Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2002 Jul;184(13):3689–3698. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.13.3689-3698.2002

A Membrane-Bound Archaeal Lon Protease Displays ATP-Independent Proteolytic Activity towards Unfolded Proteins and ATP-Dependent Activity for Folded Proteins

Toshiaki Fukui 1, Tomohiro Eguchi 1, Haruyuki Atomi 1, Tadayuki Imanaka 1,*
PMCID: PMC135145  PMID: 12057965

Abstract

In contrast to the eucaryal 26S proteasome and the bacterial ATP-dependent proteases, little is known about the energy-dependent proteolysis in members of the third domain, Archaea. We cloned a gene homologous to ATP-dependent Lon protease from a hyperthermophilic archaeon and observed the unique properties of the archaeal Lon. Lon from Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 (LonTk) is a 70-kDa protein with an N-terminal ATPase domain belonging to the AAA+ superfamily and a C-terminal protease domain including a putative catalytic triad. Interestingly, a secondary structure prediction suggested the presence of two transmembrane helices within the ATPase domain and Western blot analysis using specific antiserum against the recombinant protein clearly indicated that LonTk was actually a membrane-bound protein. The recombinant LonTk possessed thermostable ATPase activity and peptide cleavage activity toward fluorogenic peptides with optimum temperatures of 95 and 70°C, respectively. Unlike the enzyme from Escherichia coli, we found that LonTk showed higher peptide cleavage activity in the absence of ATP than it did in the presence of ATP. When three kinds of proteins with different thermostabilities were examined as substrates, it was found that LonTk required ATP for degradation of folded proteins, probably due to a chaperone-like function of the ATPase domain, along with ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, LonTk degraded unfolded proteins in an ATP-independent manner, suggesting a mode of action in LonTk different from that of its bacterial counterpart.


Energy-dependent protein degradation in viable cells plays several important roles in the rapid turnover of short-lived regulatory proteins and in the quality control of intracellular proteins by eliminating damaged or denatured proteins. In eukaryotic cells, target proteins covalently modified with ubiquitin are degraded by the multimeric 26S proteasome. Bacterial cells possess a number of ATP-dependent proteases, for instance, Lon, ClpAP, ClpXP, HslUV (ClpYQ), and FtsH in Escherichia coli (13, 14). They processively degrade proteins into short oligopeptides in a highly coupled manner with ATP hydrolysis, and their function allows cells to achieve balanced growth and respond to external stress.

Lon protease was the first ATP-dependent protease to be described (44). Lon from E. coli (LonEc) is an 87-kDa protein consisting of N-terminal ATPase and C-terminal protease domains on a single polypeptide (5, 11) and forms a homooligomer (a homotetramer or homooctamer) of identical subunits (6, 11). Previous studies demonstrated that a variety of temperature-sensitive mutations in E. coli could be suppressed by inactivation of the lon gene (16, 17). LonEc participates in the rapid degradation of abnormal proteins in cooperation with the heat shock chaperone system DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (21, 43). In addition, it has been known that Lon proteases are capable of recognizing and degrading specific protein substrates, such as UmuDC (10), SulA (31), RcsA, (7, 47), CcdA (48), and so on. LonEc shows little or no peptide cleavage activity in the absence of nucleotides; however, interestingly, it has been suggested that ATP binding, not hydrolysis, at the high-affinity sites might induce some conformational change of LonEc to the open (active) state that allows cleavage of peptide bonds (11, 12, 29).

ClpAP, ClpXP, and HslUV (ClpYQ) represent another type of ATP-dependent proteases with a heteromeric structure. They are comprised of two distinct subunits of ATPase (ClpA, ClpX, and HslU) and protease (ClpP and HslV) (13, 14). In the recently determined crystal structure of HslUV, two hexameric rings of HslU were found to be stacked to both ends of an internal chamber composed of two hexameric rings of the proteolytic core, HslV, forming a structure resembling the eukaryotic 26S proteasome (4, 41, 50). ClpAP is supposed to have a common molecular architecture, except for a tetradecameric proteolytic chamber of ClpP with sevenfold symmetry (49). It has been revealed that the hexameric ring of ClpA is self assembled when ATP is bound (22).

The ATPases in the Lon and Clp proteases share structural and mechanistic features with other chaperone-like ATPases that assist in the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes, and this sequence set is assigned to the AAA+ superfamily (34). ATPases in ATP-dependent proteases also act as molecular chaperones, and recent studies have led to considerable progress in understanding the role of ATPase subunits in the proteolysis by ClpAP and ClpXP (15, 55). That is, ClpA and ClpX ATPases function to unfold protein structures, to bind unfolded proteins, and to translocate unfolded proteins to the proteolytic chamber, coupled with ATP hydrolysis (19, 20, 39). Likewise, a chaperone-like activity of the ATPase domain of LonEc has been suggested to function during the ATP-dependent unfolding of a specific substrate, CcdA (48). A model for the protein unfolding-coupled translocation mechanism has been proposed from the crystal structure of the HslUV complex (50). In addition, proteolytically inactive Lon of yeast mitochondria could complement a mutation of host cells lacking functional assembly of mitochondrial protein complexes, suggesting a chaperone activity of ATPase domain in yeast Lon (35).

In contrast to members of the domains Bacteria and Eucarya, little is known about the energy-dependent proteolysis system in members of the third domain, Archaea. Complete genome sequences have revealed that archaeal genomes also encode putative orthologs of 20S proteasome and proteasome-activating nucleotidases, as well as open reading frames that share significant identity with Lon proteases from bacterial cytosol and eucaryal mitochondria. clp and other ATP-dependent protease genes are not found in archaeal genomes, except for the thermophilic methanogen Methanobacterium thermautotrophicum, which encodes a Clp-like ATPase (MTH284) but not a Clp-like protease in the genome. Although there have been some reports concerning archaeal proteasomes (27, 38, 56), no investigation has been made for the ATP-dependent protease Lon from archaea.

Thermococcus kodakaraensis (previously called Pyrococcus kodakaraensis) strain KOD1 is a hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from a geothermal spring at a wharf on Kodakara Island, Kagoshima, Japan (32). Various thermostable enzymes from this archaeon, including DNA polymerase (18, 45), DNA ligase (33), ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (8, 24, 26), and so on have been characterized. Many of the proteins show distinct structural and catalytic features from bacterial and eucaryal counterparts. Here, we have characterized an archaeal Lon from this hyperthermophile and report the unique properties of the archaeal Lon protease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.

E. coli TG-1 and DH5α and plasmid pUC118 were used for DNA manipulation and sequencing. E. coli BL21CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL cells (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) and plasmids derived from pET-21a(+) or pET-16b(+) (Novagen, Madison, Wis.) were used for gene expression. E. coli strains were cultivated in Luria-Bertani medium at 37°C, and ampicillin was added to the medium at a final concentration of 50 μg/ml, when needed.

DNA manipulation and sequencing.

DNA manipulations were performed by standard procedures, as described by Sambrook and Russell (36). Restriction enzymes and other modifying enzymes were purchased from Takara Shuzo (Kyoto, Japan) or Toyobo (Osaka, Japan). Small-scale preparation of plasmid DNA from E. coli cells was performed with a plasmid mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA sequencing was performed with the ABI PRISM kit and model 310 capillary DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Nucleotide and amino acid sequences were analyzed with GENETYX software (Software Development, Tokyo, Japan).

Cloning and expression of lonTk.

The lon gene from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 (lonTk) was identified by random sequencing of a phage library of T. kodakaraensis KOD1 genomic DNA, and the nucleotide sequence was determined with the phage DNA as a template. The full-length lonTk flanked by the NdeI and BamHI sites was amplified by PCR with KOD1 genomic DNA and two primers (sense [5′-ATGCATCATATGGACGAGGAGTCCACCA-3′] and antisense [5′-ATGCATGGATCCAGTTAGGAAGACCCGTAAAGCGGAAG-3′]; the italicized sequences indicate the NdeI site in the sense primer and the BamHI site in the antisense primer). The amplified DNA fragment was digested with NdeI and BamHI after confirmation of the sequence. The fragment was then ligated with the corresponding sites of plasmid pET-21a(+) to obtain pETlon for the production of recombinant Lon protease from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 (LonTk) with the native structure. E. coli BL21CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL harboring pETlon was induced for overexpression with 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at the mid-exponential growth phase and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (7,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C), washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), and then resuspended in the same buffer. The cells were disrupted by sonication and centrifuged (15,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C). The resulting supernatant was incubated at 70°C for 30 min, followed by centrifugation (15,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C). The precipitated fraction was treated with 1.5% Triton X-100 in the Tris buffer at 4°C for 2 h and then centrifuged (15,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C) to obtain solubilized recombinant LonTk. The supernatant was applied to a ceramic hydroxyapatite CHT5 column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) preequilibrated with 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). LonTk was eluted by a linear gradient of sodium phosphate buffer (5 to 500 mM) by using a protein purification apparatus (ÄKTA explorer 10S; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) with a flow rate of 2.0 ml/min. The peak fractions were concentrated by using Centricon-100 (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.), and the sample was applied to a Superdex 200 high resolution 10/30 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) preequilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl with a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min.

In order to purify LonTk without using Triton X-100, a recombinant Lon flanked with a His10 tag at the N terminus (LonTkNHis10) was expressed and purified by Ni2+ affinity chromatography. An expression plasmid, pETlonNHis, was constructed by inserting the NdeI-BamHI fragment of lonTk into pET-16b(+). E. coli BL21CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL cells were then transformed with pETlonNHis and were induced and disrupted as described above. The soluble protein fraction was applied to a Ni2+ affinity column (HisBind purification kit; Novagen) and washed with 200 mM imidazole in 160 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.9) containing 4 M NaCl, and LonTkNHis10 was eluted with 1 M imidazole in the buffer.

The protein concentration was determined according to the method of Bradford (4a) (Bio-Rad protein assay) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. The protein purity was examined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis performed according to the standard procedure. The N-terminal amino acid sequences of purified proteins were determined by a protein sequencer (cLC model 491; Applied Biosystems).

Enzyme assays.

Peptide cleavage activity was assayed using the fluorogenic peptides glutaryl-Ala-Ala-Phe-4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide (Glt-AAF-MNA) or succinyl-Phe-Leu-Phe-4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide (Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland) (52). The reaction mixture was composed of 0.3 mM fluorogenic peptide, 1 or 4 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, and LonTk (5 μg) in 500 μl of 50 mM 2-(cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic acid (CHES) buffer (pH 9.0). The mixture was incubated at 70°C for 60 min, and the increase in fluorescence (350 nm, excitation; 440 nm, emission) was monitored by spectrofluorometer (model F-2000; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

ATPase activity was assayed by determining Pi liberated from ATP. LonTk (2.5 μg) was incubated with 4 mM ATP and 10 mM MgCl2 in 100 μl of 50 mM CHES buffer (pH 9.0) at 70°C for 15 min. Free Pi was determined by the procedure described by Black and Jones (3). The background levels of hydrolysis (no enzyme) were subtracted in each assay.

Proteolytic properties of LonTk towards α-casein from bovine milk (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), hemoglobin A from human (Sigma), and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 (RubiscoTk) (8) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Substrate protein (3.2 μg) was incubated with LonTk (2 μg)-1 mM ATP-10 mM MgCl2 in 100 μl of 50 mM CHES buffer (pH 9.0) at 37°C for the appropriate amount of time. The mixtures were concentrated to approximately 10 μl under reduced pressure, applied to SDS-PAGE, and then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Bio-Rad). The experiments were also performed at 70°C with slight modification. In order to avoid the complete consumption of ATP in the mixture, the amounts of protein substrate and LonTk were reduced to 0.5 and 0.2 μg, respectively, and Bio-Rad silver stain was applied for visualization of protein bands. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of protein substrates were obtained in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.3) containing 10 mM MgCl2 by using a spectropolarimeter (model J-820; JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectroscopic and electron-spray ionization-time of flight mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopic analyses of the degradation products from enzymatically dephosphorylated α-casein (Sigma) were carried out with AXIMA-CFR (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and API QSTAR (Applied Biosystems), respectively, after desalting the mixture by using the ZipTip μC18 column (Millipore).

Western blot analysis.

T. kodakaraensis KOD1 was cultivated in artificial seawater (Marine Art SF; Senjyu Seiyaku, Osaka, Japan) containing 0.5% tryptone and 0.5% yeast extract. The cells grown on 1% pyruvate or 0.1% elemental sulfur in the medium at 85°C for 12 h were harvested, washed with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.4 M NaCl, and then disrupted by French press (96 MPa). The resulting cell extract was ultracentrifuged (110,000 × g for 2 h at 4°C) to separate the cytosol and membrane fractions. Each fraction (20 μg of protein) was subjected to SDS-PAGE and followed by Western blot analysis using specific antiserum (rabbit) against the recombinant LonTk. A protein A-peroxidase conjugate was used to visualize the specific proteins together with 4-chloro-1-naphthol and hydroxyperoxide.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence data reported here will appear in the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ nucleotide sequence databases under accession number AB066562.

RESULTS

Primary structure of LonTk.

We found a phage clone harboring a gene homologous to known lon genes through random sequencing of the T. kodakaraensis KOD1 genomic DNA library. The full-length lonTk was subcloned, and the primary structure was determined, as shown in Fig. 1. lonTk (1,905 bp) encoded a protein consisting of 635 amino acids (aa) with a molecular mass of 70 kDa, which was smaller than the 87-kDa LonEc (5, 11). LonTk possessed a two-domain structure like other Lon proteases. The N-terminal region was an ATPase domain belonging to the AAA+ superfamily with Walker A and B, sensor 1 and 2, and several replication factor C box motifs, as previously described by Neuwald et al. (34). Nevertheless, the overall identity of the ATPase domain of LonTk was very low compared to the values for LonEc (20%) and other bacterial and eucaryal Lon proteases. Interestingly, two transmembrane helices could be identified at positions 128 to 150 and 160 to 182, which were between the Walker A and B motifs in the ATPase domain. The protease domain of LonTk, comprising the C-terminal region, showed 37% identity to that of LonEc, and Ser679, which functions as a nucleophile during peptide bond cleavage (2, 9), was also conserved in LonTk at position 521. In LonEc, His665, His667, and Asp676 have been found to be important residues and were supposed to form a catalytic triad together with Ser679, as in the case of classical serine proteases (42). The putative counterparts for His665 and Asp676 were conserved in LonTk as His507 and Glu518, respectively, but His667 was replaced by Gln at the corresponding position in LonTk.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

(A) Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of LonTk. The sequences with underlined and highlighted characters represent conserved motifs in the AAA+ modules and putative transmembrane domains, respectively. The asterisks indicate putative catalytic triad in the protease domain. (B) Comparison of primary structures between LonTk and LonEc.

Recent genome analyses showed the presence of lon-homologous genes in other archaea, namely, Pyrococcus abyssi (PAB1313), Pyrococcus horikoshii (PH0452), Archaeoglobus fulgidus (AF0364), Methanococcus jannaschii (MJ1417), M. thermautotrophicum (MTH785), Thermoplasma acidophilum (Ta1081), and Halobacterium sp. (VNG0303G). The deduced amino acid sequences of archaeal Lon showed high identities to LonTk (50 to 87%) except for that from M. jannaschii (36%). In particular, those from Thermococcales were quite similar to LonTk (86 to 87%), although putative lon genes from P. abyssi and P. horikoshii were divided by intein sequences. In contrast, similarities were lower between LonTk and bacterial orthologs, even from hyperthermophilic Thermotoga maritima (TM1633) (24%) and extremely thermophilic Thermus thermophilus (51) (23%).

Expression and purification of recombinant LonTk.

In order to investigate the catalytic properties of LonTk, we constructed an expression plasmid, pETlon, in which lonTk was oriented downstream of the T7 promoter and the designed ribosome binding site of pET-21a(+). E. coli BL21CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL was then transformed with pETlon, and crude LonTk was obtained as a soluble protein after 0.1 mM IPTG induction. There was no influence of lonTk expression on the growth of the transformant. The crude soluble fraction was then heat treated at 70°C for 30 min to precipitate the proteins from the host cell. Thermostable enzymes derived from thermophiles generally maintained their solubility even at high temperatures so that those expressed in E. coli could effectively be separated from host-derived proteins by heat treatment. However, in the case of LonTk, the recombinant protein precipitated and was found in the insoluble protein fraction after the heat treatment. This was probably due to the hydrophobic nature derived from the putative transmembrane sequences, since addition of Triton X-100 to the precipitated fraction led to efficient solubilization of an active protein. The solubilized LonTk was further purified by hydroxyapatite chromatography, followed by gel filtration chromatography. SDS-PAGE analysis indicated the existence of one major band of 70 kDa together with four faint bands with apparent molecular masses of 64, 50, 38, and 36 kDa (Fig. 2A). The 70-kDa major protein agreed with the predicted molecular mass of LonTk, and its N-terminal amino acid sequence was identical to the deduced sequence of LonTk. N-terminal sequences of the minor protein bands of 64, 50, and 38 kDa were also identical to that of LonTk, and that of the 36-kDa protein corresponded to an internal sequence of LonTk from aa 324. These facts indicated that these minor proteins were formed by the partial proteolysis of LonTk during the expression and purification steps or by the autolysis of LonTk. Therefore, the active fraction after gel filtration was used for further biochemical characterization. We also attempted to obtain recombinant LonTk without using any detergent during the purification steps. For this purpose, a plasmid for recombinant LonTk with a His10 tag at the N terminus (LonTkNHis10) was constructed. LonTkNHis10 was expressed in E. coli and successfully purified by Ni2+ affinity chromatography, although the yield was much lower than that for LonTk with the native primary structure described above.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

(A) SDS-PAGE gel of purified LonTk from recombinant E. coli. Arrowheads show the four minor bands in the preparation. Lane M, molecular marker. (B) Western blot analysis of LonTk in crude extract, cytosol, and membrane fractions from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 grown on 1% pyruvate and 0.1% elemental sulfur. Numbers on the left side of the panel are molecular masses in kDa.

The native molecular mass of LonTk could not be estimated by gel filtration chromatography because the recombinant LonTk was eluted from an exclusion volume of the column. This might be due to incorporation of the recombinant protein within micelles of the detergent used for the solubilization. However, this large molecular mass was still observed in the case of LonTkNHis10 purified without the use of any detergents, suggesting an intrinsic property of recombinant LonTk to form a highly oligomeric structure.

Subcellular localization of LonTk in T. kodakaraensis KOD1.

We examined the localization of LonTk carrying two possible transmembrane sequences in the cells of T. kodakaraensis KOD1. The cytosol and membrane fractions from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 were separated by ultracentrifugation and then subjected to Western blot analysis with specific antiserum against the recombinant LonTk, as represented in Fig. 2B. The results clearly indicate that LonTk was located in the membrane fractions while no signal was detected in the cytosol fractions from the cells grown on both pyruvate (fermentation) and elemental sulfur (sulfur respiration). LonTk is actually a membrane-bound protein, which is a significant difference between it and its bacterial and eucaryal counterparts.

Peptide cleavage activity of LonTk.

Peptide cleavage activity of LonTk was determined by using Glt-AAF-MNA (52), which has often been used as a substrate for various Lon proteases. When LonTk was incubated with Glt-AAF-MNA in the presence of ATP and Mg2+, a time-dependent increase in fluorescence due to hydrolysis of the fluorogenic peptide at a high temperature (75°C) was observed (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, we further found that LonTk exhibited much higher activity when ATP was omitted from the reaction mixture, as shown in Fig. 3A. The high ATP-independent activity of LonTk is an unprecedented feature of Lon proteases. LonTk exhibited no cleavage activity without Mg2+, regardless of the presence or the absence of ATP. The optimum pH and temperature for the ATP-independent activity of LonTk were determined to be 9.0 and 70°C (Fig. 3B), respectively. Under the optimum condition, LonTk showed a specific activity of 44 ± 9.7 pmol of MNA/μg of protein/h toward Glt-AAF-MNA in the absence of ATP while that in the presence of 1 mM ATP showed an activity of 15 ± 5.1 pmol of MNA/μg of protein/h. LonTkNHis10 also showed higher peptide cleavage activity without ATP than with ATP (data not shown), which rules out the possibility that the ATP-independent activity was an artifact derived from the influence of detergent used in the purification procedure of LonTk.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

(A) Time courses of hydrolysis of fluorogenic peptide by LonTk. The reaction was carried out in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 5 μg of LonTk and 0.3 mM Glt-AAF-MNA at 75°C. ATP and/or MgCl2 was added to the mixture as follows: 10 mM MgCl2 (open circle); 4 mM ATP and 10 mM MgCl2 (open triangle); no addition (filled circle); or 4 mM ATP (filled triangle). (B) Effects of temperature on peptide cleavage (open circle) and ATPase (filled circle) activities of LonTk. The peptide cleavage assay was performed using Glt-AAF-MNA as a substrate. (C) Effects of ATP (open circle) or AMP-PNP (filled circle) concentration on peptide cleavage activity of LonTk.

Succinyl-Phe-Leu-Phe-4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide (52) served as a better substrate for LonTk, with a 5.7-fold higher degradation rate than that toward Glt-AAF-MNA, suggesting that LonTk preferred hydrophobic substrates. LonTk showed the peptide cleavage activity in the presence of various nucleoside triphosphates; however, the highest level of activity was obtained when no nucleotide was added to the mixture, as shown in Table 1. These nucleotides seemed to inhibit the activity rather than support it. ADP, a potent inhibitor for LonEc, also inhibited the activity of LonTk, but the enzyme retained 57% activity in comparison to the condition with the addition of ATP. The activity with the nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP, 5′-adenylylimidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP), was similar to that with ATP, as was the case for LonEc. Increase in ATP or AMP-PNP concentration resulted in decrease in the activity, and the activity reached half at 1 mM ATP or AMP-PNP (Fig. 3C). These results suggested the inhibition by nucleotide binding and were quite distinct from those for LonEc, for which activity elevated with the increase of ATP concentration from 10−4 to 10−2 mM (12). LonTk strictly required divalent cations for the activity, regardless of the presence or absence of ATP (Table 1). Interestingly, Ni2+ served as a cofactor better than Mg2+ and Ca2+ could replace Mg2+ to a similar extent. Mn2+ and Co2+ could also support the hydrolysis, although they were less effective than Mg2+, Ni2+, or Ca2+.

TABLE 1.

Relative peptide cleavage activity of LonTk with different nucleotides or divalent cations

Nucleotide Divalent cation Peptide hydrolysis (%)a
None None 0
ATP Mg2+ 100
ATP None 0
None Mg2+ 301
AMP-PNP Mg2+ 94
ADP Mg2+ 57
GTP Mg2+ 66
CTP Mg2+ 193
UTP Mg2+ 77
dTTP Mg2+ 193
None Ni2+ 530
None Ca2+ 316
None Mn2+ 144
None Co2+ 81
None Zn2+ 0
a

Purified LonTk (5 μg) was incubated with 0.3 mM Glt-AAF-MNA, 4 mM nucleotide, and 10 mM divalent cation at 70°C for 60 min.

ATPase activity of LonTk.

Even though LonTk possessed ATP-independent peptide cleavage activity, the enzyme exhibited inherent ATPase activity as in other Lon proteases. We confirmed formation of ADP from [α-32P]ATP by thin-layer chromatography analysis and did not observe AMP formation (data not shown). The optimum pH and temperature were 9.0 and 95°C (Fig. 3B), respectively, and the specific activity was 7.0 ± 0.6 × 104 pmol of Pi/μg of protein/h under the optimum condition, which was 3 orders of magnitude higher than that for peptide cleavage activity. The ATPase activity of LonTk was efficient and highly thermostable. The activity was strictly dependent on divalent cations such as Mg2+, and other divalent cations (Ni2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, and Co2+) could support 43 to 59% activity of that with Mg2+ (Table 2). UTP could be accepted as a substrate with a hydrolysis rate that was 21% of that for ATP. It is interesting that CTP and dTTP, quite poor substrates for LonTk, seemed to inhibit the peptide cleavage activity less than other nucleotides.

TABLE 2.

Relative hydrolysis rates of different nucleotides by LonTk and effects of divalent cations

Nucleotide Divalent cation Nucleotide hydrolysis (%)a
ATP Mg2+ 100
ATP None 0
AMP-PNP Mg2+ 0
ADP Mg2+ 0
GTP Mg2+ 0
CTP Mg2+ 1
UTP Mg2+ 21
dTTP Mg2+ 2
ATP Ni2+ 46
ATP Ca2+ 43
ATP Mn2+ 56
ATP Co2+ 59
ATP Zn2+ 1
a

Purified LonTk (2.5 μg) was incubated with 4 mM nucleotide and 10 mM divalent cation at 70°C for 15 min.

Previous studies have indicated a regulatory feature of Lon proteases through stimulation of both ATPase and peptide cleavage activities by interaction with protein substrates at an allosteric site distinct from the proteolytic site. α-Casein stimulated both the peptide cleavage and ATPase activities of LonEc as much as 10-fold and 2.8-fold, respectively (30, 53). In order to examine the allosteric effects of LonTk, α-casein was added to the reaction mixture because α-casein is a good substrate not only for LonEc but also for LonTk (see below). Without ATP, peptide cleavage activity against Glt-AAF-MNA in the presence of α-casein was 103% of that in the absence of α-casein. In the presence of ATP, the allosteric effects were slightly larger in the peptide cleavage and ATPase activities, which were increased to 113 and 133%, respectively, by the addition of α-casein. LonTk showed weak allosteric activation when ATP was present, but the effects were not so striking as in those of LonEc.

Proteolytic property of LonTk.

We further examined the proteolytic properties of LonTk towards three protein substrates with different thermostabilities. α-Casein possessed no specific structure, and the CD spectra of α-casein indeed demonstrated that this protein was unfolded without any secondary structure at different temperatures (37 and 70°C), as shown in Fig. 4A. In SDS-PAGE analyses, the band corresponding to α-casein readily disappeared regardless of the presence or absence of ATP, both at 37 and 70°C (Fig. 4B). These results coincided with the ATP-independent activity of LonTk toward the fluorogenic peptides. Hemoglobin A from human is an α2β2 heterotetramer with a helix-rich structure at 37°C, but the secondary structure was disrupted at 70°C due to thermal denaturation (Fig. 4C). When hemoglobin A was used as a substrate at 70°C, LonTk could degrade the unfolded hemoglobin A in either the presence or the absence of ATP (Fig. 4D). In contrast, this protein substrate was degraded only in the presence of ATP at 37°C, the temperature under which hemoglobin A maintains its original folded structure, and the degradation at the low temperature did not occur in the absence of ATP. The third substrate was ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 (RubiscoTk), composed of 10 subunits with a unique pentagonal structure (8, 24, 26). It was previously demonstrated that the optimum temperature of RubiscoTk is extremely high (90°C) (8) and that its structure is stable even at high temperatures (24). Figure 4E shows that RubiscoTk maintains its secondary structure between 37 and 70°C. Despite the large decameric structure of RubiscoTk, LonTk could degrade the protein in the presence of ATP at 70°C whereas no degradation could be observed when ATP was absent (Fig. 4 F). In these experiments, 15% (0.15 mM) of ATP was confirmed to have remained in the mixture even after the reaction at 70°C for 8 h, since we observed a gradual decrease in the rate of ATP hydrolysis during the incubation.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Proteolytic properties of LonTk with different protein substrates. (A, C, and E) CD spectra of α-casein, hemoglobin A, and RubiscoTk at 37°C (gray line) and 70°C (black line), respectively. (B, D, and F) Degradation of α-casein, hemoglobin A, and RubiscoTk, respectively, by LonTk. The reaction was carried out at 37 or 70°C with or without the addition of ATP, as indicated in each panel. The mixtures at each reaction time were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as described in Materials and Methods.

In contrast to the higher peptide cleavage activity of LonTk at a lower ATP concentration (Fig. 3C), the degradation of RubiscoTk by LonTk was maximal at 0.5 mM ATP and the lower ATP concentrations resulted in less degradation efficiency (Fig. 5A). ATP concentrations higher than 0.5 mM also decreased the degradation, probably due to the inhibition by ADP accumulated in the reaction mixture. These results are similar to those for LonEc, in which the optimum ATP concentration for protein degradation was 0.6 mM (25). In addition, Fig. 5B shows that the degradation was not observed when AMP-PNP was added instead of ATP. The results obtained here indicated that coupled hydrolysis of ATP was necessary for degradation of folded proteins by LonTk, whereas peptide and unfolded protein substrates could be cleaved by LonTk in an ATP-independent manner.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Degradation of RubiscoTk by LonTk with different ATP concentrations (A) and with a nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP, AMP-PNP (B), respectively. The reaction was carried out at 70°C with various concentrations of ATP (0 to 16 mM) for 10 h (A) or with 1 mM AMP-PNP for different reaction periods (B), as indicated in each panel. The mixtures were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as described in Materials and Methods.

To clarify the peptide bond specificity of LonTk, identification of the degradation products from α-casein (enzymatically dephosphorylated) was examined. After the degradation by LonTk in the presence of ATP at 70°C for 30 min, the reaction mixture was applied to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectroscopic analysis. The molecular masses of the products ranged from 771.5 to 2,461.4 Da (data not shown), indicating that LonTk degrades the protein into short peptides (6 to 20 aa), like other known ATP-dependent proteases. We further applied electron-spray ionization-time of flight mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopic analysis and could determine the sequence of one product [m/z 614.4 (2+)] as NPWDQVKRNA, an α-S2-casein peptide encompassing aa 107 through 116. This result indicated that LonTk cleaved the substrate at the bonds after 106Leu and 116Ala, and these preferences were the same as those reported for LonEc (28).

DISCUSSION

As seen in other Lon proteases from various sources, LonTk possessed a two-domain structure consisting of N-terminal ATPase and C-terminal protease domains. Although the ATPase domain of LonTk showed low overall similarity to those of its bacterial and eucaryal counterparts, it still belonged to the AAA+ superfamily, possessing several conserved motifs such as the nucleotide-binding Walker A and B (34). A region including the sensor 2 motif in E. coli Lon and Clp proteases has recently been proposed to be a sensor and substrate discrimination domain for recognition and binding to their specific substrates (40, 54). This region was also conserved in LonTk and might be involved in the discrimination of unknown specific substrates in T. kodakaraensis KOD1. Another candidate for the discrimination region in LonEc is a predicted coiled-coil structure in the N-terminal region (approximately 310 aa) flanked to the AAA+ module (7), but such an additional sequence was not found in LonTk. One significant difference in LonTk from other known Lon proteases is the presence of two possible transmembrane regions within the ATPase domain, and indeed, LonTk was revealed to be located in the membrane of T. kodakaraensis KOD1 (Fig. 2 B). This protein shared considerably high homology to putative Lon proteins identified in archaea, and the presumable transmembrane sequences were seen in all archaeal Lon. HslU, an ATPase component of another bacterial ATP-dependent protease, also has a large intermediate domain (134 aa) between the Walker A and B motifs. These intermediate domains, supposed to participate in the binding to protein substrates, are extended outward from the complex (41, 50). The common position of these insertion sequences suggests that the transmembrane regions of archaeal Lon proteases may also project outward from the enzyme core, forming structures for anchoring to the membrane. Bacteria also possess a different type of ATP-dependent protease, FtsH, that is a zinc metalloprotease and a membrane-bound protein anchored at the N-terminal region (37, 46). Although the positions of transmembrane segments and catalytic mechanisms were different between archaeal Lon and bacterial FtsH, Lon might play important roles in the quality control of the membranes of archaeal cells, like FtsH in bacterial cells (1, 23). In contrast to the ATPase domain, the protease domain of LonTk showed relatively high similarity to other Lon from bacteria and eucarya.

Beyond our expectation, LonTk exhibited activity to cleave fluorogenic peptides in the absence of any nucleotides higher than that in the presence of nucleotides, a remarkable catalytic difference between LonTk and other known Lon proteases. The peptide cleavage activity was maximal when ATP was absent but diminished with increases in ATP or AMP-PNP concentration. These results demonstrate that LonTk already had an open conformation without nucleotide binding. LonTk also possessed thermostable ATPase activity, and this activity was much higher than the peptide cleavage activity of this enzyme. Not only did the ATPase activity of LonTk require divalent cations but so did the ATP-independent peptide cleavage activity of LonTk, indicating two independent roles for the cations. As previously proposed (11, 29), these metal cations must serve as a factor that contributes to proteolytic activity, in addition to their function as a cofactor for ATP binding.

We further examined the proteolytic activity of LonTk with three protein substrates. Schematic models of the action of LonTk in the archaeal membrane are presented in Fig. 6. LonTk could degrade proteins that lost their secondary structures without consumption of ATP (Fig. 6A), while it required ATP for the degradation of proteins maintaining their original secondary structures (Fig. 6B). The degradation of folded proteins occurred in an energy-dependent manner, since nonhydrolyzable AMP-PNP could not support the degradation. It has been recently clarified that ATPase components in ATP-dependent proteases are molecular chaperones functioning in the unfolding of protein structures (15, 19, 20, 39, 48, 55). As for LonTk, ATP hydrolysis was required for the degradation of protein substrates with folded structures, such as hemoglobin at 37°C or RubiscoTk. It should be noted that the in vitro degradation required a long incubation period. Although this low degradation efficiency is probably due to the fact that they are not native substrates for LonTk, our results suggested a specific role for ATP hydrolysis in the disruption of the structures of folded protein substrates, a role shared by the ATPase components of other ATP-dependent proteases. The nucleotide binding might induce some conformational change in LonTk for the degradation of substrate proteins with folded structures, when intracellular ATP concentration is sufficient.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Schematic model of the function of LonTk in an archaeal membrane in the absence of ATP (A) and in the presence of ATP (B).

On the other hand, LonEc requires ATP hydrolysis for efficient degradation of α-casein, a protein without a specific secondary structure (12), indicating that ATP hydrolysis is still needed for the translocation of large unfolded proteins to the proteolytic sites. Unlike LonEc, LonTk showed ATP-independent proteolytic activity against not only peptide substrates but also large protein substrates lacking secondary structure (Fig. 4B and D). These facts point out a further unique property of LonTk; that is, the translocation of unfolded polypeptide chains to proteolytic sites did not require ATP hydrolysis. In the crystal structures of bacterial HslUV (4, 41, 50) and ClpP (49), the entrance pore from the ATPase ring to the proteolytic chamber is very small (<10 Å), possibly leading to the ATP requirement for translocation of already unfolded substrates through the small pore. In contrast, the ATP-independent translocation in LonTk suggested easier access of unfolded proteins to the proteolytic core without energy consumption. One of the possibilities accounting for the higher accessibility might be a larger entrance pore in LonTk than that in LonEc.

We here reported the first characterization of an archaeal Lon protease. LonTk was a novel membrane-bound protease, and the presence of putative transmembrane helices is a common feature among archaeal Lon orthologs. It can be presumed that archaeal Lon degrades specific short-lived proteins in addition to abnormal proteins, as well as Lon (14) and FtsH (37) from E. coli. Identification of the specific substrates will help to better understand the important roles of Lon in archaeal cells.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Akiyama, Y., A. Kihara, H. Tokuda, and K. Ito. 1996. FtsH (HflB) is an ATP-dependent protease selectively acting on SecY and some other membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 271:31196-31201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amerik, A., V. K. Antonov, A. E. Gorbalenya, S. A. Kotova, T. V. Rotanova, and E. V. Shimbarevich. 1991. Site-directed mutagenesis of La protease. A catalytically active serine residue. FEBS Lett. 287:211-214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Black, M. J., and M. E. Jones. 1983. Inorganic phosphate determination in the presence of a labile organic phosphate: assay for carbamyl phosphate phosphatase activity. Anal. Biochem. 135:233-238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bochtler, M., C. Hartmann, H. K. Song, G. P. Bourenkov, H. D. Bartunik, and R. Huber. 2000. The structures of HsIU and the ATP-dependent protease HsIU-HsIV. Nature 403:800-805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4a.Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chin, D. T., S. A. Goff, T. Webster, T. Smith, and A. L. Goldberg. 1988. Sequence of the lon gene in Escherichia coli. A heat-shock gene which encodes the ATP-dependent protease La. J. Biol. Chem. 263:11718-11728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chung, C. H., and A. L. Goldberg. 1981. The product of the lon (capR) gene in Escherichia coli is the ATP-dependent protease, protease La. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:4931-4935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ebel, W., M. M. Skinner, K. P. Dierksen, J. M. Scott, and J. E. Trempy. 1999. A conserved domain in Escherichia coli Lon protease is involved in substrate discriminator activity. J. Bacteriol. 181:2236-2243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ezaki, S., N. Maeda, T. Kishimoto, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka. 1999. Presence of a structurally novel type ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. J. Biol. Chem. 274:5078-5082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fischer, H., and R. Glockshuber. 1993. ATP hydrolysis is not stoichiometrically linked with proteolysis in the ATP-dependent protease La from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 268:22502-22507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Frank, E. G., D. G. Ennis, M. Gonzalez, A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate. 1996. Regulation of SOS mutagenesis by proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10291-10296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goldberg, A. L., R. P. Moerschell, C. H. Chung, and M. R. Maurizi. 1994. ATP-dependent protease La (Lon) from Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 244:350-375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goldberg, A. L., and L. Waxman. 1985. The role of ATP hydrolysis in the breakdown of proteins and peptides by protease La from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 260:12029-12034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gottesman, S. 1999. Regulation by proteolysis: developmental switches. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:142-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gottesman, S., and M. R. Maurizi. 1992. Regulation by proteolysis: energy-dependent proteases and their targets. Microbiol. Rev. 56:592-621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gottesman, S., M. R. Maurizi, and S. Wickner. 1997. Regulatory subunits of energy-dependent proteases. Cell 91:435-438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gottesman, S., and D. Zipser. 1978. Deg phenotype of Escherichia coli lon mutants. J. Bacteriol. 133:844-851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grossman, A. D., R. R. Burgess, W. Walter, and C. A. Gross. 1983. Mutations in the Lon gene of E. coli K12 phenotypically suppress a mutation in the sigma subunit of RNA polymerase. Cell 32:151-159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hashimoto, H., M. Nishioka, S. Fujiwara, M. Takagi, T. Imanaka, T. Inoue, and Y. Kai. 2001. Crystal structure of DNA polymerase from hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. J. Mol. Biol. 306:469-477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoskins, J. R., M. Pak, M. R. Maurizi, and S. Wickner. 1998. The role of the ClpA chaperone in proteolysis by ClpAP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:12135-12140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hoskins, J. R., S. K. Singh, M. R. Maurizi, and S. Wickner. 2000. Protein binding and unfolding by the chaperone ClpA and degradation by the protease ClpAP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8892-8897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jubete, Y., M. R. Maurizi, and S. Gottesman. 1996. Role of the heat shock protein DnaJ in the lon-dependent degradation of naturally unstable proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 271:30798-30803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kessel, M., M. R. Maurizi, B. Kim, E. Kocsis, B. L. Trus, S. K. Singh, and A. C. Steven. 1995. Homology in structural organization between E. coli ClpAP protease and the eukaryotic 26 S proteasome. J. Mol. Biol. 250:587-594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kihara, A., Y. Akiyama, and K. Ito. 1998. Different pathways for protein degradation by the FtsH/HflKC membrane-embedded protease complex: an implication from the interference by a mutant form of a new substrate protein, YccA. J. Mol. Biol. 279:175-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kitano, K., N. Maeda, T. Fukui, H. Atomi, T. Imanaka, and K. Miki. 2001. Crystal structure of a novel-type archaeal Rubisco with pentagonal symmetry. Structure 9:473-481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Larimore, F. S., L. Waxman, and A. L. Goldberg. 1982. Studies of the ATP-dependent proteolytic enzyme, protease La, from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 257:4187-4195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Maeda, N., K. Kitano, T. Fukui, S. Ezaki, H. Atomi, K. Miki, and T. Imanaka. 1999. Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 is composed solely of large subunits and forms a pentagonal structure. J. Mol. Biol. 293:57-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maupin-Furlow, J. A., H. C. Aldrich, and J. G. Ferry. 1998. Biochemical characterization of the 20S proteasome from the methanoarchaeon Methanosarcina thermophila. J. Bacteriol. 180:1480-1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maurizi, M. R. 1987. Degradation in vitro of bacteriophage lambda N protein by Lon protease from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 262:2696-2703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Menon, A. S., and A. L. Goldberg. 1987. Binding of nucleotides to the ATP-dependent protease La from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 262:14921-14928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Menon, A. S., and A. L. Goldberg. 1987. Protein substrates activate the ATP-dependent protease La by promoting nucleotide binding and release of bound ADP. J. Biol. Chem. 262:14929-14934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mizusawa, S., and S. Gottesman. 1983. Protein degradation in Escherichia coli: the lon gene controls the stability of sulA protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:358-362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morikawa, M., Y. Izawa, N. Rashid, T. Hoaki, and T. Imanaka. 1994. Purification and characterization of a thermostable thiol protease from a newly isolated hyperthermophilic Pyrococcus sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:4559-4566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nakatani, M., S. Ezaki, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka. 2000. A DNA ligase from a hyperthermophilic archaeon with unique cofactor specificity. J. Bacteriol. 182:6424-6433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Neuwald, A. F., L. Aravind, J. L. Spouge, and E. V. Koonin. 1999. AAA+: a class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 9:27-43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rep, M., J. M. van Dijl, K. Suda, G. Schatz, L. A. Grivell, and C. K. Suzuki. 1996. Promotion of mitochondrial membrane complex assembly by a proteolytically inactive yeast Lon. Science 274:103-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  • 37.Schumann, W. 1999. FtsH—a single-chain charonin? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23:1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seemuller, E., A. Lupas, D. Stock, J. Lowe, R. Huber, and W. Baumeister. 1995. Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum: a threonine protease. Science 268:579-582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Singh, S. K., R. Grimaud, J. R. Hoskins, S. Wickner, and M. R. Maurizi. 2000. Unfolding and internalization of proteins by the ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP and ClpAP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8898-8903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith, C. K., T. A. Baker, and R. T. Sauer. 1999. Lon and Clp family proteases and chaperones share homologous substrate-recognition domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6678-6682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sousa, M. C., C. B. Trame, H. Tsuruta, S. M. Wilbanks, V. S. Reddy, and D. B. McKay. 2000. Crystal and solution structures of an HslUV protease-chaperone complex. Cell 103:633-643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Starkova, N. N., E. P. Koroleva, L. D. Rumsh, L. M. Ginodman, and T. V. Rotanova. 1998. Mutations in the proteolytic domain of Escherichia coli protease Lon impair the ATPase activity of the enzyme. FEBS Lett. 422:218-220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Straus, D. B., W. A. Walter, and C. A. Gross. 1988. Escherichia coli heat shock gene mutants are defective in proteolysis. Genes Dev. 2:1851-1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Swamy, K. H., and A. L. Goldberg. 1981. E. coli contains eight soluble proteolytic activities, one being ATP dependent. Nature 292:652-654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Takagi, M., M. Nishioka, H. Kakihara, M. Kitabayashi, H. Inoue, B. Kawakami, M. Oka, and T. Imanaka. 1997. Characterization of DNA polymerase from Pyrococcus sp. strain KOD1 and its application to PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4504-4510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tomoyasu, T., K. Yamanaka, K. Murata, T. Suzaki, P. Bouloc, A. Kato, H. Niki, S. Hiraga, and T. Ogura. 1993. Topology and subcellular localization of FtsH protein in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:1352-1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Torres-Cabassa, A. S., and S. Gottesman. 1987. Capsule synthesis in Escherichia coli K-12 is regulated by proteolysis. J. Bacteriol. 169:981-989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van Melderen, L., M. H. D. Thi, P. Lecchi, S. Gottesman, M. Couturier, and M. R. Maurizi. 1996. ATP-dependent degradation of CcdA by Lon protease. Effects of secondary structure and heterologous subunit interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 271:27730-27738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang, J., J. A. Hartling, and J. M. Flanagan. 1997. The structure of ClpP at 2.3 Å resolution suggests a model for ATP-dependent proteolysis. Cell 91:447-456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang, J., J. J. Song, M. C. Franklin, S. Kamtekar, Y. J. Im, S. H. Rho, I. S. Seong, C. S. Lee, C. H. Chung, and S. H. Eom. 2001. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 9:177-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Watanabe, S., T. Muramatsu, H. Ao, Y. Hirayama, K. Takahashi, M. Tanokura, and Y. Kuchino. 1999. Molecular cloning of the Lon protease gene from Thermus thermophilus HB8 and characterization of its gene product. Eur. J. Biochem. 266:811-819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Waxman, L., and A. L. Goldberg. 1985. Protease La, the lon gene product, cleaves specific fluorogenic peptides in an ATP-dependent reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 260:12022-12028. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Waxman, L., and A. L. Goldberg. 1986. Selectivity of intracellular proteolysis: protein substrates activate the ATP-dependent protease (La). Science 232:500-503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wickner, S., and M. R. Maurizi. 1999. Here's the hook: similar substrate binding sites in the chaperone domains of Clp and Lon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8318-8320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wickner, S., M. R. Maurizi, and S. Gottesman. 1999. Posttranslational quality control: folding, refolding, and degrading proteins. Science 286:1888-1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zwickl, P., D. Ng, K. M. Woo, H. P. Klenk, and A. L. Goldberg. 1999. An archaebacterial ATPase, homologous to ATPases in the eukaryotic 26S proteasome, activates protein breakdown by 20S proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 274:26008-26014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES