Abstract
Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) offer promising strategies for combating drug-resistant bacteria such as Escherichia coli (E. coli). This study evaluated the synergistic effects of the human-derived AMP LL37 and its fragments FK16 and FK13, in combination with polymyxin B, colistin, and vancomycin, against three E. coli strains in vitro. Methods: Because the outer membrane of E. coli acts as a barrier to antimicrobial agents, we assessed the membrane-permeabilizing activity of these AMPs. We further examined electrostatic interactions between the cationic AMPs and bacterial surfaces via zeta potential measurements. To simulate physiological conditions, we investigated how Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions, common in blood, stabilize the bacterial outer membrane and influence AMP activity. Additionally, we assessed cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization as a key mechanism of antibacterial action. Finally, to support clinical translation, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of the AMPs on human dermal fibroblasts. Results: Checkerboard assays revealed that the peptide–antibiotic combinations exerted synergistic effects against the tested E. coli strains in both MHB medium and cation-adjusted MHB medium, with FICI values ranging from 0.3125 to 0.5 and <0.375 to 0.5, respectively. All three AMPs (LL37, FK16, and FK13) exhibited strong outer membrane-permeabilizing activity. Zeta potential measurements revealed a correlation between membrane disruption and surface charge neutralization. The presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions was found to stabilize the bacterial outer membrane. Cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization was confirmed as a key antibacterial mechanism. Cytotoxicity assays confirmed the safety profile of these AMPs on human cells. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that LL37 and its fragments enhance the activity of conventional antibiotics against E. coli through membrane disruption and charge neutralization, as evidenced by the FICI values (0.3125–0.5), membrane disruption and charge neutralization. While divalent cations in physiological conditions influence AMP efficacy, these peptides show potential for clinical application against E.coli.
Keywords: antimicrobial peptide, cathelicidin LL37, LL37 fragments, combination strategy, zeta potential, outer membrane permeabilization, cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization
1. Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a major global public health crisis, driven in part by the misuse and overuse of antibiotics. AMR is currently responsible for approximately 700,000 deaths annually, a number projected to rise to 10 million by 2050 [1]. In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a list of 12 bacterial families urgently requiring new antibacterial strategies or antibiotics [2]. Among them, Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most prevalent Gram-negative pathogen in both community and hospital settings, causing the highest absolute number of infections globally (including urinary tract infections, sepsis, and [3,4,5,6]), representing a primary healthcare problem [2,7]. Beyond its clinical significance, E. coli also serves as a well-characterized model organism for studying Gram-negative bacterial resistance and outer membrane permeability, offering a standardized and reproducible platform for initial efficacy testing of novel antimicrobial strategies.
As a Gram-negative bacterium, E. coli possesses an outer membrane that serves as a critical barrier, preventing many antibiotics from reaching intracellular targets. This membrane’s impermeability is reinforced by negatively charged lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules, which interact with divalent cations such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ to form stabilizing salt bridges, further reducing permeability [8]. Enhancing outer membrane permeability has been shown to improve antibiotic access and efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria [9].
Clinically, combination therapies are commonly employed to treat drug-resistant Gram-negative infections. For example, Zerbaxa (ceftolozane–tazobactam) and Zavicefta (ceftazidime–avibactam) are used to enhance antibacterial efficacy through synergistic mechanisms. However, these combinations may accelerate the emergence of resistance [10]. Notably, in 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a multi-state outbreak of Verona Integron-mediated Metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) Guiana-Extended Spectrum-β-Lactamase (GES)-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (VIM-GES-CRPA), a strain resistant to both Zerbaxa and Zavicefta [11].
In this study, we explored the potential of combining conventional antibiotics with the human-derived antimicrobial peptide (AMP) LL37 and its structured fragments FK16 and FK13. LL37 is a 37-amino-acid cationic peptide that plays a key role in innate immunity [12], largely due to its amphipathic α-helical structure. However, this α-helicity is limited (approximately 70–80%) by a disordered N-terminal region [13], and LL37’s clinical use is further constrained by manufacturing costs and potential cytotoxicity [14]. To address these issues, truncated derivatives FK16 and FK13, which lack the disordered region, were developed. Compared to the full-length peptide, these shorter fragments retain potent antibacterial activity while offering several practical advantages, including reduced synthesis cost, broader-spectrum efficacy, and significantly lower cytotoxicity against mammalian cells [15,16,17]. The reduced toxicity is attributed to the removal of N-terminal hydrophobic residues, which have been associated with hemolytic and cytotoxic effects in the parent peptide [18].
We tested three antibiotics—vancomycin, colistin (polymyxin E), and polymyxin B—in combination with LL37, FK16, and FK13 against three clinical E. coli strains. Vancomycin inhibits cell wall synthesis by targeting lipid II but is generally ineffective against E. coli due to limited outer membrane penetration [19,20]. Vancomycin was selected as a model permeation probe to assess whether the combination strategy could facilitate the entry of otherwise impermeable antibiotics into E. coli. Previous work from our lab showed that LL37 enhances vancomycin efficacy against P. aeruginosa PAO1 by increasing membrane permeability [9,21]. We hypothesized that LL37 and its fragments could similarly sensitize E. coli to vancomycin.
Colistin and polymyxin B, both last-resort antibiotics for Gram-negative infections, act by disrupting the outer membrane [22]. However, resistance to these agents is rising, as seen in VIM-GES-CRPA strains [11], and their clinical use is further limited by dose-dependent nephrotoxicity. To preserve their efficacy and potentially reduce the required dosage, we evaluated whether combining polymyxins with AMPs could yield synergistic effects.
This study assessed the antibacterial activity of AMP-antibiotic combinations under both cation-adjusted and non-adjusted conditions, to examine how Mg2+ and Ca2+ modulate outer membrane stability. We also evaluated the role of exogenous LPS, AMP interactions with bacterial surfaces, and the relationship between charge neutralization and membrane permeabilization. Further, we analyzed cytoplasmic membrane disruption, vancomycin sensitization, and AMP-induced changes in permeability. Finally, to support clinical relevance, we assessed AMP cytotoxicity on human dermal fibroblasts.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Three E. coli strains were studied in this research: Three clinically isolated uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) strains (B37, B73, and B78), all derived from female patients with cystitis, were obtained from Dr. James Johnson (VA Medical Centers, Minneapolis, MN, USA) [23]. These well-characterized clinical isolates serve as representative models for evaluating antibacterial activity against pathogenic E.coli strains [24]. Bacteria were cultured in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) (Hardy Diagnostics CRITERION™, Santa Maria, CA, USA). Human dermal fibroblasts (ATCC CRL-2565) were cultured in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA)) with supplement of 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA). Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS, 10×) was also purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Grand Island, NY, USA) RealTime-Glo™ MT Cell Viability Assay kit was purchased from Promega™ Corporation (Madison, WI, USA). LL37 (LLGDFFRKSKEKIGKEFKRIVQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES), FK16 (FKRIVQRIKDFLRNLV), and FK13 (FKRIVQRIKDFLR) (Figure 1) were purchased from Anaspec, Inc. (Fremont, CA, USA). Vancomycin, colistin, and polymyxin B, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli O55:B5, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer solution (1 M in H2O), 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN), and propidium iodide (PI) were also procured from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Figure 1.

Sequence and charge distributions of LL37, FK16, and FK13. The red and blue letters represent the amino acid residues that carry positive and negative charges, respectively.
2.2. Broth Microdilution Assay
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of LL37, FK16, FK13, and antibiotics were determined following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [25]. AMPs and antibiotics were dissolved in sterile deionized water and stored at −80 °C until use.
For MIC testing, two-fold serial dilutions of antimicrobials were prepared in a 96-well polypropylene microtiter plate. E. coli colonies from Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) plates were incubated overnight in MHB or cation-adjusted MHB (CMHB; 12.5 mg/L Mg2+, 25 mg/L Ca2+) at 37 °C in a Tissue Culture Roller Drum TC-7 (40 rpm) until log-phase growth. Bacterial suspensions were adjusted to a McFarland standard of 0.5 (~1.5 × 108 CFU/mL), then diluted to a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. A 90 μL aliquot of the suspension was added to each well of a 96-well plate, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 20 h without shaking. MICs were recorded as the lowest antimicrobial concentrations inhibiting visible bacterial growth.
To assess the protective effects of LPS, LPS was dissolved in DI water to 1 mg/mL. In a 96-well plate, 10 μL of two-fold serial antimicrobial dilutions and 10 μL of LPS (1 mg/mL) were combined, followed by the addition of 80 μL of E. coli suspensions to reach a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. MICs in the presence of LPS were determined as described above. All experiments were performed with three independent biological replicates, each comprising three technical replicates.
2.3. Checkerboard Assay
The checkerboard assay was used to determine synergistic AMP-antibiotic combinations [9]. To reach a 1:1 mix of AMP and antibiotic, 10 μL of different concentrations of AMPs and antibiotics were prepared in a 96-well plate. 80 μL of E. coli suspensions were added to a 96-well plate to reach a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. The 96-well plate was incubated for 20 h at 37 °C without shaking. The synergistic effects can be determined by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) [9]. The formula for calculating FICI is:
Synergy can be defined when FICI ≤ 0.5 [9]. The experiments were repeated three times independently.
2.4. Neutralization Process
Bacteria–antimicrobial interactions were assessed by measuring zeta potential changes in three E. coli strains upon antimicrobial addition. The net charges of LL37, FK16, FK13, polymyxin B, vancomycin, and ampicillin are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Net charges of different antimicrobials at neutral pH.
| Antimicrobials | Net Charge |
|---|---|
| LL37 | +6 |
| FK16 | +4 |
| FK13 | +4 |
| Polymyxin B | +5 |
| Vancomycin | +0.83 [26] |
| Ampicillin | 0 |
E. coli cultures were grown to log phase at 37 °C, centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min, washed three times with DI water, and diluted to 1 × 106 CFU/mL. Suspensions were loaded into disposable folded capillary cells, and zeta potential was measured using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS ZEN 3600 (Malvern Instruments, Inc., Malvern, UK)). Changes in zeta potential with increasing antimicrobial concentrations were recorded. Measurements were performed in triplicate.
To evaluate electrostatic interactions between lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), changes in zeta potential were measured following AMP treatment. LPS from E. coli O55:B5 was dissolved in deionized (DI) water to a final concentration of 100 μg/mL and used immediately without sonication. Zeta potential measurements were performed using the same protocol described previously, and shifts in surface charge were recorded at increasing concentrations of LL37, FK16, and FK13. All measurements were conducted in triplicate.
To assess the role of divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+) in modulating electrostatic interactions with E. coli and LPS, bacterial cultures were prepared by growing the three E. coli strains in CMHB overnight at 37 °C until logarithmic phase. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in cation-adjusted DI water (final concentrations: 12.5 mg/L Mg2+ and 25 mg/L Ca2+) to 1 × 106 CFU/mL. LPS was also dissolved in the same cation-adjusted DI water at 100 μg/mL. Zeta potential measurements were performed for each strain and for LPS in the presence of divalent cations. Each condition was measured independently in triplicate.
2.5. Outer Membrane Permeability Test
Outer membrane permeability changes in three E. coli strains were assessed by measuring the uptake of the fluorescent probe NPN, using a previously published method [27]. NPN was dissolved in acetone to reach a final concentration of 2 mg/mL.
E. coli strains were cultured in MHB at 37 °C to logarithmic phase and diluted to an optical density of OD600 = 0.2. Two milliliters of each bacterial suspension were incubated with LL37, FK16, FK13, polymyxin B, vancomycin, or ampicillin at a final concentration of 25.6 μg/mL for 1 h at 37 °C. Following treatment, cells were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min and washed twice with GHEPES buffer (pH 7.25; 5 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose).
NPN (40 μL of the 2 mg/mL stock solution) was added to the washed E. coli suspensions, which were then incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Fluorescence was measured using an F-4500 Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan) under the following settings: excitation at 350 nm, emission at 420 nm, and a PMT voltage of 700 V.
The increased outer membrane permeability can be calculated as the percentage of NPN uptake:
| NPN uptake (%) = (FAntimicrobial − FC)/(FC) × 100% |
FAntimicrobial is the fluorescence of E. coli strains with the addition of antimicrobials; FC is the fluorescence of E. coli strains with the addition of DI water and serves as the control group. The experiments were repeated three times independently.
To evaluate the protective and stabilizing effects of Mg2+ and Ca2+ on the E. coli outer membrane, bacterial strains were cultured overnight in CMHB at 37 °C and diluted to an OD600 of 0.2. Antimicrobials were added to the suspensions at the same final concentration as described above (25.6 μg/mL) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Following treatment, the bacterial suspensions were centrifuged and washed with GHEPES buffer as previously described. NPN fluorescence was then measured to assess outer membrane permeability in the presence of divalent cations.
2.6. Sensitization Assay
The ability of AMPs to sensitize E. coli to vancomycin was evaluated by measuring changes in vancomycin MIC following AMP pretreatment. E. coli strains were cultured in MHB at 37 °C to logarithmic phase, then diluted to 1 × 106 CFU/mL. Bacteria were incubated with LL37, FK16, or FK13 at half their respective MICs for 1 h.
Following pretreatment, two-fold serial dilutions of vancomycin were prepared in a 96-well polypropylene plate. Control groups received no AMP pretreatment. Treated bacterial suspensions were diluted and 90 μL was added to each well, yielding a final inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/mL.
Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h without shaking. Vancomycin MICs were then determined by visual inspection as the lowest concentration with no visible bacterial growth.
2.7. Cytoplasmic Membrane Permeability Test
To investigate the cytoplasmic membrane-disrupting properties of LL37 and its fragments, membrane permeabilization was assessed using propidium iodide (PI), following a previously published protocol [27]. PI was dissolved in DI water at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.
E. coli strains were cultured in MHB at 37 °C to logarithmic phase, diluted to OD600 = 0.2, and treated with LL37, FK16, FK13, or vancomycin (25.6 μg/mL) for 1 h at 37 °C. A negative control group was incubated in DI water without antimicrobials.
After treatment, cells were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min and washed twice with GHEPES buffer (pH 7.25). The bacterial pellets were then resuspended and stained with 20 μL of PI solution (1 mg/mL), followed by incubation in the dark at room temperature for 30 min.
Fluorescence was measured using an F-4500 Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan) with the following settings: excitation wavelength 535 nm, emission wavelength 620 nm, and PMT voltage 700 V. All measurements were performed in triplicate.
2.8. Cytotoxicity Assay
Cytotoxicity of LL37, FK16, and FK13 was evaluated using human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Cells were cultured in flasks at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 until approximately 70% confluence, as confirmed by optical microscopy.
The cytotoxicity of the peptides was evaluated across a concentration range of 0.25–256 μg/mL. AMP solutions were prepared at various concentrations, and 5 μL of each was added to wells of a 96-well tissue culture plate. HDFs were seeded into the plate at a density of 3000 cells/well in 45 μL of Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM). Cells treated with deionized (DI) water served as the negative control.
Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Following incubation, 50 μL of 2× RealTime-Glo™ reagent was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for an additional 30 min. Luminescence was measured using a PerkinElmer Victor3 multilabel plate reader. Cell viability was quantified by comparing luminescence signals from AMP-treated wells to those from the control group.
3. Results
3.1. Anti-E. coli Effect of AMPs and Antibiotics
As expected, polymyxin B and colistin showed lower MICs when compared to other antimicrobials for the three E. coli strains in this study (Table 2). Vancomycin targets lipid II, a precursor peptide located within the cell, which is vital for cell wall synthesis. However, the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria acts as a barrier that hinders access of vancomycin to this target [9]. Vancomycin exhibited the highest MICs to three E. coli strains, indicating poor antibacterial effects (Table 2).
Table 2.
MICs of AMPs and different antibiotics against E. coli strains in MHB medium.
| Antimicrobials | MIC (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli B78 | E. coli B37 | E. coli B73 | |
| LL37 | 16 | 32 | 16 |
| FK16 | 8 | 4 | 2 |
| FK13 | 32 | 16 | 16 |
| Vancomycin | 64 | 64 | 64 |
| Polymyxin B | 0.125 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 |
| Colistin | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 |
LL37, FK16, and FK13 exhibited antibacterial effects against the three E. coli strains, with FK16 demonstrating the best antibacterial efficacy among the three AMPs (Table 2). The structural differences among the three AMPs may contribute to their different antibacterial effects. FK16 is more structured than LL37, which may account for the increased efficacy, as α-helical secondary structure is crucial for AMPs to show antibacterial effects [13]. FK16 also contains N30, L31, and V32 residues, which play important roles in determining the antibacterial efficacy of LL37, thus resulting in better antibacterial effects for FK16 compared to FK13 [15]. Our results correspond to previous research indicating that the antibacterial efficacy of FK13 is decreased due to the absence of N30, L31, and V32 residues [15].
The antibacterial efficacy of these antimicrobials was also assessed in CMHB medium containing Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions (Table 3). The concentrations of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions mimic those found in human blood. Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions can protect and stabilize the outer membrane through the creation of salt bridges with negatively charged LPS. Cationic antimicrobials need to compete with and displace Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions that are bound to LPS in order to penetrate the outer membrane and achieve antibacterial efficacy [28].
Table 3.
MICs of AMPs and different antibiotics against E. coli strains in CMHB medium.
| Antimicrobials | MIC (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli B78 | E. coli B37 | E. coli B73 | |
| LL37 | 64 | >256 | 64 |
| FK16 | 32 | 64 | 16 |
| FK13 | 128 | 64 | 64 |
| Vancomycin | 128 | 128 | 128 |
| Polymyxin B | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
| Colistin | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.0625 |
The MICs of all antimicrobials increased against the three E. coli strains, except for colistin, which remained unchanged against strain B73, indicating the protective effects of Mg2+ and Ca2+. The MICs for polymyxin B and colistin generally increased, suggesting outer membrane stabilization by these cations; however, polymyxins maintained low MICs, demonstrating their ability to penetrate the membrane effectively. Vancomycin MICs doubled across all strains, indicating that Mg2+ and Ca2+ may reduce outer membrane permeability.
The presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions showed a significant influence on the antibacterial effects of AMPs. A 4-fold to 16-fold increase in MIC was observed in the presence of the cations. The low salt tolerance of LL37 and its analogs may constrain their clinical potential [13]. FK16 displayed the lowest MICs among the three AMPs (except for B37, where FK16 exhibited the same MIC as FK13), thereby indicating the better antibacterial potential of FK16.
LPS is an important component of the outer membrane and influences the outer membrane permeability, thereby hindering the penetration of antimicrobials [29]. To investigate the impact of LPS on the antibacterial effects of AMPs, we assessed the MICs of AMPs against three E. coli strains in the presence of exogenous LPS (100 μg/mL) (Table 4). The concentration of 100 μg/mL exogenous LPS was chosen as a saturation condition to evaluate the maximal inhibitory effect of LPS on AMP activity, rather than to reflect physiological LPS levels at infection sites. The MICs of all three AMPs increased several-fold. The exogenous LPS significantly hindered the antibacterial effects of LL37 and FK13, resulting in increased MICs of >256 μg/mL and 128 μg/mL, respectively. The MICs of FK16 also exhibited 4-fold to 8-fold increases; however, FK16 maintained the lowest MICs compared to the other two AMPs. The increased MICs of AMPs in the presence of exogenous LPS suggest that AMPs not only bind to the LPS at membrane surfaces but also bind to exogenous LPS in solution.
Table 4.
MICs of AMPs and different antibiotics against E. coli strains in MHB medium with addition of 100 μg/mL LPS.
| Antimicrobials | MIC (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli B78 | E. coli B37 | E. coli B73 | |
| LL37 | >256 | >256 | >256 |
| FK16 | 64 | 16 | 16 |
| FK13 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
3.2. AMP-Antibiotic Combination Effects
LL37, FK16, and FK13 were combined with vancomycin, polymyxin B, and colistin to evaluate potential synergistic effects against three E. coli strains in MHB medium (Table 5). Synergy was more frequently observed when AMPs were paired with membrane-targeting antibiotics (polymyxin B and colistin) than with vancomycin, which targets lipid II. While AMPs are often combined with intracellular-targeting antibiotics to enhance uptake, our findings suggest that pairing two membrane-active agents may also yield promising synergies, warranting further investigation of such combinations. The MIC values of each antimicrobial alone and in combination, along with the corresponding FICI values, are provided in Table S1.
Table 5.
Combined activity of AMPs with antibiotics against E. coli strains in MHB medium.
| Strain | FICI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobials | Vancomycin | Polymyxin B | Colistin | |
| E. coli B78 | LL37 | >0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| FK16 | >0.5 | 0.5 | >0.5 | |
| FK13 | 0.5 | 0.5 | >0.5 | |
| E. coli B37 | LL37 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| FK16 | >0.5 | >0.5 | >0.5 | |
| FK13 | >0.5 | >0.5 | >0.5 | |
| E. coli B73 | LL37 | >0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| FK16 | >0.5 | >0.5 | 0.5 | |
| FK13 | 0.3125 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
AMP-antibiotic combinations were also tested in CMHB medium to assess the influence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions (Table 6). Despite the protective effects of these cations, AMP-polymyxin B combinations continued to show synergy against all three E. coli strains. AMP-colistin combinations were synergistic against B78 and B37 but not B73. In contrast, AMP-vancomycin combinations exhibited synergy only in two cases against B37 and showed no synergy against the other strains. These results suggest that, even in the presence of divalent cations that stabilize the outer membrane, combinations with polymyxin B and colistin retain greater synergistic potential than those with vancomycin. The MIC values of each antimicrobial alone and in combination, along with the corresponding FICI values, are provided in Table S2.
Table 6.
Combined activity of AMPs with antibiotics against E. coli strains in CMHB medium.
| Strain | FICI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobials | Vancomycin | Polymyxin B | Colistin | |
| E. coli B78 | LL37 | >0.5 | 0.375 | 0.375 |
| FK16 | >0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| FK13 | >0.5 | 0.375 | 0.375 | |
| E. coli B37 | LL37 | <0.375 | <0.5 | <0.5 |
| FK16 | 0.5 | 0.375 | 0.5 | |
| FK13 | >0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| E. coli B73 | LL37 | >0.5 | 0.5 | >0.5 |
| FK16 | >0.5 | 0.375 | >0.5 | |
| FK13 | >0.5 | 0.5 | >0.5 | |
3.3. Neutralization Process
The zeta potentials of E. coli strains B78, B37, and B73 were −39.5 mV, −40.2 mV, and −35.4 mV, respectively (Figure 2). As expected, the concentration of each AMP required to neutralize surface charge correlated with its net positive charge (Table 1). LL37, with the highest net charge (+6), required the lowest concentration for neutralization. Polymyxin B (+5) required slightly higher concentrations, while FK16 and FK13 (both +4) showed similar neutralization profiles across all strains.
Figure 2.


Changes in zeta potential of (a) E. coli B78, (b) E. coli B37, (c) E. coli B73 with addition of LL37, FK16, FK13, and polymyxin B. The error bars indicate the standard deviations after three independent experiments.
To further examine the relationship between antimicrobial charge and neutralization capacity, we measured zeta potential shifts following the addition of vancomycin and ampicillin (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Vancomycin, with a lower net charge (+0.83), required higher concentrations to neutralize E. coli compared to cationic AMPs and polymyxin B. B73 required less vancomycin for neutralization than B37 and B78, likely due to its less negative baseline zeta potential. In contrast, ampicillin (net charge = 0) failed to neutralize the negative surface charges of any strain. Vancomycin, despite its lack of antibacterial activity against E. coli, exhibited a greater capacity to neutralize the bacterial surface charge compared to ampicillin, which is likely attributable to its positive net charge (+0.83 mV) versus the neutral charge of ampicillin. This electrostatic effect does not correlate with antibacterial efficacy. These findings reinforce that charge neutralization is governed primarily by the net positive charge of the antimicrobial and the initial surface charge of the bacterial strain.
Figure 3.

Changes in zeta potential of E. coli B78, E. coli B37, E. coli B73 with addition of vancomycin. The error bars indicate the standard deviations after three independent experiments. The net charge for vancomycin is +0.83 mV [26].
Figure 4.

Changes in zeta potential of E. coli B78, E. coli B37, and E. coli B73 with addition of ampicillin. The error bars indicate the standard deviations after three independent experiments. The net charge for ampicillin is 0 mV.
The presence of exogenous LPS reduced the antibacterial activity of all three AMPs (Table 4). We hypothesized that this was due to electrostatic binding of the cationic peptides not only to the bacterial surface but also to free LPS in solution, effectively sequestering the AMPs. To test this, we repeated the zeta potential measurements using LPS solutions (100 μg/mL) with increasing concentrations of LL37, FK16, and FK13 (Figure 5). All three peptides increased the zeta potential of the LPS solutions, confirming their ability to bind LPS. LL37 showed the strongest neutralizing effect, while FK16 and FK13 performed similarly, consistent with their matched net charges.
Figure 5.

Changes in zeta potential of LPS (100 μg/mL) with addition of AMPs. The error bars indicate the standard deviations after three independent experiments.
Although the initial zeta potential of the LPS solutions was less negative than that of whole bacteria, higher AMP concentrations were required for neutralization. Moreover, the differences in required concentrations between LL37 and its fragments were smaller in LPS solutions than in bacterial suspensions. These observations suggest that AMPs interact differently with free LPS than with LPS embedded in the outer membrane. One possible explanation is that AMP-induced aggregation of free LPS may limit access to all negatively charged binding sites, leading to only partial zeta potential changes [30]. Nevertheless, AMPs such as LL37 are known to dissociate LPS aggregates and neutralize endotoxins, highlighting their potential role in anti-sepsis applications [31,32].
3.4. Outer Membrane Permeabilizing Effects
Outer membrane permeabilization was assessed via uptake of the hydrophobic fluorescent probe NPN, which increases in fluorescence upon entering bacteria. Each cationic antimicrobial was shown to increase the outer membrane permeability of the three E. coli strains (Figure 6).
Figure 6.

Outer membrane permeabilizing properties of antimicrobials against (a) E. coli B78, (b) E. coli B37, (c) E. coli B73 in the absence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions. The error bars indicate the standard deviations after three independent experiments.
LL37 showed the strongest outer membrane permeabilizing activity, followed by polymyxin B, with FK16 and FK13 displaying similar but somewhat weaker effects. Vancomycin exhibited minimal permeabilization, and ampicillin had no detectable effect. These results suggest that outer membrane permeabilization generally correlates with the net positive charge of the antimicrobial agent.
To assess the stabilizing effects of Mg2+ and Ca2+, we compared outer membrane permeability in the presence and absence of these ions. At concentrations of 12.5 mg/L Mg2+ and 25 mg/L Ca2+, all three E. coli strains showed reduced membrane permeability (Figure 7a). Zeta potential measurements also increased for both the bacterial cells and LPS solutions (100 μg/mL) in the presence of these cations (Figure 7b), consistent with the formation of stabilizing salt bridges between divalent cations and LPS.
Figure 7.

(a) Outer membrane permeability of three E. coli strains in the presence or absence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions, * stands for p ≤ 0.05, ** stands for p ≤ 0.01, (b) binding performance of three E. coli strains and LPS (100 μg/mL) in the presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions. The error bars refer to the standard deviations after three independent experiments.
In the presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+, the outer membrane permeabilizing activity of cationic antimicrobials was reduced (Figure 8), likely contributing to the higher MICs observed in CMHB. LL37’s activity declined most noticeably, while polymyxin B remained the most effective. FK16 and FK13 showed similar, moderate activity, and vancomycin remained weakly permeabilizing. As expected, ampicillin had no effect.
Figure 8.

Outer membrane permeabilizing properties of antimicrobials against (a) E. coli B78, (b) E. coli B37, (c) E. coli B73 in the presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions. The error bars refer to the standard deviations after three independent experiments.
3.5. Sensitization of E. coli Strains to Vancomycin
All three AMPs lowered the MICs of vancomycin against the three E. coli strains (Figure 9). LL37 pretreatment decreased vancomycin MICs by 24- to 32-fold in B78 and B37 (Table 7), consistent with its strong outer membrane permeabilization. The results suggest that increased outer membrane permeability can suppress the intrinsic resistance of E. coli strains to vancomycin by enhancing the ability for vancomycin to reach its lipid II target.
Figure 9.

MICs of vancomycin against E. coli strains after peptide treatment. (a) E. coli B78, (b) E. coli B37, (c) E. coli B73. The control groups were operated under the same conditions except for the treatment with peptides. The error bars indicate the standard deviations after three independent experiments; data without error bars indicate that the SD is too small to be seen. ** stands for p ≤ 0.01, *** stands for p ≤ 0.001, **** stands for p ≤ 0.0001.
Table 7.
Sensitization of E. coli strains to vancomycin after treatment with LL37, FK16, and FK13.
| Strain | AMPs | Fold of Sensitization (MICControl/MICTreated) |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli B78 | LL37 | 24 |
| FK16 | 4 | |
| FK13 | 4.4 | |
| E. coli B37 | LL37 | 32 |
| FK16 | 1.7 | |
| FK13 | 3.8 | |
| E. coli B73 | LL37 | 2.4 |
| FK16 | 1.7 | |
| FK13 | 2.2 |
3.6. Cytoplasmic Membrane-Permeabilizing Effects
FK16 exhibited the strongest cytoplasmic membrane permeabilizing activity among the three AMPs, consistent with its lower MICs and enhanced antibacterial efficacy (Figure 10). LL37 and FK13 showed similar, moderate permeabilizing effects, which align with their comparable antibacterial performance. Vancomycin, while capable of acting on the cytoplasmic membrane, showed limited activity in this assay, likely due to poor outer membrane penetration.
Figure 10.

Cytoplasmic membrane permeabilizing properties of antimicrobials to (a) E. coli B78, (b) E. coli B37, (c) E. coli B73. The error bars refer to the standard deviations after three independent experiments. *** stands for p ≤ 0.001, **** stands for p ≤ 0.0001.
3.7. Cytotoxicity of AMPs Toward Human Dermal Fibroblasts
LL37 and FK16 exhibited significant cytotoxicity toward human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) at high concentrations, with nearly complete cell death observed at 256 μg/mL (Figure 11). In contrast, FK13 showed markedly lower cytotoxic effects, suggesting improved biocompatibility and greater clinical potential. The reduced toxicity of FK13 may be due to the absence of hydrophobic residues N30, L31, and V32, which are present in LL37 and FK16 and have been associated with cytotoxicity.
Figure 11.

Effect on cell viability for LL37, FK16, and FK13 against HDF cells. The error bars indicate the standard deviations after three independent experiments. The x-axis represents increasing peptide concentrations (μg/mL) and the y-axis represents cell viability.
4. Discussion
The development of drug resistance poses a major threat to public health worldwide, driving up healthcare costs, hospitalizations, and mortality rates [33]. Considering the challenges in launching new antibiotics to market, novel antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. One promising clinical approach is the combination of two or more antimicrobials, particularly for treating resistant infections [11,34]. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a novel class of therapeutic candidates with potent antibacterial activity [1]. In this study, we investigated the synergistic potential of LL37 and its fragments (FK16 and FK13) in combination with vancomycin, polymyxin B, and colistin against three clinical E. coli strains, while also examining the underlying antibacterial mechanisms of these AMPs.
Synergy between antimicrobials with different targets is an attractive strategy [35,36,37]. Vancomycin, which binds to lipid II, is generally ineffective against Gram-negative bacteria due to the outer membrane barrier, but combining vancomycin with outer membrane-permeabilizing agents, such as AMPs, may enhance its uptake and activity [17,21]. In our study, a few synergistic combinations between vancomycin and AMPs were observed, though overall synergy was limited, and the concentrations required were relatively high. These results highlight the need for further investigation into optimizing AMP-vancomycin combinations.
In contrast, AMP combinations with polymyxin B and colistin showed better synergy, especially under cation-adjusted conditions. Polymyxin B and colistin disrupt both outer and cytoplasmic membranes via the self-promoted uptake pathway [38], potentially facilitating AMP access to intracellular targets. LL37, in particular, is known to affect bacterial metabolism and energy production in addition to membrane disruption [39]. Whether FK16 and FK13 share these intracellular targets remains to be determined. An additional benefit of AMP-polymyxin combinations is the potential to reduce polymyxin dosing, thereby minimizing nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity [40,41]. Given the reintroduction of polymyxins into clinical use due to rising resistance, the ability to lower toxic doses through synergy can present an important clinical advantage.
LPS is a key structural component of the Gram-negative outer membrane and contributes to its negative surface charge. We showed that LL37 and its fragments neutralize the bacterial surface charge via electrostatic interactions with LPS, as reflected in zeta potential shifts. The reduced AMP activity in the presence of exogenous LPS supports the hypothesis that free LPS can bind and sequester AMPs, limiting their availability for membrane targeting. LPS binding is also important for the immunomodulatory roles of AMPs, such as endotoxin neutralization and sepsis prevention [31,32,42,43,44]. LL37 has demonstrated both antimicrobial and anti-sepsis potential, although whether FK16 and FK13 retain these properties requires further study. It has to be noted that only a single, relatively high concentration of exogenous LPS (100 μg/mL) was tested. While this concentration served as a stringent condition to evaluate the maximal inhibitory effect of LPS on AMP activity, future studies incorporating a range of lower, more physiologically relevant LPS concentrations are needed to determine the threshold at which AMP activity becomes significantly impaired.
Charge neutralization strongly correlates with the net positive charge of the antimicrobial. LL37, with the highest net charge (+6), required the lowest concentration to neutralize bacterial zeta potentials, followed by polymyxin B (+5) and FK peptides (+4). Ampicillin, with a net charge of 0, showed no such effect. These results align with previous studies showing that cationic agents increase membrane permeability through charge neutralization [9,21,22,30,45,46]. For example, CTAB increases outer membrane permeability by disrupting surface charge [45]. This interaction may interfere with the cell’s ability to maintain a stable zeta potential, altering membrane integrity and leading to cell death [45,47,48]. In our study, the extent of charge neutralization generally corresponded with outer membrane permeabilization in the absence of divalent cations, reinforcing this relationship.
Pretreating E. coli with AMPs sensitized the bacteria to vancomycin, further supporting the role of the outer membrane as a permeability barrier [21,49]. Although vancomycin-AMP synergy was limited, all three AMPs were able to reduce vancomycin resistance across strains. These results, along with prior findings in P. aeruginosa [21], support the strategy of using outer membrane-disrupting agents to expand the utility of vancomycin against Gram-negative pathogens.
The role of Mg2+ and Ca2+ in stabilizing the outer membrane was also confirmed. These cations bind LPS to form salt bridges, reducing membrane permeability and increasing MICs for cationic antimicrobials [50]. Our data show that AMP efficacy declined in the presence of divalent cations, consistent with reduced permeability and electrostatic competition. Higher AMP concentrations may be needed to displace these cations and achieve effective membrane coverage [28,51,52,53,54]. The observation that polymyxin B was least affected by the presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ among the tested antimicrobials may be explained by their mechanisms of interaction with LPS. The linear cationic peptides (LL-37, FK16, and FK13) rely primarily on electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged phosphate groups of LPS [55]; the presence of divalent cations competes for these binding sites, thereby reducing peptide binding and activity. Colistin, while possessing a cyclic lipopeptide structure that provides some hydrophobic anchoring, still depends largely on electrostatic interactions and thus remains sensitive to divalent cations. In contrast, polymyxin B possesses a slightly longer fatty acyl chain (e.g., 6-methyloctanoyl in polymyxin B vs. 6-methylheptanoyl in colistin) [56], which may enhance its hydrophobic insertion into the lipid A region [57]. This stronger hydrophobic interaction likely compensates for the charge-shielding effect of Mg2+ and Ca2+, rendering polymyxin B activity less sensitive to the presence of divalent cations [58].
Outer membrane permeabilization alone was not sufficient for antibacterial activity. LL37 had the strongest permeabilizing effect but was not the most effective antimicrobial. Instead, cytoplasmic membrane disruption appears to be more predictive of bactericidal activity [27,59,60,61,62,63,64]. FK16, which showed the highest cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization, also had the strongest antibacterial effects. LL37 and FK13 displayed similar cytoplasmic membrane activity, aligning with their comparable MICs. As cationic peptides, LL37 and its fragments may disrupt the cytoplasmic membrane by targeting LPS or other negatively charged components [65]. Future work is needed to identify their specific binding sites.
This study is a mechanistic proof-of-concept investigation. Combination cytotoxicity was not tested, as it falls outside the scope of this work and would require a separate translational study. While we acknowledge that the therapeutic window of these combinations remains to be determined, future studies should systematically assess the combination cytotoxicity using mammalian cell lines.
5. Conclusions
This study highlights the potential of polymyxin B and colistin in combination with AMPs—particularly LL37 and its fragments—as a promising strategy to combat antibiotic-resistant E. coli. These combinations exhibited strong synergistic effects, especially under physiologically relevant conditions. We confirmed that outer membrane permeabilization is closely linked to antimicrobial charge, and that divalent cations such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ stabilize the membrane by interfering with this process. Additionally, we demonstrated that cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization is a key determinant of AMP efficacy. Together, these findings support the continued exploration of AMP-antibiotic combinations and guide future efforts to optimize AMP design for improved potency, selectivity, and clinical applicability.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Alden Fellowship from Worcester Polytechnic Institute for funding W.H. in this project. We express appreciation to Daryl Richard Johnson, Jiamin Jian, Yanzhao Wang, and Hui Zhang for help with certain experiments and equipment. We thank Jeannine Coburn for providing the human dermal fibroblast culture.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| AMPs | Antimicrobial peptides |
| E. coli | Escherichia coli |
| AMR | Antimicrobial resistance |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
| VIM-GES-CRPA | Verona Integron-encoded Metallo-β-lactamase—Guiana Extended Spectrum—Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
| LPS | lipopolysaccharide |
| MHB | Mueller–Hinton broth |
| MHA | Mueller–Hinton agar |
| IMDM | Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium |
| FBS | Fetal Bovine Serum |
| DPBS | Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline |
| HEPES | 4-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid |
| NPN | 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine |
| PI | Propidium iodide |
| MIC | Minimum inhibitory concentrations |
| CLSI | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute |
| FICI | Fractional inhibitory concentration index |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom16091324/s1. Table S1. MICs of antimicrobials alone and in combination against E. coli strains with corresponding FICI values in MHB medium. All MIC values are expressed in μg/mL; Table S2. MICs of antimicrobials alone and in combination against E. coli strains with corresponding FICI values in CMHB medium. All MIC values are expressed in μg/mL.
Author Contributions
W.H.: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. N.J.W.: Investigation, Writing—review & editing. T.A.C.: Supervision, Resources, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
W.H. was funded by the Alden Fellowship from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.O’Neill J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance; London, UK: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 2.WHO . WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics are Urgently Needed. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ivaturi K., Symes C., Farahbakhsh M., Bhuri S., Wheatley J.L., Selvarangan R., Heruth D.P., Chavez-Bueno S. Clinical Characteristics, Antibiotic Resistance Trends, and Associated Molecular Epidemiology Traits in Escherichia coli Isolates Producing Neonatal Bacteremia. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2026;13:ofag246. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofag246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kasanga M., Shempela D.M., Daka V., Mwikisa M.J., Sikalima J., Chanda D., Mudenda S. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from clinical and environmental samples: Findings and implications. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2024;6:dlae061. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wen Z., Jin J., Chen Y., Zhao C., Xu C., Liu J., Ge B. Clinical epidemiological characteristics and antibiotic sensitivity of Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. PLoS ONE. 2025;20:e0336572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hoffman A., Satyavolu S., Muhanna D., Malay S., Raffay T., Windau A., Ransom E.M., Mukherjee D. Predictors of mortality and severe illness from Escherichia coli sepsis in neonates. J. Perinatol. 2024;44:1816–1821. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02117-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang Z., Wei M., Jia B., Yuan Y. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Resistance: Insights from Escherichia coli as a Model Organism. Microorganisms. 2025;13:51. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li J., Koh J.-J., Liu S., Lakshminarayanan R., Verma C.S., Beuerman R.W. Membrane active antimicrobial peptides: Translating mechanistic insights to design. Front. Neurosci. 2017;11:73. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li Q., Cebrián R., Montalbán-López M., Ren H., Wu W., Kuipers O.P. Outer-membrane-acting peptides and lipid II-targeting antibiotics cooperatively kill Gram-negative pathogens. Commun. Biol. 2021;4:31. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01511-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu J., Gefen O., Ronin I., Bar-Meir M., Balaban N.Q. Effect of tolerance on the evolution of antibiotic resistance under drug combinations. Science. 2020;367:200–204. doi: 10.1126/science.aay3041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.CDC . Outbreak of Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Associated with ArtiFcial Tears. CDC; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kahlenberg J.M., Kaplan M.J. Little peptide, big effects: The role of LL-37 in inflammation and autoimmune disease. J. Immunol. 2013;191:4895–4901. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dürr U.H., Sudheendra U., Ramamoorthy A. LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2006;1758:1408–1425. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ridyard K.E., Overhage J. The potential of human peptide LL-37 as an antimicrobial and anti-biofilm agent. Antibiotics. 2021;10:650. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li X., Li Y., Han H., Miller D.W., Wang G. Solution structures of human LL-37 fragments and NMR-based identification of a minimal membrane-targeting antimicrobial and anticancer region. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:5776–5785. doi: 10.1021/ja0584875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Han W., Camesano T.A. LL37-Derived Fragments Improve the Antibacterial Potential of Penicillin G and Ampicillin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics. 2023;12:1398. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12091398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mohammed I., Said D.G., Nubile M., Mastropasqua L., Dua H.S. Cathelicidin-Derived Synthetic Peptide Improves Therapeutic Potential of Vancomycin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2190. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oren Z., Lerman J.C., Gudmundsson G.H., Agerberth B., Shai Y. Structure and organization of the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in phospholipid membranes: Relevance to the molecular basis for its non-cell-selective activity. Biochem. J. 1999;341:501–513. doi: 10.1042/bj3410501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Loll P.J., Axelsen P.H. The structural biology of molecular recognition by vancomycin. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2000;29:265–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Iancu C., Grainger A., Field D., Cotter P.D., Hill C., Ross R.P. Comparison of the potency of the lipid II targeting antimicrobials nisin, lacticin 3147 and vancomycin against Gram-positive bacteria. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2012;4:108–115. doi: 10.1007/s12602-012-9095-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Han W., Wei Z., Camesano T.A. New antimicrobial peptide-antibiotic combination strategy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa inactivation. Biointerphases. 2022;17:041002. doi: 10.1116/6.0001981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trimble M.J., Mlynárčik P., Kolář M., Hancock R.E. Polymyxin: Alternative mechanisms of action and resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016;6:a025288. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Colgan R., Johnson J.R., Kuskowski M., Gupta K. Risk factors for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008;52:846–851. doi: 10.1128/aac.01200-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tao -Y., Pinzón-Arango -P.A., Howell -A.B., Camesano -T.A. Oral Consumption of Cranberry Juice Cocktail Inhibits Molecular-Scale Adhesion of Clinical Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Med. Food. 2011;14:739–745. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2010.0154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.CLSI . Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically: M07. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne, PA, USA: 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhu Q., Gao X., Brown M.D., Eismont F., Gu W. Transport of vancomycin and cefepime into human intervertebral discs: Quantitative analyses. Spine. 2019;44:E992–E999. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ma B., Fang C., Zhang J., Wang M., Luo X., Hou Z. Contemporaneous Measurement of Outer and Inner Membrane Permeability in Gram-negative Bacteria. Bio-protocol. 2020;10:e3548. doi: 10.21769/bioprotoc.3548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lei J., Sun L., Huang S., Zhu C., Li P., He J., Mackey V., Coy D.H., He Q. The antimicrobial peptides and their potential clinical applications. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11:3919–3931. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Khadka N.K., Aryal C.M., Pan J. Lipopolysaccharide-dependent membrane permeation and lipid clustering caused by cyclic lipopeptide colistin. ACS Omega. 2018;3:17828–17834. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Domingues M.M., Inácio R.G., Raimundo J.M., Martins M., Castanho M.A., Santos N.C. Biophysical characterization of polymyxin b interaction with LPS aggregates and membrane model systems. Pept. Sci. 2012;98:338–344. doi: 10.1002/bip.22095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosenfeld Y., Shai Y. Lipopolysaccharide (Endotoxin)-host defense antibacterial peptides interactions: Role in bacterial resistance and prevention of sepsis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2006;1758:1513–1522. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brandenburg K., Schromm A.B., Weindl G., Heinbockel L., Correa W., Mauss K., Martinez de Tejada G., Garidel P. An update on endotoxin neutralization strategies in Gram-negative bacterial infections. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2021;19:495–517. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1834847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sy C.L., Chen P.-Y., Cheng C.-W., Huang L.-J., Wang C.-H., Chang T.-H., Chang Y.-C., Chang C.-J., Hii M., Hsu Y.-L., et al. Recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of infections due to multidrug resistant organisms. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2022;55:359–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kerantzas C.A., Jacobs W.R., Jr. Origins of combination therapy for tuberculosis: Lessons for future antimicrobial development and application. mBio. 2017;8:e01586–e01616. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01586-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Field D., Seisling N., Cotter P.D., Ross R.P., Hill C. Synergistic nisin-polymyxin combinations for the control of Pseudomonas biofilm formation. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1713. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Naghmouchi K., Baah J., Hober D., Jouy E., Rubrecht C., Sané F., Drider D. Synergistic effect between colistin and bacteriocins in controlling Gram-negative pathogens and their potential to reduce antibiotic toxicity in mammalian epithelial cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:2719–2725. doi: 10.1128/aac.02328-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ejim L., Farha M.A., Falconer S.B., Wildenhain J., Coombes B.K., Tyers M., Brown E.D., Wright G.D. Combinations of antibiotics and nonantibiotic drugs enhance antimicrobial efficacy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:348–350. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tran T.B., Velkov T., Nation R.L., Forrest A., Tsuji B.T., Bergen P.J., Li J. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of colistin and polymyxin B: Are we there yet? Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2016;48:592–597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chung M.-C., Dean S.N., van Hoek M.L. Acyl carrier protein is a bacterial cytoplasmic target of cationic antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Biochem. J. 2015;470:243–253. doi: 10.1042/bj20150432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Almaaytah A., Qaoud M.T., Abualhaijaa A., Al-Balas Q., Alzoubi K.H. Hybridization and antibiotic synergism as a tool for reducing the cytotoxicity of antimicrobial peptides. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018;11:835–847. doi: 10.2147/idr.s166236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Koch-Weser J., Sidel V.W., Federman E.B., Kanarek P., Finer D.C., Eaton A.E. Adverse effects of sodium colistimethate: Manifestations and specific reaction rates during 317 courses of therapy. Ann. Intern. Med. 1970;72:857–868. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-72-6-857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brandenburg K., Heinbockel L., Correa W., Lohner K. Peptides with dual mode of action: Killing bacteria and preventing endotoxin-induced sepsis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2016;1858:971–979. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pulido D., Nogués M., Boix E., Torrent M. Lipopolysaccharide neutralization by antimicrobial peptides: A gambit in the innate host defense strategy. J. Innate Immun. 2012;4:327–336. doi: 10.1159/000336713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nagaoka I., Tamura H., Reich J. Therapeutic potential of cathelicidin peptide LL-37, an antimicrobial agent, in a murine sepsis model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5973. doi: 10.3390/ijms21175973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Halder S., Yadav K.K., Sarkar R., Mukherjee S., Saha P., Haldar S., Karmakar S., Sen T. Alteration of Zeta potential and membrane permeability in bacteria: A study with cationic agents. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:672. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1476-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Maillard A.P.F., Espeche J.C., Maturana P., Cutro A.C., Hollmann A. Zeta potential beyond materials science: Applications to bacterial systems and to the development of novel antimicrobials. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2021;1863:183597. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ong T.H., Chitra E., Ramamurthy S., Ling C.C.S., Ambu S.P., Davamani F. Cationic chitosan-propolis nanoparticles alter the zeta potential of S. epidermidis, inhibit biofilm formation by modulating gene expression and exhibit synergism with antibiotics. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang S.-K., Yusoff K., Thomas W., Akseer R., Alhosani M.S., Abushelaibi A., Lim S.-H.-E., Lai K.-S. Lavender essential oil induces oxidative stress which modifies the bacterial membrane permeability of carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55601-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Marcellini L., Borro M., Gentile G., Rinaldi A.C., Stella L., Aimola P., Barra D., Mangoni M.L. Esculentin-1b(1–18)––a membrane-active antimicrobial peptide that synergizes with antibiotics and modifies the expression level of a limited number of proteins in Escherichia coli. FEBS J. 2009;276:5647–5664. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sahalan Z.A., Aziz H.A.A., Lian H.H., Ghani K.A.M. Divalent Cations (Mg2+, Ca2+) protect bacterial outer membrane damage by polymyxin B. Sains Malays. 2013;42:301–306. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Clifton L.A., Skoda M.W., Le Brun A.P., Ciesielski F., Kuzmenko I., Holt S.A., Lakey J.H. Effect of divalent cation removal on the structure of gram-negative bacterial outer membrane models. Langmuir. 2015;31:404–412. doi: 10.1021/la504407v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lam N.H., Ma Z., Ha B.-Y. Electrostatic modification of the lipopolysaccharide layer: Competing effects of divalent cations and polycationic or polyanionic molecules. Soft Matter. 2014;10:7528–7544. doi: 10.1039/c4sm01262c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kandasamy S.K., Larson R.G. Effect of salt on the interactions of antimicrobial peptides with zwitterionic lipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2006;1758:1274–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ghosh S., Pandit G., Debnath S., Chatterjee S., Satpati P. Effect of monovalent salt concentration and peptide secondary structure in peptide-micelle binding. RSC Adv. 2021;11:36836–36849. doi: 10.1039/d1ra06772a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hemshekhar M., Faiyaz S., Choi K.-Y.G., Krokhin O.V., Mookherjee N. Immunomodulatory functions of the human cathelicidin LL-37 (aa 13–31)-derived peptides are associated with predicted α-helical propensity and hydrophobic index. Biomolecules. 2019;9:501. doi: 10.3390/biom9090501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Roberts K.D., Azad M.A.K., Wang J., Horne A.S., Thompson P.E., Nation R.L., Velkov T., Li J. Antimicrobial Activity and Toxicity of the Major Lipopeptide Components of Polymyxin B and Colistin: Last-Line Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015;1:568–575. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Carr C., Morrison D.C. Mechanism of polymyxin B-mediated lysis of lipopolysaccharide-treated erythrocytes. Infect. Immun. 1985;49:84–89. doi: 10.1128/iai.49.1.84-89.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Buchholz K.R., Reichelt M., Johnson M.C., Robinson S.J., Smith P.A., Rutherford S.T., Quinn J.G. Potent activity of polymyxin B is associated with long-lived super-stoichiometric accumulation mediated by weak-affinity binding to lipid A. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:4733. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49200-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Velkov T., Thompson P.E., Nation R.L., Li J. Structure-activity relationships of polymyxin antibiotics. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:1898–1916. doi: 10.1021/jm900999h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Faust J.E., Yang P.-Y., Huang H.W. Action of antimicrobial peptides on bacterial and lipid membranes: A direct comparison. Biophys. J. 2017;112:1663–1672. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hong L., Gontsarik M., Amenitsch H., Salentinig S. Human antimicrobial peptide triggered colloidal transformations in bacteria membrane lipopolysaccharides. Small. 2022;18:2104211. doi: 10.1002/smll.202104211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Marsh J., Goode J.A. Antimicrobial Peptides. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Steiner H., Andreu D., Merrifield R.B. Binding and action of cecropin and cecropin analogues: Antibacterial peptides from insects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 1988;939:260–266. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90069-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sochacki K.A., Barns K.J., Bucki R., Weisshaar J.C. Real-time attack on single Escherichia coli cells by the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:E77–E81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101130108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sabnis A., Hagart K.L., Klöckner A., Becce M., Evans L.E., Furniss R.C.D., Mavridou D.A., Murphy R., Stevens M.M., Davies J.C., et al. Colistin kills bacteria by targeting lipopolysaccharide in the cytoplasmic membrane. eLife. 2021;10:e65836. doi: 10.7554/elife.65836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
