Skip to main content
Discover Oncology logoLink to Discover Oncology
. 2026 Jul 13;17:1157. doi: 10.1007/s12672-026-05106-w

Cellular reprogramming and signaling control by kaempferol in colorectal cancer

Bo Wu 1,#, Li-li Qiu 1,✉,#, Yuan Bu 2, You-long Liang 3, Yuan-yuan Tan 1
PMCID: PMC13462004  PMID: 42443584

Abstract

Drug resistance and toxicity are major challenges for colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy. Kaempferol (KMP), a natural flavonoid compound, is characterized by low toxicity and multi-targeted effects. KMP has multiple biological functions (anti-inflammation, antioxidation, anti-angiogenesis, apoptosis induction, and immunoregulation). Therefore, KMP is extensively investigated the treatment of various diseases, including cancer. Currently, a series of studies has explored the potential anti-cancer role in CRC therapy. KMP can inhibit the progression of colitis to CRC. Furthermore, KMP suppresses the proliferation of CRC cells and tumor growth. The mechanisms regulated by KMP are involved in multiple signaling pathways such as the matrix metalloproteinases family, VEGF/VEGFR, Wnt/β-catenin, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR. As a multi-targeted inhibitor, KMP shows its natural advantage in combination therapy and is often defined as a sensitizer or attenuator. However, due to the poor stability, absorption, and bioavailability of KMP, its clinical value is hindered. Nano-based delivery systems can compensate for these shortcomings and boost their therapeutic potential. KMP is a hopeful anticancer flavonol, and this review aims to summarize its anticancer effects, mechanisms, and potential applications in CRC.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name 12672_2026_5106_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Kaempferol, Colorectal cancer, Drug resistance, Chemosensitization, Nano-delivery systems

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading malignancy, with an annual burden reaching roughly two million newly diagnosed cases and close to one million deaths [1]. Estimates project an annual increase of 63% in new cases and 73% in deaths by 2040 [2]. Its rising incidence is closely related to rapid urbanization, dietary shifts, and population aging [3]. Despite significant progress in screening and treatment, CRC remains a growing public health challenge.

Current management of CRC typically relies on multimodal strategies, spanning local interventions, systemic chemotherapy, and increasingly, molecularly targeted and immune-based therapies. These treatment strategies have enhanced the therapeutic efficacy and improved the prognosis. However, we have to confront two major challenges: drug resistance and toxicity. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most effective agent for CRC, but drug resistance remains particularly prominent. Innate and acquired drug resistance often lead to treatment failure and disease progression. While the mechanisms have been extensively explored, drug resistance, including 5-FU resistance, has not been completely overcome. Furthermore, these treatments often cause various serious side effects. For example, chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and drug-induced dermatitis severely impair patients' tolerability and the quality of life. Additionally, combination therapy may lead to the accumulation of drug-related side effects. [4]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop safer, multi-targeted drugs to overcome these limitations.

Natural compounds have gained widespread attention, particularly flavonoids [5, 6]. These plant-derived molecules are characterized by low toxicity and multi-targeted effects [7]. Kaempferol (KMP) is a common dietary flavonoid with multiple biological activities such as anti-inflammation, antioxidation, apoptosis induction, and immunoregulation [810]. Research has shown that KMP has protective effects on multiple organs, including the heart [11], liver [12], kidneys [13], bones, and nervous system [14], suggesting its promise in treating associated disorders. Compared with other flavonoids, KMP exerts unique anticancer effects in CRC [15, 16]. KMP prevents the malignant transformation of colitis into CRC [17]. Furthermore, KMP suppresses the proliferation of CRC cells and tumor growth. In addition to the biological activities mentioned above, KMP can also inhibit the growth of CRC through multiple pathways, including the suppression of angiogenesis, post-transcriptional regulation, metabolic reprogramming, and novel forms of programmed cell death. Especially, KMP may improve drug resistance and toxicity. These characteristics make KMP a mechanistically versatile and translationally promising flavonol in CRC. Combination therapy involving KMP, as well as nanoparticle-based delivery strategies, may enhance the translational potential of KMP. This review aims to summarize the anticancer effects, mechanisms, and potential applications of KMP in CRC.

Sources, extraction, and pharmacokinetics of KMP

The chemical name of KMP is 3,5,7-Trihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxy phenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one. It is a natural polyphenol that belongs to the flavonoid class. KMP is a naturally occurring flavonol, widely distributed in the leaves (portulaca oleracea L. [18], ginkgo leaf [19]), flowers (broccoli [20], chrysanthemum [21]), rhizomes (kaempferia galanga [22], astragalus membranaceus [23]), and fruits (apple [24], strawberry [25]) of various plants (Fig. 1). KMP is commonly extracted from plant materials using conventional solvent-based methods, particularly methanolic [26], ethanolic [27], or hydroalcoholic extraction [28]. Following crude extraction, purification is typically achieved through Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography [29]. Ultrasound and microwaves play an auxiliary role in this process [30, 31].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Sources and extraction methods of Kaempferol

Oral delivery is the primary way for the intake of KMP and other flavonoids. KMP is mainly absorbed through three mechanisms (active transport, passive diffusion, and facilitated diffusion) in the intestine and colon. Subsequently, KMP enters the circulatory system in both aglycone and glycoside forms [32]. During the metabolic phase, KMP undergoes glucuronidation and sulfonation in the liver [33]. Finally, the metabolites are excreted through urine and feces [34]. It should be known that the free form of KMP exhibits lipophilicity [35]. But KMP is prone to glycosylation, which results in its hydrophilic properties [26]. Low-polarity glycosides are readily absorbed, while high-polarity ones are not. These characteristics determine the poor absorption, stability, and bioavailability of KMP [36]. This is the primary issue to be resolved before the clinical application of KMP.

Anticancer effects and mechanisms of KMP in CRC

Apoptosis induction and anti-proliferation

KMP may have the potential to inhibit the growth of CRC cells. The optimum extract containing KMP inhibited the viability of HT-29 cells [37, 38]. Another work further evaluated the cytotoxicity of 14 plant-derived phytochemicals using the MTT assay, and KMP was found to induce cell death and inhibit the growth of SW1116 cells [39]. Apoptosis, also known as type I programmed cell death, is the greatest barrier to tumor initiation and progression. Inducing apoptosis is an important step in suppressing tumor proliferation, while cell cycle arrest is often a prelude to apoptosis. KMP induced apoptosis and suppressed the proliferation of HCT116 and DLD1 cells [40] (Table 1). Experimental analyses showed that KMP delayed the progression of the G1 phase and then induced apoptosis. KMP induced apoptosis of HCT116 and HT29 cells and significantly inhibited the proliferation, invasion, and migration [41]. Cell-cycle profiling suggests that KMP skewed the population toward a G1-enriched distribution, concomitantly reducing the S-phase fraction. KMP treatment (60 μM) to HT-29 cells caused cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase after 6 h and at the G2/M phase after 12 h [42].

Table 1.

The anticancer effects and mechanisms of kaempferol in colorectal cancer

Classes Cell lines Animal Models Functions and Mechanisms Refs.
Apoptosis induction and anti-proliferation HCT116, DLD1 N/A Inducing apoptosis and suppressing cell proliferation through the miR-339-5p–hnRNPA1/PTBP1–PKM2 signaling axis [40]
HCT116, HT-29 N/A Inducing apoptosis, arresting the cell cycle, and inhibiting proliferation, invasion, and migration through downregulation of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression [41]
Anti-angiogenesis HCT-15, HCT-116 N/A Inhibiting hypoxia-induced tumor angiogenesis through the HIF-1α/VEGF signaling pathway [43]
Anti-oxidation and anti-inflammation N/A C57 BL/6 mice (male and female, 6 weeks) inhibiting the progression of colitis to CRC through BCRP and MRP2 [17]
HCT-15, HCT-116 N/A Inducing oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage and apoptosis [43]
Immune regulation HCT116 BALB/c mice (male, weeks of age unknown) Inhibiting the expression of IL1B, MMP9, CXCL8, and IL6 and promoting neutrophil activity [44]
Post-transcriptional regulation HCT116, HT-29, YB5 C57BL/6 mice (male, 4 weeks) Inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, and reducing tumor burden via the DNMT1–DACT2–Wnt/β-catenin signaling axis [45]
LoVo, SW620, SW480, HCT8, HCT15, HCT116, Caco-2 Nude mice (unspecified) Inhibiting CRC cell migration and lung metastasis through the circ_0000345-mediated JMJD2C/β-catenin signaling pathway [46]
Metabolic reprogramming HCT116, DLD1 N/A Inhibiting aerobic glycolysis and tumor growth via the miR-339-5p–hnRNPA1/PTBP1–PKM2 signaling axis [40]
DLD1, SW620 N/A Inducing DNA damage via the miR-195/miR-497–PFKFB4-mediated nonoxidative pentose phosphate pathway [47]
DLD-1, HCT116, RKO, HT-29, SW480, Caco2; MC38 APCMin/ + , C57BL/6 mice (male, 5–6 weeks) Suppressing cell proliferation, migration, and tumor growth through the OGT-collagen signaling axis [48]
Novel programmed cell death HCT116, HT29, LOVO, SW620, CT26 BALB/c mice (male, 5 weeks) Inducing ferroptosis through upregulation of Hmox-1 expression [49]
CT26, FHC BALB/c mice (female, 4 weeks) Inducing pyroptosis through the Ca overload/ER stress/STING/IRF3 signaling pathway [50]
RKO, HCT-116 N/A Suppressing cell proliferation, motility, and invasion and inducing apoptosis and autophagy [51]

Multiple proteins are associated with the KMP-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [52]. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases with the function of cleaving the extracellular matrix (ECM) [53]. MMPs are involved in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes, such as tissue remodeling, inflammation, and cancer invasion and metastasis. Surface plasmon resonance revealed a strong binding affinity (6.551 × 10⁻⁶ M) between KMP and MMP3 [54]. Western blot (WB) assay demonstrated that KMP induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 [41]. AURKB is a cell cycle regulatory protein [55]. Molecular docking revealed that KMP formed two hydrogen bonds with AURKB through the residues LEU-83 and PHE-219 [56]. Cellular thermal shift assay and WB assay further confirmed that KMP (100 μM) increased the heat stability of AURKB. Through these key proteins, KMP induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, thereby inhibiting tumor cell proliferation.

KMP is also involved in the regulation of several classical signaling pathways. Molecular docking found that KMP strongly bound to PI3K and mTOR proteins [57]. The high affinity of KMP and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway should be further confirmed in experimental studies. KMP promoted apoptosis under hypoxic conditions and was regarded as a multi-pathway inhibitor [43]. First, it enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced DNA damage and then triggered intrinsic apoptosis (increased caspase-3/9 activation and decreased Bcl-2 expression). Second, KMP significantly reduced the expression of key molecules such as β-catenin. In short, KMP inhibited the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin axis. Third, KMP markedly suppressed the phosphorylation levels of multiple proteins (Akt, ERK, and p38-MAPK). Finally, KMP weakens the hypoxia-induced cell survival and proliferation.

Anti-angiogenesis

A variety of signaling pathways are associated with tumor angiogenesis of CRC [58]. KMP is capable of interacting with these pathways, such as MMPs [59], VEGF/VEGFR [60, 61], HIF [62], and FGF [63]. However, studies on the anti-angiogenic mechanisms of KMP in CRC are relatively limited. One research analyzed the effects and mechanisms of KMP on HCT-15 and HCT-116 in a hypoxic environment [43]. KMP not only induced intrinsic apoptosis and inhibited cell proliferation but also reduced tumor angiogenesis. In hypoxia-induced conditions, KMP (60 µM) treatment markedly reduced HIF-1α protein levels in both CRC cell lines. A significant downregulation of VEGF was observed in the KMP-treated hypoxic group compared with the control group. Furthermore, KMP markedly suppressed both the activation and expression of VEGFR-2. In addition, KMP also reduced the expression of angiogenic factor ANG-1 that was upregulated under CoCl₂-induced hypoxic conditions. In summary, KMP significantly inhibited the stability of HIF-1α and the expression of its downstream angiogenesis-related genes, thereby blocking hypoxia-induced tumor angiogenesis. However, more evidence is needed to support the notion that KMP inhibits angiogenesis in CRC.

Anti-oxidation and anti-inflammation

Oxidative stress may be a contributing factor in the initiation and progression of CRC [64]. KMP displays significant anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects [65]. Digestive products containing KMP exert anti-inflammatory activity by suppressing NF-κB and activating the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway [66]. The methanolic extract rich in KMP enhanced oxidative stress, caused mitochondrial dysfunction, and ultimately induced apoptosis [67]. The ethanolic extract containing KMP increases ROS production in CRC cells, thereby inducing apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation [68]. Flavonoids containing KMP showed both antioxidant and anticancer activities against HT-29 cells [69]. However, these works only provide indirect evidence. Several other works have further elucidated the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of KMP, as well as their underlying mechanisms. Under hypoxic conditions, KMP markedly increased intracellular ROS levels [43]. Subsequently, KMP induced oxidative stress, resulting in DNA damage and impaired repair. Furthermore, KMP derivatives also showed antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity against CaCo-2 cells, accompanied by necrotic cell death [28].

Several animal models have provided more valuable research findings. In a 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH)-induced CRC rat model, KMP mitigated lipid peroxidation while enhancing enzymatic antioxidant capacity, reflected by increased SOD/CAT/GPx activity [70]. In addition, KMP also exhibited anti-inflammatory effects in mouse models and maintained a high concentration in the intestine through the "enterohepatic triple recycling" [17, 71]. Mechanistic analysis indicated that the inhibitory effect of KMP on the progression of colitis to CRC relied on BCRP and MRP2 [17].

Immune regulation

A series of genes and proteins, such as PD-1 and PD-L1, have been identified as potentially correlated with tumor immunity in CRC. Integrated spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations revealed a strong binding affinity between KMP and the extracellular domain of PD-L1 [72]. It is necessary to address the question of how KMP regulates tumor immunity in CRC. Through network pharmacology and bioinformatics analyses, CDKN2A, SERPINE1, and MMP3 were identified as prognostic genes [73]. These prognostic genes displayed a positive correlation with the immune infiltration score. Moreover, KMP was found to bind to these genes and may exert pharmacological effects through these interactions. Another similar study also identified nine genes (e.g., ICAM1, IL6, MMPs) associated with tumor immunity [59]. Molecular docking manifested a strong binding affinity between KMP and these targets. Protein–protein interaction analysis and molecular docking revealed that KMP had strong binding interactions with multiple core targets such as TP53, MAPK1, HSP90AA1, HIF-1A, STAT3, ESR1, JUN, and AKT1 [74, 75]. Therefore, KMP may regulate tumor immunity through classical signaling pathways (p53, HIF-1A, PI3K/Akt, STAT3, MMPs). KMP may further strengthen the antitumor immune response by enhancing the activation and killing capacity of T cells in CRC mice [74]. KMP inhibited the viability of HCT116 cells and promoted their apoptosis [44]. Immune infiltration analysis showed that IL1B, MMP9, CXCL8, and IL6 exerted their anticancer effects mainly by enhancing neutrophil activity.

Although preliminary laboratory data support the immunomodulatory potential of KMP, most existing studies rely on bioinformatics analyses. Evidence derived from in vivo and in vitro experiments remains limited. As an important research direction of CRC, the immunoregulatory effects and mechanisms of KMP should receive greater attention. Further experimental validation, such as co-immunoprecipitation or in vivo studies, is needed to confirm these predictions.

Post-transcriptional regulation

KMP acts on the post-transcriptional regulation and regulates the Wnt/β-catenin axis in CRC. As a tumor suppressor gene, DACT2 is often silenced due to DNA methylation [76]. KMP induced DACT2 demethylation by directly binding to DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), which significantly reduced its methylation level (approximately 19.58–67.00%) [45]. Subsequently, the Wnt/β-catenin axis was inactivated, and the proliferation and migration of CRC cells were significantly reduced. Consequently, KMP successfully slowed down and reversed CRC tumorigenesis by restoring the epigenetic regulation of DACT2 through the Wnt/β-catenin axis. It is well known that JMJD2C can activate the Wnt/β-catenin axis and promote CRC cell metastasis [77]. A study revealed that miR-205-5p is a key regulatory factor for JMJD2C expression [46]. In this study, KMP inhibited CRC cell migration in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo. Mechanically, KMP downregulated the expression of circ_0000345, which subsequently inhibited the function of miR-205-5p. Thus, KMP suppressed CRC metastasis by inhibiting the circ_0000345-mediated JMJD2C/β-catenin axis. As a multi-targeted inhibitor, KMP may regulate more signaling pathways through post-transcriptional regulation. This could be a promising research direction in the future.

Metabolic reprogramming

Tumor cells often exhibit metabolic reprogramming, tending to acquire ATP and intermediate metabolites through unconventional metabolic pathways. GlcNAcylation is a reversible post-translational modification of proteins that is closely associated with tumor proliferation, metabolic abnormalities, and metastasis [78]. KMP reduced the O-GlcNAcylation modification of Hsp47, leading to decreased maturation and secretion of type I collagen [48]. This process affected ECM remodeling and blocked CRC progression. Thus, KMP showed its anticancer effects by targeting the OGT-collagen axis. O-GlcNAcylation Metabolic reprogramming is subject to post-transcriptional regulation. The Warburg effect suggests that cancer cells preferentially obtain energy through aerobic glycolysis [79]. PKM2 is a rate-limiting enzyme that regulates tumor progression [80]. KMP upregulated the miR-339-5p expression, which mediated the alternative splicing of PKM and then reduced the production of PKM2 [40]. As a result, aerobic glycolysis was inhibited, and the metabolic balance of CRC cells was restored. KMP reversed aerobic glycolysis and inhibited CRC growth by modulating the miR-339-5p–hnRNPA1/PTBP1–PKM2 axis. The pentose phosphate pathway is an important intracellular metabolic pathway, consisting of two types: oxidative and non-oxidative [81]. KMP caused DNA damage and promoted apoptosis via the miR-195/miR-497–PFKFB4-mediated nonoxidative pentose phosphate axis [47]. Specifically, KMP upregulated the expression of miR-195/497. miR-195/497 directly bound to PFKFB4 and then suppressed its expression. Finally, two key enzymes, transketolase and transaldolase, were inhibited. In summary, KMP can reverse the aberrant metabolic reprogramming of CRC cells through post-transcriptional regulation, thereby exerting its anticancer effects.

The induction of novel programmed cell death

In recent years, novel forms of programmed cell death have attracted increasing attention in CRC, including ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy. Ferroptosis is defined by the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products driven by iron-dependent ROS [82]. Hmox1 belongs to the heme oxygenase family and is the rate-limiting enzyme in heme degradation [83]. Upregulation of Hmox1 increases intracellular iron load and induces ferroptosis. As an active ingredient, KMP may directly upregulate Hmox-1 expression and induce ferroptosis [49]. Further experimental evidence is needed to verify this potential mechanism.

Pyroptosis induces CRC cell death through both typical and atypical pathways [84]. CS-HAP@KAE is a KMP-loaded nanomedicine [50]. When CS-HAP@KAE bound to the CRC cell membrane, KMP promoted calcium influx, led to intracellular calcium overload, and ultimately induced pyroptosis. Mechanically, CS-HAP@KAE induced caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis through the Ca overload/ER stress/STING/IRF3 axis.

Autophagy can maintain cellular homeostasis by degrading long-lived proteins and eliminating abnormal organelles [85]. KMP not only inhibited cell proliferation, motility, and invasion of RKO and HCT-116 cells but also stimulated apoptosis and autophagy [51]. Additionally, KMP treatment also modified the expression of coding and noncoding genes. Research on novel programmed cell death in CRC is rapidly evolving. Increasing evidence suggests that KMP can induce these forms of death through specific mechanisms. These findings provide novel insights for developing CRC therapies.

Combination therapy and nano-delivery

Combination therapy

Owing to its multi-pathway modulation, KMP is often discussed as an adjuvant candidate in combination strategies (Table 2). Sulindac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and fluoxetine is an antidepressant. They have been reported to have the ability to suppress colon carcinogenesis [86, 87]. Using a DMH-induced CRC rat model, KMP enhanced the antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory activities of sulindac and fluoxetine [88, 89]. Clearly, KMP potentiates their chemopreventive effects against CRC. The combined treatment with KMP and sorafenib induced cell cycle arrest (S and G2/M phases), mitochondrial membrane damage, and finally resulted in apoptosis [39]. KMP synergistically enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis, characterized by the upregulation of pro-apoptotic factors and the downregulation of anti-apoptotic factors [90]. The combined treatment of KMP and cisplatin induces cell cycle arrest, thereby inhibiting cell division and proliferation. Thus, KMP can enhance the preventive and therapeutic effects of some drugs against CRC.

Table 2.

Kaempferol combined with other drugs for the treatment of colorectal cancer

Combined treatment Cell lines Models Effects and Mechanisms Refs.
kaempferol + sorafenib SW1116, SW837 N/A Inducing cell-cycle arrest and mitochondrial membrane damage, leading to apoptosis [39]

kaempferol + sulindac

kaempferol + fluoxetine

N/A Sprague–Dawley albino rats (male, 220 ± 30 g) Enhancing the chemopreventive effects of sulindac and fluoxetine against CRC development [88, 89]
kaempferol + cisplatin HCT-15, HCT-116 N/A Enhancing cisplatin-induced apoptosis through ROS-mediated signaling pathways [90]
kaempferol + 5-fluorouracil HCT8-R N/A Overcoming 5-FU resistance through modulation of the miR-326–hnRNPA1/A2/PTBP1–PKM2 axis [91]
kaempferol + 5-fluorouracil LS174-R N/A Enhancing 5-FU sensitivity through ROS modulation and regulation of JAK/STAT3, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and NF-κB signaling pathways [92]
kaempferol + 5-fluorouracil N/A Wistar rats (male, 300 ± 30 g) Providing hematopoietic protection, immunomodulation, and hepatic and renal protection, thereby improving survival [93]

Drug resistance and toxicity remain major challenges in CRC treatment. HCT8-R is a 5-FU–resistant CRC cell line. KMP significantly reduced glucose and lactic acid production uptake [91]. Mechanistically, KMP overcame the resistance to 5-FU by modulating the miR-326–hnRNPA1/A2/PTBP1–PKM2 axis. KMP can chemosensitize 5-FU-resistant LS174-R cells [92]. KMP and 5-FU exerted a strong synergistic inhibitory effect through ROS inhibition and multiple signaling axes, including PI3K/AKT, MAPK, JAK/STAT3, and NF-κB. KMP reduced the toxicity of 5-FU and increased the survival rate of DMH-induced CRC rats [93]. KMP could restore hematological parameters (RBC, Hb, and platelets) and alleviate the suppression of lymphocyte percentage caused by 5-FU, showing hematopoietic protective and immunomodulatory effects. KMP also exerted protective effects on the liver and kidneys of rats. In addition, another work manifested that KMP could reduce the cardiotoxicity induced by 5-FU [94]. Therefore, KMP can serve as both a chemosensitizer and a detoxifying agent for chemotherapeutic drugs.

Oral intake and nano-delivery

The anti-CRC effect of KMP was positively correlated with the dose. KMP inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in HCT116 and DLD1 cells, with IC₅₀ values of 63.0 ± 12.9 μM and 98.3 ± 15.9 μM, respectively [40]. Furthermore, the high-dose KMP group (120 μM) exhibited a stronger growth-inhibitory effect than the low-dose group (60 μM) [39]. Therefore, increasing oral intake of KMP may be a potential strategy to enhance its anti-CRC efficacy. A clinical study reported that healthy individuals can tolerate a single oral dose of 10 mg of KMP [95]. Further in vivo and clinical studies are needed to determine the optimal dosage and safety profile.

Another important issue is that the poor absorption, stability, and bioavailability of KMP may limit its application in tumor therapy [96]. It has been reported that derivatization (Kae-SO₃-Ga) can increase the water solubility of KMP [97]. However, more efficient approaches are expected. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems offer a range of advantages, including high stability, excellent biocompatibility, resistance to enzymatic degradation, and low toxicity [98]. Loading phytochemicals into this system can enhance their activity and bioavailability against cancers [99]. Nanoencapsulation of polyphenols such as KMP can improve the bioavailability and therapeutic effects [100, 101]. Various KMP-loaded nanomedicines have been developed and applied for the treatment of liver cancer [102, 103], breast cancer [104, 105], lung cancer [106, 107], and glioblastoma multiforme [108].

A variety of KMP-loaded nanomedicines for CRC have been developed and validated (Table 3). Nano-KMP was synthesized using an oil-in-water emulsion technique. It is bound to human serum albumin and human holo-transferrin, which modulated their interaction [109]. MTT assays revealed that Nano-KMP inhibits the viability of SW480 cells in a concentration- and time-dependent pattern. Mechanistic analysis implied that Nano-KMP downregulates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, leading to cell cycle arrest. KMP can effectively disrupt the regulation of calcium homeostasis and promote calcium influx into tumor cells. This effect was used to develop KMP-loaded nanomedicines [110]. CS-HAP@KAE are constructed from three components: calcium-releasing hydroxyapatite (HAP) nanoparticles (NPs), chondroitin sulfate (CS), and KMP [50]. After binding to the CRC cell membrane, HAP released calcium in the acidic tumor microenvironment (TME), while KMP facilitated the influx of extracellular calcium. These processes collectively led to intracellular calcium overload and induced pyroptosis. KMP and KMP nanoparticles (KPF-NPs) could improve 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity [94]. This study was conducted by intraperitoneally injecting 5-FU and KMP or KPF-NPs into male Wistar rats. On one hand, KPF and KPF-NPs alleviated oxidative stress and reduced cardiac enzyme levels, COX-2 expression, and VEGF expression. On the other hand, they improved hematological parameters (blood cell counts and hemoglobin levels), mitigated histopathological damage, and increased body weight in the treated rats. Naturally, KPF-NPs demonstrated superior performance compared to KMP. In summary, nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems overcome the limitations of KMP and enhance its anticancer efficacy against CRC.

Table 3.

List of kaempferol-loaded nanomedicines against colorectal cancer

KMP-loaded nanocomposite Cell lines Models Effects Refs.
CS-HAP@KAE CT26, FHC BALB/c mice (female, 4 weeks) Inducing intracellular calcium overload and inducing pyroptosis [50]
KPF-NPs N/A Male Wistar rats (male, 200–250 g) Attenuating 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity [94]
Nano-KMP SW480 N/A Suppressing cell viability and inducing cell-cycle arrest [109]

Future directions

In this review, we systematically summarize the multifaceted effects, underlying mechanisms, and therapeutic prospects of KMP in CRC (Fig. 2). KMP precisely modulates a range of biological processes, including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis induction, anti-proliferation, anti-angiogenesis, anti-inflammation, anti-oxidation, tumor immunology, post-transcriptional regulation, and metabolic reprogramming. Additionally, KMP also induces novel types of programmed cell death (ferroptosis [49], pyroptosis [50], and autophagy [51]). Multiple genes, proteins, and signaling pathways are crucial for KMP to exert its anti-CRC effects, such as the MMP family, miR-205-5p, and the Wnt/β-catenin axis.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Multilevel anticancer mechanisms and translational potential of kaempferol in colorectal cancer

Although the preclinical evidence supporting the anti-CRC effects of KMP is strong, there are several limitations and inconsistencies that need to be addressed. First, the current conclusions are predominantly based on in vitro findings and lack support from in vivo data. Second, poor absorption and metabolism result in low bioavailability of KMP in the human body. Third, few clinical trials or retrospective research on KMP treatment for CRC have been reported.

Currently, there are two approaches to try to solve these problems. KMP should be defined as a sensitizer or attenuator to be used in combination with current mainstream therapies. For instance, KMP can improve the effect of 5-FU and reduce its toxicity [91, 93]. Although KMP is a multi-targeted agent, improving the bioavailability is the fundamental approach to enhancing its anticancer effects. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems can precisely deliver a greater amount of KMP to tumor tissues. Various KMP-loaded nanomedicines have been developed and validated in CRC treatments such as CS-HAP@KAE [50], KPF-NPs [94], and Nano-KMP [109]. Therefore, nano-delivery systems or combination therapy represent feasible strategies to enhance the bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of KMP.

Some clinical studies provide a reference for the use of KMP in treating CRC. A study (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry in Japan, ID: UMIN000049589) involving 16 well-trained male athletes evaluated the impact of a single 10 mg KMP intake on high-intensity exercise capacity [95]. Compared to the control group, KMP significantly reduced VO2 and respiratory rate during exercise, without concurrent increases in the respiratory quotient or blood lactate levels. Furthermore, it led to a significant increase in exercise duration at 100% VO2max. Another study further investigated the effects of KMP on hypoxia and inflammatory responses [111]. A botanical preparation containing KMP significantly improved oxygen saturation and lung function parameters (FVC and respiratory volume). It also elevated ATPase activity and glucose levels, while reducing the white blood cell count. These findings highlight the role of KMP in improving organ oxygenation and inflammatory status. As discussed earlier, this constitutes an important mechanism underlying the anti-CRC effects of KMP. Thus, the preliminary clinical data on KMP provide a rationale for considering its evaluation in future clinical trials for CRC.

There is still a long journey ahead before KMP can make its way from the laboratory to the clinic. As works further explore the mechanisms of KMP and confirm its efficacy through clinical trials, its potential as a new therapeutic option for CRC appears increasingly promising.

Conclusions

KMP demonstrates considerable potential as an anti-CRC agent by targeting a variety of crucial biological processes involved in tumor growth, metabolism, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, immune response, metabolic reprogramming, and programmed cell death. In addition, KMP may serve as a valuable adjuvant by enhancing chemosensitivity and alleviating treatment-related toxicity. KMP primarily exerts its anti-CRC effects through several classical signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/Akt, Wnt/β-catenin, MMPs, and VEGF/VEGFR pathways. However, its clinical translation faces significant challenges due to its poor stability, limited bioavailability, and inefficient absorption. Nano-based delivery strategies may partially address these issues. Nanoencapsulation allows for targeted delivery of KMP to tumor tissues, bypassing the barriers associated with traditional oral administration. While preclinical studies provide strong evidence supporting KMP's anti-CRC effects, the lack of sufficient clinical trials remains a critical gap. Further well-designed clinical studies are necessary. These studies will not only validate its effectiveness but also explore the optimal dosing strategies and treatment combinations. In conclusion, KMP shows promise as a potential therapeutic option for CRC, and continued research may help confirm its clinical applicability.

Abbreviations

CRC

Colorectal cancer

KMP

Kaempferol

5-FU

5-Fluorouracil

ECM

Extracellular matrix

MMPs

Matrix metalloproteinases

VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGFR

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

HIF-1α

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

DMH

1,2-Dimethylhydrazine

PD-1

Programmed cell death protein 1

PD-L1

Programmed death-ligand 1

DNMT1

DNA methyltransferase 1

TME

Tumor microenvironment

Author contributions

Bo Wu and Li-li Qiu conceived the study. Bo Wu conducted the investigation and prepared the original draft of the manuscript. Yuan Bu and You-long Liang contributed to manuscript review and editing. Yuan-yuan Tan was responsible for visualization and figure preparation. Li-li Qiu supervised the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. ZR2023LZY019), Shandong Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project (No. M-2023128), and Doctoral Research Fund of Binzhou Polytechnic (No. 2022bzbs03).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Bo Wu and Li-li Qiu have contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Li JJ, Zhang YM, Ji YT, Wu J, Jin QY, Feng ZW, et al. Comparison analyses of global burden of colorectal cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2025;47:308–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xi Y, Xu P. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Transl Oncol. 2021;14:101174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Matsuda T, Fujimoto A, Igarashi Y. Colorectal cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, and public health strategies. Digestion. 2025;106:91–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Singh U, Kokkanti RR, Patnaik S. Beyond chemotherapy: exploring 5-FU resistance and stemness in colorectal cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2025;991:177294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jamshidi S, Eghbalian A, Shojaei S, Taherkhani A, Feizi-Dehnayebi M. Flavonoids as promising Akt1 inhibitors in cancer medicine: insights from molecular docking, dynamics, DFT calculations, and in vitro validation. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025;8:e70315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dubey N, Dubey N, Bhadoria U, Shah K, Chauhan NS. Targeting colorectal cancer using dietary flavonols. Cancer Innov. 2024;3:e99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Esmeeta A, Adhikary S, Dharshnaa V, Swarnamughi P, Ummul Maqsummiya Z, Banerjee A, et al. Plant-derived bioactive compounds in colon cancer treatment: an updated review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dong H, Song G, Wang Z, Wu X, Wang Q, Wang YH. Kaempferol as a multifaceted immunomodulator: implications for inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1671519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Oliveira MR. Mitochondrial physiology and beyond: mechanistic insights into Kaempferol actions. Chem Biol Interact. 2025;421:111743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Herrera TES, Tello IPS, Mustafa MA, Jamil NY, Alaraj M, Altameem KKA, et al. Kaempferol: unveiling its anti-inflammatory properties for therapeutic innovation. Cytokine. 2025;186:156846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kamisah Y, Jalil J, Yunos NM, Zainalabidin S. Cardioprotective properties of Kaempferol: a review. Plants. 2023;12:2096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Niziński P, Krajewska A, Oniszczuk T, Polak B, Oniszczuk A. Hepatoprotective effect of Kaempferol-a review. Molecules. 2025;30:1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alkandahri MY, Sadino A, Pamungkas BT, Oktoba Z, Arfania M, Yuniarsih N, et al. Potential nephroprotective effect of kaempferol: biosynthesis, mechanisms of action, and clinical prospects. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2024;2024:8907717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chaubey S, Singh L. Deciphering the mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective potential of kaempferol: a comprehensive investigation. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025;398:2275–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singh T, Sharma D, Sharma R, Tuli HS, Haque S, Ramniwas S, et al. The role of phytonutrient kaempferol in the prevention of gastrointestinal cancers: recent trends and future perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16:1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen J, Zhong H, Huang Z, Chen X, You J, Zou T. A critical review of kaempferol in intestinal health and diseases. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12:1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Y, Lu Y, Li X, Zhang Z, Sun L, Wang Y, et al. Kaempferol suppression of acute colitis is regulated by the efflux transporters BCRP and MRP2. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2022;179:106303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shao G, Liu Y, Lu L, Wang L, Ji G, Xu H. Therapeutic potential of traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of digestive inflammatory cancer transformation: Portulaca oleracea L. as a promising drug. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;327:117999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ni HF, Si LT, Huang JP, Zan Q, Chen Y, Luan LJ, et al. Rapid determination of active components in Ginkgo biloba leaves by near infrared spectroscopy combined with genetic algorithm joint extreme learning machine. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021;46:110–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gudiño I, Casquete R, Martín A, Wu Y, Benito MJ. Comprehensive analysis of bioactive compounds, functional properties, and applications of broccoli by-products. Foods. 2024;13:3918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chu Z, Xiong R, Peng X, Cui G, Dong L, Li W. Delineating molecular regulatory of flavonoids indicated by transcriptomic and metabolomics analysis during flower development in Chrysanthemum morifolium “Boju.” Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:10261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cao R, Cao C, Hu X, Du K, Zhang J, Li M, et al. Kaempferol attenuates carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4))-induced hepatic fibrosis by promoting ASIC1a degradation and suppression of the ASIC1a-mediated ERS. Phytomedicine. 2023;121:155125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mao J, Tan L, Tian C, Wang W, Zou Y, Zhu Z, et al. Systemic investigation of the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of Astragalus membranaceus in ulcerative colitis. Am J Med Sci. 2025;369:238–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang D, Wang G, Lu X, Liu Z, Sun S, Guo H, et al. Identification and mining of functional components of polyphenols in fruits of Malus germplasm resources based on multivariate analysis. Foods. 2024;13:3465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seke F, Adiamo OQ, Sultanbawa Y, Sivakumar D. In vitro antioxidant activity, bioaccessibility, and thermal stability of encapsulated strawberry fruit (Fragaria × ananassa) polyphenols. Foods. 2023;12:4045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Beszterda M, Frański R. Elucidation of glycosylation sites of kaempferol di-O-glycosides from methanolic extract of the leaves of Prunus domestica subsp. syriaca. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2021;35:e9100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.P. Essoh A, Liberal Â, Fernandes Â, Dias MI, Pereira C, Mandim F, et al. Evaluation of the Polyphenolic Composition and Bioactivities of Three Native Cabo Verde Medicinal Plants. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15:1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Malfa GA, Pappalardo F, Miceli N, Taviano MF, Ronsisvalle S, Tomasello B, et al. Chemical, antioxidant and biological studies of Brassica incana subsp. raimondoi (Brassicaceae) leaf extract. Molecules. 2023;28:1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang JH, Kondratyuk TP, Marler LE, Qiu X, Choi Y, Cao H, et al. Isolation and evaluation of kaempferol glycosides from the fern Neocheiropteris palmatopedata. Phytochemistry. 2010;71:641–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Corona-Pérez AC, Vargas-Torrico MF, Aguilar-Méndez MA, von Borries-Medrano E. Comparative evaluation of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in Justicia spicigera extracts using ultrasound-assisted and microwave-assisted extraction methods. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2025;34:3565–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Norouzi H, Dastan D, Abdullah FO, Al-Qaaneh AM. Recent advances in methods of extraction, pre-concentration, purification, identification, and quantification of kaempferol. J Chromatogr A. 2024;1735:465297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Williamson G, Kay CD, Crozier A. The bioavailability, transport, and bioactivity of dietary flavonoids: a review from a historical perspective. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018;17:1054–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yodogawa S, Arakawa T, Sugihara N, Furuno K. Glucurono- and sulfo-conjugation of kaempferol in rat liver subcellular preparations and cultured hepatocytes. Biol Pharm Bull. 2003;26:1120–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Vries JH, Hollman PC, Meyboom S, Buysman MN, Zock PL, van Staveren WA, et al. Plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of the antioxidant flavonols quercetin and kaempferol as biomarkers for dietary intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68:60–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jiang H, Engelhardt UH, Thräne C, Maiwald B, Stark J. Determination of flavonol glycosides in green tea, oolong tea and black tea by UHPLC compared to HPLC. Food Chem. 2015;183:30–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.DuPont MS, Day AJ, Bennett RN, Mellon FA, Kroon PA. Absorption of kaempferol from endive, a source of kaempferol-3-glucuronide, in humans. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:947–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baharuddin SA, Shah NNAK, Yazan LS, Rashed AA, Kadota K, Al-Awaadh AM, et al. Optimization of Pluchea indica (L.) leaf extract using ultrasound-assisted extraction and its cytotoxicity on the HT-29 colorectal cancer cell line. Ultrason Sonochem. 2023;101:106702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lazarova I, Nilofar, Caprioli G, Piatti D, Ricciutelli M, Ulusan MD, et al. Influence of extraction solvents on the chemical constituents and biological activities of Astragalus aduncus from Turkey flora: in vitro and in silico insights. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 2024;357:e2400257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bahman A, Abaza MS, Khoushaish S, Al-Attiyah RJ. Therapeutic efficacy of sorafenib and plant-derived phytochemicals in human colorectal cancer cells. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23:210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu H, Cui M, Li C, Li H, Dai Y, Cui K, et al. Kaempferol reverses aerobic glycolysis via miR-339-5p-mediated PKM alternative splicing in colon cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:3060–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang X, Fan J, Guo F, Huang H, Xue J, Wu X, et al. Effect of Kaempferol on the biological behavior of human colon cancer via regulating MMP1, MMP2, and MMP9. J Oncol. 2022;2022:2841762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cho HJ, Park JH. Kaempferol induces cell cycle arrest in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. J Cancer Prev. 2013;18:257–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Haroon M, Kang SC. Kaempferol promotes apoptosis and inhibits proliferation and migration by suppressing HIF-1α/VEGF and Wnt/β-catenin activation under hypoxic condition in colon cancer. Appl Biol Chem. 2025;68:19. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li Y, Wu J, Jiang S, Wang N. Exploring the immunological mechanism of Houttuynia cordata in the treatment of colorectal cancer through combined network pharmacology and experimental validation. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024;397:9095–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lu L, Wang Y, Ou R, Feng Q, Ji L, Zheng H, et al. DACT2 epigenetic stimulator exerts dual efficacy for colorectal cancer prevention and treatment. Pharmacol Res. 2018;129:318–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pu Y, Han Y, Ouyang Y, Li H, Li L, Wu X, et al. Kaempferol inhibits colorectal cancer metastasis through circ_0000345 mediated JMJD2C/β-catenin signalling pathway. Phytomedicine. 2024;128:155261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wu H, Du J, Hu P, Wang P, Wang Z, Ma J, et al. Kaempferol induces DNA damage in colorectal cancer cells by regulating the MiR-195/miR-497-PFKFB4-mediated nonoxidative pentose phosphate pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2025;73:8312–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhou C, Zheng J, Li Z, Li Y, Jin X, Huang Y, et al. O-GlcNAcylated Hsp47 as a predictive biomarker in colorectal cancer: kaempferol targets OGT-collagen axis for therapeutic intervention. Int J Biol Sci. 2025;21:5586–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen M, Ma S, Ji W, Hu W, Gao J, Yang J, et al. Shenqi Sanjie Granules induce Hmox1-mediated ferroptosis to inhibit colorectal cancer. Heliyon. 2024;10:e38021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen Q, Peng B, Lin L, Chen J, Jiang Z, Luo Y, et al. Chondroitin sulfate-modified hydroxyapatite for Caspase-1 activated induced pyroptosis through Ca overload/ER stress/STING/IRF3 pathway in colorectal cancer. Small. 2024;20:e2403201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Budisan L, Gulei D, Jurj A, Braicu C, Zanoaga O, Cojocneanu R, et al. Inhibitory effect of CAPE and Kaempferol in colon cancer cell lines-possible implications in new therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lu X, Wu X, Jing L, Tao L, Zhang Y, Huang R, et al. Network Pharmacology Analysis and Experiments Validation of the Inhibitory Effect of JianPi Fu Recipe on Colorectal Cancer LoVo Cells Metastasis and Growth. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:4517483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hacking SM, Chakraborty B, Nasim R, Vitkovski T, Thomas R. A holistic appraisal of stromal differentiation in colorectal cancer: biology, histopathology, computation, and genomics. Pathol Res Pract. 2021;220:153378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guo Y, Yuan C, Huang T, Cheng Z. Integrating UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS, network pharmacology, bioinformatics and experimental validation to uncover the anti-cancer mechanisms of TiaoPi AnChang decoction in colorectal cancer. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;334:118576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kasap E, Gerceker E, Boyacıoglu S, Yuceyar H, Yıldırm H, Ayhan S, et al. The potential role of the NEK6, AURKA, AURKB, and PAK1 genes in adenomatous colorectal polyps and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:3071–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen JF, Wu SW, Shi ZM, Qu YJ, Ding MR, Hu B. Exploring the components and mechanism of Solanum nigrum L. for colon cancer treatment based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1111799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhai Y, Sun J, Sun C, Zhao H, Li X, Yao J, et al. Total flavonoids from the dried root of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg inhibit colorectal cancer growth through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Phytother Res. 2022;36:4263–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Battaglin F, Puccini A, Intini R, Schirripa M, Ferro A, Bergamo F, et al. The role of tumor angiogenesis as a therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18:251–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gao R, Lv Y. Characterizing the antitumor effect of coptis chinensis and mume fructus against colorectal cancer based on pharmacological analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:9061752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chu T, Yu R, Gu Y, Wang Y, Chang H, Li Y, et al. Kaempferol protects gut-vascular barrier from high glucose-induced disorder via NF-κB pathway. J Nutr Biochem. 2024;123:109496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yu R, Zhong J, Zhou Q, Ren W, Liu Z, Bian Y. Kaempferol prevents angiogenesis of rat intestinal microvascular endothelial cells induced by LPS and TNF-α via inhibiting VEGF/Akt/p38 signaling pathways and maintaining gut-vascular barrier integrity. Chem Biol Interact. 2022;366:110135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang S, Liu C, Li W, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Yang H, et al. Kaempferol promotes angiogenesis through HIF-1α/VEGF-A/Notch1 pathway in ischemic stroke rats. Neurochem Int. 2025;185:105953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liang F, Han Y, Gao H, Xin S, Chen S, Wang N, et al. Kaempferol identified by zebrafish assay and fine fractionations strategy from Dysosma versipellis inhibits angiogenesis through VEGF and FGF pathways. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Huang Q, Jing Y, Xiong L, Li L, Feng J, Cheng J. The interplay between driver mutation and oxidative stress in colorectal cancer: from pathogenesis to therapeutics. J Transl Med. 2025;23:635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bangar SP, Chaudhary V, Sharma N, Bansal V, Ozogul F, Lorenzo JM. Kaempferol: a flavonoid with wider biological activities and its applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63:9580–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Guo F, Peng L, Xiong H, Wang J, Tsao R, Peng X, et al. Free and bound phenolics of Laird lentil (Lens culinaris) hulls and the anti-inflammatory activity of their digestive products via crosstalk between NF-κB and Keap1-Nrf2 signaling pathways in HT-29 cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:13251–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bianchini S, Bovio F, Negri S, Bisson L, Piccinelli AL, Rastrelli L, et al. Methanolic extract of the nutritional plant (Diospyros kaki Thunb.) exhibits anticancer activity by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction in colorectal cancer cells. Nutrients. 2024;16:3742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Faundes-Gandolfo N, Jara-Gutiérrez C, Párraga M, Montenegro I, Vera W, Escobar M, et al. Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) Pers. leaf ethanolic extract exerts selective anticancer activity through ROS-induced apoptotic cell death in human cancer cell lines. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024;24:269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Al-Rimawi F, Khalid M, Salah Z, Zawahreh MAA, Alnasser SM, Alshammari SO, et al. Anticancer, antioxidant, and antibacterial activity of chemically fingerprinted extract from Cyclamen persicum Mill. Sci Rep. 2024;14:8488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nirmala P, Ramanathan M. Effect of Kaempferol on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in 1,2-dimethyl hydrazine induced colorectal carcinoma in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;654:75–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Park MY, Ji GE, Sung MK. Dietary Kaempferol suppresses inflammation of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:355–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cai Y, Tu Y, Cheng H, Yu J. Investigating the interaction mechanism of five flavonoids and PD-L1 based on multi-spectroscopy and molecular dynamics. Chem Biol Interact. 2025;421:111741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gu C, Tang L, Hao Y, Dong S, Shen J, Xie F, et al. Network pharmacology and bioinformatics were used to construct a prognostic model and immunoassay of core target genes in the combination of quercetin and kaempferol in the treatment of colorectal cancer. J Cancer. 2023;14:1956–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lu S, Sun X, Zhou Z, Tang H, Xiao R, Lv Q, et al. Mechanism of Bazhen decoction in the treatment of colorectal cancer based on network pharmacology, molecular docking, and experimental validation. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1235575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yan H, Li Y, Yang B, Long F, Yang Z, Tang D. Exploring the mechanism of action of Yiyi Fuzi Baijiang powder in colorectal cancer based on network pharmacology and molecular docking studies. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2023;39:1107–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jalilvand A, Soltanpour MS. Investigating the methylation status of DACT2 gene and its association with MTHFR C677T polymorphism in patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2019;8:53–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wu X, Li R, Song Q, Zhang C, Jia R, Han Z, et al. JMJD2C promotes colorectal cancer metastasis via regulating histone methylation of MALAT1 promoter and enhancing β-catenin signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu X, Wang J, Xiang Y, Wang K, Yan D, Tong Y. The roles of OGT and its mechanisms in cancer. Cell Biosci. 2024;14:121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.De Leon-Oliva D, González-Prieto P, De Castro-Martinez P, Boaru DL, Laguna-Hernández P, Fraile-Martinez O, et al. Revisiting the biological role of the Warburg effect: evolving perspectives on cancer metabolism. Pathol Res Pract. 2025;273:156151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pan T, Hao J, Wang Y, Duan W, Yue L, Gao X. Role in post-translational modification of M2-type pyruvate kinase in tumorigenesis and development. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023;48:1359–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Punnasseril JMJ, Auwal A, Gopalan V, Lam AK, Islam F. Metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells and therapeutics targeting cancer metabolism. Cancer Med. 2025;14:e71244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yang G, Qian B, He L, Zhang C, Wang J, Qian X, et al. Application prospects of ferroptosis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2025;25:59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ma Y, Zhang D, Li Z. Dual role of Heme oxygenase-1 in disease progression and treatment: a literature review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;321:146272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wang X, Yin QH, Wan LL, Sun RL, Wang G, Gu JF, et al. Research progress on the effect of pyroptosis on the occurrence, development, invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024;16:3410–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Qu Z, Pen X, Liu Y, Pen X, Lu X, Luo S. Autophagy in colorectal cancer: current understanding of mechanisms and future therapeutic directions. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;191:118524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ohishi T, Kishimoto Y, Miura N, Shiota G, Kohri T, Hara Y, et al. Synergistic effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate with sulindac against colon carcinogenesis of rats treated with azoxymethane. Cancer Lett. 2002;177:49–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kannen V, Marini T, Turatti A, Carvalho MC, Brandão ML, Jabor VA, et al. Fluoxetine induces preventive and complex effects against colon cancer development in epithelial and stromal areas in rats. Toxicol Lett. 2011;204:134–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hassanein NMA, Hassan ESG, Hegab AM, Elahl HMS. Chemopreventive effect of sulindac in combination with epigallocatechin gallate or kaempferol against 1,2-dimethyl hydrazine-induced preneoplastic lesions in rats: a comparative study. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2018;32:e22198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hassan ESG, Hassanein NM, Sayed Ahmed HM. Probing the chemoprevention potential of the antidepressant fluoxetine combined with epigallocatechin gallate or kaempferol in rats with induced early stage colon carcinogenesis. J Pharmacol Sci. 2021;145:29–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Haroon M, Kang SC. Kaempferol synergistically enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in colon cancer cells. J Cancer Prev. 2024;29:69–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Wu H, Du J, Li C, Li H, Guo H, Li Z. Kaempferol can reverse the 5-Fu resistance of colorectal cancer cells by inhibiting PKM2-mediated glycolysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:3544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Riahi-Chebbi I, Souid S, Othman H, Haoues M, Karoui H, Morel A, et al. The phenolic compound kaempferol overcomes 5-fluorouracil resistance in human resistant LS174 colon cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9:195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Sharma A, Chorawala MR, Rawal RM, Shrivastava N. Integrated blood and organ profile analysis to evaluate ameliorative effects of Kaempferol on 5-fluorouracil-induced toxicity. Sci Rep. 2024;14:2363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Safarpour S, Pirzadeh M, Ebrahimpour A, Shirafkan F, Madani F, Hosseini M, et al. Protective Effect of Kaempferol and Its Nanoparticles on 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Rats. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:2273000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Okita K, Mizokami T, Yasuda O, Ikeda Y. Acute Kaempferol ingestion lowers oxygen uptake during submaximal exercise and improves high-intensity exercise capacity in well-trained male athletes. Physiol Rep. 2025;13:e70369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Barve A, Chen C, Hebbar V, Desiderio J, Saw CL, Kong AN. Metabolism, oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of chemopreventive Kaempferol in rats. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2009;30:356–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Deng SP, Yang YL, Cheng XX, Li WR, Cai JY. Synthesis, spectroscopic study and radical scavenging activity of Kaempferol derivatives: enhanced water solubility and antioxidant activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Park S, Lu GL, Zheng YC, Davison EK, Li Y. Nanoparticle-based delivery strategies for combating drug resistance in cancer therapeutics. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17:2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yıldırım M, Sessevmez M, Poyraz S, Düzgüneş N. Recent strategies for cancer therapy: Polymer nanoparticles carrying medicinally important phytochemicals and their cellular targets. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Khatoon S, Kalam N, Shaikh MF, Hasnain MS, Hafiz AK, Ansari MT. Nanoencapsulation of polyphenols as drugs and supplements for enhancing therapeutic profile—a review. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2022;15:77–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.He W, Zhang J, Ju J, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Zhan L, et al. Preparation, characterization, and evaluation of the antitumor effect of Kaempferol nanosuspensions. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023;13:2885–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Aglan HA, Abd-Rabou AA, Ahmed HH, Elsayed GH, Kishta MS, Elhinnawi MA, et al. Role of CD133 antibody-conjugated nanocarrier in enhancing the targetability of hepatocellular carcinoma stem cells. Sci Rep. 2025;15:30441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kazmi I, Al-Abbasi FA, Afzal M, Altayb HN, Nadeem MS, Gupta G. Formulation and evaluation of Kaempferol loaded nanoparticles against experimentally induced hepatocellular carcinoma: in vitro and in vivo studies. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:2086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yang X, Tang D, Pang E, Yang Q, Zhao S, Yi J, et al. Kaempferol-Iron assembled nanoparticles for synergistic photothermal and chemodynamic therapy of breast cancer. Bioconjug Chem. 2025;36:2287–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dewangan HK, Sharma R, Marwah H, Shah K, Alam P. Nanostructured solid lipid for Paclitaxel and Kaempferol co-delivery as a novel synergistic approach for breast cancer. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2025;36:1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lei C, Liu D, Zhou Q, Ma S, Qian H. Engineering of dopamine conjugated with bovine serum albumin and zeolite imidazole framework: a promising drug delivery nanocarrier on lung cancer cells. Heliyon. 2024;10:e36580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 107.Ma Y, Liu J, Cui X, Hou J, Yu F, Wang J, et al. Hyaluronic Acid Modified Nanostructured Lipid Carrier for Targeting Delivery of Kaempferol to NSCLC: preparation, optimization, characterization, and performance evaluation in vitro. Molecules. 2022;27:4553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Nicoleti LR, Di Filippo LD, Duarte JL, Luiz MT, Sábio RM, Chorilli M. Development, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity of Kaempferol-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers in glioblastoma multiforme cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2023;226:113309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kaffash M, Tolou-Shikhzadeh-Yazdi S, Soleimani S, Hoseinpoor S, Saberi MR, Chamani J. Spectroscopy and molecular simulation on the interaction of Nano-Kaempferol prepared by oil-in-water with two carrier proteins: an investigation of protein-protein interaction. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2024;309:123815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Li Y, Zhou S, Song H, Yu T, Zheng X, Chu Q. CaCO3 nanoparticles incorporated with KAE to enable amplified calcium overload cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2021;277:121080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Philippova A, Aringazina R, Lozano R, Tikhonova Y. Correction of hypoxic effects on target organs in pneumonia with phytotherapy. J Complement Integr Med. 2025;22:200–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Discover Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES