Abstract
Protein-protein interactions govern the biomolecular logic of immunity, signalling, and disease. Elementary rates of association, dissociation, and inhibition underpin our understanding of life processes and remain a limiting factor at the frontier of therapeutic discovery. Yet existing assays infer these processes indirectly through ensemble-averaged signals or labels that obscure native dynamics. Here, we introduce a label-free, real-time, mass-resolved single-molecule immunoassay based on interferometric scattering microscopy (iSCAT) that directly observes individual protein-protein binding events in complex biological samples. By detecting light scattered from single proteins as they bind to an antibody-functionalized surface, we resolve discrete antibody-antigen interactions with single-molecule sensitivity and molecular-weight discrimination. Using IgM as a model system, we demonstrate real-time detection of individual binding events, with measured association rates that scale linearly with concentration over three orders of magnitude. Direct counts of IgM binding events in human serum yield quantitative concentrations that agree with bulk measurements obtained by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Spatially resolved tracking of individual binding and unbinding events captures the elementary dissociation rate constant,
, from the distribution of single-molecule dwell times. This bioaffinity iSCAT platform unifies molecular specificity, label-free detection, real-time kinetics, and mass-resolved single-molecule sensitivity, to offer a general framework for quantitative, single-molecule immunoassay.
Subject terms: Biochemistry, Biological techniques, Biophysics
Protein-protein interactions lie at the heart of nearly every biological process, governing how cells sense, respond, repair, and communicate. Their dysregulation drives a wide range of diseases, from autoimmunity to cancer and neurodegeneration. Resolving these interactions with molecular specificity and temporal precision remains a major unmet need in biophysics and bioanalytics with significant implications for disease diagnosis, therapeutic drug monitoring, and drug discovery1–4. Immunoassays exploit highly specific antigen-antibody interactions to isolate and quantify target proteins in complex biological samples. Recent advances include the development of label-free approaches5, as well as methods with single-molecule sensitivity6–10 and real-time methods offering the capacity to determine kinetic binding constants11,12. Yet, despite decades of innovation in immunochemistry, no immunoassay affords label-free, real-time, direct, mass-resolved single-molecule detection simultaneously.
In a novel use of interferometric scattering microscopy (iSCAT), we overcome this long-standing limitation by enabling real-time, label-free, mass-resolved detection of discrete antibody-antigen binding events on an antibody-derivatized and blocked coverslip. This approach transforms a routine iSCAT measurement into a true single-molecule immunoassay that quantifies target proteins in complex fluids and distinguishes molecular species by mass, without labels, amplification, or ensemble averaging. This label-free optical detection method avoids variability, steric perturbation, and kinetic distortion introduced by fluorescent or enzymatic tags, enabling direct measurement of native binding events. Single-molecule detection resolves binding heterogeneity, stoichiometry, and oligomeric state, enabling insights inaccessible to bulk assays. Real-time monitoring captures the dynamic sequence of adsorption and recognition, opening a path to genuine single-molecule kinetics on immuno-functionalized surfaces.
Conventional immunoassays share similar biorecognition principles but employ various detection platforms2. Typically, antibodies bind to a surface, and a blocking agent occupies the remaining binding sites. Upon sample introduction, target molecules bind to the immobilized antibodies. Often, detection requires a secondary antibody with a molecular label. In enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), enzymatic labels catalyze a colour-changing reaction that reflects the analyte concentration, yielding a bulk, end-point measurement. Enzymatic labels introduce variability through amplification-related artifacts, including enzyme degradation, temperature sensitivity, and incomplete reagent removal, and the bulk signal obscures molecular-level dynamics.
Digital ELISA gains single-molecule resolution by confining analyte molecules to microbeads or microdroplets13, but still requires labels and yields an end-point rather than a real-time readout. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) detects analyte without the use of labels, producing a bulk signal that arises from a change in refractive index14. However, an ensemble-averaged response precludes access to binding heterogeneity, stoichiometry, or oligomeric state. Localized SPR can register single-molecule binding by micromanipulating analytes and secondary probes tethered to nanoparticles7, but requires elaborate surface engineering and does not directly resolve molecular mass.
Recently, Zhou et al. has demonstrated label-free, single-molecule, real-time, mass-resolved detection of purified antibodies binding to surface-captured analyte molecules10. That work measures the labelling probe (the antibody) rather than the analyte itself, thereby restricting access to oligomeric-state information carried by the analyte and limiting multiplexing to species distinguishable by the probe rather than by the analyte’s intrinsic mass. By contrast, the direct iSCAT immunoassay introduced here detects each analyte molecule as it adsorbs from a complex sample solution onto an antibody-derivatized surface. This interferometric signal, defined by the scattered field combined with a specularly reflected reference field,
, determines the iSCAT contrast
of a protein. The amplitude of scattered light,
, varies with polarizability, which scales linearly with molecular mass, enabling quantitative optical mass measurements of single biomolecules15–20, and thus provides for label-free multiplexing, real-time kinetics, and mass-resolved single-molecule sensitivity in a single measurement.
Here, we demonstrate such a direct, label-free, mass-resolved, real-time immunoassay, in which an iSCAT measurement detects binding events on an antibody-derivatized surface. The present work demonstrates the principle using a single-molecule immunoassay with an immunoglobulin M (IgM) model system. Experimental measurements detect and count individual IgM molecules landing on the capture surface with linear concentration dependence, distinguish IgM from IgA in mixed samples by their mass-dependent contrast signatures, and quantify endogenous IgM in human serum with accuracy comparable to ELISA, while remaining insensitive to non-target proteins.
Taken together, these findings demonstrate that bioaffinity iSCAT can serve as a true single-molecule immunoassay platform, delivering label-free molecular identification, real-time binding trajectories, and single-protein quantification directly in complex biological samples. By enabling direct observation of discrete, mass-resolved immuno-recognition events, this approach opens a new experimental window for probing protein-protein interactions, accelerating the development of therapeutic strategies targeting molecular recognition pathways in health and disease.
Results
Simultaneous measurement of IgA and IgM
Our custom-built iSCAT microscope images diffraction-limited scattering point-spread function signals formed in real time by individual protein molecules as they bind to a derivatized coverslip surface. A tailored particle-tracking algorithm analyzes video records of such signals to log the location, adsorption time, and contrast of each binding event. The contrast distribution observed for a given protein forms a histogram centred at a value proportional to its molecular weight.
Figure 1 demonstrates this principle. For reference, Panel B shows contrast histograms observed in separate 30-second measurements of landings from 2 nM IgA and 1nM IgM solutions on coverslips bearing conventional poly-D-lysine (PDL) thin films at a pH of 7.4. The dominant pentameric form of IgM has a molecular mass of 970 kDa. This dimerizes to form a small concentration of decamer. The contrast histogram shows a dominant peak centred at 0.0033 and a secondary feature at 0.0066. The dimeric form of IgA has a molecular mass of 385 kDa. The IgA solution yields a single particle contrast distribution that peaks at 0.0013.
Fig. 1.
Immunoassay of IgM and IgM - IgA mixtures (A) Contrast histogram of landings from a solution containing 1 nM IgM and 2 nM IgA on an immunoassay-functionalized coverslip. (B) Contrast histograms for 1 nM IgM (green) and 2 nM IgA (blue) on separate PDL-coated coverslips. (C) Cumulative IgM landing events on comparably prepared immunoassay coverslips over time for IgM pentamer concentrations 0.046, 0.093, 0.46, 0.93, 2.3, and 4.6 nM in PBS. (D) Standard curve correlating many different IgM concentrations with mass-resolved immunoassay landing rates on a log scale with a linear inset. (E) Conventional ELISA analysis of an IgM concentration series in PBS. The schematic diagram depicts a common-path interferometric measurement in which a derivatized coverslip selectively binds single IgM pentamers and IgA dimers, which appear in real time as transient point-spread functions.
The mass discrimination of iSCAT enables simultaneous IgM and IgA immunoassay on a coverslip derivatized with a polyclonal anti-Ig antibody. Panel A shows the contrast histograms observed in a 30-second measurement of a solution containing 2 nM IgA dimer and 1nM IgM pentamer on an immunoassay-functionalized coverslip. Here, we see the same pattern of landings. Three evident peaks with contrast values centred at 0.0013, 0.0033, and 0.0066 match the individual contrast values observed in separate analyses of IgA and IgM solutions on non-discriminating PDL coverslips.
Quantification of IgM concentration by particle counting
To test whether the observed iSCAT landing rate accurately gauges protein concentration in solution, we counted the appearance of single-molecule signals as a function of time for a wide range of IgM concentrations in PBS. Figure 1C displays the accumulation rate of IgM molecules on immunoassay functionalized coverslips for different IgM concentrations in PBS. We find that binding events increase linearly with IgM concentration over the full range from 0.046 nM to 4.6 nM. Individual observations of landing rate as a function of time show no plateau indicative of a depletion layer21 within the first 30 s of measurement. Figure S2 in the Supplementary Information shows single frames taken from video records of single-molecule IgM – anti-IgM binding events over this range of concentrations in PBS22. There, we also provide a link to corresponding 200-frame videos.
Counts of total numbers of bound molecules observed in 30-second measurements at various IgM concentrations in PBS form the basis of a standard curve. Figure 1D shows the concentration-dependent response in the total number of observed IgM binding events obtained by following the immunoassay procedure using known concentrations of IgM in PBS. We see a strong positive linear correlation between IgM concentration and IgM particle counts. The equation of the trendline is y = 360x - 0.36. Notably, this relationship spans three orders of magnitude. The standard error increases with IgM concentration. Note the intercept near zero and high correlation coefficient (
), affirming the quantitative accuracy of this assay.
Compare this with the results of the conventional ELISA-based standard-addition curve plotted in Figure 1E. Here, note that the 450 nm absorbance response measuring IgM concentration exhibits a pronounced curvature above 0.2 nM. Notice as well that the standard-addition response intercepts the y-axis at a point that denotes a measured, nonzero response for a PBS blank.
Binding specificity
Several negative control experiments serve to confirm the binding specificity of the iSCAT-based IgM immunoassay. Negative control experiments testing for signal using solutions of PBS buffer alone establish that coverslips derivatized with IgM antibody and blocked with casein yield a negligible background signal. In 30-second observations, PBS buffer alone produced an average of 0.3 landing events on casein-blocked control coverslips and 1.4 on derivatized and blocked coverslips. Other control experiments test the effectiveness of casein in blocking protein landing events in the absence of antibody derivatization. Buffered IgM solutions, normal serum, and depleted serum samples, all with high solute concentrations, exhibited negligible landings on casein-blocked coverslips. A 5 nM IgM sample produced 99.5% fewer landings on a casein-blocked coverslip than on a poly-D-lysine-derivatized coverslip. In a 30-second measurement, normal and depleted serum samples exhibited fewer than 100 and 50 landings, respectively, over a 30-second period. Finally, in a test for nonspecific binding to the capture antibody, a 5 nM ferritin solution yielded an average of fewer than 2 landings over a 30-second measurement. Supplementary Information Table S1 summarizes the results of control experiments22.
Immunoassay selectivity for IgM and IgA in human serum
Tests using diluted human serum samples on different functionalized surfaces, poly-D-lysine (PDL) and anti-Ig with casein blocking, verify the specificity of the immunoassay when presented with a complex sample matrix. These experiments examined both normal serum and serum depleted of IgM, IgA, and IgG. Figure 2 shows the contrast values of observed landings for serum.
Fig. 2.
Immunoassay selectivity in human serum. Contrast histograms comparing numbers of landings observed in 30 seconds from human serum samples, diluted 1:5,000, on poly-D-lysine (light) and equivalent measurements on prepared immunoassay coverslips (dark). (A) Normal serum (B) IgM/IgA/IgG depleted serum. (C) Contrast histogram showing unspiked serum and a series of IgM spikes. (D) Linear regression relating the amount of IgM spike to the observed counts of IgM. The equation of the line is y = 371x +121 with
..
Normal serum produces numerous landings on PDL, forming a broad contrast distribution centered around 0.002. Few landings occur with higher contrasts. On an antibody-derivatized coverslip, normal serum forms iSCAT contrast histograms with peaks between 0.001 and 0.002 and between 0.003 and 0.004. Depleted serum shows a comparable contrast distribution on PDL. In contrast to the normal serum, depleted serum produces few landings with contrasts between 0.003 and 0.004 on an antibody-derivatized coverslip.
To ascertain the robustness of the iSCAT single-molecule immunoassay in a complex sample matrix, we added IgM spikes of known concentration to human serum. IgM spikes in serum increased the height of the peak centred in contrast histograms at 0.0033 (Figure 2C). A linear fit to the particle count rates observed for varying added concentrations of IgM in serum (Figure 2D) exhibits a slope of 371 particles/nM added IgM, which compares well with that of the calibration line obtained for IgM in PBS buffer (360 particles/nM IgM). The standard-addition intercept indicates a native IgM concentration of 163 mg/dL in the undiluted serum. A conventional sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) applied to the same human serum sample yields a comparable IgM concentration of 167 mg/dL ± 3 mg/dL.
Single-molecule measurement of the dissociation rate constant
The ratiometric iSCAT video recorded in this measurement encodes not only the binding of each protein to a conjugate antibody but also its unbinding. Whereas a landing event appears as a transient dark point-spread function that fades into the background as the molecule immobilizes, an unbinding event produces the time-reverse signature: a brief white disc that emerges from the background as the molecule leaves the surface and is lost to the denominator of the ratiometric frame. This polarity contrast makes departure as unambiguous as arrival, enabling the measurement to record a spatially registered two-column log of adsorption and desorption times associated with the x, y coordinates of each particle.
We have exploited this capability to measure the elementary dissociation rate constant of IgM from a surface derivatized to present a non-cognate antibody. Replacing the polyclonal anti-Ig capture antibody with anti-ovalbumin, an antibody that has no specific affinity for IgM, produces a markedly different binding landscape: numerous IgM landing events are followed by observable unbinding, in contrast to the stronger binding observed to the immunospecific anti-Ig surface. Figure 3 presents the results of an experiment in which, for each detected IgM molecule, we paired the coordinates of its landing signal with the spatially coincident coordinates of its subsequent leaving signal, and recorded the elapsed time between them as the molecular dwell time. Panel A maps the landing (blue) and leaving (yellow) locations of IgM within the field of view over a 60-second observation, with object sizes enlarged for clarity. The close spatial correspondence of paired events confirms the reliability of the coordinate-matching algorithm. Panel B shows the resulting histogram of complex lifetimes. An exponential decay function fit to this distribution,
![]() |
1 |
yields a decay constant of
for the transient IgM–anti-ovalbumin interaction.
Fig. 3.
Single-molecule dissociation kinetics of IgM on a non-cognate antibody surface. (A) Ratiometric point-spread function formed by the binding of a single IgM molecule to a coverslip-bound non-cognate anti-ovalbumin antibody. (B) Inverse ratiometric point-spread function formed by the unbinding of the same IgM-anti-ovalbumin pair. (C) Spatial map of IgM landing events (blue) and leaving events (yellow) recorded in the iSCAT field of view over 60 s on a casein-blocked coverslip derivatized with anti-ovalbumin. Object sizes are enlarged for clarity; the close spatial correspondence of paired events confirms the coordinate-matching procedure. (D) Histogram of IgM–anti-ovalbumin complex lifetimes with a single-exponential fit (solid curve). The fitted decay constant,
, constitutes a direct, single-molecule determination of the elementary dissociation rate constant for this protein pair.
The measurement demonstrates that the immunosorbent iSCAT platform yields more than just means for quantitative, real-time, label-free, single-molecule, mass-resolved immunoassays. For surface antibodies with undefined affinity for the analyte, the same instrument, using the same ratiometric processing pipeline, delivers a direct, label-free, single-molecule determination of
. The precision of such a determination improves with the spatial density of captured molecules, limited by the approximately 40 nm localization precision of the 200 nm point spread function formed by a protein scattering 532 nm light.
Discussion
This work introduces a novel, real-time, label-free immunoassay with single-molecule sensitivity. A custom-built interferometric scattering microscope directly detects individual antigen binding events. We demonstrate this assay on an IgM and anti-Ig model system. The analyte can be quantified based on the number of analyte adsorption events on an antibody-coated surface. Measured particle counts for nanomolar concentrations of IgM using the immunoassay procedure yield a standard curve (Figure 1D) with strong linearity (
) over three orders of magnitude. Rates of landing are linear for 30 s following sample injection (Figure 1C), indicating that the number of available binding sites is not substantially reduced nor is the local concentration of IgM near the coverslip significantly depleted during that time.21
By comparison, the ELISA offers a much less ideal analytical response. The 450 nm absorbance signal response becomes visibly nonlinear for IgM concentrations above 0.2 nM. In addition, the calibration of IgM in blank PBS yields a nonzero y-intercept. This signal, proportional to enzyme turnover rather than direct count, can arise from an absorbance offset owing to nonspecific absorption or incomplete removal of enzyme-linked detection reagents during washing or optical baseline contributions inadequately removed by blank subtraction23,24.
The demonstrated linear dynamic range for iSCAT single-molecule detection, from 0.046 nM to 4.6 nM, is 10x higher than that measured with a commercial IgM ELISA kit. A low landing rate within the field of view sets the current lower measurement limit. Expanding the illumination field of view or extending the landing window duration would significantly improve the detection limit. Too many particles landing in close succession at higher concentrations can lead to issues with particle detection because point-spread functions may overlap, making individual particles indistinguishable25. A higher frame rate or smaller ratiometric binning size could increase the upper detection limit by temporally separating particles in the ratiometric video. However, a higher frame rate makes smaller proteins harder to detect because the signal-to-noise ratio decreases with shorter exposure times19.
This real-time mass-resolved label-free single-molecule immunoassay is specific to the target protein. In control experiments with high IgM concentrations, casein effectively blocks empty binding sites on the microscope coverslip. The average number of landings recorded in these negative controls is two orders of magnitude lower than that in positive controls. Control experiments testing non-specific protein binding to anti-Ig using ferritin further support assay specificity because no ferritin landings are recorded. Experiments on poly-D-lysine-functionalized coverslips show that serum biomolecules bind rapidly to PDL. PDL has a strong positive charge at neutral pH, and electrostatically adsorbs negatively charged species from solution. Most proteins have regions of negative charge, so PDL is considered a nonspecific attractor. The broadness of the low-contrast peak from serum molecules bound to PDL (Figure 2A) indicates the presence of a diversity of serum biomolecules with different masses. Comparatively few serum biomolecules bind to immunoassay-functionalized coverslips. The contrast distribution for the normal serum on the immunoassay surface has two main peaks around 0.002 and 0.004, corresponding to measured average contrasts of IgA and IgM (Figure 2B). In the depleted serum, where IgM has been removed, the peak around 0.004 is no longer present. This observation suggests that IgM was successfully removed, and no other species of similar mass has affinity for the immunoassay surface.
IgM particle count rates increase with increasing IgM concentration equivalently in diluted serum samples and pure PBS buffer (cf. Figures 1D and 2D). Thus, other serum biomolecules have minimal impact on the immunoassay signal, enabling accurate IgM measurement in complex sample matrices. The y-intercept of the iSCAT standard addition curve (Figure 2D) determines the IgM concentration in undiluted normal serum to be 163 mg/dL. This value accords with typical IgM serum concentrations26. A commercial ELISA determination of IgM in the present human serum sample yields a concentration of 167 mg/dL ± 3 mg/dL, further validating the accuracy of the iSCAT immunoassay.
Label-free detection provides mass resolution, enabling the detection of multiple analytes. A mass calibration curve relates iSCAT contrast to protein mass (Figure S2). The strong linear relationship between mass and contrast (
) differentiates proteins without requiring labels. We demonstrate simultaneous detection of two different targets (IgM and IgA) of the iSCAT immunoassay using the anti-Ig antibody, which is known to bind to both IgM and IgA (Figure 2). The ability to identify IgA and IgM in serum without additional labelling steps reduces assay complexity, lowers costs, and preserves the native state of the proteins, avoiding potential alterations caused by tags or conjugates. Moreover, mass information from single measurements provides insight into oligomeric states of detected proteins. The reach of such experiments depends on the optical mass resolution of the iSCAT instrument18. We expect that hardware and data-processing improvements underway will increase the mass resolution of the current instrument by a factor of five, and substantially lower its detection threshold.
A key distinction separates the present immunoassay from the recent single-molecule iSCAT immunoassay reported by Zhou et al.10, which detects purified antibody probes as they bind to analyte molecules pre-captured on a surface. In that configuration, the detected signal arises from the labelling antibody, not from the analyte itself, so the mass signature reflects the probe rather than the target. Here, we detect each analyte molecule directly as it adsorbs from solution, which provides three distinct advantages. First, the measured contrast is intrinsic to the analyte, giving immediate access to its oligomeric state without additional inference steps. Second, multiplexing is achieved through the mass of the analytes themselves: the simultaneous detection of IgA and IgM shown in Figure 1A requires no additional probes or labelling steps beyond a single polyclonal capture antibody. Third, because binding of the analyte to the capture antibody is the observed event, the measurement directly reports the association kinetics of the immunoreaction of interest. Together, these features make the direct iSCAT immunoassay a uniquely capable platform for label-free, multiplexed, single-molecule immunosorption measurements in complex biological samples.
In this particular case, the iSCAT contrast histogram describes the competitive rate at which IgM and IgA bind to polyclonal anti-Ig. Integrated landings observed over 30 seconds suggest that anti-Ig binds the IgM pentamer approximately six times faster than IgA. We see the same competitive rate when measured on a coverslip functionalized with PDL, an undiscriminating electrostatic binder. Thus, it would appear that the rate of binding in either case is regulated by the structure of the immunoglobulin protein complex as opposed to differences in antibody selectivity.
The ability of immunoassays to detect specific proteins in complex samples makes them invaluable tools for biomolecular research and clinical diagnostics. However, the reliance of common methods on fluorescent labels and bulk measurements makes assays complex and time-consuming, and limits the scope of information that can be obtained from them. The addition of simultaneous label-free, real-time, single-molecule capability enhances the versatility of an immunoassay, offering direct, single-molecule, immunoselective measurements in real time.
Sample preparation requires less time and demands fewer resources than conventional methods, such as ELISA, because immunosorbent iSCAT detects target proteins without indicators or fluorescent tags. Assays that take no more than three hours in total provide instantaneous landing rates that indicate the concentrations of target analytes in solution. The relationship between protein mass and the scattered-light contrast of label-free proteins enables simultaneous detection of multiple immunologically active analytes in a single assay.
The immunosorbent landscape offers additional advantages that extend well beyond quantitative immunoassay. An iSCAT measurement resolves the x, y coordinates of every landing event. Unbinding produces an inverted, white point-spread function that is as easy to detect and localize as the original dark landing signal. The distribution of dwell times in a record of spatially resolved binding and unbinding events therefore provides a direct, single-molecule readout of
, a quantity that bulk surface-plasmon-resonance measurements access only as the slow exponential tail of a dissociation phase averaged over millions of molecules. The IgM–anti-ovalbumin experiment reported here demonstrates this quantitatively: fitting a single exponential to the dwell-time histogram (Figure 3B) yields
from a 60-second record spanning tens of individual molecules. No labelling, amplification, or ensemble averaging is required. The selectivity conferred by the surface antibody ensures that the measured dwell-time distribution samples only the interaction of interest, even in a background of non-binding proteins.
The breadth of interactions accessible to this approach is not limited to antigen-antibody pairs. The detection surface can be functionalized with any protein, nucleic acid, or other ligand that can be tethered to a derivatized coverslip, which makes the platform a general tool for single-molecule binding kinetics. Of particular interest are protein-DNA interactions, where elementary dissociation rate constants govern the residence times of transcription factors on their cognate promoter sequences and thereby regulate the dynamical logic of gene expression. Ensemble methods, such as electrophoretic mobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation, provide thermodynamic averages but cannot resolve kinetic heterogeneity. Studies have shown that distinct on-rates and off-rates can signal significant, functionally different binding modes or sequence contexts12. An immunosorbent iSCAT surface functionalized with a double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide bearing a target promoter sequence could, in principle, report the
of a transcription factor from a single landing-and-leaving record, at analyte concentrations and sample complexities inaccessible to fluorescence-based single-molecule methods. The mass resolution of iSCAT further enables simultaneous monitoring of co-factor binding, conformational switching, as evidenced by a mass shift, and competitive displacement, providing a multi-dimensional kinetic picture of the regulatory event. The present work establishes the experimental and analytical foundation for such measurements.
Methods
Sample materials
Goat anti-Human IgG, IgM, IgA (H+L) Secondary Antibody (anti-Ig capture antibody, Cat: 31128), Human Immunoglobulin M Isotype Control (IgM, Cat: 31146), Human Immunoglobulin A Isotype Control (IgA, Cat: 31148), and Normal Human Serum (Cat: 31876) were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific. Serum minus IgA/IgM/IgG human (depleted serum, Cat: S5393) was purchased from Millipore Sigma. Ferritin protein, in stock solution of 20 mg/mL, was provided by the Lallous laboratory at the Vancouver Prostate Centre. 1% casein solution (Cat: 37528) and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Cat: AM9625) solution were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific. PBS and casein solutions were filtered with a 0.22 μm Millex-GP syringe filter (Millipore Sigma, Cat: SLGP033RS). Casein was centrifuged for 12 mins at 14,000 × g with 30 kDa Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL centrifugal filters (Millipore Sigma, Cat: UFC503008). Stock IgM (4.5 mg/mL) was diluted in PBS to concentrations between 0.046 nM and 4.64 nM. Anti-Ig capture antibody was diluted in PBS to 2 µM concentration. Ferritin was diluted in PBS to 5 nM and 7.6 nM. Human serum samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 10 min and diluted 5000-fold in PBS to a concentration suitable for single-molecule measurements.
Immunoassay surface preparation
A 4-well silicon gasket (Grace Bio-labs, Cat: GBL103250-10EA) is placed on a poly-D-lysine (PDL) coated glass coverslip (Neuvitro, Cat: GG-25-15-PDL). 10 μL of anti-Ig capture antibody is pipetted in each well and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Gaskets are covered with clean glass coverslips to avoid sample evaporation during the incubations. Three PBS washes remove unbound antibodies. 10 μL of 1% casein solution is then pipetted into each gasket well, followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Six PBS washes remove unbound casein.
iSCAT sample measurement
Prepared coverslips are placed on the sample stage, with one silicon gasket centred above the microscope objective. 10 μL of sample solution is added, and a 1 min video is recorded with 2 ms exposure time, a frame rate of 500 fps, and a field of view of 8.4 x 8.4 µm2.
Ratiometric image processing
To resolve thousands of protein landings per minute, we employ ratiometric processing15–17,19, which reveals dynamic changes in the interferometric image of light scattered by the coverslip as proteins bind to the antibody-functionalized surface. In the resulting ratiometric video, individual proteins appear as transient signals upon landing, manifesting as localized dark point-spread functions, owing to destructive interference, before fading into the static background upon immobilization. This temporal isolation is crucial for particle tracking, enabling the algorithm to pinpoint and characterize unique binding events at the precise moment of adsorption, without interference from previously bound molecules. Ratiometric processing uses a sliding-window approach with a bin size of N=150 frames, defined as the number of frames averaged in each of the two adjacent windows (one for the pre-event denominator and one for the post-event numerator) at a 500 Hz acquisition rate. The ratiometric frame at time step k (for pixel (x, y)) is given by
![]() |
2 |
where
are the high-pass filtered frames, yielding values centred around 1 in background regions. Plotting the contrast at a binding pixel over successive steps, k, yields a characteristic V-shaped profile, consisting of a linear trendline, decreasing from 1 to a value representing the maximum destructive contrast (when the denominator contains no particle signal and the numerator fully includes it), followed by a linear slope back up to 1 as the immobilized protein point-spread-function enters the background. The apex of this variation precisely marks the completion point of a landing frame bin. This binning is essential to achieve an adequate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for quantifying protein contrast, as averaging multiple frames suppresses shot noise and other fluctuations that would otherwise obscure weak scattering signals. As it fills 150 frames, the light scattered by a single protein interferes with the reference field to form a Gaussian point-spread function in which the integrated ratiometric illumination intensity deviates from the unit backgroud to define a contrast, C, that is directly proportional to the scattering amplitude, s, and phase shift,
, and inversly proportional to the specularly reflected reference amplitude, r incident on the camera (see Figure 3):
![]() |
3 |
We attenuate r to an apparatus-fixed value for all measurements and adjust the focal position such that
to yield a maximum contrast. This interference diminishes the ratiometric image by less than 1% for proteins in the mass range of the current study. The measurable contrast signal, observed as a darkened transient 2D Gaussian point spread function, varies in direct proportion to the protein molecular mass. The variance owing to the coverslip roughness dwarfs the magnitude of s for any single protein. Ratiometric processing accounts for the fixed-pattern background roughness in every recorded image, and thus plays a vital role in enabling high-throughput, mass-resolved detection of single-molecule immuno-recognition in real time.
Particle detection and contrast measurement
The You Only Look Once (YOLO v8) object detection model detects single landing events. The model was trained using a database of 2023 annotated ratiometric images from iSCAT experiments. Particles are uniquely labelled with an ID number and collected in a list. The Python script saves a 30 × 30 pixel image of the particle for each frame in which it appears, along with its location within the field of view. The data processing routine fits a two-dimensional Gaussian function to the ratiometric image of every detected particle. Peak amplitudes of fitted functions determine the particle contrasts in each frame.
The background noise for each experiment is quantified by computing the standard deviation of pixel intensity values within 20 selected 30 × 30 pixel squares at pseudo-random xy positions in each frame, then selecting the lowest value.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
A Human IgM ELISA Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat: 88-50620-22) was used as directed. The IgM standard was tested in duplicate, and the human serum was tested in triplicate with a dilution of 10,000×. A Microplate Reader Multi-Mode FilterMax F5 measured the absorbance profile at 450 nm.
Supplementary Information
Author contributions
Edward Grant and Luigi Anastasia conceived the experiment. Carraugh C. Brouwer and Flaminia M. Muratori developed measurement protocols, prepared samples and substrates, gathered ratiometric images, and processed data. Luke Melo designed and built the interferometric microscope. Luigi Anastasia and Carlo Pappone directed immunosorbent assays in Milan. All authors contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. Edward Grant and Carlo Pappone acquired the funding. Edward Grant supervised the project.
Funding
CB, FM, LM and EG acknowledge support from The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (ALLRP 586076 - 23).
LA and CP acknowledge support from Ricerca Corrente funding from the Italian Ministry of Health to IRCCS Policlinico San Donato.
Data Availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Raw data supporting this research are available via the following link: https://github.com/grantlab-ubc/immunoassay-iscat
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-53440-4.
References
- 1.Darwish, I. A. Immunoassay Methods and their Applications in Pharmaceutical Analysis: Basic Methodology and Recent Advances. International Journal of Biomedical Science: IJBS2, 217–235 (2006). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Peng, P. et al. Emerging ELISA derived technologies for in vitro diagnostics. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem.152, 116605 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Qiao, H. et al. Innovative medicinal chemistry strategies for improving target binding kinetics in drug discovery. J. Med. Chem.68(21), 22116–22144 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu, H., Zhong, H. & Guo, D. Understanding drug-target residence time and the implications on drug discovery. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 1–12 (2026). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Kabashin, A. V., Kravets, V. G. & Grigorenko, A. N. Label-free optical biosensing: going beyond the limits. Chem. Soc. Rev.52, 6554–6585 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Su, Y. & Zhou, L. Review of single-molecule immunoassays: Non-chip and on-chip Assays. Anal. Chim. Acta1322, 342885 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zeng, Q. et al. Dynamic single-molecule sensing by actively tuning binding kinetics for ultrasensitive biomarker detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.119, e2120379119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang, Y., Gu, H. & Xu, H. Recent progress in digital immunoassay: how to achieve ultrasensitive, multiplex and clinical accessible detection?. Sensors & Diagnostics3, 9–27 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu, Y., Fu, Y., Guo, J. & Guo, J. Single-molecule immunoassay technology: Recent advances. Talanta265, 124903 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhou, X. et al. Label-Free Single-Molecule Immunoassay. Advanced Science12, e05207 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mancera-Zapata, D. L., Rodríguez-Nava, C., Arce, F. & Morales-Narváez, E. AI-Assisted Real-Time Immunoassay Improves Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity. Anal. Chem.96, 13756–13761 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lim, Y. J., Choi, J. H., Mun, S. J., Kim, J. & Bong, K. W. Real-Time Signal Analysis with Wider Dynamic Range and Enhanced Sensitivity in Multiplex Colorimetric Immunoassays Using Encoded Hydrogel Microparticles. Anal. Chem.96, 7204–7211 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rissin, D. M. et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat. Biotechnol.28, 595–599 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mostufa, S. et al. Advancements and perspectives in optical biosensors. ACS Omega9, 24181–24202 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ortega-Arroyo, J. & Kukura, P. Interferometric scattering microscopy (iSCAT): new frontiers in ultrafast and ultrasensitive optical microscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.14, 15625–15636 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ortega Arroyo, J. et al. Label-Free All-Optical Detection, Imaging, and Tracking of a Single Protein. Nano Lett.14, 2065–2070 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Piliarik, M. & Sandoghdar, V. Direct optical sensing of single unlabelled proteins and super-resolution imaging of their binding sites. Nat. Commun.5, 4495 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Young, G. et al. Quantitative mass imaging of single biological macromolecules. Science360, 423–427 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Young, G. & Kukura, P. Interferometric Scattering Microscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.70, 301–322 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu, D. & Piszczek, G. Measuring the affinity of protein-protein interactions on a single-molecule level by mass photometry. Anal. Biochem.592, 113575 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Melo, L. et al. Size Distributions of Gold Nanoparticles in Solution Measured by Single-Particle Mass Photometry. J. Phys. Chem. B125, 12466–12475 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brouwer, C. et al. Supplementary Information: Interferometric scattering microscopy supports real-time mass-resolved label-free single-molecule immunoassay. Scientific Reports 16, xxxx (2026), supporting Information available online, 10.1002/jrs.XXXXX. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Findlay, J. W. et al. Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.21, 1249–1273 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Findlay, J. W. & Dillard, R. F. Appropriate calibration curve fitting in ligand binding assays. AAPS J.9, 29 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kratochvíl, J., Asor, R., Helmi, S., Struwe, W. B. & Kukura, P. Lifting the Concentration Limit of Mass Photometry by PEG Nanopatterning. Nano Lett.24, 10032–10039 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gonzalez-Quintela, A. et al. Serum levels of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in a general adult population and their relationship with alcohol consumption, smoking and common metabolic abnormalities. Clin. Exp. Immunol.151, 42–50 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Raw data supporting this research are available via the following link: https://github.com/grantlab-ubc/immunoassay-iscat






