Abstract
Topological entanglements are central to understanding and predicting the properties of polymer melts. Yet, they make equilibrium sampling computationally challenging, as decorrelation times grow rapidly with chain length. Here, we introduce a Monte Carlo scheme that bypasses typical computational bottlenecks by working in a self-assembly ensemble rather than at fixed composition. Strictly local moves efficiently propagate backbone reconnections across scales while conserving the number of linear chains, achieving near-linear scaling of decorrelation time with system size, τeq ~ V 1.0. With this method, formulated for a fully-packed lattice, we equilibrate periodic systems totalling up to ≃ 1.1 × 109 monomers, accessing a universal melt regime insensitive to lattice details. We analyze intra- and inter-chain entanglements for chains of up to N ≃ 5 × 105 monomers, revealing that they manifest as localized knots and links rather than as global tangles. Finally, we show that the magnitude of the Gauss linking integral between neighbouring chains grows only as N1/4.
Subject terms: Statistical physics, Computational methods, Polymers
Simulating dense polymer melts remains challenging due to the rapid increase in computational cost with chain length. Fornasa et al. report a Monte Carlo scheme that addresses this bottleneck by employing a self-assembly ensemble, achieving linear scaling with system size and typical chain length.
Introduction
Polymer melts owe many of their physical properties to topological entanglements established by the densely packed chains. Examples range from the structural plasticity of eukaryotic genomes to the viscoelasticity of synthetic materials and the mechanics of interlocked filaments1–9. The regime most relevant to soft matter, materials science, and biological physics occurs when the chain length, N, largely exceeds the entanglement length, the typical contour separation between entanglement points10,11. In this regime, equilibration is governed by the slow reptation of the individual filaments within the constraining mesh, with disengagement times growing at least as O(N3) 12–15. In molecular dynamics simulations with cell or neighbor lists, the additional cost of computing interactions leads to wall-clock decorrelation times scaling as ≳ O(N4)16. Analogous considerations hold for Monte Carlo methods with topology-preserving local moves. Consequently, characterizing and predicting the properties of dense polymer melts with realistic simulations becomes impractical as N grows well beyond the entanglement length.
To make the problem more tractable, several accelerated sampling strategies have been proposed, including hierarchical coarse-graining, thermodynamic reweighting, and enrichment17–36. Off-lattice bridging moves that cut and rejoin bonds while conserving melt composition (i.e., polymer lengths, chain count and density), can bypass topological constraints and reduce the effective dynamic exponents to the 2–2.5 range37–39. On lattices, local reconnection moves for space-filling walks can achieve O(N2) decorrelation scaling19,40, and efficient hierarchical construction algorithms can be employed too41,42. Despite these advances, most approaches to equilibrating melts are formulated for the fixed-composition ensemble, where enforcing constraints of chain lengths and connectivity remains a major computational bottleneck.
Here, we introduce an efficient self-assembly Monte Carlo (SAMC) scheme for dense polymers on a cubic lattice at full packing. The system, composed of a periodic ring-linear blend, is evolved with local endpoint bond-swaps that allow the composition to fluctuate while still conserving density, self-avoidance, and the number n of linear chains. By allowing reconnections, SAMC avoids the aforementioned expensive backbone tracing checks that hinder sampling methods at fixed composition. As a result, the global decorrelation time, measured in Monte Carlo steps, scales approximately linearly with system size, τeq ~ V 1.001±0.002. Because the CPU time per Monte Carlo step varies only weakly with V, the near-linear scaling applies also to wall-clock decorrelation time.
This upends the usual hierarchy of computational bottlenecks: while for conventional methods the most onerous step is the collection of uncorrelated states, for SAMC it is instead their analysis, as the computational cost of calculating physical observables often scales quadratically or worse with chain lengths.
In the stationary SAMC ensemble, giant linear components spontaneously emerge against a background of finite and non-extensive rings. In fact, the n linear chains are individually macroscopic, with average lengths 〈N〉 proportional to the system volume, which is almost entirely (~ 90%) occupied by them.
Leveraging the efficiency of SAMC and the emergence of giant components, we equilibrate fully packed systems in which only a few giant chains collectively comprise up to ≃ 1.1 × 109 monomers. By analyzing chains with millions of monomers, we show that their metric statistics are consistent with those of pure linear melts, indicating that their scaling properties lie in a universal melt regime, insensitive to microscopic lattice details.
We thus push the topological characterization of melts to previously unexplored chain densities and lengths. We profile intra- and inter-chain entanglements across scales and show that they manifest as localized knots and links rather than as global tangles. Finally, we show that the characteristic Gauss linking integral between neighboring chains grows only as N1/4.
Results
Self-assembly Monte Carlo
We study self-assembled blends of linear chains and rings that are fully packed on a simple-cubic lattice. The system is evolved by a Monte Carlo scheme with strictly local endpoint bond swaps that efficiently propagate backbone reconnections across scales while conserving the number of linear chains. This self-assembly Monte Carlo (SAMC) method has near-linear global decorrelation time with system size and yields macroscopic linear chains with melt-like statistics. This makes it possible to efficiently equilibrate very large systems and thus investigate and establish large-scale properties that are insensitive to microscopic lattice details.
We consider a fully-packed ring-linear blend on a L × L × L periodic lattice, containing n linear chains. Accordingly, all sites have connectivity degree 2 except those hosting the 2n endpoints of the chains, which have degree 1.
The elementary SAMC move is sketched in Fig. 1a and is articulated over the following stages. First, one of the 2n endpoints, denoted A, is chosen uniformly. Next, a site B is chosen uniformly among the non-bonded nearest neighbors of A. Then, a site C is chosen uniformly among the bonded neighbors of B (one choice if B is an endpoint, two otherwise). If C is an endpoint, the move is rejected, and the current configuration is retained, otherwise bond BC is replaced with AB.
Fig. 1. Endpoint bond-swap move and decorrelation time.
a Sketch of the three stages involved in an endpoint bond-swap move. For clarity, the sketch is shown for a blend with n = 2 linear chains on a two-dimensional (8 × 8) periodic square lattice. First, an endpoint A is randomly chosen among the 2n = 4 degree-1 sites (open circles). Next, a site B is randomly chosen among the non-bonded nearest neighbors of A. Then, a site C is randomly chosen among the bonded neighbors of B. If C is an endpoint, the move is rejected, otherwise bond BC is replaced by AB, obtaining the evolved configuration shown on the right. The move conserves packing, self-avoidance, and the total number of linear chains, while chain lengths and ring counts typically vary. b Global decorrelation time τeq for systems with a single linear chain (n = 1) per periodic box as a function of the box volume V = L3. τeq was obtained as the integrated autocorrelation of edge-state overlap q, and is measured in Monte Carlo steps. The power law best fit yields a practically linear dependence of τeq on V, as indicated, with the prefactor equal to 1.05 ± 0.01. The relative statistical uncertainty on τeq is estimated to be smaller than 1% (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 5).
After each accepted move, every site retains its degree except for sites A, whose degree changes from 1 to 2 after the addition of bond AB, and site C, whose degree changes from 2 to 1 after removing bond BC. As a result, C replaces A as the free end. Rejecting proposals in which C is an endpoint is necessary because the bond swap would disconnect that site, violating the conservation of the number of free ends. With the above move set, such rejections occur with probability O(n/V), where V = L3 is the lattice volume, and hence become negligible as V grows at fixed n (Supplementary Fig. 2). An optional lower-rejection variant, discussed in Supplementary Note 6, reduces this scaling to O(n2/V2).
Thus, the SAMC evolution conserves full packing, self-avoidance, and the number of endpoints (and thus the number of linear chains, n). Instead, the linear chains’ lengths and the number and lengths of rings can fluctuate.
The move proposal is symmetric on admissible endpoint bond swaps, and all such proposals are accepted. The rejected proposals instead contribute only to self-loops. Therefore, the resulting Markov chain satisfies detailed balance with respect to a uniform stationary measure, see Supplementary Note 1. On the considered periodic hypercubic lattices at full packing, the dynamics is free of blocked (immobile) configurations except in the limiting case n = V/2, where the system is made entirely of chains of length 1 (Supplementary Note 2). While a general proof of ergodicity is lacking, comparisons against exhaustively enumerable systems with up to ≃ 105 states show that a single extensive SAMC run samples uniformly the full configuration space (Supplementary Fig. 1). These results support the effective ergodicity and uniformity of SAMC.
Global decorrelation: near-linear scaling
For a conservative measure of global decorrelation, we take the integrated autocorrelation time of the edge overlap, τeq, expressed in Monte Carlo steps. This overlap measures the fraction of lattice edges that have the same state (empty or occupied) in two configurations (“Methods” and Supplementary Note 5).
To characterize the scaling of τeq with system size, we computed τeq for L ranging from 20 to 800, corresponding to V spanning more than four decades, from 8.0 × 103 to 5.12 × 108. A power-law fit of the data yields a practically linear scaling of the decorrelation time with system size, τeq ∝ V1.001±0.002 (Fig. 1b). The near-linear decorrelation reflects three features of SAMC. First, working in a self-assembly ensemble circumvents constraints inherent to the conventional fixed-composition ensemble. Second, the endpoint bond-swap move is local, and yet it efficiently propagates connectivity changes across scales. Lastly, the SAMC evolution requires tracking only the 2n endpoints, dispensing with the onerous tracing of entire backbones that fixed-composition accelerated schemes require at each bond swap. With SAMC, backbone tracing is needed only at the analysis stage, and exclusively for the independent samples used to compute observables of interest. In this regard, we collect configurations at time intervals of 3τeq to ensure their statistical independence.
In terms of wall-clock runtime, the single-core CPU time per Monte Carlo step on standard workstations is approximately independent of V and equal to ≃ 0.2 μs as long as RAM capacity is not exceeded (Supplementary Fig. 5). Accordingly, the near-linear scaling of τeq on V is carried over to the wall-clock decorrelation time. On the tested workstations, decorrelating configurations of 100 × 100 × 100 systems (V = 106) at 3τeq intervals requires ≃ 0.6 s.
Finally, regarding the analysis, we note that common observables of interest, including those used later to study entanglement, have an O(N2) cost or worse. As a consequence, for the large systems considered here, the dominant computational bottleneck shifts from equilibration to post-processing analysis.
Giant linear components
An emergent property of the SAMC ensemble is that the n linear chains are individually giant or macroscopic, i.e., with length growing proportionally to V. By contrast, the complementary ring background consists of numerous finite loops.
Figure 2 shows a typical SAMC-equilibrated configuration of a ring-linear blend with n = 10 chains fully occupying a 1024 × 1024 × 1024 periodic lattice (V ≃ 1.1 × 109), the largest addressable system with the RAM available to us. We note that this size exceeds the maximum one used for the decorrelation analysis of Fig. 1b because the latter required the simultaneous storage of multiple configurations in memory, while SAMC sampling requires storing only one configuration. Figure 2a shows the blend with coordinates wrapped around the boundaries of the periodic L × L × L box. The linear chains are manifestly the giant components of the system, collectively occupying ≃ 9.7 × 108 monomers, or 90% of the box volume. Figure 2b shows one of the possible unwrapped representations of the same linear chains in panel a, obtained by selecting a reference periodic box and then tracing each backbone continuously across periodic boundaries, starting from one of its ends in that box.
Fig. 2. Emergent giant linear components.
a Wrapped and (b) unwrapped representations of an SAMC-equilibrated configuration with n = 10 linear chains on a fully-packed 1024 × 1024 × 1024 periodic lattice, totalling ≃ 1.1 × 109 monomers. The 10 linear chains are distinguished by a rainbow palette, while the ring background is shown in black. Collectively, the linear chains comprise ≃ 9.7 × 108 monomers, about 90% of the volume.
Indeed, for the considered range of n, the distribution of the volume fraction occupied by the linear chains ϕlin converges with increasing V to an asymptotic curve sharply peaked at (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 1). The ϕlin distributions for the effectively asymptotic 100 × 100 × 100 system are shown in Fig. 3a. The tails beyond the peak have a common rapid decay, while the shoulders at become visibly sharper with increasing n. Thus, the combined linear components are most likely to occupy about 90% of the lattice sites across the explored n.
Fig. 3. Statistics of the macroscopic linear chains and ring background.
a Probability distribution of ϕlin, the volume fraction collectively occupied by the indicated number of linear chains, n. Inset: close-up near the modal value, . b Tail probability, Pn(x), that individual linear chains at occupy a portion larger than x of the linear volume, . The Pn(x) data are well approximated by the theoretical Dirichlet distribution (solid lines) for random n-partitioning of the linear volume, . (c) Average number density of rings of length k, 〈nk〉/V, for configurations conditioned at . The solid line is the parameter-free theoretical prediction , with A ≃ 0.1379 (Supplementary Note 10). All plots are for independent SAMC-equilibrated samples of 100 × 100 × 100 systems. For each n, 105 independent configurations were used for panel (a) and 103 independent conditioned configurations for panels (b, c). Error bars in panels (a) and (b) represent standard errors.
Analysis of how the collectively macroscopic linear volume is partitioned among the n linear chains shows that the latter are individually macroscopic. To establish this, we first conditioned the system to the macroscopic linear regime () by retaining from the independent configurations only those with ϕlin ∈ [0.90, 0.91]. From the individual chain lengths, Ni=1,...,n, we next computed the corresponding linear volume portions, xi = Ni/Vlin, where .
For n = 1, the conditioning clearly yields a near monodisperse chain length, N1 ≃ 0.9 V, hence macroscopic. To characterize the n > 1 case, we consider the tail probability Pn(x) that xi is larger than x and compare it with the Dirichlet expression for uniform random n-partitioning of the unit interval, . Figure 3b shows that the observed Pn(x) follows closely the theoretical expression. Notice that the agreement is not the result of a best-fit procedure, since the theoretical expression has no adjustable parameters.
We conclude that, at the modal linear volume fraction , the n linear chains are statistically equivalent and individually giant or macroscopic, with average lengths scaling as O(V/n), see also Supplementary Fig. 8.
By contrast, the ring background conditioned at is instead finite and dominated by short rings. Figure 3c shows that the average number density 〈nk〉/V of rings of length k collapses on the solid curve, corresponding to the theoretical prediction , with A ≃ 0.1379. This expression is based on the statistics of loops formed by chain closure in melt-like conditions and, notably, has no free parameters, Supplementary Note 10. Consistent with the theoretical scaling, the data for k ≫ 1 decay rapidly as 〈nk〉/V ~ k−5/2. As a consequence, the average ring length at remains finite across all considered n and V and stays close to the theoretical estimate (Supplementary Note 10 and Supplementary Table 3).
Two observations are in order. First, the regime of giant chains must eventually break down at sufficiently large n, since for n = O(V) the typical chain length is necessarily O(1). Second, our observation of a giant linear component at n = 1 connects to recent mathematical developments for the three-dimensional double-dimer model, for which rigorous proofs have established the existence of a macroscopic open path upon insertion of a single pair of defects43. While the double-dimer model and ours differ for both the configurational averaging and the nature of the ring background, our results provide a direct physical realization of this prediction, and offer a quantitative basis for motivating extensions of the rigorous proof to n > 1.
Giant linear melts
Consistent with the fact that the linear chains are the sole macroscopic components at , we observe that their metric properties follow closely the scaling laws expected for melts over the investigated range.
Figure 4a shows the intra-chain contact statistics at for selected values of n and V; additional combinations are in Supplementary Fig. 9. The data are for the probability, Pc(s), that pairs of monomers at contour distance s are in contact, i.e., on nearest neighboring sites. To connect with known scaling properties for melts, the analysis was performed on near monodisperse configurations. Specifically, the configurations were selected a posteriori such that each of the n chain lengths fell within 10% of the equisubdivision value, . The Pc(s) data follow the ~ s−3/2 scaling typical of melts and ideal chains in three dimensions, the effective exponent from a power-law best fit to the data for 150 × 150 × 150 systems being − 1.505 ± 0.003 (solid line). Also, the mean square internal distance (inset) exhibits the expected scaling for melts, 〈R2(s)〉 ∝ s, the best fit exponent being 1.00 ± 0.01.
Fig. 4. Melt-like metric scaling of giant linear chains.
a Contact probability Pc and mean square internal distance 〈R2〉 (inset) of giant linear chains as a function of contour separation s. Power-law best fits (solid lines) to Pc and 〈R2〉 data (L = 150, n = 1, s < 104) yield respectively the exponents − 1.505 ± 0.003 and 1.00 ± 0.01, consistent with melt behavior. b Average total number of inter-chain monomeric contacts and average number of distinct overlapping chains as a function of chain length, N. Again, the indicated exponents of power-law best fits (solid lines) are consistent with melt behavior. Data are for various system sizes and numbers of linear chains n; additional combinations are in Supplementary Fig. 9. For each combination of size and n, data are from 102 independent configurations conditioned at and with near-monodisperse lengths, . Error bars in panel (b) represent standard errors.
For the inter-chain contact statistics, shown in Fig. 4b, we computed two distinct observables for the same near monodisperse samples. First, we addressed the length dependence of the average number of inter-chain monomeric contacts, ncontacts, made by a given linear chain. Next, we computed the number of overlapping chains, noverlap, i.e., chains making at least one contact with a given one. Contributions from periodic images were included in both cases. We observed that ncontacts grows as , with β1 = 0.994 ± 0.006, while noverlap scales as Na, with a = 0.48 ± 0.01. We recall that the expected theoretical exponents for melts are and atheor = ν d − 1, where d is the dimensionality and ν is the metric exponent42. Our observed β1 and a are compatible with these theoretical expressions specialized to three-dimensional melts (d = 3 and ν = 1/2), and atheor = 1/2.
Notice that all considered observables collapse onto the same master curves across various n and V, even though the density of periodic chain images varies substantially across these combinations. This indicates that the metric scaling of the giant linear chains at effectively lies in a universal melt regime, insensitive to microscopic lattice details, and interactions with both periodic images and the finite ring background.
Capitalizing on this, we use the giant chains equilibrated by SAMC as a gateway to access properties of linear melts at previously unexplored chain lengths and densities. Given the centrality of topological constraints for rationalizing and predicting the physical properties of melts, we next direct our analysis to intra- and inter-chain entanglement across scales.
Knotting in giant linear melts
For the intra-chain topological entanglements, we study how the abundance and complexity of physical knots vary with the length of the macroscopic linear chains. The most straightforward setting for this analysis is to consider the n = 1 case conditioned at , which yields giant chains with near monodisperse lengths, N ≃ 0.9V. The physical knotted state of the (unwrapped) macroscopic linear chains was established by joining the ends with minimally invasive auxiliary arcs and then evaluating topological invariants, see Methods section. Because this topological profiling is more costly than SAMC sampling, we performed it up to N ≃ 1.1 × 105, corresponding to systems of size 50 × 50 × 50.
Figure 5 shows the (un-)knotting probability of the giant chains as a function of N. The data indicate an effective exponential decay, , with characteristic knotting length N0 = (4.8 ± 0.1) × 103. This value lies between those of two well-studied cases. It is an order of magnitude smaller than for isolated self-avoiding chains (N0 ≃ 105 for both open and closed chains on- and off-lattice) but an order of magnitude larger than for ideal chains (N0 ≃ 300 Kuhn lengths44,45 about 450 steps in our model, see “Methods”). The intermediate value of N0 reflects the crossover of effective interactions in dense melts, where excluded volume is screened at large scales while it persists locally. For completeness, we note that the observed N0 for the giant melts is also much larger than for self-avoiding polymers below the θ-point. In this regime, corresponding to bad solvent conditions, polymer chains are individually collapsed and the reported characteristic knotting lengths of these dense and hence highly entangled globules, which have been studied for circular chains46–48, are of the order of 102 − 103. Consequently, melt chains are substantially underknotted relative to pure random walks49 and collapsed polymers, while also being overknotted compared to isolated self-avoiding chains.
Fig. 5. Intra-chain entanglement: physical knotting of giant linear chains.
a Knotting probability of giant chains versus their length N. The complementary unknotting probability is shown in the inset along with the exponential best fit to the data. b Stacked histogram illustrating the contributions of various prime and composite knots to the overall knotting probability. c Typical configuration (unwrapped representation) of a giant chain of N ≃ 5.8 × 104 monomers before (top) and after (bottom) a topology-preserving geometrical simplification. In the simplified configuration, spatially separated localized prime components are clearly visible, see also close-ups in the callouts. The corresponding knotted regions are highlighted with matching colors in the original configuration. Data are based on 104 independent configurations conditioned at for various system sizes and n = 1 linear chains. d Average trefoil knot length, 〈ltref〉 as a function of N/ntref, the chain contour length rescaled by the number of trefoil components. Only (L, ntref) combinations with at least 50 measurements of trefoil knot length were considered. Data for these combinations, distinguished by different colors and symbols, collapse onto a master curve that is well described by the power law best fit (dashed line). The outlier data point for (L = 10, ntref = 1) was excluded from the fit. e Probability density of ltref for various (L, ntref) combinations. The corresponding cumulative distributions for ntref = 3 and various L are shown in panel (f). Error bars in panels (a) and (d) represent standard errors.
The knot spectrum, which we could resolve near exhaustively for lengths up to N ≃ 2.4 × 104, is dominated by composite knots, which are connected sums of prime components (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 2). A sliding-window scan along the chain contour reveals that for N ≫ N0 these composites typically manifest as multiple localized simple prime knots separated by long unknotted segments (Fig. 5c). The observed spatial factorization is nontrivial, since the multiple prime components could instead coalesce in a single delocalized tangle.
Motivated by the abundance of trefoils (31) among prime knots and prime components (Supplementary Table 2), we analyzed their average contour length, 〈ltref〉. To this end, we isolated individual trefoil-knotted components with a bottom-up scan of the chains (Supplementary Note 8). Figure 5d shows that 〈ltref〉 depends on both the overall chain length, N, and the number of trefoil-knotted components, ntref, accommodated by the chain. Except for the smallest system (L = 10), the 〈ltref(N, ntref)〉 data points fall on the same master curve when plotted versus the reduced chain length N/ntref. The master curve is well described by the power law (dashed line in Fig. 5d)
| 1 |
Several observations are in order. First, the result is qualitatively consistent with previous studies of single self-avoiding open and closed chains, which found that the average contour length of single prime knots scaled sublinearly with chain length, indicating weak knot localization47,50–53.
Second, it is interesting to compare the observed exponent with previous estimates for trefoil-knotted polymers in the absence of attractive interactions. Reported values span a broad range, possibly also due to the limited length of the studied chains, as noted by Mansfield and Douglas52. Specifically, previous estimates include 0.74 ± 0.14 and 0.54 (51 and52, respectively) for lattice rings, 0.63 for a polyethylene model47, 0.4 ± 0.1 as inferred from the mechanical response of chains stretched between two plates50, and 0.44 ± 0.08 for fully-flexible off-lattice chains of up to 1.5 × 104 monomers53. The value found here for the giant chains in a melt, 0.36 ± 0.05, is at the lower end of the above range, and is closest to the last two estimates.
Third, our results show that this scaling extends to the individual localized prime components of composite knots, with N/ntref emerging as the appropriate scaling variable to account for the competition of the multiple components that share the same chain contour.
Finally, further insight into the characteristic knot length emerges from the probability distributions of the individual trefoil-knot lengths, ltref, shown in Fig. 5e,f for various (N, ntref) combinations. In qualitative accord with ref. 53, the data show that: (i) the distributions are unimodal, (ii) they are peaked at about almost independently of N and ntref, and (iii) have a slowly decaying tail at large knot lengths. At the same time, the tails of the distributions decay slowly enough that a non-negligible portion of the probability density extends to the largest observed knot lengths (Fig. 5f). Therefore, while the modal trefoil-knot length is independent of N and ntref, the average one depends on N/ntref because increasing this rescaled length extends the cutoff of the slowly decaying probability tail.
As a complement to the above considerations on the length and localization of trefoil knots, we discuss a minimal stochastic model for their multiplicity in composite knots. To this end, we consider a Poisson insertion process in which localized trefoils are placed independently along the chain contour. Inspired by theoretical arguments for isolated chains46,54–56, we take the insertion rate as , where is the chain length corresponding to the peak abundance of trefoils (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 10). This process, despite underestimating total knotting by neglecting the insertion of other prime types, yields , capturing both the observed exponential decay and the correct order of magnitude for N0. Thus, the model ties both results to the observed spatial localization of the simple prime components.
Linking in giant linear melts
For the inter-chain topological entanglement, we investigate the pairwise physical linking of contacting giant chains, studying its localization and dependence on chains’ length. To achieve, again, near monodisperse conditions, we considered the case n = 2 conditioned at , further restricting the dataset to configurations with a < 10% difference between the two chain lengths, hence equal to N1 ≃ N2 ≃ 0.45 V. To quantify the topological interlocking of the two chains, we computed the Gauss linking integral LG (Supplementary Note 9) of their closest periodic images, defined as the unwrapped images with the smallest center-of-mass separation (see “Methods”).
Because the ensemble average 〈LG〉 vanishes by symmetry, we characterized the entanglement magnitude using the root-mean-square and mean absolute values, and 〈∣LG∣〉. Note that for linear chains, LG is generally not an integer. The analysis was performed up to N ~ 4.5 × 105 monomers, corresponding to systems of size 100 × 100 × 100.
Figure 6 a illustrates the linking magnitude as a function of N. Intuitively, one might expect that tightly contacting chains in densely packed systems should form tangles of complexity rapidly growing with N. In stark contrast, the linking magnitude increases only slowly with chain length,
| 2 |
and remains modest even for our longest chains. Indeed, the most probable value of ∣LG∣ remains of order unity throughout the entire explored length range (Fig. 6b).
Fig. 6. Inter-chain entanglement: physical linking of giant linear chains.
a Root-mean-square Gauss linking integral versus chain length N. The solid line is a power-law best fit to the data; the exponent is indicated. b Histogram of the ∣LG∣ probability distribution, with bins centered at integer values. Data are for 103 independent configurations conditioned at for various system sizes and n = 2 near-monodisperse linear chains. c Typical heatmap of local segment-segment contributions to the Gauss linking integral of two contacting (unwrapped) giant chains in a 100 × 100 × 100 system. The heatmap is computed at the resolution of 104 monomers per segment. Finer resolution close-ups are shown in panels (d, e). Error bars in panels (a) and (b) represent standard errors; those in (a) are smaller than the symbols.
To resolve the spatial organization of the overall weak interlockings, we decomposed LG into segment-segment contributions (Methods and Supplementary Note 9). The heatmaps constructed through this double-contour scan are remarkably sparse even for the longest chains, as illustrated in Fig. 6c–e for a representative . At the segment resolution of Δ = 10000 monomers, only about 20 segment pairs contribute significantly to the overall linking integral (LG ≃ 1.19). Importantly, these contributions appear with both signs. Using finer segment subdivisions reveals that the significant entries correspond to localized clusters.
We conclude that, despite the overall tight packing, nearby giant chains have sparse and localized entanglements. Even at the largest lengths, pairwise chain interlockings occur over only a few and widely separated distinct regions.
Both this linking factorization and the observed exponent γ ≃ 0.25 ± 0.01 can be rationalized and connected by a simple scaling argument for monodisperse melts at fixed density. A given chain overlaps with neighboring ones (see also Fig. 4b), with the total number of interlockings scaling as ~ N/Le, where Le is the entanglement length. Thus, the typical number of distinct interlockings between two neighboring chains scales as . Since these topological constraints are sparse and independent, they contribute to LG with random (unbiased) signs. Resorting to the central limit theorem, the argument gives,
| 3 |
thus accounting for both the observed scaling exponent and the sparsity of the heatmaps.
As a complement, we note that the LG distributions have fatter than Gaussian tails (Supplementary Fig. 12), suggesting long-range correlations between interlockings, a feature warranting future investigation.
Discussion
We introduced a self-assembly Monte Carlo (SAMC) scheme for equilibrating fully packed ring-linear blends on a lattice via strictly local endpoint bond swaps. The method samples an ensemble in which the number of linear chains, n, is conserved while chain lengths and ring statistics fluctuate.
This allows SAMC to bypass the bottlenecks of conventional fixed-composition schemes, achieving a linear scaling of the global decorrelation time with system size, τeq ~ V 1.001±0.002. This scaling inverts the usual hierarchy of computational costs, shifting it from the collection of independent states to their analysis. Accordingly, we equilibrated fully packed blends in which a few linear chains collectively comprise ~ 9.7 × 108 monomers, and computed complex observables for individual chains of length up to N ~ 106.
In the SAMC stationary ensemble, macroscopic linear components emerge spontaneously, collectively occupying ≃ 90% of the volume. At the modal linear volume fraction, , the n linear chains are statistically equivalent and individually extensive, while the complementary ring background remains non-extensive and dominated by short loops. As a result, the giant chains reproduce the metric statistics of dense linear melts, placing the large-scale behavior accessed by SAMC in the melt universality class.
We harnessed SAMC to characterize topological entanglement in melts at packing density and chain lengths up to N ~ 106, a regime typically inaccessible to equilibrium sampling. For intra-chain entanglement, i.e., physical knotting, the unknotting probability is well described by an exponential decay with characteristic length N0 ≃ 4.8 × 103, substantially smaller than in dilute self-avoiding conditions. In addition, the growth of topological complexity with N is driven by the spatial factorization into localized prime knots separated by extended unknotted segments, similar to a Poisson insertion process.
For inter-chain entanglement, i.e., physical linking, we observed an analogous spatial factorization of the interlocking between contacting chain pairs. The Gauss linking integral, LG, remains modest and of order unity even at the longest analyzed lengths, N ~ 4.5 × 105, and its magnitude grows only as N1/4. Analysis of segment-segment contributions to LG shows that this weak growth arises from sparse and spatially localized interlockings. A simple scaling argument based on the number of such topological constraints and their unbiased random-sign contribution to LG rationalizes both the exponent and the observed sparsity.
The performance of SAMC, which is also straightforward to implement, makes it well-suited to tackle strongly entangled polymer systems at lengths where conventional equilibration is typically unfeasible. A standing open problem addressable with SAMC is the characterization of multi-chain entanglements57,58, which remain poorly understood and, e.g., may account for the interlocking correlations suggested by the non-Gaussian tails of the measured ∣LG∣ distributions. Spatial confinements relevant to experimental setups (channels, slits and cavities) can be accessed with suitable embedding geometries and open boundaries (Supplementary Note 2). The microscopic details of the model can be refined too. The resolution can be enhanced with higher-coordination lattices, and bending rigidity can be treated with the same local updates supplemented by a Metropolis acceptance criterion. More generally, SAMC-generated configurations can be used, after off-lattice relaxation, as equilibrated initial states for molecular dynamics simulations of large dense polymer systems. This would enable studying the manifestations and implications of topological constraints across scales, a central problem from designed materials, such as slide-ring polymer networks, to biological soft matter, such as eukaryotic chromosomes.
In principle, SAMC could be extended to control the dispersity of the linear chains. For instance, the original SAMC could be used to sample equilibrated configurations with a substantial number of distinct chains, e.g., , thus ensuring a non-giant average chain length, . To achieve near-monodispersity, these configurations could then be separately evolved with a modified SAMC in which moves are accepted or rejected with a Metropolis-like criterion favoring small chain-length dispersity. This additional evolution, requiring backbone tracing at each step, would steer the original configurations towards near-monodispersity. Among other applications, this would enable more direct comparisons with standard ring-linear blends and linear melts.
A further interesting future direction is to extend SAMC beyond the fully packed regime. To this end, one could equip SAMC with additional moves, e.g., attaching bonds to empty lattice sites while deleting terminal bonds to conserve density. Though the sampling efficiency would expectedly degrade as the packing fraction is lowered, with such an extension it might become possible to study how knotting and linking statistics cross over from dense melts to dilute self-avoiding polymers.
SAMC could also be generalized to simulate blends of living polymers59 by supplementing the present dynamics with scission and recombination moves that create or anneal nearby pairs of free ends. More specifically, the number of linear chains, n, could be allowed to fluctuate by removing non-terminal bonds through split moves that increment n by 1, and by bridging nearest-neighbor endpoints through merge moves that decrease n by 1. This would allow for sampling living polymer blends in which the linear chains fluctuate in both number and length, as the circular chains in the background already do. Though the efficiency of such extensions would need to be determined, it would be interesting to use the approach to study how reversible breakage and recombination modify the equilibrium properties of dense ring-linear blends.
Methods
Model and initialization
Our approach is inspired by recent work that recasts the sampling of dense polymer systems as a binary optimization (QUBO) problem amenable to quantum annealing machines6,60–62. The QUBO representation is based on binary variables, corresponding to occupation states of lattice sites, edges, and corner turns, that interact via local bonding rules but without global connectivity constraints. This motivated our modeling of ring-linear polymer blends in the self-assembly ensemble rather than at fixed composition.
The initial space-filling SAMC state for n linear chains and the ring background on L × L × L periodic simple-cubic lattice can be conveniently prepared with the following two-step procedure. First, one generates a deterministic Hamiltonian path that, starting from a corner of the L × L × L box, fills successive layers in a serpentine fashion. Removing n − 1 non-consecutive bonds from the obtained path yields the desired initial space-filling configuration with n open chains, with an initial ring count of zero. The procedure can be used with all admissible values of n, from 1 to . Excluding the n = V/2 case, when admissible by lattice parity constraints, is necessary because it corresponds to configurations entirely filled by chains of length 1, which are blocked under the SAMC evolution (Supplementary Note 2). Under the subsequent Monte Carlo dynamics, the number of linear chains, n, is conserved while chain lengths and ring counts vary. The tests of uniformity and ergodicity of the self-assembly Monte Carlo, including a statistical analysis after ref. 40, are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1.
The nominal Kuhn length of polymers on simple-cubic lattices can be estimated by considering non-backtracking random walks, for which the mean scalar product of two consecutive unit-length steps is 〈c〉 = 1/5. Using the Kuhn length expression for freely-rotating chains, (1 + c)/(1 − c), and replacing c with 〈c〉 yields a nominal value of 3/2.
Global decorrelation time
To quantify global decorrelation, we use the normalized edge-state overlap q between two configurations Γ0 and Γ1:
| 4 |
where neq counts the lattice edges with identical state (empty or occupied) in both configurations and the normalizing factor E = 3V is the total number of edges.
The normalized autocorrelation function for q is:
| 5 |
where 〈q(t)〉 is the average overlap of configurations at time lag t, measured in Monte Carlo steps, and is the average overlap of independent configurations, estimated numerically (Supplementary Fig. 3). The global decorrelation time, τeq, is obtained by integrating C(t) from t = 0 up to the first time lag when C(t) < 10−2.
Statistical analysis of observables
Power-law best fits were performed via linear regression of the log-log data. The reported errors of the exponents correspond to the 3σ confidence interval. For each combination of system size and n, data in Fig. 4a involves a double average. First, for each considered giant chain, we compute the contact probability of all pairs of monomers at separation s. Next, we compute Pc(s) as the mean of these individual contact probabilities at fixed s. In the plots of Fig. 4b, 5, 6, where data for near-monodisperse chains are presented as a function of chain length, the reported value of N corresponds to , i.e., the reference length around which 10% length fluctuations are allowed. Statistical errors on the knotting probabilities were obtained from block analysis, using m = 5 or m = 10 blocks per dataset, depending on data numerosity.
Detection of physical knots
The knotting probability and knot spectrum of the giant linear chains were established by computing topological invariants on their circularized versions, obtained by applying the minimally invasive closure procedure of ref. 63. For a given open chain, the latter involves comparing the termini separation, DTT = dt1,t2, with the sum of their distances to the chain convex hull, DTCH = dt1,ch + dt2,ch. If DTT≤DTCH, the termini are bridged directly; otherwise, each terminus is prolonged along its distance vector to the convex hull by a length ten times the chain gyration radius and the prolonged ends are then connected. Choosing the smaller of DTT and DTCH is a practical way to limit spurious entanglement from closure arcs by minimizing the contour length of the portion inside the convex hull, which can topologically interfere with the open chain. To speed up the calculation of topological invariants for the giant chains, we apply topology-preserving geometrical simplifications, first on-lattice using BFACF-type moves64,65 and then off-lattice with KMT-type moves66,67. After simplification, we compute Alexander determinants and Dowker codes. After algebraic simplification and factorization, the latter are compared against lookup tables of prime knots with up to 16 crossings, allowing near complete (> 95%) determination of the knot spectrum for giant chains with up to N ≃ 2.4 × 104 monomers. For longer chains, we conservatively discriminate between knotted and unknotted states using the determinants of the Alexander polynomial. Applying the same knot-profiling procedure to systematic bottom-up scans of chain segments of increasing length enables localizing the knotted components. Details of the scanning procedure and knot spectrum, including a best-fit analysis of the trefoil-knot probability after ref. 68, are provided in Supplementary Note 8, Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 10.
Detection of physical links
To quantify the degree of entanglement of two giant linear chains, we compute the Gauss linking integral LG of their closest unwrapped periodic images, i.e., the pair of images with the minimal center-of-mass separation. Except for accidental degeneracies, the distance-minimizing pair is unique up to common translations by integer linear combinations of the simulation-box basis vectors, under which LG is invariant. The latter was evaluated using the method detailed in Supplementary Note 9. The direct evaluation of LG involves O(N2) elementary operations. Applying on- and off-lattice topology-preserving simplifications afforded an order-of-magnitude speed-up while leaving LG unchanged to within 1% (Supplementary Fig. 11). To establish the degree of localization of physical links, we subdivide each chain into equally long segments and compute the segment-segment contributions to LG, yielding matrices capturing the degree of physical interlocking between the various regions of the two chains.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Enzo Orlandini, Angelo Rosa and De Witt Sumners for valuable feedback on the manuscript and Giovanni Bussi for advice on code optimization.
Author contributions
E.F., F.S., and C.M. designed research, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; E.F. implemented the model and carried out simulations.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Gerard Barkema and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
This study was funded in part by the European Union - NextGenerationEU, in the framework of the PRIN Project “The Physics of Chromosome Folding" (code: 2022R8YXMR, CUP: G53D23000820006) and by PNRR Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.4_CN_00000013_CN-HPC: National Center for HPC, Big Data and Quantum Computing - spoke 7 (CUP: G93C22000600001). The views and opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union, nor can the European Union be held responsible for them.
Data availability
The data generated in this study and presented in the main text and Supplementary Information plots have been deposited together with the corresponding Jupyter notebooks in the Zenodo repository under accession code 10.5281/zenodo.2003944469.
Code availability
The source code of SAMC has been deposited in the GitHub repository indicated in ref. 70. Compilation requires users to provide their own licensed copy of the specified random number generator.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-74480-4.
References
- 1.Grosberg, A. Y., Nechaev, S. K. & Shakhnovich, E. I. The role of topological constraints in the kinetics of collapse of macromolecules. J. de. Phys.49, 2095–2100 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Everaers, R., Grosberg, A., Rubinstein, M. & Rosa, A. Flory theory of randomly branched polymers. Soft Matter13, 1223–1234 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gartner, T. E. I. & Jayaraman, A. Modeling and simulations of polymers: A roadmap. Macromolecules52, 755–786 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orlandini, E. & Micheletti, C. Topological and physical links in soft matter systems. J. Phys. Condens. Matter34, 013002 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang, Z., Schaller, M., Petzold, A., Saalwächter, K. & Thurn-Albrecht, T. How entanglements determine the morphology of semicrystalline polymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA120, e2217363120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Slongo, F., Hauke, P., Faccioli, P. & Micheletti, C. Quantum-inspired encoding enhances stochastic sampling of soft matter systems. Sci. Adv.9, eadi0204 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schmid, F. Understanding and modeling polymers: The challenge of multiple scales. ACS Polym. Au3, 28–58 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tubiana, L. et al. Topology in soft and biological matter. Phys. Rep.1075, 1–137 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grosse-Holz, S., Mirny, L. & Coulon, A. Scale-free models of chromosome structure, dynamics, and mechanics. PNAS Nexus4, 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf337 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Everaers, R. et al. Rheology and microscopic topology of entangled polymeric liquids. Science303, 823–826 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hoy, R. S. & Kröger, M. Unified analytic expressions for the entanglement length, tube diameter, and plateau modulus of polymer melts. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 147801 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Doi, M. & Edwards, S. F. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford University Press, 1988).
- 13.Rubinstein, M. & Colby, R. H. Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, 2003).
- 14.McLeish, T. C. Tube theory of entangled polymer dynamics. Adv. Phys.51, 1379–1527 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abadi, M., Serag, M. F. & Habuchi, S. Entangled polymer dynamics beyond reptation. Nat. Commun.9, 5098 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dünweg, B., Grest, G. S. & Kremer, K. Molecular dynamics simulations of polymer systems. in Numerical Methods for Polymeric Systems (Springer, 1998).
- 17.Rosenbluth, M. N. & Rosenbluth, A. W. Monte carlo calculation of the average extension of molecular chains. J. Chem. Phys.23, 356–359 (1955). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tesi, M., Van Rensburg, E. J., Orlandini, E. & Whittington, S. Monte Carlo study of the interacting self-avoiding walk model in three dimensions. J. Stat. Phys.82, 155–181 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Deutsch, J. Long range moves for high density polymer simulations. J. Chem. Phys.106, 8849–8854 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Grassberger, P. Pruned-enriched rosenbluth method: Simulations of θ polymers of chain length up to 1 000 000. Phys. Rev. E56, 3682 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Prellberg, T. & Krawczyk, J. Flat histogram version of the pruned and enriched rosenbluth method. Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 120602 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lua, R., Borovinskiy, A. L. & Grosberg, A. Y. Fractal and statistical properties of large compact polymers: a computational study. Polymer45, 717–731 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lua, R. C., Moore, N. T. & Grosberg, A. Y. Physical and Numerical Models in Knot Theory: Including Applications to the Life Sciences (2005).
- 24.Siepmann, J. I. & Frenkel, D. Configurational bias Monte Carlo: a new sampling scheme for flexible chains. Mol. Phys.75, 59–70 (1992). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Clisby, N. Accurate estimate of the critical exponent ν for self-avoiding walks via a fast implementation of the pivot algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 055702 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Micheletti, C., Marenduzzo, D. & Orlandini, E. Polymers with spatial or topological constraints: Theoretical and computational results. Phys. Rep.504, 1–73 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ghosh, S. K. & Jost, D. How epigenome drives chromatin folding and dynamics, insights from efficient coarse-grained models of chromosomes. PLoS Comput. Biol.14, e1006159 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rubinstein, M. Discretized model of entangled-polymer dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1946 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Harmandaris, V. A. & Kremer, K. Dynamics of polystyrene melts through hierarchical multiscale simulations. Macromolecules42, 791–802 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hugouvieux, V., Axelos, M. A. & Kolb, M. Amphiphilic multiblock copolymers: From intramolecular pearl necklace to layered structures. Macromolecules42, 392–400 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schram, R. D. & Barkema, G. T. Simulation of ring polymer melts with GPU acceleration. J. Comput. Phys.363, 128–139 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Karayiannis, N. C., Mavrantzas, V. G. & Theodorou, D. N. A novel Monte Carlo scheme for the rapid equilibration of atomistic model polymer systems of precisely defined molecular architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 105503 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reith, D. & Virnau, P. Implementation and performance analysis of bridging Monte Carlo moves for off-lattice single chain polymers in globular states. Comput. Phys. Commun.181, 800–805 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dietz, J. D. & Hoy, R. S. Facile equilibration of well-entangled semiflexible bead–spring polymer melts. J. Chem. Phys.156, 014103 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Bonato, A., Marenduzzo, D., Michieletto, D. & Orlandini, E. Topological gelation of reconnecting polymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA119, e2207728119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Svaneborg, C. & Everaers, R. Multiscale equilibration of highly entangled isotropic model polymer melts. J. Chem. Phys.158, 054903 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Mavrantzas, V. G., Boone, T. D., Zervopoulou, E. & Theodorou, D. N. End-bridging Monte Carlo: A fast algorithm for atomistic simulation of condensed phases of long polymer chains. Macromolecules32, 5072–5096 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Auhl, R., Everaers, R., Grest, G. S., Kremer, K. & Plimpton, S. J. Equilibration of long chain polymer melts in computer simulations. J. Chem. Phys.119, 12718–12728 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Svaneborg, C., Karimi-Varzaneh, H. A., Hojdis, N., Fleck, F. & Everaers, R. Multiscale approach to equilibrating model polymer melts. Phys. Rev. E94, 032502 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mansfield, M. L. Unbiased sampling of lattice hamilton path ensembles. J. Chem. Phys.125, 154103 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Smrek, J. & Grosberg, A. Y. A novel family of space-filling curves in their relation to chromosome conformation in eukaryotes. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl.392, 6375–6388 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Halverson, J. D., Smrek, J., Kremer, K. & Grosberg, A. Y. From a melt of rings to chromosome territories: the role of topological constraints in genome folding. Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 022601 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Quitmann, A. & Taggi, L. Macroscopic loops in the 3 d double-dimer model. Electron. Commun. Probab.28, 1–12 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Deguchi, T. & Tsurusaki, K. Universality of random knotting. Phys. Rev. E55, 6245 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Katritch, V., Olson, W. K., Vologodskii, A., Dubochet, J. & Stasiak, A. Tightness of random knotting. Phys. Rev. E61, 5545 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Van Rensburg, E. J. & Whittington, S. G. The knot probability in lattice polygons. J. Phys. A Math. Gen.23, 3573 (1990). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Virnau, P., Kantor, Y. & Kardar, M. Knots in globule and coil phases of a model polyethylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc.127, 15102–15106 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baiesi, M., Orlandini, E. & Stella, A. L. Knotted globular ring polymers: how topology affects statistics and thermodynamics. Macromolecules47, 8466–8476 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Meyer, H., Horwath, E. & Virnau, P. Mapping onto ideal chains overestimates self-entanglements in polymer melts. ACS Macro Lett.7, 757–761 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Farago, O., Kantor, Y. & Kardar, M. Pulling knotted polymers. EPL60, 53–59 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Marcone, B., Orlandini, E., Stella, A. & Zonta, F. What is the length of a knot in a polymer? J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.38, L15–L21 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mansfield, M. L. & Douglas, J. F. Properties of knotted ring polymers. i. equilibrium dimensions.J. Chem. Phys.133, 10.1063/1.3457160 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 53.Tubiana, L., Rosa, A., Fragiacomo, F. & Micheletti, C. Spontaneous knotting and unknotting of flexible linear polymers: Equilibrium and kinetic aspects. Macromolecules46, 3669–3678 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sumners, D. & Whittington, S. Knots in self-avoiding walks. J. Phys. A Math. Gen.21, 1689 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pippenger, N. Knots in random walks. Discret. Appl. Math.25, 273–278 (1989). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Grosberg, A. Y. Disordered polymers. Phys. Usp.40, 125 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Barkataki, K. & Panagiotou, E. The jones polynomial of collections of open curves in 3-space. Proc. R. Soc. A478, 20220302 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Barkataki, K., Kauffman, L. H. & Panagiotou, E. The virtual spectrum of linkoids and open curves in 3-space. J. Knot Theory Ramif.33, 2450006 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cates, M. & Candau, S. Statics and dynamics of worm-like surfactant micelles. J. Phys. Condens. Matter2, 6869–6892 (1990). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Micheletti, C., Hauke, P. & Faccioli, P. Polymer physics by quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 080501 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Slongo, F. & Micheletti, C. Computing canonical averages with quantum and classical optimizers: Thermodynamic reweighting for qubo models of physical systems. Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023116 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Grosberg, A. Y. Is quantum computing promising for soft matter problems? J. Club Condens. Matter Phys.10.36471/JCCM_June_2025_02 (2025).
- 63.Tubiana, L., Polles, G., Orlandini, E. & Micheletti, C. Kymoknot: A web server and software package to identify and locate knots in trajectories of linear or circular polymers. Eur. Phys. J. E41, 72 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Berg, B. & Foerster, D. Random paths and random surfaces on a digital computer. Phys. Lett. B106, 323–326 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- 65.De Carvalho, C. A., Caracciolo, S. & Fröhlich, J. Polymers and g∣ φ∣ 4 theory in four dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B215, 209–248 (1983). [Google Scholar]
- 66.Koniaris, K. & Muthukumar, M. Self-entanglement in ring polymers. J. Chem. Phys.95, 2873–2881 (1991). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Taylor, W. R. A deeply knotted protein structure and how it might fold. Nature406, 916–919 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Deguchi, T. & Tsurusaki, K. A statistical study of random knotting using the Vassiliev invariants. J. Knot Theory Ramif.3, 321–353 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fornasa, E., Slongo, F. & Micheletti, C. Research data for Self-assembly Monte Carlo reveals localized entanglement in giant polymer melts, Version 2. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.20039444 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Fornasa, E., Slongo, F. & Micheletti, C. SAMC_Self_assembly_Monte_Carlo. Computer software. GitHub. https://github.com/FrancescoSlongo/SAMC_Self_assembly_Monte_Carlo (2026).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data generated in this study and presented in the main text and Supplementary Information plots have been deposited together with the corresponding Jupyter notebooks in the Zenodo repository under accession code 10.5281/zenodo.2003944469.
The source code of SAMC has been deposited in the GitHub repository indicated in ref. 70. Compilation requires users to provide their own licensed copy of the specified random number generator.






