Simple Summary
Amazonian toads produce complex skin and parotoid gland secretions that serve as an effective defense against predators and microorganisms. These secretions contain a wide variety of bioactive compounds, including bufadienolides, alkaloids, antimicrobial peptides, and other metabolites with diverse biological activities. In recent years, these natural products have attracted increasing scientific interest because of their potential applications in medicine, biotechnology, and agriculture. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge on the chemical composition, biological activities, mechanisms of action, toxicity, and therapeutic potential of the secretions of Rhaebo guttatus and Rhinella marina. Evidence indicates that these secretions exhibit antiproliferative, antimicrobial, antiparasitic, antiviral, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and larvicidal properties. However, their therapeutic application remains challenging because several compounds also display significant systemic toxicity. Understanding the relationship between chemical structure and biological activity will be essential for identifying safer and more selective molecules. Overall, the secretions of these Amazonian species represent a valuable source of natural compounds that may contribute to the development of new drugs and other biotechnological products while highlighting the importance of conserving biodiversity as a reservoir of bioactive molecules.
Keywords: Bufonidae, Rhaebo guttatus, Rhinella marina, bufadienolides
Abstract
Amazonian bufonid toads represent an important source of bioactive compounds with promising pharmacological potential. Among them, Rhaebo guttatus and Rhinella marina produce complex cutaneous and parotoid gland secretions composed mainly of bufadienolides, indole alkaloids, antimicrobial peptides, biogenic amines, and other secondary metabolites that play essential roles in chemical defense. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge regarding the ecology, chemical composition, biological activities, toxicological profile, and therapeutic potential of secretions from these two Amazonian species. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Google Scholar, covering publications from 2005 to 2025. The reviewed evidence demonstrates that these secretions exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activities, including antiproliferative, antimicrobial, antiparasitic, antiviral, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and larvicidal effects. These pharmacological properties are primarily associated with the modulation of molecular targets such as Na+/K+-ATPase, intracellular signaling pathways, oxidative stress, and inflammatory mediators. Despite their remarkable therapeutic potential, the clinical application of crude secretions remains limited by their significant systemic toxicity and narrow therapeutic window. Overall, the secretions of R. guttatus and R. marina constitute a valuable natural reservoir of bioactive molecules with considerable potential for drug discovery and the development of innovative therapeutic agents.
1. Introduction
The Amazon region holds one of the greatest biodiversities on the planet, harboring a vast array of anuran amphibians that have developed complex chemical defense mechanisms for survival in their ecological niches [1,2,3]. Among the most representative families, Bufonidae stands out for the presence of specialized cutaneous glands, such as the parotoid glands, capable of synthesizing and storing a secretion rich in biocompounds with distinct pharmacological properties [4,5,6]. Species such as Rhaebo guttatus (R. guttatus) and Rhinella marina (R. marina), widely distributed in the Southern Amazon, have attracted increasing scientific interest due to the potential of their secretions as sources of active biocompounds [7,8,9,10,11]. However, although preliminary tests point to antiparasitic activities, the pharmacological use of crude extracts is hampered by a high profile of cellular cytotoxicity [12].
Chemically, the poison of these bufonids is a “cocktail” of secondary metabolites, composed mainly of bufadienolides (cardiotonic steroids) and indole alkaloids [13]. Bufadienolides, such as marinobufagin (MBG) and bufaline, are recognized for their specific interaction with the Na+/K+-ATPase enzyme, which confers antitumor, cardiotonic, and cell cycle modulating activities [14]. In parallel, the alkaloid fraction, represented by molecules such as bufotenine and dehydrobufotenine, presents a promising profile for the development of analgesic and antiplasmodial agents, offering alternatives for the treatment of neglected diseases such as malaria [15].
Despite the historical recognition of their acute toxicity, which can cause severe poisoning in predators and domestic animals, modern science seeks to elucidate the therapeutic window of these compounds [16]. Recent investigations indicate that these secretions not only inhibit the growth of cancerous cells and pathogens, but also act in modulating the immune response and the antioxidant redox status of the host [16,17]. However, the complexity of these interactions and the inherent toxicity of crude extracts necessitate detailed studies of the molecular mechanisms involved.
In this context, the present work proposes an in-depth review of the biological and pharmacological activities of the secretions of R. guttatus and R. marina. The analysis ranges from antiproliferative and antimicrobial potential to systemic effects of toxicity and oxidative modulation, aiming to consolidate current knowledge and highlight the strategic value of Amazonian fauna for drug bioprospecting and the advancement of biotechnology.
2. Methodology
This study consists of a narrative literature review aimed at compiling and discussing current knowledge regarding the ecology, chemical composition, and biological activities of the cutaneous and parotoid gland secretions of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus, with emphasis on their pharmacological and biotechnological potential.
The literature search was conducted between January and May 2026 using the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Google Scholar, published between the years 2005 and 2025. The search strategy employed combinations of the following keywords and their respective Boolean operators: “Rhinella marina”, “Rhaebo guttatus”, “Bufonidae”, “parotoid secretion”, “cutaneous secretion”, “bufadienolides”, “alkaloids”, “chemical composition”, “antimicrobial activity”, “antiparasitic activity”, “antitumor activity”, “immunomodulatory activity”, “pharmacological potential”, and “Amazonian amphibians”.
Original research articles, review papers, book chapters, and relevant reports published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish were considered. Preference was given to peer-reviewed publications addressing the chemical characterization of secretions, ecological aspects of the species, and experimentally validated biological activities of compounds isolated from Bufonidae amphibians.
Studies not directly related to R. marina, R. guttatus, or closely related species of the family Bufonidae were excluded when their findings could not contribute to the understanding of the ecological, biochemical, or pharmacological aspects discussed in this review. Classical studies of historical relevance and recent publications were included to provide both a foundational and updated overview of the subject.
The selected literature was analyzed qualitatively and organized into thematic sections covering species ecology and distribution, glandular morphology, chemical composition of secretions, ecological functions of bioactive compounds, and their reported pharmacological applications. Given the narrative nature of this review, no formal systematic review protocol or meta-analysis was performed.
3. Taxonomic Aspects, Geographic Distribution and Ecology
The genus Rhaebo, described by Edward Drinker Cope in 1862, belongs to the family Bufonidae, which currently comprises about 471 species distributed across 33 genera [18]. Currently, Rhaebo consists of nine species of neotropical frogs, distributed from eastern Honduras to the South American Amazon, encompassing countries such as Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Venezuela, the Guianas, and Brazil [2]. Recent records indicate the presence of these species in Amazon–Cerrado transition areas, such as in the southern Brazilian Amazon, reinforcing the importance of these regions as sympatric zones with other bufonids, especially R. marina [19].
The genus exhibits diagnostic morphological characteristics that allow differentiation between its species: R. guttatus (Figure 1) has a well-developed preocular crest, a brown to dark brown back, a belly with rounded cream spots and light groins, and oval and prominent parotoid glands. In contrast, R. glaberrimus has smoother skin, lacks a preocular crest, and has inconspicuous parotoid glands. Other species, such as R. ecuadorensis, show distinct combinations of skin color and texture, reinforcing the morphological diversity of the genus [2].
Figure 1.

Rhaebo guttatus, Xingu Reserve, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Photograph by Marcos Penhacek, kindly provided for use in this study. Photograph taken on 22 September 2022.
In addition to morphological characteristics, acoustic signals have proven important for taxonomic differentiation. In R. guttatus, the release call, recently described in the Brazilian Amazon, features short, simple harmonic notes, distinct from the advertisement call, suggesting behavioral adaptations to specific environments and providing information about the species’ reproductive ecology [20].
From an ecological point of view, species of the genus Rhaebo preferentially occupy humid tropical forests and non-flooded upland areas, often associated with leaf litter near small watercourses [2]. The cutaneous secretion, produced mainly by the parotoid glands, acts in defense against predators and pathogenic microorganisms. In some species, such as R. guttatus, the chemical composition of this secretion can be influenced by diet and environment, especially with regard to alkaloids, while steroids appear to be more conserved [3,21].
The genus Rhinella, formerly included in Bufo, is the most representative of the Bufonidae family, with over 250 recognized species [4,11]. It stands out for its great morphological and ecological plasticity, adapting to a wide diversity of habitats, from humid forests to open and anthropized areas. Emblematic species, such as R. marina (Figure 2), can exceed 20 cm in snout-vent length and 1 kg in body mass, presenting rough and warty skin of olive-brown to dark brown coloration, a whitish to yellowish belly, voluminous and elongated parotoid glands, and well-developed cephalic crests from the preorbital to the occipital region [2,4]. Species of the Rhinella diptycha group demonstrate morphological variation related to different phytophysiognomies, such as the Pantanal, Chaco, and Cerrado, indicating that the geographic diversification of the genus was influenced by the formation of the large South American hydrographic basins during the Tertiary and Quaternary periods [22].
Figure 2.

Rhinella marina, Xingu Reserve, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Photograph by Marcos Penhacek, kindly provided for use in this study. Photograph taken on 22 September 2022.
The distribution of Rhinella extends from southern Texas and Mexico, throughout Central and South America, to the Brazilian Amazon [19]. R. marina exhibits high ecological plasticity, occurring in Amazonian floodplain environments, open areas, and anthropized zones, while R. diptycha is observed aggregating in river ports in the Pantanal, a behavior associated with the abundance of insects attracted by artificial light [23,24,25]. These species show a preference for bodies of water for reproduction and daytime refuge in humid environments, but are capable of exploring altered habitats [26].
In the southern Brazilian Amazon, simultaneous records of R. guttatus and R. marina confirm the occurrence of sympatry between the genera in transition zones, reinforcing the importance of this region for studies of ecology, distribution, and conservation of bufonids [19]. The diversity of habitats occupied and the morphological and behavioral variability of these genera highlight their ecological and evolutionary relevance, evidencing specific adaptations to micro-habitats and historical processes of diversification in tropical America.
4. Chemical Composition of Cutaneous and Parotoid Secretions
The secretions produced by the exocrine glands distributed throughout the skin of frogs and toads, and particularly conspicuously by the parotoid macroglands characteristic of the Bufonidae family—including the neotropical genera Rhaebo and Rhinella—represent a chemical arsenal of high complexity and functional diversity [5,6,13]. These mixtures, rich in secondary metabolites, constitute a sophisticated chemical defense mechanism, essential for the survival and ecological success of these amphibians, providing protection against a wide spectrum of biological threats, from vertebrate and invertebrate predators to a myriad of potentially pathogenic microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoa) prevalent in their diverse habitat [5,27,28]. Detailed analysis of these secretions has revealed a rich molecular tapestry, highlighting major classes of bioactive compounds, including: cardiotonic steroids known as bufadienolides (exemplified by MBG, telocinobufagin, and helveticoneolin); various alkaloids, with emphasis on indolic and tryptamine derivatives (such as bufotenine and dehydrobufotenine); a variety of bioactive peptides and proteins with antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties; as well as biogenic amines, such as serotonin and catecholamines [10,13,14,15].
The synthesis and storage of these defensive substances occur primarily in the granular (or poison) glands of the dermis, which in Bufonidae frequently aggregate to form externally visible macroglands. The parotoid glands, located bilaterally in the postorbital region, are the most developed and characteristic [5,6,8,10]. These structures function as strategic reservoirs, capable of rapidly releasing their contents—viscous secretions, typically whitish or yellowish—in response to direct mechanical stimuli, such as the pressure exerted by a predator’s bite, or in situations perceived as threatening [5]. The exact release mechanism, however, exhibits remarkable interspecific variation reflecting different defensive strategies. In species such as R. marina, defense is predominantly passive: external pressure applied to the parotoid gland is necessary to rupture the epithelial plugs that seal the glandular ducts, resulting in the expulsion of poison and self-poisoning of the aggressor. In striking contrast, R. guttatus has developed a unique form of active defense among known toads, being able to voluntarily eject jets of poison over considerable distances (up to 2 m). This peculiar mechanism is facilitated by specific morphological adaptations, including the adhesion of the ventral portion of the parotoid gland to the scapula, the absence of a calcified dermal layer over the parotoid gland (conferring greater flexibility), and the presence of structurally weaker ductal plugs, which require less internal pressure (possibly generated by muscle contraction associated with the shoulder girdle and lung inflation) to rupture and release the poison [5].
Chemically, biosynthesis reflects the origin of the precursors: Lipophilic metabolites, notably bufadienolides and other cardiotonic steroids, derive from cholesterol metabolism. Nitrogenous components, such as tryptamines (bufotenin, serotonin) and other indole alkaloids, originate from the tryptophan biosynthetic pathway, while peptides (such as bufonins, dermaseptins, defensins, and the potent buforin II from Bufo gargarizans) are products of gene expression [13]. In addition to these main classes, free (non-steroid-conjugated) diacyl arginine derivatives, such as suberoyl and azelayl arginine, and other biogenic amines such as histamine have been identified in Rhinella [29]. The final chemical composition is not only species-specific, reflecting phylogeny, but also demonstrates intraspecific plasticity, being modulated by ecological (habitat, diet—especially for sequestered alkaloids), physiological (reproductive stage, age, sex), and environmental (temperature, humidity) factors, resulting in locally adapted chemical profiles [3]. The reproductive physiology of R. guttatus has also been experimentally investigated, including hormonal induction and cryopreservation approaches for reproductive material, highlighting the relevance of physiological state when interpreting biological variation in this species [30]. This chemical and functional complexity underscores the evolutionary and pharmacological potential of these secretions. Functionally, different classes of compounds contribute to distinct biological effects: bufadienolides can exert cardiotoxic effects primarily through inhibition of Na+/K+-ATPase, whereas alkaloids, peptides, and amines have been associated with neuroactive and antimicrobial activities, respectively [13,14]. This chemical and functional complexity underscores the evolutionary and pharmacological potential of these secretions.
4.1. Bufadienolides and Cardiotonic Steroids
Bufadienolides represent the predominant and most studied chemical class in the cutaneous and parotoid secretions of frogs belonging to the genera Rhaebo and Rhinella, and are also found in certain plant families, such as the Crassulaceae [13]. Structurally, they are defined as C-24 steroids, biosynthesized from cholesterol, characterized by the presence of an α-pyrone ring (a six-membered α, β-unsaturated lactone) fused to the C-17β position of the cyclopentanoperhydrophenanthrene steroid nucleus, which is frequently polyhydroxylated [13,14]. In nature, they can occur as free aglycones or as glycosides, conjugated to sugar residues (commonly L-rhamnose or D-glucose), typically at the C-3 position [14]. Its most notable biological activity is cardiotonic, mediated by the specific inhibition of the Na+/K+-ATPase enzyme in the cell membrane, a mechanism shared with plant cardenolides such as digitoxin [14,19].
Inhibition of Na+/K+-ATPase by bufadienolides results in an increase in intracellular sodium concentration ([Na+]i), which secondarily leads to an accumulation of intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) via the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger [13,19]. In cardiomyocytes, this increase in [Ca2+]i elevates the force of contraction (positive inotropic effect), but at excessive or prolonged concentrations, it causes arrhythmias and severe cardiotoxicity, this being the main toxic effect observed in toad poisoning. The biosynthesis of these steroids occurs primarily in the parotoid glands, following complex metabolic pathways from cholesterol, possibly regulated by factors such as environmental stress and the availability of lipid precursors [14].
Detailed chromatographic (HPLC-UV, LC-MS/MS) and spectrometric analyses allowed the identification of several bufadienolides in the species of interest. In R. marina, a consistently more complex profile is observed, with the marked presence of telocinobufagin, marinobufagin, bufalin, and resibufogenin as main components, in addition to conjugates such as marinobufoxin (3-(N-suberoylargininyl) marinobufagin) [10]. MBG frequently stands out as the major constituent, representing up to 60% of some extracts. In contrast, R. guttatus exhibits a simpler chemical profile in this class, with MBG being the predominant bufadienolide or, in some analyses, the only one detected in significant quantities, although other minor steroids such as 3β,16β-dihydroxybufa-8(14),20,22-trienolide and bufatrienolides have also been identified [3,14].
In addition to their potent cardiotonic activity, bufadienolides demonstrate a broad spectrum of other bioactivities that support their pharmacological interest. Of particular note is their strong cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity against various human tumor cell lines in vitro (leukemia, breast, lung, colon, ovary, glioblastoma, melanoma, liver), often superior to or comparable to chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin [8,14,19]. The antitumor mechanism often involves the induction of apoptosis, associated with mitochondrial depolarization, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA fragmentation, and cell cycle arrest [13,14]. Other important pharmacological activities include anti-inflammatory effects [31], antiviral effects (against HBV, HIV, coronavirus), antibacterial effects, antifungal effects (including against phytopathogens and Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis), antiparasitic effects (against Leishmania, Trypanosoma, Plasmodium), immunomodulatory effects, and, in some cases, insecticidal and larvicidal effects (as observed against Anopheles darlingi) [12,13,15,31].
Ecologically, bufadienolids are crucial for chemical defense. Their intensely bitter taste and toxic effects act as a powerful deterrent against predation by vertebrates [5,13]. Contact with secretions can cause severe irritation of the mucous membranes, salivation, vomiting, cardiac arrhythmias, and, in smaller or more sensitive predators, even death, promoting rapid aversive learning [13,14].
4.2. Tryptamine Alkaloids and Derivatives
Alkaloids and their tryptamine derivatives constitute a relevant chemical fraction, although generally less abundant than bufadienolides, in the cutaneous and parotoid secretions of frogs of the genera Rhaebo and Rhinella. These nitrogenous compounds, biosynthesized mainly from the amino acid tryptophan through specific enzymes, are characterized by their high neurophysiological and pharmacological activity [13,14]. Their actions include neurotoxic and psychotropic (hallucinogenic) effects, and modulation of neurotransmission systems, particularly serotonergic receptors, due to their structural similarity to serotonin. During chromatographic analysis, these compounds tend to concentrate in the more polar (hydrophilic) fractions of the extracts [14].
Among the alkaloids most frequently identified in these genera, bufotenine (5-hydroxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine) and its dehydrogenated derivative, dehydrobufotenine, stand out, both consistently reported in several species, including R. marina, R. diptycha, and R. guttatus [14]. Bufotenidine, a quaternary ammonium derivative of bufotenine, was also found in R. diptycha [28]. Other tryptamines include N-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (identified in R. guttatus) and serotonin itself (5-hydroxytryptamine), detected in both main species (R. marina and R. guttatus). Additionally, the potent psychedelic tryptamine 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) and bufotionine have been mentioned as constituents of bufonid secretions [13]. Although generally present as minor components in terms of mass (<5% of total metabolites in some analyses), their high biological potency gives them significant functional and pharmacological importance [15].
The biological activities associated with these alkaloids are varied and noteworthy. Bufotenine, despite its known hallucinogenic properties that limit its direct therapeutic application, has demonstrated in vitro the ability to inhibit rabies virus infection, possibly through interaction with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Studies also suggest that it possesses anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties [13]. Dehydrobufotenine has exhibited antiproliferative activity against some cell lines [15], antifungal activity (including against phytopathogens such as Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea), and has emerged as a promising prototype for the development of antiplasmodial drugs, demonstrating activity against Plasmodium falciparum with a favorable profile of low cytotoxicity and high selectivity. Synthetic analogs of dehydrobufotenine have shown even greater potential as antifungal and antiviral agents against tobacco mosaic virus. Serotonin, in turn, is a known biogenic amine with neuromodulatory and vasoconstrictive functions [12,15,26].
In an ecological context, the presence of these alkaloids, particularly those with psychotropic and neurotoxic effects, plays a crucial role in chemical defense against predators [14]. Contact with secretions rich in these compounds can induce rapid and intense aversive responses in the aggressor, such as excessive salivation, disorientation, vomiting, and convulsions, facilitating the prey’s escape and promoting strong avoidance learning on the part of the predator [13,14]. This mechanism contributes to the adaptive success of species such as R. marina, which efficiently colonizes diverse environments, including anthropized areas. Evidence also suggests that the production or modification of some alkaloids may be related to the symbiotic skin microbiota of the frog or dietary sequestration of precursors [13]. Despite pharmacological interest, especially in antimicrobial, antiviral, and antiparasitic activities, the systemic toxicity and psychotropic effects of tryptamines such as bufotenine represent significant challenges for clinical development, reinforcing the need for more structural, pharmacokinetic, and structure–activity relationship studies to explore the therapeutic potential of these nitrogenous metabolites from neotropical anurans [13,15].
4.3. Antimicrobial Peptides and Other Metabolic Classes
In addition to bufadienolides and alkaloids, which frequently dominate the chemical characterization of Bufonidae secretions, a diverse set of bioactive peptides and other classes of secondary metabolites contributes significantly to the complexity and functionality of these defensive mixtures [14]. Peptides, in particular, represent a crucial component of the innate cutaneous immunity of anurans, forming an essential chemical barrier against colonization and infection by opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms, aiding in the maintenance of microbial homeostasis of the skin [27]. Although less explored in Rhaebo and Rhinella compared to other anuran families, the granular glands of these frogs also synthesize and secrete peptides, generally of low molecular weight (1–5 kDa). These include members of families known as dermaseptins, bufonins, temporins, defensins, and ranatensins, many of which exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungi [27].
Experimental studies confirm the functional relevance of these peptides in Bufonidae secretions. Methanolic extracts of R. guttatus secretion have demonstrated significant antifungal (against phytopathogens such as Fusarium solani, Aspergillus flavus) and antibacterial (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus) activity in vitro [27]. Inactivation assays using heat or protease treatment confirmed that this antimicrobial activity is substantially associated with the peptide fraction of the secretion. In R. marina, cationic peptides with structural characteristics similar to magainins and bombinins were detected, suggesting a mechanism of action based on the destabilization and lysis of the microbial cell membrane [27]. A notable example of a potent AMP isolated from a bufonid (Bufo gargarizans) is buforin II, a histone H2A-derived peptide that exhibits exceptional broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity through an unusual mechanism of membrane translocation and subsequent binding to intracellular nucleic acids. Cathelicidins have also been identified in the same species [27].
In addition to defense against microorganisms, many peptides derived from frogs also exhibit selective cytotoxicity against tumor cells [19]. This effect is frequently mediated by the induction of apoptosis, either through preferential interaction with cancerous cell membranes or by mitochondrial membrane depolarization. The antiproliferative activity observed in crude extracts of R. guttatus against breast and liver cancer cell lines [8] can be partially attributed to these peptides, which possibly act synergistically with the bufadienolides and alkaloids coexisting in the secretion [14]. This co-occurrence of multiple classes of toxins with distinct mechanisms of action suggests an integrated and robust defensive strategy, where peptides can potentiate or complement the action of steroids and alkaloids, amplifying the overall effectiveness of secretion and hindering the development of resistance by predators or pathogens [27].
Other minor, yet functionally relevant, metabolic classes include various biogenic amines, in addition to the tryptamines already discussed. Catecholamines such as adrenaline and dopamine are also known constituents of bufonid secretions. An additional intriguing class, identified in R. marina and R. diptycha, is diacyl arginine derivatives that exist in free form (not esterified to bufadienolides), such as adipoyl, pimeloyl, suberoyl, azelayl, and sebacyl arginine esters. Argininyl bufadienolide esters have also been detected in R. diptycha [29]; the specific function of these compounds in secretion still needs elucidation. Proteins, detected by electrophoresis, make up another significant fraction and may play structural, enzymatic, or homeostatic roles [14]. Lipids, such as glycerides and fatty acids, can influence the physicochemical properties of secretion, while phenolic compounds could contribute to antioxidant properties [4].
Taken together, the concomitant presence of antimicrobial and cytotoxic peptides, cardiotonic steroids, neuroactive alkaloids, biogenic amines, and other metabolites gives the secretions of Rhaebo and Rhinella an exceptionally integrated and dynamic chemical profile [14,27]. Each metabolic class plays potentially synergistic and complementary roles in the organism’s defense against a wide range of biological threats. This complex chemical arrangement is the result of long evolutionary processes shaped by multiple selective pressures—predation, microbial competition, abiotic stresses—that favored the diversification and optimization of adaptive chemistry in these neotropical anurans [13,14]. Beyond their undeniable ecological importance, the ongoing elucidation of the structure and function of peptides and other minor metabolic classes in these secretions represents a promising frontier for the discovery of new antimicrobial, antitumor, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant agents with potential biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications [4,14].
4.4. Intra- and Interspecific Chemical Variations
The chemical composition of the defensive glandular secretions of frogs belonging to the genera Rhaebo and Rhinella exhibits remarkable heterogeneity, manifesting itself both between distinct species (interspecific variation) and within the same species (intraspecific variation). The latter can occur between geographically isolated populations, between individuals of the same population, between sexes, or even throughout the ontogenetic development of an individual. This chemical variability is the complex result of the interaction between genetic inheritance (reflecting evolutionary history and gene flow), ecological factors (such as habitat type, availability and composition of diet—crucial for sequestered metabolites, the local community of predators and pathogens), abiotic environmental conditions (climate, temperature, humidity) and the physiological state of the animal (age, size, body condition, reproductive cycle) [13,14]. The study of these variations is fundamental not only for the chemical taxonomy and understanding of the evolutionary ecology of these amphibians, but also guides more efficient bioprospecting strategies for the discovery of new bioactive molecules [14].
At the interspecific level, differences in chemical composition can be striking and serve as auxiliary diagnostic characters in species delimitation, especially in morphologically complex or cryptic groups. Although the formal description of species such as Rhaebo ecuadorensis has been based primarily on morphological characters that distinguish it from R. guttatus (e.g., absence of a preocular crest) and R. glaberrimus (e.g., body size, groin coloration) [2], it is highly likely that these morphological distinctions are accompanied by specific chemical profiles. A comparison between the well-studied chemical profiles of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus reveals substantial and consistent differences [14,17]. R. marina typically exhibits a more complex cocktail of bufadienolides (including telocinobufagin, bufalin, and resibufogenin, in addition to MBG and a greater diversity of conjugated derivatives, such as diacid arginine esters [13,29].
In contrast, R. guttatus demonstrates a simpler bufadienolide profile, dominated by MBG, with other steroids present in smaller or variable amounts [17]. This fundamental chemical divergence may be directly correlated with the distinct defensive strategies observed (predominantly passive in R. marina vs. active ejection capability in R. guttatus) [5] and with the differences in the biological effects of their poisons (greater systemic lethality associated with R. marina vs. greater induction of pain and local edema by R. guttatus). Distinct alkaloid profiles also contribute to interspecific differentiation [14]. Intraspecific variation, within the same species, is equally significant and offers insights into adaptive plasticity and the environmental influence on defensive chemistry [14]. A key comparative study involving R. guttatus populations from different regions of the Brazilian Amazon (preserved primary forest vs. Amazon–Cerrado transition zone with greater anthropogenic influence) compellingly illustrated this point [17]. While the chromatographic profile of steroids (bufadienolides) showed remarkable consistency between individuals from both locations, indicating a strong endogenous basis and genetic control for their biosynthesis, the alkaloid composition exhibited marked variability [17]. Individuals from the preserved forest showed a more uniform pattern, while those from the transition zone showed highly variable and non-standardized alkaloid profiles. This dichotomy strongly suggests that the accumulation and/or modification of alkaloids in R. guttatus is significantly influenced by external factors, such as diets (probable sequestration of precursors from consumed arthropods, a mechanism known in Bufonidae and other anuran families) and local environmental conditions. In R. marina, intraspecific variations have also been documented, correlating different bufadienolide profiles with geographic variations (humid vs. dry habitats), seasonality (possible fluctuations associated with the reproductive cycle), and perhaps even with the degree of anthropization of the environment [14]. Factors such as age, body size, and sex also modulate composition; for example, it has been observed in R. guttatus that females tend to have higher concentrations of steroids, while males may present higher levels of alkaloids and peptides, suggesting differential roles linked to reproductive physiology or sex-specific defensive strategies.
In conclusion, the chemical heterogeneity observed in the glandular secretions of Rhaebo and Rhinella, both between and within species, is a multifactorial phenomenon that reflects the complex interaction between evolutionary inheritance, physiological plasticity, and ecological pressures [14]. Detailed analysis of these variations provides valuable information on the taxonomy, chemical ecology, and adaptive strategies of these anurans. Furthermore, the structural diversity resulting from this variability represents a natural resource of immense value for pharmacology and biotechnology, offering a vast field for the discovery of new molecules with therapeutic potential in diverse areas, from cardiovascular diseases and cancer [8,14] to the development of new antimicrobial [27], antiparasitic [12], and larvicidal agents [31].
5. Biological and Pharmacological Activities
The cutaneous and parotoid secretions of frogs from the Bufonidae family, particularly the species R. guttatus and R. marina, represent one of the most complex and promising chemical arsenals of the Amazonian fauna [4,17]. Historically recognized for their acute toxicity, these secretions have been the subject of intense bioprospecting investigations, revealing a wide range of bioactivities that transcend the primary function of defense against predators [13]. The pharmacological versatility of these poisons is due to the presence of distinct secondary metabolites, mainly bufadienolides (cardiotonic steroids) and indole alkaloids, which selectively interact with cellular receptors and metabolic pathways in mammals [15,27]. A summary of the main bioactive compounds identified in R. guttatus and R. marina, together with their reported biological activities, experimental models, and proposed mechanisms of action, is presented in Table 1.
The recent literature highlights that the biological efficacy of these extracts does not stem solely from a single component, but from a synergistic action between their nitrogenous and steroidal fractions [14]. While bufadienolides are widely recognized for their potent cytotoxic and cardiotonic activity via inhibition of the Na+/K+-ATPase enzyme, alkaloids such as bufotenine and dehydrobufotenine demonstrate relevant analgesic and antiparasitic properties [13,15]. Additionally, in vivo studies have revealed the ability of these poisons to modulate the host’s immune system and redox status, alternating between protective and oxidative stress-inducing effects, depending on the dosage and tissue context [16].
5.1. Cytotoxic and Antiproliferative Activity
The cytotoxic potential against neoplastic cells is the most prominent and documented pharmacological property of bufonid secretions, signaling a promising path for the development of new cancer treatments [8,19]. This antitumor effect is directly correlated with the high concentration of bufadienolides [13], whose antiproliferative efficacy has already been demonstrated in vitro by crude extracts of R. marina and R. guttatus against breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB435) and liver cancer cell lines (HepG2), with a dose-dependent pattern [8].
The underlying mechanism of action operates at multiple molecular levels. The primary and most studied target is the Na+/K+-ATPase enzyme. Bufadienolides bind to this membrane ion transporter, which is frequently overexpressed in tumor cells, transforming it from a transporter into a signaling receptor. This binding triggers a signal transduction cascade involving the activation of Src tyrosine kinase (proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src) and MEK kinase (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase), culminating in the activation of the ERK1/2 pathway (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2). This critical axis is responsible for disrupting ionic balance, proliferation, and cell survival. MBG, a bufadienolide researched in this context, exemplifies the depth of this action by inducing specific cellular changes in human neoplasms [14]. Biochemically, MBG causes DNA cleavage into oligo-nucleosomal fragments, a signature of programmed cell death, and demonstrates potent cytotoxicity against cell lines such as promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) and colon carcinoma (HCT-116). Morphologically, treated cells exhibit cellular and nuclear shrinkage, chromatin condensation, and apoptotic body formation, as well as cytoskeletal disorganization. At the cell cycle level, MBG prevents orderly cell division, altering the progression of the G1/S/G2/M phases.
Bufadienolides have demonstrated antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects against several cancer cell lines. In particular, newly identified bufadienolides from R. marina inhibited Na+/K+-ATPase and induced apoptosis in human breast and ovarian cancer cells, accompanied by activation of caspases-3 and -9 [32,33]. In addition to inhibiting Na+/K+-ATPase, bufadienolides induce cell death through well-defined internal pathways. Bufaline, for example, demonstrates pathway specificity: In human leukemia cells U937, its apoptotic action is dependent on the activation of the AP-1 protein [19], a transcription factor involved in cell proliferation and death. In contrast, in human osteosarcoma MG-63 cells, bufaline acts directly on the intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway, promoting an imbalance between pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins through the downregulation of Bcl-2/Bax [14], which triggers the release of cytochrome C and the subsequent activation of the caspase cascade. Although the molecular mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated, these compounds have been associated with the inhibition of cell proliferation and the induction of programmed cell death in various tumor cell lines, reinforcing the pharmacological potential of anuran secretions as a source of bioactive molecules for the development of new antineoplastic agents [19].
In summary, the cytotoxicity of the secretion is the result of a complex and synergistic action [14]. Although bufadienolides (including conjugated derivatives such as argininyl esters) in R. diptycha [29] are the main culprits, bioactive peptides also contribute significantly, exhibiting selective cytotoxicity through interaction with carcinogenic membranes [19]. Additionally, extracts of R. marina and R. guttatus exhibit antimutagenic activity, suggesting potential protection against mutagen-induced genetic damage [19].
5.2. Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Activity
The glandular secretions of Rhaebo and Rhinella act as potent modulators of the immune response, exhibiting a functional duality that varies between stimulating host defense mechanisms and suppressing exacerbated inflammatory processes. This immunomodulation is mediated by the complex interaction between bufadienolides, alkaloids, and peptides with cells of the immune system, especially macrophages and lymphocytes [4,13]. Recent evidence further supports this immunomodulatory potential, demonstrating that venom extracts from Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus modulate responses in human peripheral blood monocytes [34]. The glandular secretions of Rhaebo and Rhinella act as potent modulators of the immune response, exhibiting a functional duality that varies between stimulating host defense mechanisms and suppressing exacerbated inflammatory processes. This immunomodulation is mediated by the complex interaction between bufadienolides, alkaloids, and peptides with cells of the immune system, especially macrophages and lymphocytes (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Proposed molecular mechanisms underlying the immunomodulatory effects of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus venoms. The illustration was generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence using ChatGPT (OpenAI), based on the concepts and mechanisms described in this review.
Studies conducted with the crude methanolic extract of R. guttatus secretion revealed a significant capacity to stimulate innate immunity. In vitro, the extract was able to activate peritoneal macrophages, resulting in a dose-dependent increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the release of crucial pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α) and Interleukin-12 (IL-12) [35]. IL-12 plays a fundamental role in bridging the gap between innate and adaptive immunity, being essential for the differentiation of helper T cells into the Th1 phenotype, which enhances the antitumor response and the fight against intracellular pathogens [31]. This stimulatory effect appears to be mediated by the interaction of cardiotonic steroids, such as telocinobufagin and bufaline, which promote the polarization of macrophages towards the M1 phenotype (pro-inflammatory/antitumor), activating signaling pathways involving the Na+/K+-ATPase/Src complex [35].
Conversely, the secretions also exhibit remarkable anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, often associated with their nitrogenous fraction. Indole alkaloids such as bufotenine, identified in both R. marina and R. guttatus, demonstrate anti-inflammatory action through the inhibition of lipid metabolism pathways involved in the synthesis of inflammatory mediators [13]. Additionally, some bufadienolides have the ability to suppress the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in specific cell lines, possibly through modulation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, suggesting therapeutic potential for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases [4].
The immunomodulation exerted by these secretions is not limited to cell activation, but also extends to the regulation of cell adhesion. It has been found that signaling via Na+/K+-ATPase induced by these cardiotonic steroids can increase the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial and immune cells, facilitating the recruitment of leukocytes to sites of inflammation or antigenic challenge [35]. However, the clinical application of these properties requires caution, since excessive stimulation of inflammatory cytokines can lead to tissue damage, highlighting the need to isolate specific compounds that maintain immunomodulatory efficacy with reduced systemic toxicity [4,35].
5.3. Antioxidant Activity and Modulation of Oxidative Stress
The cutaneous secretion of bufonid exhibits a complex interaction with the host’s redox system, acting both as a direct antioxidant agent and as a potent modulator of systemic enzymatic defenses [4]. Recent studies conducted with the crude methanolic extract of R. guttatus in in vivo experimental models (2024) revealed that exposure to these substances significantly alters the oxidative status, with pronounced impacts on liver tissue [16].
Biochemically, the poison of R. guttatus promotes the modulation of critical parameters of the first line of defense against free radicals. In the liver, an adaptive response was observed, mainly directed at the glutathione system, evidenced by a significant alteration in the activity of Glutathione S-Transferase (GST), signaling an effort by the organ to promote the detoxification of secondary metabolites and xenobiotics. In contrast, Catalase (CAT) activity did not show significant variations compared to the control, suggesting a limitation or consumption of this enzymatic pathway in the initial phase of exposure. Furthermore, when the initial endogenous protective capacity is exceeded, cellular damage occurs due to oxidation. This phenomenon was evidenced in liver tissue by a transient increase in TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) levels at 7 days, which confirms the occurrence of lipid peroxidation—the degradation of cell membranes caused by the attack of free radicals [13,16].
The intrinsic scavenging activity demonstrated by extracts of R. marina and R. guttatus is mainly attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds and indolic alkaloids, such as bufotenine [4,13]. On the other hand, the pro-oxidant effect observed at high doses is related to the action of bufadienolides. By inhibiting the Na+/K+-ATPase pump, these molecules unbalance the mitochondrial ion flow, exacerbating the production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). This mechanism is, paradoxically, one of the cornerstones of its antitumor efficacy, since the induced oxidative stress leads to DNA fragmentation and programmed cell death of neoplastic cells [4,14].
In summary, the redox activity of this secretion is characterized by a biological duality that depends on the experimental model and the exposure time: while in vitro assays indicate that bufadienolides act as potent inducers of oxidative stress to promote the death of neoplastic cells, systemic in vivo evaluation reveals a complex hepatic modulation. In this organ, exposure causes acute and transient oxidative stress in the initial phase (7 days) characterized by a reduction in reduced glutathione (GSH) and induction of lipid damage, which is mitigated at 30 days by an adaptive response of the antioxidant defense system, evidenced by a compensatory increase in GST activity [4,13,16].
5.4. Antimicrobial, Antiparasitic, and Antiviral Activity
The skin secretions of bufonid amphibians constitute a primary line of chemical defense against microorganisms and parasites, presenting a vast array of molecules with therapeutic potential for neglected and infectious diseases [13]. The antimicrobial efficacy of these secretions derives from the synergistic action between antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and cardiotonic steroids, which compromise the integrity of biological membranes and interfere with essential metabolic pathways [27].
In the field of parasitology, one of the most significant documented advances involves activity against Plasmodium falciparum, the etiological agent of malaria. Investigations with toad poisons from the Southern Amazon revealed that both the crude extract and isolated molecules possess potent anti-plasmodial action. Dehydrobufotenine, an alkaloid isolated from R. marina, has proven to be a promising prototype molecule, exhibiting selective cytotoxicity against the parasite without severely compromising host cells [15]. The suggested mechanism involves interaction with the membrane of the infected erythrocyte and inhibition of the progression of the parasite’s asexual stages [12,15]. Furthermore, bufadienolides isolated from other Rhinella species have already demonstrated in vitro efficacy against Leishmania sp. and Trypanosoma cruzi, reinforcing the broad-spectrum antiparasitic potential of this family [3,29].
Activity against disease vectors is also a highlight in the recent literature. Extracts of R. guttatus and R. marina exhibited significant larvicidal activity against the mosquito Anopheles darlingi, the main vector of malaria in Brazil [33]. This effect is particularly relevant for controlling mosquito populations in endemic areas, offering a biological alternative to synthetic insecticides [31].
Regarding antimicrobial activity, methanolic extracts of R. guttatus and R. marina have demonstrated the ability to inhibit the growth of phytopathogens of agricultural interest, such as fungi and bacteria that affect crops of great economic importance [30]. In the human clinical context, bufadienolides exhibit bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties against Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains, in addition to displaying antiviral potential. Reviewed studies indicate that these molecules can interfere with the replication of viruses, such as Herpes simplex and even certain influenza subtypes, although the exact mechanisms of viral entry and inhibition are still under detailed investigation [13,27].
It is concluded that the chemical fraction intended for the antimicrobial and antiparasitic defense of bufonids is a rich source of lead compounds. However, the transition from in vitro studies to clinical applications depends on modulating the inherent toxicity of bufadienolides and further understanding the mechanisms of biological selectivity [15,27].
5.5. Other Activities (Neuroactivity, Cardiovascular, Analgesics and Others)
In addition to their antitumor and immunomodulatory properties, the secretions of Rhaebo and Rhinella possess a wide range of effects on vital physiological systems, particularly on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. These activities are mainly mediated by the presence of cardiotonic steroids and indolic alkaloids, whose chemical structures allow specific interactions with receptors and ion channels in mammals [13].
Concerning neuroactivity and analgesia, the alkaloid fraction plays the main role. Bufotenine and dehydrobufotenine, isolated from R. marina, exhibit a structural similarity to serotonin (5-HT), allowing them to bind to serotonergic receptors in the central nervous system [15]. Recent studies indicate that bufotenin possesses significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, acting through the inhibition of lipid metabolism pathways involved in nociception. Additionally, in animal models, these substances can induce sedation or behavioral changes, depending on the dose and route of administration, raising possibilities for the development of new neurological agents. Other biological activities of interest include potential wound healing and hemostatic properties; certain bufadienolides and peptides present in these secretions can accelerate tissue regeneration and modulate blood coagulation, properties that have been historically explored in traditional Asian medicine (such as in the use of ChanSu) and are now beginning to be validated by modern pharmacological assays [13].
In summary, the chemical diversity of the secretions of R. guttatus and R. marina allows these poisons to act as multi-target modulators. Although the risk of systemic toxicity is high, the isolation and structural modification of molecules such as dehydrobufotenin and MBG represent a promising frontier for the synthesis of drugs with specific cardiovascular and neurological action [13,14,15].
6. Toxicity, Adverse Effects and Toxic Mechanisms of Action
The toxicity of the secretions of R. guttatus and R. marina is a direct consequence of their biological defense function, determined by the presence of cardiotonic steroids and neuroactive alkaloids that can cause severe and sometimes fatal poisoning in mammals [5]. The clinical picture of poisoning is characterized by a rapid progression of symptoms affecting the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and neurological systems [13].
The primary adverse effects result from the systemic inhibition of Na+/K+-ATPase by bufadienolides. In the cardiovascular system, an excess of these molecules causes serious arrhythmias, bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and ventricular fibrillation, mimicking a digitalis overdose [8,14]. In the gastrointestinal tract, irritation of the mucous membranes from direct contact with the poison causes sialorrhea (excessive salivation), vomiting, and intense abdominal pain. In the nervous system, the presence of alkaloids such as bufotenine can induce disorientation, convulsions, mydriasis, and, in cases of high exposure, respiratory arrest [13].
Recent in vivo studies have detailed specific organic oxidative modulation. Research with mice exposed to R. guttatus extract demonstrated that, although the organism activates long-term adaptive antioxidant responses, the initial exposure generates a scenario of oxidative stress in liver tissue. The increase in biomarkers such as TBARS at 7 days indicates that acute toxicity manifests through lipid peroxidation and degradation of cell membranes in the liver, accompanied by the temporary consumption of non-enzymatic defenses [16].
In addition to systemic liver toxicity, genotoxicity is a concern. Although the extracts exhibit antimutagenic properties under certain conditions, direct exposure of healthy cells to high concentrations of MBG causes DNA fragmentation and cytoskeletal disorganization, making the use of the crude extract unfeasible without rigorous isolation and purification processes [14].
Therefore, the therapeutic window for the use of compounds derived from these secretions is narrow. Pharmacological safety depends on the isolation and rational modification of specific molecules—such as dehydrobufotenin for antiparasitic purposes—and the development of bufadienolide derivatives with improved selectivity and reduced cardiotoxicity [13,15,36,37].
Table 1.
Main bioactive compounds identified in the cutaneous and parotoid gland secretions of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus, their biological activities, experimental models, and corresponding references.
| Species (Toad) | Compound Class | Elucidated/Studied Molecules | Biological Activity |
Experimental Model | Main Mechanism | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhaebo guttatus | Bufadienolides and steroid derivatives | Marinobufagin-related compounds, bufadienolides identified by LC-MS/HPLC | Cytotoxic, antiproliferative, antioxidant effects | Cancer cell lines; HPLC chemical profiling | Steroid glycosides interfere with cellular proliferation and survival pathways | [3,8,10,17,19,35,38] |
| Peptides and proteins | Bioactive peptides identified by proteomic/peptidomic analysis | Potential antimicrobial and pharmacological activity | Proteomic LC-MS/MS characterization | Peptide-mediated interaction with microbial/cellular targets | [17] | |
| Bufadienolides | Bufadienolide profile | Quantitative chemical characterization | HPLC-UV | Identification of steroid toxin composition | [10] | |
| Crude methanolic extract | Steroids and secondary metabolites | Antioxidant response modulation | Mouse model | Regulation of antioxidant enzymes and redox balance | [16] | |
| Crude methanolic extract | Steroid compounds and unidentified metabolites | Pro-inflammatory immunomodulation | Mouse peritoneal macrophages | Increased reactive species production and cytokine release | [35] | |
| Rhaebo guttatus and Rhinella marina | Crude venom extracts | Complex mixture of bufadienolides and metabolites | Antiproliferative activity | Human tumor cell lines | Cytotoxicity and inhibition of cell proliferation | [8] |
| Skin secretion metabolites | Unspecified secondary metabolites | Antimutagenic and cytotoxic effects | Mutagenicity assays and cell models | Reduction in DNA damage and cytotoxic effects depending on concentration | [19] | |
| Venom extracts | Chemical constituents | Antiplasmodial and cytotoxic effects | Plasmodium assays; cancer cell models | Parasite inhibition and cellular toxicity | [12] | |
| Rhinella marina | Bufadienolides (cardiotonic steroids) | Marinobufagin, marinobufagenin, telocinobufagin, bufalin, cinobufagin, resibufogenin | Cytotoxic, antiproliferative, immunomodulatory, cardiotonic | Human cancer cell lines; enzymatic assays; murine models | Na+/K+-ATPase inhibition; activation/inhibition of PI3K/Akt, MAPK pathways; induction of apoptosis | [4,9,10,14,23,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] |
| Bufadienolides | Marinobufagin | Antitumor activity | Human cancer cells (neoplastic models) and plant cells | Cell cycle arrest, morphological alterations, oxidative stress induction | [14] | |
| Bufadienolides | Bufalin, marinobufagin and related bufadienolides | Anticancer activity | Molecular/cellular cancer models | Apoptosis induction, inhibition of tumor growth pathways | [9,36,37] | |
| Bufadienolides | Marinobufagenin | Cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity | Human tumor cell lines | Modulation of Na+/K+-ATPase signaling and intracellular pathways | [14,23,39,40] | |
| Indole alkaloids | Dehydrobufotenin | Antiplasmodial activity | Plasmodium falciparum model | Interference with parasite survival pathways | [15] | |
| Bufadienolides | Argyninyl bufadienolide esters | Antiproliferative activity | Human cancer cell lines | Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation | [29,38] | |
| Peptides | Novel antimicrobial peptides from skin secretion | Antimicrobial activity | Microbial assays | Membrane permeabilization and disruption of microbial integrity | [40] | |
| Proteins, enzymes and low molecular weight compounds | Proteomic profile of parotoid secretion | Antimicrobial, enzymatic and biological effects | Biochemical assays | Multiple pathways involving enzymatic and toxic components | [32] | |
| Steroids, alkaloids, peptides | Chemical profile of skin secretion | Cardiovascular effects | Murine heart model | Modulation of cardiac contractility; interaction with ion transport mechanisms | [18] | |
| Bufadienolides | Marinobufagin, bufalin and related compounds | Cardiotoxicity | Murine cardiovascular models | Na+/K+-ATPase inhibition leading to altered Ca2+ handling | [18,39] | |
| Bufadienolides | Major toxins mapped in parotoid glands | Chemical distribution and toxin localization | DESI-MSI imaging | Spatial distribution of toxic metabolites in glands | [41] | |
| Bufadienolides | Bufadienolide profile | Quantitative chemical characterization | HPLC-UV analysis | Identification and quantification of toxic steroid compounds | [10] | |
| Crude methanolic extract | Bufadienolides, phenolics and other secondary metabolites | Antioxidant and immunomodulatory activity | Chemical assays; immune cell assays | Modulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses | [4] | |
| Bufadienolide derivatives | Synthetic modified bufadienolides | Reduced cardiotoxic anticancer candidates | Molecular pharmacology models | Structural modification reducing cardiac toxicity while maintaining antitumor activity | [37] |
7. Conclusions
This review highlights the promising multi-target biological potential of the secretions of R. guttatus and R. marina, particularly the antiproliferative, antiparasitic, and agricultural activities associated with their bufadienolides and alkaloids. However, translation into therapeutic applications remains limited by the systemic toxicity, limited selectivity, and narrow therapeutic windows reported for several crude extracts and isolated compounds. Future research should therefore prioritize the isolation and structural characterization of individual bioactive molecules, followed by systematic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigations, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, tissue exposure, and target engagement. In parallel, structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies and rational chemical modification should be pursued to identify structural determinants of efficacy and toxicity and to generate derivatives with improved selectivity and therapeutic indices. Comparative in vitro and in vivo toxicity studies should also be integrated early in the drug-development pipeline, with particular emphasis on cardiotoxicity and off-target effects associated with bufadienolides. For antiparasitic and agricultural applications, future studies should prioritize standardized extracts or purified molecules, dose–response relationships, selectivity toward target organisms, environmental safety, and efficacy in relevant in vivo or field models. Finally, standardized extraction procedures, chemical fingerprinting, reproducible bioassays, and pharmacological validation using well-characterized molecular targets will be essential to ensure reproducibility and facilitate translational development. Collectively, these research priorities may enable the rational optimization of amphibian-derived molecules and support the development of safer and more selective pharmacological or biotechnological applications.
Acknowledgments
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT, OpenAI (https://chatgpt.com/, accessed on 10 August 2026) for the purpose of Figure 3; used Google Gemini (https://gemini.google.com/, accessed on 29 May 2026) to assist with the correction of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and textual coherence. No AI-generated content was incorporated into the manuscript without careful review and verification by the authors. The authors reviewed and edited the generated output and assume full responsibility for the content of this publication.
Abbreviations
| AMP | Antimicrobial peptide |
| ATPase | adenosine triphosphatase |
| Bcl-2/Bax | B-cell lymphoma 2/BCL-2-associated protein X |
| CAT | Catalase |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic acid |
| ERK1/2 | Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1 and 2 |
| G1/S/G2/M | Gap 1, synthesis, and Gap 2 of interphase, and mitosis of the cell cycle |
| GSH | Reduced glutathione |
| GST | Glutathione S-Transferase |
| HBV | Hepatitis B virus |
| HCT-116 | Human colorectal carcinoma cell line |
| HIV | Human immunodeficiency virus |
| HL-60 | Human promyelocytic leukemia cell line |
| HPLC-UV | High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Ultraviolet Detection |
| IL-12 | Interleukin-12 |
| LC-MS/MS | Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry |
| M1 | Pro-inflammatory macrophages |
| MBG | Marinobufagenina |
| MDA-MB435 | Human melanoma cell line |
| MEK | Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase |
| MG-63 | Human osteosarcoma cell line |
| NF-κB | Nuclear factor kappa B |
| PI3K/Akt/mTOR | Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Protein Kinase B/Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
| SAR | Structure–activity relationships |
| TBARS | Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances |
| Th1 | T helper 1 cells |
| TNF-α | Tumor necrosis factor-alpha |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.E.D.D.S. and L.R.A.; methodology: B.E.D.D.S. and L.R.A.; writing—original draft, B.E.D.D.S. and L.R.A.; writing—review and editing, V.D.G.S.; visualization, V.D.G.S.; supervision, V.D.G.S.; project administration, L.R.A. and V.D.G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (Propesq-UFMT, Edital nº 06/2026/PROPESQ—Apoio a Publicações em Periódicos e Livros Qualificados).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Lewinsohn T.M., Prado P.I. How many species are there in Brazil? Conserv. Biol. 2005;19:619–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00680.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mueses-Cisneros J.J., Cisneros-Heredia D.F., McDiarmid R.W. A new Amazonian species of Rhaebo (Anura: Bufonidae) with comments on Rhaebo glaberrimus (Günther, 1869) and Rhaebo guttatus (Schneider, 1799) Zootaxa. 2012;3447:22–40. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3447.1.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Souza E.B.R., Sousa Júnior P.T., Vasconcelos L.G., Rodrigues D.J., Sinhorin V.D.G., Kerkhoff J., Pelissari S.R.N., Sinhorin A.P. Comparative study of the chemical profile of the parotoid gland secretions from Rhaebo guttatus from different regions of the Brazilian Amazon. Toxicon. 2020;179:101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pelissari S.R.N., Sinhorin V.D.G., Castoldi L., Vasconcelos L.G., Rodrigues D.J., Ribeiro E.B.S., Kerkhoff J., Sinhorin A.P. Methanolic extract of Rhinella marina poison: Chemical composition, antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2021;32:1584–1597. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20210057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mailho-Fontana P.L., Antoniazzi M.M., Toledo L.F., Verdade V.K., Sciani J.M., Barbaro K.C., Pimenta D.C., Rodrigues M.T., Jared C. Passive and active defense in toads: The parotoid macroglands in Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus. J. Exp. Zool. Part A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 2014;321:65–77. doi: 10.1002/jez.1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jared C., Antoniazzi M.M., Jordão A.E.C., Silva J.R.M.C., Greven H., Rodrigues M.T. Parotoid macroglands in toad (Rhinella jimi): Their structure and functioning in passive defence. Toxicon. 2009;54:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pramuk J.B. Phylogeny of South American Bufonidae (Anura: Bufonidae) inferred from combined evidence. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2006;146:407–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00212.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ferreira P.M.P., Lima D.J.B., Debiasi B.W., Soares B.M., Machado K.C., Noronha J.C., Rodrigues D.J., Sinhorin A.P., Pessoa C., Vieira Júnior G.M. Antiproliferative activity of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus venom extracts from Southern Amazon. Toxicon. 2013;72:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Deng L.J., Li Y., Qi M., Liu J.S., Wang S., Hu L.J., Lei Y.H., Jiang R.W., Chen W.M., Qi Q., et al. Molecular mechanisms of bufadienolides and their novel strategies for cancer treatment. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020;887:173379. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kerkhoff J., Noronha J.C., Bonfilio R., Sinhorin A.P., Rodrigues D.J., Chaves M.H., Vieira Júnior G.M. Quantification of bufadienolides in the poisons of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus by HPLC-UV. Toxicon. 2016;119:311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maciel N.M., Collevatti R.G., Colli G.R., Schwartz E.F. Late Miocene diversification and phylogenetic relationships of the huge toads in the Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758) species group (Anura: Bufonidae) Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010;57:787–797. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Banfi F.F., Guedes K.E.S., Andrighetti C.R., Aguiar A.C., Noronha J.A.C., Rodrigues D.J., Sánchez B.A.M. Antiplasmodial and cytotoxic activities of toad poisons from southern Amazon, Brazil. Korean J. Parasitol. 2016;54:415–421. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Szymczak K., Bonikowski R. Bufadienolides—Naturally occurring, biologically active compounds for medicines and cosmetics: A review. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2023;85:3–15. doi: 10.34658/bfs.2023.85.1.3-15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Machado K.D.C., Sousa L.Q., Lima D.J.B., Soares B.M., Cavalcanti B.C., Maranhão S.S.A., Noronha J.D.C., Rodrigues D.J., Militão G.C.G., Chaves M.H., et al. Marinobufagin, a molecule from poisonous frogs, causes biochemical, morphological and cell cycle changes in human neoplasms and vegetal cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2018;285:121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Banfi F.F., Krombauer G.C., Fonseca A.L., Nunes R.R., Andrade S.N., Rezende M.A., Chaves M.H., Monção Filho E.S., Taranto A.G., Rodrigues D.J., et al. Dehydrobufotenin extracted from the Amazonian toad Rhinella marina (Anura: Bufonidae) as a prototype molecule for the development of antiplasmodial drugs. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2021;27:e20200073. doi: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2020-0073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pelissari S.R.N., Sinhorin V.D.G., Rodrigues D.J., Sheng L.Y., Castoldi L., Sinhorin A.P. Investigation of crude methanolic extract from poison secreted by the Rhaebo guttatus on status redox antioxidant in mice. Biosci. J. 2024;40:e40012. doi: 10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-69866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dos Santos N.G.P., Mendes L.C., Juliano M.A., Caldeira C.A.S., Beraldo-Neto E., Pimenta D.C. Proteomic and peptidomic characterization of Rhaebo guttatus (Anura: Bufonidae) skin secretion. Toxicon. 2025;259:108359. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rose’Meyer R.B., Wilson J.C., Grice I.D., Hayton J., Carroll A., Peart J.N., Nirthanan S. The chemical profile and cardiovascular effects of Rhinella marina cane toad skin secretion on murine heart. Toxin Rev. 2025;45:15–28. doi: 10.1080/15569543.2025.2603285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oliveira A.F., Castoldi L., Vieira Junior G.M., Monção Filho E.S., Chaves M.H., Rodrigues D.J., Sugui M.M. Evaluation of antimutagenic and cytotoxic activity of skin secretion extract of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus (Anura, Bufonidae) Acta Amazon. 2019;49:145–151. doi: 10.1590/1809-4392201801751. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Marinho P., Costa-Campos C.E., Sanches P.R., Carvalho T.R. The release call of Rhaebo guttatus (Anura: Bufonidae) Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 2020;55:18–24. doi: 10.1080/01650521.2019.1658507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jairam R., Lock D., van der Sterren F. First record of dermatophagy by a Smooth-sided Toad, Rhaebo guttatus (Schneider 1799) in nature. Reptil. Amphib. 2016;23:173–174. doi: 10.17161/randa.v23i3.14127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Monção Filho E.S., Chaves M.H., Ferreira P.M.P., Pessoa C., Lima D.J.B., Maranhão S.S.A., Rodrigues D.J., Vieira Júnior G.M. Cytotoxicity potential of chemical constituents isolated and derivatised from Rhinella marina venom. Toxicon. 2021;194:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Noronha-de-Souza C.R., Bovo R.P., Gargaglioni L.H., Andrade D.V., Bícego K.C. Thermal biology of the toad Rhinella schneideri in a seminatural environment in southeastern Brazil. Temperature. 2015;2:554–562. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2015.1096437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Souza F.L., Martins F.I., Raizer J. Habitat heterogeneity and anuran community of an agroecosystem in the Pantanal of Brazil. Phyllomedusa. 2014;13:41–50. doi: 10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v13i1p41-50. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Manfrin A., Hölker F., Teurlincx S., Baranov V., van Grunsven R.H.A., Bundschuh M., Monaghan M.T. Artificial light at night reduces emergence and attracts flying adults of aquatic Diptera. Aquat. Sci. 2025;87:38. doi: 10.1007/s00027-025-01161-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Raasch-Fernandes L.D., Bonaldo S.M., Rodrigues D.J., Ferrarini S.R., Verçosa A.G.A., Oliveira D.L. In vitro antimicrobial activity of methanolic extracts from cutaneous secretions of Amazonian amphibians against phytopathogens of agricultural interest. Acta Amaz. 2021;51:145–155. doi: 10.1590/1809-4392201904462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ibarra-Vega R., Galván-Hernández A.R., Salazar-Monge H., Zataraín-Palacios R., García-Villalvazo P.E., Zavalza-Galvez D.I., Valdez-Velazquez L.L., Jiménez-Vargas J.M. Antimicrobial compounds from skin secretions of species that belong to the Bufonidae family. Toxins. 2023;15:145. doi: 10.3390/toxins15020145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tempone A.G., Pimenta D.C., Lebrun I., Sartorelli P., Taniwaki N.N., de Andrade H.F., Jr., Antoniazzi M.M., Jared C. Antileishmanial and antitrypanosomal activity of bufadienolides isolated from the toad Rhinella jimi parotoid macrogland secretion. Toxicon. 2008;52:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schmeda-Hirschmann G., Quispe C., Theoduloz C., de Sousa P.T., Jr., Parizotto C. Antiproliferative activity and new argininyl bufadienolide esters from the “cururú” toad Rhinella (Bufo) schneideri. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014;155:1076–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Browne R.K., Serna-López S., Pompa-Mera E.N., Calatayud N.E., Zippel K.C. Cryopreservation and hormonal induction of spermic urine in a novel species: The smooth-sided toad (Rhaebo guttatus) Cryobiology. 2019;89:109–111. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trindade F.T.T., Lucena I.V., Rodrigues M.M.S., Stábeli R.G., Moreira-Dill L.S., Soares A.M., Calderon L.A., Silva A.A.E. Larvicidal activity of the skin secretion of Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus (Anura: Bufonidae) against the Brazilian malaria vector, Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) Trop. Biomed. 2021;38:505–510. doi: 10.47665/tb.38.4.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Medeiros D.S.S., Rego T.B., dos Santos A.P.A., Pontes A.S., Moreira-Dill L.S., Matos N.B., Zuliani J.P., Stábeli R.G., Teles C.B.G., Soares A.M., et al. Biochemical and biological profile of parotoid secretion of the Amazonian Rhinella marina (Anura: Bufonidae) BioMed Res. Int. 2019;2019:2492315. doi: 10.1155/2019/2492315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Garcia I.J.P., Oliveira G.C., Valadares J.M.M., Banfi F.F., Andrade S.N., Freitas T.R., Noel F., Vieira-Júnior G.M., Chaves M.H., Rodrigues D.J., et al. New bufadienolides extracted from Rhinella marina inhibit Na,K-ATPase and induce apoptosis by activating caspases 3 and 9 in human breast and ovarian cancer cells. Steroids. 2019;152:108490. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2019.108490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Santangelo R.C., Albiero L.R., Sinhorin V.D.G., Sinhorin A.P., Rodrigues D.J., Castoldi L. Evaluation of the biological activity of venom extracts from the toads Rhinella marina and Rhaebo guttatus on peripheral blood monocytes from healthy human subjects. Sci. Electron. Arch. 2026;19:1–11. doi: 10.36560/19320262222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pelissari S.R.N., Souza E.B.R., Sinhorin V.D.G., Rodrigues D.J., Castoldi L., Sinhorin A.P. A crude methanolic extract from the parotoid gland secretion of Rhaebo guttatus stimulates the production of reactive species and pro-inflammatory cytokines by peritoneal macrophages. World Acad. Sci. J. 2023;5:15. doi: 10.3892/wasj.2023.192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhong Y., Zhao C., Wu W.Y., Fan T.Y., Li N.G., Chen M., Duan J.A., Shi Z.H. Total synthesis, chemical modification and structure–activity relationship of bufadienolides. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020;189:112038. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deng L.J., Wang L.H., Peng C.K., Li Y.B., Huang M.H., Chen M.F., Lei X.P., Qi M., Cen Y., Ye W.C., et al. Fibroblast Activation Protein α Activated Tripeptide Bufadienolide Antitumor Prodrug with Reduced Cardiotoxicity. J. Med. Chem. 2017;60:5320–5333. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schmeda-Hirschmann G., Quispe C., Arana G.V., Theoduloz C., Urra F.A., Cárdenas C. Antiproliferative activity and chemical composition of the venom from the Amazonian toad Rhinella marina (Anura: Bufonidae) Toxicon. 2016;121:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lenaerts C., Wells M., Hambÿe S., Blankert B. Marinobufagenin extraction from Rhinella marina toad glands: Alternative approaches for a systematized strategy. J. Sep. Sci. 2019;42:1384–1392. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201800879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mailho-Fontana P.L., Porcari A.M., Eberlin M.N., Jared C., Antoniazzi M.M., Pimenta D.C., Sciani J.M. Distribution of major toxins in Rhinella marina parotoid macroglands using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging (DESI-MSI) Toxicon X. 2020;6:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhou M., Wang L., Owens R.A., Chen T., Walker B., Shaw C. Rapid identification of precursor cDNAs encoding five structural classes of antimicrobial peptides from pickerel frog (Rana palus-tris) skin secretion by single step “shotgun” cloning. Peptides. 2009;30:672–678. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.
