atrophy in db/db mice. The beneficial effects of empagliflozin on glomerular and tubular cells were described previously in db/db mice [60,61]. Similar effects have been demonstrated in this model under linagliptin or metformin [62,63].

Taking into account the key roles of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK pathways in the regulation of autophagy, apoptosis and EMT, we determined the content of some markers of these processes in the renal medulla by WB. We found elevated levels of Beclin-1 (but not LC3-II) and caspase-3 p17 subunit and lower levels of Bcl-2 in db/db mice compared to non-diabetic control mice. Among these molecules, Beclin-1 is considered to be a key regulator of autophagy. The protein interacts with either Bcl-2 or PI3K class III, regulating autophagy and cell death [64]. Bcl-2 is considered to be an anti-apoptotic protein [64], and the cleaved, active form of caspase-3 (p17) is an enzyme known for its crucial role in apoptosis [65]. Although we did not study the structural features of apoptosis and autophagy flux in our animals, these WB data may serve as indirect indicators of changes in the discussed processes.

In animals treated with empagliflozin, linagliptin, or metformin, we observed increased LC3-II levels. It should be noted that two bands (LC3-I and LC3-II, cytosolic and lipidated forms of LC3B, respectively) are typically seen in WB performed using an anti-LC3B antibody. In our blots, we observed a single band that migrated at approximately 15 kDa, which corresponds to LC3-II. The signal for LC3-I was weak under our experimental conditions, likely due to its conversion to LC3-II. Therefore, the band that we observed with a high probability corresponds to LC3-II, a marker of autophagosomes. An increase in LC3-II may reflect either increased autophagosome formation or impaired autophagosome degradation [8]. Future studies examining autophagic flux are warranted to elucidate these findings.

A decreased caspase-3 p17 subunit and increased Bcl-2 content were observed in actively treated mice. Administration of empagliflozin or metformin was also associated with an elevation in Beclin-1. These data can be interpreted, with some caution, as changes in apoptotic, anti-apoptotic, and autophagy-related signaling under the influence of the drugs studied.

We found decreased E-cadherin and elevated N-cadherin levels in the renal cortex and medulla of db/db mice. In our experiment, these shifts were associated with the signs of tubular atrophy. The association of cadherin expression changes with EMT in DKD was also reported [66]. SGLT2 inhibitors can reverse the changes in cadherin expression and suppress EMT and diabetes-induced renal fibrosis [33,66]. Treatment by linagliptin was found to mitigate transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1)-mediated EMT in tacrolimus-induced renal interstitial fibrosis in rats [67]. The suppressive effect of metformin on EMT in renal cells was also described [68,69,70].

3.2. Effects of Empagliflozin, Linagliptin, and Metformin on PI3K/Akt Signaling in the Kidney in db/db Mice

We found downregulation of PI3Kp110β in the renal cortex and medulla of db/db mice. Hyperglycemia and oxidative stress are considered to be the primary factors dysregulating PI3K/Akt signaling in diabetes [5]. The disruption of PI3K/Akt signaling may promote insulin resistance in renal cells [19]. It was estimated that PI3Kp110β promotes autophagy in mammalian cells, including kidney cell culture [8,71]. In its turn, suppression of autophagy is involved in the development of DKD [69,70,71,72,73]. We revealed an increased cortical level of PI3Kp110β in empagliflozin-treated and linagliptin-treated db/db mice. We also noted increased levels of PI3Kp110β in linagliptin-treated and metformin-treated animals in the renal medulla. It was demonstrated that empagliflozin and linagliptin reactivate autophagy in the renal cortex, glomeruli, and podocytes in db/db mice [74]. Likewise, the reactivation of autophagy in tubular cells was also found in metformin-treated db/db mice [75]. Therefore, further research is needed to find out if the reactivation of autophagy in the renal cortex and medulla is associated with upregulation of PI3Kp110β under empagliflozin, linagliptin and metformin treatments.

In our study, both metformin and linagliptin enhanced the levels of AMPKα1 in the renal cortex and medulla. Metformin is a well-known activator of AMPK [36,76]. It was demonstrated that metformin alleviates podocyte loss, apoptosis of mesangial cells, and tubular cell senescence through AMPK-mediated signaling pathways in DKD [77]. On the other hand, it was reported that metformin-induced AMPK upregulation is associated with activation of apoptosis in renal medullary interstitial cells [78]. Modulation of AMPK activity is also considered to be an effect of DPP4 inhibitors [79]. In NRK-52E cells (rat renal proximal tubule cell line), linagliptin attenuated ROS production by activating the AMPK pathway and decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 1β [80]. In a rat models of T2D, linagliptin enhanced renal expressions of phospho-AMPK/AMPK, improved proteinuria, and alleviated renal ultrastructural changes and fibrosis [81]. In our study, we found no association of AMPKα1 with autophagy, apoptosis, and EMT markers. Therefore, the contribution of AMPKα1 to the renal protective effects of anti-diabetic drugs remains to be clarified.

We found significantly elevated levels of phosphorylated forms of the pro-apoptotic protein BAD in the renal cortex in db/db mice. It is well known that DKD is associated with activation of apoptosis in renal cells [2,3]. On the other hand, BAD acts as an activator of autophagy [8]. We were unable to demonstrate any significant effect of the three studied drugs on the levels of this regulator.

We observed a higher level of phosphorylated PTEN in the renal cortex and medulla of db/db mice. PTEN is a suppressor of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and a crucial regulator of cell death, autophagy, and apoptosis [6]. In patients with T2D, elevated urinary PTEN is associated with CKD [82]. Phosphorylation at Ser380 generally inactivates PTEN, reduces the ability of PTEN to inhibit the PI3K/Akt pathway, and promotes cell survival [83]. In non-diabetic mice, PTEN knockout in tubular cells resulted in renal hypertrophy [84]. We found that the levels of phosphorylated BAD and PTEN in the renal cortex correlated negatively with the height of PTECs in db/db mice. Moreover, we found associations of phospho-PTEN with the markers of EMT (E-cadherin and N-cadherin) in the renal medulla of db/db mice. Therefore, we can speculate that increased levels of phosphorylated BAD and PTEN may contribute to tubular atrophy and EMT in this model of diabetes. Empagliflozin treatment only was associated with lower medullar levels of phosphorylated PTEN.

The exact effects of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of PTEN are highly context-dependent [85]. Generally, the phosphorylation of Ser380 deactivates PTEN and the diminishing capacity of PTEN to inhibit the PI3K/Akt pathway [83]. In our study, increased medullar level of phosphorylated PTEN were associated with albuminuria and abnormalities in N-cadherin and E-cadherin expression. It can be assumed that activation of PTEN through decreased phosphorylation under treatment by empagliflozin is associated with the mitigation of albuminuria and EMT.

We found a decreased level of phosphorylated rpS6 in the renal medulla of db/db mice. rpS6 is involved in the regulation of glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, body mass and energy balance, as well as cell size [86]. Phosphorylation of rpS6 at serine 235/236 is a crucial step in activating protein synthesis, especially for mRNAs encoding cell growth and proliferation proteins [87]. Phosphorylation of rpS6 was associated with renal hypertrophy in a unilateral nephrectomy model [88]. Another study demonstrated that the blocking of rpS6 phosphorylation exacerbates kidney growth in a non-diabetic model [89]. In our study, we found no correlations between the levels of rpS6 in the renal cortex or medulla and kidney weight in db/db mice. However, medullar phospho-rpS6 was associated with tubular atrophy and elevated N-cadherin expression.

The treatment by empagliflozin or linagliptin was associated with decreased levels of phosphorylated rpS6 in the renal medulla of db/db mice. However, genetic knockout and pharmacological inhibition of rpS6 phosphorylation have been demonstrated to prevent podocyte hypertrophy and mitigate focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in patients and in a rat model [90]. In a model of diabetes, attenuated phosphorylation of rpS6 was found to be associated with the antifibrotic activity of resveratrol in heart and skeletal muscles [91].

Decreased phosphorylation of rpS6 may be due to the influence of different factors, such as energy depletion [92]. A shift in energy metabolism towards an energy-saving state is a characteristic feature of the action of SGLT2 inhibitors [93]. We may suppose that downregulation of rpS6 reflects the change in the energy balance in the renal medulla. Notably, although db/db mice already exhibited reduced medullary phospho-rpS6 compared to non-diabetic control mice, treatment by empagliflozin or linagliptin further lowered its levels. This seemingly paradoxical effect may be explained by a compensatory mechanism: in untreated diabetes, residual rpS6 phosphorylation might sustain maladaptive hypertrophy, whereas additional suppression by these drugs could shift cellular metabolism toward a more protective, energy-conserving state. At the same time, phospho-rpS6 is considered to be a marker of impaired protein synthesis and cellular stress [9]. Therefore, the precise role of this regulator in the development of DKD and its modulation by empagliflozin and linagliptin deserves further study.

3.3. Effects of Empagliflozin, Linagliptin, and Metformin on the MAPK/ERK Pathway in Kidneys of db/db Mice

MAPK/ERK signaling plays a role in the regulation of renal development and differentiation [94]. Phosphorylation at Thr202/Tyr204 and Thr185/Tyr187 is an activating post-translational modification of ERK1/2 [95]. Similarly, phosphorylation at Ser78 and phosphorylation at Ser217/Ser221 activate HSP27 and MEK1, respectively [96,97]. Activation of MEK/ERK signaling in mesangial cells has been shown to be involved in mesangial expansion in diabetes [98]. Finally, MEK/ERK signaling is considered to contribute to the suppression of renal autophagy in a rat model of diabetes [99]. The suppression of autophagy in the kidneys of db/db mice, as well as the ability of empagliflozin to reactivate renal autophagy, were demonstrated in previous studies [74,100].

In this study, we found an elevated expression of phosphorylated forms of ERK-1/2, HSP27, and MEK1 in the renal cortex of db/db mice. We also revealed higher levels of phosphorylated HSP27 and MEK1 in the renal medulla. Treatment by empagliflozin was associated with lower cortical levels of phosphorylated MEK1.

Elevated serum and urinary HSP27 are considered to be specific and early markers of DKD [101,102]. In the kidney, HSP27 is localized in podocytes, tubular epithelial cells and endotheliocytes [103]. In our study, an increased content of phosphorylated HSP27 in the renal cortex was associated with tubular atrophy, while increased phosphorylated HSP27 in the renal medulla was associated with kidney hypertrophy.

In our experiment, empagliflozin-treated animals demonstrated the lowest levels of phosphorylated p53 and p90RSK in the renal medulla. p53 is a transcription factor that suppresses cell proliferation [104]. Elevated phosphorylation of p53 was found to play a role in the development and progression of CKD due to increased expression of TGFβ1 [105]. Targeting p53 is a promising approach for organ fibrosis therapy [106]. p90RSK belongs to a protein family that regulates cell motility and survival. An elevated expression of p90RSK is associated with renal fibrosis and DKD [17,18]. The levels of phosphorylated p90RSK in the renal cortex were negatively associated with tubular cell atrophy. Interestingly, suppression of p90RKS in models of lung fibrosis and breast cancer was associated with suppression of EMT [107,108]. EMT is also known as a process involved in the development and progression of DKD [109]. In db/db mice, treatment by empagliflozin was associated with less pronounced changes in the renal expression of cadherins, which are involved in EMT [110]. Thus, decreased p53 and p90RSK under empagliflozin may be a possible mechanism underlying the suppression of renal fibrosis and EMT in the kidney.

3.4. Methodological Remarks and the Study Limitations

In this study, we assessed a panel of key molecules involved in PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling. Both signaling pathways are complex and include a number of molecules interacting with each other and forming cascades and networks [111,112,113]. In such cases, the measurement of individual regulators may not provide a comprehensive view of the molecular changes [114]. We assessed the phosphorylated forms of the proteins, taking into account that this post-translational modification regulates the activity of signal transduction [115]. In order to avoid pseudoreplication, we averaged the technical replicates of measurements for several observational units, with the animals as biological and experimental units, and used these averages for further statistical analysis of morphometry results, as recommended [116].

The limitations of the study include the small sample size, the absence of drug-treated non-diabetic control groups, the lack of blinding in some experimental procedures, and the use of a single terminal time point. The small sample size limits the representativeness of the results. Although the animals were randomly allocated, baseline imbalances between the groups in body weight and blood glucose could introduce residual confounding. The absence of a non-diabetic control group treated with the studied drugs limits our ability to dissociate drug-specific effects from antihyperglycemic and body weight-lowering effects. A single time point does not provide any insight into the dynamics of molecular changes.

The changes in AMPKα1 and PI3Kp110β levels were only validated by WB. We used glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a loading control in the WB study. As GAPDH may be affected by the metabolic alterations associated with diabetes [117], its use as a loading control could be another possible limitation. Accordingly, we compared GAPDH expression stability with that of β-actin, an alternative housekeeping protein, under our experimental conditions. We further tested our samples using total protein stained with Ponceau S for normalization and demonstrated identical patterns of protein changes.

In this study, we focused predominantly on examining alterations in the signaling pathways, without directly assessing proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, and EMT in the kidney. In an attempt to overcome this limitation, at least partially, we studied the expression of a number of molecules involved in the regulation of these processes in the renal medulla. However, the limited set of markers and the lack of renal cortex data did not allow us to answer the question about the causal role of the changes in the signaling pathways. The results do not provide a clear assessment of the intensity of the above-mentioned cellular processes. In particular, the autophagic flux was not measured, and the present results cannot distinguish increased autophagosome formation from reduced autophagosome clearance. Therefore, further research is needed for this.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Design

The design of the study is presented in Figure 8. We used specific pathogen-free male db/db mice (BKS.Cg-Dock7m+/+Leprdb/Icg) obtained from the Center for Genetic Resources of Laboratory Animals at ICG SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) for the experiment. Due to a mutation in the gene of the leptin receptor, these mice become hyperphagic early in their life and develop marked obesity, hyperglycemia, and hyperinsulinemia [45,46]. Therefore, db/db is a widely used model of obesity and T2D [118]. The animals demonstrate structural changes in the kidneys that are similar to those in humans with diabetes [59,60,119]. The model is characterized by the slow-to-moderate progression of nephropathy [120]. Sibling non-diabetic db/+ male mice were used as the control.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Flowchart of the study. The experiment used 7–8-week-old non-diabetic db/+ mice and diabetic db/db mice. Diabetic mice were randomly assigned to treatment by a vehicle, empagliflozin, linagliptin, or metformin. The total duration of the experiment was 8 weeks.

The animals were housed in a carefully controlled setting, with a consistent 12-h day/night cycle, a stable temperature of 23 ± 2 °C, and a humidity level of 45 ± 10%. The mice, aged three weeks, were separated from their mothers and placed in individually ventilated cages (OptiMICE, Animal Care Systems, Centennial, CO, USA), with two to three mice per cage. They had unrestricted access to food (Ssniff, Soest, Germany) and water.

Diabetic mice were assigned by simple randomization method to receive empagliflozin (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany; 10 mg/kg), linagliptin (Boehringer Inhelheim, Ingelheim, Germany; 10 mg/kg), metformin (Ozon Pharmaceuticals, Zhigulevsk, Samara Region, Russia; 300 mg/kg), or saline (200 µL). The dosages of empagliflozin, linagliptin, and metformin were selected according to previous investigations [121,122,123]. The medicines were diluted in 200 µL of saline. Intragastric administration was performed once a day with 20 G × 38 mm curved oral dosing needles (pk/3, VetTech Solutions Ltd., Congleton, UK). All animals were treated for 56 days from 7–8 to 15–16 weeks of life by the investigator, who was aware of the group allocation. Eight animals were enrolled in each group.

The animals were weighed weekly. The animals were starved overnight with access to water before blood collection. Blood sampling to determine glucose concentration was carried out from the tail. Blood samples for the assessment of other biochemistry parameters (150–200 μL) were collected from the retro-orbital venous sinus at weeks 7–8, 11–12 and 15–16 of life, using a glass Pasteur pipette previously wetted by heparin 5000 IU/mL. To obtain plasma, the blood samples were centrifuged at 3000× g and +4 °C for 15 min after collection. Urine samples were collected at week 7–8 and week 15–16 of age, prior to the blood sampling. After collection, the urine samples were centrifuged at 3000× g and +4 °C for 15 min; the supernatant was separated and used for the following investigation. The plasma and urine samples were labeled, frozen immediately, and stored at −80 °C for biochemistry investigations.

All animals were decapitated at week 15–16. To assess renal hypertrophy, kidneys were weighed and adjusted to body weight. Kidney samples were obtained for histological and ultrastructural examination and assessment of signaling pathways by multiplex analysis and WB. The researchers who performed biochemical investigations, ELISA, microscopy, WB, and multiplex bead array assays were not aware of the group allocation.

All invasive procedures with animals (blood collection and harvesting) were performed under anesthesia with isoflurane (Laboratories Karizoo, S.A., Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain) and Gas Anesthesia System Ugo Basile (Gemonio, Italy, catalog 21210). The study had no human endpoint. No adverse events were noticed during the experiment.

4.2. Biochemistry and ELISA

The fasting blood glucose level was measured by a Contour TS blood glucose meter (Bayer, Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) immediately after blood sampling.

Plasma and urinary creatinine concentrations were estimated by applying the Jaffe methods (DiaS, Moscow, Russia). Plasma fructosamine and urinary albumin concentrations were assessed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with commercially available kits (BlueGen, Shanghai, China, lots E03F0411 and E04A0028, respectively). The concentrations of urinary albumin were adjusted to excreted creatinine.

Biochemical investigations were performed on each animal. Due to the small volume of biological samples available for analysis, biochemical studies were carried out in one technical replicate. The results were used as the experimental units in the following statistical analysis.

4.3. Microscopy and Morphometry

4.3.1. Light Microscopy

Kidney samples from each animal (N = 8 per group) were fixed in 10% formalin (pH = 7.4) for 48 h, dehydrated in alcohol at increasing concentrations and embedded in Histomix material (BioVitrum, Saint Petersburg, Russia) using a Thermo Scientific™ Citadel 2000 Tissue Processor and Thermo Scientific™ HistoStar™ Embedding Workstation (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, UK). Then, 5 µm thick sections were prepared on a microtome LEICA RM2155 (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The sections were counterstained, dehydrated, and mounted.

Light optical studies were performed with an Axioskop 2 plus microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The manufacturer’s software Axiovision 2.0 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to acquire images with a size of 1300 × 1300 pixels. Ten random non-overlapping areas of the renal cortex on one or two kidney sections were photographed to provide the pictures for each animal (N = 8 per group) at a primary magnification of ×100. These images were used to assess the VV of glomeruli, proximal and distal tubules.

Images of 15 non-overlapping areas of the renal cortex and medulla of each animal (N = 8 per group, one kidney section per animal) were obtained and investigated at a final magnification of ×400. At least 10 renal corpuscles with vascular and urinary poles from the inner, mid, and outer renal cortex, 10 proximal tubules, 10 distal tubules, and 10 collecting ducts per animal (N = 8 per group) were selected for the assessment of MFV and the height of PTECs, DTECs, and CDECs, respectively. Tangentially sectioned, incomplete, folded, artifact-containing, or stain-precipitate-containing glomeruli were not used for the assessment of MFV.

4.3.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy

Renal cortex and medulla samples from each animal (N = 8 per group) were fixed in a 4% solution of paraformaldehyde with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4), followed by 1% OsO4. The samples were then dehydrated and embedded in EPON epoxy resin. The 70–100 nm kidney sections (two or three per animal) were contrasted with aqueous uranyl acetate solution and lead citrate and were studied with a JEM-1400 electron microscope (JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The number of sections for quantification of FPs was determined based on the data of Shi et al. [124].

To estimate the NL of podocyte FPs, 10 non-overlapping images of the cross-sectioned glomerular barrier were obtained at a magnification of ×5000. Three glomeruli from each animal (N = 8 per group) were examined. In each animal (N = 8 per group), we also acquired five random images of cross-sections of the glomerular capillary wall, 10 cross-sectioned proximal tubules, 10 cross-sectioned distal tubules, and 10 cross-sectioned collecting ducts at a magnification of ×40,000. Further, we used these transmission electron microscopy (TEM) pictures to measure the width of the basement membranes of these structures.

4.3.3. Morphometric Analysis

Morphometric analysis was performed with ImageJ software version 1.54p (Madison, WI, USA). We applied the Grid and Cell Counter plug-ins for the morphometric analysis of the images, as described below. The measurements were based on previously described methods [125].

The entire visual field area of the kidney section was used to assess the VV of glomeruli, proximal and distal tubules. The VV of these renal structures was determined by point counting with the use of a lattice square test system with a distance between lines of 5 mm, corresponding to 5 μm. Approximately 300 points were counted per region of each image. The VV values were calculated using the equation:

VV=NSNT×100% (1)

where VV is volumetric density, NS is the number of points overlaid on the structure, NT is the total number of points.

We counted dots corresponding to mesangial cells, the mesangial matrix, and glomeruli to calculate MFV. We used a lattice square test system with a distance between lines of 4 mm, corresponding to 1 μm. Up to 450 points were counted per glomerulus in each image. The region of interest included the glomerular capillary tuft and excluded Bowman’s space, Bowman’s capsule, adjacent tubules, interstitium, and periglomerular vessels. MFV was determined by the equation:

MFV=NMNG×100% (2)

where NM is the number of points overlaid on the mesangial cells and matrix in the glomerulus and NG is the total number of points in one glomerulus.

In order to assess podocyte FP effacement, we measured the NL of podocyte FPs. We counted the number of podocyte FPs on the GBM segment in TEM images. The length of the GBM segment was measured with the selection tools of ImageJ software (Madison, WI, USA), such as straight and segmented lines. The 1 μm standard bar was applied for the measurements. We used the following equation to estimate the NL of podocyte FPs:

NL=NFPsL (3)

where NL is a linear number density, NFPs is the number of podocyte foot processes in a GBM section, and L is the length of a GBM section in µm.

4.3.4. Measurements of Epithelial Cell Height and Basement Membrane Width

We used ImageJ software version 1.54p (Madison, WI, USA) to measure epithelial cell height and basement membrane width. We utilized selection tools such as straight lines to calculate values in physical units (μm for light microscopy and nm for TEM) by establishing an image scale.

On the light micrographs of the renal cortex and medulla that were acquired at a magnification of ×400, ten random cross-sections per animal were identified from each of the following nephron segments: proximal tubules, distal tubules, and collecting ducts. Then, we selected five random epithelial cells in each cross-section. In total, at least 50 epithelial cells of proximal tubules, distal tubules, and collecting ducts per animal (N = 8 in each group) were included in the analysis. We applied the 10 μm standard bar to assess the height of epithelial cells from the basement membrane to the luminal surface.

We measured the GBM and TBM widths by a direct method [126]. For this, we drew uniform cross-sections across the membrane and measured the exact pixel distance between the basal aspect of the epithelial membrane and the opposite edge. The measurements were carried out at intervals of at least 300 nm from each other. Five to ten measurements were performed in each image. The arithmetic mean of multiple evenly spaced measurements was then calculated for each animal (N = 8 per group). The 200 nm standard bar was applied for measurements.

4.3.5. Processing of Morphometry Data

In the light microscopy images, we assessed 14 kidney sections, 112 glomeruli, 112 cross-sectioned proximal tubules, 112 distal tubules, and 112 collecting ducts in each group. We assessed the height of at least 560 PTECs, 560 DTECs and 560 CDECs in each group. In the TEM images, we analyzed 24 glomeruli, 40 glomerular barrier cross-sections, 80 proximal tubule cross-sections, 80 distal tubule cross-sections, and 80 collecting duct cross-sections in each group. We evaluated 280 GMB measurement points, 480 TBM measurement points, and 480 collecting duct basement membrane measurement points per group. We estimated 600 FPs in vehicle-treated db/db mice and 800 FPs in other groups. We then calculated the average values for each individual animal. These biological replicates were used as experimental units in the following statistical procedures.

4.4. Protein Extraction, WB and Multiplex Bead Array Assay

4.4.1. Protein Extraction

Frozen samples of the renal cortex and renal medulla (N = 8) obtained from db/+ and db/db mice were homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) protein lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% of Triton X-100, 1% of sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% of sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) with the proteinase inhibitor Proteinsafe (Transgene Biotech, Beijing, China). Protein extracts were stored at −20 °C for further investigations.

4.4.2. WB

We randomly selected five of the eight animals in each group for WB. Equal amounts of protein were analyzed by immunoblot assays using antibodies to Beclin-1, LC3B, caspase-3 p17 subunit, Bcl-2, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, AMPK α1 and PI3Kp110β (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab207612, ab192890, ab13847, ab182858, ab40772, ab76011, ab32047, and ab151549, respectively). Anti-GAPDH antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab9485) was used as a loading control. Intensities of individual bands were quantified by using ImageJ software version 1.54p (Madison, WI, USA).

4.4.3. Normalization of WB Results

Taking into account possible changes in GAPDH under hyperglycemic conditions, we verified stable GAPDH expression across experimental groups. Firstly, we re-analyzed the density of the GAPDH bands. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed no significant intergroup differences in GAPDH levels (p = 0.7 for renal cortex and p = 0.69 for renal medulla, Table S2, Figure S1), ruling out any systematic bias.

Secondly, we compared GAPDH expression stability with that of an alternative housekeeping protein (β-actin, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab6276) under our experimental conditions. We conducted an additional Western blot experiment with the protein extracts of the renal cortex and renal medulla (N = 5 per group). No differences in the signal intensity for β-actin were detected between samples from the studied groups in the renal cortex or medulla (p = 0.41 and p = 0.47, respectively, Table S2, Figure S1).

Finally, we analyzed the signal intensity for GAPDH and β-actin bands, as well as total protein by Ponceau S staining (Table S3; Figure S1). The normalization results for GAPDH, β-actin, and Ponceau S staining were compared. We found no difference between the intensities of the parameters (coefficient of variation for GAPDH < 5.0%).

4.4.4. Multiplex Bead Array Assay

The concentrations of phosphorylated forms of some key molecules, regulators, and downstream targets of the PI3K/Akt pathway were assessed with the use of the Bio-Plex Pro™ Cell Signaling Akt Panel (catalog no. LQ00006JK0K0RR, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). This panel included BAD phosphorylated at Ser136 [phospho-BAD (Ser136)], GSK-3α/β phosphorylated at Ser21/Ser9 [phospho-GSK-3α (Ser21)/ p-GSK-3β (Ser9)], IRS-1 phosphorylated at Ser636/Ser639 [phospho-IRS-1 (Ser636/Ser639)], mTOR phosphorylated at Ser2248 [phospho-mTOR (Ser2248)], PTEN phosphorylated at Ser380 [phospho-PTEN (Ser380)], and rpS6 phosphorylated at Ser235/Ser236 [phospho-rpS6 (Ser235/236)]. The concentrations of some core components of the MAPK cascade and downstream targets of MAPK signaling were assessed with the use of the Bio-Plex Pro™ Cell Signaling MAPK Panel (catalog no. LQ00000S6KL81S, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). This kit was used to assess ERK1/2 phosphorylated at Thr202/Tyr204 and Thr185/Tyr187 [phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204, Thr185/Tyr187)], MEK1 phosphorylated at Ser217/Ser221 [phospho-MEK1 (Ser217/Ser221)], HSP27 phosphorylated at Ser78 [phospho-HSP27 (Ser78)], p90RSK phosphorylated at Ser15 [phospho-p90RSK (Ser15)], and p53 phosphorylated at Ser380 [phospho-p53 (Ser380)].

The multiplex bead array assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Renal protein extract samples in equal amounts of protein were incubated with antibody-coupled beads, detection antibody, and streptavidin for 30 min, 30 min, and 10 min, respectively. After each coating with antigen, the plate was washed with a Bio-PlexHandheld Magnetic Washer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), resuspended and vortexed. Fluorescence was measured on a two-beam laser automated analyzer, the Bio-Plex® 200 system. Data were acquired with Bio-PlexManager Software 4.0 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The values below the detection limit (OOR<) were set to zero. To validate the results, the positive and negative controls supplied with the kits were used.

Multiplex analysis was carried out in one technical replicate from one animal. We performed the assay with the Bio-Plex Pro™ Cell Signaling Akt Panel for eight animals per group. The assay, with the use of the Bio-Plex Pro™ Cell Signaling MAPK Panel, was performed on seven animals from each group.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

We considered data obtained from each individual animal as an experimental unit for statistical analysis. If several technical replicates were performed, the averaged results were used.

An outlier criterion was specified before examining group differences. Outliers were excluded using Grubbs’ test. Any data points with a two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 were considered significant outliers and were subsequently excluded from the analysis. The individual animal was considered the biological experimental unit for this analysis.

Statistical processing was performed using STATISTICA 12 (Dell, Round Rock, TX, USA). The normal distribution was determined by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. As most of the variables were not distributed normally, the data are presented as medians, minimum and maximum values, and the significance of the differences between independent groups was determined using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was applied to compare dependent samples. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was applied to test the association between variables. The differences were considered significant at p below 0.05. Correlation coefficients were considered significant if their absolute value was equal to or greater than 0.3. Due to the exploratory nature of the analysis, we did not apply multiple-comparison correction.

The power of the study was assessed by G*Power 3.1.9.4 (Dusseldorf, Germany) post hoc and ranged from 70% (for WB) to 80% (for multiplex bead array assays).

ANCOVA was carried out using SPSS Statistics 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, NY, USA). The studied drugs were assumed to be a categorical independent variable, while baseline body weight and glucose levels were used as covariates. Associations were considered significant if the p-value was below 0.05. Only db/db mice, but not control animals, were included in this analysis.

4.6. Ethical Issues

All experiments were performed in compliance with the protocols and recommendations for the proper use and care of laboratory animals (Directive 2010/63/EU). The protocol was approved by the Inter-Institutional Animal Ethics Committee based on the Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS (Protocol 72 dated 5 April 2021).

5. Conclusions

The results of the study demonstrate that the development of DKD in db/db mice, a model of T2D, is associated with dysregulation of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways in the kidneys. Particularly, these changes are characterized by decreased levels of PI3Kp110β and increased levels of phosphorylated PTEN, MEK1 and HSP27 in the renal cortex and medulla. Additionally, there is an increase in phosphorylated BAD and ERK1/2 in the renal cortex, as well as a decrease in rpS6 in the renal medulla.

Empagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, linagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, and metformin may have different effects on the studied signaling pathways. Specifically, empagliflozin prevented the changes in the levels of cortical PI3Kp110β, phospho-MEK1, and medullar phospho-PTEN; linagliptin restored PI3Kp110β levels; and both agents further decreased medullar phospho-rpS6. Metformin upregulated cortical AMPKα1, medullar PI3Kp110β, phospho-GSK-3α/β and MEK1 and increased phospho-HSP27 in the renal cortex and medulla. The changes in the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways under empagliflozin, linagliptin and metformin treatment may contribute to the mitigation of albuminuria, renal hypertrophy, glomerular sclerosis and tubular atrophy. Direct effects on apoptosis, autophagy, EMT and fibrosis deserve further investigation.

Acknowledgments

The studies were implemented using the equipment of the Center for Genetic Resources of Laboratory Animals at IC&G SB RAS, supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia (Unique identifier of the project RFMEFI62117X0015). The microscopy was conducted at the Joint Access Center for Microscopy of Biological Objects of the SB RAS.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

AMPK 5′-Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
AMPKα1 5′-Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase catalytic subunit α1
ANCOVA Analysis of covariance
BAD Bcl-2-associated death promoter
Bcl-2 B-cell lymphoma 2
BM Basement membrane
CARMELINA The Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study With Linagliptin
CDs Collecting ducts
CKD Chronic kidney disease
DTEC Distal tubular epithelial cell
DPP4 Dipeptidyl peptidase-4
DKD Diabetic kidney disease
EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
EMPA-KIDNEY The Study of Heart and Kidney Protection With Empagliflozin
EMPA-REG OUTCOME The Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
EMT Epithelial–mesenchymal transition
ERK Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
ESRD End-stage renal disease
FPs Foot processes
HSP27 Heat shock protein 27
GAPDH Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
GBM Glomerular basement membrane
GSK-3 Glycogen synthase kinase 3
IRS-1 Insulin receptor substrate 1
LC3B Microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3B
LC3-I Microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3B cytosolic form
LC3-II Microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3B lipidated form
MAPK Mitogen-activated protein kinase
MEK1 Dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1
MFV Mesangial fractional volume
mTOR Mammalian target of rapamycin
NL Lineal number density
p90RSK Subfamily p90 ribosomal s6 kinase
PI3K/Akt Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinases/protein kinase B
PI3Kp110β Phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110β catalytic subunit β isoform
PTEC Proximal tubular epithelial cell
PTEN Phosphatase and tensin homolog
rpS6 Ribosomal protein S6
RSK Ribosomal s6 kinase
SGLT2 Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2
SDS Sodium dodecyl sulfate
T2D Type 2 diabetes
TBM Tubular basal membrane
TEM Transmission electron microscopy
TGFβ1 Transforming growth factor-β1
VV Volume fraction
WB Western blotting

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27146483/s1.

ijms-27-06483-s001.zip (374.3KB, zip)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V.K.; methodology, N.P.B., V.I.K., E.L.Z., and V.V.K.; software, A.I.K. and N.A.M.; validation, N.P.B. and V.V.K.; formal analysis, A.I.K.; investigation, A.I.K., E.A.A., N.B.O. and N.A.M.; resources, V.V.K.; data curation, A.I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.K. and V.V.K.; writing—review and editing, V.V.K.; visualization, E.A.A., A.I.K., and N.A.M.; supervision, V.V.K.; project administration, A.I.K. and V.V.K.; funding acquisition, E.L.Z. and V.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of IC&G SB RAS (approval number 72; approval date 5 April 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

The study was carried out using funds from the state assignment of the RICEL—Branch of IC&G SB RAS.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Ying M., Shao X., Qin H., Yin P., Lin Y., Wu J., Ren J., Zheng Y. Disease Burden and Epidemiological Trends of Chronic Kidney Disease at the Global, Regional, National Levels from 1990 to 2019. Nephron. 2024;148:113–123. doi: 10.1159/000534071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sanz A.B., Sanchez-Niño M.D., Ramos A.M., Ortiz A. Regulated Cell Death Pathways in Kidney Disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2023;19:281–299. doi: 10.1038/s41581-023-00694-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deng B., Song A., Zhang C. Cell-Cycle Dysregulation in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Kidney Disease: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:2133. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang H., Gao L., Zhao C., Fang F., Liu J., Wang Z., Zhong Y., Wang X. The Role of PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway in Chronic Kidney Disease. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2024;56:2623–2633. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-03989-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang Y., Jin D., Kang X., Zhou R., Sun Y., Lian F., Tong X. Signaling Pathways Involved in Diabetic Renal Fibrosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:696542. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.696542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khokhar M., Roy D., Modi A., Agarwal R., Yadav D., Purohit P., Sharma P. Perspectives on the Role of PTEN in Diabetic Nephropathy: An Update. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2020;57:470–483. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1746735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Githaka J.M., Kirschenman R., Patel N., Tripathi N., Wang J., Li L., Muranyi H., Pirayeshfard L., Montpetit R., Glubrecht D.D., et al. Multiple Anti-Tumor Programs Are Activated by Blocking BAD Phosphorylation. Oncogene. 2025;44:2530–2546. doi: 10.1038/s41388-025-03420-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Klionsky D.J., Abdel-Aziz A.K., Abdelfatah S., Abdellatif M., Abdoli A., Abel S., Abeliovich H., Abildgaard M.H., Abudu Y.P., Acevedo-Arozena A., et al. Guidelines for the Use and Interpretation of Assays for Monitoring Autophagy (4th Edition) Autophagy. 2021;17:1–382. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Magnuson B., Ekim B., Fingar D.C. Regulation and Function of Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinase (S6K) within mTOR Signalling Networks. Biochem. J. 2012;441:1–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hunie Tesfa K., Desalegn Gebeyehu C., Tadele Ewunetie A., Gugsa E., Nigatu Zewdie A., Dessie G., Tezera Endale H. The Role of AMPK Signaling Pathway in the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Its Complications and Related Metabolic Disorders. Metab. Open. 2025;28:100397. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2025.100397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kakoti B.B., Alom S., Deka K., Halder R.K. AMPK Pathway: An Emerging Target to Control Diabetes Mellitus and Its Related Complications. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2024;23:441–459. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01420-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wen X., Jiao L., Tan H. MAPK/ERK Pathway as a Central Regulator in Vertebrate Organ Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:1464. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roskoski R. MEK1/2 Dual-Specificity Protein Kinases: Structure and Regulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012;417:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.11.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wright E.B., Lannigan D.A. Therapeutic Targeting of P90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023;11:1297292. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1297292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zou J., Lei T., Guo P., Yu J., Xu Q., Luo Y., Ke R., Huang D. Mechanisms Shaping the Role of ERK1/2 in Cellular Senescence (Review) Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;19:759–770. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zou Y., Shi H., Liu N., Wang H., Song X., Liu B. Mechanistic Insights into Heat Shock Protein 27, a Potential Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023;10:1195464. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1195464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lin L., White S.A., Hu K. Role of p90RSK in Kidney and Other Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:972. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lin L., Shi C., Sun Z., Le N.-T., Abe J.-I., Hu K. The Ser/Thr Kinase p90RSK Promotes Kidney Fibrosis by Modulating Fibroblast-Epithelial Crosstalk. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:9901–9910. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sinha S., Haque M. Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Ultimatum to Renal Physiology. Cureus. 2022;14:e28944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hinden L., Kogot-Levin A., Tam J., Leibowitz G. Pathogenesis of Diabesity-Induced Kidney Disease: Role of Kidney Nutrient Sensing. FEBS J. 2022;289:901–921. doi: 10.1111/febs.15790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rogacka D., Piwkowska A. Beneficial Effects of Metformin on Glomerular Podocytes in Diabetes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021;192:114687. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wanner C., Inzucchi S.E., Lachin J.M., Fitchett D., von Eynatten M., Mattheus M., Johansen O.E., Woerle H.J., Broedl U.C., Zinman B., et al. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:323–334. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Herrington W.G., Staplin N., Wanner C., Green J.B., Hauske S.J., Emberson J.R., Preiss D., Judge P., Mayne K.J., et al. Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:117–127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wanner C., Heerspink H.J.L., Zinman B., Inzucchi S.E., Koitka-Weber A., Mattheus M., Hantel S., Woerle H.-J., Broedl U.C., von Eynatten M., et al. Empagliflozin and Kidney Function Decline in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Slope Analysis from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018;29:2755–2769. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018010103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group Impact of Primary Kidney Disease on the Effects of Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Secondary Analyses of the EMPA-KIDNEY Trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12:51–60. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00322-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Herrington W.G., Staplin N., Agrawal N., Wanner C., Green J.B., Hauske S.J., Emberson J.R., Preiss D., Judge P., et al. Long-Term Effects of Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025;392:777–787. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2409183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rosenstock J., Perkovic V., Johansen O.E., Cooper M.E., Kahn S.E., Marx N., Alexander J.H., Pencina M., Toto R.D., Wanner C., et al. Effect of Linagliptin vs Placebo on Major Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular and Renal Risk: The CARMELINA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321:69–79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Perkovic V., Toto R., Cooper M.E., Mann J.F.E., Rosenstock J., McGuire D.K., Kahn S.E., Marx N., Alexander J.H., Zinman B., et al. Effects of Linagliptin on Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes in People With Normal and Reduced Kidney Function: Secondary Analysis of the CARMELINA Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:1803–1812. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.International Diabetes Federation . IDF Global Clinical Practice Recommendations for Managing Type 2 Diabetes. International Diabetes Federation; Brussels, Belgium: 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Davies M.J., Aroda V.R., Collins B.S., Gabbay R.A., Green J., Maruthur N.M., Rosas S.E., Del Prato S., Mathieu C., Mingrone G., et al. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetes Care. 2022;45:2753–2786. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kwon S., Kim Y.C., Park J.Y., Lee J., An J.N., Kim C.T., Oh S., Park S., Kim D.K., Oh Y.K., et al. The Long-Term Effects of Metformin on Patients With Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:948–955. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.El-Damanawi R., Stanley I.K., Staatz C., Pascoe E.M., Craig J.C., Johnson D.W., Mallett A.J., Hawley C.M., Milanzi E., Hiemstra T.F., et al. Metformin for Preventing the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2024;6:CD013414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013414.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guo W., Li H., Li Y., Kong W. Renal Intrinsic Cells Remodeling in Diabetic Kidney Disease and the Regulatory Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023;165:115025. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kawanami D., Takashi Y., Takahashi H., Motonaga R., Tanabe M. Renoprotective Effects of DPP-4 Inhibitors. Antioxidants. 2021;10:246. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alicic R.Z., Cox E.J., Neumiller J.J., Tuttle K.R. Incretin Drugs in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2021;17:227–244. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-00367-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kleibert M., Zygmunciak P., Łakomska K., Mila K., Zgliczyński W., Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska B. Insight into the Molecular Mechanism of Diabetic Kidney Disease and the Role of Metformin in Its Pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:13038. doi: 10.3390/ijms241713038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Huang B., Wen W. Metformin Attenuates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Mechanistic Insights and Future Perspectives. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2025;57:3701–3707. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04562-7. Correction in Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2026, 58, 1889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04799-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Z., Zhou J., Lu M., Liang Y., Jiang Z., Chen K. Therapy of Empagliflozin plus Metformin on T2DM Mice Shows No Higher Amelioration for Glucose and Lipid Metabolism than Empagliflozin Monotherapy. Life Sci. 2019;232:116622. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Harada M., Han S., Shi M., Ge J., Yu S., Adam J., Adamski J., Scheerer M.F., Neschen S., de Angelis M.H., et al. Metabolic Effects of SGLT2i and Metformin on 3-Hydroxybutyric Acid and Lactate in Db/Db Mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;265:130962. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lin B., Koibuchi N., Hasegawa Y., Sueta D., Toyama K., Uekawa K., Ma M., Nakagawa T., Kusaka H., Kim-Mitsuyama S. Glycemic Control with Empagliflozin, a Novel Selective SGLT2 Inhibitor, Ameliorates Cardiovascular Injury and Cognitive Dysfunction in Obese and Type 2 Diabetic Mice. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2014;13:148. doi: 10.1186/s12933-014-0148-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lu J., Liu J., Zhang L., Wang X., Zhang Y., Tang Q. Morphological and Functional Characterization of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy in Db/Db Mice Following Exercise, Metformin Alone, or Combination Treatments. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;584:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sharkovska Y., Reichetzeder C., Alter M., Tsuprykov O., Bachmann S., Secher T., Klein T., Hocher B. Blood Pressure and Glucose Independent Renoprotective Effects of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibition in a Mouse Model of Type-2 Diabetic Nephropathy. J. Hypertens. 2014;32:2211–2223; discussion 2223. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ma M., Hasegawa Y., Koibuchi N., Toyama K., Uekawa K., Nakagawa T., Lin B., Kim-Mitsuyama S. DPP-4 Inhibition with Linagliptin Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment and Brain Atrophy Induced by Transient Cerebral Ischemia in Type 2 Diabetic Mice. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2015;14:54. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0218-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kalyani R.R., Neumiller J.J., Maruthur N.M., Wexler D.J. Diagnosis and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: A Review. JAMA. 2025;334:984–1002. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.5956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang B., Chandrasekera P.C., Pippin J.J. Leptin- and Leptin Receptor-Deficient Rodent Models: Relevance for Human Type 2 Diabetes. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2014;10:131–145. doi: 10.2174/1573399810666140508121012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hu W., Zhu H., Gong F. Leptin and Leptin Resistance in Obesity: Current Evidence, Mechanisms and Future Directions. Endocr. Connect. 2025;14:e250521. doi: 10.1530/EC-25-0521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pham T.K., Nguyen T.H.T., Yi J.M., Kim G.S., Yun H.R., Kim H.K., Won J.C. Evogliptin, a DPP-4 Inhibitor, Prevents Diabetic Cardiomyopathy by Alleviating Cardiac Lipotoxicity in Db/Db Mice. Exp. Mol. Med. 2023;55:767–778. doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-00958-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Takahashi H., Nomiyama T., Terawaki Y., Horikawa T., Kawanami T., Hamaguchi Y., Tanaka T., Motonaga R., Fukuda T., Tanabe M., et al. Combined Treatment with DPP-4 Inhibitor Linagliptin and SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Attenuates Neointima Formation after Vascular Injury in Diabetic Mice. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2019;18:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yu X., Meng Z., Fang T., Liu X., Cheng Y., Xu L., Liu X., Li X., Xue M., Li T., et al. Empagliflozin Inhibits Hepatic Gluconeogenesis and Increases Glycogen Synthesis by AMPK/CREB/GSK3β Signalling Pathway. Front. Physiol. 2022;13:817542. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.817542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Xue M., Li T., Wang Y., Chang Y., Cheng Y., Lu Y., Liu X., Xu L., Li X., Yu X., et al. Empagliflozin Prevents Cardiomyopathy via sGC-cGMP-PKG Pathway in Type 2 Diabetes Mice. Clin. Sci. 2019;133:1705–1720. doi: 10.1042/CS20190585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen J., Zhang S., You Y., Hu S., Tang J., Chen C., Wen W., Tang T., Yu Q., Tong X., et al. Investigating the Impact of Empagliflozin on the Retina of Diabetic Mice. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2025;35:252–261. doi: 10.1177/11206721241247585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sharma N., Liu W., Tsai X.-Q.E., Wang Z., Outtrim C., Tang A., Pieper M.P., Reinhart G.A., Huang Y. A Novel Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Activator, Avenciguat, in Combination with Empagliflozin, Protects against Renal and Hepatic Injury in Diabetic Db/Db Mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025;328:E362–E376. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00254.2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Martos-Guillami N., Vergara A., Llorens-Cebrià C., Motto A.E., Martínez-Díaz I., Gonçalves F., Garcias-Ramis M.M., Allo-Urzainqui E., Narváez A., Bermejo S., et al. SGLT2i and GLP1-RA Exert Additive Cardiorenal Protection with a RAS Blocker in Uninephrectomized Db/Db Mice. Front. Pharmacol. 2024;15:1415879. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1415879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gong Q., Zhang R., Wei F., Fang J., Zhang J., Sun J., Sun Q., Wang H. SGLT2 Inhibitor-Empagliflozin Treatment Ameliorates Diabetic Retinopathy Manifestations and Exerts Protective Effects Associated with Augmenting Branched Chain Amino Acids Catabolism and Transportation in Db/Db Mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022;152:113222. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tu Y., Li Q., Zhou Y., Ye Z., Wu C., Xie E., Li Y., Li P., Wu Y., Guo Z., et al. Empagliflozin Inhibits Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Reduces Cardiac Pericyte Loss in Db/Db Mice. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:995216. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.995216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Matsui T., Sotokawauchi A., Nishino Y., Koga Y., Yamagishi S.-I. Empagliflozin Ameliorates Renal and Metabolic Derangements in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Mice by Blocking Advanced Glycation End Product-Receptor Axis. Mol. Med. 2025;31:88. doi: 10.1186/s10020-025-01138-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cheong A.J.Y., Teo Y.N., Teo Y.H., Syn N.L., Ong H.T., Ting A.Z.H., Chia A.Z.Q., Chong E.Y., Chan M.Y., Lee C.-H., et al. SGLT Inhibitors on Weight and Body Mass: A Meta-Analysis of 116 Randomized-Controlled Trials. Obesity. 2022;30:117–128. doi: 10.1002/oby.23331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sharma K., McCue P., Dunn S.R. Diabetic Kidney Disease in the Db/Db Mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2003;284:F1138–F1144. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00315.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tesch G.H., Lim A.K.H. Recent Insights into Diabetic Renal Injury from the Db/Db Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2011;300:F301–F310. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00607.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Klimontov V.V., Korbut A.I., Taskaeva I.S., Bgatova N.P., Dashkin M.V., Orlov N.B., Khotskina A.S., Zavyalov E.L., Klein T. Empagliflozin Alleviates Podocytopathy and Enhances Glomerular Nephrin Expression in Db/Db Diabetic Mice. World J. Diabetes. 2020;11:596–610. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v11.i12.596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yang K., Liang W., Hu H., Zhang Z., Hao Y., Song Z., Yang L., Hu J., Chen Z., Ding G. ESRRA Modulation by Empagliflozin Mitigates Diabetic Tubular Injury via Mitochondrial Restoration. Cell. Signal. 2024;122:111308. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2024.111308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gavrilova Y.S., Bgatova N.P., Klimontov V.V., Ischenko I.Y., Michurina S.V., Myakina N.E., Zavyalov E.L. Effect of Linagliptin on Structural Changes in the Kidney in Experimental Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2016;161:501–504. doi: 10.1007/s10517-016-3447-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xie D., Zhu Y., Guo S., Li H., Wang Z., Wang X., Cai Y., Chai J., Wang Y., Hu Z., et al. The Metformin Mediated MAPK Signaling Pathway Influences D-Xylose Regulation during Diabetic Kidney Disease Therapy. Commun. Med. 2025;5:454. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01152-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xu H.-D., Qin Z.-H. Beclin 1, Bcl-2 and Autophagy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019;1206:109–126. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0602-4_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Eskandari E., Eaves C.J. Paradoxical Roles of Caspase-3 in Regulating Cell Survival, Proliferation, and Tumorigenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2022;221:e202201159. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202201159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hu Q., Saleem K., Pandey J., Charania A.N., Zhou Y., He C. Cell Adhesion Molecules in Fibrotic Diseases. Biomedicines. 2023;11:1995. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nady M.E., Abd El-Raouf O.M., El-Sayed E.-S.M. Linagliptin Mitigates TGF-Β1 Mediated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Tacrolimus-Induced Renal Interstitial Fibrosis via Smad/ERK/P38 and HIF-1α/LOXL2 Signaling Pathways. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2024;47:1008–1020. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b23-00737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Guan M., Li W., Xu L., Zeng Y., Wang D., Zheng Z., Lyv F., Xue Y. Metformin Improves Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by TGF-Β1 in Renal Tubular Epithelial NRK-52E Cells via Inhibiting Egr-1. J. Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:1031367. doi: 10.1155/2018/1031367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang M., Weng X., Guo J., Chen Z., Jiang G., Liu X. Metformin Alleviated EMT and Fibrosis after Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats. Ren. Fail. 2016;38:614–621. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2016.1149770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Thakur S., Viswanadhapalli S., Kopp J.B., Shi Q., Barnes J.L., Block K., Gorin Y., Abboud H.E. Activation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Prevents TGF-Β1-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Myofibroblast Activation. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:2168–2180. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dou Z., Chattopadhyay M., Pan J.-A., Guerriero J.L., Jiang Y.-P., Ballou L.M., Yue Z., Lin R.Z., Zong W.-X. The Class IA Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase P110-Beta Subunit Is a Positive Regulator of Autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2010;191:827–843. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gonzalez C.D., Carro Negueruela M.P., Nicora Santamarina C., Resnik R., Vaccaro M.I. Autophagy Dysregulation in Diabetic Kidney Disease: From Pathophysiology to Pharmacological Interventions. Cells. 2021;10:2497. doi: 10.3390/cells10092497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yu J., Liu Y., Li H., Zhang P. Pathophysiology of Diabetic Kidney Disease and Autophagy: A Review. Medicine. 2023;102:e33965. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Korbut A.I., Taskaeva I.S., Bgatova N.P., Muraleva N.A., Orlov N.B., Dashkin M.V., Khotskina A.S., Zavyalov E.L., Konenkov V.I., Klein T., et al. SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin and DPP4 Inhibitor Linagliptin Reactivate Glomerular Autophagy in Db/Db Mice, a Model of Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:2987. doi: 10.3390/ijms21082987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sun D., Li H., Du Y., Chen Y., Yao L., Wang L. Metformin Modulates Mitochondrial Autophagy in Renal Tubular Epithelial Injury Induced by High Glucose via the Keap1/Nrf2 Pathway. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2024;479:2483–2496. doi: 10.1007/s11010-023-04843-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhu H., Jia Z., Li Y.R., Danelisen I. Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Metformin: Latest Advances and Therapeutic Implications. Clin. Exp. Med. 2023;23:2941–2951. doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-01051-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Song A., Zhang C., Meng X. Mechanism and Application of Metformin in Kidney Diseases: An Update. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021;138:111454. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zheng S., Liu J., Han Q., Huang S., Su W., Fu J., Jia X., Du S., Zhou Y., Zhang X., et al. Metformin Induces Renal Medullary Interstitial Cell Apoptosis in Type 2 Diabetic Mice. J. Diabetes. 2014;6:132–146. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Salami R., Salami M., Mafi A., Aarabi M.-H., Vakili O., Asemi Z. Possible Mechanisms and Molecular Signaling of Incretins against the Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2023;16:448–464. doi: 10.2174/1874467215666220829102020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wu T.-J., Hsieh Y.-J., Lu C.-W., Lee C.-J., Hsu B.-G. Linagliptin Protects against Endotoxin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Rats by Decreasing Inflammatory Cytokines and Reactive Oxygen Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:11190. doi: 10.3390/ijms222011190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wan L., Qian Y., Ni W., Lu Y., Li W., Pan Y., Chen W. Linagliptin improves diabetic kidney disease in rats by promoting mitochondrial biogenesis through the AMPK/PGC-1α/TFAM pathway. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023;43:2053–2060. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.12.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Korbut A.I., Romanov V.V., Klimontov V.V. Urinary Excretion of Biomolecules Related to Cell Cycle, Proliferation, and Autophagy in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Biomedicines. 2024;12:487. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yang Z., Xie C., Xu W., Liu G., Cao X., Li W., Chen J., Zhu Y., Luo S., Luo Z., et al. Phosphorylation and Inactivation of PTEN at Residues Ser380/Thr382/383 Induced by Helicobacter Pylori Promotes Gastric Epithelial Cell Survival through PI3K/Akt Pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6:31916–31926. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen J.-K., Nagai K., Chen J., Plieth D., Hino M., Xu J., Sha F., Ikizler T.A., Quarles C.C., Threadgill D.W., et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signaling Determines Kidney Size. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:2429–2444. doi: 10.1172/JCI78945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lee Y.-R., Chen M., Pandolfi P.P. The Functions and Regulation of the PTEN Tumour Suppressor: New Modes and Prospects. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:547–562. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ruvinsky I., Sharon N., Lerer T., Cohen H., Stolovich-Rain M., Nir T., Dor Y., Zisman P., Meyuhas O. Ribosomal Protein S6 Phosphorylation Is a Determinant of Cell Size and Glucose Homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2199–2211. doi: 10.1101/gad.351605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hutchinson J.A., Shanware N.P., Chang H., Tibbetts R.S. Regulation of Ribosomal Protein S6 Phosphorylation by Casein Kinase 1 and Protein Phosphatase 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:8688–8696. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.141754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Xu J., Chen J., Dong Z., Meyuhas O., Chen J.-K. Phosphorylation of Ribosomal Protein S6 Mediates Compensatory Renal Hypertrophy. Kidney Int. 2015;87:543–556. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wu H., Chen J., Xu J., Dong Z., Meyuhas O., Chen J.-K. Blocking rpS6 Phosphorylation Exacerbates Tsc1 Deletion-Induced Kidney Growth. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;27:1145–1158. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014121264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Li F., Fang Y., Zhuang Q., Cheng M., Moronge D., Jue H., Meyuhas O., Ding X., Zhang Z., Chen J.-K., et al. Blocking Ribosomal Protein S6 Phosphorylation Inhibits Podocyte Hypertrophy and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. 2022;102:121–135. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.02.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Strunz C.M.C., Roggerio A., Cruz P.L., Benvenuti L.A., Irigoyen M.C., Mansur A.d.P. Resveratrol Attenuates Fibrosis and Alters Signaling Pathways in Diabetic Cardiac and Skeletal Muscles and Adipose Tissue Without Reversing Structural Damage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:1672. doi: 10.3390/ijms26041672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Meyuhas O. Chapter 1 Physiological Roles of Ribosomal Protein S6: One of Its Kind. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008;268:1–37. doi: 10.1016/s1937-6448(08)00801-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Upadhyay A. SGLT2 Inhibitors and Kidney Protection: Mechanisms Beyond Tubuloglomerular Feedback. Kidney360. 2024;5:771–782. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kurtzeborn K., Kwon H.N., Kuure S. MAPK/ERK Signaling in Regulation of Renal Differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1779. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Thompson T., Danilenko M., Vassilev L., Studzinski G.P. Tumor Suppressor P53 Status Does Not Determine the Differentiation-Associated G1 Cell Cycle Arrest Induced in Leukemia Cells by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and Antioxidants. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010;10:344–350. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.4.12366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wu M., Wan Q., Dan X., Wang Y., Chen P., Chen C., Li Y., Yao X., He M.-L. Targeting Ser78 Phosphorylation of Hsp27 Achieves Potent Antiviral Effects against Enterovirus A71 Infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2024;13:2368221. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2368221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Guo Y., Kamara S., Zhang J., Wen H., Zheng M., Liu Y., Zhou L., Chen J., Zhu S., Zhang L. EBV LMP1-C Terminal Binding Affibody Molecule Downregulates MEK/ERK/p90RSK Pathway and Inhibits the Proliferation of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells in Mouse Tumor Xenograft Models. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022;12:1078504. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1078504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Sorokin A. Endothelin in Renal Physiology and Disease; Contributions to Nephrology. Volume 172. Karger Publishers; Basel, Switzerland: 2011. Endothelin Signaling and Actions in the Renal Mesangium; pp. 50–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Huang H., Ni H., Ma K., Zou J. ANGPTL2 Regulates Autophagy through the MEK/ERK/Nrf-1 Pathway and Affects the Progression of Renal Fibrosis in Diabetic Nephropathy. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11:5472–5486. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Lee Y.H., Kim S.H., Kang J.M., Heo J.H., Kim D.-J., Park S.H., Sung M., Kim J., Oh J., Yang D.H., et al. Empagliflozin Attenuates Diabetic Tubulopathy by Improving Mitochondrial Fragmentation and Autophagy. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2019;317:F767–F780. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00565.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jakhotia S., Sivaprasad M., Shalini T., Reddy P.Y., Viswanath K., Jakhotia K., Sahay R., Sahay M., Reddy G.B. Circulating Levels of Hsp27 in Microvascular Complications of Diabetes: Prospects as a Biomarker of Diabetic Nephropathy. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32:221–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Irfan M., Abid F., Azhar A., Farooqui M.U., Fatima U., Subhan M. THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN-27 AND MICROALBUMIN: COVARIATE OF EARLY DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY. J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad. 2024;36:40–44. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-01-12499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chebotareva N., Bobkova I., Shilov E. Heat Shock Proteins and Kidney Disease: Perspectives of HSP Therapy. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2017;22:319–343. doi: 10.1007/s12192-017-0790-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Engeland K. Cell Cycle Regulation: P53-P21-RB Signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:946–960. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00988-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Overstreet J.M., Gifford C.C., Tang J., Higgins P.J., Samarakoon R. Emerging Role of Tumor Suppressor P53 in Acute and Chronic Kidney Diseases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022;79:474. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04505-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bao Y.-N., Yang Q., Shen X.-L., Yu W.-K., Zhou L., Zhu Q.-R., Shan Q.-Y., Wang Z.-C., Cao G. Targeting Tumor Suppressor P53 for Organ Fibrosis Therapy. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15:336. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-06702-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kim S., Han J.-H., Kim S., Lee H., Kim J.-R., Lim J.H., Woo C.-H. p90RSK Inhibition Ameliorates TGF-Β1 Signaling and Pulmonary Fibrosis by Inhibiting Smad3 Transcriptional Activity. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2020;54:195–210. doi: 10.33594/000000214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Jin Y., Huynh D.T.N., Kang K.W., Myung C.-S., Heo K.-S. Inhibition of p90RSK Activation Sensitizes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells to Cisplatin by Inhibiting Proliferation, Migration and EMT. BMB Rep. 2019;52:706–711. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.12.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wang Y., Jin M., Cheng C.K., Li Q. Tubular Injury in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Perspectives. Front. Endocrinol. 2023;14:1238927. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1238927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Korbut A.I., Ananishnikova E.A., Bgatova N.P., Muraleva N.A., Klimontov V.V. Empagliflozin Alleviates Changes in Renal Expression of E- and N-Cadherins in Mice with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2026;180:288–292. doi: 10.1007/s10517-026-06622-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ghomlaghi M., Hart A., Hoang N., Shin S., Nguyen L.K. Feedback, Crosstalk and Competition: Ingredients for Emergent Non-Linear Behaviour in the PI3K/mTOR Signalling Network. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:6944. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Klomp J.E., Klomp J.A., Der C.J. The ERK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Network: The Final Frontier in RAS Signal Transduction. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2021;49:253–267. doi: 10.1042/BST20200507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gagliardi P.A., Pertz O. The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Network, Wired to Dynamically Function at Multiple Scales. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2024;88:102368. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2024.102368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Graham H., Chandler D.J., Dunbar S.A. The Genesis and Evolution of Bead-Based Multiplexing. Methods. 2019;158:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Pang K., Wang W., Qin J.-X., Shi Z.-D., Hao L., Ma Y.-Y., Xu H., Wu Z.-X., Pan D., Chen Z.-S., et al. Role of Protein Phosphorylation in Cell Signaling, Disease, and the Intervention Therapy. MedComm. 2022;3:e175. doi: 10.1002/mco2.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Percie du Sert N., Ahluwalia A., Alam S., Avey M.T., Baker M., Browne W.J., Clark A., Cuthill I.C., Dirnagl U., Emerson M., et al. Reporting Animal Research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Fortes M.A.S., Marzuca-Nassr G.N., Vitzel K.F., da Justa Pinheiro C.H., Newsholme P., Curi R. Housekeeping Proteins: How Useful Are They in Skeletal Muscle Diabetes Studies and Muscle Hypertrophy Models? Anal. Biochem. 2016;504:38–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Jasińska-Stroschein M. Animal Models for Preclinical Research on Multifactorial Human Conditions: The Case of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2025;189:118269. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kitada M., Ogura Y., Koya D. Rodent Models of Diabetic Nephropathy: Their Utility and Limitations. Int. J. Nephrol. Renov. Dis. 2016;9:279–290. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S103784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Luo W., Tang S., Xiao X., Luo S., Yang Z., Huang W., Tang S. Translation Animal Models of Diabetic Kidney Disease: Biochemical and Histological Phenotypes, Advantages and Limitations. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2023;16:1297–1321. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S408170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Tahara A., Takasu T., Yokono M., Imamura M., Kurosaki E. Characterization and Comparison of SGLT2 Inhibitors: Part 3. Effects on Diabetic Complications in Type 2 Diabetic Mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017;809:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Thomas L., Eckhardt M., Langkopf E., Tadayyon M., Himmelsbach F., Mark M. (R)-8-(3-Amino-Piperidin-1-Yl)-7-but-2-Ynyl-3-Methyl-1-(4-Methyl-Quinazolin-2-Ylmethyl)-3,7-Dihydro-Purine-2,6-Dione (BI 1356), a Novel Xanthine-Based Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor, Has a Superior Potency and Longer Duration of Action Compared with Other Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008;325:175–182. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.135723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Jeong Y.-S., Jusko W.J. Meta-Assessment of Metformin Absorption and Disposition Pharmacokinetics in Nine Species. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:545. doi: 10.3390/ph14060545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Shi J., Hu Y., Shao G., Zhu Y., Zhao Z., Xu Y., Zhang Z., Wu H. Quantifying Podocyte Number in a Small Sample Size of Glomeruli with CUBIC to Evaluate Podocyte Depletion of Db/Db Mice. J. Diabetes Res. 2023;2023:1901105. doi: 10.1155/2023/1901105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Rangan G.K., Tesch G.H. Quantification of Renal Pathology by Image Analysis. Nephrology. 2007;12:553–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Viana D.L., Alladagbin D.J., Dos-Santos W.L.C., Figueira C.P. A Comparative Study of Human Glomerular Basement Membrane Thickness Using Direct Measurement and Orthogonal Intercept Methods. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23:23. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02634-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ijms-27-06483-s001.zip (374.3KB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES