Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Apr 10;125(6):461–474. doi: 10.1111/mmi.70068

An Escherichia coli Phosphotransferase System Modulates Methylglyoxal Resistance by Regulating Intracellular Potassium

Sara Alexander 1, Mark Goulian 2,3,✉
PMCID: PMC13445646  PMID: 41960855

ABSTRACT

Methylglyoxal is a toxic aldehyde produced during cellular metabolism across all domains of life. To cope with methylglyoxal stress, Escherichia coli employs the glyoxalase detoxification pathway coupled with Kef‐mediated potassium/proton antiport. However, the Kef system is protective only when extracellular potassium is well below concentrations typically found in mammalian hosts. The regulatory phosphotransferase system (PTS) that is historically known as the nitrogen‐related PTS (PTSNtr) has previously been shown to modulate potassium homeostasis and other processes in E. coli . Here, we identified this regulatory PTS as a mediator of methylglyoxal resistance for potassium concentrations that are comparable to those encountered in the context of host colonization or infection. We found that loss of unphosphorylated PtsN increases survival in methylglyoxal, and that this depended on the potassium/proton antiporter YcgO, whose activity decreases intracellular potassium and pH. While cytoplasmic acidification has been hypothesized to underlie protection from methylglyoxal via potassium/proton antiport, our results suggest the effects of acidification and intracellular potassium cannot be easily separated. Loss of potassium import through Trk increased survival in methylglyoxal and decreased intracellular potassium with only a relatively small decrease in pH. Moreover, the addition of acetate, which acidifies the cytoplasm and protects cells from methylglyoxal, also decreased intracellular potassium. Our results demonstrate that for extracellular potassium levels relevant for host infection and colonization, PtsN modulates methylglyoxal resistance by regulating potassium transport, and that low intracellular potassium, in addition to acidification, could play a direct role in protecting against methylglyoxal stress.

Keywords: Escherichia coli , methylglyoxal, pH, phosphotransferase systems, potassium, PTSNtr , pyruvaldehyde


Escherichia coli can survive methylglyoxal stress by modulating phosphorylation of a regulatory phosphotransferase system, which, in turn, regulates the activity of a potassium/proton antiporter. The constitutive potassium importer Trk also contributes to intracellular potassium levels. Cells that achieve a low intracellular potassium concentration, which is coupled to intracellular pH, are protected from methylglyoxal‐induced killing. Created in BioRender; https://BioRender.com/ys2f7q0.

graphic file with name MMI-125-461-g004.jpg

1. Introduction

A fundamental challenge for all cells is coping with the inevitable formation of toxic compounds during metabolism (Danchin 2017). Methylglyoxal (MGO) is a highly reactive dicarbonyl that is generated nonenzymatically from various metabolic processes across all domains of life (Thornalley 1996; Chakraborty et al. 2014). MGO has been implicated in infection and host immunity as it is produced by macrophages in response to intracellular bacteria and may play a role in shaping microbial communities in the gut (Anaya‐Sanchez et al. 2025; Baskaran et al. 1989; Akinrimisi et al. 2025). A variety of bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae, also produce MGO enzymatically via methylglyoxal synthase, which is thought to protect against the toxic effects of sugar phosphate accumulation (Hopper and Cooper 1971; Ferguson et al. 1998; Weber et al. 2005; Totemeyer et al. 1998; Kadner et al. 1992). However, MGO itself is toxic to cells due to its propensity to chemically modify DNA, proteins, and other molecules, which can lead to cellular dysfunction and death (Rabie et al. 2016; Yim et al. 1995; Fraval and McBrien 1980; Kang 2003; Thornalley 2008; Cooper and Anderson 1970).

Cells protect themselves from MGO primarily through the glyoxalase system, which facilitates glutathione‐dependent detoxification (Chakraborty et al. 2014; Ferguson et al. 1998). In this pathway, MGO spontaneously reacts with glutathione to form a hemithioacetal that is converted to S‐lactoylglutathione (SLG) by glyoxalase I (GloA or Glo1). Glyoxalase II (GloB or Glo2) then catalyzes the formation of D‐lactate from SLG, which regenerates glutathione (Cooper and Anderson 1970; Cliffe and Waley 1961; Still 1941; MacLean et al. 1998). In Escherichia coli and other Gram‐negative bacteria, the detoxification intermediate SLG also activates the potassium (K+)‐proton (H+) antiporters KefB and KefC, leading to potassium export and proton import, which provides protection from MGO (Ferguson et al. 1998, 1993; MacLean et al. 1998; Ozyamak et al. 2010; Booth 2005). When MGO or other activating electrophiles are absent, Kef transport activity is inhibited by glutathione (Meury and Kepes 1982). A similar MGO protective mechanism by a K+/H+ antiporter has been demonstrated in Bacillus subtilis, where bacillithiol plays a similar role to that of glutathione (Chandrangsu et al. 2014). The resulting cytoplasmic acidification resulting from Kef‐mediated ion exchange reportedly protects from MGO (Ferguson et al. 1995), however, to our knowledge, the mechanism for this protection is not known (Kalapos 1999). In addition, protection from Kef‐mediated potassium transport occurs only when extracellular potassium is very low (≲ 0.2 mM) (Ferguson et al. 1995). It remains unclear whether potassium transport contributes to MGO resistance at higher potassium concentrations, such as those found in animal hosts (Spencer 1959).

One important modulator of potassium homeostasis in E. coli is a regulatory phosphotransferase system (PTS) that is highly conserved across Gram‐negative bacteria and is historically known as the nitrogen‐related phosphotransferase system (PTSNtr) (Barabote and Saier Jr. 2005; Rabus et al. 1999). Despite its name, a direct connection with nitrogen metabolism has never been established. In addition, unlike the classical carbohydrate PTS, this system appears to have a purely regulatory role (Pfluger‐Grau and Gorke 2010). Therefore, in what follows, we will avoid the term nitrogen‐related PTS and instead use the name “regulatory PTS” (PTSReg). In the PTSReg, a phosphoryl group derived from phosphoenolpyruvate is passed from PtsP to the final acceptor PtsN via PtsO (Figure 1A) (Rabus et al. 1999; Pfluger‐Grau and Gorke 2010; Powell et al. 1995; Luttmann et al. 2015). The signals that modulate the phosphorylation levels of these proteins are not well understood. Carbon and nitrogen availability have been suggested to play a role (Lee et al. 2013), but this has not been supported by other studies (Luttmann et al. 2015; Jahn et al. 2013). In addition, the phosphatase SixA dephosphorylates PtsO. Therefore, factors that affect SixA expression or activity could also contribute to PTSReg phosphorylation and subsequent PtsN regulatory activities (Schulte and Goulian 2018; Schulte et al. 2021).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Effect of PTSReg on sensitivity to MGO. (A) In the PTSReg pathway, a phosphoryl group is transferred successively from phosphoenolpyruvate to PtsP, then to PtsO, and finally to PtsN. SixA dephosphorylates PtsO. Created in BioRender. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8mggriy. (B) Survival of PTSReg mutants relative to WT following treatment with 0.8 mM MGO for 1 h in K5 medium. Survival relative to WT is the ratio of the CFU/mL of the indicated mutant after MGO treatment to the CFU/mL at the time of MGO addition, divided by the corresponding ratio for WT (see Section 4). Filled bars represent geometric means; error bars are geometric standard deviations. Significance was calculated using a one‐sample ratio t‐test versus a hypothetical value of 1 (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, n = 4). (C) Complementation of ΔptsN with a chromosomal ptsN transcribed from a tetracycline‐inducible promoter. Expression was induced with 0.1 ng/mL anhydrotetracycline (ATC). The uninduced sample is compared to an uninduced WT control (strain SAA49, Table 1); the induced sample is relative to this WT + 0.1 ng/mL ATC. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, n = 5. (D) Effect of sixA deletion on MGO sensitivity relative to WT. Significance of ΔsixA and the complemented strain, relative to WT, were determined with a one‐sample ratio t‐test using a hypothetical value of 1 (**p < 0.01, n = 5); the relative survival of ptsN and ptsN sixA deletion strains were compared with a Welch's unpaired t‐test (n = 4).

PtsN interacts with and modulates various proteins and processes based on its phosphorylation state, such as sigma factor selectivity, motility, phosphate‐related stress, the stringent response, and potassium homeostasis (Pfluger‐Grau and Gorke 2010; Bowlin et al. 2022; Luttmann et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2010; Gravina et al. 2021; Karstens et al. 2014; Ronneau et al. 2016). Among these, the regulation of potassium transport by PtsN is the most well‐established in E. coli . Unphosphorylated PtsN stimulates expression of the KdpFABC high‐affinity potassium uptake system. Kdp expression is activated when extracellular potassium is very low, but might also be affected by other cations or through cross‐regulation (Luttmann et al. 2009; Epstein 2016; Schramke et al. 2017). Conversely, unphosphorylated PtsN has also been shown to regulate potassium export by directly interacting with and inhibiting the potassium‐proton antiporter YcgO (also known as CvrA), thereby suppressing potassium efflux (Sharma et al. 2016; Patidar et al. 2025). Additionally, there is biochemical evidence that PtsN interacts with the TrkA subunit of the constitutive Trk potassium import system (Lee et al. 2007). However, evidence for a physiological role of this interaction is lacking (Sharma et al. 2016).

Here, we investigate the role of potassium transport in MGO sensitivity for extracellular potassium concentrations that are comparable to those found in the mammalian host environment (5 mM), and thus distinct from the potassium‐limiting conditions that were characterized in previous E. coli studies. We identify PTSReg as a novel regulator of MGO resistance. Specifically, we find that unphosphorylated PtsN sensitizes cells to MGO by inhibiting the potassium/proton antiport activity of YcgO. Relief of this inhibition results in YcgO‐mediated potassium efflux and concomitant cytoplasmic acidification. In addition, we demonstrate that disrupting potassium import by the Trk system increases MGO resistance, suggesting that limiting intracellular potassium accumulation, and possibly the resulting subtle decrease in cytoplasmic pH, also provides protection against MGO. Together, our results suggest a model in which modulation of intracellular potassium, achieved indirectly through changes in PtsN phosphorylation or directly through reduced potassium uptake by Trk, controls bacterial survival during MGO stress in extracellular potassium concentrations that E. coli encounters in the context of infection.

2. Results

2.1. PtsN Phosphorylation State Affects MGO Sensitivity

To identify genes that might contribute to MGO resistance in higher potassium concentrations, we took advantage of transposon sequencing data for E. coli in a variety of growth and stress conditions (Wetmore et al. 2015). Transposon insertions within ptsP, ptsO, and ptsN showed fitness effects for cells growing in lysogeny broth (LB) containing MGO. We confirmed the reported ΔptsN phenotype in the E. coli MG1655 wild‐type (WT) strain following an hour of MGO exposure in LB (Figure S1). Next, we measured the survival of WT and strains lacking ptsP, ptsO, or ptsN (Figure 1A) in modified minimal medium containing 5 mM potassium (K5). We chose this potassium concentration because it is within the range found in mammalian serum (Spencer 1959; Cohn et al. 2000). In these conditions, MGO treatment resulted in significant killing of the WT strain after up to 2 h of exposure (Figure S2). The ΔptsP and ΔptsO mutants demonstrated significantly worse survival relative to WT, while the ΔptsN strain showed significantly better survival (Figure 1B). We complemented the ΔptsN phenotype by expressing ptsN under a tetracycline‐inducible promoter. Addition of anhydrotetracycline (ATC) to induce ptsN expression prior to MGO exposure restored survival to near WT levels (Figure 1C).

We suspected that PtsN phosphorylation state influences MGO sensitivity. This hypothesis is supported by the significantly worse MGO survival of both the ΔptsP strain, which has previously been shown to result in decreased PtsN phosphorylation (Luttmann et al. 2015), and the ΔptsO strain (Figure 1B). To explore this further, we took advantage of the fact that the phosphatase SixA dephosphorylates PtsO (Figure 1A) (Schulte and Goulian 2018; Schulte et al. 2021). Since deleting sixA increases PtsN phosphorylation (Schulte and Goulian 2018), we tested the effect of this deletion on MGO sensitivity. Survival was significantly higher in the ΔsixA strain relative to WT following MGO treatment, and this phenotype could be complemented with sixA integrated at an ectopic site in the chromosome (Figure 1D). We also determined that the increased MGO resistance conferred by ΔsixA was not additive with the effect of deleting ptsN, consistent with ΔsixA affecting MGO resistance by decreasing PtsN phosphorylation (Figure 1D). Taken together, these results suggest that unphosphorylated PtsN makes E. coli more sensitive to MGO.

2.2. The Effect of PtsN on MGO Survival Is Dependent on the Potassium Transporter YcgO

As discussed above, potassium transport was reported to increase MGO resistance through the Kef system in potassium‐limiting conditions (Ferguson et al. 1993). However, a role for potassium transport in MGO survival at potassium concentrations relevant for host infection has not been described. Since PtsN has been shown to interact with or regulate the activity of several potassium transporters, we hypothesized that modulation of potassium transport might underlie the enhanced MGO resistance of the ΔptsN strain. We first tested whether Kef plays a role in MGO resistance at 5 mM K+. We measured survival after MGO exposure of strains lacking PtsN and/or KefB and KefC. Deletion of both kefB and kefC did not significantly alter survival relative to WT (Figure 2A). This is consistent with previous results that found KefB/C activity provides protection against MGO in medium containing 0.2 mM K+ but not in medium containing 10 mM K+ (Ferguson et al. 1995). To rule out the possibility that PtsN inhibits KefB/C in higher potassium conditions, we also tested a mutant lacking both PtsN and the Kef transporters. The ΔptsN Δkef strain demonstrated the same degree of survival in MGO as the ΔptsN strain, confirming that PtsN's effect on MGO sensitivity is not mediated by the Kef system (Figure 2A). Although we ruled out the contribution of Kef, we investigated whether the MGO protection conferred by the loss of PtsN is nonetheless dependent on the concentration of extracellular potassium. To this end, we measured survival of ΔptsN relative to WT in 0.2 mM K+, which has frequently been used for MGO survival studies in E. coli (Ferguson et al. 1998, 1993, 1995, 1996; Ozyamak et al. 2010). In contrast to the ~10‐fold increase in survival in 5 mM K+, the absence of PtsN had no effect on MGO survival in the low potassium medium (Figure 2B). This suggests that the PtsN‐mediated protection is distinct from the canonical Kef pathway and requires sufficient extracellular potassium.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Effect of the Kef and YcgO potassium transporters on PTSReg‐mediated sensitivity to MGO. (A) Survival of strains lacking PtsN and/or both Kef transporters (KefB and KefC, denoted as Δkef) in MGO relative to WT. A one‐sample ratio t‐test was used to assess significance of all strains relative to WT using a hypothetical value of 1 (***p < 0.001, n = 7); an unpaired t‐test was used to compare the relative survival of ΔptsN and ΔptsN ΔkefBkefC (n = 7). (B) Survival of Δkef relative to WT was compared in media containing 0.2 mM or 5 mM [K+] after 1 h of exposure to MGO (one‐sample ratio t‐test, hypothetical value = 1, **p < 0.01, n = 4). (C) YcgO is inactive when inhibited by binding of unphosphorylated PtsN or when in low external potassium concentrations. Created in BioRender. (2026) https://BioRender.com/ivx5nrp. (D) Survival of ptsN and ycgO single and double deletions relative to WT in K5 (one‐sample ratio t‐test, hypothetical value = 1, ****p < 0.0001, n = 6).

We hypothesized that the recently described potassium transporter YcgO contributes to the enhanced survival of the ΔptsN strain, given that YcgO is a potassium/proton antiporter, it is inhibited by unphosphorylated PtsN, and, consistent with our results in Figure 2B, it is inactive at low extracellular potassium (Sharma et al. 2016; Patidar et al. 2025) (Figure 2C). To test whether the effect of PtsN on MGO sensitivity is through YcgO, we measured survival of a strain lacking YcgO and/or PtsN following MGO exposure. Deletion of ycgO alone did not significantly change survival relative to WT, whereas deletion of ycgO in the ΔptsN background decreased survival to near‐WT levels (Figure 2D). In addition, deletion of ycgO abolished the increased survival of the ΔsixA strain (Figure S3). Taken together, these results support a model in which loss of unphosphorylated PtsN increases MGO survival by relieving the inhibition of YcgO.

2.3. The YcgO‐Mediated Increase in MGO Resistance Is Associated With Decreased Intracellular Potassium and Cytoplasmic pH

Previous work found that in a ΔptsN background, YcgO‐mediated potassium transport is active in ≥ 20 mM K+ but not in 1 mM K+ (Sharma et al. 2016). To determine if PtsN and YcgO affect potassium transport in our growth conditions of 5 mM K+, we quantified intracellular potassium in WT as well as ΔptsN, ΔycgO, and ΔptsN ΔycgO strains using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP‐OES). The ΔptsN mutant exhibited a significant decrease in intracellular potassium compared to WT, which was restored to WT levels upon deletion of ycgO (Figure 3A). The ΔycgO deletion alone, on the other hand, had similar intracellular potassium levels as WT. These results indicate that, in the absence of PtsN, YcgO functions as a potassium transporter in media containing 5 mM K+.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The effect of PtsN and YcgO on intracellular potassium and pH. (A) Intracellular potassium was assayed in exponential‐phase cultures growing in K5 medium by ICP‐OES. Symbols represent the cellular potassium content per optical density at 600 nm (OD600) for individual cultures, colored bars represent the averages, and error bars report the standard deviations. Significance was determined by a one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons (**p < 0.01, n = 6 for WT and ΔptsN ΔycgO; n = 4 for ΔptsN and ΔycgO). (B) Intracellular pH was measured by treating exponentially growing cells with the pH probe BCECF‐AM and quantifying fluorescence by microscopy (see Section 4). The indicated mutants are derived from the strain NR698, which is used as the WT reference for these experiments (see text and Section 4). Data were normalized to the mean pH of the WT control group for each independent experiment (n = 2 per day). Final reported values represent the difference in average pH (ΔpH) of a population of single cells relative to WT, bars represent the mean of each biological replicate, and error bars are standard deviations. One‐way ANOVA was used to assess differences between strains (***p < 0.001, n = 4). (C) Absolute intracellular pH values for the experiment described in (B). Intracellular pH was measured as described above; each data point represents the average pH of a population of single cells. Bars represent the mean across biological replicates with the value displayed at the base, and error bars represent standard deviations. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons test (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n = 4).

Previous studies have suggested that when extracellular potassium is low (0.2 mM), cytoplasmic acidification mediated by Kef potassium/proton antiport provides protection from MGO (Ferguson et al. 1998, 1993, 1995). Therefore, we tested whether YcgO activity in a ΔptsN background affects intracellular pH in 5 mM K+. To measure intracellular pH, we used the acetoxymethyl ester of 2′,7′‐bis‐(2‐carboxyethyl)‐5‐(and‐6)‐carboxyfluorescein (BCECF‐AM), which crosses membranes and is converted to BCECF, a membrane impermeable compound that has a pH‐sensitive fluorescence spectrum (Homolya et al. 1993). For these experiments, we used the E. coli strain NR698, which has a leaky outer membrane (Ruiz et al. 2005) and was significantly more permeable to BCECF‐AM than was MG1655. We confirmed that PtsN has a similar effect on MGO sensitivity in this strain background (Figure S4). From fluorescence microscopy measurements of cells loaded with BCECF, we found that deleting ptsN lowered intracellular pH by approximately 0.5 units relative to WT (Figure 3B,C). On the other hand, the double deletion ΔptsN ΔycgO had an intracellular pH that was not significantly different from that of the parent strain NR698 (Figure 3B,C), consistent with YcgO activity contributing to the decreased pH of the ΔptsN strain.

2.4. Parallel Potassium Transport Pathways Confer MGO Resistance Additively

As noted above, in vitro studies suggested PtsN interacts with the Trk potassium transporter (Lee et al. 2007), but evidence supporting a role in vivo is lacking (Sharma et al. 2016). To investigate whether Trk might contribute to the MGO resistance conferred by ΔptsN, we measured the survival of ΔptsN, ΔtrkA, and ΔptsN ΔtrkA relative to WT following treatment with MGO. The ΔtrkA strain survived significantly better than WT, and this survival was further improved upon deletion of ptsN in this background (Figure 4A). This suggests that while Trk affects MGO resistance, it does so independently of PtsN. We also found that the ΔtrkA mutant had significantly lower intracellular potassium levels relative to WT, and that potassium levels were even lower in the ΔptsN ΔtrkA strain (Figure 4B). To test whether the Trk potassium transport system affects intracellular pH in E. coli , we measured cytoplasmic pH of ΔptsN and/or ΔtrkA in the NR698 (leaky outer membrane) strain background. We confirmed that loss of TrkA increases MGO resistance in NR698 as in MG1655 (Figure S4). When we measured pH, we found that the ΔtrkA strain has an intracellular pH approximately 0.3 units lower than WT, although the difference did not meet the threshold for statistical significance (p = 0.18) (Figure 4C). As with intracellular potassium, deletion of ptsN in the ΔtrkA background further decreased intracellular pH (Figure 4C). This suggests that the absence of the Trk system protects from MGO toxicity through a decrease in intracellular potassium and possibly pH.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

The effect of the Trk potassium import pathway on MGO sensitivity. (A) Survival relative to WT was assessed by a one‐sample ratio t‐test with a hypothetical value of 1 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, n = 4). Statistical differences between ΔptsN ΔtrkA and the respective single mutants were determined by a one‐way ANOVA with log‐normal distribution and Dunnett's multiple comparison test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, n = 4). (B) Intracellular potassium was assessed as in Figure 3. Symbols represent the cellular potassium content per OD600 for individual cultures in K5, colored bars represent the averages, and error bars report the standard deviations. One‐way ANOVA was used to assess differences between WT and the deletion strains (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, n = 8 for WT, n = 4 for ΔptsN and ΔtrkA, n = 3 for ΔptsN ΔtrkA). (C) Intracellular pH was measured as in Figure 3. Significance was evaluated by one‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons test (*p < 0.05, n = 4).

2.5. Increased MGO Protection From Sodium Acetate Is Associated With a Decrease in Both Intracellular Potassium and pH

The addition of sodium acetate (NaOAc) to growth medium lowers cytoplasmic pH, since the conjugate acid (acetic acid) crosses lipid bilayers (Warnecke and Gill 2005; Walter and Gutknecht 1984). Even for growth medium buffered to neutral pH, where the fraction of acetic acid is very low, a small decrease in pH can be achieved (Ferguson et al. 1995). This mild acidification protects from MGO‐induced killing and has been used to support the argument for cytoplasmic acidification as the basis of K+/H+ antiport‐mediated protection (Ferguson et al. 1998, 1995, 1996). To test if acetate is protective in our growth conditions, we measured the effect of treating cells with 25 mM NaOAc during MGO exposure. As previously reported, the addition of NaOAc significantly improved survival of E. coli MG1655 upon exposure to lethal MGO concentrations (Figure 5A). To confirm that the addition of NaOAc decreased intracellular pH, we performed pH measurements as described above and found that intracellular pH was lowered from approximately 7.2 to 6.5, a change of approximately 0.7 units (Figure 5B).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Effect of sodium acetate (NaOAc) on sensitivity to MGO, intracellular pH, and potassium. (A) Where indicated, NaOAc was added to 25 mM at the time of MGO addition. Symbols represent the ratio of treated to untreated CFU/mL for each biological replicate. Closed circles were only treated with MGO, while open circles were also treated with NaOAc. Differences in survival between conditions were assessed using a one‐way ANOVA with the indicated comparisons (****p < 0.0001, n = 4). (B) Intracellular pH of strains with or without NaOAc treatment. One‐way ANOVA was used to assess differences between conditions (****p < 0.0001, n = 8). (C) Intracellular potassium was measured in WT E. coli with or without the addition of 25 mM NaOAc using ICP‐OES. Data presented as nmol K+ per OD600 at time of culture collection. Welch's t‐test was used to assess differences between conditions (***p < 0.001, n = 6 for control; n = 4 for NaOAc‐treated).

A previous study reported that cytoplasmic acidification by addition of NaOAc did not alter intracellular potassium levels of E. coli; however, the data were not published (Ferguson et al. 1995). We therefore measured the effect of NaOAc on intracellular potassium in WT cells grown in K5 with and without 25 mM NaOAc. Unexpectedly, we found that NaOAc addition significantly decreased intracellular potassium (Figure 5C). Thus, our results cannot distinguish between a role for decreased intracellular potassium or pH, or perhaps both, in providing protection from MGO.

3. Discussion

In this work, we have shown that PtsN serves as a regulator of MGO resistance by modulating potassium efflux (YcgO) in tandem with constitutive potassium import systems (Trk). Previous studies identified a role for potassium transport in modulating MGO resistance through detoxification‐induced Kef activity (Ferguson et al. 1993). However, Kef has been shown to protect E. coli from MGO only in very low extracellular potassium concentrations (Ferguson et al. 1993). Indeed, loss of Kef did not significantly change MGO survival in our growth conditions of 5 mM K+ (Figure 2A). It is unclear where E. coli encounters the potassium limiting conditions in which Kef‐mediated protection would be operative, but it is plausible that it could be important in various ex vivo environments where potassium is scarce, such as in some fresh water sources, soils, or abiotic surfaces (Sardans and Peñuelas 2015; Do and Gries 2021). However, potassium concentrations in animal hosts are significantly higher, with extracellular fluid and the gastrointestinal tract containing an average of 5 mM and 16 mM K+, respectively (Spencer 1959). Thus, the MGO resistance pathways uncovered in this study, which function in these host‐relevant potassium ranges, are potentially important in the context of host colonization or infection where cells encounter MGO.

We found that YcgO activity can facilitate protection from MGO in media containing 5 mM K+ (Figure 2D); however, the physiological contexts that permit YcgO‐mediated potassium transport remain unknown. Recently, it was demonstrated that unphosphorylated PtsN inhibits YcgO by interacting with the C‐terminal cytoplasmic region of the transporter (Patidar et al. 2025). Under standard laboratory growth conditions, most PtsN protein in the cell is phosphorylated (Luttmann et al. 2015; Schulte and Goulian 2018; Bahr et al. 2011); nevertheless, there is apparently enough unphosphorylated PtsN to effectively inhibit YcgO, as we and others observed no effect of deleting ycgO alone on intracellular potassium, or in our case, on MGO resistance (Figures 2D and 3A) (Sharma et al. 2016). However, one would expect that if the ratio of phosphorylated to unphosphorylated PtsN becomes sufficiently high, YcgO inhibition would be relieved. Indeed, eliminating the phosphatase SixA leads to high PtsN phosphorylation and YcgO‐dependent phenotypes, including decreased intracellular potassium (Schulte and Goulian 2018). This aligns with our data showing that loss of SixA confers increased protection from MGO in a YcgO‐dependent manner (Figure 1B and Figure S4).

While deletion of sixA serves as a genetic proof‐of‐principal that high PtsN phosphorylation levels can enable YcgO activity, the environmental and cellular signals that modulate PtsN phosphorylation are not well understood. Since SixA dephosphorylates PtsO, conditions that affect SixA's expression or activity have the potential to regulate PtsN phosphorylation. In addition, previous work suggests a role for nitrogen availability through glutamine and alpha‐ketoglutarate‐mediated regulation of PtsP (Lee et al. 2013), although additional studies have not corroborated this observation (Luttmann et al. 2015; Jahn et al. 2013). In some conditions, carbon source availability might also affect PtsN phosphorylation status through changes in phosphoenolpyruvate levels (Brauer et al. 2006), which serves as the phosphoryl group donor to phosphotransferase systems (Figure 1A). Spatiotemporal fluctuations in nutrient availability and other stresses occur throughout the human body; therefore, E. coli could encounter conditions that promote MGO resistance through increased PtsN phosphorylation during colonization or infection (Schlomann and Parthasarathy 2019; Chang et al. 2004; Donaldson et al. 2016). More work is needed to identify the factors that govern phosphorylation of PtsN, as well as to determine whether YcgO can function independently of PtsN in certain conditions, in order to further our understanding of YcgO's cellular role and provide deeper insight into how this system modulates protection from MGO.

The constitutive Trk system is one of the major potassium uptake systems in bacteria. In some species, Trk has been implicated in a wide range of processes, including virulence activation (Valente and Xavier 2016), antibiotic resistance (Castaneda‐Garcia et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2004), and stress survival (Vevik et al. 2025; Binepal et al. 2016), but in E. coli , little is known about its role in the cell beyond potassium homeostasis (Stautz et al. 2021; Epstein 2003; Bakker and Mangerich 1981; Kuo et al. 2005). Our results identify Trk‐mediated potassium import as a determinant of MGO sensitivity, as deletion of trkA significantly improved survival. The loss of Trk was accompanied by a significant decrease in intracellular potassium and a mild decrease in cytoplasmic pH, both of which have been previously reported in trk‐deficient E. coli (Durand et al. 2016; Hartmann et al. 2022). Since Trk is not a K+/H+ antiporter, this suggests cytoplasmic potassium can affect pH independently of the transport process. A similar argument applies to the effect of Kdp on pH at very low extracellular potassium (Ferguson et al. 1996). It has been postulated that pH‐mediated protection from MGO relies on cytoplasm pH crossing a particular threshold value (Ferguson et al. 1995, 1996). Thus, it is possible that the subtle decrease in pH observed in the ΔtrkA strain, while statistically indistinguishable from WT, crossed this threshold for MGO protection. Alternatively, other potassium‐dependent mechanisms besides intracellular pH might also affect MGO susceptibility.

It has long been held that cytoplasmic acidification from potassium/proton antiport activity underlies Kef's protection from MGO (Ferguson et al. 1995). Since YcgO also functions as a potassium/proton antiporter (Patidar et al. 2025), it is likely that the basis for MGO protection is the same for both of these systems. However, to our knowledge, the mechanism underlying how cytoplasmic acidification increases MGO resistance has not been established. Decreased cytoplasmic pH has been suggested to slow or reduce reactions between MGO and macromolecules and/or activate repair systems (Ferguson et al. 1998; Krymkiewicz 1973; Murata‐Kamiya and Kamiya 2001), but whether this occurs in vivo and in response to the relatively small changes in pH associated with Kef and YcgO activity is unclear. The addition of sodium acetate (NaOAc) has been shown to lower intracellular pH and protect cells from MGO (Ferguson et al. 1995), and we observed the same effect (Figure 5A,B). However, we also found that acetate treatment decreased intracellular potassium levels (Figure 5C), which contrasts with previous reports based on unpublished data (Ferguson et al. 1995). Potassium is the major cation in cells and plays numerous biological roles, from maintaining electrochemical potential and turgor pressure to serving as a cofactor for molecular chaperones (Danchin and Nikel 2019). There is also evidence that decreasing intracellular potassium levels can increase protein‐DNA and protein–protein interactions, which could have consequences for repairing damage caused by MGO (Durand et al. 2016; Wood 2011). Thus, it is possible that decreased potassium levels alone, or perhaps in tandem with lower intracellular pH, increase MGO survival. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, our results demonstrate a broader role for potassium transport in protection from MGO, both PtsN‐dependent and independent, than was previously appreciated. Future work will be required to disentangle the effects of intracellular potassium and pH and to determine the underlying protective mechanisms.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Media and Growth Conditions

Strains were grown aerobically at 37°C, except when propagating strains with temperature‐sensitive plasmids, in which case growth was at 30°C. Solid medium consisted of Miller's Lysogeny Broth (LB) agar containing 10% tryptone, 5% yeast extract, 10% NaCl, and 1.5% agar. Minimal media was based on minimal A medium (Miller 1992), but modified to contain different potassium concentrations and buffered with 3‐(N‐Morpholino) Propane‐Sulfonic Acid (MOPS) adjusted to pH 7. For assays with 5 mM K+, the growth medium (designated K5) contained, 7.6 mM (NH4)2SO4, 1.7 mM Na citrate, 1 mM MgSO4, 2 mM K2HPO4, 1 mM KH2PO4, 40 mM MOPS, and 0.2% glucose. For assays with 0.2 mM K+, the medium components were identical to those of K5, except the concentrations of K2HPO4 and KH2PO4 were 0.08 mM and 0.04 mM, respectively. Methylglyoxal (Alfa Aesar B24664.14) was stored at 4°C with argon in the headspace. When required, ampicillin or kanamycin was added to the growth medium to a concentration of 100 or 50 μg/mL, respectively. To induce expression from the tet promoter for ptsN complementation, anhydrotetracycline was added to a final concentration of 0.1 ng/mL from a 1 mg/mL stock prepared in 100% molecular grade ethanol. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), which was used to dilute cultures for determining colony forming units (CFU), consisted of 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4.

4.2. Plasmid and Strain Construction

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Phage transduction was performed with P1vir (Miller 1992). FLP recombinase expressed from pCP20 was used to excise FRT‐flanked antibiotic‐resistance cassettes from bacterial genomes (Cherepanov and Wackernagel 1995). Gene deletions from the Keio collection (Baba et al. 2006) were confirmed by PCR. To construct the ptsN complementation strain, we constructed a tet‐inducible ptsN at the lambda attachment site. First, primers ptsN_tetA_U1 and KEIOP1_GFP_L1 (Table 3), with flanking homology to pAFS07, were used to amplify ptsN and the downstream FRT‐KanR‐FRT from SAA60 gDNA (Haldimann and Wanner 2001). Recombineering was then used to insert the sequence into SAA50 harboring pSIM6, replacing tetA and gfp (Thomason et al. 2023). The resulting construct was confirmed by DNA sequencing and transduced into SAA50 to give SAA68.

TABLE 1.

Strains used in this study.

Strain Relevant genotype References, source, or other information Associated figures
MG1655 (WT) F− ilvG rfb‐50 rph‐1 E. coli Genetic Stock Center (CGSC no. 7740) 1B,D; 2A,B,D; 3A; 4A,B; 5A,C; S1–S3
JES269 MG1655 ΔptsN::(FRT) P1vir(JW3171 × MG1655), treatment with pCP20 1B,D; 2D; 3A; 4A,B; S1
JW3171 ΔptsN::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
JES215 MG1655 ΔptsP::(FRT) P1vir(JW2408 × MG1655), treatment with pCP20 1B
JW2408 ΔptsP::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
ARS98 MG1655 ΔptsO::(FRT) P1vir(JW3173 × MG1655), treatment with pCP20 1B
JW3173 ΔptsO::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
SAA49 MG1655 att λ::(cat tetR tetA‐gfp) Used as WT control strain; Plasmid pAS07 integrated at att λ 1C
SAA50 MG1655 ΔptsN::(FRT) att λ::(cat tetR tetA‐gfp) Used to construct SAA68; Plasmid pAS07 integrated at att λ —
SAA60 MG1655 ΔrapZ::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3172 × MG1655), Used to construct SAA68 —
JW3172 ΔrapZ::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
SAA68 MG1655 ΔptsN attλ:(ptsN, kan, cat) See Section 4 1C
JES13 MG1655 ΔsixA::(FRT) Goulian lab stock, Schulte and Goulian (2018) 1D; S3
JES73 MG1655 Δ(sixA) att λ::(sixA yfp cat) pJS05 integration into JES13 using pINT‐ts 1D
JES194 MG1655 ΔsixA::(FRT) ΔptsN::(FRT) P1vir(JW3171 × JES13), treatment with pCP20 1D
JW0046 ΔkefC::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
JW3313 ΔkefB::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
SAA26 MG1655 ΔkefC::(FRT) P1vir(JW0046 × MG1655), treatment with pCP20 —
SAA27 MG1655 ΔptsN::(FRT) ΔkefC::(FRT) P1vir(JW0046 × JES269), treatment with pCP20 —
SAA29 MG1655 ΔkefC::(FRT) ΔkefB::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3313 × SAA26) 2A
SAA30 MG1655 ΔptsN::(FRT) ΔkefC::(FRT) ΔkefB::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3313 × SAA27) 2A
JES193 MG1655 ΔycgO::(FRT) P1vir(JW5184 × MG1655), treatment with pCP20 2D; 3A
JW5184 ΔycgO::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
JES203 MG1655 ΔycgO::(FRT) ΔptsN::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3171 × JES269) 2D, 3A
JES31 MG1655 ΔycgO::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) ΔsixA::(FRT) Goulian lab stock, Schulte and Goulian (2018) S3
MC4100 F– araD139 Δ(argF‐lac)U169 rpsL150 (StrR)relA1 flbB5301 deoC1 ptsF25 rbsR Casadaban (1976) —
NR698 MC4100 lptD4213 Ruiz et al. (2005) 3B,C; 4C; 5B; S4
SAA86 NR698 ΔptsN::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3171 × NR698) 3A; 4C; S4
SAA94 NR698 ΔptsN::(FRT) SAA86 treated with pCP20 —
SAA98

NR698 ΔptsN::(FRT)

ΔycgO::(FRT‐kan‐FRT)

P1vir(JW5184 × SAA94) 3A; S4
SAA92 NR698 ΔtrkA::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3251 × NR698) 4B; S4
SAA99 NR698 ΔptsN::(FRT) ΔtrkA::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3251 × SAA94) 4B; S4
JW3251 ΔtrkA::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) Baba et al. (2006) —
JES295 MG1655 ΔtrkA::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3251 × MG1655) 4A,B
SAA12 MG1655 ΔptsN::(FRT) ΔtrkA::(FRT‐kan‐FRT) P1vir(JW3251 × JES269) 4A,B

TABLE 2.

Plasmids used in this study.

Plasmid Relevant genotype References or construction
pCP20 λcI857(ts) λp R‐FLP repA101(ts) oriR101 bla cat Cherepanov and Wackernagel (1995)
pINT‐ts LAMcI857(ts), repA101(ts), oriR101, lpR‐int, bla(AmpR) Haldimann and Wanner (2001)
pSIM6 miniλ recombineering plasmid, pSC101 origin, repAts Datta et al. (2006)
pAS07 pCAH63 tetR + Φ(tetA +‐cfp +) Lasaro et al. (2014)
pCAH63 oriR λ cat attP λ P synl ‐uidAf Haldimann and Wanner (2001)
pJS05 pCAH63 cat P sixA ‐sixA + Goulian lab stock; Psyn1‐uidA was replaced with sixA; sixA complementation vector comprising the native promoter (including sequence 694 bp upstream of start codon and 68 bp downstream of stop codon) and a promoterless yfp.

TABLE 3.

Primers used in this study.

Primer Sequence Resulting construct and purpose
ptsN_tetA_U1 CATTGATAGAGTTATTTTACCACTCCCTATCAGTGATAGAGAAAAGTGAAatgACAAATAATGATACAAC ptsN ΔrapZ FRT‐kan‐FRT with flanking homology to pAS07; Recombineering.
KEIOP1_GFP_L1 TGTCAAACATGAGAATTCGTACGGCCGACTAGTAGGTCAGCTAATTAAGCTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTCG ptsN ΔrapZ FRT‐kan‐FRT with flanking homology to pAS07. Recombineering, sequencing SAA68.

4.3. MGO Survival Assays

Overnight cultures grown in K5 were diluted 1:100 into fresh, pre‐warmed K5 and grown to early exponential phase (OD ~0.2). Cells were then diluted 1:10 into pre‐warmed K5 and MGO was added to a final concentration of 0.8 mM and incubated at 37°C. Cultures were exposed to MGO for 1 h, then serially diluted in 1× PBS and 10 μL was plated on LB agar plates and incubated overnight at 37°C. Relative survival was calculated by comparing the ratio of final to initial CFU/mL for each mutant to WT, according to the following formula:

Relative survival=finalCFUinitialCFUMutfinalCFUinitialCFUWT

For experiments with sodium acetate (NaOAc), a final concentration of 25 mM NaOAc was added immediately prior to the addition of MGO (Ferguson et al. 1995). For ptsN complementation experiments, ATC was added at the time of overnight culture dilution to induce ptsN expression.

4.4. Intracellular Potassium Measurements

Cell pellets for potassium measurements were prepared by spinning through oil as previously described (Schulte and Goulian 2018). Bacteria were grown to early exponential phase (OD ~0.2) in K5, then 1.5 mL of sample was spun through 300 μL of a 2:1 (vol/vol) dibutyl and dioctyl phthalate (Sigma; 524980, 201154) mixture in triplicate for each culture, then spun at 16,000 g. The supernatant was carefully removed, and the remaining pellet was resuspended in 100 μL 1 N nitric acid and digested at room temperature overnight. The next day, 950 μL of diluent (2% nitric acid, 0.5% HCl) was added, samples were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 30 min, and 1 mL of supernatant was removed and mixed with 4 mL diluent. Samples were stored at 4°C until analysis. Intracellular potassium measurements were performed on a Spectro Genesis inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP‐OES). The fully aqueous samples were delivered to the plasma via a modified Lichte maximum dissolved solid nebulizer (MDSN) and cyclonic spray chamber. Instrument drift and performance were monitored using Ar wavelengths 404.442 nm and 430.010 nm. Calibration solutions containing 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, and 10 mg/L KCl and 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/L NaCl were prepared in distilled H2O and analyzed alongside a blank. Potassium was quantified at wavelength 766.491 nm. All data was processed using Smart Analyzer Vision software (v 5.01).

4.5. Intracellular pH Measurements by BCECF‐AM

E. coli strain NR698 was used for all pH experiments as detailed in the results and Table 1. Intracellular pH was measured using BCECF‐AM as previously described with the following modifications (Aono et al. 1997; Worthan et al. 2024). BCECF‐AM (Invitrogen, B1170) was prepared in anhydrous DMSO (Biotium, 90082) to a final concentration of 1 mM and nigericin (Cayman Chemical, 11437) was prepared in 100% molecular biology grade ethanol to a concentration of 25 mM on the day of pH measurement. NR698 (WT) and derived strains were grown in K5 to exponential phase (OD ~0.2) with aeration at 37°C. For pH calibration, WT (NR698) cultures were clamped in potassium phosphate buffer containing a final concentration of 100 mM potassium and 50 μM nigericin at pH 6, 6.4, 7, 7.4, 8, or 8.4. Next, 10 μM of BCECF‐AM was added and cells were incubated at 37°C in the dark for 60 min. For samples containing NaOAc, a final concentration of 25 mM was added prior to the addition of BCECF‐AM. Following incubation, samples were spun at 6500 g, resuspended in 100 μl K5 or the corresponding pH buffer, and then added to a 1% agarose pad for imaging as previously described (Miyashiro and Goulian 2007). For pH calibration, agarose pads were prepared with the corresponding pH buffer to keep the microenvironment consistent during imaging, otherwise pads were prepared with K5. Fluorescence microscopy was performed with an Olympus IX81 microscope equipped with a 100X UPlanApo NA 1.35 objective lens, a 100‐watt mercury lamp, and a Sensicam QE ccd camera (Cooke Corporation, Romulus, MI). Fluorescence filters, which were used for ratiometric pH measurements of BCECF, were from Chroma (Brattleboro, VT); one filter set (488) consisted of HQ500/20 excitation, Q515lp dichroic, HQ535/30 emission filters, and the other set (440) consisted of D436/20 excitation, 455dclp dichroic, HQ535/30 emission filters. Cells were exposed to filter 440 for 40 ms and filter 488 for 20 ms. Images were analyzed using in‐house software; cells with a mean fluorescence of less than 25 or 50 for 440 and 488 respectively, and with > 8%‐pixel saturation, were removed from analysis. A minimum of 60 cells were analyzed per condition or strain. Ratio of 488/440 calculated for each sample, then average and standard deviation were calculated in Microsoft Excel. Mean fluorescence ratios were fitted to a modified Henderson‐Hasselbalch equation to determine day‐specific calibration parameters using non‐linear least squares regression as described previously (Worthan et al. 2024; James‐Kracke 1992) using python package SciPy (Virtanen et al. 2020).

4.6. Statistical Analysis and Figure Preparation

All graphs were prepared and statistical tests performed with GraphPad Prism Version 10.5.0. Details of statistical tests are found in corresponding figure legends. All relevant p values were two‐tailed and p < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses and are indicated with asterisks or letters in the text: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Figures 1A and 2C were made in BioRender.

Author Contributions

Sara Alexander: conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); methodology (lead); writing – original draft (lead); formal analysis (lead); writing – review and editing (lead); visualization (lead). Mark Goulian: conceptualization (supporting); methodology (supporting); supervision (lead); writing – review and editing (supporting).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM139541, F31GM154412, and T32 GM07229).

Disclosure

Copyright Statement: Figures 1A, 2C, and the graphical abstract were created with BioRender.com under publication licenses SG2991T2GQ, PU2991SW2H, and NR2991UDU3. No other third‐party copyrighted materials were used.

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Figure S1: Survival of WT and ΔptsN in MGO during growth in LB. Cultures were exposed to 0.8 mM MGO for 1 h, as described in Section 4. Symbols represent the ratio of treated to untreated (initial) CFUs, bars represent the mean, and error bars represent the standard deviations. Significance was determined by a log‐normal Welch's t‐test (***p < 0.001, n = 6).

Figure S2: Survival of MG1655 in MGO over time. Survival in MGO was assessed in K5 as described in Section 4 for up to 2 h. Symbols represent CFUs after indicated MGO exposure time, bars represent the mean, and error bars are standard deviations. Statistical differences were assessed by log‐normal one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n = 3).

Figure S3: MGO resistance of ΔsixA and ΔsixA ΔycgO. MGO survival was assessed as described in Section 4. Bars represent the geometric mean, and error bars are the geometric standard deviations. Statistical differences were determined by a one‐sample ratio t‐test versus a hypothetical value of 1 (*p < 0.5, n = 4).

Figure S4: Survival of NR698 and derived mutants in MGO. Survival was assessed as described in Section 4. Bars represent the geometric mean and error bars are the geometric standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by a log‐normal one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test (***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, n = 4).

MMI-125-461-s001.pdf (128.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank David Burney for his training and help with ICP‐OES and Natacha Ruiz for providing the strain NR698. This work was supported by NIH grants R35GM139541 (MG), T32 GM07229 (SA), and F31GM154412 (SA).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study will be made available on a public repository.

References

  1. Akinrimisi, O. I. , Maasen K., Scheijen J., et al. 2025. “Does Gut Microbial Methylglyoxal Metabolism Impact Human Physiology?” Antioxidants 14: 763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anaya‐Sanchez, A. , Berry S. B., Espich S., et al. 2025. “Methylglyoxal Is an Antibacterial Effector Produced by Macrophages During Infection.” Cell Host & Microbe 33: 1121–1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aono, R. , Ito M., and Horikoshi K.. 1997. “Measurement of Cytoplasmic pH of the Alkaliphile Bacillus lentus C‐125 With a Fluorescent pH Probe.” Microbiology (Reading) 143: 2531–2536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baba, T. , Ara T., Hasegawa M., et al. 2006. “Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 In‐Frame, Single‐Gene Knockout Mutants: The Keio Collection.” Molecular Systems Biology 2: 2006‐0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bahr, T. , Luttmann D., Marz W., Rak B., and Gorke B.. 2011. “Insight Into Bacterial Phosphotransferase System‐Mediated Signaling by Interspecies Transplantation of a Transcriptional Regulator.” Journal of Bacteriology 193: 2013–2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker, E. P. , and Mangerich W. E.. 1981. “Interconversion of Components of the Bacterial Proton Motive Force by Electrogenic Potassium Transport.” Journal of Bacteriology 147: 820–826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barabote, R. D. , and Saier M. H. Jr. 2005. “Comparative Genomic Analyses of the Bacterial Phosphotransferase System.” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 69: 608–634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baskaran, S. , Rajan D. P., and Balasubramanian K. A.. 1989. “Formation of Methylglyoxal by Bacteria Isolated From Human Faeces.” Journal of Medical Microbiology 28: 211–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Binepal, G. , Gill K., Crowley P., et al. 2016. “Trk2 Potassium Transport System in Streptococcus Mutans and Its Role in Potassium Homeostasis, Biofilm Formation, and Stress Tolerance.” Journal of Bacteriology 198: 1087–1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Booth, I. R. 2005. “Glycerol and Methylglyoxal Metabolism.” EcoSal Plus 1: 10–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowlin, M. Q. , Long A. R., Huffines J. T., and Gray M. J.. 2022. “The Role of Nitrogen‐Responsive Regulators in Controlling Inorganic Polyphosphate Synthesis in Escherichia coli .” Microbiology (Reading) 168: 001185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brauer, M. J. , Yuan J., Bennett B. D., et al. 2006. “Conservation of the Metabolomic Response to Starvation Across Two Divergent Microbes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 19302–19307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Casadaban, M. J. 1976. “Transposition and Fusion of the lac Genes to Selected Promoters in Escherichia coli Using Bacteriophage Lambda and Mu.” Journal of Molecular Biology 104: 541–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Castaneda‐Garcia, A. , Do T. T., and Blazquez J.. 2011. “The K+ Uptake Regulator TrkA Controls Membrane Potential, pH Homeostasis and Multidrug Susceptibility in Mycobacterium smegmatis .” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 66: 1489–1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chakraborty, S. , Karmakar K., and Chakravortty D.. 2014. “Cells Producing Their Own Nemesis: Understanding Methylglyoxal Metabolism.” IUBMB Life 66: 667–678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chandrangsu, P. , Dusi R., Hamilton C. J., and Helmann J. D.. 2014. “Methylglyoxal Resistance in Bacillus subtilis : Contributions of Bacillithiol‐Dependent and Independent Pathways.” Molecular Microbiology 91: 706–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chang, D. E. , Smalley D. J., Tucker D. L., et al. 2004. “Carbon Nutrition of Escherichia coli in the Mouse Intestine.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 7427–7432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, Y. C. , Chuang Y. C., Chang C. C., Jeang C. L., and Chang M. C.. 2004. “A K+ Yptake Protein, TrkA, Is Required for Serum, Protamine, and Polymyxin B Resistance in Vibrio vulnificus .” Infection and Immunity 72: 629–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cherepanov, P. P. , and Wackernagel W.. 1995. “Gene Disruption in Escherichia coli : TcR and KmR Cassettes With the Option of Flp‐Catalyzed Excision of the Antibiotic‐Resistance Determinant.” Gene 158: 9–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cliffe, E. E. , and Waley S. G.. 1961. “The Mechanism of the Glyoxalase I Reaction, and the Effect of Ophthalmic Acid as an Inhibitor.” Biochemical Journal 79: 475–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohn, J. N. , Kowey P. R., Whelton P. K., and Prisant L. M.. 2000. “New Guidelines for Potassium Replacement in Clinical Practice: A Contemporary Review by the National Council on Potassium in Clinical Practice.” Archives of Internal Medicine 160: 2429–2436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cooper, R. A. , and Anderson A.. 1970. “The Formation and Catabolism of Methylglyoxal During Glycolysis in Escherichia coli .” FEBS Letters 11: 273–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Danchin, A. 2017. “Coping With Inevitable Accidents in Metabolism.” Microbial Biotechnology 10: 57–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Danchin, A. , and Nikel P. I.. 2019. “Why Nature Chose Potassium.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 87: 271–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Datta, S. , Costantino N., and Court D. L.. 2006. “A Set of Recombineering Plasmids for Gram‐Negative Bacteria.” Gene 379: 109–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Do, E. A. , and Gries C. M.. 2021. “Beyond Homeostasis: Potassium and Pathogenesis During Bacterial Infections.” Infection and Immunity 89: e0076620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Donaldson, G. P. , Lee S. M., and Mazmanian S. K.. 2016. “Gut Biogeography of the Bacterial Microbiota.” Nature Reviews. Microbiology 14: 20–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Durand, A. , Sinha A. K., Dard‐Dascot C., and Michel B.. 2016. “Mutations Affecting Potassium Import Restore the Viability of the Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase III holD Mutant.” PLoS Genetics 12: e1006114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Epstein, W. 2003. “The Roles and Regulation of Potassium in Bacteria.” Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology 75: 293–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Epstein, W. 2016. “The KdpD Sensor Kinase of Escherichia coli Responds to Several Distinct Signals to Turn on Expression of the Kdp Transport System.” Journal of Bacteriology 198: 212–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferguson, G. P. , Chacko A. D., Lee C. H., and Booth I. R.. 1996. “The Activity of the High‐Affinity K+ Uptake System Kdp Sensitizes Cells of Escherichia coli to Methylglyoxal.” Journal of Bacteriology 178: 3957–3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ferguson, G. P. , McLaggan D., and Booth I. R.. 1995. “Potassium Channel Activation by Glutathione‐S‐Conjugates in Escherichia coli : Protection Against Methylglyoxal Is Mediated by Cytoplasmic Acidification.” Molecular Microbiology 17: 1025–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferguson, G. P. , Munro A. W., Douglas R. M., McLaggan D., and Booth I. R.. 1993. “Activation of Potassium Channels During Metabolite Detoxification in Escherichia coli .” Molecular Microbiology 9: 1297–1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferguson, G. P. , Totemeyer S., MacLean M. J., and Booth I. R.. 1998. “Methylglyoxal Production in Bacteria: Suicide or Survival?” Archives of Microbiology 170: 209–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fraval, H. N. , and McBrien D. C.. 1980. “The Effect of Methyl Glyoxal on Cell Division and the Synthesis of Protein and DNA in Synchronous and Asynchronous Cultures of Escherichia coli B/r.” Journal of General Microbiology 117: 127–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gravina, F. , Degaut F. L., Gerhardt E. C. M., et al. 2021. “The Protein‐Protein Interaction Network of the Escherichia coli EIIA(Ntr) Regulatory Protein Reveals a Role in Cell Motility and Metabolic Control.” Research in Microbiology 172: 103882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Haldimann, A. , and Wanner B. L.. 2001. “Conditional‐Replication, Integration, Excision, and Retrieval Plasmid‐Host Systems for Gene Structure‐Function Studies of Bacteria.” Journal of Bacteriology 183: 6384–6393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hartmann, F. S. F. , Weiss T., Shen J., Smahajcsik D., Savickas S., and Seibold G. M.. 2022. “Visualizing the pH in Escherichia coli Colonies via the Sensor Protein mCherryEA Allows High‐Throughput Screening of Mutant Libraries.” mSystems 7: e0021922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Homolya, L. , Hollo Z., Germann U. A., Pastan I., Gottesman M. M., and Sarkadi B.. 1993. “Fluorescent Cellular Indicators Are Extruded by the Multidrug Resistance Protein.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 268: 21493–21496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hopper, D. J. , and Cooper R. A.. 1971. “The Regulation of Escherichia coli Methylglyoxal Synthase; a New Control Site in Glycolysis?” FEBS Letters 13: 213–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jahn, S. , Haverkorn van Rijsewijk B. R., Sauer U., and Bettenbrock K.. 2013. “A Role for EIIA(Ntr) in Controlling Fluxes in the Central Metabolism of E. coli K12.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1833: 2879–2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. James‐Kracke, M. R. 1992. “Quick and Accurate Method to Convert BCECF Fluorescence to pHi: Calibration in Three Different Types of Cell Preparations.” Journal of Cellular Physiology 151: 596–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kadner, R. J. , Murphy G. P., and Stephens C. M.. 1992. “Two Mechanisms for Growth Inhibition by Elevated Transport of Sugar Phosphates in Escherichia coli .” Journal of General Microbiology 138: 2007–2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kalapos, M. P. 1999. “Methylglyoxal in Living Organisms: Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology and Biological Implications.” Toxicology Letters 110: 145–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kang, J. H. 2003. “Oxidative Damage of DNA Induced by Methylglyoxal In Vitro.” Toxicology Letters 145: 181–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Karstens, K. , Zschiedrich C. P., Bowien B., Stulke J., and Gorke B.. 2014. “Phosphotransferase Protein EIIANtr Interacts With SpoT, a Key Enzyme of the Stringent Response, in Ralstonia eutropha H16.” Microbiology (Reading) 160: 711–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Krymkiewicz, N. 1973. “Reactions of Methylglyoxal With Nucleic Acids.” FEBS Letters 29: 51–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuo, M. M. , Haynes W. J., Loukin S. H., Kung C., and Saimi Y.. 2005. “Prokaryotic K(+) Channels: From Crystal Structures to Diversity.” FEMS Microbiology Reviews 29: 961–985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lasaro, M. , Liu Z., Bishar R., et al. 2014. “ Escherichia coli Isolate for Studying Colonization of the Mouse Intestine and its Application to Two‐Component Signaling Knockouts.” Journal of Bacteriology 196: 1723–1732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee, C. R. , Cho S. H., Kim H. J., Kim M., Peterkofsky A., and Seok Y. J.. 2010. “Potassium Mediates Escherichia coli Enzyme IIA(Ntr)‐Dependent Regulation of Sigma Factor Selectivity.” Molecular Microbiology 78: 1468–1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee, C. R. , Cho S. H., Yoon M. J., Peterkofsky A., and Seok Y. J.. 2007. “ Escherichia coli Enzyme IIANtr Regulates the K+ Transporter TrkA.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 4124–4129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, C. R. , Park Y. H., Kim M., et al. 2013. “Reciprocal Regulation of the Autophosphorylation of Enzyme INtr by Glutamine and Alpha‐Ketoglutarate in Escherichia coli .” Molecular Microbiology 88: 473–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Luttmann, D. , Gopel Y., and Gorke B.. 2012. “The Phosphotransferase Protein EIIA(Ntr) Modulates the Phosphate Starvation Response Through Interaction With Histidine Kinase PhoR in Escherichia coli .” Molecular Microbiology 86: 96–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Luttmann, D. , Gopel Y., and Gorke B.. 2015. “Cross‐Talk Between the Canonical and the Nitrogen‐Related Phosphotransferase Systems Modulates Synthesis of the KdpFABC Potassium Transporter in Escherichia coli .” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 25: 168–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Luttmann, D. , Heermann R., Zimmer B., et al. 2009. “Stimulation of the Potassium Sensor KdpD Kinase Activity by Interaction With the Phosphotransferase Protein IIA(Ntr) in Escherichia coli .” Molecular Microbiology 72: 978–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. MacLean, M. J. , Ness L. S., Ferguson G. P., and Booth I. R.. 1998. “The Role of Glyoxalase I in the Detoxification of Methylglyoxal and in the Activation of the KefB K+ Efflux System in Escherichia coli .” Molecular Microbiology 27: 563–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Meury, J. , and Kepes A.. 1982. “Glutathione and the Gated Potassium Channels of Escherichia coli .” EMBO Journal 1: 339–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Miller, J. H. 1992. A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics: A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria. Vol. 62, 159. Genetics Research. [Google Scholar]
  59. Miyashiro, T. , and Goulian M.. 2007. “Single‐Cell Analysis of Gene Expression by Fluorescence Microscopy.” Methods in Enzymology 423: 458–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Murata‐Kamiya, N. , and Kamiya H.. 2001. “Methylglyoxal, an Endogenous Aldehyde, Crosslinks DNA Polymerase and the Substrate DNA.” Nucleic Acids Research 29: 3433–3438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ozyamak, E. , Black S. S., Walker C. A., et al. 2010. “The Critical Role of S‐Lactoylglutathione Formation During Methylglyoxal Detoxification in Escherichia coli .” Molecular Microbiology 78: 1577–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Patidar, Y. , Athreya A., Sharma R., Penmatsa A., and Sardesai A. A.. 2025. “Interaction of Unphosphorylated PtsN With the K(+)/H(+) Antiporter YcgO Inhibits Its Activity in Escherichia coli .” Journal of Biological Chemistry 301: 108153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Pfluger‐Grau, K. , and Gorke B.. 2010. “Regulatory Roles of the Bacterial Nitrogen‐Related Phosphotransferase System.” Trends in Microbiology 18: 205–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Powell, B. S. , Court D. L., Inada T., et al. 1995. “Novel Proteins of the Phosphotransferase System Encoded Within the rpoN Operon of Escherichia coli . Enzyme IIANtr Affects Growth on Organic Nitrogen and the Conditional Lethality of an Erats Mutant.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 270: 4822–4839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rabie, E. , Serem J. C., Oberholzer H. M., Gaspar A. R., and Bester M. J.. 2016. “How Methylglyoxal Kills Bacteria: An Ultrastructural Study.” Ultrastructural Pathology 40: 107–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rabus, R. , Reizer J., Paulsen I., and Saier M. H. Jr. 1999. “Enzyme I(Ntr) From Escherichia coli . A Novel Enzyme of the Phosphoenolpyruvate‐Dependent Phosphotransferase System Exhibiting Strict Specificity for Its Phosphoryl Acceptor, NPr.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 26185–26191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ronneau, S. , Petit K., De Bolle X., and Hallez R.. 2016. “Phosphotransferase‐Dependent Accumulation of (p)ppGpp in Response to Glutamine Deprivation in Caulobacter crescentus .” Nature Communications 7: 11423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ruiz, N. , Falcone B., Kahne D., and Silhavy T. J.. 2005. “Chemical Conditionality: A Genetic Strategy to Probe Organelle Assembly.” Cell 121: 307–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sardans, J. , and Peñuelas J.. 2015. “Potassium: A Neglected Nutrient in Global Change.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 24: 261–275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Schlomann, B. H. , and Parthasarathy R.. 2019. “Timescales of Gut Microbiome Dynamics.” Current Opinion in Microbiology 50: 56–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schramke, H. , Laermann V., Tegetmeyer H. E., Brachmann A., Jung K., and Altendorf K.. 2017. “Revisiting Regulation of Potassium Homeostasis in Escherichia coli : The Connection to Phosphate Limitation.” Microbiology 6: e00438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Schulte, J. E. , and Goulian M.. 2018. “The Phosphohistidine Phosphatase SixA Targets a Phosphotransferase System.” MBio 9: 10–1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schulte, J. E. , Roggiani M., Shi H., Zhu J., and Goulian M.. 2021. “The Phosphohistidine Phosphatase SixA Dephosphorylates the Phosphocarrier NPr.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 296: 100090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sharma, R. , Shimada T., Mishra V. K., Upreti S., and Sardesai A. A.. 2016. “Growth Inhibition by External Potassium of Escherichia coli Lacking PtsN (EIIANtr) Is Caused by Potassium Limitation Mediated by YcgO.” Journal of Bacteriology 198: 1868–1882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Spencer, R. P. 1959. “Potassium Metabolism and Gastrointestinal Function; a Review; a Semiquantitative Approach.” American Journal of Digestive Diseases 4: 145–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Stautz, J. , Hellmich Y., Fuss M. F., et al. 2021. “Molecular Mechanisms for Bacterial Potassium Homeostasis.” Journal of Molecular Biology 433: 166968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Still, J. L. 1941. “Glyoxalase of Bacterium Coli.” Biochemical Journal 35: 390–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Thomason, L. C. , Costantino N., Li X., and Court D. L.. 2023. “Recombineering: Genetic Engineering in Escherichia coli Using Homologous Recombination.” Current Protocols 3: e656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Thornalley, P. J. 1996. “Pharmacology of Methylglyoxal: Formation, Modification of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, and Enzymatic Detoxification—A Role in Pathogenesis and Antiproliferative Chemotherapy.” General Pharmacology 27: 565–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Thornalley, P. J. 2008. “Protein and Nucleotide Damage by Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal in Physiological Systems—Role in Ageing and Disease.” Drug Metabolism and Drug Interactions 23: 125–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Totemeyer, S. , Booth N. A., Nichols W. W., Dunbar B., and Booth I. R.. 1998. “From Famine to Feast: The Role of Methylglyoxal Production in Escherichia coli .” Molecular Microbiology 27: 553–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Valente, R. S. , and Xavier K. B.. 2016. “The Trk Potassium Transporter Is Required for RsmB‐Mediated Activation of Virulence in the Phytopathogen Pectobacterium wasabiae .” Journal of Bacteriology 198: 248–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Vevik, K. , Sribasgaran B., Cai K., et al. 2025. “TrkA of Streptococcus mitis CCUG31611 Binds Cyclic Di‐Adenosine Monophosphate and Is Required for Growth in Low Potassium Conditions.” Microbiology (Reading, England) 171: 001597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Virtanen, P. , Gommers R., Oliphant T. E., et al. 2020. “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python.” Nature Methods 17: 261–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Walter, A. , and Gutknecht J.. 1984. “Monocarboxylic Acid Permeation Through Lipid Bilayer Membranes.” Journal of Membrane Biology 77: 255–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Warnecke, T. , and Gill R. T.. 2005. “Organic Acid Toxicity, Tolerance, and Production in Escherichia coli Biorefining Applications.” Microbial Cell Factories 4: 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Weber, J. , Kayser A., and Rinas U.. 2005. “Metabolic Flux Analysis of Escherichia coli in Glucose‐Limited Continuous Culture. II. Dynamic Response to Famine and Feast, Activation of the Methylglyoxal Pathway and Oscillatory Behaviour.” Microbiology (Reading) 151: 707–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wetmore, K. M. , Price M. N., Waters R. J., et al. 2015. “Rapid Quantification of Mutant Fitness in Diverse Bacteria by Sequencing Randomly Bar‐Coded Transposons.” MBio 6: e00306‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wood, J. M. 2011. “Bacterial Osmoregulation: A Paradigm for the Study of Cellular Homeostasis.” Annual Review of Microbiology 65: 215–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Worthan, S. B. , McCarthy R. D. P., Delaleau M., et al. 2024. “Evolution of pH‐Sensitive Transcription Termination in Escherichia coli During Adaptation to Repeated Long‐Term Starvation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121: e2405546121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Yim, H. S. , Kang S. O., Hah Y. C., Chock P. B., and Yim M. B.. 1995. “Free Radicals Generated During the Glycation Reaction of Amino Acids by Methylglyoxal. A Model Study of Protein‐Cross‐Linked Free Radicals.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 270: 28228–28233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: Survival of WT and ΔptsN in MGO during growth in LB. Cultures were exposed to 0.8 mM MGO for 1 h, as described in Section 4. Symbols represent the ratio of treated to untreated (initial) CFUs, bars represent the mean, and error bars represent the standard deviations. Significance was determined by a log‐normal Welch's t‐test (***p < 0.001, n = 6).

Figure S2: Survival of MG1655 in MGO over time. Survival in MGO was assessed in K5 as described in Section 4 for up to 2 h. Symbols represent CFUs after indicated MGO exposure time, bars represent the mean, and error bars are standard deviations. Statistical differences were assessed by log‐normal one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n = 3).

Figure S3: MGO resistance of ΔsixA and ΔsixA ΔycgO. MGO survival was assessed as described in Section 4. Bars represent the geometric mean, and error bars are the geometric standard deviations. Statistical differences were determined by a one‐sample ratio t‐test versus a hypothetical value of 1 (*p < 0.5, n = 4).

Figure S4: Survival of NR698 and derived mutants in MGO. Survival was assessed as described in Section 4. Bars represent the geometric mean and error bars are the geometric standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by a log‐normal one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test (***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, n = 4).

MMI-125-461-s001.pdf (128.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study will be made available on a public repository.


Articles from Molecular Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES