Skip to main content
Pharmaceuticals logoLink to Pharmaceuticals
. 2026 Aug 3;19(8):1220. doi: 10.3390/ph19081220

From Ethnobotany to Pharmacology: A Comprehensive Review of Selected Asteraceae Species Highlighting Phytochemical Composition, Traditional Uses, and Diverse Pharmacological Activities

Joy Khoury 1, Magda Lena El Dada 1, Heba Hellany 1, Ghosoon Albahri 1, Rola Abdallah 1, Raya I Hage 1, Mikhael Bechelany 2,3,*, Elias Baydoun 1,4,*
Editors: Isabel Martínez Solís, Jose Ignacio Bueso-Bordils, Nuria Acero de Mesa
PMCID: PMC13516593  PMID: 42653717

Abstract

Medicinal plants are widely used in the Mediterranean region, where they have long been employed in traditional medicine as well as in the food and beverage industry. At the same time, people in developed countries are increasingly dissatisfied with modern healthcare due to the side effects and complications associated with chemical drugs, prompting a growing interest in more natural alternative treatments. The Asteraceae family is one of the largest flowering plant families, containing many species with medicinal properties. It comprises over 1600 genera and approximately 25,000 species worldwide. Silybum marianum, Picnomon acarna, Glebionis segetum, and Carduus pycnocephalus are invasive species in the Mediterranean region belonging to the Asteraceae family. Although they have been used traditionally to treat certain diseases, their biological and pharmacological potential has not yet been fully explored. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the phytochemical components, geographical and botanical characteristics, traditional uses, pharmacological activities, and potential applications of these species in green nanotechnology and the food industry.

Keywords: Asteraceae family, traditional medicine, phytochemicals, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, green nanotechnology

1. Introduction

Invasive plant species represent a major ecological and agricultural concern worldwide, particularly in Mediterranean and semi-arid ecosystems where climatic conditions favor their establishment and spread [1]. Several members of the Asteraceae family have attracted considerable attention due to their adaptability, persistence, and influence on agroecosystems [2]. The Asteraceae family is one of the largest and most diverse families of flowering plants, comprising an estimated 25,000–30,000 species distributed across a wide range of ecological habitats [3]. Members of this family are particularly well represented among agricultural weeds because of their prolific seed production, efficient dispersal mechanisms, and remarkable adaptability to disturbed environments [4]. Beyond their ecological success, Asteraceae species are recognized as a rich source of structurally diverse bioactive secondary metabolites, including sesquiterpene lactones, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and terpenoids, which have been associated with a broad range of pharmacological activities, such as anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, and anti-cancer effects [3,5,6]. This unique combination of ecological abundance and phytochemical richness positions the Asteraceae family as an attractive target for natural product research, transforming plants often regarded as agricultural weeds into valuable sources of therapeutic compounds [6,7]. However, despite increasing interest in the medicinal potential of individual species, comparative studies evaluating the phytochemical diversity and pharmacological properties of co-occurring weedy Asteraceae species remain limited, underscoring the need for the present synthesis. Among these, Picnomon acarna is widely distributed across Mediterranean countries and is frequently encountered in cultivated and managed landscapes, where it contributes to shaping plant community dynamics and agricultural practices [8]. Similarly, Silybum marianum has gained recognition not only for its long-standing medicinal value but also for its broad geographic distribution beyond its native range. Its widespread introduction across continents reflects both its biological resilience and its importance as a plant of economic and pharmacological interest [9]. Another notable species, Carduus pycnocephalus, has similarly expanded beyond its Mediterranean origin and is now commonly observed in diverse regions worldwide, contributing to vegetation diversity in disturbed and managed environments [10]. In contrast, Glebionis segetum represents a species whose presence has declined in certain parts of its native range, despite its historical association with agricultural systems [11]. Numerous modern pharmaceuticals are derived directly or indirectly from plant secondary metabolites, highlighting the importance of botanical resources in drug discovery and development. The continued exploration of plant-based compounds offers significant potential for identifying novel anti-microbial, anti-oxidant, and anti-inflammatory agents [12]. Moreover, the growing concern over anti-biotic resistance has renewed interest in medicinal plants as alternative or complementary therapeutic options [13]. Therefore, investigating the phytochemical and pharmacological components of plant species, including those traditionally regarded as weeds, represents an important approach in expanding the repertoire of natural bioactive compounds and supporting the development of safer and more sustainable treatments.

2. Taxonomical Classification (Index Kewensis, POWO)

The taxonomic classification of the plants was obtained from the Plants of the World Online (POWO) website and the Index Kewensis.

  • a

    Picnomon acarna

Kingdom: Plantae; Phylum: Streptophyta; Class: Equisetopsida; Order: Asterales; Family: Asteraceae; Genus: Picnomon; Species: Picnomon acarna (L.) Cass.

  • b

    Silybum marianum

Kingdom: Plantae; Phylum: Streptophyta; Class: Equisetopsida; Order: Asterales; Family: Asteraceae; Genus: Silybum; Species: Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.

  • c

    Carduus pycnocephalus

Kingdom: Plantae; Phylum: Streptophyta; Class: Equisetopsida; Order: Asterales; Family: Asteraceae; Genus: Carduus; Species: Carduus pycnocephalus Spreng.

  • d

    Glebionis segetum

Kingdom: Plantae; Phylum: Streptophyta; Class: Equisetopsida; Order: Asterales; Family: Asteraceae; Genus: Glebionis; Species: Glebionis segetum (L.) Fourr.

3. Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using major scientific databases, including PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SciFinder, Chemical Abstracts, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Abstracts, to identify relevant articles on the review topic. Additional sources were retrieved through general web searches using Google and Google Scholar (accessed using Google Chrome, version 138.0). The search included publications from 1988 to the end of 2025 and was performed using relevant keywords and MeSH terms related to ‘Picnomon acarna’, ‘Silybum marianum’, ‘Carduus pycnocephalus’, ‘Glebionis segetum’, AND (‘traditional uses’, ‘ phytochemical components’, ‘pharmacological applications, or roles, or effects’, ‘antimicrobial’, ‘anticancer’, ‘antioxidant’, ‘antidiabetic’, ‘anti-enzymatic’, and ‘anti-obesity’, ‘anti-inflammatory’, ‘neuroprotective’, ‘green nanotechnology’, ‘food’, ‘toxicity’).

The inclusion criteria were the studies investigating the extracts of the four selected species as the intervention, with outcomes focusing on their pharmacological applications, potential nanotechnology applications, and food-related applications. Studies involving all experimental approaches, including in vitro, in vivo, and in silico investigations, were considered eligible. The exclusion criteria included studies focusing on plant species other than the selected species, non-English publications, and studies investigating isolated compounds derived from the selected species rather than the complete plant extracts. Differences were observed in the plant parts used (e.g., leaves, flowers, seeds, and aerial parts), extraction methods and solvents, extract concentrations, experimental conditions, biological models, outcome measures, and analytical techniques.

The limitations of the experimental models used in the included studies were also considered during data interpretation. Most pharmacological evidence was derived from in vitro assays or animal models, which may not fully reflect human physiological responses.

Duplicate records were removed manually, and the eligible studies were used for data extraction and analysis. A flow diagram illustrating the literature search strategy has been added (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow diagram illustrating the literature search and study selection process used in this comprehensive review. Articles published between 1988 and 2025 were identified through multiple scientific databases. After duplicate removal, studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by a full-text eligibility assessment. Eligible publications reporting ethnobotanical, phytochemical, pharmacological, toxicological, food, or green nanotechnology applications of Picnomon acarna, Silybum marianum, Carduus pycnocephalus, and Glebionis segetum were included in the review.

4. Geographical and Botanical Characteristics

4.1. Geographical and Ecological Characteristics

Picnomon acarna is an invasive thistle species native to the Mediterranean region, where it is widely distributed and recognized as an aggressive agricultural weed [14,15]. Its natural range extends across numerous countries, including Lebanon, where it is locally known as “shawk-ul-far” and classified as a principal weed along with Syria, Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Albania, Bulgaria, Crete, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Russia (Crimea), Sardinia, Switzerland, Spain, and the former Yugoslavia. Outside its native range, P. acarna has expanded into regions such as Morocco and Australia, where it is known as soldier thistle and poses serious challenges in agricultural landscapes, particularly in the Victorian Mallee and Wimmera regions [14]. Ecologically, P. acarna is an annual weed well adapted to rainfed agricultural systems and disturbed habitats, including crop fields, gardens, roadsides, riverbanks, and abandoned land [16]. It thrives in areas receiving annual rainfall between 300 and 600 mm and exhibits low palatability, high tolerance to grazing pressure, and resistance to soil compaction. These characteristics have contributed to increased plant density in rangelands and forest ecosystems of western Iran. The species negatively affects agricultural productivity by reducing yields of crops such as wheat and chickpea, while its spiny morphology significantly interferes with harvesting operations, occasionally leading farmers to abandon chickpea and lentil fields [17]. Reproduction occurs exclusively through seeds. The seeds are efficiently dispersed by wind via a pappus measuring 1–2 cm in length and are also spread unintentionally by animals, vehicles, irrigation water, mud, wool, and hides. Additionally, the entire plant may detach and act as a tumbleweed, enhancing seed dispersal [17]. Freshly produced seeds exhibit dormancy and require a post-ripening period of approximately 12 weeks under dry conditions before achieving maximum germination. Germination is strongly light-dependent due to positive photoblastism and occurs over a broad temperature range (5–35 °C), with optimal germination (up to 95%) observed under alternating temperatures of 20/10 °C [14]. The species tolerates wide pH conditions (4–10), preferring alkaline soils, and shows high resistance to water stress, making it well suited to drought-prone rainfed systems. However, it is sensitive to salinity, with 50% germination inhibition recorded at 20.53 mM NaCl. Seedling emergence is restricted by burial depth, with no emergence occurring beyond 4 cm, indicating that minimum tillage favors its spread, whereas deep tillage may effectively suppress its establishment [14]. Silybum marianum (milk thistle) originates from the Mediterranean regions of Europe and Asia [18]. Due to its long-standing medicinal use and subsequent cultivation, it has been widely introduced beyond its native range and is now considered invasive in many regions worldwide, including parts of North and South America, southern Australia, and various areas across Europe and Asia [19]. In Canada, the species is present in several provinces, including British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia, although its distribution in British Columbia is largely restricted to the southwest coast. It is classified as a noxious weed under the British Columbia Weed Control Act [20]. Milk thistle is a highly adaptable annual species with strong reproductive capacity and shade tolerance, allowing it to colonize a wide range of disturbed environments [20]. It commonly forms dense populations in abandoned lands, roadsides, pastures, and nutrient-rich soils such as meadows. Its invasive growth habit enables it to outcompete native vegetation and desirable forage species, thereby reducing grazing capacity. The plant’s sharp spines pose risks to livestock and humans and provide shelter for agricultural pests. Furthermore, nitrate accumulation within plant tissues may cause toxicity in grazing animals [21]. S. marianum exhibits considerable phenotypic plasticity, allowing it to adapt to variations in climate, altitude, and soil conditions [22]. Elevation plays a key role in determining habitat suitability, with lower altitudes generally supporting higher population densities. In Iran, particularly in Fars Province, lower elevations in the northwest, west, and south have been identified as highly suitable for growth [22]. Climatic factors such as temperature and rainfall significantly influence both plant distribution and silymarin accumulation. While moderate temperatures and rainfall favor plant growth, higher temperatures combined with reduced precipitation enhance silymarin production [18]. Soil parameters also influence plant performance, with higher importance values associated with alkaline soils rich in organic matter and nitrogen, particularly at lower elevations [22]. At higher altitudes, the plant allocates more resources to reproduction rather than vegetative growth, ensuring reproductive success under less favorable conditions [20]. Reproduction occurs solely via seeds. Each flower head can produce approximately 100 seeds, resulting in 1000–5000 seeds per plant. The seeds are dark brown, oval achenes with a golden ring and remain viable in the soil seed bank for over nine years, contributing substantially to the species’ invasiveness [23]. Although seeds possess a pappus that facilitates wind dispersal, their relatively heavy mass limits long-distance movement. Human-mediated dispersal via roads, vehicles, water, animals, and agricultural equipment plays a major role in seed spread, with higher population densities frequently observed near road networks [22]. Carduus pycnocephalus (Italian thistle) is an annual or biennial herb native to the Mediterranean region, including southern Europe, northern Africa, and western Asia [24]. It has since been widely introduced and is now considered invasive in regions such as California, Australia, and South America. The species thrives in disturbed habitats, including pastures, croplands, roadsides, wastelands, and riparian zones. In California, it is commonly found in areas receiving 250–1000 mm of annual rainfall and at elevations below 1500 m. Due to its competitive growth and dense spiny structure, C. pycnocephalus significantly reduces pasture productivity and deters grazing animals. Reproduction occurs exclusively by seeds, which are dispersed through wind, animals, vehicles, and contaminated agricultural materials. Seeds generally remain viable in the soil for several years [15,25]. Glebionis segetum (corn marigold) is predominantly distributed along the western coastal regions of Great Britain, particularly in areas characterized by well-drained sandy and shale-based soils, including Cornwall, Devon, Pembrokeshire, Ceredigion, Gower, and the Outer Hebrides [26]. It is commonly associated with cultivated agricultural land but is also found in disturbed habitats such as roadsides, wastelands, refuse sites, and overgrazed fields [26]. Ecologically, G. segetum is an annual species that flowers between June and October. It shows a preference for light, well-drained, slightly acidic soils but can also tolerate calcareous substrates and a range of nutrient conditions [27]. Seed germination is closely linked to agricultural disturbance, particularly soil cultivation, which brings dormant seeds to the surface. Seedlings may emerge in early spring, while those emerging in autumn can survive frost conditions. The species plays an important ecological role by supporting pollinators such as bees, butterflies, and hoverflies [28]. Due to a marked population decline, G. segetum is currently classified as vulnerable in Great Britain and England. This decline is largely attributed to intensified agricultural practices, including herbicide application, seed cleaning, liming, and changes from spring to autumn cropping systems. Conservation efforts emphasize the need for annual soil disturbance and shallow seed placement to promote germination and sustain remaining populations [29].

4.2. Botanical Characteristics: Roots, Leaves, and Stem

Picnomon acarna (L.) Cass., commonly known as soldier thistle, is an erect annual member of the Asteraceae that can reach up to 100 cm in height and is distinguished by its densely branched, winged, and strongly spiny stems covered with thick, cobweb-like hairs that give the plant a wooly appearance [30]. The leaves are densely pubescent with white fibers; basal rosette leaves may reach 30 cm in length and are weakly lobed with short spines, while the smaller cauline leaves (up to 10 cm) are narrow, oppositely arranged, and bear prominent yellow spines measuring 10–15 mm along the lobes, with additional smaller spines along the margins. Leaf bases extend downward along the stem, forming spiny wings that enhance protection and structural rigidity [17]. Silybum marianum (milk thistle) is characterized by a strong, deep taproot with central yellow wood and well-developed latex vessels within a thick bark, enabling persistence in nutrient-rich and disturbed soils typical of Mediterranean habitats [31]. The plant develops large, glossy, dark green leaves with conspicuous milky-white venation; basal rosette leaves are obovate and deeply lobed, reaching up to 50 cm, while alternately arranged cauline leaves are sessile, lanceolate to oblong, and armed with rigid spines along pinnatifid margins [31]. The erect stem is grooved, hollow, smooth to slightly pubescent, unwinged, and often striped, reaching 30–200 cm in height, branching in the upper portions, and exuding milky latex upon injury [25]. Carduus pycnocephalus (Italian thistle) possesses a sturdy taproot with fibrous lateral roots, which provide stability and facilitate rapid establishment in disturbed Mediterranean grasslands and open woodlands. Its leaves are lanceolate to oblong (10–25 cm long), deeply pinnatifid with a leathery texture and sharp yellow spines along the margins, and are directly attached to the stem, with a cottony tomentum on the abaxial surface [32]. The upright stem, reaching 60–150 cm, is ridged, densely pubescent, and winged due to decurrent leaf bases; it is typically unbranched at the base and branched toward the apex, contributing to its competitive growth habit in invaded habitats [33]. Glebionis segetum (corn marigold) exhibits a fibrous root system well adapted to sandy, cultivated, and disturbed soils common in coastal and temperate regions of Europe [34]. Its leaves are alternately arranged, oblanceolate to spatulate (3–10 cm long), with irregularly toothed or pinnatifid margins and smooth to slightly hairy surfaces. The stems are erect, freely branching, and reach heights of 15–60 cm; they are silky to weakly glandular, distinctly striated, and often display reddish pigmentation, facilitating field identification and reflecting adaptation to open agricultural environments [35]. Figure 2 shows the morphological diversity of the four species, highlighting the variations in their flowers.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A,E) Picnomon acarna, (B,F) Carduus pycnocephalus, (C,G) Glebionis segetum, (D,H) Silybum marianum (A,E) reproduced from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Javier_martin (accessed on 26 July 2026) (2008), licensed under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:public_domain (accessed on 26 July 2026), (B,F) reproduced from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Italian_Thistle.jpg?wprov=srpw1_0 (accessed on 26 July 2026) (2016), licensed under https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en (accessed on 26 July 2026), (C,G) reproduced from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:AnRo0002 (accessed on 26 July 2026) (2013), licensed under https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en (accessed on 26 July 2026), (D,H) reproduced from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Awinch1001 (accessed on 26 July 2026) (2026), licensed under https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en (accessed on 26 July 2026).

5. Traditional Uses of Each Plant

Picnomon acarna (L.) Cass., the sole species of its genus within the Asteraceae family, has a long history of traditional use across the Mediterranean basin and the Middle East, particularly for gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and inflammatory disorders. In Lebanon, rural communities around Mount Hermon prepare decoctions of the aerial parts to treat gastric pain and rheumatism, with high informant consensus reflecting strong ethnomedicinal reliability, while in Iran, Kurdish populations use the leaves internally as a stomachic for indigestion and gastric discomfort; additional ethnobotanical records from Turkey report its use as an infusion for cancer treatment, and Greek folk medicine describes the plant as a stimulant, tonic, and antiseptic, uses that are partially supported by the identification of bioactive flavonoid methyl ethers in its leaves and flowers [36,37]. Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. (milk thistle), another Asteraceae species native to the Mediterranean region, possesses one of the most extensively documented traditions of medicinal use, dating back more than 2000 years, primarily targeting liver and biliary disorders; historical sources from classical antiquity through the Middle Ages describe its application for bile flow, liver detoxification, and poisoning, while modern traditional medicine systems employ its fruits and seeds—rich in silymarin—for hepatitis, cirrhosis, jaundice, and toxin-induced liver injury, with additional uses as a galactagogue, digestive aid, diuretic, antidote to mushroom poisoning, and remedy for dermatological and gynecological conditions across Europe, Iran, and, later, North America [23,25]. Carduus pycnocephalus (L.) Gaertn., an annual or biennial thistle native to the Mediterranean, is traditionally valued both as food and medicine; ethnobotanical data from Iran and other Mediterranean and Asian regions describe its use as a liver and spleen tonic, digestive, diuretic, and remedy for constipation, headache, stomachache, diarrhea, and respiratory complaints, while broader traditional knowledge attributes anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, and anti-microbial properties to the genus Carduus, uses supported by modern pharmacological observations [33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Glebionis segetum (L.) Fourr. (syn. Chrysanthemum segetum L.) is widely distributed across Europe, North Africa, Asia, and the Mediterranean and has been traditionally employed both as a medicinal and edible plant; in Anatolia, it is used to alleviate abdominal pain, sore throat, shortness of breath, and hair loss, while its aerial parts are consumed as salad, and traditional Asian uses further include applications related to feeding deterrence and pest control, highlighting its multifaceted ethnobotanical relevance [26].

6. Phytochemical Components in the Four Plants

The identification of isolated compounds was carried out using various analytical techniques, including chromatographic methods such as TLC and LC-MS/MS, as well as spectroscopic techniques like UV–Vis and NMR. The first compounds identified in the Asteraceae family were flavonoids. The earliest study on the identification of flavonoids from the Asteraceae family was conducted on the aerial parts of Picnomon acarna, where three flavonoids were isolated via chromatographic separation, and their structures subsequently elucidated using chemical and spectroscopic methods [41]. Another study focused on the identification of flavonoids from Silybum marianum, where seven flavonoids were extracted from its flowers and identified using spectroscopic techniques [42].

The type of extraction method employed and the plant part analyzed can influence the phytochemicals identified. For instance, in a study investigating the chemical composition of Silybum marianum using an ethanol/water extract, 33 phytochemicals were identified, including flavonolignans (such as silybin, isosilybin, and silychristin), as well as phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins [43]. In contrast, another study examining the oil of the same plant reported the presence of unsaturated fatty acids and phytosterols [42]. Table 1 summarizes the major constituents identified from the four Asteraceae plants using various extraction solvents, demonstrating their significance as valuable sources of bioactive compounds.

Table 1.

Summary of the phytochemical constituents identified in extracts from different parts of Picnomon acarna, Silybum marianum, Carduus pycnocephalus, and Glebionis segetum using various solvents.

Plant Name Plant Part Extract Extract Type Technique Used for Identification Phytochemical Names References
Picnomon acarna Leaves and flowers Fractionation:
Ethyl acetate fraction
TLC + PC • Gossypetin-8,3′,4′-trimethyl ether
• luteolin-7,3′-dimethyl ether
• luteolin-3′-methyl ether
[41]
Picnomon acarna Areial parts of the plant Fractionation of
Methanolic extract:
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
n-Butanol
1H-NMR
EIMS
UV
NOESY
• Coumarins:
6,7,8-Trimethoxycoumarin
• Flavonoid aglycones
Hispidulin
Luteolin
Quercetin
5,4′-Dihydroxy-6-methoxyflavone
• Flavonoid glycosides
Pectolinarin
Linarin
Homoplantagin
Hyperin
5,4′-Dihydroxy-6-methoxyflavone-7-O
α-L-rhamnopyranoside
• Phenolic acids/Phenolic glycosides
Gentisic acid 5-O-glucoside
[42]
Silybum marianum Whole plant Ethanol/water extract LC-MS/MS 33 types including: Flavonolignans (silybin, isosilybin, silychristin, etc.), phenolics, flavonoids, tannins [43]
Silybum marianum Flowers Methanol/water extract • Chromatographic techniques:
PC + TLC
• Spectroscopic techniques:
UV–Vis
1H + 13C NMR
• apigenin 7-O-β-(2″-O-α-rhamnosyl) galacturonide
• kaempferol 3-O-α-rhamnoside-7-O-β-galacturonide
• apigenin 7-O-β-glucuronide 6″-ethyl ester
• apigenin 7-O-β-glucoside
• apigenin 7-O-β-galactoside
• kaempferol-3-O-α-rhamnoside
• kaempferol
[44]
Silybum marianum Seeds oil Soxhlet petroleum-ether extraction HPLC-UV • Unsaturated fatty acids: Linoleic acid, Oleic acid
• Phytosterols: Campesterol, β-Sitosterol, Stigmasterol, β-Amyrin
• Tocopherols: α-Tocopherol
• Phenolic compounds
[42]
Carduus pycnocephalus Whole plant Methanolic extract GC–MS • 2-(Hept-6-yn-1-yl) malonic acid
• (E)-4-(((2-Methoxyoctadec-4-en-1-yl)oxy)methyl) -2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane
• 3,5-Dihydroxy-6-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4H-pyran-4-one
• Methyl 11-((2R,3S)-3-pentyloxiran-2-yl) undecanoate
• Methyl (E)-octadec-11-enoate
• Ethyl iso-allocholate
[45]
Carduus pycnocephalus Aerial parts • Essential oil
• Petroleum ether extract → unsaponifiable fraction + Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs)
GC/MS • Essential oil: 19 compounds, major ones: Hexadecanoic acid + 9,12-Linoleic acid
• Unsaponifiable matter: 16 compounds, major ones: Olean-12-en-3-ol + Ursa-9(11),12-dien-3-ol
• FAMEs: 20 fatty acids, major ones: 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dimethyl ester + Palmitic acid
[45]
Carduus pycnocephalus Aerial parts Ethanolic extract + fractionation: petroleum ether → chloroform → ethyl acetate → butanol → water • Chromatographic techniques: silica gel column chromatography + TLC
• Spectroscopic techniques: UV Spectroscopy + IR + NMR + MS
Flavonoids + sterols:
• apigenin
• kaempferol-3-O-β-d-glucoside
• kaempferol-3-O-α-l-rhamnoside
• kaempferol-7-methoxy-3-O-α-l-rhamnoside
• β-sitosterol
• β-sitosterol-3-O-β-d-glucoside
• Lupeol
• Diosmetin-7-O-β-D-xylosyl-(1 → 6)-β-D-glucopyranoside
• Diosmetin-7-O-α-L-arabinosyl-(1 → 6)-β-D-glucopyranoside
• Kaempferol-3-O-α-L-rhamnosyl-(1 → 2)-α-L-rhamnoside
[25]
Carduus pycnocephalus Aerial parts Ethanolic extract + fractionation:
Petroleum ether → Chloroform → Ethyl acetate → butanol → Aqueous
• Chromatographic techniques:
TLC + HPLC
• Spectroscopic techniques:
UV + MS + NMR
• 3-O-acetyl-ursolic acid-28-ethyl ester
• Bis (2-ethylhexyl) benzene-1,2-dicarboxylate
• 3α, 24-dihydroxyolean-12-en-28, 30-dioic acid dimethyl ester
• Kaempferol
• Diosmetin-7-O-α-L-arabinopyransyl (1‴ → 4″)-β-D-glucopyranoside
[25]
Glebionis segetum Aerial parts Essential oil GC–MS 28 compounds, major ones:
• Capillene
• caryophyllene oxide
• 1-phenyl-penta-2,4-diyne
• capillin
[26]
Glebionis coronaria Aerial parts Essential oil GC–MS 9 compounds, major ones:
• Capillin
• Capillene
• caryophyllene oxide
[26]

7. Pharmacological Activities of Each Plant

7.1. Anti-Microbial Activity

7.1.1. Anti-Microbial Activity of Silybum marianum

Silybum marianum extracts exhibited variable anti-microbial activity depending on the solvent, plant part, and extraction method [46]. Ethanolic seed extracts showed the highest anti-bacterial activity, particularly against MRSA and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, while acetone extracts displayed moderate activity but were ineffective against Gram-negative bacteria [47]. Aqueous extracts, especially hot water, demonstrated weak or no activity, suggesting possible degradation or poor extraction of bioactive compounds [48]. In contrast, chloroform and n-butanol extracts exhibited bacteriostatic effects with moderate anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activities, with n-butanol showing greater potency based on lower MIC values. Hydroalcoholic extracts obtained via ultrasound-assisted extraction showed moderate, dose-dependent activity against both bacterial and fungal strains [48]. Methanolic extracts revealed that stems were generally more active than leaves and flowers, particularly against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Similarly, acetone and ethyl acetate extracts showed variable but notable activity depending on the plant part, with flowers often being more effective. Petroleum ether extracts exhibited moderate anti-microbial effects but were less potent overall [49]. Collectively, these findings indicate that organic solvents, particularly ethanol and methanol, are more efficient in extracting anti-microbial compounds than aqueous solvents as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Anti-microbial activity of Silybum marianum.

Plant Name Solvent used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Experimental Model Results References
Silybum marianum Ethanol (95%) Seeds 600 mg/mL Agar-well diffusion against
-Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
-Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
-Klebsiella pneumonia
-Escherichia coli
Inhibition zones (mm):
-MRSA: 33.67
-S. maltophilia: 34.33
-K. pneumoniae: 25.00
-E. coli: 21.00
[50]
Silybum marianum Acetone Seeds 600 mg/mL Agar-well diffusion against
-Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
-Gram-negative bacteria
Inhibition zone (mm):
-MRSA: 25.33
-No activity against Gram-negative bacteria.
[50]
Silybum marianum Cold Aqueous (Water) Seeds 600 mg/mL Agar-well diffusion against
-Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
Inhibition zones (mm):
-S. maltophilia: 20.00
-E. coli: 14.33
-K. pneumoniae: 11.67
-No activity against MRSA.
[50]
Silybum marianum Hot Aqueous (Water) Seeds N/A Agar-well diffusion against MDR bacteria. No anti-microbial activity was observed against any of the tested MDR strains. [50]
Silybum marianum Chloroform Seeds (from flowers) Various Disk diffusion and Broth macro-dilution (MIC/CMB):
-Staphylococcus aureus
-Staphylococcus albus
-Candida albicans
-Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Action was determined to be bacteriostatic. Disk diffusion: Zones of 17–18 mm for S. aureus and S. albus; 9–16 mm for fungi. MIC: 10.25–20.5 mg/mL
CMB: 41 mg/mL
[51]
Silybum marianum n-Butanol Seeds (from flowers) Various Disk diffusion and Broth macro-dilution (MIC/CMB):
-Staphylococcus aureus
-Staphylococcus albus
-Candida albicans
-Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Action was determined to be bacteriostatic. Disk diffusion: Zones of 17–18 mm for S. aureus and S. albus; 9–16 mm for fungi. MIC: 7–14 mg/mL CMB: 28 mg/mL [51]
Silybum marianum Hydroalcoholic (Ethanol) (Ultrasound-assisted extraction) Crude extract of a whole plant 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/mL Agar disk diffusion:
-Staphylococcus aureus
-Escherichia coli
-Aspergillus oryzae
-Candida albicans
Inhibition zones (mm) at 50 mg/mL:
-S. aureus: 12.30
-E. coli: 11.38
-C. albicans: 7.68
-A. oryzae: 7.44
[49]
Silybum marianum Methanol Flowers 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 21.33, 26.33, 13.1, 24.96, 10, 17.13 [50]
Silybum marianum Methanol Leaves 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 16.4, 17.4, 13.5, 24.6, 13.3, 13.8 [50]
Silybum marianum Methanol Stems 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 21.0, 17.83, 22.1, 32.16, 18.16, 14.16 [50]
Silybum marianum Acetone Flowers 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 23.3, 27.3, 12.2, 24.7, 14, 18 [50]
Silybum marianum Acetone Leaves 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 17.4, 18.4, 15.2, 24, 23, 12.8 [50]
Silybum marianum Acetone Stems 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 15.7, 19.5, 23.3, 29.5, 12.3, 13.2 [50]
Silybum marianum Ethyl Acetate Flowers 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 22.3, 13.1, 23.4, 23.7, 12.8, 12.1 [50]
Silybum marianum Ethyl Acetate Leaves 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 18.6, 13.4, 14.1, 23.4, 22, 10 [50]
Silybum marianum Ethyl Acetate Stems 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 13, 17.07, 23.9, 28.4, 13.1, 14.17 [50]
Silybum marianum Petroleum Ether Flowers 100 µL Agar-well diffusion:
-B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, C. albicans
Inhibition zones (mm): 22, 23.53, 18.43, 21.33, 10, 10 [50]

7.1.2. Anti-Microbial Activity of Carduus pycnocephalus

Carduus pycnocephalus methanolic extracts demonstrated notable anti-microbial activity that varied by plant part, with leaves and flowers generally showing stronger inhibition compared to roots and stems, particularly against Salmonella typhimurium and Bacillus cereus [52]. Root and stem extracts exhibited moderate activity, especially against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while showing no effect on certain strains such as Staphylococcus haemolyticus and S. xylosus [52]. Ethanolic extracts of aerial parts displayed broad-spectrum anti-microbial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, although no effect was observed against Candida albicans. In contrast, the essential oil showed selective activity with low MIC values against Gram-positive bacteria but no inhibitory effect against Gram-negative bacteria or C. albicans, highlighting the influence of extraction type on anti-microbial efficacy as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Anti-microbial activities of Carduus pycnocephalus.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Experimental Model Results References
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Methanol Root 10 mg/L Disk diffusion
-Gram-negative: E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, S. epidermidis
-Gram-positive: B. cereus, S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, S. xylosus, K. pneumonius
Inhibition zones (mm):
-P. aeruginosa: 22
-S. typhimurium: 14
-E. coli: 13
-S. aureus: 12
-B. cereus: 11
-S. epidermidis and K. pneumonius: 10
-No activity against S. haemolyticus or S. xylosus
[45]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Methanol Stem 10 mg/L Disk diffusion
-Gram-negative: E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, S. epidermidis
-Gram-positive: B. cereus, S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, S. xylosus, K. pneumonius
Inhibition zones (mm):
-P. aeruginosa: 20
-S. typhimurium and B. cereus: 13
-E. coli, S. aureus, K. pneumonius: 10
-S. epidermidis: 5
-No activity against S. haemolyticus or S. xylosus
[45]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Methanol Leaf 10 mg/L Disk diffusion
-Gram-negative: E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, S. epidermidis
-Gram-positive: B. cereus, S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, S. xylosus, K. pneumonius
Inhibition zones (mm):
-S. typhimurium: 26
-B. cereus: 23
-E. coli: 20
-K. pneumonius: 13
-P. aeruginosa and S. aureus: 10
-S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus: 5
-No activity against S. xylosus
[45]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Methanol Flower 10 mg/L Disk diffusion
-Gram-negative: E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, S. epidermidis
-Gram-positive: B. cereus, S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, S. xylosus, K. pneumonius
Inhibition zones (mm):
-S. typhimurium and B. cereus: 25
-E. coli: 20
-S. epidermidis: 15
-S. aureus: 14
-K. pneumonius: 13
-P. aeruginosa: 10
-S. haemolyticus and S. xylosus: 5
[45]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Ethanol (95%) Aerial parts 50 µg/mL Agar diffusion
-Fungi: Aspergillus fumigatus, Syncephalastrum racemosum, Geotricum candidum, Candida albicans
-Gram-positive: Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bacillus subtilis
-Gram-negative: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli
Inhibition zones (mm):
-G. candidum: 18.6
-B. subtilis: 18.6
-S. pneumonia: 17.3
-E. coli: 17.2
-A. fumigatus: 16.8
-P. aeruginosa: 15.3
-S. racemosum: 15.2
-No activity against C. albicans
[45]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Essential oil Aerial parts 5 mg/disk Anti-microbial test resulting in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
-Bacillus subtillus, Staphylococcus aereus, Mucobacterium smegmatus
-Also tested against: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans
MIC (mg/mL):
-Bacillus subtillus: 1
-Staphylococcus aereus: 5
-Mucobacterium smegmatus: 5
-No activity against E. coli, P. aeruginosa, or C. albicans
[45]

7.2. Anti-Oxidant Activity

Oxidative stress arises from an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the body’s endogenous anti-oxidant defenses. While ROS are naturally generated under normal physiological conditions, their accumulation can trigger oxidation, leading to cellular damage and various diseases [53]. During oxidative stress, anti-oxidant enzymes—including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR)—act as the first line of defense against free-radical-induced damage [54]. On the other hand, there is growing interest in natural anti-oxidants from plants, which are considered safer alternatives to synthetic compounds such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) [55]. In this context, the anti-oxidant potential of the four plant extracts was evaluated using multiple assays, as summarized in Table 4. Plant extracts have demonstrated significant anti-oxidant activity across various assays, including 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging, ferric reducing anti-oxidant power (FRAP), and cupric ion reducing anti-oxidant capacity (CUPRAC). A study on Silybum marianum reported that both aqueous and methanolic extracts obtained from different plant parts exhibited high anti-oxidant activity, particularly showing strong DPPH radical scavenging activity and pronounced anti-oxidant capacity in the ABTS assay [56]. Similarly, another study investigating the methanolic extract of Picnomon acarna demonstrated strong anti-oxidant activity across all tested assays, with IC50 values of 144.28 ± 0.16 μmol/g DW for DPPH, 81.57 ± 0.09 μmol/g DW for FRAP, and 85.57 ± 0.88 μmol/g DW for CUPRAC [57].

Table 4.

The anti-oxidant activities of Picnomon acarna, Silybum marianum, Carduus pycnocephalus, and Glebionis segetum extracts.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Methods Used Results References
Picnomon acarna n-hexane extract+ chloroform/methanol extract Seeds Not reported DPPH, FRAP, CUPRAC • DPPH: 144.28 ± 0.16 μmol/g DW
• FRAP: 81.57 ± 0.09 μmol/g DW
• CUPRAC: 85.57 ± 0.88 μmol/g DW
[57]
Silybum marianum Ethanol–water (microwave-enhanced extraction) Whole plant Not reported • DPPH
• ABTS
• FRAP
• CUPRAC
• Phenanthroline
• DPPH IC50: 19.2 ± 2.3 µg/mL
• ABTS IC50: 7.2 ± 1.7 µg/mL
• FRAP IC50: 24.1 ± 1.2 µg/mL
• CUPRAC IC50: 22.2 ± 1.2 µg/mL • Phenanthroline IC50: 35.2 ± 1.8 µg/mL
[58]
Silybum marianum Water and ethanol Leaves, roots, seeds Concentration range (μg/mL):
5–100
• DPPH
• ABTS
• DPPH IC50:
Ethanolic extract:
8.53 ± 0.95–248.38 ± 7.10 μg/mL
Aqueous extract: 689.14 ± 9.59–5578.62 ± 1378.93 μg/mL

• ABTS IC50:
Ethanolic extract: 64.56 ± 1.77–93.48 ± 4.74 μg/mL
Aqueous extract: 78.09 ± 1.05–191.75 ± 9.12 μg/mL
[59]
Silybum marianum Aqueous extract Seeds + fruits Concentration range (mg/mL):
10–30
• Ferric thiocyanate method
• DPPH
• ABTS
• Ferrous ion (Fe2+)
• H2O2
• Superoxide anion
• Cupric ions (Cu2+)
• Ferric thiocyanate method: 82.7% inhibition of lipid peroxidation

• DPPH: IC50 = 20.8 mg/mL

• ABTS: EC50 = 8.62 mg/mL

• Ferrous ion (Fe2+): 85.5% chelation

• H2O2: 78.5% scavenging

• Superoxide anion: 40.2% scavenging

• Cupric ions (Cu2+): Concentration-dependent
Cu2+ reducing capability
[59]
Carduus pycnocephalus Methanol Flowers Concentration range (mg/L): 5–50 (serial dilutions: 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg/L) DPPH assay IC50 (mg/L)
30.69
[25]
Carduus pycnocephalus Methanol Leaves Concentration range (mg/L): 5–50 (serial dilutions: 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg/L) DPPH assay IC50 (mg/L)
32.78
[25]
Carduus pycnocephalus Methanol Stems Concentration range (mg/L): 5–50 (serial dilutions: 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg/L) DPPH assay IC50 (mg/L)
41.31
[25]
Carduus pycnocephalus Methanol Roots Concentration range (mg/L): 5–50 (serial dilutions: 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg/L) DPPH assay IC50 (mg/L)
46.84
[25]
Glebionis segetum Water
(hydrodistillation)
Aerial parts Concentration range (µg/mL): 0.49–250 DPPH assay IC50: 2.525 ± 0.017 mg/mL [26]

In addition, the same type of extract obtained from different parts of a plant may exhibit varying anti-oxidant activities and distinct IC50 values when evaluated using the same assay. For example, a study investigating the anti-oxidant activity of methanolic extracts of Carduus pycnocephalus derived from different plant parts (flowers, stems, roots, and leaves) demonstrated significant variation in activity using the DPPH assay. Among these, the methanolic extract of the flowers showed the strongest anti-oxidant potential, with the lowest IC50 value (32.78 mg/L) [45]. These differences are primarily attributed to variations in the total phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin contents among the different plant parts [45].

7.3. Anti-Cancer Activity

7.3.1. Anti-Cancer Activity of Silybum marianum

Silybum marianum and its bioactive flavonolignans exhibit significant anti-cancer potential across various in vitro and in vivo models. The plant-derived compounds demonstrate strong anti-proliferative effects, induction of apoptosis, and modulation of key molecular signaling pathways involved in cancer progression [60]. These effects are largely mediated through the downregulation of major pathways such as PI3K/Akt, ERK, and Wnt/β-catenin, alongside inhibition of cell proliferation markers and activation of apoptotic mechanisms [61]. Overall, these findings highlight the therapeutic potential of Silybum marianum constituents as promising candidates for cancer treatment and drug development as shown in Table 5.

Table 5.

Anti-cancer activity of Silybum marianum.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Experimental Model Results References
Silybum marianum N/A Commercial Silibinin flavonoid In vitro: 50 µM.
In vivo: 50 and 100 mg/kg
In vitro: Cell lines: Human ovarian cancer cells (A2780, SKOV3). Assays used: MTT assay, Annexin V staining, ROS measurement, Western blot (ERK, Akt).
In vivo: Animal model: Balb/c nude mice with subcutaneous A2780 xenograft. Tests used: Tumor volume measurement, IHC (Ki-67, caspase-3, p-ERK, p-Akt), TUNEL assay.
In vitro: Decreased cell viability (58–65% cell viability). Induced apoptosis (42.09% in A2780; 26.19% in SKOV3). Caused downregulation of ERK and Akt.
In vivo: Reduced tumor volume. Decreased cell proliferation (Ki-67-positive cells) and induced apoptosis (TUNEL-positive cells, caspase-3 activation). Inhibited p-ERK and p-Akt.
[62,63]
Silybum marianum 75% methanol-water (v:v) extract Dried fruit (Silydianin component) 5–100 µM/L In vitro: Screening tool: SNAP-tag-EGFR/CMC-HPLC-MS two-dimensional system. Cell lines: SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 (overexpressing EGFR) and NC-HEK293 (control). Verification tests: CCK-8 assay and nonlinear chromatography (NLC) Inhibited proliferation of SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Affinity equilibrium constant KA = 347.78 ± 59.04 L/mol [64]
Silybum marianum 75% methanol-water (v:v) extract Dried fruit (Silychristin) 5–100 µM/L In vitro: Screening tool: SNAP-tag-EGFR/CMC-HPLC-MS two-dimensional system. Cell lines: SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 (overexpressing EGFR) and NC-HEK293 (control). Verification tests: CCK-8 assay and NLC Inhibited proliferation of SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Affinity equilibrium constant KA = 685.76 ± 169.15 L/mol. [64]
Silybum marianum 75% methanol-water (v:v) extract Dried fruit (Silybin) 5–100 µM/L In vitro: Screening tool: SNAP-tag-EGFR/CMC-HPLC-MS two-dimensional system. Cell lines: SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 (overexpressing EGFR) and NC-HEK293 (control). Verification tests: CCK-8 assay and NLC. Inhibited proliferation of SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Affinity equilibrium constant KA = 2025.62 ± 405.94 L/mol. [64]
Silybum marianum 75% methanol-water (v:v) extract (screened/isolated compound) Dried fruit (Isosilybin) 5–100 µM/L In vitro: Screening tool: SNAP-tag-EGFR/CMC-HPLC-MS two-dimensional system. Cell lines: SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 (overexpressing EGFR) and NC-HEK293 (control). Verification tests: CCK-8 assay and NLC Inhibited proliferation of SNAP-tag-EGFR HEK293 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Most potent inhibitory effect among the four compounds tested. Affinity equilibrium constant KA = 2227.62 ± 152.09 L/mol. [64]
Silybum marianum Water extract Seed In vitro: 5 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL.
In vivo: 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% (oral feeding).
In vitro: Cell lines: Human breast cancer cells (T-47D, ZR-751, MDA-MB-231). Assays Used: MTT assay. Western blot (PLK1, EXTAH complex proteins).
In vivo: Animal model: Balb/c mice orthotopically injected with 4T1 cells. Assay used: IHC (PCNA, PLK1).
In vitro: Decreased cell viability dose- and time-dependently. Increased mitosis disruption through downregulation of PLK1 and associated spindle assembly proteins (TPX2, Eg5, HURP).
In vivo: Significantly decreased tumor growth. Reduced PCNA and PLK1 expression in tumor specimens.
[65]
Silybum marianum Total Extract (STE) Methanol and Petroleum ether extraction Fruits In vitro: 0–250 µg/mL.
In vivo: 200 mg/kg bw (oral, every other day).
In vitro: Cell lines: Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2, Huh7). Assay Used: MTT assay.
In vivo: Animal model: Wistar rats with experimentally induced HCC (DEN/AAF/CCl4). Assays used: IHC (Ki-67), WB (HGF/c-Met, PI3K/Akt/mTOR), qRT-PCR (Wnt).
In vitro IC50 (µg/mL): HepG2: 190.91 ± 5.17. Huh7: 134.4 ± 4.84.
In vivo: Inhibited cancerous lesions growth. Suppressed Ki-67 expression. Downregulated HGF/cMet, Wnt/β-catenin, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways.
[62]
Silybum marianum Methanol extract Fruits (Silymarin component) In vitro: 0–250 µg/mL.
In vivo: 150 mg/kg bw (oral, every other day).
In vitro: Cell lines: Human HCC cell lines (HepG2, Huh7). Assay used: MTT assay.
In vivo: Animal model: Wistar rats with experimentally induced HCC. Assays used: IHC (Ki-67), WB (HGF/c-Met, PI3K/Akt/mTOR), qRT-PCR (Wnt).
In vitro IC50 (µg/mL): HepG2: 99.66 ± 3.62. Huh7: 46.97 ± 1.89.
In vivo: Inhibited cancerous lesions growth. Suppressed Ki-67 expression. Downregulated HGF/cMet, Wnt/β-catenin, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways.
[62]
Silybum marianum N/A (purchased) Purchased Silibinin flavonoid In vitro: 0–250 µg/mL. In vivo: 5 mg/kg bw (oral, every other day). In vitro: Cell lines: Human HCC cell lines (HepG2, Huh7). Assay used: MTT assay.
In vivo: Animal model: Wistar rats with experimentally induced HCC. Assays used: IHC (Ki-67), WB (HGF/c-Met, PI3K/Akt/mTOR), qRT-PCR (Wnt).
In vitro IC50 (µg/mL): HepG2: 58.72 ± 2.03. Huh7: 17.18 ± 0.97. Most potent anti-HCC agent tested in HepG2 and Huh7 cells.
In vivo: Inhibited cancerous lesions growth. Suppressed Ki-67 expression. Downregulated HGF/cMet, Wnt/β-catenin, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways.
[62]

7.3.2. Anti-Cancer Activity of Carduus pycnocephalus

Carduus pycnocephalus crude methanolic extract demonstrates notable cytotoxic activity against cancer cell lines, indicating its potential as a source of anti-cancer agents. The observed effect suggests a dose-dependent inhibition of tumor cell viability, reflecting the presence of bioactive compounds with anti-proliferative properties. Although the activity is considered moderate, it highlights the plant’s relevance in cancer research and the need for further phytochemical and mechanistic investigations. Overall, these findings support the potential application of Carduus pycnocephalus in developing novel therapeutic strategies against cancer, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6.

Anti-cancer activity of Carduus pycnocephalus.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Experimental Model Results References
Carduus pycnocephalus Methanol Crude plant extract 31.3, 62.5, 125, 500, and 1000 µg/mL (five concentrations prepared in serial dilution) In vitro:
Cell line: HePG-2 (hepatocellular carcinoma) human tumor cell line. Assay used: MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) colorimetric assay.
IC50 = 46.2 µg/mL (indicated a moderate cytotoxic effect) [66]

7.3.3. Anti-Cancer Activity of Glebionis segetum

Glebionis segetum ethanolic extract exhibits low cytotoxic activity against the tested cancer cell lines, indicating limited anti-proliferative potential under the studied conditions. The extract showed weak or negligible effects on cell viability, suggesting that its bioactive constituents may not be sufficiently potent or present in effective concentrations [60]. These findings imply that the plant, in this form, may not be a strong candidate for anti-cancer applications compared to other medicinal species. Nevertheless, further studies focusing on different extraction methods or isolated compounds may reveal enhanced biological activity as shown in Table 7.

Table 7.

The anti-cancer activity of Glebionis segetum.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Experimental Model Results References
Glebionis segetum L. Fourr. 70% Ethanol extract Aerial parts Concentrations ranging from 100 to 0.01 µg/mL (gradual decrease) In vitro cytotoxicity screening.
Cell lines: HT-29 (human colorectal adenocarcinoma) and MCF-7 (human breast adenocarcinoma). Test used: Sulforhodamine B (SRB) colorimetric assay. (Cells exposed for 72 h).
HT-29: IC50: µg/mL ± 17.11. MCF-7: IC50: >100 µg/mL (the extract showed no or very low cytotoxic activity against these cell lines based on NCI standards). [60]

7.4. Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Enzymatic, and Anti-Obesity Activities

Silybum marianum exhibits a wide range of metabolic and enzyme-modulating activities, particularly in anti-diabetic, anti-obesity, and enzyme inhibition applications [67]. Various extracts and isolated compounds demonstrate strong inhibitory effects against key metabolic enzymes such as α-amylase, α-glucosidase, lipase, and PTP1B, indicating their potential in regulating glucose and lipid metabolism. In vivo studies further confirm significant hypoglycemic, anti-obesity, and metabolic regulatory effects, including reductions in body weight, serum glucose, and lipid-related parameters, alongside improvements in insulin levels and metabolic signaling pathways [68]. Additionally, its bioactive constituents show inhibitory activity against oxidative and inflammatory enzymes, supporting its therapeutic potential in managing metabolic disorders and related complications as shown in Table 8.

Table 8.

Anti-diabetic, anti-enzymatic, and anti-obesity activities of Silybum marianum and the anti-diabetic activity of Glebionis segetum.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Methods Used Results References
Silybum marianum Methanol (SMLM) Seeds
(Whole extract)
IC50 concentration determined Anti-diabetic assay IC50 = 5.2 ± 0.07 μg/mL (superior to standard acarbose IC50 = 377.01 ± 1.06 μg/mL) [69]
Silybum marianum n-hexane (SMLH) Seeds
(whole extract)
IC50 concentration determined Anti-diabetic assay IC50 = 18.02 ± 0.24 μg/mL (lowest potential among tested extracts, but superior to acarbose) [69]
Silybum marianum Ethanol/Water (MEE) Whole extract/compounds (flavonolignans identified) IC50 concentration determined -Amylase inhibition IC50 = 26.5 ± 1.3 μg/mL (significantly stronger than acarbose IC50 = 45.8 ± 1.2 μg/mL) [41,70]
Silybum marianum Aqueous (boiled distilled water) Seeds
(Seed Extract NP4)
Not specified for IC50/inhibition % -Amylase inhibition 38.74 ± 1.09% inhibition (highest activity found) [71]
Silybum marianum Dilute Acetic Acid Seeds
(Fraction F4)
Not specified for IC50/inhibition % -Amylase inhibition (in vitro, DNSA method) 68.87 ± 2.94% inhibition [72]
Silybum marianum Ethanol/Water (MEE) Whole extract/compounds (flavonolignans identified) IC50 concentration determined -Glucosidase inhibition (in vitro) IC50 = 18.1 ± 1.7 μg/mL (comparable to acarbose IC50 = 17.8 ± 1.1 μg/mL) [41]
Silybum marianum Aqueous (boiled distilled water) Seeds
(Seed Extract NP4)
Not specified for IC50/inhibition % -Glucosidase inhibition (in vitro) 32.62 ± 1.81% inhibition [72]
Silybum marianum 95% Ethanol Fruits
Silychristin A (isolated compound)
IC50 concentration determined -Glucosidase inhibition (in vitro, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae enzyme) IC50 = 8.16 ± 1.83 mM [72]
Silybum marianum EtOAc fraction (from 95% Ethanol extract) Seeds
Compounds 1–16 (isolated)
IC50 concentration determined -Glucosidase inhibition (in vitro, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae enzyme) IC50 = 0.38–37.21 μM (Compound 1 was most potent) [72]
Silybum marianum 95% Ethanol Fruits
Silychristin A (isolated compound)
50 mg/kg body weight/day Anti-diabetic activity (in vivo, oral sucrose tolerance test) Reduced postprandial hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetic rats [72]
Silybum marianum 95% Ethanol Fruits
Silychristin A (isolated compound)
50 mg/kg body weight/day Anti-diabetic activity (in vivo, STZ-induced T1DM rats) Significantly lowered fasting glucose level after 3 weeks; significantly increased serum insulin levels. [72]
Silybum marianum Dissolved in Physiological saline solution Derived from fruits/seeds
Silymarin/Silibinin (commercial/isolated)
75 mg/kg body weight/day Anti-diabetic activity (in vivo, STZ-induced diabetic rats) Produced hypoglycemic effects; significantly decreased glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels compared to diabetic control. [72]
Silybum marianum Alcoholic extract Aerial parts/leaves
Silymarin (whole extract)
400 mg/kg (intraperitoneal injection) Anti-diabetic activity (in vivo, Alloxan-induced diabetic rats) Caused a major reduction in fasting serum glucose (∼38.42% reduction); showed protective effect against hepatic and renal disorders. [72]
Silybum marianum Alcoholic extract Aerial parts/leaves
Silymarin (Whole extract)
400 mg/kg (intraperitoneal injection) Amylase assessment (in vivo parameter) Reduced amylase concentration by approximately 15%. [73]
Silybum marianum Isolated compounds from milk thistle seeds Seeds/Fruits
Silibinin/Isosilybin/Silychristin/Silydianin (isolated compounds)
Varies (e.g., 1–50 μM) PTP1B (Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B) inhibitors (in vitro) Identified as natural PTP1B inhibitors. [73]
Silybum marianum EtOAc fraction Seeds
Compound 12 (flavonoid)
IC50 concentration determined PTP1B inhibitory activity (in vitro) Showed strong PTP1B inhibitory activities compared to oleanolic acid (IC50 = 8.35 ± 0.21 μM). [74]
Silybum marianum N/A (standard drug containing Silymarin) N/A (derived from seed extract/standard protection)
Seed extract/caps/standard drug
100 mg/kg bw (oral administration in rats) α-L-Fucosidase (FS) assay (colorimetric examination in rat serum) FS activity decreased significantly: 0.57 ± 0.37 U/L (Hepaticum group) compared to 1.48 ± 0.21 U/L (Control group) [75]
Silybum marianum Aqueous extract (used as reducing/capping agent for CuO-NPs) Seeds
(seed extract)
200 mg mL−1 (CuO-NPs) Alpha-Amylase inhibition assay 35.5 ± 1.54% inhibition [75]
Silybum marianum Aqueous extract (used as reducing/capping agent for CuO-NPs) Seeds
(seed extract)
200 mg mL−1 (CuO-NPs) Lipase inhibition assay 80.5 ± 0.91% inhibition [75]
Silybum marianum Aqueous extract (used as reducing/capping agent for CuO-NPs) Seeds
(seed extract)
200 mg mL−1 (CuO-NPs) Urease inhibition assay 78.4 ± 1.26% inhibition [75]
Silybum marianum N/A (in vitro system) N/A
Silibinin (pure compound)
32.2 μM (IC50) Xanthine Oxidase (XO) inhibition assay (inhibition of uric acid formation) IC50 of 32.2 μM (inhibition of uric acid formation) [71]
Silybum marianum N/A (in vitro system) N/A
Silibinin (pure compound)
10 μM NADPH Oxidase inhibition assay (in PMA-stimulated cell lysate) 50% inhibition [71]
Silybum marianum N/A (in vitro system, human granulocytes) N/A
Silibinin (pure compound)
15 μM (IC50) 5-Lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway inhibition (inhibition of LTB4 formation) IC50 values of 15 μM for LTB4 formation [71]
Silybum marianum N/A (in vitro system, human granulocytes) N/A
Silibinin (pure compound)
14.5 μM (IC50) 5-Lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway inhibition (inhibition of LTC4/D4/E4/F4 formation) IC50 values of 14.5 μM for LTC4/D4/E4/F4 formation [71]
Silybum marianum N/A N/A
Silibinin (pure compound)
50 mg/kg/BW (supplementation in rats) Xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes assessment: Cytochrome b5 reductase activity Supplementation modulates xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, including decreasing activity of ROS-producing cytochrome b5 reductase [71]
Silybum marianum N/A (administered in diet) Seeds (extract contained 80% Silymarin, 20% soy lecithin)
(SME)
200 mg/kg/day HFD-induced obesity rat model (11 weeks administration). Measured: final body weight (g), final BMI (g/cm), serum leptin level (pg/L), liver weight (g). Significantly decreased final body weight, final BMI, and liver weight (p < 0.05) vs. HFD control. Significantly decreased serum leptin levels (p < 0.01) vs. HFD control. [76]
Silybum marianum N/A (administered in diet) Seeds (extract contained 80% Silymarin, 20% soy lecithin)
(SME)
200 mg/kg/day HFD-induced obesity rat model (4 weeks therapeutic administration). Measured: serum leptin level (pg/L). Significantly decreased serum leptin levels (p < 0.01) vs. HFD control. [76]
Silybum marianum 80% ethanol Seeds
(SMEE)
150 mg/kg bw/day (oral gavage for 8 weeks) DIO rat model (high-fat diet). measured: body weight gain (as % of baseline) Body weight gain was 200.39% of baseline, a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) compared to model control (221.81% of baseline). [77]
Silybum marianum 80% ethanol Seeds
(SMEE)
300 mg/kg bw/day (oral gavage for 8 weeks) DIO rat model (high-fat diet). measured: body weight gain (as % of baseline) Body weight gain was 189.29% of baseline, a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) compared to model control. [77]
Silybum marianum 80% ethanol Seeds
(SMEE)
450 mg/kg bw/day (oral gavage for 8 weeks) DIO rat model (high-fat diet). measured: body weight gain (as % of baseline) Body weight gain was 181.36% of baseline, a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) compared to model control. [77]
Silybum marianum 80% ethanol Seeds
(SMEE)
600 mg/kg bw/day (oral gavage for 8 weeks) DIO rat model (high-fat diet). measured: body weight gain (as % of baseline) Body weight gain was 177.17% of baseline, representing the lowest gain among treatment groups, a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) compared to model control. [77]
Silybum marianum Ethyl acetate Seeds (rich in Silydianin/Silychristin, 51.2%)
(SMEE/P)
200 mg/kg/day (3 weeks preventive) HFD/F-induced metabolic syndrome rat model. Measured: percent weight gain Percent weight gain (11.1%) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to HFD/F control (24.2%). [74]
Silybum marianum Ethyl acetate Seeds (rich in Silydianin/Silychristin, 51.2%)
(SMEE/T)
200 mg/kg/day (3 weeks therapeutic) HFD/F-induced metabolic syndrome rat model. Measured: percent weight gain Significantly decreased weight gain compared to untreated HFD/F control (p < 0.05). [74]
Silybum marianum N/A (pure compound) N/A (tested in NAFLD rat model)
Silibinin
0.5 mg/kg/day HFD-induced NAFLD rat model. Measured: visceral obesity, visceral fat, lipolysis (adipose triglyceride lipase expression), gluconeogenesis (FoxO1, PEPCK, G6Pase expression). Prevented visceral obesity and reduced visceral fat. Enhanced lipolysis (up-regulated adipose triglyceride lipase) and inhibited gluconeogenesis (down-regulated FoxO1, PEPCK, G6Pase). [78]
Silybum marianum N/A (administered in diet) N/A (tested in HFD mouse model)
Silymarin
40 mg/100 g diet HFD-induced obesity mouse model. Measured: body weight loss and epididymal fat mass. Resulted in body weight loss and a reduction in epididymal fat mass. [78]
Silybum marianum Cold press Seed oil (low Silymarin)
Milk thistle oil (MTO)
80 mg kg−1 day−1 (0.1% oil/50 gm bw/day) HFD-induced obesity mouse model (8 weeks treatment). Measured: body weight, oxygen consumption (VO2), adipose tissue molecular markers (mitochondrial function, IR signaling). Attenuated HFD-induced obesity and weight gain (p < 0.05). Increased oxygen consumption (VO2) to control levels. Increased markers of mitochondrial fusion (Mfn1) and browning of white adipose (CREG1, UCP1, FGF21, SIRT1). [78]
Silybum marianum N/A (in vitro assays) N/A
Silychristin
0.90 µM (KI) Carbonic Anhydrase (hCA) inhibition assay: hCA VII Highly effective and selective for hCA VII, with KI of 0.90 µM. [75]
Silybum marianum N/A (in vitro assays) N/A
Isosylibin A
0.92 µM (KI) Carbonic Anhydrase (hCA) inhibition assay: hCA VA Equipopent inhibitor of hCAs VA and VII. hCA VA inhibition: KI of 0.92 µM. [75]
Glebionis segetum Essential oil (obtained via hydrodistillation) Aerial parts (dried) IC50 concentration Alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activity 0.967 ± 0.006 mg/mL [26]

7.5. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Picnomon acarna extracts demonstrate notable anti-inflammatory potential through the inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in human monocytes. Both ethanolic and methanolic extracts exhibit significant inhibitory effects, indicating the presence of bioactive compounds capable of modulating inflammatory responses [61]. The ethanolic extract shows comparatively higher inhibitory activity, suggesting that solvent choice influences the extraction efficiency of active constituents. Overall, these findings support the potential of Picnomon acarna as a promising natural source of anti-inflammatory agents, as shown in Table 9.

Table 9.

The anti-inflammatory activities of Picnomon acarna.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Methods Used Results References
Picnomon acarna 70% ethanol Full plant 10 g/mL Inhibition of Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in human monocytes 100–80% inhibition [61]
Picnomon acarna Methanol Full plant 10 g/mL Inhibition of Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in human monocytes 80–60% inhibition [61]

Silybum marianum exhibits potent anti-inflammatory activity through multiple molecular and cellular mechanisms in both in vitro and in vivo models [79]. Its extracts and bioactive compounds effectively suppress key inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α, IL-6, nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species, while also inhibiting pro-inflammatory enzymes such as COX, LOX, and sPLA2 [80]. Additionally, the plant demonstrates strong in vivo efficacy by reducing inflammation-related parameters in various disease models, including edema, nephrotoxicity, and ulcerativeolitis [81]. Overall, these findings highlight its significant therapeutic potential as a natural anti-inflammatory agent targeting multiple signaling pathways as shown in Table 10.

Table 10.

The anti-inflammatory activity of Silybum marianum.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Methods Used Results References
Silybum marianum Dissolved in 100% DMSO Purified Silymarin 36 μg/mL In vitro: Inhibition of LPS-induced Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA expression in human fibroblast cells (real-time PCR) Significantly inhibited COX-2 mRNA expression (p < 0.001) [82]
Silybum marianum Ethanol (EtOH 96%) Seeds Equivalent to 1.0 g seeds powder/kg body weight/day (oral) In vivo: Experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in rats (MCD diet); reduction in hepatic TNF- α mRNA (Real-time PCR) 47% decrease in elevated TNF-α mRNA levels [77]
Silybum marianum Ethanol (EtOH 96%) Seeds Equivalent to 1.0 g seeds powder/kg body weight/day (oral) In vivo: NASH in rats (MCD diet); reduction in hepatic TGF-β mRNA (Real-time PCR) 26% decrease in elevated TGF-β mRNA levels [77]
Silybum marianum Ethanol (EtOH 96%) Seeds Equivalent to 1.0 g seeds powder/kg body weight/day (oral) In vivo: NASH in rats (MCD diet); reduction in JNK phosphorylation (Immunoblot) Significant decrease in JNK phosphorylation [77]
Silybum marianum Methanol Leaf callus 100 mg/kg (oral) In vivo: Carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model 93.9% inhibition in paw edema [83]
Silybum marianum Methanol Leaf callus 100 mg/kg (oral) In vivo: Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 91.27% inhibition in paw edema [83]
Silybum marianum Methanol Leaves 100 mg/kg (oral) In vivo: Carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model 74.00% inhibition in paw edema [83]
Silybum marianum Methanol Leaves 100 mg/kg (oral) In vivo: Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 85.61% inhibition in paw edema [83]
Silybum marianum 70% aqueous ethanol Leaves/fruits 50 mg/kg/day (oral) In vivo: Reduction in serum TNF-α level in DEN/PB-administered nephrotoxic rats Significantly lowered the elevated serum TNF-α level [83]
Silybum marianum 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) (solution) Purified silymarin (standard) 10 mg/kg/day (oral) In vivo: Determination of serum TNF-α level in DEN/PB-administered nephrotoxic rats Reduced serum TNF-α level from 109.90 ± 5.32 pg/mL (control) to 81.02 ± 3.48 pg/mL [84]
Silybum marianum 99.9% methanol Callus cultures (Optimized: Continuous Light + 1.0 mg/L Melatonin) N/A (Extract composition dependent) In vitro: Enzyme Inhibition (15-LOX) 42.33 ± 1.59% Inhibition [85]
Silybum marianum 99.9% methanol Callus cultures (Optimized: Continuous Light + 1.0 mg/L Melatonin) N/A (Extract composition dependent) In vitro: Enzyme Inhibition (COX-1) 37.15 ± 1.29% Inhibition [85]
Silybum marianum 99.9% methanol Callus cultures (Optimized: Continuous Light + 1.0 mg/L Melatonin) N/A (Extract composition dependent) In vitro: Enzyme Inhibition (sPLA2) 35.70 ± 0.99% Inhibition [85]
Silybum marianum 54.5% aqueous EtOH Cell suspension cultures (SMCE) (0.5 mg/L Chitosan) N/A (Extract composition dependent) In vitro: Enzyme Inhibition (15-LOX) 35.4 ± 1.3% Inhibition [86]
Silybum marianum 54.5% aqueous EtOH Cell suspension cultures (SMCE) (0.5 mg/L Chitosan) N/A (Extract composition dependent) In vitro: Enzyme Inhibition (COX-2) 31.2 ± 1.0% Inhibition [86]
Silybum marianum Ethanol/Water (Multistep 70%, 50%, H2O) Undifferentiated callus 15–125 μg/mL In vitro: Suppression of induced IL-6 release in normal human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKn) stimulated by IFN-γ (ELISA) Complete inhibition of IL-6 release in HEKn at concentrations exceeding 60 μg/mL [87]
Silybum marianum Methanol Seeds 200–800 μg/mL In vitro: Inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages (Griess assay) Significantly inhibited NO production compared to control (p = 0.01 at 200 μg/mL) [88]
Silybum marianum Methanol Seeds 2000 mg/kg, gavage In vivo: Reduction in NO production in LPS-stimulated peritoneal macrophages Significantly less NO than control (p = 0.001) [88]
Silybum marianum Distilled water (10% w/v maceration) Seeds (aqueous extract, AESS) 100 mg/kg (oral, p.o. for 10 days) In vivo: Acetic acid (AA) 3-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) in rats; reduction in plasma C-reactive protein (C-RP) Significant drop in C-RP (p < 0.05) [89]
Silybum marianum Distilled water (10% w/v maceration) Seeds (aqueous extract, AESS) 1000 mg/kg (oral, p.o. for 10 days) In vivo: AA 3-induced UC in rats; reduction in plasma TNF-α and IL-1β Significant reduction in plasma TNF-α (p < 0.05) and IL-1β (p < 0.05) [89]
Silybum marianum Dissolved in H2O Seeds (Aqueous Extract, AESS) IC50 = 25.79 ± 8.74 μg/mL (fMLP-stimulated); 46.12 ± 9.21 µg/mL (PMA-stimulated) In vitro: Inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by human neutrophils stimulated by fMLP (Luminol-amplified chemiluminescence) Strong inhibition of reactive-oxygen-species (ROS) generation in fMLP- and PMA-activated neutrophils. [89]
Silybum marianum Dissolved in H2O Seeds (aqueous extract, AESS) 200 μg/mL In vitro: Inhibition of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) release after PMA stimulation (Western blot) Significantly lowered NGAL release (p < 0.001) [89]

Carduus pycnocephalus L. demonstrates significant anti-inflammatory activity in formalin-induced rat paw edema models. Various extracts from the aerial parts show different levels of edema inhibition, with chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts producing the highest effect at over 75% inhibition [45]. Aqueous and butanol extracts also display substantial activity, while acetonitrile, ethanol, and petroleum ether extracts exhibit moderate to lower inhibition. These results indicate that the choice of solvent strongly influences the anti-inflammatory potency of Carduus pycnocephalus L. [25], highlighting its potential as a source of natural anti-inflammatory agents, as shown in Table 11.

Table 11.

The anti-inflammatory activity of Carduus pycnocephalus and Glebionis segetum.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Dose Used Methods Used Results References
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Chloroform Aerial parts 500 mg/kg I.P. Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 75.2% Inhibition of edema after 2 h [25]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Ethyl acetate Aerial parts 500 mg/kg I.P. Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 75.2% Inhibition of edema after 2 h [25]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Water (aqueous extract) Aerial parts 500 mg/kg I.P. Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 61.9% Inhibition of edema after 2 h [25]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Butanol (water saturated) Aerial parts 500 mg/kg I.P. Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 59.27% Inhibition of edema after 2 h [25]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Acetonitrile Aerial parts 500 mg/kg I.P. Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 38% Inhibition of edema after 2 h [25]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Ethanol (alcohol extract) Aerial parts 500 mg/kg I.P. Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 30% Inhibition of edema after 2 h [25]
Carduus pycnocephalus L. Petroleum ether Aerial parts 500 mg/kg I.P. Formalin-induced rat paw edema model 30% Inhibition of edema after 2 h [25]
Glebionis segetum L. Fourr. Hydrodistillation (essential oil) Aerial parts Tested concentration range: 250–0.49 µg/mL 5-lipoxygenase inhibition activity IC50: 17 ± 3 µg/mL (strong anti-inflammatory activity) [26]

8. Applications in Green Nanotechnology

Nanotechnology is a rapidly advancing field with significant potential to impact multiple disciplines. It focuses on the manipulation of materials at the nanoscale (1–100 nm), where they display distinct physical, chemical, and biological characteristics compared to their bulk counterparts [90]. Nanoparticles can be produced through three primary approaches: physical, chemical, and biological methods [91]. Compared to conventional physical and chemical techniques, green synthesis offers several advantages in accordance with the principles of green chemistry [92]. This approach utilizes natural compounds obtained from plants or microorganisms—including fungi, bacteria, and algae—to reduce metal ions such as gold [93]. Plant extracts, which are rich in bioactive constituents such as flavonoids, terpenoids, amino acids, aldehydes, and alcohols, function as both reducing and stabilizing agents due to their strong redox potential [94]. Accordingly, extracts from Silybum marianum, a member of the Asteraceae family, have been successfully employed in the synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Reported therapeutic applications of silver and gold nanoparticles synthesized using Silybum marianum extract.

Silver nanoparticles are widely applied as anti-microbial agents in the medical field because of their potent inhibitory activity against a broad range of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, while exhibiting relatively low toxicity toward human cells [95]. A study reported the synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous seed extract of Silybum marianum as both reducing and capping agents [96]. The synthesized silver nanoparticles demonstrated strong anti-oxidant activity [97]. Moreover, enhanced anti-bacterial effects were observed against Klebsiella pneumonia, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter intermedius, along with anti-fungal activity against Candida albicans [98].

On the other hand, gold nanoparticles have been synthesized from Silybum marianum. A study conducted by Clichici et al. showed that the synthesized gold nanoparticles reduced oxidative stress, as evidenced by decreased MDA levels, and exhibited anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects, reflected by lowered α-SMA expression and TGF-β1 levels, along with reduced pNF-κB levels, indicating significant anti-inflammatory activity [99]. Table 12 presents a summary of nanoparticles synthesized using Silybum marianum, including their physicochemical properties and biological activities.

Table 12.

Overview of nanoparticles synthesized using Silybum marianum extracts and their physicochemical and biological characteristics.

Plant Name Solvent Used for Extraction Plant Part Types of Nanoparticles Synthesized Applications of Nanoparticles Results References
Silybum marianum Water Seeds AgNPs (silver) Anti-bacterial; anti-fungal; anti-oxidant; anti-inflammatory; anti-diabetic; cytotoxicity screening • Physical characteristics:
Spherical AgNPs, size: 13–18 nm, crystalline structure
• Biological activities:
a. Anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activity: zones of inhibition: 2–13 mm
b. Cytotoxic activity: cell viability of HepG2 Liver Cancer: 54.8 ± 0.9%
c. Anti-oxidant activity:
DPPH assay:
47.9%
ABTS assay:
115.9%
d. Anti-diabetic activity:
α-Glucosidase inhibition: 25.41 ± 1.37%
α-Amylase inhibition: 26.78 ± 1.43%
e. Anti-inflammatory activity:
COX-2 inhibition: 12.52 ± 2.01%
COX-1 inhibition: 14.56 ± 0.87%
[96]
Silybum marianum Water Leaves AgNPs (silver) Anti-urogenital disorder; metabolic regulation; anti-oxidant; anti-inflammatory; hormone-modulating (menopausal urinary incontinence) • Physical characteristics: Spherical AgNPs, Size range: 15–60 nm
• Biological activities:
a. Hormonal and urogenital activity:
↑ Serum 17β-estradiol, ↑ Urinary bladder weight, ↑ hydroxyproline
b. Metabolic and lipid regulation: ↓ weight gain, ↓ Triglycerides, cholesterol, LDL, ↑ HDL
c. Hepatoprotective results:
↓ Liver enzymes AST, ALT, and ALP
[100]
Silybum marianum Silymarin Not reported AuNPs (gold) Hepatoprotective; anti-fibrogenic; anti-oxidant; anti-inflammatory Physical characteristics:
Spherical AuNPs, size range: 4–11 nm.

• Biological activities:
a. Hepatoprotective activity:
↓ ASAT and ALAT
b. ↓ Oxidative stress: ↓ MDA levels
c. Anti-fibrotic/anti-inflammatory effects:
↓ α-SMA expression, ↓ TGF-β1 levels d. Anti-inflammatory activity: ↓ pNF-kB levels
[101]

9. Other Applications

The four Asteraceae species reviewed herein exhibit considerable potential as sources of functional foods, nutraceuticals, and medicinal products [102]. Nevertheless, the current body of evidence reveals marked disparities in both their utilization and scientific characterization [103]. While Picnomon acarna, Carduus pycnocephalus, and Glebionis segetum have primarily been recognized as traditional edible plants in Mediterranean cultures, Silybum marianum has progressed substantially beyond ethnobotanical use, supported by extensive investigations into its nutritional properties, food applications, and toxicological safety [38,104]. This contrast illustrates a common trend in medicinal plant research, where longstanding traditional use often precedes comprehensive scientific validation. Therefore, integrating food application studies with toxicological evidence provides a more balanced perspective on the translational potential of these species for functional food and nutraceutical development [105]. Picnomon acarna has a long history of consumption as a traditional wild edible vegetable throughout the Mediterranean basin [106]. Ethnobotanical surveys from Lebanon indicate that both its raw leaves and roots are commonly consumed in salads prepared with olives, onions, and bread, reflecting its cultural importance in rural communities [107]. Similar reports across the Mediterranean identify P. acarna as one of several wild Asteraceae species traditionally harvested as seasonal vegetables, contributing to dietary diversity and local food security [108]. In Balkan countries, its roots are cooked as vegetables, while floristic references classify the species as a traditional European potherb and recognize it as an edible wild plant even beyond its native distribution [109]. Despite this extensive traditional use, scientific studies addressing its nutritional composition, bioavailability of phytochemicals following culinary preparation, and long-term safety remain scarce [110]. Moreover, no experimental investigations have systematically evaluated its acute or chronic toxicity, organ-specific effects, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, or allergenic potential. Consequently, although centuries of traditional consumption suggest an acceptable safety profile, the absence of rigorous toxicological evidence represents a major limitation that currently restricts its development as a scientifically validated functional food or nutraceutical ingredient [111]. Future investigations should therefore integrate nutritional characterization with standardized toxicological assessment to facilitate its safe commercialization. Among the four species, Silybum marianum represents the most advanced example of successful translation from traditional medicine to modern functional food applications [71]. Recent studies have demonstrated that milk thistle seed flour can be incorporated into bakery products, significantly improving dietary fiber content, anti-oxidant capacity, and overall nutritional quality without compromising sensory acceptability [112]. Similar benefits have been observed in gluten-free formulations, where partial substitution of rice flour with milk thistle flour enhanced nutritional value while maintaining desirable technological properties. In addition to flour applications, milk thistle seeds constitute a valuable source of edible vegetable oil characterized by favorable fatty acid composition, high oxidative stability, and abundant bioactive constituents, including phenolic compounds and silymarin derivatives [113]. Comparative analyses of different genotypes further demonstrate considerable variability in oil yield, essential fatty acid composition, and phytochemical content, highlighting opportunities for cultivar selection aimed at maximizing nutritional quality and commercial value. Importantly, the development of S. marianum as a functional food ingredient has been supported by extensive toxicological investigations demonstrating an excellent safety profile [74]. Clinical and experimental studies consistently report high tolerability at therapeutic doses, with only mild and transient gastrointestinal adverse effects documented in most cases. Although high-dose silibinin formulations have occasionally produced reversible elevations in hepatic enzymes, the overall evidence indicates a wide margin of safety, with oral LD50 values exceeding 2000 mg/kg in experimental animals and no evidence of significant cytotoxicity or chromosomal damage in vivo [114]. Nevertheless, reports of reproductive toxicity at very high doses in animal models suggest that cautious use during pregnancy remains advisable until more comprehensive human data become available. Collectively, S. marianum represents the most scientifically validated species among those reviewed, providing a successful model for the translation of traditional medicinal plants into evidence-based nutraceutical and functional food products [19].

Carduus pycnocephalus, likewise, occupies an important place in Mediterranean food traditions, where its young leaves are consumed raw or cooked, and its tender stems are eaten fresh as seasonal foraged vegetables [115]. Scientific investigations have confirmed that this species contains appreciable concentrations of phenolic compounds and flavonoids that contribute to its anti-oxidant capacity and nutritional value. These phytochemical characteristics support its potential as a functional food resource; however, research remains largely descriptive, with limited information regarding nutrient bioavailability, processing stability, consumer acceptance, or industrial food applications [116]. Toxicological investigations are similarly limited. However, preclinical safety assessments in female mice concluded that the hydroalcoholic extract of Carduus pycnocephalus is relatively safe, exhibiting an LD50 greater than 2000 mg/kg in acute oral studies and showing no significant biochemical or histopathological toxicity in repeated-dose trials at levels below 200 mg/kg [36]. Similarly, Glebionis segetum has traditionally been consumed throughout Mediterranean countries as a cooked leafy vegetable and has recently attracted growing attention because of its edible flowers, which combine attractive sensory characteristics with considerable anti-oxidant and polyphenolic content [107]. Studies indicate that the flowers maintain satisfactory quality during refrigerated storage, supporting their potential use in salads, garnishes, and other culinary applications. Furthermore, broader evaluations of edible flowers identify G. segetum as an emerging species of gastronomic interest whose nutritional and sensory quality is influenced by genotype, environmental conditions, and cultivation practices [117]. Despite these promising characteristics, food-related investigations remain preliminary and have yet to evaluate processing technologies, shelf-life optimization, consumer acceptance, or commercial feasibility [118]. Toxicological evidence is even more limited, with available studies focusing primarily on its insecticidal activity rather than mammalian safety. Chronic exposure produces growth inhibition, prolonged larval development, and increased mortality in Spodoptera littoralis, indicating the presence of biologically active metabolites capable of disrupting physiological processes [119]. While these findings support the plant’s potential as a natural bioinsecticide, their implications for human safety remain uncertain and warrant dedicated toxicological evaluation [120]. Overall, comparison of the four species reveals a clear disparity between traditional utilization and scientific validation. Whereas S. marianum has progressed toward commercial functional food and nutraceutical applications through extensive investigations of both efficacy and safety, P. acarna, C. pycnocephalus, and G. segetum remain largely supported by ethnobotanical knowledge and preliminary phytochemical studies [121,122]. Their long histories of traditional consumption undoubtedly support their potential as valuable dietary resources; however, traditional use alone cannot substitute for comprehensive nutritional, pharmacological, and toxicological evaluation. Future research should therefore adopt multidisciplinary approaches integrating food science, phytochemistry, toxicology, and clinical nutrition to establish standardized quality parameters, determine the bioavailability of bioactive compounds following food processing, evaluate long-term safety, and define evidence-based recommendations for their incorporation into modern functional foods and nutraceutical formulations.

The traditional uses in addition to the toxicological properties of the four species studied are illustrated in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The traditional uses and the toxicological investigation of the studied species.

10. Conclusions

Picnomon acarna, Silybum marianum, Carduus pycnocephalus, and Glebionis segetum are invasive yet highly adaptive species of the Asteraceae family, widely distributed across Mediterranean regions. These plants have long been utilized in traditional medicine; for example, P. acarna is used for digestive disorders, S. marianum for liver diseases, C. pycnocephalus for inflammatory conditions, and G. segetum for sore throat. Their medicinal value is largely attributed to their richness in bioactive phytochemicals such as flavonoids, tannins, and phenolic compounds.

Beyond these traditional uses, extracts from these species have demonstrated a broad spectrum of biological activities, including anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, anti-oxidant, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-enzymatic, anti-obesity, and anti-inflammatory effects, highlighting their significant therapeutic potential. In addition, these plant extracts have been successfully employed as reducing and capping agents in the green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles, which exhibit diverse biomedical applications. Furthermore, some of these species are increasingly incorporated into modern food systems as sources of nutrient-rich flour and edible oils, contributing to both nutritional diversity and sustainable food practices. Overall, their multifunctional biological properties continue to attract considerable research interest, highlighting their potential as promising candidates for the development of future therapeutic applications. However, further investigations, including pharmacological studies and clinical trials, are required to validate their efficacy and therapeutic potential.

Despite these promising findings, most studies remain limited to crude extracts and in vitro investigations, highlighting the need for bioassay-guided isolation and characterization of the active compounds, followed by mechanistic, in vivo, and clinical studies to validate their therapeutic potential. In particular, the substantial hepatoprotective evidence for S. marianum provides a strong basis for progression to well-designed controlled clinical trials. Comprehensive toxicological and pharmacokinetic evaluations are also required, especially for P. acarna, C. pycnocephalus, and G. segetum, to establish their safety profiles and therapeutic dosage ranges. Future research should further optimize the green synthesis of nanoparticles for applications in drug delivery, biosensing, and other biomedical technologies, while also assessing the long-term safety and efficacy of these species as functional food ingredients and nutraceuticals. Ultimately, sustainable valorization strategies that transform these invasive plants into valuable pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and biotechnological resources, supported by interdisciplinary collaboration among phytochemists, pharmacologists, toxicologists, and biotechnologists, will be essential for translating their traditional uses and biological potential into safe, evidence-based applications.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University Research Board (URB) of the American University of Beirut for its support.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.H., R.A., G.A. and E.B.; formal analysis, H.H., G.A. and R.A.; investigation, H.H., G.A. and R.A.; writing—review and editing, J.K., M.L.E.D., H.H., G.A., R.A., R.I.H., E.B. and M.B.; visualization, M.B. and E.B.; funding acquisition, E.B.; project administration M.B. and E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Nasim N., Sandeep I.S., Mohanty S. Plant-Derived Natural Products for Drug Discovery: Current Approaches and Prospects. Nucleus. 2022;65:399–411. doi: 10.1007/s13237-022-00405-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rolnik A., Olas B. The Plants of the Asteraceae Family as Agents in the Protection of Human Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:3009. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Benvenuti S., Cioni P.L., Flamini G., Pardossi A. Weeds for Weed Control: Asteraceae Essential Oils as Natural Herbicides. Weed Res. 2017;57:342–353. doi: 10.1111/wre.12266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yousefi A.R., Babaei S., Nosratti I., Zeidali E., Babaei M., Asadi Oskouei E., Saberi H., Redhu M., Sadeghpour A. Emerging Invasive Weeds in Iran: Occurrence, Ecological Impacts, and Sustainable Management. Plants. 2025;14:2611. doi: 10.3390/plants14172611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kozuharova E., Malfa G.A., Acquaviva R., Spadaro V., Ionkova I., Statti G., Raimondo F.M. The Wild Plants from the Family Asteraceae That Are Traditionally Used for Food in Sicily and Bulgaria and Their Health Benefits. Foods. 2026;15:988. doi: 10.3390/foods15060988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taliwe A., Lamula S.Q.N., Buwa-Komoreng L.V., Khwaza V. Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets of Botanicals Derived from Asteraceae Plant Species. Pharmaceutics. 2026;18:759. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18060759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jayasundera M., Florentine S., Tennakoon K.U., Chauhan B.S. Medicinal Value of Three Agricultural Weed Species of the Asteraceae Family: A Review. Pharmacogn. J. 2021;13:264–277. doi: 10.5530/pj.2021.13.36. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kacholi D.S. Ethnomedicinal Evidence for Medicinal Plants of the Asteraceae Family Used by Tanzanians to Treat Various Ailments: A Review. BioMed Res. Int. 2026;2026:4164568. doi: 10.1155/bmri/4164568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Puglisi D., Pasquariello M., Martinelli T., Paris R., De Vita P., Pecchioni N., Esposito S., Bassolino L. Genetic Diversity of a Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. Germplasm Collection Revealed by DNA Diversity Array Technology (DArTseq) PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0308368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Laface V.L.A., Bombino G., Musarella C.M., Proto A.R., Spampinato G. Analysis of Post-Fire Regeneration Dynamics in Pine Plantations Under Naturalistic Management with In Situ Burnt Logs. Sustainability. 2026;18:971. doi: 10.3390/su18020971. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cano E., Cano-Ortiz A., Quinto Canas R., Piñar Fuentes J.C., Rodrigues Meireles C., Raposo M., Pinto Gomes C., Laface V.L.A., Spampinato G., Musarella C.M. Ecological and Syntaxonomic Analysis of the Communities of Glebionis Coronaria and G. Discolor (Malvion Neglectae) in the European Mediterranean Area. Plants. 2024;13:568. doi: 10.3390/plants13050568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.El-Saadony M.T., Saad A.M., Mohammed D.M., Korma S.A., Alshahrani M.Y., Ahmed A.E., Ibrahim E.H., Salem H.M., Alkafaas S.S., Saif A.M., et al. Medicinal Plants: Bioactive Compounds, Biological Activities, Combating Multidrug-Resistant Microorganisms, and Human Health Benefits—A Comprehensive Review. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1491777. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1491777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anand U., Jacobo-Herrera N., Altemimi A., Lakhssassi N. A Comprehensive Review on Medicinal Plants as Antimicrobial Therapeutics: Potential Avenues of Biocompatible Drug Discovery. Metabolites. 2019;9:258. doi: 10.3390/metabo9110258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nosratti I., Almaleki S., Chauhan B.S. Seed Germination Ecology of Soldier Thistle (Picnomon acarna): An Invasive Weed of Rainfed Crops in Iran. Weed Sci. 2019;67:261–266. doi: 10.1017/wsc.2018.74. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Albahri G., Badran A., Abdel Baki Z., Alame M., Hijazi A., Daou A., Baydoun E. Potential Anti-Tumorigenic Properties of Diverse Medicinal Plants against the Majority of Common Types of Cancer. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17:574. doi: 10.3390/ph17050574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Öz U. Anatomy of Carlina corymbosa L., Carthamus dentatus Vahl. and Picnomon acarna (L.) Cass. (Asteraceae) Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Derg. 2021;17:215–222. doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.785328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Souleles C., Laskaris G. Flavonoids from Picnomon acarna. Planta Med. 1988;54:47–48. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-962332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Porwal O., Mohammed Ameen M.S., Anwer E.T., Uthirapathy S., Ahamad J., Tahsin A. Silybum marianum (Milk Thistle): Review on Its Chemistry, Morphology, Ethno Medical Uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Activities. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2019;9:199–206. doi: 10.22270/jddt.v9i5.3666. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang X., Liu M., Wang Z., Wang P., Kong L., Wu J., Wu W., Ma L., Jiang S., Ren W., et al. A Review of the Botany, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, Synthetic Biology and Comprehensive Utilization of Silybum marianum. Front. Pharmacol. 2024;15:1417655. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1417655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Valková V., Ďúranová H., Bilčíková J., Habán M. Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum): A Valuable Medicinal Plant with Several Therapeutic Purposes. J. Microb. Biotech. Food Sci. 2020;9:836–843. doi: 10.15414/jmbfs.2020.9.4.836-843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khan N., Ullah R., Alamri S.S., Alwasel Y.A., AL-Hashimi A., Abdel-Maksoud M.A., Okla M.K., AbdElgawad H. Environment-Driven Changes in the Functional Traits of Milk Thistle [Silybum marianum (L). Gaertn.] Along an Altitudinal Gradient in the Semi-Arid Environment: Perspective on Future Plant Invasion. Front. Plant Sci. 2022;13:897678. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.897678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Karkanis A., Bilalis D., Efthimiadou A. Cultivation of Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaertn.), a Medicinal Weed. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011;34:825–830. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.03.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marceddu R., Dinolfo L., Carrubba A., Sarno M., Di Miceli G. Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum L.) as a Novel Multipurpose Crop for Agriculture in Marginal Environments: A Review. Agronomy. 2022;12:729. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Goeden R.D. Comparative Survey of the Phytophagous Insect Faunas of Italian Thistle, Carduus pycnocephalus, in Southern California and Southern Europe Relative to Biological Weed Control. Environ. Entomol. 1974;3:464–474. doi: 10.1093/ee/3.3.464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Al-Shammari L.A., Hassan W.H.B., Al-Youssef H.M. Phytochemical and Biological Studies of Carduus pycnocephalus L. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015;19:410–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2012.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Servï H. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Essential Oils of Two New Chemotypes of Glebionis Cass. Turk. J. Chem. 2021;45:1559–1566. doi: 10.3906/kim-2104-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Paciolla C., D’Emerico S., Tommasi F., Scrugli A. Karyomorphological and Biochemical Studies in Glebionis Coronaria (L.) Spach and Glebionis segetum (L.) Fourreau from Italy. Plant Biosyst.-Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2010;144:563–567. doi: 10.1080/11263501003658438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bussmann R.W., Paniagua-Zambrana N.Y., Khutsishvili M., Kikvidze Z. Glebionis coronaria (L.) Cass. Ex SpachGlebionis segetum (L.) Fourr. Asteraceae. In: Bussmann R.W., editor. Ethnobotany of the Caucasus. Springer Nature; Cham, Switzerland: 2024. pp. 1–5. (Ethnobotany of Mountain Regions). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tsioutsiou E.E., Amountzias V., Vontzalidou A., Dina E., Stevanović Z.D., Cheilari A., Aligiannis N. Medicinal Plants Used Traditionally for Skin Related Problems in the South Balkan and East Mediterranean Region—A Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:936047. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.936047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bijak M. Silybin, a Major Bioactive Component of Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaernt.)—Chemistry, Bioavailability, and Metabolism. Molecules. 2017;22:1942. doi: 10.3390/molecules22111942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fanoudi S., Alavi M.S., Karimi G., Hosseinzadeh H. Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum) as an Antidote or a Protective Agent against Natural or Chemical Toxicities: A Review. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2020;43:240–254. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2018.1485687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yamani R.A., Harche H.E., Ngadi M., Bourkhiss B., El Mahjoub A. Effect of Glebionis segetum (Corn Marigold) Extracts: Insecticidal and Nematicidal Activities against Agricultural Pests Thrips tabaci, Ditylenchus dipsaci, and Sitophilus oryzae. Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2026;27:76–96. doi: 10.12912/27197050/221293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Derbak L., Bendif H., Ayad R., Rebbas K., Demirtas I., Yildiz I., Boufahja F., Garzoli S. Extraction Process and Phenolic Profiling of Glebionis Coronaria: Insight into Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activities with ADME-Based Therapeutic Potential. Food Anal. Methods. 2025;18:1621–1636. doi: 10.1007/s12161-025-02818-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Alruwad M.I., Salah El Dine R., Gendy A.M., Sabry M.M., El Hefnawy H.M. Exploring the Biological and Phytochemical Potential of Jordan’s Flora: A Review and Update of Eight Selected Genera from Mediterranean Region. Molecules. 2024;29:1160. doi: 10.3390/molecules29051160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baydoun S., Chalak L., Dalleh H., Arnold N. Ethnopharmacological Survey of Medicinal Plants Used in Traditional Medicine by the Communities of Mount Hermon, Lebanon. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015;173:139–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.06.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mousavi Z., Aliabadi S., Mohamadi Motamed S., Najafizadeh P., Rastegar T. Safety Assessment of Carduus pycnocephalus Hydro Alcoholic Extract in Female Mice: Acute and Repeated Oral Toxicity Studies. Arch. Adv. Biosci. 2023;14:1–7. doi: 10.22037/aab.v14i1.41613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abenavoli L., Izzo A.A., Milić N., Cicala C., Santini A., Capasso R. Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum): A Concise Overview on Its Chemistry, Pharmacological, and Nutraceutical Uses in Liver Diseases. Phytother. Res. 2018;32:2202–2213. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Marengo A., Maxia A., Sanna C., Bertea C.M., Bicchi C., Ballero M., Cagliero C., Rubiolo P. Characterization of Four Wild Edible Carduus Species from the Mediterranean Region via Phytochemical and Biomolecular Analyses. Food Res. Int. 2017;100:822–831. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bibi Y., Nisa S., Chaudhary F.M., Zia M. Antibacterial Activity of Some Selected Medicinal Plants of Pakistan. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Laskaris G.G., Gournelis D.C., Kokkalou E. Phenolics of Picnomon acarna. J. Nat. Prod. 1995;58:1248–1250. doi: 10.1021/np50122a015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lekmine S., Benslama O., Ola M.S., Touzout N., Moussa H., Tahraoui H., Hafsa H., Zhang J., Amrane A. Preliminary Data on Silybum marianum Metabolites: Comprehensive Characterization, Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, Antimicrobial Activities, LC-MS/MS Profiling, and Predicted ADMET Analysis. Metabolites. 2025;15:13. doi: 10.3390/metabo15010013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Maaloul S., Ghzaiel I., Mahmoudi M., Mighri H., Pires V., Vejux A., Martine L., De Barros J.-P.P., Prost-Camus E., Boughalleb F., et al. Characterization of Silybum marianum and Silybum Eburneum Seed Oils: Phytochemical Profiles and Antioxidant Properties Supporting Important Nutritional Interests. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0304021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ahmed A.A., Mabry T.J., Matlin S.A. Flavonoids of the Flowers of Silybum marianum. Phytochemistry. 1989;28:1751–1753. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97838-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pereira C., Barros L., Santos-Buelga C., Ferreira I. Phenolic Profiling of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn (Milk Thistle) by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS. Planta Med. 2014;80:2–27. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hayyany L.E., El-Halawany E., Soliman H., El-Amier Y. Characterization of the Chemical components of the Extracted Carduus pycnocephalus L, and Assessment of Its Potential Novel Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Anticancer Activities 2021. [(accessed on 26 July 2026)]. Available online: https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR416088.
  • 46.Melad F.M., Alsadi H., Edrah S.M. The Bio-Constituents Extracted from Silybum marianum L Plant and Its Effects as Antimicrobial. J. Pharm. Allied Med. 2023;1:106–112. doi: 10.58985/jpam.2023.v01i02.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Iraqi O., Jalal M., El Mouzazi I., Jbene M., Taboz Y., Habsaoui A. Advances in Extraction Technologies of Silybum marianum L. and Its Role in Protecting Against Skin Damage. Cosmetics. 2025;12:211. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics12050211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.El-Sapagh S., Allam N.G., El-Sayed M.N.E.-D., El-Hefnawy A.A., Korbecka-Glinka G., Shala A.Y. Effects of Silybum marianum L. Seed Extracts on Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) Bacteria. Molecules. 2023;29:64. doi: 10.3390/molecules29010064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Safarpoor M., Ghaedi M., Asfaram A., Yousefi-Nejad M., Javadian H., Zare Khafri H., Bagherinasab M. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Antimicrobial Compounds from Thymus Daenensis and Silybum marianum: Antimicrobial Activity with and without the Presence of Natural Silver Nanoparticles. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018;42:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mahmoud N.N., Selim M.T. Phytochemical Analysis and Antimicrobial Activity of Silybum marianum L. via Multi-Solvent Extraction. AMB Expr. 2025;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s13568-025-01925-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barros L., Oliveira S., Carvalho A.M., Ferreira I.C.F.R. In Vitro Antioxidant Properties and Characterization in Nutrients and Phytochemicals of Six Medicinal Plants from the Portuguese Folk Medicine. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010;32:572–579. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kurt A., Ozcan M., Colak N., Ozogul Y., Glew R., Ozogul F., Ayaz F. Fatty Acids of Oil and Antioxidant Capacity of Phenolics from Fruits of 11 Cardueae (Carduoideae, Asteraceae) Taxa from Northeast Anatolia (Turkey) Bot. Serb. 2019;43:31–45. doi: 10.2298/BOTSERB1901031K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Birben E., Sahiner U.M., Sackesen C., Erzurum S., Kalayci O. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense. World Allergy Organ. J. 2012;5:9–19. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182439613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jomova K., Alomar S.Y., Alwasel S.H., Nepovimova E., Kuca K., Valko M. Several Lines of Antioxidant Defense against Oxidative Stress: Antioxidant Enzymes, Nanomaterials with Multiple Enzyme-Mimicking Activities, and Low-Molecular-Weight Antioxidants. Arch. Toxicol. 2024;98:1323–1367. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03696-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yildiz A.Y., Öztekin S., Anaya K. Effects of Plant-Derived Antioxidants to the Oxidative Stability of Edible Oils under Thermal and Storage Conditions: Benefits, Challenges and Sustainable Solutions. Food Chem. 2025;479:143752. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.143752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kiran, Kumar P., Kirti S., Daudi A.A. Phytochemical Analysis and Antioxidants Activity of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. Ann. Phytomed. 2019;8:127–134. doi: 10.21276/ap.2019.8.1.16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Karakus Z. Phytochemical Characterisation and Bioactivity of Picnomon acarna Extracts: LC–MS/MS Profiling, Antioxidant Capacity and Enzyme Inhibition. Molecules. 2026;31:1240. doi: 10.3390/molecules31081240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Saleh I.A., Vinatoru M., Mason T.J., Abdel-Azim N.S., Shams K.A., Aboutabl E., Hammouda F.M. Extraction of Silymarin from Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum) Seeds – a Comparison of Conventional and Microwave-Assisted Extraction Methods. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy. 2017;51:124–133. doi: 10.1080/08327823.2017.1320265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Baba F.V., Khodadadi M., Esfandiari Z., Ahranjani P.J. Silybum marianum L. (Milk Thistle): A Review of Phytochemical and Bioactive Compound Extraction, Food Applications, and Safety Considerations. Appl. Food Res. 2026;6:102099. doi: 10.1016/j.afres.2026.102099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alruwad M.I., Sabry M.M., Gendy A.M., El-Dine R.S., El Hefnawy H.M. In Vitro Cytotoxic Potential of Selected Jordanian Flora and Their Associated Phytochemical Analysis. Plants. 2023;12:1626. doi: 10.3390/plants12081626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bremner P., Rivera D., Calzado M.A., Obón C., Inocencio C., Beckwith C., Fiebich B.L., Muñoz E., Heinrich M. Assessing Medicinal Plants from South-Eastern Spain for Potential Anti-Inflammatory Effects Targeting Nuclear Factor-Kappa B and Other pro-Inflammatory Mediators. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124:295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yassin N.Y.S., AbouZid S.F., El-Kalaawy A.M., Ali T.M., Almehmadi M.M., Ahmed O.M. Silybum marianum Total Extract, Silymarin and Silibinin Abate Hepatocarcinogenesis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth via Modulation of the HGF/c-Met, Wnt/β-Catenin, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathways. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022;145:112409. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Koltai T., Fliegel L. Role of Silymarin in Cancer Treatment: Facts, Hypotheses, and Questions. J. Evid. Based Integr. Med. 2022;27:2515690X211068826. doi: 10.1177/2515690X211068826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang X., Jiang Y., Guo N., Ding Y., Feng J., Miao C., Lv Y. Application of SNAP-Tag-EGFR Cell Membrane Chromatography Model in Screening Antitumor Active Components of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2024;238:115816. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jao H.-Y., Chang F.-R., Cheng C.-W., Liang H.-W., Wang C.-J., Lee H.-J. Silybum marianum Seed Disrupts Mitosis by Reducing Polo-like Kinase 1 in Breast Cancer Cells. Phytomed. Plus. 2022;2:100164. doi: 10.1016/j.phyplu.2021.100164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Alonazi M., Horchani H., Alwhibi M., Ben Bacha A. Cytotoxic, Antioxidant, and Metabolic Enzyme Inhibitory Activities of Euphorbia Cyparissias Extracts. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020;2020:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2020/9835167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ayeni E.A., Afolayan A.J. Antidiabetic Potential of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. and Brachylaena Discolor DC (Asteraceae) in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Plants. 2025;14:3267. doi: 10.3390/plants14213267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Abu-zaiton A.S. Evaluating the Effect of Silybum marianum Extract on Blood Glucose, Liver and Kidney Functions in Diabetic Rats. Asb. 2013;5:447–454. doi: 10.12988/asb.2013.3936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Iqbal T., Aslam T., Zulfiqar S., Faisal N., Rehman A.U., Aslam S., Rehman R. Exploring Silybum marianum L. Seeds from Pakistan for Its Antibacterial, Antioxidant, Antidiabetic Activities, and Phytochemical Analysis. Nat. Prod. Res. 2026;40:3544–3550. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2025.2475506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Iqbal J., Andleeb A., Ashraf H., Meer B., Mehmood A., Jan H., Zaman G., Nadeem M., Drouet S., Fazal H., et al. Potential Antimicrobial, Antidiabetic, Catalytic, Antioxidant and ROS/RNS Inhibitory Activities of Silybum marianum Mediated Biosynthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2022;12:14069–14083. doi: 10.1039/D2RA01929A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Surai P. Silymarin as a Natural Antioxidant: An Overview of the Current Evidence and Perspectives. Antioxidants. 2015;4:204–247. doi: 10.3390/antiox4010204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Elhassaneen Y.A., Elkamisy A.E., Ahmed S.A.S., Radwan M.M.S. Potential effects of Silybum marianum L. seeds extract on obesity and other related complications in rats. J. Fac. Specif. Educ. Port Said Univ. 2023;19:1039–1053. doi: 10.21608/pssrj.2023.154357.1188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shen H., Alex R., Bellner L., Raffaele M., Licari M., Vanella L., Stec D.E., Abraham N.G. Milk Thistle Seed Cold Press Oil Attenuates Markers of the Metabolic Syndrome in a Mouse Model of Dietary-induced Obesity. J. Food Biochem. 2020;44 doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Awla N.J., Naqishbandi A.M., Baqi Y. Preventive and Therapeutic Effects of Silybum marianum Seed Extract Rich in Silydianin and Silychristin in a Rat Model of Metabolic Syndrome. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2023;6:1715–1723. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.3c00171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Citriniti E.L., Rocca R., Costa G., Renzi G., Carta F., Supuran C.T., Alcaro S., Ortuso F. Dual Inhibition of Carbonic Anhydrases VA and VII by Silychristin and Isosilybin A from Silybum marianum: A Potential Antiobesity Strategy. Arch. Der Pharm. 2025;358:e2400966. doi: 10.1002/ardp.202400966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sayin F., Buyukbas S., Basarali M., Alp H., Toy H., Ugurcu V. Effects of Silybum marianum Extract on High-Fat Diet Induced Metabolic Disorders in Rats. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2016;66:43–49. doi: 10.1515/pjfns-2015-0014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Maaliah M.S., Haddadin M., Abdalla S. Hypolipidemic and Hypoglycemic Effects of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. (Milk Thistle) Ethanol Seed Extract in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes in Rats. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2024;20:841–852. doi: 10.1177/09731296241231104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yao J., Zhi M., Gao X., Hu P., Li C., Yang X. Effect and the Probable Mechanisms of Silibinin in Regulating Insulin Resistance in the Liver of Rats with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2013;46:270–277. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20122551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sayyad M., Sutar A.D., Shivhare K., Shukla R., Flora S.J.S. Silymarin as a Phytopharmaceutical Agent: Advances in Mechanistic Insights, Formulation Strategies, and Pre-Clinical Applications. Front. Pharmacol. 2025;16:1711653. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1711653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Surai P.F., Surai A., Earle-Payne K. Silymarin and Inflammation: Food for Thoughts. Antioxidants. 2024;13:98. doi: 10.3390/antiox13010098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nakadate K., Ito N., Kawakami K., Yamazaki N. Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Plant-Derived Compounds and Prevention of Chronic Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:5206. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sharifi R., Pasalar P., Kamalinejad M., Dehpour A.R., Tavangar S.M., Paknejad M., Mehrabani Natanzi M., Nourbakhsh M., Ahmadi Ashtiani H.R., Akbari M., et al. The Effect of Silymarin (Silybum marianum) on Human Skin Fibroblasts in an In Vitro Wound Healing Model. Pharm. Biol. 2013;51:298–303. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2012.721789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Balian S., Ahmad S., Zafar R. Antiinflammatory Activity of Leaf and Leaf Callus of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. in Albino Rats. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2006;38:213. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.25815. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kaur G., Athar M., Alam M.S. Dietary Supplementation of Silymarin Protects against Chemically Induced Nephrotoxicity, Inflammation and Renal Tumor Promotion Response. Invest New Drugs. 2010;28:703–713. doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9289-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Shah M., Ullah M.A., Drouet S., Younas M., Tungmunnithum D., Giglioli-Guivarc’h N., Hano C., Abbasi B.H. Interactive Effects of Light and Melatonin on Biosynthesis of Silymarin and Anti-Inflammatory Potential in Callus Cultures of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. Molecules. 2019;24:1207. doi: 10.3390/molecules24071207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Shah M., Jan H., Drouet S., Tungmunnithum D., Shirazi J.H., Hano C., Abbasi B.H. Chitosan Elicitation Impacts Flavonolignan Biosynthesis in Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn Cell Suspension and Enhances Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Cell Extracts. Molecules. 2021;26:791. doi: 10.3390/molecules26040791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gjörloff Wingren A., Ziyad Faik R., Holefors A., Filecovic E., Gustafsson A. In Vitro Effects of Undifferentiated Callus Extracts from Plantago Major L, Rhodiola Rosea L and Silybum marianum L in Normal and Malignant Human Skin Cells. Heliyon. 2023;9:e16480. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ayduğan A., Ok S., Yılmaz E. Cold-Pressed Milk Thistle Seed Oil: Physico-Chemical Properties, Composition and Sensory Analysis. Grasas Aceites. 2022;73:e481. doi: 10.3989/gya.0894211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kouki A., Marrouchi R., Souli A., Bouabdallah S., Ferjani W., Dang P.M.-C., Dicko A., El-Benna J., Ben-Attia M. Silybum marianum Seeds Mitigate Pro-Inflammatory Functions of Human Neutrophils and Alleviate Ulcerative Colitis in Rats. Inflammopharmacology. 2025;33:6993–7014. doi: 10.1007/s10787-025-01998-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bayda S., Adeel M., Tuccinardi T., Cordani M., Rizzolio F. The History of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: From Chemical-Physical Applications to Nanomedicine. Molecules. 2019;25:112. doi: 10.3390/molecules25010112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Karunakaran G., Sudha K.G., Ali S., Cho E.-B. Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles from Various Biological Sources and Its Biomedical Applications. Molecules. 2023;28:4527. doi: 10.3390/molecules28114527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ahmed R., Manik K.H., Islam M.S., Rhine A., Mim J.J., Hossain N. Green Synthesis Methods for Nanoparticles: Principles, Biological Routes, and Physicochemical Approaches toward Sustainable Nanotechnology. Next Mater. 2026;11:101929. doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.101929. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ying S., Guan Z., Ofoegbu P.C., Clubb P., Rico C., He F., Hong J. Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Current Developments and Limitations. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022;26:102336. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hanna D.H., Nady D.S., Wasef M.W., Fakhry M.H., Mohamed F.S., Isaac D.M., Kirolos M.M., Azmy M.S., Hakeem G.E., Fathy C.A. Plant-Derived Nanoparticles: Green Synthesis, Factors, and Bioactivities. Next Mater. 2025;9:101275. doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bruna T., Maldonado-Bravo F., Jara P., Caro N. Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:7202. doi: 10.3390/ijms22137202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Shah M., Nawaz S., Jan H., Uddin N., Ali A., Anjum S., Giglioli-Guivarc’h N., Hano C., Abbasi B.H. Synthesis of Bio-Mediated Silver Nanoparticles from Silybum marianum and Their Biological and Clinical Activities. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2020;112:110889. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Al Baloushi K.S.Y., Senthilkumar A., Kandhan K., Subramanian R., Kizhakkayil J., Ramachandran T., Shehab S., Kurup S., Alyafei M.A.M., Al Dhaheri A., et al. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Using Moringa peregrina and Their Toxicity on MCF-7 and Caco-2 Human Cancer Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024;19:3891–3905. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S451694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Khan R., Islam B., Akram M., Shakil S., Ahmad A.A., Ali S.M., Siddiqui M., Khan A.U. Antimicrobial Activity of Five Herbal Extracts Against Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) Strains of Bacteria and Fungus of Clinical Origin. Molecules. 2009;14:586–597. doi: 10.3390/molecules14020586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Abdullah A.S., El Sayed I.E.T., El-Torgoman A.M.A., Alghamdi N.A., Ullah S., Wageh S., Kamel M.A. Preparation and Characterization of Silymarin-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles with Enhanced Anti-Fibrotic Therapeutic Effects against Hepatic Fibrosis in Rats: Role of MicroRNAs as Molecular Targets. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1767. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9121767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wei L., Wang W., Feng N., Qiao S. Effect of Silver Nanoparticles Formulated by Silybum Marianum on Menopausal Urinary Incontinence in Ovariectomized Rats. Open Chem. 2024;22:20230215. doi: 10.1515/chem-2023-0215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Clichici S., David L., Moldovan B., Baldea I., Olteanu D., Filip M., Nagy A., Luca V., Crivii C., Mircea P., et al. Hepatoprotective Effects of Silymarin Coated Gold Nanoparticles in Experimental Cholestasis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2020;115:111117. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bessada S.M.F., Barreira J.C.M., Oliveira M.B.P.P. Asteraceae Species with Most Prominent Bioactivity and Their Potential Applications: A Review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;76:604–615. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Macias-Konstantopoulos W.L., Collins K.A., Diaz R., Duber H.C., Edwards C.D., Hsu A.P., Ranney M.L., Riviello R.J., Wettstein Z.S., Sachs C.J. Race, Healthcare, and Health Disparities: A Critical Review and Recommendations for Advancing Health Equity. W. J. Emerg. Med. 2023;24 doi: 10.5811/WESTJEM.58408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kozuharova E., Malfa G.A., Acquaviva R., Valdés B., Batovska D., Stoycheva C., Rejdali M., Marino P., Spadaro V. Wild Species from the Asteraceae Family, Traditionally Consumed in Some Mediterranean Countries. Plants. 2025;14:2006. doi: 10.3390/plants14132006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Vignesh A., Amal T.C., Sarvalingam A., Vasanth K. A Review on the Influence of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods on Health. Food Chem. Adv. 2024;5:100749. doi: 10.1016/j.focha.2024.100749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Motti R., Bonanomi G., Lanzotti V., Sacchi R. The Contribution of Wild Edible Plants to the Mediterranean Diet: An Ethnobotanical Case Study Along the Coast of Campania (Southern Italy) Econ. Bot. 2020;74:249–272. doi: 10.1007/s12231-020-09504-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Baydoun S., Hani N., Nasser H., Ulian T., Arnold-Apostolides N. Wild Leafy Vegetables: A Potential Source for a Traditional Mediterranean Food from Lebanon. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023;6:991979. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.991979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gori B., Cossu T., El Zein H., Liu U., Ulian T., Bacchetta G. A Comprehensive Checklist of Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants: Diversity, Traditional Uses, and Knowledge Gaps. Plants People Planet. 2025:1–18. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.70137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Jman Redzic S. Wild Edible Plants and Their Traditional Use in the Human Nutrition in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ecol. Food Nutr. 2006;45:189–232. doi: 10.1080/03670240600648963. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hossain M.S., Wazed M.A., Asha S., Amin M.R., Shimul I.M. Dietary Phytochemicals in Health and Disease: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025;13:e70101. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dwyer J.T. Have Safety and Efficacy Assessments of Bioactives Come of Age? Mol. Asp. Med. 2023;89:101103. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2022.101103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Bedrníček J., Lorenc F., Jarošová M., Bártová V., Smetana P., Kadlec J., Jirotková D., Kyselka J., Petrášková E., Bjelková M., et al. Milk Thistle Oilseed Cake Flour Fractions: A Source of Silymarin and Macronutrients for Gluten-Free Bread. Antioxidants. 2022;11:2022. doi: 10.3390/antiox11102022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Makouie S., Małajowicz J., Gόrska A., Piasecka-Lenartowicz I., Strojny-Cieślak B., Pruchniewski M., Zieniuk B., Bryś J. Compositional Characterization of Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum) Seeds and Press Cake with Emphasis on Press Cake Valorization. Appl. Sci. 2026;16:5265. doi: 10.3390/app16115265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Li X., Zhu H., Wang Y., Zhang X., Yang Z., Yan X., Yu Q. Silymarin and Silybin: Rejuvenating Traditional Remedies with Modern Delivery Strategies. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17:1628. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17121628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Mejri D., Souissi T., Berner D. First Report of Rust Caused by Puccinia carduorum on Italian Thistle in Tunisia. Plant Dis. 2008;92:174. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-1-0174A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mutha R.E., Tatiya A.U., Surana S.J. Flavonoids as Natural Phenolic Compounds and Their Role in Therapeutics: An Overview. Futur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021;7:25. doi: 10.1186/s43094-020-00161-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Carboni A.D., Di Renzo T., Nazzaro S., Marena P., Puppo M.C., Reale A. A Comprehensive Review of Edible Flowers with a Focus on Microbiological, Nutritional, and Potential Health Aspects. Foods. 2025;14:1719. doi: 10.3390/foods14101719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Pérez-García E., Carrascosa C., Raposo A., Zandonadi R.P., Oliveira L., Raheem D., Sanjuán E., Saraiva A. Emerging Non-Thermal and Low-Temperature Food Processing Technologies: Effects on Food Quality, Safety, and Sustainability. Food Biosci. 2026;83:109576. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2026.109576. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Pavela R. Insecticidal Activity of Some Essential Oils against Larvae of Spodoptera Littoralis. Fitoterapia. 2005;76:691–696. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Petrović S., Leskovac A. Biopesticides and Human Health Risks: A Critical Review. Toxics. 2026;14:246. doi: 10.3390/toxics14030246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Keservani R.K., Sharma A.K., Kesharwani R.K., editors. Recent Advances in Drug Delivery Technology. IGI Global; Palmdale, PA, USA: 2017. (Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice). [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Wang X., Zhang Z., Wu S.-C. Health Benefits of Silybum marianum: Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020;68:11644–11664. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.


Articles from Pharmaceuticals are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES