Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine logoLink to Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine
. 1999 Jan;16(1):39–42. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.1.39

Attitudes towards general practice and primary care: a survey of senior house officers in accident and emergency.

J Dale 1, S Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1343253  PMID: 9918286

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The attitudes and knowledge of hospital based staff about the capabilities of general practice may be important obstacles to continuity of care and the quality of communication at the primary-secondary care interface. However, little research has sought to investigate such factors or how they change over time. The study aims to assess how senior house officers (SHOs) in accident and emergency (A&E) departments perceive general practice, and to test how attitudes change during their six months' tenure. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to all A&E SHOs working in the 27 A&E departments in South Thames region. At the end of the first month and at the end of the sixth months SHOs were asked to respond using 100 mm visual analogue scales to statements about the quality of general practitioner (GP) services in their area and their attitudes towards treating primary care patients in A&E. RESULTS: After sending reminders, 135 (79%) SHOs responded to the questionnaire at the end of the first month, and 115 (67%) responded to the questionnaire at the end of the sixth month; 104 (61%) responded to both. Statements relating to GP accessibility within and outside normal working hours, perceptions of patients' satisfaction with GP services, GPs' effectiveness in educating patients about use of services, and the frustrations and lack of reward of treating primary care patients scored most negatively. The overall trend was for attitudes to become more negative during SHOs' period of employment in A&E, particularly for those intent on hospital specialist careers or those working within London hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate the extent to which attitudes become more entrenched over time. This may lead to care that is more hospital focused. These issues need to be addressed if quality improvement is to occur across the A&E-primary care interface.

Full text

PDF
39

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bedford H. E., Jenkins S. M., Shore C., Kenny P. A. Use of an east end children's accident and emergency department for infants: a failure of primary health care? Qual Health Care. 1992 Mar;1(1):29–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Billinghurst B., Whitfield M. Why do patients change their general practitioner? A postal questionnaire study of patients in Avon. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Aug;43(373):336–338. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell J. L. General practitioner appointment systems, patient satisfaction, and use of accident and emergency services--a study in one geographical area. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):438–445. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crouch R., Dale J., Haverty S., Winsor S. Piloting an A&E and practice nurse educational exchange. Br J Nurs. 1996 Dec 12;5(22):1387–1390. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.22.1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dale J., Green J. How do nurses working in hospital accident and emergency departments perceive local general practitioners? A study in six English hospitals. Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Sep;8(3):210–216. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.3.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dale J., Green J., Reid F., Glucksman E., Higgs R. Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors. BMJ. 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):427–430. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dale J. Primary care: the old bugbear of accident and emergency services. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Mar;42(356):90–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foroughi D., Chadwick L. Accident and emergency abusers. Practitioner. 1989 May 8;233(1468):657–659. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibney D., Murphy A. W., Smith M., Bury G., Plunkett P. K. Attitudes of Dublin accident and emergency department doctors and nurses towards the services offered by local general practitioners. J Accid Emerg Med. 1995 Dec;12(4):262–265. doi: 10.1136/emj.12.4.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Green J., Dale J. Primary care in accident and emergency and general practice: a comparison. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Oct;35(8):987–995. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90238-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hadfield J. M., Yates D. W., Berry A. The emergency department and the community: a model for improved cooperation. J R Soc Med. 1994 Nov;87(11):663–665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hull S. A., Jones I. R., Moser K. Factors influencing the attendance rate at accident and emergency departments in East London: the contributions of practice organization, population characteristics and distance. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Jan;2(1):6–13. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeffery R. Normal rubbish: deviant patients in casualty departments. Sociol Health Illn. 1979 Jun;1(1):90–107. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11006793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morrison W. G., Pennycook A. G., Makower R. M., Swann I. J. The general practitioner's use and expectations of an accident and emergency department. J R Soc Med. 1990 Apr;83(4):237–240. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murphy A. W., Bury G., Plunkett P. K., Gibney D., Smith M., Mullan E., Johnson Z. Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost. BMJ. 1996 May 4;312(7039):1135–1142. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7039.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Padgett D. K., Brodsky B. Psychosocial factors influencing non-urgent use of the emergency room: a review of the literature and recommendations for research and improved service delivery. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Nov;35(9):1189–1197. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90231-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Salisbury C. J. How do people choose their doctor? BMJ. 1989 Sep 2;299(6699):608–610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6699.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scheithauer W., Rosen H., Kornek G. V., Sebesta C., Depisch D. Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ. 1993 Mar 20;306(6880):752–755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6880.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ward P., Huddy J., Hargreaves S., Touquet R., Hurley J., Fothergill J. Primary care in London: an evaluation of general practitioners working in an inner city accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 Jan;13(1):11–15. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams S., Dale J., Glucksman E., Wellesley A. Senior house officers' work related stressors, psychological distress, and confidence in performing clinical tasks in accident and emergency: a questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997 Mar 8;314(7082):713–718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7082.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES