Abstract
Cancer and inflammatory diseases are critically influenced by dynamic interactions between pathological tissues and the host immune system. The precise migration of immune cells into the local microenvironments of tumors or inflammation is a fundamental prerequisite for them to exert their functions. Immune reservoirs, including tertiary lymphoid structures, secondary lymphoid structures, bone marrow and the intestinal tract, serve as critical mobilization hubs for diverse lymphoid and myeloid populations to infiltrate tumors or inflamed sites. The directional migration of immune cells is orchestrated through complex regulatory networks involving chemokine or cytokine-receptor pairs, adhesion molecule interactions, extracellular vesicle signaling, metabolic reprogramming and microbiota modulation. In both tumors and inflammation, immune cell trafficking shapes the local immune landscape, contributing to either immune protection or pathological progression. Contemporary therapeutic strategies targeting immune cell migration encompass the following axes: precision modulation of chemokine or cytokine networks, architectural reprogramming of lymphatic structures or extracellular matrix, dietary intervention and strategic manipulation of microbiome. Nevertheless, clinical translation remains hindered by microenvironmental heterogeneity, suboptimal migratory efficiency, and technical limitations in longitudinal tracking of cellular dynamics. This review integrates recent findings from oncology and inflammatory diseases to explore the origins, phenotypes and trafficking mechanisms of migratory immune cells, highlighting how advances in understanding immune migration across cancer and inflammation can inform therapeutic innovation and precision immunomodulation.
Subject terms: Tumour immunology, Inflammation
Introduction
The intricate interplay between the immune system and pathological tissues, such as tumors and inflammatory diseases, has long been recognized as a critical determinant of disease progression or alleviation.1 Whether in cancer or inflammatory disorders, migratory immune cells not only participate in host defense but also contribute to disease exacerbation, reflecting their context-dependent dual functionality.2,3 While substantial studies have illuminated the phenotypic and functional characteristics of immune cells within tumor and inflamed tissues, fundamental challenges concerning the comprehensive nature of immune responses and therapeutic efficacy remain unresolved.4,5 In cancer therapy, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) still faces significant limitations in efficacy, evident in persistent disease progression or rapid relapse after initial response.6 Similarly, treatments for chronic inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently exhibit therapeutic resistance or partial remission, necessitating continuous, intensive management.7,8 These impasses strongly indicate unexplored regulatory dimensions in current therapeutic strategies, potentially mediated by the broader immunological macroenvironment.
Emerging evidence indicates that peripheral immune cells mobilized from reservoirs such as secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs), bone marrow, and the gastrointestinal tract play critical yet often underappreciated roles in modulating disease.9–11 In cancer, peripheral immune cells, including diverse lymphoid and myeloid subsets, migrate toward tumor sites under specific chemokine gradients and adhesion molecule interactions.12 Importantly, these recruited immune cells exhibit significant functional heterogeneity and are capable of either promoting robust antitumor immunity or facilitating tumor progression. Similarly, during inflammation, peripheral immune cell migration profoundly shapes disease outcomes. For instance, gut-derived immune cells, including mucosal-associated invariant T cells, can exacerbate joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis through targeted trafficking mediated by upregulated E-selectin, ICAM1, and VCAM1.13 Conversely, gut-origin IgA+ plasma cells traffic into the central nervous system (CNS), alleviating neuroinflammation through the elevation of IL-10, thereby highlighting the dual potential of migrating peripheral cells.14
In this review, we comprehensively delineate the multidimensional characteristics of immune cell migration in cancer and inflammation, including acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. Specifically, we describe the origins, phenotypic diversities, and dynamic migratory trajectories of these immune cells, examining the intricate regulatory networks that govern their mobilization and functional polarization. The discussion extends to advanced methodologies enabling high-resolution tracking of immune cell trajectories, providing novel insights into the dynamic interactions underpinning effective tumor and inflammatory immunity. Furthermore, a systematic analysis of the molecular determinants governing immune cell trafficking was conducted. Concurrently, we performed a critical evaluation of innovative therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating these pathways. By connecting the mechanisms of immune cell migration to clinical applications, our discussion establishes a cohesive framework that links fundamental insights with therapeutic strategies. This integration ultimately aims to identify precision immunomodulation for treating cancer and inflammatory diseases.
Origin of migratory immune cells
The migration of distinct immune cell subsets from their reservoirs, including lymphoid structures, bone marrow and gut, exerts profound influences on the intralesional microenvironment.11,15–17 Immune cells derived from different origins exhibit distinct functional properties. For instance, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) from bone marrow exhibit immunosuppressive properties that promote tumor progression, whereas gut-derived Th17 cells can drive inflammatory responses, contributing to the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders.18,19 Meanwhile, the migration of immunocytes is governed by sophisticated molecular networks. These specific mechanisms, from chemokine signaling to the modulation of adhesion molecules, ensure precise spatiotemporal control over immune responses.
Tertiary lymphoid structures
Prior investigations have predominantly focused on alterations in immune cell populations within diseased tissues. However, intralesional migration of immune cells plays a pivotal role in driving microenvironmental remodeling20 (Fig. 1). Tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) initiation involves the recruitment of lymphoid tissue-inducer-like (LTi-like) cells, whose secretion of LTα and TNF drives stromal cell differentiation into lymphoid tissue organizer (LTo) cells.21 These LTo cells orchestrate T and B cell recruitment and segregation via the CCL21-CCR7 and CXCL13-CXCR5 axes, establishing a self-amplifying loop that promotes TLS maturation and expansion.22 Mature TLSs, situated within stromal regions of tumors and adjacent to tumor cell nests, constitute critical structures for mediating intratumoral migration of immunocytes.21,23 High endothelial venules (HEVs) serve as critical structures for recruiting immune cells within mature TLSs. These specialized vessels express peripheral node addressin (PNAd), which binds to L-selectin (CD62L) on circulating immune cells, mediating their trafficking into the tumor parenchyma.24 Intratumoral TLSs can recruit B cells, sustaining their maturation and subsequent antibody production, which is associated with the response to immunotherapy.25 In metastatic melanoma and lung cancer, these tumor-specific antibodies promote natural killer (NK) cell infiltration and mediate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), thereby augmenting the adaptive immune response against tumor cells.26,27 Within T-B cell segregation, B cells activate T follicular helper (Tfh) cells via the costimulatory molecules ICOSL/CD40L and the cytokine IL-21, which subsequently promote the intratumoral migration of NK cells.28 However, in murine models of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been observed to infiltrate TLSs via the CCL17/CCL22-CCR4 axis, a process associated with adverse prognosis.29 While the upstream mechanisms governing Treg infiltration remain elusive, emerging evidence suggests that these cells may participate in TLS neogenesis.30
Fig. 1.
The origin of migratory immune cells in cancer and inflammation. Immune cells originate from three main sources: secondary lymphoid organs (including spleen and lymph nodes), intestines and bone marrow. Distinct immune cells infiltrate tumors or inflammatory tissues from their reservoirs via unique migratory patterns. Conversely, immune cells within these lesions can also circulate back to their sites of origin, thereby executing their effector functions. Additionally, immune cell migration within the tumor or inflammatory microenvironment may be orchestrated by tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), which serve as organized hubs for immune coordination. Purple, red, green, and blue arrows represent the migration pathways of immune cells originating from the spleen, intestines, lymph nodes, and bone marrow, respectively. The black arrows represent the migration of immune cells within tissues or organ axes. Created with BioRender.com. TLS tertiary lymphoid structures, HSCs hematopoietic stem cells, GMPs granulocyte-monocyte progenitors, MDSCs myeloid-derived suppressor cells, MAIT mucosal-associated invariant T cells, FDC follicular dendritic cell, NK cells natural killer cells, TCM cells central memory T cells, DCs dendritic cells, CTLs cytotoxic T lymphocytes, Tregs regulatory T cells, Tfh T follicular helper cells, Tpex progenitor-exhausted T cells
While the formation of TLSs can be seen as a response to chronic inflammation, immune cells within TLSs often paradoxically exacerbate the inflammatory milieu, contributing to disease progression. This detrimental effect is mediated through immune cell recruitment and subsequent amplification of local inflammatory responses. In lupus nephritis, for example, the presence of the formation of TLSs was associated with a longer disease course together with elevated CXCL13, a chemokine that promotes B cel recruitment and impairs renal function.31 Similarly, during atherogenesis, M1-polarized macrophages in TLSs induce vascular smooth muscle cells to express CCL19, CCL20, and CXCL16 via the TNF-α/TNFR signaling pathway.32 This process effectively recruits B cells and T helper cells, whose accumulation significantly amplifies the local inflammatory milieu, ultimately promoting the progression of atherosclerotic plaques.32 Beyond direct recruitment, TLSs serve as crucial niches for immune cell activation and cytokine production, contributing to tissue damage. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), IL-18+ M1 macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) initially localize within pulmonary TLSs, which stimulate responsive lymphocytes to release IFN-γ, promoting tissue damage and inflammation.33 In progressive multiple sclerosis, TLSs in the subarachnoid space are associated with extensive periventricular infiltration predominantly composed of B cells and follicular dendritic cells (FDCs).34 These immune cells further secrete inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, eliciting microglial activation that exacerbates neuronal and axonal damage.34 Furthermore, TLSs can structurally modify their microenvironment, impacting immune cell trafficking and local immune responses. Within the inflamed intestinal mucosa of IBD patients, TLSs can remodel lymphatic architecture and disturb lymph fluid flow, thereby impeding plasma cell and dendritic cell trafficking. This compromised drainage promotes excessive local antibody production, ultimately exacerbating intestinal inflammation.35
Although TLSs establish privileged migratory routes for intratumoral immune cell trafficking, malignant cells actively counteract immune infiltration through diverse strategies. Cancer cells can impair the physical interactions between tumor and immune cells, including MHC class I:TCR and CD58:CD2, thereby mediating T cell exclusion.36 Physical obstruction of the stroma is another important factor in T cell exclusion. Chi3l1 produced by tumors can promote neutrophil recruitment and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, which blocks T cell infiltration by forming a physical barrier around tumors.37 Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms by which TLSs orchestrate intralesional immune cell migration and how physical and biological barriers counteract this process is crucial for identifying vulnerabilities to enhance immunotherapy efficacy.
Secondary lymphoid organs
SLOs, including the spleen and lymph nodes, serve as hubs for the initiation of effective adaptive immune responses38–40 (Fig. 1). Following lymphocyte activation within SLOs, effector and memory lymphocytes egress and migrate to peripheral sites of tumor and inflammation to execute their immune functions.38
In tumor and chronic inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis and IBD, the spleen undergoes distinct adaptive alterations, particularly manifesting as splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis.41–43 Specifically, myeloid precursors such as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) display myeloid-biased differentiation at the expense of erythropoiesis and lymphopoiesis.44 Primed by IL-6-producing stromal cells, these splenic HSCs subsequently differentiate into MDSCs and migrate to tumors and chronic inflammatory sites, contributing to systematic immunosuppression.41 Tumor and chronic inflammation facilitate the spleen’s role as a reservoir for immune cells migrating toward distal diseased sites.44 For instance, excessive secretion of the peptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) in murine models of lung adenocarcinoma enhances the self-renewal of HSCs within the spleen, thereby inducing the generation of classical monocytes.45 These monocytes egress from the spleen via the S1P1 receptor and migrate into the tumor microenvironment (TME), where they further differentiate into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) to facilitate cancer progression.45 Similarly, during atherosclerosis, CD45⁺ leukocytes within the splenic red pulp robustly produce GM-CSF and IL-3, inducing the differentiation of HSCs into classical monocytes.42 Monocytes born in such extramedullary niches intravasate, circulate, and accumulate abundantly in atheromata, where they exacerbate inflammation by secreting IL-1β, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and proteolytic enzymes.42 In contrast, during infection, the spleen primarily regulates the immune response by recruiting immune cells into its compartment rather than functioning as a reservoir for immune cell egress.46 Bacterial infection recruits innate response activator B cells to the red pulp in the spleen via VLA-4 and LFA-1 adhesion.47 As infection persists, abundant CX3CR1+ classical monocytes are recruited to the marginal zone and T cell zone of the spleen and then differentiate into pro-inflammatory TNF- and iNOS-producing DCs (Tip-DCs), triggering a cytokine storm that causes severe tissue injury.48 Crucially for the differentiation of these pathogenic Tip-DCs, NK cells have been reported to be a major contributor during Listeria infection.49 Once recruited in a CCR5-dependent manner, these NK cells locally produce IFN-γ, which is essential for differentiating monocytes into cytokine-producing Tip-DCs.49
Unlike the spleen’s primary role in systemic immune regulation, lymph nodes play a more prominent role in orchestrating immune responses within their local drainage areas.40 During tumor development and inflammation, lymph nodes function as crucial sites for antigen capture and serve as sources of migratory immune cells that initiate immune responses.9,50 The critical entry gateway for immune cells into lymph nodes is HEVs. During tumors and inflammation, HEVs switch to an immature phenotype, with endothelial cells upregulating chemokines and adhesion proteins such as CXCL9, P-selectin, and E-selectin.51,52 Once across the HEV endothelium, tissue-migratory CCR7+ DCs are recruited to T-cell rich zones within the lymph nodes via a CCL21 chemokine gradient secreted by the lymphatic endothelium.53 Within the lymph nodes, these DCs further secrete lymphotoxin to activate LT-βR on the surface of HEV endothelial cells.54 Activation of LT-βR maintains the expression of adhesion molecules on HEVs such as GLYCAM-1, thereby ensuring the efficient homing of lymphocytes.54 The major function of DCs within lymph nodes is to orchestrate the dual priming of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, a process essential for effective CD8⁺ T cell activation.55 Initially, activated CD4⁺ T cells license DCs through CD40L-CD40 interactions, enhancing the antigen-presenting and co-stimulatory capacity of DCs.56 Subsequently, licensed DCs, along with CD4+ T cells, secrete cytokines such as IL-2 and IL-12 that are essential for the full activation and polarization of CD8⁺ T cells. This dual mechanism ensures robust and sustained CD8⁺ T cell responses against tumor or pathogen-derived antigens.57 The egress of T cells from lymph nodes to tumor or inflammatory sites is regulated by sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) gradients and their interaction with the S1P receptor (S1PR1).58 Intrinsically, S1PR1 is indispensable for effector T cell emigration, as its deletion prevents lymphatic sinus entry despite downregulation of retention signals such as CCR7.59 The establishment of the S1P gradient within lymphatic vessels depends critically on the activity of the Spinster homolog 2 (SPNS2), which mediates transcellular S1P transport on lymphatic endothelial cells.60 Furthermore, desensitization of S1PR1 via G-protein coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2) terminates sustained egress signaling in circulation and enables effector T cells to re-enter lymphoid tissues, thus preventing tissue damage caused by excessive effector lymphocyte egress.61 Collectively, S1PR1 signaling, SPNS2-mediated S1P availability, and GRK2-dependent receptor desensitization constitute the core mechanism governing effector T cell egress from lymph nodes.
During inflammation, LNs are instructive hubs where the geography of lymphatic drainage and the site of priming determine whether immunity is amplified, specialized, tolerogenic or pathogenic. During herpes simplex virus infections, tissue conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) undergo CCR7-dependent migration to draining LNs and transfer antigens to LN-resident DCs for efficient cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) priming and antiviral response amplification.62 Building on this principle, LN specialization along distinct drainage basins dictates antibacterial efficacy. After dermal infection with Staphylococcus aureus, skin-draining LNs recruit neutrophils through IL-17-dependent signals mediated by Th17-polarized γδ T cells, thereby orchestrating bacterial clearance.63 In contrast, gut-draining mesenteric LNs fail to effectively combat such infection owing to the absence of such Th17-like γδ T cells populations.63 Moreover, networks of co-draining LNs can impose cross-organ tolerance. Within the co-draining LNs shared by the pancreas, liver, and duodenum, DC1 cells with high Aldh1a2 expression drive retinoic acid-dependent Treg differentiation to establish immunological tolerance and restrain pancreas-directed autoimmunity.64 However, intestinal rotavirus infection aberrantly activates DCs across all co-draining LNs via dysregulated interferon signaling, skewing pancreas-reactive T cells toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes and contributing to the pathogenesis of type I diabetes.64 Critically, the anatomical location of LNs where T helper cells undergo initial priming dictates their functional phenotype upon homing to distal tissues. T helper cells originating from the mesenteric LNs upregulate P2rx7 and rarely infiltrate the gray matter, whereas those primed in the inguinal LNs exhibit elevated expression of Cxcr6 and preferentially infiltrate both the gray and white matter.65 In autoimmune encephalomyelitis, these infiltrating CXCR6⁺ Th cells propagate neuroinflammation by producing IL-17, IFN-γ, and GM-CSF. Furthermore, these cells constitutively express high levels of SerpinB1, which inhibits granzyme-mediated suicidal cell death and sustains the expansion of pathogenic CXCR6⁺ Th cells to perpetuate neuroinflammation.66
Tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) are lymph nodes that are located along the lymphatic drainage pathway of primary tumors.67 While lymph nodes in infection and autoimmunity primarily serve as rapid effector priming sites, immune responses within TDLNs are functionally diversified to balance sustained antitumor immunity with the risk of immunosuppression.69,71 This distinction is further reflected in the composition and functionality of immune cells emigrating from TDLNs. Although ICB induces local expansion of T cells within the TME, T cells originating from TDLNs may play a more critical role in antitumor immunity.68 The local TDLN environment serves as a reservoir that maintains the stem-like state of precursor exhausted T (TPEX) cells by providing a spatially segregated niche for sustained antigenic stimulation.69 Upon tumor antigen recognition via TCR, TPEX cells upregulate CXCR3 and migrate from TDLNs to tumors, where they continuously supply stem-like progeny to the intratumoral T-cell compartment.70 By maintaining a pool of responsive precursors within the TME, this process helps sustain ongoing antitumor immunity and may contribute to therapeutic responsiveness, particularly in immunologically cold tumors.69 Within the TME, TPEX cells undergo further differentiation into terminally differentiated (TD) CD8+ T cells upon receiving CD28 costimulatory signals from DCs.70 These TD CD8+ T cells paradoxically retain self-renewal capacity while directly mediating tumor cytolysis through granzyme B (GZMB) and IFN-γ.70 Notably, TDLNs can also establish an immunosuppressive microenvironment that impairs immune cell infiltration and function.71 Primary tumor cells can reportedly induce substantial B cell recruitment in TDLNs, potentially resulting in the production of pathogenic antibodies targeting HSPA4/ITGB5 that can activate Src/NF-κB signaling within tumor cells, ultimately supporting tumor metastasis via the CXCR4/CXCL12α axis.72 In a mouse mammary tumor model, high levels of immunosuppressive Treg infiltration in TDLNs were also noted during primary tumor growth, wherein these cells were able to suppress NK cell activation and migration.73 Tumor cells can hijack the lymph nodes to facilitate their metastatic dissemination to other tissue compartments.74 Upon invasion by metastatic tumor cells, TDLNs exhibit a profoundly suppressed immune status, characterized by functional impairment of antitumor effector cells and increased infiltration of immunosuppressive cells.74 Metastatic tumor cells within TDLNs sustain upregulation of PD-L1 and MHC class I subunits, which in turn suppress cytotoxic functions of T cells and NK cells, respectively.75 In a lung carcinoma metastasis model, DCs located in the subcapsular regions of metastatic lymph nodes were found to induce the recruitment of Tregs through the COX-2/EP3-dependent production of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (CXCL12).76 These metastatic niches further drive the de novo differentiation of antigen-specific Tregs through cytokines such as TGF-β.75 The expanded Treg pool accumulates within metastatic TDLNs and subsequently disseminates systemically, engendering widespread immune suppression.75 Therefore, leveraging the dual roles of TDLNs in promoting antitumor immunity and fostering immunosuppression offers a promising direction to optimize immunotherapy and develop novel therapeutic strategies. However, challenges such as lymphocyte activation driven by tumor-nonspecific antigens and broader systemic immune perturbations should be acknowledged. For instance, administration of ICB induces nonspecific activation of highly cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and IFN-γ/TNF-α-secreting myeloid cells, culminating the development of colitis.77 Beyond this, ICB elevates pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α across multiple organs, driving nonspecific tissue damage and resulting in systemic immune disruption.78 Given that TDLNs are often overlooked in preclinical and clinical studies, we recommend that future work explicitly investigate TDLN-focused strategies to harness their antitumor functions while mitigating their immunosuppressive potential.
Bone marrow
Extramedullary inflammatory diseases and nonhaematological malignancies have been found to profoundly disrupt the bone marrow ecosystem (BME), yet their perturbation patterns exhibit distinct features1,79 (Fig. 1).
In inflammatory diseases, the bone marrow remodels the hematopoietic system through emergency myelopoiesis (EM) mechanisms, which involve differentiation reprogramming of HSCs.11 Specifically, IL-1 induces the expression of the critical myeloid transcription factor PU.1 to direct myeloid differentiation at the expense of self-renewal in HSCs.80 Hence, HSCs function as sustained reservoirs for the generation of hyperinflammatory myeloid cells, which are major contributors to chronic inflammatory pathology.81 During systemic lupus erythematosus, HSCs constitutively differentiate into M1 macrophages that produce TNF-α and IL-6 to exacerbate inflammation.82 Even after resolution of primary inflammation, these HSCs can persist within the bone marrow for extended periods and rapidly differentiate into hyperinflammatory macrophages upon stimulation, triggering systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relapse.82 Such myeloid differentiation bias during EM is further amplified by dysregulation of the WNT/β-catenin-IRF8 signaling axis. Upregulated β-catenin suppresses IRF8, triggering aberrant self-renewal and abnormal clustered aggregation of granulocyte-monocyte progenitors (GMPs) that accelerate myeloid amplification.83 In IBD, these GMPs massively accumulate in the gut and differentiate into short-lived neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes, thereby exacerbating intestinal inflammation.43 Although tumors similarly induce EM and skewed progenitor differentiation in the bone marrow, the underlying mechanisms involved differ from those in inflammatory diseases. Cancer-induced EM, initiated by cytokines, including G-CSF, GM-CSF and IL-6, profoundly modulates the expansion and differentiation of multiple progenitor populations in the bone marrow.84,85 Within the context of EM, hyperactivation of STAT3 and/or STAT5 suppresses IRF8 expression, resulting in aberrant self-renewal of GMPs and induction of MDSCs.83 These tumor-induced alterations, particularly the expansion and immunosuppressive function of MDSCs, critically impair immune cell function within tumors.19 Moreover, the G-CSF-suppressed IRF8 axis not only promotes MDSC emergence but also simultaneously represses the production of cDCs from myeloid progenitors, augmenting immune evasion of tumor antigens.86 HtrA serine peptidase 1 (HTRA1) carried by tumor-derived small extracellular vesicles also drives expansion of granulocyte-monocyte progenitors and HSCs, generating an EM-promoting niche at the endosteum through the production of MMP13.87 Notably, these alterations persist long after primary tumor resection, indicating durable effects on hematopoiesis.87 Collectively, these studies exemplify how cancer cells can manipulate the EM mechanism and hematopoietic-stromal niche unit to alter the number and entrained functions of myeloid cells reaching the tumor.
Aging is another contributor to BME remodeling. However, current research lacks in-depth investigation into the molecular mechanisms by which senescence directly regulates immunocyte egress from the bone marrow. Existing evidence indicates that senescence-mediated BME remodeling affects hematopoietic differentiation processes and alters the composition of immune cell output. During organismal aging, degeneration of bone marrow sympathetic nervous function attenuates β3-adrenergic receptor (ADRβ3) signaling, thereby contributing to the senescence of HSCs.88 These aged HSCs exhibit a significantly rapid cell cycle, declined regenerative capacity, minimal efficacy in homing to bone marrow and generate a higher number of myeloid cells.89 In addition to senescent HSCs, bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) also contribute to the egress of myeloid cells. A large increase in the abundance of BMAds with altered secretory profiles occurs during ageing.90 For instance, higher DPP4 levels expressed by BMAds cleave key hematopoietic regulators, including G-CSF, GM-CSF and IL-3, impairing HSC retention and promoting myeloid-biased differentiation.91 Collectively, these mechanisms promote the expansion of myeloid cells within bone marrow. These myeloid cells are recruited into the TME via CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling and subsequently differentiate into TAMs, thereby promoting tumor progression.92 Beyond altered differentiation, senescence also perturbs the trafficking and effector function of mature myeloid cells. As age increases, loss of rhythmic Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) expression in senescent macrophages disrupts diurnal trafficking from the bone marrow and impairs phagocytic activity, thereby heightening patients’ susceptibility to infection.93
Gut
Clinical and experimental observations have established the gut as a central organ for several inflammatory diseases of extraintestinal organs and demonstrated disease-relevant communication via the gut-liver, gut-joint and gut-brain axes94–96 (Fig. 1). In gut-liver axis, aberrant expression of gut-specific adhesion molecules such as MADCAM1 on hepatic vessels in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) provided strong evidence for hepatic recruitment of mucosal T helper cells that are primed initially in the intestinal environment.97,98 Notably, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells might promote gut tropism by upregulating gut-homing markers α4β7 and CCR9 in a retinoic acid-dependent manner, supporting an enterohepatic lymphocyte circulation from the liver back to the gut.99 The gut-joint axis operates through a similar mechanism but involves a broader spectrum of immune cell types. During the pre-arthritic phase, upregulation of zonulin reduces the expression of intestinal tight junction proteins such as ZO-1 and occludin, thereby enhancing gut permeability and facilitating translocation of intestinal Th1 and Th17 cells into circulation.18 Following migration to the synovial tissue, these cells induce osteoclast accumulation that promotes joint erosive damage and inflammation.18 Mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are another lymphocyte subset that undergoes targeted trafficking to the joints. This process is enabled by the TNF-α and IL-1β-induced upregulation of E-selectin, ICAM1, and VCAM1 on synovial endothelial cells in the inflammatory milieu.100 While the gut-liver and gut-joint axes predominantly exacerbate tissue inflammation and damage, immune cell trafficking via the gut-brain axis possesses broader functions, including mediating both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects. During multiple sclerosis, intestinal IgA⁺ plasma cells are recruited into the brain and spinal cord to attenuate neuroinflammation in an IL-10-dependent manner.14 Local immune cells of the CNS may also be programmed by gut-derived cells. For example, a subset of IFN-γ-producing meningeal NK cells derived from the gut promotes the development of neuroimmunoregulatory astrocytes that express LAMP1 and TRAIL.101
In addition to the gut-liver, gut-joint and gut-brain axes in inflammation, the gut-bone marrow circuit plays a crucial role in the regulation of tumor immunity. In leukemic mice, immunogenic chemotherapy has been shown to prime central memory T (TCM) cells with enhanced gut-to-bone marrow trafficking capacity, thereby potentiating immune-mediated leukemic cell clearance.102 Beyond hematological malignancies, this circuit also impacts solid tumors. Gut-bone crosstalk has been shown to modulate melanoma metastasis and growth by recruiting intestinal NK and Th1 cells to the tumor-associated bone marrow, and clinical evidence further indicates that disruption of intestinal homeostasis is associated with inferior outcomes in patients with melanoma.103 Nutritional interventions such as dietary restriction induce immunocyte redistribution from the gut to the bone marrow.104 Specifically, during fasting, naive B cells traffic from the small intestinal Peyer’s patches to the bone marrow and return to the small intestine after refeeding.105 This nutritional stress-induced redistribution of immune cells exemplifies a fundamental mechanism by which systemic metabolism reshapes immune cell dynamics, indicating that dietary interventions enhance anti-tumor immunity by reprogramming bone marrow-immune crosstalk.102,104
Types and properties of migratory immune cells
The immunological landscape of cellular constituents fundamentally governs tumor immunity and inflammatory responses. For instance, intratumoral infiltration of CTLs correlates with prolonged disease-free survival across multiple malignancies, whereas Treg infiltration is frequently associated with adverse clinical outcomes.106 This principle extends to chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis. Synovial enrichment dominated by CTLs drives potent destructive inflammation, whereas myeloid cell-mediated inflammation predisposes toward chronic maintenance and tissue remodeling.107 Nevertheless, the immune landscape is governed by multifactorial determinants. For instance, low-grade gliomas exhibit sparse lymphocytic infiltration with predominant M2 macrophage polarization. In contrast, gastric and ovarian carcinomas demonstrate M1 macrophage profiles coincide with enriched CD8+ T cell signatures.108 These findings underscore that cancer subtypes and the TME are key determinants of immune landscape composition. Additionally, a study in patients with asthma revealed progressive neutrophilic predominance in sputum with advancing age, underscoring age as an additional determinant of immune cell composition within inflammatory tissue microenvironments.109 However, the precise spatiotemporal positioning of immune cells within pathological niches is fundamentally contingent on their migratory dynamics, thereby representing a fundamental prerequisite for immunocyte functional impact (Fig. 2) (Table 1). Consequently, understanding the molecular mechanisms governing immune cell trafficking is pivotal for deciphering disease pathogenesis and developing targeted immunomodulatory strategies.
Fig. 2.
Subtypes of migratory immune cells. Distinct subsets of adaptive and innate immune cells employ specialized migratory mechanisms to traffic into tumor or inflammatory sites, where they orchestrate specific effector functions. Created with BioRender.com. DCs dendritic cells, cDCs conventional DCs, mregDCs mature regulatory DCs, pDCs plasmacytoid DCs, moDCs Monocyte-derived DCs, Tfh T follicular helper cells, Tregs Regulatory T cells, Breg regulatory B cells, TCM central memory T cells, Tpex progenitor-exhausted T cells, CD8+ TA effector T cells, TAM tumor-associated macrophages, ILC Innate. lymphoid cells, NK cells natural killer cells, MDSCs myeloid-derived suppressor cells, TANs tumor-associated neutrophils
Table 1.
Functions of migratory immune cells in the tumor microenvironment
| Cell type | Subtype marker | Origin | Species | Effects on tumor cells | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive immune cells | |||||
| CD8+T cell | CMKLR1+ | Adjacent normal liver and lung tissue | Human and mouse | Cytotoxic effects similar to NK cells. | ref. 113 |
| TCRαβ+ | Induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro | Human | Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. | ref. 114 | |
| NKp30+ | |||||
| CD161+ | |||||
| CD62L+ | Tumor-draining lymph nodes | Human | Mounting a rapid and pronounced immune response upon re-encounter with the tumor antigen. | ref. 518 | |
| CCR7+ | |||||
| TCF1+ | Tumor-draining lymph nodes | Human and mouse | Sustained anti-tumor immune response. | ref. 69 | |
| CX3CR1+ | Tumor-draining lymph nodes | Mouse | Producing cytotoxic molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines in TME. | ref. 519 | |
| TCF1- | |||||
| CD39+ | Tumor-draining lymph nodes | Human and mouse | Irrecoverable loss of intrinsic and therapeutically inducible anti-tumor activity, exhibiting immunosuppressive effects. | ref. 121 | |
| TIM-3+ | |||||
| CD4+T cell | CD195+ | Tumor-draining lymph node | Human | Early response to anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA4 therapy. | ref. 520 |
| CD26+ | Peripheral blood | Human and mouse | Cytotoxic effects, self-renewal and maintenance of long-term antitumor activity. | ref. 521 | |
| S1P1+ | Thymus and lymph node | Mouse | Improving immunosurveillance and tumor-specific immune responses. | ref. 522 | |
| PDLIM4+ | |||||
| Treg | GPR15+ | Thymus | Human and mouse | Inhibiting antitumoral CD8+T cell immunity and facilitating tumorigenesis by producing IL17 and TNFα. | ref. 148 |
| CXCR3+ | Tumor-draining lymph nodes | Mouse | Inhibiting cross-presentation of tumor antigens by DC1s, thereby limiting activation and function of anti-tumor CD8+T cells. | ref. 523 | |
| CCR4+ | Peripheral lymph nodes | Human and mouse | Suppressing effector T cell function and promoting tumor resistance to immunotherapy. | ref. 293 | |
| CCR6+ | Peripheral blood and lymphatic tissue | Human and mouse | Promoting immune evasion by expressing high levels of CD25 and inhibiting effector T cell activity. | ref. 302 | |
| B cell | ICOSL+ | Peripheral blood | Human and mouse | Stimulate the generation of Th1 cells and CTLs. | ref. 524 |
| CD45+ | Spleen | Mouse | Differentiating into plasma cells upon contact with neutrophils, resulting in IgG production. | ref. 312 | |
| B220+ | |||||
| CD138- | |||||
| MUM1+ | Tertiary lymphoid structures | Human | Producing IgG antibodies that mediate apoptosis of tumor cells via effector macrophages. | ref. 525 | |
| Innate immune cells | |||||
| Dendritic cells | CD103+ | Bone marrow | Human | Activating CD8+T cells by cross-presentation of tumor-associated antigens. | ref. 526 |
| CD11b+ | Bone marrow | Human and mouse | Activating CD4+T cells by presentation of MHC II-associated tumor antigens. | ref. 527 | |
| CD303+ | Bone marrow | Mouse | Inducting cDC1 maturation by type I interferon production and enhancing effector functions of CD8+ T cells and NK cells. | ref. 528 | |
| CD304+ | |||||
| CD123+ | |||||
| CD64+ | Bone marrow | Mouse | Inducing CD4+T cell activation and IL-17 production. | ref. 529 | |
| IRF8+ | |||||
| NK cells | CX3CR1+ | Peripheral blood | Human and mouse | Inhibiting tumor cell metastasis through the STAT3 pathway. | ref. 530 |
| CXCR6+ | Peripheral blood | Human | A subpopulation of immune cell responding to irradiation. | ref. 531 | |
| CXCR3+ | Peripheral blood and lymphatic tissue | Mouse | Directly eliminating tumor cells and promoting the formation of immune memory. | ref. 532 | |
| NKG2D+ | Peripheral blood | Human | Mediating cytotoxic function by recognizing stress proteins on tumor cells. | ref. 533 | |
| XCL1+ | Peripheral blood | Human | Recruiting cross-presenting dendritic cells and activating T-cell immunity. | ref. 534 | |
| XCL2+ | |||||
| ATF3+ | Peripheral blood | Human | Exhibiting higher cellular stress response, immunosuppressive signaling, and metabolic activation. | ref. 535 | |
| BAG3+ | |||||
| GADD45B+ | |||||
| DUSP1+ | |||||
| Innate lymphoid cells-2 | KLRG1+ | Gut | Human and mouse | Induce tertiary lymphoid structures. | ref. 218 |
| GATA3+ | Skin or small intestine | Human and mouse | Secreting GM-CSF, IL-5 and IL-13 recruiting anti-tumor immune cell infiltration. | ref. 536,537 | |
| Sca-1+ | |||||
| RORγt- | |||||
| IL10+ | Peripheral blood | Human and mouse | Suppressing T cell activity under hypoxic conditions by secreting immunosuppressive factors, such as IL-10. | ref. 547 | |
| CD103- | |||||
| ST2+ | Bone marrow and spleen | Human and mouse | Secreting cytokines such as IL-5 and activating eosinophils, thereby promoting tumor growth and progression. | ref. 538 | |
| Sca-1+ | |||||
| Monocyte/Macrophage | Ly6Chigh | Bone marrow | Mouse | Enriched in hypoxic regions, pro-angiogenic and inhibiting T cell proliferation after differentiation into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). | ref. 539 |
| CX3CR1low | |||||
| Ly6Chigh | Bone marrow | Mouse | Promotes endothelial translocation and colonization of tumor cells in distant organs by secreting SDF-1 after differentiation into CXCR4high TAMs. | ref. 540 | |
| CCR2+ | |||||
| CXCR4+ | |||||
| Gr-1+ | Bone marrow | Human and mouse | Promoting tumor metastasis by secreting VEGF after differentiation into TAMs. | ref. 181 | |
| CCR2+ | Bone marrow | Human and mouse | Promoting tumor survival, proliferation and angiogenesis by secreting a variety of cytokines after differentiation into TAMs. | ref. 541 | |
| CX3CR1− | |||||
| CCR2+ | Bone marrow | Mouse | Supporting tumor progression by inducing apoptosis of cytotoxic T cells, promoting angiogenesis, triggering fibrosis and remodeling the ECM. | ref. 542 | |
| CX3CR1+ | |||||
| Myeloid-derived suppressor cells | DPP-4+ | Bone marrow | Human and mouse | Leading to immunosuppression through high expression of integrin β1 and DPP-4. | ref. 192 |
| CD11b+ | Bone marrow and spleen | Mouse | Suppressing T cell and NK cell function and inducing tumor epithelial-mesenchymal transition. | ref. 543 | |
| Gr-1+ | |||||
| CX3CR1+ | Bone marrow | Mouse | Inhibiting the anti-tumor activity of CD8+T cells, thereby promoting tumor growth and metastasis. | ref. 544 | |
| Neutrophils | CD49d+ | Skull bone marrow | Human and mouse | Activating T cells in an MHCII-dependent manner to control tumor growth. | ref. 205 |
| CXCR2-Ly6Glow/high | |||||
| CXCR2+ | Bone marrow | Human and mouse | Inducing tumor resistance to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. | ref. 545 | |
| Ly6G+ | Bone marrow | Human and mouse | Inducing the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps that support tumor colonization and growth in the lung. | ref. 546 | |
| CD11b+ | |||||
| Ly6G+ | Bone marrow | Human and mouse | Activating AXL receptors on tumor cells to promote tumor regeneration. | ref. 547 | |
| Gas6+ | |||||
Adaptive immune cells
CD8+ T cells
Among adaptive immune cells, distinct subtypes of CD8+ T cells, including effector CD8+ T cells, central memory CD8+ T cells and precursor exhausted T cells, exhibit disparate migration properties and unique immunoregulatory functions. Activated CD8+ T cells (CD8+ TA) serve as primary mediators that directly eliminate malignant or infected target cells.110,111 Conventional theory reveals that CD8+ TAs can be recruited to targeted cells by antigen-dependent and antigen-independent mechanisms. Key inflammatory mediators, including IFNγ, TNF and IL-1, potentiate this trafficking through stereotyped integrin upregulation, directing CD8+ TA homing to TMEs and infection sites.112 Recent studies have identified CD8+ TAs with distinct activation or differentiation states. Chemerin chemokine-like receptor 1 (CMKLR1+) CD8+ TAs recruited by chemerin and α4β1 integrin develop NK cell-like properties at the tumor site, significantly enhancing their cytotoxic capacity.113 B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 11B (BCL11B)-deficient CD8+ TA cells effectively infiltrate tumors via transendothelial migration, maintaining both cytotoxicity and memory properties to ensure sustained anti-tumor efficacy.114 Conversely, the formidable trafficking and effector capacity of CD8+ TAs can be misdirected, precipitating severe immunopathology. For instance, immune checkpoint inhibitors can promote the aberrant migration of CXCR6-expressing CD8+ TA cells to the thyroid gland, where they secrete IFN-γ and granzyme B to mediate the pathogenesis of autoimmune thyroiditis.115 Similarly, in multiple sclerosis, CD8+ TA cells driven by myelin basic protein antigen-presenting signals preferentially home to cerebral parenchyma over the spinal cord.116 Subsequently, CD8+ TA cells activate myeloid populations in a FasL-dependent manner and potentiate intracerebral ROS production, thereby exacerbating neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis.116
Additionally, the potent effector response of CD8+ TA can be maintained and replenished by a reservoir of central memory CD8+ T cells (TCMs), which differentiate from naive CD8⁺ T cells following antigenic stimulation. The expression of CCR7 and CD62L on TCM enables their homing to lymphoid organs from circulation.117,118 Residing in the SLOs, TCM cells possess self-renewal capacity and multilineage differentiation potential, thereby conferring a significant advantage for long-term immune protection and robust secondary immune responses.117,118 Upon viral infection, TCM cells rapidly differentiate into CD8+ TA cells that substantially reduce viral loads.117,118 Similarly, TCM is capable of mediating long-term tumor control through memory recall responses.119 Upon activation by tumor antigens, TCM cells egress from TDLNs and enter the circulation to differentiate into CD8+ TA cells, thereby mediating IFN-γ-mediated immune activation and enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy.120
Sustained antigen exposure ultimately drives the progression of CD8+ TA into exhausted states. While exhausted T cells (TEX) and terminally exhausted T cells (TEX-term) exhibit restricted tissue penetration and are retained in the tumor core via metabolic constraints,121 TPEX exhibit a propensity to migrate to SLOs and retain the capacity for self-renewal.110,122 The homing and retention of TPEX cells within lymph nodes are governed by TGF-β-mediated regulation of integrin α4β1/α4β7 expression during chronic infection.123 However, the egress of TPEX cells from lymphoid organs accelerates their differentiation, thereby attenuating stemness properties. CXCR3-mediated intratumoral trafficking of TPEX cells coincides with their differentiation toward CD8+ TA cell lineages.124 Although this transition is associated with attenuated stemness, concomitant upregulation of granzyme B and IFNγ enhances effector functionality.124,125 This migratory property of TPEX cells further underscores their targetability in anti-PD-1 therapy.124
CD4+ T cells
Among CD4+ T cell subsets, the functional competence of Th17, Tfh, and Tregs is intimately linked to their migratory potential.
Steady-state Th17 cells primarily reside in mucosal barriers such as the intestinal lamina propria, where they secrete IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 to prevent microbial invasion and mediate tissue homeostasis.126,127 However, these intestinal-originated Th17 cells can be converted to pathogenic CXCR6+ Th17 cells under the stimulation of inflammatory signals mediated by IL-23 and migrate out of the gut to participate in extra-intestinal autoimmune disease.128,129 Recruitment of Th17 cells in the context of malignancies further exemplifies their role in pathogenic progression. In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, overexpression of miR130b downregulated tumor OX40L expression by directly targeting the IFNAR1/p-STAT1 axis. This alleviates OX40/OX40L interaction-mediated suppression of Th17 cells, promoting their recruitment into the lymphoma microenvironment.130 These recruited Th17 cells induce an immunosuppressive TME by stimulating tumor cell stemness, proliferation, migration, and invasion.130 Cytokine TWEAK-secreting Th17 cells, recruited by CD163L1⁺ macrophages, can promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by binding TWEAK to receptor Fn14 on tumor cells, therefore enhancing tumor migration and invasion.131
Tfh cells are the specialized CD4+ T cell subset that promote the germinal center (GC) reaction and differentiation of B cells.132 Under the guidance of CXCL13, Tfh cells migrate from the T cell zone to the T-B cell border, where they interact with B cells through ICOS-ICOSL and CD40L-CD40 interactions and ultimately migrate into the GC in the B cell zone.133 In autoimmune diseases, Tfh cells at the T-B cell border tend to travel through efferent lymph to the blood and are referred to as circulating Tfh (cTfh) cells.134 These cTfh cells exacerbate autoimmune responses by eliciting pathogenic IL-21 secretion from B cells, which antagonizes the immunosuppressive function of regulatory T cells.135 Treatment with the drug FTY720, which prevents lymph node exit, can dramatically decrease the number of c Tfh cells.136 Migratory Tfh cells can also respond to tumor immunotherapy, exemplified by their increased frequencies of infiltration after ICB administration in different types of cancer.137,138 Within the TME and TDLNs, IL-21 secreted by Tfh cells restores CD8+ T cell-dependent antitumor immunity by enhancing the expression of IFN-γ and granzyme B.139 Notably, CD8+ TAs further recruit IL-12-producing Tfh cells via CXCL13-CXCR5 axis, thereby sustaining their effector functions.139
Whereas the majority of immune cells function to promote inflammation to fight pathogens and cancers, Tregs keep immunity in check to maintain homeostasis and prevent pathology.140 Tregs exhibit tissue-agnostic migratory patterns by bearing TCRs that recognize common tissue antigens rather than highly restricted tissue-specific antigens.141 This migratory pattern is further regulated by key transcription factors including BATF and GATA3.142,143 Ablation of BATF in Tregs impairs their migratory capacity to multiple peripheral sites, particularly visceral adipose tissue, lung, colon and bone marrow.142 Along with BATF, GATA3 has also been recognized as a pivotal regulator critical for the trafficking of Tregs into tissues and the maintenance of tissue residency.144 Within the TME, Tregs are an immunosuppressive subset of CD4+ T cells with an essential role in tumor progression.145 The infiltration of Tregs into tumor tissues has been associated with poor prognosis for patients with cancer.146 Tumor-infiltrating Tregs expressing high levels of CCR4 were specifically recruited into the tumor via their interaction with CCL22, expressed by both ovarian cancer cells and TAMs.147 GPR15high Tregs can directly migrate from the thymus to tumors under inflammatory stimuli. These cells adopt a Th17-like phenotype to suppress anti-tumor immunity.148 After entering the tumor, upregulated expression of CCR8 on Tregs might play a pivotal role in cell retention that prevents Tregs from trafficking out of the TME.149
B cells
The migratory activity of B cells occurs predominantly within lymphoid organs, where distinct subsets exhibit specialized migratory mechanisms. Conventional B (B-2) cells chemotaxis into inflammatory lesions are amplified by CCL5 released from T cells, which are sequentially recruited through an autocrine CCL5-CCR1 signaling axis established by CCR1high/CCL5high macrophages.150 Once positioned, these B-2 cells engage cognate T cells to initiate robust BCR-driven activation and differentiation programs that underpin autoantibody production.150 Memory B cells recruited by CXCL9-CXCR3 or CXCL13-CXCR5 axis significantly contribute to the formation of TLS.52,151 The presence of intratumoral TLSs has been associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.52 While in giant cell arteritis, memory B cells induced TLSs may exacerbate the inflammatory response and contribute to vascular injury.151 Whereas mature plasma cells remain largely nonmotile, immature plasma cells exhibit CXCL12-CXCR4 axis-directed migratory activity, orchestrated by Wnt and TGF-β pathways in cancer cells.152 Infiltration of these immature plasma cells suppresses colorectal cancer liver metastasis by enhancing cytotoxic T cell activation and is associated with improved patient survival.152
The migration and spatial localization of regulatory B cells (Bregs) are pivotal determinants of their immunomodulatory functions, orchestrating divergent outcomes in cancer and autoimmune diseases. In the TME, Breg trafficking and infiltration are primarily modulated by local signals. For instance, intratumoral CXCL9/CXCL10 promotes their infiltration through microRNA 15A and 16-1-mediated activation of the IκB kinase complex.153 Additionally, knockdown of tumor cell-derived IL-1β resulted in diminished frequencies of Bregs, suggesting that IL-1β signaling modulates the Breg trafficking mechanism.154 Once positioned within the TME, Bregs that produce IL-35 primarily aggregate within TLSs, hindering endogenous antitumor T cell immunity via a STAT3-mediated decrease in CD8+ T cell infiltration.155 Complementing this, another subset of Bregs is characterized by high expression of LARS. These LARS⁺ Bregs can secrete TGF-β1 through activation of the mTORC1 signaling pathway, thereby suppressing CD8⁺T cell effector functions and attenuating antitumor immune responses.156 In contrast to their pro-tumoral role, the migratory capacity of Bregs is instrumental in ameliorating inflammation in autoimmune settings. In a preclinical multiple sclerosis model, dopamine receptor D3 (DRD3) signaling upregulates the homing molecule CD49d on Bregs, facilitating their entry into the CNS.157 Within the CNS, IL-10 secreted by Bregs not only suppresses microglial production of pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IL-6 but also inhibits T cell polarization toward pathogenic Th1/Th17.158 This dual functionality establishes Bregs as critical regulators restraining the progression of autoimmune encephalomyelitis.158 Beyond the site of inflammation, intravital imaging has revealed that Bregs can selectively migrate into T-cell zones of lymph nodes and directly contact T cells.159 This interaction physically limits T cell access to DCs and reduces the contact of T cells and DCs, thereby curbing the priming of pathogenic T cells.159
Innate immune cells
Dendritic cells
As pivotal bridges connecting innate immunity and adaptive immunity, DCs require precise migratory positioning to fulfill their antigen-presenting functions.15,160 After stimulated by inflammatory and tumor signals, cDCs upregulate the expression of MHC class II, costimulatory molecules and the chemokine receptor CCR7, guiding cDC trafficking toward lymph nodes via afferent lymphatics.15,161 cDCs are subdivided into cDC1 and cDC2 subpopulations. Both cDC1s and cDC2s can present antigens through MHC class I and MHC class II pathways, and the presentation efficiency of each subset is regulated by local activation signals.162 cDC1s can be recruited into the TME by XCL1 and CCL5, produced by intratumoral NK cells.163 Within the melanoma, cDC1s acquire antigens from necrotic tumor cells and specifically migrate to TDLNs, where they present antigens to naive CD8+ T cells and prime cytotoxic effector CD8+ T cells.164 During asthma exacerbations, cDC2s that specifically infiltrate inflamed airways interact with Th2 cells via costimulatory molecules.165 The localized DC2-Th2 crosstalk establishes Th2 residence in the airways, induces pathogenic Th2 phenotypes, and promotes IL-9 production through PPARγ activation, establishing a positive feedback loop that amplifies type 2 inflammation.165 However, a recent study identified a new subset of cDCs that preferentially resides within tumors. These cDCs progressively downregulate the expression of molecules involved in antigen presentation and pro-inflammatory transcripts, serving as a potential marker for predicting therapeutic response.166 Beyond their antigen-presenting function, migratory cDCs can directly recruit immune cells and drive tumor progression. For instance, cDCs expressing LAMP3 can recruit immunosuppressive Tregs through the CCL17/CCL22-CCR4 axis, thus driving tumor progression.167 Further investigations identify these LAMP3+ CCR7+ cDCs as mature regulatory DCs (mregDCs) based on their distinct molecular profile, which features the coordinated expression of immunoregulatory molecules, including PD-L1, PD-L2, and CD200.162,168 mregDCs rely on the CCR7-CCL19/CCL21 chemokine axis for migration to lymph nodes, where they mediate immunomodulatory functions while retaining their capacity to activate T cells.168,169 Within the TDLN, mregDCs upregulate PD-L1 via the AXL signaling pathway following antigen uptake, thereby impairing CTL activity and ultimately curtailing anti-tumor immunity.168 Similarly, during sepsis, mregDCs in the lymph nodes promote the polarization of CD4⁺T cells toward Treg and Th2 cells through the secretion of IL-4i1 and CCL22, which attenuates excessive inflammation.170 Beyond these immunomodulatory roles, mregDCs are critical for sustaining adaptive immune responses. mregDCs promote the formation and maturation of TLSs through the high expression of costimulatory molecules CD80, CD86 and CD40 alongside cytokines IL12B and IL15.171 These molecules also serve as vital signaling cues that sustain T cell differentiation, activation, and survival.171 Furthermore, mregDCs can recruit TPEX via CXCL9 and CCL5 while sustaining TPEX expansion and self-renewal through CD80-CD28 costimulatory signaling, ultimately promoting durable responses to ICB.172
Monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) are inflammatory DC subsets that predominantly operate within inflammatory contexts instead of tumors. Notably, in solid tumors, most intratumoral DCs are monocyte-derived DCs, whereas cDCs are less frequent and pDCs often represent a minor subset.173,174 During parasitic infection, moDCs originate from CCR2-mediated recruitment of blood classical monocytes and are capable of activating protective Th1 responses at the site of infection.174 In the inflamed colon, CX3CR1intLy6Clow moDCs with the capacity for antigen presentation and T-cell priming can also egress from the colonic lamina propria toward the mesenteric lymph nodes, contributing to colon inflammation.175 Commonly distributed in peripheral blood and lymphoid organs, pDCs are potent producers of type I interferon (IFN) with unique migratory properties.15 After CCR7-mediated extravasation into lymphoid tissues, pDCs further upregulate CCR6 and migrate to the inflamed epithelium in response to CCL20 and CCL27. Subsequently, pDCs contribute to the production of IFN I, which facilitates pathogen clearance and suppresses local inflammation.176
Monocyte/Macrophage
Based on the expression levels of Ly6C, monocytes in peripheral blood can be classified into classical (Ly6Chigh) and nonclassical (Ly6Clow) subsets.177 Classical monocytes, primarily utilizing the CCL2-CCR2 signaling axis for migration, often play a pro-pathogenic role. For instance, during nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, classical monocytes migrate to the liver, where they subsequently differentiate into pro-inflammatory monocyte-derived Kupffer cells.178 This migratory process displaces intrahepatic tolerogenic resident Kupffer cells, thereby exacerbating hepatic inflammation and injury.178 Similarly, in the context of severe COVID-19, CCL2-driven recruitment of classical monocytes into the airways establishes a self-amplifying inflammatory loop and promotes pulmonary fibrosis through their differentiation into TGF-β-secreting macrophages.179,180 The pro-pathogenic capacity of classical monocytes extends to oncology. In breast cancer, classical monocytes are preferentially recruited to pulmonary metastases via CCL2-CCR2 axis.181 During the early stages of metastasis, tumor cell extravasation is critically dependent on VEGF secreted by classical monocytes. Subsequently, classical monocytes differentiate into metastasis-associated macrophages, which sustain the proliferation of tumor cells within established metastatic lesions.181 Nonclassical monocytes typically infiltrate diseased tissue via CX3CR1-dependent patrolling. During inflammatory primary graft dysfunction, infiltration of nonclassical monocytes and subsequent activation of MyD88/TRIF signaling trigger the secretion of CXCL2, which recruits neutrophils and drives pulmonary inflammatory injury.182 Moreover, in colorectal cancer, nonclassical monocytes recruitment by peritumoral vascular endothelia establish an immunosuppressive microenvironment, where nonclassical monocytes produce IL-10 and promote resistance to anti-VEGFR2 therapy.183 Conversely, nonclassical monocytes can also exert potent anti-tumor effects. In lung metastasis models, nonclassical monocytes recruited by the CX3CR1-CX3CL1 subsequently secrete chemokines including CCL4 and CCL5, which further recruit NK cells to potentiate cancer immunosurveillance.184
During tumorigenesis and inflammation, the trafficking of macrophages is predominantly mediated by blood monocytes that infiltrate tissues and differentiate into diverse functional subsets.185,186 Following infiltration, TAMs undergo further directed migration and spatial redistribution into specialized niches, particularly in perivascular regions, where they orchestrate critical steps of tumor progression. Tumor hypoxia-induced ANGPT2 expression stimulated the recruitment and revascularization of perivascular aggregates of TIE2-expressing TAMs.187 Upon perivascular localization, TIE2+ TAMs drive VEGF-A-mediated signaling, leading to the disruption of endothelial junctions and transient vascular hyperpermeability that facilitates tumor distant metastasis.187 Complementing this, tumor-derived TGF-β upregulates CXCR4 expression on TAMs, while perivascular cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) secrete the corresponding ligand CXCL12 to recruit CXCR4⁺ TAMs toward the vasculature.188 TAMs co-localized in perivascular sites engage in physical interactions with cancer cells and endothelial cells to assemble TMEs of metastasis, which can directly facilitate cancer cell intravasation into the bloodstream.188 Furthermore, TAM-mediated perivascular organization extends to the lymphatic vasculature. Tumor-derived IL-6 induces CCR5 expression in lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1-expressing (LYVE-1⁺) TAMs, which drive LYVE-1⁺ TAMs migration and perivascular clustering, forming specialized niche structures. Within the perivascular niches, LYVE-1⁺ TAMs further express the immune-suppressive enzyme heme oxygenase-1 to restrict CD8⁺ T cell infiltration into the TME, thereby orchestrating chemotherapy resistance and immune exclusion.189 Research in an MMTV-PyMT spontaneous breast cancer mouse model further demonstrated that perivascular LYVE-1⁺ TAMs can promote the proliferation of αSMA⁺ mesenchymal cells via PDGF-CC signaling, fostering a proangiogenic niche and accelerating tumor progression.190
MDSCs and neutrophils
MDSCs, primarily classified into polymorphonuclear (PMN-MDSCs) and monocytic (M-MDSCs) subgroups, exhibit distinct migratory dominance that critically dictates their functional impact on both tumorigenesis and inflammatory diseases.191 Within the TME, M-MDSCs are the predominant population and exhibit heightened immunosuppressive activity compared to PMN-MDSCs. In glioblastoma, M-MDSCs leverage high expression of integrin β1 and DPP-4 to enhance their migratory capacity.192 M-MDSC recruitment can be further modulated by therapeutic interventions. Local radiotherapy in tumor-bearing mice has been shown to induce tumor cell secretion of CCL2, which selectively facilitates the infiltration of CCR2-high M-MDSCs.193 Upon migration to tumors, M-MDSCs can induce Treg proliferation through the secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β.194 Furthermore, MDSCs induce the acquisition of an epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype in tumor cells, thereby triggering tumor cell dissemination.195 In contrast to M-MDSCs, PMN-MDSCs are less prevalent within primary tumors and are preferentially recruited to metastatic foci. In multiple preclinical models of head and neck cancer, galectin-1 increases STING stability in cancer cells that activates NF-κB signaling and CXCL2 expression to promote PMN-MDSC trafficking.196 These recruited PMN-MDSCs are instrumental in establishing a premetastatic niche in distant organs, such as the lungs, by remodeling the extracellular matrix (ECM).196 Within metastatic sites, PMN-MDSCs promote tumor outgrowth by inducing the reversion of tumor cells from an EMT phenotype.195 Beyond oncology, the differential migration of MDSC subsets is also pivotal in regulating inflammatory conditions. During liver ischemia‒reperfusion injury (IRI), PMN-MDSCs represent the predominant subset recruited via CXCL17, whose expression is upregulated following hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced activation of the YAP/TEAD1 complex.197 These PMN-MDSCs subsequently attenuate hepatic IRI-induced inflammation and damage by inhibiting M1 macrophage polarization.197 In parallel, during acute graft-versus-host disease, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) released by inflammation or tissue damage mediates the directional migration of M-MDSCs via the P2X7 receptor. Locally, M-MDSCs secrete IL-1β, thereby exerting immunosuppressive functions and maintaining immune homeostasis.198
Neutrophil recruitment across diverse tissues typically adheres to a canonical, sequentially ordered cascade encompassing initial tethering, rolling, firm adhesion and intraluminal crawling and culminating in transendothelial migration.199 Spatiotemporal gradients of chemoattractants govern the directional orientation of neutrophil crawling within the vasculature, thereby guiding these cells to precise sites of inflammation.200 Crucially, neutrophil chemotaxis is orchestrated primarily through key signaling pathways, including the PI3K pathway, the ERK pathway and the p38 MAPK pathway.201,202 Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) are categorized into N1 and N2 subtypes based on their demonstrated antitumor or protumor functions within the TME.203 TANs recruited by CXCL2 presented an N1-like anti-tumor phenotype, with increased NETs causing tumor cell apoptosis through cell-to-cell contact.204 Recent investigation has identified a novel subset of TANs exhibiting dendritic morphology and functional properties, which are recruited from the skull bone marrow to glioblastoma.205 The functional repertoire of these dendritic-like TANs encompasses morphological complexity, expression of genes associated with antigen presentation and the capacity to process exogenous peptides and robustly stimulate MHC class II-dependent T cell activation.205
Innate lymphoid cells
Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) encompass a diverse array of subpopulations, including NK cells, ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s.206
Directed NK cells are a pivotal determinant of immunological outcomes, exhibiting a dual role in both constraining and amplifying immune responses. During lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection, NK cells translocate from the splenic red pulp to T cell-enriched white pulp (WP) regions via CXCR3-dependent trafficking.207 Within the WP, NK cells directly eliminate activated CD4⁺ T cells through perforin-mediated cytotoxicity, thereby constraining T cell responses and mitigating immunopathology.207 Conversely, in a Leishmania major infection model, the same CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 chemokine axis directs NK cells to lymph nodes. Subsequently, NK cell-derived IFN-γ enhances IL-12 production by DCs, thereby driving Th1 polarization and potentiating anti-infective immunity.208 However, this potent pro-inflammatory capacity can become pathogenic in the context of autoimmune cells. In psoriatic skin lesions, NK cells are recruited by keratinocyte-derived CXCL10 and CCL5 and are activated by skin-resident DCs. Activated NK cells subsequently release high levels of IFN-γ and exacerbate local inflammation.209 Similarly, NK cells expressing the CXCR3 receptor are recruited to the synovium via neutrophil-derived CXCL10 in a mouse model of experimental osteoarthritis.210 Infiltrating NK cells further exacerbate cartilage degradation and bone erosion by promoting osteoclast differentiation and suppressing osteoblast function.210
NK cells infiltrate the TME via coordinated chemokine-receptor interactions, such as the CXCR3-CXCL10, CX3CR1-CX3CL1, and CCR5-CCL5 axes.16 Upon successful infiltration, activated NK cells can lyse tumor cells by directly releasing perforin and granzymes and inducing apoptosis with ADCC, FasL, or TRAIL.211 Additionally, they orchestrate broader immune responses by producing IFN-γ and chemokines, including CCL5 and XCL1/2, which recruit cDC1s and enhance T cell priming.163 The critical nature of NK cell infiltration is highlighted in breast cancer models, where reduced NK cell trafficking leads to increased tumor burden.212 Despite the migration-dependent antitumor capabilities, the therapeutic efficacy of NK cells is frequently curtailed by impaired trafficking, especially into solid tumors.213 Multiple mechanisms have been implicated in the impaired trafficking of NK cells within the solid-tumor microenvironment. Investigation of the TME in endometrial carcinoma identified diminished levels of key chemokines, including CXCL12, CXCL10, and CCL27. Such chemokine downregulation could compromise the recruitment of NK cells to the tumor.214 Additionally, aberrantly accumulated metabolites within the TME, such as adenosine and lactate, disrupt chemotactic responsiveness of NK cells through interference with cellular metabolism and chemokine receptor expression, thereby impairing NK cell infiltration to solid tumors.215,216
The migratory dynamics of ILCs critically influence immune responses in both neoplastic and inflammatory settings, exhibiting subset-specific trafficking patterns with profound functional consequences. Within colorectal cancer, ILC2s infiltrate tumors via an IL-33-dependent pathway and mediate tumor immune surveillance by promoting CTL responses.217 Beyond this direct anti-tumor role, IL-33-activated ILC2s can migrate from the gut to pancreatic adenocarcinoma and engage putative lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR+) myeloid organizer cells to initiate tertiary lymphoneogenesis.218 During inflammation, a distinct subset of ILC2s named inflammatory ILC2s (iILC2s) can be mobilized from blood and lymph.219 The trafficking of iILC2s to peripheral infection sites is IL-25-signaling dependent, whereupon they acquire IL-17 production capacity for host defense against invasive fungal pathogens.219 Similarly, ILC3s exhibit dynamic migratory behaviors that underpin their dual roles in tumor immunology and inflammation. ILC3s migrate to tumors via the CCL20-CCR6 chemokine axis. Within the TME, IL-1β-activated ILC3s secrete CXCL10 to recruit CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, thereby converting immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot” tumors and potentiating response to immunotherapy.220 This process is further exemplified in lung cancer, where NCR⁺ ILC3s recognize tumor cells via the NKp44 receptor and secrete TNF-α. These cytokines upregulate ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on endothelial cells, thereby facilitating the infiltration of ILC3s into TLS.221 Within TLSs, ILC3s secrete TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-2, contributing to TLS formation while simultaneously potentiating lymphocyte infiltration and activation.221 Beyond chemokine-driven migration, ILC3 trafficking can be modulated by distinct classes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) during inflammation. GPR183-expressing ILC3s respond to inflammation-induced 7α,25-hydroxycholesterol and migrate to intestinal mucosal sites, where they potentiate colonic inflammation through sustained cytokine amplification.222 Conversely, GPR34-mediated sensing of ILC3 trafficking to tissue injury sites, where these cells orchestrate epithelial regeneration through IL-22-dependent mechanisms.223
Detection techniques for immune cell migration
Sequencing technique
Cell migration often induces alterations in gene expression, which can serve as an indirect reflection of a cell’s migratory status224 (Fig. 3). Bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq) has emerged as a potential tool for tracking immune cell migration by detecting tissue-specific gene expression signatures.225,226 For example, researchers utilized bulk RNA-seq in a study investigating immune cell migration between bone marrow and the intestine, identifying key T-cell subpopulations involved in this migration pathway.102 Nonetheless, this sequencing method exhibits certain deficiencies including low precision and limited resolution in discerning heterogeneous cell populations.226 Single-cell sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies have partially addressed these deficiencies and revolutionized the field by offering a more granular perspective on cell migration. By combining scRNA-seq with RNA velocity analysis, researchers can track the dynamic states of individual cells and predict their migration trajectories with high precision.227 In a multi-tissue Treg model study, researchers employed scRNA-seq to reveal the shared phenotypes, transient residency and multi-tissue migration characteristics of Tregs, further highlighting the potential of scRNA-seq in deconstructing immune cell migration at cellular resolution.141
Fig. 3.
Sequencing techniques and in vivo/in vitro models for immune cell migration detection. Detection techniques for immune cell migration involve sequencing technology and animal and in vitro models. These techniques are capable of resolving immune cell migration in multiple dimensions. Created with BioRender.com
For specific immune cell populations, advances in T-cell/B-cell receptor sequencing (TCR/BCR-seq) have paved the way for more precise tracking of T and B cell migratory routes.228,229 TCR sequencing leverages the high specificity and stability of TCR sequences, allowing for tracking T cell migration by comparing TCR sequences in samples from different tissues or time points.225 To enhance tracking resolution beyond natural TCR sequences, researchers developed an embedded viral barcode-assisted high-throughput sequencing technology.230 This technology artificially inserts unique DNA barcodes into cellular genomes and analyses the distribution and abundance of the barcodes by high-throughput sequencing, thus effectively mapping the trafficking patterns and dynamics of cells.230 Advances in single-cell TCR sequencing (sc-TCR) further refine the capability to track individual T-cell migratory patterns.231 Unlike traditional TCR sequencing, which examines T-cell migration patterns at the population level, sc-TCR sequencing allows for more precise monitoring of migratory trajectories at single-cell resolution.232 By integrating single-cell sequencing with TCR sequencing, the STARTRAC-migr index was developed to quantify T-cell migration capacity and track dynamic migration patterns with unprecedented precision.226 Likewise, parallel approaches have been developed for B cells. Studies demonstrate that BCR-seq, in conjunction with longitudinal analysis of single-cell sequencing, also facilitates the tracking of the time course and pattern of cell migration during the process of immune response.233 However, existing studies on BCR-seq combined with single-cell sequencing to detect cell migration remain limited, and further exploration is warranted.
In vivo and in vitro models
Animal models remain indispensable for investigating immune cell migration dynamics in vivo, with genetically engineered systems providing unprecedented spatial-temporal resolution234 (Fig. 3). The Kaede transgenic animal model exemplifies this capability through its photoconvertible fluorescent reporter protein that irreversibly shifts emission from green to red upon UV exposure.235 Through these findings, researchers demonstrated extensive multi-tissue migration of intestinal immune cells, shedding light on the dynamic behavior of immune cells in the body.236 Complementing this approach, the Kit-CreER/Rosa26-tdTomato dual reporter model enables tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase activity, which specifically induces tdTomato fluorescent protein expression in c-Kit+ cells, enabling their visualization through fluorescence microscopy.237 This model has been used to reveal the migration and differentiation of c-Kit+ cells during the atherosclerotic process.237 In addition to fluorescent labeling of proteins, genetic reporter systems also enable noninvasive tracking of immune cell dynamics in animal models.238,239 The DiLiCre model exemplifies this approach through doxycycline-controlled and light-controlled Cre recombinase activation.238 This precision tool mediates FLEx (Flip-Excision) reporter cassette switching at loxP sites, generating permanent fluorescent markers that permit longitudinal monitoring of cellular migration via in vivo imaging without the need to sacrifice animals.238 While the DiLiCre system provides broad applicability, specialized immune cell tracking requires more targeted approaches. For neutrophil-specific tracking, the Catchup model employs targeted tdTomato insertion at the Ly6g locus, creating definitive genetic tagging of granulocyte populations.239 When integrated with intravital two-photon microscopy, this model reveals neutrophil trafficking patterns in native microenvironments without the need for adoptive cell transplantation.239
In vitro models primarily rely on mathematical algorithms or deep learning methods to systematically analyze and process multidimensional signals generated during cell migration, enabling the visualization and quantitative analysis of cellular migratory behavior.240,241 One such model, Tracking Cells by Footprint (TCF), employs a mechano-optical biosensor to map 2D cellular migration trajectories via fluorescent signals generated by DNA/PNA hybrid duplex disassembly under cellular mechanical forces.242 Recent research further explored the integration of sequencing technologies with in vitro models. The bidirectional single-cell migration chip (BM-Chip) exemplifies this paradigm by synergizing sequencing technologies with bidirectional migration channels, permitting high-throughput detection of cellular migratory phenotypes via time-lapse imaging.243 Building upon conventional 2D imaging, a microchip-based time-lapse imaging system incorporating temporal analysis achieved 12-h continuous monitoring of NK cells, enabling comprehensive tracking of individual NK cell migration trajectories and documentation of cytotoxic events.244 While 2D systems provide foundational insights, their physiological relevance is constrained by dimensional limitations. To overcome this limitation, researchers have progressively developed higher-dimensional analysis algorithms to depict cell movements more comprehensively. Based on a 3D U-net deep neural network architecture, cell position and motion fields (CPMF) offer high-precision tracking of complex migration dynamics by analyzing cellular spatial position and motion vector fields.245 The Automatic Feature Extraction for Cell Migration Examination (ACME) system extends this capability by integrating 3D convolutional neural networks with temporal dimensions for real-time intravascular tracking, offering valuable insights into immune cell movement during cancer treatment.246 Parallel advancements in microengineered platforms address spatiotemporal resolution gaps through tracking single-cell migration from spatial and temporal perspectives.247 This platform enables real-time monitoring and quantitative analysis of cell movement, providing a powerful tool for in-depth investigation of the differentiation mechanisms and functional regulatory alterations during cell migration.247
Clinical imaging technology
Conventional clinical imaging methods for tracking and monitoring cell migration are contingent upon the development and implementation of novel contrast agents248,249 (Fig. 4). The selection of appropriate imaging techniques for cell tracking studies depends on the imaging mechanisms and properties of different contrast agents.248,249
Fig. 4.
Clinical imaging techniques for immune cell migration detection. Clinical imaging techniques include ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and advanced imaging technologies. These techniques enable real-time visualization of immune cell migratory trajectories, allowing for dynamic and high-precision tracking of their spatial behavior. Created with BioRender.com
Ultrasound imaging has been revolutionized by phase-change peptide nanoemulsion contrast agents that generate enhanced acoustic signals upon ultrasound excitation.250 Functionalization of these nanoemulsions with an integrin-targeted peptide emulsifier enables efficient macrophage uptake, thus permitting sustained real-time visualization of migration trajectories by ultrasonography imaging.250 Additionally, gold nanoparticles used as contrast agents in computed tomography (CT) imaging enable multidimensional tracking and quantitative analysis of T cell migration patterns across tissue compartments.251 This technology holds considerable promise for evaluating the efficacy of adoptive T cells therapy and providing a basis for optimizing clinical therapeutic regimens.251 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has also proved advantageous in tracking cell migration, particularly through a nanomaterial-enhanced contrast mechanism.252 DCs labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles generate hypointense signals on T2-weighted imaging.253 By optimizing the imaging pulse sequence parameters, researchers have enhanced the single-cell detection sensitivity of SPIO-labeled DCs, thus providing a reliable imaging basis for monitoring DC-based immunotherapeutic responses.253
Distinguished from nanomaterial-dependent imaging modalities, Positron emission tomography (PET) uses radionuclides to label cells through metabolic mechanisms. Integrated with bioorthogonal chemistry, CTLs can be effectively radiolabeled with 64Cu, thereby enabling PET imaging to visualize their migration under diverse treatment conditions.254 Quantitative analysis of CTL accumulation within TME through this methodology provides invaluable prognostic insights for early-phase prediction of adoptive cell therapies.254 Complementary PET strategies employ genetic reporters for enhanced tracking specificity. The engineered hdCK3mut reporter system exhibits particular utility for cell tracking in immunotherapy, where its specific binding affinity for [18F]-L-FMAU generates quantifiable PET signals proportional to cell migration activity.255
In addition to the phenomenal techniques that are routinely employed in the clinic, researchers have also developed novel imaging methodologies for tracking cell migration. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), originally developed for ophthalmic applications, has been repurposed for high-resolution glioblastoma tracking through nanoparticle-enhanced contrast mechanisms.256 However, traditional OCT suffers from limitations in cell tracking, particularly due to speckle noise. Recent development of the Speckle-Modulating Optical Coherence Tomography (SM-OCT) system has addressed this limitation by implementing noise suppression algorithms during imaging, achieving unprecedented clarity in TAM tracking within the TME.257 This advancement leverages large gold nanorods as photostable molecular tracers that enable spatiotemporal mapping of TAM migratory patterns, revealing insights into the potential role of TAMs as nanoparticle-based drug delivery vectors in immunotherapy.257 Beyond advancements in single-modality imaging, a multimodal approach offers distinct advantages, with OCT being integrated with Photoacoustic Microscopy for enhanced long-term cell tracking.258 In a study of in vivo tracking progenitor cells, this technique enabled longitudinal monitoring of transplanted retinal pigment epithelial cells for 3 months and systematically elucidated the migration dynamics of these cells in the damaged area.258 Complementing these optical approaches, Phototruncation-assisted Cell Tracking (PACT) has emerged as an innovative technique that employs photosensitive dyes and light-induced chemical reactions to label and track cells.259 This technique permits quantitative analysis of spatial distribution and migration efficiency of immune cells in TDLNs.259,260 Parallel innovations in biphotonic include All-engineered Bioluminescence Imaging (AkaBLI), which incorporates genetically modified firefly luciferase to significantly enhance tissue barrier penetration, enabling single-cell resolution tracking in deep tissues.261 This technology has been successfully applied to track cellular responses in the hippocampus and migration within deep lung vessels, demonstrating its potential for non-invasive, in vivo tracking of cellar dynamics.261
Factors influencing immune cell migration
Immune cells exhibit distinct infiltration patterns in the contexts of tumors and inflammation. For instance, immune-cold tumors frequently drive the infiltration of immunosuppressive cells or impede antitumor immunocyte migration through physical and biological barriers. In contrast, immune-hot tumors are characterized by enrichment of antitumor immune cells.262 During infection, the inflammatory site primarily recruits immune cells capable of pathogen clearance.15,263 Whereas in autoimmune diseases, infiltrating immune cells exacerbate local inflammatory responses and promote tissue injury.2,264 Such infiltration pattern heterogeneity is regulated by the tumor or inflammatory microenvironment and systemic determinants. Local microenvironmental factors primarily encompass chemokines, cytokines, and adhesion molecules. Furthermore, systemic factors such as organismal metabolic reprogramming and the gut microbiota also significantly influence infiltration patterns.
Cytokines and chemokines
Across diverse pathophysiological landscapes, including oncology, autoimmunity, and infection, chemokine and cytokine networks play a critical role in orchestrating immune cell trafficking (Fig. 5). Malignant cells exploit this chemotactic system by constitutively expressing chemokines or cytokines that sculpt immunosuppressive niches.12 In a panel of mouse pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumors derived from clones of an autochthonous model, MYC-driven expression of CXCL1 by cancer cells inversely correlates with intratumoral infiltration, mechanistically impeding cytotoxic lymphocyte recruitment.265 Frequent expression of chemokine ligand(s) and their cognate receptors by tumor cells establishes self-sustaining autocrine circuits, amplifying ligand-receptor signaling to drive pathway hyperactivity.266 In one such instance, the autocrine CCL5-CCR5 axis induces MDSC infiltration via the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, which restricts T cell chemotaxis and antitumor function.267 Alternative to the expression of chemokines, cancer cell-intrinsic mechanisms can also modulate the secretion of cytokines to regulate immune cell migration. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is an attractive strategy for counteracting tumor-mediated immune evasion by inducing interferon production and influencing immune cell trafficking.268,269
Fig. 5.
Factors influencing immune cell migration. Factors influencing immune cell migration include cytokine and chemokine signaling pathways, cellular interactions, the extracellular matrix, metabolic reprogramming, and microbiota. a Cytokines and chemokines regulate immune cell recruitment through ligand-receptor signals derived from tumor cells, immune cells, stromal cells and epithelial cells. b Cellular interactions regulate immune cell migration through adhesion molecules, soluble mediators, EVs-associated signals. c Extracellular matrix components and remodeling shape migratory routes by providing structural support or physical barriers to immune cell movement. d Metabolic factors, including nutrient utilization, hypoxia, and metabolite signaling, modulate the migratory capacity of immune cells. e Microbiota-derived signals regulate immune cell trafficking through effects on chemokines, homing receptors and lymphatic network expansion. Created with BioRender.com. EVs extracellular vesicles, OPN osteopontin, MIF macrophage migration inhibitory factor, HC heavy chain, HA hyaluronan, LOX lysyl oxidase, ECM extracellular matrix, FPP farnesyl pyrophosphate, SFA short-chain fatty acid, SBA secondary bile acid, KA kynurenic acid
For instance, ICD induction in PERK-ablated tumors stimulates type I interferon production in DCs, which primes CCR2-dependent recruitment of common monocytic precursors to bolster anti-tumor responses.270 Separately, in tumor signaling pathways, STAT3 expression in multiple tumors is closely associated with poor prognosis.271,272 Mechanistically, constitutively activated STAT3 in tumors promotes cytokine Chi3l1-mediated neutrophil recruitment and NET formation that physically constrain CD8+ T cell infiltration.37
Endothelial and epithelial cells function as critical regulators of immune cell trafficking by secreting specific chemokines, thereby orchestrating the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases. Within the vasculature, endothelial cells can initiate and amplify localized inflammation. For instance, in IBD, intestinal microvascular endothelial cells upregulate the expression of CX3CL1, which mediates the recruitment of CX3CR1+ CD8⁺ T cells into the intestinal mucosa. Upon infiltration, CX3CR1+ CD8⁺ T cells release type I cytokines such as IFN-γ and cytotoxic molecules, which collectively drive the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation.273 Furthermore, in an experimental autoimmune model, pulmonary vascular endothelial cells mediate the secretion of CCL5 via the cGAS-STING pathway, which recruits CCR5+ CD8+ T cells to the lungs, thereby initiating TLS formation and exacerbating autoimmune pathogenesis.274 Beyond the vasculature, epithelial cells lining various organs are also key contributors to chemokine secretion. CXCL12 secreted by glomerular and tubular epithelial cells can recruit CXCR4+ B cells, which subsequently differentiate into plasma cells and generate anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies to exacerbate lupus nephritis.275 In the context of pulmonary inflammation, the role of epithelial-derived chemokines is equally prominent. During allergic asthma, pulmonary epithelial cells secrete CCL2 to recruit CCR2-expressing classical monocytes that can differentiate into MoDCs, thereby promoting Th2 cell-mediated immune responses and exacerbating allergic inflammation.276 Similarly, in acute viral infections such as COVID-19, alveolar epithelial cells upregulate CXCL16 to guide the migration of monocytes into the lung parenchyma via CXCR6, contributing to pulmonary inflammation.277 Conversely, patients with long COVID-19 exhibit sustained downregulation of COX2 and CXCR2 expression, impairing monocyte responsiveness to inflammatory signals.277
Mesenchymal stromal cells, including adipocytes, fibroblasts, and fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs), establish chemokine gradients that profoundly modulate immunocyte trafficking in both inflammation and tumors. Adipocytes adopt a pro-inflammatory role during diabetes and acute hepatic inflammation. Adipocyte-derived CCL2 and IL-29 facilitate the recruitment of monocytes, which subsequently differentiate into M1 macrophages and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, thereby contributing to the development of insulin resistance.278–280 The pro-pathogenic function of adipocytes extends to the TME. In breast cancer (BC), peritumoral cancer-associated adipocytes (CAAs) are located predominantly at the invasive front of BC.281 Mechanistic investigations revealed that CAA-derived CXCL8 exerts immunosuppressive effects by suppressing CD8+ T cell infiltration while upregulating CD274 expression in BC, thereby promoting EMT and metastasis progression.282 The chemokine network orchestrated by fibroblasts also exhibits a pathogenic function. Dermal fibroblasts stimulated by IFNγ can secrete the chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 to recruit cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells, which specifically target epidermal melanocytes, thereby driving the progression of vitiligo.283 Similarly, during Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) skin infection and psoriasis, both IL-17A and TNFα have been observed to induce the secretion of CXCL12 via the NFKBIZ pathway in dermal fibroblasts, thereby orchestrating the recruitment of neutrophils. CXCL12-recruited neutrophils contribute to bacterial clearance during S. aureus infection but exacerbate tissue damage in psoriasis.284 Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) are a specialized fibroblast subtype that serve as major contributors to CCL25 elevation during arthritis. Following recruitment to the joint via the CCL25-CCR9 signaling axis, monocytes undergo CCL25-driven differentiation into proinflammatory M1 macrophages, which subsequently secrete IL-8 and CCL2 to exacerbate synovial inflammation.285 Additionally, FLSs also produce CCL20 to mediate the migration of CCR6+ Th17 cells to inflamed joints. Th17-secreted IL-17A further activates FLSs to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby establishing a pathogenic positive feedback loop that exacerbates rheumatoid arthritis.286 Within the tumor stroma, CAFs similarly adopt CXCL12 to modulate immune cell behavior. Perivascular CAF-derived CXCL12 activates CXCR4 on immune cells, including monocyte-derived TAM.188 This CXCL12-CXCR4 axis impedes the direct migration of immune cells through inhibiting the chemotactic functions of chemokine receptors, including CXCR1, CXCR3 and CCR2.287 Therefore, the effects of CXCL12 extend beyond impairing cellular migration to orchestrating systemic immunosuppression. While CAFs hinder immune cell migration through CXCL12, FRCs within the stromal niche exhibit immunostimulatory properties. CCL19 and CCL21 secreted by FRCs are fundamental for recruiting dendritic cells, T helper cells and B cells, which is essential for initiating adaptive immunity against chronic infections and for fostering a protective anti-tumor immunity.288,289 Further investigations confirmed that the FRC-derived CCL19 gradient promotes T cell infiltration and fosters a protective intratumoral T cell environment, critically regulating the potency and durability of antitumor T cell immunity.290 Beyond CCL19 and CCL21, CXCL12 produced by FRCs via the LTβR signaling pathway plays a protective role in limiting pathological inflammation. During allograft rejection, Tregs recruited by CXCL12 exert their potent immunoregulatory capacity by inhibiting Th1 and Th17 lineage differentiation, thereby attenuating the inflammatory rejection process.284
Immune cells also constitute self-regulatory chemokine networks during inflammation and tumors. In advanced-stage tumors, Th17-mediated immunosuppression operates through IL-17A/STAT3 signaling to downregulate CXCR3 expression, systemically impairing CD8+ T-cell trafficking.291 TAMs and DCs further shape immune landscapes by secreting CCR4 ligands such as CCL17 and CCL22, which promote the recruitment of Tregs to the tumor site.147,292 Interestingly, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors facilitates CCR4 ligand expression and Treg infiltration, suggesting a mechanism by which immune evasion is facilitated.293 Furthermore, Treg-derived IL-10 reinforces this immunosuppressive axis by suppressing the recruitment of M1-type macrophages and promoting the activation of immunosuppressive M2-type macrophages.294 Counterbalancing these inhibitory mechanisms, cDC1s drive anti-tumor immunity through CXCL9/CXCL10 production, creating chemotactic gradients that recruit effector CD8+ T cells.295 Therapeutic amplification of these chemokines by injecting Flt3 ligand-derived DCs significantly enhances T cell recruitment and anti-tumor immunity.296 Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production is mainly regulated by NK cells in innate immunity, while CD8+ and CD4+ T cells serve as principal paracrine producers in adaptive immunity.297,298 IFN-γ establishes a self-reinforcing recruitment circuit by initiating CXCL9/10 secretion from DCs and malignant cells upon detection by sparse tumor-infiltrating T/NK cells, thereby amplifying the influx of IFN-γ-producing T cells to sustain this immunostimulatory cascade.296,299 Beyond the T-cell-centric feedback mechanisms, DC-derived chemokines are also pivotal in directing humoral responses and autoimmune pathology. CXCL13 secreted by renal DCs promotes the recruitment of CXCR5+ B cells to the kidney, fostering a proinflammatory environment that contributes to tissue damage in lupus nephritis.300 Similarly, during asthma, pulmonary DCs stimulated by IL-13 can secrete CCL22 and CCL17, which recruit CCR4+ Th2 lymphocytes into the airways. Upon infiltration, production of IL-13 by Th2 cells establishes a positive-feedback loop that amplifies eosinophilic inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness.301
Beyond the pivotal roles played by dendritic cells and T lymphocytes, macrophages emerge as a critical source of chemokines. In the TME, TAMs frequently foster immunosuppression by recruiting Tregs. In hepatocellular carcinoma, activation of the DGAT1-catalyzed and DGAT2-catalyzed triglyceride biosynthetic pathway in TAMs drives lipid droplet accumulation, which in turn promotes CCL20 expression to recruit CCR6+ Tregs.302 In addition to direct recruitment of Tregs, CCL18 secreted by TAMs also recruits naive CD4⁺ T cells, which subsequently differentiate into Tregs within the tumor niche.303 Conversely, macrophages can also mediate potent anti-tumor immunity. Dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade has been reported to induce the secretion of CXCL9 and CXCL10 from macrophages. CXCR3-expressing CD8⁺ T cells recruited by CXCL9 and CXCL10 subsequently mediate antitumor immunity through the production of IFN-γ and TNF-α.304 This CXCL9-CXCR3 axis is also fundamental in infection defense. Under IFN-γ stimulation, the transcription factor PU.1 in macrophages induces the expression of CXCL9, which subsequently mediates CXCR3+ CTL and NK cell migration to sites of inflammation and controls infection progression.305 Beyond infection, macrophage-derived chemokines are pivotal drivers of inflammatory pathologies. During asthma, pulmonary macrophages activated by IL-14 secrete CCL11 and CCL24. These ligands engage CCR3 on eosinophils, promoting their infiltration into the airways, which drives the pathogenesis of allergic airway inflammation.301 In the context of autoimmune diabetes, IL-1β-stimulated pancreatic macrophages orchestrate neutrophil infiltration into pancreatic islets through the CXCL1/CXCL2-CXCR2 axis.306 Within pancreatic islets, neutrophils exacerbate tissue inflammation and propagate autoimmune diabetes through NETosis-mediated excessive release of neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3.307
Subsequent to recruitment by chemokines from macrophages and other sources, neutrophils themselves act as both effector cells and chemokine producers. A fundamental mechanism underpinning the localized infiltration and accumulation of neutrophils is the establishment of a CXCL1/CXCL2-CXCR2 autocrine self-amplifying loop, which perpetuates inflammation in conditions such as arthritis.308 A comparable self-amplifying recruitment of neutrophils occurs during infection.309 However, elevated local chemoattractant concentrations trigger GRK2-mediated site-specific phosphorylation of serine/threonine residues within GPCR intracellular domains, which sterically hinders G protein coupling to terminate downstream signaling.310 This negative feedback mechanism induces neutrophil migratory arrest and prevents pathological accumulation.310 In the context of oncology, neutrophils polarize into TANs and exert a profound influence over other immune lineages through chemokines and cytokines. For instance, hepatocellular carcinoma cells activate the PI3K/Akt and p38/MAPK signaling pathways in neutrophils, promoting their polarization into TANs and stimulating the secretion of CCL2 and CCL17. These chemokines facilitate the recruitment of macrophages and Tregs via CCR2 and CCR4, respectively, thereby establishing an immunosuppressive microenvironment and contributing to resistance to Sorafenib.311Beyond typical chemokine-mediated recruitment, TNFα derived from TANs directly regulates B cell chemotaxis and migration through a novel mechanism independent of CXCL12, CXCL13, and CXCL9. Following infiltration into tumors, B cells are further induced by TANs via membrane-bound BAFF to differentiate into IgG-producing plasma cells that exert either anti-tumor or pro-tumor functions.312
The aforementioned migratory network, centered on the chemokine-receptor axis, constitutes a localized immune response subject to feedback regulation. However, dysregulation of cytokine secretion induced by aberrant pathogenic signals can precipitate a deleterious systemic inflammatory cascade, commonly referred to as a cytokine storm.313 Pathogen recognition occurs via Toll-like receptors (TLRs) engaging pathogen-associated molecular patterns and damage-associated molecular patterns, subsequently activating both the canonical TLRs/MyD88/MAPK pathway and noncanonical TLRs/TRIF/IRF3 pathway, which drive massive uncontrollable release of proinflammatory cytokines.314 Neutrophils recruited by elevated CXCL8 during cytokine storms induce the formation of NETs, which trigger TLR2/4-dependent upregulation of IL-6 and pro-IL-1β in macrophages.313,315 This amplified pro-inflammatory cytokine milieu further drives Th17 cell differentiation and myeloid cell recruitment that exacerbate systemic inflammation.315 Notably, IL-1β and IL-18 can in turn facilitate the recruitment of neutrophils and T helper cells to the site of infection, resulting in the release of secondary wave cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF.314,316 Additionally, dysregulation of cytolytic activity during cytokine storm undermined the cytotoxicity of CTL and NK cells, resulting in pathological retention of undegraded lymphocytes.317 These lymphocytes undergo prolonged crosstalk between antigen-presenting cells, substantially enhancing the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ that amplify the inflammatory response.318
Cellular interaction
In addition to their role in cytokine and chemokine networks, cellular interactions mediated by adhesion molecules, soluble signaling proteins and extracellular vesicles critically regulate immune cell trafficking (Fig. 5). Specifically, MAdCAM-1 expression on HEVs engages α4β7 integrins to mediate lymphocyte extravasation into tissues.319 This interaction not only promotes the recruitment of immune cells across organ barriers but also intensifies local inflammation within the TME. Beyond commonly expressed adhesion molecules, individual organs also harbor tissue-specific adhesion molecules that govern immunocyte trafficking. For instance, neuro-oncology studies have revealed that T cells in intracranial melanoma preferentially utilize ICAM-1-dependent pathways for peritumoral venous adhesion, suggesting central nervous system-specific immune trafficking mechanisms.320 During multiple sclerosis, Th17 cells employ their constitutively high surface expression of DICAM to engage cognate DICAM ligands and αVβ3 integrin on blood-brain barrier endothelial cells, thereby facilitating transendothelial migration into the CNS.321 Infiltrated Th17 cells further secrete IL-17 to promote blood‒brain barrier disruption and CNS inflammation.321 Conversely, endothelial cells (ECs) can also actively restrict immune trafficking by modulating the availability of adhesion molecules. For instance, EC autophagy remodels intercellular junctions through ATG16L1-dependent degradation of adhesion molecules, including PECAM-1 and E-cadherin.322 Genetic ablation of EC autophagy led to excessive neutrophil transendothelial cell migration and uncontrolled leukocyte migration in murine inflammatory models.322 In addition to the above adhesion molecules, emerging evidence highlights noncanonical molecular regulators that paradoxically impede rather than promote immune cell migration. EDIL3 is a secreted multifunctional protein that interacts with integrins.323 Endothelial cell-derived EDIL3 primarily regulates inflammatory initiation by restraining ITGAL- and ICAM1-dependent neutrophil recruitment.324 When secreted by CAFs, EDIL3 disrupts the cellular adhesion cascade by antagonizing LFA-1/ICAM-1 binding and effectively impedes T-cell transmigration. This spatial regulation of adhesion molecule interactions establishes EDIL3 as a multifaceted regulator of tumor immune evasion.325
Beyond direct cellular contact, the migration of immune cells is also regulated by soluble proteins or extracellular vesicles secreted by neighboring cells. POSTN secreted by glioblastoma stem cells recruits αVβ3+ microglia and upregulates CD70 expression, subsequently fostering Treg development and facilitating tumor progression.326 Parallel mechanisms operate in hepatocellular carcinoma, where tumor-overexpressed osteopontin (OPN) initiates the migration of M2 macrophages through the OPN/CSF1R axis coupled with PD-L1 upregulation to blunt cytotoxic T cell responses.327 Ongoing research is elucidating the mechanistic underpinnings of tumor-mediated protein secretion. Myosin II is a molecular motor that converts chemical energy derived from ATP hydrolysis into mechanical work.328 Surprisingly, enhanced Myosin II activity in ameboid cancer cells triggers the release of immunomodulatory proteins that recruit monocytes and direct their differentiation into tumor-promoting macrophages.329 Epigenetic modifications further fine-tune this protein secretory landscape that mediates cellular interaction and migration. METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification sustains MDSC migration through a BHLHE41-dependent pathway and inhibits antitumor immunity.330
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized, membranous structures secreted into the extracellular space that participate in cellular interactions.331 Decorated with membrane proteins derived from their parental cells, EVs are significant carriers for signal proteins.332 For instance, CCL2 bound to proteoglycans on the surface of cancer cell-derived EVs recruits NK cells and MDSCs, promoting an immunosuppressive microenvironment that may play a role in tumor metastasis.333 In diabetes, chronic exposure to pro-inflammatory cytokines has been shown to perturb β cell communication and function.334 For instance, EVs with the expression of the chemokine CXCL10 on their surface can facilitate leukocyte recruitment to islets, leading to β cell dysfunction.335 Integrins, selectins, and immunoglobulin superfamily molecules constitute another critical class of EV surface determinants. These molecules mediate immune cell transendothelial migration by engaging cognate receptors on vascular endothelial cells.331 EVs with the expression of integrin β1 have been identified as a key contributor to the hepatic recruitment of monocyte-derived macrophages from circulation, which exacerbates inflammation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.336
Additionally, EVs carry a wide range of cargo mediating immunocyte migration, including signaling proteins and nucleic acids.331 EVs released by neutrophils, macrophages and other immune cells that contain cytokines and chemokines can promote or resolve inflammatory reactions.337 Although most cytokines are secreted predominantly in soluble forms, EVs can cotransport cytokines intraluminally.332 Compared with their secretion of free cytokines, the phospholipid bilayer of EVs can prevent EV-associated cytokines from rapid degradation, thereby supporting sustained signaling.332 Interestingly, pancreatic cancer-secreted EVs that carry macrophage migration inhibitory factors (MIFs) have been demonstrated to promote the recruitment of bone marrow-derived macrophages, which further initiate premetastatic niche formation in the liver.338 In addition to cytokines, EVs can modulate immune cell migration through miRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression within target immune cells. During sepsis-related acute lung injury, neutrophil-derived EVs enriched with miR-30d-5p drive M1 macrophage polarization and migration via activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway.339 Conversely, TAM-secreted EVs harbor miR-21-5p and miR-29a-3p, which induce Treg/Th17 imbalance through STAT3 pathway activation, thereby promoting Treg trafficking into the TME.340 Additionally, hepatocyte-derived EVs in fatty liver are reported to transfer YAP signaling-regulating microRNAs into cancer cells, resulting in the establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment by M2 macrophage infiltration through CYR61 production.341
Metabolic reprogramming
Disruptions in lipid, glucose and energy metabolism not only affect immune cell metabolism but also act as signaling molecules to regulate their migration342 (Fig. 5). Lipids execute important physiological roles in energy storage and membrane fluidity modulation, making them key participants in cell trafficking.343,344 As a TME-derived lipid mediator, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) orchestrates metabolic suppression through c-Myc and PGC-1 downregulation, concurrently impairing oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, and ribosomal biogenesis.345,346 This metabolic reprogramming compromises multiple functions of CD8+ T cells, particularly their migratory capacity and tumor-infiltrating potential.345 During SLE, aberrant cholesterol metabolism culminates in farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) accrual within mregDCs. FPP-mediated activation of RhoA fosters mitochondrial fusion and enhances oxidative metabolism, which collectively bolsters DC motility and exacerbates SLE progression.347 Additionally, inflammatory factors in the cellular microenvironment activate the immune response, thereby promoting glycolysis and increasing the production and release of lactate.348,349 Lactate imported via SlC5A12 and SlC16A1 transporters into CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells suppresses glycolytic enzymes such as hexokinase-1, compromising cellular bioenergetics and inducing motility arrest both in tumors and inflammation.350,351 Accordingly, elevated expression of lactate dehydrogenase A not only correlates with enhanced macrophage infiltration but also induces TAM polarization toward the M2 subtype through a lactate-mediated mechanism, ultimately promoting tumor progression.352 In recent years, an increasing number of studies have emerged in understanding ATP metabolism signals regulating immune cell migration. Malignant cells upregulate distinct energy metabolism programs that hijack essential nutrients and outcompete neighboring infiltrating immune cells.353 Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) contributes to immune suppression by preventing NK cell infiltration into the TME and impairing their anti-tumor activity.215 Parallel findings demonstrate that adenosine signaling through A2AR attenuates antitumor immunity by inhibiting CD8+ T cell infiltration and effector functions.354 During inflammation, extracellular ATP released by damaged cells increases mregDC motility through CACNB3-mediated calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum, thereby attenuating inflammation to prevent excessive tissue damage.355 In addition to the accumulation of metabolites, heightened metabolic activity in immune and neoplastic cells drives accelerated oxygen consumption during tumorigenesis and inflammatory processes, culminating in the establishment of localized hypoxic niches.356–358 During acute inflammation, hypoxic niches resulting from neutrophil respiratory burst activate HIF signaling within epithelial cells.359 This fortifies epithelial barrier integrity, thereby restricting further neutrophil transmigration and accelerating inflammation resolution.359 Within GBM, hypoxia attracts and sequesters TAMs through CCL8 and IL-1β, where they are reprogrammed toward an immunosuppressive state.360 Furthermore, hypoxia modulates NK cell functionality by altering chemokine secretion patterns, ultimately impairing directional migration toward tumor sites.361
Extracellular matrix
The ECM constitutes a critical spatial structure that bidirectionally regulates immune cell migration through biomechanical and biochemical cues, mediating both permissive and restrictive functions (Fig. 5). On the one hand, the physical structure and molecular composition of the ECM can serve as guidance cues for immune cell migration and positioning. Pores formed by interwoven collagen fibrils within the ECM are pivotal structural determinants. For instance, leukocytes will leverage nuclear positioning mechanisms to actively probe the ECM, preferentially navigating through larger pores of ECM to facilitate their migration.362 Similarly, T cells have been demonstrated to preferentially move through tissue sites that are characterized by thin fibers, deliberately avoiding denser matrices that are made by lysyl oxidases (LOXs).363 Beyond these passive guidance cues offered by the ECM architecture, successful migration relies on the intrinsic ability of immune cells to actively adapt their morphology. After experiencing large cell shape changes caused by the physical structures in the ECM, DCs employ the ARP2/3-cPLA2 shape-sensing mechanism to potentiate myosin contractility, thereby enhancing DC motility and enabling their directional migration from peripheral tissues toward TDLNs.364 In addition to its physical structure, the ECM molecular composition serves as a significant biochemical regulator orchestrating directed immune cell migration. During inflammation, type I collagen protein in the ECM potently enhances the migratory capacity of ILC2s by inducing their polarization and remodeling the actin cytoskeleton.365 In inflamed skin, structural changes to fibronectin fibers of the ECM result in enhanced integrin binding, thereby guiding Th1 cells migrating to perivascular sites366 ECM to further facilitate directional cell guidance indirectly by mediating the presentation of signaling proteins. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans in ECM can bind and present chemokines within the vasculature as well as the tissue parenchyma to form gradients that direct immune cell movement.367 Similarly, ECM glycosaminoglycans can regulate whether chemokines were presented on cell surfaces or remain more soluble, thereby affecting chemokine availability and ensuring specificity of chemokine action that directs immune cell trafficking.368 This phenomenon elucidates the underlying mechanism by which immune cells achieve directional migration through intricate chemokine networks.
On the other hand, spatial confinement formed by the ECM structure fundamentally undermines the migration of immune cells.369,370 Under homeostatic conditions, the glycocalyx in the ECM forms a 200-2000 nm barrier that blocks interaction with adhesion molecules on circulating leukocytes, preventing aberrant leukocyte recruitment.370 During injury and inflammation, hyaluronan (HA) becomes covalently modified with heavy chains (HCs) from the interalpha-inhibitor (IaI) family of proteoglycans, forming crosslinked HA matrices.371,372 Crosslinked HC-HA complexes demonstrate enhanced CD44 binding affinity, trapping leukocytes within the lesional ECM by promoting adhesion and preventing their migration, thereby perpetuating inflammatory responses.373,374 Clinical and translational studies further reveal that ECM-impaired T cell migration through the tumor parenchyma constitutes a major bottleneck for adoptive cell therapies.375 This limitation persists even in immunogenic tumors, as aligned stromal collagen fibers physically restrict T cells infiltration into tumor cores.376 For instance, lysyl oxidase-mediated collagen cross-linking increases matrix rigidity while creating steric hindrance for T cell migration.375 In addition to enzymes, CAFs are another significant mediator that contributes to ECM remodeling. CAFs comprise a heterogeneous cellular compartment with functionally distinct subpopulations. Among these, myofibroblastic CAFs (myCAFs) are the main regulators of ECM remodeling through the exertion of actomyosin-dependent contracting forces and secretion of matrix metalloproteinases.377,378 The ECM protein network remodeled by myCAFs serves as a physical barrier for immune cells, especially T lymphocytes, thus inhibiting their recruitment into cancer sites and subsequently reducing their opportunities to participate in the immune response in the TME.379
Impact of microbiota
A previous study revealed that antibiotic-induced gut microbiota depletion inhibits systemic trafficking of intestinal immunocytes, highlighting the impact of microbiota on immune cell migration.236
The microbiota can modulate the expression of immune cell membrane proteins, thereby regulating their migratory capabilities (Fig. 5). In the context of preventing local excessive inflammation, commensal-derived metabolites play a crucial role. For instance, Clostridium scindens-produced short-chain fatty acids can stimulate colonic epithelial cells to secrete TGF-β1, which induces high expression of CD103 and β7 integrin on Tregs, thereby promoting Treg homing to the colonic mucosa to maintain intestinal immune homeostasis.380 Similarly, during intestinal inflammation, cyclic dinucleotides derived from Helicobacter hepaticus upregulate the expression of CCR7 on ILC3s through the STING/NF-κB signaling pathway, driving ILC3 migration from the intestinal lamina propria to the mesenteric lymph nodes to suppress inflammatory responses.381 Beyond local immune regulation, microbial influence on cell trafficking is pivotal for systemic antitumor immunity. Secondary bile acids produced by Clostridium scindens and Enterocloster spp. downregulate MAdCAM-1 in the ileum, driving the emigration of enterotropic α4β7+ Th17 cells into the tumor.382 Similarly, modifications in the Ligilactobacillus to Bacteroides ratio within the gut microbiota regulate the MAdCAM-1-dependent homing of IgA+ antibody-secreting cells, thereby enhancing the CD8+ T cell response in distal tumors.383 However, microbial modulation of immune cell trafficking can also precipitate pathology, particularly through mechanisms such as molecular mimicry. Clostridioides difficile expresses a surface layer protein A that contains a mimic epitope of myelin basic protein (MBP), leading to the activation of MBP-specific Th1/Th17 cells.384 Activated Th1/Th17 cells with elevated expression of α4β1 integrin then migrate to the CNS, thereby inducing multiple sclerosis.384 Additionally, segmented filamentous bacteria have been reported to directly elevate S1PR1 expression on Tfh cells, enabling their migration from Peyer’s patches to inflammatory sites and promoting systemic extraintestinal autoimmunity.385
Beyond directly modulating immune cell protein expression, the microbiota also orchestrates immunocyte migration by regulating the molecular and structural composition of the extracellular microenvironment (Fig. 5). Segmented filamentous bacteria have been proven to convert vitamin A into retinoic acid (RA) through retinaldehyde dehydrogenase. Local accumulation of RA further induces intestinal epithelial cells to express serum amyloid A, which facilitates Th17 cell homing to the inflammation site and defense against infection.386 This principle of metabolite-driven recruitment extends to autoimmune inflammation. Kynurenic acid produced by Sporosarcina pasteurii specifically recruits macrophages to mesenteric lymph nodes (mLNs) via GPR35 receptor activation. Within the mLNs, macrophages secrete IL-6 to facilitate Th17 cell migration from the mLNs to the spinal cord, where they secrete IL-17A and exacerbate neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis.387 Microbial metabolite regulation of immune trafficking is equally pivotal in promoting antitumor immunity. Tumors infected by human papillomavirus (HPV) tend to secrete higher levels of chemokines such as CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL12 to recruit Th17, Th1 and CD8⁺T lymphocytes.388 Infiltrated CD4⁺T and CD8⁺T cells subsequently secrete IFN-γ and IL-17 to enhance anti-tumor immunity.388 Conversely, microbiota can also impede the migration of immunosuppressive cells. For example, urocanic acid derived from Muribaculum suppresses NF-κB signaling in tumor vascular endothelial cells, which reduces CXCL1 secretion and consequently impairs the recruitment of MDSCs toward tumors, thereby enhancing the tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.389 In addition to microbiota-mediated chemoattractant gradients, investigations have also identified the microbiota contribution to the formation of lymphatic structures that facilitate the migration of immune cells. For instance, Helicobacter hepaticus has been demonstrated to promote colonic lymphatic network expansion through enhancement of lymphatic endothelial cell proliferation functional maturation, establishing optimized conduits for tumor-directed trafficking of anti-tumor T follicular helper cells.28
Therapeutic approaches targeting immune cell migration
Although conventional therapies such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy in tumors and immunosuppressive agents in autoimmunity do not directly target immune cell migration mechanisms, evidence indicates that they can also modulate immune cell trafficking. These therapeutic effects on immunocyte migration in turn contribute to improved therapeutic outcomes. For instance, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX is associated with increased recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages, significantly contributing to greater anti-tumor response and improved patient survival.390 In parallel, radiotherapy-induced upregulation of CXCL16, CXCL8, CXCL9 and CXCL10 within the TME facilitates the recruitment of NK cells and CTLs, thereby synergizing the ICB therapy.391,392 The modulatory effect on immune cell migration extends to autoimmune diseases. Administration of methotrexate in psoriasis suppresses the infiltration of pathogenic T helper cells into lesional skin, thereby significantly ameliorating cutaneous inflammation.393 Therefore, targeting the process of immune cell migration represents a promising therapeutic strategy.
Targeting cytokine and chemokine signaling pathways
Therapeutic strategies targeting cytokine and chemokine signaling pathways primarily encompass two distinct approaches, including blockade of ligand‒receptor interactions and elevation of cytokine or chemokine levels (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Principal strategies for immune cell directed therapy. a Targeting chemokine/cytokine pathways includes blockade of ligand-receptor interactions through antibodies or inhibitors and enhancement of local chemokine or cytokines activity such as nanoparticles, CAR immune cells, chemotherapy/ICB-induced chemokine production, engineered cytokines and fusion proteins. b Targeting tertiary lymphoid structures modulates organized immune-cell recruitment by promoting TLS formation and HEV maturation in tumors or suppressing pathogenic TLS responses in inflammatory diseases. c Targeting ECM reduces stromal barriers to immune cell infiltration by limiting collagen cross-linking, collagen deposition and fibroblast-driven ECM remodeling. d Targeting metabolic reprogramming restores immune-cell function by reshaping lactate and fatty acid metabolism through metabolic inhibitors, FAO modulation and dietary intervention. e Targeting microbiota reshapes microbial communities or microbial metabolites through antibiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation and engineered microbiota. Created with BioRender.com. CAR chimeric antigen receptor, ICB immune checkpoint blockade, TLS tertiary lymphoid structures, LOX lysyl oxidases, Hsp heat shock proteins, NIR-PIT infrared photoimmunotherapy, FAO fatty acid oxidation
Artificially engineered small-molecule inhibitors, antagonists and monoclonal antibodies can disrupt chemokine-receptor binding.394,395 Within the TME, chemokines and their corresponding receptors mediate the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells. In contrast, similar chemokine-receptor axes in inflammatory disorders drive the infiltration of pro-inflammatory cells. Although the nature of the recruited immune cells is fundamentally distinct between malignant and inflammatory contexts, both contribute to disease progression. Consequently, targeting these chemokine-receptor axes has emerged as a pivotal area of therapeutic investigation. CXCR2 not only recruits N2 TANs and TAMs but also establishes an MDSC-mediated immunotherapy-resistant microenvironment, as evidenced by diminished PD-1 blockade efficacy.396–399 Small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies against CXCR2, such as SB225002, Reparixin, Navarixin, AZD5069, SX682, ABX-IL8 and HuMax-IL8, have shown potential in enhancing cancer therapy by impairing the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells and angiogenesis.400–402 In addition to CXCR2, myeloid immunosuppressive cells can also be recruited by CCR2 and CCR5.403 The CCR2 inhibitor PF04136309, combined with FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin and bolus fluorouracil) chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, has demonstrated notable antitumor efficacy, with disease control achieved in 97% of patients and an objective response rate (ORR) of 49%.404 Although carlumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CCR2 ligands, its therapeutic impact is modest. Stable disease was observed in a minority of patients, and no objective responses were achieved.405 Similarly, another monoclonal antibody that binds to CCL2, CNTO888, was also not effective at sustaining CCL2-CCR2 signaling blockade in a phase II study in patients with prostate cancer.406 These limited therapeutic efficacies may be attributed to compensatory surges in endogenous CCL2 production following its inhibition, thereby preventing sustained suppression of the target pathway.405 The CCR2 antagonist INCB3344 curbs M1 macrophage infiltration into vascular and renal compartments, thereby reducing inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular remodeling. These effects suggest its potential utility in antihypertensive therapy.407 Preclinical studies in murine models also demonstrated that the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc exerts cardioprotective effects, mediated through reduced expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, which was associated with diminished lesional M1 macrophage infiltration.408 These protective effects were further substantiated in a phase IV clinical trial, wherein 24 weeks of maraviroc treatment reduced markers of arterial stiffness and early carotid atherosclerosis in patients with HIV infection.409 A dual antagonist targeting CCR2 and CCR5, cenicriviroc, has been developed to block mucosa-associated invariant T (MAIT) cell migration in cases of acute intestinal inflammation.410 Preclinical models also identify the central role of cenicriviroc in blocking liver-infiltrating CCR2+ monocyte interaction with tissue-destructive CD8+ T cells in the pathogenesis of hepatitis.411 However, cenicriviroc demonstrated disappointing clinical outcomes. In the phase IIb TANDEM study, only 31.6% of patients achieved ≥1-point improvement in fibrosis stage without worsening steatohepatitis.412 The above negative outcomes may stem from the possibility that CCR2/CCR5-mediated immune cell recruitment does not constitute the dominant pathogenic driver in the progression of these diseases. CCR4 is another significant receptor that mediates the directional migration of Tregs to modulate the TME.413–415 Blocking CCR4-dependent Treg accumulation can reverse CD8+ T cell exhaustion and PD-L1-mediated immune evasion, thereby potentiating ICB responsiveness.395,416 Clinical translation of this approach is exemplified by mogamulizumab, a CCR4 antagonist that has undergone evaluation for cancer treatment in several clinical trials.417–419 In a phase I clinical study, NCT02476123, the combination of mogamulizumab and the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab manifested an adequate safety profile and significant antitumor activity in solid tumors.417 Specifically, in inflammation, dysregulation of cytokine and chemokine control during inflammatory responses drives aberrant recruitment of immune cells, ultimately leading to tissue damage or cytokine storms. For instance, IL-1 facilitates the recruitment of neutrophils and Th1 cells to the site of inflammation, resulting in the release of secondary wave cytokines that promote destructive inflammation.420 Anakinra, the recombinant IL-1Ra that specifically blocks the activity of both IL-1α and IL-1β, has been demonstrated to effectively alleviate cytokine syndrome during immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome and rheumatic conditions, as well as improve cardiac contractility and outcomes in patients with fulminant myocarditis.420–422 During the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, IL-6 is associated with increased infiltration of pro-inflammatory monocytes.423 The administration of tocilizumab, a recombinant human IL-6 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated positive outcomes for patients with severe COVID-19 necessitating organ support in intensive care units.424
Apart from blocking cytokine and chemokine pathways, strategies aimed at breaching biological barriers within migratory paths have emerged. A prominent approach involves elevating cytokine and chemokine levels through endogenous production or exogenous delivery.425 Enhanced endogenous chemokine production involves targeting specific signaling molecules that stimulate resident cells within the TME. For instance, dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade significantly upregulated macrophage-derived CXCL9 and CXCL10 expression, promoting CD8+ T cell infiltration and therapeutic efficacy.304 In addition to targeting immune checkpoints, the administration of DPP4 inhibitors or COX-2 inhibitors similarly elevates CXCL9/CXCL10 expression, facilitating CD8+ T cell trafficking and thereby potentiating anti-PD-1 responses.426–428 Combination therapy with carboplatin and PP4 inhibition specifically upregulates CXCL10, improving NK/T cell recruitment and tumor chemosensitivity.429 Additionally, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T and NK cells with chemokine/cytokine secreting capability represent a strategy to locally overcome chemotactic barriers. Preclinical studies in metastatic pancreatic cancer models have revealed that IL-15 co-expression not only facilitates the infiltration of CAR immune cells but also achieves substantial therapeutic responses with favorable safety profiles, providing a strong rationale for clinical application.430 Clinical validation of these barrier-overcoming strategies has been documented in multiple trials. A phase I clinical study, NCT04099797, reported that GD2. CAR-T cells engineered with Interleukin-7 receptor demonstrated favorable treatment response and safety tolerability.431 Similarly, IL-7/CCL19-secreting CAR-T cells in a phase I trial, NCT03198546, showed disease control benefits across hepatic, prostatic, and ovarian malignancies.432 Despite these advancements, CAR-NK applications in solid tumors remain clinically underexplored. Promisingly, the safety and efficacy of IL-15-expressing CAR-NK cells in B cell tumors have been demonstrated by a phase 1/2 trial, NCT03056339, with 70% of patients remaining in CR at 12 months and no patients suffering neurotoxicity or graft-versus-host disease.433 In cancer therapy, recent advances in nanotechnology have provided novel exogenous chemokine and cytokine delivery strategies for targeted transport in therapeutic applications.434 These nanocarriers can be precisely engineered to excel in releasing IL-1β and CXCL10, thereby establishing a local pro-inflammatory environment that promotes the influx of immune cells.435 Moreover, Chen et al. constructed a tumor acidity-responsive nanoparticle delivery system (NP-siCD47/CCL25) that enabled intratumoral delivery of CCL25, significantly enhancing CCR9+ CD8+ T cells infiltration and improving PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapeutic efficacy.436 Intriguingly, the novel erythrocyte-anchored nanoparticle platform ImmunoBait enables CXCL10 chemokine delivery through tumor-associated vasculature, thereby bypassing vascular barriers and recruiting CD8+ T cells and NK cells to tumors.437 Parallel innovations involve a nanopolymer for IL-2 delivery, which is a biodegradable carrier with minimal toxicity.438 Peritumoural injection of this nanopolymer was reported to promote the infiltration of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and NK cells into the TME, suppressing tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice.438 Unlike traditional adenovirus-based IL-2 delivery, which often necessitates multiple injections and results in dose-dependent toxicity, employment of nanotechnology enables reduced administration frequency while maintaining therapeutic efficacy, thereby significantly mitigating IL-2-associated adverse effects.439,440 However, such nanopolymer delivery exhibits limited sustainability, necessitating frequent administration. Delivery of circular RNA (circRNA) via H1L1A1B3 lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) resolves this challenge by providing sustained therapeutic payload release.441 A single intratumoral injection of H1L1A1B3 LNPs loaded with circRNA encoding interleukin-12 (IL-12) induces a robust immune response and significantly suppresses tumor growth in a Lewis lung carcinoma model.441 Collectively, these studies demonstrate that modulating chemokine/cytokine gradients, either endogenously or via advanced delivery systems, constitutes a validated hypothesis for restoring immune cell infiltration by targeting their migratory mechanisms and helping them overcome the biological barriers present in the TME.
Given that supraphysiological cytokine levels in inflammatory disorders risk triggering cytokine release syndrome, the core strategy for targeting cytokines under inflammatory conditions lies in augmenting their beneficial effects at low dose rather than merely elevating their overall concentrations.394 Engineered IL-2 analogs with selectivity for the trimeric high-affinity IL-2R can selectively expand Tregs, which subsequently suppress pathogenic autoreactive T cell infiltration into inflamed tissues and promote protective regulatory immune responses.442 However, due to its short half-life (<15 min), high amounts of intravenous IL-2 were required and were associated with severe nonspecific toxicities.443 Although low-dose IL-2 therapy avoids severe toxicities and demonstrates favorable efficacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,444 its off-target effects prove challenging to circumvent and frequently precipitate treatment failure.442,443 Engineered cytokine variants are another novel strategy to address the dose-limiting toxicities associated with high-dose cytokine administration. IL-10 variants with enhanced binding to IL-10Rβ display augmented potency, with robust activity even at low doses in monocytes, thereby limiting their ability to recruit inflammatory immune cell subsets.445 Additionally, prolongation of cytokine half-life achieved by protein fusions also demonstrates its potential in low-dose administration of cytokines without sacrificing efficiency.394 In mice with chronic autoimmune encephalomyelitis, IL-4-albumin fusion inhibits Th17 cell infiltration into the spinal cord and completely abrogates immune responses to myelin antigen in the spleen, demonstrating its prophylactically and therapeutically advantageous role in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.446
Targeting metabolic reprogramming
Although metabolic reprogramming has been demonstrated to modulate immune cell migration, current metabolically targeted therapeutic strategies primarily focus on modulating the overall functionality of immune cells rather than specifically intervening in their migratory capacity. Consequently, alterations in immune cell infiltration observed following treatment may represent a concomitant effect of metabolic targeting rather than its core therapeutic objective. This constitutes a fundamental distinction from the aforementioned therapeutic approaches directly targeting cytokine or chemokine pathways.
Targeting lactate metabolism has shown promise in modulating immune suppression within the TME. Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH-A) by oxamate in combination with PD-1 blockade pembrolizumab restores T cell function and enhances CD8⁺T cell infiltration by reducing lactic acid accumulation in tumors, thereby improving immunosurveillance and sensitizing immunotherapy.447 Similarly, preclinical trials have shown that the combination of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) inhibitor AZD3965 and anti-PD-1 therapy can reduce lactate secretion into the TME, reduce the infiltration of Tregs in solid tumors, and improve antitumor immunity.448 In autoimmune or chronic inflammatory diseases, the glycolytic reprogramming of immune cells contributes to excessive inflammation and tissue infiltration. Dioscin can suppress glycolysis by inhibiting the HIF-1α/mTORC1 signaling pathway. During silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis, dioscin partially attenuates chronic pulmonary inflammation by suppressing the infiltration of M1 macrophages, B cells, and T helper cells.449 Similarly, inhibition of glycolysis via 2-DG in macrophages dampens LPS-induced chemokine secretion and impairs chemotactic migration, thereby limiting inflammatory T cell infiltration in models of acute lung injury.450
Recent advances have also demonstrated that targeting key nodes of lipid metabolism not only alters the bioenergetic state of immune cells but is also associated with increased immune cell infiltration, thereby indicating potential therapeutic effects in cancer and inflammatory diseases. Metabolic reprogramming within the TME often restricts glucose availability, forcing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), especially CD8⁺ T cells, to rely on fatty acid oxidation (FAO) for energy.451 Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) using fenofibrate enhances the FAO capacity of CD8⁺ TILs, thereby improving their survival, motility and cytotoxic function in lipid-rich, hypoglycemic environments.452 Beyond enhancing FAO, modulating lipid uptake can also impact immune cell localization. CD36, a key scavenger receptor mediating fatty acid uptake, has been implicated in inducing lipid peroxidation and dysfunction in TILs within the TME.453 Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of CD36 restores CD8⁺ T cell fitness and promotes their accumulation at tumor sites, leading to suppressed tumor progression.453,454 Similarly, in inflammatory diseases such as ulcerative colitis (UC), targeting lipid metabolic pathways modulates immune cell recruitment and activation in affected tissues. PPAR-α activation by fenofibrate reduces the infiltration of pro-inflammatory T helper subsets (Th1/Th17) by altering their metabolic programming, which in turn dampens the production of cytokines.455 This immune rebalancing contributes to the resolution of intestinal inflammation in susceptible models.
Dietary intervention offers a novel therapeutic paradigm for metabolically targeted approaches by modulating host metabolism at the macroenvironmental level. A fasting or fasting-mimicking diet (FMD) was shown to remodel the intratumoral immune landscape by promoting the infiltration of activated and cytotoxic immune cell populations, including CD8+ T cells, M1 macrophages, and NK cells.456 A recent phase II clinical trial (NCT04248998) demonstrated that the combination of FMD with chemotherapy achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 56.6% in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer, with a favorable safety profile.457 In the context of autoimmune disorders, intermittent fasting exerts protective effects by increasing the infiltration of Tregs and simultaneously diminishing the number of pro-inflammatory IL-17-producing T cells, thereby mitigating disease progression in multiple sclerosis.458 In addition to fasting, healthy dietary interventions also exert targeted immunomodulatory effects. Phenolic compounds in extravirgin olive oil, an essential component of the Mediterranean diet, attenuate immune cell infiltration and tissue damage in inflammatory arthritis models by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandin E₂ levels, thereby reducing joint edema, leukocyte infiltration and structural degradation.459 Similarly, dietary protein restriction or selective amino acid limitation, such as methionine or cystine, enhances the infiltration and tumoricidal activity of CD8⁺ T cells while curbing the recruitment of immunosuppressive MDSCs.460 Mechanistically, moderate protein restriction activates the unfolded protein response (UPR) in tumor cells via IRE1α, which potentiates CD8⁺ T cell recruitment and bolsters antitumor immunosurveillance.461 In contrast, detrimental dietary patterns can promote pathological immune cell infiltration. High-fat diets (HFD) are implicated in fostering liver metastasis via hepatocyte-derived extracellular vesicles that propagate YAP-regulating microRNAs, culminating in nuclear CYR61 overexpression and M2-like macrophage infiltration.341 HFD-induced adipose tissue hypoxia and inflammation further exemplify this mechanism, wherein inflammation-driven adipocyte dysfunction activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and promotes the infiltration of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, aggravating systemic insulin resistance.462,463 Moreover, elevated intake of dietary salt can exacerbate autoimmune conditions by promoting the induction of pathogenic Th17 cells, contributing to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.464 Interestingly, research has also shown that a high-salt diet can impair cytokine networks critical for MDSC expansion and thus attenuate the accumulation of MDSCs within the tumor niche.465 These results suggest that modification of detrimental dietary patterns may confer therapeutic benefits, although its potential warrants further rigorous investigation.
Targeting tertiary lymphoid structures
TLSs frequently undergo spatial structural remodeling in response to therapeutic interventions, creating a permissive destination for migratory immune cells466 (Fig. 6). However, therapeutic strategies targeting TLSs diverge substantially between oncology and inflammatory diseases. In oncology, the primary approach involves facilitating TLS maturation to augment the infiltration of antitumor immune cells. Conversely, in inflammatory disorders, therapeutic efforts are directed toward preventing the formation of TLSs, thereby reducing the migration of pathogenic immune cells.
Recent preclinical studies have underscored the therapeutic potential of promoting TLS formation and maturation to optimize immune cell infiltration and improve antitumor immunity. The administration of recombinant human IL-33 protein induces intratumoral expansion of lymphoneogenic ILC2s and facilitates the development of TLSs in PDAC mouse models, establishing organized hubs for adaptive immune activation.218 The formation of TLSs can also be induced by a novel fusion protein, LIGHT-VTP, consisting of the TNF superfamily cytokine LIGHT and vascular targeting peptide (VTP).467 When combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, LIGHT-VTP stimulates the trafficking of preexisting endogenous effector T cells and promotes their intratumoral activation, outperforming conventional immunotherapies in preclinical evaluations.467 Clinical translation is evidenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced TLS maturation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, which maintains T cells with preserved responsiveness to ICB.468 Within the TLS, HEVs function as specialized lymphocyte trafficking conduits, whose functional status directly governs the recruitment efficiency of immune cells.469–471 Emerging evidence demonstrates that targeted modulation of HEV functional status enhances TLS-mediated immunogenicity, providing a paradigm to refine contemporary immunotherapeutic regimens.470 Former studies reveal that HEV density positively correlates with both T and B cell infiltration while serving as a prognostic biomarker in malignant patients.472 Mechanistically, the lymphotoxin (LT)/LTβR signaling pathway has been identified as the principal regulator of HEV maturation and maintenance.473 Therapeutic activation of this pathway through LTβR agonists has shown significant enhancement of immunotherapy efficacy in preclinical models.474 Recent advances highlight synergistic strategies for HEV maturation beyond LTβR agonists. Dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade substantially augments both the density and functional maturation of HEVs, thereby enhancing endogenous lymphocyte trafficking.475 Complementary approaches combining anti-angiogenic agents with PD-L1 inhibitors demonstrate similar potentiation of immunotherapeutic effects by inducing HEV maturation.476
In autoimmune diseases and chronic inflammatory conditions, which are typically characterized by the immune system’s attack on self-tissues, the emergence and maturation of TLSs are often associated with poorer prognoses.477 Thus, inhibition of TLS formation has become a potential therapeutic strategy. As pivotal drivers of TLS development, Th17 and Tfh cells constitute critical therapeutic targets in inflammatory disorders. During viral myocarditis (VMC), targeting Th17 cells by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as podoplanin (PDPN) mAb, suppresses their proliferation and activation, thereby inhibiting the formation of ectopic TLSs.478 Consequently, the recruitment of pro-inflammatory CD68⁺ M1 macrophages and B cells mediated by ectopic TLS is blocked, leading to reduced production of anti-heart autoantibodies and ameliorating VMC symptoms.478 Similar experimental outcomes were replicated in a Sjögren’s syndrome model, where anti-IL-17A antibodies suppressed infiltration of GL7+ germinal center B cells, thereby ameliorating tissue damage due to autoimmune responses.479 Tfh cells also contribute to the recruitment and activation of B cells, mediating TLS formation.480 Targeting Tfh cells with ICOS-neutralizing antibodies significantly suppresses the formation of TLSs as well as the infiltration of B cells and plasma cells, thereby alleviating the process of renal fibrosis.481
Targeting extracellular matrix
In contrast to TLSs, which typically facilitate immune cell trafficking into tumors, the ECM often serves as a predominant driver of the physical barrier, necessitating focused strategies for therapeutic targeting482 (Fig. 6). In inflammatory diseases, ECM-targeted therapies are primarily aimed at mitigating fibroproliferative pathology, with no established role in modulating immune cell migration.483 One prominent therapeutic strategy targeting the ECM in oncology involves inhibiting the deposition and cross-linking of collagen. Hsp47 constitutes a critical regulator of collagen deposition within the ECM.484 Functioning as a molecular chaperone, Hsp47 facilitates procollagen folding and maturation in the endoplasmic reticulum, thereby enhancing collagen secretion into the ECM.485 Col003, an inhibitor disrupting the Hsp47-collagen association, suppresses collagen maturation and secretion, which in turn reduces ECM density and rigidity, thereby facilitating CTL infiltration and enhancing the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy.486 However, clinical trials evaluating Col003 have not yet been initiated, and its therapeutic potential in patients requires further investigation. Lysyl oxidases (LOX) are the major enzymes that catalyze covalent cross-linking of both collagens and elastin, contributing to the formation and increased stiffness of ECM.487,488 Recombinant collagenase, such as LOX inhibitor, has gained traction as a potential oncological therapeutic by directly depleting collagen.375 Given their capacity to modulate ECM density and stiffness, LOX inhibitors may also restore immune cell infiltration by alleviating physical barriers to migration. PXS-5505, a pan-LOX inhibitor, has been reported not only to facilitate CTL infiltration but also to enhance the gemcitabine response in pancreatic cancer, suggesting a dual role in modifying both tumor stroma and migratory accessibility.489 However, clinical trials of PXS-5505 have thus far been conducted exclusively in myelofibrosis, with its efficacy and safety in solid malignancies remaining unexplored.490 Similarly, the anti-tumor efficacy of the dual LOX/LOXL2 inhibitor CCT36562 has been demonstrated solely in murine models, with no clinical trials conducted to date.491 The efficacy of the selective LOXL2 inhibitor simtuzumab in combination with gemcitabine has been evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind study. Unfortunately, simtuzumab failed to confer additional clinical benefit over gemcitabine monotherapy for first-line treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.492 This may indicate that partial LOX axis blockade is insufficient to overcome redundant stromal mechanisms that continue to restrict immune cell infiltration, including persistently activated CAFs.493
Given the suboptimal clinical efficacy of directly targeting ECM-modifying enzymes, where CAFs represent a prominent confounding factor underlying these results, therapeutic strategies specifically directed against CAFs have thus emerged. One major approach is to directly eliminate CAFs by targeting specific surface markers such as FAP, thereby fundamentally blocking CAF-induced ECM remodeling and the impairment of immune cell infiltration.494 FAP-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cell treatment (CAR-T) can explicitly deplete FAP+ CAFs, overcoming stroma-dependent T cell exclusion and altering the immune landscape by reducing myeloid cell accumulation and increasing endogenous CD8+ T cell and NK cell infiltration.495 Recently, a phase I clinical trial (NCT01722149) investigating FAP-specific CAR-T cell therapy in four patients with metastatic pleural mesothelioma (MPM) demonstrated an acceptable safety profile.496 However, the limited sample size precluded definitive assessment of treatment efficacy, warranting further investigation.496 Infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is another novel approach to remove CAFs. Mechanistically, NIR-PIT utilizes antibody-IRDye700DX (IR700) conjugates that bind to FAP+ CAFs. Subsequent near-infrared light irradiation drives a dramatic change in the solubility of conjugate, culminating in rapid plasma membrane disruption and highly ICD of targeted FAP+ CAFs.497 This technology constitutes a novel approach for CAF-targeted therapeutic strategies. However, its efficacy remains to be validated in further clinical trials.
Overall, these findings collectively support a conceptual framework whereby targeting ECM remodeling may facilitate immune cell migration by overcoming both physical and biochemical stromal barriers. Further investigations are warranted to explore whether combining these agents with chemokine axis modulators could synergistically restore effective immune cell trafficking into tumors.
Targeting microbiota
Therapeutic strategies targeting microbiota encompass selective depletion or supplementation of defined bacterial taxa and modulation of microbiota-derived metabolites (Fig. 6). Emerging insights into intratumoral microbiota dynamics are unveiling novel therapeutic opportunities for enhancing antitumor immunity.498 In breast cancer mouse models, F. nucleatum colonization exacerbates tumor metastatic potential through Gal-GalNAc-mediated impairment of T cell infiltration.499 Targeted clearance of Fusobacterium nucleatum within tumor niches through metronidazole or bacteriophage resulted in marked inhibition of both local tumor expansion and distal metastatic dissemination.499,500 Neutrophil depletion leads to significant expansion of intratumoral bacteria such as Akkermansia. These bacteria boost B-cell infiltration via IL-17, thereby driving immune evasion and tumor cell proliferation.501 In neutrophil-deficient mouse models, antibiotic depletion of Akkermansia ameliorates intratumoral dysbiosis and significantly attenuates tumor invasion, demonstrating therapeutic potential by disrupting this bacterial-immune axis.501 In addition to targeted clearance of microbiota, engineered consortia introduction constitutes another potential strategy in oncological immunotherapy. Researchers designed an attenuated Salmonella typhimurium strain that released Vibrio trauma flagellum B (FlaB) in the tumor, promoting M1 macrophage infiltration through TLR4 signaling.502 Additionally, a probiotic strain of E. coli Nissle 1917 was engineered to target mouse tumors and transform the accumulated metabolic product ammonia in the TME into L-arginine, which increased the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and had marked synergistic effects with PD-L1 blocking antibodies in the clearance of tumors.503
Beyond intratumoral microbiota, gut microbiomes exert increasingly recognized impacts on tumors and autoimmune diseases. Clostridium butyricum (C.B.), a bacterium that is found in the gut microbiota, has demonstrated antitumor potential in colorectal cancer (CRC).504 Treatment with CB results in proteasomal degradation of oncogenic MYC protein and enhanced infiltration of CD8+ T cells. These findings underscore the important mechanisms of microbiota in boosting the effectiveness of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in CRC.505 Contrary to C.B., a recent investigation identified a new strain of the bacterial genus Hominenteromicrobium (designated YB328) isolated from the feces of patients who responded to PD-1 blockade.506 Oral administration of YB328 augments the antitumor efficacy of PD-1 blockade by promoting the migration of cDCs from gut-associated lymphoid tissue to the TME, thereby enhancing CD8+ T cell activation.506 The impact of microbial metabolites on immune cell trafficking is increasingly recognized, consequently catalyzing the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Propionic acid and butyrate are significant short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced by bacteria such as Coprococcus, Ruminococcaceae, and Clostridium.507 Propionic acid-mediated GPR43 activation has been reported to inhibit pathogenic CD4+ and CD8+ T cell egress from the colonic lamina propria, abrogating their CNS infiltration and attenuating autoimmune encephalomyelitis progression.508 Oral propionate administration has been demonstrated to significantly improve clinical outcomes and reduce the annual relapse rate in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).509 In contrast, butyrate administration in drinking water promotes the egress of gut-derived Tregs in nonobese diabetic mice and increases their pancreatic infiltration, suggesting therapeutic potential in type I diabetes through induced immune tolerance.510
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) represents an emerging therapeutic strategy that remains under active investigation. Investigation reveals that FMT can reprogram the gut-tumor immune axis, systemically augmenting the trafficking competence of circulating CD8±T cells to tumor-infiltrated niches.511 Clinical trials are currently evaluating FMT as an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) adjuvant, with preliminary data showing restored anti-PD-1 responsiveness in refractory metastatic melanoma patients receiving microbiota from ICI-responsive donors.512,513 FMT also exhibits potential in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. In SLE patients, FMT elevates Lactobacillus johnsonii-derived inosine, which suppresses the expression of B cell migration-associated genes via the ERK-HIF-1α pathway, thereby reducing renal B cell infiltration and ameliorating lupus symptoms.514 Clinical trials further demonstrate that FMT mitigates autoimmune responses and preserves pancreatic β-cell function in type I diabetes by reducing pathogenic CD8+ T cell migration while promoting Treg infiltration.515 However, a critical challenge in FMT lies in the current inability to establish standardized criteria defining an “optimized fecal microbiota”, which consequently constrains its clinical translation in contrast to prebiotic interventions. Water-soluble polysaccharide extracted from Ganoderma lucidum (GLP) has been demonstrated to suppress tumor and inflammation progression by inhibiting macrophage infiltration and downregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, iNOS, and COX-2.516 Conversely, inulin modulates the relative abundance of Lactobacillus, Dubosiella and the Prevotellaceae_NK3B31 group within the gut microbiota, thereby enhancing SCFA production and indirectly limiting Th17 cell infiltration into the CNS, ultimately attenuating autoimmune neuroinflammation.517
Conclusion and perspective
Immune cell migration constitutes a cornerstone of effective cancer immunotherapy and inflammatory disease resolution by orchestrating the spatiotemporal dynamics of immune surveillance and effector functions across diverse pathological contexts. This review elucidates the navigation mechanisms by which immune cells from diverse sources infiltrate tumors and inflammatory microenvironments through coordinated cellular and molecular interactions. These migratory processes facilitate the recruitment, activation, and spatial reprogramming of immune subsets that either suppress or exacerbate disease progression. Overall, a nuanced understanding of immune cell trafficking not only enables the precise optimization of immune spatial distribution but also offers novel immunomodulatory avenues for restraining pathogenic inflammation.
Despite remarkable advances in mechanistic insights, critical challenges persist in translating immune migration into clinically actionable strategies. One principal obstacle is the heterogeneity of tumor or inflammatory microenvironments and interindividual variability that impact immune cell infiltration. This variability arises from complex factors such as chemokine gradients, adhesion molecule landscapes, ECM remodeling, metabolic reprogramming and microbiome modulation, which complicate therapeutic response, necessitating personalized stratification frameworks. Moreover, current limitations in imaging methodologies for tracking immune cell migration are further compounded by insufficient imaging safety profiles and suboptimal spatiotemporal resolution.250,251,253–255 These technical constraints, along with patient-specific variability in immune responses, complicate the development of standardized protocols for effectively harnessing immune cell migration. Addressing these challenges necessitates multidisciplinary innovation, including advancing real-time in vivo imaging, improving molecular tagging strategies, and developing integrated platforms that combine high-resolution data with functional clinical endpoints.
Future research on immune cell migration is entering a transformative phase driven by three synergistic frontiers: mechanistic dissection, therapeutic innovation, and technological convergence. Comprehensive investigation of the regulatory networks governing immune cell migration, particularly from nontraditional sources such as the gut, will not only uncover novel mechanistic insights into immune cell trafficking but also identify innovative therapeutic targets across both cancer and inflammatory diseases. The integration of multidisciplinary technologies prominently involves therapeutic strategies and imaging modalities. The strategic implementation of biomaterials has enabled precision-targeted therapeutic approaches through biologically engineered delivery mechanisms. While incorporation of material science and sequencing with intravital imaging multidimensional tracking of immune dynamics, resolving previously inaccessible spatiotemporal patterns of immune cell migration.242,243,245–247 Assimilating these molecular insights with technological innovations will ultimately pave the way for precision immunotherapies that effectively harness the full potential of immune cell migration to treat both malignancies and inflammation.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U25C2032, 82573645). Y.-Z.J. is a SANS exploration scholar.
Author contributions
Yufeng Lu and Di Shao drafted and conceptualized the initial manuscript. Supervision and strategic direction were provided by Yi Xiao, Yi-Zhou Jiang and Zhi-Ming Shao. All authors have read and approved the review article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Yufeng Lu, Di Shao.
Contributor Information
Yi Xiao, Email: yixiao11@fudan.edu.cn.
Yi-Zhou Jiang, Email: yizhoujiang@fudan.edu.cn.
Zhi-Ming Shao, Email: zhimin_shao@yeah.net.
References
- 1.Hajishengallis, G., Netea, M. G. & Chavakis, T. Trained immunity in chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol.25, 497–514 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pisetsky, D. S. Pathogenesis of autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol.19, 509–524 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oliveira, G. & Wu, C. J. Dynamics and specificities of T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer23, 295–316 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roerden, M. & Spranger, S. Cancer immune evasion, immunoediting and intratumour heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.25, 353–369 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miner, J. J. & Fitzgerald, K. A. A path towards personalized medicine for autoinflammatory and related diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.19, 182–189 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morad, G., Helmink, B. A., Sharma, P. & Wargo, J. A. Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell184, 5309–5337 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Villablanca, E. J., Selin, K. & Hedin, C. R. H. Mechanisms of mucosal healing: treating inflammatory bowel disease without immunosuppression? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.19, 493–507 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Konzett, V. & Aletaha, D. Management strategies in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.20, 760–769 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cruz de Casas, P., Knöpper, K., Dey Sarkar, R. & Kastenmüller, W. Same yet different—how lymph node heterogeneity affects immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol.24, 358–374 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sepich-Poore, G. D. et al. The microbiome and human cancer. Science371, eabc4552 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Swann, J. W., Olson, O. C. & Passegué, E. Made to order: emergency myelopoiesis and demand-adapted innate immune cell production. Nat. Rev. Immunol.24, 596–613 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mempel, T. R., Lill, J. K. & Altenburger, L. M. How chemokines organize the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Cancer24, 28–50 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu, Z., Chen, X., Han, F., & Leeansyah, E. MAIT cell homing in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Sci. Adv. 11, eadu4172 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Rojas, O. L. et al. Recirculating intestinal IgA-producing cells regulate neuroinflammation via IL-10. Cell176, 610–624.e18 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu, J., Zhang, X., Cheng, Y. & Cao, X. Dendritic cell migration in inflammation and immunity. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 2461–2471 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Yao, X. & Matosevic, S. Chemokine networks modulating natural killer cell trafficking to solid tumors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.59, 36–45 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin, X. et al. Gut-X axis. iMeta4, e270 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tajik, N. et al. Targeting zonulin and intestinal epithelial barrier function to prevent onset of arthritis. Nat. Commun.11, 1995 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schnell, A. et al. Stem-like intestinal Th17 cells give rise to pathogenic effector T cells during autoimmunity. Cell184, 6281–6298 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ronaldson-Bouchard, K. et al. Engineering complexity in human tissue models of cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.184, 114181 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Teillaud, J.-L., Houel, A., Panouillot, M., Riffard, C. & Dieu-Nosjean, M.-C. Tertiary lymphoid structures in anticancer immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer24, 629–646 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang, Z.-Z. et al. Stromal cells and B cells orchestrate ectopic lymphoid tissue formation in nasal polyps. Allergy76, 1416–1431 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Posch, F. et al. Maturation of tertiary lymphoid structures and recurrence of stage II and III colorectal cancer. Oncoimmunology7, e1378844 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Chaisemartin, L. et al. Characterization of chemokines and adhesion molecules associated with T cell presence in tertiary lymphoid structures in human lung cancer. Cancer Res.71, 6391–6399 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meylan, M. et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures generate and propagate anti-tumor antibody-producing plasma cells in renal cell cancer. Immunity55, 527–541.e5 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Germain, C. et al. Presence of B cells in tertiary lymphoid structures is associated with a protective immunity in patients with lung cancer. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.189, 832–844 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lynch, K. T. et al. Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structure B-cells correlates with patient survival in metastatic melanoma. J. Immunother. Cancer9, e002273 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Overacre-Delgoffe, A. E. et al. Microbiota-specific T follicular helper cells drive tertiary lymphoid structures and anti-tumor immunity against colorectal cancer. Immunity54, 2812–2824.e4 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Devi-Marulkar, P. et al. Regulatory T cells infiltrate the tumor-induced tertiary lymphoïd structures and are associated with poor clinical outcome in NSCLC. Commun. Biol.5, 1416 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Colbeck, E. J. et al. Treg depletion licenses T cell-driven HEV neogenesis and promotes tumor destruction. Cancer Immunol. Res.5, 1005–1015 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.He, D. N., Chen, W. L., Long, K. X., Zhang, X. & Dong, G. F. Association of serum CXCL13 with intrarenal ectopic lymphoid tissue formation in lupus nephritis. J. Immunol. Res.2016, 4832543 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guedj, K. et al. M1 macrophages act as LTβR-independent lymphoid tissue inducer cells during atherosclerosis-related lymphoid neogenesis. Cardiovasc. Res.101, 434–443 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Briend, E. et al. IL-18 associated with lung lymphoid aggregates drives IFNγ production in severe COPD. Respir. Res.18, 159 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Magliozzi, R. et al. ‘Ependymal-in’ gradient of thalamic damage in progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol.92, 670–685 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Randolph, G. J. et al. Lymphoid aggregates remodel lymphatic collecting vessels that serve mesenteric lymph nodes in Crohn disease. Am. J. Pathol.186, 3066–3073 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jerby-Arnon, L. et al. A cancer cell program promotes T cell exclusion and resistance to checkpoint blockade. Cell175, 984–997.e24 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Taifour, T. et al. The tumor-derived cytokine Chi3l1 induces neutrophil extracellular traps that promote T cell exclusion in triple-negative breast cancer. Immunity56, 2755–2772.e8 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cyster, J. G. Chemokines and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Science286, 2098–2102 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cyster, J. G. Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Annu. Rev. Immunol.23, 127–159 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Neely, H. R. & Flajnik, M. F. Emergence and evolution of secondary lymphoid organs. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.32, 693–711 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wu, C. et al. Spleen mediates a distinct hematopoietic progenitor response supporting tumor-promoting myelopoiesis. J. Clin. Invest.128, 3425–3438 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Robbins, C. S. et al. Extramedullary hematopoiesis generates Ly-6C(high) monocytes that infiltrate atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation125, 364–374 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Griseri, T., McKenzie, B. S., Schiering, C. & Powrie, F. Dysregulated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell activity promotes interleukin-23-driven chronic intestinal inflammation. Immunity37, 1116–1129 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bronte, V. & Pittet, M. J. The spleen in local and systemic regulation of immunity. Immunity39, 806–818 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cortez-Retamozo, V. et al. Angiotensin II drives the production of tumor-promoting macrophages. Immunity38, 296–308 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dong, W. et al. Targeted spleen modulation: a novel strategy for next-generation disease immunotherapy. Theranostics15, 4416–4445 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rauch, P. J. et al. Innate response activator B cells protect against microbial sepsis. Science335, 597–601 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Auffray, C. et al. CX3CR1+ CD115+ CD135+ common macrophage/DC precursors and the role of CX3CR1 in their response to inflammation. J. Exp. Med.206, 595–606 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kang, S.-J., Liang, H.-E., Reizis, B. & Locksley, R. M. Regulation of hierarchical clustering and activation of innate immune cells by dendritic cells. Immunity29, 819–833 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity39, 1–10 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Veerman, K., Tardiveau, C., Martins, F., Coudert, J. & Girard, J.-P. Single-cell analysis reveals heterogeneity of high endothelial venules and different regulation of genes controlling lymphocyte entry to lymph nodes. Cell Rep.26, 3116–3131.e5 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chaurio, R. A. et al. TGF-β-mediated silencing of genomic organizer SATB1 promotes Tfh cell differentiation and formation of intra-tumoral tertiary lymphoid structures. Immunity55, 115–128.e9 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Marciscano, A. E. & Anandasabapathy, N. The role of dendritic cells in cancer and anti-tumor immunity. Semin. Immunol.52, 101481 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Moussion, C. & Girard, J.-P. Dendritic cells control lymphocyte entry to lymph nodes through high endothelial venules. Nature479, 542–546 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sl, T., Jm, T. & Dm, P. Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Science367, eaax0182 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Pittet, M. J., Di Pilato, M., Garris, C. & Mempel, T. R. Dendritic cells as shepherds of T cell immunity in cancer. Immunity56, 2218–2230 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jobin, K. et al. A distinct priming phase regulates CD8 T cell immunity by orchestrating paracrine IL-2 signals. Science388, eadq1405 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Matloubian, M. et al. Lymphocyte egress from thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs is dependent on S1P receptor 1. Nature427, 355–360 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Benechet, A. P. et al. T cell-intrinsic S1PR1 regulates endogenous effector T-cell egress dynamics from lymph nodes during infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.113, 2182–2187 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Okuniewska, M. et al. SPNS2 enables T cell egress from lymph nodes during an immune response. Cell Rep.36, 109368 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Arnon, T. I. et al. GRK2-dependent S1PR1 desensitization is required for lymphocytes to overcome their attraction to blood. Science333, 1898–1903 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Allan, R. S. et al. Migratory dendritic cells transfer antigen to a lymph node-resident dendritic cell population for efficient CTL priming. Immunity25, 153–162 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ataide, M. A. et al. Lymphatic migration of unconventional T cells promotes site-specific immunity in distinct lymph nodes. Immunity55, 1813–1828.e9 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Brown, H., Komnick, M. R., Brigleb, P. H., Dermody, T. S. & Esterházy, D. Lymph node sharing between pancreas, gut, and liver leads to immune crosstalk and regulation of pancreatic autoimmunity. Immunity56, 2070–2085.e11 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hiltensperger, M. et al. Skin and gut imprinted helper T cell subsets exhibit distinct functional phenotypes in central nervous system autoimmunity. Nat. Immunol.22, 880–892 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hou, L. et al. SerpinB1 controls encephalitogenic T helper cells in neuroinflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.116, 20635–20643 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang, Y. et al. Tumor-draining lymph nodes: opportunities, challenges, and future directions in colorectal cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunother. Cancer12, e008026 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Huang, Q. et al. The primordial differentiation of tumor-specific memory CD8+ T cells as bona fide responders to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in draining lymph nodes. Cell185, 4049–4066 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 69.Connolly, K. A. et al. A reservoir of stem-like CD8+ T cells in the tumor-draining lymph node preserves the ongoing antitumor immune response. Sci. Immunol.6, eabg7836 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Prokhnevska, N. et al. CD8+ T cell activation in cancer comprises an initial activation phase in lymph nodes followed by effector differentiation within the tumor. Immunity56, 107–124.e5 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rahim, M. K. et al. Dynamic CD8+ T cell responses to cancer immunotherapy in human regional lymph nodes are disrupted in metastatic lymph nodes. Cell186, 1127–1143.e18 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gu, Y. et al. Tumor-educated B cells selectively promote breast cancer lymph node metastasis by HSPA4-targeting IgG. Nat. Med.25, 312–322 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kos, K. et al. Tumor-educated Tregs drive organ-specific metastasis in breast cancer by impairing NK cells in the lymph node niche. Cell Rep.38, 110447 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ji, H. et al. Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.8, 367 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Reticker-Flynn, N. E. et al. Lymph node colonization induces tumor-immune tolerance to promote distant metastasis. Cell185, 1924–1942.e23 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ogawa, F. et al. Prostanoid induces premetastatic niche in regional lymph nodes. J. Clin. Invest.124, 4882–4894 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Luoma, A. M. et al. Molecular pathways of colon inflammation induced by cancer immunotherapy. Cell182, 655–671.e22 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Keam, S. et al. Toxicity in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Front. Immunol.15, 1447021 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Engblom, C., Pfirschke, C. & Pittet, M. J. The role of myeloid cells in cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Cancer16, 447–462 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 80.Pietras, E. M. et al. Chronic interleukin-1 exposure drives haematopoietic stem cells towards precocious myeloid differentiation at the expense of self-renewal. Nat. Cell Biol.18, 607–618 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chavakis, T., Mitroulis, I. & Hajishengallis, G. Hematopoietic progenitor cells as integrative hubs for adaptation to and fine-tuning of inflammation. Nat. Immunol.20, 802–811 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mills, T. S. et al. A distinct metabolic and epigenetic state drives trained immunity in HSC-derived macrophages from autoimmune mice. Cell Stem. Cell31, 1630–1649.e8 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Waight, J. D. et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell development is regulated by a STAT/IRF-8 axis. J. Clin. Invest.123, 4464–4478 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.McAllister, S. S. & Weinberg, R. A. The tumour-induced systemic environment as a critical regulator of cancer progression and metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol.16, 717–727 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Veglia, F., Sanseviero, E. & Gabrilovich, D. I. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the era of increasing myeloid cell diversity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.21, 485–498 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Meyer, M. A. et al. Breast and pancreatic cancer interrupt IRF8-dependent dendritic cell development to overcome immune surveillance. Nat. Commun.9, 1250 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hao, X. et al. Osteoprogenitor-GMP crosstalk underpins solid tumor-induced systemic immunosuppression and persists after tumor removal. Cell Stem. Cell30, 648–664.e8 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Maryanovich, M. et al. Adrenergic nerve degeneration in bone marrow drives aging of the hematopoietic stem cell niche. Nat. Med.24, 782–791 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Liang, Y., Van Zant, G. & Szilvassy, S. J. Effects of aging on the homing and engraftment of murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood106, 1479–1487 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Fazeli, P. K. et al. Marrow fat and bone-new perspectives. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.98, 935–945 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ambrosi, T. H. et al. Adipocyte accumulation in the bone marrow during obesity and aging impairs stem cell-based hematopoietic and bone regeneration. Cell Stem. Cell20, 771–784.e6 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Duong, L., Pixley, F. J., Nelson, D. J. & Jackaman, C. Aging leads to increased monocytes and macrophages with altered CSF-1 receptor expression and earlier tumor-associated macrophage expansion in murine mesothelioma. Front. Aging3, 848925 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Blacher, E. et al. Aging disrupts circadian gene regulation and function in macrophages. Nat. Immunol.23, 229–236 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tilg, H., Adolph, T. E. & Trauner, M. Gut-liver axis: pathophysiological concepts and clinical implications. Cell Metab.34, 1700–1718 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Agirman, G., Yu, K. B. & Hsiao, E. Y. Signaling inflammation across the gut-brain axis. Science374, 1087–1092 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.S, Z. et al. Gut immune cell trafficking: inter-organ communication and immune-mediated inflammation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.20, 50–64 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Schippers, A. et al. MAdCAM-1/α4β7 integrin-mediated lymphocyte/endothelium interactions exacerbate acute immune-mediated hepatitis in mice. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.11, 1227–1250.e1 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.de Krijger, M. et al. Characterization of gut-homing molecules in non-endstage livers of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease. J. Transl. Autoimmun.3, 100054 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Neumann, K. et al. Connecting liver and gut: murine liver sinusoidal endothelium induces gut tropism of CD4+ T cells via retinoic acid. Hepatology55, 1976–1984 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kim, M. et al. TNFα and IL-1β in the synovial fluid facilitate mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cell migration. Cytokine99, 91–98 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sanmarco, L. M. et al. Gut-licensed IFNγ+ NK cells drive LAMP1+TRAIL+ anti-inflammatory astrocytes. Nature590, 473–479 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ry, S. et al. Trafficking circuit of CD8+ T cells between the intestine and bone marrow governs antitumour immunity. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 1346–1358 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 103.Pal, S. et al. The microbiome restrains melanoma bone growth by promoting intestinal NK and Th1 cell homing to bone. J. Clin. Invest.132, e157340 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Delconte, R. B. et al. Fasting reshapes tissue-specific niches to improve NK cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. Immunity57, 1923–1938.e7 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Nagai, M. et al. Fasting-refeeding impacts immune cell dynamics and mucosal immune responses. Cell178, 1072–1087 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 106.Fridman, W. H., Pagès, F., Sautès-Fridman, C. & Galon, J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat. Rev. Cancer12, 298–306 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Zhang, F. et al. Deconstruction of rheumatoid arthritis synovium defines inflammatory subtypes. Nature623, 616–624 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Thorsson, V. et al. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity48, 812–830.e14 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Schleich, F. et al. Asthma in elderly is characterized by increased sputum neutrophils, lower airway caliber variability and air trapping. Respir. Res.22, 15 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Chung, H. K., McDonald, B. & Kaech, S. M. The architectural design of CD8+ T cell responses in acute and chronic infection: parallel structures with divergent fates. J. Exp. Med.218, e20201730 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Philip, M. & Schietinger, A. CD8+ T cell differentiation and dysfunction in cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol.22, 209–223 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Pritykin, Y. et al. A unified atlas of CD8 T cell dysfunctional states in cancer and infection. Mol. Cell81, 2477–2493.e10 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ballet, R. et al. Chemerin triggers migration of a CD8 T cell subset with natural killer cell functions. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther.31, 2887–2900 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Forkel, H. et al. BCL11B depletion induces the development of highly cytotoxic innate T cells out of IL-15 stimulated peripheral blood αβ CD8+ T cells. Oncoimmunology11, 2148850 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Lechner, M. G. et al. Clonally expanded, thyrotoxic effector CD8+ T cells driven by IL-21 contribute to checkpoint inhibitor thyroiditis. Sci. Transl. Med.15, eadg0675 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Wagner, C. A., Roqué, P. J., Mileur, T. R., Liggitt, D. & Goverman, J. M. Myelin-specific CD8+ T cells exacerbate brain inflammation in CNS autoimmunity. J. Clin. Invest.130, 203–213 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Pais Ferreira, D. et al. Central memory CD8+ T cells derive from stem-like Tcf7hi effector cells in the absence of cytotoxic differentiation. Immunity53, 985–1000.e11 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Bresser, K. et al. Replicative history marks transcriptional and functional disparity in the CD8+ T cell memory pool. Nat. Immunol.23, 791–801 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Xu, Q. et al. Intrinsic STING of CD8 + T cells regulates self-metabolic reprogramming and memory to exert anti-tumor effects. Cell Commun. Signal. CCS23, 99 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Tang, X. et al. Glycolysis inhibition induces anti-tumor central memory CD8+T cell differentiation upon combination with microwave ablation therapy. Nat. Commun. 15, 4665 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 121.Vignali, P. D. A. et al. Hypoxia drives CD39-dependent suppressor function in exhausted T cells to limit antitumor immunity. Nat. Immunol.24, 267–279 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Jansen, C. S. et al. An intra-tumoral niche maintains and differentiates stem-like CD8 T cells. Nature576, 465–470 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ma, C. et al. TGF-β promotes stem-like T cells via enforcing their lymphoid tissue retention. J. Exp. Med.219, e20211538 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Chow, M. T. et al. Intratumoral activity of the CXCR3 chemokine system is required for the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy. Immunity50, 1498–1512.e5 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Luoma, A. M. et al. Tissue-resident memory and circulating T cells are early responders to pre-surgical cancer immunotherapy. Cell185, 2918–2935.e29 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Weaver, C. T., Elson, C. O., Fouser, L. A. & Kolls, J. K. The Th17 pathway and inflammatory diseases of the intestines, lungs, and skin. Annu. Rev. Pathol.8, 477–512 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Honda, K. & Littman, D. R. The microbiota in adaptive immune homeostasis and disease. Nature535, 75–84 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Wu, H.-J. et al. Gut-residing segmented filamentous bacteria drive autoimmune arthritis via T helper 17 cells. Immunity32, 815–827 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Lee, Y. et al. Induction and molecular signature of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nat. Immunol.13, 991–999 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Sun, R. et al. Therapeutic targeting miR130b counteracts diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progression via OX40/OX40L-mediated interaction with Th17 cells. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.7, 80 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Liu, X. et al. Th17 cells secrete TWEAK to trigger epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promote colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Cancer Res.84, 1352–1371 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Crotty, S. T follicular helper cell biology: a decade of discovery and diseases. Immunity50, 1132–1148 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Yin, X., Chen, S. & Eisenbarth, S. C. Dendritic cell regulation of T helper cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol.39, 759–790 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Walker, L. S. K. The link between circulating follicular helper T cells and autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.22, 567–575 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Morita, R. et al. Human blood CXCR5(+)CD4(+) T cells are counterparts of T follicular cells and contain specific subsets that differentially support antibody secretion. Immunity34, 108–121 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Vella, L. A. et al. T follicular helper cells in human efferent lymph retain lymphoid characteristics. J. Clin. Invest.129, 3185–3200 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bassez, A. et al. A single-cell map of intratumoral changes during anti-PD1 treatment of patients with breast cancer. Nat. Med.27, 820–832 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Nagasaki, J. et al. PD-1 blockade therapy promotes infiltration of tumor-attacking exhausted T cell clonotypes. Cell Rep.38, 110331 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Niogret, J. et al. Follicular helper-T cells restore CD8+-dependent antitumor immunity and anti-PD-L1/PD-1 efficacy. J. Immunother. Cancer9, e002157 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Wardell, C. M., Boardman, D. A. & Levings, M. K. Harnessing the biology of regulatory T cells to treat disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.24, 93–111 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Burton, O. T. et al. The tissue-resident regulatory T cell pool is shaped by transient multi-tissue migration and a conserved residency program. Immunity57, 1586–1602.e10 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Itahashi, K. et al. BATF epigenetically and transcriptionally controls the activation program of regulatory T cells in human tumors. Sci. Immunol.7, eabk0957 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Delacher, M. et al. Precursors for nonlymphoid-tissue treg cells reside in secondary lymphoid organs and are programmed by the transcription factor BATF. Immunity52, 295–312.e11 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Sakai, R. et al. Kidney GATA3+ regulatory T cells play roles in the convalescence stage after antibody-mediated renal injury. Cell. Mol. Immunol.18, 1249–1261 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Kumagai, S., Itahashi, K. & Nishikawa, H. Regulatory T cell-mediated immunosuppression orchestrated by cancer: towards an immuno-genomic paradigm for precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.21, 337–353 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Ohkura, N. & Sakaguchi, S. Transcriptional and epigenetic basis of Treg cell development and function: its genetic anomalies or variations in autoimmune diseases. Cell Res.30, 465–474 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Curiel, T. J. et al. Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat. Med.10, 942–949 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Adamczyk, A. et al. GPR15 facilitates recruitment of regulatory T cells to promote colorectal cancer. Cancer Res.81, 2970–2982 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Whiteside, S. K. et al. CCR8 marks highly suppressive Treg cells within tumours but is dispensable for their accumulation and suppressive function. Immunology163, 512–520 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Zhou, J. et al. CCR1hi/CCL5hi macrophage-mediated CCL5hi T cell chemotaxis in salivary gland aggravates Sjögren’s syndrome. J. Adv. Res. 82, 507–520 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 151.Graver, J. C. et al. Association of the CXCL9-CXCR3 and CXCL13-CXCR5 axes with B-cell trafficking in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. J. Autoimmun.123, 102684 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Xu, Y. et al. Tumor-infiltrated activated B cells suppress liver metastasis of colorectal cancers. Cell Rep.40, 111295 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Liu, R. et al. MicroRNAs 15A and 16-1 activate signaling pathways that mediate chemotaxis of immune regulatory B cells to colorectal tumors. Gastroenterology154, 637–651.e7 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Das, S., Shapiro, B., Vucic, E. A., Vogt, S. & Bar-Sagi, D. Tumor cell-derived IL1β promotes desmoplasia and immune suppression in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res.80, 1088–1101 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Mirlekar, B. et al. B cell-derived IL35 drives STAT3-dependent CD8+ T-cell exclusion in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res.8, 292–308 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Wang, Z. et al. Leucine-tRNA-synthase-2-expressing B cells contribute to colorectal cancer immunoevasion. Immunity55, 1067–1081.e8 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Prado, C. et al. Dopaminergic stimulation leads B-cell infiltration into the central nervous system upon autoimmunity. J. Neuroinflammation18, 292 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Geladaris, A. et al. IL-10-providing B cells govern pro-inflammatory activity of macrophages and microglia in CNS autoimmunity. Acta Neuropathol.145, 461–477 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Su, Q.-Y., Jiang, Z.-Q., Song, X.-Y. & Zhang, S.-X. Regulatory B cells in autoimmune diseases: Insights and therapeutic potential. J. Autoimmun.149, 103326 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Worbs, T., Hammerschmidt, S. I. & Förster, R. Dendritic cell migration in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol.17, 30–48 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Hager, F. T. et al. Progressive changes in phenotype, transcriptome and proliferation capacity characterise continued maturation and migration of intestinal cDCs in homeostasis. Nat. Commun.16, 8204 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Del Prete, A. et al. Dendritic cell subsets in cancer immunity and tumor antigen sensing. Cell. Mol. Immunol.20, 432–447 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Böttcher, J. P. et al. NK cells stimulate recruitment of cDC1 into the tumor microenvironment promoting cancer immune control. Cell172, 1022–1037.e14 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Roberts, E. W. et al. Critical role for CD103(+)/CD141(+) dendritic cells bearing CCR7 for tumor antigen trafficking and priming of T cell immunity in melanoma. Cancer Cell30, 324–336 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Alladina, J. et al. A human model of asthma exacerbation reveals transcriptional programs and cell circuits specific to allergic asthma. Sci. Immunol.8, eabq6352 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Cyc, L. et al. Tumour-retained activated CCR7+ dendritic cells are heterogeneous and regulate local anti-tumour cytolytic activity. Nat. Commun. 15, 682 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 167.Chen, Z. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing highlights the role of inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Nat. Commun.11, 5077 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Maier, B. et al. A conserved dendritic-cell regulatory program limits antitumour immunity. Nature580, 257–262 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Xie, Z. et al. The emerging role of dendritic cells in the tumor microenvironment: from antigen presentation to targeted immunotherapy. Cell Death Dis.16, 900 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Yao, R.-Q. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the immune space-time landscape reveals dendritic cell regulatory program in polymicrobial sepsis. Theranostics12, 4606–4628 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Chen, C.-Y. et al. Combining an alarmin HMGN1 peptide with PD-L1 blockade results in robust antitumor effects with a concomitant increase of stem-like/progenitor exhausted CD8+ T cells. Cancer Immunol. Res.9, 1214–1228 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Li, H. et al. Mature tertiary lymphoid structures evoke intra-tumoral T and B cell responses via progenitor exhausted CD4+ T cells in head and neck cancer. Nat. Commun.16, 4228 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Nofech-Mozes, I., Soave, D., Awadalla, P. & Abelson, S. Pan-cancer classification of single cells in the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Commun.14, 1615 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.León, B., López-Bravo, M. & Ardavín, C. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells formed at the infection site control the induction of protective T helper 1 responses against Leishmania. Immunity26, 519–531 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Zigmond, E. et al. Ly6C hi monocytes in the inflamed colon give rise to proinflammatory effector cells and migratory antigen-presenting cells. Immunity37, 1076–1090 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Sisirak, V. et al. CCR6/CCR10-mediated plasmacytoid dendritic cell recruitment to inflamed epithelia after instruction in lymphoid tissues. Blood118, 5130–5140 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Ng, L. G., Liu, Z., Kwok, I. & Ginhoux, F. Origin and heterogeneity of tissue myeloid cells: a focus on GMP-derived monocytes and neutrophils. Annu. Rev. Immunol.41, 375–404 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Tran, S. et al. Impaired Kupffer cell self-renewal alters the liver response to lipid overload during non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Immunity53, 627–640.e5 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Wendisch, D. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers profibrotic macrophage responses and lung fibrosis. Cell184, 6243–6261.e27 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Szabo, P. A. et al. Longitudinal profiling of respiratory and systemic immune responses reveals myeloid cell-driven lung inflammation in severe COVID-19. Immunity54, 797–814.e6 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Qian, B.-Z. et al. CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumour metastasis. Nature475, 222–225 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Zheng, Z. et al. Donor pulmonary intravascular nonclassical monocytes recruit recipient neutrophils and mediate primary lung allograft dysfunction. Sci. Transl. Med.9, eaal4508 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Jung, K. et al. Ly6Clo monocytes drive immunosuppression and confer resistance to anti-VEGFR2 cancer therapy. J. Clin. Invest.127, 3039–3051 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Hanna, R. N. et al. Patrolling monocytes control tumor metastasis to the lung. Science350, 985–990 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Epelman, S., Lavine, K. J. & Randolph, G. J. Origin and functions of tissue macrophages. Immunity41, 21–35 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Ginhoux, F. & Jung, S. Monocytes and macrophages: developmental pathways and tissue homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol.14, 392–404 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Harney, A. S. et al. Real-time imaging reveals local, transient vascular permeability, and tumor cell intravasation stimulated by TIE2hi macrophage-derived VEGFA. Cancer Discov.5, 932–943 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Arwert, E. N. et al. A unidirectional transition from migratory to perivascular macrophage is required for tumor cell intravasation. Cell Rep.23, 1239–1248 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Anstee, J. E. et al. LYVE-1+ macrophages form a collaborative CCR5-dependent perivascular niche that influences chemotherapy responses in murine breast cancer. Dev. Cell58, 1548–1561.e10 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Opzoomer, J. W. et al. Macrophages orchestrate the expansion of a proangiogenic perivascular niche during cancer progression. Sci. Adv.7, eabg9518 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Hegde, S., Leader, A. M. & Merad, M. MDSC: markers, development, states, and unaddressed complexity. Immunity54, 875–884 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Bayik, D. et al. Distinct cell adhesion signature defines glioblastoma myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets. Cancer Res. 82, 4274–4287 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 193.Kalbasi, A. et al. Tumor-derived CCL2 mediates resistance to radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res.23, 137–148 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Siret, C. et al. Deciphering the crosstalk between myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Front. Immunol.10, 3070 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Ouzounova, M. et al. Monocytic and granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells differentially regulate spatiotemporal tumour plasticity during metastatic cascade. Nat. Commun.8, 14979 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Nambiar, D. K. et al. Galectin-1 mediates chronic STING activation in tumors to promote metastasis through MDSC recruitment. Cancer Res.83, 3205–3219 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Zhang, S. et al. Endothelial YAP/TEAD1-CXCL17 signaling recruits myeloid-derived suppressor cells against liver ischemia-reperfusion injury. Hepatology81, 888–902 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Koehn, B. H. et al. Danger-associated extracellular ATP counters MDSC therapeutic efficacy in acute GVHD. Blood134, 1670–1682 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Kolaczkowska, E. & Kubes, P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol.13, 159–175 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Zhang, F. et al. Neutrophil diversity and function in health and disease. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.9, 343 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Kim, D. & Haynes, C. L. The role of p38 MAPK in neutrophil functions: single cell chemotaxis and surface marker expression. Analyst138, 6826–6833 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Lavoie, H., Gagnon, J. & Therrien, M. ERK signalling: a master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.21, 607–632 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Fridlender, Z. G. et al. Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: ‘N1’ versus ‘N2’ TAN. Cancer Cell16, 183–194 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Chan, Y.-T. et al. Pancreatic melatonin enhances anti-tumor immunity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma through regulating tumor-associated neutrophils infiltration and NETosis. Acta Pharm. Sin. B13, 1554–1567 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Lad, M. et al. Glioblastoma induces the recruitment and differentiation of dendritic-like ‘hybrid’ neutrophils from skull bone marrow. Cancer Cell42, 1549–1569.e16 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Vivier, E. et al. Innate lymphoid cells: 10 years on. Cell174, 1054–1066 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Ali, A. et al. Natural killer cell immunosuppressive function requires CXCR3-dependent redistribution within lymphoid tissues. J. Clin. Invest.131, e146686 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Martín-Fontecha, A. et al. Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat. Immunol.5, 1260–1265 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Ottaviani, C. et al. CD56brightCD16(-) NK cells accumulate in psoriatic skin in response to CXCL10 and CCL5 and exacerbate skin inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol.36, 118–128 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Benigni, G. et al. CXCR3/CXCL10 axis regulates neutrophil-NK cell cross-talk determining the severity of experimental osteoarthritis. J. Immunol.198, 2115–2124 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Huntington, N. D., Cursons, J. & Rautela, J. The cancer-natural killer cell immunity cycle. Nat. Rev. Cancer20, 437–454 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Escoto, A. et al. Nuclear EGFR in breast cancer suppresses NK cell recruitment and cytotoxicity. Oncogene44, 288–295 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Russick, J., Torset, C., Hemery, E. & Cremer, I. NK cells in the tumor microenvironment: Prognostic and theranostic impact. Recent advances and trends. Semin. Immunol.48, 101407 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Degos, C. et al. Endometrial tumor microenvironment alters human NK cell recruitment, and resident NK cell phenotype and function. Front. Immunol.10, 877 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Young, A. et al. A2AR adenosine signaling suppresses natural killer cell maturation in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res.78, 1003–1016 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Brand, A. et al. LDHA-associated lactic acid production blunts tumor immunosurveillance by T and NK cells. Cell Metab.24, 657–671 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Qi, J. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic landscape reveals tumor specific innate lymphoid cells associated with colorectal cancer progression. Cell Rep. Med.2, 100353 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Amisaki, M. et al. IL-33-activated ILC2s induce tertiary lymphoid structures in pancreatic cancer. Nature638, 1076–1084 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Huang, Y. et al. IL-25-responsive, lineage-negative KLRG1(hi) cells are multipotential ‘inflammatory’ type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol.16, 161–169 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Bruchard, M. et al. Recruitment and activation of type 3 innate lymphoid cells promote antitumor immune responses. Nat. Immunol.23, 262–274 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Carrega, P. et al. NCR(+)ILC3 concentrate in human lung cancer and associate with intratumoral lymphoid structures. Nat. Commun.6, 8280 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Emgård, J. et al. Oxysterol sensing through the receptor GPR183 promotes the lymphoid-tissue-inducing function of innate lymphoid cells and colonic inflammation. Immunity48, 120–132.e8 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Wang, X. et al. GPR34-mediated sensing of lysophosphatidylserine released by apoptotic neutrophils activates type 3 innate lymphoid cells to mediate tissue repair. Immunity54, 1123–1136.e8 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Nelson, W. J. & Nusse, R. Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science303, 1483–1487 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Pauken, K. E. et al. TCR-sequencing in cancer and autoimmunity: barcodes and beyond. Trends Immunol.43, 180–194 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Zhang, L. et al. Lineage tracking reveals dynamic relationships of T cells in colorectal cancer. Nature564, 268–272 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 227.Feng, W. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the migration of osteoclasts in giant cell tumor of bone. Front. Oncol.11, 715552 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Pai, J. A. & Satpathy, A. T. High-throughput and single-cell T cell receptor sequencing technologies. Nat. Methods18, 881–892 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Zhang, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome atlas of peripheral immune features to Omicron breakthrough infection under booster vaccination strategies. Front. Immunol.15, 1460442 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Bramlett, C. et al. Clonal tracking using embedded viral barcoding and high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Protoc.15, 1436–1458 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Stubbington, M. J. T. et al. T cell fate and clonality inference from single-cell transcriptomes. Nat. Methods13, 329–332 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Gerdemann, U. et al. Identification and tracking of alloreactive t cell clones in rhesus macaques through the RM-scTCR-Seq platform. Front. Immunol.12, 804932 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Ferreira-Gomes, M. et al. Recruitment of plasma cells from IL-21-dependent and IL-21-independent immune reactions to the bone marrow. Nat. Commun.15, 4182 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Kunwar, P. S., Siekhaus, D. E. & Lehmann, R. In vivo migration: a germ cell perspective. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.22, 237–265 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Mackley, E. C. et al. CCR7-dependent trafficking of RORγ+ ILCs creates a unique microenvironment within mucosal draining lymph nodes. Nat. Commun.6, 5862 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Galván-Peña, S., Zhu, Y., Hanna, B. S., Mathis, D. & Benoist, C. A dynamic atlas of immunocyte migration from the gut. Sci. Immunol. 9, eadi0672 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 237.Ni, Z. et al. Recipient c-kit lineage cells repopulate smooth muscle cells of transplant arteriosclerosis in mouse models. Circ. Res.125, 223–241 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Vizoso, M. et al. A doxycycline- and light-inducible Cre recombinase mouse model for optogenetic genome editing. Nat. Commun.13, 6442 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Hasenberg, A. et al. Catchup: a mouse model for imaging-based tracking and modulation of neutrophil granulocytes. Nat. Methods12, 445–452 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Masuzzo, P., Van Troys, M., Ampe, C. & Martens, L. Taking aim at moving targets in computational cell migration. Trends Cell Biol.26, 88–110 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Brückner, D. B. & Broedersz, C. P. Learning dynamical models of single and collective cell migration: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. Phys. Soc. G. B. 87, 056601 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 242.Tu, Y. & Wang, X. Tracking cell migration by cellular force footprint recorded with a mechano-optical biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron.193, 113533 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Shao, N. et al. A bidirectional single-cell migration and retrieval chip for quantitative study of dendritic cell migration. Adv. Sci.10, e2204544 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Vanherberghen, B. et al. Classification of human natural killer cells based on migration behavior and cytotoxic response. Blood121, 1326–1334 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Yuan, L.-X. et al. High precision tracking analysis of cell position and motion fields using 3D U-net network models. Comput. Biol. Med.154, 106577 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Molina-Moreno, M. et al. ACME: automatic feature extraction for cell migration examination through intravital microscopy imaging. Med. Image Anal.77, 102358 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Samal, P., Maurer, P., van Blitterswijk, C., Truckenmüller, R. & Giselbrecht, S. A new microengineered platform for 4D tracking of single cells in a stem-cell-based in vitro morphogenesis model. Adv. Mater.32, e1907966 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Dekaban, G. A. et al. Tracking and evaluation of dendritic cell migration by cellular magnetic resonance imaging. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.5, 469–483 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Kim, J. et al. Use of nanoparticle contrast agents for cell tracking with computed tomography. Bioconjug. Chem.28, 1581–1597 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Kim, I. et al. Real-time, in situ imaging of macrophages via phase-change peptide nanoemulsions. Small19, e2301673 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Meir, R. et al. Nanomedicine for cancer immunotherapy: tracking cancer-specific T-cells in vivo with gold nanoparticles and CT imaging. ACS Nano9, 6363–6372 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Ahrens, E. T. & Bulte, J. W. M. Tracking immune cells in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Rev. Immunol.13, 755–763 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Xu, Y. et al. Superparamagnetic MRI probes for in vivo tracking of dendritic cell migration with a clinical 3 T scanner. Biomaterials58, 63–71 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Lu, D. et al. Metabolic radiolabeling and in vivo PET imaging of cytotoxic T lymphocytes to guide combination adoptive cell transfer cancer therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology19, 175 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.McCracken, M. N. et al. Noninvasive detection of tumor-infiltrating T cells by PET reporter imaging. J. Clin. Invest.125, 1815–1826 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Vakoc, B. J. et al. Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging. Nat. Med.15, 1219–1223 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.SoRelle, E. D. et al. Spatiotemporal tracking of brain-tumor-associated myeloid cells in vivo through optical coherence tomography with plasmonic labeling and speckle modulation. ACS Nano13, 7985–7995 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Nguyen, V. P. et al. Long-term, noninvasive in vivo tracking of progenitor cells using multimodality photoacoustic, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescence imaging. ACS Nano15, 13289–13306 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Fukushima, H. et al. Cyanine phototruncation enables spatiotemporal cell labeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 11075–11080 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Fukushima, H. et al. Phototruncation cell tracking with near-infrared photoimmunotherapy using heptamethine cyanine dye to visualise migratory dynamics of immune cells. EBioMedicine102, 105050 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Iwano, S. et al. Single-cell bioluminescence imaging of deep tissue in freely moving animals. Science359, 935–939 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Khosravi, G.-R. et al. Immunologic tumor microenvironment modulators for turning cold tumors hot. Cancer Commun.44, 521–553 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Björkström, N. K., Strunz, B. & Ljunggren, H.-G. Natural killer cells in antiviral immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.22, 112–123 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Ramírez-Valle, F., Maranville, J. C., Roy, S. & Plenge, R. M. Sequential immunotherapy: towards cures for autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.23, 501–524 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Li, J. et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic factors underlie heterogeneity of immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapy. Immunity49, 178–193.e7 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Raman, D., Baugher, P. J., Thu, Y. M. & Richmond, A. Role of chemokines in tumor growth. Cancer Lett.256, 137–165 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Ban, Y. et al. Targeting autocrine CCL5-CCR5 axis reprograms immunosuppressive myeloid cells and reinvigorates antitumor immunity. Cancer Res.77, 2857–2868 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Kepp, O. et al. Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death. Oncoimmunology3, e955691 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Galluzzi, L. et al. Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death. J. Immunother. Cancer8, e000337 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Mandula, J. K. et al. Ablation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress kinase PERK induces paraptosis and type I interferon to promote anti-tumor T cell responses. Cancer Cell40, 1145–1160.e9 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Jiang, Y. et al. STAT3 palmitoylation initiates a positive feedback loop that promotes the malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in mice. Sci. Signal.16, eadd2282 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Heichler, C. et al. STAT3 activation through IL-6/IL-11 in cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes colorectal tumour development and correlates with poor prognosis. Gut.69, 1269–1282 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Sans, M. et al. Enhanced recruitment of CX3CR1+ T cells by mucosal endothelial cell-derived fractalkine in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology132, 139–153 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Zhao, R. et al. cGAS-activated endothelial cell-T cell cross-talk initiates tertiary lymphoid structure formation. Sci. Immunol.9, eadk2612 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Zhao, L.-D. et al. Contribution and underlying mechanisms of CXCR4 overexpression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell. Mol. Immunol.14, 842–849 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Provoost, S., Maes, T., Joos, G. F. & Tournoy, K. G. Monocyte-derived dendritic cell recruitment and allergic T(H)2 responses after exposure to diesel particles are CCR2 dependent. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.129, 483–491 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Scott, N. A. et al. Monocyte migration profiles define disease severity in acute COVID-19 and unique features of long COVID. Eur. Respir. J.61, 2202226 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Maqdasy, S. et al. Impaired phosphocreatine metabolism in white adipocytes promotes inflammation. Nat. Metab.4, 190–202 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Lin, T.-Y. et al. IL-29 promoted obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance. Cell. Mol. Immunol.17, 369–379 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Kim, S.-J. et al. Adipocyte death preferentially induces liver injury and inflammation through the activation of chemokine (C-C Motif) receptor 2-positive macrophages and lipolysis. Hepatology69, 1965–1982 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Zhao, C. et al. Cancer-associated adipocytes: emerging supporters in breast cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.39, 156 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Huang, R. et al. Targeting cancer-associated adipocyte-derived CXCL8 inhibits triple-negative breast cancer progression and enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Cell Death Dis.14, 703 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Xu, Z. et al. Anatomically distinct fibroblast subsets determine skin autoimmune patterns. Nature601, 118–124 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Yamamura, Y. et al. CXCL12+ fibroblastic reticular cells in lymph nodes facilitate immune tolerance by regulating T cell-mediated alloimmunity. J. Clin. Invest.135, e182709 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Umar, S. et al. CCL25 and CCR9 is a unique pathway that potentiates pannus formation by remodeling RA macrophages into mature osteoclasts. Eur. J. Immunol.51, 903–914 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Hirota, K. et al. Preferential recruitment of CCR6-expressing Th17 cells to inflamed joints via CCL20 in rheumatoid arthritis and its animal model. J. Exp. Med.204, 2803–2812 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Biasci, D. et al. CXCR4 inhibition in human pancreatic and colorectal cancers induces an integrated immune response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.117, 28960–28970 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Denton, A. E. & Linterman, M. A. Stromal networking: cellular connections in the germinal centre. Curr. Opin. Immunol.45, 103–111 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Choi, S. Y. et al. YAP/TAZ direct commitment and maturation of lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells. Nat. Commun.11, 519 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Onder, L. et al. Fibroblastic reticular cells generate protective intratumoral T cell environments in lung cancer. Cell188, 430–446.e20 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Wang, D. et al. Th17 cells inhibit CD8+ T cell migration by systematically downregulating CXCR3 expression via IL-17A/STAT3 in advanced-stage colorectal cancer patients. J. Hematol. Oncol. J. Hematol. Oncol.13, 68 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Rapp, M. et al. CCL22 controls immunity by promoting regulatory T cell communication with dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med.216, 1170–1181 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.La, M. et al. Tumors establish resistance to immunotherapy by regulating Treg recruitment via CCR4. J. Immunother. Cancer8, e000764 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 294.Ma, J. et al. Lysosome blockade induces divergent metabolic programs in macrophages and tumours for cancer immunotherapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.42, 192 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 295.Meiser, P. et al. A distinct stimulatory cDC1 subpopulation amplifies CD8+ T cell responses in tumors for protective anti-cancer immunity. Cancer Cell41, 1498–1515.e10 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Spranger, S., Dai, D., Horton, B. & Gajewski, T. F. Tumor-residing Batf3 dendritic cells are required for effector T cell trafficking and adoptive T cell therapy. Cancer Cell31, 711–723.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Burke, J. D. & Young, H. A. IFN-γ: a cytokine at the right time, is in the right place. Semin. Immunol.43, 101280 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Jorgovanovic, D., Song, M., Wang, L. & Zhang, Y. Roles of IFN-γ in tumor progression and regression: a review. Biomark. Res.8, 49 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Baldominos, P. et al. Quiescent cancer cells resist T cell attack by forming an immunosuppressive niche. Cell185, 1694–1708.e19 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Sato, S. et al. Transcription factor Fli-1 impacts the expression of CXCL13 and regulates immune cell infiltration into the kidney in MRL/lpr mouse. Lupus Sci. Med.10, e000870 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Crapster-Pregont, M., Yeo, J., Sanchez, R. L. & Kuperman, D. A. Dendritic cells and alveolar macrophages mediate IL-13-induced airway inflammation and chemokine production. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.129, 1621–1627.e3 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Wang, Y. et al. Lipid droplet accumulation mediates macrophage survival and Treg recruitment via the CCL20/CCR6 axis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. Mol. Immunol.21, 1120–1130 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Su, S. et al. Blocking the recruitment of naive CD4+ T cells reverses immunosuppression in breast cancer. Cell Res.27, 461–482 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.House, I. G. et al. Macrophage-derived CXCL9 and CXCL10 are required for antitumor immune responses following immune checkpoint blockade. Clin. Cancer Res.26, 487–504 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Ellis, S. L. et al. The cell-specific induction of CXC chemokine ligand 9 mediated by IFN-gamma in microglia of the central nervous system is determined by the myeloid transcription factor PU.1. J. Immunol.185, 1864–1877 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Diana, J. & Lehuen, A. Macrophages and β-cells are responsible for CXCR2-mediated neutrophil infiltration of the pancreas during autoimmune diabetes. EMBO Mol. Med.6, 1090–1104 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Wang, Y. et al. Increased neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3 and augmented NETosis are closely associated with β-cell autoimmunity in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes63, 4239–4248 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Miyabe, Y. et al. Complement C5a receptor is the key initiator of neutrophil adhesion igniting immune complex-induced arthritis. Sci. Immunol.2, eaaj2195 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Lämmermann, T. et al. Neutrophil swarms require LTB4 and integrins at sites of cell death in vivo. Nature498, 371–375 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Kienle, K. et al. Neutrophils self-limit swarming to contain bacterial growth in vivo. Science372, eabe7729 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Zhou, S.-L. et al. Tumor-associated neutrophils recruit macrophages and t-regulatory cells to promote progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and resistance to sorafenib. Gastroenterology150, 1646–1658.e17 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Shaul, M. E. et al. Tumor-associated neutrophils drive B-cell recruitment and their differentiation to plasma cells. Cancer Immunol. Res.9, 811–824 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Fajgenbaum, D. C. & June, C. H. Cytokine storm. N. Engl. J. Med.383, 2255–2273 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Nie, J. et al. Deep insight into cytokine storm: from pathogenesis to treatment. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.10, 112 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Warnatsch, A., Ioannou, M., Wang, Q. & Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science349, 316–320 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Clark, J. T. et al. IL-18BP mediates the balance between protective and pathological immune responses to Toxoplasma gondii. Cell Rep.42, 112147 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Jenkins, M. R. et al. Failed CTL/NK cell killing and cytokine hypersecretion are directly linked through prolonged synapse time. J. Exp. Med.212, 307–317 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Cron, R. Q., Goyal, G. & Chatham, W. W. Cytokine storm syndrome. Annu. Rev. Med.74, 321–337 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Bertoni, A., Alabiso, O., Galetto, A. S. & Baldanzi, G. Integrins in T cell physiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19, 485 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Messmer, J. M. et al. T lymphocyte recruitment to melanoma brain tumors depends on distinct venous vessels. Immunity57, 2688–2703.e11 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Charabati, M. et al. DICAM promotes TH17 lymphocyte trafficking across the blood-brain barrier during autoimmune neuroinflammation. Sci. Transl. Med.14, eabj0473 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Reglero-Real, N. et al. Autophagy modulates endothelial junctions to restrain neutrophil diapedesis during inflammation. Immunity54, 1989–2004.e9 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Hajishengallis, G. & Chavakis, T. DEL-1-Regulated immune plasticity and inflammatory disorders. Trends Mol. Med.25, 444–459 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Li, M., Zhong, D. & Li, G. Regulatory role of local tissue signal Del-1 in cancer and inflammation: a review. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett.26, 31 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Tabasum, S. et al. EDIL3 as an angiogenic target of immune exclusion following checkpoint blockade. Cancer Immunol. Res.11, 1493–1507 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Wang, H. et al. The dual role of POSTN in maintaining glioblastoma stem cells and the immunosuppressive phenotype of microglia in glioblastoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.43, 252 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 327.Zhu, Y. et al. Disruption of tumour-associated macrophage trafficking by the osteopontin-induced colony-stimulating factor-1 signalling sensitises hepatocellular carcinoma to anti-PD-L1 blockade. Gut.68, 1653–1666 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Rassier, D. E. & Månsson, A. Mechanisms of myosin II force generation: insights from novel experimental techniques and approaches. Physiol. Rev.105, 1–93 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Georgouli, M. et al. Regional activation of myosin II in cancer cells drives tumor progression via a secretory cross-talk with the immune microenvironment. Cell176, 757–774.e23 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Chen, H. et al. METTL3 inhibits antitumor immunity by targeting m6A-BHLHE41-CXCL1/CXCR2 axis to promote colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology163, 891–907 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 331.Kumar, M. A. et al. Extracellular vesicles as tools and targets in therapy for diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.9, 27 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Kalluri, R. The biology and function of extracellular vesicles in immune response and immunity. Immunity57, 1752–1768 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Lima, L. G. et al. Tumor microenvironmental cytokines bound to cancer exosomes determine uptake by cytokine receptor-expressing cells and biodistribution. Nat. Commun.12, 3543 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Eizirik, D. L., Colli, M. L. & Ortis, F. The role of inflammation in insulitis and beta-cell loss in type 1 diabetes. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.5, 219–226 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Javeed, N. et al. Pro-inflammatory β cell small extracellular vesicles induce β cell failure through activation of the CXCL10/CXCR3 axis in diabetes. Cell Rep.36, 109613 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Guo, Q. et al. Integrin β1-enriched extracellular vesicles mediate monocyte adhesion and promote liver inflammation in murine NASH. J. Hepatol.71, 1193–1205 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Buzas, E. I., György, B., Nagy, G., Falus, A. & Gay, S. Emerging role of extracellular vesicles in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.10, 356–364 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Costa-Silva, B. et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat. Cell Biol.17, 816–826 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Jiao, Y. et al. Exosomal miR-30d-5p of neutrophils induces M1 macrophage polarization and primes macrophage pyroptosis in sepsis-related acute lung injury. Crit. Care25, 356 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Zhou, J. et al. Exosomes released from tumor-associated macrophages transfer miRNAs that induce a Treg/Th17 cell imbalance in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res.6, 1578–1592 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Wang, Z. et al. Extracellular vesicles in fatty liver promote a metastatic tumor microenvironment. Cell Metab.35, 1209–1226.e13 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Wennerberg, E. et al. CD73 blockade promotes dendritic cell infiltration of irradiated tumors and tumor rejection. Cancer Immunol. Res.8, 465–478 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Zheng, M. et al. The impact of lipids on the cancer-immunity cycle and strategies for modulating lipid metabolism to improve cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B13, 1488–1497 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344.Welte, M. A. & Gould, A. P. Lipid droplet functions beyond energy storage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids1862, 1260–1272 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345.Punyawatthananukool, S. et al. Prostaglandin E2-EP2/EP4 signaling induces immunosuppression in human cancer by impairing bioenergetics and ribosome biogenesis in immune cells. Nat. Commun.15, 9464 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346.Santiso, A., Heinemann, A. & Kargl, J. Prostaglandin E2 in the tumor microenvironment, a convoluted affair mediated by EP receptors 2 and 4. Pharmacol. Rev.76, 388–413 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347.Zhang, X. et al. Farnesyl pyrophosphate potentiates dendritic cell migration in autoimmunity through mitochondrial remodelling. Nat. Metab.6, 2118–2137 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Xiao, Z., Dai, Z. & Locasale, J. W. Metabolic landscape of the tumor microenvironment at single cell resolution. Nat. Commun.10, 3763 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349.Kelly, B. & O’Neill, L. A. J. Metabolic reprogramming in macrophages and dendritic cells in innate immunity. Cell Res.25, 771–784 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Wang, Z. et al. Tumor-secreted lactate contributes to an immunosuppressive microenvironment and affects CD8 T-cell infiltration in glioblastoma. Front. Immunol.14, 894853 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Haas, R. et al. Lactate regulates metabolic and pro-inflammatory circuits in control of T cell migration and effector functions. PLoS Biol.13, e1002202 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Yan, C. et al. GPR65 sensing tumor-derived lactate induces HMGB1 release from TAM via the cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway to promote glioma progression. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.43, 105 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.Mohamed, E., Al-Khami, A. A. & Rodriguez, P. C. The cellular metabolic landscape in the tumor milieu regulates the activity of myeloid infiltrates. Cell. Mol. Immunol.15, 421–427 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Young, A. et al. Co-inhibition of CD73 and A2AR adenosine signaling improves anti-tumor immune responses. Cancer Cell30, 391–403 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Woo, M. S. et al. Calcium channel β3 subunit regulates ATP-dependent migration of dendritic cells. Sci. Adv.9, eadh1653 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Gilkes, D. M., Semenza, G. L. & Wirtz, D. Hypoxia and the extracellular matrix: drivers of tumour metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer14, 430–439 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Barsoum, I. B., Koti, M., Siemens, D. R. & Graham, C. H. Mechanisms of hypoxia-mediated immune escape in cancer. Cancer Res.74, 7185–7190 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.As, M., Ma, S.-G. & Sr, W. How oxygenation shapes immune responses: emerging roles for physioxia and pathological hypoxia. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 25, 161–177 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 359.El, C. et al. Transmigrating neutrophils shape the mucosal microenvironment through localized oxygen depletion to influence resolution of inflammation. Immunity40, 66–77 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 360.Sattiraju, A. et al. Hypoxic niches attract and sequester tumor-associated macrophages and cytotoxic T cells and reprogram them for immunosuppression. Immunity56, 1825–1843.e6 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361.Parodi, M. et al. Hypoxia modifies the transcriptome of human NK cells, modulates their immunoregulatory profile, and influences NK cell subset migration. Front. Immunol.9, 2358 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Renkawitz, J. et al. Nuclear positioning facilitates amoeboid migration along the path of least resistance. Nature568, 546–550 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Salmon, H. et al. Matrix architecture defines the preferential localization and migration of T cells into the stroma of human lung tumors. J. Clin. Invest.122, 899–910 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Alraies, Z. et al. Cell shape sensing licenses dendritic cells for homeostatic migration to lymph nodes. Nat. Immunol.25, 1193–1206 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Puttur, F. et al. Pulmonary environmental cues drive group 2 innate lymphoid cell dynamics in mice and humans. Sci. Immunol.4, eaav7638 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Fernandes, N. R. J. et al. CD4+ T cell interstitial migration controlled by fibronectin in the inflamed skin. Front. Immunol.11, 1501 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367.Weber, M. et al. Interstitial dendritic cell guidance by haptotactic chemokine gradients. Science339, 328–332 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368.Ridley, A. J. L. et al. Chemokines form complex signals during inflammation and disease that can be decoded by extracellular matrix proteoglycans. Sci. Signal.16, eadf2537 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369.Zhang, T. et al. Targeting the tumor biophysical microenvironment to reduce resistance to immunotherapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.186, 114319 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Sutherland, T. E., Dyer, D. P. & Allen, J. E. The extracellular matrix and the immune system: a mutually dependent relationship. Science379, eabp8964 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371.Briggs, D. C. et al. Inter-α-inhibitor heavy chain-1 has an integrin-like 3D structure mediating immune regulatory activities and matrix stabilization during ovulation. J. Biol. Chem.295, 5278–5291 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Day, A. J. & Milner, C. M. TSG-6: a multifunctional protein with anti-inflammatory and tissue-protective properties. Matrix Biol.78–79, 60–83 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Matuska, B. et al. Pathological hyaluronan matrices in cystic fibrosis airways and secretions. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.55, 576–585 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Reeves, S. R. et al. Asthmatic bronchial epithelial cells promote the establishment of a Hyaluronan-enriched, leukocyte-adhesive extracellular matrix by lung fibroblasts. Respir. Res.19, 146 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375.Nicolas-Boluda, A. et al. Tumor stiffening reversion through collagen crosslinking inhibition improves T cell migration and anti-PD-1 treatment. eLife10, e58688 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376.Ozga, A. J., Chow, M. T. & Luster, A. D. Chemokines and the immune response to cancer. Immunity54, 859–874 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377.Cords, L. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast classification in single-cell and spatial proteomics data. Nat. Commun.14, 4294 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378.Arpinati, L., Carradori, G. & Scherz-Shouval, R. CAF-induced physical constraints controlling T cell state and localization in solid tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer24, 676–693 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379.Joyce, J. A. & Fearon, D. T. T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor microenvironment. Science348, 74–80 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380.Atarashi, K. et al. Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota. Nature500, 232–236 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381.Zhou, W. et al. ILC3s sense gut microbiota through STING to initiate immune tolerance. Immunity58, 1762–1777 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 382.Fidelle, M. et al. A microbiota-modulated checkpoint directs immunosuppressive intestinal T cells into cancers. Science380, eabo2296 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383.Lee, W. S. et al. Oral reovirus reshapes the gut microbiome and enhances antitumor immunity in colon cancer. Nat. Commun.15, 9092 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384.Mindur, J. E. et al. Surface layer protein a expressed in clostridioides difficile DJNS06-36 possesses an encephalitogenic mimotope of myelin basic protein. Microorganisms9, 34 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385.Fan, T. et al. Aberrant T follicular helper cells generated by TH17 cell plasticity in the gut promote extraintestinal autoimmunity. Nat. Immunol.26, 790–804 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386.Woo, V. et al. Commensal segmented filamentous bacteria-derived retinoic acid primes host defense to intestinal infection. Cell Host Microbe29, 1744–1756.e5 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387.Miyamoto, K. et al. The gut microbiota-induced kynurenic acid recruits GPR35-positive macrophages to promote experimental encephalitis. Cell Rep.42, 113005 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388.Partlová, S. et al. Distinct patterns of intratumoral immune cell infiltrates in patients with HPV-associated compared to non-virally induced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunology4, e965570 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 389.Zhang, M. et al. Microbiota-derived urocanic acid triggered by tyrosine kinase inhibitors potentiates cancer immunotherapy efficacy. Cell Host Microbe33, 915–931.e9 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 390.Dias Costa, A. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with altered immune cell infiltration and an anti-tumorigenic microenvironment in resected pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res.28, 5167–5179 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 391.Walle, T. et al. Radiotherapy orchestrates natural killer cell dependent antitumor immune responses through CXCL8. Sci. Adv.8, eabh4050 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 392.Burckel, H. et al. Distinct immune responses to proton and photon radiotherapy: implications for anti-PD-L1 combination therapy in colorectal cancer. J. Transl. Med.23, 360 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393.Chen, Y. et al. Dihydroartemisinin ameliorates psoriatic skin inflammation and its relapse by diminishing CD8+ T-cell memory in wild-type and humanized mice. Theranostics10, 10466–10482 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 394.Leonard, W. J. & Lin, J.-X. Strategies to therapeutically modulate cytokine action. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.22, 827–854 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 395.Scholten, D. J. et al. Pharmacological modulation of chemokine receptor function. Br. J. Pharmacol.165, 1617–1643 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396.Ha, H., Debnath, B. & Neamati, N. Role of the CXCL8-CXCR1/2 axis in cancer and inflammatory diseases. Theranostics7, 1543–1588 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397.S, J. et al. Neutrophil diversity and plasticity in tumour progression and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer20, 485–503 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398.Cambier, S., Gouwy, M. & Proost, P. The chemokines CXCL8 and CXCL12: molecular and functional properties, role in disease and efforts towards pharmacological intervention. Cell. Mol. Immunol.20, 217–251 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399.Liao, W. et al. KRAS-IRF2 axis drives immune suppression and immune therapy resistance in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell35, 559–572.e7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400.Han, Z.-J. et al. Roles of the CXCL8-CXCR1/2 axis in the tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy. Molecules27, 137 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 401.Greene, S. et al. Inhibition of MDSC trafficking with SX-682, a CXCR1/2 inhibitor, enhances NK-cell immunotherapy in head and neck cancer models. Clin. Cancer Res.26, 1420–1431 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402.Kumar, V. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts neutralize the anti-tumor effect of CSF1 receptor blockade by inducing PMN-MDSC infiltration of tumors. Cancer Cell32, 654–668.e5 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 403.Liu, M. et al. The crosstalk between macrophages and cancer cells potentiates pancreatic cancer cachexia. Cancer Cell42, 885–903.e4 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404.Nywening, T. M. et al. Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol.17, 651–662 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 405.Sandhu, S. K. et al. A first-in-human, first-in-class, phase I study of carlumab (CNTO 888), a human monoclonal antibody against CC-chemokine ligand 2 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.71, 1041–1050 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 406.Pienta, K. J. et al. Phase 2 study of carlumab (CNTO 888), a human monoclonal antibody against CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Invest. N. Drugs31, 760–768 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 407.Chan, C. T. et al. Reversal of vascular macrophage accumulation and hypertension by a CCR2 antagonist in deoxycorticosterone/salt-treated mice. Hypertension60, 1207–1212 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408.Cipriani, S. et al. Efficacy of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc in reducing early, ritonavir-induced atherogenesis and advanced plaque progression in mice. Circulation127, 2114–2124 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 409.Francisci, D. et al. Maraviroc intensification modulates atherosclerotic progression in hiv-suppressed patients at high cardiovascular risk. A randomized, crossover pilot study. Open Forum Infect. Dis.6, ofz112 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 410.Zheng, Y. et al. MAIT cell activation and recruitment in inflammation and tissue damage in acute appendicitis. Sci. Adv.10, eadn6331 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 411.Gudd, C. L. C. et al. Therapeutic inhibition of monocyte recruitment prevents checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis. J. Immunother. Cancer12, e008078 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 412.Anstee, Q. M. et al. Tropifexor plus cenicriviroc combination versus monotherapy in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results from the phase 2b TANDEM study. Hepatology78, 1223–1239 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 413.Luo, X. et al. SOX12 facilitates hepatocellular carcinoma progression and metastasis through promoting regulatory T-cells infiltration and immunosuppression. Adv. Sci.11, e2310304 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 414.Shabaneh, T. B. et al. Oncogenic BRAFV600E governs regulatory T-cell recruitment during melanoma tumorigenesis. Cancer Res.78, 5038–5049 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 415.Wiedemann, G. M. et al. Cancer cell-derived IL-1α induces CCL22 and the recruitment of regulatory T cells. Oncoimmunology5, e1175794 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 416.van Gulijk, M. et al. PD-L1 checkpoint blockade promotes regulatory T cell activity that underlies therapy resistance. Sci. Immunol. 8, eabn6173 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 417.Doi, T. et al. A phase I study of the anti-CC chemokine receptor 4 antibody, mogamulizumab, in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res.25, 6614–6622 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 418.Zamarin D. et al. Mogamulizumab in combination with durvalumab or tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I study. Clin. Cancer Res.26, 4531–4541 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 419.Kurose, K. et al. Phase Ia study of FoxP3+ CD4 Treg depletion by infusion of a humanized anti-CCR4 antibody, KW-0761, in cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res.21, 4327–4336 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 420.Wehrli, M. et al. Single-center experience using anakinra for steroid-refractory immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). J. Immunother. Cancer10, e003847 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 421.Quartier, P. et al. A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra in patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (ANAJIS trial). Ann. Rheum. Dis.70, 747–754 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 422.Cavalli, G. et al. Treating life-threatening myocarditis by blocking interleukin-1. Crit. Care Med.44, e751–e754 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 423.Fahlberg, M. D. et al. Cellular events of acute, resolving or progressive COVID-19 in SARS-CoV-2 infected non-human primates. Nat. Commun.11, 6078 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 424.REMAP-CAP Investigators et al. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically Ill patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med.384, 1491–1502 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 425.Märkl, F., Huynh, D., Endres, S. & Kobold, S. Utilizing chemokines in cancer immunotherapy. Trends Cancer8, 670–682 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 426.Li, Y. et al. Hydrogel dual delivered celecoxib and anti-PD-1 synergistically improve antitumor immunity. Oncoimmunology5, e1074374 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 427.Decalf, J. et al. Inhibition of DPP4 activity in humans establishes its in vivo role in CXCL10 post-translational modification: prospective placebo-controlled clinical studies. EMBO Mol. Med.8, 679–683 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 428.Barreira da Silva, R. et al. Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 inhibition enhances lymphocyte trafficking, improving both naturally occurring tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Nat. Immunol.16, 850–858 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 429.Raja, R. et al. PP4 inhibition sensitizes ovarian cancer to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity via STAT1 activation and inflammatory signaling. J. Immunother. Cancer10, e005026 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 430.Ky, T. et al. Off-the-shelf prostate stem cell antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cell therapy to treat pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology162, 1319–1333 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 431.Lin, F. Y. et al. Phase I trial of GD2.CART cells augmented with constitutive interleukin-7 receptor for treatment of high-grade pediatric CNS tumors. J. Clin. Oncol.42, 2769–2779 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 432.Pang, N. et al. IL-7 and CCL19-secreting CAR-T cell therapy for tumors with positive glypican-3 or mesothelin. J. Hematol. Oncol. J. Hematol. Oncol.14, 118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 433.Marin, D. et al. Safety, efficacy and determinants of response of allogeneic CD19-specific CAR-NK cells in CD19+ B cell tumors: a phase 1/2 trial. Nat. Med.30, 772–784 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 434.Yang, M., Li, J., Gu, P. & Fan, X. The application of nanoparticles in cancer immunotherapy: Targeting tumor microenvironment. Bioact. Mater.6, 1973–1987 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 435.Yang, W. et al. Immunogenic material vaccine for cancer immunotherapy by structure-dependent immune cell trafficking and modulation. Adv. Mater.36, e2402580 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 436.Chen, H. et al. Intratumoral delivery of CCL25 enhances immunotherapy against triple-negative breast cancer by recruiting CCR9+ T cells. Sci. Adv.6, eaax4690 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 437.Zhao, Z. et al. Systemic tumour suppression via the preferential accumulation of erythrocyte-anchored chemokine-encapsulating nanoparticles in lung metastases. Nat. Biomed. Eng.5, 441–454 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 438.Yao, H. et al. Effective melanoma immunotherapy with interleukin-2 delivered by a novel polymeric nanoparticle. Mol. Cancer Ther.10, 1082–1092 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 439.Siegel, J. P. & Puri, R. K. Interleukin-2 toxicity. J. Clin. Oncol.9, 694–704 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 440.Shin, H., Kang, S., Won, C. & Min, D.-H. Enhanced local delivery of engineered IL-2 mRNA by porous silica nanoparticles to promote effective antitumor immunity. ACS Nano17, 17554–17567 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 441.Xu, S. et al. Tumor-tailored ionizable lipid nanoparticles facilitate IL-12 circular RNA delivery for enhanced lung cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Mater.36, 2400307 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 442.Hernandez, R., Põder, J., LaPorte, K. M. & Malek, T. R. Engineering IL-2 for immunotherapy of autoimmunity and cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol.22, 614–628 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 443.Fyfe, G. et al. Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. J. Clin. Oncol.13, 688–696 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 444.He, J. et al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose IL-2 in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis.79, 141–149 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 445.Gorby, C. et al. Engineered IL-10 variants elicit potent immunomodulatory effects at low ligand doses. Sci. Signal.13, eabc0653 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 446.Ishihara, A. et al. Prolonged residence of an albumin-IL-4 fusion protein in secondary lymphoid organs ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat. Biomed. Eng.5, 387–398 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 447.Qiao, T. et al. Inhibition of LDH-A by oxamate enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment in an NSCLC humanized mouse model. Front. Oncol.11, 632364 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 448.Beloueche-Babari, M. et al. Monocarboxylate transporter 1 blockade with AZD3965 inhibits lipid biosynthesis and increases tumour immune cell infiltration. Br. J. Cancer122, 895–903 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 449.Li, C. et al. Dioscin exerts protective effects against crystalline silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Theranostics7, 4255–4275 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 450.Gerriets, V. A. et al. Metabolic programming and PDHK1 control CD4+ T cell subsets and inflammation. J. Clin. Invest.125, 194–207 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 451.Zhang, S., Lv, K., Liu, Z., Zhao, R. & Li, F. Fatty acid metabolism of immune cells: a new target of tumour immunotherapy. Cell Death Discov.10, 39 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 452.Zhang, Y. et al. Enhancing CD8+ T cell fatty acid catabolism within a metabolically challenging tumor microenvironment increases the efficacy of melanoma immunotherapy. Cancer Cell32, 377–391.e9 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 453.Ma, X. et al. CD36-mediated ferroptosis dampens intratumoral CD8+ T cell effector function and impairs their antitumor ability. Cell Metab.33, 1001–1012.e5 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 454.Xu, S. et al. Uptake of oxidized lipids by the scavenger receptor CD36 promotes lipid peroxidation and dysfunction in CD8+ T cells in tumors. Immunity54, 1561–1577.e7 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 455.Lee, J. W. et al. Fenofibrate represses interleukin-17 and interferon-gamma expression and improves colitis in interleukin-10-deficient mice. Gastroenterology133, 108–123 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 456.Vernieri, C. et al. Fasting-mimicking diet is safe and reshapes metabolism and antitumor immunity in patients with cancer. Cancer Discov.12, 90–107 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 457.Ligorio, F. et al. Early downmodulation of tumor glycolysis predicts response to fasting-mimicking diet in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Cell Metab.37, 330–344.e7 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 458.Lorefice, L., Pitzalis, M. & Zoledziewska, M. Intermittent and periodic fasting—evidence and perspectives in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord.88, 105744 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 459.Rosillo, M. Á et al. Anti-inflammatory and joint protective effects of extra-virgin olive-oil polyphenol extract in experimental arthritis. J. Nutr. Biochem.25, 1275–1281 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 460.Orillion, A. et al. Dietary protein restriction reprograms tumor-associated macrophages and enhances immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res.24, 6383–6395 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 461.Rubio-Patiño, C. et al. Low-protein diet induces IRE1α-dependent anticancer immunosurveillance. Cell Metab.27, 828–842.e7 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 462.Lee, Y. S. et al. Increased adipocyte O2 consumption triggers HIF-1α, causing inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. Cell157, 1339–1352 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 463.Cao, S. et al. EGFR-mediated activation of adipose tissue macrophages promotes obesity and insulin resistance. Nat. Commun.13, 4684 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 464.Kleinewietfeld, M. et al. Sodium chloride drives autoimmune disease by the induction of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nature496, 518–522 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 465.He, W. et al. High-salt diet inhibits tumour growth in mice via regulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell differentiation. Nat. Commun.11, 1732 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 466.Sautès-Fridman, C., Petitprez, F., Calderaro, J. & Fridman, W. H. Tertiary lymphoid structures in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer19, 307–325 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 467.Johansson-Percival, A. et al. De novo induction of intratumoral lymphoid structures and vessel normalization enhances immunotherapy in resistant tumors. Nat. Immunol.18, 1207–1217 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 468.Lanickova, T. et al. Chemotherapy drives tertiary lymphoid structures that correlate with ICI-responsive TCF1+CD8+ T cells in metastatic ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res.31, 164–180 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 469.Vella, G., Hua, Y. & Bergers, G. High endothelial venules in cancer: regulation, function, and therapeutic implication. Cancer Cell41, 527–545 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 470.Vella, G., Guelfi, S. & Bergers, G. High endothelial venules: a vascular perspective on tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer. Front. Immunol.12, 736670 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 471.Rosen, S. D. Ligands for L-selectin: homing, inflammation, and beyond. Annu. Rev. Immunol.22, 129–156 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 472.Martinet, L. et al. Human solid tumors contain high endothelial venules: association with T- and B-lymphocyte infiltration and favorable prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Res.71, 5678–5687 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 473.Browning, J. L. et al. Lymphotoxin-beta receptor signaling is required for the homeostatic control of HEV differentiation and function. Immunity23, 539–550 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 474.Allen, E. et al. Combined antiangiogenic and anti-PD-L1 therapy stimulates tumor immunity through HEV formation. Sci. Transl. Med.9, eaak9679 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 475.Asrir, A. et al. Tumor-associated high endothelial venules mediate lymphocyte entry into tumors and predict response to PD-1 plus CTLA-4 combination immunotherapy. Cancer Cell40, 318–334.e9 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 476.Kabir, A. U. et al. Dual role of endothelial Myct1 in tumor angiogenesis and tumor immunity. Sci. Transl. Med.13, eabb6731 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 477.Sato, Y. et al. The roles of tertiary lymphoid structures in chronic diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol.19, 525–537 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 478.Zhu, M. et al. Cardiac ectopic lymphoid follicle formation in viral myocarditis involving the regulation of podoplanin in Th17 cell differentiation. FASEB J.35, e21975 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 479.Lucchesi, D. et al. Impaired interleukin-27-mediated control of CD4+ T cell function impact on ectopic lymphoid structure formation in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. Hoboken NJ72, 1559–1570 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 480.Noël, G. et al. Functional Th1-oriented T follicular helper cells that infiltrate human breast cancer promote effective adaptive immunity. J. Clin. Invest131, e139905 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 481.Luo, R. et al. T follicular helper cells in tertiary lymphoid structure contribute to renal fibrosis by IL-21. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 12535 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 482.Jiang, Y. et al. Targeting extracellular matrix stiffness and mechanotransducers to improve cancer therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. J. Hematol. Oncol.15, 34 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 483.Ma, K. et al. The good and the bad collagens of fibrosis—their role in signaling and organ function. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 121, 43–56 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 484.Zhu, J. et al. Chaperone Hsp47 drives malignant growth and invasion by modulating an ECM gene network. Cancer Res.75, 1580–1591 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 485.Ishikawa, Y., Rubin, K., Bächinger, H. P. & Kalamajski, S. The endoplasmic reticulum-resident collagen chaperone Hsp47 interacts with and promotes the secretion of decorin, fibromodulin, and lumican. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 13707–13716 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 486.Wang L. et al. Targeting the HSP47-collagen axis inhibits brain metastasis by reversing M2 microglial polarization and restoring anti-tumor immunity. Cell Rep. Med. 5, 101533 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 487.Baker, A.-M., Bird, D., Lang, G., Cox, T. R. & Erler, J. T. Lysyl oxidase enzymatic function increases stiffness to drive colorectal cancer progression through FAK. Oncogene32, 1863–1868 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 488.Maller, O. et al. Tumour-associated macrophages drive stromal cell-dependent collagen crosslinking and stiffening to promote breast cancer aggression. Nat. Mater. 20, 548–559 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 489.Chitty, J. L. et al. A first-in-class pan-lysyl oxidase inhibitor impairs stromal remodeling and enhances gemcitabine response and survival in pancreatic cancer. Nat. Cancer4, 1326–1344 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 490.Tan, P. et al. Multicenter, open-label phase 1/2a study of Pxs-5505 and ruxolitinib in patients with primary, post-polycythemia vera (PV) or post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) myelofibrosis. Blood144, 1001 (2024).38754055 [Google Scholar]
- 491.Leung, L. et al. Anti-metastatic Inhibitors of Lysyl Oxidase (LOX): design and structure–activity relationships. J. Med. Chem.62, 5863–5884 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 492.Benson, A. B. et al. A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of simtuzumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine for the first-line treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncologist22, 241-e15 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 493.Kieffer, Y. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals fibroblast clusters linked to immunotherapy resistance in cancer. Cancer Discov.10, 1330–1351 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 494.Zhang, H. et al. Define cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment: new opportunities in cancer immunotherapy and advances in clinical trials. Mol. Cancer22, 159 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 495.Xiao, Z. et al. Desmoplastic stroma restricts T cell extravasation and mediates immune exclusion and immunosuppression in solid tumors. Nat. Commun.14, 5110 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 496.Hiltbrunner, S. et al. Local delivery of CAR T cells targeting fibroblast activation protein is safe in patients with pleural mesothelioma: first report of FAPME, a phase I clinical trial. Ann. Oncol.32, 120–121 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 497.Kato, T. et al. Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy targeting podoplanin-expressing cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Mol. Cancer Ther.22, 75–88 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 498.Galeano Niño, J. L. et al. Effect of the intratumoral microbiota on spatial and cellular heterogeneity in cancer. Nature611, 810–817 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 499.Parhi, L. et al. Breast cancer colonization by Fusobacterium nucleatum accelerates tumor growth and metastatic progression. Nat. Commun. 11, 3259 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 500.Kabwe, M, Dashper, S, Bachrach, G, & Tucci, J. Bacteriophage manipulation of the microbiome associated with tumour microenvironments-can this improve cancer therapeutic response? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 45, fuab017 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 501.Triner, D. et al. Neutrophils restrict tumor-associated microbiota to reduce growth and invasion of colon tumors in mice. Gastroenterology156, 1467–1482 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 502.Zheng, J. H. et al. Two-step enhanced cancer immunotherapy with engineered Salmonella typhimurium secreting heterologous flagellin. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaak9537 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 503.Canale, F. P. et al. Metabolic modulation of tumours with engineered bacteria for immunotherapy. Nature598, 662–666 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 504.Qu, R. et al. Role of the gut microbiota and its metabolites in tumorigenesis or development of colorectal cancer. Adv. Sci.10, e2205563 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 505.Xu, H., Luo, H., Zhang, J., Li, K. & Lee, M.-H. Therapeutic potential of Clostridium butyricum anticancer effects in colorectal cancer. Gut Microbes15, 2186114 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 506.Ny, L. et al. Microbiota-driven antitumour immunity mediated by dendritic cell migration. Nature644, 1058–1068 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 507.Sn, C. et al. CXCR3+ T cells in multiple sclerosis correlate with reduced diversity of the gut microbiome. J. Transl. Autoimmun. 3, 100032 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 508.Prado, C. et al. GPR43 stimulation on TCRαβ+ intraepithelial colonic lymphocytes inhibits the recruitment of encephalitogenic T-cells into the central nervous system and attenuates the development of autoimmunity. J. Neuroinflammation20, 135 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 509.Duscha, A. et al. Propionic acid shapes the multiple sclerosis disease course by an immunomodulatory mechanism. Cell180, 1067–1080 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 510.Mariño, E. et al. Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat. Immunol.18, 552–562 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 511.Riquelme, E. et al. Tumor microbiome diversity and composition influence pancreatic cancer outcomes. Cell178, 795–806 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 512.Baruch, E. N. et al. Fecal microbiota transplant promotes response in immunotherapy-refractory melanoma patients. Science371, 602–609 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 513.Davar, D. et al. Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients. Science371, 595–602 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 514.Gao, L. et al. Microbiota-derived inosine suppresses systemic autoimmunity via restriction of B cell differentiation and migration. Adv. Sci.12, e2409837 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 515.de Groot, P. et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation halts progression of human new-onset type 1 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial. Gut70, 92–105 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 516.Guo, C. et al. Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide modulates gut microbiota and immune cell function to inhibit inflammation and tumorigenesis in colon. Carbohydr. Polym.267, 118231 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 517.Li, N. et al. Prebiotic inulin controls Th17 cells mediated central nervous system autoimmunity through modulating the gut microbiota and short chain fatty acids. Gut Microbes16, 2402547 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 518.Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Förster, R., Lipp, M. & Lanzavecchia, A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature401, 708–712 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 519.Zander, R. et al. CD4+ T cell help is required for the formation of a cytolytic CD8+ T cell subset that protects against chronic infection and cancer. Immunity51, 1028–1042.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 520.Franken, A. et al. CD4+ T cell activation distinguishes response to anti-PD-L1+anti-CTLA4 therapy from anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Immunity57, 541–558.e7 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 521.Bailey, S. R. et al. Human CD26high T cells elicit tumor immunity against multiple malignancies via enhanced migration and persistence. Nat. Commun.8, 1961 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 522.Fu, C. et al. JMJD3 regulates CD4 T cell trafficking by targeting actin cytoskeleton regulatory gene Pdlim4. J. Clin. Investig. 129, 4745–4757 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 523.Ma, M. A. et al. CXCR3 expression in regulatory T cells drives interactions with type I dendritic cells in tumors to restrict CD8+ T cell antitumor immunity. Immunity56, 1613–1630 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 524.Lu, Y. et al. Complement signals determine opposite effects of B cells in chemotherapy-induced immunity. Cell180, 1081–1097.e24 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 525.Hu, X. & Liu, X. S. A high-resolution view of intra-tumoral B cell immunity. Immunity55, 387–389 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 526.MacNabb, B. W. et al. Dendritic cells can prime anti-tumor CD8+ T cell responses through major histocompatibility complex cross-dressing. Immunity55, 982–997.e8 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 527.Schlitzer, A. et al. IRF4 transcription factor-dependent CD11b+ dendritic cells in human and mouse control mucosal IL-17 cytokine responses. Immunity38, 970–983 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 528.Brewitz, A. et al. CD8+ T cells orchestrate pDC-XCR1+ dendritic cell spatial and functional cooperativity to optimize priming. Immunity46, 205–219 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 529.Bosteels, C. et al. Inflammatory type 2 cDCs acquire features of cDC1s and macrophages to orchestrate immunity to respiratory virus infection. Immunity52, 1039–1056.e9 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 530.Chen, E.-B. et al. The miR-561-5p/CX3CL1 signaling axis regulates pulmonary metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma involving CX3CR1+ natural killer cells infiltration. Theranostics9, 4779–4794 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 531.Yoon, M. S. et al. Irradiation of breast cancer cells enhances CXCL16 ligand expression and induces the migration of natural killer cells expressing the CXCR6 receptor. Cytotherapy18, 1532–1542 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 532.Fitzgerald, A. A. et al. DPP inhibition alters the CXCR3 axis and enhances NK and CD8+ T cell infiltration to improve anti-PD1 efficacy in murine models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Immunother. Cancer9, e002837 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 533.Rezaeifard, S., Talei, A., Shariat, M. & Erfani, N. Tumor infiltrating NK cell (TINK) subsets and functional molecules in patients with breast cancer. Mol. Immunol.136, 161–167 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 534.de Andrade, L. F. et al. Discovery of specialized NK cell populations infiltrating human melanoma metastases. JCI Insight4, e133103 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 535.Netskar, H. et al. Pan-cancer profiling of tumor-infiltrating natural killer cells through transcriptional reference mapping. Nat. Immunol.25, 1445–1459 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 536.Jacquelot, N. et al. Blockade of the co-inhibitory molecule PD-1 unleashes ILC2-dependent antitumor immunity in melanoma. Nat. Immunol.22, 851–864 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 537.Moral J. A. et al. ILC2s amplify PD-1 blockade by activating tissue-specific cancer immunity. Nature579, 130-135 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 538.Alam, A. et al. Fungal mycobiome drives IL-33 secretion and type 2 immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell40, 153–167.e11 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 539.Movahedi, K. et al. Different tumor microenvironments contain functionally distinct subsets of macrophages derived from Ly6C(high) monocytes. Cancer Res70, 5728–5739 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 540.Bertolini, G. et al. A novel CXCR4 antagonist counteracts paradoxical generation of cisplatin-induced pro-metastatic niches in lung cancer. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther.29, 2963–2978 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 541.Zhou, W. et al. Periostin secreted by glioblastoma stem cells recruits M2 tumour-associated macrophages and promotes malignant growth. Nat. Cell Biol.17, 170–182 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 542.Huang, H.-Y. et al. Alternations in inflammatory macrophage niche drive phenotypic and functional plasticity of Kupffer cells. Nat. Commun.15, 9337 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 543.Long, L. et al. Regulating lactate-related immunometabolism and EMT reversal for colorectal cancer liver metastases using shikonin targeted delivery. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.42, 117 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 544.Pang, L. et al. Postoperative plasmacytoid dendritic cells secrete IFNα to promote recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and drive hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Cancer Res. 82, 4206–4218 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 545.Xie, Y. et al. Targeting ESE3/EHF with nifurtimox inhibits CXCR2+ neutrophil infiltration and overcomes pancreatic cancer resistance to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Gastroenterology167, 281–297 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 546.Xiao, Y. et al. Cathepsin C promotes breast cancer lung metastasis by modulating neutrophil infiltration and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Cancer Cell39, 423–437.e7 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 547.Bellomo, G. et al. Chemotherapy-induced infiltration of neutrophils promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis via Gas6/AXL signalling axis. Gut71, 2284–2299 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






