Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1975 Mar;181(3):346–358. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197503000-00017

Spontaneous reversal of portal blood flow: the case for and against its occurrence in patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

A H Moreno, A R Burchell, R V Reddy, J A Steen, W F Panke, T F Nealson Jr
PMCID: PMC1343860  PMID: 1093486

Abstract

Because of its presumed serious clinical significance, we made an analysis of the evidence for and against the occurrence of spontaneous reversal of portal flow in cirrhosis of the liver. We examined the evidence obtained from manometric studies, radioactive tracer studies, radiologic studies, and actual measurements of magnitude and direction of portal blood flow. Concerning manometric studies, we introduced a physical analysis, based on first principles, which demonstrates that the occluded portal pressures cannot be used to construct a hydraulic gradient for portal flow. Similarly, we examined the weakness of the evidence derived from radioactive tracer and radiologic studies and, in the latter, the drastically opposite results reported by different investigators. Finally, we found that actual measurements of magnitude and direction of portal flow provide impressive evidence against the occurrence of spontaneous reversal of portal flow in cirrhosis. We conclude that unless new and convincing evidence is provided, it may not serve the best interests of medicine and of our patients to continue accepting spontaneous reversal of portal flow in cirrhosis as if it were a proven phenomenon.

Full text

PDF
357

Images in this article

347Fig. 1.
on p.347
353Fig. 5.
on p.353

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Britton R. C., Voorhees A. B., Jr, Price J. B., Jr Selective portal decompression. Surgery. 1970 Jan;67(1):104–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burchell A. R., Moreno A. H., Panke W. F., Nealon T. F., Jr Hemodynamic variables and prognosis following portacaval shunts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974 Mar;138(3):359–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burchell A. R., Moreno A. H., Panke W. F., Rousselot L. M. Some limitations of splenic portography. I. Incidence, hemodynamics and surgical implications of the nonvisualized portal vein. Ann Surg. 1965 Dec;162(6):981–995. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196512000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charters A. C., 3rd, Chandler J. G., Condon J. K., Grambort D. E., Levin S. E., Modafferi T. R., Orloff M. J. Spontaneous reversal of portal flow in patients with bleeding varices treated by emergency portacaval shunt. Am J Surg. 1974 Jan;127(1):25–29. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(74)90006-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clain D., Freston J., Kreel L., Sherlock S. Clinical diagnosis of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. A report of six cases. Am J Med. 1967 Oct;43(4):544–554. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(67)90178-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clain D., McNulty J. A radiological study of the lymphatics of the liver. Br J Radiol. 1968 Sep;41(489):662–668. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-41-489-662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FERGUSON D. J. HEMODYNAMICS IN SURGERY FOR PORTAL HYPERTENSION. Ann Surg. 1963 Sep;158:383–386. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196309000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galloway S., Casarella W. J., Price J. B. Unilobar veno-occlusive disease of the liver. Angiographic demonstration of intrahepatic competition simulating hepatoma. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1973 Sep;119(1):89–94. doi: 10.2214/ajr.119.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KITTREDGE R. D., FINBY N. ONE ASPECT OF SPLENOPORTOGRAPHY: REVERSAL OF FLOW WITH RESULTING NON-VISUALIZATION OF THE PORTAL VEIN. Radiology. 1963 Aug;81:267–271. doi: 10.1148/81.2.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kessler R. E., Tice D. A., Zimmon D. S. Retrograde flow of portal vein blood in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology. 1969 Apr;92(5):1038–1042. doi: 10.1148/92.5.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kessler R. E., Tice D. A., Zimmon D. S. Value, complications, and limitations of umbilical vein catheterization. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973 Apr;136(4):529–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LEGER L., PREMONT M., LEFORT J. [Subhepatic phlebography by injection into the hepatic parenchyma]. Presse Med. 1962 Sep 26;70:1855–1857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LONGMIRE W. P., Jr, MULDER D. G., MAHONEY P. S., MELLINKOFF S. W. Side-to-side portacaval anastomosis for portal hypertension. Ann Surg. 1958 Jun;147(6):881–894. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MADDEN J. L., LORE J. M., Jr, GEROLD F. P., RAVID J. M. The pathogenesis of ascites and a consideration of its treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954 Oct;99(4):385–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MIKKELSEN W. P., TURRILL F. L., PATTISON A. C. Portacaval shunt in cirrhosis of the liver. Clinical and hemodynamic aspects. Am J Surg. 1962 Aug;104:204–215. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(62)90320-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MORENO A. H., ROUSSELOT L. M., BURCHELL A. R., BONG R. F., BURKE J. H. Studies on the outflow tracts of the liver. I. On a method for the functional demonstration of the outflow tracts of the liver and its application to the study of hepatic hemodynamics in normal and cirrhotic rats. Ann Surg. 1962 Mar;155:412–426. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196203000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MORENO A. H., ROUSSELOT L. M., BURCHELL A. R., BONO R. F., BURKE J. H. Studies on the outflow tracts of the liver. II. On the outflow tracts of the canine liver with particular reference to its regulation by the hepatic vein sphincter mechanisms. Ann Surg. 1962 Mar;155:427–433. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196203000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MULDER D. G., MURRAY J. F. An evaluation of the side-to-side portacaval shunt. Surg Forum. 1960;11:278–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McDermott W. V., Jr Evaluation of the hemodynamics of portal hypertension in the selection of patients for shunt surgery. Ann Surg. 1972 Oct;176(4):449–456. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197210000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moreno A. H., Burchell A. R., Rousselot L. M., Burke J. H. Studies on the outflow tracts of the liver. 3. Qualitative observations in normal man and in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Ann Surg. 1969 Jul;170(1):63–73. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196907000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moreno A. H., Burchell A. R., Rousselot L. M., Panke W. F., Slafsky F., Burke J. H. Portal blood flow in cirrhosis of the liver. J Clin Invest. 1967 Mar;46(3):436–445. doi: 10.1172/JCI105545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moreno A. H., Burchell A. R., Van der Woude R., Burke J. H. Respiratory regulation of splanchnic and systemic venous return. Am J Physiol. 1967 Aug;213(2):455–465. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1967.213.2.455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Moreno A. H. Of models and models. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972 Feb;134(2):311–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mulder D. G., Plested W. G., 3rd, Hanafee W. N., Murray J. F. Hepatic circulatory and functional alterations following side-to-side portacaval shunt. Surgery. 1966 Jun;59(6):923–931. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. NEY H. R. Rontgenologischer Nachweis portovenoser und intervenōser Nebenschlüsse in der Leber. Acta radiol. 1958 Mar;49(3):227–232. doi: 10.3109/00016925809170988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Price J. B., Jr, Voorhees A. B., Jr, Britton R. C. Operative hemodynamic studies in portal hypertension. Significance and limitations. Arch Surg. 1967 Nov;95(5):843–852. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330170151019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. REDEKER A. G., KUNELIS C. T., YAMAMOTO S., REYNOLDS T. B. ASSESSMENT OF PORTAL AND HEPATIC HEMODYNAMICS AFTER SIDE-TO-SIDE PORTACAVAL SHUNT IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS. J Clin Invest. 1964 Jul;43:1464–1471. doi: 10.1172/JCI105022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ramsay G. C., Britton R. C. Intraparenchymal angiography in the diagnosis of hepatic veno-occlusive diseases. Radiology. 1968 Apr;90(4):716–726. doi: 10.1148/90.4.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reynolds T. B. The role of hemodynamic measurements in portosystemic shunt surgery. Arch Surg. 1974 Mar;108(3):276–281. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1974.01350270010003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruzicka F. F., Jr, Rossi P. Arterial portography: patterns of venous flow. Radiology. 1969 Mar;92(4):777–787. doi: 10.1148/92.4.777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. SCHENK W. G., Jr, McDONALD J. C., McDONALD K., DRAPANAS T. Direct measurement of hepatic blood flow in surgical patients: with related observations on hepatic flow dynamics in experimental animals. Ann Surg. 1962 Sep;156:463–471. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196209000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith G. W. An assessment of the validity of preoperative hemodynamic studies in portal hypertension. Surgery. 1973 Jul;74(1):130–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith G. W., Westgaard T., Björn-Hansen R. Hepatic venous angiography in the evaluation of cirrhosis of the liver. Ann Surg. 1971 Apr;173(4):469–480. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197104000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sovak M., Soulen R. L., Reichle F. A. Blood flow in the human portal vein. A cineradiographic method using particulate contrast medium. Radiology. 1971 Jun;99(3):531–536. doi: 10.1148/99.3.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Strandell T., Delin A., Erwald R., Kulling K. G., Lundbergh P., Marions O., Wiechel K. L. Portal blood flow measurement by a catheter tip electromagnetic velocity probe in awake man. Preliminary report. Acta Chir Scand. 1973;139(1):7–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Viamonte M., Jr, Warren W. D., Fomon J. J., Martinez L. O. Angiographic investigations in portal hypertension. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970 Jan;130(1):37–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. WARREN W. D., MULLER W. H., Jr A clarification of some hemodynamic changes in cirrhosis and their surgical significance. Ann Surg. 1959 Sep;150:413–427. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195909000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. WARREN W. D., RESTREPO J. E., RESPESS J. C., MULLER W. H. THE IMPORTANCE OF HEMODYNAMIC STUDIES IN MANAGEMENT OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION. Ann Surg. 1963 Sep;158:387–404. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196309000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. WELCH C. S., ATTARIAN E., WELCH H. F. The treatment of ascites by side to side portacaval shunt. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1958 Apr;34(4):249–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. WELCH C. S., WELCH H. F., CARTER J. H. The treatment of ascites by side to side portacaval shunt. Ann Surg. 1959 Sep;150:428–444. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195909000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Warren W. D., Fomon J. J., Viamonte M., Zeppa R. Preoperative assessment of portal hypertension. Ann Surg. 1967 Jun;165(6):999–1012. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196706000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES