Abstract
Timeless and its fission yeast ortholog Swi1 are evolutionarily conserved components of the replication fork protection complex that ensures faithful DNA replication and genome stability. While their nuclear roles are well-characterized, their roles in mitochondrial genome maintenance remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate a previously unrecognized connection between Timeless/Swi1 and mitochondrial homeostasis. In fission yeast, swi1 deletion increased association of the DNA repair protein Rad52 with mitochondrial DNA sequences across the mitochondrial genome, suggesting altered mitochondrial genome maintenance. Unexpectedly, swi1∆ cells showed an increased mtDNA copy number and improved growth under respiratory conditions, suggesting activation of compensatory mechanisms that promote mitochondrial genome maintenance. The loss of Swi1 also partially rescued the growth defect under respiratory conditions and mtDNA loss associated with depletion of mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ, linking Swi1 to pathways regulating mitochondrial replication under stress. Consistent with these phenotypes, transcriptomic and pathway enrichment analyses revealed transcriptional changes indicative of reduced glycolysis and enhanced oxidative phosphorylation, suggesting a shift toward respiratory metabolism. In human cells, Timeless depletion elicited distinct mitochondrial responses depending on the cell type. While Timeless-depleted TE-11 and Saos-2 cells elicited mitochondrial phenotypes comparable to those observed in fission yeast, Timeless depletion in U-2 OS cells led to reduced mtDNA copy number, elevated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and mass, consistent with mitochondrial dysfunction. Despite these phenotypic differences, both fission yeast and human cells exhibited elevated levels of orthologs of the mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) and the oxidative stress regulator NRF2, suggesting the conserved activation of compensatory mitochondrial and antioxidant pathways. Together, these findings identify an evolutionarily conserved connection between Timeless/Swi1 and mitochondrial homeostasis and reveal distinct adaptive responses to mitochondrial stress.
Keywords: Timeless, Swi1, fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, mitochondria, mtDNA, DNA polymerase γ, stress response, mitochondrial genome, oxidative stress
1. Introduction
Timeless is conserved amongst eukaryotes and plays a key role in DNA replication and genome stability. In both yeast and mammals, Timeless (Swi1 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Tof1 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae) functions as the major subunit of the replication fork protection complex that is critical for stabilizing replication forks, coordinating S-phase checkpoint responses, and preventing replication-transcription conflicts, thereby contributing to genome maintenance [1,2,3]. Consistent with its role in maintaining replication fork stability, the loss of Timeless/Swi1 causes replication stress and accumulation of DNA damage in the nuclear genome, particularly at difficult-to-replicate genomic regions, including telomeres, rDNA loci, repetitive DNA sequences, and ectopically introduced LacO repeat arrays [1,2,3,4,5].
While the nuclear functions of Timeless/Swi1 have been well-characterized, its potential role in mitochondrial function remains unknown. Mitochondria possess their own genome (mtDNA), which must be faithfully replicated and maintained to ensure proper oxidative phosphorylation and energy production. The loss of mitochondrial genome integrity is associated with aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and metabolic disorders [6,7,8]. Unlike nuclear DNA replication, mitochondrial DNA replication is carried out by DNA polymerase γ (Pol γ). Moreover, because mitochondria continuously generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, leading to non-bulky base lesions, base excision repair is the primary DNA repair mechanism in mitochondria. However, studies indicate that homologous recombination also operates in this organelle [9]. In addition, studies have suggested that nuclear DNA repair and replication proteins can influence mitochondrial genome dynamics, either through direct localization or indirect regulatory mechanisms [10,11,12]. Rad52 is a key homologous recombination factor that binds single-stranded DNA and promotes recombination-mediated repair of damaged DNA. Studies have shown that members of the Rad52 epistasis group, including Rad51, Rad52, and Rad59, contribute to mitochondrial DNA repair and maintenance, and that some of these proteins localize to mitochondria in both yeast and human cells [13,14,15,16]. Furthermore, the mitochondrial DNA copy number is dynamically regulated in response to metabolic state, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cellular stress, suggesting that changes in mtDNA abundance may represent an adaptive response to compromised mitochondrial function [17].
In this study, we explore the role of Timeless/Swi1 in mitochondrial genome maintenance and function. We show that Swi1 deletion in S. pombe results in increased Rad52 association across the mitochondrial genome, consistent with elevated mitochondrial genome stress and instability, and is accompanied by a substantial increase in mtDNA copy number. Moreover, through genetic interaction studies with pog1, which encodes Pol γ in S. pombe, we demonstrate that Swi1 loss partially suppresses the growth defects caused by impaired mitochondrial DNA replication. In human cells, mitochondrial responses are cell-type-dependent. Timeless depletion in TE-11 esophageal cancer cells and Saos-2 osteosarcoma cells results in mitochondrial phenotypes similar to those observed in fission yeast; however, its depletion in U-2 OS cells leads to a reduced mtDNA copy number, elevated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS), and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, consistent with mitochondrial dysfunction. Despite these cell-type-specific differences, our findings support a previously unrecognized connection between Timeless/Swi1 and mitochondrial homeostasis. Together, our data uncover a novel function for Timeless/Swi1 in mitochondrial homeostasis and provide new insight into the coordination of nuclear and mitochondrial genome maintenance.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. General Techniques and Strains Used in S. pombe Studies
The S. pombe strains used in this study were constructed using standard genetic and molecular techniques [18], and their genotypes are listed in Table A1. Unless otherwise specified, S. pombe cells were grown in yeast extract and supplements (YES) medium (0.5% yeast extract and 3% glucose supplemented with adenine, histidine-HCL, leucine, and uracil) at 25 °C or 30 °C as previously described [18]. For experiments involving regulation of the thiamine-repressible nmt81 promoter, cells were grown in Edinburgh minimal medium (EMM2) and supplemented as described [18]. For growth under respiration conditions, S. pombe cells were cultured in YEGlyE medium containing 1% yeast extract, 0.5% casamino acid, 3% glycerol, and 3% ethanol, and supplemented as indicated above.
For selection of S. pombe strains carrying specific antibiotic markers, G418 (for kanMX6), hygromycin B (for hphMX6), and nourseothricin (for natMX6) were used at final concentrations of 150 µg/mL, 100 µg/mL, and 100 µg/mL, respectively.
The nmt81-pog1 (nmt81-3FLAG-pog1:kanMX6) allele was constructed by a two-step PCR method using primers P1878, P1885, P1887, and P1893 to construct a 3 × FLAG tag at the N terminus of pog1 and replace the endogenous promoter with the thiamin-repressible nmt81 promoter via the pFA6a-kanMX6-P81nmt1-3FLAG vector [19]. Unless otherwise indicated, experiments using the nmt81-pog1 strain were performed in YES medium, which provides sufficient endogenous thiamine to partially repress the nmt81 promoter while maintaining the low level of Pog1 expression required for cell viability. Complete repression of nmt81-driven expression was examined in EMM2 medium supplemented with 10 µg/mL thiamine [19]. Gene deletions and mutations used in this study have been described previously for swi1∆ (swi1::natMX6) [20] and rad52-12PK:KanMX6 [4,21].
The general genetic and molecular biology and biochemical methods for S. pombe were performed as previously described [18]. Serial dilution growth assays and drug sensitivity assays were carried out as reported in earlier studies [22,23]. The primer used for strain construction in this study are listed in Table A2.
2.2. Cell Culture and RNAi
Human U-2 OS cells and Saos-2 cells were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium, and TE-11 cells were cultured in RPMI medium (Corning, New York, NY, USA), each supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 U/mL penicillin, and 50 µg/mL streptomycin.
Constitutive short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated gene silencing was performed using the lentiviral vector pLKO.1-PURO encoding scrambled control, Timeless shRNA-#3 (CCGGGCCCACACTAACCATTGCATTCTCGAGAATGCAATGGTTAGTGTGGGCTTTTTTG), and Timeless shRNA-#5 (CCGGCGATACCAGATTGAGGATGATCTCGAGATCATCCTCAATCTGGTATCGTTTTTTG) as described previously [24,25]. Timeless shRNA-#4 (CCGGCGAGAACTATTCCTGGCACTTCTCGAGAAGTGCCAGGAATAGTTCTCGTTTTTTG) and Timeless shRNA-#6 (CCGGGCCGCATCATCAAGAACAATACTCGAGTATTGTTCTTGATGATGCGGCTTTTTTG) were also used.
Transfection of siRNA duplexes were carried out as previously described [24,25], using siRNAs purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; Mission Universal Negative Control #1 (SIC001), Timeless-siRNA-#1 (SASI_Hs01_00010403), and Timeless-siRNA-#2 (SASI_Hs01_00010411) were used.
For the propidium iodide (PI) exclusion assay to measure cell viability, both adherent and floating cells were collected, suspended in 1 × PBS, and incubated with 2.5 µg/mL PI. Samples were then diluted to 1:5 in buffer containing 0.1 M HEPES/NaOH (pH7.4), 1.4 M NaCl, and 25 mM CaCl2, and subsequently analyzed using the Guava EasyCyte Mini flow cytometer in the Guava Express Plus program (Guava Technology, Hayward, CA, USA). A WST-8 assay was performed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to assess cell fitness. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with the indicated drugs for 48 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm with background subtraction at 620 nm while using wells without cells as controls.
2.3. mtDNA Copy Number Assay
The total genomic DNA from exponentially growing S. pombe and human cells was isolated using the glass bead preparation method, as described by Burke et al. in 2000 [26], and the Quick-DNATM Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To measure the relative mtDNA copy number, 2 ng of each DNA sample was subjected to qPCR using the primer sets targeting mitochondrial genes and a single-copy nuclear gene (see below). Reactions were performed with the PowerUpTM SYBRTM Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on a Bio-Rad CFX96TM Real-Time System coupled to the C1000TM Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). For S. pombe, primer pairs for atp9 (mtDNA, P1874/P1875) and spo12 (nuclear, P1876/P1877) were used. For human DNA, primer pairs for ND1 (mtDNA, P1850/P1851), ND4 (mtDNA, P1889/P1890), CO1 (mtDNA, P1891/P1892), and HGB (nuclear, P1852/P1853) were used. The relative mtDNA copy number was determined by qPCR following normalization to a single-copy nuclear reference gene. Briefly, the ∆Ct values were obtained by subtracting the median Ct of the nuclear gene from the Ct of the mtDNA gene. The relative mtDNA copy number was then calculated as 2−∆Ct and is presented as mtDNA copy number normalized to the nuclear reference locus. This approach permits the direct comparison of the normalized mtDNA copy number between samples and across different mitochondrial loci. All oligonucleotide primers used for the mtDNA copy number assay are listed in Table A3.
2.4. ChIP-Seq of Analysis of Rad52-12PK
ChIP samples from mid-log-phase Y4250 (rad52-12PK) and Y4256 (rad52-12PK swi1∆) strains were prepared as described [27]. Briefly, exponentially growing cells were crosslinked with 3% paraformaldehyde, and chromatin was sheared into 500 to 700 bp fragments using a Misonix Sonicator 3000 (Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA). Chromatin-associated proteins were immunoprecipitated using the mouse monoclonal anti-V5/Pk (SV5-Pk1, AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) together with Protein G-coupled Dynabeads (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Crosslinks were reversed, and DNA was purified from the immunoprecipitates and also from a no-IP input control. DNA quantity and quality were assessed using Qbit fluorometry (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Takara ThruPLEX DNA-seq 48D kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), with a target depth of ~15 million reads at 1 × 75 nt. Sequence reads were aligned against the complete S. pombe reference sequence (from PomBase [28]: ASM294v2, GCA_000002945.2), including all three nuclear chromosomes and the mitochondrial genome, using BWA-MEM (v0.7.13-r1126) [29] and sambamba [30]. ChIP enrichment was measured using MACS2 (callpeak-B--SPMR-nomodel-keep-dup 1) with merged duplicates with genotype-specific no input controls acting as the background [31]. Fold enrichment (FE) values, called peaks, and read alignments were visualized with the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA) [32].
2.5. RNA-Seq and Analysis
The total RNA from triplicate log-phase cultures of wild-types and swi1∆ was isolated using the Master PureTM Yeast RNA Purification Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA) following the instructions provided by the supplier. The Illumina TruSeq stranded Total RNA library kit (Illumina) was used for library prep, and sequenced at 1 × 75 nt on an Illumina NextSeq500 targeting ~15 million reads per sample. Alignments were conducted as above, and bedtools coverage [33] was used to count the number of reads that aligned to each gene for each sample.
The total RNA was isolated from U-2 OS cells expressing scrambled control or Timeless shRNA-#3 in biological triplicates using TRIzol reagent. RNA samples were analyzed by Plasmidsaurus using a 3′ end counting RNA-seq workflow. Libraries were prepared by poly(A) mRNA capture with barcoded oligo-dT primers containing UMIs, followed by second-strand synthesis, tagmentation, and Illumina library amplification with dual indices. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina platform to generate ~10 million deduplicated 3′ end reads per sample. Data outputs included FASTQ files, deduplicated BAM files, quality control metrics, and gene count tables for downstream differential expression analysis.
To assess the relative mRNA expression levels of rad52, cmb1, zip1, and pog1 in swi1∆ cells compared to wild-type cells, gene expression values were normalized using the median-of-ratios method provided by DESeq2 in Bioconductor [34,35]. Data were visualized as a log10 of the normalized expression using the ggplot and ggrepel packages in R. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), and leading-edge analyses were conducted using the HALLMARK gene sets from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) with the clusterProfiler package in R.
2.6. Western Blotting and Antibodies
Protein extraction and Western blotting from S. pombe and human cells were conducted as described [20,25]. The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-FLAG (M2, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-α-tubulin (B-5-1-2, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-tubulin TAT-1, anti-NRF2 (sc-722, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-TFAM (sc-28200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-phospho-S6K1 (Thr289; #9206, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). The Timeless antibody used in this study was described in our previous work [36].
2.7. Mitochondrial Functional Assays
Mitochondrial functional assays were performed as described in our previous studies with minor modifications [37]. Briefly, mitochondrial mass was assessed by incubating cells with 100 nM MitoTrackerTM Green FM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Mitochondrial ROS levels were measured by incubating cells with 5 μM of MitoSoxTM Red Mitochondrial Superoxide Indicator (Invitrogen). Mitochondrial membrane potential was determined using 1 µM tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester perchlorate (TMRE; Invitrogen). For all three assays, adherent cells were washed with PBS to remove the culture medium and detached cells, incubated with the respective reagents at 37 °C for 30 min, harvested in 2.5% trypsin–EDTA, and resuspended in 400 μL growth medium. Samples were immediately analyzed on the Guava EasyCyte Mini flow cytometer using the Guava Express Plus program (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA, USA). Debris and dead cells were excluded by flow cytometric gating prior to quantification of fluorescence intensity.
2.8. Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Immunofluorescence microscopy of human cells was performed as described [25]. Briefly, U-2 OS cells were seeded onto chambered polystyrene slides (Corning/Falcon); fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS; permeabilized with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM EDTA, and 0.5% Triton X-100; and blocked with 5% FBS in PBS. Cells were then incubated with an anti-NRF2 antibody (C-20, sc-722), followed by an Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody. DNA was counterstained using ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Images were captured using an EVOS FL Auto Imaging System (Life Technologies) and analyzed with ImageJ 1.52a software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Swi1 Deletion Impairs Mitochondrial Genome Integrity in S. pombe
Because Swi1 deficiency causes replication stress and accumulation of DNA damage in the nuclear genome in S. pombe, resulting in increased Rad52 association at several genomic loci, including telomeres, rDNA, and ectopically introduced LacO repeats [4], we investigated whether loss of Swi1 also affects mitochondrial genome stability. To address this question, we performed ChIP-seq analysis of Rad52 association across the S. pombe mitochondrial genome under glucose-limited and glucose-rich conditions (Figure 1A). Sequence reads were aligned to the complete S. pombe reference genome including both the nuclear and mitochondrial chromosomes (see Section 2).
Figure 1.

The swi1 deletion impairs mitochondrial genome integrity in S. pombe. (A) ChIP-seq analysis of Rad52 distribution across mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in asynchronous cultures of wild-type (blue) and swi1∆ (red) S. pombe cells grown in YES medium containing 5% (dark shading) and 0.1% (light shading) glucose. Average Rad52 enrichment from two-independent cultures is shown as fold enrichment scores (y-axis). Mitochondrial genome coordinates (x-axis; in kilobases, kb) were downloaded from PomBase (www.pombase.org) [28]. (B) Average Rad52 enrichment scores across the mitochondrial genome from two independent ChIP-seq experiments are displayed as a bar graph. (C) RNA-seq analysis of rad52 transcript abundance in wild-type and swi1Δ S. pombe cells grown under glucose-rich (5%) and glucose-limited (0.1%) conditions. The rad52 transcript abundance was determined from normalized RNA-seq counts. Bars represent mean ± SD. p-values were determined by one-tailed Student’s t-test. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. (D) Wild-type cells and cells engineered to express 3 × FLAG-Pog1 under the control of the nmt81 promoter (nmt81-pog1) were grown in EMM2, either in the presence or absence of 10 µg/mL thiamine (B1), and subjected to Western blotting analysis to detect 3 × FLAG-Pog1. Tubulin was used as a loading control. Asterisks indicate non-specific bands. (E) Genomic DNA was isolated from S. pombe cells with the indicated genotypes and used to determine the relative mtDNA copy number by qPCR. The relative mtDNA copy number was determined using the mitochondrial atp9 locus and normalized to the single-copy nuclear gene spo12. n = 3. Bars represent mean ± SEM. p-values were determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test.
In wild-type cells, Rad52 association showed only a modest increase in glucose-rich medium (high glucose) relative to glucose-limited conditions (low glucose). In contrast, swi1Δ cells (lacking the S. pombe Timeless ortholog) displayed markedly elevated Rad52 association broadly across the mitochondrial genome (Figure 1A,B). Notably, this elevated Rad52 association in swi1∆ cells persisted even under glucose-limited conditions, in which wild-type cells showed lower levels of Rad52 association (Figure 1A,B). Because the increased Rad52 signal was distributed throughout the mitochondrial genome rather than confined to discrete loci, these findings suggest a genome-wide increase in the association of Rad52 with mitochondrial DNA sequences in the absence of Swi1. Although previously reported nuclear mitochondrial DNA segments (NUMTs) in S. pombe cannot be completely excluded as a minor source of mapped reads, they represent only a limited and fragmented subset of the mitochondrial genome [38,39] and are therefore unlikely to account for the broad distribution of Rad52 association observed across the mitochondrial genome.
Importantly, RNA-seq analysis did not reveal an increased rad52 transcript abundance in swi1∆ cells. Instead, rad52 transcript levels in swi1∆ cells were modestly reduced under glucose-rich conditions and were not significantly different from those in wild-type cells under glucose-limited conditions (Figure 1C). Likewise, glucose availability did not significantly alter rad52 transcript levels within either the wild-type or swi1∆ backgrounds (Figure 1C). These findings indicate that increased rad52 transcription is unlikely to account for the increased ChIP-seq signal. Furthermore, these data reflect increased association of Rad52 with mitochondrial DNA and do not directly assess total Rad52 protein abundance or mitochondrial localization. Together, these results are consistent with increased mitochondrial genome stress or instability in swi1∆ cells.
In S. pombe, mtDNA is replicated by DNA polymerase γ, encoded by the pog1+ gene. The deletion of pog1 leads to a loss of mtDNA and results in a petite phenotype characterized by severe growth defects [40]. To conditionally reduce pog1 expression, we replaced its native promoter with the thiamine-repressible nmt81 promoter at the endogenous locus and expressed Pog1 as a 3 × FLAG fusion protein. To confirm repression of the nmt81-pog1 allele, cells were cultured in EMM2 in the presence or absence of 10 µg/mL thiamine. As expected, thiamine treatment markedly reduced 3 × FLAG-Pog1 protein levels (Figure 1D). Subsequent phenotypic analyses of the nmt81-pog1 strain were performed in YES medium, which partially represses nmt81-driven expression while maintaining sufficient Pog1 for cell viability. Although nmt81-pog1 cells showed mild growth defects, they were still viable (Figure 2A), allowing for their characterization.
Figure 2.

The swi1 deletion partially rescues growth defects of pog1-deficient cells under respiratory conditions. (A) S. pombe cells with the indicated genotypes were grown to mid-log phase in YES medium, and fivefold serial dilutions were spotted onto YES agar or YEGlyE agar media supplemented with 2 µg/mL of oligomycin or 1 mM DTT. Representative images of repeat experiments are shown. The indicated strains were analyzed on the same YES and YEGlyE agar plates; the images have been cropped to show only the strains relevant to this study. (B,C) RNA-seq datasets were subjected to KEGG pathway analysis and visualized as a heatmap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Expression data are represented as z-scores per each gene, with red representing high expression and blue indicating low expression.
To examine the effect of Swi1 loss on mitochondrial genome maintenance, we quantified the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number by comparing the mitochondrial gene atp9+ with the single-copy nuclear gene spo12+. As a control, nmt81-pog1 cells displayed a pronounced reduction in the mtDNA copy number (Figure 1E), consistent with the established role of Pog1 in mtDNA replication. In contrast, swi1∆ cells showed a modest increase in the mtDNA copy number despite exhibiting an increased Rad52 association with mitochondrial genome (Figure 1E). This paradoxical increase suggests that the loss of Swi1 activates a compensatory mtDNA amplification response, potentially offsetting replication stress or damage within the mitochondrial genome.
3.2. Swi1 Deletion Alleviates Growth Defects Caused by Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase Depletion in S. pombe
To examine the effect of Swi1 and Pog1 deficiency on cell growth, we performed serial-dilution growth assays on both glucose- and glycerol-containing solid media (Figure 2A). While glucose allows cells to generate ATP via glycolysis, glycerol forces reliance on mitochondrial respiration. In the glucose medium, nmt81-pog1 cells exhibited modest growth delays compared with wild-types (Figure 2A). As expected, nmt81-pog1 cells showed severe growth defects on the glycerol medium. This growth inhibition was further exacerbated in the presence of oligomycin or dithiothreitol (DTT), both of which negatively impact mitochondrial fitness (Figure 2A), confirming the critical role of Pog1 in mitochondrial respiration. The swi1∆ cells had modest growth defects in the glucose-containing medium, consistent with the well-known role of Swi1 in preventing replication stress. Strikingly, when cultured on the glycerol medium, swi1∆ cells grew comparably to wild-type cells (Figure 2A).
We then constructed swi1∆ nmt81-pog1 double-mutant cells and compared their growth with wild-type and single-mutant strains. Interestingly, swi1∆ nmt81-pog1 cells displayed a modest but reproducible improvement in growth relative to nmt81-pog1 single mutants in the glycerol medium (Figure 2A). Similar growth improvements were also observed in independent isolates with the same genotypes (Figure 2A). This growth enhancement was particularly evident when cells were cultured in the presence of oligomycin (Figure 2A), which inhibits ATP synthesis.
To determine whether this partial growth recovery correlates with changes in mitochondrial DNA contents, we quantified the mtDNA copy number in double-mutant cells. The mtDNA copy number was significantly increased in swi1∆ nmt81-pog1 cells compared to nmt81-pog1 cells (Figure 1E), suggesting a positive correlation between the mtDNA copy number and respiratory growth capacity. Notably, swi1∆ cells also exhibit an increased mtDNA copy number (Figure 1E), which may contribute to their ability to maintain growth under respiratory conditions.
To examine the effect of Swi1 deletion and subsequent mtDNA enrichment on broader mitochondrial function, we analyzed RNA-seq datasets using KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. Pathway-level analysis revealed enrichment of transcriptional changes consistent with reduced glycolytic activity (Figure 2B; Supplementary Figure S1) and upregulated oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 2C; Supplementary Figure S2) in swi1∆ cells, suggesting metabolic reprograming in response to loss of Swi1. These pathway-level trends are consistent with the improved growth of swi1∆ cells on glycerol medium (Figure 2A) and support the possibility of increased reliance on mitochondrial respiration.
3.3. Timeless Depletion Results in Loss of Mitochondrial Fitness in Human U-2 OS Cells
To examine the role of Timeless/Swi1 in mitochondrial maintenance in higher eukaryotes, we depleted Timeless in a human U-2 OS osteosarcoma cell line using siRNA or shRNA-expressing lentiviral vectors (Figure 3A,B). Timeless-depleted cells showed decreased viability (Figure 3C), although they were able to grow and divide continuously.
Figure 3.

Timeless depletion results in a reduced mtDNA copy number in U-2 OS cells. (A) U-2 OS cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and subjected to Western blot analysis to detect the Timeless protein. Tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) U-2 OS cells stably expressing the indicated shRNAs were processed for Western blot analysis to detect Timeless and tubulin. (C) Cell viability was assessed two days after transient siRNA transfection in U-2 OS cells using propidium iodide (PI) exclusion. (D) Genomic DNA was isolated from adherent U-2 OS cells stably expressing the indicated shRNAs after removing the culture medium and PBS washing, and was used to determine the mtDNA copy number by qPCR. The relative mtDNA copy number was determined using the mitochondrial loci ND1, ND4, and CO1 and normalized to the single-copy nuclear gene HGB. n = 3. Bars represent mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
The mtDNA copy number was quantified by comparing the mitochondrial gene ND1 with the single-copy nuclear gene HGB. In striking contrast with the S. pombe results, Timeless depletion led to a reduction in the mtDNA copy number of U-2 OS cells (Figure 3D). Similar decreases were observed when ND4 and CO1 genes were used as mitochondrial references (Figure 3D). Although the difference could reflect a cell-cycle delay, where Timeless-depleted cells spend more time in S and G2 phases due to slowed replication, our findings indicate that, unlike in S. pombe, Timeless loss in U-2 OS cells compromises mitochondrial genome maintenance rather than triggering a compensatory increase in the mtDNA copy number. Thus, DNA damage resulting from Timeless depletion is associated with reduced genomic instability of mitochondrial DNA.
To evaluate mitochondrial function in U-2 OS cells, we measured mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) using siRNAs targeting Timeless (Figure 3A). Timeless depletion modestly but reproducibly increased mtROS levels (Figure 4A; Supplementary Figure S6). We then assessed mitochondrial membrane potential in live cells using TMRE staining and found that siRNA-mediated Timeless knockdown caused a statistically significant reduction in membrane potential (Figure 4B; Supplementary Figure S7). The combination of increased mtROS and decreased TMRE signals was indicative of mitochondrial dysfunction, suggesting that the loss of Timeless negatively affected the maintenance of mitochondrial integrity in U-2 OS cells.
Figure 4.

Timeless depletion impairs mitochondrial functions in U-2 OS cells. (A–C) U-2 OS cells were transiently transfected with the indicated control of Timeless siRNAs, and mitochondrial superoxides (A), membrane potential (B), and mitochondrial content (C) were measured as described in the Section 2. (D) U-2 OS cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs were cultured in the presence of 50 ng/mL ethidium bromide (EtBr) for 5 days. Cell viability was determined using Trypan Blue exclusion. (E) U-2 OS cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs were cultured in the presence of 0.5 µg/mL oligomycin for 2 days, and cell fitness was measured using a WST-8 assay. n = 3. Bars represent mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
To further assess mitochondrial content, we stained cells with MitoTracker. Timeless-depleted U-2 OS cells showed a statistically significant decrease in MitoTracker signal (Figure 4C; Supplementary Figure S8), consistent with reduced mitochondrial mass and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential. We next examined cell viability following siRNA-mediated Timeless depletion in U-2 OS cells combined with low-dose ethidium bromide treatment, which inhibits DNA polymerase γ activity without affecting nuclear DNA [41,42]. The trypan blue exclusion assay revealed a modest but significant increase in cell death when Timeless depletion was combined with Pol γ inhibition (Figure 4D), indicating that the loss of Timeless sensitizes cells to Pol γ inhibition. We also assessed cell fitness in U-2 OS cells following oligomycin treatment. Although the effect was modest, Timeless depletion reduced cell fitness under these conditions (Figure 4E).
Together, these observations of decreased mtDNA content, elevated mtROS, reduced TMRE staining, reduced MitoTracker signaling, and increased EtBr and oligomycin sensitivity suggest that Timeless deletion impairs mitochondrial genome stability and compromises mitochondrial fitness in U-2 OS cells.
3.4. Context-Dependent Effects of Timeless Depletion on Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Human Cells
To further investigate whether the mitochondrial phenotypes associated with Timeless depletion were cell-type specific or more broadly conserved, we extended our analysis to additional human cell lines, including Saos-2 and TE-11 cells (Figure 5A). Although both U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells are derived from osteosarcoma, Timeless depletion in Saos-2 cells, in contrast to U-2 OS cells, resulted in an increase in the mtDNA copy number, consistent with observations in S. pombe (Figure 5B). Similarly, Timeless depletion in TE-11 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells led to an elevated mtDNA copy number (Figure 5B). These increases were accompanied by enhanced MitoTracker signals, suggesting increased mitochondrial mass (Figure 5C; Supplementary Figures S9 and S12).
Figure 5.

Timeless depletion alters mitochondrial regulation in TE-11 and Saos-2 cells. (A) Cell lysates were prepared from Saos-2 and TE-11 cells expressing the indicated shRNAs and probed for Timeless protein by Western blotting. Tubulin protein was used as a loading control. (B) Genomic DNA isolated from the indicated shRNA-expressing cells was subjected to qPCR analysis to determine the relative mtDNA copy number using the mitochondrial loci ND1 and ND4. Values were normalized to the single-copy nuclear gene HGB. (C–E) Determination of mitochondrial content (C), membrane potential (D), and superoxides (E) were measured in the indicated cells as described in the Section 2. n = 3. Bars represent mean ± STDEV. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. MFI: mean fluorescence intensity.
Consistent with the findings from S. pombe, the elevated mtDNA copy number in Timeless-depleted TE-11 cells correlated with increased mitochondrial membrane potential, as measured by TMRE staining (Figure 5D; Supplementary Figure S13). In contrast to U-2 OS cells, in which TMRE signals decreased upon Timeless depletion, Saos-2 cells did not exhibit a reduction in TMRE signals (Figure 5D; Supplementary Figure S10).
While Timeless depletion produced divergent effects on the mtDNA copy number, MitoTracker signals, and TMRE across U-2 OS and TE-11 cells, both cell lines exhibited increased mitochondrial ROS, as measured by MitoSOX (Figure 5E; Supplementary Figures S11 and S14). This consistent elevation in mtROS suggests that Timeless depletion induces a mitochondrial stress response and perturbs mitochondrial homeostasis across these cell lines.
Collectively, these results indicate that Timeless contributes to the regulation of mitochondrial homeostasis in human cells; however, the phenotypic outcomes are cell-type dependent and likely reflect the underlying differences in cellular context.
3.5. Timeless Depletion Activates Antioxidant Stress Pathways
mtROS is known to act as a signaling cue to activate the mTOR pathway. Indeed, in U-2 OS cells, Timeless depletion resulted in elevated phosphorylation of S6K1 (Figure 6A), a downstream target of mTOR. mtROS also triggers the oxidative stress response. Consistently, Timeless depletion led to increased levels of NRF2 (NFE2L2) (Figure 6A), a bZIP (basic leucin zipper)-type transcription factor and the master regulator of the oxidative stress response. As a response to cellular stress, NRF2 translocates from the mitochondrion to the nucleus to trigger transcription of antioxidant proteins [43]. Timeless depletion in U-2 OS cells led to an increase in nuclear NRF2 signals (Figure 6B), suggesting that Timeless depletion activates antioxidant defense pathways. Furthermore, we observed upregulation of TFAM, a nuclear-encoded transcription factor essential for mitochondrial DNA transcription, replication, and packaging (Figure 6A). This increase likely reflects a compensatory effort to stabilize and maintain mitochondrial DNA in response to dysfunction.
Figure 6.

Oxidative stress response activation upon Timeless/Swi1 loss. (A) Cell lysates were prepared from U-2 OS cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs and probed for NRF2, TFAM, and phospho-S6K1 by Western blotting. Tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) Immunofluorescence was performed in U-2 OS cells to determine the nuclear localization of NRF2 relative to control cells. Data are represented as the mean corrected intensity of the nuclear signal. At least 50 cells were counted for each replicate. n = 2. Bars represent mean ± STDEV. p-values were determined by Mann–Whitney U tests. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. (C) Box plots for RNA-seq analysis of gene expression in S. pombe was determined for cmb, zip1, and pog1 in wild-type (blue) and swi1∆ (red) cells. Expression values are represented as log10 of the normalized expression values. The boxes were limited by the 25th and 75th percentiles. The horizontal black lines represent the median value. The whiskers extend to the largest and smallest data points that are no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. p-values were determined by student t-test, * p < 0.05.
To assess whether similar responses are activated in S. pombe, we analyzed S. pombe RNA-seq data. In S. pombe, the zip1+ gene encodes a bZIP transcription factor Zip1, which is functionally related to human NRF2 [44,45]. The expression of zip1 was significantly elevated with the absence of Swi1 (swi1∆ cells), while pog1 mRNA levels were unchanged (Figure 6C). Furthermore, transcription of the S. pombe TFAM ortholog cmb1+ was also elevated in swi1∆ cells (Figure 6C), suggesting that, although mitochondrial fitness phenotypes differ from those in human cells, Swi1 deficiency activates mitochondrial transcription and stress response pathways.
3.6. Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal Conserved Metabolic Reprogramming Toward Oxidative Metabolism upon Timeless/Swi1 Loss
Building on the observed mitochondrial phenotypes and activation of oxidative stress responses, we next sought to determine whether Timeless depletion is associated with broader metabolic alterations. For this purpose, we analyzed RNA-seq datasets using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Gene Ontology (GO), and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses.
In U-2 OS, Timeless depletion was associated with significant dysregulation of gene sets related to mitochondrial gene expression and mitochondrion organization, as identified by KEGG analysis (Figure 7A). GSEA and leading-edge analysis further revealed enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation pathways following Timeless depletion (Figure 7B; Supplementary Figures S3 and S5). These pathway-level transcriptional changes are consistent with our observations in S. pombe (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure S2) and with functional phenotypes, in which swi1∆ cells exhibit an elevated mitochondrial DNA copy number (Figure 1E) and improved growth under respiratory conditions (Figure 2A). Together, these findings are consistent with metabolic reprogramming characterized by reduced glycolytic activity and enhanced reliance on oxidative metabolism following Timeless/Swi1 deficiency. The concurrent enrichment of pathways related to mitochondrial organization further suggests that this metabolic shift may be accompanied by broader changes in mitochondrial homeostasis rather than a uniform enhancement of mitochondrial function.
Figure 7.

Transcriptome-wide mitochondrial stress response to Timeless/Swi1 loss. (A–C) RNA-seq datasets were subjected to GO and GSEA pathway analyses. (A) GO results were visualized as a dot plot, with the size of dots representing the number of DEGs in the annotated gene set and the color indicating the p-value. (B,C) GSEA analyses were conducted using the HALLMARK gene sets and visualized as a heatmap of DEGs. Data were normalized by obtaining z-scores for each gene, with red representing high expression and blue indicating low expression.
Notably, pathways associated with oxidative stress responses were also enriched following Timeless depletion. These included elevated expressions of SOD1 and SOD2 (Figure 7C; Supplementary Figure S4), consistent with increased mitochondrial superoxides and a compensatory antioxidant response. These transcriptional changes are consistent with our functional data demonstrating increased mitochondrial ROS (Figure 4A and Figure 5E) and activation of NRF2-dependent stress pathways (Figure 6A,B).
Collectively, these results suggest that a Timeless/Swi1 loss is associated with conserved metabolic and stress response reprogramming across species. The transcriptomic analyses support a model in which Timeless/Swi1 deficiency is accompanied by alterations in mitochondrial function, oxidative metabolism, and cellular redox homeostasis.
4. Discussion
Our findings reveal a previously unappreciated connection between Timeless (Swi1 in S. pombe), mitochondrial genome maintenance, and overall mitochondrial fitness. Although Timeless is best known for its nuclear functions in replication fork protection and genome stability [1,2,3], our data suggest that the loss of Timeless/Swi1 is associated with significant alterations in mitochondrial homeostasis, particularly under conditions of replication stress or impaired mitochondrial function.
In S. pombe, the loss of Swi1 resulted in a marked enrichment of Rad52 association with mitochondrial DNA sequences across the mitochondrial genome (Figure 1A), suggesting altered mitochondrial genome homeostasis. One limitation of this analysis is that the compact organization of the S. pombe mitochondrial genome, including the extensive overlap among transcriptional units, makes it difficult to define promoter, gene body, and terminator regions with the same confidence as in the nuclear genome. Furthermore, the increase in Rad52 association was broadly distributed across the mitochondrial genome rather than concentrated at discrete loci, limiting meaningful assessment of feature-specific recruitment patterns. In addition, because swi1Δ cells exhibit an increased mtDNA copy number, differences in mitochondrial DNA abundance may contribute, in part, to the mitochondrial ChIP-seq signal. Furthermore, the ChIP-seq data do not directly demonstrate mitochondrial localization of Rad52. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted as demonstrating increased association of Rad52 with mitochondrial DNA sequences rather than as evidence of mitochondrial localization of Rad52 or as a quantitative comparison of Rad52 occupancy between the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes.
Unexpectedly, swi1Δ cells exhibited an increase in mtDNA copy number (Figure 1D), which correlated with improved growth under respiratory conditions. The estimated mtDNA copy number in wild-type cells (~100–200 copies per nuclear genome) is consistent with previously reported values for actively growing S. pombe cells [40], supporting the biological relevance of our qPCR-based measurements. Moreover, the deletion of swi1 partially alleviated the growth defects and mtDNA loss associated with reduced expression of DNA Polymerase γ (Pog1) (Figure 2A), suggesting that Swi1 deficiency activates compensatory mechanisms that promote mitochondrial genome amplification and sustain respiration despite replication stress. One possible contributing factor to the increased mtDNA copy number is the replication stress-induced cell-cycle delay and increased cell size previously reported in swi1Δ cells [46,47]. Because the mtDNA copy number has been reported to scale with cell size and continues increasing during cell-cycle arrest in budding yeast [48], these physiological changes may contribute, at least in part, to the elevated mtDNA copy number observed in swi1Δ cells. However, importantly, the increased mtDNA copy number was accompanied by improved respiratory growth, enhanced resistance to respiratory stress, and transcriptional reprogramming consistent with increased oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 2). These observations suggest that altered cell-cycle progression and increased cell size are unlikely to fully account for the mitochondrial phenotypes associated with Swi1 deficiency.
Consistent with these functional observations, RNA-seq analyses coupled with KEGG pathway enrichment revealed that swi1 deletion is associated with broad metabolic reprogramming. In particular, pathway-level analyses revealed transcriptional changes consistent with reduced glycolytic activity and enhanced oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 2B,C; Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). These transcriptomic changes support a shift away from glycolytic metabolism toward increased reliance on mitochondrial respiration. Together with the increased mtDNA copy number and improved growth in glycerol-based respiratory conditions (Figure 1E and Figure 2A), these findings indicate that Swi1 deficiency promotes a respiration-adapted metabolic state.
While human TE-11 and Saos-2 cells displayed mitochondrial phenotypes similar to S. pombe (Figure 5), Timeless depletion in U-2 OS cells led to a reduced mtDNA copy number and mitochondrial mass, elevated mitochondrial ROS, and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, and increased sensitivity to Pol γ inhibition (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Although the flow cytometric measurements of mitochondrial ROS, membrane potential, and mitochondrial content provide indirect assessments of mitochondrial physiology and may be influenced by multiple biological and technical factors, the observed changes were supported by complementary analyses, including mtDNA copy number measurements, sensitivity to mitochondrial stressors, and transcriptomic profiling. Although mitochondrial responses varied across cell lines, these findings suggest that Timeless depletion is associated with altered mitochondrial homeostasis in human cells. The divergent phenotypes observed in S. pombe and human cells further suggest context-dependent responses to the loss of Timeless/Swi1. Nevertheless, both systems exhibited upregulation of TFAM (Cmb1 in S. pombe) and the bZIP-type transcription factor NRF2 (Zip1 in S. pombe), consistent with activation of mitochondrial transcriptional and antioxidant stress responses as compensatory mechanisms.
Importantly, RNA-seq analyses in U-2 OS cells further revealed enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation and reactive oxidative species signatures, as determined by GSEA, GO and KEGG analyses (Figure 7). Consistent with this, the pathways associated with oxidative stress responses were enriched, and the transcripts encoding antioxidant enzymes, including SOD1 and SOD2, were elevated (Figure 7), suggesting the activation of compensatory antioxidant responses. These findings, together with elevated mtROS and NRF2 activation and translocation, suggest that Timeless depletion in human cells induces metabolic and redox imbalance characterized by reduced glycolytic capacity and increased reliance on oxidative metabolism.
Together, these findings support a model in which Timeless/Swi1 is functionally linked to mitochondrial homeostasis in both S. pombe and human cells, potentially linking replication stress response pathways to mitochondrial homeostasis. In addition to its role in genome integrity, our data indicate that Timeless/Swi1 is associated with the regulation of cellular metabolic state, and that its loss triggers conserved metabolic reprogramming characterized by suppression of glycolytic and anabolic pathways and increased reliance on oxidative metabolism. Given the well-established function of Timeless/Swi1 in maintaining genomic integrity, it is possible that at least some of the mitochondrial phenotypes observed in this study arise indirectly from broader genomic stress. At present, neither our data nor previous studies provide definitive evidence that Timeless/Swi1 or Rad52 localizes to mitochondria or directly regulates mitochondrial DNA metabolism. Future studies will be required to determine whether Timeless/Swi1 directly contributes to mitochondrial genome maintenance, regulates mitochondrial gene expression, or influences mitochondrial function indirectly through nuclear genome stress responses and associated signaling pathways. Elucidating these mechanisms will provide important insights into how nuclear and mitochondrial genome maintenance is coordinated and how their dysregulation contributes to disease.
5. Conclusions
This study identifies Timeless and its fission yeast ortholog Swi1 as previously unrecognized contributors to mitochondrial genome stability and function, extending their well-established roles in nuclear DNA replication and repair. The loss of Swi1 in fission yeast increases mitochondrial genome stress and instability but paradoxically induces a compensatory response characterized by an elevated mtDNA copy number, enhanced respiratory growth, and partial suppression of defects caused by impaired mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ, consistent with adaptive regulation of mitochondrial homeostasis under stress and a shift toward respiratory metabolism. In contrast, Timeless depletion in U-2 OS human cells reduces the mtDNA copy number, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial mass, whereas TE-11 and Saos2 cells exhibit an increased mtDNA copy number, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial mass, similar to the phenotypes observed in fission yeast. Notably, all human cell lines show elevated mitochondrial ROS, indicative of mitochondrial dysfunction. Transcriptomic analyses further reveal enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation and ROS-related pathways, supporting a metabolic shift toward increased reliance on mitochondrial respiration. Despite these divergent phenotypic outcomes, both systems activate conserved compensatory pathways involving mitochondrial and antioxidant responses, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved response to mitochondrial stress with mechanistically distinct consequences across species.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to members of the Noguchi and Sell laboratories for their support, insightful comments, and encouragement. We also thank the Drexel University College of Medicine Genomics Core Facility for assistance with the ChIP-seq experiments. The anti-tubulin TAT-1 was a gift from Keith Gull. During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT (GPT-5.5, Open AI) to correct grammar and improve the written language. Following the use of this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as necessary, and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| DTT | Dithiothreitol |
| FBS | Fetal bovine serum |
| FE | Fold enrichment |
| IGV | Integrated genomics viewer |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| mtDNA | Mitochondrial DNA |
| mtROS | Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species |
| PBS | Phosphate-buffered saline |
| PI | Propidium iodide |
| Pol γ | DNA polymerase γ |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| TFAM | Mitochondrial transcription factor A |
| TMRE | Tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester perchlorate |
| YEGlyE | Yeast extract, glycerol, and ethanol |
| YES | Yeast extract and supplements |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom16081177/s1, Figure S1: GSEA enrichment plot for the glycolysis pathway in S. pombe swi1Δ cells. GSEA enrichment curve of RNA-seq data comparing swi1Δ and wild-type cells. The glycolysis gene set shows significant negative enrichment in swi1Δ cells, consistent with the pathway-level analyses presented in Figure 2B and supporting reduced glycolytic activity following Swi1 loss; Figure S2: GSEA enrichment plot for the oxidative phosphorylation pathway in S. pombe swi1Δ cells. GSEA enrichment curve of RNA-seq data comparing swi1Δ and wild-type cells. The oxidative phosphorylation gene set shows significant positive enrichment in swi1Δ cells, consistent with the pathway-level analyses presented in Figure 2C and supporting enhanced oxidative phosphorylation activity following Swi1 loss; Figure S3: GSEA enrichment plot for the oxidative phosphorylation pathway in U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells. GSEA enrichment curve of RNA-seq data comparing U-2 OS cells expressing Timeless shRNA and scrambled shRNA. The oxidative phosphorylation gene set shows significant positive enrichment in Timeless shRNA cells, consistent with the pathway-level analyses presented in Figure 7B and supporting enhanced oxidative phosphorylation activity following Timeless loss; Figure S4: GSEA enrichment plot for the reactive oxygen species pathway in U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells. GSEA enrichment curve of RNA-seq data comparing U-2 OS cells expressing Timeless shRNA and scrambled shRNA. The reactive oxygen species gene set shows significant positive enrichment in Timeless shRNA cells, consistent with the pathway-level analyses presented in Figure 7C and supporting enhanced reactive oxygen species activity following Timeless loss; Figure S5: GSEA heatmap for the oxidative phosphorylation pathway in U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells. GSEA heatmap of RNA-seq data comparing U-2 OS cells expressing Timeless shRNA and scrambled shRNA. The HALLMARK_OXIDATIVE_PHOSPHORYLATION gene set shows significant positive enrichment in Timeless shRNA cells. This extended dataset shows all leading-edge genes from the GSEA line plot and heatmap presented in Figure S3 and Figure 7B; Figure S6: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial superoxide measurement in U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial superoxide levels in U-2 OS cells treated with Timeless siRNAs and control siRNA. The histograms show a modest shift and increase in mitochondrial superoxide levels in Timeless siRNA cells; Figure S7: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial potential measurement in U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial membrane potential in U-2 OS cells treated with Timeless siRNAs and control siRNA. The histograms show a modest shift and decrease in mitochondrial potential in Timeless siRNA cells; Figure S8: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial content measurement in U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial content in U-2 OS cells treated with Timeless siRNAs and control siRNA. The histograms show a modest shift and decrease in mitochondrial content in Timeless siRNA cells, consistent with mtDNA qPCR analyses presented in Figure 3D; Figure S9: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial content measurement in Saos2 osteosarcoma cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial content in Saos2 cells expressing Timeless shRNAs and scrambled shRNA. The histograms show a modest shift and increase in mitochondrial content in Timeless shRNA cells, consistent with mtDNA qPCR analyses presented in Figure 5B; Figure S10: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial potential measurement in Saos2 osteosarcoma cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial membrane potential in U-2 OS cells expressing Timeless shRNAs and scrambled shRNA. The histograms show no significant change in mitochondrial potential in Timeless shRNA cells; Figure S11: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial superoxide measurement in Saos2 osteosarcoma cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial superoxide levels in Saos2 cells expressing Timeless shRNAs and scrambled shRNA. The histograms show no significant change in mitochondrial superoxide levels in Timeless shRNA cells; Figure S12: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial content measurement in TE-11 ESCC cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial content in TE-11 cells expressing Timeless shRNAs and scrambled shRNA. The histograms show a modest shift and increase in mitochondrial content in Timeless shRNA cells, consistent with mtDNA qPCR analyses presented in Figure 5B; Figure S13: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial potential measurement in TE-11 ESCC cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial membrane potential in TE-11 cells expressing Timeless siRNAs and control siRNA. The histograms show a modest shift and increase in mitochondrial potential in Timeless siRNA cells; Figure S14: Flow cytometry histogram for mitochondrial superoxide measurement in TE-11 osteosarcoma cells. Histogram of flow cytometry data comparing mitochondrial superoxide levels in TE-11 cells expressing Timeless siRNAs and control siRNA. The histograms show a modest shift and increase in mitochondrial superoxide levels in Timeless siRNA cells; File S1: Original images of Western blotting results.
Appendix A
Table A1.
S. pombe strains used in this study.
| Figure | Strain | Genotype |
|---|---|---|
| Figure 1A, B | Y4250 | h+ rad52-12PK:kanMX6 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1A, B | Y4256 | h+ swi1::kanMX6 rad52-12PK:natMX6 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1C | Y0001 | h- leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1C | Y0002 | h+ leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1C | Y5272 | h+ kanMX6-P81nmt-FLAG:pog1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1C | Y5273 | h+ kanMX6-P81nmt-FLAG:pog1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1D | Y0001 | h- leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1D | Y1679 | h- swi1::natMX6 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1D | Y5271 | h- kanMX6-P81nmt-FLAG:pog1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 1D | Y5275 | h- swi1::natMX6 kanMX6-Pnmt81-FLAG-pog1 leu1-31 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 2 | Y0001 | h- leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 2 | Y1679 | h- swi1::natMX6 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 2 | Y5273 | h+ kanMX6-P81nmt-FLAG:pog1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 2 | Y5274 | h+ swi1::natMX6 kanMX6-Pnmt81-FLAG-pog1 leu1-31 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 2 | Y5271 | h- kanMX6-P81nmt-FLAG:pog1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 2 | Y5275 | h- swi1::natMX6 kanMX6-Pnmt81-FLAG-pog1 leu1-31 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 5B | Y4250 | h+ rad52-12PK:kanMX6 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
| Figure 5B | Y4256 | h+ swi1::kanMX6 rad52-12PK:natMX6 leu1-32 ura4-D18 |
Table A2.
Oligonucleotide primers used for S. pombe strain construction.
| No. | Name | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| P1878 | Ppog1-5′ | CTG TTT ATA CTT GCT GAT TTC TC |
| P1885 | Ppog1-3′dep module-N | GTT TAA ACG AGC TCG AAT TCG AGC AAT GGA CGC CCA ACT GGA ATT TAC |
| P1887 | pog1NT-3′ | CTT TAT TCA GTA GTT GGT GCT TCG |
| P1893 | pog1NT-5′depFLmodule | CTA TAA GGA CGA TGA TGA TAA AGG AGG CGG AAT GTT CTA CAA AGC TTG TCC AAG TAC |
Table A3.
Oligonucleotide primers used for mtDNA copy number assay.
| No. | Name | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| P1850 | ND1-F | CCC TAA AAC CCG CCA CAT CT |
| P1851 | ND1-R | GAG CGA TGG TGA GAG CTA AGG T |
| P1852 | HGB-1 | GTG CAC CTG ACT CCT GAG GAG A |
| P1853 | HGB-2 | CCT TGA TAC CAA CCT GCC CAG |
| P1854 | cox1-RT-F | TGG ACG GTA TAT CCA CCA CT |
| P1855 | cox1-RT-R | GTC GCT ATT AAA TTT ACT GAT CC |
| P1868 | mtF3163 | GCC TTC CCC CGT AAA TGA TA |
| P1869 | mtR3260 | TTA TGC GAT TAC CGG GCT CT |
| P1874 | atp9-RT-F | GGT GCT GGT GTT GGT ATT GGA |
| P1875 | atp9-RT-R | ACC TGT AGC TTC TGT TAA GGC G |
| P1876 | Spo12-F | TCG GCT CTA AGA AGG TAT CTG TAT C |
| P1877 | Spo12-R | AGT ACC AGA TCT GCC TGA GTA GTT G |
| P1889 | mtND4-F | GCT CCA TCT GCC TAC GAC AA |
| P1890 | mtND4-R | GCT TCA GGG GGT TTG GAT GA |
| P1891 | mtCO1-F | CGC CGA CCG TTG ACT ATT CT |
| P1892 | mtCO1-R | CGG CTC GAA TAA GGA GGC TT |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.I.H. and E.N.; methodology, K.I.H., J.C.M., C.S. and E.N.; software, J.C.M.; validation, K.I.H., J.C.M. and E.N.; formal analysis, K.I.H., J.C.M., S.P., R.M. and E.N.; investigation, K.I.H., J.C.M., S.P., R.M. and E.N.; resources, C.N., S.H.J. and C.S.; data curation, K.I.H., J.C.M., S.P., R.M. and E.N.; writing—original draft preparation, E.N.; writing—review and editing, K.I.H., C.S. and J.C.M.; supervision, E.N.; project administration, E.N.; funding acquisition, E.N. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The U-2 OS RNA-seq data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE339246. The S. pombe RNA-seq and ChIP-seq datasets have also been deposited in the NCBI GEO under accession numbers GSE342402 and GSE342403.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the W. W. Smith Charitable Trust, #C2007 and #C2106 (E.N.), NIH/NIA AG071815 (C.S.), 2016 Pennsylvania Department of Health Formula Grant (E.N.) and the Drexel University College of Medicine.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Leman A.R., Noguchi E. Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:3945–3955. doi: 10.4161/cc.21989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patel J.A., Kim H. The TIMELESS effort for timely DNA replication and protection. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2023;80:84. doi: 10.1007/s00018-023-04738-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vipat S., Moiseeva T.N. The TIMELESS Roles in Genome Stability and Beyond. J. Mol. Biol. 2024;436:168206. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gadaleta M.C., Das M.M., Tanizawa H., Chang Y.T., Noma K., Nakamura T.M., Noguchi E. Swi1Timeless Prevents Repeat Instability at Fission Yeast Telomeres. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gadaleta M.C., Noguchi E. Regulation of DNA Replication through Natural Impediments in the Eukaryotic Genome. Genes. 2017;8:98. doi: 10.3390/genes8030098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen W., Zhao H., Li Y. Mitochondrial dynamics in health and disease: Mechanisms and potential targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023;8:333. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01547-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ren J., Xiang B., Xueling L., Han X., Yang Z., Zhang M., Zhang Y. Molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial homeostasis regulation in neurons and possible therapeutic approaches for Alzheimer’s disease. Heliyon. 2024;10:e36470. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Suomalainen A., Nunnari J. Mitochondria at the crossroads of health and disease. Cell. 2024;187:2601–2627. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rong Z., Tu P., Xu P., Sun Y., Yu F., Tu N., Guo L., Yang Y. The Mitochondrial Response to DNA Damage. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:669379. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.669379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen X.J. Mechanism of homologous recombination and implications for aging-related deletions in mitochondrial DNA. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77:476–496. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00007-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fernandes P., Miotto B., Saint-Ruf C., Said M., Barra V., Nähse V., Ravera S., Cappelli E., Naim V. FANCD2 modulates the mitochondrial stress response to prevent common fragile site instability. Commun. Biol. 2021;4:127. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01647-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mochizuki-Kashio M., Otsuki N., Fujiki K., Abdelhamd S., Kurre P., Grompe M., Iwama A., Saito K., Nakamura-Ishizu A. Replication stress increases mitochondrial metabolism and mitophagy in FANCD2 deficient fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells. Front. Oncol. 2023;13:1108430. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1108430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sage J.M., Gildemeister O.S., Knight K.L. Discovery of a novel function for human Rad51: Maintenance of the mitochondrial genome. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:18984–18990. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.099846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sage J.M., Knight K.L. Human Rad51 promotes mitochondrial DNA synthesis under conditions of increased replication stress. Mitochondrion. 2013;13:350–356. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Samach A., Melamed-Bessudo C., Avivi-Ragolski N., Pietrokovski S., Levy A.A. Identification of plant RAD52 homologs and characterization of the Arabidopsis thaliana RAD52-like genes. Plant Cell. 2011;23:4266–4279. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.091744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stein A., Kalifa L., Sia E.A. Members of the RAD52 Epistasis Group Contribute to Mitochondrial Homologous Recombination and Double-Strand Break Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Filograna R., Mennuni M., Alsina D., Larsson N.G. Mitochondrial DNA copy number in human disease: The more the better? FEBS Lett. 2021;595:976–1002. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hagan I.M., Carr A.M., Grallert A., Nurse P. Fission Yeast: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Noguchi C., Garabedian M.V., Malik M., Noguchi E. A vector system for genomic FLAG epitope-tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biotechnol. J. 2008;3:1280–1285. doi: 10.1002/biot.200800140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roseaulin L.C., Noguchi C., Martinez E., Ziegler M.A., Toda T., Noguchi E. Coordinated degradation of replisome components ensures genome stability upon replication stress in the absence of the replication fork protection complex. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gadaleta M.C., Iwasaki O., Noguchi C., Noma K., Noguchi E. New vectors for epitope tagging and gene disruption in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biotechniques. 2013;55:257–263. doi: 10.2144/000114100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Noguchi C., Grothusen G., Anandarajan V., Martinez-Lage Garcia M., Terlecky D., Corzo K., Tanaka K., Nakagawa H., Noguchi E. Genetic controls of DNA damage avoidance in response to acetaldehyde in fission yeast. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:45–58. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1237326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shetty M., Noguchi C., Wilson S., Martinez E., Shiozaki K., Sell C., Mell J.C., Noguchi E. Maf1-dependent transcriptional regulation of tRNAs prevents genomic instability and is associated with extended lifespan. Aging Cell. 2020;19:e13068. doi: 10.1111/acel.13068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Noguchi C., Horne K.I., Brewster T., Duffy A., Shah J.P., Theriault A., El Naggar O., Vavilala S., Sheth S., Noguchi E. Timeless prevents senescence-associated phenotypes and enhances DNA repair to promote esophageal cancer cell growth. Exp. Cell Res. 2026;455:114828. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2025.114828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peake J.D., Noguchi C., Lin B., Theriault A., O’Connor M., Sheth S., Tanaka K., Nakagawa H., Noguchi E. FANCD2 limits acetaldehyde-induced genomic instability during DNA replication in esophageal keratinocytes. Mol. Oncol. 2021;15:3109–3124. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Burke D., Dawson D., Stearns T. Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gadaleta M.C., Iwasaki O., Noguchi C., Noma K., Noguchi E. Chromatin immunoprecipitation to detect DNA replication and repair factors. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1300:169–186. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2596-4_12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wood V., Gwilliam R., Rajandream M.A., Lyne M., Lyne R., Stewart A., Sgouros J., Peat N., Hayles J., Baker S., et al. The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature. 2002;415:871–880. doi: 10.1038/nature724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li H. Aligning Sequence Reads, Clone Sequences and Assembly Contigs with BWA-MEM. [(accessed on 26 July 2026)]. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997.
- 30.Tarasov A., Vilella A.J., Cuppen E., Nijman I.J., Prins P. Sambamba: Fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2032–2034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang Y., Liu T., Meyer C.A., Eeckhoute J., Johnson D.S., Bernstein B.E., Nusbaum C., Myers R.M., Brown M., Li W., et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Robinson J.T., Thorvaldsdóttir H., Winckler W., Guttman M., Lander E.S., Getz G., Mesirov J.P. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Quinlan A.R., Hall I.M. BEDTools: A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lawrence M., Huber W., Pagès H., Aboyoun P., Carlson M., Gentleman R., Morgan M.T., Carey V.J. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013;9:e1003118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leman A.R., Noguchi C., Lee C.Y., Noguchi E. Human Timeless and Tipin stabilize replication forks and facilitate sister-chromatid cohesion. J. Cell Sci. 2010;123:660–670. doi: 10.1242/jcs.057984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nacarelli T., Azar A., Sell C. Inhibition of mTOR Prevents ROS Production Initiated by Ethidium Bromide-Induced Mitochondrial DNA Depletion. Front. Endocrinol. 2014;5:122. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Decottignies A. Capture of extranuclear DNA at fission yeast double-strand breaks. Genetics. 2005;171:1535–1548. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.046144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lenglez S., Hermand D., Decottignies A. Genome-wide mapping of nuclear mitochondrial DNA sequences links DNA replication origins to chromosomal double-strand break formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genome Res. 2010;20:1250–1261. doi: 10.1101/gr.104513.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chu Z., Li J., Eshaghi M., Karuturi R.K., Lin K., Liu J. Adaptive expression responses in the Pol-gamma null strain of S. pombe depleted of mitochondrial genome. BMC Genom. 2007;8:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stewart J.D., Schoeler S., Sitarz K.S., Horvath R., Hallmann K., Pyle A., Yu-Wai-Man P., Taylor R.W., Samuels D.C., Kunz W.S., et al. POLG mutations cause decreased mitochondrial DNA repopulation rates following induced depletion in human fibroblasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1812:321–325. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Valenzuela S., Zhu X., Macao B., Stamgren M., Geukens C., Charifson P.S., Kern G., Hoberg E., Jenninger L., Gruszczyk A.V., et al. Small molecules restore mutant mitochondrial DNA polymerase activity. Nature. 2025;642:501–507. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08856-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lin L., Wu Q., Lu F., Lei J., Zhou Y., Liu Y., Zhu N., Yu Y., Ning Z., She T., et al. Nrf2 signaling pathway: Current status and potential therapeutic targetable role in human cancers. Front. Oncol. 2023;13:1184079. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1184079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Baudouin-Cornu P., Labarre J. Regulation of the cadmium stress response through SCF-like ubiquitin ligases: Comparison between Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and mammalian cells. Biochimie. 2006;88:1673–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Guo L., Ghassemian M., Komives E.A., Russell P. Cadmium-induced proteome remodeling regulated by Spc1/Sty1 and Zip1 in fission yeast. Toxicol. Sci. 2012;129:200–212. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Noguchi E., Noguchi C., Du L.L., Russell P. Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;23:7861–7874. doi: 10.1128/mcb.23.21.7861-7874.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Noguchi E., Noguchi C., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R., 3rd, Russell P. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:8342–8355. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.19.8342-8355.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Seel A., Padovani F., Mayer M., Finster A., Bureik D., Thoma F., Osman C., Klecker T., Schmoller K.M. Regulation with cell size ensures mitochondrial DNA homeostasis during cell growth. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2023;30:1549–1560. doi: 10.1038/s41594-023-01091-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The U-2 OS RNA-seq data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE339246. The S. pombe RNA-seq and ChIP-seq datasets have also been deposited in the NCBI GEO under accession numbers GSE342402 and GSE342403.
