Abstract
Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is a universally conserved biopolymer central to bacterial stress survival, yet understanding of its roles derives almost entirely from Gram-negative models in which polyP accumulates intracellularly following nutrient downshift. We examined polyP metabolism in the Gram-positive spore-forming bacterium Bacillus cereus using deletions of the polyP kinases PPK1 and PPK2 and the exopolyphosphatase PPX. Intracellular polyP synthesis required PPK1 and was opposed by PPX and PPK2: ppx mutants accumulated polyP in sporulation medium by 24 hours, ppx ppk2 double mutants accumulated more, and no ppk1 mutant accumulated any. A ppk1 ppx double mutant could not be generated, suggesting that unopposed PPK2 activity is lethal. Unlike Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, B. cereus did not accumulate polyP after shift to minimal medium, increasing only modestly in stationary phase. Fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy localized intracellular polyP to electron-dense granules within ribosome-depleted cytoplasm. Cells bearing these granules remained membrane-intact yet failed to resume growth over 8 hours in rich medium, leading us to propose that polyP drives ribosome sequestration into condensates and a hibernation-like state. Unexpectedly, B. cereus also released close to 100μM polyP extracellularly during late stationary phase, even in a ppk1 ppk2 mutant lacking both known synthetases. Extracellular polyP resisted hydrolysis by purified PPX even after deproteinization, indicating an atypical structure. Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus anthracis released similar amounts of extracellular polyP. Together these results identify two distinct polyP pools in the B. cereus group: a PPK1-dependent intracellular pool and an extracellular pool made by an uncharacterized pathway.
Introduction
Bacillus cereus is a Gram-positive, spore forming bacteria that is ubiquitous in the environment 1–6. Its ability to form environmentally resilient spores enables persistence throughout the food chain, where it is a common cause of foodborne illness 1,3,7. Because of its widespread distribution in soil and food products, B. cereus is frequently ingested and may transiently colonize the human gastrointestinal tract, where it can act as an opportunistic pathogen 8,9. Although most commonly associated with foodborne illness, B. cereus can also cause localized wound and ocular infections, as well as severe systemic disease that may be fatal 10. Members of the B. cereus group are also of considerable interest due to their close relationship with Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax 11, and Bacillus thuringiensis, which is widely used as a biological pesticide worldwide 10,12,13. The ability of these organisms to persist in diverse environments and establish successful host interactions highlights the importance of understanding the molecular mechanisms that contribute to bacterial stress adaptation, survival, and pathogenesis in these species.
One such mechanism involves inorganic polyphosphate (polyP), a widely distributed biopolymer that is highly conserved across all domains of life 14–18. PolyP is a linear polymer of orthophosphates that can be made up of 10–1000 orthophosphates linked by high energy bonds 19. In bacteria, polyP participates in numerous cellular processes, including the modulation of gene expression during stress responses 17,20–24, metal chelation 25–27, energy and phosphate storage 28–30, protein stabilization through chaperone-like activity 31,32, and other functions. Although polyP is not essential for bacterial viability, its absence renders cells highly sensitive to environmental stressors, including antibiotics, oxidative damage, osmotic stress, and nutrient limitation 14,15,26,29,33–46. Notably, pathogenic bacteria deficient in polyP show severe attenuation of virulence and increased sensitivity to antibiotics 47–54, highlighting polyP as a central regulator of bacterial fitness and pathogenicity. These findings have identified polyP metabolism and regulation as an attractive target for antimicrobial drug development, particularly since mammals lack homologs of any known microbial polyP synthesis enzymes 14,30,36,46,55–59.
In prokaryotes, polyP is synthesized by two known types of polyphosphate kinases (PPK’s) with limited sequence homology to one another 29,30,43,57,60,61: PPK1 and PPK2, both of which are widespread among both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Fig 1)17,24,30,62,63. PolyP is primarily degraded by exopolyphosphatase (PPX)23,64,65 (Fig 1). PPK1, first identified in Escherichia coli in the 1990’s, preferentially produces polyP from ATP, although it can also catalyze the reverse reaction (Fig 1)63,66. PPK2 enzymes, originally identified in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, preferentially catalyze polyP degradation to generate nucleoside phosphates, exhibiting approximately a 75-fold greater activity for degradation than for synthesis, despite retaining the capacity to synthesize polyP 30,43,44,53,61,62,67. PPK2s are further classified into three subfamilies based on their preference for a specific nucleoside phosphate substrate. Class I preferentially phosphorylates nucleoside diphosphates, Class II nucleoside monophosphates, and Class III can phosphorylate both nucleoside di- and monophosphates 30,68. While Pseudomonas contains PPK1 as well as all three types of PPK2 30, the genome of B. cereus encodes only single PPK1, PPX, and class-II PPK2 homologs (Fig. 1)30,54,64,68,69.
Figure 1.

Schematic of known enzymes contributing to inorganic polyP synthesis and degradation in Bacillus cereus.
Despite being found in nearly all living organisms, almost all of the work on polyP in prokaryotes has been done in Gram-negative bacteria, specifically E. coli 14,32,33,35,38,39,55 and P. aeruginosa 30,41,57,62,67,70. However, in 2004, Arthur Kornberg’s lab established B. cereus as a model organism for studying polyP in Gram-positives 69. They reported that in B. cereus ATCC 14579, deletions of PPK1, PPK2, and PPX affected motility, biofilm formation and sporulation. There have been almost no studies into the molecular biology of Gram-positive bacterial polyP since. This means that, despite the established importance of polyP in bacterial physiology and pathogenesis, the mechanisms governing its synthesis, regulation, and biological functions in Gram-positive organisms remain poorly defined. This knowledge gap is particularly relevant in B. cereus, where understanding how polyP contributes to cellular fitness and host interaction may reveal novel insights into bacterial pathogenesis and identify new opportunities for antimicrobial development.
Materials and Methods
Strains, plasmids and growth conditions
The Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed below in Table 1.
Table 1.
List of strains and plasmids used in this study.
| Name | Genotype | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CH0082 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 | BGSC |
| CH0193 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 Δppk1 | This study |
| CH0197 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 Δspo0A | This study |
| CH0201 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 Δppx | This study |
| CH0212 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 Δppk2 | This study |
| CH0217 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 Δppx Δppk2 | This study |
| CH0221 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 Δppk1 Δppk2 | This study |
| CH0244 | B. cereus ATCC 14579 Δppx Δppk1 Δppk2 | This study |
| 4D1 | Bacillus thuringiensis (Kurstaki HD1) | Charles Turnbough, 71 |
| Sterne 34F2 | Bacillus anthracis (USAMR11D) (avirulent isolate lacking virulence plasmid pXO2) | Charles Turnbough, 72 |
| dam-/dcm- E. coli | dam-/dcm- E. coli chemically competent cells from New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA, Cat#C2925H | NEB |
| Plasmids | Genotype/purpose | Source |
| pMiniMAD | Cloning vector for Bacillus species, oriTsBs-MLSR Ec-AmpR | Gift from Dan Kearns, 73 |
| pMiniMAD-Δppk1 | Deletion plasmid for ppk1 in B. cereus constructed by GenScript. | GenScript |
| pMiniMAD-Δppx | Deletion plasmid for ppx in B. cereus constructed by GenScript. | GenScript |
| pMiniMAD-Δppk2 | Deletion plasmid for ppk2 in B. cereus constructed by GenScript. | GenScript |
| pMiniMAD-Δspo0A | Deletion plasmid for spo0A in B. cereus constructed by GenScript. | GenScript |
| pMiniMAD-Δppx Δppk1 | Deletion plasmid for the ppx and ppk1 gene cluster in B. cereus constructed by GenScript. | GenScript |
All strains were routinely grown in Lysogeny Broth (LB) medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl) or in Bacto™ Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) (Soybean-Casein Digest Medium) at 37°C in broth or on 1.5% Bacto agar as appropriate. When appropriate antibiotics were added (MLS: 0.5 μg/ml erythromycin and 2.5 μg/ml lincomycin, ampicillin 100 μg/ml) to select for markers. For sporulation media, 1/10th TSB media was used (example: 10 ml of TSB with 90 ml of sterile H2O) and cells were grown at 30°C. Strains were always grown in sterile, 250 ml beveled flasks with shaking at 180 rpm to ensure proper oxygenation of cells. Markerless replacement for gene deletions was performed with the pMiniMAD vector (gift from Dan Kearns, Indiana University) for allelic replacement, as previously described 73. All mutant strains were confirmed with full genome sequencing through SeqCenter (Pittsburgh, PA) using Illumina Whole Genome Sequencing. The DNA sequences for the plasmids constructed in this study were codon-optimized and custom-synthesized, then cloned into the pMiniMAD cloning vector by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA). All plasmid sequences were confirmed via whole plasmid sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technology (Plasmidsaurus, LLC).
Strain Construction
The markerless gene replacement in the strains below were added in succession using the pMiniMAD vector. A pMiniMAD vector containing our gene deletion of interest was synthesized by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA) with 600 bp of genomic DNA sequence on either side of the gene of interest and propagated in E. coli dcm−/dam− for storage and propagation. Plasmids must be kept in a nonmethylated strain of E. coli as B. cereus will not uptake methylated DNA 74. The plasmid containing the desired gene deletion was directly transformed into B. cereus ATCC 14579 via electroporation 75 and selected on MLS (0.5 μg/ml erythromycin and 2.5 μg/ml lincomycin). Five to 10 transductants were then inoculated into liquid LB and kept in exponential phase at approximately 25°C for several hours to permit plasmid excision before being repeatedly diluted and grown in liquid LB at 37°C (restrictive for plasmid replication) to promote loss of excised plasmid. The cells were then plated, and single colonies were screened for the successful replacement by patching on plain LB and LB/MLS plates to verify plasmid loss, restreaked, verified by full genome sequencing at SeqCenter (Pittsburgh, PA) and stored at −80°C.
PolyP Assay
Bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 16,100 × g for 2 minutes at room temperature to separate the cells from culture supernatants. JC-D7 (polyP binding dye) 76,77 was purchased from InvivoChem (Houston, TX, USA )(Cat. No. V22869) and dissolved in DMSO at 60 μM before dilution to 1 μM with 25 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 8.0). Extracellular polyP was quantified by combining 50 μl supernatants with 50 μl 1 μM JC-D7 in a black 96-well plate. Sodium polyP standards (0–100 μM, dissolved in 25 mM HEPES-KOH pH 8.0) (sodium polyP acquired from Acros Organics) were included for calibration on each plate. Following a 5-minute incubation at room temperature, fluorescence was measured in a Tecan Spark plate reader (Ex 405 nm/Em 535 nm).
Cell pellets were resuspended in 250 μL guanidinium thiocyanate (GITC) lysis buffer (4 M GITC, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7)39,78,79 and disrupted by bead beating (2 × 40 s, 1 min interval, power level 6) in a Fisherbrand bead mill 24. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 16,100 × g for 2 min, and protein concentrations were determined using a Bradford assay with bovine serum albumin (BSA) standards. Intracellular polyP was isolated from lysates using silica membrane spin columns as previously described 64. Bound polyP was washed with 750 μL of 5 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 50% EtOH, then eluted in 200 μL of 25 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 8.0) and quantified by mixing eluates (50 μl) with JC-D7 38,76,77,80 dye (50 μl) in a black 96-well plate. After incubation for 5 min at room temperature, fluorescence was measured in a Tecan Spark plate reader (Ex 405 nm/Em 535 nm). PolyP concentrations were calculated from a polyP standard curve and normalized to total protein content, with results reported as nmol polyP mg−1 protein.
Microscopy Imaging
Fluorescent and time-lapse microscopy was performed with a Keyence BZ-X810 all-in-one fluorescence microscope (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan) equipped with a BZ Plan Apo Chromatic 60x oil objective. Images were captured using the BZ-X800 Viewer/Analyzer software and processed with BZ-X800 analyzer software or FIJI. Our microscope has a BZX DAPI filter, BZX TritC filter and BZX GFP Filter. We had a custom JC-D7 filter cube made by Chroma Technology, Bellows Falls, VT, USA which contains for excitation: Et 405/20x LP filter and T425LPL XR dichromatic mirror, and for emission: ET 450 LP filter. Automated time lapse microscopy and stage movement was controlled and run by BZ-X800 Software. Samples were maintained at 37°C using a Tokai Hit stage-top incubation system (Tokai Hit, Fujinomiya, Japan).
Transmission Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation
Specimens were prepared for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a standard embedding protocol, where cell pellets were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde prepared in 0.15 M sodium cacodylate (NaCaCo) buffer (pH 7.4) for a minimum of 1 hour. Following fixation, the samples were rinsed several times with sodium cacodylate buffer and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide containing 0.8% potassium ferrocyanide in buffer for 1 hour. After additional buffer rinses for 1 hour, the samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series consisting of 50% ethanol for 10 minutes, 70% ethanol for 10 minutes, 95% ethanol for 10 minutes, and three changes of 100% ethanol for 15 minutes each. Samples were then infiltrated with two 15-minute changes of 100% propylene oxide followed by a 50:50 mixture of propylene oxide and Embed 812 epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) for 12–18 hours. The samples were transferred through two fresh changes of 100% Embed 812 resin for at least 1 hour each before final embedding in fresh resin. Polymerization was performed at 60°C for 12–18 hours.
Transmission Electron Microscopy Sectioning and Imaging
Polymerized resin blocks were initially sectioned at 0.5 μm using a diamond histology knife on an ultramicrotome. Thick sections were stained with Toluidine Blue and used to identify regions of interest for trimming prior to ultrathin sectioning. Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm; silver to pale gold interference color) were cut with a diamond knife (Diatome; Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) and collected on copper mesh grids. Following drying, sections were contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Grids were examined using a JEOL 1400 FLASH 120 kV transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA). Digital images were acquired using an AMT NanoSprint43 Mark II camera (AMT Imaging, Woburn, MA) and transferred electronically via UAB BOX or other secure file-sharing methods.
Neutral phenol/chloroform and ethanol precipitation of polyP
Culture supernatants were clarified by centrifugation (4,000 × g, 10 min, 4 °C) and passed through a 0.22 μm filter to remove residual cells. Five milliliters of cell-free supernatant were extracted with an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, pH 7.8–8.2); acid phenol was avoided owing to the instability of polyP under acidic conditions. Following centrifugation (4,000 × g, 10 min, room temperature), the aqueous phase was re-extracted with an equal volume of chloroform to remove residual phenol81. PolyP was precipitated from the recovered aqueous phase with 0.1 volume of 3 M ammonium acetate and 2.5 volumes of ice-cold ethanol at −20 °C overnight, pelleted at 10,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, washed once with 70% ethanol, air-dried briefly, and resuspended in 40 μL of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7), 1 mM EDTA. Nuclease treatment was omitted, as DAPI staining discriminates polyP from co-purifying nucleic acids in-gel81,82.
Samples were mixed 1:1 with loading buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7, 1 mM EDTA, 30% glycerol, bromophenol blue) and resolved on 15.0% TBE-urea polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen Cat#EC68855BOX) at 100 V for 1 h 45 min in 1× TBE. Gels were stained for 30 min in 20% methanol, 1% glycerol, 20 mM Tris base containing 20 μg/mL DAPI, destained for 60 min in the same solution lacking DAPI, and imaged. Gels were then exposed to 300 nm UV for 5 min and reimaged; under these conditions DAPI–polyP complexes preferentially photobleach, allowing polyP to be detected as negatively stained bands against a fluorescent nucleic acid background82. EDTA was maintained throughout to prevent DAPI staining of glycosaminoglycans.
Exopolyphosphatase Treatment
ScPPX was purified as previously described 32. We used sodium polyP (Cas# 50813–16-6; average ~ 45-mer) for standards. To 150 μl polyP sample solution and standard curve solutions of 0, 25, 50 and 100 μM potassium phosphate, we added 40 μl 5X ScPPX Reaction Buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 25 mM MgCl2, 250 mM ammonium acetate), 9 μl dH2O, and 1 μl ScPPX (1 μg). We incubated the reactions for 15 minutes at 37°C, then added 50 μl of digested polyP sample to 50 μl of JC-D7, and determined polyP concentrations as described above.
Data Availability
Genome sequences of all B. cereus strains used in this study have been deposited in the NIH Sequence Read Archive (accession number PRJNA1505627) and all other raw data are available on FigShare (10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8628284).
Results
Intracellular polyP accumulation
We first wanted to characterize the production of polyP in B. cereus using modern genetic tools and detection assays unavailable in the previous study of B. cereus polyP from 2004 69,76,77. We used allelic exchange mutagenesis to individually delete ppk1, ppk2, ppx, and the global cell fate regulator spo0A83,84 as well as constructing double Δppk1 Δppk2, Δppk2 Δppx, and triple Δppk1 Δppk2 Δppx mutants. Surprisingly, despite multiple attempts, we were unable to make a Δppx Δppk1 mutant, indicating that the presence of PPK2 alone appears to be lethal to B. cereus. To test the amount of polyP made by cells that are entering starvation, we grew cells in rich TSB media at 37°C and assayed the amount of polyP associated with the cells over a period of 72 hours (Fig 2A). We found little to no polyP accumulating in any strain of B. cereus over the course of 72 hours in TSB medium (Fig 2A). When we tested cells in sporulation media (1:10 TSB) grown at 30°C over the same time period, however, we found that cells lacking ppx were able to start accumulating detectable polyP as early as 24 hours (Fig 2B). The ppx mutant continued to accumulate polyP over 48 hours, but returned to wild-type levels at 72 hours (Fig 2B). Cells lacking both ppx and ppk2 started accumulating polyP later than a ppx mutant alone but accumulated much more polyP at 48 hours and 72 hours than either the wild-type or the ppx mutant, while still having diminished polyP levels by 72 hours (Fig 2B), at which point almost all the cells had sporulated (see Fig 4). No polyP accumulated at any time point in a spo0A mutant (Supplemental Fig 1). Taken together, these findings support the idea that PPX is primarily responsible for degrading polyP, along with PPK2, and together they control levels of polyP accumulation within B. cereus, while PPK1 is primarily responsible for intracellular polyP synthesis in this species.
Figure 2.

A) Accumulation of cell-associated polyP during growth of B. cereus in TSB at 37°C with shaking in beveled flasks over 72 hours B) Cell-associated polyP levels over 72 hours of cells grown in 1:10 TSB (sporulation media) at 30°C shaking in a beveled flask. Samples were taken over the course of 3 days. Statistics performed in Prism using a one-way ANOVA (* p=<0.05) (**** p=<0.0001).
Figure 4.

A) Percentage of cell populations with spores after 48 hours of growth in sporulation media at 30°C. By 72 hours all populations are ~99% spores. B) Microscopy of wild-type B. cereus and C) B. cereus Δppx cells grown in sporulation media at 30°C in a beveled flask shaking. Cells were mixed with JC-D7 dye and spotted on agarose pads for imaging. JC-D7 was imaged using a custom JC-D7 filter cube (see Methods).
B. cereus produces very little polyP under traditional starvation conditions
PolyP accumulation is stimulated in E. coli and in P. aeruginosa by growing in rich medium (LB or TSB) and then shifting them to a minimal media such as M9 or MOPS minimal media 41,70,79,85,86. E. coli cells will accumulate nearly 200 nmol polyP/mg of protein by three hours after such a nutrient switch, then rapidly degrade that polyP 39. We wanted to test whether B. cereus cells would accumulate polyP in a similar manner to E. coli or P. aeruginosa. B. cereus cells were grown in TSB into exponential phase (OD600 = 0.2), before being rinsed and subcultured in MOPS minimal media. Cells experienced a short diauxic shift before resuming exponential growth (Fig 3A). We observed little to no polyP accumulation within the cell over the first 6 hours after switching to MOPS minimal media (Fig 3B), consistent with previous reports 69. We continued monitoring polyP levels within B. cereus over a period of several days and were observed a modest but reproducible spike of polyP at 24 hours of growth in MOPS minimal media (Fig 3B), more consistent with polyP synthesis as a characteristic of entry into stationary phase than of response to nutrient limitation. These findings suggest a deviation in B. cereus from known polyP accumulation bacterial models, highlighting the existence of species-specific mechanisms governing polyP production and storage.
Figure 3.

A) Growth of Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 in MOPS minimal media (MOPS with Glutamic Acid 1.84 mg/ml, Leucine 0.8mg/ml, Valine 0.3 mg/ml, Threonine 0.168 mg/ml, Methionine 0.07 mg/ml, Histidine 0.05 mg/ml, 4 g liter−1 glucose, and 0.1 mM K2HPO4) at 37°C for 96 hours shaking. Culture density (OD600) was measured every 10 minutes and is indicated by solid black line, in triplicate. Error bars shown on graph as light gray dotted line. B) PolyP levels extracted from cultures at indicated times over the course of 72 hours.
PolyP plays minimal roles in sporulation and motility
Previous work reported a modest reduction in sporulation efficiency in a ppx mutant 69. This observation is not entirely unexpected, given the established links between polyP metabolism, cellular metabolism, and cell cycle regulation in bacteria 15,55. Consistent with these findings, we observed a similar small reduction in sporulation in the Δppx mutant (Fig 4A), although it was variable enough that it was not statistically significant in our experiments. No other polyP mutants exhibited any defect in sporulation. As expected, a spo0A mutant made no spores (not shown)84. For unknown reasons, possibly relating to differences in strain or culture conditions, we were unable to replicate the reported motility defect of B. cereus ppk1 mutants 69, although we did observe a substantial motility defect in the spo0A mutant (Supplemental Fig 2).
We next investigated whether intracellular polyP localization corresponded to spore formation by staining sporulating cells with the polyP-specific fluorophore JC-D7 76,77 and visualizing polyP distribution. In wild-type cells, which contained little detectible intracellular polyP, only a weak diffuse signal was observed throughout the cell, with no apparent localization at either 24 or 48 hours of growth in sporulation medium (1:10 TSB) (Fig 4B). In contrast, the Δppx mutant, which accumulated an average of ~5 nmol of intracellular polyP / mg total protein by 48 hours (Fig 2B), showed little detectible signal at 24 hours but exhibited intensely stained cytoplasmic polyP accumulation at 48 hours (Fig 4C). Staining with JC-D7 dye was sensitive enough that the signal from this small amount of polyP within the cells was enough to saturate our camera signal (Fig 4C). Overlay of the brightfield and JC-D7 fluorescence images revealed that these polyP accumulations were localized outside of the developing spore compartment, while still within the cell (Fig 4C). Taken together, these findings suggest that although polyP may influence the timing of sporulation, it is either not directly incorporated into or concentrated within the spore itself or the JC-D7 dye is unable to penetrate into spores. Regardless, these results show that micrographic staining with JC-D7 is easily able to detect levels of polyP in B. cereus near or below the limit of detection of our bulk culture quantification method.
PolyP condensates within B. cereus
A recurring but unexplained feature of sporulating B. cereus is the presence of distinct intracellular granules that appear during spore development 4,87. Although these structures have been reported since the earliest studies of sporulation, their composition and function have remained unclear. We observed similar granules in stationary phase B. cereus cells (Fig 5A), and notably, all detectable granules exhibited JC-D7 fluorescence, indicating the presence of polyP (Fig 5B-D). We were puzzled to observe, however, that these JC-D7 bright granules were also present in both Δppk1 and Δppk1 Δppk2 mutants (Fig 5C and 5D).
Figure 5.

A) Brightfield microscopy of B. cereus wild-type cells at exponential phase of growth (3 hours) and at late stationary phase of growth (48 hours) in TSB media at 37°C. Unlabeled scale bars represent 10 μm. B) Brightfield and fluorescence microscopy with JC-D7 of B. cereus wild-type at late stationary phase of growth (48 hours) in TSB at 37°C. C) Brightfield and fluorescence microscopy with JC-D7 of B. cereus Δppk1 at late stationary phase of growth (48 hours) in TSB at 37°C. D) Brightfield and fluorescence microscopy with JC-D7 of B. cereus Δppk1 Δppk2 at late stationary phase of growth (48 hours) in TSB at 37°C. E) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of exponential phase growth (3 hours) and of stage stationary growth (48 hours). Scale bars are 500 nm for TEM images.
To determine whether these structures resembled the liquid-liquid phase separated polyP granules described in P. aeruginosa and other bacteria 31,70, we examined B. cereus cells by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at 48 hours, corresponding to a time point at which intracellular JC-D7 positive granules are readily observed (Fig 5A–D). Unlike the spherical, phase-separated polyP granules in P. aeruginosa, the structures observed in B. cereus appear as electron dense condensates within regions of the cytoplasm that otherwise appear depleted of ribosomes. Actively-growing cells without granules appeared as expected, with homogenously distributed ribosomes throughout their cytoplasm (Fig 5E). PolyP is known to interact with ribosomes 88, and the dimensions of the granular structures, approximately 200–500 nm in diameter, are consistent with the intracellular foci observed by light microscopy. Taken together, these observations suggest that the JC-D7 positive granules observed in B. cereus may represent ribosome condensates that form during nutrient limitation.
To investigate whether the presence of these granules was associated with altered cellular physiology, we performed time-lapse microscopy of wild-type cells from 48-hour cultures transferred to fresh TSB agarose pads and incubated at 37°C. Cells containing visible granules consistently failed to resume growth, whereas neighboring cells lacking granules readily initiated cell division (Fig 6 and Supplemental video 1). Notably, granule containing cells remained growth-arrested throughout the entire 8-hour observation period despite exposure to nutrient rich conditions (Fig 6). To check and see if these cells were alive or dead we stained cells with propidium iodide, a common viability stain 89, and found that while the dye entered into some cells, indicating disrupted membrane permeability in those cells, not all the cells with granules inside allowed propidium iodide to pass (Supplemental Fig 3). This suggests that while some cells may have compromised membranes, many of these granule-containing cells are still alive but not growing.
Figure 6.

Time-lapse microscopy of wild-type B. cereus and Δppk1 mutant strain. Strains were grown for 48 hours before being spotted on fresh TSB agarose pads and incubated at 37°C during time-lapse microscopy. Scale bars represent 10 μm, time is in hours and minutes.
PolyP can be found outside the cell in B. cereus
Given the low levels of intracellular polyP that we detected, it was unclear whether B. cereus produced only limited amounts of polyP or whether polyP accumulated in a cellular compartment that is not typically examined. When imaging B. cereus cultures stained with JC-D7, in addition to discrete intracellular fluorescent foci, we frequently observed diffuse extracellular fluorescence surrounding subsets of cells (Fig 5B and 5C). These extracellular “clouds” were absent when regions of the agarose pad lacking cells were imaged, indicating that the signal originated from the cells or their surrounding medium rather than from background fluorescence.
Most studies of bacterial polyP focus exclusively on intracellular stores, leaving the presence and potential role of extracellular polyP largely unexplored. We therefore analyzed cell-free supernatants from growing cultures in TSB media at 37°C. PolyP release by the wild-type was minimal during early time points but became detectable by 24 hours and continued to increase over three days (Fig 7A). Under these conditions, extracellular polyP accumulated during late stationary phase, reaching up to ~90 μM (Fig 3), while intracellular levels remained low (Fig 2A). Extracellular polyP accumulation was dependent on sufficient oxygenation (Supplemental Fig 4), with more highly aerated conditions promoting production, in contrast to E. coli, in which polyP accumulation is favored under anaerobic conditions 90. Most startlingly, the production of extracellular polyP was the same in all of the mutant strains, including the Δppk1 Δppk2 mutant, which lacks all known polyP synthesis enzymes (Fig 7A). This, in combination with the observation of JC-D7 bright granules in the Δppk1 Δppk2 mutant above (Fig 5D), led us to more seriously consider the possibility that in addition to PPK1 and PPK2, B. cereus encodes a third, previously unknown polyP synthesis pathway. Although JC-D7 fluorescence is thought to be specific to polyP 76,77, we used an established polyP-specific gel electrophoresis DAPI photobleaching technique 82 to independently confirm that the extracellular signal was due to the presence of bona fide polyP (Fig 7B). These findings indicate that extracellular polyP accumulation in B. cereus does not require the canonical polyP synthesis pathways. The observation that extracellular polyP production is independent of known polyP-synthesizing enzymes suggests the presence of previously uncharacterized mechanisms in the B. cereus group. Identification of the factors underlying this process will require further investigation.
Figure 7.

A) Accumulation of extracellular polyP in cell-free supernatants during growth of B. cereus in TSB at 37°C, or in1:10 TSB (sporulation media) at 30°C, with shaking in beveled flasks over 72 hours. Samples were taken over the course of 3 days. Statistics performed in Prism using a one-way ANOVA (* p=<0.05) (**** p=<0.0001). B) Aliquots of supernatants from strains grown for 72 hours at 37°C in TSB media shaking in a beveled flask. Supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter, with polyP being extracted by phenol: chloroform extraction and separate on a 15% acrylamide TBE-urea gels and negative stained for polyP with DAPI.
We next examined if polyP was found extracellularly in cells during starvation as well and found that extracellular polyP levels remained low during the first 24 hours of growth in sporulation medium but increased modestly by 48 hours (Fig 7B). After 72 hours, extracellular concentrations of polyP approached 30 μM in the Δppx Δppk2 and Δppx Δppk1 Δppk2 strains (Fig 7B). This indicated that extracellular polyP was PPK-independent under these conditions as well, but that, unlike in full-strength TSB, the polyP-degrading enzymes PPX and PPK2 did influence polyP release in 1/10th TSB. No extracellular polyP was produced by the spo0A mutant under these conditions (Supplemental Fig 5). We also detected extracellular polyP accumulating in the supernatant of wild-type cells grown in MOPS minimal medium over the course of 72 hours (Supplemental Fig 6).
Extracellular polyP is resistant to ScPPX-mediated degradation
A common approach for detecting and quantifying polyP in prokaryotes relies on the use of purified ScPPX from Saccharomyces cerevisiae 39,78,79. To further characterize the extracellular polyP detected in culture supernatants, we treated samples with purified ScPPX. Surprisingly, no detectable hydrolysis was observed under conditions that readily degrade purified polyP controls (Supplemental Fig 7). ScPPX hydrolyzes polyP processively by removing phosphate residues from the terminal phosphoanhydride bonds of the polymer and therefore require access to the ends of the polyP chain 65,78,91. The resistance of the extracellular material to ScPPX-mediated hydrolysis suggests that the polymer may be inaccessible to the enzyme. Interestingly, polyP from the supernatant was still resistant to ScPPX degradation even after phenol/chloroform and ethanol precipitation (Supplemental Fig 8). One possible explanation is that extracellular polyP is associated with proteins or other macromolecules that shield the terminal ends of the polymer and prevent enzymatic degradation, although phenol/chloroform extraction would be expected to remove most proteins. Alternatively, polyP may be incorporated into a larger extracellular structure that limits enzyme accessibility or the ends of the extracellular polyP chains might be covalently modified in a way that prevents ScPPX activity. Further studies will be required to determine the molecular basis of this resistance to ScPPX hydrolysis.
Extracellular polyP is found in the related strains B. thuringiensis and B. anthracis
To investigate if this extracellular polyP was unique to B. cereus or if it was more widespread, we next examined the closely related species Bacillus thuringiensis, producer of insect-killing toxins, and a strain of Bacillus anthracis which is non-pathogenic to humans due to the lack of the pXO2 virulence plasmid 72,92. Extracellular polyP accumulation was observed in both B. thuringiensis and B. anthracis under similar conditions (Fig 8) suggesting that this phenotype is conserved across the B. cereus group and could have broader relevance during infection. Further studies need to be done in other pathogenic bacteria, both Gram-negatives and Gram-positives, to determine if extracellular polyP accumulation is widespread among bacteria and if it plays a role during infection by pathogenic bacteria.
Figure 8.

Accumulation of extracellular polyP in cell-free supernatants during growth of B. cereus, B. thuringiensis and B. anthracis in TSB at 37°C with shaking in beveled flasks over 72 hours.
Discussion
Nearly all studies investigating bacterial polyP metabolism have been conducted in Gram-negative species 14,30,31,33,38,43,44,50,55,70. One notable exception is a single pioneering 2004 paper from Arthur Kornberg’s lab, which established B. cereus as a model organism for studying polyP biology in Gram-positive organisms 69. Despite this foundation, relatively little progress has been made in understanding the role of polyP in Gram-positive organisms over the past two decades. In the present study, we revisited B. cereus using contemporary approaches for polyP detection, microscopy, and genetic manipulation to investigate the functions of polyP throughout the bacterial lifecycle. Our findings reveal previously unrecognized roles for polyP during vegetative growth and sporulation, provide evidence for the existence of extracellular polyP associated with B. cereus, and most surprisingly, indicate the presence of a novel, non-PPK-driven mechanism for polyP synthesis. In fungi and some protozoa, polyP is synthesis is mediated by the vacuolar transporter chaperone complex component VTC4, encoding a transmembrane polyphosphate polymerase 93,94. No VTC4 homolog is present in B. cereus. The precise origin of B. cereus extracellular polyP remains unclear and identifying the protein(s) involved is currently a major focus of research in our lab.
PolyP has long been linked to bacterial survival, stress adaptation, and virulence during infection 14,19,20,30,43,46,50,53,58,62,95,96. More recent studies have demonstrated that bacterial polyP can accumulate at infection sites, inhibiting macrophage-mediated phagocytosis 97, modulate the immune response 18, and contribute to biofilm formation 43,46,98. However, the source of extracellular polyP present during infection has remained unclear. Our results here provide evidence that B. cereus cells can actively release or secrete polyP into the extracellular environment, suggesting a potential mechanism by which polyP accumulates at sites of infection and influences host-pathogen interactions. We further observed extracellular polyP in B. thuringiensis and B. anthracis, suggesting that this phenomenon is not unique to B. cereus and may be conserved among members of the B. cereus group and, potentially, other Gram-positive organisms. While the broader distribution of extracellular polyP among bacteria remains unknown, these findings raise the possibility that extracellular polyP may be more widespread than currently appreciated and could contribute to host-pathogen interactions in other organisms. These observations also raise questions regarding the mechanism by which polyP reaches the extracellular environment. For example, extracellular polyP could be released following cell lysis, actively exported from the cell, or secreted in association with proteins or other macromolecular assemblies. We are working to identify these mechanisms in Bacillus species now, although we expect that rigorous determination of polyP export mechanisms will not be possible until we identify the source of non-PPK polyP synthesis in these bacteria.
We observed the accumulation of intracellular granules prior to sporulation in starving cells (Fig 5). These granules have been reported previously 4,87, but their composition and biological significance remain unclear. The fact that these granules stain with JC-D7, suggesting they contain polyP even in the absence of PPK1 and PPK2, supports the idea that in Bacillus species there is a non-canonical polyP producing enzyme. One potential interpretation of these observations is that polyP participates in the formation of macromolecular assemblies containing ribosomal components, potentially contributing to a reduction in translational activity during entry into sporulation. Although polyP has long been known to associate with and modulate ribosomes 88, the functional significance of this interaction remains incompletely understood. Our findings are in agreement with the possibility that polyP may contribute to the regulation of translational activity under specific physiological conditions 99–101. Protein synthesis is an energetically demanding process that is central to bacterial growth and survival 102–106. To adapt to changing environmental conditions, bacterial cells tightly regulate protein synthesis, trafficking, folding and degradation 103,107,108. One strategy used by bacteria involves ribosome hibernation factors which promote the conversion of active 70S ribosomes in translationally inactive 100S ribosomes during stress 108. Additional mechanisms capable of reducing protein synthesis include ribosomal pausing or stalling on specific codons 109 or through mRNA secondary structures 110, so it is possible that these large ribosome complexes represent a new mechanism for ribosome inactivation. However, the composition of the JC-D7 bright dense granules in B. cereus and the extent to which they might directly influence ribosome function remain unknown.
A speculative extension of this model is that polyP accumulation may serve dual roles during periods of reduced growth in B. cereus. In addition to any potential regulatory effects on protein synthesis, polyP could function as a reservoir of stored phosphate and metabolic potential that can later be mobilized when favorable conditions return. Under such circumstances, polyP degradation could both relieve any polyP-associated inhibitory effects and provide phosphate for rapid metabolic reactivation. While this hypothesis is consistent with the established roles of polyP in cellular energetics, our current data do not directly address these mechanisms. Future studies aimed at defining the molecular composition of polyP containing granules, determining whether ribosomes are associated with these structures, and measuring translational activity in the presence and absence of polyP will be necessary to evaluate these possibilities and establish any mechanistic connection between polyP accumulation and translational regulation.
Supplementary Material
Importance.
Bacillus cereus is a spore-forming bacterium that causes foodborne illness and persists in soil and food-processing environments, where survival depends on managing phosphate and energy reserves during starvation. Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP), an ancient polymer used by nearly all cells to withstand stress, has been studied almost entirely as a molecule stored inside bacteria. We show that Bacillus cereus maintains two separate polyP pools. The internal pool is made by a known enzyme (PPK1) and is associated with dormant cells whose protein-making machinery appears to be packed away. The external pool is made without any known polyP-synthesizing enzyme, pointing to a novel polyP synthesis pathway that is shared with the close relatives Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus anthracis.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by NIGMS R35 MIRA grant GM124590 (to MJG) and NIGMS F32 postdoctoral fellowship GM159427 (to CWH). Thank you to the Bacillus Genetic Stock center for kindly providing Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 for this study.
References
- 1.Sun T., Wang R., Sun Y., Zhang X., Ge C., and Li Y. (2025). The Global Prevalence of Bacillus spp. in Milk and Dairy Products: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Foods 14. 10.3390/foods14152599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hinnekens P., Fayad N., Gillis A., and Mahillon J. (2022). Conjugation across Bacillus cereus and kin: A review. Front Microbiol 13, 1034440. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bottone E.J. (2010). Bacillus cereus, a volatile human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 23, 382–398. 10.1128/CMR.00073-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Vries Y.P., Hornstra L.M., de Vos W.M., and Abee T. (2004). Growth and sporulation of Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 under defined conditions: temporal expression of genes for key sigma factors. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 2514–2519. 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2514-2519.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Browne N., and Dowds B.C. (2001). Heat and salt stress in the food pathogen Bacillus cereus. J Appl Microbiol 91, 1085–1094. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hanson R.S., Srinivasan V.R., and Halvorson H.O. (1963). Biochemistry of Sporulation. Ii. Enzymatic Changes during Sporulation of Bacillus Cereus. J Bacteriol 86, 45–50. 10.1128/jb.86.1.45-50.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stenfors Arnesen L.P., Fagerlund A., and Granum P.E. (2008). From soil to gut: Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32, 579–606. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Turnbull P.C., and Kramer J.M. (1985). Intestinal carriage of Bacillus cereus: faecal isolation studies in three population groups. J Hyg (Lond) 95, 629–638. 10.1017/s0022172400060733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jensen G.B., Hansen B.M., Eilenberg J., and Mahillon J. (2003). The hidden lifestyles of Bacillus cereus and relatives. Environ Microbiol 5, 631–640. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00461.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ehling-Schulz M., Lereclus D., and Koehler T.M. (2019). The Bacillus cereus Group: Bacillus Species with Pathogenic Potential. Microbiol Spectr 7. 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0032-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mock M., and Fouet A. (2001). Anthrax. Annu Rev Microbiol 55, 647–671. 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bel Y., Ferre J., and Hernandez-Martinez P. (2020). Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: Functional Characterization and Mechanism of Action. Toxins (Basel) 12. 10.3390/toxins12120785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martinez-Zavala S.A., Barboza-Perez U.E., Hernandez-Guzman G., Bideshi D.K., and Barboza-Corona J.E. (2019). Chitinases of Bacillus thuringiensis: Phylogeny, Modular Structure, and Applied Potentials. Front Microbiol 10, 3032. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bowlin M.Q., and Gray M.J. (2021). Inorganic polyphosphate in host and microbe biology. Trends Microbiol 29, 1013–1023. 10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rai A., and Jakob U. (2025). Polyphosphate: a cellular Swiss army knife. Curr Opin Biotechnol 93, 103303. 10.1016/j.copbio.2025.103303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Denoncourt A., and Downey M. (2021). Model systems for studying polyphosphate biology: a focus on microorganisms. Curr Genet 67, 331–346. 10.1007/s00294-020-01148-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hofmann S., Kogay R., Schmerling C., Stracke C., Niemeyer F., Schaller T., Makarova K.S., Koonin E.V., Snoep J.L., Brasen C., and Siebers B. (2026). Identification of a distinct family of polyphosphate kinases relevant to energy homeostasis in Crenarchaeota. J Biol Chem 302, 111283. 10.1016/j.jbc.2026.111283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Morrissey J.H. (2012). Polyphosphate: a link between platelets, coagulation and inflammation. Int J Hematol 95, 346–352. 10.1007/s12185-012-1054-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kornberg A., Rao N.N., and Ault-Riche D. (1999). Inorganic polyphosphate: a molecule of many functions. Annu Rev Biochem 68, 89–125. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brown M.R., and Kornberg A. (2008). The long and short of it - polyphosphate, PPK and bacterial survival. Trends Biochem Sci 33, 284–290. 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang H., Gomez-Garcia M.R., Brown M.R., and Kornberg A. (2005). Inorganic polyphosphate in Dictyostelium discoideum: influence on development, sporulation, and predation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 2731–2735. 10.1073/pnas.0500023102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ogawa N., Tzeng C.M., Fraley C.D., and Kornberg A. (2000). Inorganic polyphosphate in Vibrio cholerae: genetic, biochemical, and physiologic features. J Bacteriol 182, 6687–6693. 10.1128/JB.182.23.6687-6693.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Van Dien S.J., and Keasling J.D. (1999). Effect of polyphosphate metabolism on the Escherichia coli phosphate-starvation response. Biotechnol Prog 15, 587–593. 10.1021/bp990067u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ahn K., and Kornberg A. (1990). Polyphosphate kinase from Escherichia coli. Purification and demonstration of a phosphoenzyme intermediate. J Biol Chem 265, 11734–11739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Keasling J.D. (1997). Regulation of intracellular toxic metals and other cations by hydrolysis of polyphosphate. Ann N Y Acad Sci 829, 242–249. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gray M.J., and Jakob U. (2015). Oxidative stress protection by polyphosphate--new roles for an old player. Curr Opin Microbiol 24, 1–6. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Beaufay F., Quarles E., Franz A., Katamanin O., Wholey W.Y., and Jakob U. (2020). Polyphosphate Functions In Vivo as an Iron Chelator and Fenton Reaction Inhibitor. mBio 11. 10.1128/mBio.01017-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Phillips N.F., Hsieh P.C., and Kowalczyk T.H. (1999). Polyphosphate glucokinase. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 23, 101–125. 10.1007/978-3-642-58444-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Achbergerova L., and Nahalka J. (2011). Polyphosphate--an ancient energy source and active metabolic regulator. Microb Cell Fact 10, 63. 10.1186/1475-2859-10-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Neville N., Roberge N., and Jia Z. (2022). Polyphosphate Kinase 2 (PPK2) Enzymes: Structure, Function, and Roles in Bacterial Physiology and Virulence. Int J Mol Sci 23. 10.3390/ijms23020670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guan J., and Jakob U. (2024). The Protein Scaffolding Functions of Polyphosphate. J Mol Biol 436, 168504. 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gray M.J., Wholey W.Y., Wagner N.O., Cremers C.M., Mueller-Schickert A., Hock N.T., Krieger A.G., Smith E.M., Bender R.A., Bardwell J.C., and Jakob U. (2014). Polyphosphate is a primordial chaperone. Mol Cell 53, 689–699. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baijal K., Abramchuk I., Herrera C.M., Mah T.F., Trent M.S., Lavallee-Adam M., and Downey M. (2024). Polyphosphate kinase regulates LPS structure and polymyxin resistance during starvation in E. coli. PLoS Biol 22, e3002558. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Akosah Y., Yang J., and Pavlov E. (2024). Inorganic polyphosphate and ion transport across biological membranes. Biochem Soc Trans. 10.1042/BST20230522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Baijal K., Abramchuk I., Herrera C.M., Stephen Trent M., Lavallee-Adam M., and Downey M. (2023). Proteomics analysis reveals a role for E. coli polyphosphate kinase in membrane structure and polymyxin resistance during starvation. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2023.07.06.546892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kus F., Smolenski R.T., and Tomczyk M. (2022). Inorganic Polyphosphate-Regulator of Cellular Metabolism in Homeostasis and Disease. Biomedicines 10. 10.3390/biomedicines10040913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Karasz D.C., Weaver A.I., Buckley D.H., and Wilhelm R.C. (2022). Conditional filamentation as an adaptive trait of bacteria and its ecological significance in soils. Environ Microbiol 24, 1–17. 10.1111/1462-2920.15871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gray M.J. (2020). Interactions between DksA and Stress-Responsive Alternative Sigma Factors Control Inorganic Polyphosphate Accumulation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 202. 10.1128/JB.00133-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gray M.J. (2019). Inorganic Polyphosphate Accumulation in Escherichia coli Is Regulated by DksA but Not by (p)ppGpp. J Bacteriol 201. 10.1128/JB.00664-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Soto D.F., Recalde A., Orell A., Albers S.V., Paradela A., Navarro C.A., and Jerez C.A. (2019). Global effect of the lack of inorganic polyphosphate in the extremophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus: A proteomic approach. J Proteomics 191, 143–152. 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Munevar N.F., de Almeida L.G., and Spira B. (2017). Differential regulation of polyphosphate genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Genet Genomics 292, 105–116. 10.1007/s00438-016-1259-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Varas M., Valdivieso C., Mauriaca C., Ortiz-Severin J., Paradela A., Poblete-Castro I., Cabrera R., and Chavez F.P. (2017). Multi-level evaluation of Escherichia coli polyphosphate related mutants using global transcriptomic, proteomic and phenomic analyses. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1861, 871–883. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ortiz-Severin J., Varas M., Bravo-Toncio C., Guiliani N., and Chavez F.P. (2015). Multiple antibiotic susceptibility of polyphosphate kinase mutants (ppk1 and ppk2) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 as revealed by global phenotypic analysis. Biol Res 48, 22. 10.1186/s40659-015-0012-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Casey W.T., Nikodinovic-Runic J., Fonseca Garcia P., Guzik M.W., McGrath J.W., Quinn J.P., Cagney G., Prieto M.A., and O'Connor K.E. (2013). The effect of polyphosphate kinase gene deletion on polyhydroxyalkanoate accumulation and carbon metabolism in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol Rep 5, 740–746. 10.1111/1758-2229.12076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Varela C., Mauriaca C., Paradela A., Albar J.P., Jerez C.A., and Chavez F.P. (2010). New structural and functional defects in polyphosphate deficient bacteria: a cellular and proteomic study. BMC Microbiol 10, 7. 10.1186/1471-2180-10-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rao N.N., Gomez-Garcia M.R., and Kornberg A. (2009). Inorganic polyphosphate: essential for growth and survival. Annu Rev Biochem 78, 605–647. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.083007.093039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jenal U., and Hengge-Aronis R. (2003). Regulation by proteolysis in bacterial cells. Curr Opin Microbiol 6, 163–172. 10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Candon H.L., Allan B.J., Fraley C.D., and Gaynor E.C. (2007). Polyphosphate kinase 1 is a pathogenesis determinant in Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol 189, 8099–8108. 10.1128/JB.01037-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu G., Saxena D., Deng H., Norman R.G., Chen Z., Abrams W.R., Malamud D., and Li Y. (2010). Effect of protease inhibitors on the quantitative and qualitative assessment of oral microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 312, 63–70. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02100.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Peng L., Luo W.Y., Zhao T., Wan C.S., Jiang Y., Chi F., Zhao W., Cao H., and Huang S.H. (2012). Polyphosphate kinase 1 is required for the pathogenesis process of meningitic Escherichia coli K1 (RS218). Future Microbiol 7, 411–423. 10.2217/fmb.12.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Srisanga K., Suthapot P., Permsirivisarn P., Govitrapong P., Tungpradabkul S., and Wongtrakoongate P. (2019). Polyphosphate kinase 1 of Burkholderia pseudomallei controls quorum sensing, RpoS and host cell invasion. J Proteomics 194, 14–24. 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Weidenmaier C., and Peschel A. (2008). Teichoic acids and related cell-wall glycopolymers in Gram-positive physiology and host interactions. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6, 276–287. 10.1038/nrmicro1861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rashid M.H., Rumbaugh K., Passador L., Davies D.G., Hamood A.N., Iglewski B.H., and Kornberg A. (2000). Polyphosphate kinase is essential for biofilm development, quorum sensing, and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 9636–9641. 10.1073/pnas.170283397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Doruk T., Avican U., Camci I.Y., and Gedik S.T. (2013). Overexpression of polyphosphate kinase gene (ppk) increases bioinsecticide production by Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Res 168, 199–203. 10.1016/j.micres.2012.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hamm C.W., and Gray M.J. (2025). Inorganic polyphosphate and the stringent response coordinately control cell division and cell morphology in Escherichia coli. mBio 16, e0351124. 10.1128/mbio.03511-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chugh S., Tiwari P., Suri C., Gupta S.K., Singh P., Bouzeyen R., Kidwai S., Srivastava M., Rameshwaram N.R., Kumar Y., et al. (2024). Polyphosphate kinase-1 regulates bacterial and host metabolic pathways involved in pathogenesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121, e2309664121. 10.1073/pnas.2309664121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Neville N., Roberge N., Ji X., Stephen P., Lu J.L., and Jia Z. (2021). A Dual-Specificity Inhibitor Targets Polyphosphate Kinase 1 and 2 Enzymes To Attenuate Virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 12, e0059221. 10.1128/mBio.00592-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gautam L.K., Sharma P., and Capalash N. (2019). Bacterial Polyphosphate Kinases Revisited: Role in Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Potential. Curr Drug Targets 20, 292–301. 10.2174/1389450119666180801120231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Baran A., Kwiatkowska A., and Potocki L. (2023). Antibiotics and Bacterial Resistance-A Short Story of an Endless Arms Race. Int J Mol Sci 24. 10.3390/ijms24065777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Andexer J.N., and Richter M. (2015). Emerging enzymes for ATP regeneration in biocatalytic processes. Chembiochem 16, 380–386. 10.1002/cbic.201402550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang H., Ishige K., and Kornberg A. (2002). A polyphosphate kinase (PPK2) widely conserved in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 16678–16683. 10.1073/pnas.262655199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Parks Q.M., and Hobden J.A. (2005). Polyphosphate kinase 1 and the ocular virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46, 248–251. 10.1167/iovs.04-0340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Akiyama M., Crooke E., and Kornberg A. (1992). The polyphosphate kinase gene of Escherichia coli. Isolation and sequence of the ppk gene and membrane location of the protein. J Biol Chem 267, 22556–22561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pokhrel A., Lingo J.C., Wolschendorf F., and Gray M.J. (2019). Assaying for Inorganic Polyphosphate in Bacteria. J Vis Exp. 10.3791/58818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Akiyama M., Crooke E., and Kornberg A. (1993). An exopolyphosphatase of Escherichia coli. The enzyme and its ppx gene in a polyphosphate operon. J Biol Chem 268, 633–639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kornberg A. (1995). Inorganic polyphosphate: toward making a forgotten polymer unforgettable. J Bacteriol 177, 491–496. 10.1128/jb.177.3.491-496.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nocek B., Kochinyan S., Proudfoot M., Brown G., Evdokimova E., Osipiuk J., Edwards A.M., Savchenko A., Joachimiak A., and Yakunin A.F. (2008). Polyphosphate-dependent synthesis of ATP and ADP by the family-2 polyphosphate kinases in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 17730–17735. 10.1073/pnas.0807563105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Motomura K., Hirota R., Okada M., Ikeda T., Ishida T., and Kuroda A. (2014). A new subfamily of polyphosphate kinase 2 (class III PPK2) catalyzes both nucleoside monophosphate phosphorylation and nucleoside diphosphate phosphorylation. Appl Environ Microbiol 80, 2602–2608. 10.1128/AEM.03971-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shi X., Rao N.N., and Kornberg A. (2004). Inorganic polyphosphate in Bacillus cereus: motility, biofilm formation, and sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 17061–17065. 10.1073/pnas.0407787101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Racki L.R., Tocheva E.I., Dieterle M.G., Sullivan M.C., Jensen G.J., and Newman D.K. (2017). Polyphosphate granule biogenesis is temporally and functionally tied to cell cycle exit during starvation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, E2440–E2449. 10.1073/pnas.1615575114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dulmage H.T. (1970). Production of the spore-delta-endotoxin complex by variants of bacillus thuringiensis in two fermentation media. J Invertebr Pathol 16, 385–389. 10.1016/0022-2011(70)90157-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chesnokova O.N., McPherson S.A., Steichen C.T., and Turnbough C.L. Jr. (2009). The spore-specific alanine racemase of Bacillus anthracis and its role in suppressing germination during spore development. J Bacteriol 191, 1303–1310. 10.1128/JB.01098-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Patrick J.E., and Kearns D.B. (2008). MinJ (YvjD) is a topological determinant of cell division in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 70, 1166–1179. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06469.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sitaraman R., and Leppla S.H. (2012). Methylation-dependent DNA restriction in Bacillus anthracis. Gene 494, 44–50. 10.1016/j.gene.2011.11.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Belliveau B.H., and Trevors J.T. (1989). Transformation of Bacillus cereus vegetative cells by electroporation. Appl Environ Microbiol 55, 1649–1652. 10.1128/aem.55.6.1649-1652.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Deitert A., Fees J., Mertens A., Nguyen Van D., Maares M., Haase H., Blank L.M., and Keil C. (2024). Rapid Fluorescence Assay for Polyphosphate in Yeast Extracts Using JC-D7. Yeast 41, 593–604. 10.1002/yea.3979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yang X., Gao R., Zhang Q., Yung C.C.M., Yin H., and Li J. (2024). Quantification of Polyphosphate in Environmental Planktonic Samples Using a Novel Fluorescence Dye JC-D7. Environ Sci Technol 58, 14249–14259. 10.1021/acs.est.4c04545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dahl J.U., Gray M.J., Bazopoulou D., Beaufay F., Lempart J., Koenigsknecht M.J., Wang Y., Baker J.R., Hasler W.L., Young V.B., et al. (2017). The anti-inflammatory drug mesalamine targets bacterial polyphosphate accumulation. Nat Microbiol 2, 16267. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rudat A.K., Pokhrel A., Green T.J., and Gray M.J. (2018). Mutations in Escherichia coli Polyphosphate Kinase That Lead to Dramatically Increased In Vivo Polyphosphate Levels. J Bacteriol 200. 10.1128/JB.00697-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lieber A.D., Vaghasia D., Hamm C.W., and Gray M.J. (2025). A Defined Artificial Saliva Medium Allows Characterization of the Hypothiocyanite Response of Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans. Mol Oral Microbiol 40, 289–302. 10.1111/omi.70008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bru S., Jimenez J., Canadell D., Arino J., and Clotet J. (2016). Improvement of biochemical methods of polyP quantification. Microb Cell 4, 6–15. 10.15698/mic2017.01.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Smith S.A., and Morrissey J.H. (2007). Sensitive fluorescence detection of polyphosphate in polyacrylamide gels using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindol. Electrophoresis 28, 3461–3465. 10.1002/elps.200700041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Milton M.E., and Cavanagh J. (2023). The Biofilm Regulatory Network from Bacillus subtilis: A Structure-Function Analysis. J Mol Biol 435, 167923. 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zahid S.H., and Fujita M. (2026). Differential signaling roles of the KinA-KinE sensor kinases in regulating Spo0A, the master regulator of Bacillus subtilis cell-fate decisions. Curr Opin Microbiol 92, 102791. 10.1016/j.mib.2026.102791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rao N.N., Liu S., and Kornberg A. (1998). Inorganic polyphosphate in Escherichia coli: the phosphate regulon and the stringent response. J Bacteriol 180, 2186–2193. 10.1128/JB.180.8.2186-2193.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ault-Riche D., Fraley C.D., Tzeng C.M., and Kornberg A. (1998). Novel assay reveals multiple pathways regulating stress-induced accumulations of inorganic polyphosphate in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180, 1841–1847. 10.1128/JB.180.7.1841-1847.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.de Vries Y.P., Atmadja R.D., Hornstra L.M., de Vos W.M., and Abee T. (2005). Influence of glutamate on growth, sporulation, and spore properties of Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 in defined medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 3248–3254. 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3248-3254.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.McInerney P., Mizutani T., and Shiba T. (2006). Inorganic polyphosphate interacts with ribosomes and promotes translation fidelity in vitro and in vivo. Mol Microbiol 60, 438–447. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Davey H.M. (2011). Life, death, and in-between: meanings and methods in microbiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 77, 5571–5576. 10.1128/AEM.00744-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kristiansen R., Nguyen H.T., Saunders A.M., Nielsen J.L., Wimmer R., Le V.Q., McIlroy S.J., Petrovski S., Seviour R.J., Calteau A., et al. (2013). A metabolic model for members of the genus Tetrasphaera involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal. ISME J 7, 543–554. 10.1038/ismej.2012.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Tammenkoski M., Moiseev V., Lahti M., Ugochukwu E., Brondijk T.H.C., White S.A., Lahti R., and Baykov A.A. (2007). Kinetic and mutational analyses of the major cytosolic exopolyphosphatase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 282, 9302–9311. 10.1074/jbc.M609423200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Carroll L.M., Cheng R.A., Wiedmann M., and Kovac J. (2022). Keeping up with the Bacillus cereus group: taxonomy through the genomics era and beyond. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 62, 7677–7702. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1916735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Muller O., Bayer M.J., Peters C., Andersen J.S., Mann M., and Mayer A. (2002). The Vtc proteins in vacuole fusion: coupling NSF activity to V(0) trans-complex formation. EMBO J 21, 259–269. 10.1093/emboj/21.3.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bertolini M.S., Chiurillo M.A., and Docampo R. (2026). Composition and role of the vacuolar transporter chaperone complex in polyphosphate synthesis and infectivity in Trypanosoma cruzi. mBio 17, e0037226. 10.1128/mbio.00372-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Chuang Y.M., Belchis D.A., and Karakousis P.C. (2013). The polyphosphate kinase gene ppk2 is required for Mycobacterium tuberculosis inorganic polyphosphate regulation and virulence. mBio 4, e00039–00013. 10.1128/mBio.00039-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kim K.S., Rao N.N., Fraley C.D., and Kornberg A. (2002). Inorganic polyphosphate is essential for long-term survival and virulence factors in Shigella and Salmonella spp. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 7675–7680. 10.1073/pnas.112210499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Roewe J., Stavrides G., Strueve M., Sharma A., Marini F., Mann A., Smith S.A., Kaya Z., Strobl B., Mueller M., et al. (2020). Bacterial polyphosphates interfere with the innate host defense to infection. Nat Commun 11, 4035. 10.1038/s41467-020-17639-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kulakovskaya E.V., and Kulakovskaya T.V. (2026). Inorganic Polyphosphate and Human Diseases. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 63, 83–114. 10.1007/978-3-032-17771-1_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Guan J., Hurto R.L., Rai A., Bhattrai J., Azaldegui C.A., Ortiz-Rodriguez L.A., Liu Q., Biteen J.S., Freddolino L., and Jakob U. (2026). Polyphosphate modulates the stress-responsive formation of functional RNA-protein condensates in bacteria and mammalian cells. PLoS Biol 24, e3003775. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Baijal K., Kore B., Abramchuk I., Denoncourt A., Han S., Simms A., Dagenais A., Long A.R., Rudner A.D., Lavallee-Adam M., et al. (2025). Identification of polyphosphate-binding proteins in Escherichia coli uncovers targets involved in translation control and ribosome biogenesis. mBio 16, e0050025. 10.1128/mbio.00500-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Feaga H.A., and Dworkin J. (2021). Transcription regulates ribosome hibernation. Mol Microbiol 116, 663–673. 10.1111/mmi.14762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Njenga R., Boele J., Ozturk Y., and Koch H.G. (2023). Coping with stress: How bacteria fine-tune protein synthesis and protein transport. J Biol Chem 299, 105163. 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zegarra V., Bedrunka P., Bange G., and Czech L. (2023). How to save a bacterial ribosome in times of stress. Semin Cell Dev Biol 136, 3–12. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Baral R., Ho K., Kumar R.P., Hopkins J.B., Watkins M.B., LaRussa S., Caban-Penix S., Calderone L.A., and Bradshaw N. (2024). A General Mechanism for the General Stress Response in Bacteria. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2024.02.16.580724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Dalldorf C., Rychel K., Szubin R., Hefner Y., Patel A., Zielinski D.C., and Palsson B.O. (2024). The hallmarks of a tradeoff in transcriptomes that balances stress and growth functions. mSystems, e0030524. 10.1128/msystems.00305-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Bouillet S., Bauer T.S., and Gottesman S. (2024). RpoS and the bacterial general stress response. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 88, e0015122. 10.1128/mmbr.00151-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Helena-Bueno K., Rybak M.Y., Ekemezie C.L., Sullivan R., Brown C.R., Dingwall C., Basle A., Schneider C., Connolly J.P.R., Blaza J.N., et al. (2024). A new family of bacterial ribosome hibernation factors. Nature 626, 1125–1132. 10.1038/s41586-024-07041-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Maki Y., and Yoshida H. (2021). Ribosomal Hibernation-Associated Factors in Escherichia coli. Microorganisms 10. 10.3390/microorganisms10010033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Buskirk A.R., and Green R. (2017). Ribosome pausing, arrest and rescue in bacteria and eukaryotes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bao C., Loerch S., Ling C., Korostelev A.A., Grigorieff N., and Ermolenko D.N. (2020). mRNA stem-loops can pause the ribosome by hindering A-site tRNA binding. Elife 9. 10.7554/eLife.55799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Genome sequences of all B. cereus strains used in this study have been deposited in the NIH Sequence Read Archive (accession number PRJNA1505627) and all other raw data are available on FigShare (10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8628284).
