Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1973 Aug;232(3):503–514.1. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010283

Responses of single rods in the retina of the turtle

E A Schwartz
PMCID: PMC1350506  PMID: 4759680

Abstract

1. The responses of rods in the retina of the turtle, Chelydra serpentina, have been studied by intracellular recording.

2. The identification of rods as the origin of the recorded responses has been confirmed by marking with Procion Yellow.

3. The response to a small spot of light was a hyperpolarization which increased with increasing light intensity. For dim, small diameter stimuli, the shape of the rod response was similar to that of cones but 2× slower and 2× larger in amplitude. The time integral of the rod response to a dim, small diameter flash is, therefore, approximately 4× greater than the integral of the cone response.

4. The shape of the rod response depended on the pattern of retinal illumination as well as stimulus intensity. Enlarging the area of illumination increased the peak amplitude and delayed repolarization following a light step. The area of retina which influenced the response was approximately 200 μm in radius.

5. It is concluded that for dim light the responses of rods are larger than those of cones because of (i) a greater response to direct illumination and (ii) an enhancement of response by interaction from a large retinal area.

Full text

PDF
504

Images in this article

514-1Plate 1
on p.514-1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARDEN G. B., WEALE R. A. Nervous mechanisms and dark-adaptation. J Physiol. 1954 Sep 28;125(3):417–426. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baylor D. A., Fuortes M. G., O'Bryan P. M. Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1971 Apr;214(2):265–294. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borsellino A., Fuortes M. G. Responses to single photons in virual cells of limulus. J Physiol. 1968 Jun;196(3):507–539. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DOWLING J. E. NEURAL AND PHOTOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF VISUAL ADAPTATION IN THE RAT. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jul;46:1287–1301. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.6.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grabowski S. R., Pinto L. H., Pak W. L. Adaptation in retinal rods of axolotl: intracellular recordings. Science. 1972 Jun 16;176(4040):1240–1243. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4040.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. JOHNSON B. K., TANSLEY K. The cones of the grass snake's eye. Nature. 1956 Dec 8;178(4545):1285–1286. doi: 10.1038/1781285a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liebman P. A., Entine G. Visual pigments of frog and tadpole (Rana pipiens). Vision Res. 1968 Jul;8(7):761–775. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90128-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'BRIEN B. Vision and resolution in the central retina. J Opt Soc Am. 1951 Dec;41(12):882–894. doi: 10.1364/josa.41.000882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pautler E. L. Directional sensitivity of isolated turtle retinas. J Opt Soc Am. 1967 Oct;57(10):1267–1269. doi: 10.1364/josa.57.001267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Penn R. D., Hagins W. A. Kinetics of the photocurrent of retinal rods. Biophys J. 1972 Aug;12(8):1073–1094. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86145-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. RUSHTON W. A., COHEN R. D. Visual purple level and the course of dark adaptation. Nature. 1954 Feb 13;173(4398):301–302. doi: 10.1038/173301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RUSHTON W. A. THE SENSITIVITY OF RODS UNDER ILLUMINATION. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:141–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schwartz E. A. Organization of on-off cells in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1973 Apr;230(1):1–14. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Toyoda J., Hashimoto H., Anno H., Tomita T. The rod response in the frog and studies by intracellular recording. Vision Res. 1970 Nov;10(11):1093–1100. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(70)90026-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WEALE R. A. Retinal summation and human visual thresholds. Nature. 1958 Jan 18;181(4603):154–156. doi: 10.1038/181154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES