Abstract
Practical relevance:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in senior cats. Early diagnosis can facilitate interventions to slow progression and minimise clinical signs. Management according to the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) staging system for CKD can lead to prolonged survival and an excellent quality of life for affected cats.
Aim:
The ‘2026 iCatCare consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease in cats’ provide information on the pathogenesis of CKD, guidance on making a diagnosis and staging of disease, and practical content on medical and nutritional treatment. They also discuss optimising the home and veterinary clinic environment to positively influence mental wellbeing and, in turn, physical health, as well as working with the whole veterinary team and caregivers to slow disease progression and maximise quality of life.
Clinical challenges:
Affected cats may show minimal or no clinical signs in the early stages of CKD, which can result in a delay in diagnosis. The condition is generally progressive and management requires consideration of multiple factors in order to address clinical signs. Complications such as hypercalcaemia, hypertension, proteinuria and anaemia may develop, requiring treatment. Moreover, as advancing age is a risk factor for CKD, cats may have important comorbidities that need to be balanced, with impacts on the kidney. Caring for a cat with CKD can result in caregiver burden. Hence, supporting caregivers, contextualising monitoring to the individual cat, and involving both the veterinary and nursing teams is important.
Evidence base:
These Guidelines have been created by a panel of experts brought together by International Cat Care (iCatCare) Veterinary Society. Information is based on the available literature, expert opinion and the panel members’ experience.
Specific abbreviations:
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ACKD = acute-on-chronic kidney disease; AKI = acute kidney injury; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; CKD = chronic kidney disease; CKD-MBD = CKD–mineral and bone disorder; FGF23 = fibroblast growth factor 23; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; iCa = ionised calcium; ICGN = immune-complex glomerulonephritis; IRIS = International Renal Interest Society; PTH = parathyroid hormone; SDMA = symmetric dimethylarginine
Keywords: Renal, creatinine, urinalysis, phosphate, diet
Introduction
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common cause of illness in cats. The previous ‘ISFM consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of feline chronic kidney disease’ 1 were published by the then International Society of Feline Medicine in 2016 to provide clinicians with practical information on the condition. However, over the past 10 years, a large body of research has progressed the understanding of CKD in terms of causes, early diagnosis and management strategies.
The ‘2026 iCatCare consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease in cats’ from International Cat Care (iCatCare) Veterinary Society seek both to supply updated information – with the addition of dedicated sections on comorbidities, anaesthesia and analgesia – and to discuss the importance of early diagnosis in order to allow the integration of measures to slow the progression of CKD. In addition, accompanying these Guidelines are resources from iCatCare Veterinary Society – for caregivers on managing a cat with CKD and for nurses and technicians to enable a team-based approach to this important condition.


Prevalence of CKD and the importance of routine health screening
CKD is frequently encountered by veterinarians and, generally, the disease has a very low prevalence in young cats, becoming more common with age.2–4 Congenital renal disease is usually recognised in cats <3 years of age, after which the prevalence of CKD decreases and then increases again from 6 years onwards. 5 CKD is one of the most commonly diagnosed diseases in older cats, with studies variously reporting a prevalence of 28–81% in all cats aged >12 years.5–8 It was the most common cause of death in an investigation of cats in the UK aged 5 years or older; death due to renal disease occurred in 13.6% of the study cats, with a median age at death of 15 years. 9 Kidney disease was also the most common cause of death in insured cats dying before the age of 13 years in a Swedish study. 10
Many cats with CKD may be diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease, as they exhibit few clinical signs during the early stages. However, early diagnosis and intervention can allow monitoring, as well as the initiation of dietary and other therapeutic measures, when appropriate. Therefore, screening of cats ⩾7 years of age is recommended. Screening is achieved by performing regular body weight measurement, blood examination and urinalysis, even in asymptomatic cats.1,2 For mature adult cats, aged 7–10 years, annual examinations are recommended, whereas senior cats (>10 years) should preferably be presented twice a year for a routine health check.2,11,12
Such health screening revealed subclinical CKD (International Renal Interest Society [IRIS] stage 2 or higher) in 8% of apparently healthy older cats in two prospective studies at Ghent University, Belgium.13,14 The disease occurred significantly more frequently in healthy-appearing senior cats (15%) compared with mature adult cats (3%). 14 Of cats
who were confirmed healthy during the first screening, a further 24% aged ⩾11 years and 8% aged 7–10 years developed azotaemia within 2 years. 14 Therefore, even when initial health screening results are unremarkable, and cats are non-azotaemic, it is advised to monitor older cats longitudinally and evaluate serial laboratory data for the individual cat so that changes (eg, creatinine trending upwards or sudden increases in creatinine) can be identified sooner.11,12,14,15
Pathophysiology of CKD
Risk factors for CKD
Age is the most consistently identified risk factor for CKD in cats. 6 Histopathological changes consistent with renal ageing develop in older cats, 16 suggesting that age-associated structural alterations may increase renal susceptibility to further injury. Also, a species-related predisposition to CKD is recognised in felids, including domestic and wild species, and their obligate carnivore status has been suggested to contribute to this risk. 17 Tubular lipid accumulation is a speciesspecific phenomenon that may play an important role in CKD pathogenesis and progression.5,16,18 Dietary factors associated with obligate carnivore status – such as high pro-tein19,20 and phosphate 21 intake, increased dietary acid load 22 and alterations in gut-derived uraemic toxin profiles 23 – may be contributing risk factors in the pathogenesis of CKD.
Several comorbid conditions are associated with an increased risk of developing or exacerbating CKD. These include hyperthyroidism, 24 persistent (including borderline) proteinuria (which may be due to hypertension),25–27 repeated renal ischaemic events and repeated ureteral obstructions.5,28 Additionally, cohort studies have identified periodontal disease as being a potential risk factor,29,30 indicating that chronic inflammatory and systemic conditions may influence renal health. Frequent vaccination status has also been proposed as a risk factor, 29 although current evidence remains limited and further investigation is required.

Figure 1.

Histology section (trichrome stain) of tubulointerstitial nephritis, the typical change found in cats with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This image illustrates focal areas of interstitial inflammation, fibrosis and tubular loss (blue, purple) interspersed among healthy tubules. Image courtesy of Shannon McLeland
Known aetiologies of feline CKD
In the majority of cats with CKD, the underlying cause of their disease cannot be determined; if renal biopsies are performed, histopathology (see box, ‘Histopathological lesions in cats with CKD’) reveals chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis of unknown aetiology. 34 However, there are a number of well recognised diseases or conditions that are known or suspected to be an inciting cause of CKD (Box 1), as outlined in the following discussion.


Inherited/genetic causes of CKD
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, the result of a mutation in the PKD1 gene, is the most prominent inherited disease of cats, affecting 38% of Persians worldwide (6% of all cats). 39
Hereditary forms of amyloid A amyloidosis (AA-amyloidosis) are recognised in Abyssinian, Somali, Siamese and Oriental cats, in which the deposition of amyloid can lead to dysfunction in multiple organs, resulting in decreasing kidney function or hepatic rupture and fatal haemorrhage. Research is ongoing to characterise which genetic variants are implicated in this condi-tion.40,41 Additionally, AA-amyloidosis has been reported in shelter cats with rapidly progressive CKD, with the hypothesis that chronic inflammation may have triggered amyloid deposition or horizontal transmission may have occurred. 42
In the future, our understanding of the genetic risk factors for idiopathic CKD in cats is likely to expand. Recent work has identified an association between a genetic variant in the gene encoding for feline apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages (a protein involved in kidney repair) and declining kidney function in CKD. 43
Nephrolithiasis
It has long been debated whether nephrolithiasis causes CKD, or if CKD results in urolithiasis. The vast majority of nephroliths in cats are calcium oxalate,44,45 making dissolution impossible. Epidemiological research shows that incidental nephroliths are not associated with progression of CKD in older cats, 46 but nephroliths that move and lead to ureteral obstruction can result in severe kidney damage – the extent of injury being proportional to both the degree and duration of the obstruction.
Figure 2.

Ultrasound image of a polycystic kidney in a Persian cat. Image courtesy of Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists
Figure 3.

Renal carcinoma in an 11-year-old cat presenting with azotaemia and unilateral renomegaly. Image courtesy of Samantha Taylor
Unilateral ureteral obstruction can easily be overlooked in the clinic because azotaemia will not develop when the contralateral kidney has normal function. However, subsequent damage can lead to marked fibrosis and shrinking of the affected kidney. A disparity in size of >0.7 cm between the kidneys is referred to as ‘big kidney-little kidney’ syndrome (Figure 4), 47 and this has been documented in 33% of cats with upper urinary tract (kidney and/or ureter) stones. 45
Figure 4.

‘Big kidney-little kidney’ syndrome occurs when a prior, undetected, unilateral ureteral obstruction results in damage to one kidney, leading to fibrosis and shrinkage of that kidney over time. The contralateral kidney hypertrophies to help increase the global glomerular filtration rate. The size difference may be exacerbated if the second kidney suffers a ureteral obstruction, and this may be the point at which the cat presents as azotaemic and unwell. Image courtesy of Rebecca Geddes
When ureteral obstruction is identified, surgical intervention is recommended over medical management due to improved out-comes. 48 However, medical management can result in good outcomes, with younger age and more distal small uroliths showing a significant association with successful treat-ment. 49 After surgical management to restore urine flow from the kidney to the bladder (eg, subcutaneous ureteral bypass placement, ureteral reimplantation), cats should be considered to have CKD; this appears analogous to idiopathic CKD in terms of future disease progression. 50
Acute kidney injury
Any cause of AKI due to renal insult (eg, pyelonephritis, toxin or drug-related, ischaemic injury or postrenal obstruction) should be considered to be a contributing factor to the subsequent development of CKD. 51
Hypercalcaemia and nephrocalcinosis
Nephrocalcinosis is the deposition of calcium in the parenchyma of the kidney, which, in cats, typically consists of calcium phosphate deposits in the renal medulla. 52 The incidence of histological nephrocalcinosis is higher in cats with azotaemic CKD compared with non-azotaemic cats. 53
The relationship between nephrocalcinosis and the progression of CKD is complex. Retrospective data indicate that it takes time for nephrocalcinosis to develop, because cats with rapidly progressive CKD and shorter survival times are the least likely to demonstrate microscopic nephrocalcinosis at postmortem examination. 52 Prospective studies of hypercalcaemic cats managed on renal diets have shown that they are more likely to develop nephrocalcinosis. 54 In turn, this is associated with a greater increase in serum creatinine, phosphate and FGF23 over time when compared with cats fed a renal diet who did not develop nephrocalcinosis, suggesting that nephrocalcinosis may contribute to CKD pro-gression. 54 Thus, when feeding a renal diet, serum calcium (preferably ionised) should be monitored. If hypercalcaemia develops, measures to reduce serum calcium will be needed (see ‘Management of hypercalcaemia’).
Glomerular diseases
Glomerulonephropathies are an uncommon cause of CKD but important to recognise. Primary glomerular diseases include ICGN and non-immune-complex glomerulonephri-tis. 55 ICGN is a significant cause of proteinuric renal disease, typically affecting younger cats who present with azotaemia, marked proteinuria, hypoalbuminaemia, anaemia, reno-megaly 33 and, in some cases, plasma cell pododermatitis. 56 As early diagnosis and management may increase the chances of disease control, urinalysis, including quantification of protein, should be performed in azotaemic patients.
Primary hyperaldosteronism
Primary hyperaldosteronism, which is the result of excessive aldosterone secretion secondary to adrenal neoplasia or hyperplasia, is an uncommon endocrinopathy in cats, but CKD is a frequently reported comorbidity. 57 It is possible that excess aldosterone contributes directly to the development of CKD through stimulation of fibrosis and that further renal damage occurs due to associated systemic hypertension. 58 Importantly, cats with CKD may have adrenal gland hyperplasia, so appropriate diagnostic testing is indicated before making a diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism. 59
Progression of CKD
CKD progression can follow two principal pathways. In the first, disease advances gradually and continuously due to ongoing intrarenal processes, ultimately leading to loss of nephrons and replacement of the functional parenchyma with fibrotic tissue. The second involves a stepwise trajectory characterised by discrete episodes of AKI. Some of these episodes may be subclinical and go unnoticed, yet still contribute to disease progression, while others are clinically evident and classified as acute-on-chronic kidney disease (ACKD).60,61 The relative prevalence and the impact of these pathways remain incompletely understood.
All the known aetiologies of AKI, including ischaemia, infection, inflammation and nephrotoxicity, are potential triggers of ACKD. In a study of ACKD in cats, ischaemia, ureteral obstruction and pyelonephritis were the most common presumed causes; yet, in 66% of cases, the aetiology remained unidentified at presentation and throughout the course of disease. 61
AKI and CKD have traditionally been regarded as distinct clinical entities. However, increasing evidence suggests a bidirectional interplay – with CKD representing a risk factor for AKI, 61 and AKI episodes potentially initiating or accelerating the progression of CKD. 51
Factors associated with the progression of CKD
Several factors are associated with CKD progression in cats, as illustrated by the findings of a number of studies. The severity of proteinuria is strongly associated with survival time, 62 while the UPC is an independent predictor of CKD progression within the first 12 months following diagnosis. 63 Variables involved in CKD–mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD; Box 2) are also associated with CKD progression and outcomes: increased serum phosphate concentration is associated with progression within 12 months of diagno-sis 63 and also with a short survival time; 70 higher serum FGF23 concentration at the point of diagnosis of azotaemic CKD is similarly associated with both disease progression and mortality. 71

Monitoring in the first 3 months from diagnosis can aid prediction of progression, suggesting serial monitoring of creatinine, phosphate and body weight can identify cats with progressive CKD vs stable disease; cats with progressive CKD have a significantly shorter survival time (>60% dying within 365 days of diagnosis). 72 Other factors associated with progression of CKD include anaemia, 63 uraemic toxins (Box 3) 74 and hypokalaemia. 77
Clinical signs of CKD
Clinical signs associated with CKD are typically insidious in onset and often non-specific. The most commonly reported signs, both historically and in more recent studies, have been polyuria (PU), polydipsia (PD) and weight loss, followed by loss of appetite and vomit-ing.78–80 Other common signs include lethargy and weakness, although many cats show no clinical signs and may only be diagnosed via health screening.14,80,81 Weight loss (Figure 6), which is typically gradual in onset, 82 may occur due to nausea and malaise associated with complications of CKD, such as hypo-kalaemia, anaemia, acidosis, constipation and dehydration, as well as appetite dysregu-lation due to accumulation of anorexigenic substances. 83
Figure 6.

Weight loss is common in cats with CKD and may be the only clinical sign. This patient also has a poor haircoat and reduced muscle condition, which are further typical findings in cats with CKD. Image courtesy of Sarah Caney
Insidious weight loss and loss of muscle mass may go unnoticed by caregivers or be incorrectly attributed to age. One large study of over 500 cats reported a median loss of 8.9% body weight in the 12 months before diagnosis of CKD, but found that weight loss was already present 3 years before diagnosis and accelerated after diagnosis. 82 Unintended weight loss or a deterioration in body condition score (BCS) or muscle condition score (MCS) should not be ignored, and should prompt consideration of further diagnostic testing.

Less frequent signs of CKD include neck ventroflexion due to hypokalaemia (Figure 7) 84 and lower urinary tract signs due to urinary tract infection (UTI) and constipation.85,86 Constipation may indicate chronic dehydration and/or hypokalaemia. Uraemic halitosis and oral ulceration may develop in cats with advanced CKD (Figure 8). 79
Figure 7.

Neck ventroflexion and generalised weakness in a cat due to hypokalaemia associated with CKD. Image courtesy of Sarah Caney
Figure 8.

Painful uraemic oral ulcers and halitosis may develop in cats with severe azotaemia due to CKD. Image courtesy of Sarah Caney
Making a diagnosis of CKD
Although standardised diagnostic criteria for cats have not been established, feline CKD is generally defined following principles analogous to human CKD, 87 requiring documentation of chronic (eg, ⩾3 months) functional impairment or structural renal change. However, in practical terms, postponing interventions to confirm persistent change would not be recommended in cats with clinical signs or higher stage CKD. Confirmation of persistent azotaemia sooner is desirable in order to expedite interventions (eg, repeat testing 2 weeks later).
In the clinical setting, a diagnosis may be based on a serum creatinine concentration above the laboratory reference interval (RI), in combination with an inappropriately low urine specific gravity (USG) or persistent azotaemia (when urine cannot be obtained). In addition, consideration is given to other supportive findings such as evidence of structural change on imaging or kidney palpation and/or proteinuria. A USG <1.035 should raise suspicion for decreased urineconcentrating ability and early-stage CKD, even when other markers of kidney function remain within the RI, particularly when documented consistently over time. In such cases, further investigations including serial measurement of serum creatinine and diagnostic imaging can support a diagnosis of CKD.
Not all cats with CKD will meet all criteria; for example, CKD can be diagnosed based on structural changes on diagnostic imaging or persistent proteinuria (UPC >0.4) without azotaemia (see ‘IRIS staging of CKD’). Other important aspects that clinicians should be aware of in relation to the diagnosis of CKD are addressed in Box 4.
History and physical examination
Pertinent historical findings were discussed in the earlier section, ‘Clinical signs of CKD’. Physical examination may be unremarkable in cats with CKD, but suggestive findings include pallor due to anaemia (Figure 9), clinical evidence of dehydration, signs of target organ damage due to systemic hypertension (Box 5), 90 abnormal renal palpation (often small, firm kidneys), firm faeces in the colon, and reduced BCS and/or MCS.78,79 Cats should also be assessed for signs of comorbidities such as periodontal disease, cardiac disease, hyperthyroidism, cognitive dysfunction syndrome and degenerative joint disease (DJD) (see ‘CKD and important comorbidities’).
Figure 9.

Pallor in a cat with non-regenerative anaemia due to CKD. Image courtesy of Sarah Caney
Serum creatinine
Creatinine is the most widely used surrogate marker of GFR. It is the preferred marker over urea as it is less affected by non-renal factors and so has greater specificity. 91 However, creatinine concentration has its limitations: it is influenced by muscle mass and hydration status. Moreover, RIs vary among reference laboratories and analytical methods. 92 Creatinine also demonstrates a non-linear relationship with GFR; therefore, a substantial decline in GFR might occur prior to an increase in serum creatinine above the laboratory RI. 93
Ideally, an RI designed for the population to which the cat belongs is used. Since CKD occurs more commonly in older cats, age-appropriate RIs for older cats may best be used in cats aged ⩾7 years. 94 It has been shown that serum creatinine is lower in older cats, possibly due to loss of lean muscle mass, and so the upper limit of the RI for creatinine needs to be adjusted downwards.95,96 Additionally, ‘trending’ can be performed if previous blood examination results are available (see Box 4), ideally using the same laboratory for measurements.


Figure 10.

Blood pressure measurement should be performed as the first part of the clinical examination and in as calm a manner as possible, with minimal handling, allowing the cat to adopt a natural position. Here the cat is in the base of their carrier, with the cuff placed around the tail. Image courtesy of Sarah Caney
Figure 11.

Distant indirect ophthalmoscopy. The technique is performed in a darkened room (for the purposes of this image, there is daylight), with the examiner standing at arm’s length from the cat, directing the light source towards the cat’s eye. The angle of the light beam should be adjusted until a bright tapetal reflection is seen; then a 20–30 dioptre hand lens is placed just in front of the eye, perpendicular to the beam of light. The ‘belly’ (bulging side) of the lens should be facing the examiner (‘belly to belly’). An inverted image of the fundus is obtained and the lens magnification typically ensures that much of the fundus is visible in one view. Image courtesy of Sarah Caney
Figure 12.

Ocular target organ damage is present in up to 80% of cats with systemic hypertension and can manifest as (a) anterior changes such as hyphaema and/or (b) retinal and choroidal changes such as oedema, haemorrhage and detachment. Images courtesy of Sarah Caney
Symmetric dimethylarginine
SDMA is a more recently available biomarker of GFR. Initial studies showed that SDMA demonstrated greater sensitivity than creatinine for the detection of reduced renal function, with some studies indicating that elevations in SDMA might be documented 17 months before creatinine exceeds the upper limit of the RI in cats with CKD. 95 Subsequent research, however, has shown that the correlation between SDMA and GFR, and creatinine and GFR, is comparable.97,98 Unlike creatinine, SDMA concentrations are less affected by muscle mass and may be more reliable during inflammatory states and in animals with loss of muscle mass.99,100
Pre-renal and non-renal factors influence serum SDMA concentrations. Importantly, this includes hyperthyroidism in older cats, where factors other than GFR may lead to elevations in serum SDMA (see ‘CKD and important comor-bidities’).101,102 Lymphoma can elevate SDMA concentrations. 103 Conversely, cats with diabetes mellitus often have significantly lower SDMA concentrations than healthy controls or those with renal or cardiac disease. 104 For older cats, a higher diagnostic threshold (⩾18 µg/dl) than the standard commercial immunoassay cut-off (>14 µg/dl) has been proposed for SDMA. 96

Serum total and/or ionised calcium
Calcium concentrations in cats with CKD may be low, normal or increased, and should be interpreted as part of CKD-MBD. Total calcium reflects protein-bound, complexed and ionised fractions, but only the ionised fraction is biologically active and clinically relevant. Therefore, direct measurement of ionised calcium (iCa) is recommended whenever possible in cats with CKD.
Ionised hypercalcaemia is present at diagnosis in 20% of cats with CKD, 110 and is typically mild, yet can exacerbate CKD by further lowering GFR and contributing to anorexia, PU/PD, muscle weakness, constipation, urolithiasis and soft tissue calcification. Identification of azotaemia concurrent with hypercalcaemia can be challenging to interpret because CKD may promote hypercal-caemia, while ionised hypercalcaemia can reduce GFR; therefore, dependent on case presentation, clinicians should consider evaluating for additional causes such as neoplasia or diet-related factors.
Serum phosphate
The kidneys play a key role in phosphate regulation. Hyperphosphataemia develops in CKD because of decreased renal excretion of phosphate, although phosphate concentrations are often within the RI in earlier stages of disease because of PTH and FGF23 regulatory mechanisms.111–113 Therefore, serum phosphate should not be considered a sensitive marker of CKD.

Glomerular filtration rate
GFR is considered the most accurate and sensitive measure of kidney function, although RIs are wide and measurements can vary temporally in an individual cat. 91 In cats with established azotaemic CKD, assessment of GFR is rarely indicated because it does not add useful diagnostic information beyond an increase in serum creatinine concentration. Measurement of GFR may be considered in suspected early, non-azotaemic CKD, or when precise evaluation of renal function is required to guide the safe use or dosing of renally excreted drugs. In such cases, simplified and single-sample iohexol clearance protocols are available for estimating GFR in cats, but are rarely performed in practice.91,93,114
Haematology
Normocytic normochromic non-regenerative anaemia is common in cats with CKD,34,63 especially in the later stages of disease. Thus, a complete blood count, or, as a minimum, assessment of packed cell volume (PCV) and a blood smear review, is indicated. Cats with pyelonephritis may exhibit leukocytosis.
Urinalysis
The most important urinary parameters to evaluate as part of the diagnostic work-up are USG and urine protein.
✜ Urine-concentrating ability One of the earliest manifestations of a decline in kidney function is a reduction in urine-concentrating ability (USG <1.035).115,116 In many cases, urine-concentrating ability decreases or is lost before serum creatinine exceeds the upper limit of the RI. 79 However, despite urine concentration being one of the earliest markers of decreased kidney function, cats with early-stage CKD and mildly elevated creatinine could have appropriately concentrated urine (ie, USG ⩾1.035). Unless a cat is being fed a high-moisture diet, or has another reason for producing dilute urine, a USG <1.035 should alert the clinician to the possibility of CKD and prompt repeated assessment and further investigation, if persistent. 91

Figure 13.

Where possible, urine should be obtained via cystocentesis for bacterial culture. The technique can be performed using minimal handling, with the cat in a comfortable standing position and food offered as a distraction. Image courtesy of Jessica Quimby
✜ Proteinuria An important and clinically relevant parameter in the diagnosis and evaluation of CKD in cats is proteinuria. A persistent high-magnitude renal proteinuria most commonly reflects glomerular injury, which may be the inciting cause of the disease and may be present before marked increases in serum creatinine occur. 55 Proteinuria may also be the result of hyperfiltration and hypertension, and thus a secondary consequence of tubular interstitial disease.63,117 The presence of proteinuria (UPC >0.2) in conjunction with other abnormalities, such as azotaemia, inappropriate urine-concentrating ability, structural changes or increases in SDMA, supports a diagnosis of CKD. In addition, the magnitude of UPC provides prognostic information and is associated with disease progression, making the identification and monitoring of this urinary parameter an integral component of CKD assessment in cats (see ‘IRIS staging of CKD’).62,118 UPC should be interpreted alongside sediment examination and biochemistry results to exclude pre- and post-renal proteinuria.
✜ Urine sediment examination An additional essential part of urinalysis in cats with suspected CKD is urine sediment examination, which provides clinically relevant information that may either identify the cause or highlight complications of the disease (eg, crystalluria, bacteriuria; Box 6).
Diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic imaging is an important part of the assessment of cats presenting with azotaemia or suspected renal disease. The aim is to rule in intrinsic renal disease, as well as rule out postrenal azotaemia (ie, ureteral obstruction and/or hydronephrosis; Figure 14) or other causes of azotaemia such as renal neoplasia, 137 polycystic kidney disease or infectious causes (feline infectious peritonitis, pyeloneph-ritis). 138 Imaging (radiographs, ultrasound, CT) may also demonstrate the presence of CKD when serum creatinine and other biomarkers are normal in early (IRIS stage 1) disease. Findings typical of CKD on imaging include small kidney size, irregular margins and loss of corticomedullary definition (Figure 15). 138 Additional findings that may be observed in cats with CKD include renal mineralisation, nephroliths or striations in the cortex.
Figure 14.

Imaging such as ultrasound can be used to look for underlying causes of CKD and exclude causes of postrenal azotaemia such as (a) ureterolithiasis or (b) hydronephrosis. Images courtesy of Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists
Figure 15.

Typical ultrasound findings in a cat with intrinsic CKD, including a small, irregular kidney with loss of corticomedullary definition. Image courtesy of Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists
Renal cytology and histopathology
Fine-needle aspiration of the kidneys is indicated when neoplasia or infection (eg, feline infectious peritonitis) is suspected. 139 Kidney biopsy or SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) on urine is indicated in cats with suspected glomerular disease to assess for ICGN. 33 Contraindications to tissue biopsy such as coagulopathies or uncontrolled hypertension must be excluded, and the procedure should only be performed when the potential diagnostic and therapeutic benefits justify the risks, which include haemorrhage, hydronephrosis and death. 140
Renal sampling has limited utility once CKD has been diagnosed, as typical irreversible histopathological changes are expected and will not alter management approaches. Sampling may be considered in cases of suspected ACKD or rapidly progressive disease where imaging abnormalities are present suggesting additional pathology (eg, neoplasia).
Biomarkers
Research into biomarkers of kidney injury is rapidly expanding in both human and veterinary medicine, largely driven by the limitations of currently used markers of renal function. Serum creatinine and SDMA are surrogate markers of GFR and, as such, are insensitive to renal injury where there is no concurrent decline in kidney function. 91
Initial investigations into novel biomarkers primarily focused on the early detection of AKI, and multiple studies have demonstrated that injury biomarkers can identify AKI days before increases in functional markers are observed. 106 In several of these studies, animals with CKD were included as control groups and, unexpectedly, many individuals with apparently stable CKD exhibited increased concentrations of injury biomarkers, suggesting the presence of ongoing tubular epithelial damage or stress. 141 In preliminary studies in dogs with stage 1 CKD, an association between markers of tubular epithelial injury and the rate of disease progression has been shown; 142 however, comparable data in cats with CKD (particularly IRIS stage 1) are currently lacking.
Serum cystatin C is a protein produced by nucleated cells and filtered freely at the glomerulus before reabsorption in the proximal tubules. It was proposed as a useful biomarker for CKD in cats, but data showed only a weak correlation between GFR and serum cystatin C and, hence, it was concluded not to be useful. 143 It also remains to be determined whether biomarkers of tubular epithelial injury (eg, cystatin B), or other markers reflecting intrarenal pathophysiological processes, are sufficiently sensitive for the diagnosis of early-stage CKD. This stage represents a significant diagnostic challenge, yet is of critical clinical importance, as current diagnostic approaches often identify CKD only after substantial nephron loss has already occurred. Earlier identification of CKD through sensitive biomarkers might enable more effective therapeutic intervention before irreversible loss of kidney function has developed. 141
FGF23 is a hormone produced by osteocytes and osteoblasts that is responsible for regulation of phosphate and calcitriol (see Box 2). Serum FGF23 concentrations have been shown to be significantly higher in cats with azotaemic CKD than in healthy cats; moreover, concentrations increased significantly with increasing severity of CKD.71,144 FGF23 is a biomarker for phosphate derangement in CKD, identifying cats who may benefit from intervention, but it is not recommended as a screening test for early diagnosis of the disease. 145
IRIS staging of CKD
IRIS staging standardises assessment of the severity of CKD, guides evidence-based treatment and monitoring decisions, and improves communication and prognostication for the benefit of clinicians and caregivers alike. It is based on either fasting serum creatinine concentration alone or creatinine and SDMA (Figure 16). Subsequent substaging is based on the magnitude of renal proteinuria and SBP, which are therapeutically modifiable risk factors for disease progression.
Figure 16.

Decision-making for International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) staging and substaging of chronic kidney disease (CKD). SBP = systolic blood pressure; SDMA = symmetric dimethylarginine; UPC = urine protein:creatinine ratio
When to perform IRIS staging
✜ IRIS staging should only be performed in a cat with a confirmed diagnosis of CKD, based on evidence of persistent functional or chronic structural changes (see ‘Making a diagnosis of CKD’).
✜ IRIS staging should be restricted to cats with clinically stable CKD. Staging is not appropriate in cats with AKI or ACKD, or when creatinine or SDMA concentrations are rapidly changing (eg, with dehydration, upper or lower urinary tract obstruction, or recent fluid therapy).
✜ Prerenal and postrenal causes of azotaemia should be corrected before staging. IRIS recommends using fasting serum creatinine alone, or creatinine and SDMA, measured on at least two occasions in a well-hydrated, clinically stable patient. If concentrations are inconsistent, measurement(s) should be repeated after 2–4 weeks before staging is confirmed.
How to perform IRIS staging
✜ Initial staging (IRIS stages 1-4) Following a confirmed diagnosis of CKD, assign an IRIS stage based on fasting creatinine alone, or creatinine and SDMA, in a stable, hydrated cat, ensuring consistent results on at least two occasions (Table 1).1,69 If discrepancies between creatinine and SDMA exist regarding the CKD stage, IRIS recommends repeating the measurements within 2–4 weeks. If the discrepancy persists, assigning the more advanced stage of CKD would be an appropriate response. 69
✜ Substaging Substage the IRIS classification according to the degree of proteinuria and the SBP.
Table 1.
IRIS staging of feline CKD, based on stable creatinine and SDMA
| Stage | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Creatinine | ||||
| μmol/l | <140 | 140–250 | 251–440 | >440 |
| mg/dl | <1.6 | 1.6–2.8 | 2.9–5 | >5 |
| SDMA | ||||
| μg/dl | <18 | 18–25 | 26–38 | >38 |
Adapted from the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS), 69 with permission
CKD = chronic kidney disease; SDMA = symmetric dimethylarginine
– Proteinuria – a substage of non-proteinuric, borderline proteinuric or proteinuric (Table 2) is assigned based on UPC (ideally, measured on a minimum of two urine samples collected at least 2 weeks apart).62,69,146,147
– SBP – a substage of normotensive, prehypertensive, hypertensive or severely hypertensive (Table 2) is assigned based on multiple sequential SBP measurements. The exception is if extra-renal target organ damage is already present, in which case immediate treatment is indicated (see ‘Management of CKD’).1,69
✜ Re-evaluation and monitoring Repeat the staging process if there is a significant change in creatinine/SDMA concentrations, proteinuria or SBP, or a change in the cat’s treatment regimen or clinical status.
Table 2.
IRIS substaging of feline CKD, based on UPC and SBP
| Non- Borderline | proteinuric proteinuric | Proteinuric | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPC | <0.2 | 0.2–0.4 | >0.4 | |
| Normotensive | Pre-hypertensive | Hypertensive | Severely hypertensive | |
| SBP (mmHg) | <140 | 140–159 | 160–179 | ⩾180 |
Adapted from the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS), 69 with permission CKD = chronic kidney disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure; UPC = urine protein:creatinine ratio
Management of CKD
In broad terms, the aims of management of CKD are to address clinical signs to optimise the quality of life of the affected cat and to implement measures aimed at slowing progression of the disease, all the while working as a team with the caregiver to ensure interventions are appropriate for the individual situation (Figure 17).78,148 The former aims assume most importance as the cat reaches the later IRIS stages, whereas the latter measures are more important in the earlier IRIS stages. Compliance should always be considered when prescribing medications; a requirement for multiple drugs is commonplace and can impact quality of life in cats with CKD, 149 as well as contributing to ‘caregiver burden’ (Box 7). 80
Figure 17.

Factors to consider in the management of cats with chronic kidney disease (CKD). ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; Ca:P = calcium:phosphorus ratio; DJD = degenerative joint disease; PEG = polyethylene glycol; SC = subcutaneous; UPC = urine protein:creatinine ratio; UTI = urinary tract infection
Dietary intervention
There is strong evidence to support dietary modification in cats with CKD. Feeding a veterinary therapeutic renal diet can prolong survival and reduce the risk of uraemic crises.66,151 The primary nutrient of concern to slow the progress of CKD and prolong survival is dietary phosphorus (both organic and inorganic); typically, renal diets provide ~80–130 mg phosphorus/100 kcal, whereas non-renal diets may contain up to 400–600 mg/100 kcal. Hyperphosphataemia is associated with reduced survival in cats with CKD.70,146,147

Figure 18.

Including caregivers in the monitoring of their cat – for example, by encouraging assessment of body weight at home and keeping a diary – can help caregivers feel informed about the status of their cat’s illness and encourage communication between the veterinary clinic and caregiver. Image courtesy of Samantha Taylor
In one study, for every 0.32 mmol/l (1 mg/dl) increase in serum phosphate, there was an 11.8% increased risk of death. 70
Plasma phosphate concentration is a potent stimulator of FGF23, a phosphatonin involved in the development of CKD-MBD (see Figure 5). 152 Feeding a reduced-phosphorus diet decreases serum phosphate and FGF23 in cats with CKD. 153
Figure 5.

Pathophysiology of CKD-MBD. A reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) leads to reduced filtration and excretion of phosphate. Increasing phosphate stimulates fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) secretion, which attempts to increase renal phosphate excretion but is limited by decreasing nephron numbers. FGF23 reduces calcitriol concentrations, while increased phosphate complexes with calcium, causing ionised hypocalcaemia. Increased serum phosphate and reduced ionised calcium (iCa) and calcitriol all stimulate parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. These chronic biochemical changes lead to soft tissue mineralisation including nephrocalcinosis, renal osteodystrophy, CKD progression and reduced survival times

Renal diets may also have other benefits for cats with CKD; for example, supplementation with omega 3 fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). In one study, the renal diet with the highest EPA content was the most effective in extending survival in cats with CKD. 67 Additional benefits include supplementation with antioxidants, potassium and B vitamins; they may also contain alkalinising ingredients.
When it comes to choosing a specific reduced phosphate diet for an individual cat, a nutritional assessment should be performed to include measurement of body weight, BCS and MCS, and to identify cat preferences (flavour, texture, frequency of feeding) as well as relevant caregiver factors (finances, lifestyle). 154 Other considerations are outlined below.
✜ Feeding a canned or moist diet will provide more water to the cat, which can aid in maintaining adequate hydration.
✜ Canned diets will be lower in caloric density, requiring cats to eat a greater volume of food, and it may thus be challenging for some cats to maintain weight. By contrast, kibble or dry diets will typically provide about four times more calories per gram than most canned or fresh diets.
✜ Cats with CKD can have a waxing and waning appetite; hence, it is often desirable to have multiple appropriate diet options that meet nutritional needs.
When introducing a new diet to a cat with CKD, it is best to offer small amounts of the new food gradually over at least 1–2 weeks alongside the existing food. Cats often do not like having the new and existing diets mixed, so offering the foods side by side may be better tolerated. It is important never to introduce a novel diet during a period of illness or while, for example, a cat is undergoing diagnostic investigations within the veterinary clinic, as they could develop food aversions affecting long-term acceptance of the food.
Diets marketed for early kidney disease typically provide slightly more protein than diets marketed for more advanced disease. Ultimately, the decision of whether to feed an ‘early’ or ‘advanced’ renal diet may be based on factors other than the cat’s assigned IRIS stage. For example, if a cat is eating fewer calories than ideal, then feeding a higher protein diet may be preferable to ensure the cat’s protein requirement is being met. Additionally, many of the ‘early’ renal diets provide slightly more phosphate and may have a lower calcium:phosphorus (Ca:P) ratio; however, this is not universally the case.
Preserving a healthy body weight, BCS and MCS through maintaining an adequate caloric intake should be prioritised in the management of CKD. Some cats will maintain weight simply by eating their resting energy requirement (RER; calculated as 70 x body weight [kg]0.75). However, for others the RER will need to be multiplied by a maintenance energy requirement (MER) factor of approximately 1.2–1.4. If a cat requires more than 2.0 x RER, additional diagnostics should be performed to assess for comorbid conditions (eg, hyperthyroidism, chronic enteropathy, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency).
Although, ideally, a therapeutic renal diet would be fed exclusively, this is not always possible, and caregivers should be encouraged to continue to feed the renal diet even if it only makes up a proportion of the calories eaten. A diet that is 50% or more renal diet can have a beneficial effect on survival. 66
Further management of hyperphosphataemia
Feeding a phosphate-restricted renal diet is the initial treatment of choice to maintain serum phosphate concentrations within the target range recommended by IRIS for each stage of CKD (Table 3). Evidence is available that these diets slow CKD progression and prolong survival time.66–68 ,151
Table 3.
Target serum phosphate concentrations according to IRIS stage of CKD
| IRIS stage | Phosphate target mmol/l (mg/dl) |
|---|---|
| 1 | N/A |
| 2 | 0.81–1.45 (2.5–4.5) |
| 3 | 0.81–1.63 (2.5–5.0) |
| 4 | 0.81–1.94 (2.5–6.0) |
CKD = chronic kidney disease; IRIS = International Renal Interest Society; N/A = not applicable
However, if feeding a renal diet is not sufficient to reduce serum phosphate to within the target range after 4–6 weeks, a phosphate binder can be considered to help reduce phosphate further (Figures 19 and 20). Phosphate binders should be thoroughly mixed into all meals fed to the cat, with the total daily dose divided between the number of meals fed. This is because their efficacy requires simultaneous administration of dietary phosphate and the binding compound. Calcium-containing phosphate binders (eg, calcium carbonate ± chitosan) are effective and relatively cheap, but these should be avoided in hypercalcaemic cats. Alternative, non-calcium-containing phosphate binders include aluminium hydroxide, sevelamer and lanthanum carbonate.
Figure 19.

Recommended interventions based on serum phosphate in cats with early (International Renal Interest Society [IRIS] stage 1 or 2) chronic kidney disease (CKD). FGF23 = fibroblast growth factor 23; RI = reference interval; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SDMA = symmetric dimethylarginine
Figure 20.

Recommended interventions based on serum phosphate in cats with azotaemia (International Renal Interest Society [IRIS] stage 2, 3 or 4) chronic kidney disease (CKD). FGF23 = fibroblast growth factor 23; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SDMA = symmetric dimethylarginine
Management of hypercalcaemia
Kidney disease is routinely cited as one of the top three aetiologies associated with ionised hypercalcaemia in cats (other common causes are idiopathic hypercalcaemia and neopla-sia).155,156 A retrospective cohort study found that, of cats with azotaemic CKD, approximately 20% demonstrated ionised hypercal-caemia at diagnosis, and an additional 26% went on to develop marked or persistent ionised hypercalcaemia within 12 months of diagnosis. 157 Approximately half of all cats with azotaemic CKD will demonstrate increasing calcium concentrations over time after transition onto a phosphate-restricted renal diet. 112 The consequence of ionised hypercal-caemia in cats with CKD is an increased risk of nephrocalcinosis, which appears to be associated with more progressive CKD. 54
For some cats, feeding a phosphate-restricted diet induces ionised hypercalcaemia via PTH-independent mechanisms; 157 hence, transition onto a higher phosphate diet can normalise elevated iCa concentrations. In one study, the key difference between diets fed to cats who developed hypercalcaemia vs those in whom hypercalcaemia resolved was the dietary Ca:P ratio: a Ca:P ratio of 1.9:1 induced hypercal-caemia and a ratio of 1.3:1 resulted in normalisation of iCa. 158 As such, a newer approach to manage hypercalcaemia in cats with CKD combines these two nutritional goals – namely, feeding a diet with ⩽200 mg calcium/100 kcal and a Ca:P ratio <1.4:1. In a recent case series, this approach was found to improve ionised hypercalcaemia in 9/10 cats with either CKD or idiopathic hypercalcaemia. 159
Ideally, the calcium and phosphate concentrations of all cats with newly diagnosed CKD should be carefully assessed prior to initiating dietary phosphate restriction. Unfortunately, there is a poor correlation between total calcium and iCa concentrations, particularly in cats with azotaemic CKD.157,160 Total calcium underestimates iCa concentrations and, as a result, measurement of iCa is the preferred method for assessment of hypercalcaemia, whenever possible. Alternatively, a total calcium concentration at the high end of the laboratory RI should raise concern for ionised hypercalcaemia.
If a cat is hypercalcaemic at diagnosis of CKD or following the introduction of a therapeutic renal diet, or is diagnosed with calcium oxalate uroliths, careful selection of an alternative therapeutic renal diet that meets the criteria of ⩽200 mg calcium/100 kcal and a Ca:P ratio <1.4:1 is recommended. It is important to remember that the nutrient profiles of specific diets evolve frequently (as often as every 6–12 months); hence, contacting manufacturers may be advisable if unexpected increases in calcium are documented.
Magnesium supplementation of renal diets has been proposed to reduce the tendency for ionised hypercalcaemia and to stabilise serum FGF23 as part of the management of CKD-MBD;64,161 hence, the addition of magnesium to renal foods may be useful in managing cats who develop hypercalcaemia when fed renal diets, allowing greater phosphate restriction. Supplementation with chia seeds may also be considered for hypercalcaemic cats, either in conjunction with the above nutritional approach or on its own.159,162 Chia seeds can be mixed with wet food after being soaked for 20 mins, or alternatively overnight, and therefore contribute additionally to water intake. A suggested dosage is 1–2 g/cat/q24h divided and mixed into each meal.159,162 Other options include bisphosphonates, 163 and a novel therapeutic, cinacalcet, which is a calcimimetic that upregulates the calcium-sensing receptor on the parathyroid gland and has been used to treat hypercalcaemia of CKD in humans. 164 There is limited information on its use in feline CKD, but successful management of idiopathic hypercalcaemia has been reported. 165
Management of nausea and hyporexia
Cats with CKD can suffer from nausea, vomiting and inappetence as a result of uraemic toxins (see Box 3) affecting the central chemoreceptor trigger zone, as well as appetite dysregulation due to the accumulation of anorexigenic substances secondary to decreased renal excretion. 83 These clinical signs are more prevalent in cats with higher stage CKD; 166 hence, when observed in cats with IRIS stage 1 or 2 CKD, comorbidities should be considered.
Inappetence is a significant quality of life concern for caregivers, 149 and in the CKD patient may result in protein and calorie malnutrition, with subsequent losses in body weight and reductions in BCS and MCS. 167 A reduced appetite should, therefore, be actively managed as soon as such losses are appreciated, and any complications of CKD that can contribute to inappetence, such as dehydration, constipation, hypokalaemia, acidosis or anaemia, should be addressed. Centrally acting antiemetics, such as maropitant, mirtazapine and ondansetron,168–170 should be considered for management. In placebo-controlled trials of cats with IRIS stage 2 or 3 CKD, maropitant (given orally for 2 weeks) was shown to reduce vomiting, 170 and mirtazapine (given orally or transdermally for 3 weeks) reduced vomiting and also increased appetite and body weight.169,171 Mirtazapine, therefore, is a useful adjunct to the nutritional management of cats with CKD. Based on anecdotal experience, dosage can be titrated to effect (eg, administering q48h) to stimulate appetite and avoid side effects, and long-term administration is often utilised.
The ghrelin receptor agonist capromorelin is a logical choice for managing the appetite dys-regulation that accompanies CKD. 172 Transient bradycardia and hypotension have been reported as side effects of capromorelin treatment in cats; thus, appropriate monitoring is required, and the drug is not recommended for haemodynamically compromised patients.
Anecdotally, there are reports of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (eg, famotidine) or proton pump inhibitors (eg, omeprazole) alleviating inappetence in some feline CKD patients; however, the presence and degree of gastric hyperacidity, and efficacy of these medications remain unproven. Recent evidence indicates that hypergastrinaemia and gastric ulceration are less common than previously assumed.173,174 If therapy for hyperacidity in cats is considered, omeprazole is superior to famotidine, as the latter loses efficacy after a couple of days. 175 However, given the caregiver burden associated with administering multiple medications, prescribing should be reserved for cases with a strong suspicion of, or confirmed, gastroduodenal ulceration. 176
Table 4 provides dosage information for medications commonly used to treat nausea, vomiting and inappetence in cats with CKD. A feeding tube (eg, oesophagostomy tube) may be beneficial in cats with persistent hyporexia, higher stage CKD and/or during episodes of ACKD;167,178 a tube can also assist with maintaining hydration and administering medications. Information and accompanying videos on how to place feeding tubes are provided in the ‘2022 ISFM consensus guidelines on management of the inappetent hospitalised cat’. 167
Table 4.
Commonly used antiemetics, appetite stimulants and antacids in cats with CKD*
| Drug | Dosage | Indications in CKD | Adverse effect(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maropitant 170 | 1 mg/kg SC, IV or PO q24h | Prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting | Pain on subcutaneous injection |
| Mirtazapine169,171 | 2 mg/cat PO or transdermally q24h (q48h with higher stage CKD, due to reduced renal clearance) | Prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting
Appetite stimulant |
Vocalisation and agitation
Erythema at application site with transdermal use |
| Ondansetron 168 | 0.1–1 mg/kg IV (slowly), IM, SC or PO q6–12h
(subcutaneous route is associated with higher bioavailability; use higher end of dose range orally) |
Prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting | Gastrointestinal effects, constipation and rare hypersensitivity reactions
Increased liver enzymes (reported in humans) |
| Omeprazole 177 | 1 mg/kg PO q12h | Strongly suspected or proven gastroduodenal ulceration | Anorexia, vomiting and diarrhoea |
| Capromorelin 172 | 2 mg/kg PO q24h | Appetite stimulant | Hyperglycaemia, vomiting, hypersalivation, lethargy, bradycardia and hypotension |
Information contained in this table represents a consensus of opinion and experience of the Guidelines panel members. Treatment is at the discretion of the attending veterinary surgeon
CKD = chronic kidney disease; IM = intramuscularly; IV = intravenously; PO = orally; SC = subcutaneously
Management and prevention of dehydration
Dehydration is common in CKD patients due to their impaired ability to concentrate urine, and can lead to inappetence, lethargy, weakness, constipation and an increased susceptibility to uraemic crises. 166 Dehydration may precipitate pathophysiological responses that have a negative effect on the kidney. Cats with clinical dehydration may benefit from hospitalisation and intravenous fluid therapy to correct deficits, followed by home interventions to increase their voluntary water intake.
An iCatCare resource entitled ‘Encouraging your cat to drink: a guide for caregivers’ (available at icatcare.org/cat-advice/cat-carer-guides) describes various ways in which water intake can be increased. These include:
✜ Providing free access to multiple water sources, including water fountains and wide-brimmed ceramic bowls, positioned in easily accessible locations for the cat (Figure 21a);
✜ Raising water bowls so that cats with DJD do not need to lower their head to drink (Figure 21b);
✜ Feeding a wet diet (taking into consideration the need for a careful transition, as well as the lower calorie content per gram in wet foods);
✜ Adding water to the food (taking care not to adversely affect the cat’s calorie or nutrient intake);
✜ Using nutrient-enriched water products; these supplements have been shown to improve voluntary water intake and hydration in dehydrated cats. 179
Figure 21.

Interventions to increase voluntary water intake, such as (a) encouraging use of a water fountain or (b) raising the water bowl to a more comfortable position, can benefit cats with CKD. Images courtesy of Samantha Taylor (a) and Sarah Collins (b)
Administration of subcutaneous fluids at home by caregivers is not recommended for all cats with CKD, but is well accepted by most cats and, hence, can be considered for those with ongoing dehydration despite the measures discussed above (Figure 22). 180 Techniques such as warming the fluids, offering treats and performing the procedure efficiently improve patient tolerance. 180 Giving 75–100 ml/cat every 1–3 days is generally well tolerated. Ideally, hypotonic solution (half-strength lactated Ringer’s solution, 0.45% saline, Normosol-M) is used to reduce the sodium load, but, in practice, cats tolerate other crystalloid fluids without clinical complication. Fluid is administered via a giving set and butterfly or standard needle; potassium chloride can be added to the solution in deficient cats (eg, 20–30 mEq KCl per 1000 ml fluid). 180
Figure 22.

Subcutaneous fluid therapy. (a) The procedure for administering subcutaneous fluids should be demonstrated to caregivers for use in the home environment. (b) A cat receiving subcutaneous fluids at home using a giving set and fluid bag. Images courtesy of Sarah Caney (a) and Femke Mortier (b)
If cats have an oesophagostomy tube in situ, it can be used to provide water and maintain hydration.
Management of anaemia
The kidney is responsible for producing the hormone erythropoietin (EPO), which stimulates the bone marrow to produce red blood cells. As CKD progresses, EPO production decreases and anaemia can result. Consequences of anaemia include weakness, lethargy, inappetence and potential acceleration of CKD progression due to hypoxia driving the development of fibro-sis.63,181–183 Anaemia may also cause left heart enlargement, which could predispose patients to heart failure and fluid overload. 184
Moderate to severe anaemia likely has the potential to affect the quality of life of cats with CKD as a result of lethargy and inappetence. In a recent study, anaemia (PCV <27%) was associated with poorer health-related quality of life scores in cats with CKD. 149 Therefore, for multiple reasons, anaemia should be actively managed in CKD patients.
EPO deficiency can be supplemented with artificial products such as darbepoetin alpha (or, if unavailable, recombinant human EPO). Darbepoetin is a longer acting form of EPO and is thought to give rise to fewer anti-EPO antibodies than human EPO. The recommended starting dosage for darbepoetin is 0.75–1 µg/kg subcutaneously once weekly until the low end of the PCV RI is reached (30%). 185 Thereafter, the dosing frequency is decreased to once every other week, as needed, to maintain an adequate PCV (eg, ⩾30%) (Figure 23). The patient’s SBP and PCV should be measured before each injection during the induction period; once maintenance has been reached, a regular monitoring schedule (eg, checking SBP and PCV every 1–3 months) can be followed.
Figure 23.

Approach to the treatment of anaemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with darbepoetin, an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. IM = intramuscularly; PCV = packed cell volume; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SC = subcutaneously
Iron supplementation (iron dextran 50 mg/cat IM q3–4 weeks, ferrous sulphate 50–100 mg/cat PO q24h, ferrous fumarate 30–60 mg/cat [one-fifth of a 305 mg capsule] q24h) is recommended when EPO therapy is initiated, as a relative iron deficiency is often present in cats with CKD. Oral ferrous sulphate can result in gastrointestinal upset (albeit usually mild); this side effect is reduced if the dose is divided and administered with food. Note that in the face of chronic inflammation and elevated serum hepcidin concentrations, absorption of orally administered iron will be compromised. 181
Hypoxia-inducible factor–prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have been used in human medicine for some time. They are considered to have a similar, if not better, efficacy and safety profile than darbepoetin. 186 Molidustat (an HIF-PHI suspension) given to healthy adult cats in a pilot study resulted in a significant and dose-dependent increase in serum EPO concentrations, and an increase in haematocrit, in comparison with placebo-treated cats. 187 In another study, where 21 cats with CKD were treated with molidustat or placebo for 28 days, cats who received the drug had a significant increase in PCV compared with the control group. 188 Adverse effects include vomiting and poly-cythaemia, with the latter less likely in cats with CKD, presumably due to the many counter-regulatory mechanisms suppressing red blood cell production in CKD. 188 The recommended dosage for molidustat is 5 mg/kg PO q24h for 28 days, restarting after a 1-week pause, as needed (Figure 24). 189
Figure 24.

Approach to the treatment of anaemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with molidustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor–prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. CBC = complete blood count; IM = intramuscularly; PCV = packed cell volume; PO = orally; SBP = systolic blood pressure
In humans with CKD treated with moli-dustat, the drug may lower hepcidin and increase haematocrit without lowering serum iron, 190 suggesting that HIF-PHIs have a beneficial effect on iron metabolism and that their efficacy in increasing red cell mass is less dependent on iron supplementation. However, some patients will require iron supplementation due to reduced ferritin and iron concentrations, 191 so it is presumed there may be a requirement for iron supplementation in some treated cats.
Management of proteinuria
Persistent proteinuria is associated with disease progression and mortality in cats with CKD.62,63,192 Patients with a persistent UPC of >0.4 (IRIS substage proteinuric, see Table 2) should be treated with a renal diet and pharmacological inhibition of the renin– angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). RAAS inhibition should only be considered in non-dehydrated cats with stable CKD to avoid possible adverse effects. As treatment of hypertension can reduce proteinuria, 192 hypertensive cats should be reassessed for proteinuria once SBP is <160 mmHg and prior to additional antiproteinuric medication.
Options for the treatment of proteinuria include:
✜ Telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Telmisartan prevents angiotensin II from binding to one of its receptors (angiotensin receptor-1). In so doing, it reduces proteinuria in cats with CKD. 193 The dosage of telmisartan for proteinuria is 1 mg/kg PO q24h.
✜ An angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, such as benazepril. ACE inhibitors reduce proteinuria by blocking the production of angiotensin II. 194 The dosage of benazepril for proteinuria is 0.25–0.5 mg/kg PO q12h, and this ACE inhibitor is available both in tablet form and as a medicated food.
Cats with borderline proteinuria (UPC 0.2–0.4) may be more likely to develop renal disease and have an increased mortality risk compared with cats with a UPC <0.2.28,62 Although there is no current evidence that treatment with antiproteinuric medication is beneficial at the borderline proteinuric substage, some clinicians may consider prescribing such medication.
Adverse effects of RAAS inhibition can include hypotension, hyperkalaemia and worsening azotaemia. Hence, ACE inhibitors and ARBs should be used with care, especially in cats with late-stage CKD and in dehydrated cats. As well as monitoring for any clinical deterioration, cats undergoing treatment should be reassessed regularly, as described in Table 5 (contextualising to the caregiver’s resources). An increase in creatinine of >25–30% may warrant review of treatment and a dosage adjustment; the effect of any intervention should be assessed around 4 weeks later.
Table 5.
Monitoring schedule for cats receiving ARB or ACE inhibitor treatment for proteinuria/borderline proteinuria
| Time since starting ARB or ACE inhibitor treatment | Parameters to check | Aims |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 weeks | Clinical signs, SBP, serum creatinine and potassium | Assess tolerance of medication. Creatinine increase >25–30% may warrant dosage adjustment |
| 4 weeks after commencing treatment or making a dosage adjustment | Clinical signs, SBP, UPC | Assess efficacy for reducing UPC |
| Every 3 months | Clinical signs, SBP, UPC (see ‘Monitoring the cat with CKD’) | Long-term monitoring |
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; CKD = chronic kidney disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure; UPC = urine protein:creatinine ratio
Management of hypertension
CKD is a common underlying cause of hypertension, and all cats with CKD should have their SBP measured at diagnosis and as part of routine monitoring (see ‘Monitoring the cat with CKD’). Management of hypertension can prevent target organ damage and reverse or improve any existing clinical signs of target organ damage. Ocular target organ damage is often slow to resolve but some vision can be regained with treatment of the hypertension, 195 and signs of hypertensive encephalopathy can be reversed. 196
The goal of management is to reduce SBP to a normotensive level (ideally <140 mmHg, but otherwise <160 mmHg).90,197 Options for treatment are listed in Table 6. Efficacy should be reassessed after 1–2 weeks of starting or adjusting therapy. Outpatient management is usually appropriate, although patients with severe hypertension and target organ damage may be hospitalised to allow closer monitoring of SBP (eg, after 24 h). 25 If significant proteinuria is present, an ARB (telmisar-tan) could be considered as an initial choice of therapy for hypertension. An ARB or ACE inhibitor could also be used in addition to amlodipine if proteinuria persists despite the cat being normotensive. When using combinations of medications, the cat should be monitored closely for hypotension.
Table 6.
Options for management of hypertension in cats with CKD
| Class of agent | Agent(s) and oral dosage regimen | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Calcium channel blocker | Amlodipine 0.125–0.25 mg/kg q24h 198 (typically 0.625 or 1.25 mg/cat q24h) Cats with severe hypertension may require higher doses (eg, 0.5 mg/kg) 199 | Often effective as sole therapy. Adverse effects include hypotension and gingival hyperplasia
Transdermal amlodipine is less effective than oral treatment 200 |
| ARB | Telmisartan 2 mg/kg q24h201,202 | Typically lowers SBP by 20–25 mmHg When used as a sole agent, a dosage of 2 mg/kg q24h is suggested. If used in combination with amlodipine, start at a dosage of ⩽1 mg/kg q24h |
| ACE inhibitor | Benazepril 0.5–1.0 mg/kg q24h
Enalapril 0.25–0.5 mg/kg q24h Ramipril 0.125–0.25 mg/kg q24h |
Not generally recommended as monotherapy for hypertension, especially if marked (SBP >180 mmHg). Benazepril can be used in combination with amlodipine 203 |
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; CKD = chronic kidney disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure
Management of hypokalaemia
Hypokalaemia is common in cats with higher stages of CKD, and an inadequate dietary intake or increased urinary loss of potassium and activation of the RAAS are thought to be contributing factors. 204 Potassium is vital for normal muscle function and gastrointestinal motility, and hypokalaemia is associated with lethargy, inappetence, myopathy (eg, cervical ventroflexion and plantigrade stance) and constipation. 86 In humans, a potassium level <4.0 mmol/l is associated with an increased risk of end-stage renal disease and mortality, 77 but hypokalaemia has not been identified as a risk factor for progression in cats. However, serum potassium levels are not representative of systemic tissue potassium levels, and so cats with low–normal serum potassium may still be systemically depleted. 205
Some clinicians recommend supplementation even when serum potassium is within the low end of the RI, with a goal of maintaining serum potassium >4 mmol/l. Maintaining serum potassium concentrations is particularly important in cats with CKD and constipation.
Renal diets are supplemented with potassium, but to a very variable degree. In stable, mildly hypokalaemic patients, switching to a higher potassium diet may be beneficial. In moderately to severely hypokalaemic, but stable, patients, supplementation with oral potassium gluconate or potassium citrate is indicated (1–4 mEq/cat q12h, adjusted according to response). In patients with evidence of acidosis, potassium citrate may be a better choice than potassium gluconate due to its greater alkalinising properties. In decompensated, severely hypokalaemic patients, hospitalisation and intravenous potassium chloride supplementation is necessary, followed by oral supplementation at home.
Management of acidosis
Metabolic acidosis is a significant risk factor for CKD progression and mortality in humans, 206 and may be more common in feline CKD than previously thought. 207 Urinary ammonia excretion is significantly impaired in cats with CKD and is inversely associated with serum creatinine concentra-tion. 207 Feeding a renal diet formulated to minimise acidosis may be beneficial; however, alkali supplementation may still be necessary in some cats and is currently under investigation by one of the Guidelines’ panel members (JQ). Oral supplementation with potassium citrate (40–75 mg/kg q12h) or sodium bicarbonate (10–12 mg/kg q8–12h) may be used to maintain serum bicarbonate concentrations >16 mmol/l.
Management of constipation
The prevalence of constipation associated with CKD has not been reported; however, constipation appears to be a common medical concern and can cause discomfort, nausea and reduced food intake, and thereby affect quality of life (Figure 25).86,149 Cats with CKD are observed to defecate less frequently than healthy cats.208,209 The aetiology of constipation associated with CKD is likely a dysfunction of water balance, possibly combined with abnormal gastrointestinal motility. The kidneys fail to provide appropriate urineconcentrating ability and, hence, chronic sub-clinical dehydration results in water being reabsorbed from the colon to compensate. Factors such as hypokalaemia, uraemic toxins, diet and the use of phosphate binders may additionally contribute to constipation.
Figure 25.

Lateral abdominal radiograph of a cat with constipation associated with CKD.
Constipation can reduce food intake and cause nausea and discomfort. When imaging such patients, examination of joints can help to identify DJD as an additional contributing factor causing reluctance to defecate and/or use a litter tray. Image courtesy of Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists
A clinical history is very important in the assessment of constipation. Questions to discuss with the caregiver include the frequency of defecation, time spent defecating, faecal consistency, the degree of difficulty or straining, and any vomiting associated with defecation, as this information may not be volunteered. Also, faecal pellets left around the house may indicate dyschezia. An assessment of the cat’s hydration status should be noted in the medical record at each assessment. Physical examination may reveal small hard faeces in the descending colon with a build-up of faecal material before the pelvic inlet, or, in more severe cases, a large amount of hard faecal material in the colon.
Factors additional to the CKD to consider in affected cats include:
✜ Pain from DJD, causing reluctance to defecate and/or use a litter tray; and
✜ Environmental factors, including the availability/number of litter trays, their location and the litter substrate.
Managing pain and optimising litter facilities for older cats can encourage regular defecation.
As the primary inciting cause of constipation secondary to CKD is considered to be chronic dehydration, the patient’s hydration status should be addressed before other medical therapies are instituted. Serum potassium should be measured and supplemented, if needed. After correction of dehydration and hypokalaemia, oral osmotic stool softeners are introduced. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 is an osmotic laxative that has been assessed in normal cats and found to be effective as a stool-softening agent. 210 Although its efficacy in cats with CKD has not been evaluated, it is commonly prescribed (one-eighth to one-quarter of a teaspoon q12–24h); moreover, it is thought by some to be more effective than lactulose, which is processed by intestinal microflora and may lead to bloating, as well as being challenging to administer to many cats. 210 Another important consideration is that PEG 3350 comes as a powder that appears to be well tolerated. Bulk-forming agents such as psyllium (starting dose one-quarter teaspoon q24h or divided q12h) or canned pumpkin (starting dose one-half to one teaspoon q24h or divided q12h) may also be useful as fibre sources in the management of constipation associated with CKD in patients with normal hydration, if accepted mixed into food.211,212
Promotility agents are a second tier of medical management for constipation associated with CKD, as the degree to which inherent colonic motility is affected has not been assessed in feline CKD patients. Cisapride (1 mg/kg q8h PO) is the most common promotility medication used, and has been demonstrated to have a positive effect on contractility in normal and abnormal feline colonic smooth muscle in vitro.213,214
Management of uraemic toxins
Strategies to decrease the production of uraemic toxins include dietary management (eg, avoidance of high protein), use of prebiotics, probiotics or adsorbents, and management of constipation. Renaltec, a carbon-based adsorbent designed to bind indoxyl sulfate precursors in the digestive tract, has recently been demonstrated to decrease serum uraemic toxins in cats with CKD.215,216
Future developments
Vascular endothelial function is thought to be impaired in cats with CKD, and beraprost, a prostacyclin analogue, is thought to have protective effects on injured endothelial cells. Beraprost has been assessed in a retrospective cohort study. Progression-free survival in cats with stage 3 CKD was reported to be significantly higher in treated patients. 217

Figure 26.

Blood sampling in this cat is being performed using a lickable treat as a distraction, gentle handling (including a soft cover over the consultation table) and use of the medial saphenous vein with a butterfly catheter. Note that the small amount of food/treats used in this way is unlikely to affect serum biochemistry results. Image courtesy of Jessica Quimby
CKD and important comorbidities
Given the high prevalence of CKD in senior cats, comorbidities are common. Not only can they further impact the cat’s quality of life, but they pose a number of challenges for patient management. Presenting signs of each condition may be masked by the presence of concurrent conditions. The need to give several medications can increase the caregiver burden 225 and also the risk of drug interactions; additionally, CKD can result in reduced renal clearance of medications used to treat concurrent conditions. 226 Moreover, nutritional requirements may conflict. 227 It can be challenging to make optimal nutritional recommendations for cats with multiple diseases, especially those with CKD and comorbid conditions. The first step is to identify nutritional goals for each disease; in some situations, there is a need to prioritise one goal over another. Consultation with a board-certified veterinary nutritionist may be warranted in some cases.
Table 7.
Optimising the home environment for a cat with CKD using the ‘five pillars’ model as a guide218,220,221
|
Pillar 1: Provide a safe space |
| Provide predictable, secure and readily accessible resting areas in multiple locations. They should be within easy reach for a cat with mobility issues or pain from DJD, with the use of ramps or steps, as necessary, and located away from busy areas of the home. Quiet, warm, sunny resting spots with deep bedding encourage use. | |
|
Pillar 2: Provide multiple and separated resources |
| Cats with CKD may need to urinate and drink more frequently, so should have easy access to litter trays and multiple water sources. Resources should be distributed across all levels of the home and in sufficient number (at least two of each resource per cat). Food and water can be offered in raised bowls, and horizontal scratching opportunities provided for cats with DJD. Litter trays should be low sided with a soft substrate and regularly cleaned. | |
|
Pillar 3: Provide opportunity to play and perform predatory behaviour |
| Even older cats with chronic illness will benefit from activity. Analgesia may help cats with DJD engage with light activity and low-impact play, which can also help trigger engaging emotions and prevent constipation. Cats could be encouraged to walk around a garden or engage with a fishing toy for short periods. Incorporating toys with auditory or olfactory stimuli (eg, crinkle material, catnip, valerian, silvervine), playing at predictable times and locations, using short, consistent sessions, and offering cardboard boxes placed on their sides supports safe, comfortable engagement. | |
|
Pillar 4: Provide positive, consistent and predictable human–cat social interaction |
| Allow cats to choose the type and duration of interaction and never force handling.
Some cats with chronic illness may groom less and enjoy being brushed; others may still have the appetite for occasional treats from their caregivers. All family members should be educated not to pick up the cat, but approach slowly with a soft voice to prevent startling. The cat should be allowed to disengage from interactions with people at their choosing. | |
|
Pillar 5: Provide an environment that respects the importance of the cat’s senses |
| Strong scents should be avoided (perfumes, air fresheners) and use of feline pheromone products considered. Food could be warmed to increase aromas and encourage eating. Sudden loud noises should be avoided to prevent startling the cat. |
Images courtesy of Samantha Taylor (Pillars 1, 2 and 5), International Cat Care (Pillar 3) and Sarah Caney (Pillar 4)
Despite the challenges, by focusing on the disease with the greatest impact on the cat, managing pain, supporting caregivers while remaining mindful of compliance and caregiver burden, and monitoring responses to treatment, senior cats with multiple conditions can enjoy a good quality of life. 228
CKD and hyperthyroidism
Hyperthyroidism is the most common feline endocrinopathy and mainly occurs in the same population of cats affected by CKD. Given that 15–51% of cats with hyperthyroidism are reported also to have CKD,229–232 managing both conditions in the same cat is not an unusual scenario. The concurrent presence of the two conditions creates some diagnostic challenges for both illnesses for the following reasons:
✜ Clinical signs may overlap (ie, weight loss, vomiting, PU/PD);
✜ CKD may mask more obvious signs of hyperthyroidism, such as polyphagia;
✜ Hyperthyroidism may increase the GFR and decrease muscle mass, with the result that creatinine is lowered into the RI but is ‘unmasked’ post-treatment; 232
✜ CKD may reduce total thyroxine (T4) into the RI; 233
✜ Secondary hypertension occurs with both CKD and hyperthyroidism; 90 thus, measurement of blood pressure is a priority in cats with these concurrent conditions.
It is difficult to make a diagnosis of CKD in a cat with hyperthyroidism without azotaemia and, hence, predict which cats will develop ‘unmasked’ azotaemia post-treatment. Cats with high SDMA concentrations prior to treatment for hyperthyroidism are more likely to have CKD, but a normal SDMA level does not exclude the development of azotaemia when the cat becomes euthyroid. 234 Hyperthyroid cats with low USG (<1.035) pretreatment are more likely to develop azotaemia post-treatment. 235 It is important to reassess renal parameters once a patient is euthyroid in order to diagnose the underlying CKD.
Key points in managing these comorbidities are summarised in Box 9.
Cats with CKD and hyperthyroidism can have very reasonable median survival times. Cats who are azotaemic at the point of diagnosis of hyperthyroidism have a poorer prognosis than those without azotaemia, with documented survival times of around 6 months to 2 years.236–238 Hyperthyroid cats who become azotaemic after treatment have significantly shorter survival times (2.8 years) than those remaining non-azotaemic (4.3 years). 232

Cats with post-treatment iatrogenic hypothyroidism and azotaemia have significantly shorter survival times. 239 Hence, hypothyroidism is particularly important to avoid in cats with CKD.
CKD and chronic pain
DJD is the most studied cause of chronic pain in cats. 240 However, many other conditions will result in pain, such as dental disease (Figure 27), 241 urinary tract disease, ocular disease and neoplasia; persistent postoperative pain, neuropathic pain and medical pain (from gastrointestinal/hepatic disease) are other forms of chronic pain.242,243 While CKD itself is unlikely to be painful, associated conditions such as dehydration, nausea, pyelonephritis, urolithiasis and target organ disease from hypertension could cause discomfort.
Figure 27.

Resorptive lesion in a cat with CKD. Dental disease should be managed in CKD patients to reduce pain. In turn, this can improve food intake and long-term health. Image courtesy of Samantha Taylor
Chronic pain should be managed using a multimodal approach, ideally involving pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies (eg, environmental modifications). 244 For the CKD patient specifically, the fear of adverse effects of analgesics could result in unmanaged pain, and so it is important that the identification and treatment of pain is considered part of the management approach for cats with CKD. Similarly, procedures that could reduce pain, such as dental extractions, should not be avoided because of the presence of CKD, although the kidneys must, of course, be carefully considered when prescribing medications or planning anaesthesia.245,246
Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cats with CKD
Comprehensive guidance to support veterinarians in decision-making around prescribing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in situations of chronic pain, including cats with CKD, is provided in the ‘2024 ISFM and AAFP consensus guidelines on the long-term use of NSAIDs in cats’. 247
For the purpose of these current Guidelines, it is important to note that there is limited evidence either supporting or refuting the longterm use of NSAIDs in cats with chronic pain and concomitant CKD. Much of the earlier data was retrospective in nature, with studies of meloxicam and robenacoxib hampered by selective bias, differing definitions of stable CKD and relatively short periods of administration of the NSAID. However, current evidence suggests that low doses of meloxicam or robenacoxib can be administered cautiously to cats with stable CKD, as studies have not demonstrated detectable renal injury in these patients under specific conditions.248–251
Patient selection is vital if NSAIDs are to be used. These drugs should be avoided in cats with unstable (progressive) CKD, cats who are dehydrated, hypovolaemic, hypotensive or otherwise unwell, or those with IRIS stage 4 CKD.
Stable CKD in cats, in the context of prescribing NSAIDs, is defined as minimal changes in body weight and creatinine concentration over a period of at least 2 months, with control of concurrent conditions such as hypertension, hyperphosphataemia and UTI. If NSAIDs are to be prescribed to cats with IRIS stage 1 or 2 CKD, they should be hydrated and eating and drinking normally, with caregivers informed of potential adverse effects and providing informed consent. Treatment of some stage 3 cats may also be considered, but use of NSAIDs is less studied in this group.
Cats should be monitored for both efficacy of the NSAID for pain management and for adverse effects, and caregivers educated on maintaining the cat’s water intake. Routine checks are recommended to allow tapering to the lowest effective dose for the individual cat and for early recognition of adverse effects. 247 The combination of NSAID and ACE inhibitor, ARB or amlodipine could increase the risk of hypotension and adverse effects. Additionally, NSAIDs could reduce the antihypertensive effects of amlodipine/ARBs (as documented in humans 252 ), and so combination therapy should be avoided, or, if used, the cat should be closely monitored.
Alternative analgesics for chronic pain in cats with CKD
When NSAIDs are not considered suitable, or additional analgesia is needed, alternative medication choices may be required. Possible drugs, and the evidence supporting their use, are summarised below. Importantly, most of these drugs are understudied in terms of efficacy, and so effectiveness should be monitored, ideally with an objective pain scale such as the Feline Musculoskeletal Pain Index. 253
✜ Gabapentinoids In one study, 254 gabapentin decreased activity in geriatric cats, potentially due to sedative effects, while also improving impaired activities compared with placebo. However, cats with CKD have higher serum levels of gabapentin, so dosage adjustment may be required to avoid adverse effects. 223 Although less well studied, similar concerns apply to pregabalin. 255 Dosage regimens for gabapentinoids in cats with CKD have not been established.
✜ Frunevetmab The anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody frunevetmab is used to manage DJD in cats, 256 but there is currently no published data on the safety of the drug in cats with concurrent DJD and CKD.
✜ Tramadol The synthetic opioid analgesic tramadol has been demonstrated to improve mobility in cats with osteoarthritis, 257 but has not been studied in cats with CKD.
✜ Amantadine A blinded, placebo-controlled study showed that amantadine, an antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, improved owner-identified impaired mobility and quality of life in cats with osteoarthritis; 258 however, activity was decreased, potentially due to sedation, in the treatment group. This drug has not been studied in cats with CKD.
✜ Buprenorphine Oral transmucosal buprenorphine can be effective for analgesia, but is less practical for long-term use. 259 There are no studies investigating the use of opioids for feline chronic pain.
✜ Subcutaneous ketamine Ketamine administration via the subcutaneous route is anecdotally used for chronic pain at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg monthly. Further study is required, but initial work suggested a beneficial effect on pain in dogs with osteoarthritis when combined with other analgesics. 260
Monitoring, including chronic pain assessment, is crucial in CKD patients on analgesics. Drug accumulation, overdosing and adverse effects may occur as excretion is impaired in these cats. Conversely, underdosing may result in subtherapeutic concentrations, leading to continuous pain or misleading placebo effects.
CKD and chronic enteropathy
As mentioned, the primary nutrient of concern for CKD is phosphorus. Nutritional management of chronic enteropathy (eg, food-responsive enteropathy, chronic inflammatory enteropathy) typically revolves around limiting dietary antigen exposure (eg, single protein + single carbohydrate diet vs a hydrolysed diet). 261 Hence, selecting such a diet, but with an appropriate phosphate content, may be possible; alternatively, phosphate binders could be added to the food. Some manufacturers produce hydrolysed diets that are also phosphate restricted. Follow-up assessment of serum phosphate would allow monitoring and adjustment according to patient response. Other measures to manage chronic enteropathy may be required, such as fibre supple-mentation 212 or immunomodulation.
CKD and diabetes mellitus
To manage a cat with diabetes mellitus, a low carbohydrate diet may be introduced.262,263 Making specific nutritional recommendations for a cat with CKD and diabetes is a balancing act between feeding a reduced phosphate diet and trying to avoid an excessively high carbohydrate load. Some canned veterinary therapeutic renal diets are sufficiently low in carbohydrates (<5 g/100 kcal) to be fed to a cat with these comorbid conditions. If it is not feasible to feed a canned diet exclusively, the priority should be feeding a higher carbohydrate, lower phosphate diet (vs feeding a lower carbohydrate, higher phosphate diet), and diabetic remission may still be achieved.
It is important to remember that while dry diets generally provide more carbohydrates than canned diets, not all canned diets are low in carbohydrates. Many cats with diabetes mellitus are obese, and obesity can contribute to insulin resistance. If the cat is obese (ie, BCS 8–9/9),
then additional consideration should be given to feeding a diet with a lower calorie density and higher protein concentration to aid in the maintenance of muscle mass as the cat loses weight. In this case, the goal for weight loss may be to achieve a BCS of 6–7/9 for long-term survival benefits, with monitoring of phosphate and the addition of a phosphate binder, if required.
Diabetic nephropathy
There is recent evidence that cats may develop early diabetic nephropathy. 264 However, they likely do not experience a cumulative glucose exposure in their life span sufficient to cause overt diabetic nephropathy, as is observed in human medicine. The reported prevalence of microalbuminuria (70%) 265 and proteinuria (39% 266 to 75% 265 ) in diabetic cats may also suggest the presence of the glomerular pathology that characterises diabetic nephropathy. As progression to overt diabetic nephropathy, in which there is declining GFR, is not typically recognised in diabetic cats, it is unlikely a cat will have a progressive increase in serum creatinine. However, the UPC should be monitored. RAAS inhibition is recommended if a cat with diabetes mellitus becomes persistently proteinuric in the absence of an active urinary sediment.
Consideration could be given to the use of a sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) over insulin therapy in a newly diagnosed diabetic cat who is proteinuric, because of the additional renoprotective benefits this class of drug offers. Further information on SGLT2i therapy is provided in the ‘2025 iCatCare consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetes melli-tus in cats’. 267


Monitoring the cat with CKD
Monitoring checks for cats with CKD are aimed at understanding patient progress (improvements and deteriorations), compliance challenges and other caregiver support needs, and should be individualised in the light of cat and caregiver factors such as temperament and financial limitations.
A spectrum of veterinary care is described for cats with diabetes mellitus, 272 and similar principles can be applied to cats with CKD; in other words, individualising treatment goals and monitoring to optimise quality of life within the capacity of the caregiver, and taking into account the mental wellbeing of the cat, without compromising care. For example, repeated appointments for a cat who is distressed by the examination process could cause harm; monitoring might, therefore, incorporate verbal/email reports from the caregiver. More generally, nurse/technician involvement can be invaluable in maintaining contact, performing check-up consultations and supporting caregiver compliance with instituting dietary recommendations and administering therapeutic medications (see ‘Nursing the cat with chronic kidney disease’ in the supplementary material).
Following the initial diagnosis of CKD or any significant changes in the cat’s clinical condition, it can be helpful to (re)assess the cat’s progress relatively frequently – for example, every 2–4 weeks, depending on the patient’s IRIS stage and the severity of their clinical signs. This will allow identification of cats with more progressive CKD who may require more intervention. 72


As noted, and if appropriate, monitoring need not necessarily always entail examining the cat, but can involve evaluation of caregiver records and reports received via email or verbally. In cats with stable CKD, the frequency of check-ups can be reduced to every 3–6 months, incorporating a detailed history and physical examination (Box 10).
With appropriate education and training, caregivers can often become valuable contributors to clinical insight; for example, by providing information on their cat’s appetite, toileting behaviour and hydration status.
Encouraging the use of clumping cat litter can allow more precise monitoring of urination patterns, while monitoring defecation frequency and faecal consistency can help identify poor hydration and hypokalaemia, as dehydrated or hypokalaemic cats tend to defecate less often and pass hard, dry faeces. A reduction in defecation frequency is an important potential indicator of dehydration.208,209
In cats with stable CKD who are doing well, laboratory tests at the 3- to 6-monthly consultations may (similar to the initial assessment of patients) be aimed at assessing the stage of disease and the presence of complications that would benefit from intervention. In addition, the clinician needs to remain vigilant to the development of any new concurrent conditions. As mentioned, most CKD patients are older cats, and concurrent diseases including hyperthyroidism, cognitive dysfunction, periodontal disease and DJD are com-mon.81,227,228 Therefore, periodic laboratory assessment should ideally include blood pressure measurement, urinalysis, haematology, serum biochemistry (creatinine, phosphate, electrolytes [including calcium and magnesium, where possible] and albumin) and measurement of total T4. In cats with phosphate within the IRIS target range, the inclusion of FGF23 concentrations, where feasible, may be helpful in guiding phosphate restriction. SDMA assessment can be helpful in poorly muscled cats, as creatinine measurement may falsely indicate a lower IRIS stage.
A spectrum-of-care approach to laboratory testing, allowing for caregiver and cat factors, may mean measuring T4 only if the cat is tachycardic or has a goitre, limiting haematology to a PCV, focusing on the key elements of a biochemistry profile (eg, running just a ‘renal panel’) and asking caregivers to collect a urine sample at home, if indicated.
Routine urinalysis should be considered for cats being treating for renal proteinuria in order to re-evaluate the UPC and determine dose adjustments for antiproteinuric therapy. However, most cats with CKD are non-proteinuric (see Table 2) and, hence, routine urinalysis is unlikely to be necessary. If urinalysis is performed and an active sediment or positive urine culture is obtained, care should be taken to document the presence or absence of lower urinary tract signs or signs suggestive of pyelonephritis (see Box 6).
In patients where complications have been identified, the timing of future check-ups will depend on the complication and intervention applied (eg, SBP might be reassessed 5–7 days after starting or changing antihypertensive therapy).
Where finances are constrained, and especially in the later stages of CKD (late IRIS stage 3 and stage 4), control of clinical signs such as poor appetite, nausea or poor hydration status can be highly effective even in the absence of detailed laboratory data. Nurse/technician consultations are worthy of consideration in these cases.


Prognosis for cats with CKD
The prognosis for cats with CKD is highly variable and unpredictable. Many cats diagnosed with the disease and managed with appropriate supportive care, as outlined in these Guidelines, remain stable and well for years. However, progression (vs stability) has a significant influence on survival time, with cats with progressive CKD having a median survival time of 287 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 246–354) vs 894 days (CI 812–1052) for cats with stable CKD. 72 Tracking patients in as much detail as possible assists in identifying those cats whose disease is progressing at a faster rate and, in turn, advising and supporting caregivers in this situation.
Palliative care options for cats with latestage CKD are outlined in Box 11.
Conclusions
CKD is common in senior cats and most frequently caused by tubulointerstitial nephritis of unknown aetiology. It results in a reduction in GFR and, hence, consequences such as increased serum phosphate, CKD-MBD and the accumulation of uraemic toxins, as well as complications such as anaemia, hypercal-caemia, hypertension and proteinuria. Cats can be well managed, with a good quality of life and prolonged survival times. These outcomes are facilitated when caregivers are supported by the veterinary team to transition their cats onto renal diets, administer medications and encourage hydration.

Summary Points
✜ cElClinical signs of CKD include weight loss, PU/PD, vomiting, lethargy and hyporexia, along with constipation.
✜ Signs may go unnoticed in the early stages of disease.
✜ ElDiagnosis is based on serum creatinine and/or SDMA measurement, plus urinalysis and imaging of the kidneys.
✜ Following diagnosis, repeat measurement of creatinine concentration 2-4 weeks later can differentiate progressive M from stable CKD, which is of prognostic significance.
✜ Factors associated with progression of CKD include increasing severity of proteinuria, raised serum phosphate M concentrations, accumulation of uraemic toxins and anaemia.
✜ Staging, followed by substaging, should be performed once a diagnosis of CKD is made, based on the IRIS staging scheme. M Management is focused on the control of CKD-MBD by addressing raised serum phosphate, treating hypertension M
✜ and proteinuria, if present, and managing other abnormalities such as anaemia, hypokalaemia, nausea/vomiting/ hyporexia and constipation.
✜ Neither anaesthesia nor analgesic therapy should be withheld due to CKD, but procedures and M
✜ treatment regimens should be planned to ensure no further renal impacts.
Supplemental Material
Monitoring form for caregivers of cats with chronic kidney disease.
Managing the cat with chronic kidney disease: a guide for caregivers.
Nursing the cat with chronic kidney disease.
Footnotes
Supplementary material: The following supplementary material files are available at go.jfms.com/CKDGLs2026_ supplementarymaterial:
✜ Video demonstrating blood pressure measurement with Doppler. Courtesy of Sarah Caney.
✜ Managing the cat with chronic kidney disease: a guide for caregivers.
✜ Monitoring form for caregivers of cats with chronic kidney disease.
✜ Nursing the cat with chronic kidney disease.
Author note: The following members of the Guidelines panel are IRIS board members: Jonathan Elliott, Jessica Quimby, Gilad Segev and Joanna White.
Members of the panel have received financial remuneration for providing educational material, speaking at conferences and/or consultancy work; however, none of these activities cause any direct conflict of interest in relation to these Guidelines.
Funding: The members of the panel received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval: This work did not involve the use of animals and therefore ethical approval was not specifically required for publication in JFMS.
Informed consent: This work did not involve the use of animals (including cadavers) and therefore informed consent was not required. For any animals or people individually identifiable within this publication, informed consent (verbal or written) for their use in the publication was obtained from the people involved.
ORCID iD: Samantha Taylor
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8668-0777
Natalie Finch
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-7276
Sarah Caney
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-1100
Jonathan Elliott
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-6590
Rebecca Geddes
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9216-4886
Femke Mortier
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-2561
Valerie Parker
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6505-8068
Jessica Quimby
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-0452
Gilad Segev
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4714-3159
Joanna White
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2481-1089
Contributor Information
Samantha Taylor, BVetMed(Hons), PhD, CertSAM, DipECVIM-CA, MANZCVS, PGCert(TLHE), FHEA, FRCVS* Panel Chair International Cat Care, Tisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
Natalie Finch, BVSc, PhD, DipECVIM-CA, FRCVS Langford Vets, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK.
Sarah Caney, BVSc, PhD, DSAM(Feline), MRCVS Vet Professionals, Edinburgh, UK.
Jonathan Elliott, MA, VetMB, PhD, Cert SAC, Dip ECVPT, Hon Dip ACVIM (SAIM), FHEA, FBPS, FRCVS Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, UK.
Rebecca Geddes, MA, VetMB, MVetMed, PhD, DipACVIM(SAIM), DipACVNU, FHEA, MRCVS Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, UK.
Femke Mortier, DVM, PhD, DipECVIM-CA (Internal Medicine) IDEXX Laboratories, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Valerie Parker, DVM, DACVIM (SAIM & Nutrition) The Ohio State University Veterinary Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jessica Quimby, DVM, PhD, DACVIM (Internal Medicine) The Ohio State University Veterinary Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Gilad Segev, DVM, DipECVIM-CA The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Joanna White, BVSc, MVS(Epi), DACVIM, PhD Small Animal Specialist Hospital, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
References
- 1. Sparkes AH, Caney S, Chalhoub S, et al. ISFM consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of feline chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2016; 18: 219–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Quimby J, Gowland S, Carney HC, et al. 2021. AAHA/AAFP feline life stage guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23: 211–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Reynolds BS, Lefebvre HP. Feline CKD: pathophysiology and risk factors – what do we know? J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15 Suppl 1: 3–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Polzin DJ. Chronic kidney disease. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, Côté E. (eds). Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. 8th ed. Elsevier, 2017, pp 1938–1959. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Brown CA, Elliott J, Schmiedt CW, et al. Chronic kidney disease in aged cats: clinical features, morphology, and proposed pathogeneses. Vet Pathol 2016; 53: 309–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Marino CL, Lascelles BD, Vaden SL, et al. Prevalence and classification of chronic kidney disease in cats randomly selected from four age groups and in cats recruited for degenerative joint disease studies. J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16: 465–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Miele A, Sordo L, Gunn-Moore DA. Feline aging: promoting physiologic and emotional well-being. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2020; 50: 719–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bartges JW. Chronic kidney disease in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 669–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. O’Neill DG, Church DB, McGreevy PD, et al. Longevity and mortality of cats attending primary care veterinary practices in England. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 125–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Egenvall A, Nødtvedt A, Häggström J, et al. Mortality of lifeinsured Swedish cats during 1999–2006: age, breed, sex, and diagnosis. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 1175–1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bellows J, Center S, Daristotle L, et al. Evaluating aging in cats: how to determine what is healthy and what is disease. J Feline Med Surg 2016; 18: 551–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Metzger FL, Rebar AH. Clinical pathology interpretation in geriatric veterinary patients. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 615–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Paepe D, Verjans G, Duchateau L, et al. Routine health screening: findings in apparently healthy middle-aged and old cats. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 8–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mortier F, Daminet S, Marynissen S, et al. Value of repeated health screening in 259 apparently healthy mature adult and senior cats followed for 2 years. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 2089–2098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fortney WD. Implementing a successful senior/geriatric health care program for veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and office managers. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 823–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Quimby JM, McLeland SM, Cianciolo RE, et al. Frequency of histologic lesions in the kidneys of cats without kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: e472–e480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Stenvinkel P, Painer J, Kuro OM, et al. Novel treatment strategies for chronic kidney disease: insights from the animal kingdom. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018; 14: 265–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Martino-Costa AL, Malhao F, Lopes C, et al. Renal interstitial lipid accumulation in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Comp Pathol 2017; 157: 75–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Adams LG, Polzin DJ, Osborne CA, et al. Influence of dietary protein/calorie intake on renal morphology and function in cats with 5/6 nephrectomy. Lab Invest 1994; 70: 347–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Boswald LF, Kienzle E, Dobenecker B. Observation about phosphorus and protein supply in cats and dogs prior to the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2018; 102 Suppl 1: 31–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Dobenecker B, Webel A, Reese S, et al. Effect of a high phosphorus diet on indicators of renal health in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20: 339–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. DiBartola SP, Buffington CA, Chew DJ, et al. Development of chronic renal disease in cats fed a commercial diet. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 202: 744–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Van Mulders L, Vanden Broecke E, De Paepe E ,et al. Alterations in gut-derived uremic toxins before the onset of azotemic chronic kidney disease in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2025; 39. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Vaske HH, Schermerhorn T, Grauer GF. Effects of feline hyperthyroidism on kidney function: a review. J Feline Med Surg 2016; 18: 55–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lawson JS, Jepson RE. Feline comorbidities: the intermingled relationship between chronic kidney disease and hypertension. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23: 812–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mortier F, Daminet S, Marynissen S, et al. Clinical importance of borderline proteinuria in nonazotemic cats and evaluation of other risk factors for the development of chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2025; 39. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jepson RE, Brodbelt D, Vallance C, et al. Evaluation of predictors of the development of azotemia in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 806–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Schmiedt CW, Brainard BM, Hinson W, et al. Unilateral renal ischemia as a model of acute kidney injury and renal fibrosis in cats. Vet Pathol 2016; 53: 87–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Finch NC, Syme HM, Elliott J. Risk factors for development of chronic kidney disease in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30: 602–610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Trevejo RT, Lefebvre SL, Yang M, et al. Survival analysis to evaluate associations between periodontal disease and the risk of development of chronic azotemic kidney disease in cats evaluated at primary care veterinary hospitals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018; 252: 710–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. McLeland SM, Cianciolo RE, Duncan CG, et al. A comparison of biochemical and histopathologic staging in cats with chronic kidney disease. Vet Pathol 2015; 52: 524–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Paschall RE, Quimby JM, Cianciolo RE, et al. Assessment of peritubular capillary rarefaction in kidneys of cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2023; 37: 556–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rayhel LH, Quimby JM, Cianciolo RE, et al. Clinico-pathologic and pathologic characteristics of feline proteinuric kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2020; 22: 1219–1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. DiBartola SP, Rutgers HC, Zack PM, et al. Clinicopathologic findings associated with chronic renal disease in cats: 74 cases (1973. –1984). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 190: 1196–1202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Du S, Kim H, Crews DC, et al. Association between ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of incident CKD: a prospective cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 80: 589–598 e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. He X, Zhang X, Si C, et al. Ultra-processed food consumption and chronic kidney disease risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Front Nutr 2024; 11. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1359229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Alexander J, Stockman J, Atwal J, et al. Effects of the longterm feeding of diets enriched with inorganic phosphorus on the adult feline kidney and phosphorus metabolism. Br J Nutr 2019; 121: 249–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Pastoor FJ, Opitz R, Van’t Klooster AT, chloride vs.et al. Dietary calcium Calcium carbonate reduces urinary pH and phosphorus concentration, improves bone mineralization and depresses kidney calcium level in cats. J Nutr 1994; 124: 2212–2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lyons LA, Biller DS, Erdman CA, et al. Feline polycystic kidney disease mutation identified in PKD1. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 2548–2555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Esders SL, Hulskotter K, Schreiner T, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with AA-amyloidosis in Siamese and Oriental Shorthair cats. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14. DOI: 10.3390/genes14122126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Paltrinieri S, Sironi G, Giori L, et al. Changes in serum and urine SAA concentrations and qualitative and quantitative proteinuria in Abyssinian cats with familial amyloidosis: a five-year longitudinal study (2009–2014). J Vet Intern Med 2015; 29: 505–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ferri F, Ferro S, Benali SL, et al. Renal alterations in cats (Felis catus) housed in shelters and affected by systemic AA-amyloidosis: clinicopathological data, histopathology, and ultrastructural features. Vet Pathol 2024; 61: 771–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Evangelista GCL, Hwang JK, Broughton-Neiswanger LE ,et al. Apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages in cats: a potential link between an exon 3 variant allele and progression of naturally occurring chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2025; 39. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.70136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kyles AE, Hardie EM, Wooden BG, et al. Management and outcome of cats with ureteral calculi: 153 cases (1984–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 937–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Geddes RF, Davison LJ, Elliott J, et al. Risk factors for upper urinary tract uroliths and ureteral obstruction in cats under referral veterinary care in the United Kingdom. J Vet Intern Med 2023; 37: 567–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ross SJ, Osborne CA, Lekcharoensuk C, et al. A case-control study of the effects of nephrolithiasis in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 230: 1854–1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wu YT, Hung WC, Huang PY, et al. Evaluation of and the prognostic factors for cats with big kidney-little kidney syndrome. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35: 2787–2796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Lulich JP, Berent AC, Adams LG, et al. ACVIM small animal consensus recommendations on the treatment and prevention of uroliths in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30: 1564–1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Merindol I, Vachon C, Juette T, et al. Benign ureteral obstruction in cats: outcome with medical management. J Vet Intern Med 2023; 37: 1047–1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Bennett Z, Lawson JS, Chang YM, et al. Progression of chronic kidney disease in cats after subcutaneous ureteral bypass placement compared to cats with idiopathic chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2025; 39. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.70242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Yerramilli M, Farace G, Quinn J, et al. Kidney disease and the nexus of chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury: the role of novel biomarkers as early and accurate diagnostics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2016; 46: 961–993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Tang PK, Jepson RE, Chang YM, et al. Risk factors and implications associated with renal mineralization in chronic kidney disease in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2022; 36: 634–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Chakrabarti S, Syme HM, Brown CA, et al. Histomorphometry of feline chronic kidney disease and correlation with markers of renal dysfunction. Vet Pathol 2013; 50: 147–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Tang PK, Geddes RF, Chang YM, et al. Risk factors and implications associated with ultrasound-diagnosed nephrocalci-nosis in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 1563–1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sugar N, Chen H, Segev G. Clinical findings, prognostic factors, and outcome of protein-losing nephropathy in cats: a retrospective study. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 3111–3118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sarkan K, Hokamp JA, Cianciolo RE, et al. Feline plasma cell pododermatitis with concurrent glomerular disease: a case series of 25 cats. J Feline Med Surg 2026; 28. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X261437907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Bugbee A, Rucinsky R, Cazabon S, et al. 2023. AAHA selected endocrinopathies of dogs and cats guidelines. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2023; 59: 113–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Javadi S, Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC, Kooistra HS, et al. Primary hyperaldosteronism, a mediator of progressive renal disease in cats. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2005; 28: 85–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Keele SJ, Smith KC, Elliott J. et al. Adrenocortical morphology in cats with chronic kidney disease (CKD) | systemic hypertension [abstract]. J Vet Intern Med . 2009; 23: 1328. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Cowgill LD, Polzin DJ, Elliott J, et al. Is progressive chronic kidney disease a slow acute kidney injury? Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2016; 46: 995–1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Chen H, Dunaevich A, Apfelbaum N, et al. Acute on chronic kidney disease in cats: etiology, clinical and clinicopatho-logic findings, prognostic markers, and outcome. J Vet Intern Med 2020; 34: 1496–1506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Syme HM, Markwell PJ, Pfeiffer D, et al. Survival of cats with naturally occurring chronic renal failure is related to severity of proteinuria. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 528–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Chakrabarti S, Syme HM, Elliott J. Clinicopathological variables predicting progression of azotemia in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2012; 26: 275–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tang PK, van den Broek DHN, Jepson RE, et al. Dietary magnesium supplementation in cats with chronic kidney disease: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 2180–2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Shipov A, Segev G, Meltzer H, et al. The effect of naturally occurring chronic kidney disease on the micro-structural and mechanical properties of bone. PloS One 2014; 9. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Elliott J, Rawlings JM, Markwell PJ, et al. Survival of cats with naturally occurring chronic renal failure: effect of dietary management. J Small Anim Pract 2000; 41: 235–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Plantinga EA, Everts H, Kastelein AM, et al. Retrospective study of the survival of cats with acquired chronic renal insufficiency offered different commercial diets. Vet Rec 2005; 157: 185–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Coyne M, Szlosek D, Webeck J, et al. Use of a veterinary therapeutic renal diet in cats with early chronic kidney disease is associated with slower disease progression and improved survival. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2026; 264: 590–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. International Renal Interest Society. IRIS staging of CKD. http://www.iris–kidney.com/pdf/2_IRIS_Staging_of_ CKD_2023.pdf (accessed 23 May 2026). [Google Scholar]
- 70. Boyd LM, Langston C, Thompson K, et al. Survival in cats with naturally occurring chronic kidney disease (2000–2002). J Vet Intern Med 2008; 22: 1111–1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Geddes RF, Elliott J, Syme HM. Relationship between plasma fibroblast growth factor-23 concentration and survival time in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2015; 29: 1494–1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Tang PK, Jepson RE, Chang YM, et al. Elevation of the slope of inverse creatinine to define progressive chronic kidney disease in cats and associated risk factors. Vet J 2026; 317. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Vanholder R, Glorieux G, De Smet R. et al. New insights in uremic toxins. Kidney Int 2003; 63 Suppl: S6–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Chen CN, Chou CC, Tsai PSJ. et al. Plasma indoxyl sulfate concentration predicts progression of chronic kidney disease in dogs and cats. Vet J 2018; 232: 33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Summers SC, Quimby JM, Isaiah A. et al. The fecal microbiome and serum concentrations of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol sulfate in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2019; 33: 662–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Cheng FP, Hsieh MJ, Chou CC. et al. Detection of indoxyl sulfate levels in dogs and cats suffering from naturally occurring kidney diseases. Vet J 2015; 205: 399–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Nakhoul GN, Huang H, Arrigain S, et al. Serum potassium, end-stage renal disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 2015; 41: 456–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Caney SM. An online survey of dietary and phosphate binder practices of owners of cats with chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19: 1040–1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Elliott J, Barber PJ. Feline chronic renal failure: clinical findings in 80 cases diagnosed between 1992 and 1995. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 78–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Magalhaes TR, Lourenco AL, Corbee RJ, et al. Caregivers’ perspectives on feline chronic kidney disease in Portugal: a questionnaire-based study. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251377486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Dowgray N, Pinchbeck G, Eyre K, et al. Aging in cats: owner observations and clinical finding in 206 mature cats at enrolment to the Cat Prospective Aging and Welfare Study. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.859041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Freeman LM, Lachaud MP, Matthews S, et al. Evaluation of weight loss over time in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30: 1661–1666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Brusach K, Lorbach S, Quimby J, et al. Measurement of ghrelin as a marker of appetite dysregulation in cats with and without chronic kidney disease. Vet Sci 2023; 10. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10070464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Karpozilou A, De Stefani A, Liatis T. Cervical ventroflex-ion in cats: 86 cases (2003–2024). J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251348328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Dorsch R, Teichmann-Knorrn S, Sjetne Lund H. Urinary tract infection and subclinical bacteriuria in cats: a clinical update. J Feline Med Surg 2019; 21: 1023–1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Benjamin SE, Drobatz KJ. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors and treatment outcome predictors in cats presenting to the emergency room for constipation. J Feline Med Surg 2020; 22: 153–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39 Suppl 1: 1–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Quimby JM, Jones SE, Saffire A, et al. Assessment of the effect of gabapentin on blood pressure in cats with and without chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2024; 26. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X241240326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Giannakopoulou N, Blacklock B. Fundoscopy in cats: a practical guide and common findings. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251338463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Taylor SS, Sparkes AH, Briscoe K, et al. ISFM consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hypertension in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19: 288–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Finch N. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate in cats: methods and advantages over routine markers of renal function. J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16: 736–748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Vanden Broecke E, Van Mulders L, Paepe D, et al. Impact of interlaboratory differences on the measurement of serum creatinine and symmetric dimethylarginine values: does this affect clinical decision-making? J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251320249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Finch NC, Heiene R, Elliott J, et al. A single sample method for estimating glomerular filtration rate in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2013; 27: 782–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Friedrichs KR, Harr KE, Freeman KP, et al. ASVCP reference interval guidelines: determination of de novo reference intervals in veterinary species and other related topics. Vet Clin Pathol 2012; 41: 441–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Hall JA, Yerramilli M, Obare E, et al. Comparison of serum concentrations of symmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine as kidney function biomarkers in healthy geriatric cats fed reduced protein foods enriched with fish oil, L-carnitine, and medium-chain triglycerides. Vet J 2014; 202: 588–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Mortier F, van Leeuwenberg R, Daminet S, et al. Determination of age-specific reference intervals for selected serum and urinary biomarkers in elderly cats. J Feline Med Surg 2023; 25. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X231207492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Braff J, Obare E, Yerramilli M, et al. Relationship between serum symmetric dimethylarginine concentration and glomerular filtration rate in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2014; 28: 1699–1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Brans M, Daminet S, Mortier F, et al. Plasma symmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine concentrations and glomerular filtration rate in cats with normal and decreased renal function. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35: 303–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Michael H, Szlosek D, Clements C, et al. Symmetrical dimethylarginine: evaluating chronic kidney disease in the era of multiple kidney biomarkers. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2022; 52: 609–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Cattaneo G, Kingsbury EJ, McCallum KE, et al. Association of serum symmetric dimethylarginine concentrations and inflammation in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2025; 39. DOI: 10.1111/ jvim.70030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Van Vertloo LR, Palerme JS, Miles KG, et al. Changes in symmetric dimethylarginine and glomerular filtration rates in hyperthyroid cats undergoing radioiodine therapy. J Feline Med Surg 2023; 25. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X231160128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Covey HL, Chang YM, Elliott J, et al. Changes in thyroid and renal function after bilateral thyroidectomy in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2019; 33: 508–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Coyne MJ, Drake C, McCrann DJ, et al. The association between symmetric dimethylarginine concentrations and various neoplasms in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Oncol 2022; 20: 846–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Langhorn R, Kieler IN, Koch J, et al. Symmetric dimethylarginine in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and diabetes mellitus. J Vet Intern Med 2018; 32: 57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Reed N. Rational approach to feline medical emergencies: part 2. J Feline Med Surg 2026; 28. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251411055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Segev G, Cortellini S, Foster JD, et al. International Renal Interest Society best practice consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury in cats and dogs. Vet J 2024; 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Segev G, Nivy R, Kass PH, et al. A retrospective study of acute kidney injury in cats and development of a novel clinical scoring system for predicting outcome for cats managed by hemodialysis. J Vet Intern Med 2013; 27: 830–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Thrall MA, Grauer GF, Mero KN. Clinicopathologic findings in dogs and cats with ethylene glycol intoxication. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984; 184: 37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Cole LP, Mantis P, Humm K. Ultrasonographic findings in cats with acute kidney injury: a retrospective study. J Feline Med Surg 2019; 21: 475–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. van den Broek DHN, Geddes RF, Lotter NS, et al. Ionized hypercalcemia in cats with azotemic chronic kidney disease (2012–2018). J Vet Intern Med 2022; 36: 1312–1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Barber PJ, Elliott J. Feline chronic renal failure: calcium homeostasis in 80 cases diagnosed between 1992 and 1995. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 108–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Tang PK, Geddes RF, Jepson RE, et al. A feline-focused review of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders – Part 1: physiology of calcium handling. Vet J 2021; 275. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Tang PK, Geddes RF, Jepson RE, et al. A feline-focused review of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders – Part 2: pathophysiology of calcium disorder and extraosseous calcification. Vet J 2021; 275. DOI: 10.1016/ j.tvjl.2021.105718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Finch NC, Syme HM, Elliott J, et al. Glomerular filtration rate estimation by use of a correction formula for slope-intercept plasma iohexol clearance in cats. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 1652–1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Finco DR, Adams DD, Crowell WA, et al. Food and water intake and urine composition in cats: influence of continuous versus periodic feeding. Am J Vet Res 1986; 47: 1638–1642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Rishniw M, Bicalho R. Factors affecting urine specific gravity in apparently healthy cats presenting to first opinion practice for routine evaluation. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 329–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Syme HM. Proteinuria in cats. Prognostic marker or mediator? J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 211–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Elliott J, Syme HM. Proteinuria in chronic kidney disease in cats – prognostic marker or therapeutic target? J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 1052–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Mayer-Roenne B, Goldstein RE, Erb HN. Urinary tract infections in cats with hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2007; 9: 124–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. White JD, Stevenson M, Malik R, et al. Urinary tract infections in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 459–465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Hindar C, Chang YM, Syme HM, et al. The association of bacteriuria with survival and disease progression in cats with azotemic chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2020; 34: 2516–2524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Le Corre E, Jousserand N, Maurey C, et al. Clinical outcomes and association with disease progression and survival of subclinical bacteriuria in cats with chronic kidney disease: a multicenter retrospective study. J Vet Intern Med 2026; 40. DOI: 10.1093/jvimsj/aalag064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Weese JS, Blondeau J, Boothe D, et al. International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases (ISCAID) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of bacterial urinary tract infections in dogs and cats. Vet J 2019; 247: 8–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Rodan I, Dowgray N, Carney HC, et al. 2022. AAFP/ISFM cat friendly veterinary interaction guidelines: approach and handling techniques. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 1093–1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Fonseca JD, Mavrides DE, Graham PA, et al. Results of urinary bacterial cultures and antibiotic susceptibility testing of dogs and cats in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 2021; 62: 1085–1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Taylor S, Boysen S, Buffington T, et al. 2025. iCatCare consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract diseases in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X241309176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Dorsch R, von Vopelius-Feldt C, Wolf G, et al. Feline urinary tract pathogens: prevalence of bacterial species and antimicrobial resistance over a 10-year period. Vet Rec 2015; 176: 201. DOI: 10.1136/vr.102630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Clark H, Lasarev M, Wood M. Risk factors of enterococ-cal bacteriuria in cats: a retrospective study. Can Vet J 2023; 64: 40–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Seidel EJ, Hess RS, Cole SJ, et al. Clinical differences in enterococcal bacteriuria compared with other bacteriuria in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: e546–e550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Wolff E. Pyelonephritis. In: Côté E. (ed). Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. Elsevier, 2024, pp 2127–2128. [Google Scholar]
- 131. Whitehouse WH, Ostronic AL, Viviano KR. Acute pyelonephritis in cats is frequently caused by Escherichia coli resistant to potentiated penicillins but has a better prognosis than other causes of acute kidney injury. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2024; 262: 232–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Coldrick O, Brannon CL, Kydd DM, et al. Fungal pyelonephritis due to Cladophialophora bantiana in a cat. Vet Rec 2007; 161: 724–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Mponda P, Cheng KY, Brunel L, et al. Fungal pyelonephritis (Candida tropicalis) in a cat successfully treated with a subcutaneous ureteral bypass device and topical and systemic antifungals. JFMS Open Rep 2025; 11. DOI: 10.1177/20551169251387480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Kurtz M, Pey PBM, Mortier J, et al. Usefulness of serum amyloid A for the diagnosis of pyelonephritis in cats: a prospective evaluation. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 1542–1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Etedali NM, Reetz JA, Foster JD. Complications and clinical utility of ultrasonographically guided pyelocentesis and antegrade pyelography in cats and dogs: 49 cases (2007–2015). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2019; 254: 826–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Quimby JM, Dowers K, Herndon AK, et al. Renal pelvic and ureteral ultrasonographic characteristics of cats with chronic kidney disease in comparison with normal cats, and cats with pyelonephritis or ureteral obstruction. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19: 784–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Cordella A, Lenz J, Bertal M, et al. Ultrasonographic features of feline renal neoplasia: a retrospective study on 187 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2026; 28. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X261432299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Griffin S. Feline abdominal ultrasonography: what’s normal? What’s abnormal? The kidneys and perinephric space. J Feline Med Surg 2020; 22: 409–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. McAloney CA, Sharkey LC, Feeney DA, et al. Diagnostic utility of renal fine-needle aspirate cytology and ultrasound in the cat. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20: 544–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Vaden SL, Levine JF, Lees GE, et al. Renal biopsy: a retrospective study of methods and complications in 283 dogs and 65 cats. J Vet Intern Med 2005; 19: 794–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Chen H, Avital Y, Peterson S, et al. Urinary cystatin B as a marker of acute kidney injury in cats. Vet J 2024; 308. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Segev G, Vaden S, Ross S, et al. Urinary cystatin B differentiates progressive versus stable IRIS stage 1 chronic kidney disease in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2023; 37: 2251–2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Ghys LF, Paepe D, Lefebvre HP, et al. Evaluation of cystatin C for the detection of chronic kidney disease in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30: 1074–1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Liao YL, Chou CC, Lee YJ. The association of indoxyl sulfate with fibroblast growth factor-23 in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2019; 33: 686–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Kongtasai T, Paepe D, Meyer E, et al. Renal biomarkers in cats: a review of the current status in chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2022; 36: 379–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. King JN, Tasker S, Gunn-Moore DA, et al. Prognostic factors in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21: 906–916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Kuwahara Y, Ohba Y, Kitoh K, et al. Association of laboratory data and death within one month in cats with chronic renal failure. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 446–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Elliott J, Reyes-Hughes H, Hibbert A, et al. Owners’ experiences of caring for cats with chronic kidney disease in the UK. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251314769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Lorbach SK, Quimby JM, Nijveldt E, et al. Evaluation of health-related quality of life in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251367535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Lim L, Quimby J, Caney S. Feline chronic kidney disease is associated with significant caregiver burden. 2024 ACVIM forum research abstract program. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 2954–2955. [Google Scholar]
- 151. Ross SJ, Osborne CA, Kirk CA, et al. Clinical evaluation of dietary modification for treatment of spontaneous chronic kidney disease in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 229: 949–957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Foster JD. Update on mineral and bone disorders in chronic kidney disease. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2016; 46: 1131–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Geddes RF, Elliott J, Syme HM. The effect of feeding a renal diet on plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 concentrations in cats with stable azotemic chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2013; 27: 1354–1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Freeman L, Becvarova I, Cave N. et al. ; WSAVA Nutritional Assessment Guidelines Task Force Members. WSAVA nutritional assessment guidelines. J Small Anim Pract 2011; 52: 385–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Coady M, Fletcher DJ, Goggs R. Severity of ionized hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia is associated with etiology in dogs and cats. Front Vet Sci 2019; 6: 276. DOI: 10.3389/ fvets.2019.00276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Broughton SE, O’Neill DG, Syme HM, et al. Ionized hypercalcemia in 238 cats from a referral hospital population (2009–2019). J Vet Intern Med 2023; 37: 80–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. van den Broek DH, Chang YM, Elliott J, et al. Chronic kidney disease in cats and the risk of total hypercalcemia. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 31: 465–475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Geddes RF, van den Broek DHN, Chang YM, et al. The effect of attenuating dietary phosphate restriction on blood ionized calcium concentrations in cats with chronic kidney disease and ionized hypercalcemia. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35: 997–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Ehrlich MR, Rudinsky AJ, Chew DJ, et al. Ionized hypercalcemia can resolve with nutritional modification in cats with idiopathic hypercalcemia or chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2024; 26. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X241229811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Schenck PA, Chew DJ. Prediction of serum ionized calcium concentration by serum total calcium measurement in cats. Can J Vet Res 2010; 74: 209–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Lötter N, Tang PK, Geddes R, et al. The effect of magnesium supplemented phosphate restricted diet in managing diet-induced hypercalcaemia in cats with chronic kidney disease [abstract]. J Vet Intern Med 2026; 40. DOI: 10.1093/jvimsj/aalaf018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Fantinati M, Priymenko N. Managing feline idiopathic hypercalcemia with chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.): a case series. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 421. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Kurtz M, Desquilbet L, Maire J, et al. Alendronate treatment in cats with persistent ionized hypercalcemia: a retrospective cohort study of 20 cases. J Vet Intern Med 2022; 36: 1921–1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Perez-Ricart A, Galicia-Basart M, Alcalde-Rodrigo M, et al. Effectiveness of cinacalcet in patients with chronic kidney disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism not receiving dialysis. PloS One 2016; 11. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0161527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Peak K, Paul A, Walker J, et al. Successful treatment of a case of feline idiopathic hypercalcaemia with cinacalcet. Vet Rec Case Rep 2024; 12. DOI: 10.1002/vrc2.965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Quimby J. Chronic kidney disease. In: Côté E, Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC. (eds). Ettinger’s textbook of veterinary internal medicine. 9th ed. Elsevier, 2024, pp 2089–2106. [Google Scholar]
- 167. Taylor S, Chan DL, Villaverde C, et al. 2022 ISFM consensus guidelines on management of the inappetent hospitalised cat. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 614–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Quimby JM, Lake RC, Hansen RJ, et al. Oral, subcutaneous, and intravenous pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in healthy cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2014; 37: 348–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Quimby JM, Lunn KF. Mirtazapine as an appetite stimulant and anti-emetic in cats with chronic kidney disease: a masked placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial. Vet J 2013; 197: 651–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Quimby JM, Brock WT, Moses K, et al. Chronic use of maro-pitant for the management of vomiting and inappetence in cats with chronic kidney disease: a blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 692–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Poole M, Quimby JM, Hu T, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to evaluate the weight gain drug, mirtazapine transdermal ointment, in cats with unintended weight loss. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2019; 42: 179–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Wofford JA, Milliken MacKinnon A, Heinen E. Capromorelin promotes weight gain in cats with unintended weight loss: a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/ 1098612X251379924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Tolbert MK, Olin S, MacLane S, et al. Evaluation of gastric pH and serum gastrin concentrations in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 31: 1414–1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. McLeland SM, Lunn KF, Duncan CG, et al. Relationship among serum creatinine, serum gastrin, calcium-phosphorus product, and uremic gastropathy in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2014; 28: 827–837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Golly E, Odunayo A, Daves M, et al. The frequency of oral famotidine administration influences its effect on gastric pH in cats over time. J Vet Intern Med 2019; 33: 544–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Tolbert K, Stubbs E. Rational use of gastroprotectants in cats: an evidence-based approach. J Feline Med Surg 2024; 26. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X241274235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Spencer A, Quimby JM, Price JM, et al. Appetite-stimulating effects of once-daily omeprazole in cats with chronic kidney disease: double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover trial. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35: 2705–2712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Ross S. Utilization of feeding tubes in the management of feline chronic kidney disease. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2016; 46: 1099–1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Peralta M, Nichelason A, Trepanier L. Voluntary acceptance of nutrient-enriched water supplement and promotion of water intake in clinically dehydrated cats. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X25133427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Cooley CM, Quimby JM, Caney SM, et al. Survey of owner subcutaneous fluid practices in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20: 884–890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Elliott J. Therapeutics of managing reduced red cell mass associated with chronic kidney disease – is there a case for earlier intervention? J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2023; 46: 145–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Spencer S, Wheeler-Jones C, Elliott J. Hypoxia and chronic kidney disease: possible mechanisms, therapeutic targets, and relevance to cats. Vet J 2021; 274. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Nangaku M, Eckardt KU. Pathogenesis of renal anemia. Semin Nephrol 2006; 26: 261–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Hammond H, Pierce KV. Treatment of high-output cardiac failure secondary to anemia in three cats. JFMS Open Rep 2023: 9. DOI: 10.1177/20551169231154178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Chalhoub S, Langston CE, Farrelly J. The use of darbe-poetin to stimulate erythropoiesis in anemia of chronic kidney disease in cats: 25 cases. J Vet Intern Med 2012; 26: 363–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Locatelli F, Del Vecchio L. Expert guidance for treating anemia in chronic kidney disease: what is the appropriate drug treatment strategy? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24: 287–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Boegel A, Flamme I, Krebber R, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of molidustat on erythropoiesis in healthy cats. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 381–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Charles S, Sussenberger R, Settje T, et al. Use of molidustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, in chronic kidney disease-associated anemia in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38: 197–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Vaden SQ J . New therapeutic approaches to management of anemia and iron metabolism in chronic kidney disease. Adv Small Anim Care 2024; 5: 179–188. [Google Scholar]
- 190. Li J, Xie QH, You L, et al. Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on iron regulation in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients with anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol Res 2021; 163. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Akizawa T, Macdougall IC, Berns JS, et al. Iron regulation by molidustat, a daily oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron 2019; 143: 243–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Jepson RE, Elliott J, Brodbelt D, et al. Effect of control of systolic blood pressure on survival in cats with systemic hypertension. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21: 402–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Sent U, Gossl R, Elliott J, et al. Comparison of efficacy of long-term oral treatment with telmisartan and benazepril in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2015; 29: 1479–1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. King JN, Gunn-Moore DA, Tasker S, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of benazepril in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 1054–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Young WM, Zheng C, Davidson MG, et al. Visual outcome in cats with hypertensive chorioretinopathy. Vet Ophthalmol 2019; 22: 161–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Kyles AE, Gregory CR, Wooldridge JD, et al. Management of hypertension controls postoperative neurologic disorders after renal transplantation in cats. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 436–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Acierno MJ, Brown S, Coleman AE, et al. ACVIM consensus statement: guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2018; 32: 1803–1822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Huhtinen M, Derre G, Renoldi HJ, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of a chewable formulation of amlodipine for the treatment of hypertension in client-owned cats. J Vet Intern Med 2015; 29: 786–793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Bijsmans ES, Doig M, Jepson RE, et al. Factors influencing the relationship between the dose of amlodipine required for blood pressure control and change in blood pressure in hypertensive cats. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30: 1630–1636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Helms SR. Treatment of feline hypertension with transder-mal amlodipine: a pilot study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2007; 43: 149–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Glaus TM, Elliott J, Herberich E, et al. Efficacy of long-term oral telmisartan treatment in cats with hypertension: results of a prospective European clinical trial. J Vet Intern Med 2019; 33: 413–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Coleman AE, Brown SA, Traas AM, et al. Safety and efficacy of orally administered telmisartan for the treatment of systemic hypertension in cats: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Vet Intern Med 2019; 33: 478–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Steele JL, Henik RA, Stepien RL. Effects of angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibition on plasma aldosterone concentration, plasma renin activity, and blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive cats with chronic renal disease. Vet Ther 2002; 3: 157–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Dow SW, Fettman MJ, Curtis CR, et al. Hypokalemia in cats: 186 cases (1984–1987). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 1604–1608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Theisen SK, DiBartola SP, Radin MJ. et al. Muscle potassium content and potassium gluconate supplementation in normokalemic cats with naturally occurring chronic renal failure. J Vet Intern Med 1997; 11: 212–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Chen W, Abramowitz MK. Metabolic acidosis and the progression of chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol 2014; 15: 55. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Brown EE, Cooke KL, Castro RA, et al. Correlation of urine ammonia excretion with renal function in healthy cats and cats with kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2025; 39. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.70142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Jones SE, Quimby JM, Summers SC, et al. Survey of defecation habits in apparently healthy and chronic kidney disease cats. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 131–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. George ZM, Quimby JM, Jones S, et al. Quantification of defecation frequency in cats with and without chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251348011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Tam FM, Carr AP, Myers SL. Safety and palatability of polyethylene glycol 3350 as an oral laxative in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 694–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Freiche V, Houston D, Weese H, et al. Uncontrolled study assessing the impact of a psyllium-enriched extruded dry diet on faecal consistency in cats with constipation. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 903–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Rudinsky AJ, Parker VJ. Therapeutic applications of dietary fiber: managing fiber-responsive gastrointestinal conditions in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2026; 56: 603–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. LeGrange SN, Boothe DM, Herndon S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and suggested oral dosing regimen of cisapride: a study in healthy cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1997; 33: 517–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Washabau RJ, Sammarco J. Effects of cisapride on feline colonic smooth muscle function. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 541–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Paschall RE, Quimby JM, Lourenco BN, et al. The effect of Renaltec on serum uremic toxins in cats with experimentally induced chronic kidney disease. Vet Sci 2024; 11. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11080379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Elzenbeck I, Teichmann-Knorrn S, Kolle P, et al. Evaluation of the effect of Renaltec in cats with IRIS stage 2 and 3 chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2026; 28. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251409548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Ito H, Matsuura T, Sano T. Beraprost and overall survival in cats with chronic kidney disease. Vet Sci 2023; 10: 459. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10070459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Heath S. Environment and feline health: at home and in the clinic. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2020; 50: 663–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Stella J, Croney C, Buffington T. Effects of stressors on the behavior and physiology of domestic cats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2013; 143: 157–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Ellis SL, Rodan I, Carney HC, et al. AAFP and ISFM feline environmental needs guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 219–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Taylor S, St Denis K, Collins S, et al. 2022. ISFM/AAFP cat friendly veterinary environment guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 1133–1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Heath S, Dowgray, Rodan I, et al. 10 years of Cat Friendly: a new model and terminology for understanding feline emotions. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 934–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Quimby JM, Lorbach SK, Saffire A, et al. Serum concentrations of gabapentin in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 1260–1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Quimby JM, Lourenco B, Lancaster M, et al. Sparse sampling pharmacokinetics of pregabalin in cats with chronic kidney disease [abstract]. J Vet Intern Med 2025; 39: 159. [Google Scholar]
- 225. Spitznagel MB, Gober MW, Patrick K. Caregiver burden in cat owners: a cross-sectional observational study. J Feline Med Surg 2023; 25. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X221145835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Kukanich B. Geriatric veterinary pharmacology. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 631–642, v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Villaverde C, Hervera M. Feline comorbidities: a nutritional approach to management. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251320877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Ray M, Carney HC, Boynton B, et al. 2021 AAFP feline senior care guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23: 613–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Conroy M, Brodbelt DC, O’Neill D, et al. Chronic kidney disease in cats attending primary care practice in the UK: a VetCompassTM study. Vet Rec 2019; 184: 526. DOI: 10.1136/vr.105100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Geddes R, Aguiar J. Feline comorbidities: balancing hyperthyroidism and concurrent chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 641–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Riensche MR, Graves TK, Schaeffer DJ. An investigation of predictors of renal insufficiency following treatment of hyperthyroidism in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2008; 10: 160–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Peterson ME, Carmody S, Rishniw M. Hyperthyroid cats that develop azotemia following successful radioiodine treatment have shorter survival times compared to cats that remain nonazotemic. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2025; 263: 454–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Wakeling J, Moore K, Elliott J, et al. Diagnosis of hyperthyroidism in cats with mild chronic kidney disease. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 49: 287–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. DeMonaco SM, Panciera DL, Morre WA, et al. Symmetric dimethylarginine in hyperthyroid cats before and after treatment with radioactive iodine. J Feline Med Surg 2020; 22: 531–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Peterson ME, Rishniw M. Urine concentrating ability in cats with hyperthyroidism: influence of radioiodine treatment, masked azotemia, and iatrogenic hypothyroidism. J Vet Intern Med 2023; 37: 2039–2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Milner RJ, Channell CD, Levy JK, et al. Survival times for cats with hyperthyroidism treated with iodine 131, methima-zole, or both: 167 cases (1996–2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 228: 559–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Vagney M, Desquilbet L, Reyes-Gomez E, et al. Survival times for cats with hyperthyroidism treated with a 3.35 mCi iodine-131 dose: a retrospective study of 96 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20: 528–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Williams TL, Peak KJ, Brodbelt D, et al. Survival and the development of azotemia after treatment of hyperthyroid cats. J Vet Intern Med 2010; 24: 863–869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Williams TL, Elliott J, Syme HM. Association of iatrogenic hypothyroidism with azotemia and reduced survival time in cats treated for hyperthyroidism. J Vet Intern Med 2010; 24: 1086–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Lefort-Holguin M, Delsart A, Frezier M, et al. Osteoarthritis in cats: what we know, and mostly, what we don’t know. . . yet. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/ 1098612X251347999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Watanabe R, Doodnaught G, Proulx C, et al. A multidisciplinary study of pain in cats undergoing dental extractions: a prospective, blinded, clinical trial. PloS One 2019; 14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Monteiro BP, Steagall PV. Chronic pain in cats: recent advances in clinical assessment. J Feline Med Surg 2019; 21: 601–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243. Monteiro BP, Taylor S, Dowgray N, et al. Feline chronic pain management: the importance of a team approach for optimal outcomes. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251374161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244. Monteiro B, Steagall PVM, Lascelles BDX, et al. Long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cats with chronic kidney disease: from controversy to optimism. J Small Anim Pract 2019; 60: 459–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Monteiro BP, Lascelles BDX, Murrell J, et al. 2022 WSAVA guidelines for the recognition, assessment and treatment of pain. J Small Anim Pract 2023; 64: 177–254. [Google Scholar]
- 246. Robertson SA, Gogolski SM, Pascoe P, et al. AAFP feline anesthesia guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20: 602–634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247. Taylor S, Gruen M, KuKanich K, et al. 2024. ISFM and AAFP consensus guidelines on the long-term use of NSAIDs in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2024; 26. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X241241951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248. Guillot M, Moreau M, Heit M, et al. Characterization of osteoarthritis in cats and meloxicam efficacy using objective chronic pain evaluation tools. Vet J 2013; 196: 360–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249. KuKanich K, George C, Roush JK, et al. Effects of low-dose meloxicam in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23: 138–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250. Goodman LA, Brown SA, Torres BT, et al. Effects of meloxi-cam on plasma iohexol clearance as a marker of glomerular filtration rate in conscious healthy cats. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70: 826–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251. Adrian D, King JN, Parrish RS, et al. Robenacoxib shows efficacy for the treatment of chronic degenerative joint disease-associated pain in cats: a randomized and blinded pilot clinical trial. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 7721. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87023-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252. Ishiguro C, Fujita T, Omori T, et al. Assessing the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on antihypertensive drug therapy using post-marketing surveillance database. J Epidemiol 2008; 18: 119–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253. Enomoto M, Lascelles BDX, Robertson JB, et al. Refinement of the Feline Musculoskeletal Pain Index (FMPI) and development of the short-form FMPI. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 142–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254. Guedes AGP, Meadows JM, Pypendop BH, et al. Assessment of the effects of gabapentin on activity levels and owner-perceived mobility impairment and quality of life in osteoarthritic geriatric cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018; 253: 579–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255. Miranda-Cortes AE, Prado-Ochoa MG, Diaz-Torres R, et al. Comparison of the anxiolytic and analgesic effects of gabapentin and pregabalin in cats: a systematic review. Animals (Basel) 2025; 15. DOI: 10.3390/ani15162346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256. Gruen ME, Myers JAE, Lascelles BDX. Efficacy and safety of an anti-nerve growth factor antibody (frunevetmab) for the treatment of degenerative joint disease-associated chronic pain in cats: a multisite pilot field study. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.610028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257. Monteiro BP, Klinck MP, Moreau M, et al. Analgesic efficacy of tramadol in cats with naturally occurring osteoarthritis. PloS One 2017; 12. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258. Shipley H, Flynn K, Tucker L, et al. Owner evaluation of quality of life and mobility in osteoarthritic cats treated with amantadine or placebo. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23: 568–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259. Doodnaught GM, Monteiro BP, Benito J, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling after subcutaneous, intravenous and buccal administration of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine in conscious cats. PloS One 2017; 12. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0176443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260. Wilder A, Mills D. Time for vets to take a bet on ket? Monthly subcutaneous ketamine as an adjunctive analgesic in 28 dogs and 17 cats with osteoarthritis. Proceedings of the 2025 BSAVA congress; 2025 March 20–22; Manchester, UK. DOI: 10.22233/9781913859510.20.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 261. Kathrani A, Church DB, Brodbelt DC, et al. The use of hydrolysed diets for vomiting and/or diarrhoea in cats in primary veterinary practice. J Small Anim Pract 2020; 61: 723–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262. Parker VJ, Hill RC. Nutritional management of cats and dogs with diabetes mellitus. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023; 53: 657–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263. Hookey T, Backus RC, Bjornvad CR, et al. Guidelines for nutritional management of feline diabetes mellitus: a proposed classification system integrating medical considerations. J Feline Med Surg 2026; 28. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251409019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264. Reyes-Hughes H, Bird E, Neal C, et al. Glomerular ultra-structural change and vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression in diabetic cats. J Small Anim Pract 2025; 66: 600–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265. Al-Ghazlat SA, Langston CE, Greco DS, et al. The prevalence of microalbuminuria and proteinuria in cats with diabetes mellitus. Top Companion Anim Med 2011; 26: 154–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266. Paepe D, Ghys LF, Smets P, et al. Routine kidney variables, glomerular filtration rate and urinary cystatin C in cats with diabetes mellitus, cats with chronic kidney disease and healthy cats. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 880–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267. Taylor SPC, Cannon M, Church D, et al. 2025 iCatCare consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2025; 27. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251399103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268. Coleman AE, Shepard MK, Schmiedt CW, et al. Effects of orally administered enalapril on blood pressure and hemodynamic response to vasopressors during isoflurane anesthesia in healthy dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016; 43: 482–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269. Rioja E. Urogenital disease. In: Duke-Novakovski T, de Vries M, Seymour C. (eds). BSAVA manual of canine and feline anaesthesia and analgesia. 3rd ed. BSAVA, 2016, pp 356–365. [Google Scholar]
- 270. Pouchelon JL, Atkins CE, Bussadori C, et al. Cardiovascular-renal axis disorders in the domestic dog and cat: a veterinary consensus statement. J Small Anim Pract 2015; 56: 537–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271. Sivolapenko D, Lowrie M. Epileptic seizures in cats: practical approaches to diagnosis. J Feline Med Surg 2026; 28. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251407905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272. Rand JS, Mott J, Kendall K, et al. Spectrum of veterinary care in feline diabetes mellitus. J Feline Med Surg 2026; 28. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X251401500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273. Eigner DR, Breitreiter K, Carmack T, et al. 2023 AAFP/ IAAHPC feline hospice and palliative care guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2023; 25. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X231201683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Monitoring form for caregivers of cats with chronic kidney disease.
Managing the cat with chronic kidney disease: a guide for caregivers.
Nursing the cat with chronic kidney disease.
