Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1963 Apr;166(1):145–167. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007096

An electrophysiological investigation of mammalian motor nerve terminals

J I Hubbard, R F Schmidt
PMCID: PMC1359367  PMID: 13955375

Full text

PDF
167

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BISHOP P. O., BURKE W., HAYHOW W. R. Repetitive stimulation of optic nerve and lateral geniculate synapses. Exp Neurol. 1959 Dec;1:534–555. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(59)90016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COLE W. V. Structural variations of nerve endings in the striated muscles of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1957 Dec;108(3):445–463. doi: 10.1002/cne.901080306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CURTIS D. R., ECCLES J. C. Synaptic action during and after repetitive stimulation. J Physiol. 1960 Feb;150:374–398. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Localization of active spots within the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1956 Jun 28;132(3):630–649. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. The effect of magnesium on the activity of motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):553–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DUDEL J. Effect of inhibition on the presynaptic nerve terminal in the neuromuscular junction of the crayfish. Nature. 1962 Feb 10;193:587–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. Presynaptic inhibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:543–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. The quantal nature of transmission and spontaneous miniature potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:514–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ECCLES J. C., KOSTYUK P. G., SCHMIDT R. F. The effect of electric polarization of the spinal cord on central afferent fibres and on their excitatory synaptic action. J Physiol. 1962 Jun;162:138–150. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ECCLES J. C., KRNJEVIC K. Presynaptic changes associated with post-tetanic potentiation in the spinal cord. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149:274–287. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ECCLES J. C., LILEY A. W. Factors controlling the liberation of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. Am J Phys Med. 1959 Jun;38(3):96–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ECCLES J. C., RALL W. Effects induced in a monosynaptic reflex path by its activation. J Neurophysiol. 1951 Sep;14(5):353–376. doi: 10.1152/jn.1951.14.5.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FATT P., KATZ B. Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1952 May;117(1):109–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. FREYGANG W. H., Jr, FRANK K. Extracellular potentials from single spinal motoneurons. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Mar 20;42(4):749–760. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.4.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GASSER H. S. The postspike positivity of unmedullated fibers of dorsal root origin. J Gen Physiol. 1958 Mar 20;41(4):613–632. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.4.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. GREENGARD P., STRAUB R. W. After-potentials in mammalian non-myelinated nerve fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):442–462. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. GREENGARD P., STRAUB R. W. Metabolic studies on the hyperpolarization following activity in mammalian non-myelinated nerve fibres. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:414–423. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HAGIWARA S., TASAKI I. A study on the mechanism of impulse transmission across the giant synapse of the squid. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):114–137. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. HUBBARD J. I. Post-activation changes at the mammalian neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1959 Dec 19;184(Suppl 25):1945–1947. doi: 10.1038/1841945a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. HUBBARD J. I., SCHMIDT R. F. Repetitive activation of motor nerve endings. Nature. 1962 Oct 27;196:378–379. doi: 10.1038/196378a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. HUBBARD J. I. The effect of calcium and magnesium on the spontaneous release of transmitter from mammalian motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1961 Dec;159:507–517. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. HUBBARD J. I., WILLIS W. D. Hyperpolarization of mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163:115–137. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. HUTTER O. F. Post-tetanic restoration of neuromuscular transmission blocked by D-tubocurarine. J Physiol. 1952 Oct;118(2):216–227. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. LILEY A. W. An investigation of spontaneous activity at the neuromuscular junction of the rat. J Physiol. 1956 Jun 28;132(3):650–666. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. LILEY A. W., NORTH K. A. An electrical investigation of effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Sep;16(5):509–527. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. LILEY A. W. The effects of presynaptic polarization on the spontaneous activity at the mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1956 Nov 28;134(2):427–443. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. LILEY A. W. The quantal components of the mammalian end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):571–587. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. LLOYD D. P. C. Post-tetanic potentiation of response in monosynaptic reflex pathways of the spinal cord. J Gen Physiol. 1949 Nov;33(2):147–170. doi: 10.1085/jgp.33.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. MURAKAMI M., WATANABE K., TOMITA T. Effect of impalement with a micropipette on the local cell membrane. Study by simultaneous intra- and extracellular recording from the muscle fiber and giant axon. Jpn J Physiol. 1961 Feb 15;11:80–88. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.11.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. RIKER W. F., Jr Pharmacologic considerations in a reevaluation of the neuromuscular synapse. Arch Neurol. 1960 Nov;3:488–499. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1960.00450050008003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. RIKER W. F., Jr, ROBERTS J., STANDAERT F. G., FUJIMORI H. The motor nerve terminal as the primary focus for drug-in-duced facilitation of neuromuscular transmission. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1957 Nov;121(3):286–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. RIKER W. F., Jr, WERNER G., ROBERTS J., KUPERMAN A. Pharmacologic evidence for the existence of a presynaptic event in neuromuscular transmission. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1959 Feb;125(2):150–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. RITCHIE J. M., STRAUB R. W. The after-effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian non-medullated fibres. J Physiol. 1956 Dec 28;134(3):698–711. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. Electrical changes in pre- and postsynaptic axons of the giant synapse of Loligo. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Jul;45:1181–1193. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.6.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. TERZUOLO C. A., ARAKI T. An analysis of intra- versus extracellular potential changes associated with activity of single spinal motoneurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1961 Sep 6;94:547–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1961.tb35558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. WALL P. D., JOHNSON A. R. Changes associated with post-tetanic potentiation of a monosynaptic reflex. J Neurophysiol. 1958 Mar;21(2):148–158. doi: 10.1152/jn.1958.21.2.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES