Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Jul 28;17:7572. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-76019-z

Table-top all-attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy

Mikhail Volkov 1,#, Evaldas Svirplys 1,#, Stefanos Carlström 1,#, Serguei Patchkovskii 1, Misha Yu Ivanov 1, Marc J J Vrakking 1, Bernd Schütte 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13415544  PMID: 42521689

Abstract

Attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (ATAS) has emerged as a powerful technique within the field of attosecond science, combining extremely high temporal and excellent spectral resolution. So far, ATAS has been implemented in pump-probe experiments where an attosecond extreme-ultraviolet (XUV) pump or probe pulse was combined with a near-infrared (NIR) pulse in the femtosecond range, with the attosecond time resolution deriving from sub-cycle NIR-driven dynamics. Investigations of ultrafast electron dynamics in atoms, molecules and solids, with potential impact across physics, chemistry, and biology, would benefit significantly from the ability to perform all-attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (AATAS). Here we demonstrate time-resolved AATAS using a table-top high-harmonic generation (HHG) source. The method is applied to investigate previously unresolved electronic coherences in Xe, revealing oscillatory valence hole motion with a 3-femtosecond period. In addition, systematic investigations of electron dynamics in Kr, Ar, and Ne are presented. Our work shows that, thanks to its broad bandwidth, high stability and easy accessibility, HHG is an ideal source for AATAS, offering the potential for replication in numerous laboratories.

Subject terms: Attosecond science, Atomic and molecular interactions with photons


Despite advances in attosecond spectroscopy methods, observation of electron dynamics on natural timescales remains challenging due to the use of near-infrared pulses. Here, the authors demonstrate time-resolved all-attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy of Xe+ ions and other atoms by means of XUV pulses from high-harmonic generation as both pump and probe.

Introduction

Electronic processes play a fundamental role in pivotal areas such as biology1 and information technology2. The emergence of attosecond science3–5 at the turn of this century has made it possible to investigate electron dynamics on extremely short timescales. To date, most attosecond pump-probe experiments have paired an attosecond pump or probe pulse with a femtosecond replica of the NIR driver pulse used to generate the attosecond pulses. This approach has resulted in an impressive body of work, subject to two significant limitations, namely (i) the strong NIR laser fields that are commonly used in two-color attosecond experiments are useful if one wishes to investigate field-driven effects, but hinder the observation of electron dynamics that is inherent to the system under investigation, and (ii) the typical ≥3 fs duration of the NIR pulses used makes it difficult to observe dynamics that occur on 1–5 fs timescales. For example, while coherent hole motion could previously be observed in Kr+ (τ = 6.3 fs) and in doubly- and triply-charged ions6,7, it was not possible to observe coherent hole motion in Xe+ (τ = 3.2 fs).

The most direct approach to studying electron dynamics on its natural timescale is attosecond-pump attosecond-probe spectroscopy (APAPS). APAPS requires the generation of intense attosecond pulses in order to ensure a sufficiently high excitation probability with the pump and/or probe pulse, which has limited its widespread and routine implementation. Thus far, a few proof-of-concept APAPS experiments have been demonstrated using table-top HHG sources8–10. These experiments relied on ion spectroscopy, which is straightforward to implement while providing indirect insight into the underlying electron dynamics. Following the first demonstration of attosecond pulses in refs. 3,4, electron spectroscopy has proven very effective for studying attosecond electron dynamics within XUV-NIR experiments11–13. Recently, the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) free-electron laser was used for the first APAPS experiments employing electron spectroscopy14,15. The approach poses several challenges. For example, it is difficult in electron spectroscopy to achieve both the temporal and spectral resolution needed to measure attosecond or few-femtosecond electronic coherences, which arise from the excitation of coherent superpositions of quantum states whose energy differences determine their oscillation periods. In addition, space charge effects limit electron spectroscopy to dilute samples, meaning that APAPS based on charged particle detection is not suitable to study electron dynamics in liquids and solids.

Attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (ATAS) overcomes these limitations, as it offers extremely high temporal resolution alongside excellent spectral resolution. Initially, ATAS was employed to observe coherent electron motion in atoms16, and it has since proven highly effective in studying ultrafast electron dynamics in atoms, molecules and solids17–21. Two-color XUV + NIR ATAS is subject to the afore-mentioned limitations (i) and (ii). Therefore, the development of all-attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (AATAS) is highly desirable. AATAS overcomes limitations (i) and (ii) and, as an additional benefit, permits the inclusion of element-specific excitation from valence and core levels in both the pump and the probe step of the experiment. A first AATAS experiment was recently carried out at LCLS, although the observation was limited to a single time delay22.

Here we demonstrate time-resolved AATAS using attosecond extreme-ultraviolet (XUV) pulses as both the pump and probe. Utilizing a table-top HHG source, we achieve an inherently broad XUV bandwidth that is ideally suited for AATAS. Leveraging highly stable experimental conditions, previously unresolved coherent electron wavepacket motion in Xe⁺ ions is observed in real time. Moreover, we observe an out-of-phase oscillation of inner- and outer-shell excitation absorption lines in Ne+, which is rationalized with the help of an orbital picture of the coherent hole wavepacket motion.

Results

The peak power of attosecond pulses generated at FELs exceeds that of HHG by several orders of magnitude15,23. However, a more relevant consideration is to compare the photon fluence of the pump pulse, Fϒ, in each laser shot, to the saturation fluence, Fϒ,sat = 1/σ, where σ is the photoionization cross section. In our experiment Fϒ = 2.5 × 1016/cm2, which is close to Fϒ,sat = 2.9 × 1016/cm2 in the case of Ar and 4.6×1016/ cm2 in the case of Xe (using σAr = 34.75 Mb and σXe = 21.53 Mb at 24 eV24). Further increasing the pump photon fluence would thus not significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the data obtained in a pump-probe experiment. On the contrary, higher intensities would lead to excessive multiphoton absorption (see Supplementary Fig. 7), which is undesirable. It is noteworthy that, with a pump-laser-induced differential absorbance on the order of a few percent, the transient signal changes observed in our experiments and in the experiments performed at LCLS22 are comparable. In contrast to the pump pulse fluence, the probe pulse fluence does not affect the magnitude of the differential absorbance.

Once the pump photon fluence approaches the saturation fluence, further improvements of the SNR depend primarily on a reduction of and averaging over fluctuations of the experimental conditions. Key factors then are (i) the repetition rate at which the attosecond pulses are generated, (ii) the acquisition time over which data can be collected, and (iii) the stability of the attosecond pulses. While both HHG and FEL sources used for APAPS may in future be operated at multi-kHz or even MHz repetition10,15,23,25, HHG offers major advantages in terms of the available acquisition time and the stability. This directly expands the range of scientific questions that can be addressed.

In our laboratory, we made systematic efforts to improve the signal-to-noise ratio in AATAS measurements. Near-infrared (NIR) pulses with an energy of 9 mJ and a duration of 37 fs were obtained from a commercial Ti:sapphire laser system operated at 1 kHz. This exceeds the repetition rate used in earlier APAPS experiments by 1–2 orders of magnitude8,9,15,22. To be able to generate near-isolated attosecond pulses, these NIR pulses were compressed to 3.7 fs using a three-stage compressor in a non-guided geometry, giving a pulse energy of 4.9 mJ. This approach resulted in an excellent single-shot NIR pulse energy stability of 0.17% r.m.s.26. Further measures to improve the stability included a three-stage beam pointing stabilization system, temperature and humidity stabilization, as well as vibration damping.

To maximize the transient signal changes in our AATAS experiments, an HHG scheme was chosen that optimized the XUV intensity rather than the XUV pulse energy27. This was achieved using an 18-m-long HHG beamline (Fig. 1a). The compressed NIR pulses were focused into an HHG cell using a telescope with an effective focal length of 3.5 m. The HHG efficiency was optimized by exploiting propagation effects of the NIR pulses in the HHG medium28, resulting in an XUV pulse energy of about 200 nJ at the source26. By choosing a distance of 13 m between the HHG source and the XUV focusing mirrors with a focal length of 5 cm, a large demagnification of the XUV source size was achieved. The pump and probe pulses were selected using two spherical XUV half-mirrors mounted on a split-and-delay unit. The obtained beam waist radii of the XUV pump pulses were 1.3 and 1.6 µm in the vertical and horizontal directions, respectively (Fig. 1c). The spatial chirp in the XUV focal plane was found to be negligible (see Supplementary Section 2). By taking into account the temporal attosecond pulse structure (Fig. 1d) and the pump pulse energy of 3.1 nJ, the XUV pump intensity was estimated as 2.8 × 1014 W/cm2, corresponding to the afore-mentioned photon fluence of 2.5 × 1016/cm2. An XUV spectrometer was utilized to individually record the pump and the probe spectra with a spectral resolution between 30 and 70 meV. XUV spectra before and after absorption in Ar are displayed in Fig. 1b.

Fig. 1. Experimental AATAS layout.

Fig. 1

a Schematic of the experiment. HHG is performed by focusing a near-infrared (NIR) beam into a gas cell filled with Xe. A telescope with an effective focal length of 3.5 m, consisting of a concave mirror (f = −1 m) and a convex mirror (f = 0.75 m) is used to focus the pulses. Following attenuation of the NIR pulses using a 100-nm-thick aluminum (Al) filter, a split-and-delay unit (SDU) is employed 13 m downstream. The SDU consists of a nano-positioning stage and two spherical multilayer half-mirrors (focal length: 5 cm) with a reflectivity optimized in the 16–30 eV region. The SDU creates two replicas of the XUV pulse and allows for variation of their relative time delay. Absorption occurs in an effusive gas jet with a full-width at half maximum of 46 µm. A turning mirror directs both the XUV pump and probe beams onto a grating, where they are diffracted onto a microchannel plate (MCP) / phosphor screen assembly. b Spectra of the XUV pump pulse before (violet-shaded area) and after absorption in Ar (blue-shaded area). c Focal profiles of the XUV pump beam in the vertical (blue) and horizontal (violet) directions, respectively, as measured using a knife-edge technique. The circles correspond to the measured transmission, which is fitted to a Gaussian profile (solid curves). The XUV pump beam waist radii in the vertical and horizontal directions are 1.3 and 1.6 µm, respectively. d Temporal profile of the near-isolated attosecond pulses, as obtained by an autocorrelation measurement in Ar atoms26.

The attosecond pump pulse ionized Xe, creating Xe+ ions in a superposition of the spin–orbit ground and excited states (Fig. 2a), thereby initiating coherent hole motion. The energy splitting between the two spin–orbit states, 5p3/25 and 5p1/25, is 1.306  eV29, corresponding to an oscillation period of 3.17 fs.

Fig. 2. Observation of coherent electron motion in Xe+.

Fig. 2

a The attosecond pump pulse generates Xe+ ions in the ground and spin–orbit excited states, 5p3/25 and 5p1/25. The probe pulse resonantly excites the ions from these two spin–orbit states to higher-lying Rydberg states converging on Xe2+. b Transient changes of the optical density (OD) as a function of the photon energy and the time delay between the XUV pump and probe pulses. The data represent the average of five independent scans (n = 5). The attosecond pump pulse ionizes a fraction of the neutral Xe atoms in the focal volume, resulting in broadband reduction of the absorption of the probe pulse (shown in blue) when this pulse arrives after the pump pulse (positive time delays). In addition, narrow absorption features are visible, corresponding to resonant absorption in Xe+. The two transitions that are indicated by the arrows correspond to excitation from each of the two spin–orbit states to the 5p46d3/2 state. c OD changes in the spectral region from 16.0 to 16.1 eV, corresponding to excitation from the 5p1/25 state to the 5p46d3/2 state. The data were fitted by a sinusoidal function (solid curve), giving an oscillation period 3.1 ± 0.1 fs, as expected from the spin–orbit splitting in Xe+. The small signal between −1 fs and 0 fs is attributed to overlap effects between the pump and probe pulses. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 2b presents an AATAS map recorded in Xe, illustrating the relative change in optical density (∆OD) as a function of probe pulse photon energy and time delay. ∆OD was calculated using reference spectra at negative time delays, meaning that the probe pulse arrives before the pump pulse. For positive time delays, when the probe pulse arrives after the pump pulse, two distinct phenomena are visible: (i) Reduced absorption is observed across a broad photon energy range (16.1−17.0 eV) due to ionization of a fraction of the neutral Xe atoms by the pump pulse, thereby decreasing the density of neutral Xe gas in the interaction region. This bleaching effect, represented by the blue regions in the AATAS map, appears as a continuous feature across the displayed photon energy range; (ii) Enhanced absorption is evident at specific photon energies corresponding to absorption resonances in Xe+ (red and white regions in the AATAS map). The two transitions that are indicated by arrows correspond to excitation from each of the two spin–orbit states to the 5p46d3/2 state. The assignment of the other features is provided in Supplementary Section 8. Integration over the spectral range of 16.0–16.1 eV (Fig. 2c), corresponding to excitation from the 5p1/25 state to the 5p46d3/2 state, reveals clear oscillations, which are attributed to coherent hole motion. The measured oscillation period of 3.1 ± 0.1 fs reflects the spin–orbit splitting in Xe+29.

The exceptional stability and robustness of our attosecond source facilitate systematic investigations of coherent hole motion. An AATAS map recorded in Ar is presented in Fig. 3a, showcasing the high quality of the recorded data, with a noise level estimated as 3 × 10−4 OD. Assignments of the spectral lines can be found in Supplementary Section 8. Clear oscillations with a 23.3 ± 0.1 fs period are observed, in agreement with the spin–orbit splitting of 0.177 eV in Ar+ 30. Integrated signals across three distinct energy regions are displayed in Fig. 3c, showing that oscillations at these different photon energies are out of phase.

Fig. 3. AATAS results in Ar and Ne.

Fig. 3

a Transient OD changes in Ar as a function of photon energy and time delay. b Corresponding Fourier map with normalized amplitudes. The vertical axis corresponds to the oscillation energy. c OD variations at three distinct photon energies (data points) and corresponding fits (solid curves), showing oscillations with a 23.3 ± 0.1 fs period. The phases of these oscillations differ across the spectrum. d AATAS map in Ne and e corresponding Fourier map. f OD changes in Ne at two different photon energies, exhibiting out-of-phase oscillations with a 42.9 ± 0.4 fs period, corresponding to the spin–orbit splitting of 0.097 eV in Ne+. Assignments of the transitions can be found in Supplementary Section 8. The error bars in (c, f) represent the standard error of the mean, calculated from 200 measurements (n = 200) for both Ar and Ne.

Performing AATAS in Ne enables access to the lowest excited states of Ne+ at 26.8 and 26.9 eV31, corresponding to excitation of a 2 s inner-valence electron into the 2p hole vacated by the ionization process, i.e., 2s22p1/25→2s12p1/26 and 2s22p3/25→2s12p1/26. Additional observed resonances around 27.8 eV correspond to the excitation of one of the remaining 2p electrons to a 3s orbital. For both types of observed resonances, the measured oscillation period of the coherent electron wavepacket motion is 42.9 ± 0.4 fs (see Fig. 3d–f), in agreement with the spin–orbit splitting of 0.097 eV in Ne+31. Interestingly, as in the afore-mentioned case of Ar, out-of-phase behavior is observed across different photon energies (Fig. 3f) and will be discussed below. In addition to the results shown here, coherent electron wavepacket motion was also measured in Kr, see Supplementary Section 5.

In order to interpret the out-of-phase oscillations observed in the Ne experiments, theoretical calculations were carried out simulating the electronic coherence resulting from the ionization process using time-dependent configuration-interaction singles32,33 by tracing out the photoelectron from the density matrix. The transient-absorption response was then computed at the single-atom level using perturbation theory34.

The dipole moments were calculated using35,36, and experimental values were used for the energies31. More details regarding the calculations are provided in Supplementary Section 9.

According to the simulations, two oscillations that occur near 26.85 eV (corresponding to the transitions from the two spin–orbit states of Ne+ to Ne+(2s2p6)J = 1/2 are in phase with each other, leading to an oscillation with high contrast (see Fig. 4a). In the spectral range near 27.75 eV, four closely spaced transitions contribute, corresponding to transitions of the two spin–orbit states of Ne+ to Ne+(2s22p43s)J = 1/2,3/237. Two of the transitions oscillate in phase with the 26.85 eV oscillations, and two of them oscillate out of phase with these oscillations. Taking into account the spectrometer resolution, a high-contrast oscillation is visible in the 26.8–26.9 eV interval, along with an out-of-phase, lower contrast oscillation in the 27.7–27.8 eV interval (Fig. 4b), in agreement with the experimental results (see Fig. 3d).

Fig. 4. Simulation of AATAS in Ne.

Fig. 4

a Transient absorption map (S, arbitrary units), calculated using perturbation theory (see Supplementary Section 9 for more details). The single-atom response has been convoluted with a Gaussian of 70 meV bandwidth to simulate the instrument response. b Lineouts of two absorption features at photon energy intervals of 26.8–26.9 eV (red curve) and at 27.7–27.8 eV (blue curve), showing out-of-phase oscillations. c The hole density oscillates between p0 and p1 character as a function of the pump-probe delay (see also Supplementary Fig. 9). The shape of this hole determines which electron transition (2s→2p0 or 2p0→3s) is more likely after excitation by a delayed probe pulse. When the hole is of p1 character, an electron transition from an occupied 2p0 orbital to an unoccupied 3s orbital is more likely (indicated by a blue arrow). In contrast, when the hole is of p0 character, electron transfer from an occupied 2s orbital to an unoccupied 2p0 orbital is maximized (red arrow), producing the out-of-phase oscillations of the two absorption features in the AATAS map.

To rationalize the out-of-phase behavior, the time-dependent hole density obtained from the calculations needs to be considered. In jj-coupling, and for m = 1/2, the two spin–orbit states are given, respectively, as ∣J=22,m=12⟩=−13∣2p0α⟩+23∣2p1β⟩ and ∣J=32,m=12⟩=23∣2p0α⟩+13∣2p1β⟩, where 2p0 and 2p1 describe l=1 holes in the n=2 shell with ml=0 and ml=1, respectively, and α and β are spin labels. Upon ionization, a partially coherent wavepacket is created in the ion. The initial shape of the hole wavefunction resembles a p0 orbital. Subsequently, the wavepacket starts to evolve and oscillates with the characteristic time period given by the spin–orbit splitting. In doing so, the shape of the hole oscillates between a dumbbell-like shape (indicated by p0 in Fig. 4c) and a doughnut-like shape (indicated by p1), with connecting intermediate shapes shown in Supplementary Fig. 9.

For the probe parameters of the experiment, three states are qualitatively relevant: the spin–orbit split ground state of the ion 2s22p5 2PJ = 3/2, 1/2 (E3/2 = 0 eV, E1/2 = 0.097 eV), the valence-excited state 2s2p6 2S1/2 (E = 26.910 eV), and the Rydberg-excited state 2s22p43s 2P1/2 (E = 27.859 eV). In a particle–hole picture of the LS coupling scheme, the valence-excited state predominantly corresponds to excitation from the 2s inner-valence orbital to the p0 outer-valence orbital. Similarly, the Rydberg-excited state is formed predominantly from excitation of the p0 orbital to the 3s orbital.

Transfer of an electron from an occupied 2s orbital to an unoccupied p0 orbital is maximized when the hole has predominantly p0 character. Given that the initial shape of the hole wavefunction resembles a p0 orbital, the oscillation around 26.85 eV therefore starts with maximum absorption near the time overlap between the pump and the probe pulses. Conversely, excitation to an unoccupied 3s orbital is maximized when the hole is localized on the doughnut (p1). For this reason, the absorption at 27.75 eV starts near a minimum and gains in strength when the hole acquires p1 character.

Discussion

In summary, we have demonstrated time-resolved all-attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (AATAS) using XUV pulses as both pump and probe. The remarkable stability of our attosecond light source allowed us to obtain high-quality data. In combination with its broad bandwidth and wide accessibility, HHG is shown to be an ideal source for AATAS. Table-top AATAS may be extended to higher photon energies in the XUV and soft X-ray ranges, enabling core-level spectroscopy in atoms and molecules. Sufficiently high intensities have already been demonstrated around 100 eV38. At higher photon energies, the use of higher repetition rates and longer acquisition times can help compensate for the lower signals resulting from lower intensities and smaller cross sections.

The presented approach can readily be replicated, as similar beamline infrastructures are available in laboratories worldwide8,9,38–44. Additionally, we have previously shown that intense XUV pulses can be generated using a compact, two-meter-long setup45, which recently enabled the first all-attosecond pump-probe experiment at a kHz repetition rate10. These advancements suggest that traditional attosecond setups can evolve into systems fully capable of performing AATAS.

Our method offers groundbreaking opportunities for exploring ultrafast electron dynamics in molecules and solids. Unlike traditional attosecond pump-probe experiments that rely on strong NIR fields, our approach eliminates the need for such fields. This enables a significantly simpler analysis and more straightforward interpretation of the observed electron dynamics. Moreover, in the field of attochemistry, our approach may be used to investigate coupled electronic and nuclear dynamics evolving during the passage through conical intersections19,46.

The noise in AATAS measurements can be further suppressed in the future by implementing advanced referencing methods47–50. Such improvements could maintain the same SNR using significantly lower XUV intensities. This is especially beneficial for the investigation of solids, as it minimizes the risk of sample degradation. Since AATAS enables specific excitation from both valence and core levels in both the pump and the probe steps, it opens the door to studying complex electron dynamics in solids. Considering that a significant number of elements have inner-shell binding energies in the spectral region of our experiment51, core-hole decay processes and charge transfer dynamics52 could be investigated directly in the time domain.

Methods

Experimental methods

A Ti:sapphire laser (Spitfire, Spectra Physics, 13 mJ, 37 fs) operating at 1 kHz was used for the experiments, and a fraction of 9 mJ of the available pulse energy was used for post-compression. A three-stage cascaded compression scheme in a non-guided geometry was utilized, generating 3.7 fs pulses with a pulse energy of 4.9 mJ26. Low single-shot pulse energy fluctuations of 0.17% were measured over half an hour. An iris with a diameter of 12 mm resulted in an optimized HHG signal, leading to an NIR pulse energy of 3.6 mJ behind the iris. High harmonics were generated in a 7.5-cm-long gas cell statically filled with Xe. To this end, the NIR pulses were loosely focused using an astigmatism-correcting telescope consisting of a convex and a concave mirror with an effective focal length of 3.5 m. After 14 m of propagation, the NIR light was attenuated using a 100-nm-thick aluminum foil (LUXEL), which is partially transparent in the XUV range. Single-shot XUV pulse energy fluctuations measured over a five-minute period yielded an r.m.s. value of 0.7%26.

A split-and-delay unit consisting of half-cut spherical XUV mirrors with a focal length of 5 cm was used to select the attosecond pump and probe pulses and to focus them. In the Xe and Kr experiments, Sc/Si multilayer mirrors with a peak reflectivity at 27 eV were used, while in the Ar and Ne experiments, B4C single-layer mirrors with a peak reflectivity at 16 eV (Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering) were used. The delay of one of the beams was varied using a closed-loop nano-positioning stage (Smaract). A closed-loop piezo-actuated mirror mount (Nanofaktur) was used to spatially overlap the pump and the probe pulses in the focus. The focal spot sizes of the XUV pump and probe beams were measured via knife-edge scans using a closed-loop three-dimensional nano-positioning stage (Smaract). The beam waist radii of the pump/probe beams were 1.3 ± 0.1 µm/1.1 ± 0.1 µm in the vertical direction and 1.6 ± 0.1 µ m/1.4 ± 0.1 µ m in the horizontal direction, respectively (see Supplementary Fig. 1). The XUV pump and probe pulse energies on target were measured as 3.1 and 2.5 nJ using an XUV photodiode (AXUV100G, OptoDiode).

The attosecond pulse structure was estimated from a cross-correlation measurement performed on ions. These data were fitted using a simple model, giving a full-width at half maximum (FWHM) pulse duration of 270 as26. In addition, pre- and post-pulses with a relative intensity of 14% were obtained from the fit. Since the carrier-envelope phase (CEP) of the laser was not stabilized, these results represent averaging over different CEP values. Taking into account the pulse energies, the focus sizes, and the pulse structure, the estimated peak intensities of the pump and the probe pulses were around 3 × 1014 W/cm2. An effusive gas jet with a FWHM diameter of 46 µm (see Supplementary Fig. 2a) was used, which was measured by scanning the jet perpendicular to the XUV propagation direction and monitoring the XUV transmission. From the static absorption in Ar, we estimated the average pressure of 85 mbar (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

After the gas jet, the XUV pump and probe beams were steered to an XUV spectrometer using a B4C-coated flat turning mirror. The spectrometer consisted of a curved-groove laminar grating (L0500-27−135, Shimadzu), which diffracted the XUV beam to a microchannel plate/phosphor screen assembly; see Fig. 1 in the main text. The XUV pump and probe spectra were spatially separated on the detector (Supplementary Fig. 3), enabling individual analysis of either of the two beams.

Theoretical methods

Reproducing the experimentally observed patterns required a two-stage approach: first a description of the initial ionization step that is responsible for creating the coherences between the different cationic cores, and second a description of the excitation of the cationic system, preparing the oscillating dipoles which are later probed in the transient-absorption scheme. Except in the small time-delay interval where the two XUV pulses overlap temporally, these two stages can be described separately.

The first step was computed using fully time-dependent calculations in the configuration-interaction singles ansatz32,33. Since the photoelectron produced in this step was not an observable, it was traced out from the total density matrix, producing the required ionic coherences. We used an effective-core potential53 to introduce relativistic corrections to the Hamiltonian such as the spin–orbit interaction.

The second step was computed using a simple perturbation-theory expression for the induced time-dependent dipole moment resulting from exciting the prepared coherent ionic wavepacket at various time delays. Experimental values for the excited state energies were used, alongside dipole moments computed using35,36 and GAMESS-US54,55.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

We thank Melanie Krause, Christoph Reiter, and Roman Peslin for technical support.

Author contributions

B.S. and M.J.J.V. conceived the experiment. B.S., M.V. and E.S. developed the experimental setup and performed the measurements. E.S. and M.V. analyzed the experimental data. S.C. and S.P. performed the theoretical calculations. M.Y.I. supervised the theoretical work. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Kai Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, project number 456137830. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, project number 471478110. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

All data used to support the claims in the article are accessible via Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.2076328456.

Code availability

The custom code used in this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Mikhail Volkov, Evaldas Svirplys, Stefanos Carlström.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-76019-z.

References

  • 1.King, W. E. et al. Ultrafast electron microscopy in materials science, biology, and chemistry. J. Appl. Phys.97, 111101 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Waser, R. (ed.) Nanoelectronics and Information Technology: Advanced Electronic Materials and Novel Devices 3rd edn (Wiley-VCH, 2012).
  • 3.Paul, P. M. et al. Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation. Science292, 1689–1692 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hentschel, M. Attosecond metrology. Nature414, 509–513 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Krausz, F. & Ivanov, M. Y. Attosecond physics. Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 163 (2009).
  • 6.Kobayashi, Y. et al. Selectivity of electronic coherence and attosecond ionization delays in strong-field double ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 233201 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wirth, A., Santra, R. & Goulielmakis, E. Real time tracing of valence-shell electronic coherences with attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Chem. Phys.414, 149–159 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tzallas, P., Skantzakis, E., Nikolopoulos, L. A. A., Tsakiris, G. D. & Charalambidis, D. Extreme-ultraviolet pump-probe studies of one-femtosecond-scale electron dynamics. Nat. Phys.7, 781–784 (2011).
  • 9.Takahashi, E. J., Lan, P., Mücke, O. D., Nabekawa, Y. & Midorikawa, K. Attosecond nonlinear optics using gigawatt-scale isolated attosecond pulses. Nat. Commun.4, 2691 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kretschmar, M. et al. Compact realization of all-attosecond pump-probe spectroscopy. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk9605 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Cavalieri, A. L. et al. Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter. Nature449, 1029–1032 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schultze, M. et al. Delay in photoemission. Science328, 1658–1662 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Drescher, M. Time-resolved atomic inner-shell spectroscopy. Nature419, 803–807 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Driver, T. et al. Attosecond response of molecules to impulsive ionization. Nat. Phys.10.1038/s41567-026-03360-x (2026).
  • 15.Guo, Z. et al. Experimental demonstration of attosecond pump–probe spectroscopy with an X-ray free-electron laser. Nat. Photonics18, 691–697 (2024).
  • 16.Goulielmakis, E. et al. Real-time observation of valence electron motion. Nature466, 739–743 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Geneaux, R., Marroux, H. J. B., Guggenmos, A., Neumark, D. M. & Leone, S. R. Transient absorption spectroscopy using high harmonic generation: a review of ultrafast X-ray dynamics in molecules and solids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.377, 20170463 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Palo, N. et al. Attosecond absorption and reflection spectroscopy of solids. APL Photonics9, 020901 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zinchenko, K. S. et al. Sub-7-femtosecond conical-intersection dynamics probed at the carbon K-edge. Science371, 489–494 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schultze, M. et al. Controlling dielectrics with the electric field of light. Nature493, 75–78 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moulet, A. et al. Soft x-ray excitonics. Science357, 1134–1138 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li, S. et al. Attosecond-pump attosecond-probe x-ray spectroscopy of liquid water. Science383, eadn6059 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Yan, J. et al. Terawatt-attosecond hard X-ray free-electron laser at high repetition rate. Nat. Photonics18, 1293–1298 (2024).
  • 24.Chan, W. F., Cooper, G., Guo, X., Burton, G. R. & Brion, C. E. Absolute optical oscillator strengths for the electronic excitation of atoms at high resolution. III. The photoabsorption of argon, krypton, and xenon. Phys. Rev. A46, 149–171 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klas, R. et al. Ultra-short-pulse high-average-power megahertz-repetition-rate coherent extreme-ultraviolet light source. PhotoniX2, 4 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sobolev, E. et al. Terawatt-level three-stage pulse compression for all-attosecond pump-probe spectroscopy. Opt. Express32, 46251–46258 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Senfftleben, B. et al. Highly non-linear ionization of atoms induced by intense high-harmonic pulses. J. Phys. Photonics2, 034001 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Major, B. et al. Propagation-assisted generation of intense few-femtosecond high-harmonic pulses. J. Phys. Photonics2, 034002 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saloman, E. B. Energy Levels and Observed Spectral Lines of Xenon, Xe I through Xe LIV. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data33, 765–921 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Saloman, E. B. Energy levels and observed spectral lines of argon, Ar II through Ar XVIII. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data39, 033101 (2010).
  • 31.Kramida, A. E. & Nave, G. The Ne II spectrum. Eur. Phys. J. At. Mol. Opt. Plasma Phys39, 331–350 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Carlström, S., Bertolino, M., Dahlström, J. M. & Patchkovskii, S. General time-dependent configuration-interaction singles. II. Atomic case. Phys. Rev. A106, 042806 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Carlström, S., Spanner, M. & Patchkovskii, S. General time-dependent configuration-interaction singles. I. Molecular case. Phys. Rev. A106, 043104 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wu, M., Chen, S., Camp, S., Schafer, K. J. & Gaarde, M. B. Theory of strong-field attosecond transient absorption. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.49, 062003 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zatsarinny, O. & Froese Fischer, C. DBSR_HF: A B-spline Dirac–Hartree–Fock program. Comput. Phys. Commun.202, 287–303 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zatsarinny, O. & Bartschat, K. Relativistic B-spline R-matrix method for electron collisions with atoms and ions: application to low-energy electron scattering from Cs. Phys. Rev. A77, 062701 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Yu., Reader, J. & Team, N. A. NIST atomic spectra database (version 5) 10.18434/T4W30F (2024).
  • 38.Bergues, B. et al. Tabletop nonlinear optics in the 100-eV spectral region. Optica5, 237–242 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jurkovičová, L. et al. Bright continuously tunable vacuum ultraviolet source for ultrafast spectroscopy. Commun. Phys.7, 1–9 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Orfanos, I. et al. Two-XUV-photon double ionization of neon. Phys. Rev. A106, 043117 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boutu, W., Auguste, T., Caumes, J. P., Merdji, H. & Carré, B. Scaling of the generation of high-order harmonics in large gas media with focal length. Phys. Rev. A84, 053819 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Manschwetus, B. et al. Two-photon double ionization of neon using an intense attosecond pulse train. Phys. Rev. A93, 061402 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang, Y. et al. Enhanced high-order harmonic generation driven by a wavefront corrected high-energy laser. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 134005 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kühn, S. et al. The ELI-ALPS facility: the next generation of attosecond sources. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 132002 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Major, B. et al. Compact intense extreme-ultraviolet source. Optica8, 960–965 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schuurman, M. S. & Stolow, A. Dynamics at conical intersections. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.69, 427–450 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zürch, M. et al. Direct and simultaneous observation of ultrafast electron and hole dynamics in germanium. Nat. Commun.8, 15734 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Géneaux, R., Chang, H.-T., Schwartzberg, A. M. & Marroux, H. J. B. Source noise suppression in attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy by edge-pixel referencing. Opt. Express29, 951–960 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Niedermayr, A. et al. Few-femtosecond dynamics of free-free opacity in optically heated metals. Phys. Rev. X12, 021045 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gutberlet, T., Chang, H.-T., Zayko, S., Sivis, M. & Ropers, C. High-sensitivity extreme-ultraviolet transient absorption spectroscopy enabled by machine learning. Opt. Express31, 39757–39764 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Moore, C. E. & Russell, H. N. Binding energies for electrons of different types. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand.48, 61 (1952). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brühwiler, P. A., Karis, O. & Mårtensson, N. Charge-transfer dynamics studied using resonant core spectroscopies. Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 703–740 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nicklass, A., Dolg, M., Stoll, H. & Preuss, H. Ab initio energy-adjusted pseudopotentials for the noble gases Ne through Xe: calculation of atomic dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities. J. Chem. Phys102, 8942–8952 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Schmidt, M. W. et al. General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J. Comput. Chem.14, 1347–1363 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gordon, M. S. & Schmidt, M. W. in Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry (eds Dykstra, C. E., Frenking, G., Kim, K. S. & Scuseria, G. E.) Ch 41 (Elsevier, 2005).
  • 56.Svirplys, E. et al. Table-top all-attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.20763284(2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data used to support the claims in the article are accessible via Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.2076328456.

The custom code used in this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES