ABSTRACT
Large-scale genomic studies have advanced our understanding of the global dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria, yet most have been limited by inconsistent sampling periods, heterogeneous geographic coverage, and weak epidemiological linkages among isolates. Consequently, the fine-scale processes underlying the establishment and maintenance of AMR pandemics remain unclear. To address these limitations, we established a rigorously controlled community- and household-integrated One Health framework that incorporates human, animal, and environmental reservoirs within a single urban area and unified sampling period, focusing on the pandemic fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) Escherichia coli sequence type (ST) 131. Using this model, we analyzed FQ-R E. coli isolates collected from humans, companion animals, sewage, and livestock in the Sapporo area, Japan, during 2021–2022. Among 2,358 E. coli isolates, 235 FQ-R isolates, including 88 ST131 isolates, underwent genomic analyses based on pan-, accessory-, and core genome data. These analyses revealed high clonal diversity but clear population structuring within ST131, with several subclusters shared between human and companion animal sources. High-resolution core genome SNP analysis delineated community-level transmission dynamics, demonstrating ST131 carriage among healthy humans and suggesting asymptomatic human-to-human spread and household-level human–companion animal transmission. These carriage isolates harbored multiple AMR genes and virulence factors and exhibited high genetic similarity to clinical isolates, indicating potential contributions to hospital-associated infections. Phylogenetic integration with international ST131 genomes demonstrated that transmission events in Sapporo are embedded within the broader global expansion of ST131. This study provides a scalable model for resolving local-to-global AMR dissemination and underscores the need for community- and household-level interventions within a One Health framework.
KEYWORDS: Escherichia coli, fluoroquinolone, ST131, antimicrobial resistance, One Health
INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria have become a major global health concern since the 2000s. Resistant pathogens often render standard antibiotic therapies ineffective, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Recognizing the scale of the problem, the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a Global Action Plan on AMR in 2015 (1). Since then, many countries have developed national action plans, accelerating research and surveillance efforts. In the human healthcare sector, AMR-related mortality has been quantified with increasing precision. According to the latest study, an estimated 4.71 million deaths were associated with AMR in 2021 (2). The AMR-associated deaths are projected to rise to 8.22 million annually, resulting in a total of 169 million deaths between 2025 and 2050. Notably, these trends show substantial regional variability, underscoring the need for localized, context-sensitive interventions.
Among Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli accounts for the highest number of AMR-associated deaths (2). Within E. coli, fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC-R) strains are identified as major contributors to AMR burden (3). Importantly, 3GC-R E. coli was ranked second out of 24 pathogens on the WHO’s Bacterial Priority Pathogens List (BPPL) in 2024, up from fourth place in 2017 (4). Notably, it is well-known that extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) frequently exhibit co-resistance to FQs and 3GCs (5, 6), reflecting the increasing global concern despite ongoing AMR countermeasures, as FQs are also widely used antimicrobial agents for E. coli infections (7).
In ExPEC, a particular FQ-R E. coli lineage, sequence type (ST) 131, has achieved pandemic spread in clinical settings, often exhibiting 3GC-R and causing serious bloodstream and urinary tract infections in humans (8, 9). Consequently, ST131 is widely recognized as an “international high-risk clone” or “pandemic clone” (6, 10–12). Thus, focusing on and monitoring of FQ-R E. coli is essential to understand the mechanisms underlying the establishment of AMR pandemic with 3GC-R. Beyond clinical cases, ST131 has also been isolated from healthy humans, companion animals, livestock, wildlife, and environmental sources such as river and lake water (12). Studies suggest that contaminated food, wastewater, and migratory birds may facilitate its community-level transmission (13–15). Supporting this, several studies have reported close genetic relatedness between human-derived ST131 strains and those from companion animals, surface water, and wild animals (14, 16, 17). Moreover, transmission of ST131 between companion animals and household members has been reported (18–20). These findings highlight the necessity of cross-sectoral molecular epidemiological studies based on the One Health approach (21).
Pandemics emerge through the accumulation and expansion of transmission events within communities. Thus, understanding AMR dissemination in community settings is essential for elucidating the mechanisms underlying bacterial pandemics. Although numerous molecular epidemiological studies of ST131 have been conducted globally, major gaps remain regarding how ST131 spreads within communities. Limitations stem primarily from two issues: (i) studies with large isolate numbers often used heterogeneous regions sampling areas and/or time periods, weakening epidemiological linkage (5, 21–23) and (ii) studies examining well-defined epidemiological contexts (such as patient-to-patient transmission or owner–pet relationships) typically analyzed too few isolates for comprehensive interpretation (20, 24–26).
To clarify the mechanisms underlying the establishment of the ST131 pandemic, more robust investigations addressing limitations (i) and (ii) simultaneously are required. Such studies should employ a standardized One Health-based design and analyze sufficient isolates collected from defined community settings during a fixed observation period. However, no comprehensive study has yet examined the dissemination of ST131 within a single community under unified sampling conditions.
In this study, we collected E. coli isolates from patients (from a university hospital and community clinics), healthy humans, companion animals (dogs and cats), their pet owners, environmental water sources (sewage and rivers), and livestock (cattle, pigs, and chickens) in the Sapporo area, Japan, during 2021–2022. We then examined their genetic relatedness as a comprehensive model to investigate the dissemination of FQ-R E. coli within a community.
RESULTS
Overview of E. coli isolates and FQ-R across multiple sources in the Sapporo area
In this study, we collected a total of 2,358 E. coli isolates from diverse sources in the Sapporo area in Japan during 2021–2022. The sampling sources included humans (university hospital patients, community clinic patients, and healthy humans), companion animals (dogs and cats), livestock (cattle, pigs, and chickens), and sewage and river water. Clinical specimens from university hospital patients mainly consisted of urine samples, suggesting that these isolates were likely associated with urinary tract infections and, therefore, represented disease-causing E. coli. In contrast, fecal samples were collected from patients in community clinics to assess the extent to which FQ-R E. coli isolates are introduced into community healthcare settings. Therefore, the FQ-R E. coli isolates from these patients were not considered causative agents of disease but were primarily regarded as colonizing strains. Fecal samples were also collected from healthy humans. To evaluate the carriage and dissemination of FQ-R E. coli to the human society, rectal swab samples were collected from companion animals and livestock. Additionally, sewage and river water samples were obtained from both central and peripheral areas of Sapporo.
Based on the susceptibility testing to ciprofloxacin, 220 E. coli isolates were identified as FQ-R. The overall FQ-R rate was 9.3% (n = 220/2,358). The proportions by source were as follows: 14.7% (n = 96/651) in humans [17.2% (n = 37/215) in university hospital patients, 12.7% (n = 28/220) in patients from community clinics, and 14.4% (n = 31/216) in healthy humans], 26.2% (n = 51/195) in companion animals, 12.8% (n = 49/384) in sewage, 0.9% (n = 6/672) in river water, and 3.9% (n = 18/456) in livestock [4.2% (n = 13/306) in cattle, 0.0% (n = 0/75) in pigs, and 6.7% (n = 5/75) in chickens]. The overall prevalence of ST131 was 3.3% (n = 77/2,358). These isolates were derived from university hospital patients, community clinic patients, healthy humans, companion animals, and sewage (Table 1). Overall differences in both FQ-R rates and the proportion of ST131 among FQ-R isolates across sources were highly significant (P < 0.001). Notably, the FQ-R rate in companion animals was significantly higher than that in healthy humans, whereas the rates in river water and livestock were significantly lower. Furthermore, regarding the proportion of ST131 among FQ-R isolates, there was no significant difference between companion animals and healthy humans, but the proportions in livestock and river water were significantly lower.
TABLE 1.
Distribution of FQ-R E. coli and ST131 isolates derived from multiple sourcesa
| Source | Total no. of E. coli isolates | No. of FQ-R isolatesb | No. of FQ-S isolatesc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | ST131 | Non-ST131 | |||
| Patient/university | 215 | 37 (17.2%) |
23 (10.7%) |
14 (6.5%) |
178 (82.8%) |
| Patient/community | 220 | 28 (12.7%) |
13 (5.9%) |
15 (6.8%) |
192 (87.3%) |
| Healthy humans | 216 | 31 (14.4%) |
12 (5.6%) |
19 (8.8%) |
185 (85.6%) |
| Companion animals | 195 | 51 (26.2%)* |
21 (10.8%) |
30 (15.4%) |
144 (73.8%) |
| Sewage | 384 | 49 (12.8%) |
8 (2.1%) |
41 (10.7%) |
335 (87.2%) |
| River water | 672 | 6 (0.9%)*** |
0 (0.0%) |
6 (0.9%) |
666 (99.1%) |
| Livestock | 456 | 18 (3.9%)*** |
0 (0.0%)†† |
18 (3.9%) |
438 (96.1%) |
| Total | 2,358 | 220 (9.3%) |
77 (3.3%) |
143 (6.1%) |
2,138 (90.7%) |
Values show number of isolates. Statistical significance relative to healthy humans is indicated by asterisks for FQ-R rates (*: Padj < 0.05, ***: Padj < 0.001) and by daggers for ST131 distribution (††: Padj < 0.01). P-values were calculated using the χ test for overall FQ-R rates and Fisher’s exact test with Monte Carlo simulation for ST131 distribution, followed by Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction for pairwise post-hoc comparisons.
FQ-R, fluoroquinolone resistant.
FQ-S, fluoroquinolone susceptible.
To more efficiently isolate FQ-R E. coli from companion animals and livestock, we additionally used ciprofloxacin-supplemented agar plates. Using this approach, we successfully recovered FQ-R E. coli, from companion animals (n = 51) and from livestock (n = 69; 27 from cattle, 3 from pigs, and 39 from chickens). After excluding duplicate clones obtained from the same animals, a total of 235 non-redundant FQ-R E. coli isolates were included in the subsequent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analyses.
Identification and prevalence of FQ-R E. coli among sequenced isolates
WGS was performed on FQ-R E. coli isolates. In total, 136 FQ-R E. coli isolates were analyzed, 96 from human (37 from university hospital patients, 28 from community clinic patients, and 31 from healthy humans), 17 from companion animals, and 23 from livestock (10 from cattle, 1 from a pig, and 12 from chickens). In addition, all FQ-R isolates from sewage (n = 49) and river water (n = 6) were included, as these environments are influenced not by a single source but by contamination from multiple ones, primarily associated with human activities. Furthermore, 38 previously reported isolates from companion animals and 6 isolates from companion animal owners (2 obtained in this study and 4 previously reported) collected during the same period were also included (20, 27). These 6 isolates from owners were incorporated into the healthy human group. Consequently, a total of 235 isolates were subjected to WGS analysis (Table S1).
WGS analysis revealed that phylogenetic group B2 was predominant, accounting for 55.7% (131/235 isolates) of FQ-R E. coli isolates. These were mainly derived from humans, companion animals, and sewage and were absent from livestock (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1a). In contrast, phylogenetic group B1 represented 17.0% (40/235) of isolates. The B1 isolates were not recovered from university hospital patients, whereas they were more frequently observed in livestock and river water.
Fig 1.
Distribution of FQ-R E. coli isolates across sources, phylogenetic groups, STs, and fimH alleles. Flow width is proportional to the number of isolates (n).
Within phylogenetic group B2, 67.2% (88/131) and 30.5% (40/131) of isolates were identified as ST131 and ST1193, respectively (Fig. 1). All 88 ST131 isolates belonged to either two fimH types, fimH30 (80.7%, n = 71) or fimH41 (19.3%, n = 17) (Fig. 1). In the classification of ST131 clades, isolates with fimH30 corresponded to clades C0, C1 (C1-M27 and C1-nM27), and C2, whereas isolates with fimH41 corresponded to clade A and unclassified lineages. In contrast to ST131, all 40 ST1193 isolates possessed a single fimH type, fimH64. ST131 and ST1193 were predominant in humans, companion animal, and sewage, whereas no ST131 isolates were identified from river water and livestock samples (Fig. S1b). ST131 was the most prevalent FQ-R E. coli lineage across human and companion animal samples, accounting for 62.2%, 46.4%, 40.5%, and 52.7% of isolates from university hospital patients, community clinic patients, healthy humans, and companion animals, respectively. ST1193 was the second most common FQ-R E. coli lineage in university hospital patients (16.2%), community clinic patients (21.4%), healthy humans (21.6%), and companion animals (9.1%). In sewage, ST1193 was the most prevalent (28.6%), followed by ST131 (16.3%).
Among ST131 isolates, clade C1 was the most frequent, accounting for 68.2% (n = 60/88), comprising 37.5% (n = 33) C1-nM27 and 30.7% (n = 27) C1-M27 isolates. The predominance of clade C1 was observed in isolates from university hospital patients (52.2%), community clinics (69.2%), healthy humans (86.7%), companion animals (72.4%), and sewage (62.5%) (Fig. S1c).
Clade A was the second most frequent ST131 clade, accounting for 13.6% (n = 12/88). It was detected in university hospital patients (13.0%), community clinic patients (15.4%), healthy humans (6.7%), companion animals (13.8%), and sewage (25.0%). Clade C2 accounted for 10.2% (n = 9/88) of isolates and was identified in university hospital patients (21.7%), community clinic patients (15.4%), healthy humans (6.7%), and companion animals (3.4%), but not in sewage. Clade C0 (2.3%, n = 2/88) was isolated only from university hospital patients (8.7%). Unclassified ST131 isolates (5.7%, n = 5/88) were detected in university hospital patients (4.3%), companion animals (10.3%), and sewage (12.5%).
Within phylogenetic group B1, ST162 (32.5%, n = 13/40) and ST533 (25.0%, n = 10/40) were the predominant lineages. ST162 isolates originated from sewage (38.5%, n = 5/13), humans and companion animals (23.1%, each n = 3/13), and river water (15.4%, n = 2/13) (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1b). ST533 was exclusively derived from livestock (all from chicken). In river water, the phylogenetic group B1 and ST162 was the most frequently isolated, followed by ST1193.
Pangenome and clusters of orthologous groups functional categories of FQ-R E. coli isolates
To characterize the genomic features of the major pandemic lineages ST131 and ST1193 in the Sapporo area and to assess their genetic relationships across multiple sources, we performed pangenome and COG functional category analyses as an initial step toward identifying key sources for detailed genomic investigation. Pangenome analysis revealed that the 235 FQ-R E. coli isolates shared 2,648 core genes (present in all isolates), while the accessory genome (present in <99% of isolates) consisted of 22,927 genes. A circular phylogenetic tree constructed from the pangenome analysis was annotated with phylogenetic groups and STs (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic tree revealed multiple clades corresponding to known phylogroups, including B2, B1, D, A, F, C, and E. Among them, phylogenetic group B2 exhibited a clear hierarchical structure, characterized by internal clustering of isolates by ST, such as ST131 and ST1193.
Fig 2.
Pan-genome overview of 235 FQ-R E. coli isolates. The circular phylogenetic tree is based on the pangenome generated by Roary.
Of the 22,927 accessory genes identified, 18,585 genes (81.1%) were annotated with COG categories, while the remaining 4,342 genes (18.9%) were classified as “Unannotated.” To elucidate the functional gene repertoires of the major FQ-R E. coli clones in the Sapporo area, we compared their distributions of Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) categories (Fig. S2 and Table S2).
First, we compared the numbers of unique accessory genes in ST131 and ST1193 with those in non-ST131 or non-ST1193 E. coli populations (Other strains). The numbers of unique accessory genes in ST131 and ST1193 were significantly higher in several COG categories compared with other strains. These included categories related to cellular processes and signaling—M (cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis), N (cell motility), and V (defense mechanisms); metabolism/poorly characterized—G (carbohydrate transport and metabolism), P (inorganic ion transport and metabolism), and S (function unknown); and information storage and processing—K (transcription) and L (replication, recombination, and repair).
Next, we performed enrichment analysis to assess the functional composition of these categories relative to other strains. This analysis revealed that category N (Odds Ratio [OR] = 4.99, adjusted P-values; Padj = 5.4 × 10−19 in ST131; OR = 4.96, Padj = 1.1 × 10−19 in ST1193) was significantly enriched as specific functional compositions in both ST131 and ST1193 among the categories with significant numbers of unique accessory genes shown in Fig. S2 (Fig. S3a). Finally, we directly compared ST131 and ST1193. Although no significant difference was observed in the total number of unique accessory genes between them, enrichment analysis of category I (lipid transport and metabolism), revealed that ST131 possessed functionally distinct genes compared with ST1193 (Fig. S3b and Table S2).
Accessory genome analysis and AMR/virulence factor profiling of ST131 isolates
To investigate the genomic relationships among ST131 isolates from multiple sources, accessory genome analysis was performed on 88 ST131. This analysis divided the ST131 isolates into seven major accessory genome clusters, ranging in sizes from 2 to 38 isolates (Ag clusters A–G and Fig. 3). However, these clusters may reflect not only clonal relationships but also the influence of horizontally acquired elements, such as plasmids. Although the composition of these Ag clusters appeared to be broadly consistent with the classification of ST131 clades, this relationship should be interpreted with caution, as accessory genome profiles can be influenced by mobile genetic elements.
Fig 3.
Accessory genome overview and presence of AMR-related genes and VF genes in 88 ST131 isolates. The phylogenetic tree represents relationships among ST131 isolates based on accessory genome analysis. Each row in the heatmap corresponds to a selected AMR or VF gene, and each column represents an individual isolate, arranged according to the tree. Colored indicates presence, and white indicates absence of the gene. Patterns suggest clade-associated differences in gene content. [AMR] CTX-M-other: including CTX-M-12, -13, -17, -24, -38, -55, -84, -102, -104, -125, -129, -130, -134, -192, and -196. CTX-M-55 was detected only in H31CIP1, whereas all other CTX-M variants in this group were exclusively found in SREC207a. Other β-lactamases: including CMY-2 and DHA-1. CMY-2 was detected only in K64CIP1, DHA-1 was detected only in 122C_1. aac(3) family: including aac(3)-IIa and aac(3)-IId. aac(3)-IIa was detected in three isolates (H43CIP1, s21038, and s21125), whereas aac(3)-IId was detected in the remaining isolates. aadA2/5: aadA2 was detected only in s21001, whereas aadA5 was detected in the remaining isolates. aph family: including aph(3'')-Ib and aph(6)-Id. Both were detected in all such isolates. dfrA12/17: dfrA12 was detected only in s21001, whereas dfrA17 was detected in the remaining isolates. sul1/2: sul1 was detected in nine isolates (122C_1, SREC166c, SREC175a, SREC409c, s21001, s21038, and s21090, s21125, s21164), sul2 was detected in two isolates (K8CIP1 and T1h1CIP2), whereas both were detected in the remaining isolates. tet(A)/tet(C): tet(C) was detected only in SREC214a, whereas tet(A) was detected in the remaining isolates. [VF] Twelve VF genes (fimH, aslA, ompT, yehB, yehC, yehD, fyuA, irp2, csgA, nlpI, terC, and usp) were detected in 100% of 88 isolates and are not shown in this heatmap. afa family: including afaA, afaB, afaC, afaD, and afaE. afaA, afaC, and afaD were detected in two isolates (SREC409c and s21170), whereas afaB and afaE were detected only in s21170. papA family: including papA_F19, papA_F20, papA_F43, papA_F48, papA_F7-1, papA_F19, and papA_F20 were detected only in SREC235a, papA_F48 was detected in two isolates (SREC27c and SREC175a), papA_F7-1 was detected s21001 with papA_F43, whereas papA_F43 was detected in the remaining isolates. shiA/B: shiA was detected in two isolates (K12CIP1 and SREC409c), whereas shiB was detected in seven isolates (s21001, H43CIP1, s21184, s21125, SREC166c, s21090, s21038). cia/cib: cia was detected in five isolates (TH1137, SBC5, SBC45, K64CIP1, s21116), whereas cib was detected in three isolates (K66CIP1, SREC199c, K64CIP1).
Ag clusters A–C were exclusively composed of clade C1-M27 isolates. Ag clusters D–E consisted of C1-M27 and C1-nM27, whereas Ag cluster F contained isolates from clades C1-nM27 and C2. In addition, Ag cluster G comprised isolates from multiple ST131 clades, including A, C0, C1-M27, C1-nM27, C2, and unclassified isolates. Six of the seven Ag clusters, except Ag cluster A, contained isolates from multiple sources (humans, companion animals, and/or sewage). The two largest clusters, G (n = 38) and F (n = 27), included isolates from humans (university hospital, community clinics, and healthy humans), companion animals, and sewage.
The distribution of 36 AMR genes was structured by the Ag clusters. The ESBL gene blaCTX-M-27 was detected in 50%–100% of isolates in Ag clusters A–D. In contrast, the possession was much lower in Ag clusters F (3.7%) and G (15.8%) (Table S3a). These FQ-R E. coli isolates in Ag clusters F and G possessed other type of ESBL genes, blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-14, respectively.
Significant differences in the prevalence of 59 VF genes were likewise observed among the Ag clusters. Twelve VF genes (fimH, aslA, ompT, yehB, yehC, yehD, fyuA, irp2, csgA, nlpI, terC, and usp) were detected in 100% of ST131 isolates analyzed. The prevalence of several VF genes including kpsE, iucC/iutA, sat, and iha was significantly lower in Ag cluster D compared to Ag clusters F and G (all Padj < 0.05, Table S3b). In contrast, the P fimbriae-associated genes papC and hra were detected in 33.3% of isolates in Ag cluster F but were absent in Ag cluster G (Padj = 0.011). Furthermore, the serum resistance gene iss was detected in all Ag cluster F isolates (100%), a significantly higher proportion than in Ag cluster G (52.6%, Padj = 0.0026).
For comparison, AMR/VF gene prevalence was also analyzed by source category and by ST131 clades. No significant associations were observed between gene content and source of origin (all Padj > 0.05 and Table S3c and d). In contrast, significant associations were found between certain genes and specific ST131 clades, consistent with the clade composition of the Ag clusters (e.g., blaCTX-M-27 with C1-M27 and Table S3e; papC with C2 and Table S3f).
Core genome SNP analysis of ST131 isolates obtained in this study
Core genome SNP analysis of the 88 ST131 isolates identified a total of 8,911 core genome SNPs. We then performed all possible pairwise comparisons among the 88 isolates (n = 3,828), with each comparison representing a pair of isolates. Pairwise core genome SNP distances ranged from 1 to 6,141 SNPs. Based on these distances, we categorized the isolate pairs into three SNP distance groups (SNP_d groups) to investigate the relationships among closely related isolates (Fig. 4a). The SNP_d groups were defined as follows: I (SNPs < 100; 62 isolates), II (SNPs 100–300; 9 isolates), and III (SNPs > 300; 17 isolates).
Fig 4.
Core genome SNP analysis and clustering of 88 ST131 isolates. (a) Distribution of all 3,828 pairwise core genome SNP distances. Pairwise comparisons were classified into three SNP distance groups (SNP_d groups) based on SNP thresholds: I (<100 SNPs), II (100–300 SNPs), and III (>300 SNPs). (b) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 8,911 core genome SNPs. The SNP_d group (I–III) defined in panel a and ST131 clades are labeled next to each isolate name. The adjacent heatmap indicates pairwise SNP distances between isolates, with colors ranging from 0 SNPs (blue) to 7,000 SNPs (red). Detailed analysis of SNP_d group I is shown in Fig. 5.
A phylogenetic tree based on the core genome SNP analysis revealed that the clustering largely corresponded with SNP_d groups and the established ST131 clade classification (Fig. 4b). The first cluster (SNP_d groups I and II) consisted of clade C isolates (group I: C0, C1-M27, C1-nM27, and C2; group II: C1-nM27 and C2), whereas the second cluster (SNP_d group III) comprised non-C clades (clades A and unclassified). Notably, each cluster contained isolates from multiple sources, including humans, companion animals, and sewage.
To investigate core genome relatedness in more detail, we constructed a core genome SNP-based phylogenetic tree for the 62 isolates belonging to SNP_d group I (Fig. 5). This analysis identified 2,136 core genome SNPs and further subdivided SNP_d group I into six subgroups (SNP_d subgroups Ia–If), each containing 2 to 37 isolates. Subgroups Ia and Ib consisted exclusively of human-derived isolates, whereas subgroups Ic and Id included isolates from both humans and companion animals. Subgroups Ie and If comprised isolates from humans, companion animals, and sewage. Pairwise core genome SNP distances within this subgroup ranged from 1 to 165 SNPs.
Fig 5.
Detailed core genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis of ST131 SNP_d group I. Detailed maximum-likelihood tree of 62 ST131 isolates within SNP_d group I (identified in Fig. 4a) was reconstructed based on 2,136 core genome SNPs, with subgroups (SNP_d group Ia–If), and clades are labeled next to each isolate name. The adjacent heatmap shows pairwise SNP differences, with colors ranging from 0 SNPs (blue) to 300 SNPs (red).
Among these, six isolate pairs exhibited extremely low pairwise SNP distances (1–6 SNPs), suggesting particularly close genetic relationships. These included three human–human pairs: a community–healthy pair (1 SNP; SREC149c vs SREC228a) and a healthy–healthy pair (5 SNPs; SREC138a vs SREC148a), both with unknown epidemiological link, and a university–university pair (3 SNPs; s21021 vs s21051) from the same university hospital. In addition, two companion animal–owner pairs (5 and 6 SNPs; H1_1 vs H1hCIP1 and H3_1 vs H3h1, respectively) were obtained from the same households, and one companion animal–companion animal pair (6 SNPs; K4CIP1 vs K61CIP1) was obtained from different households but the same small animal clinic.
Genomic relatedness and accessory genome diversity in companion animal–owner pairs
Among the five companion animal–owner pairs, FQ-R E. coli isolates were recovered from both the owner(s) and the animal in four pairs, and these pairs shared the same STs (Pairs 1–4; Table 2). To evaluate within-household genetic relatedness and assess pair-specific differences, we conducted comparative analyses of the core genome SNPs for ST131 clade C1 isolates (Pairs 1 and 2) and ST38 isolates (Pair 3) (Fig. 6a and b).
TABLE 2.
Characteristics of the four companion animal–owner pairs and their FQ-R E. coli isolates
| Pair | Strain | Host | ST | Clade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pair 1 | H1_1 | Companion animal | 131 | C1-nM27 |
| H1hCIP1 | Owner | 131 | C1-nM27 | |
| Pair 2 | H3_1 | Companion animal | 131 | C1-M27 |
| H3h1 | Owner | 131 | C1-M27 | |
| Pair 3 | A10CIP1 | Companion animal | 224 | –a |
| A11CIP1 | Companion animal | 38 | – | |
| A10A11h2CIP1 | Owner | 38 | – | |
| Pair 4 | T1CIP1 | Companion animal | 2380 | – |
| T1h1CIP2 | Owner A | 131 | C1-M27 | |
| T1h2CIP1 | Owner B | 2380 | – |
–, not tested.
Fig 6.
Core genome SNP-based phylogenetic trees and pairwise SNP distance heatmaps of three companion animal–owner pairs (Pair 1–Pair 3). (a) Comparison of ST131 clade C1 isolates from two companion animal–owner pairs (indicated by asterisks) with four other clade C1 isolates from companion animals visiting the same small animal clinic. This analysis was based on 388 core genome SNPs. *1: Pair 1 (H1_1/H1hCIP1); *2: Pair 2 (H3_1/H3h1). (b) Comparison of isolates from the ST38 companion animal–owner pair (*3: Pair 3, A10A11h2CIP1/A11CIP1) with seven other ST38 isolates from diverse sources. This analysis was based on 7,021 core genome SNPs. Phylogenetic trees based on core genome SNPs are shown on the left, and corresponding heatmaps of pairwise SNP distances are shown on the right. Heatmap cells are annotated with SNP values, and colors indicate pairwise SNP distances, ranging from blue (fewer SNPs) to red (more SNPs).
In Pairs 1 and 2, both companion animals had visited the same small animal clinic. Therefore, we additionally compared these isolates with other ST131 clade C1 isolates obtained from the same clinic. Analysis of these 9 isolates identified a total of 388 core genome SNPs, with pairwise SNP distances ranging from 7 to 175 SNPs. In both pairs, the companion animal–owner isolates combinations exhibited the lowest SNP distances: 7 SNPs between H1_1 (dog) and H1hCIP1 (owner) in Pair 1 and 9 SNPs between H3_1 (dog) and H3h1 (owner) in Pair 2. In Pair 3, the companion animal–owner isolate combination was compared with seven additional ST38 isolates derived from diverse sources in Sapporo (two each from healthy humans and sewage, and one each from a university hospital, a community clinic, and a dog). Analysis of these 9 isolates identified a total of 7,021 core genome SNPs, with pairwise SNP distances ranging from 10 to 6,351 SNPs. Among these, the companion animal–owner combination again exhibited the lowest SNP distance (10 SNPs; A11CIP1 vs A10A11h2CIP1). In Pair 4 (ST2380), the SNP distance between T1CIP1 (dog) and T1h2CIP1 (the owner) was 24.
Comparison of ST131 isolates from Sapporo and international collections based on core genome SNPs
To compare the genetic similarity of the 88 ST131 isolates obtained in this study with those from other countries, we performed a core genome SNP analysis incorporating 135 international ST131 genomes derived from 16 countries and diverse sources (humans, companion animals, water, and livestock), resulting in a combined data set of 223 isolates. This analysis identified a total of 10,381 core genome SNPs, and pairwise SNP distances ranged from 0 to 4,419 SNPs.
The core genome SNP-based phylogeny revealed that the ST131 isolates in this study tended to co-cluster with international ST131 genomes in a manner largely dependent on fimH type (Fig. 7). In addition, the core genome SNP-based phylogeny of the 172 ST131-fimH30 isolates, which was based on a total of 4,661 core genome SNPs, showed that although the phylogeny was further divided into several clusters corresponding to the SNP_d groups, the international isolates were included within the respective clusters of our ST131 collection despite differences in their geographical origin and year of isolation (Fig. 8). Pairwise core genome SNP distances within this group ranged from 0 to 578 SNPs. These international ST131-fimH30 isolates were also predominantly identified from human and companion animals.
Fig 7.
Core genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis of 88 Sapporo isolates and 135 international ST131 isolates. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the combined 223 isolates based on 10,381 core genome SNPs. fimH type, SNP_d groups, ST131 clades, country, sources, and year are labeled next to each isolate name. All isolates indicated as “JPN” in the country annotation correspond to the Sapporo isolates (this study). [Country] AUS: Australia, AUT: Austria, CAN: Canada, CHN: China, DNK: Denmark, FRA: France, DEU: Germany, IND: India, ITA: Italy, JPN: Japan, NLD: Netherlands, NZL: New Zealand, ESP: Spain, TWN: Taiwan, GBR: United Kingdom, USA: United States of America.
Fig 8.
Detailed core genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis of 172 ST131-fimH30 isolates. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the 172 ST131-fimH30 isolates (a subset from Fig. 7) based on 4,661 core genome SNPs. Annotations (including fimH type, SNP_d groups, ST131 clades, country, sources, and year) are labeled as in Fig. 7. Isolates from Sapporo are indicated as “JPN” in the country annotation. [Country] AUS: Australia, CAN: Canada, CHN: China, DNK: Denmark, FRA: France, DEU: Germany, IND: India, ITA: Italy, JPN: Japan, NLD: Netherlands, NZL: New Zealand, ESP: Spain, TWN: Taiwan, GBR: United Kingdom, USA: United States of America.
Long-read sequencing of reveals shared ESBL plasmids among ST131 isolates
To further investigate the role of mobile genetic elements in the dissemination of ST131, we performed long-read sequencing on representative isolates carrying blaCTX-M genes (n = 9 and 3 for blaCTX-M-27 and blaCTX-M-15 harboring plasmids, respectively). Plasmid analysis revealed that blaCTX-M-27 and blaCTX-M-15 harboring plasmids exhibited highly similar backbone structures and nucleotide sequences across multiple isolates (Fig. 9 and Fig. S5). Among the nine blaCTX-M-27-harboring plasmids [from patients at a university hospital (n = 1) and clinics (n = 3), a healthy human (n = 1), dogs (n = 2), one dog owner (n = 1), and sewage (n = 1)], we observed high nucleotide sequence similarity between pH3_1 (from a dog) and pH3h1 (from the owner) (99.85%). Notably, pH3_1 also showed high sequence similarity to other blaCTX-M-27-harboring plasmids, including those from patients in community clinics, pSREC125c (99.92%), pSREC426c (97.92%), and pSREC149c (95.26%), as well as a plasmid from a dog (pK13CIP1, 93.25%) and from a university hospital patient (ps21034, 83.71%). Among the three blaCTX-M-15-harboring plasmids, nucleotide sequence similarity was 56.77% with ps21038 (from a university hospital patient) and 71.55% with pSREC166c (from a community clinic patient) when using pSREC409c (from a community clinic patient) as the reference.
Fig 9.
Comparative sequence analysis of blaCTX-M-27-harboring plasmids. The innermost black ring represents the reference sequence of pSREC125c (135,702 bp). Concentric colored rings indicate BLASTn sequence identity of the query plasmids against the reference. The rings are arranged from inner to outer, corresponding to the strain list from top to bottom in the right-side legend. Ring colors represent the sources of the isolates. The outermost circular map shows the positions of predicted open reading frames (ORFs) on the reference sequence; red arrows indicate blaCTX-M-27, orange arrows indicate other antimicrobial resistance genes, blue-green arrows indicate mobile genetic elements (insertion sequence, IS and transposon, Tn), and gray arrows indicate general coding sequences (CDS). The blaCTX-M-27 harboring plasmids were derived from patients at a university hospital (ps21034) and clinics (pSREC149c, pSREC426c, pSREC125c), a healthy human (pSREC228a), dogs (pH3_1, pK13CIP1), one dog owner (pH3h1, dog owner of H3_1), and sewage (pSBC7).
We also analyzed the structure of blaCTX-M-27 and blaCTX-M-15 surrounding regions.
While structural variations, including insertions, deletions, and inversions, were observed among the plasmids, the overall genetic backbone remained conserved, particularly in the blaCTX-M-associated regions, which were consistently flanked by insertion sequences such as IS100, IS26, and IS682 in blaCTX-M-27-harboring plasmids, IS6100, and IS26 (Fig. 10 and Fig. S6). The blaCTX-M15 was not located on the two plasmids (ps21038 and pSREC166c) but was instead integrated into the chromosomes (Chr. s21038 and Chr. SREC166c) (Fig. S6)
Fig 10.
Linear sequence comparison of the blaCTX-M-27 genetic context. Arrows indicate coding sequences (CDS). Red arrows indicate blaCTX-M-27. Yellow arrows indicate other antimicrobial resistance genes. Green arrows indicate mobile genetic elements (insertion sequence, IS and transposon, Tn), and gray arrows indicate other CDS. Gray shading between sequences reflects BLASTn nucleotide identity of >90%. The blaCTX-M-27 harboring plasmids were derived from patients at a university hospital (ps21034) and clinics (pSREC149c, pSREC426c, pSREC125c), a healthy human (pSREC228a), dogs (pH3_1, pK13CIP1), one dog owner (pH3h1, dog owner of H3_1), and sewage (pSBC7).
DISCUSSION
Previous large-scale genomic analyses of FQ-R E. coli have been reported; however, most relied on publicly available genomes or isolates lacking clear epidemiological links, such as those collected across broad geographic areas or extended time periods (5, 20–26), and often lacked a unified sampling design based on the One Health concept (5, 21–23). In contrast, studies incorporating rigorously controlled sampling have been limited in both scale and analytical depth (20, 24–26).
In this study, we addressed these limitations by constructing a systematically designed research model under the One Health framework that unified sampling both spatially (within a single community level) and temporally (within a relatively short two-year period). This rigorous and structured approach (community- and household-integrated One Health approach) enabled us to clarify local dissemination dynamics of AMR pandemic clones with unprecedented resolution, generating data of high reliability and validity. Our findings provide crucial scientific evidence for understanding how AMR clones spread within communities, expand across regions, and ultimately establish global pandemics. Specifically, we elucidated community-level dissemination of FQ-R E. coli and demonstrated that particular lineages, such as ST131 and ST1193, have circulated among humans and companion animals within a defined community.
Within the ST131 population, multiple distinct clusters were identified based on accessory genome composition and core genome SNPs, suggesting that ST131 has disseminated at the community level through several co-circulating lineages. In particular, several ST131 lineages belonging to Ag clusters B–G in the accessory genome-based phylogeny and SNP_d group I in the core genome SNP analysis were primarily responsible for the major dissemination events within this regional model. Most of these isolates represented the classical clade C1 carrying fimH30. The predominant expansion of ST131 clade C1 and/or fimH30 observed in this study is consistent with reports from other regions in Japan and many other countries (6, 28, 29), indicating that the dissemination pattern demonstrated in the Sapporo area reflects the nationwide and global spread of ST131. These isolates originated from fecal samples of healthy humans and specimens from outpatients suggesting that a substantial proportion (5.6%–5.9%) of the general population carries ST131 asymptomatically. Additionally, these lineages included isolates recovered from patients with infections, predominantly urinary tract infections at a university hospital, supporting ST131 as a true etiological agent of clinical diseases and a contributor to hospital-associated problems including AMR. Although our study design represents a cross-sectional snapshot rather than a longitudinal survey, the frequent detection of ST131 in fecal samples from healthy individuals suggests that asymptomatic carriage may contribute substantially to its community-level persistence. Collectively, these observations indicate that asymptomatic carriage within human communities likely plays a major role in the ongoing dissemination of ST131. This interpretation is consistent with recent longitudinal household studies demonstrating persistent community reservoirs of ST131 (30).
Importantly, part of this dissemination appears to involve cross-host transmission between companion animals and their owners. This is supported by the extremely small SNP distances observed between companion animal-owner isolate pairs of ST131. Although the frequency of such household cross-host transmission events remains unclear, attention is warranted because ST131 is recognized as a major concern in human clinical settings carrying AMR genes including ESBL genes and VFs. This risk is also relevant to companion animals, as ST131 is a major ExPEC lineage responsible for urinary tract and bloodstream infections in dogs and cats (18). Household cross-transmission was further suggested in other FQ-R E. coli lineages, such as ST38 and ST2380 (10 and 24 SNP differences, respectively), indicating that such risks should be considered more broadly across E. coli populations. Thus, we need to focus on cross-host transmission events within households by collecting samples that include a sufficient number of companion animal–owner pairs.
In addition, our long-read sequencing data provide insights into the role of plasmids in the dissemination of ST131. We identified blaCTX-M-27- and blaCTX-M-15-carrying plasmids with varying degrees of sequence similarity across multiple isolates. In particular, blaCTX-M-27-harboring plasmids exhibited highly conserved backbone structures and near-identical sequences across isolates from both humans and companion animals, suggesting the circulation of closely related ESBL plasmids within and across reservoirs. In contrast, blaCTX-M-15-harboring plasmids showed more moderate similarity, indicating partial conservation and greater structural diversity. These findings suggest that ST131 dissemination is driven not only by clonal expansion but also by the spread of mobile genetic elements and that resistance determinants may be shared across intra-host and inter-reservoir settings within a One Health framework. However, this analysis was limited to representative isolates, and plasmid diversity and transmission dynamics may not have been fully captured. In addition, the directionality of plasmid transfer could not be determined. Further large-scale plasmid-resolved analyses are needed to clarify the role of plasmids in ST131 dissemination.
In our previous study, FQ-R E. coli, including ST131 and ST1193, were isolated from companion animals in Sapporo (5, 20, 27) and other regions of Japan (31–33). Isolation of ST131 from companion animals was not reported before 2009, but its occurrence has increased in recent years (31, 33). This trend, following the first isolation of ST131 in humans in 2001, suggests that its spread in humans may have partially triggered cross-host transmission between humans and companion animals, thereby contributing to the establishment and acceleration of the global ST131 pandemic.
A similar phenomenon may apply to the international FQ-R E. coli clone ST1193, which emerged and expanded rapidly among humans worldwide around the mid-2010s (34), and was subsequently isolated in companion animals in 2020 (34). In this study, we could not confirm direct transmission of ST1193 between humans and companion animals due to the small number of ST1193 isolates from companion animals (n = 5). Although 4 isolates were genetically distinct from human isolates, 1 isolate from a companion animal (K24CIP1) clustered with human isolates based on accessory genome and core genome SNP analyses, with pairwise SNP distances ranging from 53 to 111 (Fig. S4), suggesting that household cross-host transmission of ST1193 may also occur. Although it remains unclear whether ST1193 possesses traits enabling it to establish a stable pandemic comparable to ST131, our data showing that ST131 and ST1193 share similar accessory genome profiles based on COG categories such as those related to cell wall/membrane biogenesis, cell motility, defense mechanisms, and carbohydrate metabolism may support possibility. These findings suggest that the genomic repertoires of these pandemic lineages include advantageous traits promoting intestinal colonization and survival in both humans and companion animals, facilitating their dissemination within communities.
In this study, neither ST131 nor ST1193 was isolated from livestock. The absence or low frequency of these lineages in livestock and food products is consistent with previous studies (35, 36). A limitation of this study is the lack of sampling from food-chain products. Although further investigation is required to assess the spread of AMR via food-chain in this community, these observations support a limited contribution of food chain transmission via livestock compared with intra- and cross-host transmission among humans and companion animals. Furthermore, the isolation of ST131 and ST1193 in sewage samples, but not in river water, supports the notion that dissemination primarily occurs within human populations and that environmental spread remains limited. However, we recently reported the isolation of ST131 from wildlife and from river or lake water in other regions of Japan (12). These findings indicate that certain ST131 lineages may persist in non-human and non-companion animal hosts and warrants further attention. Additionally, phylogroup B1 lineages such as ST162 and ST533 were frequently isolated from livestock and river water, indicating the coexistence of ecologically adapted E. coli populations alongside human-associated populations within the same geographic region.
In conclusion, our systematically designed research model elucidated the community-level dissemination dynamics of the pandemic AMR clone E. coli ST131, demonstrating more clearly than ever before that its spread is driven primarily by human-to-human transmission and, to a lesser extent, by transmission between humans and companion animals. Importantly, several ST131 isolates obtained in this study clustered with isolates from other countries, indicating that the locally circulating lineages identified here are part of broader international transmission networks and that community-level dissemination can extend beyond regional and national boundaries. These findings strongly suggest the necessity of implementing community-level interventions in addition to current AMR control strategies, which mainly focus on hospital-based measures such as infection surveillance, antibiotic stewardship, and the prevention of nosocomial infections. Although this study did not quantify the frequency of FQ-R E. coli transmission between humans and their companion animals, further analyses involving a larger number of companion animal–owner pairs will be essential to determine its true extent. In addition, this study is limited by the lack of geographic mapping of isolate sampling locations due to privacy and ethical constraints, which prevented spatial analysis of transmission patterns. Incorporating such detailed epidemiological data in future studies would enable a more comprehensive understanding of ST131 dissemination dynamics. In Japan, the government has launched the Second National Action Plan on AMR (2023–2027), emphasizing the importance of AMR control under the One Health concept. Our findings not only provide scientific evidence supporting this framework but also clearly demonstrate the necessity of implementing a community- and household-integrated One Health approach as a key component of future AMR control strategies. This approach bridges human and animal health and offers a universal analytical model applicable to the investigation of other pandemic AMR clones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample origin
A total of 884 samples were collected from diverse sources in Sapporo and its suburb, Ebetsu, Japan, between 2021 and 2022. These included 651 human samples (215 from hospitalized patients at Sapporo Medical University Hospital, 220 from patients attending 40 community clinics, and 216 from healthy individuals), 85 samples from companion animals visiting 4 small animal clinics, 157 samples from livestock (108 cattle, 25 pigs, and 24 chickens) at 4 farms, 4 sewage samples, and 7 river water samples. Human clinical specimens included urine (n = 121), vaginal discharge (n = 32), pharyngeal swabs (n = 30), and other clinical specimens (n = 32). Fecal samples were collected from both community clinic patients (as part of routine clinical testing that may include cases with suspected foodborne illness or diarrhea) and healthy individuals (collected through general health checkups). Detailed information on sample sources and sample numbers is summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3.
Summary of sample sources and specimen types subjected in this study
| Source | Subcategory | Specimen type | No. of samples (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Hospitalized patients | Clinical specimensa (urine, vaginal discharge, pharyngeal swab, others) | 215 |
| Human | Community clinic patients | Fecal samples | 220 |
| Human | Healthy individuals | Fecal samples | 216 |
| Companion animals | Dogs and cats | Rectal swabs | 85 |
| Livestock | Cattle | Rectal swabs | 108 |
| Pigs | Rectal swabs | 25 | |
| Chicken | Rectal swabs | 24 | |
| Environment | Sewage | Wastewater samples | 4 |
| River water | Water samples (filtered) | 7 |
Clinical specimens including urine (n = 121), vaginal discharge (n = 32), pharyngeal swab (n = 30), and other clinical specimens (n = 32). Other clinical specimens included respiratory specimens (nasal discharge, sputum, oral and tonsillar swabs; n = 10), skin and soft tissue specimens (n = 6), blood and ascitic fluid (n = 4), drain-related specimens (n = 5), gastrointestinal/biliary specimens (n = 4), and tissue biopsy or device-associated materials (n = 3).
E. coli isolation
Isolation and identification of E. coli were performed using standardized procedures across all sample sources unless otherwise specified. Human clinical and fecal samples were streaked onto 5% sheep blood agar plates (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Samples from animals and environmental sources were cultured on ECC-CHROM agar plates (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) under the same incubation conditions. For environmental samples, sewage samples (500 mL each) were serially diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) up to 10⁻³, and 100 μL of each dilution was plated. River water samples (1 L each) were filtered through a 0.2 µm membrane filter (ADVANTEC, Tokyo, Japan), followed by resuspension in PBS, centrifugation (6,000 × g, 10 min), and plating after dilution. After overnight incubation at 37°C, up to three representative colonies per sample were selected for animal-derived samples, while up to 96 colonies per sample were screened for environmental samples. For human samples, a single colony per sample was selected as part of routine clinical diagnosis or investigation.
Selective isolation of FQ-R E. coli was performed among samples from companion animals, livestock, and environments. Samples as afordomention were also cultured on ECC-CHROM agar supplemented with 1 mg/L ciprofloxacin (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). For animal-derived samples, rectal swabs were first enriched in 3–5 mL Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 37°C overnight prior to plating. Thirty-eight FQ-R E. coli isolates derived from companion animals (32 dogs and 6 cats), collected during the same period (2021–2022) in Sapporo, were included based on previous studies (19, 26). Furthermore, 6 FQ-R E. coli isolates obtained from fecal samples of companion animal owners were also included in this study.
E. coli identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Suspected E. coli colonies were subcultured for confirmation and identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS; Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the microbroth dilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, with E. coli ATCC 25922 used as the quality control strain.
Molecular epidemiological analysis of FQ-R E. coli isolates
A total of 235 FQ-R E. coli isolates were included in the molecular epidemiological analyses. These isolates were derived from university hospital patients (n = 37), community clinics’ patients (n = 28), healthy humans (n = 31), companion animals (n = 55), owners (n = 6), sewage (n = 49), river water (n = 6), and livestock (cattle: n = 10, pigs: n = 1, chickens: n = 12).
ST131 and its clades (A, B, C, Unclassified), including subclades within clade C (C0, C1-M27, C1-nM27, and C2), were identified using multiplex PCR (37). WGS was then performed to characterize additional molecular epidemiological features of the 235 FQ-R E. coli isolates. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA libraries were prepared with the xGen DNA Library Prep Kit EZ UNI (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, USA). Sequencing was conducted using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The resulting reads were de-multiplexed, quality-trimmed, and de novo assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench (QIAGEN).
Phylogenetic characteristics of the E. coli isolates were determined using In Silico Clermont Phylotyper (38). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), fimH typing, and the detection of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes and VFs were performed using tools provided by the Center for Genomic Epidemiology: MLST 2.0, FimTyper 1.0, ResFinder 4.6.0, and VirulenceFinder 2.0 (39).
Genome annotation, pangenome, and accessory genome analysis
Pangenome analysis was performed on 235 FQ-R E. coli isolates obtained in this study. Accessory genome analysis was conducted on the 88 ST131 isolates. Genomes were annotated using Prokka (v1.14.6) with default settings, and the resulting GFF files were used as input for pangenome analysis (40). Roary (v3.12.0) was applied to define the pangenome, with core genes defined as those present in ≥99% of isolates (41). Multiple sequence alignments of core genes were generated using MAFFT, and phylogenetic trees were constructed with FastTree under the generalized time-reversible (GTR) model. A separate phylogenetic tree based on the presence or absence of accessory genes was also generated. All trees were visualized using iTOL (Interactive Tree of Life) (42).
Genes present in at least 70% of all isolates were considered for downstream association analysis. Candidate genes were prioritized using Scoary2 based on odds ratios, P-values, multiple testing correction, and the Youden index to select genes most strongly associated with each ST (43). These metrics were chosen to identify genes that were both highly specific and consistently associated with each clone, facilitating robust functional comparisons in downstream analyses. Functional annotation of candidate genes was performed using EggNOG-mapper (v2.1.13), and COG categories were compared across STs to assess functional biases (44).
Core genome SNP detection
Core genome SNP detection was performed for three datasets: (i) the 88 ST131 isolates obtained in this study, (ii) these isolates combined with 135 publicly available E. coli ST131 genomes with epidemiological information (origin, year of isolation, and country) available in the NCBI database (Table S4), and (iii) two companion animal–owner pair subsets (one consisting of ST38 isolates including pair A11CIP1/A10A11h2CIP1 and related strains from this study, and another consisting of ST131 clade C1 isolates collected from the same animal clinic, including pairs H3_1/H3h1 [C1-M27] and H1_1/H1hCIP1 [C1-nM27]. Publicly available genomes were selected from previously published studies deposited in NCBI in which ST131 designation and epidemiological metadata were clearly described. To enhance comparability with our data set, isolates were chosen to avoid substantial overrepresentation of specific sources or clades when such information was available and to include geographically diverse strains. The detection of core genome SNP was conducted using kSNP4 (45). The optimal k-mer size was determined for each data set using the built-in kchooser utility, and k = 17 was selected in all cases. For 135 publicly available genomes, raw reads (SRA) were de novo assembled with CLC Genomics Workbench (QIAGEN), and complete genomes (GenBank) were obtained as FASTA files. The reference genome used was E. coli strain EC958 (accession no. HG941718.1). Phylogenetic reconstruction was conducted using the maximum likelihood (ML) method, which estimates the most likely tree topology based on a nucleotide substitution model and is considered appropriate for genome-scale SNP analysis. The resulting tree was visualized with iTOL. Pairwise SNP distances were calculated using snp-dists (v0.8.2), and the resulting matrix was visualized as a heatmap using SRplot (46, 47).
Long-read sequencing for plasmid analysis
To completely resolve plasmid structures and investigate horizontal gene transfer dynamics, long-read sequencing was performed on selected representative E. coli isolates based on phylogenetic clustering. High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was extracted using either the QIAGEN Genomic-tip (QIAGEN) or the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Long-read libraries were prepared using the Rapid Barcoding Sequencing Kit SQK-RBK114.24 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and sequenced on a MinION device equipped with a FLO-MIN114 (R10.4.1) flow cell. Following basecalling, adapter trimming was performed using Porechop v0.2.4 (48), followed by quality filtered using Filtlong v0.2.1 (minimum length, 1,000 bp) (49). De novo genome assembly was conducted using Flye v2.9.6 (50) and Unicycler v0.5.1 with illumina short-read sequencing (51). Genome annotation was conducted using Prokka v1.14.6 (40), staramr v.0.12.1 (52), and MobileElementFinder v1.0.3 (53). Comparative genomic analyses were performed using BLAST Ring Image Generator 0.95 (BRIG) (54) and Easyfig (55) to visualize their structural characteristics and genetic contexts. Plasmid sequence similarity was calculated using dnadiff in the MUMmer v 4.0.0 based on aligned bases and average nucleotide identity (56).
Statistical analysis
Comparative analyses of categorical data were performed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. For multi-category contingency tables containing small cell counts or zero values, P-values were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation (100,000 replicates). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance. P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR). An adjusted P-value (Padj) < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partly supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (JP20ak0101118h0002, JP23gm1610012h0001, JP22ama121039, JP23ama121039, JP22ama121053 to T.S.), a grant from JSPS KAKENHI (JP21H03622, JP22K19416, JP25H01077 to T.S.), the JST START Program (ST211004JO to T.S.), and MEXT from the Joint Research Program of the Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University (to T.S.) and the Takeda Science Foundation (to T.S.), JST SPRING (Grant Number JPMJSP2119), a Grant-in-Aid for Graduate Students from the World-leading Innovative and Smart Education (WISE) Program (1801), and the Joint Research Program of the International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University.
We are grateful to all members of our laboratory for their continuous support and encouragement. We also thank Ms. Kaho Okada for her technical assistance. Aiko Maeda acknowledges Mr. Seiryo Inoue for his helpful discussions and Mr. Norihisa Araake for his kind support in the setup of computational environments and analytical tools.
Contributor Information
Toyotaka Sato, Email: sato.t@vetmed.hokudai.ac.jp.
Alessandra Carattoli, Universita degli studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The raw sequencing data of 200 FQ-R E. coli strains newly sequenced in this study were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers SAMN52957538 to SAMN52957737 (BioProject number PRJNA1354839). The remaining 35 FQ-R E. coli strains analyzed in this study were previously reported and are available in the NCBI SRA under accession numbers SAMN48440591 to SAMN48440625 (BioProject number PRJNA1261911) (27).
ETHICS APPROVAL
This study was approved by the Sapporo Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 272-70), Sapporo Medical University Animal Care and Use Committee (No. 17-137, 18-083, and 20-006), and Hokkaido University Institution Review Board (IRB No. 023-0240). A waiver of written informed consent was granted, and the study was conducted using an opt-out approach.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00007-26.
Distribution of phylogenetic groups, STs, and ST131 clades of FQ-R Escherichia coli isolates by sources.
Distribution of accessory genes across COG functional categories by ST.
Functional enrichment of accessory genes by COG category and clone.
Core genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis of 40 ST1193 isolates.
Comparative sequence analysis of blaCTX-M-15-harboring plasmids.
Linear sequence comparison of the blaCTX-M-15 genetic context.
Tables S1 to S4.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. World Health Organization . 2016. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistancal action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763. Retrieved 1 Nov 2025.
- 2. Collaborators GAR . 2024. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990-2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 404:1199–1226. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Li X, Fan H, Zi H, Hu H, Li B, Huang J, Luo P, Zeng X. 2022. Global and regional burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infections in 2019. JCM 11:2817. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. World Health Organization . 2024. WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/1a41ef7e-dd24-4ce6-a9a6-1573562e7f37/content
- 5. Fukushima Y, Sato T, Tsukamoto N, Nakajima C, Suzuki Y, Takahashi S, Yokota S. 2021. Clonal/subclonal changes and accumulation of CTX-M-type β-lactamase genes in fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli ST131 and ST1193 strains isolated during the past 12 years, Japan. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 27:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pitout JD, DeVinney R. 2017. Escherichia coli ST131: a multidrug-resistant clone primed for global domination. F1000Res 6:195. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10609.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Artero A, López-Cruz I, Piles L, Alberola J, Eiros J, Salavert S, Madrazo M. 2023. Fluoroquinolones are useful as directed treatment for complicated UTI in a setting with a high prevalence of quinolone-resistant microorganisms. Antibiotics (Basel) 12:183. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Banerjee R, Johnson J. 2014. A new clone sweeps clean: the enigmatic emergence of Escherichia coli sequence type 131. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:4997–5004. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02824-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rogers BA, Sidjabat HE, Paterson DL. 2011. Escherichia coli O25b-ST131: a pandemic, multiresistant, community-associated strain. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1–14. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kocsis B, Gulyás D, Szabó D. 2022. Emergence and dissemination of extraintestinal pathogenic high-risk international clones of Escherichia coli Life (Basel) 12:2077. doi: 10.3390/life12122077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ludden C, Decano AG, Jamrozy D, Pickard D, Morris D, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ, Cormican M, Downing T. 2020. Genomic surveillance of Escherichia coli ST131 identifies local expansion and serial replacement of subclones. Microb Genom 6:000352. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sato T, Uemura K, Yasuda M, Maeda A, Minamoto T, Harada K, Sugiyama M, Ikushima S, Yokota S-I, Horiuchi M, et al. 2024. Traces of pandemic fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli clone ST131 transmitted from human society to aquatic environments and wildlife in Japan. One Health 18:100715. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Johnson JR, Porter SB, Johnston B, Thuras P, Clock S, Crupain M, Rangan U. 2017. Extraintestinal pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli, including sequence type 131 (ST131), from retail chicken breasts in the United States in 2013. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02956. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02956-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li D, Wyrsch E, Elankumaran P, Dolejska M, Marenda M, Browning G, Bushell R, McKinnon J, Chowdhury P, Hitchick N, et al. 2021. Genomic comparisons of Escherichia coli ST131 from Australia. Microb Genom 7:000721. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zendri F, Maciuca I, Moon S, Jones P, Wattret A, Jenkins R, Baxter A, Timofte D. 2020. Occurrence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli ST131, including the H30-Rx and C1-M27 subclones, among urban seagulls from the United Kingdom. Microb Drug Resist 26:697–708. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kidsley A, White R, Beatson S, Saputra S, Schembri M, Gordon D, Johnson J, O’Dea M, Mollinger J, Abraham S, et al. 2020. Companion animals are spillover hosts of the multidrug-resistant human extraintestinal Escherichia coli pandemic clones ST131 and ST1193. Front Microbiol 11:1968. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jamborova I, Johnston B, Papousek I, Kachlikova K, Micenkova L, Clabots C, Skalova A, Chudejova K, Dolejska M, Literak I, et al. 2018. Extensive genetic commonality among wildlife, wastewater, community, and nosocomial isolates of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 (H30R1 and H30Rx subclones) that carry blaCTX-M-27 or blaCTX-M-15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00519–18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00519-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Johnson J, Davis G, Clabots C, Johnston B, Porter S, DebRoy C, Pomputius W, Ender P, Cooperstock M, Slater B, et al. 2016. Household clustering of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 clinical and fecal isolates according to whole genome sequence analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 3:ofw129. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Platell J, Cobbold R, Johnson J, Heisig A, Heisig P, Clabots C, Kuskowski M, Trott D. 2011. Commonality among fluoroquinolone-resistant sequence type ST131 extraintestinal Escherichia coli isolates from humans and companion animals in Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3782–3787. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00306-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sato T, Yokota S, Tachibana T, Tamai S, Maetani S, Tamura Y, Horiuchi M. 2021. Isolation of human lineage, fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli Isolates from companion animals in Japan. Antibiotics (Basel) 10:1463. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Watt A, Cummins M, Donato C, Wirth W, Porter A, Andersson P, Donner E, Jennison A, Seemann T, Djordjevic S, et al. 2025. Parameters for one health genomic surveillance of Escherichia coli from Australia. Nat Commun 16:17. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55103-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Neffe L, Forde T, Oravcova K, Köhler U, Bautsch W, Tomasch J, Häussler S. 2022. Genomic epidemiology of clinical ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a German hospital suggests infections are primarily community- and regionally-acquired. Microb Genom 8:000901. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. White R, Bull M, Barker C, Arnott J, Wootton M, Jones L, Howe R, Morgan M, Ashcroft M, Forde B, et al. 2024. Genomic epidemiology reveals geographical clustering of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli ST131 associated with bacteraemia in Wales. Nat Commun 15:1371. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45608-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Aziz M, Davis G, Park D, Idris A, Sariya S, Wang Y, Zerbonne S, Nordstrom L, Weaver B, Statham S, et al. 2024. Pediatric urinary tract infections caused by poultry-associated Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr 12:e0341523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03415-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Morales Barroso I, López-Cerero L, Navarro M, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Pascual A, Rodríguez-Baño J. 2018. Intestinal colonization due to Escherichia coli ST131: risk factors and prevalence. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 7:135. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0427-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Spellberg B, Doi Y. 2015. The rise of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the community: scarier than we thought. J Infect Dis 212:1853–1855. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Maeda A, Sato T, Toyting-Hiraishi J, Suzuki A, Hoshino Y, Torigoe S, Sakakibara K, Tamai S, Tachibana T, Horiuchi M. 2025. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and virulence profiles of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from companion animals in Sapporo, Japan. J Vet Med Sci 87:1249–1258. doi: 10.1292/jvms.25-0251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Matsumura Y, Pitout J, Gomi R, Matsuda T, Noguchi T, Yamamoto M, Peirano G, DeVinney R, Bradford PA, Motyl MR, et al. 2016. Global Escherichia coli sequence type 131 clade with blaCTX-M-27 gene. Emerg Infect Dis 22:1900–1907. doi: 10.3201/eid2211.160519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Petty N, Ben Zakour N, Stanton-Cook M, Skippington E, Totsika M, Forde B, Phan M, Gomes Moriel D, Peters KM, Davies M, et al. 2014. Global dissemination of a multidrug resistant Escherichia coli clone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:5694–5699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322678111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Perez R, Chung The H, Vignesvaran K, Tan W, Chua M, Tan E, Peng S, Zhou L, Singh S, Yeung W, et al. 2025. Transmission dynamics of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 in households-a one health prospective cohort study. Nat Commun 16:8455. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63121-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Harada K, Nakai Y, Kataoka Y. 2012. Mechanisms of resistance to cephalosporin and emergence of O25b-ST131 clone harboring CTX-M-27 β-lactamase in extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli from dogs and cats in Japan. Microbiol Immunol 56:480–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00463.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yasugi M, Hatoya S, Motooka D, Matsumoto Y, Shimamura S, Tani H, Furuya M, Mie K, Miyake M, Nakamura S, et al. 2021. Whole-genome analyses of extended-spectrum or AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates from companion dogs in Japan. PLoS One 16:e0246482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kawamura K, Sugawara T, Matsuo N, Hayashi K, Norizuki C, Tamai K, Kondo T, Arakawa Y. 2017. Spread of CTX-Type extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates of epidemic clone B2-O25-ST131 among dogs and cats in Japan. Microb Drug Resist 23:1059–1066. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2016.0246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Pitout JDD, Peirano G, Chen L, DeVinney R, Matsumura Y. 2022. Escherichia coli ST1193: following in the footsteps of E. coli ST131. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e0051122. doi: 10.1128/aac.00511-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bonnet R, Beyrouthy R, Haenni M, Nicolas-Chanoine M, Dalmasso G, Madec J. 2021. Host Colonization as a major evolutionary force favoring the diversity and the emergence of the worldwide multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli ST131. mBio 12:e0145121. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01451-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wyrsch E, Bushell R, Marenda M, Browning G, Djordjevic S. 2022. Global phylogeny and f virulence plasmid carriage in pandemic Escherichia coli ST1193. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0255422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02554-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Matsumura Y, Pitout J, Peirano G, DeVinney R, Noguchi T, Yamamoto M, Gomi R, Matsuda T, Nakano S, Nagao M, et al. 2017. Rapid identification of different Escherichia coli sequence type 131 clades. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00179–17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00179-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Waters NR, Abram F, Brennan F, Holmes A, Pritchard L. 2020. Easy phylotyping of Escherichia coli via the EzClermont web app and command-line tool. Access Microbiol 2:acmi000143. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Technical university of Denmark. 2025. Center for genomic epidemiology. Available from: https://www.genomicepidemiology.org
- 40. Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Letunic I, Bork P. 2024. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W78–W82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Roder T, Pimentel G, Fuchsmann P, Stern MT, von Ah U, Vergères G, Peischl S, Brynildsrud O, Bruggmann R, Bär C. 2024. Scoary2: rapid association of phenotypic multi-omics data with microbial pan-genomes. Genome Biol 25:93. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03233-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. 2021. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol 38:5825–5829. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gardner SN, Slezak T, Hall BG. 2015. kSNP3.0: SNP detection and phylogenetic analysis of genomes without genome alignment or reference genome. Bioinformatics 31:2877–2878. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Page A, Taylor B, Delaney A, Soares J, Seemann T, Keane J, Harris S. 2016. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom 2:e000056. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Tang D, Chen M, Huang X, Zhang G, Zeng L, Zhang G, Wu S, Wang Y. 2023. SRplot: a free online platform for data visualization and graphing. PLoS One 18:e0294236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wick RR. 2018. Porechop (version 0.2.4). Available from: https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop
- 49. Wick RR. 2021. Filtlong (version 0.2.1). Available from: https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong
- 50. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner P. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wick R, Judd L, Gorrie C, Holt K. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bharat A, Petkau A, Avery B, Chen J, Folster J, Carson C, Kearney A, Nadon C, Mabon P, Thiessen J, et al. 2022. Correlation between phenotypic and in silico detection of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica in Canada using staramr. Microorganisms 10:292. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Johansson M, Bortolaia V, Tansirichaiya S, Aarestrup F, Roberts A, Petersen T. 2021. Detection of mobile genetic elements associated with antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica using a newly developed web tool: MobileElementFinder. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:101–109. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Alikhan N, Petty N, Ben Zakour N, Beatson S. 2011. Blast ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sullivan M, Petty N, Beatson S. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, Zimin A. 2018. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol 14:e1005944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Distribution of phylogenetic groups, STs, and ST131 clades of FQ-R Escherichia coli isolates by sources.
Distribution of accessory genes across COG functional categories by ST.
Functional enrichment of accessory genes by COG category and clone.
Core genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis of 40 ST1193 isolates.
Comparative sequence analysis of blaCTX-M-15-harboring plasmids.
Linear sequence comparison of the blaCTX-M-15 genetic context.
Tables S1 to S4.
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing data of 200 FQ-R E. coli strains newly sequenced in this study were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers SAMN52957538 to SAMN52957737 (BioProject number PRJNA1354839). The remaining 35 FQ-R E. coli strains analyzed in this study were previously reported and are available in the NCBI SRA under accession numbers SAMN48440591 to SAMN48440625 (BioProject number PRJNA1261911) (27).










