1. INTRODUCTION
The past decade has seen remarkable progress in ophthalmic imaging, reshaping both clinical decision-making and research. From dye-free angiography to cellular-level visualisation and algorithm-assisted diagnosis, contemporary platforms offer unprecedented resolution, speed, and accessibility [1, 2].
These technical advances are unfolding against a backdrop of substantial disease burden. Recent estimates suggest that vision loss remains common in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe, with millions of adults living with moderate-to-severe impairment despite available therapies [3]. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) alone affects tens of millions of people in Europe, and the absolute number is expected to rise further as populations age, even if age-specific prevalence stabilises or falls [4-6]. Imaging innovations are therefore not an academic exercise: they are critical to delivering timely diagnosis, safe surveillance, and efficient treatment at scale.
This editorial highlights key developments that have matured from promising concepts into tools with tangible impact on patient care, and outlines priorities for the next phase of translation.
2. TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATIONS: FASTER, DEEPER, AND RICHER
Swept-source OCT extends penetration and speeds up acquisition, improving choroidal imaging and enabling widefield volumetric scans [7]. Polarisation-sensitive and visible-light OCT add contrast for fibrotic tissue, melanin, and oxygenation-sensitive features, while phase-sensitive OCT measures nanometre-scale axial motion for functional read-outs [8, 9]. Beyond reflectivity, multispectral/hyperspectral modalities and advanced autofluorescence variants expand metabolic contrast, setting the stage for earlier disease detection [10].
Functional and metabolic imaging, including fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO), retinal oximetry, and emerging photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy, aims to detect dysfunction before structural loss becomes apparent [11]. While initial work has been encouraging, particularly for FLIO and oximetry in defined cohorts, clinical validation of newer techniques such as photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy remains at an early, mainly experimental stage [12, 13].
3. OCT ANGIOGRAPHY: COMING OF AGE
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has transitioned from early adoption to routine use for many indications [1]. By deriving motion contrast from repeated B-scans, OCTA maps flow in retinal and choroidal microvasculature without the need for intravenous dye. In diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration, it enables non-invasive surveillance of neovascular activity and capillary perfusion [2, 14, 15]. Compared with dye-based angiography, OCTA reduces risk, clinic time, and patient burden while providing layer-specific information; however, artefacts from motion, projection, and segmentation persist, and visualisation of deeper choroidal vessels remains challenging.
3.1. What’s New
Swept-source OCTA (longer wavelengths, faster acquisition) improves choriocapillaris and deep plexus visualisation; projection-resolved and slab-to-slab algorithms reduce decorrelation tails; and widefield OCTA (montage/extended field) allows pan-retinal perfusion assessment [16]. In diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration, two of the leading causes of vision loss in Europe, these tools support earlier detection and safer, more targeted monitoring of sight-threatening complications [4, 6]. Pragmatic, clinic-ready metrics, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and circularity, skeletonised vessel density, perfusion density, choriocapillaris flow-void mapping, and en face ellipsoid-zone integrity are increasingly used as endpoints in trials [17].
3.2. Unmet Needs
Consistent quantification across devices; better handling of media opacity and high myopia; harmonised flow-speed sensitivity; and normative databases stratified by age, sex, and axial length.
4. ULTRA-WIDEFIELD IMAGING AND THE PERIPHERAL RETINA
Ultra-widefield (UWF) platforms have shifted attention beyond the posterior pole, capturing up to 200° of the fundus in a single shot [18]. Peripheral vascular changes, tears, and inflammatory lesions are more readily documented, augmenting risk stratification and treatment planning. UWF imaging is now central to care pathways in diabetic eye disease, uveitis, and paediatric conditions [19-21].
4.1. Advances
True-colour, non-mydriatic confocal systems now provide better colour fidelity and peripheral autofluorescence; stereographic projection tools correct for peripheral distortion; and UWF fluorescein/ICG angiography enables pan-retinal leakage and non-perfusion mapping to guide laser [22, 23].
4.2. Limitations to Recognise at the Slit-lamp
Lid/lash artefacts, peripheral resolution drop-off, and montage seam effects can mimic pathology. A brief chin-positioning checklist, combined with repeat capture across different gaze positions, mitigates most issues [19].
5. ADAPTIVE OPTICS REACHES THE CLINIC
Adaptive optics (AO), once confined to specialised laboratories, now complements clinical instruments to achieve near-cellular resolution of photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium mosaics and nerve fibre bundles, as well as anterior segment microstructure [24, 25]. AO imaging has deepened the understanding of early disease mechanisms and genotype–phenotype correlations in inherited retinal disorders, and offers sensitive structural endpoints for interventional studies [26].
5.1. Clinical Value
Cone density and spacing maps reveal subclinical degeneration; RPE reflectance metrics track toxicity; and AO-OCT can visualise outer-segment renewal dynamics [24]. In glaucoma, AO-based bundle imaging may detect focal loss prior to RNFL thickness change [27].
5.2. Barriers and Solutions
Cost and limited field of view remain constraints. Emerging compact AO-SLO add-ons, automated cone-counting, and cloud-based analysis pipelines are lowering the bar for multi-centre studies [25].
6. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACROSS THE IMAGING PATHWAY
The coupling of imaging with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning has been the decade’s most disruptive force [28]. Deep learning systems trained on fundus photographs, OCT volumes, and UWF images now deliver performance approaching subspecialist graders for several detection tasks, and can triage high-risk cases at scale. Beyond classification, AI enables segmentation, longitudinal change detection, and prognostic modelling [28, 29].
In routine practice, AI tools are already reshaping care pathways. Autonomous and assistive systems for diabetic retinopathy screening can safely discharge low-risk patients while prioritising those needing urgent review; cloud-based platforms for OCT analysis support rapid triage of macular disease in community and emergency settings; and deep-learning models embedded in widefield imaging software quantify ischaemic burden in diabetic eye disease and uveitis [30-32]. These tools do not replace the clinician; rather, they concentrate specialist time on complex cases and longitudinal decision-making, while automating repetitive detection and measurement tasks.
To be clinically useful, AI outputs must be easy to act on at the slit-lamp or reporting workstation. In practice, this means calibrated risk scores rather than binary labels, uncertainty flags when the model is “unsure”, and simple visual explanations such as saliency overlays on fundus images or OCT B-scans [33]. Systems that highlight why a case has been flagged, and how confident the model is, are more likely to be trusted and adopted by clinicians than “black-box” predictions, even when overall accuracy is high [34]. Recent consensus frameworks for trustworthy medical AI emphasise the same themes: fairness and diversity in training data, traceability of model versions, robustness to domain shift, and explainability at the level of individual cases, not just headline metrics in a development paper [34, 35].
6.1. From Promising to Dependable
External validation across sites and devices, uncertainty estimation, and continuous post-deployment monitoring convert prototypes into maintainable clinical tools [36]. Federated learning and privacy-preserving analytics facilitate training on diverse datasets without raw data leaving host institutions [37].
6.2. Safety, Ethics, and Equity
Curate balanced datasets (including high myopia, media opacity, and multi-ethnic cohorts) publish model cards, and ensure human-in-the-loop review for outliers [38]. Workflow integration matters: AI alerts should tell the clinician clearly what the concern is, how confident the system is, and where to look in the image, and they should appear naturally within existing reporting software rather than as a separate screen.
7. PORTABILITY AND POINT-OF-CARE IMAGING
Handheld and portable devices have broadened access to high-quality imaging in theatres, wards, emergency departments, neonatal units, and community settings [39, 40]. These platforms particularly benefit paediatric and bed-bound patients, and reduce barriers in low-resource environments. While image quality can lag that of benchtop systems, and battery life/durability are practical concerns, rapid improvements in sensors, optics, and onboard processing are closing the gaps.
7.1. What’s Changing
Smartphone-assisted fundus and slit-lamp adaptors, handheld OCT for NICU and theatre, and portable confocal microscopy enable decision-making at the bedside [41]. Real-time AI triage, on-device or in the cloud, can prioritise referrals without additional clinic visits.
7.2. Implementation Tips
Train super-users, standardise capture protocols, and use secure, automated image transfer to the electronic record to avoid ‘orphan’ images.
8. INTRAOPERATIVE AND DIGITALLY ASSISTED SURGERY
Intraoperative OCT integrated into microscopes provides real-time feedback during macular surgery, DMEK/DALK, and complex retinal detachment repair, confirming cleavage planes, graft/flap position, and subretinal fluid dynamics [42]. Heads-up 3-D visualisation with digital overlays aligns pre-operative imaging with the surgical field and supports teaching and tele-mentoring.
9. STRUCTURE–FUNCTION INTEGRATION
Linking imaging with microperimetry, contrast sensitivity, dark adaptation, and objective electrophysiology turns structural maps into functional risk models [43]. Co-registered change maps help decide when to treat, when to switch therapy, and how to stratify trial cohorts.
10. DATA QUALITY, GOVERNANCE, AND INTEROPERABILITY
To get the most value from these images, three elements are crucial: reliable image quality checks, standardised file formats that work across vendors, and straightforward integration with routine electronic records. Data stewardship should cover consent for secondary use, lineage tracking, and retention schedules. Interoperability with electronic records and registries unlocks real-world evidence.
11. EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE
New imaging brings new skills. Short, case-based curricula for imaging technicians and clinicians, covering capture, artefact recognition, and interpretation, are essential. Credentialing pathways and simulation with synthetic data will speed safe uptake.
CONCLUSION
Ophthalmic imaging has entered a mature phase in which resolution, field of view, speed, and analytical capability reinforce one another. Realising the full benefits for patients will depend less on incremental hardware gains and more on integration: integrating modalities, integrating quantitative metrics into trials and clinics, and integrating AI within safe, ethical, and efficient care pathways. The coming decade should focus on turning exquisite images into actionable, equitable information that protects sight.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Declared none.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
- AMD
Age-related Macular Degeneration
- FLIO
Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Ophthalmoscopy
- OCTA
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
- FAZ
Foveal Avascular Zone
- AO
Adaptive Optics
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
It is hereby acknowledged that all authors have accepted responsibility for the manuscript's content and consented to its submission. They have meticulously reviewed all results and unanimously approved the final version of the manuscript.
FUNDING
None.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Georgios D. Panos is the Associate Editorial Board Member of The Current Medical Imaging Journal.
REFERENCES
- 1.Javed A., Khanna A., Palmer E., Wilde C., Zaman A., Orr G., Kumudhan D., Lakshmanan A., Panos G.D. Optical coherence tomography angiography: A review of the current literature. J. Int. Med. Res. 2023;51(7):03000605231187933. doi: 10.1177/03000605231187933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Spaide R.F., Fujimoto J.G., Waheed N.K., Sadda S.R., Staurenghi G. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2018;64:1–55. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study; GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Prevalence of vision loss in high-income countries and in eastern and central Europe in 2020: magnitude and temporal trends. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2026;33(1):54–67. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2486461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li J.Q., Welchowski T., Schmid M., Mauschitz M.M., Holz F.G., Finger R.P. Prevalence and incidence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020;104(8):1077–1084. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Colijn J.M., Buitendijk G.H.S., Prokofyeva E., Alves D., Cachulo M.L., Khawaja A.P., Cougnard-Gregoire A., Merle B.M.J., Korb C., Erke M.G., Bron A., Anastasopoulos E., Meester-Smoor M.A., Segato T., Piermarocchi S., de Jong P.T.V.M., Vingerling J.R., Topouzis F., Creuzot-Garcher C., Bertelsen G., Pfeiffer N., Fletcher A.E., Foster P.J., Silva R., Korobelnik J.F., Delcourt C., Klaver C.C.W., Ajana S., Arango-Gonzalez B., Arndt V., Bhatia V., Bhattacharya S.S., Biarnés M., Borrell A., Bühren S., Calado S.M., Colijn J.M., Cougnard-Grégoire A., Dammeier S., de Jong E.K., De la Cerda B., Delcourt C., den Hollander A.I., Diaz-Corrales F.J., Diether S., Emri E., Endermann T., Ferraro L.L., Garcia M., Heesterbeek T.J., Honisch S., Hoyng C.B., Kersten E., Kilger E., Klaver C.C.W., Langen H., Lengyel I., Luthert P., Maugeais C., Meester-Smoor M., Merle B.M.J., Monés J., Nogoceke E., Peto T., Pool F.M., Rodríguez E., Ueffing M., Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt K.U., van Leeuwen E.M., Verzijden T., Zumbansen M., Acar N., Anastosopoulos E., Azuara-Blanco A., Bergen A., Bertelsen G., Binquet C., Bird A., Brétillon L., Bron A., Buitendijk G., Cachulo M.L., Chakravarthy U., Chan M., Chang P., Colijn J., Cougnard-Grégoire A., Creuzot-Garcher C., Cumberland P., Cunha-Vaz J., Daien V., Deak G., Delcourt C., Delyfer M-N., den Hollander A., Dietzel M., Erke M.G., Fauser S., Finger R., Fletcher A., Foster P., Founti P., Göbel A., Gorgels T., Grauslund J., Grus F., Hammond C., Helmer C., Hense H-W., Hermann M., Hoehn R., Hogg R., Holz F., Hoyng C., Jansonius N., Janssen S., Khawaja A., Klaver C., Korobelnik J-F., Lamparter J., Le Goff M., Leal S., Lechanteur Y., Lehtimäki T., Lotery A., Leung I., Mauschitz M., Merle B., Meyer zu Westrup V., Midena E., Miotto S., Mirshahi A., Mohan-Saïd S., Mueller M., Muldrew A., Nunes S., Oexle K., Peto T., Piermarocchi S., Prokofyeva E., Rahi J., Raitakari O., Ribeiro L., Rougier M-B., Sahel J., Salonikiou A., Sanchez C., Schmitz-Valckenberg S., Schweitzer C., Segato T., Shehata J., Silva R., Silvestri G., Simader C., Souied E., Springelkamp H., Tapp R., Topouzis F., Verhoeven V., Von Hanno T., Vujosevic S., Williams K., Wolfram C., Yip J., Zerbib J., Zwiener I., EYE-RISK consortium. European Eye Epidemiology (E3) consortium Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Europe. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):1753–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wong W.L., Su X., Li X., Cheung C.M.G., Klein R., Cheng C.Y., Wong T.Y. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2014;2(2):e106–e116. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grulkowski I., Liu J.J., Potsaid B., Jayaraman V., Lu C.D., Jiang J., Cable A.E., Duker J.S., Fujimoto J.G. Retinal, anterior segment and full eye imaging using ultrahigh speed swept source OCT with vertical-cavity surface emitting lasers. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2012;3(11):2733–2751. doi: 10.1364/BOE.3.002733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pircher M., Hitzenberger C.K., Schmidt-Erfurth U. Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography in the human eye. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2011;30(6):431–451. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gräfe M.G.O., van de Kreeke J.A., Willemse J., Braaf B., de Jong Y., Tan H.S., Verbraak F.D., de Boer J.F. Subretinal fibrosis detection using polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020;9(4):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.4.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ma F., Yuan M., Kozak I. Multispectral imaging: Review of current applications. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2023;68(5):889–904. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dysli C., Wolf S., Berezin M.Y., Sauer L., Hammer M., Zinkernagel M.S. Fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2017;60:120–143. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ringel M.J., Tang E.M., Tao Y.K. Advances in multimodal imaging in ophthalmology. Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol. 2021;13:25158414211002400. doi: 10.1177/25158414211002400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alshammari RD, Haliqa WMA, Majzoub RY. Diagnostic accuracy of AI or DL-enhanced technologies in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review. J Med Imaging Intervent Radiol. 2025;12:39. doi: 10.1007/s44326-025-00083-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Motulsky E.H., Liu G., Shi Y., Zheng F., Flynn H.W., Jr, Gregori G., Rosenfeld P.J. Widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50(8):474–484. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20190806-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tan B., Chua J., Lin E., Cheng J., Gan A., Yao X., Wong D.W.K., Sabanayagam C., Wong D., Chan C.M., Wong T.Y., Schmetterer L., Tan G.S. Quantitative microvascular analysis with wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3(1):e1919469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lu Y., Simonett J.M., Wang J., Zhang M., Hwang T., Hagag A.M., Huang D., Li D., Jia Y. Evaluation of automatically quantified foveal avascular zone metrics for diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(6):2212–2221. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fernández-Vigo J.I., Kudsieh B., Shi H., Arriola-Villalobos P., Donate-López J., García-Feijóo J., Ruiz-Moreno J.M., Fernández-Vigo J.Á. Normative database and determinants of macular vessel density measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020;48(1):44–52. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Patel S.N., Shi A., Wibbelsman T.D., Klufas M.A. Ultra-widefield retinal imaging: An update on recent advances. Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol. 2020;12:2515841419899495. doi: 10.1177/2515841419899495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nagiel A., Lalane R.A., Sadda S.R., Schwartz S.D. Ultra-widefield fundus imaging: A review of clinical applications and future trends. Retina. 2016;36(4):660–678. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lin C-J., Hsia N-Y., Li Y-L., Bair H., Lai C.T., Lin J.M., Chen W.L., Tien P.T., Kuo C.Y., Tsai Y.Y. Ultra-widefield angiography in the diagnosis and management of uveitis. Taiwan J. Ophthalmol. 2018;8(3):159–163. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_115_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Magnusdottir V., Vehmeijer W.B., Eliasdottir T.S., Hardarson S.H., Schalij-Delfos N.E., Stefánsson E. Fundus imaging in newborn children with wide‐field scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(8):842–844. doi: 10.1111/aos.13453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wessel M.M., Nair N., Aaker G.D., Ehrlich J.R., D’Amico D.J., Kiss S. Peripheral retinal ischaemia, as evaluated by ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography, is associated with diabetic macular oedema. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):694–698. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tan C.S., Chew M.C., van Hemert J., Singer M.A., Bell D., Sadda S.R. Measuring the precise area of peripheral retinal non-perfusion using ultra-widefield imaging and its correlation with the ischaemic index. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016;100(2):235–239. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Godara P., Dubis A.M., Roorda A., Duncan J.L., Carroll J. Adaptive optics retinal imaging: emerging clinical applications. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2010;87(12):930–941. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ff9a8b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jonnal R.S., Kocaoglu O.P., Zawadzki R.J., Liu Z., Miller D.T., Werner J.S. A review of adaptive optics optical coherence tomography: Technical advances, scientific applications, and the future. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(9):OCT51–OCT68. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Britten-Jones A.C., Thai L., Flanagan J.P.M., Bedggood P.A., Edwards T.L., Metha A.B., Ayton L.N. Adaptive optics imaging in inherited retinal diseases: A scoping review of the clinical literature. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2024;69(1):51–66. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Takayama K., Ooto S., Hangai M., Ueda-Arakawa N., Yoshida S., Akagi T., Ikeda H.O., Nonaka A., Hanebuchi M., Inoue T., Yoshimura N. High-resolution imaging of retinal nerve fiber bundles in glaucoma using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2013;155(5):870–881.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ting D.S.W., Pasquale L.R., Peng L., Campbell J.P., Lee A.Y., Raman R., Tan G.S.W., Schmetterer L., Keane P.A., Wong T.Y. Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019;103(2):167–175. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chatzimichail E., Feltgen N., Motta L., Empeslidis T., Konstas A.G., Gatzioufas Z., Panos G.D. Transforming the future of ophthalmology: Artificial intelligence and robotics’ breakthrough role in surgical and medical retina advances: A mini review. Front. Med. 2024;11:1434241. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1434241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chauhan A., Vale L., Kankaria A., Gupta V., Singh M., Kaur G., Kumar S., Yadav M., N N., Tigari B., Bhadada S., Duggal M. Reach and implementation of human and ai-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening models in primary healthcare settings in india. Sci. Rep. 2025;15(1):41355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-25402-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang T.W., Luo W.T., Tu Y.K., Chou Y.B., Wu Y.T. Prospective validation of deep-learning algorithms for diabetic retinopathy screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2025 doi: 10.37766/inplasy2025.5.0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rojas-Carabali W., Guérand T., Cifuentes-González C., Abisheganaden J., Rk P., Wei Y.C., Mejía-Salgado G., de-la-Torre A., Smith J.R., Kempen J.H., Nguyen Q.D., Pavesio C., Lee B., Gupta V., Peyrin T., Agrawal R. Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study (COTS) Group. Dynamic Prediction of Treatment Failure in Ocular Tuberculosis Using Machine Learning and Explainable AI. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2025;14(10):31. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.10.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sarao V., Veritti D., De Nardin A., Misciagna M., Foresti G., Lanzetta P. Explainable artificial intelligence model for the detection of geographic atrophy using colour retinal photographs. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2023;8(1):e001411. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lekadir K., Frangi A.F., Porras A.R., Glocker B., Cintas C., Langlotz C.P., Weicken E., Asselbergs F.W., Prior F., Collins G.S., Kaissis G., Tsakou G., Buvat I., Kalpathy-Cramer J., Mongan J., Schnabel J.A., Kushibar K., Riklund K., Marias K., Amugongo L.M., Fromont L.A., Maier-Hein L., Cerdá-Alberich L., Martí-Bonmatí L., Cardoso M.J., Bobowicz M., Shabani M., Tsiknakis M., Zuluaga M.A., Fritzsche M.C., Camacho M., Linguraru M.G., Wenzel M., De Bruijne M., Tolsgaard M.G., Goisauf M., Cano Abadía M., Papanikolaou N., Lazrak N., Pujol O., Osuala R., Napel S., Colantonio S., Joshi S., Klein S., Aussó S., Rogers W.A., Salahuddin Z., Starmans M.P.A. FUTURE-AI Consortium. FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare. BMJ. 2025;388:e081554. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kondylakis H, Osuala R, Puig-Bosch X, Lazrak N, Diaz O, Kushibar K, Chouvarda I, Charalambous S, Starmans MP, Colantonio S, Tachos N, Joshi S, Woodruff HC, Salahuddin Z, Tsakou G, Ausso S, Alberich LC, Papanikolaou N, Lambin P, Marias K, Tsiknakis M, Fotiadis DI, Marti-Bonmati L, Lekadir K. A review of methods for trustworthy AI in medical imaging: The FUTURE-AI guidelines. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2025 doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2025.3614546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ting D.S.W., Cheung C.Y.L., Lim G., Tan G.S.W., Quang N.D., Gan A., Hamzah H., Garcia-Franco R., San Yeo I.Y., Lee S.Y., Wong E.Y.M., Sabanayagam C., Baskaran M., Ibrahim F., Tan N.C., Finkelstein E.A., Lamoureux E.L., Wong I.Y., Bressler N.M., Sivaprasad S., Varma R., Jonas J.B., He M.G., Cheng C.Y., Cheung G.C.M., Aung T., Hsu W., Lee M.L., Wong T.Y. Development and validation of a deep learning system for diabetic retinopathy and related eye diseases using retinal images from multiethnic populations with diabetes. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2211–2223. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gholami S., Lim J.I., Leng T., Ong S.S.Y., Thompson A.C., Alam M.N. Federated learning for diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration. Front. Med. 2023;10:1259017. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1259017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Koçak B., Ponsiglione A., Stanzione A., Bluethgen C., Santinha J., Ugga L., Huisman M., Klontzas M.E., Cannella R., Cuocolo R. Bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging: fundamentals, detection, avoidance, mitigation, challenges, ethics, and prospects. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2025;31(2):75–88. doi: 10.4274/dir.2024.242854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Maldonado R.S., Izatt J.A., Sarin N., Wallace D.K., Freedman S., Cotten C.M., Toth C.A. Optimizing hand-held spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging for neonates, infants, and children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(5):2678–2685. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tran-Viet D., Wong B.M., Mangalesh S., Maldonado R., Cotten C.M., Toth C.A. Handheld spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging through the undilated pupil in infants born preterm or with hypoxic injury or hydrocephalus. Retina. 2018;38(8):1588–1594. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jansen L.G., Schultz T., Holz F.G., Finger R.P., Wintergerst M.W.M. Smartphone-based fundus imaging: Applications and adapters. Ophthalmologe. 2022;119(2):112–126. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01536-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pujari A., Agarwal D., Chawla R., Kumar A., Sharma N. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography guided ocular surgeries: Critical analysis of clinical role and future perspectives. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2427–2440. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S270708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang Y., Dunbar H. Clinical perspectives and trends: Microperimetry as a trial endpoint in retinal disease. Ophthalmologica. 2021;244(5):418–450. doi: 10.1159/000515148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
