Skip to main content
Virulence logoLink to Virulence
. 2026 Aug 2;17(1):2711518. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2026.2711518

D347G in PA is critical for the pathogenicity of H9N2 avian influenza A virus in mice

Zhehong Zhao a,b,c,d, Ye Tian e, Wenjie Jiang a,b,c,d, Xuefeng Yin a,b,c,d, Xinran Chu a,b,c,d, Quan Xie a,b,c,d, Tuofan Li a,b,c,d, Hongxia Shao a,b,c, Aijian Qin a,b,c, Jianqiang Ye a,b,c,d, Zhimin Wan a,b,c,d,✉
PMCID: PMC13432829  PMID: 42543038

ABSTRACT

Some subtypes of avian influenza A viruses (IAVs) have been associated with human infections (e.g. H3N8, H5Ny, H7Ny, H9N2, and H10Ny), and the ability of these viruses to cause zoonotic infections further increases the public health risk of avian IAVs. Among them, H9N2 virus is one of particular importance, both in its own right and as a contributor of internal gene segments to other emerging zoonotic avian IAVs. In recent years, an increasing number of H9N2 strains have been observed to be highly pathogenic in mice without prior adaptation. In this study, we found that a naturally occurring H9N2 isolate, A/chicken/Jiangxi/198/2019 (JX198), is lethal in mice. To investigate the molecular basis for the high virulence of JX198 in mice, a series of reassortants and mutants were generated and tested. We found that the PA, especially D347G mutation in PA, is responsible for the increased pathogenicity of JX198 in mice. Notably, D347G in PA of JX198 significantly alters the polymerase activity, vRNA production, and plaque-formation. Thus, our data demonstrate that a novel molecular marker, D347G in PA, determines the virulence of H9N2 in mice, posing a potential risk of H9N2 with D347G in PA for public health and highlighting the significance of continuing surveillance of H9N2 field strains.

KEYWORDS: H9N2, pathogenicity, mice, PA, D347G mutation, polymerase activity

Introduction

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus, containing 8 gene segments, which encode 8 structural proteins and several non-structural proteins, posing a threat to global health through seasonal epidemics and recurring pandemics [1]. Avian species are the natural reservoir of IAVs, and avian IAVs are the major source of novel IAV infections in humans, leading to a new pandemic. However, avian IAVs require some mutations to efficiently replicate and transmit in humans, especially in the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (vRdRp) [2,3]. The vRdRp is comprised of three components (PB2, PB1, and PA) that bind to viral RNAs which are encapsulated by NP protein to form the viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complex [4]. Replication and transcription of the IAV genome in the nuclei of infected cells are mediated by vRNP. Some mutations in vRdRp, which increase the polymerase activity of avian IAV, are necessary for the adaptation of avian IAV to mammalian hosts. In particular, the single mutation E627K in PB2 of several subtypes of avian IAVs has been shown to significantly increase the activities of avian vRdRp in mammalian cells, leading to greater replication and pathogenicity in mammals [5–7].

H9N2 virus belongs to low-pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV), which is enzootic in poultry across Asia, Africa, and the Middle East [8,9]. H9N2 virus causes mild disease in poultry, but can cause high mortality if co-infecting with other pathogens, resulting in a significant economic burden on the poultry industry [10,11]. In addition, H9N2 also poses a threat to public health as zoonotic diseases are being reported in different countries, as evidenced by numbers confirmed human infection cases [12]. It is worth noting that H9N2 virus has provided internal genes for some subtypes of avian IAV that infects humans in recent decades, including H5Ny, H7N9, H10N8, H10N3, and H3N8 [13–17].

Since H9N2 virus was first isolated from chickens in Guangdong Province in 1994, it has evolved into multiple lineages in China, represented by A/chicken/Beijing/1/1994 (BJ/94-like), A/quail/Hong Kong/G1/1997 (G1-like), A/chicken/G9/1997 (G9-like), and A/chicken/Shanghai/F/1998 (F/98-like) [18,19]. Moreover, different representative strains of H9N2 viruses have undergone continuous reassortment [20,21]. A novel genotype of H9N2 virus (G57, also known as genotype S) emerged in chickens in eastern China in 2007 and has become the dominant genotype throughout China since 2010, with the PB2 and M genes being derived from G1-like viruses and the other genes from Y280-like viruses [14,22,23]. Although H9N2 virus belongs to LPAIV, an increasing number of H9N2 viruses isolated from China were highly pathogenic in mice [24,25]. Amino acid variations in the PA subunit have been implicated in the adaptation of H9N2 viruses to mice, with position 347 identified as a critical residue in mouse-adapted strains generated by serial in vivo passing [26,27]. However, whether naturally occurring mutations at position 347 of the PA protein contribute in high pathogenicity of field H9N2 isolates in mice without prior adaptation remains largely unknown. In this study, we isolated a naturally circulating G57 genotype H9N2 virus from chickens in China, A/chicken/Jiangxi/198/2019 (JX198), that exhibits high lethality in mice. We confirmed that the vRNP complex is responsible for the increased pathogenicity of JX198, especially PA D347G is the major virulence determinant of JX198. This finding demonstrates that the PA D347G mutation has already emerged in naturally prevalent H9N2 field strains, highlighting the necessity of continuous surveillance for this mutation in AIV monitoring to assess potential zoonotic risks.

Materials and methods

Viruses and cells

Two H9N2 strains of JX198 and A/chicken/Xuzhou/508/2019(H9N2) (XZ508) used in this study were isolated from chickens in 2019. Reassortant H9N2 viruses were rescued using reverse genetics [28]. All viruses were propagated in 9-day-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated chicken eggs and stored at −80 ºC. Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) and human embryonic kidney 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), containing 10% fetal calf serum (Lonsera, Shanghai, China) and 1% antibiotic.

Genomic sequencing and phylogenetic analyses of the viruses

Each segment of JX198 and XZ508 was sequenced and cloned into plasmid of pDP2002 according to previous report [29]. Briefly, viral RNAs of JX198 and XZ508 were extracted from allantoic fluid and cDNAs were synthesized by reverse transcription (RT) with the primer: 5’-AGCGAAAGCAGG-3,’ and all 8 segments were amplified by RT-PCR with specific primers. The linearized influenza vector pDP2002 was also amplified. The PCR amplicon for each segment was recombined with the linearized pDP2002 vector using the ExnaseTM II (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) according manufacturer’s instructions. The constructed plasmids were sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Jinweizhi Biotechnology, Suzhou, China). For phylogenetic analysis, the sequences of the H9N2 reference strains were downloaded from Influenza Virus Database of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the maximum likelihood method in MEGA 11.

Generation of viruses by reverse genetics

A pair of reassortant H9N2 viruses used in this study were generated by reverse genetics as previously described [28]. Briefly, eight plasmids (1 µg of each plasmid) were co-transfected into co-cultured 293T and MDCK cells by TransIT®-LT1 Transfection Reagent (Mirus Bio LLC, Madison, WI, USA). After 6 h incubation, the medium was replaced with 1 mL of fresh opti-MEM. After 18 h incubation, the medium was replaced with 2 mL of fresh opti-MEM medium with 1 µg/mL TPCK-Trypsin. At day 3 post-transfection, the supernatants were collected and confirmed by hemagglutination (HA) assay and then inoculated into SPF embryonated chicken eggs.

Site-directed mutagenesis

Nucleotide changes corresponding to amino acid mutations were introduced into PA gene in plasmid pDP2002 with the Mut Express II Fast Mutagenesis Kit V2 (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), and mutation plasmids were sequenced to verify the presence of indicated mutations.

Virus plaque assays

All plaque assays were performed in MDCK cells using 1% agar overlay. Briefly, confluent cells in 6-well plates were infected with virus dilutions for 2 h at 37°C. Cells were washed two times with PBS and then overlaid with opti-MEM containing 1% agar and 1 µg/mL TPCK-trypsin. The plates were then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 72 h incubation, the overlays were removed and the cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution.

Luciferase assay for polymerase activity

Polymerase activity was measured using mini-genome assay as previously described [30]. Briefly, 293T cells were co-transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid p-Luci plasmid together with RNP genes from JX198 and/or XZ508 and internal control Renilla plasmid. After 48 h, the luciferase activity was measured using a dual-luciferase reporter system (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China).

Quantitation of viral vRNA and mRNA

The relative expression levels of viral mRNA and vRNA were determined in various recombinant virus-infected MDCK cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. Total RNA was extracted from the infected MDCK cells at 6, 12, and 24 hours post infection (hpi). For the detection of viral mRNA and vRNA, oligo dT and U12 primers were used to generate cDNAs of mRNA and vRNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting the NP gene was performed with the specific primers (Table 1). The expression values of each gene relative to GAPDH were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

Table 1.

The specific primer sequences used for detecting vRNA and mRNA.

Target fragment Orientation Primer sequence (5”−3”)
GAPDH Forward GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT
Reverse GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG
Influenza vRNA amplification for RT step / GGCCGTCATGGTGGCGAATCGTTCGTCACATCTCATCTACCTC
qPCR primers for influenza vRNA Forward GGCCGTCATGGTGGCGAAT
Reverse CCACACCCTTAGGTAACCCAGTAGA
Influenza mRNA amplification for RT step / CCAGATCGTTCGAGTCGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCT
qPCR primers for influenza mRNA Forward CCAGATCGTTCGAGTCGT
Reverse AAAAAGAGATCGTGGATTACGTCGC

Western blot

MDCK cells were infected with each H9N2 virus at an MOI of 1. The infected cell samples were collected and lysed at 6, 12, and 24 hpi to obtain total cellular protein lysates. The lysates were denatured at 98°C for 5 minutes in protein loading buffer, followed by electrophoretic separation using 10% SDS-PAGE. Then, separated proteins were transfected onto nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with block buffer, the membranes were co-incubated with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against influenza virus NP protein and GADPH for 2 h at room temperature (RT). GADPH was used as an internal reference protein. After washing 3 times with PBST, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody at RT for 1 h. After washing 5 times with PBST, the immunoreactive bands on the membranes were developed through chemiluminescent reagents.

Mouse study

Five-week-old BALB/c female mice were purchased from Experiment Animal Center of Yangzhou University (Yangzhou, China). All mice were housed in the standard cages (up to 5 mice/cage). All mice were acclimated for 3 days before the experiments. The mice (11 mice/group) were anesthetized with isoflurane and infected with the reassortant H9N2 viruses at 105 TCID50 in a volume 25 µL by intranasal inoculation, respectively. At 3-and 5-day post-infection (dpi), three mice from each group were euthanized, and the lungs were collected for virus titration. Five infected mice per group were monitored daily for body weight loss and clinical signs. The mice with the body weight loss more than 25% will be anesthetized and humanely euthanized. We strictly adhere to the veterinary guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association for the anesthesia and euthanasia of mice. During anesthesia, mice are placed in a sealed chamber containing isoflurane (Friends Honesty Life Sciences Company Limited, Hong Kong). Once anesthesia is achieved, lethality is induced via cervical dislocation within 5 to 10 seconds.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using GraphPad PRISM 8 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). The student t-test was used to calculate p values. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and all data are presented as the means ± SEM. Significant levels were set as follows: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Ethics statement

The mouse studies were performed in accordance with the institutional animal guidelines approved by the Animal Care Committee at Yangzhou University, China. The protocols were approved by the Animal Committee of Yangzhou University with ethical permission number NSFC2023-SYXY-09 (licensed on 23 May 2023).

Results

Replication and pathogenicity of JX198 in mice

In our initial study, we found the H9N2 isolate JX198, but not XZ508, was lethal to BALB/c mice. To understand the genetics of the JX198 and XZ508, the whole genomes of these two viruses were sequenced and analyzed. A phylogenetic tree based on HA revealed that these two viruses fell into the h9.3 branch and was closed to A/Duck/Hong Kong/Y280/97 (H9N2) (Y280) (Figure 1(A)). Phylogenetic analysis of the other 7 genes showed that PB2 and M genes of the two viruses derived from G1-like and other 5 genes (PB1, PA, NP, NA, and NS) were from Y280-like (Figure 1(B)). These results indicated that JX198 and XZ508 belonged to G57 genotype of H9N2, which has been predominant in chickens in China since 2010 [14]. To characterize the pathogenicity of the two H9N2 viruses in mice, BALB/c were intranasally challenged with wild type (WT) JX198 and XZ508 viruses, respectively. WT JX198 infection induced rapid body weight loss in mice, with all infected mice succumbing or had to be euthanasia by 5 dpi, whereas mice infected with WT XZ508 exhibited no obvious clinical symptoms (Supplementary Figure S1). To further evaluate pathogenicity of these two H9N2 viruses, we rescued JX198 and XZ508 by reverse genetics and performed the mice challenged study. Consistent with the WT strains, the rescued viruses exhibited highly similar pathogenic phenotypes in mice. The mice infected with rJX198 displayed rapid body weight loss and weakness from 3 dpi, and all infected mice died or had to be euthanized at 8 dpi (Figure 2(A,B)). Notably, no clinical signs of disease and only minor weight loss were observed in the mice infected with XZ508, and the infected mice were recovered rapidly from 5 dpi (Figure 2(A,B)). Three infected mice in each group were euthanized at 3 and 5 dpi to determine lung viral titers. As shown in Figure 2(C), the replication of rJX198 could be efficiently detected in the lungs of mice with high viral titers, whereas that of rXZ508 was not detected. To confirm successful infection of mice with rXZ508, we performed an immunofluorescence assay (IFA) on serum samples harvested from the rXZ508 infected mice in 14 dpi. Distinct specific fluorescent signals were still observed when XZ508 infected MDCK cells were incubated with 1:400 diluted serum, which serologically verified rXZ508 successfully infected mice (Supplementary Figure S2). All these demonstrated that JX198, but not XZ508, is highly pathogenic to BALB/c mice.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree and genotype classification of H9N2 viruses. Panel A shows a phylogenetic tree of H9N2 viruses with branches labeled h9.1 in green, h9.2 in gray, h9.3 in red and h9.4 in blue. Red triangles mark A/chicken/Jiangxi/198/2019 and A/chicken/Xuzhou/508/2019. Red squares indicate representative strains of the h9.3 lineage, including A/Duck/Hong Kong/Y280/97, A/Chicken/Hong Kong/G9/97, A/chicken/Shanghai/F/1998 and A/Chicken/Beijing/1/94. Panel B displays a genotype classification with columns labeled PB2, PB1, PA, NP, NA, M and NS. Rows represent lineages: Y280-like, G1-like, G9-like, F/98-like, Y439-like, North America-like, JX198 and XZ508, each with colored boxes corresponding to the gene segments.

Phylogenetic analyses of J198 and XZ508 viruses. (A) HA phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA11 using the maximum likelihood method. The red triangles indicate viruses characterized in this study, and the red squares indicate representative strains of h9.3 lineage. (B) Colored boxes show the lineage classification of each segment of H9N2 viruses belonging to Y280-like, G1-like, G9-like, F/98-like, Y439-like, and North America-like.

Figure 2.

Line plots, survival plots and dot plots of body weight, survival and lung virus titers across days. The image A showing a line graph of Weight change (100 percent) on the vertical axis from 60 to 140 and Dpi on the horizontal axis from 0 to 14. Two series: rJX198 declines from about 100 at 0 to about 105 at 2, then to about 70 at 7 to 8. rXZ508 stays near 100 to 110 from 0 to 14. The image B showing a step plot of Percent survival on the vertical axis from 0 to 100 and Dpi on the horizontal axis from 0 to 14. rJX198 drops from 100 to about 20 at 7 and to 0 at 8. rXZ508 remains at 100 through 14. The image C showing dot plots of TCID50 per mL (Log10) on the vertical axis from 0 to 6 and Dpi on the horizontal axis with 3 dpi and 5 dpi. At 3 dpi, rJX198 dots near 4 to 5; rXZ508 near 0. At 5 dpi, rJX198 near 3 to 4; rXZ508 near 0. The image D showing a line graph of Weight change (100 percent) from 60 to 140 versus Dpi 0 to 14. rXZ508-JX198 4P falls to about 70 by 5. rXZ508-JX198 3P dips to about 80 at 7 then rises to about 110 by 14. rXZ508-JX198(HA+NA) rises to about 120 by 14. The image E showing Percent survival 0 to 100 versus Dpi 0 to 14. rXZ508-JX198 4P drops to 0 by 5. rXZ508-JX198 3P drops to about 60 by 7 and stays to 14. rXZ508-JX198(HA+NA) stays at 100 to 14. The image F showing TCID50 per mL (Log10) 0 to 6 versus 3 dpi and 5 dpi. At 3 dpi: rXZ508-JX198 4P near 4; rXZ508-JX198 3P near 0 to 2; rXZ508-JX198(HA+NA) near 0. At 5 dpi: rXZ508-JX198 4P near 2.5 to 3; rXZ508-JX198 3P near 2.5 to 3.5; rXZ508-JX198(HA+NA) near 0. The image G showing Weight change (100 percent) 60 to 140 versus Dpi 0 to 14 with four series: rXZ508-JX198PB2, rXZ508-JX198PB1, rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508-JX198NP. All start near 100, dip around 7 to 9 to about 80 to 95, then rise to about 105 to 120 by 14. The image H showing Percent survival 0 to 100 versus Dpi 0 to 14 for the same four series. One series drops to about 60 at 7; another drops to about 60 at 8; another drops to about 40 at 9; one remains at 100 to 14. The image I showing TCID50 per mL (Log10) 0 to 6 versus 3 dpi and 5 dpi for rXZ508-JX198PB2, rXZ508-JX198PB1, rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508-JX198NP. At 3 dpi: PB2 near 2; PB1 near 3 to 4; PA near 4; NP near 3 to 4. At 5 dpi: PB2 near 2 to 3; PB1 near 2.5 to 3; PA near 3 to 4; NP near 2.

Replication and pathogenicity of JX198 and XZ508 viruses. 5-week-old BALB/c (11 mice/group) were infected with 105 TCID50 of rJX198, rXZ508, or their reassortants. (A, D, and G) Percentages of change in body weight and (B, E, and H) survival following infection with each virus. (C, F, and I) Virus titers in lung homogenates collected at 3 and 5 dpi were measured by TCID50 in MDCK cells. The p values were analyzed by using the student t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

vRNP plays a major role in the different pathogenicity between JX198 and XZ508

To identify the virulence determiners in JX198, we rescued three reassortants using XZ508 as the backbone. The first reassortant with PB2, PB1, PA, and NP from JX198 and the other genes from XZ508, designated as rXZ508-JX198 4P, the second reassortant with PB2, PB1, and PA from JX198 and the other genes from XZ508, designated as rXZ508-JX198 3P, the third reassortant with HA and NA from JX198 and the other genes from XZ508, designated as rXZ508-JX198 (HA+NA). Mouse study showed that rXZ508-JX198(HA+NA) similar to rXZ508 did not cause weight loss in infected mice, and could not be detected in lungs of the infected mice (Figure 2(D)). However, the mice infected with rXZ508-JX198 4P showed rapid body weight loss and weakness from 2 dpi, and either succumbed or had to be euthanized at 5 dpi (Figure 2(D,E)). rXZ508-JX198 3P also showed high pathogenicity in mice with weight loss beginning at 4 dpi, and the weight loss of the infected mice reached a peak at 8 dpi (about 20%), and 2 out of 5 mice had weight loss over 25% and had to be euthanized (Figure 2(D,E)). Notably, rXZ508-JX198 4P and rXZ508-JX198 3P could be efficiently detected in lungs of infected mice at 3 and 5 dpi, whereas rXZ508-JX198 (HA+NA) similar with XZ508 could not be not detected in lungs of infected mice (Figure 2(F)). All these demonstrated that the vRNP complex is the major contributor to the pathogenicity of JX198 in mice.

To further identify which gene contributes to the different pathogenicity between JX198 and XZ508, four single-gene reassortants using the XZ508 backbone were rescued, designated as rXZ508-JX198PB2, rXZ508-JX198PB1, rXZ508-JX198PA, and rXZ508-JX198NP. As shown in Figure 2(G), mice infected with these four viruses all showed body weight loss. Notably, rXZ508-JX198NP only caused about 10% bodyweight loss at 7 dpi and then recovered, the other three reassortants caused more bodyweight loss than rXZ508-JX198NP, especially rXZ508-JX198PA, which caused over 20% weight loss in infected mice, and 3 out of 5 mice had to be euthanized (Figure 2(G,H)). The higher pathogenicity of rXZ508-JX198PA was also reflected by higher viral titers in lungs of infected mice at 3 and 5 dpi (Figure 2(I)). These data demonstrated that each gene from the vRNP complex (PB2, PB1, PA, and NP) contributes to the pathogenicity of JX198 in mice, and the PA gene of JX198 plays a vital role in the pathogenesis.

PA gene of JX198 significantly enhances the polymerase activity of XZ508

To investigate whether the pathogenicity of JX198 is associated with the polymerase activity, we conducted a comparison using a minigenome assay with PB2, PB1, PA, and NP genes in 293T cells. As described in Figure 3, the polymerase activity of 4P from JX198 was significantly higher than that of XZ508 (approximately 3-fold). Hybrid vRNP complex assay showed that the polymerase activity of the XZ508 vRNP complex bearing the PA or NP of JX198 was significantly increased compared to that of original XZ508 (Figure 3), whereas that of JX198 vRNP complex bearing PA of XZ508 was significantly decreased compared to that of JX198 (Figure 3). All these demonstrated that PA is the major contributor to the difference of the polymerase activity between JX198 and XZ508.

Figure 3.

Bar graph showing luciferase activity across PB2, PB1, PA and NP gene combinations labeled J and X. Bar graph with y-axis label Luciferase Activity, range 0 to 80. X-axis shows 10 grouped conditions defined by a 4-row table labeled PB2, PB1, PA, NP, with entries J or X under each bar. Bar 1: PB2 X, PB1 X, PA X, NP X; value about 21. Bar 2: PB2 J, PB1 X, PA X, NP X; value about 11. Bar 3: PB2 X, PB1 J, PA X, NP X; value about 5. Bar 4: PB2 X, PB1 X, PA J, NP X; value about 37. Bar 5: PB2 X, PB1 X, PA X, NP J; value about 32. Bar 6: PB2 X, PB1 J, PA J, NP J; value about 37. Bar 7: PB2 J, PB1 X, PA J, NP J; value about 25. Bar 8: PB2 J, PB1 J, PA X, NP J; value about 7. Bar 9: PB2 J, PB1 J, PA J, NP X; value about 41. Bar 10: PB2 J, PB1 J, PA J, NP J; value about 63. Each bar includes an error bar. Significance brackets above bars include asterisk groupings: three asterisks and two asterisks over early comparisons and four asterisks, three asterisks, two asterisks over comparisons near the highest bars.

The gene contributes to the difference in the polymerase activity of JX198 and XZ508. Polymerase activity of the vRNP complex of JX198 and XZ508, as well as their corresponding single-gene-segment hybdid derivative, was determined. The experiments were performed with three independent biological replicates. Virus strain abbreviations: J, JX198; X, XZ508. The p values were analyzed by using the student t-test *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

D347G in PA plays a significant role in the polymerase activity of JX198

To investigate the molecular basis of the pathogenicity of PA of JX198, the sequence of PA protein of JX198 and XZ508 was analyzed. Six amino acid variations in the PA protein between JX198 and XZ508, specifically at positions 184, 212, 276, 311, 335 and 347, were found (Figure 4(A,B)). As shown in Figure 4(B), the positions 184 and 212 are located in the N-terminal endonuclease and PA-linker of the PA protein, respectively, while the positions 276, 311, 335, and 347 are within C-terminal. To identify the residue(s) in PA that affect the polymerase activity, we generated two mutant plasmids based on pDP2002-JX198PA. pDP2002-JX198PA/ΔN containing mutants S184R and R212C, and pDP2002-JX198PA/ΔC containing mutants C276R, M311V, L335V, and G347D. The polymerase activity of the vRNP complex bearing pDP2002-JX198PA/ΔN was significantly higher than that of XZ508, whereas that of vRNP bearing pDP2002-JX198PA/ΔC was close to that of XZ508 (Figure 4(C)). To pinpoint which residue of the C-terminal of PA protein affects polymerase activity, four plasmids containing each amino acid mutation in the PA C-terminal of JX198 were generated, named as pDP2002-JX198PA/C276R, pDP2002-JX198PA/M311V, pDP2002-JX198PA/L335V, pDP2002-JX198PA/G347D, and polymerase activity of the vRNA bearing each of these PA mutants were tested. As described in Figure 4(D), the mutations in position 276, 311, and 335 had no effect on the polymerase activity, whereas the G347D mutation reduced the polymerase activity to levels close to that of XZ508. To further validate the critical role of the residue at position 347 of PA in regulating polymerase activity, we performed a reverse verification experiment by introducing the D347G mutation into the PA of XZ508. Functional assays demonstrated that the XZ508 PA D347G mutation significantly enhanced viral polymerase activity in JX198 backbone (Supplementary Figure S3). These data confirmed that the residue at position 347 of PA protein significantly affects the polymerase activity of JX198.

Figure 4.

Multi-part infographic on PA amino acid sites and luciferase activity for JX198 and XZ508 mutants. Image A displays two 3D views of a polymerase complex, labeled PB1 and PB2, with a 90-degree rotation. Mutations include R184S, C212R, V311M, D347G, V355L and R276C. Image B shows a PA protein domain map with sections: Endonuclease, Linker, Arch, C-terminal domain. Two rows, JX198 and XZ508, list amino acids: JX198 has S184, C212, C276, M311, L335, G347; XZ508 has R184, R212, R276, V311, V335, D347. Positions marked: 184, 195, 212, 256, 276, 311, 335, 347, 372, 405, 716. Image C features a bar chart of luciferase activity. X-axis: XZ508-JX198PA, XZ508-JX198PA/ΔN, XZ508-JX198PA/ΔC, XZ508. Y-axis: Luciferase activity (0-50). Bar heights: XZ508-JX198PA ~37; ΔN ~33; ΔC ~15; XZ508 ~22. Significance: four and three asterisks. Image D shows another luciferase activity chart. X-axis: XZ508-JX198PA, C276R, M311V, L335V, G347D, XZ508. Y-axis: Luciferase activity (0-50). Bar heights: XZ508-JX198PA ~37; C276R ~39; M311V ~30; L335V ~32; G347D ~5; XZ508 ~22. Significance: four and three asterisks.

The key amino acid (s) in the PA gene contribute to the difference in the polymerase activity. The six amino acid differences of the PA protein between JX198 and XZ508 are shown in (A) 3D-structure image and (B) schematic sketch. The 3D-stucture image was generated using Pymol software (PDB: 6qnw). (C) and (D) Polymerase activity of vRNP complex of the PA mutations of JX198 with XZ508 backbone. The experiments were performed with three independent biological replicates. The p values were analyzed by using the student t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

D347G in PA affects viral vRNA synthesis

To determine the impact of residue 347 of PA on viral transcription and genome replication, a mutant containing single-point mutation in PA residue 347 of JX198 with XZ508 backbone, named as rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, was rescued. The MDCK cells infected with rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508 and rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, respectively, were collected at 6, 12, and 24 hpi, and the vRNA and mRNA levels of NP gene were quantified by qRT-PCR. No significant differences were observed in mRNA levels of NP in MDCK cells infected with these three viruses (Figure 5). However, the vRNA level of rXZ508-JX198PA was significantly higher than that of rXZ508 at 6, 12, and 24 hpi (p < 0.1, p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively), whereas the mutation G347D significantly reduced the vRNA level of rXZ508-JX198 in MDCK cells (Figure 5). To further clarify the impact residue 347 of PA on viral transcription and genomic replication, we generated the XZ508 mutant containing the mutation D347G in PA (rXZ508 PA/D347G) and tested the vRNA and mRNA levels in infected MDCK cells. As shown in Figure 5, the D347G did not changed mRNA level of XZ508, but significantly increased the vRNA level of XZ508. To further verify the intracellular viral protein expression levels, Western blot assay were performed with infected cell samples collected at the same time points. The results showed the NP protein express levels were comparable among the four virus groups at each detected time point (6, 12 and 24 hpi), with noticeable differences in viral NP protein abundance between virus strains, which was highly consistent with the NP mRNA expression trends obtained from qRT-PCR analysis (Supplementary Figure S4). These data demonstrated that the residue 347 of PA protein mainly affects vRNA production, but not mRNA transcription in the virus life cycle.

Figure 5.

Bar graphs comparing N P gene m R N A and v R N A fold change at 6, 12 and 24 h p i for four viruses. Image A: Bar graph at ′6 h p i′ shows mRNA and vRNA levels. mRNA values for rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, rXZ508-PA/D347G range from 1 to 2. vRNA values: rXZ508-JX198PA ~7, rXZ508 ~5, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D ~5, rXZ508-PA/D347G ~6-7. Asterisk over vRNA. Image B: At ′12 h p i′, mRNA values range 1.5 to 2.5. vRNA values: rXZ508-JX198PA ~12, rXZ508 ~6-7, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D ~8, rXZ508-PA/D347G ~10. Two brackets over vRNA, one with double asterisk. Image C: At ′24 h p i′, mRNA values range 2 to 3. vRNA values: rXZ508-JX198PA ~15-16, rXZ508 ~7, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D ~8-9, rXZ508-PA/D347G ~10-11. Two brackets over vRNA, one with double asterisk. Legend: rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, rXZ508-PA/D347G. Across all time points, vRNA levels exceed mRNA, increasing from 6 to 24 h p i, with rXZ508-JX198PA consistently highest.

The relative NP gene viral vRNA and mRNA levels in MDCK cells infected with recombinant H9N2 viruses. The MDCK cells were infected with each recombinant virus at an MOI 1. NP-specific vRNA and mRNA levels were quantified by qRT-PCR at 6, 12, and 24 dpi. The p values were analyzed by using the student t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

D347G in PA plays a key role in pathogenicity in mice

To further investigate whether mutation(s) in the C-terminate of PA contribute to the pathogenicity of JX198 in mice, we generated a mutant by introducing the mutations in C-terminate of PA of JX198 with XZ508 backbone, designated as rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔC containing mutations C276R, M311V, L335V, and G347D. The replication and pathogenicity of rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔC and rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D were evaluated in mice. Mouse study showed that the mice infected with rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔC showed no weight loss and no any clinical signs, and minor weight loss was observed in the rXZ508-PAJX198/G347D infected mice from 2 dpi and recovered from 7 dpi (Figure 6(A)). All the mice infected with rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔC and rXZ508-PAJX198/G347D survived by 14 dpi (Figure 6(B)). In contrast, the bodyweight of mice infected with XZ508-JX198PA declined rapidly from 3 dpi, and 3 out of the 5 mice had succumbed to the infection (Figure 6(A,B)). At 3 dpi and 5 dpi, 3 mice of each group were euthanized and viral titers in the lungs were determined. As shown in Figure 6(C), no virus was detected in the lungs from mice infected with rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔC, and low titers of virus in lungs from mice infected with rXZ508-PAJX198/G347D could be detected on 5 dpi (Figure 6(C)). In contrast, rXZ508-JX198PA could be efficiently detected with higher virus titers as described in Figure 6(C). These results demonstrated that the mutations in C-terminal of PA, especially D347G mutation, contribute to the pathogenicity of JX198 in mice.

Figure 6.

Line and step plots of weight change and survival, plus a dot plot of lung virus titers. Image A: Line graph with error bars. Y-axis: Weight change (100%), range 60-120. X-axis: Dpi, range 0-14. Series: rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔN, rXZ508-JX198PA. rXZ508-JX198PA starts at 100, drops to 75 at 7 dpi, rises to 112 at 14 dpi. rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D stays 98-106, ends at 110. rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔN stays 100-108, ends at 113. Image B: Step plot. Y-axis: Percent survival, range 0-100. X-axis: Dpi, range 0-14. rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D and rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔN remain at 100. rXZ508-JX198PA drops from 100 to 60 at 7 dpi, then to 40 at 8 dpi, stays at 40. Image C: Dot plot with mean/error bars. Y-axis: TCID50 per mL (Log10), range 0-8. X-axis: 3 dpi, 5 dpi. At 3 dpi: rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D and rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔN near 0.7; rXZ508-JX198PA near 3.0, 3.2, 4.8 with double asterisk. At 5 dpi: rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D near 2.2; rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔN near 0.7; rXZ508-JX198PA near 4.4, 5.7, 6.0 with triple asterisk.

Replication and pathogenicity of rXZ508-JX198PA, and its PA mutants in BALB/c mice. 5-week-old BALB/c mice (11 mice/group) were infected with 105 TCID50 of rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508-JX198 PA/G347D, and rXZ508-JX198 PA/ΔC. (A) Percentages of change in body weight and (B) survival following infection with each virus. (C) Virus titers in lung homogenates collected at 3 and 5 dpi were measured by TCID50 in MDCK cells. The p values were analyzed by using the student t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

D347G in PA of JX198 affects viral plaque phenotype

To investigate whether PA and specific residue mutations in PA of JX198 can affect the viral plaque phenotype, rJX198, rXZ508-JX198 4P, rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔC, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, and rXZ508 were selected for testing. As shown in Figure 7, rJX198 and rXZ508-JX198 4P produced significantly larger plaques, whereas rXZ508 did not exhibit discernible plaque phenotype. Although XZ508-JX198PA presented smaller plaques than that of rJX198 and rXZ508-JX198 4P, it also had a clear plaque phenotype. The plaque sizes formed by rXZ508-JX198PA/ΔC and rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D were further reduced (Figure 7). All these demonstrated that the PA of rJX198, especially D347G mutation, affects viral plaque phenotype.

Figure 7.

Plaque assay images and a box plot showing plaque diameter for rJX198 and rXZ508 variants. Image A displays six plaque assay wells: rJX198, rXZ508-JX198 4P, rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, rXZ508-JX198PA/delta C and rXZ508. Image B features a box plot with plaque diameter (mm) from 0 to 25, showing groups: rJX198, rXZ508-JX198 4P, rXZ508-JX198PA, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, rXZ508-JX198PA/delta C, rXZ508. Box plot medians: rJX198 ~18, rXZ508-JX198 4P ~19, rXZ508-JX198PA ~13, rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D ~8, rXZ508-JX198PA/delta C ~6, rXZ508 ~0. Significance: **** between rJX198 & rXZ508-JX198 4P, **** between rXZ508-JX198 4P & rXZ508-JX198PA, *** between rXZ508-JX198PA & rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D, ** between rXZ508-JX198PA/G347D & rXZ508-JX198PA/delta C.

The plaque phenotype of the reassortants and mutants of XZ508. The plaque phenotypes of rJX198, rXZ508-JX198(4P), rXZ508-JX198 PA/G347D, rXZ508-JX198 PA/ΔC, and XZ508 were assessed by plaque assay on MDCK cells under a 1% agarose overlay. (A) Representative images of the plaque size of the reassortants and mutants of XZ508. (B) All plaque assays were performed under the same conditions, and the average plaque diameter of randomly selected ten plaques for each virus was measured and calculated using ImageJ software analysis. The p values were analyzed by using the student t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Discussion

The H9N2 virus is widespread across most parts of Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa [9]. It not only causes severe economic losses to the poultry industry, but also can jump from avian species to mammalian species, including humans [31,32], which raises concerns about its potential to cause a pandemic. In this study, we focused on two H9N2 viruses isolated from chickens that these two viruses have different phenotypes in mice: XZ508 is nonpathogenic, whereas JX198 is highly lethal in mice. Through the generation and testing of a series of reassortant and mutant viruses, we demonstrated that PA is the major virulence factor of JX198, and the amino acid at position 347 of PA is the key determiner that can increase pathogenicity in mice and polymerase activity.

The pathogenicity and transmissibility of avian IAVs in mammals are influenced by different factors that are not fully understood. HA and vRNP are considered to be the two most important factors influencing the pathogenicity of IAVs. Some residue mutations in HA have been shown to alter its preference for human-type receptors, and thereby increasing the transmissibility of avian IAVs, especially Q226L and G228A/S (H3 numbering), which can increase the number of subtypes of avian IAVs binding to human-type receptors, replication in mammalian cells, and virulence and transmission in mammals [33–35]. Amino acids 627K and 701N in PB2 have also been reported to increase the pathogenicity of several subtypes of avian IAVs in mice and ferrets [5,36,37]. In this study, we found that the major factor driving the high lethality of the H9N2 virus in mice was the D347G mutation acquired in PA, rather than the 627K mutation in PB2. While this observation implies that AIVs may employ diverse molecular mechanisms to enhance pathogenicity in mammals, however, this hypothesis remains to be fully validated by future studies that systematically test the independent and combinatorial effects of non-PA gene mutations.

Notably, PB2 and PB1 from JX198 could enhance viral pathogenicity in mice when reassorted into the XZ508 backbone, but this in vivo virulence enhancement was not accompanied by a corresponding increase in polymerase. This inconsistent result might be due to the fact that the minigenome assay only measures the polymerase activity of the vRNP in vitro, while viral pathogenicity in mice is a complex phenotype involving tissue‑specific viral replication, host innate immune modulation, and viral spread efficiency. We further compared the amino acid sequences of PB2, PB1, and NP between JX198 and XZ508: 5 amino acid variations in PB2 (T76A, K105T, V292I, V338I, V613I), 16 amino acid variations in PB1 (A14V, N52K, A56T, I69V, S173T, I200V, R214K, R235K, M317V, M372I, K383Q, I525V, A573T, P598L, D619E, S642N), and 4 amino acid variations in NP (A2V, M136L, G391R, and R452K). Among these mutations, PB2 V292I has been shown to be associated with the enhancement to the polymerase activity of AIV in mammals and pathogenicity in mice [38]. Whether PB2 V292I and other previously uncharacterized amino acid mutations contribute to the increased pathogenicity of JX198 in mice requires further investigation.

In addition of PB2, PB1, and PA, our data also revealed that the NP gene of JX198 moderately contributed to viral pathogenicity in mice (Figure 2). Moreover, the polymerase activity assays further revealed that NP gene from JX198 significantly enhanced the vRNP polymerase activity of XZ508 (Figure 3). NP of influenza virus is an essential component vRNP complex that participates in viral RNA encapsulation and replication [39]. The four amino acid variation (A2V, M136L, G391R, and R452K) identified between JX198 and XZ508 NP may affect vRNP stability, RNA-binding affinity, or protein-protein interaction within the replication complex, thereby affecting viral fitness in mice. Further studies are required to clarify whether these NP substitutions individually or cooperatively contributed to enhance polymerase activity, viral replication, or mammalian adaptation.

The distribution of residues at position 347 of PA of H9N2 viruses circulating in chickens in China was analyzed, the results showed that G347 is rare (0.53%), and more than 99%, even 100%, of H9, H5, and H7 viruses circulating in chickens in China contain D at this position (Table 2). However, it should be noted that only a few PA sequences of avian IAVs circulating in chickens in China have been included in the GISAID and NCBI databases, particularly after 2020. Therefore, the currently available datasets may not fully reflect the recent evolutionary dynamics or the true prevalence of this mutation in circulating H9N2 viruses.

Table 2.

Amino acid diversity of PA position 347 of avian IAVs circulating in chickens in China.

Viruses D (%) G (%) Other (%)
H9N2 99.19 0.54 E (0.18), N (0.09)
H5Ny 100 0 0
H7Ny 100 0 0

The PA protein of avian IAV is the third protein of vRdRp and contains 716 amino acids. It is composed of the N-terminal endonuclease region and the larger C-terminal region connected by a PA linker [40,41], which also plays a crucial role in the adaptation and pathogenicity of avian IAVs in mammals. The residue at PA position 347 is located at the edge of the PA C-terminal endonuclease region (Figure 4(A)), which has been shown to affect viral polymerase activity and the pathogenicity of H5N1 and H7N9 viruses in mice [42,43]. In previous studies on generating H9N2 mouse adaptation strains, it was showed that G347D of PA can increase polymerase activity and virulence [26,27]. However, these studies only characterized this mutation in mouse adapted H9N2 strains generated by serial passaging in mice. Our study identified that the PA D347G is a naturally occurring mutation in a field G57 genotype H9N2 isolate, and this mutation is sufficient to confer high pathogenicity in mice without prior adaptation. This key distinction highlights the direct and immediate zoonotic risk of naturally circulating H9N2 strains carrying the PA D347G mutation are already present in poultry populations, which is an important consideration for on-field surveillance and risk assessment that was not addressed in previous mouse-adaptation studies.

Han et al. reported that the vRdRp of human influenza A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) and avian influenza A/duck/Fujian/01/2002 (H5N1) forms dimers of heterotrimers with dimerization mediated by the C-terminal domain of the PA subunit, the thumb subdomain of PB1 and the N1 subdomain of PB2, which plays an important role in vRNA synthesis during replication of the viral genome [40]. Structural analyses revealed that PA residue 347 is positioned at the polymerase dimer interface and participates in hydrogen-bond interaction with PB2 residues 76T and PB2 70 R [40]. Therefore, substitution of 347D with glycine may alter the stability or dynamics of polymerase dimer formation. 347D contains a carboxylic acid side chain and a negatively charged functional group, which helps it to form the hydrogen bridge with other amino acids. However, 347G lacks both the side chain length and charge required for these interactions. Interestingly, our results showed that PA D347G significantly enhanced vRNA accumulation without affecting viral mRNA levels (Figure 5). This observation is consistent with the notion that influenza virus transcription and genome replication are mechanistically distinct processes. Viral mRNA synthesis primarily depends on the cap-snatching endonuclease activity located within the N-terminal domain of PA, whereas vRNA synthesis requires coordinates assembly and dimerization of the polymerase complex [4,44]. Therefore, the D347G substitution is unlikely to directly influence transcription initiation but may alter the efficiency or dynamics of polymerase dimer formation during genome replication, thereby preferentially promoting vRNA synthesis. The precise molecular mechanism of PA residue 347 represents a critical determinant regulating vRNA replication remains to be further investigated.

It is important to acknowledge the experimental limitations of the present study. First, all in mouse challenge studies were conducted with a single high inoculation dose of 105 TCID50/mouse, which was achieve the primary objective, to clearly distinguish the pathogenic phenotypes between JX198 and XZ508 and to directly the molecular determinants of the observed lethality in mice. Nevertheless, the inclusion of low-dose inoculation data and MLD50 determination would further quantify the contribution of the PA D347G mutation to viral virulence, provide nuanced insights into the dose-response relationship between viral inoculum and pathogenicity in mice, and potentially reveal subtle differences in viral replication or host immune modulation that may not be apparent at a high challenge dose. Additionally, all functional experiments investigating the effect of PA D347G were performed using the XZ508 backbone, a G57 genotype H9N2 strain that is the dominant lineage in China; while our findings are highly relevant for this prevalent genotype, the effect of PA D347G on viral pathogenicity may be genotype- or strain-dependent, and whether this mutation confers similar enhancements in other H9N2 genotypes or non-H9N2 avian IAVs remains to be investigated. Finally, reciprocal reassortant experiments using JX198 as the backbone were not performed. However, as shown in Figure 2, all four vRNP components (PB2, PB1, PA, and NP) derived from JX198 individually boost viral pathogenicity in mice. Even if we reverted the G347 residue to D within the PA of JX198, the remaining virulence factors harbored by PB2, PB1, and NP may retain substantial pathogenic potential in mice. The contribution of PA G347D may be partially obscured by additional determinants in PB2, PB1, and NP, resulting in ambiguous experimental readouts that cannot deliver clearer or more definitive evidence compared with the XZ508 backbone system.

Understanding the molecular basis of the increased fitness of avian IAVs in both avian and mammals is essential for assessing the risks these viruses pose to food industry and public health. In this study, we have revealed that the PA D347G mutation is the key mutation for increased pathogenicity of the H9N2 virus in mice. Our work may provide guidance for future surveillance of avian IAVs and may help us to better understand the molecular basis of viral fitness and virulence in mammals.

Supplementary Material

S Figure 4.jpg
S Figure 3.jpg
S Figure 2.jpg
S Figure 1.jpg
KVIR_A_2711518_SM9809.jpg (401.7KB, jpg)

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China [2025YFD1800201], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32002262], Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province [BK20200922], the 111 Project of D18007 and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD); the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Mendeley Data at D OI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28103315 [45].

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2026.2711518

References

  • [1].Vasin AV, Temkina OA, Egorov VV, et al. Molecular mechanisms enhancing the proteome of influenza a viruses: an overview of recently discovered proteins. Virus Res. 2014;185:53–13. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Manz B, Schwemmle M, Brunotte L.. Adaptation of avian influenza a virus polymerase in mammals to overcome the host species barrier. J Virol. 2013;87(13):7200–7209. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00980-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Long JS, Mistry B, Haslam SM, et al. Host and viral determinants of influenza a virus species specificity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(2):67–81. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0115-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Fodor E, Te Velthuis AJW. Structure and function of the influenza virus transcription and replication machinery. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(9):a038398. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Sun H, Li H, Tong Q, et al. Airborne transmission of human-isolated avian H3N8 influenza virus between ferrets. Cell. 2023;186(19):4074–84.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Sediri H, Thiele S, Schwalm F, et al. PB2 subunit of avian influenza virus subtype H9N2: a pandemic risk factor. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(1):39–48. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Herfst S, Schrauwen EJ, Linster M, et al. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science. 2012;336(6088):1534–1541. doi: 10.1126/science.1213362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Homme PJ, Easterday BC. Avian influenza virus infections. I. Characteristics of influenza A-turkey-wisconsin-1966 virus. Avian Dis. 1970;14(1):66–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Alexander DJ. An overview of the epidemiology of avian influenza. Vaccine. 2007;25(30):5637–5644. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Kim JA, Cho SH, Kim HS, et al. H9N2 influenza viruses isolated from poultry in Korean live bird markets continuously evolve and cause the severe clinical signs in layers. Vet Microbiol. 2006;118(3–4):169–176. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Aamir UB, Wernery U, Ilyushina N, et al. Characterization of avian H9N2 influenza viruses from United Arab Emirates 2000 to 2003. Virology. 2007;361(1):45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Peacock THP, James J, Sealy JE, et al. A Global Perspective on H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus. Viruses. 2019;11(7):620. doi: 10.3390/v11070620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Chen LJ, Lin XD, Tian JH, et al. Diversity, evolution and population dynamics of avian influenza viruses circulating in the live poultry markets in China. Virology. 2017;505:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Pu J, Wang S, Yin Y, et al. Evolution of the H9N2 influenza genotype that facilitated the genesis of the novel H7N9 virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(2):548–553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422456112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Wan ZM, Jiang WJ, Gong JX, et al. Emergence of chicken infection with novel reassortant H3N8 avian influenza viruses genetically close to human H3N8 isolate, China. Emerg Microbes Infec. 2022;11(1):2553–2555. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2128437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Xu QZ, Jiang FL. CT of human infection with avian-origin influenza a (H10N3) virus. Radiology. 2022;304(3):531–. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Shen YY, Ke CW, Li Q, et al. Novel reassortant avian influenza A(H5N6) viruses in humans, Guangdong, China, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(8):1507–1509. doi: 10.3201/eid2208.160146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Xu KM, Smith GJ, Bahl J, et al. The genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in poultry from southern China, 2000 to 2005. J Virol. 2007;81(19):10389–10401. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00979-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Zhang P, Tang Y, Liu X, et al. A novel genotype H9N2 influenza virus possessing human H5N1 internal genomes has been circulating in poultry in eastern China since 1998. J Virol. 2009;83(17):8428–8438. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00659-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Sun Y, Pu J, Jiang Z, et al. Genotypic evolution and antigenic drift of H9N2 influenza viruses in China from 1994 to 2008. Vet Microbiol. 2010;146(3–4):215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Li C, Yu K, Tian G, et al. Evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses from domestic poultry in Mainland China. Virology. 2005;340(1):70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.06.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Gu M, Chen H, Li Q, et al. Enzootic genotype S of H9N2 avian influenza viruses donates internal genes to emerging zoonotic influenza viruses in China. Vet Microbiol. 2014;174(3–4):309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.09.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Liu YF, Lai HZ, Li L, et al. Endemic variation of H9N2 avian influenza virus in China. Avian Dis. 2016;60(4):817–825. doi: 10.1637/11452-061616-Reg [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Guo J, Wang Y, Zhao C, et al. Molecular characterization, receptor binding property, and replication in chickens and mice of H9N2 avian influenza viruses isolated from chickens, peafowls, and wild birds in eastern China. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10(1):2098–2112. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1999778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Wang G, Deng G, Shi J, et al. H6 influenza viruses pose a potential threat to human health. J Virol. 2014;88(8):3953–3964. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03292-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Guo Y, Bai X, Liu Z, et al. Exploring the alternative virulence determinants PB2 S155N and PA S49Y/D347G that promote mammalian adaptation of the H9N2 avian influenza virus in mice. Vet Res. 2023;54(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13567-023-01221-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Wu R, Zhang H, Yang K, et al. Multiple amino acid substitutions are involved in the adaptation of H9N2 avian influenza virus to mice. Vet Microbiol. 2009;138(1–2):85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Hoffmann E, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y, et al. A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza a virus from eight plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(11):6108–6113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100133697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Shao H, Fan Z, Wan Z, et al. An efficient and rapid influenza gene cloning strategy for reverse genetics system. J Virol Methods. 2015;222:91–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Wan Z, Gong J, Sang J, et al. Mouse adaptation of H6 avian influenza viruses and their molecular characteristics. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1049979. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1049979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Zhang K, Zhang Z, Yu Z, et al. Domestic cats and dogs are susceptible to H9N2 avian influenza virus. Virus Res. 2013;175(1):52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].M BK, J SG, Chen H, et al. Human infection with an avian H9N2 influenza a virus in Hong Kong in 2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11):5760–5767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Chutinimitkul S, Van Riel D, Munster VJ, et al. In vitro assessment of attachment pattern and replication efficiency of H5N1 influenza a viruses with altered receptor specificity. J Virol. 2010;84(13):6825–6833. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02737-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Wan H, Perez DR. Amino acid 226 in the hemagglutinin of H9N2 influenza viruses determines cell tropism and replication in human airway epithelial cells. J Virol. 2007;81(10):5181–5191. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02827-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Xu R, de Vries RP, Zhu X, et al. Preferential recognition of avian-like receptors in human influenza a H7N9 viruses. Science. 2013;342(6163):1230–1235. doi: 10.1126/science.1243761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Shi J, Deng G, Kong H, et al. H7N9 virulent mutants detected in chickens in China pose an increased threat to humans. Cell Res. 2017;27(12):1409–1421. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Hatta M, Gao P, Halfmann P, et al. Molecular basis for high virulence of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza a viruses. Science. 2001;293(5536):1840–1842. doi: 10.1126/science.1062882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Zhou Y, Wu X, Yan D, et al. V292I mutation in PB2 polymerase induces increased effects of E627K on influenza H7N9 virus replication in cells. Virus Res. 2021;291:198186. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Eisfeld AJ, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. At the centre: influenza A virus ribonucleoproteins. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(1):28–41. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Fan H, Walker AP, Carrique L, et al. Structures of influenza a virus RNA polymerase offer insight into viral genome replication. Nature. 2019;573(7773):287–290. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1530-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Gunl F, Krischuns T, Schreiber JA, et al. The ubiquitination landscape of the influenza a virus polymerase. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36389-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Zhong G, Le MQ, Lopes TJS, et al. Mutations in the PA protein of avian H5N1 influenza viruses affect polymerase activity and mouse virulence. J Virol. 2018;92(4). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01557-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Chan M, Leung A, Hisanaga T, et al. H7N9 influenza virus containing a polybasic HA cleavage site requires minimal host adaptation to obtain a highly pathogenic disease phenotype in mice. Viruses. 2020;12(1):65. doi: 10.3390/v12010065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Dias A, Bouvier D, Crépin T, et al. The cap-snatching endonuclease of influenza virus polymerase resides in the PA subunit. Nature. 2009;458(7240):914–918. doi: 10.1038/nature07745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Zhao Z. D347G in PA is critical for the pathogenicity of H9N2 avian influenza a virus in mice. figshare. Figure. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28103315.v9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S Figure 4.jpg
S Figure 3.jpg
S Figure 2.jpg
S Figure 1.jpg
KVIR_A_2711518_SM9809.jpg (401.7KB, jpg)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Mendeley Data at D OI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28103315 [45].


Articles from Virulence are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES