Summary
The actin cytoskeleton is a fundamental and highly conserved structure that functions in diverse cellular processes, yet its direct contribution to organismal aging remains unclear. Here, we systematically interrogated how genetic and pharmacologic perturbations of actin structure and function influence lifespan and various hallmarks of aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Whole-animal and tissue-specific knockdown of actin and key actin-binding proteins (ABPs)—arx-2 (Arp2/3), unc-60 (cofilin), and lev-11 (tropomyosin)—led to premature disruption of filament organization, reduced lifespan, and tissue-specific physiological defects. Actin dysfunction also displayed a more “aged” transcriptome using previously validated transcriptomics clocks, and broadly exacerbated many age-associated phenotypes, including mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid dysregulation, loss of proteostasis, impaired autophagy, and intestinal barrier failure. Pharmacological destabilization with Latrunculin A mirrored genetic knockdowns, while mild stabilization with Jasplakinolide modestly extended lifespan, emphasizing that optimal and finely tuned actin function is critical for healthy aging. Finally, analysis of human genome-wide association data revealed that common ACTB polymorphisms correlate with differences in age-related decline in gait speed, suggesting some links between aging and actin across organisms. Taken together, our results provide a comprehensive and publicly accessible resource that maps, for the first time, how changes in actin integrity correlate with diverse aging phenotypes across tissues. This descriptive framework is intended to enable future mechanistic discovery by offering a deep, unbiased dataset that can be integrated with emerging studies to define how actin dynamics can potentially influence aging.
Keywords: actin, aging, lifespan, healthspan
Graphical abstract

Highlights
-
•
Actin disruption accelerates aging phenotypes across tissues
-
•
Actin disruption induces a premature aging-associated transcriptome
-
•
Drug-mediated actin stabilization extends lifespan while destabilization shortens it
-
•
Human ACTB variants associate with age-related gait speed decline
Cell biology; Bioinformatics; Omics
Introduction
The actin cytoskeleton is a dynamic three-dimensional scaffold of protein filaments and is fundamental to the structure, function, and dynamic adaptability of all eukaryotic cells.1 Its evolutionary conservation demonstrates its critical role in many essential cellular processes in virtually all single- and multi-cellular eukaryotes, including cell division, motility, intracellular transport, and autophagy.2 On a physiological level, actin’s integrity and dynamics are required for muscle contraction, neuronal plasticity, immune responses, tissue development, gut barrier integrity, and many other critical processes in multicellular organisms. Given its central role in these essential processes, the precise regulation of actin dynamics is critical for organismal health, and its dysregulation is found in many human pathologies, including in age-related diseases such as neurodegeneration, cancer, and muscle myopathies.2 However, the contribution of the actin cytoskeleton in general aging pathology is only beginning to be understood.
Despite being synthesized by polymers of only a handful of proteins encoded by genes with >90% sequence identity (e.g., ACT-1 through ACT-5 in C. elegans; and α, β, and γ in mammals), the actin cytoskeleton can create diverse structures with vastly different functions within each cell type and tissue. Actin’s functional versatility is orchestrated by actin-binding proteins (ABPs) that coordinate assembly, disassembly, and organization of actin multi-protein complexes into higher-order structures capable of driving distinct biological processes.3 Key among these regulators are the Arp2/3 complex, which nucleates branched actin networks that drive cell protrusion4; cofilin, which severs filaments and promotes actin turnover5; formins, which nucleate and elongate linear actin filaments6; and tropomyosin/troponin, which stabilizes filaments and is crucial for muscle function.7 The interplay between these ABPs allows cells to tailor the form and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton for diverse and specific functions, such as muscle contractions, tight junctions in the intestine, and wound healing. However, the mechanisms that preserve cytoskeletal integrity and function throughout an organism’s lifespan, particularly under stress and during aging, are not fully understood.2
Research in model organisms has provided significant insights into the relationship between actin homeostasis, aging, and longevity. In C. elegans, aging is associated with a progressive decline of actin filament stability.8 Interventions that preserve actin integrity, such as overexpression of the genes encoding the heat shock transcription factor HSF-1 or the bromodomain protein BET-1, have been shown to extend lifespan and healthspan, providing a direct link between actin maintenance and organismal aging. HSF-1, for instance, can upregulate actin-regulatory genes such as pat-10, contributing to its pro-longevity effects.9 Similarly, BET-1 transcriptionally upregulates actin-regulatory genes, thereby increasing actin stability and delaying age-associated disorganization of actin, contributing to lifespan extension.2 In Drosophila melanogaster, one study showed that an age-associated accumulation of filamentous actin (F-actin) in the brain impairs autophagy, which leads to neuronal dysfunction and cognitive decline.10 Reducing this F-actin accumulation by targeting the formin-like gene Fhos can restore autophagy and extend healthspan.10
In vertebrate systems, the consequences of actin dysfunction are most well understood in the context of neurodegeneration, muscle dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and cancer. The actin cytoskeleton is required for neuronal development, the morphogenesis of dendritic spines, and the synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory.11,12,13 Abnormal cofilin activity and the formation of cofilin-actin rods are implicated in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.14 In the immune system, dynamic actin rearrangements drive immune cell migration, phagocytosis, and the formation of the immunological synapse necessary for T cell activation and cytotoxic responses.15,16 Cardiovascular health also relies on actin integrity for endothelial barrier function and vascular smooth muscle contractility, with regulators such as profilin-1 implicated in hypertension and atherosclerosis.17,18,19,20,21 Moreover, the actin cytoskeleton is involved in cancer progression, driving cell motility, invasion, and immune evasion.22,23,24 Importantly, aging is a major risk factor for all these actin-related diseases, providing further evidence of the association between actin and aging.
Although many studies to date correlate and associate alterations of actin with effects on aging, there is a lack of direct studies that display targeted disruption or protection of actin and their impact on aging. Therefore, to measure the impact of actin dysfunction on the aging process, we targeted the actin cytoskeleton using various genetic and chemical methods in C. elegans. First, we induced actin dysfunction using whole animal and tissue-specific RNA interference (RNAi): 1) non-lethal knockdown of the actin gene itself (10% act-1 RNAi, which targets all five isoforms of actin and does not cause developmental arrest as previously described)2 for global actin dysfunction, and more targeted approaches of 2) arx-2 knockdown to target Arp2/3 and inhibit growth of branched actin networks 3) lev-11 knockdown to target tropomyosin and destabilize actin filaments, and 4) unc-60 knockdown to target cofilin and inhibit severing of actin filaments and actin seeding. To complement these genetic manipulations, we used two global actin-targeting marine-derived chemical probes: 1) latrunculin A (LatA) that severs and depolymerizes actin filaments, while also sequestering available actin monomers and 2) jasplakinolide (Jasp), which promotes actin filament polymerization and stabilization. This work is intended as a foundational resource rather than providing mechanistic models: we performed an expansive and unbiased study analyzing how altering actin in various ways impacts numerous metrics of cellular, transcriptomic, and physiological health during aging, including studying tissue-specific effects of actin alterations on aging.
Results
Systemic RNAi of actin regulatory genes induces premature aging phenotypes
Several studies have shown that actin cytoskeletal organization and integrity decline during normal aging.2,8,9 To determine whether changes to actin are associated with aging pathology or just a consequence of aging, we sought to determine the impact of actin dysfunction on metrics of aging. We first utilized RNAi to knockdown genes encoding actin (act-1, which targets all 5 isoforms of actin,2 and will be referred to simply as “actin knockdown” for simplicity) and ABPs (arx-2, lev-11, unc-60). We first assessed RNAi knockdown efficiency by RT-qPCR and observed that lev-11 RNAi resulted in a significant reduction in transcript levels. In contrast, act-1, arx-2, and unc-60 RNAi conditions did not exhibit a detectable decrease in mRNA abundance (Figure S1A). One potential explanation for this discrepancy is the contribution of RNA derived from ingested dsRNA expressed by the bacterial source of the RNAi construct, which can confound total RNA measurements in whole-worm preparations.
Therefore, to overcome this caveat, we performed validation of act-1 and unc-60 knockdown at the protein level using western blotting, as conventional actin antibodies are cross-reactive in C. elegans and a previous study has synthesized and validated antibodies for two isoforms of UNC-60, UNC-60A and UNC-60B.25 We found that act-1 RNAi (diluted to 10% with empty vector, EV, in this study to avoid developmental defects)2 resulted in an approximately 50% reduction in protein levels, while unc-60 RNAi led to a >80% decrease relative to control animals (Figures S1B–S1D). However, we could not validate protein knockdown of arx-2 due to the lack of validated antibodies in C. elegans. Therefore, to complement our qPCR data, we leveraged our RNA-seq dataset to quantify differences in transcript reads between control and RNAi-treated animals. Importantly, we restricted this analysis to regions of each gene that do not overlap with the RNAi-targeting sequence, thereby minimizing confounding from exogenous dsRNA fragments from bacteria. Consistent with our RT-qPCR results, we observed a decrease in lev-11 reads, whereas unc-60 showed no significant change and arx-2 exhibited a modest increase in read counts. (Figure S1E). The changes in arx-2 transcript levels may reflect its high expression in the germline, a tissue known to exhibit partial resistance to feeding RNAi, thereby masking depletion in somatic compartments. Consistent with this interpretation, published work has demonstrated successful knockdown of arx-2 using the same RNAi construct used in this study when delivered via direct germline injection, indicating that the construct itself is effective under conditions that bypass tissue-specific RNAi limitations.26 Moreover, in C. elegans small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) can be amplified from target mRNAs by RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs).27 This amplification can sustain or even increase detectable transcript fragments despite effective gene silencing at the translational level, thus limiting our ability to detect arx-2 knockdown efficiency.
Therefore, to circumvent these limitations of RT-qPCR validation, we opted to confirm that these genetic perturbations with RNAi also lead to direct disruption of actin filaments during aging, as is expected for perturbing actin regulatory components. Here, we used LifeAct:mRuby-expressing animals to visualize actin structure and organization in young, mid-age, and old animals in a tissue-specific manner. LifeAct is a 17-amino-acid fragment of a yeast ABP, Abp140p, which binds directly to actin filaments and is often used to visualize actin filaments in live cells/organisms by fusing it to a fluorescent protein.28 We utilized previously developed stable transgenic lines expressing LifeAct:mRuby in various tissues.2
Actin filaments in muscle cells are organized in linear striations parallel to muscle fibers, which become disorganized at approximately day 9 of adulthood, and display fragmentation and severe disruption at late age (∼day 13–15). In the intestine, actin is visualized as dense cables that wrap around intestinal cells to make up the gut barrier, which begin to display disorganization and mislocalization at mid-age at approximately day 5 of adulthood. In the hypodermis, actin filaments are sparsely localized throughout the hypodermis at day 1 and become organized into star-like structures that resemble endocytic vesicles coated with actin around day 3–4, which reduce in number and are eventually completely lost during the aging process.8 Upon RNAi knockdown of actin and ABPs, we saw premature onset of age-related actin disorganization as expected (Figure 1). Interestingly, we saw that RNAi knockdown of ABPs had variable effects in each tissue. For example, unc-60 knockdown resulted in mislocalization and disorganization of actin in the intestine even at day 1 of adulthood, whereas arx-2 and lev-11 knockdown displayed similar timing in actin disorganization (day 5 to day 9) compared to wild-type, but displayed much stronger phenotypes with age (Figures 1A and 1B). In contrast, actin knockdown resulted in almost no observable actin filaments in the intestine at day 9. Similarly, actin knockdown resulted in no observable actin filaments in the hypodermis, and arx-2 knockdown phenocopied these effects. However, lev-11 and unc-60 knockdown resulted in only a minor reduction in the observable amount of actin structures in the hypodermis (Figures 1C and 1D). In the muscle, act-1, arx-2, and lev-11 resulted in premature disorganization of actin structures, while unc-60 had only mild effects (Figures 1E and 1F). Altogether, these data show that RNAi knockdown of actin or ABPs reliably induces premature disruption of actin structures during aging, though at variable levels in each tissue.
Figure 1.

Knockdown of ABPs decreases lifespan and leads to accelerated actin disruption
(A–F) Representative fluorescent images of adult animals expressing LifeAct:mRuby from an intestine-specific (gly-19p) (A), hypodermis-specific (col-19p) (C), or muscle-specific (myo-3p) promoter (E) and quantification of (B) intestinal, (D) hypodermal, and (F) muscle actin filament disruption. Animals were grown on empty vector (EV), a 1:9 or 2:8 mix of act-1:EV (10% act-1 or 20% act-1), arx-2, lev-11, or unc-60 RNAi from hatching. All animals were imaged on days 1, 5, and 9 of adulthood, and images were captured on a Leica Stellaris (intestine) or Leica Thunder Imager (hypodermis, muscle). Scale bars, 10 μm.
(G) Thrashing assays were performed on N2 animals grown on EV (blue), a 10:90 mix of act-1:EV (10% act-1, yellow), arx-2 (red), lev-11 (green), and unc-60 (purple) RNAi from hatching on days 1, 5, and 9 of adulthood. Recordings were performed in M9 solution, and thrashing was manually scored over a 10 s recording. Data are representative of three independent trials. N = 30–33 worms per condition. Each dot represents a single animal, and lines represent median and interquartile range. ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001 calculated using non-parametric Mann-Whitney testing.
(H) Brood assays were performed on wildtype N2 animals grown on empty vector (EV, blue), a 10:90 ratio of act-1/EV (10% act-1, yellow), arx-2 (red), lev-11 (green), or unc-60 (purple) RNAi from hatching. Brood assays were measured as any viable animal that hatched from eggs laid within 48 h ∗∗∗∗ = p < 0.0001, calculated using non-parametric Mann-Whitney testing.
To determine the physiological and functional consequences of actin, we measured the effects of actin and ABP knockdown on lifespan and healthspan metrics. Since actin in the muscle is required for muscle contractions and animal motility,29 we performed a liquid thrashing assay to measure maximal animal motility during aging.30 We found that knockdown of actin or ABPs results in a significant decrease in motility (thrashing) at older ages (Figure 1G), suggesting that muscle function is significantly perturbed in all conditions. Strikingly, knockdown of actin and arx-2 resulted in an apparent increase in thrash count at day 1, which collapses during aging. We note that thrashing rate alone does not distinguish between increased locomotor capacity and altered movement kinematics (e.g., reduced arc length), and we therefore interpret these data as a comparative measure of overall locomotor behavior under identical experimental conditions rather than as evidence of improved motility. We found that perturbations of actin resulted in severely reduced brood size (Figure 1H), which is consistent with actin function being required for proper cell division both during germline formation and throughout animal development.31,32,33,34,35 Importantly, these experiments were performed in unmated hermaphrodites, and therefore we cannot distinguish between sperm- and oocyte-specific contributions to this phenotype. Finally, RNAi knockdown of actin or any ABP led to a significant decline in lifespan (Figures 2A and 2B). Since our lifespan assays were initiated at the L1 stage, developmental defects may have contributed to the observed phenotypes. To address this possibility, we performed lifespan assays in animals exposed to RNAi beginning on day 1 of adulthood. Under these conditions, only arx-2 knockdown produced a consistent and statistically significant reduction in lifespan (Figures S1F and S1G). These data suggest that with the exception of Arp2/3 dysfunction, perturbations in actin and ABPs impact longevity primarily through effects on or during development.
Figure 2.

Whole-organism RNAi of actin regulatory genes induces an aged transcriptome
(A) Lifespans of wild-type N2 animals grown on empty vector (EV, blue) or varying ratios of act-1:EV RNAi: 1:9 (yellow), or 2:8 (black) from hatching.
(B–F) Lifespans of wild-type N2 animals grown on empty vector (EV, blue), arx-2 (red), lev-11 (green), or unc-60 (purple) RNAi from hatch. See Table S1 for lifespan statistics. Volcano plots of genome-wide changes in gene expression upon RNAi knockdown of (C) act-1, (D) arx-2, (E) lev-11, and (F) unc-60. Red dots indicate significantly differentially expressed genes with p-value ≤0.01 and log2FC>|2|. Blue dots indicate significantly differentially expressed genes with p-value ≤0.01 and log2FC<|2|. Green dots indicate significantly differentially expressed genes with p-value ≥0.01. See Table S3 for a list of differentially expressed genes and expression values.
(G) Predicted Age of day 1 adult worms, using the BiTAge algorithm. ∗∗ = p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001 calculated using paired t test. See Table S4 for the BiTAge output.
(H) An UpSet plot showing the number of all differentially expressed genes (p-value ≤0.01) unique to and shared between all tested conditions.
Whole-organism RNAi of actin regulatory genes induces an aged transcriptome
The actin cytoskeleton plays an important role in several processes that affect gene expression, including chromatin remodeling and transcription.36,37 Therefore, to determine whether actin dysfunction drives global changes to gene expression, we first performed transcriptomics analysis using whole-animal, bulk RNA-seq. RNA-seq libraries showed Phred scores >35 with consistent mapping and clustering across replicates, indicating high-quality data (Figures S2A–S2D). Knockdown of arx-2 and unc-60 led to sizable changes in gene expression, while much milder changes were seen in actin and lev-11 knockdown (Figures 2C–2F). It is possible that this is due to the ubiquitous expression—and therefore general requirement—of arx-2 and unc-60 throughout the entire organism. In contrast, lev-11 is primarily expressed in the muscle, thus likely having a smaller impact on the bulk transcriptome. Finally, actin knockdown is lethal and thus needs to be titrated to a small dosage (10–20% knockdowns used in this study), and thus likely has a much milder effect. Consistent with actin dysfunction driving premature aging, we also observed acceleration of transcriptomic age, measured using the BiT age algorithm,38 upon knockdown of arx-2 and unc-60, which was not seen in actin or lev-11 knockdowns (Figure 2G). To determine whether knockdown of a single actin regulatory gene results in a compensatory upregulation of other actin regulatory genes, we next profiled gene expression changes of major actin regulatory genes. To our surprise, most actin regulatory genes were either downregulated or unaffected in each of our knockdown conditions (Figure S2E).
Next, we performed an upset plot analysis to determine whether a common transcriptomic signature exists in response to actin dysfunction. To our surprise, most knockdown conditions exhibited highly variable changes to overall transcriptomes, with only arx-2 and unc-60 knockdown showing any significant overlap (Figure 2H). The comparison between the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of arx-2 and unc-60 knockdown conditions showed very high concordance between the groups, with almost all DEGs being shared (Figures S3A and S3B). Although arx-2 and unc-60 also show significant concordance with lev-11, the number of genes overlapping between these groups is relatively small (<200) compared to the overlap between arx-2 and unc-60 (>1500), which is consistent with these two genes being ubiquitously expressed and likely being required for all tissues, whereas lev-11 is a muscle-enriched tropomyosin (Figures S3C, S3D, S3F, and S3H). Further Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that a shared general response to actin disruption is clear, with changes related to immune and defense response (Figure S4), highlighting that at least one signature of genes is shared across all conditions. Consistent with this hypothesis, GO analysis of overlapping upregulated DEGs between arx-2 and unc-60 is primarily immune-response-related genes (Figure S3E). In contrast, GO analysis of commonly downregulated DEGs between arx-2 and unc-60 revealed changes primarily related to metabolic processes (Figure S3G). Since lev-11 knockdown displayed the most unique gene expression changes, we performed GO analysis of unique DEGs and found, as expected, that a proportion of gene expression changes are related to muscle function (Figure S3I). Interestingly, neuropeptide signaling was the most enriched GO term, although this is consistent with a role for neuronal signaling across neuromuscular junctions to coordinate proper muscle contraction.39,40
Systemic RNAi of actin regulatory genes exacerbates biological hallmarks of aging
Since we saw changes to whole animal health and longevity upon disruption of the cytoskeleton, we next sought to determine the impact of actin disruption on cellular metrics of health and aging. Several biological hallmarks of aging41 are routinely studied in C. elegans, including mitochondrial dysfunction, nutrient dysregulation, dysbiosis, proteostasis, and autophagy. In addition, the actin cytoskeleton has been shown to be involved in the regulation of many of these pathways, although the direct relevance of actin to these cellular mechanisms and their impact on aging have not been extensively studied, with few exceptions. Therefore, we directly measure how actin dysfunction impacts many age-associated cellular processes.
Mitochondrial function deteriorates during aging in almost all organisms, including C. elegans, mice, and humans.41,42,43,44 Actin plays crucial roles in the regulation of mitochondrial health, including in mitochondrial fission, fusion, motility, and mitochondrial damage response.45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53 Therefore, we visualized effects of actin and ABP knockdown on mitochondrial morphology, using a matrix-localized green fluorescent protein (MLS::GFP) in the intestine, hypodermis, and muscle.54 Actin disruption resulted in dramatic changes in mitochondrial morphology in the intestine, muscle, and hypodermis (Figures 3A–3F). Our qualitative mitochondrial images show that knockdown of actin, arx-2, and unc-60 resulted in increased fragmentation of mitochondria during aging, while lev-11 knockdown resulted in a more hyperfused network.
Figure 3.

Actin disruption leads to mitochondrial dysfunction
Animals expressing vha-6p::MLS::GFP (A), col-19p::MLS::GFP (B), and myo-3p::MLS::GFP (C), were grown on empty vector (EV), a 1:9 mix of act-1/EV (10% act-1), arx-2, lev-11, or unc-60 RNAi from hatching and imaged during days 1, 5, and 9 of adulthood.
(D–F) All quantification was performed using mitoMAPR. Object length and objects/mitochondrial footprint are shown here as example measurements, and all mitochondrial measurements measured by mitoMAPR are available in Table S5. In mitoMAPR-based quantification, the “objects/mitochondrial footprint” refers to the total number of objects detected as mitochondria and the area occupied by all the mitochondria within a defined region of interest.
(G) Seahorse analysis of mitochondrial respiration/OCR (pmol/min) of day 1 wild-type N2 animals grown on empty vector (EV, blue), 1:9 ratio of act-1:EV RNAi (yellow), arx-2 (red), lev-11 (green), or unc-60 (purple) RNAi from hatch. 50 mM sodium azide was applied to measure non-mitochondrial respiration. Scale bars, 10 μm.
To quantify mitochondrial morphology, we utilized mitoMAPR, which provides automated quantification of mitochondrial length, junction points, object number, and mitochondrial footprint (total number of objects detected and total area occupied by mitochondria within a defined region).55 While mitoMAPR can robustly quantify mitochondrial length in an unbiased manner, there are some limitations with the skeletonization of images required for quantification, particularly when major changes to fusion and fission occur.56,57 Therefore, our qualitative data did not always match quantitative analyses with mitoMAPR, except in some conditions (Figures 3D–3F).
Therefore, as a more direct measure to determine whether our observed qualitative changes in morphology reflected quantifiable, functional changes in mitochondria, we measured mitochondrial respiration rates in whole animals using a previously validated Seahorse assay.58 Consistent with changes to mitochondrial morphology, disruption of actin resulted in a significant reduction in oxygen consumption rate (OCR), suggesting that the changes in mitochondrial morphology had a direct impact on mitochondrial function (Figure 3G). Interestingly, lev-11 knockdown had the most profound effect on OCR. However, since lev-11 knockdown results in a significant defect in muscle function even at day 1 (Figure 1G), it is possible that lev-11 knockdown also disrupts non-mitochondrial respiration, as this is primarily driven by muscle function in C. elegans,58,59,60 and lev-11 knockdown animals exhibit severely dysfunctional muscle function. Indeed, we saw that even with sodium azide treatment that eliminates mitochondrial respiration, lev-11 knockdown still reduced OCR, suggesting that lev-11 knockdown reduces both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial respiration.
Given that mitochondria are central hubs for lipid synthesis and β-oxidation, and their disruption can impair lipid homeostasis, we next hypothesized that cytoskeletal defects may indirectly contribute to lipid dysregulation. Therefore, we used a lipid droplet marker DHS-3:GFP to measure lipid droplet levels in the intestine under actin disruption throughout the lifespan.61,62 Interestingly, knockdown of the ABPs arx-2, unc-60, and lev-11 all resulted in a decrease in lipid droplet levels at mid and old age (Figures 4A and 4B). While all conditions show a decreasing trend in DHS-3:GFP signal, unc-60 and lev-11 show the most profound statistically significant decrease in signal. However, since DHS-3:GFP can exist both within lipid droplets and within the cytoplasm, we completed high-resolution confocal microscopy of the DHS-3:GFP marker to investigate specific changes in lipid droplet number, size, and morphology (Figure 4C). Interestingly, there is no distinct decrease in the number of lipid droplets present in animals with ABP knockdown, but there is a trend toward an increase, with only day 1 animals reaching statistical significance (Figure 4D). However, the size of lipid droplets present is drastically decreased throughout the aging process under actin disruption (Figure 4E). Low magnification imaging showed a decrease in signal, likely due to the decrease in the size of lipid droplets. Altogether, our data suggest that actin and ABP knockdown results in dysregulation of lipid homeostasis, which is further supported by our RNAseq analysis, where we found differential expression of many lipid regulatory genes (Figure 4F).
Figure 4.

Actin disruption reduces lipid droplet size during aging
(A) Representative fluorescent stereomicroscope images of lipid droplets by visualization of DHS-3:GFP. Animals were grown on empty vector (EV), a 1:9 mix of act-1/EV (10% act-1), arx-2, lev-11, or unc-60 RNAi from hatching. All animals were imaged on days 1, 5, and 9 of adulthood.
(B) Quantification of GFP signal as measured by integrated intensity, based on 3 biological replicates of ≥12 animals per experimental condition. Two-way ANOVA was used for each time point.
(C) Representative fluorescent confocal images of lipid droplets by visualization of DHS-3::GFP. Animals were grown on the empty vector (EV), a 1:9 mix of act-1/EV (10% act-1), arx-2, lev-11, or unc-60 RNAi from hatching. All animals were imaged on days 1, 5, and 9 of adulthood. Scale bars, 10 μm.
(D) Quantification of the number of lipids per animal, based on 3 biological replicates of ≥4 animals per experimental condition. Two-way ANOVA was used for each time point.
(E) Quantification of the average lipid size (in pixels) in each animal, based on 3 biological replicates of ≥ 4 animals per experimental condition. Two-way ANOVA was used for each time point.
(F) Heat map of gene expression changes involved in lipid homeostasis (GO:0055088). See Table S6 for expression details of the genes used in the heatmap.
Another central cellular function that declines with age but is necessary for organismal health is protein homeostasis, or proteostasis. Specifically, degradation of damaged or misfolded proteins is key to maintaining proteostasis. Actin has recently been implicated as a key player in proteostasis maintenance, specifically through proteasome regulation.63 Importantly, actin disruption can exacerbate aggregation of proteins in neurons to drive neurodegenerative pathology. Therefore, we visualized the human aggregation-prone protein, polyQ40 fused to yellow fluorescent protein, expressed specifically in neurons.64,65 Here, we used the pan-neuronal Q40 strain, which has a very clear phenotype under neurotoxic conditions where neuronal aggregate-like foci are jettisoned into the body cavity.66 Perturbing actin by knocking down unc-60 had the most profound, statistically significant increase in the number and size of foci throughout the aging process (Figures 5A–5C). Interestingly, lev-11 knockdown had a very similar increase in the number and size of neuronal foci, despite lev-11 being primarily expressed in the muscle (Figures 5A–5C), suggesting that either disruption of muscle health can indirectly impact neurons, or there exists a muscle-to-neuron signaling axis that can affect protein homeostasis pathways. This is consistent with our transcriptomics data showing that lev-11 knockdown resulted in differential expression of neuropeptide-related genes (Figure S3I). Interestingly, arx-2 knockdown did not show consistent changes in polyQ levels (Figure 5). However, due to the severely shortened lifespan of arx-2 knockdown animals, it is possible that survivorship bias may especially confound mid-life and late-life results. To determine whether survivorship bias contributed to the lack of consistent changes, we quantified polyQ puncta at more aging time points. Interestingly, we find that by day 3 of adulthood, the number of protein foci was lower in arx-2 knockdown animals, suggesting that perturbations in the Arp2/3 complex may impact proteostasis in an entirely different way compared to other methods of disrupting actin (Figures 5D and 5E). Notably, the pan-neuronal Q40 strain is a systemic RNAi background in which neurons are largely resistant to RNAi, suggesting that the observed effects on proteostasis can be due to a combination of mild knockdown in neurons and/or a cell-nonautonomous effect.
Figure 5.

Actin disruption leads to dysregulation of proteostasis
(A–C) Representative stereomicroscope images of protein aggregation in animals expressing neuronal polyglutamine repeats (rgef-1p::polyQ40::YFP) at days 1, 5, and 9 of adulthood. Animals were grown on empty vector (EV), a 1:9 mix of act-1/EV (10% act-1), arx-2, lev-11, or unc-60 RNAi from hatching. Quantification of the (B) total number of aggregates and (C) average aggregate size was based on 3 biological replicates of ≥12 animals per experimental condition. Two-way ANOVA was used for each time point.
(D) Representative stereomicroscope images of protein aggregation in animals expressing neuronal polyglutamine repeats (rgef-1p::polyQ40::YFP) at days 1, 3, and 5 of adulthood. Animals were grown on empty vector (EV) or arx-2 RNAi from hatching.
(E) Quantification of the total number of foci based on 3 biological replicates of ≥12 animals per experimental condition. Statistical significance was determined by Welch’s t test (GraphPad). ∗∗∗p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
One major pathway for clearance of protein aggregates is through autophagy. In addition, dynamic remodeling of actin is essential for multiple stages of the autophagy process, including autophagosome formation, cargo sequestration, and vesicle trafficking.67,68 Actin filaments not only provide the mechanical force and scaffolding necessary for membrane deformation but also coordinate the spatial organization of autophagic machinery.69,70 Therefore, to investigate the impact of actin dysfunction on autophagy, we used C. elegans expressing a GFP-tagged LGG-1/Atg8 reporter to visualize autophagosomes.71 We found that actin disruption led to significant changes in the number of autophagosomes in a tissue-specific manner. In the intestine, actin, unc-60, and arx-2 knockdown all led to a significant increase in the number of LGG-1 puncta, while lev-11 knockdown led to a surprising decrease in puncta (Figures 6A and 6B). Interestingly, we saw the opposite results in the muscle cells, where actin, unc-60, and arx-2 knockdown all led to a significant decrease in the number of LGG-1 puncta, while lev-11 knockdown had no significant effect (Figures 6B and 6D). Surprisingly, none of the knockdown conditions had any effect on LGG-1 puncta in hypodermal seam cells (Figures 6B and 6C). These tissue-specific and bidirectional changes in LGG-1 puncta suggest that actin disruption does not uniformly enhance or suppress autophagosome formation but instead may differentially affect either the initiation or turnover of autophagosomes depending on cellular context. Since changes in autophagosome number alone do not distinguish between increased autophagic flux and impaired degradation, we next measured SQST-1/p62 levels. The p62/SQST-1 receptor protein is required for autophagic turnover of ubiquitinated protein aggregates and is itself degraded by autophagy.73 SQST-1:GFP is normally expressed in punctate structures in the head region, but accumulates in intestinal and embryonic tissues when autophagy is impaired.74,75 RNAi knockdown of actin or any ABP resulted in an observable increase in SQST-1:GFP puncta compared to wildtype animals, although not to the extent observed in the autophagy-deficient atg-3(b412) mutant, which disrupts autophagosome formation (Figures 6E and 6G). Together, the changes in LGG-1/Atg8 puncta and the accumulation of SQST-1/p62 are consistent with impaired autophagy, albeit to a lesser extent than direct genetic targeting of the autophagic machinery. We further examined changes in expression of autophagy genes in our bulk sequencing dataset and found that knockdown of arx-2 and unc-60 led to an upregulation, while knockdown of act-1 and lev-11 led to a decrease in expression (Figure 6F). These data suggest that similar to changes in actin organization, RNAi knockdown of different actin regulatory components can have differential effects on autophagy in each tissue.
Figure 6.

Actin disruption leads to tissue-specific dysregulation of autophagy
(B) Representative images of GFP::LGG-1 puncta in intestinal, hypodermal seam, and muscle cells of control and RNAi-treated animals targeting act-1, arx-2, unc-60, or lev-11 from hatch. Violin plots show quantification of GFP::LGG-1 puncta in (A) intestinal cells (CTRL, N = 63–107; act-1, N = 113; arx-2, N = 63; unc-60, N = 71; lev-11, N = 74 cells), (C) hypodermal seam cells (CTRL, N = 84–87; act-1, N = 87; arx-2, N = 51; unc-60, N = 45; lev-11, N = 70 cells) and (D) muscle cells (CTRL, N = 84–88; act-1, N = 88; arx-2, N = 51; unc-60, N = 37; lev-11, N = 57 cells. Data are pooled from three to five independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Welch’s two-tailed t test (GraphPad). ns: p > 0.05, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 10 μm. (E) Representative stereomicroscope images of day 1 adult transgenic animals over-expressing SQST-1:GFP grown on empty vector (ev), 10% act-1, arx-2, lev-11, or unc-60 RNAi from hatch, along with an ATG8/atg-3(b412) mutant grown on ev. (F) Heatmap of the changes in expression (p < 0.05) of genes involved in autophagy (directly annotated as “autophagy” in AmiGO2).72 See Table S6 for expression details of the genes used in the heatmap. (G) Quantification of the total number of GFP foci based on 3 biological replicates of ≥12 animals per experimental condition. Statistical significance was determined by Two-way ANOVA (GraphPad).
Lastly, one of the core causes and predictors of mortality across species is intestinal barrier dysfunction.76 In C. elegans, the intestinal lining contains actin-mediated tight junctions, which break down during aging, leading to bacterial colonization of the intestine.77 Moreover, in vitro and in vivo studies in mammalian intestinal epithelial cells have demonstrated that β-cytoplasmic actin is required for proper barrier function, where intestinal epithelial-specific deletion of β-cytoplasmic actin in mice results in increased gut permeability and exacerbates experimental colitis.78,79 Our previous work has established that stabilizing actin filaments by bet-1 overexpression protects C. elegans from bacterial colonization at later ages.2 Moreover, our bulk RNA-seq revealed that there is a large transcriptomic response of immunity-related genes in all our knockdown conditions (Figure S4). Therefore, we first measured whether direct perturbations of actin impact gut barrier integrity. Utilizing a well-established fluorescent bacteria colonization assay, we found that RNAi knockdown of actin or ABPs did not significantly alter gut colonization at any age (Figures S5A and S5B). Therefore, to more directly measure gut barrier integrity, we next visualized the localization of the gut barrier protein, DLG-1:GFP. In C. elegans, disks large homolog 1 (DLG-1) localizes to actin-tethered adherens junctions, where actin anchors these junctional proteins to facilitate barrier integrity of the intestine, and its localization can be used as a qualitative measure of gut barrier integrity.77 We observed age-dependent alterations in DLG-1 localization, which became more pronounced in older animals. Notably, knockdown of actin or ABPs further exacerbated this mislocalization (Figure S5C).
Cell-type-specific effects of actin dysfunction
We found that RNAi knockdown of ABPs had variable effects in each tissue tested (Figure 1), which raised an intriguing hypothesis that each individual cell type has a different requirement for actin regulatory proteins. This is unsurprising considering the vastly different structures and functions of actin in each tissue. To further test the cell-type-specific requirements of actin and ABPs, we utilized cell-type-specific RNAi strains. These strains utilize a mutation in rde-1, the gene encoding the Argonaute machinery required to process RNAi, followed by cell-type-specific rde-1 rescue.80 For neuron-specificity, we utilized a C. elegans strain with a mutation in the sid-1 gene, encoding the double-stranded RNA importer also required for RNAi function, followed by neuron-specific sid-1 rescue.81 While whole-animal RNAi knockdown of actin is lethal and thus requires dilution of the RNAi to 10%,2 cell-type specific actin knockdown was not lethal (Figure S6), and thus we tested both 10% and 100% actin RNAi for our cell-type specific studies. As expected, actin and ABP knockdown had variable effects when performed in each specific cell type (Figure 7).
Figure 7.

Actin disruption presents tissue-specific effects on lifespan
Lifespans of animals with functional RNAi only in the (A) hypodermis, (B) intestine, (C) muscle, and (D) neurons grown on empty vector (EV, blue), 100% act-1 (black), 10% act-1 (yellow), arx-2 (red), lev-11 (green), or unc-60 (purple) RNAi from hatching. (E) Average lifespan change (% MLS change) in animals with tissue-specific functional RNAi after growth on RNAi from L1 compared to control. Horizontal values at the top represent the average percent change in median lifespan for each condition. Error bars indicate the SD ∗ = p < 0.05, ∗∗ = p < 0.01 by a two-sided, one-sample t test compared to a hypothetical mean of 0.
For example, lev-11 knockdown had the most dramatic effect in reducing lifespan in the muscle, with a much milder effect on the intestine and no effect in the hypodermis or neurons (Figure 7). This is consistent with lev-11 being a muscle-enriched gene and its knockdown having the most dramatic effect on muscle actin morphology (Figures 1E and 1F). unc-60 knockdown had the most dramatic effect in reducing lifespan in the intestine, also consistent with our imaging data, which showed that unc-60 knockdown resulted in disorganization of actin in the intestine as early as day 1 of adulthood (Figures 1A and 1B). unc-60 knockdown also exhibited a mild decrease in lifespan in the muscle and neuron but had very little effect in the hypodermis. Finally, arx-2 knockdown was the only knockdown that consistently reduced lifespan in all tissues.
To better understand the potential genetic mechanisms underlying cell-type-specific effects of ABP knockdowns on health and longevity, we conducted an exploratory single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) of systemic ABP knockdowns using a previously validated protocol,82 followed by deconvolution of our bulk RNA-seq dataset.83 Our snRNA-seq was able to collect thousands of nuclei for the largest tissues of the animals in most conditions, with the exception of unc-60 (Figure S7A). It is possible that the low number of nuclei in the unc-60 knockdown condition is due to the impact of cofilin on nuclear architecture or cytokinesis.84,85 Moreover, we collected snRNA-seq data from germline-deficient mutants to reduce germline overrepresentation and improve resolution of somatic cell types. As a consequence, the total number of recovered nuclei per animal is reduced, given that the germline constitutes the predominant source of nuclei in wild-type animals. Importantly, our nuclei showed robust cell clustering for each condition (Figures S7B–S7E). Across conditions, we sequenced between approximately 2,000 and 8,000 nuclei per sample (Figure S7A). Nuclei were isolated from pooled populations of animals collected across multiple batches; consequently, the dataset captures averaged transcriptional states across many biological individuals rather than a single organism, which reduces individual-level stochastic variation. This pooled design is consistent with published C. elegans snRNA-seq studies using the same protocol.82,86
Although previous studies have shown that technical variability across C. elegans snRNA-seq datasets is relatively small due to the contribution of hundreds of animals to data collection in a single sequencing run,82 to ensure that our data were not skewed due to conducting only a single replicate, we utilized our snRNA-seq dataset to perform deconvolution of our bulk RNA-sequencing dataset with multiple biological replicates, rather than directly analyzing our snRNA-seq dataset. To first gain a holistic, zoomed-out view of the tissue-specific effects of systemic ABP knockdowns, we compared the transcriptional responses across tissues and targets. Spearman correlation analysis revealed some unexpected similarities and differences. Notably, muscle lev-11 and arx-2 knockdown and hypodermal unc-60 and arx-2 knockdown displayed a surprisingly high degree of similarity, suggesting that these tissues may share unexpected common mechanisms for maintaining cytoskeletal integrity or responding to actin dysfunction. In contrast, lev-11 knockdown produced transcriptional profiles in the intestine that were distinct from those across all other tissues (Figure S8A). Interestingly, we found that the intestine was responsible for the largest transcriptional signature for each condition, potentially because it is more sensitive to RNAi and/or more reactive to actin disruption87 (Figure S8B).
As an exploratory study, we investigated the degree of changes in gene expression of those commonly associated with longevity, including mitochondrial organization, lipid regulation, immune response, protein translation, autophagy, and general actin-related gene expression. As expected, many genes related to mitochondrial organization are downregulated in the hypodermis, intestine, and muscle upon ABP knockdown (Figure S8C), which is consistent with mitochondrial fragmentation and loss of function in these conditions. Interestingly, the hypodermis displays a similar number of significantly up- and downregulated genes under ABP knockdown, whereas neurons display primarily an upregulation of genes. We only saw upregulation of a handful of genes associated with actin function upon ABP knockdown (Figure S8D), suggesting that actin disruption does not activate a general compensatory upregulation of actin-associated genes. Similarly, only mild changes in lipid-related genes were seen across tissues (Figure S8E). We found that genes involved in immune response were differentially expressed in all tissues, with intestine showing the largest changes and muscle the least (Figure S9A). This was unsurprising considering that changes in immune response genes were one of the only shared responses across all conditions in our bulk datasets and all actin and ABP knockdown conditions affect gut barrier integrity. It has been reported that C. elegans exposed to stress can downregulate translation in response; however, we did not find major changes in protein translation-related genes in the intestine or in any other cell type88,89,90 (Figure S9B). We also see comparable changes in expression of autophagy-related genes across tissues (Figure S9C).
Since the intestine had the largest number of DEGs of any tissue upon ABP knockdown, we next performed GO analysis to further investigate specific pathways that are altered specifically in the intestine upon ABP knockdown. We found that arx-2 knockdown led to a larger immune response signature, while unc-60 knockdown had a balance of both immune response and metabolism-related changes in gene expression (Figures S9D and S9E). On the other hand, lev-11 resulted in changes completely unrelated to either metabolism or immune response (Figure S9F). Here, we intentionally opted to avoid overanalyzing changes in gene expression, as these data were based on deconvolution of a bulk RNA-seq dataset using a single snRNA-seq dataset, and only provide the data as an exploratory resource for future mechanistic studies.
However, to determine whether our deconvolution data were susceptible to potential technical bias from using a single replicate snRNA-seq dataset, we independently deconvolved our bulk RNA-seq data using a published wild-type snRNA-seq dataset as a reference (Figure S10). When deconvolution was performed using the wild-type reference, there was a clear skewing of the data to wild-type expression signatures: samples clustered more closely within each tissue type, and the resolution distinguishing actin knockdown conditions was largely lost (Figure S10A). However, despite this shift, several robust and invariant signatures were preserved. Notably, both deconvolution approaches shared a commonly robust intestinal immune response signature following arx-2 and unc-60 knockdown (Figures S9D, S9E, and S11). Together, these findings suggest that while deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq data can be informative, skewing or biasing of the data to the reference snRNA-seq dataset should be considered, and care needs to be taken to interpret data and draw conclusions cautiously. Integrating analyses using multiple methods is thus more likely to produce robust results, and experimental validation is critical. Thus, we provide our datasets as a useful resource for hypothesis generation and intentionally refrain from overanalyzing our data or drawing broad conclusions.
Targeting the actin cytoskeleton using small molecule inhibitors impacts aging
Genetic approaches are an excellent method for mechanistic studies, but are more limiting for translational studies, especially in humans. As an alternative, small molecule inhibitors, particularly those isolated from natural sources, offer advantages in delivery and robust downstream effects.91 Marine natural products have emerged as a rich source of next-generation chemical probes for studying the cytoskeleton,92 neuroscience,93 and mitochondrial dynamics.94,95 To complement our genetic tools, we next employed small-molecule modulators of the actin cytoskeleton. LatA, which sequesters G-actin and promotes filament depolymerization,96 and Jasp, which stabilizes F-actin and enhances polymerization97 were used to directly destabilize or stabilize the cytoskeleton, respectively. LatA and Jasp were purified from dichloromethane repository extracts of C. mycofijiensis and J. splendens, respectively, and chemically validated by 1H NMR in comparison to literature values98,99 (Figure S12).
As expected, we found that destabilization of actin using LatA resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in lifespan (Figure 8A), mirroring our findings using RNAi knockdown. In contrast, Jasp increased lifespans at low concentrations, but decreased lifespans at higher concentrations (Figure 8B), suggesting that increasing stability of actin can be beneficial to a certain degree, after which it can have toxic effects. To validate that treatment with these compounds alters F-actin stability in expected ways, we visualized F-actin using LifeAct:mRuby. As expected, we found that LatA profoundly reduced visible F-actin structures in both the hypodermis and muscle (Figures 8C and 8D; Figure S13). Interestingly, Jasp increased formation of F-actin structures that do not normally exist in the hypodermis, similar to previously reported structures when actin stability was increased via overexpression of the transcriptional regulator, bet-12 (Figures 8E and 8F). Similarly, Jasp treatment increased actin filament stability in the muscle at a low dose (S13A,C). Altogether, our data show that small molecule inhibitors of actin can be robustly utilized for in vivo aging experiments and mirror phenotypes found using genetic approaches.
Figure 8.

Small molecule actin manipulation alters lifespan and mitochondrial networks
(A) Lifespans of wild-type N2 animals grown on empty vector (EV) and varying concentrations of Latrunculin A (1 μM (purple), 2.5 μM (pink), 5 μM (green), 10 μM (light purple), 0 μM (control, black)) from day 1 of adulthood.
(B) Lifespans of wild-type N2 animals grown on empty vector (EV) and varying concentrations of Jasplakinolide (1 μM (purple), 2.5 μM (pink), 5 μM (green), and 0 μM (control, black)) from day 1 of adulthood. See Table S1 for lifespan statistics.
(C) Representative fluorescent images of adult animals expressing LifeAct:mRuby in the hypodermis grown on empty vector (EV) and varying concentrations of Latrunculin A (1 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM) or DMSO control.
(D) Quantification of hypodermal actin structures in animals expressing LifeAct:mRuby in the hypodermis grown on empty vector (EV) and varying concentrations of Latrunculin A (1 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM) or DMSO control. N = 3 n > 5.
(E) Representative fluorescent images of adult animals expressing LifeAct:mRuby in the hypodermis grown on empty vector (EV) and varying concentrations of Jasplakinolide (1 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM) or DMSO control. All animals were imaged on day 4, and 8 of adulthood, and images were captured on a Leica Thunder Imager.
(F) Quantification of hypodermal actin structures in animals expressing LifeAct:mRuby in the hypodermis grown on empty vector (EV) and varying concentrations of Jasplakinolide (1 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM) or DMSO control. N = 3 n > 5.
(G) Animals expressing col-19p::MLS::GFP were grown on empty vector (EV), and 1 μM Latrunculin A and 1 μM Jasplakinolide starting on day 1 of adulthood, along with DMSO control, and were imaged during days 5, 9, and 13 of adulthood.
(H) Quantification was performed using mitoMAPR. Objects/mitochondrial footprint are shown here, and all mitochondrial measurements measured by mitoMAPR are available in Table S5. In mitoMAPR-based quantification, the “objects/mitochondrial footprint” refers to the total number of objects detected as mitochondria and the area occupied by all the mitochondria within a defined region of interest. Scale bars for all images are 10 μm.
To further evaluate the effect of LatA and Jasp on actin on downstream cellular processes, we measured mitochondrial morphology in animals treated with 1 μM LatA and Jasp, since they led to opposing results in lifespan. Here, we utilized the hypodermal mitochondria strain, as it exhibits the most profound changes in mitochondrial morphology with age.54 As expected, treatment with LatA resulted in a qualitative increase in mitochondrial fragmentation in terms of morphology, though this difference did not result in statistical significance when quantified using mitoMAPR (Figures 8G and 8H). Interestingly, Jasp treatment also resulted in increased fragmentation of mitochondria at late age, despite having displayed increased lifespans. However, considering actin’s critical role in both mitochondrial fusion and fission,46 it is possible that altering actin dynamics in either direction can perturb mitochondrial morphology.
Finally, we performed bulk RNA sequencing on animals treated with 1 μM LatA and 1 μM Jasp from day 1 of adulthood after 24 h (day 2) and 120 (day 6) hours of drug exposure. RNA-seq libraries showed Phred scores >35 with consistent mapping and clustering across replicates, indicating high-quality data (Figure S14). We found that LatA led to clear changes in the transcriptome after 24 h of exposure, which was even more pronounced by day 6 of adulthood (Figures S15A–S15D). Importantly, almost all DEGs of LatA-treated animals overlapped with those found in arx-2 and unc-60 knockdown (Figures S15F–S15K), providing further evidence that our chemical and genetic approaches have similar effects. However, chemical treatments had significantly fewer DEGs compared to ABP knockdown. Indeed, we found that Jasp had an incredibly mild effect on the transcriptome with no significant DEGs at day 1 and only 6 significant DEGs at day 6 of adulthood (Figures S15C and S15D). Both Jasp and LatA exposure did not significantly alter gene expression of actin-regulatory genes, except for act-5, which was significantly increased in expression (Figure S15E). Importantly, RNAi experiments were initiated at the L1 stage while pharmacological treatments began in adulthood; therefore, these datasets are not directly quantitatively comparable, and comparisons are therefore restricted to pathway-level concordance.
We next assessed transcriptomic age using the BiT age algorithm.38 At day 2 of adulthood, neither Jasp nor Latrunculin treatment significantly altered transcriptomic age relative to the DMSO control. Interestingly, at day 6, both Jasp and Latrunculin were older in transcriptomic age compared to control (Figure S14E). To further determine whether the observed effects of either genetic or chemical modulation of actin reflect changes relevant to aging, we next compared our entire bulk RNA-seq datasets with a gold-standard aging model, daf-2 (insulin/IGF1).100 Importantly, daf-2 mutant animals display a young transcriptomic age as expected when using BiT age (S16A). In addition, we detected no significant concordance between our RNAi knockdown or LatA datasets and daf-2 mutants (Figures S16B–S16I), as these conditions are all short-lived, while daf-2 mutants are long-lived. Interestingly, the long-lived Jasp-treated animals also showed no concordance with daf-2 animals (Figures S16J and S16K). Altogether, these data suggest that the effects of LatA and Jasp mirror some, but not all, phenotypes with genetic perturbations of actin. Moreover, LatA and Jasp likely impact actin and longevity independent of effects on the transcriptome.
Single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis reveals associations between actin and aging in humans
Based on the incredibly high degree of conservation of actin across eukaryotes and the centrality of its function, we reasoned that actin could also influence aging phenotypes in humans. Here, we focused on genetic variation through naturally occurring single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the ACTB gene locus and measured their potential association with phenotypes corresponding to human aging, with particular emphasis on those related to muscle aging. Here, we analyzed available data of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in the health and retirement study (HRS); a nationally representative longitudinal study of >36,000 adults over age 50 in the United States.101 HRS contains biological and genetic samples from subsets of participants and includes physical and psychosocial measures of all study participants in older adulthood, including multiple measures of muscle-related functionality. SNPs rs852540 and rs73047183 showed suggestive association with a slower rate of decline in gait speed over time in the HRS Non-Hispanic White sample (Figure 9A). Specifically, with each additional G allele of SNP rs852540, there was an average increase in the decline in gait speed of 0.035 m per second per year compared to other same-aged individuals without the allele (Figure 9B), p-value = 0.0329, surpassing the liberal suggestive cut-off of 0.05. This was assessed among N = 3684 older individuals with a mean baseline age of 66.33 years (SD = 8.26) and a mean decline in gait speed of −0.002 m per second (SD = 0.0005). We also confirmed that the HRS cohort exhibits an expected age-related decline in gait speed (Figure 9C).
Figure 9.

Genome-wide association studies reveal a link between actin and aging outcomes in humans
(A) Plot of SNPs associated with age-related phenotypes in human populations from the health and retirement study (HRS).
(B) The boxplots show the interquartile range for the decline in gait speed in centimeters per second (y axis) by number of alleles (x axis) for the SNP rs852540 in ACTB.
(C) Plot of gait speed by age in HRS. The x axis shows the baseline age of participants, 50 to 95 years old. The y axis shows gait speed in meters per second. The sample intercept = 0.7968 and slope = −0.00217.
(D) Plot of SNPs associated with age-related phenotypes in human populations from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging. Blue, red and yellow horizontal lines correspond to p-values of 0.05, 0.00625 and 0.00217, respectively. Each color represents a unique SNP, whereas the large dots represent each SNP that has surpassed the suggestive significance threshold at p <.05 for at least one phenotype.
(E) Association between rs852535 and ACTB gene expression levels with tissue-specific effects for Esophagus-Mucosa, Nerve-Tibial tissue, and whole blood. Normalized gene expression levels for ACTB (y-axis) by SNP genotype (x axis) are shown in violin plots. Also, on the x axis is the sample size by genotype in parentheses. Violin plots show the density plot of the data (green/gray cloud), with the median of the data shown by the white line of the gray box plot within, and the lower and upper borders of the boxplot corresponding to the first and third quartiles, respectively. A linear regression model was used to estimate the mean difference in expression levels, calculated as a Normalized Effect Size (NES) to compare the alternative allele, T, to the minor allele, C.
The two SNPs (rs852540 and rs73047183) showed replication in their effects on decline in gait speed in an independent study cohort from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) (Figure 9D), highlighting robust reproducibility across human cohorts. In addition, rs852535 and rs7781531 showed significant associations in ELSA, suggesting that differences also exist across cohorts. Among the four SNPs, rs7781531 showed a faster rate of decline (beta = −0.030) with each additional T allele of rs7781531. This was evaluated among N = 6182 older individuals with a mean baseline age of 66.03 years (SD = 6.79), mean gait speed of 0.77 m/s (SD = 0.29), and the average level of decline in gait speed of −0.015 m/s (SD = 0.01). These effects are examples where variation in the gene contributes to phenotypes that represent different age-related changes in functionality; overall, we find there are small effects associated with each phenotype, but there are possible pleiotropic effects, and environmental or behavioral factors contributing. It is not known if any one of the identified ACTB SNPs is a causal variant or if they mark a different variant within the ACTB gene that was not represented on the genotyping arrays. Regardless, these results collectively support associations between ACTB and age-related physical function.
We tested replication of the top two SNPs from the GeneWAS across ethnic subsamples in the HRS by calculating a common effect size across the samples. We did this by completing fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analysis using PLINK software. The Cochrane’s Q statistic (Q), as an indicator of variance across sample effect sizes, and the heterogeneity index (I), which quantifies dispersion across samples, indicate that random effects analysis fits the data better for gait speed decline; thus, we focus on results from random effects to account for differences in effect sizes by sample. The I index indicates 34.84% of the observed variance between samples is due to differences in effect sizes of SNP rs852540, whereas there is 0.0% heterogeneity in the results across studies for rs73047183. The meta-analysis results thus show that only rs73047183 remains associated with a decline in gait speed across all race/ethnicity groups (fixed-effect p-value = 0.0305 and random-effect p-value = 0.0305). The trait analyzed in the HRS came from a population-based study and was not assessed to allow us to identify physiological degeneration in specific muscles, but rather to index and track overall age-related decline in functionality over time. It is widely accepted that genetic variation underlying these aging-related traits is highly polygenic. Thus, it is not expected that a single variant within a gene would be identified to drive these phenotypic results in humans. It is likely that small effects of multiple SNPs across multiple genes, including within the same gene, and with non-additive effects (e.g., gene-by-environment effects), contribute to the resulting phenotypes. With this use of a genome-wide association scanning approach, it is only possible to identify variants associated with overall effects. Without identifying a causal SNP, we can only aggregate available data to suggest what contributes to a biological pathway. For example, through exploitation of the publicly available genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) database, we found that one of the tag SNPs in ACTB, rs852535, was significantly associated with differential ACTB expression levels through the association with an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) in whole blood (p-value = 9.16e-8), Esophagus or Mucosa (p-value = 6.18e-6), and Nerve or Tibial (p-value = 1.61e-7) (Figure 9E).
Discussion
The actin cytoskeleton is a fundamental player in cellular organization and plasticity, providing the dynamic force and scaffolding for essential processes including vesicular trafficking, mitochondrial dynamics, and protein quality control. While actin dysfunction has been described in disease contexts and associated with several aging contexts, evidence of its direct impact on aging pathology is more limited. Here, we characterize the consequences of actin and ABP perturbations across tissues, revealing broad associations between cytoskeletal disruption and aging pathology. Specifically, we find that genetic disruption of actin or ABPs accelerated age-associated deterioration of actin structures, which were associated with a significant reduction in lifespan, impaired motility, and reproductive decline (Table 1). Interestingly, we found that individual ABPs exhibited tissue-specific effects, where unc-60 knockdown disrupted intestinal actin organization as early as day 1 of adulthood, lev-11 knockdown impaired muscle filaments and contractility, and arx-2 disruption broadly perturbed filament networks across tissues. These tissue-specific phenotypes were generally consistent with their respective effects on lifespan. Collectively, these findings reinforce the hypothesis that actin exists not as a uniform entity across an entire organism but has specialized assemblies with distinct functional roles in each tissue. Rather than identifying a single causal mechanism, our results provide a framework for understanding how cell-type-specific regulation of actin dynamics intersects with physiological aging and suggest that tissue- and context-dependent modulation of ABPs may represent an important variable in future studies of cytoskeletal function in aging.
Table 1.
Summary of the effect of actin disruption on healthspan and lifespan
| Phenotype∖RNAi | act-1 | arx-2 | unc-60 | lev-11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lifespan | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ |
| Motility | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ |
| Brood | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ |
| Mitochondrial fragmentation | ||||
| Muscle | ↑ | ↑↑↑↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
| Hypodermis | ↑ | ↑↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
| Intestine | ↑ | ↑ | ↑↑ | ↓ |
| Respiration (OCR) | ↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ |
| Lipid droplets | ||||
| DHS-3::GFP signal | ↓ | ↓ | ↓↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓↓ |
| Droplet number | ↑ | ↑ | ↑↑↑ | ↑ |
| Droplet size | ↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓ | ↓ |
| Protein aggregation | ||||
| Neuron | ↑ | NC | ↑↑↑ | ↑↑↑ |
| Autophagy (LGG-1 puncta) | ||||
| Muscle | ↓↓↓↓ | ↓↓ | ↓↓↓↓ | NC |
| Hypodermis | NC | NC | NC | NC |
| Intestine | ↑↑↑↑ | ↑↑↑ | ↑↑↑↑ | ↓↓↓ |
| Gut barrier integrity | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
NC, no change; ↓/↑, trend; ↓↓/↑↑, p < 0.05; ↓↓↓/↑↑↑, p < 0.01; ↓↓↓↓/↑↑↑↑, p < 0.001.
In addition to phenotypic analyses, we performed transcriptomic profiling to examine how actin and ABP disruption affected gene expression. Across conditions, actin disruption was associated with gene expression patterns that partially overlapped with mechanisms previously described to impact aging, including immune response.102,103,104 In addition, measurements of transcriptomic age using the BiT age algorithm suggested that arx-2 and unc-60 knockdown resulted in older biological age compared to wild-type animals. However, because RNAi exposure was initiated at the L1 stage, these differences may reflect a combination of developmental and adult-onset effects of actin disruption and therefore should not be interpreted as direct evidence of accelerated aging. Although whole-animal RNA-seq lacks tissue resolution, it captured integrated organismal responses to actin perturbation, allowing comparison to established aging-associated transcriptional programs such as BiT age and canonical longevity model daf-2.
Given the well-established links between actin dynamics and mechanosensitive transcription, we also considered whether disruption of the actin cytoskeleton engaged canonical SRF/MRTF- or Hippo/YAP/TAZ-associated transcriptional programs. Interestingly, we did not observe coordinated changes in candidate conserved regulators of these pathways, including unc-120, yap-1, wts-1, mob-1, or fos-1, suggesting that chronic disruption of the actin cytoskeleton does not primarily activate classical mechanotransduction pathways in this context. Instead, actin disruption elicited a broader stress-responsive transcriptional program characterized by induction of innate immunity and stress response genes. These findings suggest that the aging phenotypes associated with actin dysfunction are more likely mediated through integrated stress adaptation pathways than through a canonical SRF/YAP-like transcriptional response.
To further explore tissue-specific transcriptional responses, we applied deconvolution approaches integrating our bulk RNA-seq dataset with a snRNA-seq reference. While resolution of individual tissue-specific effects varied depending on the reference used, several broad patterns were reproducible across analysis strategies, including a prominent intestinal immune-related signature following arx-2 and unc-60 knockdown. Other pathways commonly linked to longevity exhibited tissue-specific and comparatively modest changes. Given the sensitivity of deconvolution outcomes to reference selection and potential skewing of data toward these references, these findings should be viewed as hypothesis-generating rather than mechanistic. Collectively, the transcriptomic and deconvolution analyses complement the phenotypic data by outlining tissue- and context-dependent responses to cytoskeletal disruption. Rather than establishing direct causal links between actin dysfunction and transcriptional aging, these datasets serve as a resource to inform future targeted studies aimed at linking actin dysfunction to aging pathology. For example, we have phenotypically associated actin dysfunction with several cell biological phenotypes characterized as biological hallmarks of aging.
Mitochondrial dysfunction is one of the most well-established hallmarks of aging across species, and perhaps one of the most heavily studied roles of actin in relation to aging. For example, actin is required for asymmetric inheritance of mitochondria during budding in S. cerevisiae to create a pristine daughter cell with a full replicative lifespan.53 Moreover, increased actin polymerization in the aging fly brain results in excessive F-actin accumulation, which impairs autophagy and increases mitochondrial dysfunction, shortening lifespan.10 Although direct effects of actin-mitochondria interactions on longevity have not yet been revealed in mammalian systems, considering the well-established role for actin in mitochondrial dynamics46 and direct correlation of dysregulation of mitochondrial fusion/fission dynamics on numerous metrics of aging pathology,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112 it is not a stretch to consider direct impacts of age-associated actin dysregulation on cellular and organismal health directly through its impact on mitochondrial dynamics. Indeed, we find that directed actin dysfunction results in major changes to mitochondrial structure and function. Importantly, altering actin in any direction (either increasing or decreasing stabilization using small molecules) resulted in increased mitochondrial fragmentation, which is a critical consideration for targeting actin for mitochondrial dynamics. Since many of the mitochondrial fusion and fission factors are shared, including the actin cytoskeleton,46,113,114 it is challenging to predict the outcome of how alterations in actin can affect mitochondria. For example, our data show that genetic knockdown of actin, arx-2, or unc-60 resulted in fragmentation of mitochondria, but knockdown of lev-11 resulted in increased fusion. Since tropomyosins bind to actin, which can affect both stability115,116 and myosin motor binding to actin to impact contractility,117,118,119 it is possible that disruption of tropomyosin impinges on both fusion and fission machinery dependent on both processes. Disruption of both fusion and fission generally has been shown to retain a relatively tubular network.120 Thus, it is plausible that tropomyosin knockdown, by simultaneously impairing fusion and fission to varying degrees, might shift the mitochondrial network toward a hyperfused state.
Beyond just general mitochondrial function, stress-responsive transcription factors are also shared between the actin cytoskeleton and mitochondria. For example, the heat-shock transcription factor, HSF-1, has been shown to be important for maintenance of actin stability with age9 and in regulation of the UPRMT.121,122 In our data, we found that knockdown of actin and ABPs also directly impacts gene expression of mitochondrial stress-responsive genes. Finally, increased integrin signaling results in increased stability of actin, remodeling of mitochondria, and activation of the mitochondrial stress response, which can have direct effects on longevity in C. elegans123 and potentially impact cancer aggression in mammalian models.124 Altogether, our data add to the increasing amount of circumstantial evidence linking an actin-mitochondria axis directly to aging pathology. Lipid homeostasis was also impaired, with actin and ABP knockdown animals displaying an increased number of significantly smaller lipid droplets. Although lipid dysregulation is often concomitant with mitochondrial dysfunction, there is usually an increase in lipid content due to impairment of beta oxidation of lipids through the mitochondria.125,126 Thus, in animals with actin dysfunction, it is possible that mitochondrial dysfunction results in a compensatory increase in lipid metabolic pathways to supply fatty acids for energy. Indeed, we find that these animals exhibit a significant upregulation of lipid metabolic genes. Moreover, lipids can be cleared and processed via autophagic turnover,127,128 and indeed, arx-2 and unc-60 animals displayed an increase in autophagosome puncta in the intestine. This is also consistent with a reduction in polyQ specifically in the intestine, suggesting that enhanced proteostatic clearance may occur in this tissue.129 However, this interpretation is complicated by our autophagy measurements, as increased LGG-1 puncta together with SQST-1 accumulation indicate impaired autophagy rather than enhanced clearance. Future studies using established autophagic flux assays, such as lysosomal inhibition with bafilomycin A1, will be required to distinguish between defects in autophagosome biogenesis and clearance.130 Nevertheless, the reduction in polyQ aggregates may reflect alternative or compensatory degradation pathways, or more complex changes in proteostasis that are not solely explained by increased autophagic activity.
Importantly, changes in autophagy were not universal across all actin dysfunction conditions or across tissues. Interestingly, lev-11 knockdown displayed a reduction in autophagosome puncta in the intestine, while displaying increased autophagosomes in the muscle. Considering lev-11 encodes a tropomyosin primarily expressed in the muscle, it is notable that lev-11 knockdown also alters autophagy in non-muscle cells, suggesting that its effects may not be strictly cell-autonomous. One possible explanation is that perturbations in muscle actin dynamics give rise to non-cell-autonomous signals that influence other tissues, although this remains to be directly tested. For example, muscle-specific overexpression of TFEB, one of the primary transcription factors that regulate autophagy, can result in improved brain function through muscle-derived chemokines, often called “myokines”.131 Finally, muscle-specific activation of the transcription factor FOXO can result in organism-wide activation of proteostasis pathways and improve longevity.132 Thus, it is feasible that muscle dysfunction induced by lev-11 knockdown could indirectly impact autophagy in distal tissues through intercellular communication. However, the mechanisms by which muscle defects influence other tissues remain unknown. One possibility is that damaged muscle cells attempt to restore homeostasis by jettisoning damage to other tissues.66,81,133 For example, muscle cells can secrete aggregated prion proteins to adjacent muscle tissue, and even to the hypodermis, a process dependent on autophagic machinery.134 Whether similar processes occur upon lev-11 knockdown remains to be determined. Alternatively, lev-11 may have low-level or condition-dependent expression in non-muscle tissues, such that its knockdown directly affects cellular function outside of the muscle.
Pharmacological perturbations reinforced that actin dynamics must be finely tuned for healthy aging. Reducing actin stability with LatA resulted in an expected shortening of lifespan, while stabilization with Jasp extended lifespan at low doses but became deleterious at higher concentrations. This is likely due to the beneficial effect of mildly stabilizing actin filaments; however, hyper-stabilizing of actin can become toxic due to suppression of the dynamic and fluid functions of actin. This was reminiscent of increased actin stabilization via bet-1 overexpression. In specific tissues, such as the muscle and intestine, where increased actin stability was beneficial for their function, bet-1 overexpression extended lifespan. However, in the hypodermis, where dynamic actin is likely required for endocytosis, exocytosis, and signaling events, bet-1 overexpression resulted in ectopic expression of actin fibers, which reduced lifespan.2 Interestingly, both LatA and Jasp increased mitochondrial fragmentation, highlighting the intricate and complex regulation of actin dynamics on mitochondria. These data also underscore that changes to mitochondrial morphology alone do not predict functional outcomes on lifespan when actin remodeling is perturbed. Consistent with this, lev-11 knockdown resulted in a hyperfused mitochondrial network, despite also reducing lifespan.
The lack of large-scale transcriptomic changes following drug treatment suggests that in these conditions, actin primarily influences aging through structural and post-transcriptional mechanisms rather than broad transcriptional reprogramming. Important to note that LatA and Jasp were administered to animals starting at day 1 of adulthood due to developmental lethality when applied during larval stages. In opposition, RNAi conditions were applied from hatching. Thus, cellular and physiological changes to actin are likely influenced both by non-transcriptional and transcriptional changes downstream of actin dysfunction. If applied during development, actin dysfunction potentially results in major shifts in chromatin remodeling—which actin has increasingly become known to regulate135,136,137—thus driving major transcriptional changes throughout the lifespan. In opposition, if applied after development, actin dysfunction only has mild impacts on the transcriptome and thus exerts its effects more directly on actin structure and organization. This is similar to other stress paradigms, such as mitochondrial hormesis, which has been shown to be required to be applied during larval stages,138 which results in dramatic chromatin remodeling to elicit effects throughout the lifespan.139
The evolutionary conservation of actin’s role in cellular processes is well established, especially considering the immense sequence and structural similarity of actin across all eukaryotes.1 Considering the shared roles of actin in numerous cellular and physiological processes across organisms, we predicted that actin’s potential role in aging is similarly conserved. Here we found that common polymorphisms in ACTB were associated with differences in gait speed decline across two independent aging cohorts, suggesting that natural variation in actin regulation contributes to functional trajectories in older adults. Although effect sizes were modest, replication across cohorts strengthens the conclusion that changes in actin can influence neuromuscular aging in humans.
Limitations of the study
In keeping within the scope of a resource, we deliberately present our findings in a data-forward manner and refrain from overinterpreting our data. Rather than forcing a single tone or conclusion, we contextualize our data within the broader literature without making unwarranted mechanistic claims, thus providing a resource that offers a platform for future investigators to mine, integrate, and build upon.
While our study presents evidence that actin structure and function play a key role in the aging process, several limitations should be noted for future studies. First, GWAS associations that we found are correlational in nature, and the identified SNPs were found in noncoding regions. Therefore, testing causality or molecular mechanisms of these SNPs driving aging pathology is challenging, as these noncoding regions are not shared in model organisms, such as C. elegans. Another limitation is that the human cohorts analyzed are predominantly of European ancestry, raising questions about the generalizability of our findings and potential differences in other populations.
In our C. elegans studies, RNAi was applied from the L1 stage of development, raising the possibility that developmental perturbations contributed to adult phenotypes. In addition, the RNAi method itself has several limitations: first, RNAi knockdown efficiency varies across tissues. This is particularly true where some tissues—such as the pharynx or neurons—are known to be refractory to RNAi.80,140,141 This is further exacerbated by the complex genetics required for cell-type-specific RNAi, which requires mutation and tissue-specific rescue of RNAi machinery. Since these RNAi machineries have important canonical roles in gene expression and pathogen defense142,143,144—there are likely physiological consequences of knockout and subsequent overexpression in cell types that naturally do not have such high expression of these genes. To complicate things further, many of the genes encoding ABPs have multiple isoforms or gene variants that could serve redundant roles, often with specific cell types expressing each gene at variable levels. However, the dramatic rewiring of the transcriptome at day 1 suggests that effects during development are likely to have lasting effects throughout adulthood. Moreover, our confirmation that knockdown of arx-2, lev-11, and unc-60 robustly perturbed actin organization in expected ways provides confidence that redundant genes were not compensating for their loss. Finally, our adult-specific chemical approaches replicating many phenotypic outcomes of RNAi suggest that not all effects of actin dysfunction on organismal health and longevity are through developmental effects and that our RNAi conditions are highlighting outcomes of direct actin perturbations. However, more precisely controlled manipulations in future work will help separate developmental versus adult-specific effects, as well as better understand the timing of when actin interventions can be applied during the life course to impact physiology and longevity.
Our snRNA-seq dataset was generated from a single library preparation per condition, which limits statistical inference at the single-cell level and precludes discovery-oriented single-cell analysis. We therefore used the snRNA-seq data exclusively as a tissue-level reference for deconvolution of replicated bulk RNA-seq datasets. To assess whether our findings were robust to reference selection, we independently repeated deconvolution using a published, triplicate wild-type N2 snRNA-seq dataset as an alternative reference; while this shifted profiles toward baseline expression states and reduced resolution between conditions, key tissue-level trends, particularly the intestinal immune response signature, were preserved across both references. All snRNA-seq-derived findings should therefore be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and tissue-level in scope, rather than as definitive cell-type-specific conclusions. Additionally, the substantially reduced nuclei recovery in the unc-60 knockdown condition, potentially attributable to cofilin’s role in nuclear integrity, further limits interpretation of this specific condition, and deconvolution results for unc-60 should be treated with particular caution.
An additional consideration is our use of LifeAct:mRuby to visualize F-actin in live animals. While LifeAct is widely used and has been validated in C. elegans, its overexpression can compete with endogenous ABPs for filament-binding sites, potentially perturbing actin dynamics independently of the experimental condition being studied. This means that some baseline actin phenotypes we observe, particularly in young animals, could be influenced by LifeAct expression itself. We have endeavored to minimize this concern by making comparisons within genotype across age and condition rather than drawing absolute conclusions about filament structure, and by utilizing stable, backcrossed transgenic lines with consistent expression levels. Nonetheless, future studies using orthogonal visualization approaches will be important to validate these structural findings.
One limitation of using C. elegans as a model system as a whole is that they are post-mitotic during adulthood, meaning our findings may not fully capture how actin dysfunction can impact highly proliferative tissues, such as in the liver or skin of mammals. This is an important consideration since one of actin’s critical roles is in cell division, and numerous studies implicate changes to actin dynamics in both hyperproliferative cancer cells and non-proliferative senescent cells.145,146,147,148,149 Thus, further work in animal models with proliferative cells throughout the adult life course is essential to further translate our findings.
Finally, our work focuses primarily on endpoint measurements of actin: that is, how filament structure, organization, and function impact cellular and organismal physiology. However, actin is a complex multi-protein structure made up of the collective function of hundreds to thousands of actin subunits interacting with dozens to hundreds of ABPs. Therefore, future work will need to focus on how changes to actin or ABP translation, folding, post-translational modification, and interaction of these thousands of proteins define the endpoint measurements of actin filament assembly, organization, and function. Together, these caveats highlight both the challenges and the opportunities in defining actin as a key player in organismal health and longevity. Nevertheless, the convergence of genetic, pharmacological, and human GWAS data argues that actin integrity is indispensable for maintaining cellular health across aging tissues, and that preserving actin homeostasis may represent a powerful strategy for manipulating organismal healthspan. However, these results are primarily descriptive and associative. Establishing whether natural age-associated changes in actin are drivers, mediators, or amplifiers of aging will require temporally controlled and tissue-specific rescue experiments, mechanistic dissection of downstream pathways, and complementary studies in additional animal models and human tissues. Our comprehensive data provide a resource to guide such future investigations.
Resource availability
Lead contact
Requests for resources and reagents should be directed to the lead contact, Dr. Ryo Sanabria (ryo.sanabria@usc.edu).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new, unique reagents.
Data and code availability
-
•
Data: All data required to evaluate the conclusions in this manuscript are available within the manuscript and supplemental information. All raw RNA-seq datasets are available through Annotare 2.0 Array Express Accession E-MTAB-16193 and E-MTAB-16195. This paper analyzes existing, publicly available GWAS phenotype and genotype data, accessible at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) under accession number EGAS00001001036 and the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) under accession number phs000428.v2.p2.
-
•
Code: All code used to analyze datasets included in this work is available on the Sanabria lab GitHub repository: https://github.com/SanabriaLab/Averbukh-et-al.-2026
-
•
All strains synthesized in this manuscript are derivatives of N2 or other strains from CGC and are either made available on CGC or available upon request.
Acknowledgments
M.A. and A.J.C. are supported by T32AG052374 from the NIA; T.W. is supported by the COMPASS CIRM grant; C.M.L. is funded by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Predoctoral Fellowship; M.V., M.O., and T.C.T. are supported by 1R25AG076400 from the NIA; J.K. is supported by the USC Provost Fellowship; E.M.C. is supported by P30AG068345; S.O. is supported by R01GM144563 from NIGMS; S.P.C. is supported by NIH R01AG058610 and Hevolution Foundation award 748 HF AGE-004; B.A.B. is supported by GM142395 from the NIGMS; T.A.J. is supported by The Fletcher Jones Endowment fund of DUC; M.C.W. is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; T.E.A. is supported by P30AG068345; C.K. is supported by NIA grant R01AG083373; G.G. is supported by T32AG052374 and R01AG079806-02S1 from the NIA; and R.H.S. is supported by R00AG065200 and R01AG079806 from the NIA, the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research and AFAR Grant for Junior Faculty Award, and 2022-A-010-SUP from the Larry L. Hillblom Foundation. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). GWAS analysis was performed at the Gerontology Bioinformatics Core at the University of Southern California and was supported by the University of Southern California and the Buck Institute Nathan Shock Center P30AG068345. Single-nucleus RNA-sequencing was performed with the assistance of the Visiting Scientist Program at the HHMI Janelia Research Campus. Real-time oxygen consumption rates (OCR) of C. elegans were measured using the XF96 Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience) at the USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology Seahorse Core. We thank Dr. Hasan Celik (UC Berkeley) and the Pines Magnetic Resonance Center’s Core NMR Facility (PMRC Core) for spectroscopic assistance with the instruments used in this work, which were supported in part by the PMRC Core and NIH S10OD024998. The health and retirement study (HRS) is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan. The ELSA (English Longitudinal Study of Aging) is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging [grants 2RO1AG7644-01A1 and 2RO1AG017644] and a consortium of UK government departments coordinated by the Office for National Statistics. Funding for the English Longitudinal Study of Aging genotyping data was provided by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and by the National Institute on Aging grants. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author contributions
M.A. designed and performed all C. elegans experiments and prepared the manuscript and figures. H.T.N., J.K., S.M.G., M.C.W., and G.G. assisted with transcriptomics analysis. T.W., A.A., T.N., D.S., M.V., N.D., R.A.B., A.J.C., D.M., T.C.T., M.O., M.P., and S.P.C. assisted with C. elegans lifespans and imaging experiments. C.M. and C.K. assisted with autophagy experiments. K.E.Y. and C.M.H. performed all qPCR experiments and analysis. J.A.G., S.F.O., J.G.C., N.S., M.S.N., J.C.P., H.L-T., and T.A.J. purified LatA and Jasp. H.H.M. performed Seahorse assays. M.A.T. assisted with biochemistry. B.A.B. assisted with snRNA-seq analysis and deconvolution. S.O. provided the cofilin antibody. E.M.C. and T.E.A. performed all GWAS analyses. G.G. and R.H.S. assisted with manuscript preparation and figure construction, and designed, executed, and analyzed all experiments and data.
Declaration of interests
All authors of the manuscript declare that they have no competing interests.
Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used OpenAI’s GPT models in order to assist with text editing for clarity and language, and for development of code for transcriptomics analysis. All scientific content was originally written by the authors prior to use of this tool/service. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the published article.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| IRDye 680 RD Donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody | LI-COR | 926–68073 |
| IRDye 800CW Donkey anti-Mouse IgG secondary antibody | LI-COR | 926–32212 |
| Anti-ACTB Mouse Monoclonal Antibody | Proteintech | 66009-1-IG |
| Rabbit Anti-UNC-60A antibody | Shoichiro Ono Lab25 | N/A |
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
| OP50 | CGC | N/A |
| HT115 | CGC | N/A |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| (+)-5-Fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) | Spectrum Chemical | F2026-10GMBL |
| AGAROSE 1BIOTECHNOLOGY GRADE | VWR | 97062–250 |
| Gibco Bacto™ Peptone | VWR | 76628–830 |
| Carbenicillin (Disodium) | GOLD BIOTECHNOLOGY INC | C-103-25 |
| Agar, BD Difco 10 KG | VWR | 90000–764 |
| IPTG | Apex | 18–242 |
| Luria Bertani Broth, Miller(Miller Luria Bertani Broth) | VWR | 95020–778 |
| Tetracycline hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | T7660-5G |
| Ambion TRIzol Reagent | Thermo Scientific | 15596018 |
| CHOLESTEROL HIGHLY PU 5 GM | VWR | 80057–932 |
| Calcium chloride dihydrate | VWR | 97061–904 |
| Sodium Chloride | EMD Millipore | SX0420-5 |
| Potassium Phosphate Mono | VWR | EM-PX1565-5 |
| Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate | VWR | EM-MX0070-3t |
| Potassium phosphate dibasic | VWR | EM-PX1570-2 |
| SODIUM PHOSPHATE DIBASIC | VWR | 71003–474 |
| Sodium Hydroxide | VWR | BDH9292-500G |
| Sodium Azide | VWR | 97064–646 |
| Chloroform | Sigma-Aldrich | 34854 |
| Isopropanol | Fisher Scientific | AC327272500 |
| Hoechst | Invitrogen | 33342 |
| 2-Mercaptoethanol | Sigma Aldrich | M3148-100 ML |
| Glycerol 1L | VWR | 97063–892 |
| Bromophenol blue | Thermo Scientific | A18469.09 |
| Latrunculin A | This Paper | N/A |
| Jasplakinolide | This Paper | N/A |
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| QuantaBio Extracta Plus RNA kit | QuantaBio | 76492–576 |
| Deposited data | ||
| Bulk RNA-seq | This paper | E-MTAB-16193 |
| snRNA-seq | This paper | E-MTAB-16195 |
| HRS GWAS | Health and Retirement Study (HRS) | dbGaP Study Accession: phs000428.v2.p2 |
| ELSA GWAS | English Longitudinal Study of Aging | EGAS00001001036 |
| daf-2 RNAi concordance | Ristow Lab100 | GSE36041 |
| Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
| C. elegans: Bristol (N2) strain as wild type (WT) | CGC | N2 |
| C. elegans: SS104: glp-4(bn2) I | CGC | SS104 |
| C. elegans: ML2615: dlg-1(mc103[dlg-1:gfp]) X | CGC77 | ML2615 |
| C. elegans: RHS41: unc-119(ed3) III; uthSi7[myo-3p:LifeAct:mRuby:unc-54 3′UTR:cb-unc-119(+)] IV | CGC2 | AGD1651 backcrossed 4x |
| C. elegans: RHS42: unc-119(ed3) III; uthSi10[col-19:LifeAct:mRuby:unc-54 3′UTR:cb-unc-119(+)] IV | CGC2 | AGD1654 backcrossed 4x |
| C. elegans: RHS43: uthSi13[gly-19p:LifeAct:mRuby:unc-54 3′UTR, cb-unc-119(+)] | CGC2 | AGD1657 backcrossed 4x |
| C. elegans: AGD1395: uthIs393[vha-6p:Q40:YFP+rol-6(su1006)] | Dillin lab65 | AGD1395 |
| C. elegans: RHS80: rmIs110[rgef-1p:Q40:YFP] | CGC64 | AM101 backcrossed 7x |
| C. elegans: RHS75: rmIs133[unc-54p:Q40:YFP] | CGC | AM141 backcrossed 8x |
| C. elegans: MAH349: sqls35[pMH951/sqst-1p:sqst-1:gfp+pMH876/unc-122p:rfp] | CGC73 | MAH349 |
| C. elegans: MAH1192: atg-3(bp412) IV;sqls35[sqst-1p:sqst-1:gfp+unc-122p:rfp] | Hansen Lab | MAH1192 |
| C. elegans: DA2123: adIs2122[lgg-1p:GFP:lgg-1 + rol-6(su1006)] | CGC87 | DA2123 |
| C. elegans: RHS191: uthSi17[myo-3p:MLS::GFP(65C):unc-54 3′UTR, cb-unc-119(+)] I; | CGC150 | AGD1664 backcrossed 4x |
| C. elegans: RHS192: uthSi83[col-19p:MLS::GFP(65C):unc-54 3′UTR, cb-unc-119(+)] I; | CGC150 | AGD2837 backcrossed 4x |
| C. elegans: RHS193: uthSi80[vha-6p:MLS::GFP(65C):unc-54 3′UTR, cb-unc-119(+)] IV; | CGC150 | AGD2805 backcrossed 4x |
| C. elegans: AM140: rmIs132[unc-54p:Q35:YFP]; | CGC151 | AM140 |
| C. elegans: NR222: rde-1(ne219) V; kzIs9[(pKK1260) lin-26p:NLS::GFP + (pKK1253) lin-26p:rde-1 + rol-6(su1006)] | CGC152 | NR222 |
| C. elegans: VP303: rde-1(ne219) V; kbIs7[nhx-2p:rde-1 + rol-6(su1006)] | CGC153 | VP303 |
| C. elegans: WM118: rde-1(ne300) V; neIs9[myo-3:HA::RDE-1 + rol-6(su1006)] X | CGC154 | WM118 |
| C. elegans: MAH677: sid-1(qt9) V; sqIs71[rgef-1p:GFP + rgef-1p:sid-1] | CGC81 | MAH677 |
| C. elegans: RHS10: ldrIs1[dhs-3p:dhs-3:GFP + unc-76(+)] | Oorloff et al.155 | AGD2048 backcrossed 4x |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
| Primer: act-1 Forward: CTCTTGCCCCATCAACCATG | This paper | IDT |
| Primer: act-1 Reverse: GAGATCCACATCTGTTGGAAGG | This paper | IDT |
| Primer: arx-2 Forward: CATGGTTTTCCTTGGAGGAGC | This paper | IDT |
| Primer: arx-2 Reverse: GCTTTGATTCCAAGTTTGGCC | This paper | IDT |
| Primer: lev-11 Forward: CCTTAAAGCACGCCAATTACAAG | This paper | IDT |
| Primer: lev-11 Reverse: TCAGTCGAAGAAGAAGAAGAAGAAGAAGAT | This paper | IDT |
| Primer: unc-60 Forward: GAAATTTGGAATGTTATGTTTGGCGTG | This paper | IDT |
| Primer: unc-60 Reverse: CTAGAAAACAGGCACACATAGGTTAGG | This paper | IDT |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| Prism7 | GraphPad | GraphPad website |
| LASX | Leica | Leica website |
| ImageJ | ImageJ | ImageJ website |
| RNA-seq data analysis code | This paper | https://github.com/SanabriaLab/Averbukh-et-al.-2026 |
| DESeq2 | Love et al.156 | N/A |
| SingleR | Aran et al.157 | N/A |
| PLINK 2.0 | Purcell et al.158 | N/A |
| InstaPrism | Hu and Chikina83 | N/A |
Experimental model and study participant details
C. elegans growth and maintenance
All strains used in this study are derived from the N2 wild-type strain from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC). All C. elegans strains are maintained at 15°C on Nematode Growth Media (NGM) plates containing 1 mM CaCl2, 12.93 μM (5 μg/mL) cholesterol, 25 mM KPO4 (pH 6.0), 1 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM (0.25% w/v) peptone, 51.3 mM NaCl, and 2% w/v agar. Plates are seeded with a saturated OP50 E. coli B strain grown in standard Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at room temperature for 24–48 h. Animals are synchronized using a standard bleaching protocol30 where worms are collected in M9 buffer (22 mM KH2PO4, 42.3 mM Na2HPO4, 85.6 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgSO4), then transferred into a 1.8% sodium hypochlorite and 0.375 M NaOH suspension. Animals are vigorously shaken in sodium hypochlorite solution until only eggs remain, which are then pelleted using centrifugation at 1,100 x g and washed with M9 solution four times. Eggs are then floated in M9 overnight (up to 16 h) at 20°C on a rotator to synchronize at the L1 stage and plated onto RNAi plates containing 1 mM CaCl2, 12.93 μM (5 μg/mL) cholesterol, 25 mM KPO4 (pH 6.0), 1 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM (0.25% w/v) peptone, 51.3 mM NaCl, 1 μM IPTG, 100 μg/mL carbenicillin, and 2% w/v agar (Note: we strictly use BD Difco granulated agar (VWR, 90000-782) as different agar brands can have different substrate stiffnesses that affect C. elegans physiology).155 RNAi plates are seeded with HT115 E. coli K strain, which carry either the pL4440 empty vector (EV) or a pL4440 construct expressing double-stranded RNA against a gene of interest (all conditions described in figure legends and all RNAi sequences used in this study are available below). Animals are grown at 20°C for all experiments unless otherwise noted. Day 1 adult animals are defined as gravid adult animals, meaning animals with a full egg sac, which occurs approximately 3 days (72 h) from the L1 stage at 20°C. All RNAi sequences used in this study are available in Table S12 and all strains used in this study are available in Table S13.
Method details
All high-resolution microscopy was performed on live animals at the specified ages in the figures and figure legends. Animals were synchronized using a standard bleaching protocol and all animals were aged on RNAi plates supplemented with FUDR starting from day 1 of adulthood until the desired age as previously described.159 To make FUDR plates, 100 μL of 10 mg/mL FUDR is spotted onto an RNAi plate seeded with RNAi bacteria of choice. Bacteria are allowed to grow for a minimum of 24 h on RNAi plates prior to seeding with FUDR. For imaging, animals are picked from plates and mounted directly onto a microscope slide into M9 + 0.1 M sodium azide to anesthetize animals. For standard wide-field imaging, imaging was performed on a Leica Thunder Imager equipped with a 63x/1.4 Plan ApoChromat objective, standard dsRed filter (11525309) and GFP filter (11525314), a Leica DFC9000 GT camera, a Leica LED5 light source, and run on LAS X software. For confocal microscopy, imaging was performed on a Stellaris 5 confocal microscope equipped with a white light laser source and 405 nm laser source using spectral filters, HyD detectors, 63x/1.4 Plan ApoChromat objective, and run on LAS X software. For all microscopy, representative images of three independent biological replicates are shown.
For full-body imaging of C. elegans, animals are lined up on NGM plates without bacteria. ∼10–12 worms are placed into M9 + 0.1 M sodium azide to anesthetize worms, arranged in a line with the pharynx facing up, and imaged with a Leica M205FCA automated fluorescent stereomicroscope driven by LAS X software. The microscope is equipped with a standard GFP and RFP filter and a Leica K5 camera.
C. elegans bulk RNA-seq
RNA isolation was performed at day 1 of adulthood in glp-4(bn2) animals grown at 22°C to ensure that no progeny or gametes contribute to transcriptional changes. This was imperative as we show in this manuscript that perturbing actin function can have dramatic effects on reproduction, and thus removing progeny is critical for whole-animal assays. ∼1000 animals were used to harvest RNA. Specifically, worms were washed off plates with M9 and immediately placed in Trizol solution. RNA isolation was performed by freeze/thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen/37°C bead bath cycles 3x. After the final thaw, chloroform was added at 1:5 chloroform:trizol ratio and the aqueous separation was collected via centrifugation in a heavy gel phase-lock tube (VWR, 10847-802). The aqueous phase was mixed 1:1 with isopropanol, then applied to a QuantaBio Extracta Plus RNA kit (76492-576) column and RNA purification was performed as per manufacturer’s directions.
For bulk RNA-seq, library construction and sequencing were performed at Novogene on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 using a poly(A) selection, first-strand synthesis, and paired-end workflow. Three biological replicates were analyzed for each condition. Low quality reads and adaptor sequences were trimmed using Trim Galore v0.6.7–1.160 Reads were aligned to the WBcel235 genome using STAR-2.7.3a,161 and a raw count matrix was generated using Subread v2.0.3.162 Differential gene expression was calculated with DESeq2156 and sva v3.54.0 was used to correct for batch effects and non-biological sources of variation.163 GO enrichment analysis was run through WormEnrichr.164,165
The Upset plots were plotted using the R package UpSetR version 1.4.0.166 Fisher’s exact test was performed using the ggbarstat() function of the R package ggstatsplot version 0.13.1.167,168 For predicting biological age, we first converted raw counts into count per million (CPM). We then computed predicted biological age using elastic net coefficients and the code provided in the BiT age publication.38
C. elegans qPCR
Isolated total RNA was quantified using Nanodrop One Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher) and subsequently reverse transcribed into cDNA with the use of SuperScript IV VILO Master Mix (Thermo Fisher). Transcripts of mRNA were quantified using a Quant Studio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher) and Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermofisher). Cycle times and parameters were determined with the Fast SYBR manufacturer protocol. Gene expression of targets was normalized to control.
Worm preparation for nuclear isolation
Conditional germline-less mutant glp-4(bn2) worms were grown at permissive 15°C until gravid adult stage. Eggs were isolated through the established bleach-based protocols. Eggs were allowed to synchronize to L1 overnight in M9 at 20°C and then plated onto 60 mm RNAi plates containing 10X concentrated EV or RNAi bacteria at a concentration of 250 worms per plate. The worms were grown at the restrictive temperature of 22°C until day 1 of adulthood before being collected for nuclear isolation. An estimated 3,000 worms were collected per condition.
Nuclear isolation
All buffers were made fresh prior to worm collection and placed on ice. All tips, tubes, and pestles were rinsed with homogenization buffer or PBS with BSA to reduce adhesion of nuclei to the surfaces. Collected worms were washed 3x with M9 in a 15 mL tube and then transferred to a 1.5 mL tube. The tubes were spun down in a swinging bucket centrifuge at 4°C and the supernatant was removed before the samples were placed on ice. 100 μL of homogenization buffer was added to the worm and then they were ground with a motorized pestle for 45 s 800 μL of homogenization buffer was added to the samples while used to wash the pestle. The samples were transferred to sterile 1 mL Dounce homogenizers on ice (Wheaton, 357538). 20 strokes were applied to the samples using the loose pestle and 50 μL of homogenization buffer were used to rinse the pestle into the sample. 20 strokes of the tight pestle were then applied and 50 μL of homogenization buffer were once again used to rinse the pestle into the sample. The lysates were then filtered into a 35 μM cell strainer tube, followed by a Flowmi cell strainer (Bel-Art, H13680-0040) to transfer the lysate to a 1.5 mL tube. The filtered lysates were spun at 800 xg for 10 min at 4°C using a swinging bucket rotor. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 500 μL of PBS with 0.5% BSA and RNase inhibitor by pipetting 60 times and avoiding the formation of bubbles. Once the pellet was fully resuspended, the samples were filtered once more through a Flowmi cell strainer while being transferred to a flow cytometry tube. 20 μL of the filtered samples was transferred into a tube containing 180 μL of PBS with 0.5% BSA and RNase inhibitor to be used as an unstained control for Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). The remaining sample was stained on ice using Hoechst (Invitrogen, 33342) at a working concentration of 1:1,000. Approximately 200,000 to 300,000 Hoechst positive events were sorted based on forward scatter area (FSC-A) into a 1.5 mL tube. Sorted nuclei were spun at 1,000 xg for 10 min at 4°C using a swing bucket rotor. The supernatant was removed and the nuclei were resuspended in 45 μL of PBS with 0.5% BSA and RNase inhibitor by pipetting. 2 μL of the resuspended nuclei were diluted and counted using a hemocytometer based on Hoechst fluorescence.
snRNA-seq
18 μL at a concentration of 1,000 nuclei/μL were provided to the Janelia Research Campus Quantitative Genomics core and run through the 10X Genomics Chromium Single Cell 5’ (v2 Chemistry Dual Index) pipeline. scRNA-sequencing was performed by Novogene using their NovaSeq XPlus 25B Premade-10X 5 prime Single Cell Transcriptome Library pipeline.
snRNA-seq pre-processing
Raw reads were processed using Cell Ranger (9.0.0, 10X Genomics). Sequencing reads were aligned to a Cell Ranger protein coding reference generated using C. elegans genome WBcel235.dna.toplevel.fa and the WBcel235.113.gtf files. Outputted raw and filtered Feature Barcode Matrices were loaded into R (4.4.3) using Seurat (4.4.0) and processed based on previously published workflow.169 Matrices were decontaminated using SoupX (1.6.2) and converted to Seurat objects (SeuratObject_4.1.4) with thresholds set to a minimum of 3 cells and minimum of 100 features. Outliers were filtered by subsetting for 100–8000 features, less than 5% mitochondrial genes, and less than 20,000 counts. Normalized data was scaled with SCTransform (0.4.1) and doublets were removed with DoubletFinder (2.0.3) and SCDS (1.22.0) R packages using the proportion estimated by 10X Genomics user guide (CG000204 Rev D).
snRNA-seq clustering and cell-type annotation
Singlets were scaled using SCTransform with variable features set to 5000 and nFeature_RNA and percent.mito as variables to regress. Samples were integrated using 2000 variable features selected using vst method. Integration anchors were identified using rpca reduction and k.anchor set to 20. Dimensional reductions using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) methods were performed using 50 dimensions from Principal Component Analysis. Clusters were identified using default Louvain algorithm, 100 random starts, and a 0.8 resolution. Cell type annotations were assigned using the SingleR package (2.8.0).157 and canonical cell types annotated in a previous snRNA-seq dataset as a ref.82 Clusters were then annotated as the tissue making up more than 50% of the cluster or based on established worm cell type proportions using the two largest cell types within the cluster.
Bulk RNA-seq deconvolution and differential expression analysis
Raw bulk RNAseq counts were deconvolved using the InstaPrism package (0.1.6) and snRNAseq data acquired using same strain and conditions as the bulk RNAseq.83 Cell type specific gene expression counts were deconvolved using the Instaprism get_Z_array() function. Deconvolved cell type specific gene counts were rounded and differential expression analysis was performed using the DEseq2 package (1.46.0). SVA (3.54.0) and lima (3.62.2) packages were employed to correct for non-biological sources of variation and batch effects.170,171
Western blot
100 worms per condition were collected in 10 μL of M9 buffer. 15 μL of SDS sample buffer (0.2M Tris-HCl, 2.86 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 4.3 M glycerol, 6 mM bromophenol blue, 277 mM SDS) was added to each sample, followed by mixing. Samples were subjected to three cycles of boiling at 95°C for 5 min and freezing at −80°C for 10 min. Following lysis, samples were centrifuged for 30 s to pellet insoluble debris. A total of 20 μL of each sample was loaded per well onto 4–15% gradient gels. Additionally, 5 μL of Kaleidoscope protein ladder was loaded. Proteins were separated by electrophoresis and subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes using a Criterion blotter (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Membranes were blocked using LI-COR Intercept blocking buffer (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing, membranes were incubated with IRDye-conjugated secondary antibodies (800CW donkey anti-mouse and/or 680CW donkey anti-rabbit; both at 1:10,000 dilution). Protein bands were visualized using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP Imaging System. Western blot signals were quantified using ImageJ.
C. elegans thrashing assay
Thrashing assays were performed at specific ages specified in the figure legends by flooding a plate containing adult animals with 100 μL M9 solution. 30 s videos were captured on a Leica M205FCA stereomicroscope using a Leica K5 camera. Thrashing was measured by eye over a 10 s period and a single thrash was defined as bending of a minimum of 50% of the animal’s body in the opposite direction.
C. elegans brood size assay
Brood assays were performed by moving 10 L4 animals onto individual plates seeded with EV culture. Every 12 h, animals were moved onto a new plate and the original plate containing eggs were stored at 15°C for 2–3 days until live progeny were counted and scored. All animals across all progeny plates were summed together per individual animal to determine brood size.
C. elegans lifespan assay
Lifespan assays were performed on standard RNAi plates at 20°C. Day 1 adult animals were placed onto RNAi plates containing FUDR and scored every day for viability. Animals were scored dead if they showed no signs of moving after prodding both the head and the tail with a platinum wire. Animals were scored as censored if they exhibited age-unrelated death including bagging (vivipary), intestinal leaking out of the vulva, crawling up the sides of the wall, burrowing into agar, etc. All statistical tests were performed using Prism7 software using Log Rank testing and all statistics are made available in Table S1.
For LatA and Jasp lifespans, animals are grown on standard RNAi plates from L1 and at the day 1 adult stage, animals are moved onto RNAi plates containing compounds. LatA and Jasp are added directly to NGM RNAi plates to concentrations indicated in figure legends. DMSO was used as a vehicle control. Lifespans were scored every 2 days similar to standard lifespans.
C. elegans gut assay
C. elegans were grown from hatch on a bacterial mixture consisting of 80% RNAi bacteria and 20% HT115 expressing mCherry. Worms were collected at Day 1, Day 5, and Day 9 of adulthood for analysis. At each time point, worms were washed three times in M9 buffer to remove external bacteria and subsequently transferred to plates seeded with OP50 for 2 h to allow clearance of non-adherent bacteria from the gut. Following the clearance period, worms were lined up for imaging. For each condition and time point, two technical replicates of 12 worms each were aligned in 0.1M Azide solution and imaged using a Leica M205 stereomicroscope under appropriate fluorescence settings to detect mCherry signal.
C. elegans seahorse assay
Day 1 adult animals were washed off plates with M9 and transferred onto an NGM plate with no bacteria. 10–15 worms were then pipetted off from this plate into individual wells of a Seahorse XF96 microplate, ensuring no progeny were included. Basal oxygen consumption rate was measured using a Seahorse XFe96 Analyzer equipped with an XFe96 sensor cartridge using 2 min of mixing, 30 s waiting period, and 2 min measurement. A total of 6 measurements were made. Animals were then exposed to 50 mM sodium azide to measure non-mitochondrial respiration rates as previously described.54 A total of 6 measurements were made after addition of sodium azide using 2 min of mixing, 30 s waiting period, and 2 min measurement.
C. elegans autophagy measurements
Autophagy was monitored by quantifying GFP::LGG-1/Atg8 puncta in body-wall muscle, proximal intestinal cells, and hypodermal seam cells of strains DA2123 and RD202 on day one of adulthood. Animals were grown at 20°C from hatching on RNAi plates containing EV, act-1 (1:9 culture with matched OD600), arx-2, unc-60, or lev-11. For imaging and puncta quantification, animals were mounted on 3% agarose pads in M9 medium supplemented with 0.1% sodium azide. GFP::LGG-1/Atg8 puncta were visualized using a Zeiss Imager Z1 equipped with an apotome.2, a Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4LT camera, and Zen 2.3 software.
Chemical isolation and purity of latrunculin A (Lat A)
Biological material collection and identification of specimens of the marine sponge C. mycofijiensis were collected via scuba diving in Vanuatu, as previously reported.95,172 Taxonomic identification was conducted by comparing characteristic biological features with reference samples from the UC Santa Cruz sponge repository. Voucher specimens and underwater photographs can be provided upon request. Extracts of C. mycofijiensis were processed according to previously reported methods.173,174,175 The fat dichloromethane extracts (FD) were used in the repeated scaleup HPLC isolation of pure Lat A. HPLC purification was performed on a semi-preparative column (Phenomenex Inc. Luna© 5 μm C18(2) 100 Å 10 × 250 mm) in conjunction with a 4.0 × 3.0 mm C18 (octadecyl) guard column and cartridge (holder part number: KJ0-4282, cartridge part number: AJ0-4287, Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). A reversed-phase linear gradient was employed (30:70 CH3CN/H2O to 80:20 over 50 min, 100% CH3CN from 51 to 61 min, then 30:70 for re-equilibration from 62 to 73 min). Compound detection was measured by means of a single wavelength (λ max = 230 nM) using a Spectroflow 783 programmable absorbance detector (detector part number: 9000-7831). LatA would begin to elute at approximately 52 min. The purified compound was dried under an N2 gas stream, stored in clear vials, and sealed in a dark desiccator under vacuum. The purity of the compound was confirmed to be >95% by 1H NMR analysis using a Bruker 500 MHz Avance NEO spectrometer equipped with a Prodigy broadband observe cryoprobe optimized for X-detection.
Chemical isolation and purity of jasplakinolide (Jasp)
Specimens of the marine sponge J. splendens (coll. no. 00101) were collected in Fiji, and taxonomic identification were conducted as previously reported.176 Voucher specimens and underwater photographs can be provided upon request. Samples of J. splendens were processed from repository extracts according to previously reported methods.99,176 The fat dichloromethane extracts (FD) were used in repeated scaleup HPLC isolation of pure jasplakinolide. HPLC was performed on a preparative column (Phenomenex Inc. Luna© 10 μm PREP C18(2) 100 Å 250 × 21.2 mm) in conjunction with a 10.0 × 10.0 mm C18 guard column and cartridge (holder part number: AJ0-9281, cartridge part number: AJ0-7221, Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). A reversed-phase linear gradient was utilized (50:50 CH3CN/H2O to 100:00 over 30 min, 100% CH3CN from 31 to 38 min, then 50:50 for re-equilibrium from 39 to 48 min). Compound detection was measured by means of a single wavelength (λ max = 230 nM) using a Spectroflow 783 programmable absorbance detector (detector part number: 9000-7831). Jasplakinolide elution began at approximately 36 min. The purified compound was dried under an N2 gas stream and stored in clear vials. The purity of the compound was confirmed to be >95% by 1H NMR analysis using a Bruker 500 MHz Avance NEO spectrometer equipped with a Prodigy broadband observe cryoprobe optimized for X-detection.
Study population
Independent discovery and replication samples were used in this study. The discovery sample was drawn from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS),101,177 which is a nationally representative, longitudinal sample of adults aged 50 years and older in the US, who were interviewed every two years, beginning in 1992. HRS includes households across the country with over 36,000 participants contributing. The GeneWAS subsample for decline in gait speed was restricted to 3,684 respondents (59.58% female) who (1) aged ≥50 years; (2) had at least two completed gait speed measurements; (3) speed ≤2.5 m/s; (4) identified as Non-Hispanic White to eliminate the issues of population stratification; and (5) had available genetic information. The replication samples were drawn from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), designed as a sister study to HRS. It is a nationally representative study cohort of individuals living in England aged over 50, for which ethical approval and written consent were granted by the London Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee. This study was initiated in 2002 with 11,391 participants and has since included follow-up every two years. The sample inclusion criteria were the same as HRS, with 6,182 ELSA participants (54.08% female) included in the current study, from whom gait speed was assessed at least two times between 2002 and 2018.
GWAS genotyping data
Genotype data were accessed from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Genotypes and Phenotypes Database (dbGaP).178 DNA samples from HRS participants included in the present study were collected in two waves (2006, 2008) and genotyped by the NIH Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR; Johns Hopkins University) using the HumanOmni2.5 arrays from Illumina (San Diego, CA). Raw data from both phases were clustered and called together. HRS followed standard quality control recommendations to exclude samples and markers that obtained questionable data, including CIDR technical filters179 removing SNPs that were duplicates, had missing call rates ≥2%, >4 discordant calls, >1 Mendelian error, deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (at p-value <10-4 in European samples), and sex differences in allelic frequency ≥0.2. Further detail is provided in HRS documentation.180 Applying these criteria to the gene region, on chromosome 7, (NC_000001.10): 5,566,040-5,603,533 resulted in available data on 18 SNPs with minor allele frequency equal or greater than 0.01 within the ACTB region that are on the Illumina array to represent 240 human SNPs in the gene. With the goal of evaluating whether representative marker SNPs across the gene are associated with the phenotypes of interest, and the significant statistical evidence between associations of ACTB variants and decline in gait speed, a clumping procedure was performed. The procedure selects SNPs by taking the most significant SNPs within the region and prunes variants with redundant correlated effects caused by linkage disequilibrium (LD). To inspect the SNPs relations, SNPs with a minor allele frequency lower than 0.01 among Non-Hispanic White were first excluded, followed by testing the R-squared by applying the parameters of: physical distance threshold at 250 kb, LD threshold of 0.5, and p-value thresholds for index and clumped SNP at the level of 0.98. We then selected the most significant SNP for each group of correlated SNPs, resulting in 12 SNPs (bold SNPs in Table S2).
The genotype data in ELSA were performed by University College London (UCL) Genomics Institute using the HumanOmni2.5–8 array from Illumina (San Diego, CA). DNA was extracted from blood samples collected in 2004 and 2008. Because the two studies were designed to be similar (with 2,368,902 markers in common across the studies), the same quality control procedures used with HRS were applied to the ELSA data, except that UCL excluded SNPs with missing call rates >5% (rather than 2%), yielding available data on 1,372,240 SNPs for 7,412 individuals with European ancestry, of whom 6,182 had phenotypic data also.
Phenotype construction
Phenotype construction was completed to calculate common measures of normal age-related muscle decline in functionality over time. Phenotypes were calculated after merging multiple survey years to get repeated assessments on the same individuals, and based on consensus in the literature on population-based surveys of aging.181,182,183 Gait speed was assessed as the number of seconds taken to walk a 98.5-inch (250 cm) course. Individuals were asked to complete two timed walks (to one end, stop, and back). Gait speed was conducted with respondents aged 65 years or older in HRS and the average of two-timed walks was calculated then converted into units of meters per second (baseline mean = 0.79, SD = 0.25). The phenotype for gait speed decline was assessed as slopes, interpreted as changes in performance on gait speed over time. Slopes were calculated using gait speed measures from 2006 to 2018 and a mixed effects model in SAS 9.4, adjusted for sex, age at the first assessment point, and number of years of follow-up. Identical procedures were carried out with ELSA data.
GeneWAS
GeneWAS was run as a series of linear regression scans, under an additive model, adjusting for relevant covariates and indicators of population stratification. Population stratification occurs when the correlation between dependent and independent variables differs for subpopulations and may result in spurious genetic associations.184 To reduce such type 1 error, we conducted GeneWAS adjusting for population substructure as indicated by latent factors from principal components analysis (PCA).185,186 Detailed descriptions of the processes employed for running PCA are provided by HRS and outlined by Patterson and colleagues.186 From PCA, the first two eigenvalues with the highest values accounted for less than 4.5% of the overall genetic variance, with additional components (3–8) increasing this minimally, by a total of ∼1.0%.180 Based on these analyses, we opted for a strategy that does not ignore population substructure, but also does not over-correct, and adjusted for the first four PCs in all analyses with HRS data. With the ancestral homogeneity in the ELSA dataset, no PCs were used. All GeneWAS were completed using PLINK 2.0.158
SNP evaluation
We evaluated SNP associations in the GeneWAS by p-value. With the number of SNPs and primary phenotypes in this study, strict Bonferroni correction would yield an adjusted multiple test-correction p-value threshold of 0.0028 (for 18 tests). However, Bonferroni correction such as these are too conservative because of the correlations among SNPs187,188 and the cross-validation approach. To address the correlation among SNPs, we implement a clumping schema and calculate empirical p-value thresholds, through permutation.187,188,189,190 Permutation is a process whereby necessary correlations between SNPs and phenotypes are intentionally shuffled so that p-values for the shuffled (null) data are compared to the non-shuffled data. This permutation is repeated multiple times in order to determine an empirical p-value,188,190,191 a calculated threshold at which a test result is less likely to achieve significance by chance alone. Thus, when performing 10,000 permutations using PLINK and max(T) option, the p-value thresholds of 0.0319 for gait speed decline were observed for determining gene-wide significance. For SNP comparisons, we used R.192
Gene expression
The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database,193 the most comprehensive, publicly-available resource for tissue-specific gene expression data, was used to evaluate whether there was evidence for regulatory functions of SNPs within the gene. We entered the top SNPs into GTEx to assess relationships with differential gene expression.
Quantification of actin filament disruption
For quantification of muscle actin, the number of muscle cells with defective actin filaments were counted manually in each animal. Muscle cells were scored as having defective actin if any visible filaments were shown to display any observable differences in phenotype (e.g., fraying of filaments, uneven filaments, broken filaments, etc.). The % of muscle cells displaying disrupted actin vs. total number of muscle cells were calculated per image and data is presented as each biological replicate plotted as a single data point. Statistical analysis was performed on GraphPad Prism using parametric student t-testing. Intestinal actin structures were evaluated by blinded manual scoring on a scale of 1–3, where 1 indicated normal wild-type–like morphology, 2 indicated partially disturbed structures, and 3 indicated severely disrupted structures.
Hypodermal actin structures were quantified in Fiji by calculating the percentage of fluorescent area relative to the total image area (Data S1A). Generally, this macro first clears the “Results” table, enables Batch Mode for faster, window-less processing (by stopping images from flashing on the screen), and sets measurement fields once (area, mean, min, area_fraction, 3 decimals). It then loops over all open images (nImages), selecting each in turn and calling processImage. Inside processImage, it notes where new rows will start (prevNumResults) and grabs the image title for labeling, switches to channel 1 (note this depends on how many channels are imaged, but this should be the optimal fluorescent channel), converts the image to 8-bit, and sets an auto-threshold (“Triangle white”). Measure records intensity stats over the entire image (so mean/min come from the grayscale image), while area_fraction is computed from the current threshold (fraction of pixels above threshold). After measuring, it writes the filename into the newly added rows. Once all images are processed, the macro turns Batch Mode off, refreshes the Results table, prompts for a save location, and saves the table with area, mean, min, area_fraction calculation for each image.
Quantification of mitochondrial morphology
For quantification of mitochondrial morphology, we used mitoMAPR,55 which quantifies numerous metrics of mitochondrial morphology. Here, we used mitochondrial object length and measurement of object number/mitochondrial footprint as representative measurements. Mitochondrial object length is generally higher for fused mitochondria and lower for fragmented mitochondria. Mitochondrial object number/mitochondrial footprint measures the total number of distinct mitochondrial objects per volume of mitochondria and higher numbers indicate more fragmented mitochondria while lower numbers indicate more fused mitochondria.
Quantification of lipid droplets
DHS-3:GFP signal in stereoscope images was quantified in Fiji by drawing an ROI around each animal and measuring the integrated fluorescence intensity (Data S1B). This macro quantifies lipid droplet signal by looping over all currently open images and measuring user-drawn ROIs. It first closes any existing Results table, initializes one by setting measurements (area, mean, integrated density, 3 decimals) and making a dummy measurement, then clears it so it’s ready. For each image (nImages), it selects the image, switches to channel 2, converts to 8-bit, and lightly enhances contrast (0.35% saturation). It resets the ROI Manager, pauses to let the user draw ROIs around each worm and add them to the ROI Manager, then iterates through those ROIs. For each ROI it runs Measure (using the current selected channel), tags the new row in Results with a label like Worm_#_<imageTitle>, and updates the table. After all images/ROIs are processed, it asks where to save and writes the Results table as “IntegratedIntensity_Summary_(rep #).csv” in chosen folder by the user.
Quantification of gut invasion
Gut assay images were quantified in Fiji by drawing an ROI around each animal and measuring the integrated fluorescence intensity above a threshold (Data S1C). This macro measures fluorescent signal in the gut on channel 2 for every open image, using only pixels above a set threshold inside user-drawn ROIs. It first closes any existing Results table, initializes measurement settings (area, mean, integrated density, 3 decimals) with “Limit to threshold” enabled, makes a dummy measurement to create the table, then clears it. For each image (nImages), it selects the image, switches to channel 2, converts to 8-bit (so the threshold is on a 0–255 scale), and prompts the user to draw ROIs around each worm and add them to the ROI Manager. For each ROI, it reselects channel 2, applies a fixed threshold of 25–255 (so only brighter pixels count), keeps “Limit to threshold” active, and runs Measure, producing Area (of the ROI above threshold), Mean (mean intensity of those included pixels), and Integrated Density (Area × Mean) for that worm. It tags each row with a label Worm_<#>_<imageTitle>, updates the Results table, and after all images/ROIs are processed, asks where to save and writes the CSV as “day#_rep#_IntegratedIntensity_Summary_gut_assay.csv”.
Quantification of neuronal polyQ aggregates
Neuronal polyQ foci were quantified in Fiji by drawing a region of interest (ROI) around each individual animal and measuring both the number of aggregates and the size of each aggregate (Data S1D). Similarly, DHS-3:GFP puncta in confocal images were quantified in Fiji by measuring both the number and size of lipid droplets per image and using the full image as the ROI (Data S1D). In short, this macro loops over every open image, switches to channel 3 (can be whichever channel contains the fluorescent images for analysis), and asks the user to draw ROIs (around each worm for stereoscope images and the full frame for confocal images) in the ROI Manager. For each ROI, it duplicates just that region into a new image and runs “Clear Outside” so only the area of interest remains. It then preprocesses the cutout: converts to 8-bit, does rolling-ball background subtraction (radius 30 px) to remove smooth background, applies MaxEntropy auto-threshold to segment bright signal, sets black background, converts to a binary mask, and runs a quick erode (dilate to clean up noise and fill small gaps). Next, it sets measurements and calls Analyze Particles … with “summarize”, which populates the Summary table with the usual totals (e.g., Count, Total Area, Average Size, %Area) for that ROI region. It then renames the “Slice” entry in the Summary table to a label like Worm_#_<imageTitle> so you can trace results back to each worm/image, close the cutout, and continue to the next ROI/image. When finished, it prompts for a folder and saves the Summary table as “Counts_SummaryTable.csv”.
Quantification of autophagy puncta
Autophagy puncta were counted manually in body-wall muscle cells, the two to three most proximal intestinal cells, or one to three visible hypodermal seam cells. At least 7–10 animals were imaged per condition, with results pooled from three independent experiments and analyzed using Student’s t test (GraphPad Prism). OCR were plotted using Prism7 software and statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism. All lifespan statistical tests were performed using Prism7 software using Log Rank testing. Brood and thrashing assay data is representative of three independent biological replicates as a dot plot generated using Prism 7 software and statistics were performed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney testing.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Unless otherwise indicated, statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software). Bulk RNA-seq differential expression analyses were performed using DESeq2, with SVA used for batch correction. Single-nucleus RNA-seq preprocessing and downstream analyses were performed in R (v4.4.3) using Seurat (v4.4.0) and associated packages as described in the method details. Human genetic association analyses were performed using PLINK v2.0, and additional statistical analyses were performed in R using the packages described in the method details.
Statistical tests used for each experiment are indicated in the corresponding figure legends. These included two-tailed Student’s t-tests, Welch’s two-tailed t-tests, paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, one-sample t-tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and log rank (Mantel-Cox) tests for lifespan analyses, as appropriate for each dataset.
For lifespan assays, survival curves were compared using the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test, and complete lifespan statistics are provided in Table S1. Differential gene expression analyses for bulk RNA-seq were performed using DESeq2, with significance thresholds described in the corresponding Results, figure legends, and supplementary tables. Gene-wide association analyses used empirical significance thresholds determined by permutation testing as described in the method details.
For all experiments, the exact value of n, the definition of n (e.g., individual animals, cells, or biological replicates), the statistical test used, and the corresponding p values are provided in the figure legends, results, or supplementary tables, as appropriate. Unless otherwise stated, independent biological replicates were performed for each experiment.
Data are presented as individual biological replicates whenever possible. For dot plots, each point represents a single biological replicate or individual animal, as indicated in the corresponding figure legend. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated. Violin plots display the full data distribution. Boxplots display the median, first and third quartiles, and whiskers as defined in the corresponding figure legend. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05 unless otherwise indicated.
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117256.
Contributor Information
Gilberto Garcia, Email: gilberto.garcia@usc.edu.
Ryo Higuchi-Sanabria, Email: ryo.sanabria@usc.edu.
Supplemental information
(A) Macro for quantification of hypodermal actin structures as percent fluorescent area.
(B) Macro for quantification of DHS-3::GFP integrated fluorescence intensity.
(C) Macro for quantification of gut mCherry integrated fluorescence intensity.
(D) Macro for quantification of lipid droplet and neuronal polyQ aggregate number and size.
References
- 1.Dominguez R., Holmes K.C. Actin Structure and Function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2011;40:169–186. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Garcia G., Bar-Ziv R., Averbukh M., Dasgupta N., Dutta N., Zhang H., Fan W., Moaddeli D., Tsui C.K., Castro Torres T., et al. Large-scale genetic screens identify BET-1 as a cytoskeleton regulator promoting actin function and life span. Aging Cell. 2023;22 doi: 10.1111/acel.13742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pollard T.D. Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016;8 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rotty J.D., Wu C., Bear J.E. New insights into the regulation and cellular functions of the ARP2/3 complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;14:7–12. doi: 10.1038/nrm3492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bernstein B.W., Bamburg J.R. ADF/Cofilin: a functional node in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wallar B.J., Alberts A.S. The formins: active scaffolds that remodel the cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13:435–446. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00153-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li W., Gao F.-B. Actin Filament-Stabilizing Protein Tropomyosin Regulates the Size of Dendritic Fields. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:6171–6175. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-15-06171.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Higuchi-Sanabria R., Paul J.W., Durieux J., Benitez C., Frankino P.A., Tronnes S.U., Garcia G., Daniele J.R., Monshietehadi S., Dillin A. Spatial regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by HSF-1 during aging. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2018;29:2522–2527. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-06-0362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baird N.A., Douglas P.M., Simic M.S., Grant A.R., Moresco J.J., Wolff S.C., Yates J.R., Manning G., Dillin A. HSF-1 mediated cytoskeletal integrity determines thermotolerance and lifespan. Science. 2014;346:360–363. doi: 10.1126/science.1253168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schmid E.T., Schinaman J.M., Liu-Abramowicz N., Williams K.S., Walker D.W. Accumulation of F-actin drives brain aging and limits healthspan in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:9238. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53389-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Honkura N., Matsuzaki M., Noguchi J., Ellis-Davies G.C.R., Kasai H. The Subspine Organization of Actin Fibers Regulates the Structure and Plasticity of Dendritic Spines. Neuron. 2008;57:719–729. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tada T., Sheng M. Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006;16:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Winans A.M., Collins S.R., Meyer T. Waves of actin and microtubule polymerization drive microtubule-based transport and neurite growth before single axon formation. eLife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.12387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bamburg J.R., Bernstein B.W. Actin dynamics and cofilin-actin rods in Alzheimer disease. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2016;73:477–497. doi: 10.1002/cm.21282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dustin M.L., Cooper J.A. The immunological synapse and the actin cytoskeleton: molecular hardware for T cell signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2000;1:23–29. doi: 10.1038/76877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dupré L., Houmadi R., Tang C., Rey-Barroso J. T Lymphocyte Migration: An Action Movie Starring the Actin and Associated Actors. Front. Immunol. 2015;6 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gabbiani G., Schmid E., Winter S., Chaponnier C., de Ckhastonay C., Vandekerckhove J., Weber K., Franke W.W. Vascular smooth muscle cells differ from other smooth muscle cells: predominance of vimentin filaments and a specific alpha-type actin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1981;78:298–302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu Z., Chang A.N., Grinnell F., Trybus K.M., Milewicz D.M., Stull J.T., Kamm K.E. Vascular disease-causing mutation, smooth muscle α-actin R258C, dominantly suppresses functions of α-actin in human patient fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E5569–E5578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703506114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Allen A., Gau D., Roy P. The role of profilin-1 in cardiovascular diseases. J. Cell Sci. 2021;134 doi: 10.1242/jcs.249060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Caglayan E., Romeo G.R., Kappert K., Odenthal M., Südkamp M., Body S.C., Shernan S.K., Hackbusch D., Vantler M., Kazlauskas A., Rosenkranz S. Profilin-1 Is Expressed in Human Atherosclerotic Plaques and Induces Atherogenic Effects on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. PLoS One. 2010;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gao X.-F., Chen A.-Q., Tang H.-Y., Kong X.-Q., Zhang H., Wang Z.-M., Lu W., Wang L.-G., Wang F., Zhou W.-Y., et al. m6A Modification of Profilin-1 in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Drives Phenotype Switching and Neointimal Hyperplasia via Activation of the p-ANXA2/STAT3 Pathway. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2024;44:2543–2559. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jung Y.-S., Wang W., Jun S., Zhang J., Srivastava M., Kim M.J., Lien E.M., Shang J., Chen J., McCrea P.D., et al. Deregulation of CRAD-controlled cytoskeleton initiates mucinous colorectal cancer via β-catenin. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:1303–1314. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0215-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yamaguchi H., Condeelis J. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1773:642–652. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yamazaki D., Kurisu S., Takenawa T. Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization. Cancer Sci. 2005;96:379–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00062.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ono S., Baillie D.L., Benian G.M. UNC-60B, an ADF/Cofilin Family Protein, Is Required for Proper Assembly of Actin into Myofibrils in Caenorhabditis elegans Body Wall Muscle. J. Cell Biol. 1999;145:491–502. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.3.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chan F.-Y., Silva A.M., Saramago J., Pereira-Sousa J., Brighton H.E., Pereira M., Oegema K., Gassmann R., Carvalho A.X. The ARP2/3 complex prevents excessive formin activity during cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2019;30:96–107. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-07-0471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tsai H.-Y., Chen C.-C.G., Conte D., Moresco J.J., Chaves D.A., Mitani S., Yates J.R., Tsai M.-D., Mello C.C. A ribonuclease coordinates siRNA amplification and mRNA cleavage during RNAi. Cell. 2015;160:407–419. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Riedl J., Crevenna A.H., Kessenbrock K., Yu J.H., Neukirchen D., Bista M., Bradke F., Jenne D., Holak T.A., Werb Z., et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:605–607. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Svitkina T. The Actin Cytoskeleton and Actin-Based Motility. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018;10 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Castro Torres T., Moaddeli D., Averbukh M., Coakley A.J., Dutta N., Garcia G., Higuchi-Sanabria R. Surveying Low-Cost Methods to Measure Lifespan and Healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Vis. Exp. 2022 doi: 10.3791/64091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wood B.W., Shi X., Weil T.T. F-actin coordinates spindle morphology and function in Drosophila meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2024;20 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen A., Arora P.D., McCulloch C.A., Wilde A. Cytokinesis requires localized β-actin filament production by an actin isoform specific nucleator. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1530. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01231-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pelham R.J., Chang F. Actin dynamics in the contractile ring during cytokinesis in fission yeast. Nature. 2002;419:82–86. doi: 10.1038/nature00999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gibieža P., Petrikaitė V. The regulation of actin dynamics during cell division and malignancy. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021;11:4050–4069. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mitsushima M., Aoki K., Ebisuya M., Matsumura S., Yamamoto T., Matsuda M., Toyoshima F., Nishida E. Revolving movement of a dynamic cluster of actin filaments during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 2010;191:453–462. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sen B., Xie Z., Thomas M.D., Pattenden S.G., Howard S., McGrath C., Styner M., Uzer G., Furey T.S., Rubin J. Nuclear actin structure regulates chromatin accessibility. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:4095. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48580-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hurst V., Shimada K., Gasser S.M. Nuclear Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins in DNA Repair. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29:462–476. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meyer D.H., Schumacher B. BiT age: A transcriptome-based aging clock near the theoretical limit of accuracy. Aging Cell. 2021;20 doi: 10.1111/acel.13320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Richmond J.E., Jorgensen E.M. One GABA and two acetylcholine receptors function at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction. Nat. Neurosci. 1999;2:791–797. doi: 10.1038/12160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stawicki T.M., Takayanagi-Kiya S., Zhou K., Jin Y. Neuropeptides Function in a Homeostatic Manner to Modulate Excitation-Inhibition Imbalance in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2013;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.López-Otín C., Blasco M.A., Partridge L., Serrano M., Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186:243–278. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Short K.R., Bigelow M.L., Kahl J., Singh R., Coenen-Schimke J., Raghavakaimal S., Nair K.S. Decline in skeletal muscle mitochondrial function with aging in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:5618–5623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501559102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rosa F.L.L., de Souza I.I.A., Monnerat G., Campos de Carvalho A.C., Maciel L. Aging Triggers Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24 doi: 10.3390/ijms241310591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gaffney C.J., Pollard A., Barratt T.F., Constantin-Teodosiu D., Greenhaff P.L., Szewczyk N.J. Greater loss of mitochondrial function with ageing is associated with earlier onset of sarcopenia in C. elegans. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10:3382–3396. doi: 10.18632/aging.101654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.De Vos K.J., Allan V.J., Grierson A.J., Sheetz M.P. Mitochondrial Function and Actin Regulate Dynamin-Related Protein 1-Dependent Mitochondrial Fission. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:678–683. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gatti P., Schiavon C., Cicero J., Manor U., Germain M. Mitochondria- and ER-associated actin are required for mitochondrial fusion. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:451. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55758-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fung T.S., Chakrabarti R., Kollasser J., Rottner K., Stradal T.E.B., Kage F., Higgs H.N. Parallel kinase pathways stimulate actin polymerization at depolarized mitochondria. Curr. Biol. 2022;32:1577–1592.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fung T.S., Ji W.-K., Higgs H.N., Chakrabarti R. Two distinct actin filament populations have effects on mitochondria, with differences in stimuli and assembly factors. J. Cell Sci. 2019;132 doi: 10.1242/jcs.234435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li S., Xu S., Roelofs B.A., Boyman L., Lederer W.J., Sesaki H., Karbowski M. Transient assembly of F-actin on the outer mitochondrial membrane contributes to mitochondrial fission. JCB (J. Cell Biol.) 2014;208:109–123. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201404050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Moore A.S., Coscia S.M., Simpson C.L., Ortega F.E., Wait E.C., Heddleston J.M., Nirschl J.J., Obara C.J., Guedes-Dias P., Boecker C.A., et al. Actin cables and comet tails organize mitochondrial networks in mitosis. Nature. 2021;591:659–664. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03309-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Boldogh I.R., Yang H.-C., Nowakowski W.D., Karmon S.L., Hays L.G., Yates J.R., Pon L.A. Arp2/3 complex and actin dynamics are required for actin-based mitochondrial motility in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:3162–3167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051494698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Basu H., Pekkurnaz G., Falk J., Wei W., Chin M., Steen J., Schwarz T.L. FHL2 anchors mitochondria to actin and adapts mitochondrial dynamics to glucose supply. J. Cell Biol. 2021;220 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201912077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Higuchi R., Vevea J.D., Swayne T.C., Chojnowski R., Hill V., Boldogh I.R., Pon L.A. Actin Dynamics Affect Mitochondrial Quality Control and Aging in Budding Yeast. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:2417–2422. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kim J., Dutta N., Vega M., Bong A., Averbukh M., Aviles Barahona R., Alcala A., Holmes J.T., Garcia G., Higuchi-Sanabria R. Cross-comparison of strains used for mitochondrial imaging in Caenorhabditis elegans during aging. Life Sci. Alliance. 2025;8 doi: 10.26508/lsa.202403189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang Y., Lanjuin A., Chowdhury S.R., Mistry M., Silva-García C.G., Weir H.J., Lee C.-L., Escoubas C.C., Tabakovic E., Mair W.B. Neuronal TORC1 modulates longevity via AMPK and cell nonautonomous regulation of mitochondrial dynamics in C. elegans. eLife. 2019;8 doi: 10.7554/eLife.49158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Viana M.P., Lim S., Rafelski S.M. Quantifying mitochondrial content in living cells. Methods Cell Biol. 2015;125:77–93. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lewis G.R., Marshall W.F. Mitochondrial networks through the lens of mathematics. Phys. Biol. 2023;20 doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/acdcdb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Haroon S., Vermulst M. Oxygen Consumption Measurements in Caenorhabditis elegans Using the Seahorse XF24. Bio. Protoc. 2019;9 doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Munasinghe M., Almotayri A., Thomas J., Heydarian D., Weerasinghe M., Jois M. Cocoa improves age-associated health and extends lifespan in C. elegans. Nutr. Healthy Aging. 2021;6:73–86. doi: 10.3233/NHA-200100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Maglioni S., Mello D.F., Schiavi A., Meyer J.N., Ventura N. Mitochondrial bioenergetic changes during development as an indicator of C. elegans health-span. Aging. 2019;11:6535–6554. doi: 10.18632/aging.102208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Na H., Zhang P., Chen Y., Zhu X., Liu Y., Liu Y., Xie K., Xu N., Yang F., Yu Y., et al. Identification of lipid droplet structure-like/resident proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1853:2481–2491. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang P., Na H., Liu Z., Zhang S., Xue P., Chen Y., Pu J., Peng G., Huang X., Yang F., et al. Proteomic Study and Marker Protein Identification of Caenorhabditis elegans Lipid Droplets. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2012;11:317–328. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.016345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Williams T.D., Cacioppo R., Agrotis A., Black A., Zhou H., Rousseau A. Actin remodelling controls proteasome homeostasis upon stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022;24:1077–1087. doi: 10.1038/s41556-022-00938-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gidalevitz T., Ben-Zvi A., Ho K.H., Brignull H.R., Morimoto R.I. Progressive disruption of cellular protein folding in models of polyglutamine diseases. Science. 2006;311:1471–1474. doi: 10.1126/science.1124514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Imanikia S., Özbey N.P., Krueger C., Casanueva M.O., Taylor R.C. Neuronal XBP-1 Activates Intestinal Lysosomes to Improve Proteostasis in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:2322–2338.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Melentijevic I., Toth M.L., Arnold M.L., Guasp R.J., Harinath G., Nguyen K.C., Taub D., Parker J.A., Neri C., Gabel C.V., et al. C. elegans neurons jettison protein aggregates and mitochondria under neurotoxic stress. Nature. 2017;542:367–371. doi: 10.1038/nature21362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kast D.J., Dominguez R. The Cytoskeleton–Autophagy Connection. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:R318–R326. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Aguilera M.O., Berón W., Colombo M.I. The actin cytoskeleton participates in the early events of autophagosome formation upon starvation induced autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8:1590–1603. doi: 10.4161/auto.21459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Coutts A.S., La Thangue N.B. Regulation of actin nucleation and autophagosome formation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016;73:3249–3263. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2224-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mi N., Chen Y., Wang S., Chen M., Zhao M., Yang G., Ma M., Su Q., Luo S., Shi J., et al. CapZ regulates autophagosomal membrane shaping by promoting actin assembly inside the isolation membrane. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;17:1112–1123. doi: 10.1038/ncb3215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Meléndez A., Tallòczy Z., Seaman M., Eskelinen E.L., Hall D.H., Levine B. Autophagy Genes Are Essential for Dauer Development and Life-Span Extension in C. elegans. Science. 2003;301:1387–1391. doi: 10.1126/science.1087782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Balsa-Canto E., Henriques D., Gábor A., Banga J.R. AMIGO2, a toolbox for dynamic modeling, optimization and control in systems biology. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3357–3359. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kumsta C., Chang J.T., Lee R., Tan E.P., Yang Y., Loureiro R., Choy E.H., Lim S.H.Y., Saez I., Springhorn A., et al. The autophagy receptor p62/SQST-1 promotes proteostasis and longevity in C. elegans by inducing autophagy. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5648. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13540-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kumar A.V., Mills J., Parker W.M., Leitão J.A., Rodriguez D.I., Daigle S.E., Ng C., Patel R., Aguilera J.L., Johnson J.R., et al. Lipid droplets modulate proteostasis, SQST-1/SQSTM1 dynamics, and lifespan in C. elegans. iScience. 2023;26 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Dupuy D., Bertin N., Hidalgo C.A., Venkatesan K., Tu D., Lee D., Rosenberg J., Svrzikapa N., Blanc A., Carnec A., et al. Genome-scale analysis of in vivo spatiotemporal promoter activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:663–668. doi: 10.1038/nbt1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Salazar A.M., Aparicio R., Clark R.I., Rera M., Walker D.W. Intestinal barrier dysfunction: an evolutionarily conserved hallmark of aging. Dis. Model. Mech. 2023;16 doi: 10.1242/dmm.049969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Egge N., Arneaud S.L.B., Wales P., Mihelakis M., McClendon J., Fonseca R.S., Savelle C., Gonzalez I., Ghorashi A., Yadavalli S., et al. Age-onset phosphorylation of a minor actin variant promotes intestinal barrier dysfunction. Dev. Cell. 2019;51:587–601.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Baranwal S., Naydenov N.G., Harris G., Dugina V., Morgan K.G., Chaponnier C., Ivanov A.I. Nonredundant roles of cytoplasmic β- and γ-actin isoforms in regulation of epithelial apical junctions. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2012;23:3542–3553. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-02-0162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lechuga S., Naydenov N.G., Feygin A., Cruise M., Ervasti J.M., Ivanov A.I. Loss of β-Cytoplasmic Actin in the Intestinal Epithelium Increases Gut Barrier Permeability in vivo and Exaggerates the Severity of Experimental Colitis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.588836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Firnhaber C., Hammarlund M. Neuron-Specific Feeding RNAi in C. elegans and Its Use in a Screen for Essential Genes Required for GABA Neuron Function. PLoS Genet. 2013;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yang Y., Arnold M.L., Lange C.M., Sun L.-H., Broussalian M., Doroodian S., Ebata H., Choy E.H., Poon K., Moreno T.M., et al. Autophagy protein ATG-16.2 and its WD40 domain mediate the beneficial effects of inhibiting early-acting autophagy genes in C. elegans neurons. Nat. Aging. 2024;4:198–212. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00548-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gao S.M., Qi Y., Zhang Q., Guan Y., Lee Y.-T., Ding L., Wang L., Mohammed A.S., Li H., Fu Y., Wang M.C. Aging atlas reveals cell-type-specific effects of pro-longevity strategies. Nat. Aging. 2024;4:998–1013. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00631-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hu M., Chikina M. InstaPrism: an R package for fast implementation of BayesPrism. Bioinformatics. 2024;40 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ono K., Parast M., Alberico C., Benian G.M., Ono S. Specific requirement for two ADF/cofilin isoforms in distinct actin-dependent processes in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Sci. 2003;116:2073–2085. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kanellos G., Zhou J., Patel H., Ridgway R.A., Huels D., Gurniak C.B., Sandilands E., Carragher N.O., Sansom O.J., Witke W., et al. ADF and Cofilin1 Control Actin Stress Fibers, Nuclear Integrity, and Cell Survival. Cell Rep. 2015;13:1949–1964. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Xu X., Li R., Mo O., Liu K., Li J., Hao P. Cell-type deconvolution for bulk RNA-seq data using single-cell reference: a comparative analysis and recommendation guideline. Brief. Bioinform. 2025;26:bbaf031. doi: 10.1090/bib/bbaf031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kumsta C., Hansen M. C. elegans rrf-1 Mutations Maintain RNAi Efficiency in the Soma in Addition to the Germline. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kim H., Strange K. Changes in translation rate modulate stress-induced damage of diverse proteins. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2013;305:C1257–C1264. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00176.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yamasaki S., Anderson P. Reprogramming mRNA translation during stress. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008;20:222–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Holcik M., Sonenberg N. Translational control in stress and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;6:318–327. doi: 10.1038/nrm1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Bonkowski M.S., Sinclair D.A. Slowing ageing by design: the rise of NAD+ and sirtuin-activating compounds. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;17:679–690. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Risinger A.L., Du L. Targeting and extending the eukaryotic druggable genome with natural products: cytoskeletal targets of natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020;37:634–652. doi: 10.1039/c9np00053d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Johnson T.A., Milan-Lobo L., Che T., Ferwerda M., Lambu E., McIntosh N.L., Li F., He L., Lorig-Roach N., Crews P., Whistler J.L. Identification of the First Marine-Derived Opioid Receptor “Balanced” Agonist with a Signaling Profile That Resembles the Endorphins. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017;8:473–485. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Dutta N., Gerke J.A., Odron S.F., Morris J.D., Hruby A., Kim J., Torres T.C., Shemtov S.J., Clarke J.G., Chang M.C., et al. Investigating impacts of the mycothiazole chemotype as a chemical probe for the study of mitochondrial function and aging. GeroScience. 2024;46:6009–6028. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01144-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Morgan J.B., Mahdi F., Liu Y., Coothankandaswamy V., Jekabsons M.B., Johnson T.A., Sashidhara K.V., Crews P., Nagle D.G., Zhou Y.-D. The marine sponge metabolite mycothiazole: A novel prototype mitochondrial complex I inhibitor. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010;18:5988–5994. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.06.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Fujiwara I., Zweifel M.E., Courtemanche N., Pollard T.D. Latrunculin A Accelerates Actin Filament Depolymerization in Addition to Sequestering Actin Monomers. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:3183–3192.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Holzinger A. Jasplakinolide: an actin-specific reagent that promotes actin polymerization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009;586:71–87. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-376-3_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Amagata T., Johnson T.A., Cichewicz R.H., Tenney K., Mooberry S.L., Media J., Edelstein M., Valeriote F.A., Crews P. Interrogating the Bioactive Pharmacophore of the Latrunculin Chemotype by Investigating the Metabolites of Two Taxonomically Unrelated Sponges. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:7234–7242. doi: 10.1021/jm8008585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Robinson S.J., Morinaka B.I., Amagata T., Tenney K., Bray W.M., Gassner N.C., Lokey R.S., Crews P. New Structures and Bioactivity Properties of Jasplakinolide (Jaspamide) Analogues from Marine Sponges. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:1651–1661. doi: 10.1021/jm9013554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zarse K., Schmeisser S., Groth M., Priebe S., Beuster G., Kuhlow D., Guthke R., Platzer M., Kahn C.R., Ristow M. Impaired Insulin/IGF1 Signaling Extends Life Span by Promoting Mitochondrial L-Proline Catabolism to Induce a Transient ROS Signal. Cell Metab. 2012;15:451–465. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sonnega A., Faul J.D., Ofstedal M.B., Langa K.M., Phillips J.W.R., Weir D.R. Cohort Profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014;43:576–585. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Garigan D., Hsu A.-L., Fraser A.G., Kamath R.S., Ahringer J., Kenyon C. Genetic Analysis of Tissue Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: A Role for Heat-Shock Factor and Bacterial Proliferation. Genetics. 2002;161:1101–1112. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhao Y., Gilliat A.F., Ziehm M., Turmaine M., Wang H., Ezcurra M., Yang C., Phillips G., McBay D., Zhang W.B., et al. Two forms of death in ageing Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Commun. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Portal-Celhay C., Bradley E.R., Blaser M.J. Control of intestinal bacterial proliferation in regulation of lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zorzano A., Claret M. Implications of mitochondrial dynamics on neurodegeneration and on hypothalamic dysfunction. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015;7 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tapia A., Palomino-Schätzlein M., Roca M., Lahoz A., Pineda-Lucena A., López del Amo V., Galindo M.I. Mild Muscle Mitochondrial Fusion Distress Extends Drosophila Lifespan through an Early and Systemic Metabolome Reorganization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms222212133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Chen Y., Liu Y., Dorn G.W. Mitochondrial fusion is essential for organelle function and cardiac homeostasis. Circ. Res. 2011;109:1327–1331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.258723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tezze C., Romanello V., Desbats M.A., Fadini G.P., Albiero M., Favaro G., Ciciliot S., Soriano M.E., Morbidoni V., Cerqua C., et al. Age-Associated Loss of OPA1 in Muscle Impacts Muscle Mass, Metabolic Homeostasis, Systemic Inflammation, and Epithelial Senescence. Cell Metab. 2017;25:1374–1389.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Byrne J.J., Soh M.S., Chandhok G., Vijayaraghavan T., Teoh J.-S., Crawford S., Cobham A.E., Yapa N.M.B., Mirth C.K., Neumann B. Disruption of mitochondrial dynamics affects behaviour and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019;76:1967–1985. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03024-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Cervantes-Silva M.P., Cox S.L., Curtis A.M. Alterations in mitochondrial morphology as a key driver of immunity and host defence. EMBO Rep. 2021;22 doi: 10.15252/embr.202153086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Rambold A.S., Pearce E.L. Mitochondrial Dynamics at the Interface of Immune Cell Metabolism and Function. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:6–18. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Lee Y.-T., Savini M., Chen T., Yang J., Zhao Q., Ding L., Gao S.M., Senturk M., Sowa J.N., Wang J.D., Wang M.C. Mitochondrial GTP Metabolism Controls Reproductive Aging in C. elegans. Dev. Cell. 2023;58:2718–2731.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Korobova F., Ramabhadran V., Higgs H.N. An Actin-Dependent Step in Mitochondrial Fission Mediated by the ER-Associated Formin INF2. Science. 2013;339:464–467. doi: 10.1126/science.1228360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Abrisch R.G., Gumbin S.C., Wisniewski B.T., Lackner L.L., Voeltz G.K. Fission and fusion machineries converge at ER contact sites to regulate mitochondrial morphology. J. Cell Biol. 2020;219 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201911122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ujfalusi Z., Vig A., Hild G., Nyitrai M. Effect of Tropomyosin on Formin-Bound Actin Filaments. Biophys. J. 2009;96:162–168. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.138420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Schmidt W.M., Lehman W., Moore J.R. Direct Observation of Tropomyosin Binding to Actin Filaments. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2015;72:292–303. doi: 10.1002/cm.21225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.McKillop D.F., Geeves M.A. Regulation of the interaction between actin and myosin subfragment 1: evidence for three states of the thin filament. Biophys. J. 1993;65:693–701. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81110-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Vibert P., Craig R., Lehman W. Steric-model for activation of muscle thin filaments. J. Mol. Biol. 1997;266:8–14. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Lehman W., Craig R., Vibert P. Ca2+-induced tropomyosin movement in Limulus thin filaments revealed by three-dimensional reconstruction. Nature. 1994;368:65–67. doi: 10.1038/368065a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Sesaki H., Jensen R.E. Division versus Fusion: Dnm1p and Fzo1p Antagonistically Regulate Mitochondrial Shape. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:699–706. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.4.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Labbadia J., Brielmann R.M., Neto M.F., Lin Y.-F., Haynes C.M., Morimoto R.I. Mitochondrial Stress Restores the Heat Shock Response and Prevents Proteostasis Collapse during Aging. Cell Rep. 2017;21:1481–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Katiyar A., Fujimoto M., Tan K., Kurashima A., Srivastava P., Okada M., Takii R., Nakai A. HSF1 is required for induction of mitochondrial chaperones during the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. FEBS Open Bio. 2020;10:1135–1148. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Moehle E.A., Higuchi-Sanabria R., Tsui C.K., Homentcovschi S., Tharp K.M., Zhang H., Chi H., Joe L., de Los Rios Rogers M., Sahay A., et al. Cross-species screening platforms identify EPS-8 as a critical link for mitochondrial stress and actin stabilization. Sci. Adv. 2021;7 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj6818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Tharp K.M., Higuchi-Sanabria R., Timblin G.A., Ford B., Garzon-Coral C., Schneider C., Muncie J.M., Stashko C., Daniele J.R., Moore A.S., et al. Adhesion-mediated mechanosignaling forces mitohormesis. Cell Metab. 2021;33:1322–1341.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Zhang J., Bakheet R., Parhar R.S., Huang C.-H., Hussain M.M., Pan X., Siddiqui S.S., Hashmi S. Regulation of Fat Storage and Reproduction by Krüppel-Like Transcription Factor KLF3 and Fat-Associated Genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;411:537–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Gilst M.R.V., Hadjivassiliou H., Jolly A., Yamamoto K.R. Nuclear Hormone Receptor NHR-49 Controls Fat Consumption and Fatty Acid Composition in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e53. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Singh R., Kaushik S., Wang Y., Xiang Y., Novak I., Komatsu M., Tanaka K., Cuervo A.M., Czaja M.J. Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature. 2009;458:1131–1135. doi: 10.1038/nature07976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lapierre L.R., Silvestrini M.J., Nuñez L., Ames K., Wong S., Le T.T., Hansen M., Meléndez A. Autophagy genes are required for normal lipid levels in C. elegans. Autophagy. 2013;9:278–286. doi: 10.4161/auto.22930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Alexander-Floyd J., Haroon S., Ying M., Entezari A.A., Jaeger C., Vermulst M., Gidalevitz T. Unexpected cell type-dependent effects of autophagy on polyglutamine aggregation revealed by natural genetic variation in C. elegans. BMC Biol. 2020;18:18. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-0750-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Chang J.T., Hansen M., Kumsta C. In: Aging: Methods and Protocols. Curran S.P., editor. Springer US; 2020. Assessing Tissue-Specific Autophagy Flux in Adult Caenorhabditis elegans; pp. 187–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Matthews I., Birnbaum A., Gromova A., Huang A.W., Liu K., Liu E.A., Coutinho K., McGraw M., Patterson D.C., Banks M.T., et al. Skeletal muscle TFEB signaling promotes central nervous system function and reduces neuroinflammation during aging and neurodegenerative disease. Cell Rep. 2023;42 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Demontis F., Perrimon N. FOXO/4E-BP signaling in Drosophila muscles regulates organism-wide proteostasis during aging. Cell. 2010;143:813–825. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Turek M., Banasiak K., Piechota M., Shanmugam N., Macias M., Śliwińska M.A., Niklewicz M., Kowalski K., Nowak N., Chacinska A., Pokrzywa W. Muscle-derived exophers promote reproductive fitness. EMBO Rep. 2021;22 doi: 10.15252/embr.202052071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Nussbaum-Krammer C.I., Park K.-W., Li L., Melki R., Morimoto R.I. Spreading of a Prion Domain from Cell-to-Cell by Vesicular Transport in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2013;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Zhao K., Wang W., Rando O.J., Xue Y., Swiderek K., Kuo A., Crabtree G.R. Rapid and Phosphoinositol-Dependent Binding of the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex to Chromatin after T Lymphocyte Receptor Signaling. Cell. 1998;95:625–636. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81633-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Shen X., Ranallo R., Choi E., Wu C. Involvement of Actin-Related Proteins in ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling. Mol. Cell. 2003;12:147–155. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00264-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Mahmood S.R., Xie X., Hosny El Said N., Venit T., Gunsalus K.C., Percipalle P. β-actin dependent chromatin remodeling mediates compartment level changes in 3D genome architecture. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5240. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25596-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Durieux J., Wolff S., Dillin A. The cell-non-autonomous nature of electron transport chain-mediated longevity. Cell. 2011;144:79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Tian Y., Garcia G., Bian Q., Steffen K.K., Joe L., Wolff S., Meyer B.J., Dillin A. Mitochondrial Stress Induces Chromatin Reorganization to Promote Longevity and UPR(mt) Cell. 2016;165:1197–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Timmons L., Court D.L., Fire A. Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene. 2001;263:103–112. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00579-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Kamath R.S., Martinez-Campos M., Zipperlen P., Fraser A.G., Ahringer J. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2001;2 doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-2-1-research0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Brown K.C., Svendsen J.M., Tucci R.M., Montgomery B.E., Montgomery T.A. ALG-5 is a miRNA-associated Argonaute required for proper developmental timing in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:9093–9107. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Conine C.C., Moresco J.J., Gu W., Shirayama M., Conte D., Yates J.R., Mello C.C. Argonautes promote male fertility and provide a paternal memory of germline gene expression in C. elegans. Cell. 2013;155:1532–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Seroussi U., Lugowski A., Wadi L., Lao R.X., Willis A.R., Zhao W., Sundby A.E., Charlesworth A.G., Reinke A.W., Claycomb J.M. A comprehensive survey of C. elegans argonaute proteins reveals organism-wide gene regulatory networks and functions. eLife. 2023;12 doi: 10.7554/eLife.83853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Dupont S., Morsut L., Aragona M., Enzo E., Giulitti S., Cordenonsi M., Zanconato F., Le Digabel J., Forcato M., Bicciato S., et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;474:179–183. doi: 10.1038/nature10137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Kümper S., Mardakheh F.K., McCarthy A., Yeo M., Stamp G.W., Paul A., Worboys J., Sadok A., Jørgensen C., Guichard S., Marshall C.J. Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) function is essential for cell cycle progression, senescence and tumorigenesis. eLife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.12203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Yin M., Ma W., An L. Cortactin in cancer cell migration and invasion. Oncotarget. 2017;8:88232–88243. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Mu X., Tseng C., Hambright W.S., Matre P., Lin C.-Y., Chanda P., Chen W., Gu J., Ravuri S., Cui Y., et al. Cytoskeleton stiffness regulates cellular senescence and innate immune response in Hutchinson–Gilford Progeria Syndrome. Aging Cell. 2020;19 doi: 10.1111/acel.13152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Kwak I.H., Kim H.S., Choi O.R., Ryu M.S., Lim I.K. Nuclear accumulation of globular actin as a cellular senescence marker. Cancer Res. 2004;64:572–580. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-1856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Kim J., Averbukh M., Alcala A., Barahona R.A., Vega M., Garcia G., Higuchi-Sanabria R., Dutta N. Imaging and Quantifying Mitochondrial Morphology in C. elegans During Aging. JoVE J. 2025 doi: 10.3791/67610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Lazaro-Pena M.I., Cornwell A.B., Samuelson A.V. Quantifying Tissue-Specific Proteostatic Decline in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Vis. Exp. 2021;10:3791–61100. doi: 10.3791/61100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Qadota H., Inoue M., Hikita T., Köppen M., Hardin J.D., Amano M., Moerman D.G., Kaibuchi K. Establishment of a tissue-specific RNAi system in C. elegans. Gene. 2007;400:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Espelt M.V., Estevez A.Y., Yin X., Strange K. Oscillatory Ca2+ Signaling in the Isolated Caenorhabditis elegans Intestine : Role of the Inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate Receptor and Phospholipases C β and γ. J. Gen. Physiol. 2005;126:379–392. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200509355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Bolz D.D., Tenor J.L., Aballay A. A Conserved PMK-1/p38 MAPK Is Required in Caenorhabditis elegans Tissue-specific Immune Response to Yersinia pestis Infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:10832–10840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.091629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Oorloff M., Hruby A., Averbukh M., Alcala A., Dutta N., Minor C., Castro Torres T., Moaddeli D., Vega M., Kim J., et al. Growth on stiffer substrates impacts animal health and longevity in C. elegans. PLoS One. 2024;19 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Aran D., Looney A.P., Liu L., Wu E., Fong V., Hsu A., Chak S., Naikawadi R.P., Wolters P.J., Abate A.R., et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:163–172. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0276-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Purcell S., Neale B., Todd-Brown K., Thomas L., Ferreira M.A.R., Bender D., Maller J., Sklar P., de Bakker P.I.W., Daly M.J., Sham P.C. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007;81:559–575. doi: 10.1086/519795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Garcia G., Homentcovschi S., Kelet N., Higuchi-Sanabria R. Imaging of Actin Cytoskeletal Integrity During Aging in C. elegans. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022;2364:101–137. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1661-1_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Krueger F. FelixKrueger/TrimGalore. 2025. https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore/releases GitHub.
- 161.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., Gingeras T.R. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Liao Y., Smyth G.K., Shi W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Leek J.T., Johnson W.E., Parker H.S., Jaffe A.E., Storey J.D. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:882–883. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Chen E.Y., Tan C.M., Kou Y., Duan Q., Wang Z., Meirelles G.V., Clark N.R., Ma’ayan A. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinf. 2013;14:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Kuleshov M.V., Jones M.R., Rouillard A.D., Fernandez N.F., Duan Q., Wang Z., Koplev S., Jenkins S.L., Jagodnik K.M., Lachmann A., et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W90–W97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Conway J.R., Lex A., Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2938–2940. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Patil I. Visualizations with statistical details: The “ggstatsplot” approach. J. Open Source Softw. 2021;6:3167. doi: 10.21105/joss.03167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Fisher R.A. On the Interpretation of X2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 1922;85:87–94. doi: 10.2307/2340521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Teefy B.B., Lemus A.J.J., Adler A., Xu A., Bhala R., Hsu K., Benayoun B.A. Widespread sex dimorphism across single-cell transcriptomes of adult African turquoise killifish tissues. Cell Rep. 2023;42 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Leek J.T. svaseq: removing batch effects and other unwanted noise from sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Ritchie M.E., Phipson B., Wu D., Hu Y., Law C.W., Shi W., Smyth G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Sonnenschein R.N., Johnson T.A., Tenney K., Valeriote F.A., Crews P. A reassignment of (-)-mycothiazole and the isolation of a related diol. J. Nat. Prod. 2006;69:145–147. doi: 10.1021/np0503597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Morris J.D., Takahashi-Ruiz L., Persi L.N., Summers J.C., McCauley E.P., Chan P.Y.W., Amberchan G., Lizama-Chamu I., Coppage D.A., Crews P., et al. Re-evaluation of the Fijianolide/Laulimalide Chemotype Suggests an Alternate Mechanism of Action for C-15/C-20 Analogs. ACS Omega. 2022;7:8824–8832. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Takahashi-Ruiz L., Morris J.D., Crews P., Johnson T.A., Risinger A.L. In Vivo Evaluation of (−)-Zampanolide Demonstrates Potent and Persistent Antitumor Efficacy When Targeted to the Tumor Site. Molecules. 2022;27:4244. doi: 10.3390/molecules27134244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Johnson T.A., Morris J.D., Coppage D.A., Cook C.V., Persi L.N., Ogarrio M.A., Garcia T.C., McIntosh N.L., McCauley E.P., Media J., et al. Reinvestigation of Mycothiazole Reveals the Penta-2,4-dien-1-ol Residue Imparts Picomolar Potency and 8S Configuration. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020;11:108–113. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Watts K.R., Morinaka B.I., Amagata T., Robinson S.J., Tenney K., Bray W.M., Gassner N.C., Lokey R.S., Media J., Valeriote F.A., Crews P. Biostructural Features of Additional Jasplakinolide (Jaspamide) Analogues. J. Nat. Prod. 2011;74:341–351. doi: 10.1021/np100721g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Juster F.T., Suzman R. An Overview of the Health and Retirement Study. J. Hum. Resour. 1995;30:S7–S56. doi: 10.2307/146277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 178.dbGaP Study. 2012 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000428.v1.p1 [Google Scholar]
- 179.Laurie C.C., Doheny K.F., Mirel D.B., Pugh E.W., Bierut L.J., Bhangale T., Boehm F., Caporaso N.E., Cornelis M.C., Edenberg H.J., et al. Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome-wide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 2010;34:591–602. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Weir D.R. Quality Control Report for Genotypic Data. University of Michigan; 2013. https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/genetic/HRS-QC-Report-Phase-4_Nov2021_FINAL.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 181.Wu C., Smit E., Peralta C.A., Sarathy H., Odden M.C. Functional Status Modifies the Association of Blood Pressure with Death in Elders: Health and Retirement Study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2017;65:1482–1489. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Batsis J.A., Germain C.M., Vásquez E., Bartels S.J. Prevalence of weakness and its relationship with limitations based on the Foundations for the National Institutes for Health project: data from the Health and Retirement Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;70:1168–1173. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Kim D.H., Glynn R.J., Avorn J., Lipsitz L.A., Rockwood K., Pawar A., Schneeweiss S. Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index Against Physical Performance and Adverse Health Outcomes in the Health and Retirement Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74:1271–1276. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Novembre J., Johnson T., Bryc K., Kutalik Z., Boyko A.R., Auton A., Indap A., King K.S., Bergmann S., Nelson M.R., et al. Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature. 2008;456:98–101. doi: 10.1038/nature07331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Tian C., Gregersen P.K., Seldin M.F. Accounting for ancestry: population substructure and genome-wide association studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008;17:R143–R150. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Price A.L., Patterson N.J., Plenge R.M., Weinblatt M.E., Shadick N.A., Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:904–909. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Han B., Kang H.M., Eskin E. Rapid and Accurate Multiple Testing Correction and Power Estimation for Millions of Correlated Markers. PLoS Genet. 2009;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Sham P.C., Purcell S.M. Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014;15:335–346. doi: 10.1038/nrg3706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Dudbridge F., Gusnanto A. Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans. Genet. Epidemiol. 2008;32:227–234. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Pahl R., Schäfer H. PERMORY: an LD-exploiting permutation test algorithm for powerful genome-wide association testing. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2093–2100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.North B.V., Curtis D., Sham P.C. A Note on the Calculation of Empirical P Values from Monte Carlo Procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002;71:439–441. doi: 10.1086/341527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.R: The R Project for Statistical Computing https://www.r-project.org/.
- 193.Aguet F., Brown A.A., Castel S.E., Davis J.R., He Y., Jo B., Mohammadi P., Park Y., Parsana P., Segrè A.V., et al. Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature. 2017;550:204–213. doi: 10.1038/nature24277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(A) Macro for quantification of hypodermal actin structures as percent fluorescent area.
(B) Macro for quantification of DHS-3::GFP integrated fluorescence intensity.
(C) Macro for quantification of gut mCherry integrated fluorescence intensity.
(D) Macro for quantification of lipid droplet and neuronal polyQ aggregate number and size.
Data Availability Statement
-
•
Data: All data required to evaluate the conclusions in this manuscript are available within the manuscript and supplemental information. All raw RNA-seq datasets are available through Annotare 2.0 Array Express Accession E-MTAB-16193 and E-MTAB-16195. This paper analyzes existing, publicly available GWAS phenotype and genotype data, accessible at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) under accession number EGAS00001001036 and the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) under accession number phs000428.v2.p2.
-
•
Code: All code used to analyze datasets included in this work is available on the Sanabria lab GitHub repository: https://github.com/SanabriaLab/Averbukh-et-al.-2026
-
•
All strains synthesized in this manuscript are derivatives of N2 or other strains from CGC and are either made available on CGC or available upon request.
