Simple Summary
Theileria orientalis is a tick-transmitted parasite that infects cattle worldwide and was long considered harmless. However, in recent decades, severe outbreaks causing anaemia, reproductive losses, and deaths have been reported in several countries, drawing increasing attention from the veterinary and scientific communities. Disease severity depends largely on the parasite genetic type, with the Ikeda and Chitose genotypes being the most dangerous. Diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in animals that carry the parasite without showing clinical signs. Treatment options remain limited, and no vaccine is currently available. Based on a comprehensive search of the available scientific literature, this narrative review brings together current knowledge on how this parasite is classified, how it spreads, how it causes disease and how infections can be managed. It also highlights the areas where research is still lacking, including a better understanding of which tick species can transmit the parasite and the development of effective vaccines. As tick distributions continue to expand due to climate change, understanding and controlling this infection are becoming increasingly important.
Keywords: Theileria orientalis, oriental theileriosis, bovine, tick-borne diseases, Haemaphysalis longicornis, major piroplasm surface protein, MPSP, anaemia
Abstract
Once regarded as a benign, clinically overlooked organism, Theileria orientalis has undergone a paradigm shift in its perceived status and is now recognised as a tick-borne haemoparasite of clinical and economic importance. Severe outbreaks characterised by haemolytic anaemia, reproductive losses, and mortality, primarily associated with the Ikeda and Chitose genotypes, have been increasingly reported in Australasia, Asia, and North America. In Europe and parts of Africa, however, the epidemiological status of T. orientalis remains poorly defined, despite increasing molecular evidence of circulation and reports of predominantly subclinical infections. The parasite is transmitted transstadially in ixodid ticks, with Haemaphysalis longicornis as the principal confirmed biological vector, although vector competence remains unverified for most suspected tick species. This narrative review was based on a comprehensive PubMed search from database inception up to the date of initial manuscript submission, supplemented by reference-list screening and targeted searches. This review synthesises current knowledge on taxonomy, life cycle, transmission, genetic diversity based on the major piroplasm surface protein gene, global epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, co-infections, production losses, diagnostics, and control strategies. Key gaps include limited understanding of the mechanisms driving erythrocyte destruction, insufficient experimental confirmation of vector competence, absence of licensed vaccines, and incomplete epidemiological data in several regions. Future research priorities are discussed in the context of climate change and the expanding geographic distribution of tick vectors.
1. Introduction
Tick-borne diseases represent a threat to livestock health and welfare worldwide. Among these, bovine theileriosis, caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Theileria (Apicomplexa: Piroplasmorida Wenyon 1926), is one of the most economically important diseases affecting cattle [1,2]. While the transforming species Theileria parva and Theileria annulata have historically attracted most research attention [3], a growing body of evidence has brought renewed focus to a group of non-transforming species collectively referred to as the Theileria sergenti/buffeli/orientalis complex [4,5]. The taxonomic classification of this group has long been debated, with different names assigned based on geographic origin—Theileria sergenti in East Asia, T. buffeli in Australia, and T. orientalis in Europe—resulting in a complex nomenclature [5,6,7]. Although T. orientalis is now widely used as a collective designation for these parasites, their formal taxonomic status remains unresolved [2,8,9,10,11]. The WOAH Terrestrial Manual considers the T. orientalis/buffeli group to comprise two species, T. orientalis and T. buffeli, whereas much of the recent molecular and epidemiological literature describes Buffeli as a genotype within the T. orientalis complex [10,11,12,13]. For consistency with the predominant usage in the recent literature, T. orientalis is used throughout this review as the principal current designation. The names T. buffeli and T. sergenti are retained only when discussing historical nomenclature or when referring to the terminology used in the original publications.
Traditionally regarded as a benign or low-virulence parasite, T. orientalis has undergone a substantial shift in perceived clinical importance, evolving from an organism historically associated primarily with subclinical or mild infections to an emerging agent of bovine theileriosis [14]. This change in perception has been particularly evident in Australia and New Zealand, where outbreaks of disease have been linked to the Ikeda genotype and characterised by haemolytic anaemia, jaundice, weakness, reduced production, abortion and, in severe cases, mortality [15,16]. Reports from Asia and North America have since confirmed that clinically relevant T. orientalis infections are not restricted to Australasia [17,18,19,20,21], while recent European studies indicate circulation but still provide limited evidence regarding genotype distribution, vector associations and clinical relevance [22,23,24]. At least twelve genotypes have been identified based on the major piroplasm surface protein (MPSP) gene [25,26], of which the Ikeda (type 2) and Chitose (type 1) genotypes are most frequently associated with disease [10], while the widely distributed Buffeli genotype (type 3) is generally associated with clinically mild infections [14].
Despite growing recognition of its clinical and economic significance, important knowledge gaps remain. The vector competence of many ixodid tick species has not been experimentally confirmed [10], the pathogenic mechanisms underlying erythrocyte destruction remain incompletely characterised [13] and no licensed vaccines or consistently effective treatments are currently available [27]. Furthermore, although molecular evidence of T. orientalis circulation has been reported in several European countries, its true prevalence, genotype distribution, vector association, and clinical relevance in Europe remain insufficiently characterised [22,23,24]. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and updated synthesis of the current knowledge on T. orientalis, covering its taxonomy, morphology, life cycle, transmission, genetic diversity, epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and control strategies, with the goal of identifying research priorities to guide the management of this emerging parasitic disease.
2. Methods—Literature Search Strategy
This narrative review was based on a comprehensive PubMed search from database inception up to the date of initial manuscript submission. No publication-date restriction was applied. Current and historical nomenclature was used, including “Theileria orientalis”, “Theileria buffeli”, “Theileria sergenti”, “oriental theileriosis” and “benign theileriosis”. Publications were considered when they addressed taxonomy, morphology, life cycle, transmission, genetic diversity, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, productive impact, diagnosis, treatment or control of T. orientalis. Additional publications were identified by screening the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conducting targeted searches and consulting authoritative institutional sources.
The evidence was interpreted considering the design and limitations of each study. Experimental studies were given greater weight when assessing causal mechanisms and vector competence, whereas observational studies, molecular surveys and case reports were interpreted more cautiously. As this was a narrative review, no formal risk-of-bias assessment or quantitative evidence-grading system was applied.
Country-level records used to construct Figure 1 were extracted into a predefined table. For each country, information was recorded on the study area, host or sample type, type of evidence, diagnostic method, sample size and reported prevalence, genotype, clinical relevance, vector evidence and supporting reference. Records were checked against the original publications and are presented in Supplementary Table S1.
Figure 1.
Global distribution of reported Theileria orientalis occurrence. Countries shown on the map had at least one eligible published record, although the type and strength of evidence varied among countries. Country-level evidence, diagnostic methods, reported genotypes, clinical relevance and vector associations are detailed in Supplementary Table S1.
A country was considered to have reported occurrence when at least one eligible publication documented Theileria orientalis through molecular, serological, microscopic or clinical evidence. Because these approaches provide different levels of taxonomic and epidemiological certainty, the type and strength of evidence were recorded separately in Supplementary Table S1.
3. Taxonomy, Historical Background and Morphology
3.1. Historical Nomenclature and Current Taxonomic Status
The nomenclature of the non-transforming bovine Theileria lineages associated with oriental theileriosis has been debated for decades [5,6]. Historical designations were based largely on geographic origin, host species, morphology, serological reactivity and transmission characteristics, but these names have not consistently corresponded to the genetic lineages recognised today. Consequently, T. sergenti, T. buffeli and T. orientalis have been used inconsistently and sometimes interchangeably in the literature [5,6,10]. In the present review, T. orientalis is used as the principal current designation, whereas T. buffeli and T. sergenti are retained only for historical context or when reproducing the terminology of the original studies. The historical nomenclature reflects descriptions made at different times and in different hosts and geographic regions. The earliest of these names was T. buffeli, described by Schein in 1908 in Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in Indochina, now Vietnam. Theileria sergenti was subsequently described by Yakimoff and Dekhtereff in 1930 in cattle from eastern Siberia, followed by the description of T. orientalis in cattle from the same region in 1931 [5,9]. However, the name T. sergenti had already been used by Wenyon in 1926 for a parasite of sheep, making its subsequent application to the bovine parasite taxonomically problematic [5,7].
In Australia, Dodd reported a bovine piroplasm in 1910 that was identified at the time as T. mutans, a species previously described in South African cattle [28,29]. Subsequent studies showed that the Australian parasite was distinct from the African T. mutans and was more closely related to the lineages later referred to as T. buffeli or T. orientalis [6,9].
Comparative studies conducted during the 1980s initially suggested that bovine Theileria isolates from Japan, Australia, Great Britain, Iran, the United States and Korea belonged to a single species, for which the name T. orientalis was provisionally retained [5,30,31]. However, subsequent transmission and serological studies showed that the Japanese parasite historically referred to as T. sergenti could be distinguished from the Australian T. buffeli and British T. orientalis, whereas the latter two appeared more closely related [5,6,9,32]. Two-dimensional protein analysis showed that the profiles of T. buffeli and T. orientalis were nearly identical, apart from a small number of minor proteins, whereas the Japanese T. sergenti stocks differed by a characteristic group of proteins that included a major 33–34 kDa antigen [33]. Nucleotide-sequence analysis of the genes encoding the immunodominant p33 protein of T. sergenti and the corresponding p34 protein of T. buffeli further supported differentiation between these parasites [34]. Marked morphological similarity between the schizont and piroplasm stages of T. buffeli and T. orientalis was also reported, although morphology alone was insufficient to resolve their taxonomic status [35]. In addition, T. sergenti was considered an unacceptable name for the bovine parasite because it had previously been used for an ovine parasite described as Babesia sergenti [5,7]. Taken together, these findings showed that the historical names could not simply be regarded as geographic synonyms and highlighted the heterogeneity within the group.
From the 1990s onwards, molecular analyses based on the major piroplasm surface protein (MPSP) and small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes confirmed the close relationship among parasites historically designated as T. sergenti, T. buffeli and T. orientalis, while also revealing considerable genetic heterogeneity within the group [4,5,36,37]. These findings led to the widespread use of the terms T. sergenti/buffeli/orientalis complex or T. buffeli/orientalis group, and much of the subsequent literature adopted T. orientalis as a collective designation, with the principal lineages described as genotypes [8,9,10,38]. Nevertheless, this convention did not formally resolve the taxonomic status of the lineages, and inconsistent nomenclature remains in use. A related non-transforming bovine parasite, T. sinensis, was subsequently described in China. Although phylogenetically related to other bovine Theileria, analyses of the internal transcribed spacer regions and the 5.8S rRNA gene placed T. sinensis in a distinct clade separate from T. orientalis, supporting its classification as a separate species rather than as another genotype of T. orientalis [39].
Whole-genome comparisons have provided stronger evidence of divergence among the principal lineages. Analysis of Australian Ikeda, Chitose and Buffeli isolates, together with the Japanese Ikeda reference genome, identified average nucleotide identity values comparable to those observed between some recognised Theileria species [11]. On this basis, the authors suggested that Ikeda and closely related genotypes could potentially be considered a species distinct from Chitose and Buffeli. However, the study did not constitute a formal taxonomic revision and was based on a limited number of representative genomes; it also identified putative recombination between Chitose and Buffeli and between Australian and Japanese Ikeda isolates, further complicating the definition of clear species boundaries [11]. Subsequent chromosome-level assemblies of the Chitose and Buffeli genotypes confirmed substantial genomic and structural differences, including chromosomal translocations, while continuing to classify these lineages as genotypes of T. orientalis [40]. Therefore, the available genomic evidence supports a reassessment of the current classification but does not yet establish a formally accepted species-level separation among Ikeda, Chitose and Buffeli [11,40].
3.2. Morphology
Theileria orientalis belongs to the genus Theileria, family Theileriidae, order Piroplasmida, class Aconoidasida and phylum Apicomplexa [8,41]. Parasites belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa are obligate intracellular parasites and propagate only within host cells. The genus Theileria is characterised by the presence of schizonts in lymphoid cells and piroplasms in the erythrocytes of the vertebrate host [2,8,9,42,43]. Microscopic detection of this haemoparasite is commonly performed using Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smears. Piroplasms typically measure up to 2.0 µm in length and 1.0 µm in width, while erythrocytes may exhibit spiculated (spiny) morphological changes during acute infection [44]. Schizonts in lymphoid cells are generally not observed on peripheral blood smears [42].
Intraerythrocytic piroplasms of T. orientalis are pleomorphic, most commonly appearing as bacilliform, ovoid, Y-shaped, tetrad, comma-shaped, and thick or thin rod-like forms with residual cytoplasm, as well as annular forms such as signet-ring and parachute-like forms [45,46]. At low parasitaemia, rod or comma forms tend to predominate, whereas later in infection the number of oval forms increases. Y-shaped and tetrad forms within erythrocytes are reported to exhibit multiple nuclei, suggesting multiplication by binary fission [45]. Piroplasms are sometimes associated with an intraerythrocytic “bar” or “veil”, formed in the cytoplasm of erythrocytes infected with piroplasms of several non-transforming Theileria species; this veil contains haemoglobin and is thought to be part of a detoxification system [44,45,47].
Morphological distinction on stained blood smears may be insufficient to reliably distinguish T. orientalis from T. annulata, as their intraerythrocytic merozoite forms can present overlapping features [1,48]. Differentiation from other haemoprotozoa and rickettsiae can also be difficult [10,44] and the low parasitaemia commonly observed in carrier animals further reduces the sensitivity of blood smear examination [1,25].
4. Life Cycle and Transmission
4.1. Life Cycle
The haemoprotozoan T. orientalis is an apicomplexan parasite with stages alternating between ticks and ruminant hosts such as cattle, water buffaloes, Cape buffaloes and yaks [2,49,50]. Its life cycle therefore includes a vertebrate as the intermediate host, in which asexual propagation by schizogony occurs, and a tick as the definitive host, in which sexual reproduction (gametogony) and asexual propagation by sporogony take place [8,43].
The vertebrate host becomes infested with ticks, which inoculate sporozoites during feeding; the sporozoites subsequently multiply and develop into schizonts within leucocytes of lymphoid organs [8,43]. These schizonts release uninucleate merozoites that infect erythrocytes, where further multiplication (merogony) occurs [43,51]. Erythrocyte invasion by merozoites occurs approximately 10 days after inoculation of the agent [42]. It has been suggested that T. orientalis utilises haemoglobin as a source of amino acids [13,52] during the intraerythrocyte phase, targeting host haemoglobin as a vital cytosolic nutrient source to support rapid proliferation. A potential example of host-protein interaction in T. orientalis is Tocp1, a piroplasm-expressed protein with sequence similarity to eukaryotic thiol proteases. Despite this similarity, Tocp1 does not show detectable proteolytic activity, probably because the catalytic cysteine residue is replaced by glycine. However, recombinant Tocp1 binds bovine haemoglobin in vitro, and several Tocp1-like genes are present in the parasite genome, suggesting a possible role in haemoglobin interaction during the intraerythrocytic stage [52].
When a new tick feeds on the vertebrate host, it ingests infected erythrocytes [43,51]. These erythrocytes are lysed in the intestinal lumen, releasing merozoites that differentiate into gametocytes, leading to sexual reproduction in the midgut (gametogony), with genetic recombination occurring at meiosis [53]. Following this division, the parasites differentiate into motile kinetes, which exit the tick’s intestinal cells, access the haemocoel and reach the salivary glands, where sporogony takes place. In this phase, the parasite develops into a multinucleate sporont that gives rise to multiple sporozoites, which are inoculated into the vertebrate host during tick feeding [51].
T. orientalis is transmitted transstadially, but not transovarially, in ticks [8,45]. Accordingly, recognised vectors are typically tick species with two- or three-host life cycles [9,49].
4.2. Confirmed and Suspected Tick Vectors
The primary vector associated with the biological transmission of T. orientalis is Haemaphysalis longicornis [54,55]. However, other ixodid species have been implicated in transmission, namely Haemaphysalis bancrofti, Haemaphysalis humerosa, Haemaphysalis punctata and Rhipicephalus microplus [10,54,56,57,58]. Haemaphysalis longicornis is native to East Asian countries, including Russia, China, Korea and Japan [59]. It can survive across a wide range of climatic conditions, and some populations are capable of parthenogenetic reproduction [54]. In addition, H. longicornis has been recorded on multiple host species, including horses, pigs, sheep, dogs and cats, although cattle are its primary host [60]. This ixodid tick has successfully invaded and established in several Asia-Pacific countries, including Australia and New Zealand. More recently, its presence has been confirmed in the USA [54] and it has also recently been recorded in Turkey [61].
Haemaphysalis spp. are the main biological vectors of T. orientalis in Australasia and Asia, with H. longicornis considered the principal vector in Australia, New Zealand and East Asia [49]. In the United States, invasive populations of H. longicornis have been experimentally confirmed as competent vectors of the Ikeda genotype [54], and T. orientalis Ikeda has more recently been detected in H. longicornis ticks collected from a cattle farm in Tennessee [62]. In Europe, H. punctata has been implicated as the most likely vector of T. orientalis, although this association remains less well characterised than that of H. longicornis in Australasia and the USA [58,63]. In Africa, vector associations for T. orientalis remain poorly defined, despite molecular evidence of parasite circulation [10,64,65,66].
The competence of some proposed vectors has not been established, as ticks were collected from cattle rather than from pasture, and no experimental infections with T. orientalis using those ticks have yet been demonstrated [10]. Consequently, there is a degree of inconsistency regarding agent detection versus confirmed transmission capacity among ixodids. Table 1 summarises selected species and their status with respect to T. orientalis presence or competence, according to various authors.
Table 1.
Relationship between tick species (Ixodidae) and the current knowledge on their capacity to transmit Theileria orientalis.
| Tick Species | Current Evidence of T. orientalis Vector Competence | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Amblyomma variegatum | Presence of the agent | [67] |
| Amblyomma coharens | Presence of the agent | [67] |
| Dermacentor nuttali | Presence of the agent | [68] |
| Dermacentor marginatus | Presence of the agent | [69] |
| Haemaphysalis bispinosa | Possible transmission | [70] |
| Haemaphysalis bancrofti | Presence of the agent | [56] |
| Haemaphysalis douglasi | Possible transmission | [71] |
| Haemaphysalis humerosa | Experimental transmission | [35] |
| Haemaphysalis longicornis | Transmission | [54] |
| Haemaphysalis mageshimaensis | Presence of the agent | [72] |
| Haemaphysalis megaspinosa | Possible transmission | [71] |
| Haemaphysalis punctata | Possible transmission | [73] |
| Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis | Possible transmission of a T. orientalis-related Theileria spp. | [74] |
| Hyalomma marginatum | Presence of the agent | [69] |
| Hyalomma detritum | Presence of the agent | [75] |
| Hyalomma excavatum | Presence of the agent | [76] |
| Hyalomma lusitanicum | Presence of the agent | [69] |
| Hyalomma scupense | Presence of the agent | [77] |
| Ixodes ricinus | Presence of the agent | [78] |
| Ixodes ovatus | Possible transmission | [71] |
| Ixodes persulcatus | Possible transmission | [71] |
| Rhipicephalus annulatus | Presence of the agent | [79] |
| Rhipicephalus bursa | Presence of the agent | [69] |
| Rhipicephalus decoloratus | Presence of the agent | [80] |
| Rhipicephalus evertsi | Presence of the agent | [80] |
| Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides | Presence of the agent | [70] |
| Rhipicephalus microplus | Transmission | [81] |
| Rhipicephalus praetextatus | Presence of the agent | [67] |
| Rhipicephalus sanguineus | Presence of the agent | [82] |
| Rhipicephalus turanicus | Presence of the agent | [83] |
Note: “Presence of the agent” refers to the molecular detection (e.g., PCR) of T. orientalis DNA in ticks collected from cattle or the environment, without evidence that the tick can transmit the parasite to a vertebrate host. “Possible transmission” indicates that the tick species has been suggested as a potential vector based on field association, epidemiological evidence, or detection of the parasite in naturally infected ticks, but without controlled experimental confirmation of transmission. “Experimental transmission” indicates that the tick species has been shown, under experimental conditions, to transmit T. orientalis to a vertebrate host. “Transmission” refers to tick species reported in the literature as vectors of T. orientalis; although the strength of evidence varies among studies.
The number of infected tick acini appears to increase with bovine parasitaemia, probably reflecting the number of parasitised erythrocytes ingested during feeding [55]. Understanding transmission modes is essential for a comprehensive assessment of disease epidemiology and for the rational formulation of outbreak control measures [84].
The evidence supporting vector competence varies considerably among tick species. Controlled transmission experiments provide direct evidence for competence, whereas molecular detection of parasite DNA in field-collected ticks demonstrates exposure or carriage but not the ability to support parasite development and transmit infection to cattle. Epidemiological associations should therefore be interpreted as hypotheses requiring experimental confirmation.
4.3. Alternative Modes of Transmission
4.3.1. Vertical Transmission
Vertical transplacental transmission of T. orientalis genotype Ikeda appears unlikely in chronically infected dairy cows and is therefore not considered a major factor in the epidemiology of Ikeda-type infection [85]. However, transplacental transmission of the parasite from cows to calves has been reported in approximately 5.5–13% of cases [54,86], suggesting that it may occur sporadically but is unlikely to maintain infection at the population level. Nevertheless, calves may develop high-level T. orientalis infections at 4–8 weeks of age, regardless of the presence of maternal antibodies after birth [87]. This subject remains controversial, as some authors report that vertically infected calves may take up to three months to test positive via PCR [86]. T. orientalis DNA has also been detected in aborted ovine and caprine material, although molecular detection alone does not establish causation [88,89].
4.3.2. Iatrogenic and Mechanical Transmission
Reports of T. orientalis infection in settings where ixodid ticks are absent, rare or not detected at the time of sampling suggest that alternative transmission routes may contribute to parasite maintenance. Mechanical transfer of infected blood has been shown experimentally to establish persistent, PCR-detectable infection in recipient cattle, indicating that this route can contribute to dissemination. Nevertheless, because mechanical transmission bypasses the tick stage and does not consistently reproduce the severe disease associated with biological tick-borne transmission, passage through the tick vector has been proposed to be important for parasite fitness, genetic diversity and possibly virulence [21,90,91].
Successful infection with T. orientalis, detected by PCR, has been achieved by inoculating approximately 107 to 108 infected bovine erythrocytes, both intravenously and subcutaneously [84,91]; infection following intravenous inoculation with small volumes of blood can be detected by PCR for up to five months post-infection [84].
The onset of parasitaemia was delayed in animals infected intravenously compared with animals infected by ixodid ticks [54]. This may reflect the tick’s ability to inject protozoa together with immunomodulatory salivary proteins, amplification of parasite numbers within the vector, and/or additional multiplication in leucocytes (schizogony) before reaching erythrocytes [54]. Stabilised blood lacks these biological advantages and undergoes immunological degradation and destruction of infected cells [54]. Therefore, iatrogenic transmission depends on the volume and parasitaemia of the transferred blood and on the parasite’s ability to survive outside the host before inoculation into a susceptible animal [84].
Mechanical transmission is associated not only with contaminated needles but also with biting flies, mosquitoes and lice [49,84,90]. In these insects, regurgitation of part of a previous blood meal or passive transfer of blood on mouthparts are possible transmission modes [84]. Although confirmatory evidence of T. orientalis mechanical transmission is still limited, mechanical transfer of Theileria spp. has been reported, under certain conditions, by the horse fly Tabanus trigeminus, and of the mechanical transmission of T. orientalis by the sucking louse Linognathus vituli, in which mechanical transmission was suggested to occur by regurgitation [84]. A high frequency of T. orientalis detection has also been reported in Haematopinus eurysternus, but no transmission mechanisms were reported [90]. The agent has also been detected in flies, notably Haematobia irritans and Stomoxys spp. [90]. The detection of T. orientalis in Culiseta annulata mosquitoes in the United Kingdom and in the biting midges Culicoides brevitarsis and Culicoides victoriae in Australia has also been demonstrated [90,92]. However, for biting arthropods, transmission would depend on both donor parasitaemia and the cumulative volumes inoculated or transferred [84]. Because mechanical transmission results in direct transfer of the haploid stage from host to host, the sexual phase of the life cycle does not occur [84] and the life cycle is interrupted [2,9]. Consequently, genetic exchange has not been confirmed in experimental studies of mechanical transmission, although this phenomenon may play an important role in the persistence and spread of theileriosis. Extensive mechanical transmission may facilitate parasite dissemination by transferring infected blood-stage parasites between cattle and establishing persistent, PCR-detectable infection. However, in an experimental study mechanical inoculation produced infection without reproducing overt clinical disease, suggesting that this route may disseminate the parasite without fully maintaining the pathogenic phenotype observed after tick-borne transmission. The authors therefore proposed that biological transmission through ticks may be required to maintain parasite virulence [84].
Although the minimum infectious dose of T. orientalis is very low, the risk of mechanical spread caused by biting arthropods depends on several interacting factors. These include the prevalence of infection within the herd, the parasitaemia level of infected donor animals, the volume of blood transferred to a naïve host, and the parasite load in the arthropod’s previous blood meal [84]. Transmission is also influenced by the number of arthropods feeding within the same period, their ability to reach a susceptible recipient shortly after an interrupted blood meal, or, in the case of lice, their transfer between animals through direct contact [84]. Ultimately, successful mechanical transmission requires viable parasites to remain associated with the retained blood and to be inoculated in sufficient quantities to establish a detectable and potentially transmissible infection [84].
Approximately 10% of calves born to infected dams may become PCR-positive within the first three months of life, despite testing negative at birth [86]. This is consistent with the epitheliochorial placenta of ruminants, which separates maternal and foetal blood supplies and restricts prenatal transfer of macromolecules such as immunoglobulins [87]. Passive immune transfer therefore occurs mainly after birth through colostrum, which contains biologically active maternal components, including immunoglobulins, cytokines and viable leucocytes [93,94]. Although transplacental transmission of T. orientalis can occur, it appears to occur at a relatively low rate and is unlikely to be a direct cause of abortion; instead, abortion may be more closely associated with the maternal clinical state and high maternal parasitaemia [87].
Calves may acquire colostral antibodies against T. orientalis, but their protective role remains unclear. Maternal antibodies may provide only partial and transient protection against severe disease or mortality, as they do not appear to prevent infection, parasitaemia or anaemia; parasite loads often increase after antibody levels decline, around 5–8 weeks postpartum [49,87].
Overall, biological transmission by competent ixodid ticks remains the best-supported and epidemiologically most important route. Mechanical transfer can establish persistent infection experimentally, but its contribution under field conditions remains uncertain because the infectious blood volume, donor parasitaemia and frequency of interrupted feeding are rarely quantified. Transplacental transmission has been demonstrated at a low frequency in observational studies and is unlikely to maintain infection at the population level.
5. Genetic Diversity and Genotypes
It is estimated that the ancestor of extant piroplasmids originated around 57 million years ago [3]. Molecular studies indicate that transforming and non-transforming Theileria species evolved independently [3]. These studies have also provided useful insights into the epidemiology, diagnosis, taxonomy and phylogeny of benign Theileria species across various regions. These studies have primarily targeted the following genes: 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), internal transcribed spacers (ITS), major piroplasm surface protein (MPSP), the 23 kDa piroplasm membrane protein (p23), among other genetic markers [38,95,96,97]. Genetic variation among Theileria parasites is sometimes associated with host specificity, but the genetic diversity of T. orientalis is less extensively studied than that of T. annulata and T. parva [3]. Recent molecular studies in Bangladesh have revealed considerable genetic diversity and distinct population structures among circulating T. orientalis genotypes, highlighting the complexity of parasite populations in endemic Asian regions [98].
T. orientalis is classified on the basis of its morphology, vector specificity, pathogenicity and 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA or MPSP sequences [38].
Phylogenetic analysis of MPSP sequences has revealed 12 MPSP types (type 1/Chitose, type 2/Ikeda, type 3/Buffeli, types 4–8, N1, N2, N3 and N4) to date, some of which correlate with virulence [8,14,26,99,100]. The Chitose genotype can be further classified into Chitose A and Chitose B [99].
Types 1 and 2 (Chitose and Ikeda, respectively) are known to be more virulent and to cause severe health effects in animals, whereas the widely distributed type 3 (Buffeli) is mainly associated with benign/mild infections [10,14,15]. The Ikeda genotype is considered the most virulent [10,14,15], with recent studies indicating the possibility that this genotype represents a distinct species from the Chitose or Buffeli genotypes [8].
Evidence linking genotype to clinical outcome is strongest for the Ikeda genotype, because associations identified during field outbreaks are supported by controlled experimental infections demonstrating haematological deterioration. For Chitose and the less common types 4, 7 and N2, evidence is based predominantly on outbreak investigations, case reports or observational associations and is therefore less conclusive. Genotype alone is also unlikely to determine clinical outcome, as parasite burden, mixed-genotype infection, previous exposure, host susceptibility and physiological stress may modify disease expression. Consequently, the detection of a genotype associated with virulence should not be interpreted as evidence that all infected animals will develop clinical disease.
6. Epidemiology
6.1. Global and Regional Distribution
The cosmopolitan distribution of T. orientalis has been attributed to the global movement of cattle without consideration of infection status, and its occurrence depends primarily on the availability of a suitable vector [10,49]. It has been detected on several continents, including Asia, Africa, Oceania, the Americas and Europe; however, clinical outbreaks are predominantly reported in parts of Asia, Oceania and North America [1,22,54,64,101], although the type and strength of the available evidence vary markedly among regions. Among the reported genotypes, Ikeda is the most consistently associated with severe clinical disease and has been documented across Australasia, East and South Asia, and North America (Supplementary Table S1). Its distribution is therefore broader than the regions in which the largest and most extensively investigated outbreaks have occurred.
Australasia represents the most extensively characterised epidemiological setting [49]. In Australia and New Zealand, molecular surveillance has demonstrated the circulation of multiple genotypes, including Ikeda, Chitose and Buffeli [102,103,104], although clinical outbreaks and measurable production losses have been most consistently associated with Ikeda [103,105,106]. The availability of longitudinal studies, outbreak investigations and confirmed vector data contrasts with the more fragmentary evidence available from several other regions (Supplementary Table S1).
East and Southeast Asia show broad parasite circulation and substantial genetic diversity [21,71,107,108,109,110,111,112,113]. Buffeli, Ikeda, Chitose, types 5 and 7 have been reported across the region [71,107,108,112,113], together with historical MPSP allelic categories that are not always directly comparable with the current numbered genotype system [109,110]. While severe disease associated with Ikeda and other potentially pathogenic genotypes has been documented in China and parts of South Asia [21,99], many surveys in Japan and Southeast Asia primarily identified apparently healthy carriers [71,107,108,109,111,112,113] (Supplementary Table S1).
In South, Western and Central Asia, molecular studies confirm widespread occurrence but reveal marked variation in study design and clinical interpretation [50,99,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124]. Buffeli and Chitose predominate in several surveys [116,118,119,120,122,123,124,125], whereas Ikeda and other genotypes have also been identified, particularly in Pakistan and India [99,122]. India provides some of the strongest regional evidence of severe and fatal disease [99], while evidence from Central Asia is based mainly on cross-sectional surveys of apparently healthy cattle [116,118,119] (Supplementary Table S1).
European evidence is geographically dispersed and methodologically heterogeneous [23,24,73,92,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134]. Molecular detection in cattle has been reported in several countries [23,24,73,125,126,127,129,131,132,133,134], but genotype information is often unavailable [23,24,73,126,127,129,132,133,134], and most studies describe asymptomatic or subclinical infection [23,24,73,125,132]. Clinical disease has been reported occasionally, including in Hungary and Croatia [73,126], whereas evidence from some countries is limited to historical serology [128], arthropod blood meals [92] or parasite DNA detected in ticks [130]. Competent local vectors remain unconfirmed in most European settings [73,92,129,130,132,133] (Supplementary Table S1).
In Africa, the evidence remains comparatively fragmented [64,65,66,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144]. Molecular detection in cattle has been reported in several northern and sub-Saharan countries [64,66,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,145], whereas other records derive from wildlife hosts [136], ticks [66] or historical outbreak investigations, such as the report from Burundi [65]. Genotype characterisation, clinical follow-up and experimental vector studies remain limited, restricting interpretation of the parasite’s epidemiological and economic relevance across the continent [64,65,66,136,137,138,139,140,141,142] (Supplementary Table S1).
In the Americas, the epidemiological picture differs markedly between regions [54,100,146,147,148,149,150,151]. In the USA, Ikeda has emerged as a clinically relevant genotype and transmission by invasive H. longicornis has been demonstrated [54,150]. Canadian evidence is more limited and includes individual cases [148,149], whereas South American records are based mainly on molecular studies in cattle or buffaloes, with limited information on clinical and productive consequences [100,146,147] (Supplementary Table S1).
Reported prevalence varied widely among countries and studies; however, direct numerical comparisons should be interpreted cautiously. The studies differed in host population, clinical status, geographic coverage, sampling strategy, diagnostic target and assay sensitivity. In addition, some records were based on vertebrate-host infection, whereas others reflected only serological exposure or parasite DNA in arthropods. Figure 1 presents the global distribution of reported T. orientalis occurrence based on the country-level evidence summarised in Supplementary Table S1 [21,23,24,50,54,64,65,66,73,92,97,99,100,102,103,104,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155]. The supporting evidence, diagnostic approach, genotype information, clinical relevance and vector associations for each country are provided in the Supplementary Material.
6.2. Epidemiological Determinants and Enzootic Stability
Seasonal fluctuations play a key role in its epidemiology: in Holstein cattle grazing in the Republic of Korea, infection rates increased progressively from 11% in March to 60% in November, mirroring the seasonal peak in tick infestation [156,157]. Grazing in mountainous areas and extensive management systems have been closely associated with increased infection rates [156,158,159]. However, there are reports of outbreaks in housed animals, indicating that the disease is not exclusive to grazing systems [21]. The epidemiological impact of T. orientalis is strongly influenced by the level of enzootic stability within a given region. In areas of enzootic stability, most calves are exposed early in life and develop immunity during the period of passive protection conferred by maternal antibodies, resulting in a low incidence of disease in adults [49]. Conversely, in regions of enzootic instability, characterised by low tick infection rates and/or low tick infestation pressure, many animals reach adulthood without prior exposure to the parasite, rendering them highly susceptible to severe clinical episodes upon first infection [49]. In Australia and New Zealand, T. orientalis is regarded as an established and economically important cattle parasite in affected regions, with outbreaks of oriental theileriosis causing substantial concern and production losses in both dairy and beef systems. In the United States, the emergence of Ikeda-type infection is increasingly recognised as a potential threat to the cattle industry [17,18,54,62,160]. In endemic regions, resident cattle may develop herd-level immunity following repeated exposure to T. orientalis. However, clinical outbreaks can occur when immunologically naïve cattle from non-endemic areas are introduced into infected herds or regions, where they are exposed to infected ticks and circulating virulent genotypes without prior immunity [2,10,49]. The prevalence of theileriosis is influenced by breed, as bovine breeds differ in tick resistance and innate susceptibility to infection; native cattle tend to have significantly lower prevalence than exotic breeds and crossbreeds [25,114]. Furthermore, multivariable analysis demonstrated that the risk of T. orientalis infection is higher in mixed-breed cattle and in animals over three years of age [159].
The published evidence supporting the occurrence of T. orientalis in each country is summarised in Supplementary Table S1. The table distinguishes molecular detection in vertebrate hosts from clinical outbreaks, historical serological or microscopic evidence, and molecular detection restricted to ticks or other haematophagous arthropods. The recognised host-vector range of bovine piroplasms has broadened following the detection of T. orientalis DNA within ixodid bat ticks [161]. These findings suggest that non-conventional hosts and their associated ectoparasites may contribute to parasite maintenance and dispersal in the environment, indicating a more complex epidemiological network than previously recognised [161].
Although T. orientalis and related genotypes have been detected in domestic bovids, wild ruminants and ticks associated with non-conventional hosts, the epidemiological significance of wildlife remains uncertain [8,12,136,161]. Most available evidence is based on cross-sectional molecular detection and does not demonstrate reservoir competence, sustained transmission to cattle or the direction of transmission between livestock and wildlife [49,136,161]. As the currently recognised significance of T. orientalis is primarily veterinary, its One Health relevance lies mainly in the shared livestock–wildlife–vector environment and in the need for coordinated surveillance across these compartments [8,12]. Paired longitudinal sampling of livestock, wildlife hosts and ticks, together with genotype comparison, is required to determine whether wildlife contributes to parasite maintenance or mainly reflects spillover from infected livestock [49,136,161].
Climate and environmental change may influence the epidemiology of oriental theileriosis indirectly by modifying the survival, development, seasonal activity and geographic suitability of competent tick vectors [49,59]. For Haemaphysalis longicornis, a modelling study conducted in New Zealand projected that areas climatically suitable for the tick could expand under future climate scenarios [162]. A separate model assessed current environmental suitability for T. orientalis transmission but did not evaluate future climate scenarios or observed disease incidence; its results should therefore not be interpreted as direct evidence that climate change is increasing the occurrence of oriental theileriosis [163]. Disease emergence also depends on the establishment and abundance of competent vector populations, the movement of infected carrier cattle, circulating parasite genotypes, host susceptibility, enzootic stability, land use and herd management [49,101]. Climate change should therefore be regarded as a modifying factor within a broader ecological and epidemiological system, rather than as an independent or sufficient explanation for the geographic expansion of oriental theileriosis.
Comparisons of prevalence among regions should be interpreted cautiously because the available studies differ substantially in sampling strategy, host selection, season, diagnostic method and molecular target. Cross-sectional PCR surveys provide evidence of parasite circulation but cannot determine the timing of infection, duration of carriage or causal relationship with clinical disease. Similarly, studies based on ticks may indicate local exposure but do not establish the prevalence of infection in cattle or confirm vector competence. These methodological differences probably account for part of the variation reported among countries and production systems.
7. Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations and Subclinical Infections
Current evidence supports a multistep model of pathogenesis in which parasite replication within erythrocytes induces structural and metabolic alterations, oxidative injury and enhanced erythrocyte clearance. These processes result in predominantly extravascular haemolytic anaemia and reduced oxygen-carrying capacity, while inflammatory dysregulation may amplify tissue injury and systemic clinical manifestations. However, the relative contribution of each mechanism has not yet been quantified experimentally.
7.1. Parasite–Erythrocyte Interactions
The initial pathological events are centred on the interaction between the parasite and the infected erythrocyte.
Theileria species are broadly classified into transforming and non-transforming groups based on their capacity to transform host leucocytes [3]. The evolution of this transforming capacity has been accompanied by marked changes in genome composition, including the acquisition or expansion of gene families considered critical to host–cell transformation [3,164]. Unlike transforming species, which induce lymphocyte proliferation in a neoplasia-like manner via the schizont stage [13,91,164], the main pathogenic effect of T. orientalis is the destruction of erythrocytes by intraerythrocytic piroplasms [2,13]. Schizonts can be detected transiently in lymph nodes, spleen and liver of infected cattle approximately 10 days after sporozoite inoculation [12]. However, schizont-infected cells are not commonly found in peripheral blood and are not typically associated with major pathogenic effects [12]. Although the pathogenic processes underlying T. orientalis infection remain incompletely understood [13], proposed mechanisms of erythrocyte destruction include direct lysis during merozoite egress, oxidative damage to erythrocyte membranes, and enhanced removal of parasitised or altered erythrocytes by the mononuclear phagocyte system [52,165,166]. The T. orientalis microneme–rhoptry protein (ToMRP), which is expressed during key stages of the erythrocytic cycle, was shown to bind band 3, a major component on the bovine erythrocyte membrane, suggesting a plausible molecular mechanism for parasite–erythrocyte interaction during invasion and/or egress [165]. Additionally, a thiol protease with haemoglobin-binding activity has been identified, which may contribute to parasite survival within erythrocytes [52]. The piroplasm surface protein p23 has also been characterised as an immunogenic heparin-binding protein; recombinant p23 binds heparin on glycoarrays, supporting a potential role in merozoite attachment and invasion, although this evidence is currently based on in vitro binding assays rather than direct erythrocyte-binding confirmation [96,167].
These molecular interactions provide plausible mechanisms for erythrocyte invasion and alteration, although their direct contribution to red-cell destruction in vivo remains incompletely demonstrated.
7.2. Mechanisms of Anaemia and Erythrocyte Clearance
Anaemia appears to result from the combined effects of direct parasite-associated injury, oxidative alteration of erythrocytes and enhanced extravascular clearance. The resulting anaemia is driven by high parasitaemia associated with the first wave of asexual reproduction, peaking approximately 2–3 months post-infection [91].
The pathogenesis of oriental theileriosis is characterised by extravascular haemolysis [46,166]. In this context, anaemia is thought to arise mainly from the splenic clearance of parasitised, damaged or immunologically altered erythrocytes, rather than from extensive intravascular lysis directly caused by parasite egress [168]. Splenic macrophage activation leads to the removal of both infected and uninfected erythrocytes from circulation, with denaturation of blood plasma postulated to further reduce erythrocyte survival [169,170]. Additionally, oxidation of haemoglobin to methaemoglobin has been documented experimentally in anaemic cattle infected with T. orientalis, with methaemoglobin concentration increasing in parallel with the onset and severity of anaemia. These oxidative alterations may reduce erythrocyte stability and promote recognition and removal by splenic macrophages. Together with oxidative bursts from phagocytic cells, this supports the involvement of oxidative erythrocyte damage in the pathogenesis of anaemia, potentially promoting the clearance of altered erythrocytes by the reticuloendothelial system [171,172]. Notably, erythrocyte destruction in T. orientalis can occur in the absence of immunoglobulins or complement activation, distinguishing it from classical antibody- or complement-mediated lysis observed in other haemoparasite infections [9,170,173].
Therefore, although direct erythrocyte lysis may contribute to red-cell loss, the available evidence suggests that oxidative injury and splenic erythrophagocytosis are central mechanisms underlying the progressive, predominantly extravascular anaemia associated with oriental theileriosis.
7.3. Inflammatory and Systemic Consequences
The consequences of erythrocyte loss extend beyond anaemia, as reduced oxygen delivery and inflammatory dysregulation may contribute to systemic and multiorgan disease. In affected cattle, intraerythrocytic piroplasms are associated with haemolytic anaemia and systemic disturbance, including haematobiochemical abnormalities, such as hyperbilirubinaemia, increased liver enzyme activities and azotaemia, alongside oxidative stress characterised by enhanced lipid peroxidation and reduced antioxidant capacity [25]. Cytokine changes may amplify this pathological process, although the available evidence remains observational and suggests immune dysregulation rather than a uniform systemic pro-inflammatory response. In naturally infected cattle, lower circulating interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) concentrations have been reported in T. orientalis-positive animals under grazing conditions [174]. More recently, clinically affected cattle showed significantly increased expression of interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 (IL-6 and IL-1), with parasite burden positively correlated with both cytokines, whereas tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) did not increase significantly and showed a non-significant downward trend [175]. These findings suggest that inflammatory activation may accompany macrophage-mediated erythrocyte clearance and contribute to systemic or hepatic dysfunction, although these relationships have not been demonstrated experimentally. In severe or fatal cases, multi-organ pathology is common, presenting as massive pulmonary oedema with froth in the trachea, abomasal ulceration, epicardial and endocardial haemorrhage and haemorrhagic duodenitis, occasionally accompanied by abortion or foetal loss [176]. Increased IL-6 and IL-1 expression may reflect macrophage activation and inflammatory amplification, whereas reduced IFN-γ suggests that the immune response is dysregulated rather than uniformly enhanced. Nevertheless, a causal link between these cytokine alterations, erythrocyte clearance and tissue injury has not yet been established.
7.4. Clinical Expression, Immunity and Determinants of Severity
Multiple outbreaks of oriental theileriosis associated with high morbidity and mortality have been reported, chiefly in the Asia-Pacific region (Australia and New Zealand), and more recently in the USA and India; reports from Africa and Europe indicate broader geographic occurrence with variable clinical impact [3,10,14,15,16,20,65,73,99,176,177,178,179,180]. Outbreak severity is strongly influenced by the predominant genotype and disease is typically associated with the Ikeda and Chitose genotypes, specifically Chitose A [181], as well as types 4 and 7 [14,15,99,125,176,179,180,182]. Approximately 1–6% of animals infected with the Ikeda genotype develop severe disease [15,183], and the degree of anaemia is directly dependent on the level of parasitaemia [184]. Recent experimental infections with the USA isolate of T. orientalis Ikeda genotype have demonstrated significant reductions in haematocrit and erythrocyte counts during acute infection, providing quantitative evidence of the haematological impact of this genotype [185]. Fatal cases have also been described in buffaloes in India associated with the N2 genotype [186]. In transforming Theileria species, protective immunity is mainly mediated by cytotoxic T cells, and antigenic diversity may contribute to immune evasion by reducing T-cell recognition of infected cells. In contrast, the immune mechanisms involved in non-transforming species such as T. orientalis remain poorly characterised [3]. Clinical signs intensify with increasing parasitaemia, correlating with haematological alterations [46]. Even for the Buffeli genotype, higher parasitaemia has been associated with clinical disease. Clinically affected cows had 3–22 piroplasms per 1000 erythrocytes and parasite loads ranging from to parasites/μL of blood, whereas apparently healthy infected cows had 0–1 piroplasms per 1000 erythrocytes and parasite loads ranging from to parasites/μL of blood [187]. Haematological alterations are evident in apparently healthy cattle, although they are relatively mild compared with clinically diseased animals [46]. Healthy animals may show a statistically significant reduction in erythrocyte parameters, especially in the warm season [157]. Haematological abnormalities are characterised by significant decreases in red blood cell count, haemoglobin concentration, and packed cell volume; leucocyte and platelet parameters may also be affected, depending on disease severity [19,46,159,166,185]. However, an increase in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and eosinophil count are often observed and these fluctuations in erythrocyte and leucocyte parameters are directly associated with the degree of parasitaemia [46,158,159].
In calves aged < 6 months, haematological changes appeared less severe than in adult dairy cattle [166]. Passive immunity appears to confer only limited protection in young calves, as high infection prevalence and peak parasitaemia have been reported during the first weeks of life, particularly around 6–9 weeks of age, coinciding with reduced packed cell volume [49,86,188]. Seroconversion to the MPSP antigen occurs approximately 14 days after the onset of patency and humoral responses persist for at least 11 weeks post-infection [9,168]. Importantly, MPSP-specific antibody responses are significantly more frequent in clinically anaemic animals (approximately 89%) compared with subclinical carriers (approximately 45%), and seroconversion is strongly correlated with both parasite load and the Ikeda genotype [168]. This differential seroconversion rate underscores the limited reliability of serological assays for surveillance in subclinical infections and reinforces the superiority of molecular methods for carrier detection [168].
Infection with T. orientalis appears to have minimal impact on platelet dynamics, potentially masked by compensatory mechanisms; thus, thrombocytopenia is not characteristic of T. orientalis infection [46]. Reported clinical features include weakness, reluctance to walk, pyrexia, lethargy, lacrimation, nasal discharge, anaemia, pale mucous membranes, tachycardia, tachypnoea, swollen lymph nodes, icterus, anorexia, haemoglobinuria, abortion, hypogalactia, and death, particularly in periparturient animals and juveniles [25,46,91,99,101,176]. Atypical neurological signs have been associated with Chitose type B [99] with a higher incidence of cases in animals aged 3–5 years, predominantly during the periparturient period [25], reaching 5–10% mortality [15,16,54,99]. In post-outbreak investigations, oriental theileriosis was found to primarily affect beef cows older than two years during the pre-partum period, with outbreaks associated with abortion and cow mortality [102]. Combined infections with different T. orientalis genotypes may contribute to parasite persistence by simultaneously presenting multiple targets to the immune system [8]. The absence of cross-protection between genotypes is underscored by repeated infections with different types in susceptible cattle, although evidence regarding the association between disease severity and mixed-genotype infections remains limited [99]. Mixed infections have been reported among the following genotype combinations: Ikeda and type 7; Ikeda, Chitose and Buffeli; Chitose and Buffeli; and Ikeda and Buffeli [99,101,189]. In mixed infections, the Ikeda genotype is consistently detected first, with a shorter pre-patent period, as early as 11 days post-exposure to infected vectors and reaches its parasitaemic peak before the other genotypes [9]. A subsequent decline in Ikeda is followed by a progressive rise in Chitose, suggesting an immune-driven genotype switching mechanism, possibly reflecting the host’s selective immune pressure against the dominant genotype [181]. This temporal pattern has important clinical implications, as the initial Ikeda-driven parasitaemia appears responsible for the most severe haematological deterioration, including the earliest and steepest drops in packed cell volume [9,181].
Regarding co-infections with other pathogens, available evidence suggests that their effects on clinical expression are not uniform and may depend on the pathogen combination and epidemiological context. Cattle chronically infected with T. orientalis exhibited lower peak Anaplasma marginale parasitaemia, a longer time to reach peak parasitaemia and a reduced requirement for anaemia treatment, suggesting that co-infection may modulate the susceptibility to and clinical expression of anaplasmosis [190]. Because no serological cross-reactivity was detected between the two agents, antibody-mediated cross-protection was considered unlikely, and the authors suggested that this effect may involve non-antigen-specific cell-mediated immune mechanisms [190,191]. A possible interference phenomenon has also been described between T. orientalis and haemotropic Mycoplasma spp. (haemoplasmas), with single infections being more frequent than co-infections, and anaemia being significantly milder in co-infected animals [192]. However, this proposed interaction was not confirmed in a subsequent study, suggesting that such effects may vary according to management system, host population and epidemiological context [193,194]. In contrast, co-infections involving Babesia ovata and T. orientalis have been associated with the clinical development of anaemia [195,196,197]. Overall, these findings indicate that co-infections with other haemoparasites may modulate the clinical expression of T. orientalis infection, but their effects appear to be pathogen-specific and context-dependent rather than uniformly associated with increased virulence [107].
7.5. Subclinical Infections and Carrier State
Subclinical infection and persistent carriage represent an important component of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of T. orientalis, because infection may persist despite the resolution or absence of overt clinical disease.
Asymptomatic infections with T. orientalis have been reported in goats, sheep, buffaloes, Cape buffaloes, yaks and gayal [8,108,117,198,199,200,201,202,203]. The high proportion of subclinical carriers suggests widespread regional dissemination of Theileria infection, often undetected due to the absence of clinical signs [46]. Countries such as Italy report high prevalence with silent circulation, particularly in grazing animals [129]. Recovered animals remain asymptomatic carriers with low parasitaemia that can be detected by PCR for at least 30 months [91] and some authors have suggested lifelong persistence [91,103,105,106]. As piroplasms persist, relapses of disease may occur under stress conditions such as gestation, lactation, transport or by abrupt environmental or management changes [13,46]. Despite high antibody titres against MPSP in persistently infected cattle, recurrent parasitaemia is frequently observed, suggesting that humoral immunity against MPSP is insufficient to fully control infection [3].
Overall, the available evidence supports a multihit pathophysiological model. Parasite replication and parasite–erythrocyte interactions initiate red-cell alterations; oxidative damage and methaemoglobin formation impair erythrocyte function and survival; and splenic clearance of infected and apparently uninfected erythrocytes drives predominantly extravascular haemolytic anaemia. The resulting reduction in oxygen delivery, together with inflammatory dysregulation, may then contribute to organ dysfunction and clinical disease. However, the relative importance of direct parasite-induced lysis, oxidative membrane damage, erythrophagocytosis and cytokine-mediated injury remains to be established experimentally.
8. Productive and Economic Impact
Theileriosis remains a major constraint to cattle production, causing substantial mortality and production losses, particularly when associated with T. annulata and T. parva [12]. Within the non-transforming bovine Theileria group, T. orientalis is also increasingly recognised as economically relevant, with the most extensively quantified production losses reported in Australia and New Zealand; by contrast, evidence from Japan indicates that infection may have little detectable effect under intensive housing conditions [8,204]. However, the magnitude of losses experienced by any given region depends on multiple interacting factors, including herd density, predominant farming system, tick ecology, cattle immunity and cattle movement patterns [205].
Rather than being uniformly economically important across all endemic regions, oriental theileriosis appears to cause measurable economic losses mainly in clinically affected or recently exposed herds, particularly through reduced milk yield, impaired liveweight gain and mortality [105,106,183]. In this context, some authors have described the disease as one of the most economically important bovine diseases in humid tropical regions [2,10].
The principal economic losses associated with oriental theileriosis include abortions, significant reductions in milk yield and alterations in milk composition, and high morbidity and mortality [10]. These losses are most pronounced during clinical outbreaks, particularly in endemically unstable regions or following the introduction of naïve animals. In contrast, in chronically or subclinically infected herds in endemic settings, the effects on reproduction appear to be minimal: no detectable changes in reproductive parameters were reported in infected dairy cows [103]. Similarly, no differences were observed in the occurrence of concomitant diseases when comparing T. orientalis-infected and uninfected animals [204]. Although transient effects on libido may reduce conception rates, the overall impact of T. orientalis (Ikeda) infection on bull fertility appears to be negligible [206]. However, while some authors also report no productivity differences when comparing infected and uninfected cows [204], multiple studies have reported milk-production losses or decreased live weight gain associated with T. orientalis infection [103,105,106,183,204,207,208], although the reported impact remains inconsistent across studies.
In the Japanese study, 325 of 471 cows sampled during the dry period were PCR-positive (69.0%). Nevertheless, infected and uninfected cows had mean 305-day milk yields of 10,066 and 9650 kg, respectively (p-value = 0.11), and mean intervals from calving to conception of 110.9 and 104.2 days, respectively (p-value = 0.40), with neither difference reaching statistical significance [204].
Significant reductions in milk yield, milk fat percentage and milk protein percentage were reported at 100 and 305 days in lactation when comparing clinically affected T. orientalis-infected cows with negative, clinically healthy cows (uninfected controls) [106]. At 100 days of lactation, clinically affected PCR-positive cows produced 288 L less milk, 16.8 kg less milk fat and 12.6 kg less milk protein than clinically healthy PCR-negative cows. At 305 days, the corresponding deficits were 624 L of milk, 42.9 kg of milk fat and 26.0 kg of milk protein per cow [106]. Based on milk prices at the time of the study, the 624 L deficit represented an estimated loss of AUD 202 per severely affected cow. The total first-year loss associated with 16 severely affected cows and the death of one cow was estimated at AUD 5035, including AUD 1800 attributed to the death [106].
When positive cows with mild clinical signs were compared against negative cows in the same study, there were few differences in milk fat and protein at 100 days in lactation, and by 305 days, only milk fat was significantly affected [106]. Specifically, mildly affected cows produced 13.6 kg less milk fat and 8.6 kg less milk protein at 100 days, whereas at 305 days only the 21.2 kg reduction in milk fat remained statistically significant [106].
These findings contrast with another study in which prevalence was not associated with milk yield, although incident infections were associated with losses in energy-corrected milk [103]. On one New Zealand farm, cows that became infected during the study produced 266 kg less energy-corrected milk than uninfected cows (95% CI: 82–450 kg), corresponding to approximately 20 kg of milk solids. By contrast, cows that were already PCR-positive at the beginning of the study, representing predominantly chronic infections, showed no detectable reduction in milk production or reproductive performance [103].
Other authors reported effects extending beyond lactation, with infection being associated with reduced weight gain that was not recovered after six months [105]. In a longitudinal Australian study of 30 introduced beef weaners, the initial parasitaemic wave associated with the Ikeda and Chitose genotypes resulted in an estimated 20 kg deficit in weight gain, which had not been recovered six months after introduction [105].
The apparent disagreement among studies partly reflects differences in the populations and infection stages being compared. Studies involving clinically affected or recently infected cattle are more likely to identify production losses than studies comparing persistently PCR-positive, clinically healthy carriers with PCR-negative animals. Furthermore, several estimates originate from individual herds or relatively small numbers of clinically affected animals, which limits their generalisability. Differences in parasite genotype and burden, breed susceptibility, production system, follow-up period and the definition of PCR-negative comparison groups may also contribute to the inconsistent findings. Failure to quantify parasite burden or determine the circulating genotype in some studies further complicates comparisons between infection status and productive outcome. Direct monetary estimates are particularly scarce and remain largely restricted to individual outbreaks or specific production systems, limiting extrapolation to other regions. Overall, the available evidence supports substantial losses during clinical outbreaks and incident infection, whereas the productive and economic consequences of persistent subclinical infection remain uncertain and require larger, longitudinal and genotype-informed studies.
9. Diagnosis
Several diagnostic methods are available for the detection of T. orientalis, ranging from microscopy and serology to molecular assays. While conventional approaches remain useful in clinically affected animals, molecular techniques are generally preferred for sensitive detection, species identification and genotype discrimination, particularly in subclinical, chronic or mixed infections [10,53]. Table 2 summarises the main methods according to their sensitivity, specificity, cost, ease of use and practical limitations.
Table 2.
Comparison of diagnostic methods for Theileria orientalis.
| Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Cost | Ease of Use | Notes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microscopy (Giemsa-stained blood smear) | Low | Moderate | Very low | High | Ineffective for chronic carriers; unable to distinguish genotypes | [10] |
| Conventional PCR | High | High | Moderate | Moderate | Detects carriers; enables genotyping | [209] |
| qPCR (quantitative) | Very High | Very High | High | Moderate | Highly sensitive, quantifies parasite load | [209] |
| ddPCR | Very High | Very High | High | Low | High analytical precision; expensive and infrequently used for routine diagnostics | [210] |
| LAMP | High | High | Low/Moderate | High | Rapid; does not require a thermocycler; potentially suitable for rapid field diagnosis. | [211,212] |
| ELISA/IFAT | Moderate | Low/Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Useful for prevalence studies; risk of cross-reactivity with other species. | [1,10,44] |
| Reverse Line Blot Hybridization (RLB) | Very High | Very High | Low | Moderate | Multi-species panel that detects co-infections, can be expanded and is suitable for surveillance. | [37,213] |
Note: Sensitivity, specificity, cost and ease of use are presented as qualitative relative categories based on a narrative synthesis by the authors of the method-development studies, validation studies and reviews cited for each diagnostic approach. These categories do not correspond to predefined quantitative thresholds or to a single direct comparison of all methods. Diagnostic performance may vary according to sample quality, parasite burden, stage of infection, laboratory infrastructure, DNA-extraction procedure, primer or probe design and diagnostic target. Costs and ease of use are considered relative to routine veterinary diagnostic settings and may vary among laboratories and countries. Molecular assays also differ in their capacity for species identification, genotype discrimination and parasite-load quantification.
Although the main diagnostic approaches for T. orientalis are summarised in Table 2, the following section focuses on multiplex hydrolysis-probe quantitative PCR (qPCR) because it combines parasite detection, genotype discrimination and parasite load quantification, thereby providing information with direct clinical and epidemiological relevance. A qPCR assay was developed to detect and quantify Theileria orientalis and to differentiate clinically relevant genotypes [209]. This assay allowed infection to be classified into clinically relevant categories: low-level infections with 15,000 MPSP gene copies/μL of blood, moderate-level infections with 15,000 to 300,000 MPSP gene copies/μL of blood, and high-level infections with 300,000 MPSP gene copies/μL of blood [209]. In the validation population, low-level infections were associated predominantly with subclinical carrier animals, whereas 95% of cattle with parasite loads above MPSP gene copies/μL of blood showed clinical signs [209]. Nevertheless, these thresholds should be regarded as diagnostic guides rather than universal clinical cut-offs, as their interpretation may depend on assay design, genotype, packed cell volume, clinical status and herd context [209].
From a practical perspective, microscopy remains useful as a rapid and inexpensive first-line method in clinically affected cattle, particularly when moderate or high parasitaemia is expected. However, a negative blood smear does not exclude infection in subclinical or chronically infected animals. Conventional PCR is more appropriate for confirming low-level infection and detecting carriers, whereas qPCR additionally allows parasite-load estimation and, depending on the assay, genotype discrimination. These advantages must be balanced against the higher cost of real-time PCR equipment, reagents and controls, the need for trained personnel and its limited availability in some diagnostic laboratories. Serological methods are more suitable for assessing previous exposure or herd-level seroprevalence than for confirming active infection, because antibody detection does not indicate current parasitaemia, parasite burden or infecting genotype.
Therefore, clinically suspected cases should ideally be assessed by blood-smear examination and haematology, with molecular testing used for confirmation, whereas PCR-based methods are preferable for asymptomatic animals, carrier detection and herd-level investigations.
10. Control Strategies
10.1. Herd-Level Surveillance and Biosecurity
Control of T. orientalis infection requires an integrated herd-level approach, as transmission depends on the interaction between infected or carrier cattle, competent tick vectors and local management conditions [49,91]. In the absence of broadly effective curative or preventive tools, control relies mainly on surveillance, early detection, vector control and management of movements involving naïve cattle [9,91].
Preventive management centres on reducing the exposure of susceptible animals to infected vectors [105]. The introduction of susceptible cattle into infected herds may increase the risk of clinical outbreaks; therefore, newly introduced animals should be temporarily separated and assessed by clinical examination and PCR-based testing before being mixed with the resident herd [214]. Deliberate exposure of calves to the parasite during the period of passive maternal immunity has been proposed as a form of premunition; however, this approach remains controversial and is not widely practised [91]. Frequent sampling may be used to monitor the spread of T. orientalis within newly affected herds but may be less informative once a high prevalence and persistent carriage are established [215]. Detection of T. orientalis DNA in the blood meals of haematophagous insects may provide a non-invasive method for obtaining supplementary evidence of local parasite circulation [92]. However, because this detection may reflect infected host blood rather than parasite development within the arthropod, it should not replace direct testing of cattle and does not demonstrate vector competence [49].
Hygienic and sanitary measures are also crucial for preventing possible mechanical transmission and should include washing and disinfection of castration knives, single-use needles or, where impractical (e.g., mass vaccination), use of sharp needles changed regularly to minimise blood transfer [84].
10.2. Integrated Vector and Environmental Management
Tick control remains the cornerstone of prevention. However, studying the vector competence of different ixodid species is critical for effective prevention planning. Distinguishing proven vector transmission capacity from mere presence of the parasite within the tick is essential [49]. Tick control is challenging because ticks may have a wide host range and overlapping periods of activity among developmental life stages, while most of their life cycle is spent off the host in the environment [59]. Integrated tick management combines chemical and non-chemical measures, including strategic acaricide use, pasture and environmental management, biological control, and selection of tick-resistant animals, with the aim of reducing tick burdens and pathogen transmission while limiting acaricide use and selection pressure for resistance [216]. Commercial Bm86-based anti-tick vaccination has been incorporated into control programmes targeting Rhipicephalus microplus in some Latin American settings [217,218]. However, its protection is species-dependent, and no commercial vaccine is currently available against Haemaphysalis longicornis, limiting its immediate relevance to the principal vector systems associated with oriental theileriosis [217]. Given the increasing challenge of acaricide resistance, integrated and context-specific tick control strategies are increasingly recommended over reliance on chemical control alone [216,219]. However, their effectiveness may still be limited by reinfestation, off-host tick stages, treatment costs and the difficulty of implementing multiple measures consistently under commercial conditions [216,219].
A T. orientalis-free grazing management system was reported after a seven-year period without cattle grazing and the exclusive introduction of uninfected heifers [220]. The system also includes monthly anaemia screening based on red blood cell parameters and tick-control measures aimed at reducing exposure to T. orientalis-infected haematophagous vectors [220]. Although successful under the specific conditions studied, maintaining pasture without grazing for seven years and introducing only uninfected animals may not be economically or operationally feasible in most commercial systems, and its applicability to other epidemiological settings remains uncertain.
10.3. Treatment and Supportive Care
Therapeutic options for oriental theileriosis remain limited. Buparvaquone has been associated with remission of clinical signs and reductions in parasitaemia, particularly when administered during the early stages of disease; however, the available evidence for T. orientalis is based mainly on relatively small field studies and experimental infections [27,91,221]; however, it is not approved for use in some countries [222,223]. In naturally infected cattle (with genotype Ikeda), buparvaquone, either alone or combined with long-acting oxytetracycline, improved clinical status but did not eliminate infection, indicating that treated animals may remain carriers [221]. Similarly, experimental treatment of subclinically infected cattle produced only transient effects and failed to clear the Ikeda genotype [27]. Toltrazuril administered at the time of experimental infection did not prevent calves from becoming infected, while the evidence supporting tulathromycin, primaquine, halofuginone and other reported treatment combinations remains too limited and heterogeneous to support general recommendations [91,221,224], treatment with diminazene diaceturate had lower efficacy in animals with high parasitaemia [225]. Although, in vitro, chloroquine, quinine and pyrimethamine inhibited T. orientalis proliferation [226], these findings have not been translated into demonstrated clinical efficacy in cattle.
Clinical management should therefore prioritise early detection and supportive care. Blood transfusion may be required in cattle with severe, life-threatening anaemia, although cost, availability and variable clinical outcomes may limit its use, while antimicrobial treatment should be reserved for animals with suspected secondary bacterial infections [9]. Grazing bovines treated preventively with ivermectin showed a lower frequency of T. orientalis infection and a smaller reduction in certain erythrocyte parameters during the grazing season, suggesting a benefit in preventing infection under field conditions [227]. Overall, currently available treatments may promote clinical recovery but cannot be relied upon to eliminate persistent infection.
10.4. Vaccine Prospects and Remaining Barriers
Vaccination has been explored both against T. orientalis and its principal vector, Haemaphysalis longicornis. However, no vaccines are currently available for either, despite ongoing efforts [91,217,228]. Attempts have been made to use recombinant proteins and peptides, particularly the major piroplasm surface protein (MPSP), as strategies for vaccine development [229]. These studies produced variable results: some formulations reduced parasitaemia or suggested partial protection, whereas others induced antibody responses without protecting cattle after challenge. Whole-blood preparations also raised biosafety concerns because of the potential transfer of other blood-borne pathogens [91].
The antigenic piroplasm-stage protein To ORF2 has also been proposed as a potential vaccine candidate. The protein was recognised by serum from an infected calf, and antibodies raised against recombinant To ORF2 recognised the native protein in piroplasm lysates and infected erythrocytes. However, its protective efficacy was not assessed, and immunogenicity alone does not demonstrate that an antigen can protect cattle against infection or clinical disease [230]. Given that the pathogenesis of this theileriosis is incompletely understood, vaccine development remains challenging. Nevertheless, the MPSP gene represents a promising target for a subunit vaccine, as genetic variability within MPSP is associated with differential virulence and includes determinants for both cellular and humoral immunity [3,13,168]. MPSP remains a biologically relevant candidate because it is abundant, immunodominant and expressed across the principal genotypes. Nevertheless, its genetic and antigenic variability may limit broad cross-protection, particularly in animals infected with multiple genotypes. The protective immune mechanisms against T. orientalis also remain incompletely defined, while previous MPSP-based vaccination studies have not generated consistent protection. Differences in vaccine formulation, challenge route and intensity, parasite genotype and the criteria used to define protection further complicate comparison among studies. These limitations help explain why promising antigen recognition has not yet resulted in a licenced vaccine [13,91].
Recent in silico approaches have also contributed to the identification of potential therapeutic targets for Theileria spp. [231]. A comparative proteomics and subtractive genomics study across T. parva, T. annulata and T. orientalis isolates identified conserved, parasite-specific and host non-homologous proteins with predicted druggability [231]. Among these, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase, phosphatidylinositol 3/4-kinase and DNA polymerase A were prioritised as promising anti-theilerial drug targets based on predicted essentiality, evolutionary conservation and structural suitability for ligand binding [231].
Anti-tick vaccination could provide a complementary approach by reducing tick feeding, reproduction and pathogen transmission. Candidate antigens identified in H. longicornis, including the ATAQ homologue HlATAQ and other genome-derived targets, remain at an early experimental stage [217,228].
Beyond conventional control measures, host genetic variability may hold future significance in the prevention of T. orientalis infection. Several studies suggest the existence of specific alleles associated with increased resistance or susceptibility; however, this approach requires further validation before it can be formally integrated into breeding programmes [232].
11. Conclusions
T. orientalis has shifted from being historically regarded as a benign or low-virulence parasite [9,10] to being increasingly recognised as a pathogen of clinical and economic importance, particularly in infections involving pathogenic genotypes such as Ikeda [2,8,14,15]. This review highlights that clinical outcomes are strongly influenced by parasite genotype, with the Ikeda and Chitose genotypes being primarily responsible for severe outbreaks [10,14,15,99,182]. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps persist: the pathogenic mechanisms driving erythrocyte destruction remain poorly understood [13]; vector competence has been experimentally confirmed for only a limited number of ixodid species [10]; and no licensed vaccines or fully effective treatments are available, with the carrier stage appearing to be lifelong and irreversible [91,221].
Future research should prioritise: (i) experimental validation of vector competence across tick species, particularly European species that have been implicated by field or molecular evidence [22,49,54]; (ii) development of effective vaccines, with MPSP-based antigens representing promising subunit vaccine candidates [3,9,168,229,233]; (iii) improved epidemiological surveillance in regions where prevalence, genotype distribution, vector associations and clinical relevance remain insufficiently characterised, including several European settings [22,49,234]; and (iv) assessment of the economic impact of subclinical infections on production parameters [103,106,204,235]. In the context of climate change and changing tick distributions, sustained investment in surveillance, genotyping, vector studies and integrated control strategies will be essential to reduce the global impact of oriental theileriosis [49,91,216].
Acknowledgments
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT 5.5 for the purpose of creating Figure 1 and to assist in drafting and refining the language. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| ddPCR | Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic acid |
| ELISA | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay |
| IFN- | Interferon-gamma |
| IFAT | Indirect fluorescent antibody test |
| IL-1 | Interleukin-1 beta |
| IL-6 | Interleukin-6 |
| ITS | Internal transcribed spacers |
| kDa | Kilodalton, a unit of molecular mass |
| LAMP | Loop-mediated isothermal amplification |
| MCV | Mean corpuscular volume |
| MPSP | Major piroplasm surface protein |
| PCR | Polymerase chain reaction |
| qPCR | Quantitative polymerase chain reaction |
| RLB | Reverse line blot hybridisation |
| rRNA | Ribosomal ribonucleic acid |
| TNF- | Tumour necrosis factor-alpha |
| ToMRP | T. orientalis microneme–rhoptry protein |
| USA | United States of America |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani16152348/s1, Table S1, Country-level evidence of Theileria orientalis occurrence, genotype distribution, clinical relevance and vector associations.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.F., L.P., S.T.Z. and A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F.; writing—review and editing, S.T.Z., I.L.S.D., E.I., S.N., P.C., A.P.B., L.P. and A.L.; visualisation, S.T.Z., I.L.S.D., E.I., S.N., P.C., A.P.B., L.P. and A.L.; supervision, S.T.Z., P.C., L.P. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Mans B.J., Pienaar R., Latif A.A. A Review of Theileria Diagnostics and Epidemiology. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2015;4:104–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Watts J.G., Playford M.C., Hickey K.L. Theileria orientalis: A Review. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016;64:3–9. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1064792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sivakumar T., Hayashida K., Sugimoto C., Yokoyama N. Evolution and Genetic Diversity of Theileria. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014;27:250–263. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kakuda T., Shiki M., Kubota S., Sugimoto C., Brown W.C., Kosum C., Nopporn S., Onuma M. Phylogeny of Benign Theileria Species from Cattle in Thailand, China and the U.S.A. Based on the Major Piroplasm Surface Protein and Small Subunit Ribosomal RNA Genes. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998;28:1261–1267. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(98)00113-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fuujisaki K. A Review of the Taxonomy of Theileria sergenti/Buffeli/Orientalis Group Parasites in Cattle. J. Protozool. 1992;2:87–96. doi: 10.32268/jprotozoolres.2.3_87. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fujisaki K., Kawazu S., Kamio T. The Taxonomy of the Bovine Theileria spp. Parasitol. Today. 1994;10:31–33. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(94)90355-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Uilenberg G. Theileria sergenti. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;175:386. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schnittger L., Ganzinelli S., Bhoora R., Omondi D., Nijhof A.M., Florin-Christensen M. The Piroplasmida Babesia, Cytauxzoon, and Theileria in Farm and Companion Animals: Species Compilation, Molecular Phylogeny, and Evolutionary Insights. Parasitol. Res. 2022;121:1207–1245. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07424-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yam J., Bogema D.R., Jenkins C. Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2018. Oriental Theileriosis. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gebrekidan H., Perera P.K., Ghafar A., Abbas T., Gasser R.B., Jabbar A. An Appraisal of Oriental Theileriosis and the Theileria orientalis Complex, with an Emphasis on Diagnosis and Genetic Characterisation. Parasitol. Res. 2020;119:11–22. doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06557-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bogema D.R., Micallef M.L., Liu M., Padula M.P., Djordjevic S.P., Darling A.E., Jenkins C. Analysis of Theileria orientalis Draft Genome Sequences Reveals Potential Species-Level Divergence of the Ikeda, Chitose and Buffeli Genotypes. BMC Genom. 2018;19:298. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4701-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) Theileriosis in Cattle (Infection with Theileria annulata, T. orientalis and T. parva) World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH); Paris, France: 2024. WOAH Terrestrial Manual 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jenkins C., Micallef M.L., Padula M.P., Bogema D.R. Characterisation of the Theileria orientalis Piroplasm Proteome across Three Common Genotypes. Pathogens. 2022;11:1135. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kamau J., de Vos A.J., Playford M., Salim B., Kinyanjui P., Sugimoto C. Emergence of New Types of Theileria orientalis in Australian Cattle and Possible Cause of Theileriosis Outbreaks. Parasites Vectors. 2011;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eamens G.J., Gonsalves J.R., Jenkins C., Collins D., Bailey G. Theileria orientalis MPSP Types in Australian Cattle Herds Associated with Outbreaks of Clinical Disease and Their Association with Clinical Pathology Findings. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;191:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McFadden A.M.J., Rawdon T.G., Meyer J., Makin J., Morley C.M., Clough R.R., Tham K., Mullner P., Geysen D. An Outbreak of Haemolytic Anaemia Associated with Infection of Theileria orientalis in Naive Cattle. N. Z. Vet. J. 2011;59:79–85. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.552857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iduu N., Barua S., Falkenberg S., Armstrong C., Stockler J.W., Moye A., Walz P.H., Wang C. Theileria orientalis Ikeda in Cattle, Alabama, USA. Vet. Sci. 2023;10:638. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10110638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maboni G., Long M., Yabsley M.J., McKinney A., Fernandez I., Garcia G., Cuellar B., Rinke N., Pulaski C., Lahmers K., et al. First Report of Theileria orientalis Ikeda Genotype Associated with Disease in Cattle, Georgia, USA. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2025;62:101279. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2025.101279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gebrekidan H., Nelson L., Smith G., Gasser R.B., Jabbar A. An Outbreak of Oriental Theileriosis in Dairy Cattle Imported to Vietnam from Australia. Parasitology. 2017;144:738–746. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016002328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Patial V., Gupta T., Angaria S., Bali D., Katoch A., Gautam M., Singh N.K., Sharma M., Chahota R. Theileria orientalis Outbreak in an Organized Cattle Breeding Farm. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2021;24:100572. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu J., Li Z., Liu A., Wang J., Guan G., Yin H., Luo J. Identification and Isolation of Pathogenic Theileria orientalis Ikeda Genotype from Confined Dairy Cattle, in Hebei, China. Parasitol. Res. 2022;121:395–402. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07401-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vasić A., Vasilić G., Radalj A., Prošić I., Kureljušić J.M., Sukara R., Tomanović S., Stevanović O. First Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Enzootic Focus of Theileria orientalis in Cattle from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Front. Vet. Sci. 2026;13:1791187. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1791187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gomes J., Soares R., Santos M., Santos-Gomes G., Botelho A., Amaro A., Inácio J. Detection of Theileria and Babesia Infections amongst Asymptomatic Cattle in Portugal. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2013;4:148–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.García-Sanmartín J., Nagore D., García-Pérez A.L., Juste R.A., Hurtado A. Molecular Diagnosis of Theileria and Babesia Species Infecting Cattle in Northern Spain Using Reverse Line Blot Macroarrays. BMC Vet. Res. 2006;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-2-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Deka C., Sarma K., Eregowda C.G., Roychoudhury P., Thakur N., Nama D., Jayappa K., Dutta S., Das D., Sonowal P.J., et al. Epizootiology and Pathophysiology of Bovine Oriental Theileriosis in Mizoram, India. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2025;62:101287. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2025.101287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baghel K.R., Saravanan B.C., Jeeva K., Chandra D., Singh K.P., Ghosh S., Tewari A.K. Oriental Theileriosis Associated with a New Genotype of Theileria orientalis in Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Calves in Uttar Pradesh, India. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2023;14:102077. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.102077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bastos R.G., Hassan A., Onzere C.K., Herndon D.R., Villarino N.F., Laughery J.M., Fry L.M. Transient Efficacy of Buparvaquone against the US Isolate of Theileria orientalis Ikeda Genotype in Sub-Clinically Infected Cattle. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024;11:1421710. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1421710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dodd S. Piroplasmosis of Cattle in Queensland. J. Comp. Pathol. Ther. 1910;23:141–160. doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742(10)80030-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Theiler A. Piroplasma Mutans (N. Spec.) of South African Cattle. J. Comp. Pathol. Ther. 1906;19:292–300. doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742(06)80073-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Uilenberg G., Perié N.M., Spanjer A.A., Franssen F.F. Theileria orientalis, a Cosmopolitan Blood Parasite of Cattle: Demonstration of the Schizont Stage. Res. Vet. Sci. 1985;38:352–360. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31808-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Uilenberg G., Hashemi-Fesharki R. Theileria orientalis in Iran. Arch. Razi Inst. 1984;34:17–22. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1984.9693897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Minami T., Fujinaga T., Furuya K., Ishihara T. Clinico-Hematologic and Serological Comparison of Japanese and Russian Strains of Theileria sergenti. Natl. Inst. Anim. Health Q. 1980;20:44–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sugimoto C., Kawazu S., Kamio T., Fujisaki K. Protein Analysis of Theileria sergenti/buffeli/orientalis Piroplasms by Two-Dimensional Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. Parasitology. 1991;102:341–346. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000064283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kawazu S., Sugimoto C., Kamio T., Fujisaki K. Analysis of the Genes Encoding Immunodominant Piroplasm Surface Proteins of Theileria sergenti and Theileria buffeli by Nucleotide Sequencing and Polymerase Chain Reaction. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1992;56:169–175. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(92)90164-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stewart N.P., De Vos A.J., McGregor W., Shiels I.A. Observations on the Development of Tick-Transmitted Theileria buffeli (Syn T. orientalis?) in Cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 1988;44:338–342. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)30868-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chae J., Allsopp B.A., Waghela S.D., Park J., Kakuda T., Sugimoto C., Allsopp M.T.E.P., Gale Wagner G., Holman P.J. A Study of the Systematics of Theileria spp. Based upon Small-Subunit Ribosomal RNA Gene Sequences. Parasitol. Res. 1999;85:877–883. doi: 10.1007/s004360050651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gubbels J.M., de Vos A.P., van der Weide M., Viseras J., Schouls L.M., de Vries E., Jongejan F. Simultaneous Detection of Bovine Theileria and Babesia Species by Reverse Line Blot Hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37:1782–1789. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.6.1782-1789.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gubbels M.-J., Hong Y., van der Weide M., Qi B., Nijman I.J., Guangyuan L., Jongejan F. Molecular Characterisation of the Theileria buffeli/orientalis Group. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000;30:943–952. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00074-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu J., Guan G., Liu Z., Liu A., Ma M., Bai Q., Yin H., Luo J. Additional Data for a New Theileria Sp. from China Based on the Sequences of Ribosomal RNA Internal Transcribed Spacers. Exp. Parasitol. 2013;133:217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yam J., Bogema D.R., Micallef M.L., Djordjevic S.P., Jenkins C. Complete Genomes of Theileria orientalis Chitose and Buffeli Genotypes Reveal within Species Translocations and Differences in ABC Transporter Content. Pathogens. 2022;11:801. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Adl S.M., Bass D., Lane C.E., Lukeš J., Schoch C.L., Smirnov A., Agatha S., Berney C., Brown M.W., Burki F., et al. Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2019;66:4–119. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sugimoto C., Fujisaki K. Non-Transforming Theileria Parasites of Ruminants. In: Dobbelaere D.A.E., McKeever D.J., editors. Theileria. Volume 3. Springer; Boston, MA, USA: 2002. pp. 93–106. World Class Parasites. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jalovecka M., Hajdusek O., Sojka D., Kopacek P., Malandrin L. The Complexity of Piroplasms Life Cycles. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018;8:248. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lempereur L., Beck R., Fonseca I., Marques C., Duarte A., Santos M., Zúquete S., Gomes J., Walder G., Domingos A., et al. Guidelines for the Detection of Babesia and Theileria Parasites. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17:51–65. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hayashida K., Umemiya-Shirafuji R., Sivakumar T., Yamagishi J., Suzuki Y., Sugimoto C., Yokoyama N. Establishment of a Mouse-Tick Infection Model for Theileria orientalis and Analysis of Its Transcriptome. Int. J. Parasitol. 2018;48:915–924. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sunkara P., Radhika R., Lakshmanan B., Gleeja V.L., Syamala K., Marykutty T., Anjaly S., Justin K.D. Clinico-Haematological Alterations in Theileria orientalis Infection in Cattle and Correlation with Level of Parasitaemia. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2024;56:32–39. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sugimoto C., Kawazu S., Sato M., Kamio T., Fujisaki K. Preliminary Biochemical Characterization of “veil” Structure Purified from Theileria sergenti-, T. buffeli- and T. orientalis-Infected Bovine Erythrocytes. Parasitology. 1992;104:207–213. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000061643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Almeria S., Castellà J., Ferrer D., Ortuño A., Estrada-Peña A., Gutiérrez J.F. Bovine Piroplasms in Minorca (Balearic Islands, Spain): A Comparison of PCR-Based and Light Microscopy Detection. Vet. Parasitol. 2001;99:249–259. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00464-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lakew B.T., Eastwood S., Walkden-Brown S.W. Epidemiology and Transmission of Theileria orientalis in Australasia. Pathogens. 2023;12:1187. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12101187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Narimani B., Hoghooghi-Rad N., Shayan P., Rahbari S. Molecular and Microscopic Detection of Theileria spp. among Cattle and Buffaloes in West Azarbaijan, Iran. Arch. Razi Inst. 2017;72:189–195. doi: 10.22092/ari.2017.111605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shaw M.K. Theileria Development and Host Cell Invasion. In: Dobbelaere D.A.E., McKeever D.J., editors. Theileria. Springer; Boston, MA, USA: 2002. pp. 1–22. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.He W., Ohashi K., Sugimoto C., Onuma M. Theileria orientalis: Cloning a cDNA Encoding a Protein Similar to Thiol Protease with Haemoglobin-Binding Activity. Exp. Parasitol. 2005;111:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zeb J., Song B., Aziz M.U., Hussain S., Zarin R., Sparagano O. Diversity and Distribution of Theileria Species and Their Vectors in Ruminants from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Diversity. 2022;14:82. doi: 10.3390/d14020082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dinkel K.D., Herndon D.R., Noh S.M., Lahmers K.K., Todd S.M., Ueti M.W., Scoles G.A., Mason K.L., Fry L.M. A U.S. Isolate of Theileria orientalis, Ikeda Genotype, Is Transmitted to Cattle by the Invasive Asian Longhorned Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasites Vectors. 2021;14:157. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04659-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kamio T., Fujisaki K., Minami T. Correlation between the Infection Rate of the Vector Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis and the Parasitaemia of Cattle Infected with Theileria sergenti. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1989;83:77–83. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1989.11812314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stewart N.P., de Vos A.J., Shiels I.A., Jorgensen W.K. Transmission of Theileria buffeli to Cattle by Haemaphysalis bancrofti Fed on Artificially Infected Mice. Vet. Parasitol. 1989;34:123–127. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(89)80001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stewart N.P., de Vos A.J., McGregor W., Shiels I. Haemaphysalis humerosa, Not H. longicornis, Is the Likely Vector of Theileria buffeli in Australia. Aust. Vet. J. 1987;64:280–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1987.tb15960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hornok S., Takács N., Kontschán J., György Z., Micsutka A., Iceton S., Flaisz B., Farkas R., Hofmann-Lehmann R. Diversity of Haemaphysalis-Associated Piroplasms of Ruminants in Central-Eastern Europe, Hungary. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:627. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1236-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Heath A. Biology, Ecology and Distribution of the Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae) in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016;64:10–20. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1035769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development . Ticks of Concern to NSW Stock Owners. NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development; Orange, Australia: 2020. p. 7. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Keskin A., Doi K. Discovery of the Potentially Invasive Asian Longhorned Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae) in Türkiye: An Unexpected Finding through Citizen Science. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2025;94:47. doi: 10.1007/s10493-025-01015-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Butler R.A., Muller L.I., Poh K.C., Aguilar M., Hokkanen-Harmon K.S., Chandler J.G., Grove D., Trout Fryxell R.T. Case Report: Retrospective Discovery of Theileria orientalis Ikeda in Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann Ticks on a Cow-Calf Farm in Tennessee (US) Front. Vet. Sci. 2026;13:1770304. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1770304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lakew B.T., Kheravii S.K., Wu S.-B., Eastwood S., Andrew N.R., Jenkins C., Walkden-Brown S.W. Endemic Infection of Cattle with Multiple Genotypes of Theileria orientalis on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales despite Limited Presence of Ticks. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2021;12:101645. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gebrekidan H., Gasser R.B., Baneth G., Yasur-Landau D., Nachum-Biala Y., Hailu A., Jabbar A. Molecular Characterization of Theileria orientalis from Cattle in Ethiopia. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016;7:742–747. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kiltz H.H., Uilenberg G., Franssen F.F., Perié N.M. Theileria orientalis Occurs in Central Africa. Res. Vet. Sci. 1986;40:197–200. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)30512-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Iweriebor B.C., Afolabi K.O., Nqoro A., Obi L.C. Emergence of Theileria Species in Ticks from Free-Ranging Domestic Animals in Raymond Mhlaba Local Municipality, South Africa. Heliyon. 2022;8:e09085. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hornok S., Abichu G., Meli M.L., Tánczos B., Sulyok K.M., Gyuranecz M., Gönczi E., Farkas R., Hofmann-Lehmann R. Influence of the Biotope on the Tick Infestation of Cattle and on the Tick-Borne Pathogen Repertoire of Cattle Ticks in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fischer T., Myalkhaa M., Krücken J., Battsetseg G., Batsukh Z., Baumann M.P.O., Clausen P.-H., Nijhof A.M. Molecular Detection of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Bovine Blood and Ticks from Khentii, Mongolia. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020;67:111–118. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Georges K., Loria G.R., Riili S., Greco A., Caracappa S., Jongejan F., Sparagano O. Detection of Haemoparasites in Cattle by Reverse Line Blot Hybridisation with a Note on the Distribution of Ticks in Sicily. Vet. Parasitol. 2001;99:273–286. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00488-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Vijayalakshmi P. Occurrence of Ticks in Bovine Benign Theileriosis in Cattle of Puducherry Region. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2018;6:72–73. doi: 10.15406/jbmoa.2018.06.00224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yokoyama N., Sivakumar T., Ota N., Igarashi I., Nakamura Y., Yamashina H., Matsui S., Fukumoto N., Hata H., Kondo S., et al. Genetic Diversity of Theileria orientalis in Tick Vectors Detected in Hokkaido and Okinawa, Japan. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2012;12:1669–1675. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Nakao S., Sivakumar T., Takakuwa Y., Suzuki H., Ohta K., Nakamura K., Tsuha O., Ikehara Y., Ikehara S., Ohki S., et al. Seasonal Activities, Morphological Characteristics, and Veterinary Importance of Haemaphysalis mageshimaensis in Ishigaki and Yonaguni, Okinawa, Japan. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2025;16:102440. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hornok S., Mester A., Takács N., Fernández de Mera I.G., de la Fuente J., Farkas R. Re-Emergence of Bovine Piroplasmosis in Hungary: Has the Etiological Role of Babesia divergens Been Taken over by B. major and Theileria buffeli? Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:434. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yin H., Guan G., Ma M., Luo J., Lu B., Yuan G., Bai Q., Lu C., Yuan Z., Preston P. Haemaphysalis qqinghaiensis Ticks Transmit at Least Two Different Theileria Species: One Is Infective to Yaks, One Is Infective to Sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2002;107:29–35. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Boularias G., Azzag N., Galon C., Šimo L., Boulouis H.-J., Moutailler S. High-Throughput Microfluidic Real-Time PCR for the Detection of Multiple Microorganisms in Ixodid Cattle Ticks in Northeast Algeria. Pathogens. 2021;10:362. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10030362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Orkun Ö. Comprehensive Screening of Tick-Borne Microorganisms Indicates That a Great Variety of Pathogens Are Circulating between Hard Ticks (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae) and Domestic Ruminants in Natural Foci of Anatolia. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2022;13:102027. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.102027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zeng W., Kairat Z., Awulibieer M., Abylay S., Serik K., Yang M., Wang Y., Hazihan W. Molecular Detection of Piroplasms, Anaplasma, and Ehrlichia Species in Kazakhstan. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025;12:1533589. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1533589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ionita M., Mitrea I.L., Pfister K., Hamel D., Silaghi C. Molecular Evidence for Bacterial and Protozoan Pathogens in Hard Ticks from Romania. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;196:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Toma L., Di Luca M., Mancini F., Severini F., Mariano C., Nicolai G., Laghezza Masci V., Ciervo A., Fausto A.M., Cacciò S.M. Molecular Characterization of Babesia and Theileria Species in Ticks Collected in the Outskirt of Monte Romano, Lazio Region, Central Italy. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanità. 2017;53:30–34. doi: 10.4415/ANN_17_01_07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kumsa B., Signorini M., Teshale S., Tessarin C., Duguma R., Ayana D., Martini M., Cassini R. Molecular Detection of Piroplasms in Ixodid Ticks Infesting Cattle and Sheep in Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2014;46:27–31. doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0442-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kakati P., Sarmah P.C., Ray D., Bhattacharjee K., Sharma R.K., Barkalita L.M., Sarma D.K., Baishya B.C., Borah P., Stanley B. Emergence of Oriental Theileriosis in Cattle and Its Transmission through Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) Microplus in Assam, India. Vet. World. 2015;8:1099–1104. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1099-1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Defaye B., Moutailler S., Pasqualini V., Quilichini Y. A Systematic Review of the Distribution of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Wild Animals and Their Ticks in the Mediterranean Rim between 2000 and 2021. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1858. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.M’ghirbi Y., Ros-García A., Iribar P., Rhaim A., Hurtado A., Bouattour A. A Molecular Study of Tick-Borne Haemoprotozoan Parasites (Theileria and Babesia) in Small Ruminants in Northern Tunisia. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;198:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hammer J.F., Jenkins C., Bogema D., Emery D. Mechanical Transfer of Theileria orientalis: Possible Roles of Biting Arthropods, Colostrum and Husbandry Practices in Disease Transmission. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:34. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1323-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lawrence K.E., Gedye K., McFadden A.M.J., Pulford D.J., Pomroy W.E. An Observational Study of the Vertical Transmission of Theileria orientalis (Ikeda) in a New Zealand Pastoral Dairy Herd. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;218:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mekata H., Minamino T., Mikurino Y., Yamamoto M., Yoshida A., Nonaka N., Horii Y. Evaluation of the Natural Vertical Transmission of Theileria orientalis. Vet. Parasitol. 2018;263:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Swilks E., Fell S.A., Hammer J.F., Sales N., Krebs G.L., Jenkins C. Transplacental Transmission of Theileria orientalis Occurs at a Low Rate in Field-Affected Cattle: Infection in Utero Does Not Appear to Be a Major Cause of Abortion. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:227. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2166-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Žilić D.J., Naletilić Š., Mihaljević Ž., Gagović E., Špičić S., Reil I., Duvnjak S., Tuk M.Z., Hodžić A., Beck R. Hemotropic Pathogens in Aborted Fetuses of Domestic Ruminants: Transplacental Transmission and Implications for Reproductive Loss. Front. Microbiol. 2025;16:1632135. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1632135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chisu V., Loi F., Mura L., Tanda A., Chessa G., Masala G. Molecular Detection of Theileria sergentii/orientalis/buffeli and Ehrlichia canis from Aborted Ovine and Caprine Products in Sardinia, Italy. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021;7:1762–1768. doi: 10.1002/vms3.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lakew B.T., Kheravii S.K., Wu S.-B., Eastwood S., Andrew N.R., Nicholas A.H., Walkden-Brown S.W. Detection and Distribution of Haematophagous Flies and Lice on Cattle Farms and Potential Role in the Transmission of Theileria orientalis. Vet. Parasitol. 2021;298:109516. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Emery D.L. Approaches to Integrated Parasite Management (IPM) for Theileria orientalis with an Emphasis on Immunity. Pathogens. 2021;10:1153. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.de Marco M.F., Brugman V.A., Hernández-Triana L.M., Thorne L., Phipps L.P., Nikolova N.I., Fooks A.R., Johnson N. Detection of Theileria orientalis in Mosquito Blood Meals in the United Kingdom. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;229:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Reber A.J., Donovan D.C., Gabbard J., Galland K., Aceves-Avila M., Holbert K.A., Marshall L., Hurley D.J. Transfer of Maternal Colostral Leukocytes Promotes Development of the Neonatal Immune System I. Effects on Monocyte Lineage Cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2008;123:186–196. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Donovan D.C., Reber A.J., Gabbard J.D., Aceves-Avila M., Galland K.L., Holbert K.A., Ely L.O., Hurley D.J. Effect of Maternal Cells Transferred with Colostrum on Cellular Responses to Pathogen Antigens in Neonatal Calves. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2007;68:778–782. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.7.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kamau J., Salim B., Yokoyama N., Kinyanjui P., Sugimoto C. Rapid Discrimination and Quantification of Theileria orientalis Types Using Ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacers. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2011;11:407–414. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Perera P.K., Gasser R.B., Jabbar A. Assessment of Sequence Variability in a P23 Gene Region within and among Three Genotypes of the Theileria orientalis Complex from South-Eastern Australia. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2015;6:123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yokoyama N., Ueno A., Mizuno D., Kuboki N., Khukhuu A., Igarashi I., Miyahara T., Shiraishi T., Kudo R., Oshiro M., et al. Genotypic Diversity of Theileria orientalis Detected from Cattle Grazing in Kumamoto and Okinawa Prefectures of Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2011;73:305–312. doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ahmed M., Roy B.C., Sajib M.M.R., Rabbi M.R.R., Zim M.M.R., Rahman M.K., Miah M.A.H., Biswas P.G., Talukder M.H. Insights into the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Prevalent Theileria orientalis in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2026;21:e0334382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Jacob S.S., Sengupta P.P., Kumar H.B.C., Maharana S.M., Goudar A., Chandu A.G.S., Rakshitha T.S., Shivakumar V., Gulati B.R., Reddy G.B.M. Unveiling Genotypic Diversity of Theileria orientalis in Lethal Outbreaks among Bovines in Karnataka, India. Parasitol. Res. 2024;123:202. doi: 10.1007/s00436-024-08227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Alves J.P.S., Rodrigues P.H.C., Castillo A.P., Fonseca Junior A.A., de Oliveira C.H.S., Leite R.C., Barbosa J.D., Silveira J.A.G. Genetic Characterization and Identification of a Recent Discovered Genotype of Theileria orientalis (Piroplasmida: Theileriidae) in Water Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Amazon Region, Brazil. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2026;17:102581. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Onizawa E., Jenkins C. Epidemiology, Clinical Signs, and Risk Factors Associated with Theileriosis in Australian Cattle (2006–2022) Pathogens. 2024;13:253. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13030253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Perera P.K., Gasser R.B., Anderson G.A., Jeffers M., Bell C.M., Jabbar A. Epidemiological Survey Following Oriental Theileriosis Outbreaks in Victoria, Australia, on Selected Cattle Farms. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;197:509–521. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Lawrence K.E., Gedye K., Pomroy W.E. A Longitudinal Study of the Effect of Theileria orientalis Ikeda Type Infection on Three New Zealand Dairy Farms Naturally Infected at Pasture. Vet. Parasitol. 2019;276:108977. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.108977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Leong C.-C., Oskam C.L., Barbosa A.D., Aleri J.W. Distribution and Prevalence of Theileria orientalis Genotypes in Adult Lactating Dairy Cows in South West Region of Western Australia. Pathogens. 2023;12:125. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12010125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Emery D., Wang S., Loo C., Shirley C. A Longitudinal Study of Infection with Genotypes of Theileria orientalis in Calves and Introduced Cattle at Dorrigo, New South Wales, and the Effect on Weight Gains. Vet. Parasitol. 2021;296:109487. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Perera P.K., Gasser R.B., Firestone S.M., Anderson G.A., Malmo J., Davis G., Beggs D.S., Jabbar A. Oriental Theileriosis in Dairy Cows Causes a Significant Milk Production Loss. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:73. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Jirapattharasate C., Adjou Moumouni P.F., Cao S., Iguchi A., Liu M., Wang G., Zhou M., Vudriko P., Changbunjong T., Sungpradit S., et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Bovine Babesia spp. and Theileria orientalis Parasites in Beef Cattle from Northern and Northeastern Thailand. Parasitol. Int. 2016;65:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Khukhuu A., Lan D.T.B., Long P.T., Ueno A., Li Y., Luo Y., Macedo A.C.C.D., Matsumoto K., Inokuma H., Kawazu S.-I., et al. Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Theileria orientalis in Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2011;73:701–705. doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Inoue M., Nguyen D.V., Meas S., Ohashi K., Sen S., Sugimoto C., Onuma M. Survey of Theileria Parasite Infection in Cattle in Cambodia and Vietnam Using Piroplasm Surface Protein Gene-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2001;63:1155–1157. doi: 10.1292/jvms.63.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Govaerts M.M., Voet M., Volckaert G., Goddeeris B.M. PCR Amplification and Sequence of the P33 Piroplasm Surface Antigen Gene of a Theileria Species Isolated from Cattle in West Java, Indonesia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998;849:126–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb11041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Ola-Fadunsin S.D., Sharma R.S.K., Abdullah D.A., Gimba F.I., Jesse F.F.A., Sani R.A. Molecular Detection, Prevalence and Risk Factors of Theileria orientalis Infection among Cattle in Peninsular Malaysia. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020;180:105027. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Bawm S., Shimizu K., Hirota J.-I., Tosa Y., Htun L.L., Maw N.N., Thein M., Kato H., Sakurai T., Katakura K. Molecular Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Bovine Theileria orientalis in Myanmar. Parasitol. Int. 2014;63:640–645. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2014.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Prado I.C.B., Capuno L.X.B., Jr., Collera P.D., Ramos K.A.S.D., Bernardo J.M.G., Divina B.P., Masatani T., Tanaka T., Galay R.L. Molecular Detection and Characterization of Babesia and Theileria in Cattle and Water Buffaloes from Southern Luzon, Philippines. Microorganisms. 2022;10:678. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kolte S.W., Larcombe S.D., Jadhao S.G., Magar S.P., Warthi G., Kurkure N.V., Glass E.J., Shiels B.R. PCR Diagnosis of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Maharashtra State, India Indicates Fitness Cost Associated with Carrier Infections Is Greater for Crossbreed than Native Cattle Breeds. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0174595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Mohammed Salih D.A.A., Jebur L.A., Al-Taii N.A., Ibadi W.S. Mutation on Theileria Species in Cattle in Fallujah City, West Region of Iraq. Open Vet. J. 2024;14:2261–2268. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i9.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ozubek S., Ulucesme M.C., Cirak V.Y., Aktas M. Detection of Theileria orientalis Genotypes from Cattle in Kyrgyzstan. Pathogens. 2022;11:1185. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Mohanta U.K., Chikufenji B., Galon E.M., Ji S., Ma Z., El-Sayed S.A.E.-S., Ringo A.E., Do T.T., Xuan X. Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Analyses of Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. in Livestock in Bangladesh. Microorganisms. 2023;11:1563. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Kuibagarov M., Makhamed R., Zhylkibayev A., Berdikulov M., Abdrakhmanov S., Kozhabayev M., Akhmetollayev I., Mukanov K., Ryskeldina A., Ramankulov Y., et al. Theileria and Babesia Infection in Cattle—First Molecular Survey in Kazakhstan. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2023;14:102078. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.102078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Aktaş M., Kısadere İ., Özübek S., Cihan H., Salıkov R., Cirak V.Y. First Molecular Survey of Piroplasm Species in Cattle from Kyrgyzstan. Parasitol. Res. 2019;118:2431–2435. doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06370-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Habibi G., Shahedi A., Afshari A., Bozorgi S., Khezrian Q. Molecular Identification and Genotyping of Theileria orientalis Type 3 (Buffeli) Isolated from Cattle Using Nested-PCR Assay in Guilan Province, Iran. Arch. Razi Inst. 2021;76:213–221. doi: 10.22092/ari.2020.128570.1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Dhakal M., Gompo T.R., Devkota P., Kafle S.C., Subedi J.R., Gong H., Arima H., Culleton R., Asada M., Pandey K. Molecular Detection and Identification of Piroplasm in Cattle from Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Pathogens. 2023;12:1045. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12081045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Gebrekidan H., Abbas T., Wajid M., Ali A., Gasser R.B., Jabbar A. Molecular Characterisation of Theileria orientalis in Imported and Native Bovines from Pakistan. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2017;47:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Sivakumar T., Tattiyapong M., Fukushi S., Hayashida K., Kothalawala H., Silva S.S.P., Vimalakumar S.C., Kanagaratnam R., Meewewa A.S., Suthaharan K., et al. Genetic Characterization of Babesia and Theileria Parasites in Water Buffaloes in Sri Lanka. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;200:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Sivakumar T., Kothalawala H., Abeyratne S.A.E., Vimalakumar S.C., Meewewa A.S., Hadirampela D.T., Puvirajan T., Sukumar S., Kuleswarakumar K., Chandrasiri A.D.N., et al. A PCR-Based Survey of Selected Babesia and Theileria Parasites in Cattle in Sri Lanka. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;190:263–267. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Özübek S., Aktaş M. Genetic Diversity of Theileria orientalis from Cattle in Turkey. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;65:132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Jurković D., Mihaljević Ž., Duvnjak S., Silaghi C., Beck R. First Reports of Indigenous Lethal Infection with Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma bovis and Theileria orientalis in Croatian Cattle. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020;11:101469. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Criado-Fornelio A., Buling A., Pingret J.L., Etievant M., Boucraut-Baralon C., Alongi A., Agnone A., Torina A. Hemoprotozoa of Domestic Animals in France: Prevalence and Molecular Characterization. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;159:73–76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Papadopoulos B., Brossard M., Perié N.M. Piroplasms of Domestic Animals in the Macedonia Region of Greece. 2. Piroplasms of Cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 1996;63:57–66. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(95)00845-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Cassini R., Marcer F., di Regalbono A.F., Cancrini G., Gabrielli S., Moretti A., Galuppi R., Tampieri M.P., Pietrobelli M. New Insights into the Epidemiology of Bovine Piroplasmoses in Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;184:77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Andersson M.O., Tolf C., Tamba P., Stefanache M., Radbea G., Rubel F., Waldenström J., Dobler G., Chițimia-Dobler L. Babesia, Theileria, and Hepatozoon Species in Ticks Infesting Animal Hosts in Romania. Parasitol. Res. 2017;116:2291–2297. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5537-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Kovalchuk S.N. Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Study of Theileria Sp. Parasites Detected in Cattle from the Moscow Region of Russia. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2022;13:101835. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Vasić A., Nieder M., Zdravković N., Bojkovski J., Bugarski D., Pavlović I., Silaghi C. Tick Infestation and Occurrence of Anaplasma Phagocytophilum and Piroplasms in Cattle in the Republic of Serbia. Parasitol. Res. 2018;117:1813–1818. doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-5867-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Hofmann-Lehmann R., Meli M.L., Dreher U.M., Gönczi E., Deplazes P., Braun U., Engels M., Schüpbach J., Jörger K., Thoma R., et al. Concurrent Infections with Vector-Borne Pathogens Associated with Fatal Hemolytic Anemia in a Cattle Herd in Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:3775–3780. doi: 10.1128/jcm.42.8.3775-3780.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Stevanovic O., Radalj A. Molecular Evidence of Theileria orientalis Infection in Cattle from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vet. Glas. 2023;77:80–86. doi: 10.2298/VETGL220708001S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.M’ghirbi Y., Hurtado A., Barandika J., Khlif K., Ketata Z., Bouattour A. A Molecular Survey of Theileria and Babesia Parasites in Cattle, with a Note on the Distribution of Ticks in Tunisia. Parasitol. Res. 2008;103:435–442. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0995-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Chaisi M.E., Collins N.E., Oosthuizen M.C. Phylogeny of Theileria buffeli Genotypes Identified in the South African Buffalo (Syncerus caffer) Population. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;204:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Sekkai A., Kernif T., Medrouh B., Messaoudi Z., Ziam H., Boutellis A. Investigation of Theileria spp. in Livestock in Northern Algeria and Identification of a Novel Haplotype of Theileria orientalis. Acta Parasitol. 2025;70:95. doi: 10.1007/s11686-025-01029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Selim A., Attia K., AlKahtani M.D.F., Albohairy F.M., Shoulah S. Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Characterization of Theileria orientalis in Cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022;54:178. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03176-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Elhachimi L., Rogiers C., Casaert S., Fellahi S., Van Leeuwen T.V., Dermauw W., Valcárcel F., Olmeda Á.S., Daminet S., Khatat S.E.H., et al. Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens Abound in the Cattle Population of the Rabat-Sale Kenitra Region, Morocco. Pathogens. 2021;10:1594. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10121594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ngangnang G.R., Aktas M., Ulucesme M.C., Tchankwe Désiré K., Fonteh Anyangwe F., Payne V.K. First Report of Theileria buffeli/Theileria orientalis Group and Identification of Piroplasms via Nested PCR-Based RLB Hybridization Assay in Zebu Cattle in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. J. Zoonotic Dis. 2021;5:43–53. doi: 10.22034/jzd.2021.13471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Hailemariam Z., Krücken J., Baumann M., Ahmed J.S., Clausen P.-H., Nijhof A.M. Molecular Detection of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Cattle from Southwestern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0188248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Egwu V.E., Ikpa T.F., Amali O. Molecular Isolation of Theileria and Babesia Species and the Risk Factors Associated with Their Infection in Cattle at Makurdi and Abinsi in Benue State, Nigeria. Int. J. Res. Sci. Innov. 2024;11:347–357. doi: 10.51244/IJRSI.2024.1107025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.M’ghirbi Y., Hurtado A., Bouattour A. Theileria and Babesia Parasites in Ticks in Tunisia. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2010;57:49–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Adjou Moumouni P.F., Aboge G.O., Terkawi M.A., Masatani T., Cao S., Kamyingkird K., Jirapattharasate C., Zhou M., Wang G., Liu M., et al. Molecular Detection and Characterization of Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, Theileria Species and Anaplasma marginale Isolated from Cattle in Kenya. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:496. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1106-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Gebrekidan H., Hailu A., Kassahun A., Rohoušová I., Maia C., Talmi-Frank D., Warburg A., Baneth G. Theileria Infection in Domestic Ruminants in Northern Ethiopia. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;200:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Mumbi N.N.M., Rojas C.E.S., Ahedor B., Ma Y., Valinotti M.F.R., Acosta T.J., Sivakumar T., Yokoyama N. Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Theileria and Anaplasma Species Infecting Cattle in Paraguay. Parasitol. Int. 2025;109:103116. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2025.103116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Silveira J.A.G., de Oliveira C.H.S., Silvestre B.T., Albernaz T.T., Leite R.C., Barbosa J.D., Oliveira C.M.C., Ribeiro M.F.B. Molecular Assays Reveal the Presence of Theileria spp. and Babesia spp. in Asian Water Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis, Linnaeus, 1758) in the Amazon Region of Brazil. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016;7:1017–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ruotsalo K., Cai H., Pasma T. Theileriosis in a Dairy Cow from Eastern Ontario. AHL Newsl. 2025;29:9. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Ruotsalo K., Shapiro J. Theileriosis in a Dairy Cow from Eastern Ontario. AHL Newsl. 2015;19:7. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Oakes V.J., Yabsley M.J., Schwartz D., LeRoith T., Bissett C., Broaddus C., Schlater J.L., Todd S.M., Boes K.M., Brookhart M., et al. Theileria orientalis Ikeda Genotype in Cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019;25:1653–1659. doi: 10.3201/eid2509.190088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Stockham S.L., Kjemtrup A.M., Conrad P.A., Schmidt D.A., Scott M.A., Robinson T.W., Tyler J.W., Johnson G.C., Carson C.A., Cuddihee P. Theileriosis in a Missouri Beef Herd Caused by Theileria buffeli: Case Report, Herd Investigation, Ultrastructure, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Experimental Transmission. Vet. Pathol. 2000;37:11–21. doi: 10.1354/vp.37-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Hilpertshauser H., Deplazes P., Meli M.L., Hofmann-Lehmann R., Lutz H., Mathis A. Genotyping of Babesia bigemina from Cattle from a Non-Endemic Area (Switzerland) Vet. Parasitol. 2007;145:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Adjou Moumouni P.F., Galon E.M., Tumwebaze M.A., Byamukama B., Ngasaman R., Tiwananthagorn S., Kamyingkird K., Inpankaew T., Xuan X. Tick-Borne Pathogen Detection and Its Association with Alterations in Packed Cell Volume of Dairy Cattle in Thailand. Animals. 2023;13:2844. doi: 10.3390/ani13182844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Altangerel K., Battsetseg B., Battur B., Sivakumar T., Batmagnai E., Javkhlan G., Tuvshintulga B., Igarashi I., Matsumoto K., Inokuma H., et al. The First Survey of Theileria orientalis Infection in Mongolian Cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;182:343–348. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Park J., Han Y.-J., Han D.-G., Chae J.-B., Chae J.-S., Yu D.-H., Lee Y.-S., Park B.-K., Kim H.-C., Choi K.-S. Genetic Characterization of Theileria orientalis from Cattle in the Republic of Korea. Parasitol. Res. 2017;116:449–454. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5316-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Choi K.-S., Yu D.-H., Chae J.-S., Park B.-K., Yoo J.-G., Park J. Seasonal Changes in Hemograms and Theileria orientalis Infection Rates among Holstein Cattle Pastured in the Mountains in the Republic of Korea. Prev. Vet. Med. 2016;127:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Espiritu H., Lee H.-W., Al Faruk M.S., Jin S.-J., Lee S.-S., Cho Y.-I. Latitude and Seasons Influence the Prevalence of Theileria orientalis and Affect the Hematology of Non-Grazed Dairy Cows in Korea. Parasites Hosts Dis. 2024;62:64–74. doi: 10.3347/PHD.23087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Kim S., Yu D.-H., Kang S.-W., Chae J.-B., Choi K.-S., Kim H.-C., Park B.-K., Chae J.-S., Park J. Hematological Changes Associated with Theileria orientalis Infection in Korean Indigenous Cattle. Korean J. Parasitol. 2017;55:481–489. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.5.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Selim A.M., Senapati S.K., Das M., Mishra C., Patra R.C., Panda S.K. Molecular, Epidemiological and Haematological Evaluation in Theileria orientalis Infected Cattle from an Endemic Region in India. Anim. Biotechnol. 2021;32:663–670. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2020.1738450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Almazán C., Scimeca R.C., Reichard M.V., Mosqueda J. Babesiosis and Theileriosis in North America. Pathogens. 2022;11:168. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Hornok S., Szőke K., Kováts D., Estók P., Görföl T., Boldogh S.A., Takács N., Kontschán J., Földvári G., Barti L., et al. DNA of Piroplasms of Ruminants and Dogs in Ixodid Bat Ticks. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Lawrence K.E., Summers S.R., Heath A.C.G., McFadden A.M.J., Pulford D.J., Tait A.B., Pomroy W.E. Using a Rule-Based Envelope Model to Predict the Expansion of Habitat Suitability within New Zealand for the Tick Haemaphysalis longicornis, with Future Projections Based on Two Climate Change Scenarios. Vet. Parasitol. 2017;243:226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Lawrence K.E., Summers S.R., Heath A.C.G., Pulford D.J., Pomroy W.E. Predicting the Potential Environmental Suitability for Theileria orientalis Transmission in New Zealand Cattle Using Maximum Entropy Niche Modelling. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;224:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Hayashida K., Hara Y., Abe T., Yamasaki C., Toyoda A., Kosuge T., Suzuki Y., Sato Y., Kawashima S., Katayama T., et al. Comparative Genome Analysis of Three Eukaryotic Parasites with Differing Abilities to Transform Leukocytes Reveals Key Mediators of Theileria-Induced Leukocyte Transformation. mBio. 2012;3:e00204-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00204-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Kim J.-Y., Yokoyama N., Kumar S., Inoue N., Inaba M., Fujisaki K., Sugimoto C. Identification of a Piroplasm Protein of Theileria orientalis That Binds to Bovine Erythrocyte Band 3. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2004;137:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Lawrence K.E., Forsyth S.F., Vaatstra B.L., McFadden A., Pulford D.J., Govindaraju K., Pomroy W.E. Clinical Haematology and Biochemistry Profiles of Cattle Naturally Infected with Theileria orientalis Ikeda Type in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2018;66:21–29. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2017.1391142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Takemae H., Sugi T., Kobayashi K., Murakoshi F., Recuenco F., Ishiwa A., Inomata A., Horimoto T., Yokoyama N., Kato K. Interaction between Theileria orientalis 23-kDa Piroplasm Membrane Protein and Heparin. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2014;62:17–24. doi: 10.14943/jjvr.62.1-2.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Jenkins C., Bogema D.R. Factors Associated with Seroconversion to the Major Piroplasm Surface Protein of the Bovine Haemoparasite Theileria orientalis. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:106. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1395-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Yagi Y., Ito N., Kunugiyama I. Decrease in Erythrocyte Survival in Theileria sergenti-Infected Calves Determined by Non-Radioactive Chromium Labelling Method. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1991;53:391–394. doi: 10.1292/jvms.53.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Hagiwara K., Tsuji M., Ishihara C., Tajima M., Kurosawa T., Takahashi K. Serum from Theileria sergenti-Infected Cattle Accelerates the Clearance of Bovine Erythrocytes in SCID Mice. Parasitol. Res. 1995;81:470–474. doi: 10.1007/BF00931788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Shiono H., Yagi Y., Thongnoon P., Kurabayashi N., Chikayama Y., Miyazaki S., Nakamura I. Acquired Methemoglobinemia in Anemic Cattle Infected with Theileria sergenti. Vet. Parasitol. 2001;102:45–51. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00520-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Shiono H., Yagi Y., Chikayama Y., Miyazaki S., Nakamura I. The Influence of Oxidative Bursts of Phagocytes on Red Blood Cell Oxidation in Anemic Cattle Infected with Theileria sergenti. Free Radic. Res. 2003;37:1181–1189. doi: 10.1080/10715760310001607023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Terada Y., Tsuji M., Hagiwara K., Takahashi K., Ishihara C. Clearance of Theileria sergenti-Infected Bovine Red Blood Cells in Severe Combined Immune Deficiency Mice. Vet. Parasitol. 1995;60:221–228. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(95)00785-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Choe C., Jung Y.-H., Yoo J.G., Cho A., Do Y.J., Oh S.-I., Kang M.-G., Kang H.-S., Yu D.-H., Park J., et al. Immune Responses of Cattle to Theileria orientalis Infection and Seasonal Change. Int. J. Appl. Res. Vet. Med. 2018;16:235–240. [Google Scholar]
- 175.Sujatha V.V., Deepa P.M., Rajasekhar R., Rathish R.L., Janus A. Cytokine Profiles in Naturally Infected Cattle Reveal Immune Responses to Theileria orientalis Infection. Parasite Immunol. 2025;47:e70031. doi: 10.1111/pim.70031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Aparna M., Ravindran R., Vimalkumar M.B., Lakshmanan B., Rameshkumar P., Kumar K.G.A., Promod K., Ajithkumar S., Ravishankar C., Devada K., et al. Molecular Characterization of Theileria orientalis Causing Fatal Infection in Crossbred Adult Bovines of South India. Parasitol. Int. 2011;60:524–529. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Ceci L., Jongejan F., Carelli G., Tassi P., Sparagano O. Identification of Theileria buffeli/orientalis and Babesia bigemina in Apulian Cattle Using Molecular Techniques and Study of Changes in Blood Parameters. Parassitologia. 1999;41:31–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Cufos N., Jabbar A., de Carvalho L.M., Gasser R.B. Mutation Scanning-Based Analysis of Theileria orientalis Populations in Cattle Following an Outbreak. Electrophoresis. 2012;33:2036–2040. doi: 10.1002/elps.201200082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Islam M.K., Jabbar A., Campbell B.E., Cantacessi C., Gasser R.B. Bovine Theileriosis—An Emerging Problem in South-Eastern Australia? Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2011;11:2095–2097. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Reghu G., Varghese A., Chundayil Kalarickal D., Karapparambu Gopalan A.K., Thozhukkad Moosaripparambil S., Aravindakshan A., Nellikka Chalapron S., Sebastian R., Peer Habeeb B., Chungapally A., et al. Phylogenetic, Pathotyping and Haplotype Analysis of Theileria orientalis in Crossbred Cattle of Northern Kerala, India. Microb. Pathog. 2026;211:108235. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2025.108235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Jenkins C., Micallef M., Alex S.M., Collins D., Djordjevic S.P., Bogema D.R. Temporal Dynamics and Subpopulation Analysis of Theileria orientalis Genotypes in Cattle. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015;32:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Kim S., Yu D.-H., Chae J.-B., Choi K.-S., Kim H.-C., Park B.-K., Chae J.-S., Park J. Pathogenic Genotype of Major Piroplasm Surface Protein Associated with Anemia in Theileria orientalis Infection in Cattle. Acta Vet. Scand. 2017;59:51. doi: 10.1186/s13028-017-0318-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Vink W.D., Lawrence K., McFadden A., Bingham P. An Assessment of the Herd-Level Impact of the Theileria orientalis (Ikeda) Epidemic of Cattle in New Zealand, 2012–2013: A Mixed Methods Approach. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016;64:48–54. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1090893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Gias E., Pulford D.J., Lawrence K., McFadden A. Application of Quantitative PCR Assays for Diagnosing Ikeda and Other Theileria orientalis Types to Examine Associations between Severity of Anaemia and Parasitaemia in Bovine Anaemia Outbreaks. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016;64:60–64. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1090892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Onzere C.K., Na E.-J., Herndon D.R., Kappmeyer L.S., Chung C.J., Bastos R.G. Acute Infection with the U.S. Isolate of Theileria orientalis Genotype Ikeda Is Associated with Decreased Hematocrit and Erythrocyte Counts in Experimentally Infected Cattle. Front. Vet. Sci. 2026;13:1768408. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1768408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Vinodkumar K., Shyma V., Justin D.K., Ashok S., Anu J.P., Mini K., Muhammedkutty V., Sasidharan S., Chullipparambil S. Fatal Theileria orientalis N2 Genotype Infection among Asian Water Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in a Commercial Dairy Farm in Kerala, India. Parasitology. 2016;143:69–74. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015001468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Sahoo S., Sahoo N., Biswal S., Mohanty B.N., Behera B., Pahari A. Theileria orientalis Buffeli Pathotype in Cows in a Theileriosis-Endemic Region of India. Trop. Biomed. 2023;40:236–240. doi: 10.47665/tb.40.2.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Swilks E., Jenkins C., Poynting A., Collins D., Krebs G.L. Prevalence and Effect of Theileria orientalis Infection in Homebred Calves in the Gloucester Region of New South Wales, Australia. Aust. Vet. J. 2017;95:211–216. doi: 10.1111/avj.12593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Pulford D., McFadden A., Hamilton J., Donald J. Investigation of the Index Case Herd and Identification of the Genotypes of Theileria orientalis Associated with Outbreaks of Bovine Anaemia in New Zealand in 2012. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016;64:21–28. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1090355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Gale K.R., Leatch G., Dimmock C.M., Gartside M.G. Increased Resistance to Anaplasma marginale Infection in Cattle Chronically Infected with Theileria buffeli (Syn. T. orientalis) Vet. Parasitol. 1997;69:187–196. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(96)01125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Gale K.R., Dimmock C.M., Gartside M., Leatch G. Anaplasma marginale: Detection of Carrier Cattle by PCR-ELISA. Int. J. Parasitol. 1996;26:1103–1109. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(96)80009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Tagawa M., Ybañez A.P., Matsumoto K., Yokoyama N., Inokuma H. Interference between Theileria orientalis and Hemotropic mycoplasma spp. (Hemoplasmas) in Grazing Cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;195:165–168. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Tatsukawa F., Nohara R., Taniguchi T., Goto A., Misawa N., Katamoto H. Detection of Mycoplasma wenyonii and “Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos” from Japanese Black Breeding Cows in Kyushu and Okinawa Region, Southern Part of Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021;83:9–16. doi: 10.1292/jvms.20-0505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.McFadden A., Ha H.J., Donald J.J., Bueno I.M., van Andel M., Thompson J.C., Tisdall D.J., Pulford D.J. Investigation of Bovine Haemoplasmas and Their Association with Anaemia in New Zealand Cattle. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016;64:65–68. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1090356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Yamagishi J., Asada M., Hakimi H., Tanaka T., Sugimoto C., Kawazu S. Whole-Genome Assembly of Babesia ovata and Comparative Genomics between Closely Related Pathogens. BMC Genom. 2017;18:832. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4230-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Sivakumar T., Tagawa M., Yoshinari T., Ybañez A.P., Igarashi I., Ikehara Y., Hata H., Kondo S., Matsumoto K., Inokuma H., et al. PCR Detection of Babesia ovata from Cattle Reared in Japan and Clinical Significance of Coinfection with Theileria orientalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012;50:2111–2113. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00220-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Sivakumar T., Igarashi I., Yokoyama N. Babesia ovata: Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Epidemiology. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;229:99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Cao S., Zhang S., Jia L., Xue S., Yu L., Kamyingkird K., Moumouni P.F.A., Moussa A.A.E.M., Zhou M., Zhang Y., et al. Molecular Detection of Theileria Species in Sheep from Northern China. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2013;75:1227–1230. doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Chai Y., Che J., Zhao S., Wang J., Guan G., Yin H. Expanding the Molecular Understanding of Theileria Infections in Cattle and Yaks from Gansu and Qinghai, China. Parasitol. Res. 2025;124:63. doi: 10.1007/s00436-025-08491-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Chamuah J.K., Jacob S.S., Ezung L., Awomi L., Aier I., Kumar H., Goswami P., Lalzampuia H., Khate K., Vupru K., et al. First Report of Ikeda Genotype of Theileria orientalis in Mithun (Bos frontalis) from Northeastern Hilly Region of India. Parasitol. Res. 2023;123:36. doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-08047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Lawrence K.E., Gedye K., Hickson R., Wang B., Carvalho L., Zhao Y., Pomroy W.E. The Role of Sheep (Ovis aries) in Maintaining Theileria orientalis Ikeda Type Infection. Vet. Parasitol. 2021;291:109391. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Sahoo N., Behera B.K., Khuntia H.K., Dash M. Prevalence of Carrier State Theileriosis in Lactating Cows. Vet. World. 2017;10:1471–1474. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1471-1474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Udonsom R., Mahittikorn A., Jirapattharasate C. Molecular Detection and Genetic Diversity of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Goats from the Southern Part of Thailand. Pathogens. 2022;11:477. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Fukushima Y., Minamino T., Mikurino Y., Honkawa K., Horii Y., Taniguchi T., Mekata H., Sasaki Y. Effects of Theileria orientalis Infection on Health Status and Productivity of Dairy Cows Reared inside Barns. Pathogens. 2021;10:650. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.McFadden A., Gias E., Heuer C., Stevens McFadden F.J., Pulford D.J. Prevalence and Spatial Distribution of Cattle Herds Infected with Theileria orientalis in New Zealand between 2012 and 2013. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016;64:55–59. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1090891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Gibson M.J., Lawrence K.E., Hickson R.E., How R., Gedye K.R., Jones G., Hoogenboom A., Draganova I., Smith S.L., Pomroy W.E. Effects of Theileria orientalis Ikeda Type Infection on Libido and Semen Quality of Bulls. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020;214:106312. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Lawrence K.E., Lawrence B.L., Hickson R.E., Hewitt C.A., Gedye K.R., Fermin L.M., Pomroy W.E. Associations between Theileria orientalis Ikeda Type Infection and the Growth Rates and Haematocrit of Suckled Beef Calves in the North Island of New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2019;67:66–73. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2018.1547227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Lawrence K.E., Gibson M., Hickson R.E., Gedye K., Hoogenboom A., Fermin L., Draganova I., Pomroy W.E. Experimental Infection of Friesian Bulls with Theileria orientalis (Ikeda) and Effects on the Haematocrit, Live Weight, Rectal Temperature and Activity. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2018;14:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Bogema D.R., Deutscher A.T., Fell S., Collins D., Eamens G.J., Jenkins C. Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Assay Using Multiplexed Hydrolysis Probes for Detection and Quantification of Theileria orientalis Isolates and Differentiation of Clinically Relevant Subtypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015;53:941–950. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03387-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Murthy S., Suresh A., Dandasena D., Singh S., Subudhi M., Bhandari V., Bhanot V., Arora J.S., Sharma P. Multiplex ddPCR: A Promising Diagnostic Assay for Early Detection and Drug Monitoring in Bovine Theileriosis. Pathogens. 2023;12:296. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Shirozu T., Badolo A., Soga A., Yoshimura A., Morishita Y., Koketsu M., Shirafuji R.-U., Inokuma H., Yokoyama N., Fukumoto S. Development and Evaluation of a Novel Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Method Targeting Theileria Parasites Infecting Yezo Sika Deer. Parasitol. Int. 2020;77:102130. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2020.102130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Prathyusha S., Radhika R., Lakshmanan B., Syamala K., Thomas M., Justin Davis K., Devada K. A Novel Colourimetric Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Rapid Field-Level Detection of Theileria orientalis. Exp. Parasitol. 2025;276:108983. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2025.108983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.O’Sullivan M.V.N., Zhou F., Sintchenko V., Kong F., Gilbert G.L. Multiplex PCR and Reverse Line Blot Hybridization Assay (mPCR/RLB) J. Vis. Exp. JoVE. 2011;54:2781. doi: 10.3791/2781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Eamens G., Bailey G., Gonsalves J., Jenkins C. Distribution and Temporal Prevalence of Theileria orientalis Major Piroplasm Surface Protein Types in Eastern Australian Cattle Herds. Aust. Vet. J. 2013;91:332–340. doi: 10.1111/avj.12078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Eamens G.J., Bailey G., Jenkins C., Gonsalves J.R. Significance of Theileria orientalis Types in Individual Affected Beef Herds in New South Wales Based on Clinical, Smear and PCR Findings. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;196:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.FAO . Guidelines for Sustainable Tick Control and Acaricide Resistance Management in Livestock. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2025. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines. [Google Scholar]
- 217.Moustafa M.A.M., Barnes M.M., Wagner N.E., Bodine D., Bendele K., Teel P.D., Saelao P., Price D.C. Genome of the Invasive North American Haemaphysalis longicornis Tick as a Template for Bovine Anti-Tick Vaccine Discovery. BMC Genom. 2025;26:307. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11477-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Tabor A.E. A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research. Vaccines. 2021;9:1030. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9091030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Makwarela T.G., Seoraj-Pillai N., Nangammbi T.C. Tick Control Strategies: Critical Insights into Chemical, Biological, Physical, and Integrated Approaches for Effective Hard Tick Management. Vet. Sci. 2025;12:114. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12020114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Fukushima Y., Minamino T., Honkawa K., Taniguchi T., Horii Y., Sasaki Y. Theileria-Free Grazing of Dairy Heifers on Grassland in Kyushu, Japan Where T. orientalis Was Epidemic before a 7-Year Vacancy. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022;84:628–633. doi: 10.1292/jvms.21-0666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Goud K.S., Vijayakumar K., Davis K.J., Ravishankar K.C., Devada K. Efficacy of Different Treatment Regimens against Oriental Theileriosis in Naturally Infected Cattle. Indian J. Vet. Med. 2020;40:14–19. [Google Scholar]
- 222.Valente D., Gomes J., Coelho A.C., Carolino I. Genetic Resistance of Bovines to Theileriosis. Animals. 2022;12:2903. doi: 10.3390/ani12212903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Rashid M., Hayat M.H., Zahra N., Khan M.S., Suleman, Nadeem M., ur Rehman T., Ehsan M., Malik M.I., Obaid M.K., et al. Systematic Review on Buparvaquone Resistance Associated with Non-Synonymous Mutation in Drug Binding Genes Site of Theileria annulate. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;332:110321. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.de Burgh S.G., Emery D.L. The Efficacy of Toltrazuril for Prevention of Oriental Theileriosis (Theileria orientalis Ikeda Genotype) in Friesian Calves. Aust. Vet. J. 2025;103:322–329. doi: 10.1111/avj.13415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Fukushima Y., Horii Y., Honkawa K., Sasaki Y. A Large-Scale Survey of Theileria orientalis Infection in Grazing Dairy Heifers in Kyushu, Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021;83:36–41. doi: 10.1292/jvms.20-0567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Kamiyama T., Niinuma S., Ikeda I., Matsubara J. Incorporation of [3H]Hypoxanthine by Short-Term Cultured Theileria sergenti and Its Inhibition by Drugs. J. Parasitol. 1992;78:856–860. doi: 10.2307/3283317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Park J., Chae J.-B., Kim S., Yu D.-H., Kim H.-C., Park B.-K., Chae J.-S., Choi K.-S. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Ivermectin against Theileria orientalis Infection in Grazing Cattle. BMC Vet. Res. 2019;15:297. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2042-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Moumouni P.F.A., Naomasa S., Tuvshintulga B., Sato N., Okado K., Zheng W., Lee S.-H., Mosqueda J., Suzuki H., Xuan X., et al. Identification and Characterization of Rhipicephalus microplus ATAQ Homolog from Haemaphysalis longicornis Ticks and Its Immunogenic Potential as an Anti-Tick Vaccine Candidate Molecule. Microorganisms. 2023;11:822. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Onuma M., Kakuda T., Sugimoto C. Theileria Parasite Infection in East Asia and Control of the Disease. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1998;21:165–177. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9571(98)00008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Kim J.-Y., Yokoyama N., Kumar S., Inoue N., Fujisaki K., Sugimoto C. Molecular Characterization of Theileria orientalis Piroplasm Protein Encoded by an Open Reading Frame (To ORF2) in a Genomic Fragment. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2004;66:957–963. doi: 10.1292/jvms.66.957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Khan H., Akbar I., Ibrahim U., Lun H., Liu B., Malik A., Ola M.S., Xu G., Khan A., Huang K. In Silico Comparative Proteomics and Structural Analysis of Theileria Species Reveals Conserved Druggable Targets for Anti-Theilerial Therapy. BMC Microbiol. 2026;26:411. doi: 10.1186/s12866-026-04960-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Agina O.A., Shaari M.R., Isa N.M.M., Ajat M., Zamri-Saad M., Hamzah H. Identification of Novel Bovine Leukocyte Antigen Alleles and Association of BoLA-DRB3.2*020:02:01 with Resistance to Theileria orientalis Infection in Crossbred Kedah-Kelantan Cattle: A Pilot Study. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2024;56:277. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04138-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Agina O.A., Shaari M.R., Isa N.M.M., Ajat M., Zamri-Saad M., Hamzah H. Clinical Pathology, Immunopathology and Advanced Vaccine Technology in Bovine Theileriosis: A Review. Pathogens. 2020;9:697. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Koehler A.V., Jabbar A., Hall R.S., Gasser R.B. A Targeted “Next-Generation” Sequencing-Informatic Approach to Define Genetic Diversity in Theileria orientalis Populations within Individual Cattle: Proof-of-Principle. Pathogens. 2020;9:448. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9060448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Guynn S.R., Greiner S.P., Currin J.F., Todd S.M., Assenga A., Hungerford L.L., Lahmers K.K. Theileria orientalis Ikeda Infection Does Not Negatively Impact Growth Performance or Breeding Soundness Exam Results in Young Beef Bulls at Bull Test Stations. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024;11:1432228. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1432228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

