Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2026 Jul 23;15(15):2260. doi: 10.3390/plants15152260

Harnessing Trichoderma Species for Sustainable Biocontrol: Mechanisms, Formulation Strategies, Commercialization, and Field Applications

Sidratul Muntaha Binta Anam Otithi 1, Md Sohel Rana 2, Md Shariful Islam 1, Randa Mohammed Zaki 3,4, Sajad Ali 5, Muhammad Fazle Rabbee 6,*, Md Mohidul Hasan 1,*, Kwang-Hyun Baek 6,*
Editor: Sumit Jangra
PMCID: PMC13467692  PMID: 42588764

Abstract

Trichoderma species are widely investigated and commercially applied as eco-friendly biocontrol agents in sustainable agriculture. These filamentous fungi protect plants through multiple complementary mechanisms, including mycoparasitism, antibiosis, competition for nutrients and ecological niches, and induction of systemic resistance in host plants. These activities are mediated by a diverse array of secondary metabolites, hydrolytic enzymes, and signaling pathways that collectively suppress pathogens and enhance plant health. Beyond disease control, selected Trichoderma strains promote plant growth by improving nutrient acquisition, modulating phytohormone signaling, and increasing tolerance to abiotic stresses. This review summarizes recent advances in the mechanisms underlying Trichoderma spp. mediated biocontrol, with particular emphasis on secondary metabolites, formulation strategies, commercialization, and field applications. Commercial products are available in various formulations, including wettable powders, granules, and liquid preparations, and have demonstrated efficacy against several economically important plant diseases under field conditions. However, their performance remains highly dependent on strain characteristics, host species, environmental conditions and agricultural practices, resulting in inconsistent efficacy across agroecosystems. Recent progress in genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics has substantially improved our understanding of Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions and revealed considerable strain-specific variation in biocontrol and plant growth-promoting traits. Future research should prioritize strain-specific optimization, formulation stability, microbiome-informed applications, and improved field predictability. Overall, Trichoderma spp. Represents a valuable component of integrated disease management, offering an effective and sustainable alternative to synthetic pesticides.

Keywords: Trichoderma spp., biocontrol agents, field application strategies, sustainable agriculture

1. Introduction

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that global food production must increase by ~70% by 2050 to meet the demands of a growing population. At the current growth rate, the global population is projected to reach ~9.1 billion by 2050 [1,2]. However, recurrent plant disease outbreaks pose a significant threat to global food security and environmental sustainability, a challenge further intensified by climate change [3]. To mitigate yield losses and achieve short-term production targets, many farmers increasingly depend on synthetic fertilizers and chemical fungicides. A global assessment reveals that 88 countries collectively consumed ~110 million tons of NPK fertilizers annually between 1961 and 2010, with China identified as the largest consumer. Insecticide consumption was highest in the United States, followed by India and Brazil, while pesticide use increased significantly in countries such as Bangladesh, Thailand, Ghana, Ethiopia, and Burkina Faso [4]. While these agrochemical inputs have significantly increased crop productivity, their prolonged and excessive use has raised significant environmental and human health concerns [5]. Synthetic fertilizers and pesticides can disrupt beneficial soil microbiota, including nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria, thereby compromising nutrient cycling and soil fertility [4]. The Green Revolution of the 20th century, characterized by the adoption of high-yielding crop varieties, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and disease-resistant cultivars, significantly enhanced agricultural productivity. However, it also produced unintended consequences, including biodiversity loss, increased dependence on water and fossil fuels, and widespread environmental degradation associated with excessive nitrogen inputs [6]. In this context, biological control agents represent a sustainable alternative by reducing dependence on synthetic agrochemicals, minimizing ecological damage, and offering long-term disease management strategies.

Trichoderma spp. are among the most widely studied and effective fungal biocontrol agents, owing to their opportunistic behavior, cosmopolitan distribution, and multifunctional roles in agroecosystems. Beyond suppressing phytopathogens and pests, they also serve as important model organisms for advancing research in agricultural and environmental sciences [7]. These ubiquitous fungi occur widely in soil, air, and plant-associated environments and exhibit multiple plant-beneficial traits. Trichoderma spp. suppress phytopathogens, enhance nutrient uptake, promote plant growth, strengthen plant immune responses, and assist in remediating agrochemical-contaminated soils [8,9]. Diverse Trichoderma spp. have been identified as endophytes in numerous plant species, colonizing various plant tissues and promoting plant health through multiple mechanisms, including antifungal activity, growth promotion, and enhanced tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Notable species include T. aggressivum, T. alni, T. effusum, T. hamatum, T. koningiopsis, and T. nivale [10]. For example, Trichoderma atroviride—an endophytic fungus isolated from the rhizosphere of Salvia miltiorrhiza—stimulates hairy root formation and enhances the biosynthesis of valuable secondary metabolites, including tanshinones [11].

Trichoderma spp., belonging to the family Hypocreaceae, are among the most common culturable fungal genera in soil ecosystems. Members of this genus are soil-dwelling, free-living, filamentous fungi that reproduce primarily asexually and tolerate facultative anaerobic conditions [12,13]. Beyond disease suppression, these fungi promote plant growth by modifying the rhizosphere, competing effectively for nutrients, thriving under adverse soil conditions, and activating plant defense pathways (Figure 1) [2,12,14]. Moreover, Trichoderma spp.) is cosmopolitan and can inhabit semi-aquatic ecosystems, including mangroves, where they maintain high population densities [15,16]. For over seven decades, Trichoderma spp. have been recognized for producing antibiotics and various secondary metabolites with potent antagonistic activity against pathogenic organisms [12].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms of Trichoderma spp. in the rhizosphere. Colonization of plant roots by Trichoderma spp. via conidia and mycelia enhances plant development by improving nutrient uptake, phytohormone production, and ISR. Biocontrol mechanisms include antibiosis, competition for nutrients and space, mycoparasitism, biofilm disruption, and suppression of soil-borne pathogens. Interactions with PGPR further support plant health and growth. Abbreviations: PGPR, plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria; ISR, induced systemic resistance.

Recent studies significantly advance our understanding of Trichoderma–plant interactions across various plant-associated niches, including the rhizosphere, endosphere, and phyllosphere, with these fungi exhibiting distinct colonization strategies and functional roles. However, phyllospheric Trichoderma spp. remain considerably less studied than their rhizospheric and endophytic counterparts [17]. They exhibit strong rhizocompetence and utilize species-specific biocontrol mechanisms, including mycoparasitism, production of cell wall–degrading enzymes, competition for nutrients and space, and synthesis of fungistatic and plant-growth-promoting secondary metabolites [12]. These mechanisms further contribute to induced systemic resistance, enhanced antioxidant activity, improved photosynthetic efficiency, increased nutrient uptake, and nutrient solubilization [18]. Among the most extensively investigated Trichoderma spp. are T. viride, T. asperellum, T. atroviride, T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum, and T. virens. Of these, the first three are widely used as commercial biocontrol agents owing to their dual modes of action, involving mycoparasitism and competitive exclusion of phytopathogenic fungi (Table 1) [19]. Notably, Trichoderma spp. constitute the active biological agents in approximately 60% of commercially available biofungicides, highlighting their significant role in the development of sustainable disease management strategies [10].

Table 1.

Commercial formulations of Trichoderma spp. used for plant disease management.

Product Name Trichoderma spp. Primary Functions Manufacturer References
RootShield® T. harzianum T-22; T. virens G-41
  • Controls pathogens including Phytophthora, Pythium, Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Cylindrocladium, and Thielaviopsis spp.

  • Enhances root hair development and improves water and nutrient uptake

BioWorks®, USA [20,21,22]
PlantShield® T. harzianum strain T-22 (Rifai; KRL-AG2)
  • Suppresses root pathogens, including Pythium, Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, and Thielaviopsis spp.

BioWorks®, USA [20,22]
Eco-T® T. asperellum KD
  • Protects against root diseases.

  • Induces SAR in plants

Andermatt PHP (Pty) Ltd., South Africa [20]
Binab® TF-WP T. atroviride; T. polysporum
  • Controls pathogens including Fusarium, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, and Sclerotium spp.

BINAB Bio-Innovation AB, Sweden [20,23]
Promot® T. harzianum; T. koningii
  • Produces enzymes degrading organic matter.

  • Enhances soil biological activity and nutrient retention.

JH Biotech, Inc., USA [20,23]
TRICHODERMA™ WP T. asperellum isolate H22
  • Controls pathogens including Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Sclerotinia, and Pythium spp.

Bioline Agrosciences Africa Ltd., Kenya [20]
Tricho Plus® T. asperelloides JM41R
  • Fungal inoculant for controlling root diseases and promoting plant growth

BASF South Africa (Pty) Ltd., South Africa [20]
ASPERELLO® T34 T. asperellum T34
  • Colonizes the root zone and forms a barrier against soil-borne fungal pathogens

  • Promotes healthy root and plant growth

Biobest, Belgium [24]
T-22™ HC T. harzianum strain T-22
  • Protects against Pythium, Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Cylindrocladium, and Thielaviopsis spp.

  • Suitable for diverse crops, including cereals, cucurbits, herbs, and leafy vegetables.

BioWorks®; Koppert, The Netherlands [25]
AkTRIvator® T. atroviride IMI 206040; T. afroharzianum G.J.S. 08–137
  • Rapidly colonizes the root zone.

  • Enhances root and root hair development, nutrient uptake, and resistance to pathogenic fungi.

CANNA, The Netherlands [26]
Trichosan® T. koningii
  • Suppresses soil-borne fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia spp.

  • Prevents damping-off, root rot, and wilt diseases.

Samarth Bio Tech Ltd., India [27]
Vintec® T. atroviride SC1
  • Protects against B. cinerea in crops, such as tomato.

Bi-PA, Belgium [28]
Ecoderma T. viride; T. harzianum
  • Protects against root rot and wilt diseases.

Morgo Biocontrol PvT. Ltd., India [22]
Biofit T. viride
  • Controls soil-borne pathogens, including Pythium, Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Sclerotium, and other root-rot pathogens.

Ajay Biotech Ltd., India [22]
SoilGard® 12G T. virens GL 20
  • Protects against root rot disease

Certis, USA [22]
Trichogourd T. viride
  • Protects against damping-off disease

Anu Biotech International Ltd., India [22]
Bioderma T. harzianum
  • Controls fungal pathogens, including Fusarium, Phytophthora, Rhizoctonia, and Pythium spp.

Ispahani Agro Limited, Bangladesh [29]
Xedavir® T. asperellum TV1
  • Antagonistic activity against root rot pathogens, including Phthium spp., P. capsici, R. solani, and Verticillium spp.

Xeda Italia S.r.I, Italy [30]
Avengelus® T. atrobrunneum T720
  • Reduces soil-borne and wood-associated fungal pathogens

MycoSolutions AG, Switzerland [30]
Tenet™ WP T. asperellum ICC012; T. gamsii ICC080
  • Controls soil-borne pathogens, including Fusarium and Pythium spp.

Isagro S.p.A., Italy [30]

Abbreviations: SAR, systemic acquired resistance; WP, wettable powder; HC, high concentration formulation; TF-WP, wettable powder formulation containing multiple Trichoderma strains; IMI, International Mycological Institute strain designation; ICC, Isagro Culture Collection strain designation; SC, suspension concentrate (biopesticide formulation type); GL, strain designation used by the manufacturer.

2. Trichoderma spp. as Broad-Spectrum Biocontrol Agents

Fungal phytopathogens cause >40% of plant diseases globally, representing a major constraint to agricultural productivity [31]. Trichoderma spp. are well known for their ability to inhibit the growth and proliferation of various phytopathogenic fungi, including Alternaria spp., Acremonium cucurbitacearum, Aphanomyces cochlioides, Aspergillus spp., Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Lasiodiplodia theobroma, Phoma betae, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, Rhizopus oryzae, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Verticillium dahliae [19,32]. Owing to this broad antagonistic potential, Trichoderma spp. have been successfully applied as biocontrol agents across diverse crops, including citrus, maize, cucumber, potato, rice, strawberry, grapevine, soybean, tomato, and wheat [33,34]. For example, T. harzianum is effectively used to control foliar pathogens of cucumber, including B. cinerea, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Sphaerotheca fusca [35]. Similarly, T. asperellum demonstrates strong suppression of soilborne pathogens, particularly F. oxysporum, in potato and tomato cropping systems [36]. Wheat powdery mildew (WPM), caused by the fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, is one of the most devastating diseases threatening global wheat production. The efficacy of Trichoderma spp. in controlling WPM at the seedling stage was evaluated across 35 genetically diverse wheat genotypes. Significant differences in disease resistance are observed among the four treatment groups, confirming the ability of Trichoderma spp. to suppress WPM. Among the tested species, T. asperellum T34 is the most effective, reducing disease severity by 50.56% [37].

3. Mechanisms Underlying the Beneficial Effects of Trichoderma spp.

The principal mechanisms underlying Trichoderma spp. biocontrol activity include antibiosis, mycoparasitism, induction of systemic or localized plant resistance, and competition for space and nutrients [38]. These antagonistic fungi, commonly isolated from soil environments, are widely utilized as biofertilizers, biopesticides, and soil amendments owing to their ability to produce various biologically active metabolites and cell wall–degrading enzymes (Table 2). Trichoderma spp. secrete diverse effectors, including proteins, small RNAs, and secondary metabolites, particularly volatile organic compounds (VOCs), play key roles in regulating plant growth, immunity, and stress responses during plant–microbe interactions [39]. Trichoderma spp. antagonize plant pathogens through both direct and indirect mechanisms, collectively referred to as their biocontrol capacity. Direct biocontrol mechanisms include antibiosis and mycoparasitism, whereas indirect mechanisms include induction of plant systemic resistance, competition for nutrients and niches, and plant growth promotion, thereby reducing disease incidence and severity [40]. Root colonization by Trichoderma spp. further enhances root architecture, improves nutrient uptake, increases crop productivity, and strengthens plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [40]. Advances in genomic and proteomic analyses reveal numerous genes and proteins involved in the complex tripartite interactions among plants, Trichoderma, and phytopathogens, providing valuable insights into their multifunctional behavior [41]. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms—including antibiosis, mycoparasitism, activation of plant defense pathways, nutrient competition, and efficient rhizosphere and root colonization—is essential for developing superior biocontrol strains and ensuring their effective application in sustainable agriculture [42].

Table 2.

Trichoderma spp.-based biofertilizers and plant growth-promoting products.

Product Name Trichoderma spp. Primary Functions Manufacturer (Company) References
Biocure-F® T. viride
  • Enhances root architecture

T. Stanes and Company Limited, Tamil Nadu, India [20]
Trianum®-P T. harzianum T-22
  • Suppresses pathogenic fungi and enhances nutrient uptake

Koppert B.V., Berkel en Rodenrijs, The Netherlands [21,43]
Bio-Tricho T. harzianum
  • Enhances nutrient availability and plant growth, particularly in acidic soils

Agro-Organics, New Delhi, India [10,20,44]
Trichostar® T. harzianum T58
  • Reduces the incidence and severity of root rot and other soil-borne diseases.

  • Enhances nutrient uptake

Trentino Innovation, Italy [21]
TrichoMax® T. asperellum Ta.13
  • Produces IAA and promotes root growth

Biotor, San Isidro, Nicaragua [20]
AgroGuard T. harzianum DSM 14944
  • Promotes root growth and plant vigor

Live Systems Technology S.A., Colombia [20,45]

Abbreviations: IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; DSM, Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures); B.V., Besloten Vennootschap (Dutch private limited liability company); S.A., Sociedad Anónima (corporation or public limited company).

3.1. Diversity of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Trichoderma spp.

Secondary metabolites produced by Trichoderma spp. exhibit remarkable chemical diversity. Terpenoids constitute the dominant class of reported Trichoderma secondary metabolites (approximately 52%), followed by polyketides (approximately 27%), whereas peptides (particularly peptaibols), alkaloids, steroids, and other metabolite classes are less abundant [46]. Collectively, these compounds exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activities, including antibacterial and antifungal effects. More than 370 Trichoderma spp. have been identified to date. Among them, several species were extensively studied and widely recognized for their potential as biological control agents, including T. asperellum, T. hamatum, T. viride, T. koningii, T. polysporum, and T. harzianum [8]. Their sources include algae, endophytic niches, marine sponges, soil, sediments, nests, mushrooms, sea stars, soft corals, and other marine environments (32.98%, 17.16%, 10.99%, 10.72%, 6.17%, 5.90%, 4.83%, 2.68%, 1.88%, and 2.41%, respectively), such as seawater, marine tunicates, and fish gastrointestinal tracts [47,48]. Trichoderma spp. biosynthesize a structurally diverse array of polyketide secondary metabolites, including trichoderones A-B, koninginin A, Cytosporones Y and Z (Figure 2) [46,49]. These compounds exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activities, including antifungal, antimicrobial, phytostimulatory, and plant defense-inducing effects, thereby contributing to biocontrol efficacy and the plant-associated lifestyle of Trichoderma. The majority of these metabolites are assembled by iterative Type I polyketide synthases, which are encoded within dedicated polyketide biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) [50,51,52]. Expression of these BGCs is often silent under standard laboratory conditions but can be activated in response to environmental stimuli, including stress or in situ interactions with phytopathogens, leading to induced metabolite production during co-cultivation or competitive challenge [25].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Trichoderma spp.-based secondary metabolites contribute to biocontrol activity and plant growth promotion.

The velvet complex of Trichoderma spp. is a conserved multi-protein regulatory system, typically forming a heterotrimeric complex, that serves as a global regulatory switch controlling fungal development and metabolism. It integrates environmental and developmental signals to regulate secondary metabolite biosynthesis, coordinate the asexual-to-sexual reproductive transition, and modulate key traits associated with biocontrol efficacy. In Trichoderma spp., velvet complex components play a pivotal role in mycoparasitism, antagonistic interactions with phytopathogens, and regulating hydrolytic enzyme production, including cellulases, which are essential for ecological competitiveness and industrial applications [53,54]. Gliotoxin—produced by T. virens GL 20—was the first biocontrol agent commercially developed and marketed as SoilGard®, providing effective protection against root and crown rot diseases caused by soilborne pathogens, such as Pythium and Rhizoctonia spp. [55]. Volatile and non-volatile metabolites produced by Trichoderma spp. are capable of inhibiting fungal mycelial growth. Antibiotics, such as trichodermin, trichodermamide, suzukacillin, and alamethicin, primarily synthesized by Trichoderma spp., enhance membrane permeability by disrupting pathogen cell membranes, thereby contributing to their antifungal efficacy [56]. T. viride and T. harzianum have been reported to significantly suppress radial mycelial growth of several pathogenic fungi. Several other species, including T. aureoviride, T. harzianum, T. koningii, T. virens, T. hamatum, and T. lignorum, are known to produce various antibiotics, bioactive metabolites, and fungicidal compounds. Producing these metabolites is tightly regulated by BGCs and associated transcription factors, leading to the synthesis of chemically diverse classes, including anthraquinones, simple pyrones, peptaibols, polyketides, sesquiterpenes, and alkaloids. Collectively, Trichoderma-derived metabolites exhibit potent antibacterial, antifungal, and insecticidal activities, highlighting their ecological significance and biotechnological potential (Table 3) [57].

Table 3.

Effectiveness of Trichoderma spp. in managing target plant diseases.

Trichoderma spp. Targeted Disease Causal Agent Crops References
T. harzianum; T. viride Damping-off Pythium spp., R. solani, Fusarium spp. Eggplant, okra, vegetables, chili, and cereals [12,58,59]
T. harzianum; T. asperellum Panama disease (Fusarium wilt) F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense Banana [60]
T. harzianum; T. virens; T. viride Collar rot Sclerotium rolfsii Lentil [61]
T. harzianum Gray mold B. cinerea Tomato [60]
T. hamatum KUFA 0077 Sheath blight R. solani Rice [62]
T. longibrachiatum; T. virens White mold S. sclerotiorum Soybean, sunflower, and bean [62]
T. harzianum; T. lixii; T. afroharzianum; T. lentinulae Seedling blight Fusarium culmorum Wheat [63]
T. atroviride; T. asperellum; T. harzianum Root knot Meloidogyne incognita
M. javanica
Tomato [60]
T. viride; T. virens; T. harzianum Soft rot Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Potato [64]

3.2. Secondary Metabolites of Trichoderma spp. in Biofilm Degradation

Biofilms are structured, surface-attached communities of microorganisms encased in a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix. This slime-like matrix acts as an activated matrix that allows microbes to share nutrients and physically defend themselves against environmental stresses, such as antibiotics, desiccation, and detergents [65]. Polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids are essential biopolymers for microbial adherence and survival [66]. EPS attaches microorganisms to surfaces, maintaining cellular integrity. Trichoderma produces enzymes that disrupt the biofilm of other pathogenic microorganisms. This process, known as anti-biofilm activity, is a notable feature of Trichoderma. The secondary metabolite 6-pentyl-α-pyrone, produced by T. atroviride P1 in combination with mineral hydroxyapatite, is used to evaluate the lytic activity of the Xccφ1 phage, specifically targeting Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris [67]. Under in vitro conditions, 7-day-old cultures of T. asperellum were reported to inhibit biofilm formation by Burkholderia pseudomallei—a soil- and water-dwelling bacterium that causes human disease—during the adhesion phase and early biofilm development. Treatment with T. asperellum resulted in approximately six-fold and three-fold reductions in biofilm formation, respectively, at a concentration of 1 × MIC (~7.81 mg/mL). However, the extent to which these inhibitory effects occur in soil or plant-associated environments remains uncertain because microbial interactions and environmental conditions can substantially influence biofilm formation and inhibition [68]. Furthermore, another study demonstrates that biofilm-based formulations combining Trichoderma and Azotobacter are more effective than single microbial inoculants in stimulating plant defense responses in wheat and cotton seedlings. Application of these biofilms markedly enhances the activities of key defense-related enzymes, including peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, catalase, and PAL, along with increased total phenolic content. These findings suggest that the synergistic interaction among microorganisms within a biofilm matrix efficiently activates ISR, thereby strengthening antioxidant capacity and overall plant defense against environmental stresses [69].

3.3. Mycoparasitism by Trichoderma spp.

Trichoderma spp. parasitize a range of other fungal pathogens through mycoparasitism [12], a process involving a sequence of coordinated events that enable the fungus to attack its target. Initially, the mycoparasite grows toward the target fungus and secretes chitinolytic enzymes, which weaken and degrade the cell wall of the pathogen. Upon contact, Trichoderma spp. adhere to and coil around the host hyphae, followed by enzymatic degradation and penetration. This mycoparasitic activity suppresses pathogen growth, thereby preventing the development of plant diseases [17,70]. Trichoderma spp. are highly effective in reducing pathogen inoculum levels, particularly for soil-borne diseases, where they are commonly applied. Manzar et al. (2022) report that mycoparasitic strains exhibit significantly higher disease suppression than the mechanisms based solely on induced defense responses or antibiosis [38]. Many Trichoderma spp. exhibit mycoparasitic activity against a broad range of phytopathogenic fungi, including Pythium, Phytophthora, Rhizoctonia, and Peronospora spp. [12,71]. During these interactions, pathogen hyphae frequently undergo morphological alterations, including swelling, shortening, deformation, cytoplasmic shrinkage, and cell-wall rupture. These changes result from hyphal attachment, coiling, penetration, and the secretion of cell wall-degrading enzymes and antifungal metabolites, ultimately leading to pathogen death [8,72]. This mycoparasitic activity is mediated by the secretion of cell wall-degrading enzymes, including chitinases, β-1,3 glucanases, cellulases, and proteases, efficiently degrading the structural components of host pathogens [70,71]. Experimental studies clearly demonstrate this behavior in vitro, with T. koningiopsis and T. virens actively attacking and degrading the hyphae of Colletotrichum siamense, the causal agent of anthracnose in pecan [70].

At the molecular level, several Trichoderma spp. exhibit differential gene expressions encoding proteases and oligopeptide transporters before and during contact with R. solani. Expressed sequence tag (EST) analyses have revealed the early induction of subtilisin-like serine proteases at the onset of Trichoderma–pathogen interactions. The prb1 gene, which encodes an extracellular protease, plays a crucial role in enhancing the mycoparasitic activity of Trichoderma spp. against Botrytis cinerea [73,74]. Furthermore, certain G-protein-coupled receptor–encoding genes in Trichoderma spp. mediate pathogen recognition and activation of mycoparasitic signaling cascades, including G-proteins, adenylate cyclase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. These signaling networks regulate the expression of hydrolytic enzymes, secondary metabolites, and other factors that contribute to pathogen cell-wall degradation and lysis. Among these signaling components, the MAP kinase Tmk1 in T. atroviride plays a central role in regulating mycoparasitism by controlling the expression of genes associated with signal transduction, cell wall integrity, siderophore biosynthesis, oxidoreductase activity, protein folding, and detoxification [75].

3.4. Induction of Systemic Resistance in Plants by Trichoderma spp.

Plants activate systemic acquired resistance (SAR) following localized pathogen infection to enhance resistance in distal, uninfected tissues and limit the systemic spread of pathogens. SAR is typically initiated after the hypersensitive response (HR), which involves localized cell death at the site of primary infection. This systemic defense response is characterized by the accumulation of salicylic acid (SA), activation of SA-dependent signaling pathways, induction of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, and accumulation of PR proteins [76]. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) is triggered by pathogenic attacks and root colonization and interactions with beneficial microbes, including systemic mutualists and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria [77].

Trichoderma spp.-induced root colonization triggers ISR through the recognition of fungal microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) by plant pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). These MAMPs include chitin oligomers, β-glucans, and secreted fungal elicitor proteins, while colonization may also stimulate the release of plant-derived damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), further enhancing immune signaling [41]. MAMPs are conserved microbial molecules recognized by pattern-recognition receptors located on the plasma membrane, representing the first step of ISR activation by beneficial microbes, such as Trichoderma spp. DAMPs are endogenous plant-derived molecules released upon cell damage, wounding, or cell wall modification. In contrast to MAMPs, DAMPs are produced by the host plant. Their recognition triggers rapid defense responses, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, Ca2+ influx, MAPK activation, and callose deposition. These early signaling events subsequently activate jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), and salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathways, leading to the induction of defense-related genes, such as PR3, PR4, PDF1.2, PAL, and PAD4, with NPR1 serving as a key regulator of systemic defense signaling [78].

Concurrently, pathogen challenge activates the SA signaling pathway, resulting in nuclear accumulation and activation of NPR1 and the subsequent induction of PR genes, including PR1, PR2, PR5, and PAL, hallmarks of SAR. NPR1 functions as a central regulatory hub integrating SA- and JA/ET-dependent signaling by suppressing JA responses in the cytosol while promoting SA-mediated defense gene expression in the nucleus. Root association with Trichoderma induces systemic and local defense responses that limit further colonization by other harmful microorganisms. While colonization is often restricted to the roots, these systemic signals protect plants from foliar pathogens [12]. Plant recognition of Trichoderma involves detecting MAMPs, which are present in Trichoderma proteins released during cell colonization, including cellulases, xylanase Xyn2, cerato-platanin Sm1, swollenin protein TasSwo, and endopolygalacturonase ThPG1. Interaction with these MAMPs, such as elicitor protein 1 (Epl1) from Trichoderma spp. trigger ISR, mediated via JA/ET signaling pathways (Figure 3) [79].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mechanisms by which Trichoderma spp. enhance plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses through rhizosphere colonization and immune signaling. Trichoderma spp. colonize the rhizosphere and produce diverse bioactive molecules, such as polyketides, terpenoids, pyrones, peptaibols, gliotoxin, gliovirin, and enzymes, such as chitinases, β-glucanases, and exopeptidases. These microbial-derived molecules are recognized by PRRs and IRs as MAMPs and trigger MAPK signaling cascades and induce ISR. Crosstalk among phytohormonal signaling pathways, particularly JA and ET, together with SA, regulates the activation of defense-related transcription factors, including WRKY18, WRKY40, MYB33, MYB15, and WRKY51. These signaling networks enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stresses (heat, cold, heavy metals, drought, high light, salinity, and flooding) and biotic stresses, while strengthening resistance against a broad range of plant pathogens. Abbreviations: ET, ethylene; HLs, high light stresses; HMs, heavy metals; HTS, heat stress; IRs, immune receptors; ISR, induced systemic resistance; JA, jasmonic acid; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MAMPs, microbe-associated molecular patterns; PGPR, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; PRRs, pattern recognition receptors; SA, salicylic acid.

3.5. Biotic and Abiotic Stress Mitigation Mechanisms by Trichoderma spp.

Trichoderma spp.-based bioactive compounds and elicitors are used as inoculants for phytostimulation. They interact with host plants through roots, enhancing tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity [80]. Trichoderma spp. interacts with plant roots through recognition, attachment, penetration, colonization, and nutrient transfer [81]. Trichoderma spp.-based chlamydospores serve as active propagules in commercial formulations, such as SoilGard™, enhancing plant resistance to environmental stress [82]. A recent study reports that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and T. harzianum (accession PV544806) influence maize responses to environmental stress. Maize plants were exposed to salinity (S1D0), drought (S0D1), or combined salinity–drought stress (S1D1), and treated with AMF alone (M1T0), T. harzianum alone (M0T1), or both microbes combined (M1T1). The results show that these microbial treatments activate specific stress-response pathways, highlighting the potential of AMF and Trichoderma spp. to enhance maize tolerance to climate change-related abiotic stresses [83]. Furthermore, Trichoderma combined with chitosan alleviates abiotic stress caused by heavy metals, including cadmium (Cd), improving pea seed germination under Cd toxicity. This combination also enhances physiological and biochemical parameters, including antioxidant enzyme activity and photosynthetic performance, supporting its suitability for cultivating plants in areas prone to Cd contamination [84]. Another study shows that Trichoderma inoculation reduces toxicity from Cd and Pb while promoting growth and physiological performance of Vigna radiata [85]. Application of certain T. harzianum strains to tomato seeds has been reported to accelerate germination and enhance tolerance to abiotic stresses, including drought, osmotic stress, salinity, chilling, and heat stress [62]. These strains have been reported to modulate the synthesis and signaling of key phytohormones, such as abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), thereby enhancing plant physiological response to abiotic stresses [86].

3.6. Competition for Nutrients and Ecological Niches

Biological control in soil ecosystems is largely mediated by interactions between antagonistic and pathogenic fungi, involving mechanisms such as competition for nutrients and ecological niches, antibiosis, and mycoparasitism, particularly under nutrient-limited conditions. Trichoderma spp. can utilize a wide range of nitrogen-containing compounds, such as histamine, peptides, putrescine, and cytidine, enabling them to thrive under nutrient-limited conditions. In contrast, several phytopathogenic fungi, such as Verticillium spp., depend primarily on simple nitrogen sources, including urea, nitrite, and amino acid derivatives. This metabolic flexibility allows Trichoderma spp. to efficiently exploit available nutrients, thereby reducing resource availability for competing pathogens. In addition, Trichoderma spp. rapidly colonizes the rhizosphere and root surface, occupying ecological niches that prevent pathogens from establishing through competitive exclusion and improve their persistence and biocontrol efficacy in the soil ecosystem [87]. Certain Trichoderma spp. can produce siderophores, which are low molecular weight iron chelating compounds that sequester ferric iron (Fe3+) under iron-limited conditions. By reducing the availability of iron, an essential micronutrient for microbial growth and metabolism, siderophores restrict the proliferation of competing phytopathogens [88]. For example, T. virens XZ11-1 is capable of producing siderophores that inhibit the infection of banana fusarium wilt caused by F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense [89]. Another study reported that the synergistic interactions between T. harzianum NJAU4742 and soil microbiome enhance plant iron nutrition in calcareous soils [90].

3.7. Nutrient Solubilization and Growth Promotion by Trichoderma spp.

Trichoderma isolates secrete plant growth regulators and solubilize phosphates and micronutrients, including Fe, Mn, and Mg. They also secrete siderophores, exogenous enzymes, and vitamins supporting plant shoot growth. Certain Trichoderma strains exhibit “rhizosphere competence”, enabling them to colonize and proliferate in association with plant roots. However, their efficiency and persistence of rhizosphere colonization vary among species and strains and are influenced by soil characteristics and the host plant [12]. Trichoderma promotes root system development and plant nutrient acquisition through multiple mechanisms. The production of organic acids, specifically gluconic, citric, and fumaric acids, contributes to nutrient solubilization by lowering rhizosphere pH and enhancing the availability of insoluble mineral nutrients [91]. In addition, Trichoderma spp. facilitate nutrient mobilization through enzyme-mediated processes, microbial interactions, and competition with other microbes, thereby increasing nutrient cycling and availability. The improved uptake of macro- and micronutrients, together with enhanced root development and microbial-mediated defense responses, contribute to greater plant growth and stress tolerance [41]. Soil application of T. harzianum T447 has been reported to enhance the accumulation of essential nutrients, including Ca2+, Mg2+, P, Na+, and K+ in plant roots and shoots [92]. In addition to improving nutrient acquisition, Trichoderma spp. produce a range of bioactive metabolites, such as valerianol, 4-heptanone, and 3-octanone, which contribute to plant growth promotion [17]. Another study reported that several Trichoderma strains, including T. atroviride IMI206040, T. virens Gv29.8, and T. asperellum LU1370, have been shown to promote plant growth through the production of VOCs; however, LU1370 had a negative effect on plant growth promotion. This finding indicates that Trichoderma-mediated plant growth promotion is highly complex and variable, with its effects influenced by the fungal strain, experimental conditions, and environmental factors [93].

3.8. Phytohormonal Crosstalk in Trichoderma spp. Mediated Plant Defense

Trichoderma spp. modulate host plant phytohormonal networks, enhancing stress tolerance [94]. Plant–Trichoderma interactions induce production of phytoalexins, antimicrobial compounds that inhibit fungal growth [95]. Phytohormones are crucial for regulating complex and interconnected plant immune signaling pathways, facilitating rapid defense responses and adaptability to diverse environmental conditions. Yedidia et al. (1999) [15] reported that root colonization by T. asperellum induces systemic resistance in cucumber against Angular leaf spot caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans. The enhanced resistance was associated with increased expression of defense-related genes, including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), a key enzyme in the phenylpropanoid pathway, and hydroxyperoxide lyase (HPL), an enzyme involved in the lipoxygenase pathway. Activation of these defense pathways promoted the biosynthesis and accumulation of phytoalexins, thereby enhancing the plant’s systemic defense against pathogen infection [96]. Phytoalexins are low-molecular-weight, inducible antimicrobial secondary metabolites that are rapidly synthesized at sites of infection in response to pathogen attack [97]. Another study demonstrated that two beneficial fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma, modulate tomato plant metabolism by altering phytohormone levels. Specifically, treatment with these fungi increased the accumulation of auxins, cytokinins, and jasmonates, with the greatest increases observed in plants inoculated with Trichoderma spp. [98].

4. Formulation of Trichoderma spp.-Based Biocontrol Agents

Trichoderma spp. are cultivated on organic substrates and applied for crop disease management and formulated as pellets, dusts, powders, or emulsifiable liquids. Culture can be grown in liquid media, mixed with talc powder at a 1:2 ratio, and dried to 8% moisture under shade. These formulations have a shelf life of 3–4 months [99]. Trichoderma formulations, including powders, granules, emulsions, and suspensions, are widely used in various applications, such as dipping, spraying, root drenching, seed treatments, irrigation, and hydroponic systems [100]. Solid formations, such as pellets and dry flowables, are directly applied to the soil during sowing or transplanting [20]. However, successful large-scale application depends not only on biocontrol efficacy but also on efficient mass production and formulation stability (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Schematic representation of seed biopriming with Trichoderma spp. Surface-sterilized seeds are soaked in a mycelial suspension to produce bio-primed seeds. The subsequent colonization of the seed surface by Trichoderma spp. enhances seed germination, promotes seedling establishment, and supports healthy plant growth.

4.1. Solid-State Fermentation of Trichoderma spp.

Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is widely used for the large-scale production of Trichoderma spp. as it supports high spore yields using inexpensive solid. Frequently used substrates include sterilized compost, farmyard manure, rice bran, or cocopeat. The substrate should maintain optimal moisture to facilitate fungal growth while avoiding excess moisture that may create anaerobic conditions [101,102]. These formulations are applied directly to the soil to suppress soil-borne inoculum. The development of a stable formulation involves selecting an effective Trichoderma strain and an appropriate carrier substrate, followed by inoculation and incubation under controlled moisture, aeration, and temperature conditions until complete fungal colonization is achieved. The colonized substrate is subsequently dried to improve the storage stability and packaged in breathable containers to preserve spore viability before application to the soil for the management of soil-borne pathogens.

A semi-solid formulation of T. harzianum was prepared by combining 200 g of solid culture with 45 g citric acid, 45 g ascorbic acid, 100 g sodium benzoate, 100 g potassium sorbate, and 200 g xanthan gum. Citric and ascorbic acids reduced the formulation pH to 4.5–4.8, thereby limiting excessive CO2 production during fermentation, while xanthan gum stabilizes the culture and nutrient matrix [103]. A rice flour-based granular formulation of T. asperellioides CMAA1584 provides a cost-effective and scalable approach for biocontrol production. Rice flour, an inexpensive milling byproduct, supports high conidial yields (2.6 × 109 colony-forming units (CFU)/g−1 in 14 days) when supplemented with 0.1% nitrogen, with hydrolyzed yeast proving most effective. The extruded granules function as micro-bioreactors, enabling in situ conidiation and enhancing secondary sporulation after rehydration. Formulations such as GControl and GBentonite exhibit marked ambient stability (>3 months), while GBentonite and GOrganic compost + Break-Thru remain viable for approximately 24 months under refrigeration. All formulations effectively suppress S. sclerotiorum (79–94% inhibition), even after prolonged storage, demonstrating improved shelf life and consistent biocontrol efficacy [104].

Agricultural digestate generated from anaerobic biogas production and enriched with food waste has been successfully utilized as a substrate for SSF of T. reesei RUT-C30 and T. atroviride Ta13, enabling the sustainable production of value-added bioproducts intended for biostimulant applications. Maximum fungal growth was achieved after 6 days for T. reesei and 3 days for T. atroviride. Both species produced cellulase, esterase and citric and malic acid, whereas T. atroviride additionally synthesized gibberellins and oxylipins, as confirmed by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS). Furthermore, crude extracts obtained from T. atroviride SSF significantly enhanced tomato seed germination and root elongation, demonstrating their potential as plant biostimulants [105]. Another study reported that wheat bran-based formulations of Trichoderma spp. was developed and evaluated for the biological control of onion white rot caused by Sclerotium cepivorum. Among the five tested species (T. album, T. harzianum, T. koningii, T. viride, T. virens), T. harzianum and T. koningii exhibited the strongest antagonistic activity and provided the greatest reduction in disease severity under both greenhouse and field conditions. The improved disease resistance was positively associated with the increased activities of defense-related enzymes, such as peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and chitinase [106].

4.2. Liquid-Based Formulations of Trichoderma spp. for Agricultural Use

Liquid formulations are widely used in agricultural biocontrol applications by suspending or emulsifying Trichoderma spores or mycelia in water- or oil-based media [96]. Among various liquid media evaluated, potato dextrose broth (PDB) supports optimal growth of Trichoderma spp. Under greenhouse conditions, T. harzianum isolate T39 effectively controls cucumber foliar pathogens, including B. cinerea, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, S. sclerotiorum, and S. fusca [107]. In another study, laboratory media and locally available food grains were assessed as cost-effective substrates for the large-scale production of the local T. viride strain KBN-24. The results show that PDB and potato dextrose agar (PDA) produced the highest biomass yields of the T. viride strain KBN-24 [108]. Among the grain substrates, rice, wheat, and maize supported fungal growth, with rice producing the highest biomass. Mass multiplication of T. viride KBN-24 was evaluated using Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and PDA. Biomass production was significantly higher on PDA (0.54 g plate −1) than on SDA (0.37 g plate −1). Among the laboratory media tested, PDA and PDB supported the highest biomass production of the T. viride KBN-24 strain. Similarly, among the grain substrates, rice was the most suitable for fungal growth, producing the highest biomass (148.04 g), followed by wheat (126.87 g), whereas maize resulted in the lowest biomass yield [109]. Furthermore, molasses yeast extract broth has been identified as the most effective medium for fermenter-based mass production of T. viride, with the maximum biomass achieved after 72 h of fermentation. Although liquid formulations are widely adopted owing to their ease of preparation and application, their long-term storage stability remains a major challenge. The shelf life of liquid formulations is influenced by several factors, including storage temperature, formulation additives (e.g., osmoprotectants and stabilizers), and packaging systems, which affect spore viability during storage. Under conventional storage conditions, liquid formulations generally exhibit a greater decline in viable propagules than solid carrier-based formulations. For example, after 180 days of storage, liquid formulations retained approximately 104 CFU mL−1, whereas solid carrier systems maintained approximately 106 CFU g−1, reflecting the superior protective environment provided by solid carriers [30].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Preparation of enhanced Trichoderma spp.-based liquid formulations using yeast–molasses broth and potato dextrose broth.

4.3. Oil-Based Formulations

Oil-based formulations are based on mineral- or vegetable oils, represent an important class of biocontrol products in which microbial agents or bioactive compounds are suspended or dispersed in an oil phase. These formulations are commonly prepared as oil dispersions or emulsifiable concentrates [30,110]. Both vegetable- and mineral oil-based formulations have demonstrated excellent potential for delivering entomopathogenic fungi in biocontrol applications. Compared with aqueous suspensions, oil-based formulations generally provide greater thermal stability, enhance the survival of fungal propagules during storage, and improve resistance to environmental stresses, thereby contributing to better persistence and efficacy under field conditions [30]. Various carrier formulations, including canola oil, neem oil, paraffin oil, soybean oil, and glycerine, were used to deliver T. harzianum isolate spores [111]. For example, paraffin oil-based formulation of T. viride maintained high viability during storage, with the conidial population decreasing only from 2.8 × 109 to 1.8 × 109 CFU mL−1 after six months at 27 °C. The formulation also exhibited strong antagonistic activity, inhibiting the growth of F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Sclerotium rolfsii by approximately 79–80% and Rhizoctonia bataticola by approximately 85%, demonstrating that oil-based formulations can effectively preserve microbial viability while maintaining biocontrol efficacy under storage conditions [112]. Oil-based emulsions formulated with commercial vegetable oils (Vatel® and Surfatron®), alongside the mineral oil Aceite Blanco®, containing T. asperellum TV190 conidia, markedly improve antagonistic efficacy against R. solani under greenhouse conditions compared to aqueous spore suspensions. Additionally, conidial survival following UV exposure is significantly greater in oil-based formulations (56–63% for vegetable oil emulsions) than in water-based controls (8–12%), thereby demonstrating the protective role of oil carriers against UV-induced damage [30,113]. The emulsions were prepared using a mixture of 20 mL Vatel® vegetable oil, 10 mL Surfatron®, and 970 mL distilled water. For mineral oil formulations, Aceite Blanco® was emulsified in water at a concentration of 20 mL L−1. A 1% (w/v) lignosulfonate solution was incorporated as a UV-protective additive. The spore concentration of T. asperellum TV190 was standardized to 1 × 106 conidia mL−1 [113]. However, oil-based formulations also have limitations, including potential compatibility issues with certain microbial biocontrol agents, higher production costs, and the need for careful optimization of oil type and emulsifier composition to maintain microbial viability and long-term storage stability [114].

4.4. Vermiculite, Biochar, and Alginate-Based Formulations

Vermiculite is a phyllosilicate mineral belonging to the mica group, which includes minerals such as micas, chlorite, serpentine, talc, and clay [30]. Terralite®, a commercial horticultural-grade expanded vermiculite, is widely used as a solid carrier in fungal biocontrol formulations because of its high porosity, moisture-retention capacity, chemical inertness, and lightweight properties. In a seminal study, Lewis et al. (1991) used Terralite® grade 4 vermiculite as the base carrier and combined it with wheat bran and conidia of several Trichoderma isolates to develop a stable solid formulation [115]. Early studies further demonstrate that vermiculite effectively protects Trichoderma conidia from desiccation and temperature stress, leading to improved shelf life and enhanced rhizosphere establishment compared to unformulated propagules. In these formulations, a concentrated Trichoderma spore suspension is mixed with vermiculite until the desired CFU concentration is achieved [116].

Biochar is a lightweight and extremely porous material produced from biomass pyrolysis. The final composition of ash and carbon varies depending on the type of biomass used and the production technique [117]. Biochar is often produced from feedstocks, such as corn residues, rice husks, fruit peels, agricultural waste wood, sludge, and microalgae [118].

Alginate is a non-toxic and biodegradable hydrocolloid capable of forming thermally stable hydrogel beads in the presence of divalent cations, including calcium. These materials are widely used to encapsulate medicines, oils, hormones, microbial cells, enzymes, herbal extracts, and other bioactive substances [119]. In submerged fermentation systems, T. harzianum propagules were successfully encapsulated in calcium alginate beads of varying sizes. Encapsulation of Trichoderma propagules in calcium alginate beads provides a highly protective microenvironment that enhances long-term viability and enables controlled release [30]. The beads retained a minimum viability value of 70% after 2 years of storage. The capsules with 1.5 ± 0.3 mm diameter exhibited the highest counts of free conidia, indicating the positive effect of Ca2+ ions on sporulation rates [120]. The presence of Ca2+ ions stabilizes the hydrogel matrix and positively influences sporulation rates and enzymatic activities associated with biocontrol mechanisms. Furthermore, alginate encapsulation enhances resistance to desiccation stress and UV radiation, making it a promising technology for developing next-generation sustainable bioformulations [30]. A Trichoderma suspension with a concentration of 20 × 1010 mL−1 was combined with a 0.6% sodium alginate solution at a ratio of 1:4. The mixture was then dripped into a beaker containing 1.5% CaCl2 and maintained at room temperature for 30 min to allow bead formation. The resulting CaCl2 beads, approximately 3 mm in diameter, were filtered and dried under sterile conditions. The alginate-coated Trichoderma beads were subsequently stored in plastic bottles containing sterile distilled water [121].

5. Shelf Life of Formulation Based on Trichoderma spp.

Under modified atmospheric conditions, different combinations of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen may act as barriers against light, moisture, and oxidative damage. Additionally, vacuum packaging may extend the storage stability of Trichoderma [122]. The incorporation of stabilizing agents, such as glycerol in liquid formulations and optimization of carrier moisture content in dry formulations, is also a critical determinant of long-term propagule viability [30]. The choice of formulation for Trichoderma may significantly influence its shelf life. Additionally, appropriate storage conditions and packaging methods must be considered to optimize the preservation duration of Trichoderma formulations. The incorporation of glycerol (3–9%) into liquid formulations significantly extends the shelf life of Trichoderma spp. from 7 months to 10 months by reducing desiccation stress in the inoculant and maintaining viability levels above 2 × 106 CFU g−1. In contrast, formulations prepared without glycerol exhibit a shorter shelf life of only 4–5 months. Furthermore, bioefficacy assays demonstrate that even after 12 months of storage, formulations produced with glycerol supplementation at 3% or 6% in the production medium effectively protect tomato plants against Fusarium wilt, thereby reducing disease incidence by 44–50% [123]. T. viride was produced in molasses-soy flour broth using liquid fermentation technology, with maximum biomass obtained after 72 h under optimal conditions. Antifoaming agents initially comprised polyethylene glycol; however, silicone was later adopted to reduce production costs. After harvesting, T. viride was formulated into de-oiled castor cake, gypsum, talc powder, vermicompost, and farmyard manure. These formulations maintain shelf life for 220 days, 190 days, and 180 days, respectively, supporting T. viride growth during storage. In contrast, talc powder- and gypsum-based formulations experience a decline in CFU/g−1 after 80 days of storage [124]. Vermiculite-based Trichoderma formulations retain viable propagule counts ranging from 106 CFU g−1 to 108 CFU g−1 for 6–12 months under ambient storage conditions, depending on moisture content, carrier composition, and storage temperature. Compared to liquid formulations, vermiculite-based dry formulations exhibit superior shelf-life, ease of handling, and suitability for soil and nursery applications. However, optimizing moisture levels and mitigating dust formation remain critical factors influencing the long-term viability and commercial scalability of these formulations. For example, a bentonite–vermiculite-based formulation of T. harzianum significantly enhances survival and biocontrol efficacy compared to a non-formulated conidial suspension when applied to melon plants under nursery conditions. The effectiveness of T. harzianum directly depends on the formulation type, as the carrier strongly influences its persistence in peat substrates. The formulated product maintained its initial inoculum viability (CFU count) for approximately 7–8 weeks, whereas non-formulated conidia exhibited a nearly 100-fold reduction in viable propagules. Consequently, plants treated with the bentonite–vermiculite formulation exhibit greater shoot biomass and enhanced resistance to Fusarium wilt in a seedling nursery of melon plants [125].

6. Challenges, Biosafety Concerns, and Limitations in the Application of Trichoderma spp.-Based Biocontrol Agents

A major challenge in producing Trichoderma spores in liquid media is maintaining high spore concentration and viability over time while preventing contamination and aggregation. Factors influencing spore production and quality include the composition of the liquid medium, pH, temperature, aeration, agitation, inoculum size, incubation time, and harvesting and storage methods. Different Trichoderma strains may require distinct optimal conditions for spore production, which should be adjusted based on the scale and intended purpose of production. Before the field application of Trichoderma-based products, these factors must be carefully considered to ensure maximal effectiveness [126].

Despite the extensive use of Trichoderma spp. as beneficial biocontrol agents and plant growth promoters, certain strains exhibit pathogenic potential and represent important exceptions that must be considered during their application. Trichoderma spp. are rarely associated with plant diseases. However, T. hamatum has been reported to cause postharvest bulb rot in Lilium davidii var. willmottiae in China [127]. Similarly, T. lixii was recently reported to cause leaf spot disease in Ceropegia vincifolia Hook in India [128]. T. longibrachiatum has been reported to cause leaf black circular spot disease on Dendrobium nobile. This plant is a medicinal orchid whose major bioactive alkaloid, dendrobine, has been investigated for its potential therapeutic effect in the treatment of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [129]. In addition, T. afroharzianum has been reported as the causal agent of ear rot disease in maize (Zea mays L.) in Europe with significant yield loss [130].

In mushroom cultivation systems, some Trichoderma strains can cause green mold disease, leading to significant reductions in the yield of cultivated mushrooms, including champignon (button), oyster, and shiitake mushrooms [131]. These infections are primarily associated with T. aggressivum subspecies, which are highly adapted to mushroom production environments. Similarly, green mold disease in cultivated oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus) has been linked mainly to T. pleuroticola and T. pleuroti [132]. These cases highlight the importance of strain-level identification and safety assessment, as beneficial and pathogenic traits within the genus Trichoderma are highly strain dependent. Trichoderma-associated green mold outbreaks cause substantial crop losses in various countries, including the UK, Netherlands, North America, France, Spain, Hungary, Poland, Croatia, Mexico, and Australia. For the first time, significant Trichoderma infections on maize ears were observed in a field in southern Germany. Samples of the infected maize cobs were collected, and the fungus was isolated in pure culture and initially identified through microscopic examination as T. afroharzianum [130].

Beyond plant-associated infections, certain Trichoderma spp. are implicated in human health complications, particularly respiratory tract infections. Trichoderma infections are often diagnosed at advanced stages and may be difficult to treat, making them potential opportunistic pathogens in immunocompromised hosts. T. longibrachiatum, capable of growth at 37 °C, is associated with clinical infections in humans [133].

Moreover, the effectiveness of Trichoderma spp.-based products is strongly influenced by environmental conditions, including climate, soil physiological properties, and the composition of native microbial communities. Temperature, soil moisture, pH, salinity, and nutrient availability can affect spore survival, rhizosphere colonization, metabolite production, and biocontrol efficacy. These limitations highlight the importance of selecting locally adapted strains, optimizing formulations, and conducting region-and crop-specific field evaluations before large-scale agricultural application [134].

7. Next-Generation Biofertilizers and Biocontrol Agents

Recent advances in omics technologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of plant growth-promoting microorganisms and accelerated the development of more effective microbial inoculants. Genomics, through whole-genome sequencing (WGS), genome annotation, and genome-editing tools, such as CRISPR-Cas9, enables the identification of genes associated with nitrogen fixation, nutrient acquisition, antimicrobial metabolite biosynthesis, abiotic stress tolerance, and plant growth promotion [135]. These insights facilitate the development of genetically improved microbial strains with enhanced biocontrol and plant growth-promoting capabilities. To date, genome sequencing efforts have been conducted for more than 200 Trichoderma spp. and strains, revealing extensive genomic diversity within the genus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/?taxon=5543 (accessed on 20 July 2026).

Comparative genomic analyses have shown that this diversity is reflected in species-specific repertoires of genes involved in secondary metabolism, mycoparasitism, nutrient acquisition, and rhizosphere colonization. For example, T. atroviride contains numerous secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters, which contribute to the production of diverse bioactive compounds. In contrast, T. virens possesses an expanded repertoire of gliotoxin biosynthetic gene clusters, enabling the production of gliotoxin, an antifungal secondary metabolite. Moreover, T. virens genome encodes genes for the biosynthesis of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), which facilitate the degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides, improve nutrient acquisition, and enhance rhizosphere colonization [136,137].

Metagenomics complements genomic studies by employing 16S rRNA gene sequencing, shotgun metagenomics, and bioinformatics platforms to characterize microbial community composition and functional potential within the rhizosphere, thereby enabling the discovery of novel beneficial microorganisms and improving our understanding of complex microbial interactions.

Transcriptomics, using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), and microarray analysis, provides comprehensive information on gene expression profiles during plant–microbe and microbe–pathogen interactions, allowing the identification of regulatory pathways involved in stress adaptation, root colonization, induced systemic resistance, and antagonistic activity [138].

Proteomics further expands this understanding by profiling proteins expressed by both microorganisms and host plants through techniques such as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-GE), liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Specific functional proteins, such as ACC deaminase, antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidases, have been identified as important molecular markers associated with plant growth promotion and enhanced tolerance to abiotic stresses [139].

Metabolomics complements genomic and proteomic analyses by characterizing the diverse metabolites produced by beneficial microorganisms and plants using analytical platforms, such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. This approach facilitates the identification of antimicrobial compounds, phytohormones, volatile organic compounds, and other bioactive metabolites that promote plant growth and suppress pathogens [140].

Collectively, the integration of multi-omics approaches provides a comprehensive framework for elucidating the molecular basis of plant–microbe interactions and supports the rational development of next-generation microbial biofertilizers and biocontrol agents.

8. Field Applications of Trichoderma spp.

The application of Trichoderma spp. under field conditions has gained considerable attention as an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical pesticides and fertilizers. Although greenhouse and laboratory studies consistently demonstrate the biocontrol and plant growth-promoting potential of Trichoderma, field performance often varies because of fluctuations in environmental conditions, soil physicochemical properties, native microbial communities, crop genotype, and agricultural management practices. Consequently, recent research has focused on improving the consistency and reliability of Trichoderma-based bioinoculants under commercial farming conditions (Figure 6) [134,141].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Foliar application of Trichoderma strains HSTUT-6 and HSTUT-8 formulated in potato–dextrose and yeast–molasses liquid media, followed by spraying the formulations onto plant foliage.

Among the field studies reported to date, one notable example demonstrated that the application of T. citrinoviride Snef1910 provided more than 50% control efficacy against root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) and significantly increased the biomass of tomato plants [142]. Another study reported that combining two T. asperellum strains CB-Pin-01 and NST-009 with CaCO3, a plant immune stimulant, reduced the incidence of tomato damping-off disease caused by Pythium aphanidermatum by 17.78% under greenhouse conditions [143]. The combined application of wettable powder formulations of Trichoderma strains with carbendazim (a broad-spectrum fungicide) provided significantly greater control of corynespora leaf spot disease (caused by Corynespora cassiicola) under field conditions, reducing disease incidence by 55–66%. In contrast, application of Trichoderma wettable powder alone showed limited disease control, while carbendazim alone reduced disease severity by only 40–45% [144]. T. asperellum 152–42 controls Fusarium root rot through integrated mechanisms involving direct antagonism, JA/ET-mediated immune priming, metabolic reprogramming, and rhizosphere microecological regulation, making it a promising biocontrol agent for sustainable alfalfa production [145].

9. Conclusions

Trichoderma spp. have emerged as multifunctional microorganisms that contribute to sustainable crop production through a combination of direct pathogen suppression, modulation of plant immune responses, and promotion of plant growth. Collectively, the evidence reviewed demonstrates that their biocontrol efficacy is governed by antibiosis, mycoparasitism, competition for nutrients and niches, ISR, and enhancement of plant resilience to abiotic and biotic stresses. Recent advances in genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics have substantially improved our understanding of the molecular basis of these interactions, revealing species and strain-specific differences in secondary metabolite biosynthesis, carbohydrate-active enzymes, signaling pathways, and rhizosphere competence that determine biocontrol preference.

Despite these advances, several challenges continue to limit the widespread and consistent application of Trichoderma-based bioinoculants. Variability in field performance resulting from environmental conditions, soil physicochemical properties, native microbial communities, and crop genotype remains a major constraint. In addition, differences among strains in colonizing ability, metabolite production, and, in rare cases, pathogenic potential underscore the importance of rigorous strain selection, biosafety assessment, and quality control during product development and commercialization.

Future research should focus on integrating multi-omics approaches with functional validation to identify superior strains and elucidate the regulatory networks underlying biocontrol and plant growth promotion. Further improvements in formulation technologies, delivery systems, and microbial consortia, together with long-term, region-specific field evaluations, will be essential to enhance the consistency, efficacy, and adoption of Trichoderma-based products. Such advances will facilitate the development of reliable biological alternatives to chemical pesticides and support the transition toward more resilient and sustainable agriculture systems.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Institute of Research and Training, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh; the Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information and Statistics (BANBESI), Government of Bangladesh; and Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (Project number: PSAU/2026/R/1447) for funding the research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and writing—original draft preparation, S.M.B.A.O., M.F.R., M.S.R., M.S.I., M.M.H. and K.-H.B.; writing—review and editing, R.M.Z., S.A., M.M.H. and K.-H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was support by the Institute of Research and Training (2024–2026), Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh; the Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information and Statistics (BANBEIS; LS20221858), Government of Bangladesh; Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (Project No. PSAU/2026/R/1447); Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (KFU263984); and the Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science and Technology Development (RS-2025-02223124), Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Hossain M.E., Shahrukh S., Hossain S.A. Chemical Fertilizers and Pesticides: Impacts on Soil Degradation, Groundwater, and Human Health in Bangladesh BT. In: Singh V.P., Yadav S., Yadav K.K., Yadava R.N., editors. Environmental Degradation: Challenges and Strategies for Mitigation. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2022. pp. 63–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh S., Singh A.K., Pradhan B., Tripathi S., Kumar K.S., Chand S., Rout P.R., Shahid M.K. Harnessing Trichoderma mycoparasitism as a Tool in the Management of Soil Dwelling Plant Pathogens. Microb. Ecol. 2024;87:158. doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02472-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh B.K., Delgado-Baquerizo M., Egidi E., Guirado E., Leach J.E., Liu H., Trivedi P. Climate Change Impacts on Plant Pathogens, Food Security and Paths Forward. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023;21:640–656. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00900-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Devi P.I., Manjula M., Bhavani R. Agrochemicals, Environment, and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2022;47:399–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-120920-111015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Cal A., Larena I., Guijarro B., Melgarejo P. Use of Biofungicides for Controlling Plant Diseases to Improve Food Availability. Agriculture. 2012;2:109–124. doi: 10.3390/agriculture2020109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fones H.N., Bebber D.P., Chaloner T.M., Kay W.T., Steinberg G., Gurr S.J. Threats to Global Food Security from Emerging Fungal and Oomycete Crop Pathogens. Nat. Food. 2020;1:332–342. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0075-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alizadeh M., Qaderi S., Roshanroo M., Karimzadeh S., Fazli M., Saeedi M., Akhtari A., Heidarzadeh A. Contouring Multifaceted Biological Activities and Applications of Trichoderma spp. for Managing Plant Health. J. Crop Health. 2024;76:561–597. doi: 10.1007/s10343-024-00976-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yao X., Guo H., Zhang K., Zhao M., Ruan J., Chen J. Trichoderma and Its Role in Biological Control of Plant Fungal and Nematode Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1160551. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1160551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Natsiopoulos D., Topalidou E., Mantzoukas S., Eliopoulos P.A. Endophytic Trichoderma: Potential and Prospects for Plant Health Management. Pathogens. 2024;13:548. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13070548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Srivastava S., Debnath B., Manda R.R., Maurya S., Rana M., Tiwari A.K. Trichoderma in Sustainable Agriculture: Advances, Applications, and Future Prospects for Biocontrol and Plant Growth Promotion. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2026;188:332–351. doi: 10.1111/aab.70052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ming Q., Su C., Zheng C., Jia M., Zhang Q., Zhang H., Rahman K., Han T., Qin L. Elicitors from the Endophytic Fungus Trichoderma atroviride Promote Salvia miltiorrhiza Hairy Root Growth and Tanshinone Biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;64:5687–5694. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harman G.E., Howell C.R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Lorito M. Trichoderma Species—Opportunistic, Avirulent Plant Symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2:43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dutta P., Deb L., Pandey A.K. Trichoderma- from Lab Bench to Field Application: Looking Back over 50 Years. Front. Agron. 2022;4:932839. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2022.932839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Daguerre Y., Siegel K., Edel-Hermann V., Steinberg C. Fungal Proteins and Genes Associated with Biocontrol Mechanisms of Soil-Borne Pathogens: A Review. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2014;28:97–125. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2014.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yedidia I., Benhamou N., Chet I. Induction of Defense Responses in Cucumber Plants (Cucumis sativus L.) by the Biocontrol Agent Trichoderma harzianum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999;65:1061–1070. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.3.1061-1070.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Degenkolb T., Fog Nielsen K., Dieckmann R., Branco-Rocha F., Chaverri P., Samuels G.J., Thrane U., von Döhren H., Vilcinskas A., Brückner H. Peptaibol, Secondary-Metabolite, and Hydrophobin Pattern of Commercial Biocontrol Agents Formulated with Species of the Trichoderma harzianum Complex. Chem. Biodivers. 2015;12:662–684. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201400300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guzmán-Guzmán P., Etesami H., Santoyo G. Trichoderma: A Multifunctional Agent in Plant Health and Microbiome Interactions. BMC Microbiol. 2025;25:434. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04158-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hermosa R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Monte E. Plant-Beneficial Effects of Trichoderma and of Its Genes. Microbiology. 2012;158:17–25. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.052274-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guzmán-Guzmán P., Kumar A., de los Santos-Villalobos S., Parra-Cota F.I., Orozco-Mosqueda M.D., Fadiji A.E., Hyder S., Babalola O.O., Santoyo G. Trichoderma Species: Our Best Fungal Allies in the Biocontrol of Plant Diseases—A Review. Plants. 2023;12:432. doi: 10.3390/plants12030432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Woo S.L., Ruocco M., Vinale F., Nigro M., Marra R., Lombardi N., Pascale A., Lanzuise S., Manganiello G., Lorito M. Trichoderma-Based Products and Their Widespread Use in Agriculture. Open Mycol. J. 2014;8:71–126. doi: 10.2174/1874437001408010071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Petrović E., Godena S. Mogućnosti Primjene Trichoderma Vrsta u Suzbijanju Gljivičnih Bolesti Masline (Olea europaea L.) Glas. Zašt. Bilja. 2023;46:32–38. doi: 10.31727/gzb.46.3.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barman S., Gorai P.S., Mandal N.C. Recent Advancement in Microbial Biotechnology. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. Trichoderma spp.—Application and Future Prospects in Agricultural Industry; pp. 49–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Barman T.K., Metzger D.W. Disease Tolerance during Viral-Bacterial Co-Infections. Viruses. 2021;13:2362. doi: 10.3390/v13122362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Debode J., Viaene J., Maenhout K., Joos L., França S.C., Cuypers A., Vandecasteele B. Wood-Based Biochars Produced at Low Pyrolysis Temperatures Are Good Carriers for a Trichoderma-Based Biopesticide. Biochar. 2024;6:91. doi: 10.1007/s42773-024-00368-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jin S., Alberti F. Advances in the Discovery and Study of Trichoderma Natural Products for Biological Control Applications. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2025;42:1367–1386. doi: 10.1039/D5NP00017C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xiao Z., Zhao Q., Li W., Gao L., Liu G. Strain Improvement of Trichoderma harzianum for Enhanced Biocontrol Capacity: Strategies and Prospects. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1146210. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1146210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oskiera M., Szczech M., Bartoszewski G. Molecular Identification of Trichoderma Strains Collected to Develop Plant Growth-Promoting and Biocontrol Agents. J. Hortic. Res. 2015;23:75–86. doi: 10.2478/johr-2015-0010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Romeo-Oliván A., Chervin J., Breton C., Lagravère T., Daydé J., Dumas B., Jacques A. Comparative Transcriptomics Suggests Early Modifications by Vintec® in Grapevine Trunk of Hormonal Signaling and Secondary Metabolism Biosynthesis in Response to Phaeomoniella Chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium Minimum. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:898356. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.898356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rahman M.M., Islam M.M., Noman M.S. Effect of Bioderma on Diseases and Yield of Jute Varieties in Bangladesh. J. Contemp. Agric. Biosci. 2022;11:9–12. doi: 10.1186/s40066-022-00365-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Martinez Y., Ribera J., Schwarze F.W.M.R., De France K. Biotechnological Development of Trichoderma-Based Formulations for Biological Control. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023;107:5595–5612. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12687-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Awal M.A., Abdullah N.S., Prismantoro D., Dwisandi R.F., Safitri R., Mohd-Yusuf Y., Mohd Suhaimi N.S., Doni F. Mechanisms of Action and Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma against Fusarium in Horticultural Crops. Cogent Food Agric. 2024;10:2394685. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2024.2394685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Reghmit A., Benzina-tihar F., López Escudero F.J., Halouane-Sahir F., Oukali Z., Bensmail S., Ghozali N. Trichoderma Spp. Isolates from the Rhizosphere of Healthy Olive Trees in Northern Algeria and Their Biocontrol Potentials against the Olive Wilt Pathogen, Verticillium Dahliae. Org. Agric. 2021;11:639–657. doi: 10.1007/s13165-021-00371-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rees H.J., Drakulic J., Cromey M.G., Bailey A.M., Foster G.D. Endophytic Trichoderma spp. Can Protect Strawberry and Privet Plants from Infection by the Fungus Armillaria Mellea. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0271622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Risoli S., Cotrozzi L., Sarrocco S., Nuzzaci M., Pellegrini E., Vitti A. Trichoderma-Induced Resistance to Botrytis Cinerea in Solanum Species: A Meta-Analysis. Plants. 2022;11:180. doi: 10.3390/plants11020180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sun Z., Yu S., Hu Y., Wen Y. Biological Control of the Cucumber Downy Mildew Pathogen Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Horticulturae. 2022;8:410. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8050410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sehim A.E., Hewedy O.A., Altammar K.A., Alhumaidi M.S., Abd Elghaffar R.Y. Trichoderma asperellum Empowers Tomato Plants and Suppresses Fusarium Oxysporum through Priming Responses. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1140378. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1140378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mourad A.M.I., Börner A., Esmail S.M. Effectiveness and Genetic Control of Trichoderma spp. as a Biological Control of Wheat Powdery Mildew Disease. Phytopathology. 2024;114:2221–2234. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-24-0157-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Manzar N., Kashyap A.S., Goutam R.S., Rajawat M.V., Sharma P.K., Sharma S.K., Singh H.V. Trichoderma: Advent of Versatile Biocontrol Agent, Its Secrets and Insights into Mechanism of Biocontrol Potential. Sustainability. 2022;14:12786. doi: 10.3390/su141912786. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alfiky A., Weisskopf L. Deciphering Trichoderma–Plant–Pathogen Interactions for Better Development of Biocontrol Applications. J. Fungi. 2021;7:61. doi: 10.3390/jof7010061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thakur A., Bharat N.K., Sharma P., Thakur I., Jyoti A., Chauhan S., Sharma N. Harnessing Natural Farming Practices for Ecofriendly and Sustainable Plant Disease Management. Discov. Plants. 2026;3:103. doi: 10.1007/s44372-026-00570-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dutta P., Mahanta M., Singh S.B., Thakuria D., Deb L., Kumari A., Upamanya G.K., Boruah S., Dey U., Mishra A.K., et al. Molecular Interaction between Plants and Trichoderma Species against Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;14:1145715. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1145715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kashyap A., Sarma A., Das B.K., Goswami A.K. Computational Methods for Rational Drug Design. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2025. Rational Design of Natural Products for Drug Discovery; pp. 285–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Radzikowska-Kujawska D., Piechota T., Jarzyniak K., Kowalczewski P.Ł., Wojewódzki P. Effects of Biopreparations Based on Bacillus and Trichoderma, Combined with Mineral and Organic Fertilization and a Pisum sativum L. Forecrop on Improving the Tolerance of Maize Plants to Drought Stress. PLoS ONE. 2025;20:e0322718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Patkowska E., Mielniczuk E., Jamiołkowska A., Skwaryło-Bednarz B., Błażewicz-Woźniak M. The Influence of Trichoderma harzianum Rifai T-22 and Other Biostimulants on Rhizosphere Beneficial Microorganisms of Carrot. Agronomy. 2020;10:1637. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10111637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.de Lima Cruz J.M.F., de Farias O.R., de Moura I.N.B.M., Linné J.A., da Silva L.D.R., do Nascimento L.C. Microbiolization of Cowpea Seeds with Commercial Strains of Trichoderma asperellum and T. harzianum. Rev. Ceres. 2022;69:613–618. doi: 10.1590/0034-737X202269050015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang J.-L., Tang W.-L., Huang Q.-R., Li Y.-Z., Wei M.-L., Jiang L.-L., Liu C., Yu X., Zhu H.-W., Chen G.-Z., et al. Trichoderma: A Treasure House of Structurally Diverse Secondary Metabolites with Medicinal Importance. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:723828. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.723828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guo Q., Shi L., Wang X., Li D., Yin Z., Zhang J., Ding G., Chen L. Structures and Biological Activities of Secondary Metabolites from the Trichoderma Genus (Covering 2018–2022) J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023;71:13612–13632. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Song Y.-P., Ji N.-Y. Chemistry and Biology of Marine-Derived Trichoderma Metabolites. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2024;14:14. doi: 10.1007/s13659-024-00433-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Azami H., Watanabe Y., Kojima H., Yoshida Y., Ban S., Nonaka K., Yaguchi T., Iwatsuki M. Cytosporones Y and Z, New Antifungal Polyketides Produced by the Fungal Strain Trichoderma sp. FKI-6626. J. Antibiot. 2024;77:721–726. doi: 10.1038/s41429-024-00765-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li M.-F., Li G.-H., Zhang K.-Q. Non-Volatile Metabolites from Trichoderma spp. Metabolites. 2019;9:58. doi: 10.3390/metabo9030058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang J., Zhang R., Chen X., Sun X., Yan Y., Shen X., Yuan Q. Biosynthesis of Aromatic Polyketides in Microorganisms Using Type II Polyketide Synthases. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020;19:110. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01367-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Keller N.P. Fungal Secondary Metabolism: Regulation, Function and Drug Discovery. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:167–180. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0121-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zeilinger S., Gruber S., Bansal R., Mukherjee P.K. Secondary Metabolism in Trichoderma—Chemistry Meets Genomics. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2016;30:74–90. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2016.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mattam A.J., Chaudhari Y.B., Velankar H.R. Factors Regulating Cellulolytic Gene Expression in Filamentous Fungi: An Overview. Microb. Cell Fact. 2022;21:44. doi: 10.1186/s12934-022-01764-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Armenova N., Tsigoriyna L., Arsov A., Stefanov S., Petrov K., Mu W., Zhang W., Petrova P. Antifungal Biocontrol in Sustainable Crop Protection: Microbial Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Plant-Derived Agents. J. Fungi. 2025;12:22. doi: 10.3390/jof12010022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mukhopadhyay R., Kumar D. Trichoderma: A Beneficial Antifungal Agent and Insights into Its Mechanism of Biocontrol Potential. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2020;30:133. doi: 10.1186/s41938-020-00333-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kaur J., Goswami D., Saraf M. Trichoderma’s Metabolomic Journey: Unveiling Bioactive Secondary Metabolites for Sustainable Solutions for Agriculture and Beyond. Indian J. Microbiol. 2025;66:292–312. doi: 10.1007/s12088-025-01507-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Elshahawy I.E., El-Mohamedy R.S. Biological Control of Pythium Damping-off and Root-Rot Diseases of Tomato Using Trichoderma Isolates Employed Alone or in Combination. J. Plant Pathol. 2019;101:597–608. doi: 10.1007/s42161-019-00248-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sain S.K., Pandey A.K. Evaluation of Some Trichoderma harzianum Isolates for the Management of Soilborne Diseases of Brinjal and Okra. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2018;88:905–914. doi: 10.1007/s40011-016-0824-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hossain M.M., Sultana F. Microbial Genetics. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2024. Genetics of Trichoderma-Plant-Pathogen Interactions; pp. 243–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kushwaha S.K., Kumar S., Chaudhary B. Efficacy of Trichoderma against Sclerotium Rolfsii Causing Collar Rot Disease of Lentil under in Vitro Conditions. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2018;10:307–312. doi: 10.31018/jans.v10i1.1622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Saxena A., Dey R., Dube S.P., Raghuwanshi R. Biodiversity, Bioengineering, and Biotechnology of Fungi. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2025. Advances in Trichoderma Biology for Biocontrol Applications; pp. 77–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Saadaoui M., Faize M., Bonhomme L., Benyoussef N.O., Kharrat M., Chaar H., Label P., Venisse J.-S. Assessment of Tunisian Trichoderma Isolates on Wheat Seed Germination, Seedling Growth and Fusarium Seedling Blight Suppression. Microorganisms. 2023;11:1512. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Abd-El-Khair H., El-Nagdi W.M.A. Application of Dry Powders of Six Plant Species, as Soil Amendments, for Controlling Fusarium Solani and Meloidogyne Incognita on Pea in Pots. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2021;45:116. doi: 10.1186/s42269-021-00571-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zafer M.M., Mohamed G.A., Ibrahim S.R.M., Ghosh S., Bornman C., Elfaky M.A. Biofilm-Mediated Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Microbes: A Comprehensive Exploration and Forward Perspectives. Arch. Microbiol. 2024;206:101. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03826-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Iaconis A., De Plano L.M., Caccamo A., Franco D., Conoci S. Anti-Biofilm Strategies: A Focused Review on Innovative Approaches. Microorganisms. 2024;12:639. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Papaianni M., Ricciardelli A., Fulgione A., d’Errico G., Zoina A., Lorito M., Woo S.L., Vinale F., Capparelli R. Antibiofilm Activity of a Trichoderma Metabolite against Xanthomonas Campestris Pv. Campestris, Alone and in Association with a Phage. Microorganisms. 2020;8:620. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8050620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Roopkhan N., Chaianunporn T., Chareonsudjai S., Chaianunporn K. Inhibitory Effects of Trichoderma asperellum Culture Filtrates on Pathogenic Bacteria, Burkholderia pseudomallei. PeerJ. 2025;13:e19051. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Velmourougane K., Prasanna R. Trichoderma–Azotobacter Biofilm-Based Formulation Enhance Natural Plant DeFense Enzyme Activities in Wheat and Cotton Seedlings. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2024;47:61–64. doi: 10.1007/s40009-023-01324-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Poletto T., Fantinel V.S., Muniz M.F.B., Quevedo A.C., Strahl M.A., Poletto I., Stefenon V.M. Efficacy of Five Trichoderma Species Against Anthracnose Pathogens in Pecan Through Mycoparasitism and Antibiosis. J. Crop Health. 2024;76:673–681. doi: 10.1007/s10343-024-00986-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ávila-Oviedo J.L., Chávez-Avilés M.N. Ecological Versatility and Biocontrol Mechanisms of Trichoderma spp.: Toward Sustainable Agriculture. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2026;8:230. doi: 10.1007/s42452-026-08253-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Maurya S., Ntakirutimana R., Debnath B., Rana M., Kaushik D., Srivastava S. Trichoderma and Their Secondary Metabolites—A Potential Approach in Plant Disease Management. Biopestic. Int. 2024;20:21–33. doi: 10.59467/BI.2024.20.21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Díaz de la Osa A., Almenares Casanova M., Fernández Millares B., Aguado Casas M.E., Rojas L., Zeilinger S., Hernández-Rodríguez A. Secondary Metabolites and Extracellular Proteases Contribute to the Antagonistic Action of Indigenous Trichoderma Strains against Botrytis Cinerea. Fungal Biol. 2025;129:101530. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2024.101530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Abbas A., Mubeen M., Zheng H., Sohail M.A., Shakeel Q., Solanki M.K., Iftikhar Y., Sharma S., Kashyap B.K., Hussain S., et al. Trichoderma spp. Genes Involved in the Biocontrol Activity Against Rhizoctonia Solani. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:884469. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.884469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Atanasova L., Marchetti-Deschmann M., Nemes A., Bruckner B., Rehulka P., Stralis-Pavese N., Łabaj P.P., Kreil D.P., Zeilinger S. Mycoparasitism Related Targets of Tmk1 Indicate Stimulating Regulatory Functions of This MAP Kinase in Trichoderma atroviride. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:19976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47027-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sandhu D., Tasma I.M., Frasch R., Bhattacharyya M.K. Systemic Acquired Resistance in Soybean Is Regulated by Two Proteins, Orthologous to Arabidopsis NPR1. BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Saravanakumar K., Fan L., Fu K., Yu C., Wang M., Xia H., Sun J., Li Y., Chen J. Cellulase from Trichoderma harzianum Interacts with Roots and Triggers Induced Systemic Resistance to Foliar Disease in Maize. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:35543. doi: 10.1038/srep35543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Choi H.W., Klessig D.F. DAMPs, MAMPs, and NAMPs in Plant Innate Immunity. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16:232. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0921-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Salwan R., Sharma A., Kaur R., Sharma R., Sharma V. The Riddles of Trichoderma Induced Plant Immunity. Biol. Control. 2022;174:105037. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hidangmayum A., Dwivedi P. Plant Responses to Trichoderma spp. and Their Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses: A Review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018;7:758–766. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pacheco-Trejo J., Aquino-Torres E., Reyes-Santamaría M.I., Islas-Pelcastre M., Pérez-Ríos S.R., Madariaga-Navarrete A., Saucedo-García M. Plant Defensive Responses Triggered by Trichoderma spp. as Tools to Face Stressful Conditions. Horticulturae. 2022;8:1181. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8121181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mukherjee P.K., Horwitz B.A., Herrera-Estrella A., Schmoll M., Kenerley C.M. Trichoderma Research in the Genome Era. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013;51:105–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Eftekhari F., Sarcheshmehpour M., Lohrasbi-Nejad A., Boroomand N. Effects of Mycorrhizal and Trichoderma Treatment on Enhancing Maize Tolerance to Salinity and Drought Stress, through Metabolic and Enzymatic Evaluation. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25:687. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06729-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sharma B., Dwivedi P., Ankita A. Effect of Chitosan and Trichoderma on Pisum sativum Germinating Seeds under Induced Cadmium Toxicity. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2025;44:2823–2835. doi: 10.1007/s00344-024-11578-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Altaf M., Ilyas T., Shahid M., Shafi Z., Tyagi A., Ali S. Trichoderma Inoculation Alleviates Cd and Pb-Induced Toxicity and Improves Growth and Physiology of Vigna radiata (L.) ACS Omega. 2024;9:8557–8573. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c10470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Geng Y., Chen S., Lv P., Li Y., Li J., Jiang F., Wu Z., Shen Q., Zhou R. Positive Role of Trichoderma harzianum in Increasing Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Antioxidants. 2025;14:807. doi: 10.3390/antiox14070807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Oszust K., Pinzari F., Donati E., Frąc M. Competition in Fungi for Nitrogen and Niche Overlap as a Biocontrol Strategy. Pest Manag. Sci. 2026;82:6905–6918. doi: 10.1002/ps.70769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lehner S.M., Lea A., Neumann N.K., Rudolf K., Marc L., Druzhinina I.S., Rainer S. Isotope-Assisted Screening for Iron-Containing Metabolites Reveals a High Degree of Diversity among Known and Unknown Siderophores Produced by Trichoderma spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:18–31. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02339-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cui H., Cheng Q., Jing T., Chen Y., Li X., Zhang M., Qi D., Feng J., Vafadar F., Wei Y., et al. Trichoderma Virens XZ11-1 Producing Siderophores Inhibits the Infection of Fusarium Oxysporum and Promotes Plant Growth in Banana Plants. Microb. Cell Fact. 2025;24:22. doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02626-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Shao Y., Gu S., Peng H., Zhang L., Li S., Berendsen R.L., Yang T., Dong C., Wei Z., Xu Y., et al. Synergic Interactions between Trichoderma and the Soil Microbiomes Improve Plant Iron Availability and Growth. npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025;11:56. doi: 10.1038/s41522-025-00684-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ren L., Lv J., Zhang F., Dou B., Li L., Wang Y., Zhang Y. Integrated Fertilization with Organic Manure and Trichoderma Enhances Wheat Productivity and Soil Nutrient Availability. Front. Plant Sci. 2025;16:1687216. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1687216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Azarmi R. Effect of Trichoderma Isolates on Tomato Seedling Growth Response and Nutrient Uptake. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011;10:5850. doi: 10.5897/AJB10.1600. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Nieto-Jacobo M.F., Steyaert J.M., Salazar-Badillo F.B., Nguyen D.V., Rostás M., Braithwaite M., De Souza J.T., Jimenez-Bremont J.F., Ohkura M., Stewart A., et al. Environmental Growth Conditions of Trichoderma spp. Affects Indole Acetic Acid Derivatives, Volatile Organic Compounds, and Plant Growth Promotion. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:102. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Martínez-Medina A., Del Mar Alguacil M., Pascual J.A., Van Wees S.C.M. Phytohormone Profiles Induced by Trichoderma Isolates Correspond with Their Biocontrol and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity on Melon Plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 2014;40:804–815. doi: 10.1007/s10886-014-0478-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ketehouli T., Sossah F.L., Panwala R., Suazo Tejada A.K., Goss E.M., Garcia F.H.S., Vallad G.E., Martins S.J. Secondary Metabolites in Plant-Microbe Interactions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2025;136:lxaf124. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxaf124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Iris Y., Michal S., Zohar K., Nicole B., Yoram K., Ilan C. Concomitant Induction of Systemic Resistance to Pseudomonas Syringae Pv. Lachrymans in Cucumber by Trichoderma asperellum (T-203) and Accumulation of. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:7343–7353. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7343-7353.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yu Z., Cao A., Ismayil A. From Scaffold to Shield: How MCD1 Organizes a Phytoalexin Metabolon for Broad-Spectrum Plant Immunity. Phytopathol. Res. 2026;8:62. doi: 10.1186/s42483-026-00452-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Iula G., Miras-Moreno B., Lucini L., Trevisan M. The Mycorrhiza-and Trichoderma-Mediated Elicitation of Secondary Metabolism and Modulation of Phytohormone Profile in Tomato Plants. Horticulturae. 2021;7:394. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7100394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sutthisa W., Popranom A., Taddeetrakool A., Khankhum S. Development of Trichoderma Formulation and Application to Control Durian Anthracnose Disease. Trends Sci. 2024;21:7276. doi: 10.48048/tis.2024.7276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Singh M., Chauhan A., Singh P.K. Enhanced Growth and Suppression of Fusarium Wilt in Tomato Plants through the Action of Rhizophagus Intraradices and Trichoderma Viride. Vegetos. 2025;38:1515–1522. doi: 10.1007/s42535-024-00935-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sala A., Artola A., Sánchez A., Barrena R. Rice Husk as a Source for Fungal Biopesticide Production by Solid-State Fermentation Using B. bassiana and T. harzianum. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;296:122322. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kumar V., Ahluwalia V., Saran S., Kumar J., Patel A.K., Singhania R.R. Recent Developments on Solid-State Fermentation for Production of Microbial Secondary Metabolites: Challenges and Solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 2021;323:124566. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Mahamud M. Large Scale Production and Increased Shelf Life of Trichoderma harzianum Inoculums in Semi Solid Medium. Malays. J. Sustain. Agric. 2019;3:5–7. doi: 10.26480/mjsa.01.2019.05.07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Silva L.G., Camargo R.C., Mascarin G.M., Favaro C.P., Nunes P.S.O., Farinas C.S., Ribeiro C., Bettiol W. Innovative Sustainable Bioreactor-in-a-Granule Formulation of Trichoderma Asperelloides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024;108:458. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13261-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bulgari D., Alias C., Peron G., Ribaudo G., Gianoncelli A., Savino S., Boureghda H., Bouznad Z., Monti E., Gobbi E. Solid-State Fermentation of Trichoderma spp.: A New Way to Valorize the Agricultural Digestate and Produce Value-Added Bioproducts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023;71:3994–4004. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Elshahawy I.E., Saied N., Abd-El-Kareem F., Morsy A. Biocontrol of Onion White Rot by Application of Trichoderma Species Formulated on Wheat Bran Powder. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2017;50:150–166. doi: 10.1080/03235408.2016.1276423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Elad Y. Biological Control of Foliar Pathogens by Means of Trichoderma harzianum and Potential Modes of Action. Crop Prot. 2000;19:709–714. doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00094-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Esposito A., Scala V., Vassilev N., Aragona M., Canfora L., Polito A., Fiorani R., Mocali S. Evaluation of Tomato Based Agro-Industrial Byproducts as Substrates for Trichoderma harzianum Cultivation and Bioinoculant Potential. Front. Microbiol. 2026;16:1713960. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1713960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kumhar K. Evaluation of Culture Media for Biomass Production of Trichoderma Viride (KBN 24) and Their Production Economics. Am. J. Agric. For. 2014;2:317. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20140206.24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lin F., Mao Y., Zhao F., Idris A.L., Liu Q., Zou S., Guan X., Huang T. Towards Sustainable Green Adjuvants for Microbial Pesticides: Recent Progress, Upcoming Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms. 2023;11:364. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kara Y.E., Tozlu E. Effect of Different Liquid Carriers On the Shelf-Life and Antifungal Effectiveness of Trichoderma harzianum. J. Crop Health. 2024;76:425–435. doi: 10.1007/s10343-024-00971-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Akshata L.T., Guldekar D.D., Potdukhe S.R., Kale S.S., Kumar A. Shelf Life Study and Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma Viride in Different Oil Formulations. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018;7:225–230. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Herrera W., Valbuena O., Pavone-Maniscalco D. Formulation of Trichoderma asperellum TV190 for Biological Control of Rhizoctonia Solani on Corn Seedlings. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2020;30:44. doi: 10.1186/s41938-020-00246-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Negi R., Sharma B., Kaur S., Kaur T., Khan S.S., Kumar S., Ramniwas S., Rustagi S., Singh S., Rai A.K., et al. Microbial Antagonists: Diversity, Formulation and Applications for Management of Pest–Pathogens. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2023;33:105. doi: 10.1186/s41938-023-00748-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lewis J.A., Papavizas G.C., Lumsden R.D. A New Formulation System for the Application of Biocontrol Fungi to Soil. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1991;1:59–69. doi: 10.1080/09583159109355186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Valkov M., Simha G. Clay Minerals in Nature—Their Characterization, Modification and Application. InTech; Singapore: 2012. Vermiculite: Structural Properties and Examples of the Use. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lee J., Sarmah A.K., Kwon E.E. Biochar from Biomass and Waste. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2019. Production and Formation of Biochar; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zhao J., Shen X.-J., Domene X., Alcañiz J.-M., Liao X., Palet C. Comparison of Biochars Derived from Different Types of Feedstock and Their Potential for Heavy Metal Removal in Multiple-Metal Solutions. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:9869. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46234-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Szekalska M., Puciłowska A., Szymańska E., Ciosek P., Winnicka K. Alginate: Current Use and Future Perspectives in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2016;2016:7697031. doi: 10.1155/2016/7697031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Mancera-López M.E., Izquierdo-Estévez W.F., Escalante-Sánchez A., Ibarra J.E., Barrera-Cortés J. Encapsulation of Trichoderma harzianum Conidia as a Method of Conidia Preservation at Room Temperature and Propagation in Submerged Culture. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2019;29:107–130. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2018.1535053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Bhai R.S. Preservation and Long-Term Storage of Trichoderma spp. by Sodium Alginate Encapsulation. J. Plant. Crops. 2020;48:36–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Teixidó N., Usall J., Torres R. Insight into a Successful Development of Biocontrol Agents: Production, Formulation, Packaging, and Shelf Life as Key Aspects. Horticulturae. 2022;8:305. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8040305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Sriram S., Roopa K.P., Savitha M.J. Extended Shelf-Life of Liquid Fermentation Derived Talc Formulations of Trichoderma harzianum with the Addition of Glycerol in the Production Medium. Crop Prot. 2011;30:1334–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Khan S., Bagwan N., Mohammed A.I., Tamboli R. Mass Multiplication and Shelf Life of Liquid Fermented Final Product of Trichoderma Viride in Different Formulations. Adv. Biores. 2011;2:178–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Martínez-Medina A., Roldán A., Pascual J.A. Performance of a Trichoderma harzianum Bentonite–Vermiculite Formulation Against Fusarium Wilt in Seedling Nursery Melon Plants. HortScience. 2009;44:2025–2027. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.7.2025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Tyagi A., Lama Tamang T., Kashtoh H., Mir R.A., Mir Z.A., Manzoor S., Manzar N., Gani G., Vishwakarma S.K., Almalki M.A., et al. A Review on Biocontrol Agents as Sustainable Approach for Crop Disease Management: Applications, Production, and Future Perspectives. Horticulturae. 2024;10:805. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10080805. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Gao J.L., Zhang M.F., Liu Z.J., Zhang L., Wang J., Yang F.P., Zhang X.H., Du Y.P. First Report of Trichoderma hamatum Causing Postharvest Bulb Rot on Lilium davidii Var. Willmottiae in China. Plant Dis. 2024;108:2929. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-24-0737-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bhujbal M.S., Patil A.S., Kadam A.S., Patil N.N., Chavan J.J. First Report of Trichoderma Lixii Causing Leaf Spot of Ceropegia Vincaefolia in India. New Dis. Rep. 2024;50:e12304. doi: 10.1002/ndr2.12304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Sarsaiya S., Jia Q., Fan X., Jain A., Shu F., Chen J., Lu Y., Shi J. First Report of Leaf Black Circular Spots on Dendrobium Nobile Caused by Trichoderma Longibrachiatum in Guizhou Province, China. Plant Dis. 2019;103:3275. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0672-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Pfordt A., Schiwek S., Karlovsky P., von Tiedemann A. Trichoderma Afroharzianum Ear Rot—A New Disease on Maize in Europe. Front. Agron. 2020;2:547758. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2020.547758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Šašić Zorić L., Janjušević L., Djisalov M., Knežić T., Vunduk J., Milenković I., Gadjanski I. Molecular Approaches for Detection of Trichoderma Green Mold Disease in Edible Mushroom Production. Biology. 2023;12:299. doi: 10.3390/biology12020299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kredics L., Hatvani L., Allaga H., Büchner R., Cai F., Vágvölgyi C., Druzhinina I.S., Naeimi S. Trichoderma Green Mould Disease of Cultivated Mushrooms BT. In: Amaresan N., Sankaranarayanan A., Dwivedi M.K., Druzhinina I.S., editors. Advances in Trichoderma Biology for Agricultural Applications. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2022. pp. 559–606. [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Naeimi S., Hatvani L., Marik T., Balázs D., Dóczi I., Cai F., Vágvölgyi C., Druzhinina I.S., Kredics L. Trichodermosis: Human Infections Caused by Trichoderma Species BT. In: Amaresan N., Sankaranarayanan A., Dwivedi M.K., Druzhinina I.S., editors. Advances in Trichoderma Biology for Agricultural Applications. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2022. pp. 607–634. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Asghar W., Craven K.D., Kataoka R., Mahmood A., Asghar N., Raza T., Iftikhar F. The Application of Trichoderma spp., an Old but New Useful Fungus, in Sustainable Soil Health Intensification: A Comprehensive Strategy for Addressing Challenges. Plant Stress. 2024;12:100455. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2024.100455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Atta N., Fahmi A.I., Abdel-Lateif K.S. Beyond Multilocus Barcoding: Harnessing Phylogenomics and Genome Mining for next-Generation Trichoderma-Based Bioproducts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2026;110:161. doi: 10.1007/s00253-026-13834-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Li W.-C., Lin T.-C., Chen C.-L., Liu H.-C., Lin H.-N., Chao J.-L., Hsieh C.-H., Ni H.-F., Chen R.-S., Wang T.-F. Complete Genome Sequences and Genome-Wide Characterization of Trichoderma Biocontrol Agents Provide New Insights into Their Evolution and Variation in Genome Organization, Sexual Development, and Fungal-Plant Interactions. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021;9:e00663-21. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00663-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Sun W., Zhang Y., Hua L., Zhong Z. Genomic and Epigenomic Insights into Trichoderma–Plant Interactions. Phytopathol. Res. 2025;7:69. doi: 10.1186/s42483-025-00359-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Steindorff A.S., Cai F.M., Ding M., Jiang S., Atanasova L., Baker S.E., Barbosa-Filho J.R., Bayram Akcapinar G., Brown D.W., Chaverri P., et al. Phenogenomics Reveals the Ecology and Evolution of Trichoderma Fungi for Sustainable Agriculture. Nat. Microbiol. 2026;11:815–831. doi: 10.1038/s41564-026-02260-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Sahoo A., Yadav G., Mehta T., Meena M., Swapnil P. Omics-Driven Insights into Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture. Discov. Sustain. 2025;6:659. doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-01582-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Ilmi N., Sogandi, Akib M.A., Mirsam H., Hikmahwati, Ambar A.A., Kining E., Rahman A.A., Yusnawan E. GC–MS-Based Metabolomic Profiling of Trichoderma asperellum NH112 and Aspergillus Terreus NH23 Culture Filtrates Revealing Fusarium Verticillioides Suppression and Maize Seedlings Stimulation. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2026;25:52. doi: 10.1007/s44447-026-00147-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Woo S.L., Hermosa R., Lorito M., Monte E. Trichoderma: A Multipurpose, Plant-Beneficial Microorganism for Eco-Sustainable Agriculture. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023;21:312–326. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00819-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Fan H., Yao M., Wang H., Zhao D., Zhu X., Wang Y., Liu X., Duan Y., Chen L. Isolation and Effect of Trichoderma Citrinoviride Snef1910 for the Biological Control of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne Incognita. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:299. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01984-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Intana W., Promwee A., Wijara K., Nguyen H.H. Enhancement of Damping-Off Disease Control in Tomatoes Using Two Strains of Trichoderma asperellum Combined with a Plant Immune Stimulant. Agronomy. 2024;14:1655. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14081655. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Romlumduan K., Kaewkrajay C., Dethoup T. Synergistic Effects of Wettable Powder of Trichoderma and Fungicides in Controlling Phytophthora and Corynespora Leaf Fall Diseases in Rubber. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2025;173:777–787. doi: 10.1007/s10658-025-03094-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Liu M., Suo X., Mai X., Smagghe G., Yin S., Wang Z., Gai Y., Niu Q. Trichoderma asperellum 152–42 Confers Resistance to Fusarium Root Rot in Alfalfa through JA-Mediated Induced Systemic Resistance and Reshaping of the Rhizosphere Microbiome. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2026;220:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2026.107087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES