Abstract
4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-alkenylquinolines (HMAQs) belong to an emerging sub-class of naturally synthesized alkaloids with several prominent biological properties. HMAQ-7 is a novel variant recently identified in Burkholderia contaminans MS14 which was previously shown to impede normal cellular behaviors in Bacillus subtilis, including multiple colonization phenotypes such as motility, pellicle formation, and sporulation. While the list of biological and chemical characteristics among HMAQ’s and related molecules is extensive, the mechanistic basis of these responses has been far more elusive. Using a combination of RNA-seq and bioinformatics, we have determined that several of the physiological defects induced by HMAQ-7 are strongly correlated with alterations in systems related to phospho-transduction. Specifically, HMAQ-7 augments gene expression in elements associated with late stationary phase growth, including those involved in phosphate assimilation and regulation of the spo0A phosphorelay. We also note that HMAQ-7 promotes dysregulated transcription of flagellar assembly genes which would normally be downregulated during late stationary phase. This study constitutes one of the first extensive investigations into an HMAQ’s mode of action, providing vital insight into the ecological dynamics between B. contaminans and B. subtilis.
Keywords: anti-sporulation, anti-biofilm, antimicrobial, Spo0A, Bacillus subtilis, flagella, Burkholderia, alkaloid, quinolone
1. Introduction
Soil and aquatic bacteria have long been considered key sources for the identification of novel antimicrobial metabolites. Competition amongst the myriad clades and serotypes of these terraqueous species has led them to cultivate a diverse arsenal of molecular weaponry suitable for interspecies conflict. Burkholderia species are well established producers of a wide assortment of antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic, and anticancer compounds with novel mechanisms of action [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. In particular, B. contaminans MS14 produces the antifungal occidiofungin [11,12,13], the siderophore ornibactin [14], and the quinolone 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-alkenylquinoline-C7 (HMAQ-7) (Figure 1A) [15].
Figure 1.

HMAQ-7 is a naturally occurring Burkholderia quinoline that augments B. subtilis culture growth during the stationary phase. (A) Covalent structure of HMAQ-7. (B) OD600 measurements of B. subtilis culture exposed to HMAQ-7 over the course of 24 h.
The HMAQs belong to a subdivision of naturally derived alkaloids commonly produced by Burkholderia [16]. They have been the subject of multiple investigations into the structure–function dynamics of natural compounds, with these assessments often revealing several unique biological properties [15,17,18]. Like many alkaloids, the HMAQs are small heterocyclic compounds of rudimentary composition, consisting of many varieties of fused bicyclic rings which are alkylated at the C2 carbon. Unique among the HMAQ’s, and a point of great interest, is the characteristic methylation of their C3 carbon, an addition critical to their function [6,18,19,20]. HMAQs possess structural affinity with known quorum sensing (QS) agents, 2-heptyl-alkyl-quinolones (HAQs), which are synthesized by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and known to promote the expression of several virulence factors, including biofilm production, siderophore release, and autoaggregation [21,22,23,24]. By contrast, HMAQ’s actively inhibit several of these virulent multi-cellular behaviors, with many also possessing bacteriostatic, cidal, and cytotoxic properties [15,18,25]. Furthermore, unlike HAQ’s and similar QS signaling molecules which are autoinducers, HMAQ’s do not promote their own biosynthesis and are only able to interact indirectly in QS-mediated transcription via modulating the expression levels of N-acyl-homoserine lactone variants in bacterial congeners [26].
A great deal has been established about HMAQ’s and related heterocyclic compounds, particularly with respect to their chemical properties, including structural diversity, the significance of their functional groups, and how the degrees of unsaturation within their alkyl chains affect signaling capabilities [18,27,28,29]. What is far less established is the precise mode(s) of action (MoA) that underpin most biological responses associated with HMAQ exposure. The current literature provides neither experimental nor theoretical elucidations into the mechanics of HMAQ’s phenotypic inductions. This paucity in robust MoA research is striking given the various responses HMAQs have shown to induce across diverse bacterial species, particularly in their hindrance of bacterial growth. The potential for HMAQs to inhibit microbial growth or disrupt microbial virulence has led to an increased interest in exploring the biophysiological aspects behind HMAQ’s activity [15,17,30].
Our group’s earlier investigation into HMAQ-7 demonstrated that the compound did not exert growth inhibition against most bacterial and fungal species that were tested. However, at low concentrations, the compound was able to disrupt complex multi-species biofilms, suppress motility, and abrogate colonization phenotypes associated with transitional and stationary phases of culture growth, including pellicle formation and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis [15]. We became interested in whether HMAQ-7 exposure was tied to any corresponding cellular adaptations or alterations in viability. Consistent with these earlier observations, B. subtilis exposure to HMAQ-7 did not appear to affect a noticeable change in cell growth during either the lag or logarithmic phases. Rather, significant differences were observed during stationary phase, wherein treated cultures outpaced controls in terms of their relative cell density and did not experience a decline in OD600 at 24 h (Figure 1B).
Typically, decreases in cellular density during late stationary phase are characteristic of Bacillus and Clostridium species undergoing autolysis, a process closely linked to nutrient depletion and later stages of sporulation [31,32,33]. The apparent absence of this phenomenon among treated cell cultures suggested that HMAQ-7 was likely interfering with several additional late stationary-phase adaptations that led to the observed higher cell densities. These observations led us to employ RNA-seq to better establish the transcriptomic profile of B. subtilis under HMAQ-7 exposure. In doing so, we endeavored to close the knowledge gap surrounding the mechanistic basis for HMAQ’s anti-colonization phenotypes and provide a foundation for future investigations.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Transcriptomic Profile of Treated B. subtilis
We noted in our previous study that when B. subtilis is exposed to a minimum effective concentration (MEC) of 10 µg/mL HMAQ-7 in standing culture, pellicle formation is ablated and sporulation is significantly diminished by 24 h [15]. For RNA-seq culture harvesting, we employed an identical experimental setup, allowing B. subtilis to incubate with HMAQ-7 in static culture over the same period just prior to collection. Consistent with our previous results, we observed differences in pellicle formation between treated and control cultures but noted that both cultures achieved equivalent cell densities of ~8 × 109 CFU/mL prior to culture harvesting. Both Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that the control and treated groups had distinct transcriptomic profiles (Figure S1). RNA-seq analysis revealed that B. subtilis experiences a sizable alteration in its transcriptome in response to prolonged HMAQ-7 exposure under experimental conditions. Of the 4407 genes detected, 788 (17.90%) were upregulated (padj < 0.05; Log2FC ≥ 1.5), 1045 (23.70%) were downregulated (padj < 0.05; Log2FC ≤ −1.5), and 2574 (58.40%) were not differentially expressed (padj ≥ 0.05) (Figure 2). Such marked changes in global gene expression are consistent with HMAQ-7 being a type of QS-like signal molecule, behaving as an exogenous transcriptional regulator. Given that this response was observed in a species lacking the requisite biosynthesis genes needed for HMAQ-mediated cross-signaling, HMAQ-7 could be described as a molecular parainducer, similar to autoinducer 2 (AI-2), noted for its unidirectional QS-signaling in Mycobacterium avium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [34,35]. Further supporting this view, we observed that among the top 25 genes which were downregulated in B. subtilis, nearly all of them were involved in sporulation and under the control of the transcriptional master regulator, Spo0A (Table 1).
Figure 2.

Exposure to HMAQ-7 induces significant changes in transcriptional expression during late stationary phase. MA plot depicts all DEGs (padj < 0.05; |Log2FC| ≥ 1.5) and non-DEGs detected in the RNA-seq analysis mapped against their associated log fold changes. The inset provides the corresponding number of genes in each category.
Table 1.
Top 25 downregulated genes in B. subtilis-treated cultures following exposure to HMAQ-7 during comparative transcriptomic analysis.
| Gene Name | Function | |Log2FC| | Adj p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| yhzE1 (sscA) | Spore assembly and germination protein | 14.5 | 6.57796 × 10−20 |
| cotF | Spore coat protein | 12.4 | 1.37096 × 10−36 |
| cmpA | Cortex morphogenic protein A; represses cortex assembly until the successful initiation of spore coat assembly | 12.2 | 9.67629 × 10−14 |
| ykzV | Unknown (Associated with Sporulation) | 12.1 | 1.7825 × 10−119 |
| cotNE | Inner spore coat protein | 11.6 | 8.2342 × 10−104 |
| VV28_RS09090 | Unknown | 11.5 | 3.81043 × 10−50 |
| VV28_RS19655 | Unknown | 11.4 | 5.9298 × 10−178 |
| yhzE2 (sscB) | Spore and germination protein | 11.2 | 7.22395 × 10−12 |
| cotY | Main structural component of the spore crust; necessary for the assembly of the spore crust, the outermost layer of the spore coat | 11.2 | 2.7225 × 10−158 |
| yqfT | Unknown (Associated with Sporulation) | 11.0 | 2.84746 × 10−81 |
| yppG | Spore coat protein | 10.9 | 1.22676 × 10−48 |
| spoVIF | Required for spore coat assembly and resistance | 10.9 | 8.3287 × 10−99 |
| VV28_RS05475 | Unknown | 10.8 | 2.65183 × 10−39 |
| cotZ | Spore crust anchor protein; necessary for the assembly of the spore crust, the outermost layer of the spore coat | 10.8 | 2.297 × 10−99 |
| glnH | Glutamine ABC transporter (binding protein) | 10.8 | 4.97431 × 10−58 |
| ydgB | Unknown | 10.6 | 6.98086 × 10−26 |
| ytcB | Putative UDP-glucose epimerase (expressed late during sporulation in mother cell) | 10.6 | 6.89041 × 10−70 |
| gerPF | Spore germination protein; facilitates access of nutrient germinants to their cognate germinant receptors in spores’ inner membrane | 10.6 | 7.81655 × 10−67 |
| ytzH | Unknown (Expressed during sporulation) | 10.2 | 1.15147 × 10−10 |
| cotW | Spore crust protein (insoluble fraction); involved in the formation of the spore crust | 10.2 | 2.2383 × 10−119 |
| yitB | Phospho-adenylylsulfate sulfotransferase | 10.2 | 2.72395 × 10−52 |
| yjcZ | Unknown (Associated with sporulation) | 10.1 | 2.5711 × 10−72 |
| ytcA | Similar to UDP-sugar dehydrogenase | 10.1 | 2.39958 × 10−84 |
| cotX | Spore crust protein (insoluble fraction); necessary for the assembly of the spore crust, the outermost layer of the spore coat | 10.0 | 2.8129 × 10−138 |
| cotV | Spore crust protein (insoluble fraction); involved in the formation of the spore crust | 10.0 | 2.9889 × 10−138 |
2.2. GO Term and KEGG Enrichment Analysis
Enrichment analyses were performed to better contextualize global changes to the transcriptome and tie these alterations to any relevant biological and/or biochemical pathways. Among all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that experienced significant downregulation, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment identified the top 3 categories among “Biological Processes” (BP) as being associated with sporulation (Figure 3A). Concomitantly, enrichment categories among “Cellular Components” (CC) were exclusively tied to sporulation-related elements. The same analysis done with upregulated genes identified the most enriched categories among BPs and CCs as being associated with flagellum synthesis and motility (Figure 3B). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis revealed comparable results, showing that biosynthesis pathways involved in flagellar assembly and bacterial chemotaxis were the most highly enriched in the B. subtilis transcriptome (Figures S1 and S2).
Figure 3.

HMAQ-7 promotes the upregulation of genes involved in flagellar assembly and motility while suppressing expression of genes involved in sporulation during late stationary phase in B. subtilis. Enrichment analysis identifies a number of GO terms that are either downregulated or upregulated 24 h into HMAQ-7 incubation. (A) GO enrichment of downregulated genes. (B) GO enrichment of upregulated genes. The “n” next to each pathway denotes the number of differentially expressed genes (padj < 0.05) therein.
Flagellar assembly is commonly associated with exponential cell growth during the latter stages of log phase rather than in late stationary phase where severe nutrient deprivation would make synthesis far too costly [36,37,38,39]. Considering that our previous findings showed HMAQ-7 inhibiting motility of B. subtilis in low-density agars, we found such an increase in transcription of genes related to motility to be highly paradoxical [15]. This decoupling of flagellar assembly from standard nutritional cues within cell culture would suggest that HMAQ-7 is mediating a maladaptive and/or severely dysregulated stress response. Indeed, among the top 25 upregulated genes, several are tied to nutrient uptake (salts, metal ions, carbohydrates), with KEGG enrichment revealing upregulation of inositol phosphorylation and phosphotransferase pathways, consistent with a starvation response (Table 2; Figure S3).
Table 2.
Top 25 upregulated genes in B. subtilis treated cultures following exposure to HMAQ-7 during comparative transcriptomic analysis.
| Gene Name | Function | |Log2FC| | Adj p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| pchE | Pyochelin synthetase (siderophore) | 7.9 | 5.62941 × 10−55 |
| cypX | cytochrome P450, cyclo-l-leucyl-l-leucyl dipeptide oxidase | 7.7 | 8.35828 × 10−60 |
| pchR | transcriptional repressor (MarR family); controls the expression of genes involved in pulcherriminic acid biosynthesis | 7.6 | 1.10441 × 10−52 |
| gmuA | glucomannan-specific permease of the phosphotransferase system; EIIA of the PTS | 7.6 | 6.47966 × 10−74 |
| gmuD | phospho-beta-mannosidase | 7.4 | 2.05897 × 10−73 |
| pchC | Thioesterase (Optimizes Biosynthesis of Pyochelin) | 7.4 | 2.40079 × 10−57 |
| celB | lichenan-specific permease of the phosphotransferase system, EIIC of the PTS | 7.3 | 5.36079 × 10−71 |
| gmuB | glucomannan-specific permease of the phosphotransferase system, EIIB of the PTS | 7.1 | 3.87635 × 10−63 |
| manA (yjdE) | mannose-6-phosphate isomerase, required for proper cell wall synthesis (mutants lose rod shape) | 6.6 | 6.99917 × 10−59 |
| gmuR | transcriptional repressor (GntR family) of the gmuB-gmuA-gmuC-gmuD-gmuR-gmuE-gmuF-gmuG operon | 6.6 | 4.97431 × 10−58 |
| gmuE | mannose kinase | 6.5 | 2.27548 × 10−59 |
| czcD | cation exporter (antiporter); involved in the export of zinc in exchange for extracellular K+ and H+ | 6.1 | 4.25716 × 10−44 |
| gmuG | beta-1,4-mannanase | 5.9 | 9.99789 × 10−53 |
| treP | trehalose permease of the phosphotransferase system; EIIBC of the PTS | 5.6 | 4.87397 × 10−46 |
| ybeC (aimA) | general amino acid importer; low affinity symporter for glutamate/H+, serine/H+, asparagine/H+, glycine[metabolite|]/H+, diaminopropionic acid/H+, alanine/H+, and beta-alanine/H+ | 5.6 | 7.19505 × 10−36 |
| copO | metal (copper) efflux transporter | 5.6 | 7.64361 × 10−40 |
| amtB | ammonium transporter; required at low ammonium concentration | 5.5 | 4.15004 × 10−32 |
| treC (treA) | phospho-alpha-glucosidase | 5.4 | 2.19579 × 10−35 |
| rbsB | ribose ABC transporter (binding protein) | 5.1 | 6.61476 × 10−31 |
| msmR (melR) | transcriptional regulator of the melR-melE-melD-melC-melA operon | 5.1 | 1.01571 × 10−23 |
| rbsC | ribose ABC transporter (permease) | 5.1 | 2.91855 × 10−32 |
| sdhB | succinate dehydrogenase | 5.0 | 1.10992 × 10−23 |
| cimH | transporter for citrate (proton symport) | 5.0 | 1.14098 × 10−30 |
| cadA | Cadmium-transporting ATPase, resistance to cadmium | 4.9 | 1.3597 × 10−34 |
| bdhA (ydjL) | acetoine/butanediol dehydrogenase | 4.9 | 6.63549 × 10−29 |
Besides enrichment of phosphotransferase and inositol phosphorylation systems, KEGG analysis also identified sizable enrichment in many elements associated with the two-component system pathways of B. subtilis. Using an exploratory padj-value cutoff of 0.1 in tandem with the pathview tool [40], several genes associated with two-component systems (TCS) were mapped to their respective regulatory schemes, revealing that many of these pathways were undergoing modulation, including those for nitrate reduction, protein secretion, and citrate utilization (Figure S4). Of these TCS-associated DEGs, the two most interesting were the downregulated genes phoB, which encodes an alkaline phosphatase involved in phosphate assimilation [41,42], and kinE, which encodes a regulatory kinase involved in phosphorylation of Spo0A [43,44]. The phosphorylation state of various regulatory proteins is essential for controlling several physiological behaviors within a bacterial cell, including sporulation, motility, biofilm formation, and metabolic adaptations [45,46,47,48,49]. Considering these observations, we came to hypothesize that HMAQ-7 might be achieving its inhibitory phenotypes via interference with signal transduction within B. subtilis.
2.3. Transcriptional Expression of Spo0A Phosphorelay Components
As a model organism, several regulatory pathways and systems in B. subtilis have been thoroughly investigated and well characterized, including those related to starvation, motility, sporulation, and biofilm formation [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. Given our exploratory findings in pathview and the fact that biofilm formation and sporulation are tightly linked through the transcription master regulator, Spo0A, we thought it best to focus on the phosphorelay system [59,60]. It is well established that spo0A transcription is autoregulated, heterogeneous in cell culture, and bistable, with basal-level expression occurring during vegetative growth, and heightened transcription occurring at the start of the transition period [61,62,63,64,65]. We were interested to see whether the decline in sporulation and pellicle formation reflected a defect in a single regulatory component or a broader global downregulation of the associated operons. Normalized transcript counts for each gene were used to evaluate relative expression levels of the major regulatory components. With the exception of spo0J, all spo0 class transcripts experienced downregulation (Figure 4A; Table 3). Additionally, other spo0A-adjacent regulators such as sigma factor H and the transition state regulator, abrB, experienced significant upregulation while comER transcription was entirely ablated.
Figure 4.

HMAQ-7 modulates the transcription of several regulatory elements in the spo0A phosphorelay circuit. (A) Relative transcription levels of elements within the spo0 regulon. (B) Relative transcription levels of kinases and competence genes associated with the spo0 regulon and motility in B. subtilis. (C) Relative transcription levels of phosphatases involved in controlling the phosphorylation state of various Spo0 proteins.
Table 3.
List of genes involved in the Spo0A phosphorelay.
| Gene Name | log2FC | padj | Relative Transcription * |
|---|---|---|---|
| comER | −6.789799858 | 3.12783 × 10−53 | 0.009 ± 0.000 |
| spo0A | −0.805853708 | 0.804073008 | 0.572 ± 0.082 |
| spo0B | −0.290363342 | 1 | 0.881 ± 0.401 |
| spo0E | −1.566555243 | 0.036105837 | 0.357 ± 0.102 |
| spo0F | −0.632207452 | 1 | 0.650 ± 0.127 |
| spo0J | 1.79625086 | 0.003607347 | 3.604 ± 1.462 |
| kinA | −0.089142854 | 1 | 0.940 ± 0.000 |
| kinB | 0.416301095 | 1 | 1.257 ± 0.430 |
| kinC | 0.785421498 | 0.868700963 | 1.722 ± 0.390 |
| kinD | 1.257651556 | 0.141049911 | 2.384 ± 0.077 |
| kinE | −1.37884717 | 0.061589895 | 0.390 ± 0.106 |
| rapA | 0.059891589 | 1 | 1.112 ± 0.322 |
| rapB | 1.640453482 | 0.008435424 | 3.111 ± 0.398 |
| rapE | 0.844007532 | 0.893652685 | 1.737 ± 0.930 |
| rapF | −3.538468751 | 3.19951 × 10−11 | 0.084 ± 0.037 |
| rapH | −1.900906358 | 0.000592772 | 0.271 ± 0.054 |
| rapI | 1.49720248 | 0.036105837 | 2.904 ± 0.750 |
| rapJ | 1.671685903 | 0.008095299 | 3.294 ± 1.043 |
| sigH | 2.118787383 | 4.60775 × 10−5 | 4.339 ± 0.602 |
| abrB | 1.901515014 | 0.002127456 | 3.953 ± 1.978 |
* Values corresponding to those calculated and displayed in Figure 4A.
Both sigH and spo0J are known to promote transcription of spo0A during the latter stages of culture growth [44,66,67]. Reduced cell growth experienced by B. subtilis during this period leads to increased phosphorylation of Spo0A, which, being in its active form, promotes sporulation/biofilm formation and serves as a direct inhibitor of abrB. While direct experimental data would be required to support this, the reduced transcription of spo0A despite increased transcription of sigH and spo0J is consistent with a significant break in the phosphorelay circuit. The ablation of comER transcription further supports this hypothesis given that this gene is essential for the time-sensitive phosphorylation of the intermediate phosphoryl-carrier, Spo0F, which operates upstream of Spo0A within the circuit [58]. spo0A transcription levels are dependent in large part on the availability of Spo0A~P which is modulated under natural conditions via multiple phosphatases and kinases including several varieties of rap proteins and KinA-E [44,68,69,70]. When looking at transcription levels of these spo0A kinases, we observe a relative reduction in the expression of kinase kinE by 61% (Figure 4B). Looking at related phosphotransferases which inhibit Spo0A activation, we note relative fold-increases in transcription among rapB, rapI, and rapJ of 3.11, 2.90, and 3.29 respectively (Figure 4C).
Taken together, the transcriptomics align with the idea that anti-colonization effects of HMAQ-7 in B. subtilis are the result of the compound augmenting components within the phosphorelay circuit (Figure 5). Furthermore, it does appear that the MoA of HMAQ-7 is consistent with an antagonistic parainduction mechanism, engendering global changes in gene expression and producing similar phenotypes as those previously observed in certain species exposed to AI-2 [71,72,73]. With that said, it is difficult to know whether the concomitant dysregulation in flagellar gene expression is directly attributable to the mechanism affecting sporulation or whether it is a separate downstream effect. Regardless, it is clear that HMAQ-7 subverts normative responses to nutrient deprivation during prolonged exposure and radically restructures B. subtilis physiology in ways that are highly relevant to future investigations.
Figure 5.

Schematic of the Spo0A regulatory pathway under the influence of HMAQ-7. Proteins colored red indicate upregulated transcriptional elements; those in blue indicate downregulated elements; and those in gray are not differentially expressed. Solid arrows indicate direct regulation, and dashed arrows indicate indirect regulation.
2.4. Current Limitations and Future Directions
Our knowledge of the biological underpinnings of HMAQs has been quite limited until now, with some previous forays having provided useful, if not remote, findings. This study provides one of the first extensive insights into the physiological inductions of HMAQ’s in a model bacterial species. Although this is noteworthy, it is also necessary to acknowledge some of the work’s shortcomings as well as some future developments.
One of the major experimental limitations within the present study is the reliance upon biological duplicates for transcriptomics. While the use of duplicates provides statistically informative data, the low number of replicates does constrain the statistical robustness of our present analysis. This should be taken into consideration when evaluating genes displaying marginal statistical significance (0.01 < padj < 0.05). With that said, both PCA and Pearson’s correlation analyses demonstrated strongly divergent responses in transcriptional expression between the available treated and control replicates (Figure S1). Furthermore, the fold changes observed amongst genes associated with sporulation/germination, biofilm/pellicle formation, and flagellar assembly all show associated padj-values several orders of magnitude below the marginal significance threshold, with many of these genes also having log2FC values greater than 7 (FC ≥ 128-fold) (Table 1 and Table 2 and Tables S1–S3). All of this paired with our earlier experimental work provides strong assurance in our conclusion that HMAQ-7 exerts bona fide alterations in multiple virulence pathways, including in elements associated with the Spo0A phosphorelay system.
While we express robust confidence in our assessment of HMAQ-7 as a parainducer with noticeable, albeit unintuitive, modulatory effects, the available data do not provide a precise causal mechanism for how this is achieved. Although the relative transcriptional patterns among Spo0A phosphorelay genes are consistent with our hypothesis that HMAQ-7 disrupts signal transduction through the Spo0A phosphorelay in B. subtilis, transcriptional changes alone cannot establish this mechanism. This is due in large part to the non-linear association between transcriptional expression, translation, and enzymatic activity in cell culture [74,75]. Consequently, direct measurement of intracellular phosphorylation states in HMAQ-7-treated and untreated cells will be necessary to determine whether disruption of phosphotransduction contributes to the observed biological changes.
The current study also documents transcriptomic remodeling at only a single time point which limits the level of context we have for cellular adaptation. This is critical as this reduces our detection of physiologically relevant responses such as ROS production. ROS detection assays performed on the culture at 24 h did not show an elevation of ROS in treated cells (Figure S5). With that said, we cannot exclude the possibility of transient ROS accumulation and subsequent dissipation in the preceding 12 h. If indeed HMAQ-7 causes a change in intracellular phosphorylation, it would entail a decoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and a commensurate increase in ROS within the cell. This response would indeed be consistent with similar varieties of HMAQs which are known to achieve cellular dysfunction through oxidative stress. The implications of this hypothesis are interesting and warrant further investigation.
Beyond some of these limitations, the study does offer critical insights into B. subtilis ecology and soil species relationships more broadly. Transcriptomics identified relative upregulation of luxS transcription in treated cells, hinting at a potential connection between the signaling of HMAQs and AI-2. Previous reports have indicated that Spo0A negatively controls expression of luxS and, by extension, the synthesis of AI-2 [76]. If HMAQ-7 does in fact disrupt phosphorylation of spo0A directly, we might hypothesize that HMAQs mediate cross-species signaling through indirect methods. Although highly speculative, such a finding would suggest a more complex dimension to interspecies communication between Burkholderia and Bacillus than previously thought. This interactivity could, if demonstrated, be potentially interesting in studying these effects on other more distantly related and pathogenic varieties of Gram-positive species.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
Bacillus subtilis strain BS34a was cultured on either Todd-Hewitt yeast extract (THyex) medium or Tryptic Soy Agar (TSB) as mentioned previously [13,15]. Burkholderia contaminans MS14 was cultured on either NBY medium or in a modified M9 media containing L-asparagine (1 g/L L-asparagine).
3.2. Purification of HMAQ-7
Isolation of HMAQ-7 was conducted in Gu et al., 2011, with specific modifications [11]. The producing strain, Burkholderia contaminans MS14, was grown in 1 L of modified minimal M9 media with asparagine (1 g/L). The final pH of the medium was adjusted to 6.9. A 10% inoculum with an OD600 nm between 0.6 and 0.8 was made before incubating the culture at 28 °C for 3 to 4 days. Before drying, the cell-free supernatant (CFS) was passed through a 0.2 μm filter. The dried material was then rinsed with 200 mL of acetonitrile, which extracts HMAQ-7. The acetonitrile fraction containing HMAQ-7 was lyophilized and subsequently suspended in a sufficient volume of 80:20 acetonitrile:water (v/v) with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid to re-solubilize the contents. This preparation was then subjected to reverse phase chromatography using a 5-micron C18 SinChrom ODS-BP (10 mm × 250 mm) preparative column employing a DuoFlow HPLC (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at a mobile phase flow rate of 3 mL/min at room temperature. LC separations were performed using 10 mM Ammonium formate in water (MPA) and ACN (MPB) serving as the mobile phase (MP). The chromatography method consisted of a gradient elution program specified as follows: 0–5.0 min, 10% MPB; 5.0–32.0 min, 10–75% MPB; 32.0–37.0 min, 75% MPB; 37.0 min, 75–10% MPB; and 37.0–42.0 min, 10% MPB. The fraction of interest eluted at 75% MPB and was analyzed via MALDI-TOF for material validation. After confirming the product’s mass, the purified sample was lyophilized and weighed on an analytical scale (Adventurer Pro AV114C; Ohaus Corporation, Parsippany, NJ, USA). The powder would then be suspended in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for bioassays.
3.3. Standing Culture Preparation
Pellicle experiments were organized in accordance with methods discussed in Pisithkul et al., 2019, with specific modifications [77]. Briefly, a plate of an indicator species is inoculated into TSB containing 0.25% sucrose to an OD600 of between 0.2 and 0.3. After reaching the desired density, a 100-fold dilution is then performed into 10 mL of identical media containing either 10 μg/mL of HMAQ-7 or an equivalent volume of DMSO which acts as a vehicle. The inoculum of each tube is thoroughly vortexed before being decanted into sterile Petri dishes (VWR Polystyrene, 100 × 15 mm) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the contents of these plates would be pipetted into pre-weighted falcon tubes and centrifuged at 10,000 RPM for 5 min at 20 °C. The supernatants are subsequently decanted, and the pellets are resuspended in 1 mL of RNA shield (Zymo Chemicals, San Leandro, CA, USA) and stored on dry ice for transport. CFU/mL were determined with 10-fold serial dilutions of the tubes which were performed down to 10−7 and plated to ascertain cell density. Standard culture used for RNA-seq was n = 2 biological duplicates.
3.4. Preliminary Growth Curve Study
The growth curve study with B. subtilis was performed as described by Geng et al., 2018, with specific modifications [78]. Briefly, a fresh plate of B. subtilis 34A was incubated between 16 and 24 h at 37 °C. A tube containing 10 mL of fresh TSB broth + 0.25% sucrose was inoculated to a starting OD600 of 0.1 and incubated in a mechanical shaker. The tube remained incubated at 37 °C with a 240 rpm until reaching an OD600 of 0.5–0.6, at which point a 100-fold dilution is performed on the inoculum, resulting in a 2.3 × 105 CFU/mL cell density. HMAQ-7 material was solubilized into a 10 mg/mL stock solution using 100% DMSO. The volume of experimental tubes was adjusted such that the final working concentration would be 10 μg/mL. An equivalent volume of DMSO (1% vol) would be used as vehicle controls absent the drug. Treatments and vehicle tubes were made in duplicate. Both sets of tubes would be incubated at 37 °C and 240 rpm. A 100 μL aliquot would be taken from each tube at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h time points. Readouts between 0.000 and 0.900 would be used for charting growth, with readouts beyond this range undergoing 2-fold dilution. Bars represent technical duplicates of experiments (n = 2).
3.5. RNA-Seq Library Preparation
Two biological replicates of both treated and non-treated B. subtilis standing culture samples were sent to Zymo Research for Total RNA-Seq Service (Zymo Chemicals, San Leandro, CA, USA). Libraries were built from total RNA samples, with a full extraction being performed on each replicate. No samples were excluded from processing. Library preparation was performed using the Zymo-Seq RiboFree Total RNA Library Prep Kit (Cat # R3000) (Zymo Chemicals, San Leandro, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction manual v1.3.1. Briefly, RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA, which was followed by ribosomal RNA depletion. Afterwards, the partial P7 adapter sequence was ligated to the 3′ end of cDNAs, followed by subsequent second-strand synthesis and partial P5 adapter ligation to the 5′ end of the double-stranded DNAs. Libraries were amplified to integrate full-length adapters under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min; 10–16 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 60 s; and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Successful library construction was validated with Agilent’s D1000 ScreenTape Assay on TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). RNA-Seq libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq to a sequencing depth of at least 30 million read pairs (150 bp paired-end sequencing) per sample (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
3.6. RNA-Seq Data Bioinformatics Analysis
The Zymo Research RNA-Seq pipeline was originally adapted from nf-core/rnaseq pipeline v1.4.2 (https://github.com/nf-core/rnaseq) [79]. The pipelines were built using Nextflow (https://www.nextflow.io/) [80]. Briefly, quality control of raw reads was carried out using FastQC v0.11.9 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Adapter and low-quality sequences were trimmed from raw reads using Trim Galore! v0.6.6 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore). Trimmed reads were aligned to the reference genome using STAR v2.6.1d (https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR) [81]. BAM file filtering and indexing were carried out using SAMtools v1.9 (https://github.com/samtools/samtools) [82]. RNAseq library quality control was implemented using RSeQC v4.0.0 (http://rseqc.sourceforge.net/) [83] and QualiMap v2.2.2-dev (http://qualimap.conesalab.org/) [84]. Duplicate reads were marked using Picard tools v2.23.9 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) [85]. Library complexity was estimated using Preseq v2.0.3 (https://github.com/smithlabcode/preseq) [86]. Duplication rate quality control was performed using dupRadar v1.18.0 (https://bioconductor.org/packages/dupRadar/) [87]. Reads overlapping with exons were assigned to genes using featureCounts v2.0.1 (http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/featureCounts/) [88]. Classification of rRNA genes/exons and their reads were based on annotations and RepeatMasker rRNA tracks from UCSC genome browser when applicable. Differential gene expression analysis was completed Ver 3.0 using DESeq2 v1.28.0 (https://bioconductor.org/packages/DESeq2/) [89]. Functional enrichment analysis was achieved using g:Profiler python API v1.0.0 (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gost) [90]. Quality control and analysis results plots were visualized using MultiQC v1.9 (https://github.com/ewels/MultiQC) [91]. All are accessed on 9 September 2026.
As part of the DESeq2 design, we excluded all genes from the “FeatureCounts” counts matrix that had zero counts in all samples, then applied DESeq2 rlog counts normalization with blind set to false. The DESeq2 design formula used in the comparison involved only one variable/group, which represented the treated and control conditions. DESeq2 employed the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) correction to generate padj values. RNA counts were modeled with a negative binomial distribution and employed the Wald test in all differential expression calculations.
3.7. MA Plotting and Enrichment Analyses
An MA plot was generated using the normalized base mean transcripts. A DEG was defined based on the following thresholds: (padj < 0.05; |Log2FC| > 1.5). GO term, KEGG, and pathview enrichment analyses were used to assess the transcriptomics profile of BS34A data. All omics-based analyses were subject to Benjamin–Hochberg correction to minimize the False Discovery Rate. Due to low biological replicates, an exploratory p-value was used for pathview analysis to capture borderline genes of biological interest. As a result of the limited curation of the BS34A strain, detected genes were mapped to their corresponding orthologs in the better-curated B. subtilis 168 strain using the smart table tool in BioCyc. B. subtilis 168 would serve as the reference genome for all enrichment analyses.
3.8. ROS Detection Experiment
A ROS-ID® Total ROS/Superoxide detection kit from Enzo Biochemistry was used according to the instructions of the manufacturer. For experiments with B. subtilis, cells were initially cultured and prepped as described in Section 3.3. 10 µg/mL of HMAQ-7 was added to each tube or an equivalent volume of DMSO before mixing and storage in sterile Petri dishes. Plates were incubated for 24 h, after which the contents were collected via a serological pipette and transferred into Falcon tubes. In total, 2 µL of the ROS detection reagent would be added to both sets of tubes at a final concentration of 1 uM, vortexed, and then stored for 30 min at 37 °C. After 30 min readings would be made as described previously.
All measurements were taken on a Biorad Versafluor fluorometer set at medium gain, 1000 acquisition range, and blanked with Thyex media. In total, 1 mM hydrogen peroxide was used as a detection control. A 490/520 Excitation/Detection Filter was employed for these experiments. All bar graphs represent technical duplicates of experiments (n = 2).
3.9. Statistical Analysis
Statistically significant differences between treatment and solvent controls in terms of CFU/mL and OD600 were determined via a two-sample t-test. A statistically significant difference was defined as one with a minimum measured p < 0.05 after appropriate Bonferroni correction. All statistical analyses were performed in Graphpad Prism ver. 9.5.0.
4. Conclusions
This transcriptomics-based study into HMAQ-7 activity constitutes one of the first investigations into the specific MoA of an HMAQ compound. RNA-seq analysis has provided evidence for HMAQ-7 achieving its antimicrobial effects through the transcriptional attenuation of components involved in intracellular phospho-transduction, including the Spo0A phosphorelay circuit (Figure 5). These might explain the clear reductions in biofilm formation and sporulation phenotypes previously seen in treated B. subtilis [15]. Furthermore, transcriptomics and bioinformatics identify an apparent dysregulation in the expression of flagellar assembly, which likely contributes to cellular starvation experienced by the cell during late stationary phase.
Acknowledgments
We are greatly indebted to the significant technical support provided by Taylor R. Sweeney, Sabrina Trieu, Abraham Tenorio, and Kevin Cao during the preliminary stages of this work. These considerations also extend to Jesse Starkey of the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Sierra Pregossin, and Jocelyn Hunyadi of the University of Texas Health Science Center. Special thanks to both Harriette L. Block and Cleveland Lane Jr. of Prairie View A&M for their continued support. We would also like to express our gratitude to Jerry Lieu and associates of Zymo Research for their professionalism, diligence, and rapid return of the RNA-seq raw data. Finally, we extend very special acknowledgements to both Kevin Johnson and Charles Williams Jr. of Texas A&M, Lawrence Williams of The University of Texas at San Antonio, Melvin D. Williams of the College of the Mainland, Donna M. Williams, and Marissa D. Williams for their material support and critical insights into the paper’s statistical analysis.
Abbreviations
| HMAQ | 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-alkylquinoline |
| HMAQ-7 | 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-alkylquinoline-C7 |
| MoA | Mode of Action |
| QS | Quorum Sensing |
| HAQ | 2-heptyl-alkylquinoline |
| MEC | Minimum Effective Concentration |
| PCA | Principal Correlation Analysis |
| AI-2 | Autoinducer-2 |
| DEG | Differentially Expressed Gene |
| BP | Biological Process |
| CC | Cellular Component |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| TCS | Two-Component System |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
| THyex | Todd-Hewitt Yeast Extract |
| TSB | Tryptic Soy Broth |
| CFS | Cell Free Supernatant |
| DMSO | Dimethyl Sulfoxide |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31183226/s1. Table S1: Genes involved in Flagellar Assembly with Corresponding Directional Log2 Fold Changes. Table S2: Genes involved in Chemotaxis with Corresponding Directional Log2 Fold Changes. Table S3: Genes involved in Pellicle/Biofilm Biosynthesis with Corresponding Direction Log2 Fold Changes. Figure S1: PCA and Pearson Correlation of B. subtilis Samples. Figure S2: KEGG Analysis. Figure S3: Flagellar assembly in B. subtilis. Figure S4: Two-component systems in B. subtilis. Figure S5: Induction of ROS in B. subtilis.
Author Contributions
M.D.W.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing; L.S.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA). The BioProject accession number is PRJNA1236414.
Conflicts of Interest
L. Smith is CEO and a board member of Sano Chemicals Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health R41AI131792-01 and 2R42AI131792-02A1.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Cothrell A., Cao K., Bonasera R., Tenorio A., Orugunty R., Smith L. Intravaginal Gel for Sustained Delivery of Occidiofungin and Long-Lasting Antifungal Effects. Gels. 2023;9:787. doi: 10.3390/gels9100787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Depoorter E., De Canck E., Coenye T., Vandamme P. Burkholderia bacteria produce multiple potentially novel molecules that inhibit carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Antibiotics. 2021;10:147. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Foxfire A., Buhrow A.R., Orugunty R.S., Smith L. Drug discovery through the isolation of natural products from Burkholderia. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2021;16:807–822. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1877655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hansanant N., Smith L. Occidiofungin: Actin Binding as a Novel Mechanism of Action in an Antifungal Agent. Antibiotics. 2022;11:1143. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hing S., Ravichandran A., Escano J., Cooley J., Austin F., Lu S., Pruett S., Smith L. Toxicological Evaluation of Occidiofungin against Mice and Human Cancer Cell Lines. Pharmacol. Pharm. 2014;5:1085–1093. doi: 10.4236/pp.2014.511118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jang J.Y., Le Dang Q., Choi G.J., Park H.W., Kim J.-C. Control of root-knot nematodes using Waltheria indica producing 4-quinolone alkaloids. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019;75:2264–2270. doi: 10.1002/ps.5363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ma J., Guo F., Jin Z., Geng M., Ju M., Ravichandran A., Orugunty R., Smith L., Zhu G., Zhang H. Novel Antiparasitic Activity of the Antifungal Lead Occidiofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e00244-20. doi: 10.1128/aac.00244-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ravichandran A., Escano J., Lee J.H., Ross M.K., Austin F., Orugunty R., Lu S.E., Smith L. Formulation, Pharmacological Evaluation, and Efficacy Studies of Occidiofungin, a Novel Antifungal. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e01737-20. doi: 10.1128/aac.01737-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rodríguez-Cisneros M., Morales-Ruíz L.M., Salazar-Gómez A., Rojas-Rojas F.U., Estrada-de Los Santos P. Compilation of the antimicrobial compounds produced by Burkholderia Sensu Stricto. Molecules. 2023;28:1646. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tan W., Cooley J., Austin F., Lu S.E., Pruett S.B., Smith L. Nonclinical toxicological evaluation of occidiofungin, a unique glycolipopeptide antifungal. Int. J. Toxicol. 2012;31:326–336. doi: 10.1177/1091581812445185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gu G., Smith L., Liu A., Lu S.-E. Genetic and Biochemical Map for the Biosynthesis of Occidiofungin, an Antifungal Produced by Burkholderia contaminans Strain MS14. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:6189–6198. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00377-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ravichandran A., Gu G., Escano J., Lu S.-E., Smith L. The Presence of Two Cyclase Thioesterases Expands the Conformational Freedom of the Cyclic Peptide Occidiofungin. J. Nat. Prod. 2013;76:150–156. doi: 10.1021/np3005503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen K.-C., Ravichandran A., Guerrero A., Deng P., Baird S.M., Smith L., Lu S.-E. The Burkholderia contaminans MS14 ocfC Gene Encodes a Xylosyltransferase for Production of the Antifungal Occidiofungin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:2899–2905. doi: 10.1128/aem.00263-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Deng P., Jia J., Foxfire A., Baird S.M., Smith L.J., Lu S.-E. A Polyketide Synthetase Gene Cluster Is Responsible for Antibacterial Activity of Burkholderia contaminans MS14. Phytopathology. 2023;113:11–20. doi: 10.1094/phyto-03-22-0106-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Williams M.D., Sweeney T.R., Trieu S., Orugunty R., Barbour A., Younesi F., Glogauer M., Hansanant N., Shin R., Lu S.-E., et al. Antibiofilm properties of 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-alkenylquinoline, a novel Burkholderia-derived alkaloid. mSphere. 2025;10:e01081-24. doi: 10.1128/msphere.01081-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coulon P.M.L., Groleau M.-C., Déziel E. Potential of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex to Produce 4-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-2-Alkyquinolines. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019;9:3. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klaus J.R., Majerczyk C., Moon S., Eppler N.A., Smith S., Tuma E., Groleau M.-C., Asfahl K.L., Smalley N.E., Hayden H.S., et al. Burkholderia thailandensis Methylated Hydroxyalkylquinolines: Biosynthesis and Antimicrobial Activity in Cocultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020;86:e01452-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01452-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Saalim M., Villegas-Moreno J., Clark B.R. Bacterial Alkyl-4-quinolones: Discovery, Structural Diversity and Biological Properties. Molecules. 2020;25:5689. doi: 10.3390/molecules25235689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reen F.J., McGlacken G.P., O’Gara F. The expanding horizon of alkyl quinolone signalling and communication in polycellular interactomes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018;365:fny076. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vial L., Lépine F., Milot S., Groleau M.-C., Dekimpe V., Woods D.E., Déziel E. Burkholderia pseudomallei, B. thailandensis, and B. ambifaria Produce 4-Hydroxy-2-Alkylquinoline Analogues with a Methyl Group at the 3 Position That Is Required for Quorum-Sensing Regulation. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:5339–5352. doi: 10.1128/jb.00400-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Diggle S.P., Matthijs S., Wright V.J., Fletcher M.P., Chhabra S.R., Lamont I.L., Kong X., Hider R.C., Cornelis P., Cámara M. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-quinolone signal molecules HHQ and PQS play multifunctional roles in quorum sensing and iron entrapment. Chem. Biol. 2007;14:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kang D., Turner K.E., Kirienko N.V. PqsA Promotes Pyoverdine Production via Biofilm Formation. Pathogens. 2018;7:3. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7010003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lin J., Cheng J., Wang Y., Shen X. The Pseudomonas Quinolone Signal (PQS): Not Just for Quorum Sensing Anymore. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018;8:230. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Williams P., Cámara M. Quorum sensing and environmental adaptation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A tale of regulatory networks and multifunctional signal molecules. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009;12:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.de Macedo M.B., Kimmel R., Urankar D., Gazvoda M., Peixoto A., Cools F., Torfs E., Verschaeve L., Lima E.S., Lyčka A. Design, synthesis and antitubercular potency of 4-hydroxyquinolin-2 (1H)-ones. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;138:491–500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.06.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chapalain A., Groleau M.-C., Le Guillouzer S., Miomandre A., Vial L., Milot S., Déziel E. Interplay between 4-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-2-Alkylquinoline and N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Signaling in a Burkholderia cepacia Complex Clinical Strain. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1021. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Piochon M., Coulon P.M.L., Caulet A., Groleau M.-C., Déziel E., Gauthier C. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of Burkholderia-Related 4-Hydroxy-3-methyl-2-alkenylquinolines (HMAQs) and Their N-Oxide Counterparts. J. Nat. Prod. 2020;83:2145–2154. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ramos A.F., Woods D.F., Shanahan R., Cano R., McGlacken G.P., Serra C., O’Gara F., Reen F.J. A structure-function analysis of interspecies antagonism by the 2-heptyl-4-alkyl-quinolone signal molecule from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology. 2020;166:169–179. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rajesh Y.B. Quinoline Heterocycles: Synthesis and Bioactivity. In: Nandeshwarappa B.P., Sadashiv S.O., editors. Heterocycles–Synthesis and Biological Activities. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yihan W., Mohammad R.S. Synergy and Target Promiscuity Drive Structural Divergence in Bacterial Alkylquinolone Biosynthesis. Cell Chem. Biol. 2017;24:1437–1444.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Allocati N., Masulli M., Di Ilio C., De Laurenzi V. Die for the community: An overview of programmed cell death in bacteria. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1609. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li R., Chu R., Ban R. The characteristics of autolysins associated with cell separation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2024;206:e00133-24. doi: 10.1128/jb.00133-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu Z., Qiao K., Tian L., Zhang Q., Liu Z.-Y., Li F.-L. Spontaneous large-scale autolysis in Clostridium acetobutylicum contributes to generation of more spores. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:950. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Geier H., Mostowy S., Cangelosi G.A., Behr M.A., Ford T.E. Autoinducer-2 triggers the oxidative stress response in Mycobacterium avium, leading to biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:1798–1804. doi: 10.1128/aem.02066-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li H., Li X., Wang Z., Fu Y., Ai Q., Dong Y., Yu J. Autoinducer-2 regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation and virulence production in a dose-dependent manner. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:192. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0529-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al-Tohamy A., Donnarumma F., Grove A. Transcriptome-Proteome Profiling in Burkholderia thailandensis during the Transition from Exponential to Stationary Phase. J. Proteome Res. 2025;24:4082–4097. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mirel D.B., Chamberlin M.J. The Bacillus subtilis flagellin gene (hag) is transcribed by the sigma 28 form of RNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 1989;171:3095–3101. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.6.3095-3101.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nishihara T., Freese E. Motility of Bacillus subtilis during growth and sporulation. J. Bacteriol. 1975;123:366–371. doi: 10.1128/jb.123.1.366-371.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhuang X.Y., Guo S., Li Z., Zhao Z., Kojima S., Homma M., Wang P., Lo C.J., Bai F. Live-cell fluorescence imaging reveals dynamic production and loss of bacterial flagella. Mol. Microbiol. 2020;114:279–291. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Luo W., Brouwer C. Pathview: An R/Bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1830–1831. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bruna R.E., Kendra C.G., Pontes M.H. An intracellular phosphorus-starvation signal activates the PhoB/PhoR two-component system in Salmonella enterica. mBio. 2024;15:e0164224. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01642-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Makino K., Shinagawa H., Amemura M., Kawamoto T., Yamada M., Nakata A. Signal transduction in the phosphate regulon of Escherichia coli involves phosphotransfer between PhoR and PhoB proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1989;210:551–559. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90131-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jiang M., Shao W., Perego M.M., Hoch J.A. Multiple histidine kinases regulate entry into stationary phase and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2000;38:535–542. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zahid S.H., Fujita M. Differential signaling roles of the KinA-KinE sensor kinases in regulating Spo0A, the master regulator of Bacillus subtilis cell-fate decisions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2026;92:102791. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2026.102791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Amati G., Bisicchia P., Galizzi A. DegU-P represses expression of the motility fla-che operon in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:6003–6014. doi: 10.1128/jb.186.18.6003-6014.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cairns L.S., Marlow V.L., Bissett E., Ostrowski A., Stanley-Wall N.R. A mechanical signal transmitted by the flagellum controls signalling in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2013;90:6–21. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fujita M., Sadaie Y. Feedback Loops Involving Spo0A and AbrB in In Vitro Transcription of the Genes Involved in the Initiation of Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biochem. 1998;124:98–104. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Marlow V.L., Porter M., Hobley L., Kiley T.B., Swedlow J.R., Davidson F.A., Stanley-Wall N.R. Phosphorylated DegU manipulates cell fate differentiation in the Bacillus subtilis biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:16–27. doi: 10.1128/jb.00930-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zarazúa-Osorio B., Srivastava P., Marathe A., Zahid S.H., Fujita M. Autoregulation of the Master Regulator Spo0A Controls Cell-Fate Decisions in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2025;123:305–329. doi: 10.1111/mmi.15341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aguilar C., Vlamakis H., Guzman A., Losick R., Kolter R. KinD Is a Checkpoint Protein Linking Spore Formation to Extracellular-Matrix Production in Bacillus subtilis Biofilms. mBio. 2010;1:e00035-10. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00035-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Faria J.P., Overbeek R., Taylor R.C., Conrad N., Vonstein V., Goelzer A., Fromion V., Rocha M., Rocha I., Henry C.S. Reconstruction of the Regulatory Network for Bacillus subtilis and Reconciliation with Gene Expression Data. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:275. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fujita M., González-Pastor J.E., Losick R. High- and Low-Threshold Genes in the Spo0A Regulon of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187:1357–1368. doi: 10.1128/jb.187.4.1357-1368.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Grifaldo J., Leyva-Sanchez H., Rosales K., Callaway A., Sotelo A., Martin H.A., Perez R.K., Chavez Rios J., Huezo E.N., Pedraza-Reyes M., et al. Mfd interacts with RNA polymerase to modulate flagellum-dependent motility, chemotaxis, and population heterogeneity in the stationary phase of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2026;208:e0058925. doi: 10.1128/jb.00589-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kearns D.B., Losick R. Cell population heterogeneity during growth of Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 2005;19:3083–3094. doi: 10.1101/gad.1373905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mukherjee S., Kearns D.B. The structure and regulation of flagella in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2014;48:319–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Phillips Z.E., Strauch M.A. Bacillus subtilis sporulation and stationary phase gene expression. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2002;59:392–402. doi: 10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sonenshein A.L. CodY, a global regulator of stationary phase and virulence in Gram-positive bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005;8:203–207. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yan F., Yu Y., Wang L., Luo Y., Guo J.-h., Chai Y. The comER Gene Plays an Important Role in Biofilm Formation and Sporulation in both Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1025. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chastanet A., Vitkup D., Yuan G.C., Norman T.M., Liu J.S., Losick R.M. Broadly heterogeneous activation of the master regulator for sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:8486–8491. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002499107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hamon M.A., Lazazzera B.A. The sporulation transcription factor Spo0A is required for biofilm development in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;42:1199–1209. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chastanet A., Losick R. Just-in-time control of Spo0A synthesis in Bacillus subtilis by multiple regulatory mechanisms. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:6366–6374. doi: 10.1128/jb.06057-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chibazakura T., Kawamura F., Takahashi H. Differential regulation of spo0A transcription in Bacillus subtilis: Glucose represses promoter switching at the initiation of sporulation. J. Bacteriol. 1991;173:2625–2632. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.8.2625-2632.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Narula J., Fujita M., Igoshin O.A. Functional requirements of cellular differentiation: Lessons from Bacillus subtilis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2016;34:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Strauch M.A., Trach K.A., Day J., Hoch J.A. Spo0A activates and represses its own synthesis by binding at its dual promoters. Biochimie. 1992;74:619–626. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(92)90133-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yamashita S., Kawamura F., Yoshikawa H., Takahashi H., Kobayashi Y., Saito H. Dissection of the Expression Signals of the spo0A Gene of Bacillus subtilis: Glucose Represses Sporulation-specific Expression. Microbiology. 1989;135:1335–1345. doi: 10.1099/00221287-135-5-1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Predich M., Nair G., Smith I. Bacillus subtilis early sporulation genes kinA, spo0F, and spo0A are transcribed by the RNA polymerase containing sigma H. J. Bacteriol. 1992;174:2771–2778. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.9.2771-2778.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Quisel J.D., Grossman A.D. Control of sporulation gene expression in Bacillus subtilis by the chromosome partitioning proteins Soj (ParA) and Spo0J (ParB) J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:3446–3451. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.12.3446-3451.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Auchtung J.M., Lee C.A., Grossman A.D. Modulation of the ComA-dependent quorum response in Bacillus subtilis by multiple Rap proteins and Phr peptides. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:5273–5285. doi: 10.1128/jb.00300-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Boguslawski K.M., Hill P.A., Griffith K.L. Novel mechanisms of controlling the activities of the transcription factors Spo0A and ComA by the plasmid-encoded quorum sensing regulators Rap60-Phr60 in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2015;96:325–348. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Serra C.R., Earl A.M., Barbosa T.M., Kolter R., Henriques A.O. Sporulation during growth in a gut isolate of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:4184–4196. doi: 10.1128/jb.01993-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Auger S., Krin E., Aymerich S., Gohar M. Autoinducer 2 affects biofilm formation by Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:937–941. doi: 10.1128/aem.72.1.937-941.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Azakami H., Teramura I., Matsunaga T., Akimichi H., Noiri Y., Ebisu S., Kato A. Characterization of autoinducer 2 signal in Eikenella corrodens and its role in biofilm formation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006;102:110–117. doi: 10.1263/jbb.102.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hammer B.K., Bassler B.L. Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;50:101–104. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kim S., Zhang Y., Ju X., Hassan A., Wang Y.-H., Liu S., Kim S. Spatial and genetic constraints govern transcription–translation coupling and mRNA degradation in bacteria. Nat. Microbiol. 2026;11:1920–1933. doi: 10.1038/s41564-026-02374-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Baumann C., Hydorn M., Cooke S.F., Dworkin J., Rosenthal A.Z. Simultaneous measurements of translation rate and transcriptome uncovers linked regulation within an active bacterial cell population. Sci. Adv. 2026;12:eadz1707. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adz1707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lombardía E., Rovetto A.J., Arabolaza A.L., Grau R.R. A LuxS-dependent cell-to-cell language regulates social behavior and development in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:4442–4452. doi: 10.1128/jb.00165-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pisithkul T., Schroeder J.W., Trujillo E.A., Yeesin P., Stevenson D.M., Chaiamarit T., Coon J.J., Wang J.D., Amador-Noguez D. Metabolic Remodeling during Biofilm Development of Bacillus subtilis. mBio. 2019;10:e00623-19. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00623-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Geng M., Ravichandran A., Escano J., Smith L. Efficacious Analogs of the Lantibiotic Mutacin 1140 against a Systemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e01626-18. doi: 10.1128/aac.01626-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Patel H., Ewels P., Peltzer A., Hammarén R., Botvinnik O., Sturm G., Moreno D., Vemuri P., Garcia L. Nf-core/rnaseq: Nf-core/rnaseq v3.0-Silver Shark. Zenodo. 2020. [(accessed on 9 September 2026)]. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/4323183.
- 80.Di Tommaso P., Chatzou M., Floden E.W., Barja P.P., Palumbo E., Notredame C. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:316–319. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., Gingeras T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Danecek P., Bonfield J.K., Liddle J., Marshall J., Ohan V., Pollard M.O., Whitwham A., Keane T., McCarthy S.A., Davies R.M., et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10:giab008. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wang L., Wang S., Li W. RSeQC: Quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2184–2185. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.García-Alcalde F., Okonechnikov K., Carbonell J., Cruz L.M., Götz S., Tarazona S., Dopazo J., Meyer T.F., Conesa A. Qualimap: Evaluating next-generation sequencing alignment data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2678–2679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Institute B. Picard Toolkit. GitHub Repository; San Francisco, CA, USA: 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Daley T., Smith A.D. Predicting the molecular complexity of sequencing libraries. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:325–327. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Sayols S., Scherzinger D., Klein H. dupRadar: A Bioconductor package for the assessment of PCR artifacts in RNA-Seq data. BMC Bioinform. 2016;17:428. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1276-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Liao Y., Smyth G.K., Shi W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Raudvere U., Kolberg L., Kuzmin I., Arak T., Adler P., Peterson H., Vilo J. g:Profiler: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update) Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W191–W198. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ewels P., Magnusson M., Lundin S., Käller M. MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA). The BioProject accession number is PRJNA1236414.
