Skip to main content
Biology logoLink to Biology
. 2026 Sep 13;15(18):1613. doi: 10.3390/biology15181613

Comparative Elicitation of Phenolic Accumulation in Salvia officinalis Hairy-Root Cultures Using Salicylic Acid, Silver Nitrate, LED Spectra, and Microbial Preparations

Rahmanifar Behnaz 1, Aglaia Popa 1,*, Oana-Alina Boiu-Sicuia 1,2, Oana Livadariu 1, Călina Petruța Cornea 1
Editor: Osvaldo Ferrarese-Filho
PMCID: PMC13604356  PMID: 42792559

Simple Summary

Sage is a medicinal plant that contains natural compounds with potential health and protective benefits, but the amount of these compounds can vary when plants are grown outdoors. This study developed a controlled laboratory method for growing fast-growing sage roots and tested whether different light colours, silver nitrate, salicylic acid, and substances produced by beneficial bacteria and fungi could increase the production of these compounds. Silver nitrate was the most effective treatment, markedly increasing the total amount of plant phenolic compounds and producing about three times more rosmarinic acid after seven days. Blue and red light also increased total phenolic content, while green light encouraged the release of these compounds into the surrounding liquid. A liquid produced by Bacillus velezensis increased rosmarinic acid production approximately tenfold. Extracts from treated roots slowed the growth of selected bacteria and fungi, particularly Bacillus spizizenii and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, although the effects were relatively weak and varied between organisms. These findings show that controlled sage-root cultures could provide a more consistent source of valuable natural compounds for future research and the development of plant-based products.

Keywords: Salvia officinalis, hairy roots, Agrobacterium rhizogenes, phenolics, elicitation, LED light

Abstract

Salvia officinalis L. is a pharmaceutically important species rich in rosmarinic acid, yet strategies to enhance phenolic accumulation in controlled systems remain limited. This study compared three elicitor categories on polyphenol biosynthesis in Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed hairy root cultures: chemical (salicylic acid, AgNO3), physical-Light-emitting diode (LED light spectra: white, blue, red, green, darkness), and biological (Bacillus velezensis BPVs2cell lysate and cell-free supernatant, Trichoderma asperellum TdCP biomass lysate). Within the chemical-elicitation series, AgNO3 produced the strongest response, increasing total phenolic content by 39.2% after 7 days compared with the untreated control and inducing an approximately three-fold increase in rosmarinic acid, together with elevated levels of caffeic, syringic, and chlorogenic acids. Salicylic acid exhibited an inhibitory effect, decreasing total phenolic content by 50%. Exposure to blue and red LED light resulted in a two-fold increase in total phenolics compared with white light and darkness, while green light uniquely stimulated the exudation of phenolics into the culture medium. Among biological elicitors, B. velezensis cell-free supernatant (1.5 mL) triggered a 10-fold increase in rosmarinic acid at day 7, whereas T. asperellum produced a transient, non-specific response without targeted rosmarinic acid enhancement. These results demonstrate that elicitor type, dose, and exposure time critically determine phenolic accumulation specificity. AgNO3, blue and red LED illumination, and B. velezensis cell-free supernatant were identified as promising individual treatments in their respective experimental series; however, combined-treatment effects and possible synergism require confirmation in a factorial experiment.

1. Introduction

Salvia officinalis L. is a perennial medicinal plant of the Lamiaceae family that has been used traditionally for the management of inflammatory, gastrointestinal, metabolic and neurological conditions. Modern pharmacological studies have associated sage preparations with antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and neuroprotective activities, although the chemical composition and biological effects may vary according to plant origin, chemotype, developmental stage and extraction procedure [1]. Essential oils and polar extracts of S. officinalis have also shown antibacterial and antioxidant properties, supporting the continued investigation of this species as a source of plant-derived bioactive compounds [2,3].

The biological activity of S. officinalis is associated with a chemically diverse profile that includes phenolic acids, flavonoids, diterpenes, triterpenes and volatile terpenoids. Among these compounds, rosmarinic acid is particularly important because it combines high abundance in many Lamiaceae species with antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties [4]. Rosmarinic acid is formed through the phenylpropanoid pathway from phenylalanine- and tyrosine-derived precursors, and its accumulation is influenced by plant development, tissue type, nutritional conditions and environmental stress. These characteristics make rosmarinic acid a suitable target for metabolic optimisation in plant in vitro cultures.

The direct extraction of specialised metabolites from field-grown plants is affected by seasonality, environmental variation, slow biomass production and fluctuations in metabolite content. Hairy root cultures provide an alternative production platform because they combine rapid root growth, genetic stability, relatively uniform metabolism and the capacity to synthesise compounds associated with differentiated root tissues [5]. Hairy roots induced by Agrobacterium rhizogenes can be maintained under controlled nutritional and environmental conditions, making them suitable for the study of specialised metabolism and for the development of scalable production systems.

Although hairy root cultures can produce specialised metabolites without external stimulation, elicitation is frequently used to redirect cellular metabolism towards selected compounds. Elicitors may be chemical, physical or biological and can activate plant defence signalling, oxidative responses and phenylpropanoid metabolism. Their effects are strongly dependent on elicitor identity, concentration, culture age and exposure duration; therefore, an elicitor that is effective in one species or culture system may have a limited or inhibitory effect in another [6].

Chemical elicitation is one of the most established approaches for enhancing specialised-metabolite production in Salvia in vitro cultures. In Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots, several elicitors, including silver ions, methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, yeast extract, abscisic acid, and other signalling molecules, have been investigated for their effects on phenolic acids and tanshinones. The response is strongly dependent on elicitor identity, concentration, exposure time, and the metabolic pathway considered. For example, different elicitors can preferentially stimulate phenolic-acid or tanshinone biosynthesis rather than producing a uniform increase in all secondary metabolites [7]. Similar treatment-dependent responses have been reported in other Salvia species. Methyl jasmonate increased phenolic accumulation and expression of genes associated with the phenylpropanoid pathway in Salvia viridis hairy roots, but the response varied according to the compound analysed and the time after elicitation [8]. Studies involving S. officinalis and related species have also shown that silver ions, methyl jasmonate, and salicylic acid can modify phenolic-acid production, although the magnitude and direction of the response depend on the experimental system [9,10].

Light quality represents a distinct form of abiotic or physical elicitation because spectral composition can modify photoreceptor signalling, oxidative status, and the expression of genes involved in phenylpropanoid metabolism. In S. miltiorrhiza, blue, red, and combined blue–red LED (Light-emitting diode) treatments have been associated with changes in growth and phenolic-acid production, including stimulation of genes involved in the rosmarinic-acid pathway [11]. Responses to LED spectra are nevertheless species-, tissue-, genotype-, and compound-dependent. For example, LED treatments altered the growth characteristics of Salvia fruticosa seedlings, but total phenolic content was not significantly affected under the tested conditions [12]. Evidence from related Lamiaceae species further indicates that red and blue wavelengths may increase total phenolics or rosmarinic acid, whereas other spectra can produce neutral or opposite responses. This variability means that light treatments should be optimised for the specific species, organ, culture system, and target metabolite rather than being considered universally stimulatory.

Biological elicitation is based on the ability of microbial cells, cell-wall components, secreted metabolites, and culture filtrates to activate plant defence signalling and redirect secondary metabolism. In Salvia, fungal elicitors have received considerable attention. Preparations derived from Trichoderma species have been reported to promote hairy-root growth and stimulate specialised-metabolite biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza, particularly the production of tanshinones [13]. Bacterial elicitation has also been demonstrated in Salvia, although the available studies have mainly focused on S. miltiorrhiza. A root–bacteria co-culture system involving Bacillus sp. enhanced tanshinone production in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots [14]. In a related study, polysaccharide–protein fractions obtained from the plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus promoted both hairy-root growth and tanshinone production [15]. These findings are important because they show that bacterial elicitation does not necessarily require direct colonisation by living bacteria. Cell-wall fractions, bacterial lysates, and soluble extracellular metabolites may all provide signals capable of inducing plant defence responses and secondary-metabolite biosynthesis. The response is expected to depend on the bacterial strain, the type of preparation, the applied dose, and the duration of exposure. However, the response of S. officinalis hairy roots to elicitors derived from B. velezensis and T. asperellum has not been addressed in the same experimental system as the response to chemical and spectral elicitation. The use of bacterial cell lysate and cell-free supernatant is particularly relevant because these preparations allow the elicitor effect to be evaluated without introducing living microbial populations into the hairy-root culture.

Against this background, the present study uses an Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed S. officinalis hairy-root system to examine three experimentally distinct elicitation approaches. The chemical treatments comprise salicylic acid and silver nitrate; the physical treatments comprise white, blue, red, and green LED light, with darkness as the control; and the biological treatments comprise preparations derived from B. velezensis BPVs2 and T. asperellum TdCP.

The study therefore addresses two related gaps. First, it examines the response of S. officinalis hairy roots to microbial preparations from the selected Bacillus and Trichoderma strains. Secondly, it provides a comparative overview of how chemical, spectral, and microbial elicitation influence root growth, total phenolic content, individual phenolic acids, and antimicrobial activity within the same plant culture platform. Because the three treatment groups were conducted as separate experimental series, the comparison is exploratory and does not test interactions or synergistic effects between elicitor categories.

The aim of this study was to establish and optimise a hairy-root culture system for S. officinalis and to examine, in separate experimental series, the effects of culture medium, auxin supplementation, LED spectra, chemical elicitors, and microbial preparations on root growth, biomass accumulation, phenolic composition, and antimicrobial activity. Particular attention was given to rosmarinic acid and related phenolic acids as target metabolites. By comparing the response patterns produced by salicylic acid, silver nitrate, LED spectra, and preparations derived from B. velezensis BPVs2 and T. asperellum TdCP, the study aimed to identify treatment-specific effects and define priorities for future factorial optimisation experiments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Hairy-Root Induction and Molecular Confirmation

Seeds and potted plants of S. officinalis obtained from the National Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Fundulea, Romania, were used as plant material. Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) served as the basal medium for in vitro culture, whilst MS, B5 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and Woody Plant Medium (WPM) media (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at full and half strength were used for hairy-root cultivation. Sterile seedling preparation, Agrobacterium rhizogenes ATCC 15834 cultivation, explant inoculation and co-cultivation, hairy-root development and maintenance, and molecular confirmation were performed in previous research as described by Rahmanifar et al. (2025) [16]. The transgenic status of the hairy roots was confirmed by PCR detection of the rolB and rolC genes.

2.2. Hairy-Root Culture and Experimental Treatments

Hairy roots longer than 2 cm were excised from the explants and transferred to liquid culture. Cultures were maintained in Erlenmeyer flasks containing 75 mL of liquid medium at 25 °C, under agitation at 120 rpm and in darkness. Subculturing was performed approximately every two weeks using fresh medium.

For physical elicitation, hairy-root cultures were exposed to white, red, blue, or green LED light at a distance of approximately 12 cm, with darkness used as the control treatment [17]. The cold-white LEDs had a colour temperature of 5000–8300 K, the deep-red LEDs emitted within the 650–670 nm range, the high-blue LEDs emitted within the 460–490 nm range, and the green LEDs emitted within the 500–540 nm. The LED units had a power rating of 18 W, and a voltage of 220 V. Each treatment consisted of 3 independent culture flasks, and each flask was considered one biological replicate. Light intensity and exposure duration were kept constant, and spectral quality was the principal experimental variable. Root length, branching intensity and fresh biomass were recorded. Branching intensity was calculated as the number of lateral branches divided by the length of the main root. The treatments were maintained for 50 days.

Chemical elicitation was performed using salicylic acid at 50 µM and silver nitrate at 2.5 ppm. These concentrations were selected based on previously published elicitation studies in Salvia species and related culture systems [18]. No preliminary concentration-response experiment was conducted in the present S. officinalis hairy-root line. Accordingly, these treatments were used to compare the responses to two literature-informed single concentrations rather than to determine the optimal concentration. Fresh roots were cultured in liquid medium, and the elicitors were added after the cultures had entered the exponential growth phase. Samples were collected before treatment and after 4 and 7 days of incubation. For the chemical-elicitation experiment, untreated hairy roots sampled before elicitation and at the corresponding sampling times served as controls. Root tissue and culture supernatant were analysed separately.

In experiments conducted with S. officinalis hairy roots, the effects of biological elicitors on secondary-metabolite biosynthesis and accumulation were evaluated using four experimental treatments:

  • Trichoderma asperellum strain TdCP biomass lysate;

  • Bacillus velezensis endophytic strain BPVs2 cell lysate;

  • Cell-free supernatant obtained from B. velezensis BPVs2 culture;

  • An untreated control without elicitor.

For the first two treatments, the elicitors were prepared from autoclaved, grinded microbial biomass. Fungal biomass was obtained from two-week-old, submersed cultures, obtained in Potato-Dextrose Broth (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at 25 °C and 150 rpm orbital shaking. The bacterial biomass was obtained from 3-day-old, submersed cultures, obtained in Luria–Bertani broth (Luria/Miller, Carl Roth GmbH + Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 28 °C, under orbital shaking at 150 rpm. The biomass was collected by centrifugation, dried at 75 °C, finely ground, and sterilised by autoclaving. The resulting preparations were added to hairy-root suspensions, which were cultivated for 14 days. For biological elicitation, untreated hairy-root cultures without microbial preparation served as controls.

For the cell-free supernatant treatment, bacterial supernatant was obtained from a 3-day-old B. velezensis BPVs2 culture, centrifuged, and filtered through a sterile 0.22 µm membrane. The cell-free supernatant was added to the hairy-root cultures at two volumes, 0.75 mL and 1.5 mL, to provide a limited comparison of the response to two amounts of the crude bacterial preparation. Because the concentration of the active compounds in the supernatant was not quantified, these treatments should not be interpreted as a defined concentration-response experiment. The cultures were incubated for 14 days.

The endophytic strain B. velezensis BPVs2 had previously been tested for its ability to biosynthesise various bacterial metabolites, including enzymes and lipopeptides, involved in plant biostimulation [19]. It was selected because of its potential usefulness in plant protection and biostimulation. The strain has currently been submitted for patent protection to the State Office for Inventions and Trademarks under Patent Application No. A100364/10.07.2023 as a plant biostimulant. It has also been deposited in an international microorganism collection at NCAIM, Hungary, under accession number NCAIM (P) B 001510.

2.3. Extraction and Phytochemical Analyses

The samples were subjected to ultrasound-assisted extraction with 50% ethanol at a sample-to-solvent ratio of 1:10 (v/w). The extraction was performed for 15 min at room temperature. The resulting suspensions, including root extracts and culture supernatants, were centrifuged and filtered through 0.22 µm syringe filters before analysis.

Total phenolic content was determined using the Folin–Ciocâlteu spectrophotometric method [20]. This assay is based on the reduction of phosphomolybdic and phosphotungstic acids by phenolic compounds, resulting in the formation of blue-coloured molybdenum and tungsten oxides. The absorbance of the reaction products was measured at 765 nm. Gallic acid was used as the calibration standard. Standard solutions were prepared at concentrations ranging from 0 to 500 µg/mL and analysed under the same conditions as the samples. The calibration curve was constructed from the absorbance values measured at 765 nm. Results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents. For root samples, the values were expressed per unit mass of root material, whereas the results for culture supernatants were expressed per millilitre of supernatant.

The phenolic profile was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography using a Waters 2695 Alliance system coupled with a Waters 2487 UV–VIS detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) [21]. Separation was performed under reversed-phase conditions using a SunFire column with a particle size of 5 µm and dimensions of 3.9 mm × 150 mm. The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C, whilst the analysed samples were maintained at 20 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.5% o-phosphoric acid in water as solvent A and acetonitrile as solvent B. According to the experimental record, the gradient began at an A/B ratio of 90/10, changed to 75/25 at 25 min, changed to 10/90 at 40 min, held at 10/90 for 5 min, and changed to 90/10 at 45 min, where it was maintained for an additional 10 min. Chromatograms were recorded at 280 and 300 nm. Phenolic compounds were identified by comparing their retention times with those of injected analytical standards. The compounds considered included gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, rutin, ferulic acid, rosmarinic acid, ellagic acid and quercetin. Each compound was identified by comparison of its retention time with that of an authentic analytical standard analysed under the same chromatographic conditions. Quantification was performed by integrating the area of each chromatographic peak and applying the corresponding calibration curve prepared for each standard.

2.4. Antimicrobial Assays

The antimicrobial activity of extracts from untreated and elicited hairy roots was evaluated against Bacillus spizizenii ATCC 6633, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Bacillus cereus ATCC 1178. The fungal test organisms were Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Fusarium sp., and Aspergillus sp. Agar well diffusion assays were performed using 100 µL of each sample. Bacterial plates were incubated overnight at approximately 36 °C, whereas fungal plates were incubated for seven days at approximately 25 °C. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by measuring the inhibition zones around the wells. Each antimicrobial treatment was tested in 2 independent assay replicates.

For the antibacterial assay, the microbial strains were grown overnight in liquid Luria–Bertani (LB) medium under orbital shaking. The bacterial suspension was adjusted to an optical density of 0.3 at 600 nm. This suspension was then incorporated into molten Luria–Bertani agar at a ratio of 1:20 (v/v). Equidistant within the Petri plates, wells were created in the solidified substrate, and filled with 100 µL of hairy-root extract or culture supernatant. The plates were left for approximately 1 h to allow diffusion of the samples into the agar and were subsequently incubated overnight at 36 ± 0.2 °C. Antibacterial activity was determined by measuring the diameter of the clear inhibition zones surrounding the wells. The intensity of the antibacterial effect was assessed using the Manka scale [22].

The antifungal activity was tested using Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). After the medium had been distributed into sterile Petri dishes and solidified, wells were prepared in the agar and filled with 100 µL of the tested hairy-root extracts or culture supernatants. Mycelial discs obtained from a young culture of fungal strains were placed at a defined distance from the wells, approximately 2 cm, to allow the fungal colony to grow towards the treated areas. The plates were first left for approximately 1 h to facilitate diffusion of the samples and were then incubated at 25 ± 0.2 °C for seven days. Antifungal activity was evaluated by measuring the radial inhibition zones or the clear, non-colonised areas surrounding the wells. The inhibitory effect was recorded using the Manka scale [22].

The inhibition-zone measurements were used to compare the antimicrobial effects of extracts and supernatants obtained from untreated and elicited hairy-root cultures. Bacterial and fungal assays were performed using the same sample volume and diffusion principle, whilst the microbial growth medium, incubation temperature, incubation period, and measurement approach were adapted to the organism tested.

2.5. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2021 with the Analysis ToolPak for one-way analysis of variance. The experiments were conducted using a completely randomised design with three independent biological replicates per treatment (physical, chemical and biological elicitation). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. For each dataset and sampling point, differences among treatment means were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). When the ANOVA indicated a significant treatment effect, Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was used for post hoc pairwise comparisons. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05, corresponding to p < 0.05. Because the chemical, LED, and biological treatments were evaluated in separate experimental series, the analyses were not intended to test interactions among the three elicitor categories.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical Elicitation

LED treatments affected root growth and altered the phenolic profile of S. officinalis hairy roots, with the direction and magnitude of the response depending on the light spectrum. Under the experimental conditions used, red light stimulated biomass accumulation and the longitudinal growth of the hairy roots. Similar effects were observed when the roots were maintained in darkness or under blue light. This suggests that light of different wavelengths influences metabolic pathways involved in cell-growth processes. However, the effects of the different illumination treatments on polyphenolic production did not follow the stimulatory pattern observed for hairy-root growth.

The data presented in Table 1 indicate that LED treatments markedly altered the polyphenol content of S. officinalis roots at the descriptive level, although the response was clearly dependent on the light spectrum. In the root biomass, blue light produced the highest total-polyphenol content, approximately twice that recorded under white light, which was used as the control. A similar level was observed under red light. This pattern is consistent with scientific literature, which indicates that light is an important elicitor of secondary metabolites and that its effects on phenolic-compound biosynthesis depend on the plant species, organ, light intensity, and spectral quality of the radiation [11,23].

Table 1.

Phenolic compound content of roots treated with LED light.

Treatment Total Polyphenol Content (mg GAE/g Roots or mg GAE/mL Supernatant)
Roots maintained in darkness 0.251 ± 0.012 c
Roots illuminated with white light 0.226 ± 0.011 c
Roots illuminated with blue light 0.451 ± 0.019 a
Roots illuminated with red light 0.438 ± 0.015 a
Roots illuminated with green light 0.351 ± 0.014 b
Supernatant from roots maintained in darkness 0.025 ± 0.012 e
Supernatant from roots illuminated with white light 0.023 ± 0.012 e
Supernatant from roots illuminated with blue light 0.023 ± 0.011 e
Supernatant from roots illuminated with red light 0.025 ± 0.014 e
Supernatant from roots illuminated with green light 0.137 ± 0.013 d

Values are presented as means ± standard deviation from 3 independent biological replicates. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test.

The results obtained under blue and red light are biologically plausible, as numerous studies have shown that these wavelengths can activate phenylpropanoid pathways and promote the accumulation of phenolic compounds with antioxidant and defence-related functions. Within the Lamiaceae family, light and other abiotic factors are considered important regulators of phenolic-acid accumulation, including rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid, and salvianolic acids. These compounds are recognised as relevant markers of secondary metabolism in this taxonomic group [4,24]. In addition, in related experimental systems, light exposure has been associated with increased expression of genes involved in rosmarinic-acid biosynthesis. This supports the interpretation that LED illumination can act as a signal for metabolic elicitation, rather than merely as a growth factor [11].

However, comparisons with other in vitro cultures of Lamiaceae species show that this response is not universal. In Agastache rugosa, white light increased the contents of rosmarinic acid and tilianin, whereas in Hyptis marrubioides, red light promoted biomass accumulation and blue light supported rutin accumulation [25]. This variability confirms observations of other research that plant responses to LED illumination are strongly dependent on both the species and the tissue analysed. Consequently, the results cannot be directly extrapolated from one experimental model to another [23].

In this case, the low and relatively constant polyphenol values detected in the supernatant under dark, white, blue, and red light suggest limited release of phenolic compounds into the external medium, with most compounds apparently remaining within the root tissue. The exception was green light, which caused a marked increase in the polyphenol content of the supernatant. This may indicate a modification of tissue permeability, enhanced exudation, or redistribution of metabolites from the roots into the culture medium. Recent literature on transformed-root cultures of Lamiaceae species shows that roots can respond differently to light and that, in certain systems, darkness may even represent the optimal condition for polyphenol accumulation [26]. This suggests that, at the root level, photomodulation of secondary metabolism may involve not only biosynthesis but also metabolite transport, compartmentalisation, and exudation processes.

These observations are broadly consistent with reports that red and blue light can stimulate phenolic accumulation in several Lamiaceae and medicinal-plant species. However, species-, tissue-, and protocol-dependent responses prevent direct extrapolation between experimental systems [27], in which red or blue light stimulated total polyphenol levels. Although limited in number, similar results concerning the effects of red and blue light on secondary-metabolite accumulation have also been reported for Salvia przewalskii [28]. The accumulation of several polyphenolic compounds, including salvianolic acid A, salvianolic acid B, and rosmarinic acid, as well as terpenoids such as dihydrotanshinones, cryptotanshinone, and tanshinone IIA, was stimulated by both blue and red light.

Plant responses to radiation of different wavelengths also vary according to the species, experimental conditions, light intensity, photoperiod, and other environmental factors that may act synergistically or antagonistically on metabolite biosynthesis. Despite the results reported by different researchers for various plant species, the precise mechanisms underlying the effects of different illumination treatments on secondary-metabolite production remain unclear [11].

Regarding the polyphenolic profile of extracts obtained from hairy roots cultivated under illumination with different wavelengths, differences were observed not only in the types of compounds present but also in their respective concentrations (Table 2).

Table 2.

Phenolic compound profile of sage roots treated with LED light.

Treatment Individual Phenolic Compounds (µg/g)
Chlorogenic Acid Caffeic Acid Ellagic Acid Rosmarinic Acid
Roots maintained in darkness 1.535 ± 0.021 a 0.57 ± 0.003 a ND 0.841 ± 0.006 c
Roots illuminated with white light 0.915 ± 0.019 b 0.86 ± 0.011 a ND 1.581 ± 0.023 b
Roots illuminated with blue light ND 0.138 ± 0.002 c ND ND
Roots illuminated with red light ND 0.29 ± 0.014 b ND 2.873 ± 0.021 a
Roots illuminated with green light ND 0.163 ± 0.011 c 0.863 ± 0.007 3.099 ± 0.002 a

Values are presented as means ± standard deviation from 3 independent biological replicates. ND, not detected. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test.

The phenolic profile obtained for S. officinalis roots indicated a relatively limited composition, strongly oriented towards phenolic acids, with rosmarinic acid representing the predominant metabolite in most of the analysed treatments. Under the experimental conditions used, gallic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and quercetin were not detected. This suggests that physical elicitation selectively favoured the phenylpropanoid branch responsible for the biosynthesis of compounds that are more characteristic of the Lamiaceae family, particularly rosmarinic acid, chlorogenic acid, and caffeic acid. This predominance is consistent with literature, which identifies rosmarinic acid as one of the most important and widely distributed polyphenols in the Lamiaceae family, with a central role in stress responses and antioxidant activity in these species [4,24].

In the dark-grown control, the profile was dominated by chlorogenic acid, followed by caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid. Exposure to white light led to a reduction in chlorogenic acid, accompanied by an increase in caffeic acid and, particularly, rosmarinic acid. This suggests a redirection of metabolic flux towards the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid derivatives. Under blue light, the profile was strongly reduced, with chlorogenic acid and rosmarinic acid not detected and only a small amount of caffeic acid present.

By contrast, red and green light favoured the accumulation of rosmarinic acid, reaching 2.873 µg/g and 3.099 µg/g, respectively. Green light was the only treatment that resulted in the production of ellagic acid. Comparative analysis suggests that sage roots do not respond uniformly to light quality but modify their patterns of metabolite production and accumulation according to the plant organ and light spectrum.

Although blue light resulted in the highest total-polyphenol content, the concentrations of the individual compounds included in the phenolic profile were very low or below the detection limit. This suggests that blue illumination may have promoted the synthesis of other phenolic compounds, conjugated phenolics, or bound phenolic fractions that were not included in the analysed profile.

3.2. Chemical Elicitation

Chemical elicitation produced contrasting effects. AgNO3 increased total phenolic content, whereas salicylic acid reduced total phenolic content under the tested conditions.

Salicylic acid (SA) is an essential component of plant defence mechanisms under stress and plays an important role in various metabolic processes. Recent studies on the mechanisms of action of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and certain metal ions have shown that these compounds modulate plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress by activating cellular signalling pathways. These pathways can induce several effects, including stimulation of Ca2+ influx into cells, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and activation of enzymes, ultimately promoting the production of secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and phenolic compounds [29].

When salicylic acid was used, the total polyphenol content in the treated roots was lower than that in the untreated roots for both incubation periods, namely 4 and 7 days. After 4 days of incubation, the total polyphenol content decreased by approximately 12%. After 7 days of incubation, salicylic acid reduced total phenolic content by approximately 50% relative to the untreated control, and a 39% reduction compared with the level recorded after 4 days of incubation with salicylic acid (Table 3).

Table 3.

Effect of treatment with chemical elicitors (salicylic acid and AgNO3) on the level of total polyphenols in hairy roots of S. officinalis.

Treatment Total Polyphenol Content (mg GAE/g Roots or mg GAE/mL Supernatant)
Incubation Period
0 Days
(Untreated Control)
4 Days 7 Days
Salicylic acid 0.701 ± 0.018 c 0.513 ± 0.012 d 0.313 ± 0.002 e
AgNO3 0.701 ± 0.017 c 0.938 ± 0.019 b 0.976 ± 0.013 a

Values are presented as means ± standard deviation from 3 independent biological replicates. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test.

At the selected AgNO3 concentration of 2.5 ppm, total polyphenol content increased by approximately 33.8% after 4 days and by approximately 39.2% after 7 days compared with the untreated roots. The response therefore confirms a stimulatory effect of the tested AgNO3 treatment under the experimental conditions used. Because only one AgNO3 concentration was evaluated, the present data cannot establish a dose–response relationship, identify the optimal concentration, or determine whether higher or lower concentrations would produce stronger or weaker responses.

The response to salicylic acid was opposite to the expected stimulatory effect of chemical elicitation. Under the conditions used in this study, salicylic acid at 50 µM reduced total phenolic content by approximately 12% after 4 days and by approximately 50% after 7 days. The chromatographic profile indicates that this was not necessarily a complete suppression of phenolic metabolism, because chlorogenic acid and rutin were maintained or slightly increased, whereas rosmarinic acid was clearly reduced. The response therefore appears to represent a selective remodelling of phenolic metabolism rather than a uniform inhibition of all phenolic pathways.

Salicylic acid can activate defence-related signalling involving reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide, and stimulatory effects on phenolic compounds have been reported in Salvia miltiorrhiza cell cultures [30]. However, the direction of the response is dependent on species, tissue type, concentration, exposure duration, and culture conditions. Previous studies in Salvia have reported positive effects of salicylic acid, but they have also shown that elicitor concentration affects the expression of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and the accumulation of phenolic compounds [10].

One possible explanation is that the concentration or exposure period used here exceeded the optimal signalling window for this S. officinalis hairy-root line. Prolonged or excessive signalling may generate an oxidative burden, activate feedback regulation, or redirect metabolic resources towards other stress-response processes instead of rosmarinic-acid biosynthesis [9]. The present study cannot distinguish between these possibilities because reactive oxygen species, antioxidant capacity, cell viability, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity, and rosmarinic-acid synthase expression were not measured. Therefore, the appropriate conclusion is that salicylic acid at 50 µM was not effective for enhancing total phenolic content or rosmarinic-acid accumulation under the tested conditions, rather than that salicylic acid is generally unsuitable as an elicitor in Salvia.

The detection of p-coumaric acid and quercetin after 4 days but not after 7 days should not be interpreted as complete absence of these compounds at the later sampling point. Time-dependent and compound-specific responses to elicitation have been reported in hairy-root and other plant culture systems, with metabolite accumulation varying according to elicitor exposure time and concentration [8]. The change observed here may therefore reflect transient biosynthesis, metabolic conversion, degradation, redistribution, or variation in the amount of compound available for extraction. Because intermediate sampling points and pathway-level measurements were not included, the specific cause of this change cannot be established from the present data.

At the level of individual compounds, substantial accumulation of rosmarinic acid, syringic acid, caffeic acid, and chlorogenic acid was observed following AgNO3 treatment (Table 4). Compared with the untreated control, the rosmarinic acid content was three times higher, whilst syringic acid showed the strongest increase. Caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid also increased substantially, suggesting robust stimulation of the entire phenylpropanoid network and a clear redirection of precursors towards soluble phenolic metabolites. This is the type of response frequently described for Ag+-based elicitors, which may be more effective than other inducers in increasing rosmarinic acid and total polyphenol content [9,31].

Table 4.

Phenolic compound profile of sage roots treated with chemical elicitors.

Treatment Incubation Period (Days) Individual Phenolic Compounds (µg/g)
Gallic Acid Chlorogenic Acid Caffeic Acid Syringic Acid p-Coumaric Acid Rutin Rosmarinic Acid Quercetin
Roots treated with salicylic acid 4 0.300 ± 0.012 c 0.257 ± 0.002 d 1.608 ± 0.011 c 0.133 ± 0.002 c ND 0.186 ± 0.002 d 0.327 ± 0.003 c ND
7 0.130 ± 0.005 d 0.46 ± 0.015 c ND ND ND 0.388 ± 0.007 c 0.151 ± 0.002 d ND
Roots treated with AgNO3 4 0.560 ± 0.013 b 2.787 ± 0.019 a 11.65 ± 0.018 b 3.464 ± 0.015 a 0.178 ± 0.01 1.518 ± 0.008 a 6.248 ± 0.009 b 0.137 ± 0.002
7 0.800 ± 0.019 a 2.511 ± 0.012 b 17.08 ± 0.015 a 0.959 ± 0.002 b ND 0.977 ± 0.002 b 7.934 ± 0.013 a ND

Values are presented as means ± standard deviation from 3 independent biological replicates. ND, not detected. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Compared with the available literature, this result is highly consistent with previous findings. In studies of Salvia spp. and other Lamiaceae species, Ag+ is often one of the most effective inducers of phenolic compounds because it enhances defence responses and increases the biosynthesis of phenolic acids alongside the activation of enzymes involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway [9].

By contrast, the results obtained using AgNO3 as an elicitor were consistent with those reported for numerous plant species, including Salvia species. The stimulatory effect of AgNO3 on tanshinone production has been reported in Salvia miltiorrhiza and S. castanea [15,18]. Although the precise mechanism underlying this stimulation has not been fully elucidated, the main effect appears to involve modulation of the expression of key genes associated with biosynthetic pathways [32].

Bakhtiar et al. (2026) demonstrated a synergistic stimulatory effect of combined chemical elicitors, including squalene plus pyruvic acid and methyl jasmonate plus coronatine, on the biosynthesis of metabolites of interest in Glycyrrhiza glabra [33].

3.3. Biological Elicitation

The production of secondary metabolites of interest in several plant species can also be stimulated through the use of biological elicitors of various origins, including components of microbial cells, such as polysaccharides and proteins, microbial endophytes, and plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria [29,34]. In Salvia species, researchers have reported the effects of endophytes, including Alternaria sp., Chaetomium globosum, Cladosporium tenuissimum, Paecilomyces sp., Mucor fragilis, Sarocladium kiliense, and Trichoderma atroviride, on biomass accumulation and the levels of metabolites such as tanshinones and salvianolic acids in S. miltiorrhiza [35,36]. These effects have been attributed to biologically active compounds of microbial origin that stimulate or inhibit the expression of specific plant genes involved in different metabolic pathways, including those responsible for secondary-metabolite biosynthesis.

The results reported for S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots treated with the fungal endophyte Cladosporium tenuissimum showed that the fungus stimulated tanshinone production and accumulation by increasing the expression of genes controlling the biosynthesis of these metabolites [35]. Similarly, the use of homogenised and sterilised Mucor fragilis biomass as an elicitor for treating S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots resulted in increased levels of certain primary metabolites, including amino acids and fatty acids, as well as secondary metabolites such as diterpenoids and phenolic acids [37].

The use of fungal-derived cellular components as elicitors, including polysaccharides obtained from Trichoderma atroviride or Bacillus cereus, has also produced positive effects on root growth and on the biosynthesis of tanshinones, dihydrotanshinone I, and cryptotanshinone in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots [15].

The bacterial strain used in the experiments had previously been isolated, identified using molecular techniques, including sequencing, and characterised for its ability to synthesise enzymes and other compounds capable of promoting plant growth [19].

Treatment with B. velezensis cell lysate had a relatively moderate effect on total polyphenol content (Table 5), and the values recorded on days 7 and 14 remained below those of the untreated control. However, the use of 1.5 mL of bacterial cell-free supernatant resulted in a substantially higher polyphenol content, approximately 58% higher than the control on day 7.

Table 5.

Phenolic compound content of roots treated with biotic elicitors.

Sample Total Polyphenol Content (mg GAE/g Roots or mg GAE/mL Supernatant)
Day 0 Day 7 Day 14
Biologically elicited root extracts
B. velezensis BPVs2 Cell lysate 0.701 ± 0.012 c 0.363 ± 0.015 e 0.413 ± 0.013 d
0.75 mL cell-free supernatant 0.701 ± 0.012 c 0.563 ± 0.012 d 0.338 ± 0.009 e
1.5 mL cell-free supernatant 0.701 ± 0.012 c 0.988 ± 0.007 b 0.313 ± 0.006 e
T. asperellum TdCP Biomass lysate 0.701 ± 0.012 c 1.363 ± 0.019 a 0.488 ± 0.011 d
Supernatant from biologically elicited root cultures
B. velezensis BPVs2 Cell lysate 0.012 ± 0.001 c 0.016 ± 0.002 b 0.016 ± 0.002 b
0.75 mL cell-free supernatant 0.012 ± 0.001 c 0.022 ± 0.001 a 0.027 ± 0.003 a
1.5 mL cell-free supernatant 0.012 ± 0.001 c 0.025 ± 0.002 a 0.026 ± 0.001 a
T. asperellum TdCP Biomass lysate 0.012 ± 0.001 c 0.016 ± 0.001 b 0.017 ± 0.001 b

Values are presented as means ± standard deviation from 3 independent biological replicates. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test.

In the supernatants obtained from elicited hairy-root suspensions, total polyphenol levels were extremely low in all treatments compared with the untreated controls. The chromatographic profiles of the phenolic acids supported this observation, suggesting that the plant cells in suspension retained most secondary metabolites intracellularly, with only negligible release into the culture medium.

The present result extends this research by showing that a cell-free preparation from B. velezensis can strongly modify phenolic-acid accumulation in S. officinalis hairy roots. Nevertheless, the active compound or compounds responsible for the response cannot be identified from the current data. The bacterial supernatant was not chemically profiled, and bacterial elicitation was not accompanied by measurements of reactive oxygen species, defence-related enzymes, or phenylpropanoid-pathway transcripts. Consequently, the tenfold increase should be interpreted as a treatment-specific metabolic response, not as proof that a particular lipopeptide or other bacterial metabolite directly activated rosmarinic-acid biosynthesis.

A decrease was observed on day 7 in roots treated with the cell lysate and 0.75 mL of bacterial cell-free supernatant (Table 6). This suggests partial activation of the phenylpropanoid metabolism, without effective stimulation of the pathway leading to the maximum accumulation of rosmarinic acid. This type of response is typical of microbial elicitors, which can induce metabolic reorganisation but do not always produce a uniform increase in all phenolic compounds [31].

Table 6.

Phenolic compound profile of sage roots treated with biotic elicitors.

Treatment Incubation Period (Days) Individual Phenolic Compounds (µg/g)
Gallic Acid Chlorogenic Acid Caffeic Acid Syringic Acid p-Coumaric Acid Rutin Rosmarinic Acid
Roots elicited with B. velezensis
Cell lysate 7 1.397 ± 0.022 a 0.582 ± 0.011 b 2.916 ± 0.025 b 0.313 ± 0.005 c 0.054 ± 0.002 a 0.336 ± 0.001 c 0.594 ± 0.003 c
14 0.4 ± 0.011 d 0.784 ± 0.019 a 2.586 ± 0.019 c 0.488 ± 0.006 b <LoQ 0.478 ± 0.006 b 0.323 ± 0.001 d
0.75 mL cell-free supernatant 7 <LoQ 0.370 ± 0.023 c 3.006 ± 0.020 b 0.42 ± 0.005 b ND 0.374 ± 0.009 c 0.920 ± 0.009 b
14 0.132 ± 0.014 e 0.128 ± 0.015 e 0.984 ± 0.013 d ND ND ND 0.779 ± 0.018 b
1.5 mL cell-free supernatant 7 0.378 ± 0.011 d 0.522 ± 0.018 b 9.798 ± 0.02 a 0.896 ± 0.009 a ND 1.960 ± 0.013 a 25.635 ± 0.029 a
14 0.246 ± 0.018 e 0.304 ± 0.001 d 0.745 ± 0.007 e ND ND ND 0.468 ± 0.016 c
Roots elicited with T. asperellum
TdCP Biomass lysate 7 0.842 ± 0.001 c 2.961 ± 0.018 a 2.961 ± 0.018 b 0.487 ± 0.002 b 0.097 ± 0.002 a ND 1.265 ± 0.015 b
14 0.554 ± 0.004 d 1.574 ± 0.002 b 1.575 ± 0.021 c ND 0.050 ± 0.001 a ND 0.327 ± 0.008 d

Values are presented as means ± standard deviation from 3 independent biological replicates. ND, not detected; LoQ, limit of quantification. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test.

The response to the B. velezensis cell-free supernatant was treatment- and time-dependent. The 1.5 mL treatment produced the strongest accumulation of rosmarinic acid and caffeic acid at day 7, whereas the response was substantially weaker at day 14 (Table 6). Direct comparison with other Salvia studies remains limited because the elicitor preparations, doses, culture conditions, and sampling schedules were not identical.

The response to Trichoderma asperellum TdCP biomass lysate differed from that of the Bacillus velezensis supernatant. The fungal preparation increased the overall phenolic background at the earlier sampling point, but it did not produce a comparable increase in rosmarinic acid, and the effect declined by day 14. This pattern is consistent with a transient activation of general defence or oxidative-stress responses rather than a sustained and selective increase in the rosmarinic-acid pathway. Similar treatment-dependent effects have been described for fungal elicitors in Salvia hairy-root cultures, where microbial preparations can stimulate growth or specialised metabolism, but the response depends on the fungal species, elicitor fraction, dose, and exposure time [13,31].

Compared with the LED treatments, selected biological elicitors produced larger relative changes in rosmarinic and caffeic acid under the conditions tested. However, this observation should be interpreted cautiously because the biological and LED experiments used different exposure periods and sampling schedules. The present design therefore does not permit a definitive ranking of biological versus LED elicitation. Treatment with B. velezensis produced, on day 7, substantially higher levels of rosmarinic acid and caffeic acid than any of the illumination treatments. T. asperellum also maintained an active phenolic profile, although its effect was more moderate. These findings suggest that biotic elicitors activate defence pathways and secondary-metabolite biosynthesis more strongly in hairy-root cultures, in a manner dependent on the species, dose, and exposure duration. The biological treatments produced larger relative changes in selected phenolic compounds under the conditions tested. However, because the biological and LED experiments were conducted as separate experimental series with different exposure periods and sampling schedules, these observations represent exploratory comparisons of response patterns rather than a controlled ranking of elicitor efficacy.

The experiments conducted with S. officinalis represent the first reported use of elicitors derived from two microbial species with plant-growth-biostimulating properties [38]. The present findings extend previous bacterial-elicitation studies in S. miltiorrhiza by showing that a preparation derived from B. velezensis can modify phenolic-acid accumulation in S. officinalis hairy roots. However, direct comparison with previous studies is limited by differences in plant species, bacterial preparation, dose, culture conditions, and sampling time.

Following treatment with 1.5 mL of B. velezensis BPVs2 cell-free supernatant, rosmarinic acid decreased from 25.635 μg/g after 7 days to 0.468 μg/g after 14 days. This pattern indicates a transient elicitation response and may reflect metabolic adaptation, feedback regulation, degradation, redistribution, or a shift towards other defence-related processes [8]. Because only two sampling times were used and pathway-gene expression, enzyme activity, reactive oxygen species, and compound stability were not measured, the cause of this decline cannot be determined from the present experiment.

The stronger response to the cell-free supernatant than to the autoclaved bacterial lysate suggests that soluble extracellular bacterial compounds may have contributed to the elicitation effect. However, the supernatant was not chemically profiled, so the active component cannot be identified. This interpretation is consistent with previous studies showing that Bacillus co-culture and bacterial polysaccharide–protein fractions can stimulate specialised-metabolite production in Salvia hairy roots [15].

The fungal strain used in the experiments, T. asperellum TdCP, had previously demonstrated plant-growth-promoting and plant-protection properties. To the best of our knowledge, T. asperellum was used for the first time in experiments investigating the elicitation of secondary-metabolite biosynthesis. The literature reports similar results for other plant species, including Panax sikkimensis and Salvia miltiorrhiza, but using different Trichoderma species, namely T. atroviride and T. harzianum [27,29].

Regarding the mechanisms of action of biological elicitors, results reported for culture filtrates and microbial extracts from Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Trichoderma species suggest that these preparations are rich in chitosans, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, lipids, and small peptides. These compounds can interact with receptors on the surface of treated plant cells or enter the cells directly, thereby affecting the expression of genes involved in cellular defence and secondary-metabolite biosynthesis, including alkaloids, terpenes, iridoids, and phenylethanoids [27,34].

However, biological elicitors, particularly those of fungal origin, can produce negative effects in treated plant cells at certain concentrations or following prolonged exposure. This highlights the need to identify the active microbial components and clarify their mechanisms of action, particularly when their large-scale use as biological elicitors is being considered [29].

The three elicitation approaches investigated in this study produced distinct metabolic response patterns rather than a uniform increase in all phenolic parameters. Because the LED, chemical, and biological treatments were conducted as separate experimental series with different exposure periods and sampling schedules, the results should be interpreted primarily as within-series comparisons. Direct ranking of the three elicitor categories based on absolute metabolite concentrations would therefore be inappropriate.

Chemical elicitation produced the clearest overall enhancement of phenolic accumulation when AgNO3 was used. AgNO3 increased total phenolic content and stimulated the accumulation of several individual phenolic acids, including rosmarinic and caffeic acids, whereas salicylic acid produced an inhibitory response under the tested conditions.

In the LED experiment, blue and red light increased total phenolic content relative to the white-light control, while red and green light produced the most pronounced changes in the rosmarinic-acid profile. Green light also markedly increased the concentration of phenolic compounds in the culture supernatant, suggesting an effect on metabolite release or exudation rather than only on intracellular biosynthesis.

Biological elicitation showed a different response pattern. The 1.5 mL cell-free supernatant from B. velezensis BPVs2 produced the most pronounced rosmarinic-acid accumulation among the biological treatments, particularly after 7 days, whereas T. asperellum TdCP biomass lysate induced a stronger but transient increase in the overall phenolic background without a comparable enhancement in rosmarinic acid.

Taken together, the three elicitor categories appear to influence different aspects of the phenolic response. AgNO3 was the most effective treatment within the chemical series for broad phenolic enhancement, blue and red LED light were associated with increased total phenolic content, and B. velezensis cell-free supernatant was particularly effective for targeted rosmarinic-acid accumulation. These observations do not establish that one category is universally superior because the experiments were not performed under identical exposure durations, doses, or sampling conditions. A future factorial experiment should include the relevant single treatments, combined treatments, and untreated controls under the same culture conditions, with harmonised sampling times. Such a design would allow the independent, additive, and interactive effects of chemical and spectral elicitation to be statistically separated.

A limitation of the present study is that salicylic acid and AgNO3 were each evaluated at only one concentration. Although the selected concentrations were supported by previous studies, the design does not allow the optimal dose, concentration threshold, or possible toxicity range to be determined. The two volumes of B. velezensis cell-free supernatant provided only a preliminary comparison of crude preparation amounts and were not equivalent to a defined concentration series. Future experiments should evaluate several concentrations of each chemical elicitor and quantify the active components of the bacterial supernatant in order to establish dose–response relationships and compare elicitors more rigorously.

3.4. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Sage Root Extracts and Supernatants from Elicited Root Cultures

In recent decades, plant extracts have attracted considerable scientific and applied interest, mainly because of their beneficial effects on human health; their ability to inhibit pathogenic or potentially pathogenic microorganisms in various products, including food products; and their capacity to stimulate beneficial microorganisms [39].

Among plant species, particular interest has been directed towards plants of the genus Salvia. The metabolic profiles of extracts obtained from different plant organs, including leaves, stems, roots, and flowers, have revealed the presence of essential oils, alkaloids, carbohydrates, and polyphenols, including coumarins, flavonoids, tannins, and phenolic acids, as well as terpenes, steroids, and other compounds [1,39]. These compounds have been associated with various pharmacological properties, including antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, antioxidant, and antibacterial effects [40].

Regarding antimicrobial activity, alcoholic extracts obtained from several Salvia species have demonstrated both antibacterial activity [1] and antifungal activity [41]. In S. officinalis, S. triloba, S. bulleyana, S. tomentosa, S. sclarea, and other sage species, the alcoholic or hydroalcoholic extracts tested exhibited bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity against strains of Bacillus cereus, B. mycoides, B. subtilis, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Proteus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Salmonella sp., and other microorganisms [26,39,42].

The results obtained in the present study using unconcentrated extracts from elicited S. officinalis hairy roots showed that certain treatments, including silver nitrate, cell-free bacterial supernatant, and autoclaved Trichoderma biomass, induced changes in the polyphenolic composition of the sage extracts. These changes resulted in inhibition of the model strain Bacillus spizizenii ATCC 6633 (formerly B. subtilis subsp. spizizenii) (Table 7). The assays were performed comparatively using extracts from unelicited hairy roots and supernatants from the culture medium in which the roots had been grown.

Table 7.

Inhibitory effect of some extracts of S. officinalis hairy roots on B. spizizenii ATCC 6633.

Elicitor Antibacterial Effect Against B. spizizenii ATCC 6633
Sage-root extracts
Extract from untransformed roots ±
Hairy-root extract, control ±
AgNO3 ++
B. velezensis BPVs2 cell lysate +
0.75 mL bacterial cell-free supernatant +
1.5 mL bacterial cell-free supernatant ++
T. asperellum TdCP biomass lysate +
Supernatants from elicited sage-root cultures
AgNO3 −
B. velezensis BPVs2 cell lysate −
0.75 mL bacterial cell-free supernatant −
1.5 mL bacterial cell-free supernatant −
T. asperellum TdCP biomass lysate −

Legend: −, no antibacterial activity; ±, low inhibitory activity, bacteriostatic, manifested as a reduction in the density of the target bacterial cells; +, low antibacterial activity; ++, moderate antibacterial activity.

The antibacterial activity of extracts from elicited hairy roots was clearly evident, particularly following treatment with certain elicitors, whereas no antibacterial activity was detected in the supernatant samples under any of the experimental conditions. Clear zones of growth inhibition against the reference strain B. spizizenii ATCC 6633 were observed when bacterial cell-free supernatant was used, with the effect corresponding to the applied dose, as well as following treatment with the other elicitors. The most pronounced results were obtained for extracts from hairy roots elicited with AgNO3 (Figure 1). Notably, inhibition zones against this bacterial strain remained visible after several days of incubation. Because viable-cell counts and MBC measurements were not performed, the result is interpreted as sustained growth inhibition rather than confirmed bactericidal activity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Antibacterial activity of extracts from sage hairy roots elicited with chemical agents (AgNO3) or biological agents such as B. velezensis BPVs2 cell lysate and cell-free bacterial supernatant (CFBS), or T. asperellum TdCP biomass lysate against B. spizizenii ATCC 6633.

The root-extract samples were also tested against human pathogenic bacteria and quality control strains Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Bacillus cereus ATCC 1178.

No clear inhibitory effects were detected against E. coli in any of the tested samples. In contrast, a bacteriostatic effect was observed against the two Gram-positive bacterial strains, S. aureus ATCC 6538 and B. cereus ATCC 1178. After 24 h of incubation, growth-inhibition zones were observed for samples obtained from hairy roots elicited with biological or chemical agents. The largest inhibition-zone diameters were recorded for samples obtained following AgNO3 elicitation. Continued incubation for 48 to 72 h resulted in bacterial growth within the inhibition zones. These results indicate time-dependent inhibition of bacterial growth. The observed regrowth within the inhibition zones suggests that a sustained bactericidal effect cannot be concluded from the agar-diffusion assay alone.

The hairy-root extracts were also tested against the filamentous fungi Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Fusarium sp., and Aspergillus sp. Results revealed a fungicidal effect against S. sclerotiorum and a fungistatic effect against Fusarium sp. when the hairy-roots had been elicited with cell-free bacterial supernatant or AgNO3 (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Testing the antifungal activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum of extracts from S. officinalis roots elicited with chemical or biological agents.

No inhibitory effects were seen against Aspergillus sp., a mycotoxigenic fungus associated with food contamination. The phytopathogenic Fusarium sp. tested revealed slight inhibition when exposed to certain hairy-root extracts elicited with AgNO3, autoclaved B. velezensis biomass and cell-free supernatant. The most sensitive fungal strain tested was Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Table 8).

Table 8.

Testing the antifungal activity of sage root extracts subjected or not subjected to elicitation.

Samples Elicitor Used Inhibitory Effect of Root Extracts Against Filamentous Fungi
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Fusarium sp. Aspergillus sp.
Untransformed-root extract, control − − − −
Hairy-root extract, control − ± − −
Hairy-root extract AgNO3 ++ ± −
Hairy-root extract B. velezensis BPVs2 cell lysate + ± −
Hairy-root extract 0.75 mL bacterial cell-free supernatant + ± −
Hairy-root extract 1.5 mL bacterial cell-free supernatant ++ + ±
Hairy-root extract T. asperellum TdCP biomass lysate + − −

Legend: −, no antifungal activity; ±, low inhibitory activity; +, low antifungal activity; ++, moderate antifungal activity.

The agar-well diffusion assay demonstrates inhibition under the tested conditions but does not by itself distinguish bactericidal from bacteriostatic activity or fungicidal from fungistatic activity. The association between phenolic accumulation and antimicrobial activity supports the functional relevance of the elicitation response, but it does not establish that rosmarinic acid or caffeic acid alone caused the observed inhibition. Other extract constituents may also contribute, and the present study did not determine the relative contribution of individual compounds.

The results obtained in the experiments conducted with S. officinalis hairy-root extracts were generally consistent with those reported by various researchers for extracts obtained from different Salvia species, including elicited and non-elicited hairy-root extracts. In most of the reported studies, concentrated extracts were used, allowing more accurate assessments of inhibitory activity, such as minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs, expressed in mg/mL).

Regarding the causes of antimicrobial activity, it has been suggested that, in Salvia species, this activity is mainly associated with the ability of hairy roots to synthesise and accumulate increased amounts of biologically active secondary metabolites, particularly phenolic compounds, diterpenes, and flavonoids [26]. Hairy-root cultures induced through Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation represent a stable and efficient biotechnological system for producing bioactive compounds because of their rapid growth, genetic stability, and high level of secondary-metabolite biosynthesis compared with conventional roots [34].

Although many authors consider the antimicrobial activity of sage extracts to be primarily attributable to phenolic compounds, other studies have demonstrated that essential oils produced by Salvia species also contribute substantially to these inhibitory effects. For example, Nourozi et al. (2024) [43] reported the antimicrobial activity of biocomponents from S. sahendica roots against Gram-positive bacteria, including Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus, and weaker activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Pseudomonas sp. The inhibitory effect was attributed mainly to essential oils present in the extracts.

Similar findings have been reported for other Salvia species, including S. sclarea, S. officinalis, and Mediterranean Salvia species, against bacteria, pathogenic yeasts, and filamentous fungi [44]. Inhibitory effects of extracts from different Salvia species have been reported against Candida species, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. kefyr [45,46]. Inhibitory activity has also been reported against filamentous fungi, including Verticillium dahliae and Penicillium aurantiogriseum [41], Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp. [47], as well as Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, and Rhizoctonia solani treated with leaf extracts of S. rosmarinus [48]. According to the available literature, antifungal activity is generally weaker than antibacterial activity.

In addition, Yazici-Tutunis et al. (2025) [49] analysed ethanolic and aqueous extracts from eight Salvia species from Anatolia using liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). They showed that rosmarinic acid was the main component of the extracts, accompanied by substantial amounts of caffeic acid, fumaric acid, salvianolic acid B, and several glucosides. In that study, antimicrobial activity was evaluated in vitro against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacillus subtilis. Differences in antibacterial activity were observed depending on the Salvia species from which the extracts were obtained. However, for most extracts, the clearest effects were observed against S. aureus.

To explain the antibacterial activity, Yazici-Tutunis et al. (2025) [49] associated it with the high content of salvianolic acid, rosmarinic acid, verbascoside, hesperidin, and salicylic acid. Although the molecular mechanisms underlying the antibacterial activity are not yet fully understood, Yazici-Tutunis et al. (2025) [49] evaluated the antibacterial potential of relevant metabolites in silico and demonstrated that these compounds can bind to bacterial target enzymes, including dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase.

Regarding the effectiveness of sage extracts against specific groups of microorganisms, most studies have shown that alcoholic or hydroalcoholic extracts obtained from different vegetative organs of Salvia species have stronger inhibitory activity against Staphylococcus species, including S. aureus and S. epidermidis, and weaker activity against Gram-negative bacteria [26,42,45].

The involvement of phenolic compounds accumulated in different plant organs, including roots, leaves, and stems, of Salvia species from different geographical regions, including Greece, China, and the Balkans, has been investigated by several researchers [40,44,50]. The association between the accumulation of phenolic compounds, such as caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, lithospermic acid, and salvianolic acids, and antimicrobial activity has also been reported for several Salvia species, including S. tomentosa, S. bulleyana, and S. hispanica [26,42,51].

A considerable proportion of the published results concerning the antimicrobial activity of extracts is based on analyses of root extracts, including hairy-root extracts. In some Salvia species, such as S. bulleyana, the use of biological elicitors, including yeast extract, or chemical elicitors, such as methyl jasmonate and cadmium chloride, increased the accumulation of phenolic compounds in hairy roots. This had positive effects on antioxidant and cytotoxic activity against tumour cell lines, as well as on antimicrobial activity [26].

Based on a comparison between the published data and the results obtained in the present study, the antimicrobial activity of S. officinalis hairy-root extracts against the tested microbial strains can be considered present but relatively weak. However, this activity may be enhanced through the use of eliciting agents, which can stimulate not only root growth but also the accumulation of secondary metabolites. Further studies are therefore required to optimise both the cultivation conditions of the plant material and the extraction and analytical procedures.

4. Conclusions

The study established an Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated hairy-root system for S. officinalis. LED treatments influenced phenolic metabolism, with blue and red light increasing total polyphenols, while red and green light favoured rosmarinic acid accumulation. Across the separate experimental series, AgNO3 and B. velezensis BPVs2 cell-free supernatant produced the strongest responses for selected phenolic outcomes, whereas blue and red LED treatments increased total phenolic content. Because the elicitation categories were not tested in a common factorial design, their relative efficacy and any combined effects remain to be established. In particular, AgNO3 at the selected concentration substantially enhanced caffeic and rosmarinic acid levels, while B. velezensis BPVs2, particularly at 1.5 mL cell-free supernatant, stimulated pronounced accumulation of these target compounds. However, because only one concentration of each chemical elicitor was tested and the bacterial treatments involved two volumes of an uncharacterised crude supernatant, the optimal doses remain to be determined.

The association between phenolic accumulation and antimicrobial activity supports the functional relevance of the elicitation response, but it does not establish that rosmarinic acid or caffeic acid alone caused the observed inhibition. Other extract constituents may also contribute, and the present study did not determine the relative contribution of individual compounds.

The elicitation-induced changes in phenolic composition were accompanied by improved antimicrobial activity of the hairy-root extracts. AgNO3 and 1.5 mL B. velezensis BPVs2 cell-free supernatant produced the strongest antibacterial activity against B. spizizenii and antifungal activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, whereas activity against Fusarium and Aspergillus was weaker or absent; culture supernatants themselves showed no antibacterial effect. Overall, controlled elicitation enhanced the production of bioactive phenolics and functional activity in S. officinalis hairy roots, although further optimisation of cultivation, elicitor dose, exposure time, extraction, and analytical procedures is required.

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out with the support of ADER 16.1.2. project “Research on the development of a food quality scheme along the food chain according to the One Health concept”.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

ANOVA Analysis of variance
ATCC American Type Culture Collection
CFBS Cell-free bacterial supernatant
GAE Gallic acid equivalents
HPLC High-performance liquid chromatography
LB Luria–Bertani medium
LC-HRMS Liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry
LED Light-emitting diode
LoQ Limit of quantification
MICs Minimum inhibitory concentrations
MRSA Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
MS Murashige and Skoog medium
ND Not detected
NCAIM Microorganism collection code, not expanded in the manuscript
PAL Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase
PCR Polymerase chain reaction
PDA Potato Dextrose Agar
ROS Reactive oxygen species
SA Salicylic acid

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.B., O.-A.B.-S. and C.P.C.; methodology, O.-A.B.-S., O.L., A.P. and C.P.C.; validation, O.-A.B.-S., A.P. and C.P.C.; formal analysis, A.P. and C.P.C.; investigation, R.B., O.L., O.-A.B.-S. and A.P.; resources, O.L., O.-A.B.-S. and A.P.; data curation, R.B. and C.P.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P. and O.-A.B.-S.; writing—review and editing, A.P., O.-A.B.-S. and C.P.C.; visualization, O.-A.B.-S.; supervision, C.P.C.; project administration, C.P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Ghorbani A., Esmaeilizadeh M. Pharmacological properties of Salvia officinalis and its components. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017;7:433–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Assaggaf H., Mrabti H.N., Rajab B.S., Attar A., Alyamani R.A., Hamed M., El Omari N., El Menyiy N., Hazzoumi Z., Benali T., et al. Chemical analysis and investigation of biological effects of Salvia officinalis essential oils at three phenological stages. Molecules. 2022;27:5157. doi: 10.3390/molecules27165157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Afonso A.F., Pereira O.R., Fernandes Â., Calhelha R.C., Silva A.M.S., Ferreira I.C.F.R., Cardoso S.M. Phytochemical composition and bioactive effects of Salvia africana, Salvia officinalis ‘Icterina’ and Salvia mexicana aqueous extracts. Molecules. 2019;24:4327. doi: 10.3390/molecules24234327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guan H., Luo W., Bao B., Cao Y., Cheng F., Yu S., Shan M. A comprehensive review of rosmarinic acid: From phytochemistry to pharmacology and its new insight. Molecules. 2022;27:3292. doi: 10.3390/molecules27103292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shriti S., Prasad A., Sudheer W.N., Nagella P. Hairy roots as a potential source for the production of rosmarinic acid from genus Salvia. Plant Sci. Today. 2023;10:260–268. doi: 10.14719/pst.2541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alcalde M.A., Perez-Matas E., Escrich A., Cusido R.M., Palazon J., Bonfill M. Biotic elicitors in adventitious and hairy root cultures: A review from 2010 to 2022. Molecules. 2022;27:5253. doi: 10.3390/molecules27165253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liang Z., Ma Y., Xu T., Cui B., Liu Y., Guo Z.-X., Yang D. Effects of abscisic acid, gibberellin, ethylene and their interactions on production of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge hairy roots. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grzegorczyk-Karolak I., Krzemińska M., Grąbkowska R., Gomulski J., Żekanowski C., Gaweda-Walerych K. Accumulation of polyphenols and associated gene expression in hairy roots of Salvia viridis exposed to methyl jasmonate. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:764. doi: 10.3390/ijms25020764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pesaraklu A., Radjabian T., Salami S.A. Methyl jasmonate and Ag+ as effective elicitors for enhancement of phenolic acids contents in Salvia officinalis and Salvia verticillata, as two traditional medicinal plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021;141:105–115. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2021.04.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ejtahed R.S., Radjabian T., Hoseini Tafreshi S.A. Expression Analysis of Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase Gene and Rosmarinic Acid Production in Salvia officinalis and Salvia virgata Shoots Under Salicylic Acid Elicitation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015;176:1846–1858. doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1682-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang S., Zhang L., Zou H., Qiu L., Zheng Y., Yang D., Wang Y. Effects of Light on Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis in Medicinal Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:781236. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.781236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bantis F., Radoglou K. Testing the potential of LEDs to enhance growth and quality characteristics of Salvia fruticosa. Hortic. Sci. 2019;46:98–106. doi: 10.17221/206/2017-HORTSCI. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ming Q., Su C., Zheng C., Jia M., Zhang Q., Zhang H., Rahman K., Han T., Qin L. Elicitors from the endophytic fungus Trichoderma atroviride promote Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root growth and tanshinone biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;64:5687–5700. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu J.-Y., Ng J., Shi M., Wu S.-J. Enhanced secondary metabolite (tanshinone) production of Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots in a novel root–bacteria coculture process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;77:543–550. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1192-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao J.L., Zhou L.G., Wu J.Y. Effects of biotic and abiotic elicitors on cell growth and tanshinone accumulation in Salvia miltiorrhiza cell cultures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;87:137–144. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2443-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rahmanifar B., Boiu-Sicuia O.A., Livadariu O., Ionescu N., Cornea C.P. Optimization of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated hairy root induction in Salvia officinalis. Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2025;29:25–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Livadariu O., Raiciu D., Maximilian C., Căpitanu E. Studies regarding treatments of LED-s emitted light on sprouting hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2019;24:485–490. doi: 10.25083/rbl/24.3/485.490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ge X., Wu J. Tanshinone production and isoprenoid pathways in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots induced by Ag+ and yeast elicitor. Plant Sci. 2005;168:487–491. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.09.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boiu-Sicuia O.A., Toma R.C., Diguță F.C., Matei F., Cornea C.P. In vitro evaluation of some endophytic Bacillus to potentially inhibit grapes and grapevine fungal pathogens. Plants. 2023;12:2553. doi: 10.3390/plants12132553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rusu I.C., Pascariu O.E., Popa A., Diguță C.F., Apostol L., Nicolcioiu M.B., Zăgrean A.V., Israel-Roming F. The influence of substrate composition on nutritional content and biological activity of some Pleurotus mushrooms extracts. Agriculture. 2025;15:791. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15070791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Arlet A.C.I., Balanuca B., Tociu M., Ott C., Constantin L., Popa A., Israel-Roming F. Influence of membrane separation technique upon the phenolic content of red corn bran extract. Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2024;XXVIII:101–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Manka K., Manka M. A new method for evaluating interaction between soil inhabiting fungi and plant pathogens. New approaches in biological control of soil-borne diseases. Bul. OILB/SORP. 1992;XV:73–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ouzounis T., Rosenqvist E., Ottosen C.O. Spectral effects of artificial light on plant physiology and secondary metabolism: A review. HortScience. 2015;50:1128–1135. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.8.1128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mansinhos I., Gonçalves S., Romano A. How climate change-related abiotic factors affect the production of industrial valuable compounds in Lamiaceae plant species: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2024;15:1370810. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1370810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Park W.T., Yeo S.K., Sathasivam R., Park J.S., Kim J.K., Park S.U. Influence of light-emitting diodes on phenylpropanoid biosynthetic gene expression and phenylpropanoid accumulation in Agastache rugosa. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2020;63:25. doi: 10.1186/s13765-020-00510-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krzemińska M., Owczarek A., Gonciarz W., Chmiela M., Olszewska M.A., Grzegorczyk-Karolak I. The antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial potential of phenolic acids-enriched extract of elicited hairy roots of Salvia bulleyana. Molecules. 2022;27:992. doi: 10.3390/molecules27030992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Biswas D., Tarun H., Biswajit G. Enhancing secondary metabolite biosynthesis from ethnomedicinal plant Solanum nigrum L. through cytogenetically stable mass propagation, transgenic hairy root induction, and using different LED light and culture vessels for hairy root culture. J. Biotechnol. 2025;404:63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2025.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li L. Master’s Thesis. Sichuan Agricultural University; Ya’an, China: 2014. The Influence of Elicitor on the Accumulation of Several Metabolites in the Seedling Salvia przewalskii Maxim. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bajaj T., Hina A., Ahmad A., Nimisha P. Synthesis of plant secondary metabolites under the influence of elicitors, application in stress management and in vitro techniques to enhance their production. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2025;140:102905. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2025.102905. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rastegarnejad F., Mirjalili M.H., Bakhtiar Z. Enhanced production of tanshinone and phenolic compounds in hairy roots culture of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge by elicitation. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2024;156:4. doi: 10.1007/s11240-023-02632-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Malarz J., Yudina Y.V., Stojakowska A. Hairy root cultures as a source of phenolic antioxidants: Simple phenolics, phenolic acids, phenylethanoids, and hydroxycinnamates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:6920. doi: 10.3390/ijms24086920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Contreras A., Leroy B., Mariage P.A., Wattiez R. Proteomic analysis reveals novel insights into tanshinones biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42164-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bakhtiar Z., Arani S.H., Esmaeili H., Tohidfar M., Mirjalili M.H. Synergistic precursor–elicitor strategy maximizes gene expression and metabolite biosynthesis in Glycyrrhiza glabra L. hairy roots. Ind. Crops Prod. 2026;242:122856. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2026.122856. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Elbouzidi A., Taibi M., Haddou M., Baraich A., Sadougui I., Bellaouchi R., Asehraou A., Chaabane K., El Guerrouj B., Addi M. Hairy roots as a biotechnological tool for medicinal plant secondary metabolites: A systematic review. J. Biotechnol. 2026;409:117–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2025.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen H., Jialing C., Yao Q., Siyuan C., Yao M., Linna X., Shiyi L., Zhang H., Yang D., Zhu Y., et al. Endophytic fungus Cladosporium tenuissimum DF11, an efficient inducer of tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza roots. Phytochemistry. 2022;194:113021. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.113021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu Z., Wang Q., Yang S., Zheng S., Liang Z., Chen H. Sarocladium kiliense DF2 enhances tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza roots via salicylic acid signaling. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025;238:122372. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.122372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu W., Jin X., Yang M., Xue S., Luo L., Cao X., Zhang C., Qiao S., Zhang C., Li J., et al. Primary and secondary metabolites produced in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots by an endophytic fungal elicitor from Mucor fragilis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021;160:404–412. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ramakrishnan R., Nagella P. Salvia officinalis L. resilience under chromium stress: An integrated study of growth, physiology, biochemical changes and rosmarinic acid production. Plant Sci. Today. 2024;11:268–279. doi: 10.14719/pst.3258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kompoura V., Karapantzou I., Mitropoulou G., Parisis N.A., Gkalpinos V.K., Anagnostou V.A., Tsiailanis A.D., Vasdekis E.P., Koutsaliaris I.K., Tsouka A.N., et al. Exploiting the beneficial effects of Salvia officinalis L. extracts in human health and assessing their activity as potent functional regulators of food microbiota. Food Chem. 2024;441:138175. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.138175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Luca S.V., Skalicka-Woźniak K., Mihai C.-T., Gradinaru A.C., Mandici A., Ciocarlan N., Miron A., Aprotosoaie A.C. Chemical Profile and Bioactivity Evaluation of Salvia Species from Eastern Europe. Antioxidants. 2023;12:1514. doi: 10.3390/antiox12081514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rus C.F., Pop G., Alexa E., Șumălan R.M., Copolovici D.M. Antifungal activity and chemical composition of Salvia officinalis L. essential oil. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2015;47:186–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Piątczak E., Kolniak-Ostek J., Gonciarz W., Lisiecki P., Kalinowska-Lis U., Szemraj M., Chmiela M., Zielińska S. The effect of Salvia tomentosa Miller extracts, rich in rosmarinic, salvianolic and lithospermic acids, on bacteria causing opportunistic infections. Molecules. 2024;29:590. doi: 10.3390/molecules29030590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nourozi E., Hedayati A., Mirjalili M.H., Madani H., Aliahmadi A., Zahedi A.A., Aslani Z. First Report on Salvia Sahendica Boiss & Buhs roots biocomponents characterization by GC-MS and HPLC and Antibacterial Potency. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:24916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76679-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Anagnostou M., Tomou E.M., Krigas N., Skaltsa H. Phenolic constituents of Greek native Salvia species: A comprehensive review. Phytochem. Rev. 2025;24:3443–3522. doi: 10.1007/s11101-024-10062-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bălășoiu R.M., Biță A., Stănciulescu E.C., Bălășoiu M., Bejenaru C., Bejenaru L.E., Pisoschi C.G. In vitro antimicrobial activity of some extracts of Salvia spp. harvested from the Oltenia flora using different solvents. Curr. Health Sci. J. 2023;49:397. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.49.03.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kerkoub N., Panda S.K., Yang M.R., Lu J.G., Jiang Z.H., Nasri H., Luyten W. Bioassay-guided isolation of anti-Candida biofilm compounds from methanol extracts of the aerial parts of Salvia officinalis (Annaba, Algeria) Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:1418. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Saleh R.H., Al-Taei A.H.O., Al-Mousawi H.G. Studying the Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Effect of Salvia officinalis L. Med. J. Babylon. 2025;22:830–836. doi: 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_1330_23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aamer H.A., Al-Askar A.A., Gaber M.A., El-Tanbouly R., Abdelkhalek A., Behiry S., Elsharkawy M.M., Kowalczewski P.L., El-Messeiry S. Extraction, phytochemical characterization, and antifungal activity of Salvia rosmarinus extract. Open Chem. 2023;21:20230124. doi: 10.1515/chem-2023-0124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yazıcı-Tütüniş S., Alim Toraman G.Ö., Dincel E.D., Tufan S., Akalın E., Tan E., Ulusoy Güzeldemirci N., Gören A.C., Miski M., Topçu G., et al. In silico and in vitro antibacterial evaluation of eight Anatolian Salvia species with chemical profiling by LC-HRMS. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:31404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15803-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang J., Xu J., Gong X., Yang M., Zhang C., Li M. Biosynthesis, chemistry, and pharmacology of polyphenols from Chinese Salvia species: A review. Molecules. 2019;24:155. doi: 10.3390/molecules24010155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Motyka S., Kusznierewicz B., Ekiert H., Korona-Głowniak I., Szopa A. Comparative analysis of metabolic variations, antioxidant profiles and antimicrobial activity of Salvia hispanica (chia) seed, sprout, leaf, flower, root and herb extracts. Molecules. 2023;28:2728. doi: 10.3390/molecules28062728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Biology are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES