Skip to main content
Journal of Crohn's & Colitis logoLink to Journal of Crohn's & Colitis
. 2026 Jul 30;20(7):jjag101. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjag101

Region-specific immune regulation determines differential response to JAK1 inhibition in Crohn’s disease ex vivo

Klaudia Maria Grieger 1,2,3,2, Susann Dehmel 4,5,6,2, Valerie Schröder 7,8,9, Kevin Schmidt 10,11,12, Victoria Neufeldt 13, Laura Bock 14, Dirk Schaudien 15, Ulf Kulik 16, Alexander Wagner 17, Benjamin Gundert 18, Heiko Aselmann 19, Vanessa Neuhaus 20,21,22, Armin Braun 23,24,25, Katherina Sewald 26,27,28,✉
PMCID: PMC13423239  PMID: 42531704

Abstract

Crohn’s disease (CD) remains a significant therapeutic challenge, with limited treatment options and heterogeneous clinical responses. The selective JAK1 inhibitor filgotinib has shown great potential in treating ulcerative colitis but failed to demonstrate consistent efficacy in CD, for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we address this gap using an immunocompetent ex vivo model of precision-cut intestinal slices (PCIS) from CD patients, allowing region-specific analysis of ileal and colonic responses. We reveal that colonic PCIS display strong T cell activation and are highly sensitive to filgotinib, with suppression of Th1/Th17 cytokines, oxidative stress, and STAT signaling ex vivo. In contrast, ileal PCIS exhibited predominantly innate and Th17-driven inflammation, and were less sensitive to JAK1 inhibition. These data provide a potential mechanistic explanation for the limited efficacy of filgotinib in CD clinical trials and established PCIS as a human-relevant ex vivo model for region-specific drug responses, underscoring the importance of developing therapies tailored to different segments of the gut in inflammatory bowel disease.

Keywords: precision-cut intestinal slices, Crohn’s disease, filgotinib, T cell, ex vivo, immunity

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, relapsing–remitting disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that require lifelong management and are associated with substantial morbidity.1,2 CD is clinically and immunologically heterogeneous and can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract and differs fundamentally from UC in its transmural, segmental inflammation, often affecting the terminal ileum and proximal colon.3–5 Roughly one-third of patients present with isolated ileitis, while another third show ileocolonic involvement, and a smaller subset exhibit isolated colonic disease.6,7 This anatomical variation is increasingly recognized as a determinant of therapeutic efficacy, yet the mechanistic basis for region-dependent drug responses remains unresolved.8,9 Distinct immune and pathophysiological features of ileal versus colonic CD have been demonstrated at proteomic, transcriptomic, and single-cell levels.10–15 Importantly, region-dependent efficacy has been suggested for several therapies, but most evidence derives from post-hoc analysis rather than dedicated mechanistic studies.16–19 However, whether these baseline regional differences translate into differential responsiveness to targeted therapies has not been addressed in a dedicated human tissue setting.

The standard care for CD includes corticosteroids (e.g., prednisolone),20,21 immunosuppressants (e.g., azathioprine and methotrexate),22 and biologics targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF), integrins, or IL-23.23–26 Despite these established treatments, up to 60% of patients fail to achieve or sustain remission.27–29 As a newer class of orally available small molecules, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as promising therapeutic agents targeting central pro-inflammatory pathways.30,31 The JAK family involves JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2, which interact with specific cytokine receptors to initiate signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) phosphorylation.32 This ultimately drives the transcriptional activation of immune effector genes, such as IFNG or TNF.32 Filgotinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, is approved for UC but failed to show efficacy in CD in the DIVERSITY phase III trial.33,34 This discrepancy raises a key mechanistic question as to whether inflammatory programs in ileal and colonic CD are equally dependent on JAK1 signaling. Given the known regional heterogeneity of CD, differential segment-specific sensitivity to JAK1 inhibition represents a plausible explanation for the limited efficacy of filgotinib in CD.

Here, we directly tested whether ileal and colonic CD differ in their responsiveness to JAK1 inhibition. To achieve this, we used precision-cut intestinal slices (PCIS) from patient-derived human tissue, which preserves native tissue architecture and multicellular immune complexity ex vivo. We hypothesized that regional immune programs in terminal ileum and colon differ in their dependence on JAK1 signaling and therefore respond differently to filgotinib. By systematically comparing immune activation and drug effects in terminal ileum and ascending colon, we aimed to define a mechanistic basis for region-specific treatment response in CD. In addition, this approach allowed us to assess the value of PCIS as a human translational model for segment-specific drug profiling in IBD ex vivo.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethical statement

The utilization of human intestinal tissue in experiments was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hannover Medical School, Lower Saxony Medical Association for Siloah hospital Hannover and complies with the World Medical Association’s Code of Ethics (updated November 1, 2024, reference number 3082-2016). All patients or their relatives, caregivers, or guardians provided written informed consent for the use of intestinal tissue for research.

2.2. Preparation and cultivation of PCIS

PCIS were generated from intestinal tissue of female and male patients undergoing surgical resection for CD (mean age 46 ± 13 years) or cancer resection (non-CD; mean age 70 ± 7.5 years; Table 1; Table S1). In CD patients, resection was performed in cases of severe disease, often accompanied by complications such as strictures, fistulas, or an insufficient response to medical treatment. For controls without CD (non-CD), only healthy parts of the tissue from resection margins were used. PCIS from CD patients were generated exclusively from visibly inflamed areas with confirmed Crohn’s diagnosis. Samples were included only if they showed high IL-8 expression, indicating active inflammation; this criterion applied to all CD cases, regardless of ileal or colonic resection type. The preparation and cultivation of PCIS were performed according to an adapted protocol by de Graaf et al. 2010,35 as described also in a previous publication.36 Colon and ileum tissues were processed and cultured using the same protocol. After removing the muscle layers and residual fat, mucosal sheets were embedded in 3% low-melting agarose (Fisher, 10583355). PCIS were prepared using a microtome (Krumdieck Tissue Slicer) to generate tissue slices of approximately 300 µm thickness. PCIS were cultured in 12-well plates in WME medium (Gibco, 32551020) with 14 mM d-glucose (Sigma, C8270) and 1× Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Gibco, 15240062) at 37 °C, 95% O2/5% CO2, with shaking at 90 rpm. PCIS were cultured for 24 h with or without treatment. Immune cell stimulation was performed using either 10 µg/mL Concanavalin A from Canavalia ensiformis (ConA, Sigma, C5275) or 10 µL/mL ImmunoCultTM Human CD3/CD28 T cell activator (anti-CD3/CD28, STEMCELL Technologies, 10971). To inhibit JAK1 signaling, filgotinib (Filg, MCE, HY-18300) was applied at concentrations of 1 - 100 nM, and DMSO (0.05%) was included as a corresponding vehicle (Veh) control. Each experiment was set up in technical duplicates per donor (two wells with two PCIS per well).

Table 1.

Patients’ demographic and diagnosis details.

Gender Age (years) Diagnosis Removed segment Classification
Male 78 Cecum carcinoma Terminal ileum non-CD
Male 76 Colon carcinoma Terminal ileum non-CD
Female 75 Colon carcinoma Terminal ileum non-CD
Female 64 Colon carcinoma Transverse colon non-CD
Female 76 Liver cirrhosis, colon carcinoma Terminal ileum & ascending colon non-CD
Female 58 Ascending colon carcinoma Terminal ileum & ascending colon non-CD
Male 69 Adenocarcinoma Ascending colon non-CD
Female 41 Crohn’s disease Terminal ileum & ascending colon CD
Male 62 Crohn’s disease Terminal ileum & ascending colon CD
Female 62 Crohn’s disease Neoterminal ileum & ascending colon CD
Female 40 Crohn’s disease Terminal ileum CD
Male 46 Crohn’s disease Terminal ileum & ascending colon CD
Female 29 Crohn’s disease Terminal ileum CD

2.3. Viability assay

The viability of PCIS was determined by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assays from supernatants (LDH Cytotoxicity Assay Kit, Roche, 11644793001) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Triton X-100 (1% in phosphate-buffered saline [Sigma])-treated PCIS were investigated as a reference (dead) control.

2.4. Histopathology

Cultured PCIS were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h, embedded in paraffin and sliced into 4-µm sections. The paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using standard histological procedures, then mounted for light microscopy. Magnification and scale bars are indicated in the figures. Samples from N = 4 donors each for ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS, with two slices per donor, were stained.

2.5. Whole-mount immunofluorescence

CD- and non-CD-derived PCIS from human colon and ileum samples were fixed overnight in 2% PFA and subsequently washed with PBS. Samples from N = 3 donors each for ileal and colonic PCIS, with two slices per donor, were stained. Primary antibodies included anti-occludin mouse monoclonal antibody (6.6 µg/mL, OC-3F10 clone, Invitrogen, 33-1500 mouse IgG1 κ isotype) and anti-ZO-1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (3.3 µg/mL, Invitrogen, 61-7300, rabbit IgG isotype). Secondary antibodies were applied at a dilution of 1:200: AlexaFluor® 568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (Abcam, ab175471) and AlexaFluor® 647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG H+L (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 115-605-003). Nuclear staining was performed with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma, D9542) for 30 min. Stained PCIS were embedded in ibidi mounting medium (ibidi, 50001) for subsequent confocal microscopy. Z-stacks of 25 µm were imaged every 0.45 µm with a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope using a 20× water immersion objective. The images were reconstructed in three dimensions using IMARIS® 9.2.1 for the volumetric projection (Bitplane). Quantification was performed using IMARIS software, with analysis parameters optimized independently for ileal and colonic PCIS and applied to all samples. Two regions of interest (ROIs) were selected in the ileum (villous region) and four in the colon (two within crypts and two outside the crypts) for each image. Signal intensity was determined as the total antibody volume and expressed as a sum of volumes (µm3).

2.6. Analysis of mediator secretion

After 24 h, PCIS culture supernatants were collected, supplemented with a 0.2% protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, product code 87785), and stored at −80 °C until analysis. A panel of 20 cytokines and chemokines was analyzed in PCIS supernatants with a Mesoscale Discovery customized U-PLEX® assay (Mesoscale Diagnostic) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The panel included the following analytes (lower limit of quantification as pg/mL): IL-2 (0.2 pg/mL), IL-10 (0.5 pg/mL), TNF-α (0.5 pg/mL), GM-CSF (1.1 pg/mL), IFN-γ (4.1 pg/mL), IL-5 (0.6 pg/mL), IL-17A (2.7 pg/mL), IL-17F (60.1 pg/mL), IL-21 (7.5 pg/mL), IL-22 (0.4 pg/mL), IL-23 (3.8 pg/mL), granzyme A (0.2 pg/mL), granzyme B (0.9 pg/mL), TRAIL (1.1 pg/mL), TSLP (0.9 pg/mL), IL-18 (1.8 pg/mL), IL-33 (1.1 pg/mL), CXCL10 (1.3 pg/mL), MIP-3α (3.1 pg/mL), and IL-12p70 (0.8 pg/mL). Plates were measured with the MESO QuickPlex SQ120 (Mesoscale Diagnostic). Plotted values below the level of quantification were extrapolated using MSD software. Further analytes were measured using DuoSet ELISA kits (R&D, DY206 and DY208) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (lower limit of detection): human IL-6 (9.4 pg/mL) and IL-8 (31.2 pg/mL).

2.7. RNA isolation and mRNA sequencing

For RNA isolation, treated and control PCIS were collected after 24 h of incubation and preserved in RNAlaterTM (Invitrogen, AM7021). RNAlaterTM was removed following overnight incubation, and the samples were stored at −80 °C. Total RNA was isolated as previously described.36,37 All samples showed high RNA integrity (RIN > 7). mRNA sequencing was performed by Novogene using standard Illumina protocols with poly(A) enrichment. The Illumina (NovaSeq X Plus) platform was used for paired-end 150-bp sequencing (30 million reads per sample).

2.8. Analysis of mRNA sequencing

Fastp was utilized for quality control of raw sequencing reads prior to alignment to the Homo sapiens reference genome (GRCh38/hg38) with STAR.38,39 Reads per gene were counted with the “GeneCounts” quantification mode implemented in STAR based on ENSEMBL human transcript reference assembly v.113. All genes with a sum of counts across all samples less than the number of samples were excluded from further analyses. Subsequently, the DESeq2 package40 (v.1.46.0) for R (v.4.4.1) was used to normalize raw counts and perform differential gene expression calculations with default parameters except “local” fit type was used for dispersion estimation. Genes with an adjusted P-value of <.05 and an absolute log2 fold change (log2FC) ≥ 1 were considered significantly differentially expressed. Over-representation analyses (ORA) in significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were performed using the gprofiler2 (v.0.2.3) package for R to identify significantly enriched biological pathways and processes from the Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG, WikiPathways, and Reactome databases. Venn diagrams were created using the results of the DEGs and ORA.41

2.9. Analysis of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species

A DCF reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) assay (Abcam, ab238535) was used to quantify the release of ROS/RNS in the supernatant of CD-derived PCIS from ileum and colon after 24 h of cultivation with or without treatments. The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Undiluted cell-free supernatant was incubated with catalyst for 5 min at room temperature, followed by incubation with 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCFH) solution in the dark for 15 min. Fluorescence intensity at 535 nm (λExcitation = 485 nm) was measured using a microplate reader (Microplate Reader Infinite® 200 Pro Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland). The assay was considered valid if a positive signal for 20 µM H2O2 was detected. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values were normalized to the total protein content of the analyzed samples, measured using a PierceTM BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher, 23225) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein content was determined from the same PCIS samples after completion of the assay by lysing the corresponding tissue slices and measuring total protein using the BCA assay kit. Although PCIS were prepared at standardized thickness (∼300 µm), minor variation in slice size and cellular composition occurs. Therefore, normalization to total protein was applied to reduce technical variability between slices. This normalization follows the assay recommendations and was applied to ROS/RNS and nitrogen oxides (NOx) measurements.

2.10. Analysis of dissolved nitrogen oxides

For the determination of nitrate (NO3−) and nitrite (NO2−) levels in supernatants of CD-derived PCIS from human ileum and colon tissue, the nitric oxide assay kit (Invitrogen, EMSNO) was utilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In total, 250 µL (diluted 1:2 with reagent diluent) of cell-free supernatants were centrifuged through an ultracentrifugation filter (pierce concentrators) at 15 000 g for 30 min at room temperature and 50 µL in duplicates were used immediately for each assay. Separate plates for the measurement of nitrite and nitrate were prepared and followed the instructions. The optical density was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (Microplate Reader Infinite® 200 Pro Tecan Group). Individual nitrate und nitrite values were added to yield total NOx in ng/mL and normalized to the total protein content of the analyzed samples, measured using a PierceTM BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher, 23225) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.11. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism (v.10.1.24). Unpaired two-tailed t-tests were performed to compare two groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the effects of two factors (segment and treatment). Sidak’s multiple comparison test was applied in all ANOVA tests. Differences were considered significant at P < .05 (*), 0.01 (**), 0.001 (***), or 0.0001 (****). All data were from a minimum of three independent experiments.

3. Results

3.1. Distinct baseline immune programs in ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS provide a framework for region-specific response to JAK1 inhibition

Based on our previous work showing that PCIS preserve disease-related immune features ex vivo,36 we next asked whether ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS differ in baseline inflammatory programs in a manner that may predict differential responsiveness to JAK1 inhibition.

CD-derived PCIS retained key disease-associated characteristics ex vivo. Basal release of the proinflammatory mediators IL-8 and IL-6 was increased in CD-derived PCIS compared with region-matched non-CD controls, whereas LDH release remained comparable, indicating preserved tissue viability under basal culture conditions (Figure S1). To further characterize epithelial integrity, whole-mount immunofluorescence staining for the tight junction proteins ZO-1 and occludin was performed in ileal and colonic PCIS from CD and non-CD patients. In ileal PCIS, CD-derived tissue showed reduced ZO-1 and occludin staining compared with non-CD controls, consistent with impaired epithelial barrier architecture, whereas no significant differences were detected in colonic PCIS under these experimental conditions (Figures S2 and S3). Together, these data demonstrate that PCIS preserve inflammatory and epithelial disease-associated features ex vivo and provide the pathological context for the subsequent analysis of region-specific immune responses and filgotinib effects.

PCIS prepared from ileum and colon resections of CD patients preserved expected region-specific architecture ex vivo, showing prominent finger-like villi in the ileum and larger crypts structures in the colon. Key mucosal components were preserved in both regions, including epithelial cells, immune cells in the lamina propria, and the underlying muscularis mucosae (Figure 1A–E).

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Region-specific functional and transcriptional profiles are maintained ex vivo in terminal ileum and ascending colon precision-cut intestinal slices (PCIS) from Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental workflow of PCIS generation and analysis (created with BioRender.com). Hematoxylin & eosin staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded thin sections (4 μm) of ileum (B, C) and colon (D, E) tissue slices from CD patients after 24 h of cultivation; representative images of N = 4 donors. (B, D) Overview images, scale bar=1 mm and (C, E) 20× magnification of selected region, scale bar=100 µm. (F) Unstimulated tissue slices were cultivated in medium for 24 h to determine basal secretion of several mediators in supernatant of colon vs ileum tissue slices from CD patients presented as Log2 normalized fold changes (log2FC > 0 values [red]: higher in colon, < 0 values [blue]: higher in ileum). N = 4 colon and N = 6 ileum donors (two technical replicates per donor) were analyzed. *P < .05, **P < .01 by unpaired two tailed t-test between colon and ileum. (G–J) Region-specific transcriptional differences between PCIS derived from colon (N = 3) and ileum (N = 5) of CD patients were analyzed by mRNA sequencing. (G) Heatmap displaying expression levels of DEGs (adj. P < .05, |log2[FC] | ≥ 1) among investigated groups. Hierarchical clustering based on Euclidean distance. (H) Principial component analysis (PCA) based on the complete transcriptome-wide dataset showing separation of ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS samples. Statistical significance of group separation was assessed by PERMANOVA (adonis2) on variance-stabilized count data using Euclidean distances. (I) Volcano plot highlighting differential expression of genes in CD-derived PCIS comparing colon and ileum. Red: genes enriched in colon, blue: genes enriched in ileum, grey non significant genes (differentially expressed genes [DEGs]; adj. P < .05, |log2[FC] | ≤ −1 for colon or ≥ 1 for ileum). (J) Over-representation analysis (ORA) of significantly enriched biological pathways based on DEGs identified in colon and ileum PCIS from CD patients.

At baseline, CD-derived PCIS already exhibited marked region-specific immune profiles. Ileal PCIS showed increased abundance of secreted mediators in the supernatant, including MIP-3α and GzmA, indicative of innate and epithelial-associated inflammation. In contrast, colonic PCIS displayed higher levels of secreted mediators, including GM-CSF, IFN-γ, and TRAIL, consistent with a Th1/cytotoxic immune profile (Figure 1F).

Moreover, we performed mRNA sequencing in CD-derived PCIS samples to obtain a comprehensive overview of transcriptional differences between ileal and colonic regions. As expected for two anatomically distinct intestinal segments, principal component analysis (PCA) of global gene expression profiles showed clear separation of ileal and colonic samples across all donors, indicating preservation of region-specific transcriptional identity ex vivo (Figure 1G–H). This separation was statistically supported by PERMANOVA performed on variance-stabilized count data using Euclidean distances (P = .013). Direct comparison between the two anatomical regions identified 1727 protein-coding genes enriched in the ileum and 1362 enriched in the colon. In line with the cytokine profiles, ileal PCIS were enriched for genes linked to innate and barrier-associated inflammatory pathways, including CCL25, IL1R1, NLRP6, and KLRK1. In contrast, colonic PCIS showed enrichment of genes associated with Th1/cytotoxic and T cell-related responses, including TNFSF10 (gene coding for TRAIL protein), IFNLR1, GPR15LG, and IL-7 (Figure 1I).

To obtain an overview of biological processes and pathways associated with each intestinal region, genes identified as differentially abundant in the direct comparison between ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS were subjected to over-representation analysis using the GO, KEGG, WikiPathways, and Reactome databases (Table S2). Enrichment analysis was performed separately for ileum-enriched and colon-enriched gene sets, thereby capturing region-specific functional characteristics (Figure 1J). Ileal CD-derived PCIS showed enrichment in pathways related to absorption and nutrient transport, while colonic CD-derived PCIS showed enrichment in symbiotic interactions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, epithelial proliferation, and cell junctions. Both regions showed upregulation of proinflammatory pathways, including pyroptosis and interferon signaling in the colon, and leukocyte chemotaxis in the ileum (Figure 1J). Together, these data indicated that ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS differ in their baseline inflammatory architecture and suggested that their response to JAK1 inhibition may also differ.

3.2. Colonic CD-derived PCIS display stronger inducible T cell programs, whereas ileal PCIS show broader innate-inflammatory reactivity

Despite a few studies indicating proteomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity between ileal and colonic CD,10–13 region-specific immune responses and functional tissue reactivity have not been systematically investigated. Although CD-derived PCIS already displayed basal inflammatory activity ex vivo, these baseline signals primarily reflect the inflammatory state of the tissue at the time of resection and may be influenced by donor-specific disease activity, tissue composition, and sampling variability. To assess the inducible inflammatory capacity and functional response of each intestinal region under standardized conditions, we therefore applied two complementary immune challenges. ConA was used as a broad polyclonal stimulus to activate resident immune cells within the preserved tissue context, whereas anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation served as a more T cell-directed stimulatory condition. These stimulation conditions were not intended to mimic the basal physiological state of CD tissue, but to reveal region-specific inducible immune programs and to establish a dynamic range for subsequent pharmacodynamic testing of JAK1 inhibition. To determine whether these baseline differences translate into distinct functional immune responsiveness, ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS were stimulated ex vivo with ConA or anti-CD3/CD28 and analyzed for cytokine release and transcriptional responses after 24 h. Neither stimulus affected tissue viability (Figure S4A). Following ConA or anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation, distinct region-specific cytokine responses were observed (Figure 2B; Figures S5 and S6B). Ileal CD-derived PCIS showed increased release of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α (log2FC: −0.52 | −1.85; ConA | aCD3/CD28) and GM-CSF (log2FC: −3.03 | −4.2), compared with colonic CD-derived PCIS, in response to both stimuli. In contrast, colonic CD-derived PCIS revealed increased inducibility of T cell-associated mediators including IFN-γ (log2FC: 0.47 | 1.20), IL-17F (log2FC: 0.46 | 0.51), IL-23 (log2FC: 1.14 | 1.41), and GzmA (log2FC: 1.82 | 1.41), compared wtih ileal CD-derived PCIS under both stimulations. These stimulation-induced patterns should be interpreted separately from the baseline comparison shown in Figure 1F. Figure 2B illustrates stimulation-induced responses and should be interpreted as a functional immune challenge rather than as a representation of the basal inflammatory state shown in Figure 1. Accordingly, mediators may differ between ileum and colon at baseline but show a different or even opposite regional pattern after stimulation. For example, GM-CSF showed higher relative abundance in colonic PCIS at baseline, but stronger ConA-induced responsiveness in ileal PCIS, indicating that basal inflammatory state and inducible immune capacity represent distinct layers of region-specific immune regulation.

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Differential activation of inflammatory and T cell signaling in terminal ileum versus ascending colon of Crohn’s disease (CD) patients ex vivo. Colon or ileum tissue slices from CD patients were cultivated ex vivo either unstimulated (Med) or stimulated with 10 μg/mL Concanavalin A (ConA). Mediator secretion and gene expression were analyzed. Fold changes represent stimulation-induced responses and therefore reflect inducible immune capacity rather than baseline regional abundance. (A) Schematic representation (created with BioRender.com). (B) Released mediator levels as Log2 fold changes (colon vs ileum) of stimulation-induced fold changes (medium [Med] vs ConA stimulation) in precision-cut intestinal slices (PCIS) from CD patients. N = 4 colon and N = 6 ileum donors (log2FC, > 0 values [red]: higher in colon, < 0 values [blue]: higher in ileum). A minimum of two technical replicates (two wells with two tissue slices each) were analyzed per donor. (C–E) Gene expression analysis after ConA stimulation, comparing colon and ileum PCIS from CD patients. N = 3 colon and N = 5 ileum donors. Venn-diagrams highlighting the overlap of all significantly differentially regulated genes (C, adj. P < .05), all pathways (D), and inflammatory pathways (E) by comparing colon and ileum CD-derived PCIS after ConA stimulation. Complete lists of differentially expressed genes and pathway enrichment results, including statistical parameters and contributing genes for each enriched term, are provided in Supplementary Tables S3–S5. Enriched terms were derived from GO, KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathways annotations; therefore, individual genes may contribute to multiple enriched terms.

Transcriptomic analysis following ConA stimulation revealed 2071 significantly regulated genes, with 515 shared, 851 ileum-specific, and 705 colon-specific genes in CD-derived PCIS (Figure 2C; Table S3). Euclidean distance-based clustering provided an overview of ConA-induced transcriptional changes and showed that baseline differences between ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS remained apparent after stimulation (Figure S4B). DEGs in ileal and colonic samples were subsequently used for separate over-representation analyses (Table S4). This analysis identified a substantial number of enriched functional terms shared between ileal and colonic PCIS, indicating that both tissue regions activate common inflammatory programs upon ConA stimulation. In addition, region-enriched functional terms were detected, with ileal responses showing broader enrichment of innate, mucosal, and pro-inflammatory immune processes, whereas colonic responses included selected T cell-associated and canonical NF-κB-related immune programs (Figure 2D; Table S5). Because individual genes can be annotated to multiple pathways and ontology terms, the number of enriched terms exceeds the number of input genes and should be interpreted as functional annotations.

Notably, the ileum revealed an increased number of proinflammatory pathways than the colon (59 vs 20), reflecting broader activation of both innate and adaptive immunity (Figure 2E; Table S5). Similarly, anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation induced both shared and region-enriched transcriptional programs in ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS, as reflected by the overlap of differentially regulated genes and pathway enrichment analyses (Figure S4C, Figure S6C-D). Immune pathways related to T cells were predominantly enriched in colonic CD-derived PCIS compared with ileal CD-derived PCIS (37 vs 7), including immature T cell proliferation, Th1 and Th17 differentiation, and memory T cell differentiation. However, ileal CD-derived PCIS showed selective responsiveness marked by Th17-associated gene signatures (Figure S6F).

Thus, ex vivo stimulation revealed that colonic CD-derived PCIS are characterized by stronger inducible T cell activation, whereas ileal tissue retains a broader inflammatory program with a substantial innate component. Importantly, however, the strongest regional divergence was observed when ConA-stimulated tissues were treated with filgotinib, indicating that ileal and colonic inflammatory programs differ not only at baseline or upon stimulation, but particularly in their responsiveness to JAK1 inhibition.

3.3. Filgotinib suppresses key Th1/Th17 and cytotoxic inflammatory mediators more effectively in colonic than in ileal CD-derived PCIS

Filgotinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, has proven clinical efficacy for UC, but lacked sufficient efficacy in clinical trials for CD and was therefore not approved for this indication.33,34 This could be related to underlying immune phenotypes in the colon and ileum.

Given the marked regional differences in baseline and inducible immune programs, we next tested whether responsiveness to JAK1 inhibition also differs between ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS. Therefore, to improve the interpretability of the regional drug response, we analyzed the effects of filgotinib in a stepwise manner. First, we assessed whether filgotinib suppressed inflammatory mediator release in both intestinal regions. Second, we identified mediators showing preferential or stronger inhibition in colonic compared with ileal PCIS. Finally, we integrated mediator release with transcriptomic and pathway-level analyses to determine whether differential pharmacodynamic responses were reflected by broader region-specific transcriptional programs. JAK/STAT signaling was detectable in both regions, and filgotinib was therefore evaluated under ConA-driven inflammatory conditions ex vivo.

Filgotinib was initially titrated ex vivo in non-CD-derived PCIS (1-100 nM) and showed no toxicity after 24 h of cultivation (Figure S7A and B). Dose-dependent inhibition of 19 mediators revealed variable IC50 values, with T cell-associated cytokines showing IC50 values within the tested range. Although several mediators responded at lower concentrations, 100 nM represented the lowest concentration that consistently affected a broader spectrum of T cell-associated mediators and was therefore selected for subsequent experiments (Figure S7C). In CD-derived PCIS from the ileum and colon, immune cell activation was induced with ConA, followed by treatment with 100 nM filgotinib for 24 h (Figure 3A). This treatment did not affect tissue viability (Figure 3B). Quantification of 20 inflammatory mediators revealed that filgotinib suppressed ConA-induced release of 15 mediators in both ileal and colonic PCIS supernatants (Figure S8A and B). Thus, filgotinib exerted anti-inflammatory activity in both intestinal regions. However, the magnitude and breadth of inhibition differed markedly between ileal and colonic PCIS. While several mediators were reduced in both regions, five key mediators associated with Th1/Th17 and cytotoxic immune responses showed preferential or substantially stronger inhibition in colonic PCIS. Specifically, no inhibition was observed for IL-17F (log2FC: −0.09 | −6.03; ileum | colon), IL-22 (log2FC: −0.15 | −10.08), and TRAIL (log2FC: −0.35 | −2.9), while IL-21 (log2FC: −2.05 | −5.6) and CXCL10 (log2FC: −0.7 | −6.7) were only partially inhibited in ileal compared with colon CD-derived PCIS (Figure 3C). To determine whether the mediator-level effects were reflected transcriptionally, we focused on the genes corresponding to the five mediators showing preferential or stronger suppression in colonic PCIS at the protein level. This targeted gene-level analysis showed that IL17F, IL22, TNFSF10 (gene coding for TRAIL protein), and CXCL10 were downregulated by filgotinib predominantly in colonic PCIS, whereas corresponding gene regulation in ileal PCIS was absent or did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3D; Table S6). To assess the concordance between mediator release and corresponding mRNA regulation, correlation analyses were performed separately for ileal and colonic PCIS. This analysis confirmed that the stronger mediator-level suppression in colonic PCIS was paralleled by corresponding transcriptional regulation, whereas ileal responses were weaker or less consistent (Figure 3E). Together, these mediator- and gene-level data identify the first major regional difference in filgotinib responsiveness: colonic PCIS showed stronger suppression of selected Th17-, Th1- and cytotoxicity-associated inflammatory mediators, whereas corresponding responses in ileal PCIS were weaker, partial, or absent.

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Filgotinib shows better efficacy in colon vs ileum precision-cut intestinal slices (PCIS) from Crohn’s disease (CD) patients in regulating critical type 1 and 17 related responses. Colon or ileum CD-derived PCIS were incubated for 24 h either unstimulated (Med) or stimulated using 10 μg/mL Concanavalin A combined with 100 nM filgotinib (ConA + Filg) or 0.05% DMSO vehicle control (ConA + Veh). Viability, absolute secretion of several mediators in supernatant, and gene expression analyses were performed. (A) Schematic representation (created with BioRender.com). (B) LDH release in supernatant normalized to lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release of Triton X-100 lysed control tissue slices. (C) Absolute release of IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, TRAIL, and CXCL10 levels in supernatant. N = 4 colon and N = 5 ileum donors. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, and ****P < .0001 by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test comparing ConA + vehicle vs ConA + filgotinib or ileum vs colon. (D) Volcano plot highlighting differential expression of genes in CD-derived PCIS comparing ConA + filgotinib vs ConA + vehicle in colon and ileum with highlighted genes for selected cytokines. It shows selected mediator-associated genes corresponding to the protein mediators highlighted in (C). This targeted analysis was used to assess whether the stronger mediator-level suppression observed in colonic PCIS was reflected at the mRNA level. The complete list of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) is provided in Table S6. Blue: enriched genes in ileum, red: enriched genes in colon, grey: no significant genes (DEGs; adj. P < .05, |log2[FC] | ≤ −1 for colon or ≥ 1 for ileum). (E) Correlation plots between log2 fold changes in mRNA expression and corresponding cytokine secretion in ileum (blue) or colon (red).

Having established that selected inflammatory mediators were more strongly suppressed in colonic PCIS, we next asked whether this differential pharmacodynamic response was reflected by broader region-specific transcriptional regulation. We therefore compared the transcriptomic effects of filgotinib in ConA-stimulated ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS. While Figure 3D focused on selected genes corresponding to the key inflammatory mediators quantified at the protein level, we next analyzed the global transcriptomic response to filgotinib. This broader analysis included all genes that met the predefined criteria for differential expression in the comparison of ConA + filgotinib versus ConA + vehicle in ileal and/or colonic PCIS. Transcriptomic analysis identified 5430 significantly regulated genes, of which 555 were shared, 4561 were colon-specific, and 314 were ileum-specific (Figure 4B and D; Table S6). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed 363 colon-specific, 152 ileum-specific, and 515 shared pathways affected by filgotinib treatment (Figure 4C; Table S7). To link the global filgotinib-induced transcriptomic response to defined immune mechanisms, we first examined selected genes representing T cell receptor signaling and T cell subset-associated programs (Figure 4E, F). These gene-level analyses were intended to illustrate key immune programs within the broader filgotinib-regulated transcriptome. The corresponding pathway-level analysis of filgotinib-responsive gene sets is presented in Figure 5A and was subsequently integrated to define the broader functional context of these gene-level changes. Filgotinib significantly downregulated several genes involved in T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, including TCR chains (TRAC, TRBC1, TRBC2), components of the CD3 signaling complex (CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, CD247), and the gene for proximal signaling kinase LCK, particularly in colonic PCIS than in ileal PCIS (Figure 4E). Further transcriptional analysis of T cell subsets revealed additional region-specific gene regulation. The Th17-associated genes RUNX1, RORC, IL1R1, and IL12RB1 showed greater downregulation in colonic PCIS, while the downregulation of the Th1-associated genes TBX21, IL12RB2, IFNG, and CCR5, cytotoxic T cell-related genes PRF1, GZMB, GZMA, and EOMES, as well as regulatory T cell-associated genes (e.g., FOXP3, IL2RA, IL2RB, HAVCR2, and TNFRSF18), was comparable between ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS ex vivo (Figure 4F).

Figure 4.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Filgotinib modulates T cell-associated transcriptional programs in a region-specific manner. Colon or ileum Crohn’s disease (CD)-derived precision-cut intestinal slices (PCIS) were incubated for 24 h either unstimulated (Med) or stimulated using 10 μg/mL Concanavalin A combined with 100 nM filgotinib (ConA + Filg) or 0.05% DMSO vehicle control (ConA + Veh). Upregulation of gene signature between PCIS from colon (N = 3) and ileum (N = 3) samples from CD patients was analyzed by mRNA sequencing. (A) Schematic representation of the treatment (created with BioRender.com). (B-C) Venn diagrams highlighting the overlap of all differential regulated genes (B; adj. P < .05) and all pathways (C), by comparing ConA + Veh and ConA + Filg in colon and ileum CD-derived PCIS. (D) Heatmap displaying expression levels of differentially expressed genes (DEGs; adj. P < .05, |log2[FC] | ≥ 1) among investigated groups. It shows the global transcriptome-level response to filgotinib and includes all DEGs identified after comparison of ConA + Filg vs ConA + Veh in ileal and/or colonic CD-derived PCIS according to the predefined statistical criteria. Genes are classified as shared, colon-specific or ileum-specific based on their significance in the respective regional comparison. The complete list of DEGs is provided in Table S6. Hierarchical clustering based on Euclidean distance. (E-F) Selected gene-level analysis of T cell receptor signaling and T cell subset-associated transcriptional programs for ConA + Veh vs ConA + Filg treated CD-derived PCIS from colon (N = 3) or ileum (N = 3). Genes were selected to illustrate immune programs identified within the broader filgotinib-regulated transcriptomic response. The corresponding pathway-level analysis is shown in Figure 5A.

Figure 5.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Filgotinib preferentially suppresses immune activation and oxidative stress responses in the colon vs ileum. Colon or ileum Crohn’s disease (CD)-derived precision-cut intestinal slices (PCIS) were incubated for 24 h either unstimulated (Med) or stimulated using 10 μg/mL Concanavalin A combined with 100 nM filgotinib (ConA + Filg) or 0.05% DMSO vehicle control (ConA + Veh). Upregulation of gene signature by mRNA sequencing and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) as well as nitrogen oxides (Nox) (sum of nitrate [NO3−] and nitrite [NO2−] release measurements were performed. Analysis between PCIS from colon (N = 3) and ileum (N = 3) samples from CD patients were performed. (A) Over-representation analysis of filgotinib-regulated gene sets in ConA-stimulated ileal (blue) and colonic (red) CD-derived PCIS. This pathway-level analysis provides the functional context for the selected T cell-associated gene-level changes shown in Figure 4E and F. Complete pathway enrichment results, including pathway names, database sources, contributing genes, P-values and FDR-adjusted P-values, are provided in Table S7. (B–D) Gene expression levels of selected genes for ConA + Veh- vs ConA + Filg-treated CD-derived PCIS from colon (N = 3) or ileum (N = 3). (E) ROS/RNS release in PCIS supernatants after stimulation. MFI was normalized to total protein content. (F) Release of nitrate and nitrite in PCIS supernatant after stimulation was added up to the total NO (NOx) and normalized to total protein content. N = 3 donors each. *P < .05 and **P < .01 by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test comparing ConA + Veh vs Med, ConA + Veh vs ConA + Filg, or ileum vs colon.

These data identify the second major regional difference in filgotinib responsiveness: compared with ileal PCIS, colonic PCIS showed a broader transcriptional response to JAK1 inhibition, with more extensive regulation of genes and pathways linked to T cell activation and Th17-associated inflammatory programs.

Importantly, Figure 4D also revealed a substantial set of upregulated genes after filgotinib treatment, particularly in colonic PCIS. We therefore interpret the colonic response to filgotinib not only as suppression of T cell-associated inflammatory programs, but also as a broader transcriptional shift that includes induction of tissue-regulatory and repair-associated responses. This interpretation is supported by the subsequent pathway- and gene-level analyses, where filgotinib increased the expression of genes associated with tissue remodeling and repair, including SFRP2, LTB4R, FGF22, and CCN2, predominantly in colonic PCIS. Thus, the stronger transcriptional response to filgotinib in colonic tissue appears to involve both attenuation of inflammatory immune activation and induction of compensatory regulatory or repair-associated tissue programs.

3.4. Filgotinib reduces immune activation and oxidative stress more effectively in colonic vs ileal PCIS ex vivo

After identifying stronger mediator-level and transcriptional responses to filgotinib in colonic PCIS, we next assessed whether this regional difference extended to broader immune activation, JAK/STAT signaling and oxidative stress-associated tissue responses. Over-representation analysis of filgotinib-regulated gene sets was therefore performed to define broader region-specific functional programs associated with JAK1 inhibition in ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS. It revealed distinct regional pathway responses to filgotinib treatment. In colonic PCIS, anti-inflammatory pathways including IL-10 production, negative regulation of B cell proliferation, and negative regulation of T cell migration were enriched. In contrast, ileal PCIS showed enrichment of pro-inflammatory pathways such as positive regulation of acute inflammatory response and positive regulation of T cell cytokine production (Figure 5A; Table S7). To illustrate these pathway-level findings at the gene level, we next examined representative genes involved in immune activation and antigen presentation, including HLA-DRA, CIITA, CD86, CD74, and CD38, as well as neutrophil-associated genes such as S100A9 and CSF3R. These genes showed stronger downregulation in colonic PCIS, whereas regulation in ileal PCIS was weaker or absent. In contrast, the immediate early response genes FOSB, EGR1, and NFKBIA were selectively upregulated in colonic PCIS, suggesting persistence of regulatory and transcriptional adaptation programs despite suppression of proinflammatory pathways (Figure 5B). These selected genes were used to visualize representative components of the enriched functional programs, while pathway-level conclusions were based on the formal enrichment analysis shown in Figure 5A and Table S7.

Filgotinib further increased the expression of genes associated with tissue remodeling and repair, including SFRP2, LTB4R, FGF22, and CCN2, predominantly in colonic PCIS ex vivo. Conversely, genes linked to extracellular matrix organization and collagen deposition (COL3A1 and COL1A1) were downregulated in the colon, indicating a shift away from extracellular matrix deposition programs, whereas only minor regulation was observed in ileal PCIS ex vivo (Figure 5B). This repair-associated gene induction supports the interpretation that filgotinib induces a broader tissue-regulatory response in the colon, beyond suppression of inflammatory T cell-associated programs.

Filgotinib also modulated JAK–STAT pathway genes, significantly downregulating JAK2, JAK3, STAT1, and STAT4 in colonic PCIS, whereas in the ileum only JAK3 and STAT5A were significantly reduced after ConA + filgotinib treatment compared with the ConA + vehicle control ex vivo (Figure 5C). Due to the role of JAK–STAT signaling in regulating inflammatory and oxidative stress responses, we assessed functional ROS production in PCIS ex vivo. ConA stimulation led to a significant increase in the release of ROS/RNS and total nitrogen oxides (NOx, sum of nitrate and nitrite) in both ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS ex vivo, compared with unstimulated controls. However, co-treatment with filgotinib significantly reduced ROS (ileum: 8.04 vs 6.9 MFI/µg, colon: 9.3 vs 5.0 MFI/µg; ConA + vehicle vs ConA + filgotinib) and NOx− release levels (ileum: 62.6 vs 31.8 ng/µg, colon: 93.3 vs 37.6 ng/µg) only in colonic PCIS compared with the ConA + vehicle control (Figure 5D and E). Consistent with these functional findings, transcriptional analysis revealed region-specific regulation of oxidative stress-associated genes. In colonic PCIS, the antioxidative regulator TXNIP was significantly upregulated, whereas inflammasome- and ROS-associated genes including NLRP3, CASP1, HIF1A, and DDIT4 were downregulated following ConA + filgotinib treatment. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in ileal PCIS ex vivo. (Figure 5F).

Together, these data show that the broader response to filgotinib in colonic PCIS extends beyond cytokine suppression and includes attenuation of inflammatory activation and oxidative stress pathways.

4. Discussion

In this study, we show that ileal and colonic CD tissue differ not only in their inflammatory baseline state, but also in their responsiveness to JAK1 inhibition. To assess local inflammatory processes directly in patient tissue, we used PCIS as an ex vivo platform. The PCIS model preserves complex tissue architecture, resident cell populations, and the local intestinal microenvironment, providing a physiologically relevant platform for mechanistic and pharmacological investigations.36,42–44 Using this approach, we were able to link region-specific immune programs to differential filgotinib responsiveness in human intestinal tissue ex vivo. In line with our previous work, which revealed preservation of disease-specific immune signatures in PCIS derived from IBD patients,36 this study extends these findings by systematically analyzing region-specific immune activity and drug responsiveness in CD-derived intestinal tissue ex vivo.

Chronic mucosal inflammation and epithelial barrier disruption are well-established hallmarks of CD.45,46 In our study, both ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS exhibited markedly increased basal secretion of IL-6 and IL-8, which are both essential drivers of mucosal inflammation in CD and areconsistently elevated in inflamed mucosa and plasma of patients.47–49 Their serum levels have also been associated with predicting clinical response to therapy.50 Additionally, CD-derived slices exhibited a loss of tight junction architecture, providing further evidence that key pathophysiological features of CD were preserved in tissue slices ex vivo. Alterations in tight junction proteins, including occludin, have been reported in patients with IBD and are associated with impaired epithelial barrier integrity. Consistently, circulating occludin levels have been shown to differ between patients with CD or UC and healthy individuals, supporting the clinical relevance of tight junction remodeling in IBD.51,52 These characteristics provided the pathological context for the subsequent analysis of region-specific immune responses and filgotinib effects.

Ileal and colonic PCIS retained region-specific structural and transcriptional features ex vivo, including villus-associated absorptive programs in the ileum and crypt-associated epithelial, barrier, and microenvironmental programs in the colon. These preserved regional characteristics provide the anatomical and functional context for interpreting segment-specific immune responses and differential filgotinib responsiveness.

While transcriptional differences between ileum and colon are well established, their relevance here is that they provide a mechanistic basis for region-dependent drug responsiveness. Our data suggest that colonic CD-derived PCIS are characterized by stronger inducible T cell-associated and JAK/STAT-linked inflammatory programs, whereas ileal PCIS retain broader innate and mucosal inflammatory features. Because filgotinib targets JAK1-dependent cytokine signaling, these differences may explain why colonic tissue showed stronger suppression of Th1/Th17 and cytotoxic mediators, T cell-associated transcriptional programs, JAK/STAT-related genes, and oxidative-stress-associated responses compared with ileal tissue.

Although regional differences in CD affecting the ileum or colon have been described at proteomic and transcriptomic levels, the functional responsiveness of tissue-resident immune cells in these areas remains poorly understood.10–12 Our study addresses this gap by assessing immune activity in ex vivo ileal and colonic tissue slices from CD patients, revealing regionally distinct immune signatures. compared with the colon, PCIS from the ileum exhibited increased release of MIP-3α and GzmA, accompanied by elevated expression of genes including CCL25, NLRP6, and IL1R1 already at baseline. NLRP6 and IL1R1 are associated with inflammasome activation, while CCL25 and MIP-3α are involved in immune cell recruitment, indicating an enhanced innate immune response in ileal CD-derived PCIS.53,54 In contrast, baseline gene expression patterns in colonic CD-derived PCIS were dominated by adaptive immunity. This included increased gene expression of TNFSF10 and GPR15LG, as well as basal release of T cell-associated mediators such as IFN-γ, GM-CSF, and TRAIL. Notably, GPR15LG mediates T cell homing, and both IFN-γ and GM-CSF are characteristic Th1 cytokines.55,56  TNFSF10, which encodes for TRAIL that is commonly expressed by cytotoxic T cells was found to have a dual role in intestinal immunity.57,58 It can exhibit anti-inflammatory properties in conjunction with Tregs by inducing apoptosis and inhibiting T cell activation but, conversely, it can promote inflammation by activating NF-κB and proinflammatory cytokines, thereby exacerbating inflammatory processes.59–62 Taken together, our data suggest that, even at the basal level, CD-derived PCIS derived from the colon exhibit enhanced regulation of T cell activity compared with those derived from the ileum. This regional immune heterogeneity was further pronounced upon ex vivo immune stimulation. In particular, ConA stimulation of ileal PCIS resulted in a significantly greater release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and GM-CSF, compared with colonic PCIS. This was linked to the upregulation of a broader array of inflammatory pathways at the RNA level, including those associated with macrophage or other innate cell activation. Conversely, colonic PCIS, particularly following T cell receptor-specific stimulation, exhibited higher secretion of T cell-associated cytokines, such as IFN-γ and IL-17F, and enrichment of T cell-related pathways, including Th1 response and differentiation, compared with ileal PCIS. Notably, Th17-associated pathways were similarly upregulated in both ileal and colonic PCIS following ex vivo stimulation. Kong et al. performed single-cell analyses of biopsy samples to demonstrate the region-specific landscape of immune dysregulation in CD, which is characterized by an increased frequency of myeloid and stromal cell subtypes in the terminal ileum, contrasted with a higher frequency of epithelial cells and CD4+ T cells in the colon.15 Our data extend these analyses, providing direct evidence that CD-derived PCIS from colonic tissue exhibit higher T cell activity of different subtypes, while ileal PCIS show a strong innate immune response in addition to Th17 activity ex vivo. Importantly, this functional immune divergence provides a plausible mechanistic basis for the differential response to JAK1 inhibition observed between both intestinal regions.

Post-hoc analyses of clinical studies indicate that distinct cellular environments along the gastrointestinal tract contribute to differential drug responses in ileal vs colonic CD.10,16 Consistent with this concept, Kaboub et al. reported in human intestinal mucosal explants that JAK inhibition with tofacitinib suppressed inflammatory signaling more robustly in colonic UC tissue than in ileal CD tissue, indicating region-specific differences in responsiveness to JAK-targeted therapies.63 In general, medications appear more effective in isolated colonic inflammation than in ileal-affected CD.17–19 For example, metronidazole was more effective in treating colonic CD,18 and both metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, in combination with budesonide, were ineffective in treating isolated ileal disease.19 Similarly, an anti-TNF-α agent (certolizumab) appears to be more effective in treating colonic than ileal manifestations.17 This issue becomes particularly critical when a clinical trial fails to demonstrate the efficacy of a therapy, as occurred in the DIVERSITY study for filgotinib.34 Despite its success in treating UC, the limited efficacy of filgotinib observed in clinical CD trials may be consistent with region-dependent differences in JAK1-responsive inflammatory programs, which highlights the potential value of human tissue-based models for assessing segment-specific drug responses.33,64 Our data suggest that one reason may be that key inflammatory programs are not equally JAK1-dependent across intestinal regions. Accordingly, we observed region-specific differences in response to filgotinib in complex colonic and ileal tissue models ex vivo. Following ConA stimulation, filgotinib effectively inhibited the release of IL-21, IL-22, IL-17F, TRAIL, and CXCL10 in colonic PCIS. In contrast, this suppressive effect was either absent or markedly reduced in ileal CD-derived PCIS. IL-21, IL-22, and IL-17F are recognized markers of Th1/Th17 responses, with elevated levels found in the inflamed mucosa of patients with CD, indicating their critical role in driving and exacerbating intestinal inflammation.65–68 IL-17F mRNA levels have been found to be elevated in inflamed biopsies of CD, but not UC, patients.65 Furthermore, TRAIL, a marker of cytotoxic T cell activity, has been associated with complications in CD, including the development of fistulas and strictures.69,70 Modulation of oxidative-stress-associated pathways has previously been reported for JAK inhibitors, including in intestinal mucosal explant models, and may contribute to their anti-inflammatory activity. In line with these observations, filgotinib also affected oxidative stress responses in our CD-derived PCIS model. ConA stimulation increased ROS/RNS and NOx production in both ileal and colonic tissue, indicating that both regions were capable of mounting oxidative and nitrosative stress responses under inflammatory challenge. However, filgotinib significantly reduced ROS/RNS and NOx release predominantly in colonic PCIS, whereas this effect was absent or less pronounced in ileal tissue. This region-specific reduction was accompanied by upregulation of the antioxidative regulator TXNIP and downregulation of ROS- and inflammasome-associated genes, including NLRP3, CASP1, HIF1A, and DDIT4. Since oxidative and nitrosative stress contribute to mucosal injury, barrier dysfunction, and immune activation in CD,71,72 these findings suggest that the broader colonic response to filgotinib may include attenuation of oxidative tissue stress in addition to suppression of inflammatory cytokine signaling.

Our data provide direct functional evidence that key mucosal inflammatory responses in the ileum, including components of the Th1/Th17-associated program, may be at least partially JAK1-independent, resulting in reduced sensitivity to filgotinib in this intestinal region. Despite its limited impact on Th1/Th17-associated cytokines, filgotinib was not entirely ineffective in ileal CD-derived PCIS in this study. Upon ConA stimulation, it effectively inhibited the release of several proinflammatory markers, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-17A, in both ileal and colonic tissue slices. This aligns with transcriptional data demonstrating that CD-derived PCIS from the ileum led to downregulation of typical JAK1–STAT-dependent genes, such as STAT1, IL-6, TNF and IFNG,32,73 after ex vivo filgotinib treatment. Interestingly, filgotinib also led to a modest downregulation of several Treg-associated genes, including FOXP3, IL2RA, IL2RB, CD27, and CD86, in both ileal and colonic CD-derived PCIS ex vivo. These genes are critical for the development and efficient function of Tregs, which contribute to immune tolerance and homeostasis in the gut.74,75 In CD, functional Tregs are essential for restoring immune balance, limiting chronic inflammation and promoting healing of damaged intestinal mucosa, thereby preventing disease progression and complications.76,77 However, in contrast to the regulation of Treg-associated genes observed in both intestinal regions ex vivo, filgotinib induced a broader suppression of inflammatory activation pathways predominantly in colonic PCIS. This was reflected by the downregulation of genes involved in T cell receptor signaling, antigen presentation, and immune activation, together with reduced expression of neutrophil-associated genes. In addition to suppressing inflammatory T cell-associated programs, filgotinib induced a distinct set of upregulated genes in colonic PCIS. Together with the enrichment of anti-inflammatory pathways and the induction of genes associated with tissue remodeling and repair, this suggests that the stronger response of colonic tissue reflects a broader shift from active inflammatory signaling toward regulatory and potentially repair-associated tissue programs. This aspect may be particularly relevant for understanding why JAK1 inhibition appears more effective in colonic than ileal inflammatory settings. These findings indicate that while filgotinib modulates regulatory gene programs in both ileal and colonic tissue, its anti-inflammatory effects are more pronounced in the colon, where it additionally suppresses key pathways associated with both adaptive and innate immune activation.

In conclusion, our study reveals distinct, region-specific mucosal immune responses in CD with a more pronounced Th1/Th17 profile in the colon and a dominant Th17/innate signature in the ileum. These differences were accompanied by markedly broader anti-inflammatory effects of filgotinib in colonic than in ileal tissue, including suppression of pathways associated with T cell activation, antigen presentation, and neutrophil-associated responses, while several inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress responses remained less affected in ileal tissue ex vivo. These findings suggest that inflammatory pathways in ileal CD may be less responsive to JAK1 inhibition compared with those in the colon. Our study also supports the use of PCIS as a human ex vivo platform to investigate region-specific drug responses in intestinal inflammation.

Supplementary Material

jjag101_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Emma Spies, Olaf Macke, Sabine Schild, Dana Oldenkott, Annika Klauke, Julia Primke, and Hendrik Tietz for their excellent technical assistance. The authors also thank Prof. Dr Guntram Graßl for his scientific assistance and support in adapting the ethics application for this work. Furthermore, the authors are grateful to the resident physicians and nursing staff of the gastroenterology teams at MHH and Siloah Hospital for their valuable support in sample transfer and communication related to this work.

Contributor Information

Klaudia Maria Grieger, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) Research Network, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the Fraunhofer Excellence Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Germany.

Susann Dehmel, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) Research Network, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the Fraunhofer Excellence Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Germany.

Valerie Schröder, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) Research Network, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the Fraunhofer Excellence Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Germany.

Kevin Schmidt, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) Research Network, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the Fraunhofer Excellence Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Germany.

Victoria Neufeldt, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Laura Bock, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Dirk Schaudien, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Ulf Kulik, Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Alexander Wagner, Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Benjamin Gundert, Clinic for General, Visceral and Minimally Invasive Surgery, KRH Klinikum Region Hannover, Hannover, 30459, Germany.

Heiko Aselmann, Clinic for General, Visceral and Minimally Invasive Surgery, KRH Klinikum Region Hannover, Hannover, 30459, Germany.

Vanessa Neuhaus, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) Research Network, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the Fraunhofer Excellence Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Germany.

Armin Braun, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) Research Network, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the Fraunhofer Excellence Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Germany.

Katherina Sewald, Department for Preclinical Pharmacology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) Research Network, Hannover, 30625, Germany; Member of the Fraunhofer Excellence Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Germany.

Author contributions

Klaudia Grieger and Katherina Sewald wrote and designed the original manuscript draft. Klaudia Grieger, Vanessa Neuhaus, Susann Dehmel, and Katherina Sewald conceived and designed the ex vivo studies. Klaudia Grieger, Valerie Schröder, and Victoria Neufeldt performed experiments with PCIS and endpoint measurement. Klaudia Grieger performed data analysis and statistics. Laura Bock, Klaudia Grieger, and Susann Dehmel established and analyzed the quantification of tight junction proteins. Dirk Schaudien performed histopathology and imaging analysis. Kevin Schmidt and Klaudia Grieger performed bioinformatic analysis and interpretation of the gene expression data. Armin Braun and Katherina Sewald provided resources and scientific supervision. Alexander Wagner, Ulf Kulik, Benjamin Gundert, and Heiko Aselmann performed the clinical clarification of the patients and removal of the tissue. All authors reviewed and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at ECCO-JCC online.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fraunhofer Cluster of Immune Mediated Diseases (CIMD) and by ImmunAVATAR 161L0247C project, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Data Availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Burisch J, Jess T, Martinato M, Lakatos PL, ECCO -EpiCom. The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:322-337. 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Thavamani A, Umapathi KK, Khatana J, Gulati R.  Burden of psychiatric disorders among pediatric and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based analysis. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2019;22:527-535. 10.5223/pghn.2019.22.6.527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hendrickson BA, Gokhale R, Cho JH.  Clinical aspects and pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:79-94. 10.1128/CMR.15.1.79-94.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dolinger M, Torres J, Vermeire S.  Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 2024;403:1177-1191. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02586-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kobayashi T, Siegmund B, Le Berre C, et al.  Ulcerative colitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:74. 10.1038/s41572-020-0205-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dulai PS, Singh S, Vande Casteele N, et al.  Should we divide Crohn’s disease into ileum-dominant and isolated colonic diseases?  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:2634-2643. 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel J-F.  The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55:749-753. 10.1136/gut.2005.082909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cai Z, Wang S, Li J.  Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:765474. 10.3389/fmed.2021.765474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Triantafillidis JK, Zografos CG, Konstadoulakis MM, Papalois AE.  Combination treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: present status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2024;30:2068-2080. 10.3748/wjg.v30.i15.2068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Atreya R, Siegmund B.  Location is important: differentiation between ileal and colonic Crohn’s disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:544-558. 10.1038/s41575-021-00424-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Weiser M, Simon JM, Kochar B, et al.  Molecular classification of Crohn’s disease reveals two clinically relevant subtypes. Gut. 2018;67:36-42. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Park I, Jung J, Lee S, et al.  Characterization of terminal-ileal and colonic Crohn’s disease in treatment-naïve paediatric patients based on transcriptomic profile using logistic regression. J Transl Med. 2021;19:250. 10.1186/s12967-021-02909-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pierre N, Salée C, Massot C, et al.  Proteomics highlights common and distinct pathophysiological processes associated with ileal and colonic ulcers in Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:205-215. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gonzalez CG, Mills RH, Zhu Q, et al.  Location-specific signatures of Crohn’s disease at a multi-omics scale. Microbiome. 2022;10:133. 10.1186/s40168-022-01331-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kong L, Pokatayev V, Lefkovith A, et al.  The landscape of immune dysregulation in Crohn’s disease revealed through single-cell transcriptomic profiling in the ileum and colon. Immunity. 2023;56:444-458.e5. 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Atreya R, Bojarski C, Kühl AA, Trajanoski Z, Neurath MF, Siegmund B.  Ileal and colonic Crohn’s disease: does location makes a difference in therapy efficacy?  Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov. 2022;3:100097. 10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Feagan BG, et al.  Certolizumab pegol for active Crohn’s disease: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:670-678.e3. 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sutherland L, Singleton J, Sessions J, et al.  Double blind, placebo controlled trial of metronidazole in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 1991;32:1071-1075. 10.1136/gut.32.9.1071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Steinhart AH, Feagan BG, Wong CJ, et al.  Combined budesonide and antibiotic therapy for active Crohn’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:33-40. 10.1053/gast.2002.34225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Campieri M, Ferguson A, Doe W, Persson T, Nilsson LG.  Oral budesonide is as effective as oral prednisolone in active Crohn’s disease. The Global Budesonide Study Group. Gut. 1997;41:209-214. 10.1136/gut.41.2.209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kumar A, Cole A, Segal J, Smith P, Limdi JK.  A review of the therapeutic management of Crohn’s disease. Ther Adv Gastro­enterol. 2022;15:17562848221078456. 10.1177/17562848221078456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ardizzone S, Bollani S, Manzionna G, Imbesi V, Colombo E, Bianchi Porro G.  Comparison between methotrexate and azathioprine in the treatment of chronic active Crohn’s disease: a randomised, investigator-blind study. Dig Liver Dis. 2003;35:619-627. 10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00372-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Reinisch W, Gecse K, Halfvarson J, et al.  Clinical practice of adalimumab and infliximab biosimilar treatment in adult patients with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021;27:106-122. 10.1093/ibd/izaa078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Weisshof R, Vavricka SR, Pouillon L, et al.  Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab induction with or without budesonide in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease in Europe: a retrospective observational study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23:417. 10.1186/s12876-023-03032-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. D’Amico F, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S.  Ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease: new data for positioning in treatment algorithm. J Crohns Colitis. 2022;16:ii30-ii41. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. D’Haens G, Panaccione R, Baert F, et al.  Risankizumab as induction therapy for Crohn’s disease: results from the phase 3 ADVANCE and MOTIVATE induction trials. Lancet. 2022;399:2015-2030. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00467-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Krishna M, Spartz EJ, Maas L, et al.  Retrospective cohort study on the predictive value of primary non-response to initial biologic for future biologic use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2025;70:746-753. 10.1007/s10620-024-08816-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Marsal J, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Blumenstein I, Cappello M, Bazin T, Sebastian S.  Management of non-response and loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:897936. 10.3389/fmed.2022.897936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gordon H, Minozzi S, Kopylov U, et al.  ECCO guidelines on therapeutics in Crohn’s disease: medical treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2024;18:1531-1555. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Herrera-deGuise C, Serra-Ruiz X, Lastiri E, Borruel N.  JAK inhibitors: a new dawn for oral therapies in inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1089099. 10.3389/fmed.2023.1089099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kamal S, Lo SW, McCall S, Rodrigues B, Tsoi AH, Segal JP.  Unveiling the potential of JAK inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease. Biologics. 2024;4:177-186. 10.3390/biologics4020012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hu X, Li J, Fu M, Zhao X, Wang W.  The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:402. 10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Vermeire S, Schreiber S, Rubin DT, et al.  Efficacy and safety of filgotinib as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease (DIVERSITY): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;10:138-153. 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00272-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Galapagos NV. Galapagos announces topline results from Phase 3 DIVERSITY trial of filgotinib in Crohn’s disease. GlobeNewswire. 2023. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/02/08/2604431/0/en/Galapagos-announces-topline-results-from-Phase-3-DIVERSITY-trial-of-filgotinib-in-Crohn-s-disease.html
  • 35. Graaf I D, Olinga P, Jager MHd, et al.  Preparation and incubation of precision-cut liver and intestinal slices for application in drug metabolism and toxicity studies. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:1540-1551. 10.1038/nprot.2010.111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Grieger KM, Schröder V, Dehmel S, et al.  Ex vivo modeling and pharmacological modulation of tissue immune responses in inflammatory bowel disease using precision‐cut intestinal slices. Eur J Immunol. 2025;55:e70013. 10.1002/eji.70013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Niehof M, Hildebrandt T, Danov O, et al.  RNA isolation from precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) from different species. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:121. 10.1186/s13104-017-2447-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15-21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884-i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Heberle H, Meirelles GV, Da Silva FR, Telles GP, Minghim R.  InteractiVenn: a web-based tool for the analysis of sets through Venn diagrams. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:169. 10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Beneke V, Grieger KM, Hartwig C, et al.  Homeostatic T helper 17 cell responses triggered by complex microbiota are maintained in ex vivo intestinal tissue slices. Eur J Immunol. 2024;54:e2350946. 10.1002/eji.202350946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Graaf I A D, Groothuis GM, Olinga P.  Precision-cut tissue slices as a tool to predict metabolism of novel drugs. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2007;3:879-898. 10.1517/17425255.3.6.879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Li M, Graaf I D, Groothuis GMM.  Precision-cut intestinal slices: alternative model for drug transport, metabolism, and toxicology research. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12:175-190. 10.1517/17425255.2016.1125882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Neurath MF, Artis D, Becker C.  The intestinal barrier: a pivotal role in health, inflammation, and cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;10:573-592. 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00390-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Cazzato G, Colagrande A, Andriola V, et al.  Histological hallmarks of mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel diseases in the era of monoclonal antibodies therapy: new insights and perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:1570. 10.3390/diagnostics11091570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Daig R, Andus T, Aschenbrenner E, Falk W, Schölmerich J, Gross V.  Increased interleukin 8 expression in the colon mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1996;38:216-222. 10.1136/gut.38.2.216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Nikolaus S, Waetzig GH, Butzin S, et al.  Evaluation of interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor components sIL-6R and sgp130 as markers of inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:927-936. 10.1007/s00384-018-3069-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Alhendi A, Naser SA.  The dual role of interleukin-6 in Crohn’s disease pathophysiology. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1295230. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1295230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bertani L, Caviglia GP, Antonioli L, et al.  Serum interleukin-6 and -8 as predictors of response to vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel diseases. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1323. 10.3390/jcm9051323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Landy J, Ronde E, English N, et al.  Tight junctions in inflammatory bowel diseases and inflammatory bowel disease associated colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:3117-3126. 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Górecka A, Jura-Półtorak A, Koźma EM, Szeremeta A, Olczyk K, Komosińska-Vassev K.  Biochemical modulators of tight junctions (TJs): occludin, claudin-2 and zonulin as biomarkers of intestinal barrier leakage in the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory bowel disease progression. Molecules. 2024;29: 10.3390/molecules29194577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zheng D, Kern L, Elinav E.  The NLRP6 inflammasome. Immunology. 2021;162:281-289. 10.1111/imm.13293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Wiendl M, Becker E, Müller TM, Voskens CJ, Neurath MF, Zundler S.  Targeting immune cell trafficking - insights from research models and implications for future IBD therapy. Front Immunol. 2021;12:656452. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.656452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Nguyen LP, Pan J, Dinh TT, et al.  Role and species-specific expression of colon T cell homing receptor GPR15 in colitis. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:207-213. 10.1038/ni.3079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zhang J, Roberts AI, Liu C, et al.  A novel subset of helper T cells promotes immune responses by secreting GM-CSF. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1731-1741. 10.1038/cdd.2013.130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mirandola P, Ponti C, Gobbi G, et al.  Activated human NK and CD8+ T cells express both TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and TRAIL receptors but are resistant to TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity. Blood. 2004;104:2418-2424. 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Niroshika KKH, Weerakoon K, Molagoda IMN, Samarakoon KW, Weerakoon HT, Jayasooriya RGPT.  Exploring the dynamic role of circulating soluble tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) as a diagnostic and prognostic marker; a review. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2025;751:151415. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Tang W, Wang W, Zhang Y, Liu S, Liu Y, Zheng D.  TRAIL receptor mediates inflammatory cytokine release in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner. Cell Res. 2009;19:758-767. 10.1038/cr.2009.57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Ren X, Ye F, Jiang Z, Chu Y, Xiong S, Wang Y.  Involvement of cellular death in TRAIL/DR5-dependent suppression induced by CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:2076-2084. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Ikeda T, Hirata S, Fukushima S, et al.  Dual effects of TRAIL in suppression of autoimmunity: the inhibition of Th1 cells and the promotion of regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2010;185:5259-5267. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Song S, Choi K, Ryu S-W, Kang SW, Choi C.  TRAIL promotes caspase-dependent pro-inflammatory responses via PKCδ activation by vascular smooth muscle cells. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e223. 10.1038/cddis.2011.103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Kaboub K, Abu-Taha H, Arrouasse J, et al.  Discordant effects of janus kinase inhibition ex vivo on inflammatory responses in colonic compared to ileal mucosa. J Crohns Colitis. 2025;19:jjae117. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Gros B, Goodall M, Plevris N, et al.  Real-world cohort study on the effectiveness and safety of filgotinib use in ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2025;19. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Seiderer J, Elben I, Diegelmann J, et al.  Role of the novel Th17 cytokine IL-17F in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): upregulated colonic IL-17F expression in active Crohn’s disease and analysis of the IL17F p.His161Arg polymorphism in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:437-445. 10.1002/ibd.20339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Siakavellas SI, Bamias G.  Role of the IL-23/IL-17 axis in Crohn’s disease. Discov Med. 2012;14:253-262. https://www.discoverymedicine.com/Spyros-I-Siakavellas/2012/10/26/role-of-the-il-23-il-17-axis-in-crohns-disease/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Toskas A, Milias S, Delis G, Meditskou S, Sioga A, Papamitsou T.  Expression of IL-21 and IL-33 in intestinal mucosa of inflammatory bowel disease: an immunohistochemical study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13:2185. 10.3390/diagnostics13132185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Brand S, Beigel F, Olszak T, et al.  IL-22 is increased in active Crohn’s disease and promotes proinflammatory gene expression and intestinal epithelial cell migration. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G827-38. 10.1152/ajpgi.00513.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Reenaers C, Franchimont N, Oury C, et al.  Sensitivity of intestinal fibroblasts to TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated apoptosis in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:1334-1345. 10.1080/00365520802200010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Ye C, Zhu S, Yuan J.  Characterization of two TNF-related subtypes predicting infliximab therapy responses in Crohn’s disease. Front Immunol. 2022;13:871312. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Beltrán B, Nos P, Dasí F, et al.  Mitochondrial dysfunction, persistent oxidative damage, and catalase inhibition in immune cells of naïve and treated Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:76-86. 10.1002/ibd.21027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Alzoghaibi MA.  Concepts of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6540-6547. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i39.6540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Traves PG, Murray B, Campigotto F, Galien R, Meng A, Di Paolo JA.  JAK selectivity and the implications for clinical inhibition of pharmacodynamic cytokine signalling by filgotinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib and baricitinib. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:865-875. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Georgiev P, Charbonnier L-M, Chatila TA.  Regulatory T cells: the many faces of Foxp3. J Clin Immunol. 2019;39:623-640. 10.1007/s10875-019-00684-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Takahashi T, Kuniyasu Y, Toda M, et al.  Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells: induction of autoimmune disease by breaking their anergic/suppressive state. Int Immunol. 1998;10:1969-1980. 10.1093/intimm/10.12.1969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Clough JN, Omer OS, Tasker S, Lord GM, Irving PM.  Regulatory T-cell therapy in Crohn’s disease: challenges and advances. Gut. 2020;69:942-952. 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Ishikawa D, Okazawa A, Corridoni D, et al.  Tregs are dysfunctional in vivo in a spontaneous murine model of Crohn’s disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6:267-275. 10.1038/mi.2012.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jjag101_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Crohn's & Colitis are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES