Abstract
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are among the most common nosocomial infections globally and represent a significant cause of morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. There is a scarcity of molecular data regarding pathogens and virulence factors linked to CAUTIs, particularly in South Africa. This study aimed to determine the distribution and frequency of uropathogens, including polymicrobial infection patterns, isolated from catheterised patients at the Polokwane National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS), Limpopo Province, from March 2024 to March 2025, and to characterise the prevalence and co-occurrence of six virulence genes (fimH, papC, sfa, hly, cnf, and aer) among Escherichia coli isolates, the predominant uropathogen identified. Specimens from catheterised patients diagnosed with urinary tract infections at the National Health Laboratory Services in Polokwane were used. Uropathogens were isolated on agar and identified using the VITEK® system. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for amplification of some virulence genes (fimH, papC, sfa, hly, cnf, and aer) associated with uropathogens. Confirmation of urinary tract infections revealed that Escherichia coli was the predominant uropathogen (32.8%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.8%), Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium (14%), and others. Among E. coli isolates, virulence gene analysis revealed fimH (79.8%) as the most prevalent, followed by aer (77.4%), sfa (41.7%), hly (27.4%), papC (26.19%), and lastly cnf (9.5%). This study demonstrates that E. coli is the leading cause of CAUTIs in our study population, exhibiting diverse virulence gene combinations that enhance adhesion and overall pathogenicity. The findings emphasise the need for routine molecular surveillance of CAUTI pathogens, reinforcement of catheter-care protocols, and targeted infection prevention strategies.
Keywords: Escherichia coli, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, virulence genes, Limpopo province
1. Introduction
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) represent a significant proportion of infections encountered in both healthcare institutions and community settings, making them one of the most prevalent infectious disease entities [1]. To date, urinary tract infections (UTIs) affect more than 400 million people globally each year [2]. The prevalence of UTIs in Sub-Saharan Africa has progressed from 32.12% [3] to a prevalence as high as about 67% [4]. Studies show that approximately 50% of adult women may experience a urinary tract infection (UTI) more than once throughout their lifetime. This high recurrence rate highlights the importance of understanding the risk factors and preventive measures associated with UTIs, especially in this demographic [5,6].
Catheterization is a major contributor to the onset of complex urinary tract infections (UTIs), particularly giving rise to CAUTIs. Catheterization remains one of the most common causes of nosocomial infections, highlighting their prevalence and clinical relevance in patient care settings [7]. As a result, about 75% of UTIs developed in hospitals are associated with a urinary catheter [8,9]. These infections occur after catheter insertion in a patient for more than 48 h, with symptoms like a rise in body temperature, suprapubic tenderness, or costovertebral angle tenderness [10].
A wide range of microorganisms have been implicated in CAUTIs, but Escherichia coli remains the predominant etiological agent worldwide, responsible for approximately 30–50% of cases [11]. Other significant pathogens include Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species. These organisms are often linked with biofilm formation on catheter surfaces, enabling persistence within the urinary tract and resistance to host immune responses and antimicrobial therapy [12,13,14,15,16].
One of the crucial techniques that contributes to a better understanding of causative agents of CAUTIs at the genomic level is molecular characterisation [17]. Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) is a highly valuable technique in the field of molecular characterisation [18]. Most uropathogens possess a wide range of virulence genes encoding virulence factors that enhance their ability to defeat different defence mechanisms to cause an infection [19].
Expression of some of these virulence genes encoding virulence factors contributes to disease severity by enhancing pathogenesis and antimicrobial drug resistance. This leads to substantial medical costs and increased mortality [20]. Thus, determining the virulence factors of common uropathogens is key to making the most accurate diagnosis, tracing the source of infection, choosing appropriate treatment, and overall understanding of their epidemiology and pathogenesis. There are limited reports on molecular characterisation of UTIs, especially CAUTIs in South Africa. This study therefore aimed to: (1) determine the distribution and frequency of uropathogens, including polymicrobial infection patterns, isolated from catheterised patients attending healthcare facilities across Limpopo Province whose specimens were processed at the Polokwane NHLS Medical Microbiology Laboratory, over a one-year period; and (2) characterise the prevalence and co-occurrence patterns of six virulence genes (fimH, papC, sfa, hly, cnf, and aer) in Escherichia coli isolates, as the predominant uropathogen, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
This study employed an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional design. Secondary data were obtained from the NHLS Medical Microbiology Laboratory over a one-year period. The study did not involve direct contact with participants; specimens were residual catheter urine samples submitted by healthcare providers across Limpopo Province. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Turfloop Research Ethics Committee (TREC/1583/2024: PG), and patient informed consent was waived given the non-direct contact with patients. For the purposes of this study, a CAUTI was operationally defined in accordance with CDC/NHSN criteria as the presence of at least one sign or symptom (fever > 38 °C, suprapubic tenderness, costovertebral angle pain or tenderness, dysuria, or urinary urgency/frequency) with a positive urine culture yielding ≥103 CFU/mL of no more than two uropathogen species, in a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter in situ for ≥48 h at the time of specimen collection [21]. The study did not have permission to access the patient’s file; clinical data (patient history, diagnoses, catheter duration, treatments, etc.) could not be obtained.
2.2. Study Population
The study focused on samples from previously catheterized patients presumed to have urinary tract infections based on their symptoms. The study featured all patient samples from any department/area (medical, surgical, gynaecological, etc.) at over 250 hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare services across Limpopo Province sent to the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS). Polokwane NHLS (Medical Microbiology Laboratory) serves the entire province with culturing and interpretation of UTI samples from public healthcare providers.
2.3. Data Collection
A total of 215 samples were obtained from the Polokwane NHLS over a one-year period, from March 2024 to March 2025. Demographic data were collected from the NHLS request form using a data collection tool.
2.4. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.4.1. Inclusion
All urine specimens submitted to the NHLS Polokwane from catheterised patients deemed probable CAUTIs by the doctor/clinician/healthcare provider from any public healthcare facility in Limpopo Province during the study period were eligible. Specimens were included if they yielded significant bacteriuria, defined as growth of ≥103 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of a recognised uropathogen on chromogenic agar. Samples from all departments (medical, surgical, paediatric, gynaecological, neonatal ICU, etc.) and all patient age groups were included.
2.4.2. Exclusion
Specimens were excluded if they showed no growth or growth below the diagnostic threshold (<103 CFU/mL), if they had insufficient volume for a culture or if the accompanying request form lacked sufficient demographic data (age, gender, or facility of origin) for analysis.
2.5. Disposal Criteria for Isolates
Discarded isolates were placed in designated, puncture-proof, leak-proof, tightly sealed, red biohazard containers and collected by a licenced biohazardous waste collector for further decontamination and disposal of the waste.
2.6. Laboratory Tests and Procedures for Data Collection
2.6.1. Isolation of the Most Common Uropathogen
A loopful of urine was delivered onto a chromogenic agar plate by making a straight line down the plate with the same loop. The agar plate was streaked out from the primary inoculation pool from side to side in a downward movement. The plates were incubated for 18–24 h in the walk-in aerobic incubator. The colonies on the chromogenic media were interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions based on colour and morphology.
2.6.2. Identification and Confirmation of Isolates
Isolates were identified by the Vitek MS Prime Mass Spectrometry Microbial Identification System (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), which uses MALDI-TOF technology for rapid identification. It can be divided into four steps/parts, as follows: Sample preparation, where bacterial or yeast cells from a culture are deposited onto a disposable, barcoded target slide using the VITEK MS Prep Station. This is followed by matrix addition, where a ready-to-use matrix solution is added to the sample spots. Next is the analysis, wherein the target slide is loaded into the VITEK MS acquisition station, and a laser generates protein mass spectra, which are analysed by the system’s Advanced Spectra Classifier algorithm. Lastly, result generation, wherein the system compares the generated spectrum against a comprehensive reference database to provide an organism identification with a confidence value.
2.6.3. Detection of Virulence Genes of UPEC
Bacterial DNA Extraction
Bacterial DNA was extracted using the KingFisher™ Flex Purification System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with a 96 Deep-well Head. MVP_2wash_200 flex protocol and MagMAX™ Viral/Pathogen Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used on the system. The BindIt software 4.1 (version 4.1.0.2) was used to carry out extraction on the KingFisher™ Flex Purification System.The extraction was divided into four steps. First step: setup of the KingFisher instrument. The instrument was set up with a proper magnetic head (96 deep-well magnetic head) and the proper heat block (96 deep-well heat block), and the MVP_2wash_200 flex protocol was downloaded and loaded onto the instrument. Second step: setup of the processing plates. The Wash, Elution, and Tip comb plates were set up outside of the instrument. Third step: preparation of a binding mixture; 265 µL of binding solution was mixed with 10 µL of total nucleic acid magnetic beads and mixed well by inversion. Fourth step: digestion with proteinase K and elution of nucleic acid. Then, 10 µL of proteinase K was added to each well of a 96 deep-well sample plate. Next, 200 µL of 0.5 McFarland (sample) from the culture plate colonies was added to wells with proteinase K in the sample plate. Then, 550 µL of the Binding bead mix was then added to each sample in the sample plate. The MVP_2wash_200 flex protocol was selected on the instrument, and the run was started. The prepared plates were loaded into position when prompted by the instrument. After the protocol was completed, the Elution plate was immediately removed from the instrument and covered and stored at −20 °C, and was ready to use for PCR. For extraction control(s), a no-template extraction blank (nuclease-free water substituted for sample) was included in every extraction batch to detect reagent or environmental contamination of the extraction process.
Primer Sequences
The virulence genes examined in this study include those responsible for type 1 fimbriae (fimH), which enable adhesion, biofilm formation, and persistence on catheter surfaces [22], pyelonephritis-associated pili (papC) that help in bacterial adhesion to glycolipid receptors on kidney epithelial cells, promoting ascending infections like pyelonephritis [23,24], S and F1C fimbriae (sfa and foc), which are surface structures that enable bacterial adhesion to host cells [25], hemolysin (hly), which is a key virulence determinant, as a pore-forming toxin that damages host cells [25,26], cytotoxic necrotizing factor (cnf), which aids in bacterial persistence and immune evasion [25], and aerobactin (aer), which enables iron acquisition in iron-limited environments like the urinary tract [27]. The selection of these virulence genes is grounded in the existing literature, as they grant UPEC fitness to cause UTIs and are among the most commonly investigated, with various studies exploring their roles [19,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Comprehensive details regarding the specific primer sequences and the expected sizes of the amplified products are provided in Table 1. Detection of fimH, papC, and sfa sequences was done by multiplex PCR, as in Dadi et al. (2020) [19] and Tarchouna et al. (2013) [29], while hly, cnf, and aer were detected by single-plex PCR.
Table 1.
Primers used for UPEC virulence genes.
| Virulence Factor | Target Genes | Primer Name | Primer Sequence (5′–3′) | Size of the PCR Product | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 fimbriae | fimH |
fimH-f fimH-r |
5′-AACAGCGATGATTTCCAGTTTGTGTG-3′ 5′-ATTGCGTACCAGCATTAGCAATGTCC-3′ |
465 | [19,29] |
| P fimbriae | PapC |
pap1 pap2 |
5′-GACGGCTGTACTGCAGGGTGTGGCG-3′ 5′-ATATCCTTTCTGCAGGGATGCAATA-3′ |
328 | [19,29] |
| S and F1C fimbriae | Sfa/focDEH region |
sfa1 sfa2 |
5′-CTCCGGAGAACTGGGTGCATCTTAC-3′ 5′-CGGAGGAGTAATTACAAACCTGGCA-3′ |
410 | [19,29] |
| Hemolysin | HlyCA region |
hly s hly as |
5′-AGATTCTTGGGCATGTATCCT-3′ 5′-TTGCTTTGCAGACTGTAGTGT-3′ |
556 | [19,29] |
| Cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF) | Cnf |
cnf s cnf as |
5′-TTATATAGTCGTCAAGATGGA-3′ 5′-CACTAAGCTTTACAATATTGA-3′ |
693 | [19,29] |
| Aerobactin | aer |
aer s aer as |
5′-AAACCTGGCTTACGCAACTGT-3′ 5′-ACCCGTCTGCAAATCATGGAT-3′ |
269 | [19,29] |
Amplification
Amplification of the bacterial DNA was done in a total volume of 46 µL containing 20 µL of nuclease-free water, 20 µL of 2XPhusion™ Plus Green PCR Master Mix (the mixture contains DNA polymerase, salts, magnesium, and dNTPs for efficient PCR amplification), 2 µL of DNA template, and 2 µL (15 µM) of each of the primers, giving a final primer concentration of 0.652 µM per primer. The cycling conditions for each gene are shown in Table 2. The amplification was carried out in a SimpliAmp™ Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a maximum ramp rate of 4 °C/s. (block), 3 °C/s. (sample), thermal range of 0 °C to 100 °C, and thermal uniformity of <0.5 °C (20 s. after reaching 95 °C). All PCRs were performed for 35 cycles following the initial denaturation step (Table 2). Positive and negative controls: For fimH, papC, sfa, and aer, ATCC 35218 was used as a positive control. For sfa, papC, and hly, ATCC 25922 was used as an additional positive control. For cnf, one positive sample isolate was selected during trial/optimisation runs and was used as a positive control for the cnf runs, as the ATCC strains used as controls in this study did not carry the cnf gene. For negative control, nuclease-free water was included in every run as a no-template PCR negative control. To validate controls, any PCR run in which the positive control failed to amplify or the negative control showed amplification was considered invalid, and the entire run was repeated before reporting the results.
Table 2.
| Target Genes | PCR Type | Initial Denaturation | Denaturation (per Cycle) | Annealing | Extension | Final Extension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fimH, papC, and sfa | Multiplex | 94 °C—10 min | 94 °C—2 min | 60 °C—30 s | 72 °C—1 min | 72 °C—10 min |
| Hly | Single-plex | 94 °C—10 min | 94 °C—2 min | 50 °C—30 s | 72 °C—1 min | 72 °C—10 min |
| Cnf | Single-plex | 94 °C—10 min | 94 °C—2 min | 45 °C—30 s | 72 °C—1 min | 72 °C—10 min |
| Aer | Single-plex | 94 °C—10 min | 94 °C—2 min | 55 °C—30 s | 72 °C—1 min | 72 °C—10 min |
Visualisation
To observe the amplification of DNA, a 10 µL aliquot of the PCR product was loaded on 2% agarose gel for electrophoresis, stained with 30 µL of SYBR™ Safe DNA Gel Stain or 15 µL of Ethidium bromide. Electrophoresis was carried out for 80 min at 200 volts on the 1XTBE/TAE buffer system, and the gel was visualised under the iBright™ CL750 Imaging System (iBright™ CL750 Imaging System). Amplified DNA fragments of specific sizes were detected, and the sizes of the amplicons were estimated by comparing them with the 100 or 50 bp plus DNA ladder (Invitrogen™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) included on the same gel.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
All data were recorded on Microsoft Excel and analysed using SPSS version 28. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise demographic variables. Associations between demographic variables (age, gender, race) and uropathogen isolation rates and co-infection patterns were assessed using the Pearson chi-square test where all expected cell frequencies were ≥5, and Fisher’s exact test where any expected cell frequency was <5. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all associations.
3. Results
Unless otherwise specified, pathogen distribution frequencies are reported as proportions of total isolates (n = 255); demographic proportions are based on total patients (n = 215); and E. coli-specific analyses, including co-infection patterns and virulence gene prevalence, are expressed as proportions of E. coli isolates (n = 84).
3.1. Demographic Status of Patient Samples
A total of 215 patient samples from CAUTI patients who were catheterized from different public healthcare facilities across the entire Province were investigated in this study. Samples consisted of individuals from all age groups, wherein most were from participants aged >65 years (n = 68), followed by those aged 46–65 years (n = 44), then the 26–45 year (n = 40), <1 year (n = 38), 1–18 years (n = 14), and 19–25 years (n = 10) age groups, respectively. The mean age of the study participants was found to be 44.54 years, with a range of 0 to 98 years. We also noted that of all these samples collected, n = 123 were females and n = 92 were males. In terms of race, it was found that n = 208 of the participants were African and n = 7 were white. These demographics are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 below.
Figure 1.

Distribution of study participants with CAUTI samples from March 2024 to March 2025 by age group.
Figure 2.

Distribution of study participants with CAUTI samples from March 2024 to March 2025 by gender.
Figure 3.

Distribution of study participants with CAUTI samples from March 2024 to March 2025 by race.
3.2. Distribution of Uropathogens Isolated from the 215 CAUTI Samples over a One-Year Period
A total of 255 microorganisms were isolated. The most prevalent microorganism was E. coli, with 84 occurrences, followed by K pneumoniae (n = 38), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 30), and Enterococcus faecium (n = 26). Some pathogenic yeasts (Candida spp.) were also identified, though in a smaller fraction; these include Candida albicans (n = 6), Candida auris (n = 5), Candida glabrata (n = 4), and Candida tropicalis (n = 3); see Figure 4. Among the 84 E. coli isolates, n = 60 (71.4%) were single E. coli infections, while n = 24 (28.6%) were part of E. coli co-infection/polymicrobial infections. The 24 polymicrobial infections included n = 12 (14%) co-infections of E. coli + E. faecalis, n = 6 (7%) of E. coli + K. pneumoniae, and n = 6 (7%) with other uropathogens.
Figure 4.

Distribution of uropathogens isolated from the 215 CAUTI samples over a one-year period.
Association of E. coli Infection Rate and Co-Infection with Demographic Variables of CAUTI Patients from Limpopo Province
The chi-square statistical test revealed there was a significant association between E. coli rate and gender among the 215 samples, with female participants having a higher E. coli isolation rate than male participants, and it was also found that E. coli isolation rate was statistically associated with age, with the elderly age group showing a higher rate of E. coli isolation relative to other age groups. Fisher’s exact test revealed that there was no significant association between race and E. coli rate, as shown in Table 3 below.
Table 3.
Association of demographic variables with E. coli isolation rate and isolation co-infection rate (mixed vs. single infections).
| Demographic Variable | E. coli Isolation Rate | p-Value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Absent | Chi-Square Test | Fisher’s Exact Test | ||||
| Gender | Female | 56 | 67 | 0.025 | - | 0.523 | 215 |
| Male | 28 | 64 | |||||
| Age | <1 | 9 | 30 | <0.001 | - | - | 215 |
| 1–18 | 6 | 8 | |||||
| 19–25 | 2 | 8 | |||||
| 26–45 | 11 | 29 | |||||
| 46–65 | 15 | 29 | |||||
| >65 | 41 | 27 | |||||
| Race | African | 80 | 128 | - | 0.436 | 2.133 | 215 |
| White | 4 | 3 | |||||
The chi-square statistical test revealed there was no significant association between E. coli co-infection rate and gender, age among the 84 isolated E. coli. Fisher’s exact test revealed a non-significant association between age and co-infection rate. Refer to Table 4 below.
Table 4.
Association of demographic variables with E. coli co-infection rate (mixed vs. single infections).
| Demographic Variable | E. coli Co-Infection Rate | p-Value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single | Mixed | Chi-Square Test | Fisher’s Exact Test | ||||
| Gender | Female | 38 | 18 | 0.306 | - | 1.737 | 84 |
| Male | 22 | 6 | |||||
| Age | <1 | 7 | 2 | 0.100 | - | - | 84 |
| 1–18 | 6 | 0 | |||||
| 19–25 | 0 | 2 | |||||
| 26–45 | 8 | 3 | |||||
| 46–65 | 9 | 6 | |||||
| >65 | 30 | 11 | |||||
| Race | African | 58 | 22 | - | 0.574 | 0.379 | 84 |
| White | 2 | 2 | |||||
3.3. Detection of UPEC Virulence Genes
The virulence genes fimH (456 bp), papC (328 bp), sfa (410 bp), aer (269 bp), cnf (693 bp), and hly (556 bp) were successfully amplified. Figure 5 below shows gel pictures representing the amplification of some genes.
Figure 5.

Representative 2% agarose gel electrophoresis of uropathogenic E. coli virulence genes isolated from catheter-associated urinary tract infection patients. (A) Lane 1 and lane 11 (L1 and L11) represent a 50 bp DNA ladder; lanes L2–L8, and L12–L17 represent amplified E. coli PCR products (samples 1–13) for the following virulence genes: papC (328 bp), sfa (410 bp), and fimH (456 bp); lane 9 (L9) represent positive control 1 (ATCC 35218); lane 10 (L10) represent another positive control (ATCC 25922); and lane 20 (L20) represents the negative control (nuclease-free water). (B) Lanes 1 and 11 (L1 and L11) represent a 100 bp DNA ladder; lanes L2–L8 and L12–L19 represent amplified E. coli PCR products (samples 1–16), detecting the aer (269 bp) gene. Lane L10 represents the positive control (ATCC 35218); lane L20 represents the negative control (nuclease-free water).
Six virulence genes that are among the most common UPEC virulence genes were tested. The study found that fimH was the most frequent, with a prevalence of n = 67 positive isolates out of a total of 84 E. coli isolates, followed by aer n = 65, sfa n = 35, hly n = 23, and papC n = 22, and the least frequent was cnf n = 8. Refer to Figure 6 below.
Figure 6.

Distribution of virulence genes.
The most common gene co-occurrences (combinations) observed from the 84 isolated UPEC infections were 51 fimH + aer, 30 fimH + sfa, and 28 aer + sfa (Table 5). Only one isolate was negative for all the genes, and one isolate was positive for all six genes.
Table 5.
Predominant gene combinations among E. coli isolated in the study.
| Rank | Common Gene Combinations | Count (n) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | fimH + aer | 51 |
| 2 | fimH + sfa | 30 |
| 3 | aer + sfa | 28 |
| 4 | fimH + aer + sfa | 24 |
| 5 | papC + aer | 22 |
| 6 | fimH + aer + papC | 17 |
| 7 | fimH + papC | 17 |
| 8 | fimH + hly | 15 |
| 9 | fimH + hly + aer | 14 |
| 10 | aer + sfa + hly | 12 |
4. Discussion
4.1. Demographic Status of Participants
This study found a high incidence of CAUTIs in women, who accounted for 57.2% of the participants, and men 42.8%. Many researchers have reported similar findings to ours [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. These findings may be attributed to the female sex being a risk factor for multiple reasons. Among these reasons is the anatomical difference between both genders, wherein the female urethra is located closer to the anal opening, making it easier for bacteria, primarily UPEC and other enteric bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract, to colonise the periurethral area and enter the urethra [5,48,49,50]. Another popular reason may be that women have a significantly shorter urethra than men, which leads to the bacteria travelling a shorter distance to reach the bladder [19,42,43].
This study found that the age group of patients >65 years had the most CAUTI incidences. Numerous studies are consistent with our findings [43,51,52]. This may be due to multiple reasons, such as prolonged catheterization (older adults, especially those with chronic or complex conditions, often require indwelling catheters for longer periods, which is the most significant risk factor for CAUTIs and reduced immunity. As people age, their immune system becomes less effective, making it harder to fight off infections. These and other individual factors make them more susceptible to the bacteria that can cause a CAUTI, and a higher prevalence of chronic comorbidities, which are more common in older age, such as diabetes, immobility, and dementia, thus increases the risk of CAUTIs [37,46].
Another interesting observation from the age groups was the high number of babies who were less than one year old, accounting for 17.4% of CAUTI incidences. There are various studies with similar findings [47,48,49,50,51]. This may be due to neonates and young infants often requiring indwelling urinary catheters for extended periods due to prematurity, congenital anomalies, surgical interventions, or monitoring in Neonatal ICUs (NICUs) [52,53]. Infants have weak/underdeveloped immune responses, making it harder to clear pathogens efficiently. Additionally, their shorter urethra (especially in females) facilitates easier bacterial entry from the perineal flora [10,54]. Additionally, diapered infants are prone to faecal–perineal contamination, which can introduce uropathogens directly to the catheter site. Studies link prolonged diaper exposure to higher UTI risk, as moisture and bacteria from stool amplify colonisation, particularly in resource-limited or high-volume care settings [55].
African people made up 96.7% of the study participants, while the remaining 3.3% were white. This disparity in race makes sense because Limpopo is a rural province predominantly with black people with low economic means who rely on public healthcare services; on the other hand, the minority white population mostly have the economic capacity to afford private healthcare [56,57,58].
4.2. Distribution of Isolated Microorganisms/Isolation and Identification of Uropathogens
In the literature, the most common causative agent is E. coli, followed by other members of the Enterobacteriaceae group [5,14,23,45]. The findings of this study corroborate those in the literature, as the most prevalent pathogen was E. coli, followed by other Gram-negative bacteria and fewer occurrences of some yeasts, specifically Candida species of known nosocomial occurrence. From the 215 positive samples, E. coli n = 84 (32.8%) was the most common isolated microorganism, which is consistent with occurrences in studies from across the globe; in Tanzania, for instance, prevalences of 30.7% and 33.1–43.7% have been reported [44,59], and in Pakistan, a prevalence of 37% [60] has been reported. However, studies with a lower prevalence relative to this study were also noted, such as studies in India, with a prevalence of 22% [61], Sierra Leone, with a prevalence of 23% [62], and Poland, with 25.81% [63]. Local studies with a higher prevalence relative to this present study were noted, with prevalences of 54.2%, 81.25%, and 57.6% [4,64,65]. Other studies with prevalence higher than the present study include studies from Lebanon (44.8%) [14], India (56.40%) [15], Iran (62%) [66], and Sweden [67].
This study found Klebsiella pneumoniae to be the second leading uropathogen, followed by Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This is in line with studies from South Africa [65], Uganda [68], Central Europe [69], Bulgaria [70], India [46], Iran [66], and Indonesia [40]. This pattern is consistent with reports indicating that K. pneumoniae is a major cause of hospital-acquired UTIs, particularly in catheterised patients, owing to its strong biofilm-forming ability and widespread antimicrobial resistance [11]. The detection of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium as subsequent leading pathogens is also consistent with the literature describing Enterococci as important nosocomial uropathogens capable of persisting in the hospital environment and colonising indwelling devices [71]. Although Pseudomonas aeruginosa occurred at a lower frequency, its presence is clinically relevant, as it is often associated with catheter use and increased risk of multidrug resistance in hospital settings. However, some studies report differing pathogen distributions, with P. aeruginosa or Enterococci ranking higher depending on catheter duration, ICU admission, antimicrobial pressure, or institutional microbiological trends, illustrating the context-specific nature of CAUTI epidemiology [72]. The pathogen profile observed in this study reflects typical CAUTI-associated microbiology while highlighting the need for continued surveillance across diverse clinical settings.
The high rate of isolation of E. coli may be due to various factors, such as patient demographics and population characteristics. Higher E. coli rates often occur in studies focused on specific high-risk groups where UPEC thrives due to host vulnerabilities, such as shorter urethras in females or impaired immunity in certain comorbidities [41]. For instance, outpatient or community-onset cohorts emphasise uncomplicated-to-complicated transitions, where E. coli dominates (up to 65% in complicated UTIs), unlike our samples, where patients have mostly been hospitalised, and participants include diverse inpatients (i.e., elderly, ICU, etc) prone to polymicrobial growth, diluting E. coli proportions [53]. Elderly populations skew rates of occurrences; studies show that E. coli prevalence drops 10–20% in elderly-heavy cohorts due to the presence of competing Gram-positives [73,74,75].
Most samples used in our study represent elderly and paediatric patients, who mostly require long-term catheterisation due to their age-related complications. Laboratory methods, definitions, and mixed infections can also be used to potentially explain the differences between our study and other studies. Differences in culture media, cutoffs for positivity, whether mixed infections were counted, and whether molecular methods were used can affect percentages [76,77]. In our study, we counted 24 mixed infections out of 84 E. coli infections, and other studies may not have considered mixed infections or used different culture interpretation rules/procedures from ours, which might have led to the difference in E. coli isolation rates.
A chi-square test revealed a significant association (0.025) between gender and the E. coli isolation rate, with the female gender proving to be a risk factor for E. coli isolation, ultimately leading to CAUTIs. This is in line with studies from China, p < 0.001 [78,79], Italy, p < 0.001 [80], North Macedonia, p = 0.000 [81], and the USA, p = 0.0093 [27]. This association further strengthens the notion that women are more prone to UTIs because of their anatomy, that is, their shorter urethra and the proximity of their anal region to the periurethral area.
A significant association was also observed between patient age and E. coli isolation rate (p < 0.001), with the highest prevalence noted in individuals aged above 65 years. This suggests that E. coli isolation may be dependent on age. This observation aligns with reports/studies from Italy p = 0.0005 and p < 0.05 [80,82], China, p < 0.001 [53], Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, where a high E. coli isolation rate was observed in the elderly [83,84]. This further supports the conclusion that advancing age may predispose individuals to E. coli-driven CAUTIs, most likely due to age-related factors such as declining immunity, comorbidities, and prolonged catheterisation [53,85]. Race was found to be statistically insignificant when associated with E. coli isolation rate. This may have been due to the large disparity in our racial distribution.
UPEC Co-Infection Rate
Our study found an E. coli isolation co-infection rate of 28%, which, when compared to other studies from Iraq, 16.16% [86], the United Kingdom (UK), 68% [87], and Germany, 48.4%, shows a notable discordance. Possible reasons for this discordance might include factors such as population selection bias; if the study population is highly specific, such as patients living with comorbidities, the incidence of polymicrobial infections would be inherently higher compared to studies on the general population or healthy outpatients.
Diagnostic/detection methods also play a role in polymicrobial infections. Studies using advanced molecular techniques like PCR or next-generation sequencing can detect co-infecting organisms more readily than traditional culture-based and biochemical tests, which leads to lower polymicrobial rates. However, these are less economical and may not be a standard practice for hospitals in low-income countries. Our study used a traditional culture-based method because it was financially limited and therefore unable to access techniques such as those above. Some studies argue that sample size is also a factor; studies with larger sample sizes will tend to have higher rates than studies with lower sample sizes [88,89,90,91].
The E. coli and E. faecalis pair was found to be dominant in the E. coli co-infection rate. This observation aligns with a growing body of evidence highlighting E. faecalis as one of the most frequent co-pathogens recovered alongside E. coli in urinary and catheter-associated infections. A study by Salm and colleagues reported E. faecalis in approximately 47% of polymicrobial urine samples from male outpatients in Germany [92], while Nye et al. (2024) demonstrated that E. coli and Enterococcus frequently co-occur on indwelling catheter surfaces, forming robust mixed-species biofilms [93]. Similar findings have been described in earlier studies and experimental CAUTI models, where E. faecalis was shown to promote E. coli persistence and immune evasion within catheter biofilms [94]. These reports collectively indicate that the co-isolation rate observed in our cohort reflects a clinically and biologically plausible infection pattern.
The interaction between E. coli and E. faecalis in polymicrobial CAUTIs is clinically significant. Evidence suggests that E. faecalis can enhance the survival of E. coli by dampening host immune responses, contributing to chronicity and recurrence of infection [95]. From a therapeutic perspective, the presence of E. faecalis in mixed infections poses additional treatment challenges. Enterococci have intrinsic resistance to many β-lactams and aminoglycosides, limiting the efficacy of empiric regimens typically directed at Gram-negative organisms such as E. coli.
A statistically significant association between E. coli polymicrobial rate and age was also observed in this study, where more polymicrobial E. coli infections were observed in elderly individuals (aged > 65 years). This is suggestive of old age as a predictor of E. coli co-infections in CAUTIs. Our observation aligns with multiple recent investigations showing frequent polymicrobial catheter colonisation in older and long-term-catheterised populations, where E. coli commonly co-occurs with other urinary microbes [93]. Several recent reviews and epidemiologic analyses also report higher polymicrobial detection rates in older adults, an effect that is amplified when molecular diagnostics (i.e., M-PCR/metagenomics) are used, because these methods detect low-abundance cohabitants that routine culture may miss [96]. However, some institution-level datasets and adjusted multivariable analyses have failed to find age as an independent predictor once factors such as catheter duration, prior antibiotics, comorbidity burden, and sampling/diagnostic methods are taken into account, implying that age may act largely through these mediating factors rather than as a direct causal driver [21]. Taken together, our results are consistent with a model in which advancing age and its correlates, such as long-term catheterisation, institutional residence, higher comorbidity and antibiotic exposure, increase the opportunity for polymicrobial colonisation, and more sensitive detection methods reveal this association more clearly [93]; we therefore recommend reporting catheter duration, prior antibiotic exposure, and the exact microbiologic identification method and discussing them as potential confounders.
4.3. Virulence Genes of UPEC
This section reports the observed frequency (prevalence) of virulence genes detected by PCR in the study cohort. It should be emphasised that the presence of a gene at the DNA level, as detected by PCR, does not equate to gene expression, protein production, or functional activity in vivo, nor does it establish the importance of that factor in the pathogenesis of infection in this population. Interpreting the role of these genes in adhesion, colonisation, or infection severity would require separate experimental studies, such as gene expression analysis, adhesion assays, and in vivo infection models, which were beyond the scope of this descriptive study. The contextual discussion of each gene’s known function is drawn from the peer-reviewed literature and is provided to frame the epidemiological significance of the observed prevalence, not to draw mechanistic conclusions from the present data.
This study observed the fimH gene as the most commonly present virulent gene, at 79.8%. This gene plays a significant role as a colonisation factor by binding to the urothelium during the manifestation of UTIs [97]. This is consistent with studies conducted in Iran, where they reported occurrences of 86.17% and 92.8% [28,31], Ethiopia, with an occurrence of 82% [19], India, with 87.5% [98], Mongolia, with 89.9% [20], and China, with 87.4% [99]. Our findings were noticeably different from recent UTI studies conducted in Sudan, which reported a prevalence of 63.6% [36], Tunisia, with 68% [29], and Iran, with 62.3% [33]. The discrepancy between our findings and those of other studies may potentially be due to different reasons, such as the populations sampled [36]. This study used convenience sampling, where all groups of patients were included, while other studies may have been more specific in terms of their study population, such as focusing on paediatrics, ICU patients, the elderly, etc. Sampling and selection bias might also be a factor. Studies that focus on MDR isolates, environmental isolates, or outbreak strains may under-represent/over-represent fimH-positive lineages [100]. Sample size and chance variation might also address the discordance in our findings with other studies; small studies tend to show greater random fluctuation in gene frequency than large surveillance cohorts [101].
In this study, fimH emerged as the most frequently co-occurring virulence gene, appearing in nearly all of the dominant gene combinations identified. The high prevalence of fimH reflects its fundamental role in UPEC pathogenicity, as type 1 fimbriae are essential for mediating adhesion to uroepithelial cells and indwelling catheter surfaces [11,31]. Its consistent co-occurrence with other virulence genes, particularly aer, sfa, and papC, might suggest that fimH forms a core adhesive backbone upon which additional pathogenic traits are built, but of course, this is outside of the study scope; appropriate tests should be done to further validate this. This pattern aligns with global findings showing that fimH is one of the most conserved and ubiquitous ExPEC virulence genes, providing a fitness advantage during urinary tract colonisation and persistence [102,103,104]. The dominance of fimH-containing combinations in this study therefore reinforces the central importance of adhesion as a primary strategy used by CAUTI-associated E. coli to initiate and maintain infection in catheterised patients.
S and FIC (sfa genes) were found in 35 (41.7%) of the UPEC isolates. These findings are in line with those of studies from Tunisia (34%) [29], India (49% and 39.1%) [105,106], and Iran (48.46%) [107]. However, studies from Ethiopia (25%) [19], Iran (79.4%, 13.6%, and 81%) [30,32,34], Egypt (29.3%) [35], and Taiwan (29.8%) [38] are discordant with our study. Studies report that S fimbriae have abundant receptors in the bladder and the epithelial surface of the kidneys. This contributes to the easy ascension of UPEC to the kidneys, causing pyelonephritis, which forms one of the serious, complicated UTIs [108,109,110]. This study observed 41.67% of sfa genes from the isolated UPEC infections; this means about 41% of patients who were positive for UPEC were potentially at risk for ascending UTIs, leading to nephritis. The sfa genes have previously been detected in neonatal meningitis and septicaemia [37,111]. This also suggests that neonates who were positive for UPEC had a potential risk of meningitis and septicaemia. There was no significant association between sfa genes and gender, age, and race.
The pyelonephritis-associated pili (papC) gene was found in 22 (26.2%) UPEC isolates, which can be compared to studies from Iran, (16.7%) [112], Mongolia (20.3%) [20], Ethiopia (29.5%) [19], and Iran (27.1%) and (32%) [113,114]. However, it is discordant with studies from Tunisia, (41%) [29], Iran (61.3%) [115], Egypt (52%) [35], Indonesia (65.85%) [116], and Iran (91%) [117]. The discordance between our study and other studies may be due to multiple explainable causes. Studies enriched for upper-tract infections or biofilm/catheter isolates often show a much higher prevalence of papC. Conversely, studies of mixed outpatient cystitis or commensal collections report lower papC [110]. Therefore, population and study setting may have played a role in this case. Some studies report that the prevalence of papC genes tends to be higher in strains isolated from severely ill patients and those with pyelonephritis, and E. coli harbouring papC genes are more frequent, particularly in inpatient settings and severe infections, compared to less severe outpatient cases [5,118,119]. Additionally, the papC gene is enriched in certain phylogroups, such as in many B2 strains, and may be absent or disrupted in other successful lineages such as some ST131 clones; this lowers the overall papC frequency in collections dominated by those lineages [120,121].
As already indicated in the present study, the papC gene was detected in 26.2% of the UPEC isolates. This prevalence indicates that a substantial minority of isolates carry P fimbriae, which are well-documented virulence determinants associated with upper urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis [110]. P fimbriae mediate adhesion to the renal tubular epithelium and contribute to bacterial persistence and host tissue damage [122,123]. Their detection in approximately one-quarter of isolates suggests that while some strains possess strong kidney-tropic potential, many potentially rely on other adhesins such as fimH and sfa to establish infection, reflecting the heterogeneity of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) circulating in the study area.
From a clinical perspective, the moderate papC prevalence observed here implies that a subset of infections in this cohort could possess enhanced potential for ascending or recurrent disease, but most CAUTI cases are likely caused by isolates expressing other adhesins. These findings underscore the importance of evaluating multiple virulence factors rather than relying on a single genetic marker to characterise pathogenic potential in UPEC populations. There was no statistical significance between the papC gene and the demographic variables.
In this study, 23 (27.4%) UPEC isolates had the hemolysin (hly) gene, which is comparable to studies from Poland (22%) [124], Iran (25%) and (31%) [114,125], Iraq (21.9%) [126], Nepal (32.3%) [127], and South Korea (20.3%) [128]. Studies with discordant results were noted in China (8.33%) [129], Syria (41.6%) [130], Ethiopia (51.5%) [19], and Mexico (15.4%) [131]. The discordance of our results with some of the published articles may be attributed to different plausible factors, such as local strain population (Phylogroup or Sequence Type (ST) and laboratory methods for the detection of the hly genes (different PCR targets/primers, different PCR protocols) [129]. Because hlyA is frequently associated with certain UPEC lineages, notably phlyogroup B2, the observed prevalence likely reflects the mix of sequence types in our catheter-associated collection and the healthcare setting. We therefore recommend that readers interpret the 27.4% figure in the context of these factors (geography, catheter-associated vs. community isolates, and detection method).
The 27.4% prevalence of the hly gene in this study is within some published ranges and implies that a substantial minority of isolates may carry a potent cytolytic virulence factor (hemolysin), which is a pore-forming toxin associated with epithelial damage, immune evasion, and more severe disease phenotypes in experimental and clinical contexts. Strains that carry it are more likely to cause tissue injury or persistent infection [110]. That increases the clinical relevance of the isolates that carry hly in our study.
Long-term-catheterised and older/institutionalised patients commonly harbour polymicrobial biofilms and diverse UPEC lineages; prolonged catheter presence and healthcare exposures increase opportunities for colonisation by virulent lineages and for mixed infections to establish. This may justify the appearance of hly at this frequency in this CAUTI study [93].
This study observed a cnf prevalence of 9.5%, which is concordant with studies from Uganda (5.5%) [132], Iran (12.3%) [33], Mexico (14.02%) [133], and Tunisia (3%) [29], but studies with discordant results have been noted in Iran (50.4%) [134], Egypt (42%) and (38.09%) [135,136], and Iraq (41.83%) and (41.57%) [137,138]. These apparently contradictory findings can be reconcilable when one considers three interdependent drivers: sampling frame, local strain composition, and detection methods.
Firstly, sampling methods can strongly shape observed prevalence. Collections enriched for invasive, haemolytic or complicated extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli isolates, such as urosepsis, pyelonephritis, or targeted haemolytic strain surveys, will naturally show higher Cytotoxic necrotising factor 1 (CNF1) carriage than unselected outpatient cystitis series or mixed-surveillance cohorts [132]. Secondly, CNF1 is phylogenetically concentrated in particular ExPEC lineages, often B2-associated sequence types; centres with a local dominance of these lineages therefore report inflated CNF1 rates compared with regions where other lineages predominate [139]. Thirdly, methodological choices, PCR primer targets, whether assays screen only cnf1 versus all cnf variants, and the use of whole-genome sequencing versus targeted PCR do change sensitivity and specificity and thus prevalence estimates [132,140]. We recommend that our 9.52% finding be limited to comparison with other studies with comparable sampling frames and detection methods; where possible, they should stratify prevalence by clinical syndrome (CAUTI versus community UTI), phylogroup, and specimen source.
CNF1 is a potent virulence factor that activates Rho GTPases in host cells, leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, epithelial cell damage, and proinflammatory cytokine release [140,141]. In CAUTIs, which already involve mechanical/physical injury and biofilm formation, even a modest CNF1 prevalence may suggest that a subset of E. coli strains can cause deeper tissue invasion and persistent inflammation. Clinical studies have linked CNF1-positive E. coli with more severe disease outcomes, such as upper UTIs, bacteraemia, and recurrence [140,142]. Although our cohort shows a relatively low prevalence (9.52%), this indicates that a minority of isolates may contribute disproportionately to morbidity and prolonged hospitalisation, particularly in catheterised adults with compromised mucosal barriers.
There was no observed significant statistical association between cnf and the demographic variables.
This study observed a (77.4%) prevalence of the aerobactin (aer) gene, which is consistent with studies from Poland (67–70%) [124], Belgium 73% [143], and Iran (70.5%) [34], but discordant studies were also observed in India (57%) and (65%) [144,145], Tunisia (52.2%) [29], Ethiopia (54.50%) [19], and Iran (58.6%) [33]. The higher aerobactin prevalence observed in our study compared with several published cohorts likely reflects differences in the study population and isolate source. Unlike community-based UTI cohorts, where aerobactin frequencies are often lower [29,146], our isolates originated from catheter-associated infections, a setting known to enrich for highly virulent ExPEC lineages with potent iron acquisition systems [143]. Catheter-associated biofilm environments exert strong selective pressure for siderophore-producing strains, which may account for the elevated aer carriage [147,148,149]. Additionally, methodological differences in gene targets and detection sensitivity among studies can contribute to apparent discordance [124]. Geographic variation in circulating UPEC lineages may further explain the higher prevalence observed in our setting [145].
Aerobactin is a potent siderophore that improves iron acquisition in the iron-poor urinary tract, promoting bacterial growth, survival under oxidative stress, and persistence. Studies show that aerobactin is enriched in invasive UPEC lineages associated with urosepsis and complicated UTIs [110,150]. Locally, this could potentially translate into a higher proportion of patients at risk of complicated infection, especially those who are older, comorbid or long-term-catheterised [110,150], which is in accordance with to our study, which found 47.69% of all the aer-positive samples belonged to patients aged >65 years old. Aerobactin frequently co-occurs with plasmids and ExPEC virulence and resistance determinants. While aer itself is not an antibiotic-resistant gene, its common genomic context can make toxin-rich strains more likely to carry resistance determinants, raising the risk of treatment failure or the need for broader empiric therapy [143].
5. Conclusions
This study investigated the distribution of uropathogens and the prevalence of virulence genes among Escherichia coli isolates from catheter-associated urinary tract infections in Limpopo Province, South Africa, over a one-year period. A total of 215 specimens yielded 255 uropathogen isolates. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent uropathogen (32.8% of isolates), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium, a distribution consistent with global and regional reports. Female gender and older age (>65 years) were significantly associated with E. coli isolation (p = 0.025 and p < 0.001, respectively). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 28% of E. coli cases, with E. coli + E. faecalis as the predominant co-infection pair.
Molecular characterisation of 84 E. coli isolates revealed high prevalence of fimH (79.76%) and aer (77.38%), with sfa (41.67%), hly (27.38%), papC (26.19%), and cnf (9.52%) occurring at lower frequencies. The most common gene combination was fimH + aer. No statistically significant associations between virulence gene carriage and demographic variables were identified after correction for multiple comparisons.
These findings document the uropathogen profile and UPEC virulence gene frequencies in a Limpopo Province public healthcare context, where such molecular data are limited. The high prevalence of fimH and aer genes among CAUTI-associated E. coli isolates underscores the need for continued molecular surveillance of CAUTI pathogens, reinforcement of catheter-care protocols, and targeted infection prevention strategies in high-risk patient groups. Future studies incorporating antibiotic susceptibility profiling, sequence typing, and gene expression analysis are needed to extend these findings.
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) and the University of Limpopo for funding me through the ‘Nurturing of Emerging Scholars Programme (NESP)’ scholarship, and National Research Foundation for the purchase of consumables through the supervisor’s NRF-Thuthuka research grant (TTK240408212892-PR-2025).
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| µL | Microliter |
| aer | Aerobactin gene |
| ATCC | American Type Culture Collection |
| Bp | base pairs |
| CAUTI | Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection |
| CAUTIs | Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections |
| CHCA | α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid |
| cnf | Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor gene |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic Acid |
| dNTPs | Deoxynucleotide triphosphates |
| ExPEC | Extraintestinal Pathogenic E. coli |
| fimH | Type 1 fimbrial adhesion gene |
| foc | F1C fimbriae gene |
| hly | Hemolysin gene |
| ICU | Intensive Care Unit |
| IDSA | Infectious Diseases Society of America |
| IL-6 | Interleukin-6 |
| IL-8 | Interleukin-8 |
| MALDI-TOF | Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation–Time of Flight |
| MDR | Multidrug-Resistant |
| mPCR | Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction |
| MVP | Magnetic Viral Protocol (KingFisher protocol name) |
| NC | Negative Control |
| NHLS | National Health Laboratory Service |
| NICU | Neonatal Intensive Care Unit |
| papC | Pyelonephritis-associated pili gene |
| PC | Positive Control |
| PCR | Polymerase Chain Reaction |
| RNA | Ribonucleic Acid |
| sfa | S fimbriae gene |
| SPSS | Statistical Package for the Social Sciences |
| ST | Sequence Type |
| TAE | Tris-Acetate-EDTA buffer |
| TBE | Tris-Borate-EDTA buffer |
| UPEC | Uropathogenic Escherichia coli |
| USA | United States of America |
| UTI | Urinary Tract Infection |
| UTIs | Urinary Tract Infections |
| WGS | Whole-Genome Sequencing |
Author Contributions
J.M.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, and writing—original draft preparation; O.G.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, and supervision; I.R.: supervision; M.M.: supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Turfloop Research Ethics Committee of the University of Limpopo (protocol code TREC/1583/2024: PG), 19 September 2024.
Informed Consent Statement
Patient informed consent was waived due to the study not involving direct contact with participants, and the study used secondary samples obtained from the NHLS.
Data Availability Statement
Raw data will be available upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Ahmed S.S., Shariq A., Alsallom A.A., Babikir I.H., Alhomoud B.N. Uropathogens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns: Relationship with urinary tract infections. Int. J. Health Sci. 2019;13:48–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Turcu F.L., Vacaroiu I.A., Balcangiu-Stroescu A.E., Mitrea A.R., Miricescu D., Balan D.G., Stanigut A.M. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Female Patients—A Clinical Review. J. Mind Med. Sci. 2025;12:5. doi: 10.3390/jmms12010005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mwang B.J., Mchami J.I. The aetiology and prevalence of urinary tract infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review Etiologia e prevalência de infecções do trato urinário na África Subsaariana: Uma revisão sistemática. J. Health Biol. Sci. 2022;10:1–7. doi: 10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v10i1.4501.p1-7.2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fourie J., Claassen F., Myburgh J.J. Causative pathogens and antibiotic resistance in community-acquired urinary tract infections in central South Africa. South. Afr. Med. J. 2021;111:124–128. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flores-Mireles A., Hreha T.N., Hunstad D.A. Pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Top. Spinal Cord. Inj. Rehabil. 2019;25:228–240. doi: 10.1310/sci2503-228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang X., Chen H., Zheng Y., Qu S., Wang H., Yi F. Disease burden and long-term trends of urinary tract infections: A worldwide report. Front. Public Health. 2022;10:888205. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.888205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shrestha L.B., Baral R., Khanal B. Comparative study of antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation among Gram-positive uropathogens isolated from community-acquired urinary tract infections and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019;12:957–963. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S200988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tenke P., Mezei T., Bőde I., Köves B. Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2017;16:138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2016.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chuang L., Tambyah P.A. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. J. Infect. Chemother. 2021;27:1400–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Latthe P.M., Latthe A.M. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections–A review. Wadia J. Women Child Health. 2024;3:79–82. doi: 10.25259/WJWCH_39_2024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Flores-Mireles A.L., Walker J.N., Caparon M., Hultgren S.J. Urinary tract infections: Epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;13:269–284. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tandogdu Z., Wagenlehner F.M.E. Global epidemiology of urinary tract infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2016;29:73–79. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Musinguzi B., Kabajulizi I., Mpeirwe M., Turugurwa J., Kabanda T. Incidence and Etiology of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Admitted Patients at Kabale Regional Referral Hospital, South Western Uganda. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2019;9:183–196. doi: 10.4236/aid.2019.93014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shmoury A.H., Hanna W., Zakhour J., Zahreddine N.K., Kanj S.S. Epidemiology and microbiology of catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A 14-year surveillance study at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. J. Infect. Public Health. 2024;17:825–832. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fefar D.R., Shingala H.K., Mehta K.D., Shah R.V. Comparison of Bacterial Pathogens Causing Urinary Tract Infection among Catheterized and Non-catheterized Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Jamnagar. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2023;17:1238–1245. doi: 10.22207/JPAM.17.2.57. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Asmare Z., Erkihun M., Abebe W., Ashagre A., Misganaw T., Feleke S.F. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect. Dis. Health. 2024;29:172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adzitey F., Huda N., Ali G.R.R. Molecular techniques for detecting and typing of bacteria, advantages and application to foodborne pathogens isolated from ducks. 3 Biotech. 2013;3:97–107. doi: 10.1007/s13205-012-0074-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kalle E., Kubista M., Rensing C. Multi-template polymerase chain reaction. Biomol. Detect. Quantif. 2014;2:11–29. doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dadi B.R., Abebe T., Zhang L., Mihret A., Abebe W., Amogne W. Distribution of virulence genes and phylogenetics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli among urinary tract infection patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020;20:108. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4844-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Munkhdelger Y., Gunregjav N., Dorjpurev A., Juniichiro N., Sarantuya J. Detection of virulence genes, phylogenetic group and antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Mongolia. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2017;11:51–57. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hooton T.M., Bradley S.F., Cardenas D.D., Colgan R., Geerlings S.E., Rice J.C., Saint S., Schaeffer A.J., Tambayh P.A., Tenke P., et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-aassociated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010;50:625–663. doi: 10.1086/650482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reisner A., Maierl M., Jörger M., Krause R., Berger D., Haid A., Tesic D., Zechner E.L. Type 1 fimbriae contribute to catheter-associated urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:931–939. doi: 10.1128/JB.00985-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jacobsen S.M., Stickler D.J., Mobley H.L.T., Shirtliff M.E. Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008;21:26–59. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00019-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Spaulding C.N., Hultgren S.J. Adhesive Pili in UTI pathogenesis and drug development. Pathogens. 2016;5:30. doi: 10.3390/pathogens5010030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Govindarajan D.K., Kandaswamy K. Virulence factors of uropathogens and their role in host pathogen interactions. Cell Surf. 2022;8:100075. doi: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2022.100075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dhakal B.K., Mulvey M.A. The UPEC pore-forming toxin α-hemolysin triggers proteolysis of host proteins to disrupt cell adhesion, inflammatory, and survival pathways. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zou Z., Potter R.F., McCoy W.H., Wildenthal J.A., Katumba G.L., Mucha P.J., Dantas G., Henderson J.P.E. E. coli catheter-associated urinary tract infections are associated with distinctive virulence and biofilm gene determinants. JCI Insight. 2023;8:e161461. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.161461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Momtaz H., Karimian A., Madani M., Dehkordi F.S., Ranjbar R., Sarshar M., Souod N. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Iran: Serogroup distributions, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance properties. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2013;13:8. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tarchouna M., Ferjani A., Ben-Selma W., Boukadida J. Distribution of uropathogenic virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;17:450–453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rahdar M., Rashki A., Miri H.R., Ghalehnoo M.R. Detection of pap, sfa, afa, foc, and fim adhesin-encoding operons in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates collected from patients with urinary tract infection. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015;8:e22647. doi: 10.5812/jjm.22647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hojati Z., Zamanzad B., Hashemzadeh M., Molaie R., Gholipour A. Detection of fimh gene in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015;8:e17520. doi: 10.5812/jjm.17520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Malekzadegan Y., Khashei R., Ebrahim-Saraie H.S., Jahanabadi Z. Distribution of virulence genes and their association with antimicrobial resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Iranian patients. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018;18:572. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3467-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rezatofighi S.E., Mirzarazi M., Salehi M. Virulence genes and phylogenetic groups of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from patients with urinary tract infection and uninfected control subjects: A case-control study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021;21:361. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06036-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ghazvini K., Ghavidel M., Gholamhosseini-Moghadam T., Nourian K. Virulence factors analysis and antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from patients in northeast of Iran. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2020;12:223–230. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v12i3.3240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Morsi S.S., Tash R.M.E. Virulence Determinants among Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamases producers of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates In Zagagig University Hospitals, Egypt. Egypt. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016;25:101–108. doi: 10.12816/0037000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Osman O.M.S., Osman A., Abushama H.M. Detection of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Virulence Factors’ fimH and fliC H7 in Urinary Tract Infections and Their Association with Antibiotics Resistance among Sudanese Children. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2024;11:74–87. doi: 10.32628/IJSRSET24116163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guo Y., Xiao R., Feng J., Wang X., Lai J., Kang W., Li Y., Zhu X., Ji T., Huang X., et al. Distribution of virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized neonates: A multi-center study across China. Heliyon. 2024;10:e35991. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hsiao C.-Y., Lee Y.-C., Shyu D.J., Su C.-P., Lin M.-Y., Guo N.-Y., Chiang C.-L., Chen Y.-Y. Molecular Characterization of High and Low Virulent Escherichia coli Clinical Strains Isolated from Patients with Urinary Tract Infections with or without Bacteremia in Southern Taiwan. Infect. Drug Resist. 2024;17:2389–2399. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S458925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mohamed E.H., Zaki M.E.S., Ramadan M.A., Motawea M.M., Badr D.F., El Sayed A.G.A., Hamed M.E.A. Study of Biofilm, Virulence Genes, and Risk Factors in Urinary Catheter-Associated Escherichia coli Infections. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2024;17:e144426. doi: 10.5812/jjm-144426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anggi A., Wijaya D.W., Ramayani O.R. Risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infection and uropathogen bacterial profile in the intensive care unit in hospitals in Medan, Indonesia. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019;7:3488–3492. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Asmare Z., Awoke T., Genet C., Admas A., Melese A., Mulu W. Incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections by Gram-negative bacilli and their ESBL and carbapenemase production in specialized hospitals of Bahir Dar, northwest Ethiopia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2024;13:10. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01368-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gad M.H., AbdelAziz H.H. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in the Adult Patient Group: A Qualitative Systematic Review on the Adopted Preventative and Interventional Protocols From the Literature. Cureus. 2021;13:1–21. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Letica-Kriegel A.S., Salmasian H., Vawdrey D.K., E Youngerman B., A Green R., Furuya E.Y., Calfee D.P., Perotte R. Identifying the risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A large cross-sectional study of six hospitals. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e022137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ndomba A.L.M., Laisser R.M., Silago V., Kidenya B.R., Mwanga J., Seni J., Mshana S.E. Urinary Tract Infections and Associated Factors among Patients with Indwelling Urinary Catheters Attending Bugando Medical Centre a Tertiary Hospital in Northwestern Tanzania. Microorganisms. 2022;10:473. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Oumer Y., Dadi B.R., Seid M., Biresaw G., Manilal A. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection: Incidence, associated factors and drug resistance patterns of bacterial isolates in southern Ethiopia. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021;14:2883–2894. doi: 10.2147/idr.s311229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Patel N.V., Pujara P. Assessment of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection Rate and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Isolated Organisms. Int. J. Toxicol. Pharmacol. Res. 2023;13:147–150. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Werneburg G.T. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Res. Rep. Urol. 2022;14:109–133. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S273663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baimakhanova B., Sadanov A., Trenozhnikova L., Balgimbaeva A., Baimakhanova G., Orasymbet S., Tleubekova D., Amangeldi A., Turlybaeva Z., Nurgaliyeva Z., et al. Understanding the Burden and Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Women. Diseases. 2025;13:59. doi: 10.3390/diseases13020059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010;7:653–660. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Minardi D., Nzeo D., Cantoro D., Conti A., Muzzonigro G., D’Anzeo G. Urinary tract infections in women: Etiology and treatment options. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2011;4:333–343. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S11767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hariati H., Suza D.E., Tarigan R. Risk factors analysis for catheter-associated urinary tract infection in medan, Indonesia. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019;7:3189–3194. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu Y., Li Y., Huang Y., Zhang J., Ding J., Zeng Q., Tian T., Ma Q., Liu X., Yu H., et al. Prediction of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Among Neurosurgical Intensive Care Patients: A Decision Tree Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2023;170:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shen L., Fu T., Huang L., Sun H., Wang Y., Sun L., Lu X., Zhang J., Yang Z., Ni C. 7295 elderly hospitalized patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection: A case-control study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023;23:825. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08711-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mohamed W., Algameel A., Bassyouni R., Mahmoud A.e.T. Prevalence and predictors of urinary tract infection in full-term and preterm neonates. Egypt. Pediatr. Assoc. Gaz. 2020;68:12. doi: 10.1186/s43054-020-00022-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rosenthal V.D., Yin R., Abbo L.M., Lee B.H., Rodrigues C., Myatra S.N., Divatia J.V., Kharbanda M., Nag B., Rajhans P., et al. An international prospective study of INICC analyzing the incidence and risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections in 235 ICUs across 8 Asian Countries. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2024;52:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shukla A., S. S., Charan A., Aanand N. Effectiveness of catheter-associated urinary tract infections bundle approach to reduce urinary catheter associated infection rate among children admitted in Paediatric unit. Int. J. Clin. Trials. 2024;11:117–123. doi: 10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20240963. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Davis K.F., Colebaugh A.M., Eithun B.L., Klieger S.B., Meredith D.J., Plachter N., Sammons J.S., Thompson A., Coffin S.E. Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A quality-improvement initiative. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e857–e864. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.da Silva A.R.A., Marques A.F., di Biase C.B., Zingg W., Dramowski A., Sharland M. Interventions to prevent urinary catheter–associated infections in children and neonates: A systematic review. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2018;14:556.e1–556.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Silago V., Moremi N., Mtebe M., Komba E., Masoud S., Mgaya F.X., Mirambo M.M., Nyawale H.A., Mshana S.E., Matee M.I. Multidrug-Resistant Uropathogens Causing Community Acquired Urinary Tract Infections among Patients Attending Health Facilities in Mwanza and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Antibiotics. 2022;11:1718. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Khan A.M., Ali Z., Salahuddin G.S., Kamal M., Asghar M., Afridi M.A.R. Uropathogen isolates and their antibiotic sensitivity in patients with indwelling catheter associated urinary tract infections. J. Postgrad. Med. Inst. 2020;34:68–73. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Vinoth M., Prabagaravarthanan R., Bhaskar M. Prevalence of microorganisms causing catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) among catheterised patients admitted in a tertiary care hospital. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2017;5:2367–2372. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lakoh S., Yi L., Russell J.B., Zhang J., Sevalie S., Zhao Y., Kanu J.S., Liu P., Conteh S.K., Williams C.E.E., et al. High incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and related antibiotic resistance in two hospitals of different geographic regions of Sierra Leone: A prospective cohort study. Res. Sq. 2023 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2694473/v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sleziak J., Błażejewska M., Duszyńska W. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Infect. Dis. 2025;25:595. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10996-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kubone P.Z., Mlisana K.P., Govinden U., Abia A.L.K., Essack S.Y. Antibiotic Susceptibility and Molecular Characterization of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Associated with Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Urban and Rural Settings in South Africa. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020;5:176. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed5040176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Naidoo A., Kajee A., Mvelase N.R., Swe-Han K.S. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial uropathogens in a South African regional hospital. Afr. J. Lab. Med. 2023;12:8. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mortazavi-Tabatabaei S.R., Ghaderkhani J., Nazari A., Sayehmiri K., Sayehmiri F., Pakzad I. Pattern of antibacterial resistance in urinary tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2019;10:169. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_419_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Isberg H.K., Sundqvist M., Melander E., Beckman A., Hedin K. Bacterial growth and antimicrobial resistance in urinary Escherichia coli isolates among men with lower UTI in Swedish primary healthcare: Retrospective data over a 4 year period. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2025;7:dlae214. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bazira J., Petra N.P., Nakato C.N., Walekhwa A.W., Nakazibwe B., Kawuma S. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance in Uropathogens at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (2019–2024): A Retrospective Study. Infect. Drug Resist. 2025;18:3875–3890. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S523848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hrbacek J., Cermak P., Zachoval R. Current antibiotic resistance trends of uropathogens in central europe: Survey from a tertiary hospital urology department 2011–2019. Antibiotics. 2020;9:630. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9090630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rupcheva M.Y., Kostadinov K., Kalchev Y., Gardzheva P., Hristozova E., Rachkovska Z., Lengerova G., Angelova A., Murdjeva M., Petrov M.M. Urinary Tract Infections in a Single-Center Bulgarian Hospital: Trends in Etiology, Antibiotic Resistance, and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic (2017–2022) Antibiotics. 2025;14:982. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14100982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Arias C.A., Murray B.E. The rise of the Enterococcus: Beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:266–278. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mody L., Greene M.T., Saint S., Meddings J., Trautner B.W., Wald H.L., Crnich C., Banaszak-Holl J., McNamara S.E., King B.J., et al. Comparing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Programs between Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes and Non-Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017;38:287–293. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rajasekhar B., Sreeharsha C., Sri D., Vegiraju B.V.V. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Urinary Tract Infections in Elderly Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024;14:996–1000. doi: 10.5083/ejcm. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Huh J.-S. The Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections in Institutionalized vs. Noninstitutionalized Elderly Persons. Urogenit. Tract. Infect. 2016;11:56–61. doi: 10.14777/uti.2016.11.2.56. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Alkan S., Balkan I.I., Surme S., Bayramlar O.F., Kaya S.Y., Karaali R., Mete B., Aygun G., Tabak F., Saltoglu N. Urinary tract infections in older adults: Associated factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production. Front. Microbiol. 2024;15:1384392. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1384392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Varney A.M., Mannix-Fisher E., Thomas J.C., McLean S. Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the identification and characterization of bacterial isolates recovered from catheter-associated urinary tract infections. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2024;135:lxae155. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sharma V., Shukla S., Singh V.K., Farooq U., Singh S., Sharma S.R., Ahmed I. Comparision of bacterial urinary tract infection in catheterised and non catheterised patients. IP Int. J. Med. Microbiol. Trop. Dis. 2021;7:288–291. doi: 10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2021.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gu J., Chen X., Yang Z., Bai Y., Zhang X. Gender differences in the microbial spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of uropathogens isolated from patients with urinary stones. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022;36:e24155. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhan Z.-S., Shi J., Zheng Z.-S., Zhu X.-X., Chen J., Zhou X.-Y., Zhang S.-Y. Epidemiological insights into seasonal, sex-specific and age-related distribution of bacterial pathogens in urinary tract infections. Exp. Ther. Med. 2024;27:140. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Magliano E., Grazioli V., Deflorio L., Leuci A.I., Mattina R., Romano P., Cocuzza C.E. Gender and age-dependent etiology of community-acquired urinary tract infections. Sci. World J. 2012;2012:349597. doi: 10.1100/2012/349597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Loxhaj I., Hoxha-Gashi S., Petrovska S., Loxha S. Gender Differences on Prevalence of Uropathogens and Their Antimicrobial Resistance: Results from a Single-Center Study in Peja Region, Kosovo. Int. J. Biomed. 2023;13:131–136. doi: 10.21103/Article13(3)_OA14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Vincitorio D., Barbadoro P., Pennacchietti L., Pellegrini I., David S., Ponzio E., Prospero E. Risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infection in Italian elderly. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2014;42:898–901. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Saleem M., Khaja A.S.S., Hossain A., Alenazi F., Said K.B., Moursi S.A., Almalaq H.A., Mohamed H., Rakha E., Mishra S.K. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Hail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Diagnostics. 2022;12:1695. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Perdana M.A., Wahyuni D.D., Yunita R. Characteristics and susceptibility pattern of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) bacteria in Indonesia: A study in a national reference hospital of Sumatra region 2020–2021. Narra J. 2023;3:e436. doi: 10.52225/narra.v3i3.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mitrani-Gold F.S., Kaye K.S., Gupta V., Mulgirigama A., Trautner B.W., Scangarella-Oman N.E., Yu K.C., Ye G., Joshi A.V. Older patient age and prior antimicrobial use strongly predict antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from urinary tract infections among female outpatients. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0285427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Taha A.B. Bacterial etiology and antimicrobial resistance pattern of community-acquired urinary tract infection in older adults. Med. Microecol. 2024;22:100114. doi: 10.1016/j.medmic.2024.100114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Croxall G., Weston V., Joseph S., Manning G., Cheetham P., McNally A. Increased human pathogenic potential of Escherichia coli from polymicrobial urinary tract infections in comparison to isolates from monomicrobial culture samples. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011;60:102–109. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.020602-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Uzodi A.S., Lohse C.M., Banerjee R. Risk Factors For and Outcomes of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Infections in Children. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2017;6:245–257. doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0152-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ramatla T., Ramaili T., Lekota K.E., Ndou R., Mphuti N., Bezuidenhout C., Thekisoe O. A systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Escherichia coli isolated from water in africa (2000–2021) Heliyon. 2023;9:e16123. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Casadevall A., Pirofski L.-A. What Is a Host? Attributes of Individual Susceptibility. Infect. Immun. 2018;86:e00636-17. doi: 10.1128/iai.00636-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Qian Z., Zhang S., Li N., Ma W., Zhang K., Song F., Zheng C., Zhong L., Wang Y., Cai J., et al. Risk Factors for and Clinical Outcomes of Polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022;2022:5122085. doi: 10.1155/2022/5122085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Salm J., Salm F., Arendarski P., Kramer T.S. High frequency of Enterococcus faecalis detected in urinary tract infections in male outpatients—a retrospective, multicenter analysis, Germany 2015 to 2020. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023;23:812. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08824-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Nye T.M., Zou Z., Obernuefemann C.L.P., Pinkner J.S., Lowry E., Kleinschmidt K., Bergeron K., Klim A., Dodson K.W., Flores-Mireles A.L., et al. Microbial co-occurrences on catheters from long-term catheterized patients. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:61. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44095-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tien B.Y.Q., Goh H.M.S., Chong K.K.L., Bhaduri-Tagore S., Holec S., Dress R., Ginhoux F., Ingersoll M.A., Williams R.B.H., Kline K.A. Enterococcus faecalis Promotes Innate Immune Suppression and Polymicrobial Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection. Infect. Immun. 2017;85:e00378-17. doi: 10.1128/iai.00378-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gaston J.R., Johnson A.O., Bair K.L., White A.N., Armbruster C.E. Polymicrobial interactions in the urinary tract: Is the enemy of my enemy my friend? Infect. Immun. 2021;89:e00652-20. doi: 10.1128/iai.00652-20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Moreland R.B., Brubaker L., Wolfe A.J. Polymicrobial urine cultures: Reconciling contamination with the urobiome while recognizing the pathogens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025;15:1562687. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1562687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wullt B., Bergsten G.R., Samuelsson M., Svanborg C. The role of P fimbriae for Escherichia coli establishment and mucosal inflammation in the human urinary tract. Int. J. Iof Antimicrob. Agents. 2002;19:522–538. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(02)00103-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Bali N., Borkakoty B., Ali A., Ahmed T., Roohi S., Wani S., Nisar Q., Hazarika R. Presence of fimH and iss type 1, 2 and 3 genes in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates recovered from an apex medical institute in North India. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2023;46:100417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.100417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wang Y., Zhao S., Han L., Guo X., Chen M., Ni Y., Zhang Y., Cui Z., He P. Drug resistance and virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Shanghai, China. J. Antibiot. 2014;67:799–805. doi: 10.1038/ja.2014.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Sung K., Nawaz M., Park M., Chon J., Khan S.A., Alotaibi K., Khan A.A. Comprehensive Genomic Analysis of Uropathogenic E. coli: Virulence Factors, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Mobile Genetic Elements. Pathogens. 2024;13:794. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13090794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Oliveira M.C.F., Canellas A.L.B., Berbert L.C., Cardoso A.M., Silva V.A., Garutti S.S.T., Rangel D.H.F., Dias R.C.S., Perini J.A., Souza C.R.V.M., et al. Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence of Biofilm-Forming Uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Rio de Janeiro. Antibiotics. 2025;14:869. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14090869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Poole N.M., Green S.I., Rajan A., Vela L.E., Zeng X.-L., Estes M.K., Maresso A.W. Role for fimH in extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli invasion and translocation through the intestinal epithelium. Infect. Immun. 2017;85:e00581-17. doi: 10.1128/iai.00581-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Russell C.W., Fleming B.A., Jost C.A., Tran A., Stenquist A.T., Wambaugh M.A., Bronner M.P., Mulvey M.A. Context-Dependent Requirements for fimH and Other Canonical Virulence Factors in Gut Colonization by Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2018;86:e00746-17. doi: 10.1128/iai.00746-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Subashchandrabose S., Mobley H.L.T. Virulence and Fitness Determinants of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015;3:235–261. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0015-2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Muraleetharan M., Viswanathan T. Genotyping and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing uropathogenic Escherichia coli in and around Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Urol. Sci. 2019;30:244–249. doi: 10.4103/UROS.UROS_45_19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Shetty A.V., Kumar S.H., Shekar M., Shetty A.K., Karunasagar I. Prevalence of adhesive genes among uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Mangalore. Indian. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014;32:175–178. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.129812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tajbakhsh E., Ahmadi P., Abedpour-Dehkordi E., Arbab-Soleimani N., Khamesipour F. Biofilm formation, antimicrobial susceptibility, serogroups and virulence genes of uropathogenic E. coli isolated from clinical samples in Iran. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2016;5:11. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Baby S., Karnaker V.K., Geetha R. Adhesins of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) Rev. Artic. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. Trop. Dis. 2016;2:10–18. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Behzadi P. Urinary Tract Infection—The Result of the Strength of the Pathogen, or the Weakness of the Host. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2018. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Fimbrial Adhesins Virulome; pp. 66–83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Whelan S., Lucey B., Finn K. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC)-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: The Molecular Basis for Challenges to Effective Treatment. Microorganisms. 2023;11:2169. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wijetunge D.S.S., Gongati S., DebRoy C., Kim K.S., Couraud P.O., Romero I.A., Weksler B., Kariyawasam S. Characterizing the pathotype of neonatal meningitis causing Escherichia coli (NMEC) Applied microbiology. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:211. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0547-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Firoozeh F., Saffari M., Neamati F., Zibaei M. Detection of virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with cystitis and pyelonephritis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;29:219–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Farshad S., Emamghorashi F. The Prevalence of Virulence Genes of E. coli Strains Isolated from Children with Urinary Tract Infection. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transplant. 2009;20:613–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Memar M.Y., Vosughi M., Saadat Y.R., Ardalan M., Yekani M., Niknafs B., Vahed S.Z. Virulence genes and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Escherichia coli isolated from nosocomial urinary tract infections in the northwest of Iran during 2022–2023: A cross-sectional study. Health Sci. Rep. 2024;7:e70149. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Neamati F., Firoozeh F., Saffari M., Zibaei M. Virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance pattern in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients in Kashan, Iran. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015;8:e17514. doi: 10.5812/jjm.17514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Purbowati R., Utami S.L. Increased expression of pap and sfa Genes in Biofilm-Forming Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Associated with Urinary Tract Infections. Mol. Cell. Biomed. Sci. 2025;9:69–75. doi: 10.21705/mcbs.v9i2.589. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Mohammadzadeh A., Naghizadeh H., Mosadegh A., Astani A., Pouresmaeil O., Mardaneh J. Identification and Evaluation of Pathogenic Genes (traT, hly, aer, pap, and fimH) and Antibiotic Resistance Genes (blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX) in Escherichia coli in Patients Referred to Gonabad Hospitals, Iran. Rep. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2023;12:465–475. doi: 10.61186/rbmb.12.3.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ballesteros-Monrreal M.G., Mendez-Pfeiffer P., Ortíz B., Bolado-Martínez E., Álvarez-Ainza M.L., Enciso-Martínez Y., Arenas-Hernández M.M.P., Diaz-Murrieta B., Barrios-Villa E., Valencia D. Uropathogenic E. coli and Hybrid Pathotypes in Mexican Women with Urinary Tract Infections: A Comprehensive Molecular and Phenotypic Overview. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024;46:5909–5928. doi: 10.3390/cimb46060353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Fekadu S., Weldegebreal F., Shumie T., Mekonnen G.K. A comparative study on nosocomial and community-acquired bacterial urinary tract infections: Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, and associated risk factors among symptomatic patients attending Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized University Hospital, Eastern Ethiopia. Front. Epidemiol. 2025;5:1517476. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2025.1517476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kudinha T., Kong F. Distribution of papG alleles among uropathogenic Escherichia coli from reproductive age women. J. Biomed. Sci. 2022;29:66. doi: 10.1186/s12929-022-00848-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Tanaka M., Hanawa T., Suda T., Tanji Y., Minh L.N., Kondo K., Azam A.H., Kiga K., Yonetani S., Yashiro R., et al. Comparative analysis of virulence-associated genes in ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from bloodstream and urinary tract infections. Front. Microbiol. 2025;16:1571121. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1571121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lane M.C., Mobley H.L.T. Role of P-fimbrial-mediated adherence in pyelonephritis and persistence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) in the mammalian kidney. Kidney Int. 2007;72:19–25. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Melican K., Sandoval R.M., Kader A., Josefsson L., Tanner G.A., Molitoris B.A., Richter-Dahlfors A. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli P and type 1 fimbriae act in synergy in a living host to facilitate renal colonization leading to nephron obstruction. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001298. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Krawczyk B., Wityk P., Burzyńska M., Majchrzak T., Markuszewski M.J. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Associated with Risk of Urosepsis—Genetic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:5681. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Kakian F., Abadi M.S.S., Gholipour A., Fadaie M., Zamanzad B., Khairi S., Parchami S., Damavandi M.S. Evaluating the prevalence of virulence genes of Escherichia coli in patients affected by urinary tract infection. Gene Rep. 2019;16:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.genrep.2019.100433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Abed A.D., Mutter T.Y. Relationship between antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Ramadi, Iraq: Phenotype and genotype identification. Afr. Health Sci. 2023;23:486–496. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i3.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Shah C., Baral R., Bartaula B., Shrestha L.B. Virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) and correlation with antimicrobial resistance. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:204. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1587-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Yun K.W., Kim H.Y., Park H.K., Kim W., Lim I.S. Virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli of urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in children. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2014;47:455–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Li G., Wang S., Zhao S., Zhou Y., Jin S., Pan X. Prevalence of USP and hlyA Genes and Association with Drug Resistance in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Patients in a Tertiary Hospital from Southeast China. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2022;174:57–61. doi: 10.1007/s10517-022-05648-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Al-Zahraa H.F., Samman T.Z. Prevalence of Hemolysin (hlyA)-producing Uropathogenic E. coli and Phenolics-mediated Suppression: Experimental and Bioinformatic Evidence. Ann. Proteom. Bioinform. 2025;9:001–008. doi: 10.29328/journal.apb.1001024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Paniagua-Contreras G.L., Monroy-Pérez E., Rodríguez-Moctezuma J.R., Domínguez-Trejo P., Vaca-Paniagua F., Vaca S. Virulence factors, antibiotic resistance phenotypes and O-serogroups of Escherichia coli strains isolated from community-acquired urinary tract infection patients in Mexico. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017;50:478–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Katongole P., Nalubega F., Florence N.C., Asiimwe B., Andia I. Biofilm formation, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence genes of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from clinical isolates in Uganda. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020;20:453. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05186-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Bravata-Alcantara J.C., Bello-Lopez J.M., Cortes-Ortiz I.A., Mendez-Velazquez J.J., Aviles-Soto B., Quintas-Granados L.I., Chavez-Ocana S.d.C., Rosel-Pech C., Gonzalez-Barrios J.A., Martinez M.S. Distribution of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes in phylogenetic groups of Escherichia coli strains isolated from mexican patients with urinary infection. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2019;12:83711. doi: 10.5812/jjm.83711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Aazam K., Hassan M., Mahbobe M. Detection of uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence factors in patients with urinary tract infections in Iran. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012;6:6811–6816. doi: 10.5897/AJMR12.1462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.El-baz R., Said H.S., Abdelmegeed E.S., Barwa R. Characterization of virulence determinants and phylogenetic background of multiple and extensively drug resistant Escherichia coli isolated from different clinical sources in Egypt. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022;106:1279–1298. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11740-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Morgan R.N., Saleh S.E., Farrag H.A., Aboulwafa M.M. Prevalence and pathologic effects of colibactin and cytotoxic necrotizing factor-1 (Cnf 1) in Escherichia coli: Experimental and bioinformatics analyses. Gut Pathog. 2019;11:22. doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0304-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 137.Nehmaa S.A. Distribution of CNF1among Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract infection and bladder cancer in southern of Iraq. Univ. Thi-Qar J. Sci. 2023;10:190–193. doi: 10.32792/utq/utjsci/v10i1(SI).1028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Odaa N.H., Rasheed H.M. Distribution of cytotoxic necrotizing factor type 1 in clinical isolates of E. coli isolated from urinary tract infections in Iraq. Microb. Biosyst. 2025;10:33–38. doi: 10.21608/mb.2025.324569.1183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Bunduki G.K., Heinz E., Phiri V.S., Noah P., Feasey N., Musaya J. Virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) isolated from urinary tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021;21:753. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06435-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Meda L.L.T., Landraud L., Petracchini S., Descorps-Declere S., Perthame E., Nahori M.-A., Finn L.R., Ingersoll M.A., Patiño-Navarrete R., Glaser P., et al. The cnf1 gene is associated with an expanding Escherichia coli ST131 H30Rx/C2 subclade and confers a competitive advantage for gut colonization. Gut Microbes. 2022;14:2121577. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2121577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Popoff M.R. Bacterial factors exploit eukaryotic Rho GTPase signaling cascades to promote invasion and proliferation within their host. Small GTPases. 2014;5:e983863. doi: 10.4161/sgtp.28209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Zhou Y., Zhou Z., Zheng L., Gong Z., Li Y., Jin Y., Huang Y., Chi M. Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: Mechanisms of Infection and Treatment Options. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:10537. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Biggel M., Xavier B.B., Johnson J.R., Nielsen K.L., Frimodt-Møller N., Matheeussen V., Goossens H., Moons P., Van Puyvelde S. Horizontally acquired papGII-containing pathogenicity islands underlie the emergence of invasive uropathogenic Escherichia coli lineages. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5968. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19714-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Nivetha R.M., Mariappan S., Sekar U., K.V.L A. Detection of Virulence Determinants of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cureus. 2025;7:e79116. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Kumar M N., Bhat S., Bhat K A., Saralaya V., Mulki S.S. Characterization of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance pattern of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains in a tertiary care center. F1000Res. 2022;11:1163. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.125596.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Ikeda M., Kobayashi T., Fujimoto F., Okada Y., Higurashi Y., Tatsuno K., Okugawa S., Moriya K. The prevalence of the iutA and ibeA genes in Escherichia coli isolates from severe and non-severe patients with bacteremic acute biliary tract infection is significantly different. Gut Pathog. 2021;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s13099-021-00429-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Robinson A.E., Heffernan J.R., Henderson J.P. The iron hand of uropathogenic Escherichia coli: The role of transition metal control in virulence. Future Microbiol. 2018;13:745–756. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2017-0295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Rajapitamahuni S., Lyou E.S., Kang B.R., Lee T.K. Microbial interaction-induced siderophore dynamics lead to phenotypic differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023;13:1277176. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1277176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Olejnickova K., Hola V., Ruzicka F. Catheter-related infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Virulence factors involved and their relationships. Pathog. Dis. 2014;72:87–94. doi: 10.1111/2049-632x.12188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Terlizzi M.E., Gribaudo G., Maffei M.E. UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infections: Virulence factors, bladder responses, antibiotic, and non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1566. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw data will be available upon request.
