Skip to main content
ISME Communications logoLink to ISME Communications
. 2026 Aug 20;6(1):ycag232. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycag232

Detectable effects of bacterial phylogeny on virulence but not phage efficacy in an in vivo Galleria mellonella model

Sarah K Walsh 1,2,✉, Ryan M Imrie 3,4, Angus Buckling 5,6, Ben Longdon 7
PMCID: PMC13615537  PMID: 42801156

Abstract

Predicting the outcomes of bacteria–phage interactions is a central challenge in microbial ecology, particularly across heterogeneous host environments. Evolutionary relatedness among bacteria can explain variation in phage susceptibility in vitro, but it remains unclear whether this predictive relationship persists in complex host environments and to what extent relatedness also explains variation in other bacterial traits, such as virulence. Here, we used an in vivo infection model to quantify how bacterial phylogeny and host environmental context mediate bacterial virulence and bacteria–phage interactions. We infected 4,608 Galleria mellonella larvae with 64 phylogenetically diverse Staphylococcaceae isolates, both with and without co-inoculation of the bacteriophage ISP, and recorded mortality and melanisation over 24 hours. We found that bacterial virulence varied among Staphylococcaceae strains and that a large proportion of this variation could be explained by the evolutionary relationships between bacteria, indicating that phylogeny may be useful in predicting bacterial virulence. The addition of phage significantly improved the survival of G. mellonella larvae, with an average 15.2% increase in endpoint survival and 10.1% reduction in endpoint melanisation across Staphylococcaceae strains. Unlike previous in vitro studies, the evolutionary relationships between bacterial isolates could not explain variation in in vivo phage efficacy across Staphylococcaceae. Concurrently, we found no evidence of a correlation between in vivo and in vitro measures of phage efficacy across bacterial isolates, highlighting the importance of the host environment in shaping bacteria–phage dynamics.

Keywords: bacteriophage, phage therapy, comparative analyses, virulence, evolutionary biology, phylogeny, Staphylococcaceae, staphylococcus, virology, genotype-by-environment interactions

Introduction

Predicting the outcomes of bacteria–phage interactions is a central challenge in microbial ecology. Bacteriophages (‘phage’) are abundant bacterial viruses that shape microbial communities by killing susceptible bacterial hosts, mediating competition, and driving reciprocal evolution of bacterial resistance and phage infectivity [1, 2]. These interactions are strongly context dependent, varying with bacterial genotype, community composition, and environmental conditions [3–5]. Evolutionary relatedness offers one potential source of predictability: closely related taxa often resemble one another in traits whose genetic determinants are predominantly inherited through common ancestry [6]. Across diverse systems, host and pathogen phylogenetic relationships can explain variation in infection traits such as virulence, transmissibility, and pathogen load [7–16], including bacterial susceptibility to phage in vitro [15, 17]. However, phylogenetic signals can depend on environmental context, as genotype-by-environment interactions can alter phenotypes among lineages and change or weaken patterns in trait expression across phylogenies [18]. It therefore remains unclear whether the predictive relationship between bacterial phylogeny and phage susceptibility persists in complex host environments, or whether evolutionary relatedness can also explain variation in other traits during bacterial infection, such as virulence.

Animal host environments differ from laboratory media in nutrient availability, pH, osmotic stress, spatial structure, microbial competition, and immune activity [19, 20], all of which can alter bacterial physiology [21–23]. These physiological changes can affect susceptibility to phage adsorption, infection, and replication [24–26], while phage virions can themselves be affected by the extracellular environment or targeted for clearance by the host immune system [27, 28]. During infection, bacteria and phage may also evolve in response to one another and to the host environment, allowing stochastic differences in evolutionary trajectories to contribute further to variation in infection outcomes [29, 30]. Together, these processes may alter the relative susceptibility of bacterial strains and disrupt phylogenetic patterns observed under simplified laboratory conditions. The applied importance of this problem is highlighted by phage therapy, where rising antimicrobial resistance has increased the need to identify phages that can control bacterial infections [31–33]. Phages are commonly selected using in vitro assays [34], but strong bacterial suppression in vitro does not consistently translate into reduced bacterial loads in vivo [34–37]. Similarly, experimental pre-adaptation of phages can improve bacterial suppression or host range in vitro, but evidence that these benefits reliably improve efficacy in animal hosts remains limited [38–41].

Variation in bacterial virulence provides an additional source of heterogeneity in animal–bacteria–phage infection outcomes. Virulence reflects the damage a pathogen causes to the animal host and can arise through multiple, non-mutually exclusive mechanisms, including bacterial growth, tissue invasion, toxin production, adhesion, and host immune-mediated pathology [42–44]. Bacterial strains with similar in vitro susceptibility to phage may nevertheless produce substantially different infection outcomes because they differ in the harm they cause to their host [45]. Phage-associated changes in infection outcome may reflect reduced bacterial burden, altered expression of virulence traits, altered host immune activation, or a combination of these processes [46, 47]. In some cases, lytic phage may even increase host damage through the release of endotoxins or other pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) during bacterial lysis [48]. Explaining variation in virulence, both in the presence and absence of phage, is therefore important for predicting which bacterial infections are most likely to cause host damage and which are most likely to benefit from phage treatment.

Members of the Staphylococcaceae family occupy diverse host-associated niches and span commensal to opportunistic lifestyles [49–52], making them a tractable system for studying variation in virulence and phage susceptibility. Within this family, Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of disease globally, producing infections ranging from relatively benign skin and soft-tissue infections to severe and life-threatening systemic disease [53, 54]. Bacterial phylogeny has previously been shown to explain a substantial proportion of the variation in phage susceptibility across Staphylococcaceae in vitro, suggesting that many determinants of susceptibility are vertically inherited in this system [48]. However, it is unknown whether this phylogenetic signal is preserved when Staphylococcaceae-ISP interactions occur within an animal host. It is likewise unclear whether bacterial phylogeny explains variation in Staphylococcaceae virulence during animal infection.

Here, we used a phylogenetically diverse panel of 64 Staphylococcaceae isolates, spanning 2 genera and 17 species, and the staphylococcal phage ISP [34, 55] to investigate bacterial virulence and phage efficacy in vivo using simultaneous bacteria–phage co-inoculation of Galleria mellonella larvae. G. mellonella provides a scalable in vivo infection model with a complex innate immune response, enabling comparative tests of host damage and phage effects across many bacterial strains [56, 57]. melanisation is a key component of this response, mediating pathogen encapsulation, reactive oxygen species production, and wound healing, with visible melanin accumulation providing a measure of immune activation and host damage over time [34, 55]. G. mellonella has previously been used to study staphylococcal infection phenotypes [58–60] and to evaluate antimicrobial [61, 62] and phage interventions [63–65]. Using this model, we address three questions: first, whether evolutionary relatedness explains variation in virulence across Staphylococcaceae during animal infection; second, whether evolutionary relatedness explains variation in ISP efficacy across bacterial strains during co-inoculation; and third, whether a standard in vitro measure of phage efficacy captures the same inter-strain patterns observed in vivo.

Materials and methods

Staphylococcaceae isolates

The Staphylococcaceae panel comprises 64 strains of Staphylococcaceae, representing a broad phylogenetic and geographic range of hosts. These strains span 2 genera and 17 species that were estimated to have last shared a common ancestor ~122 Ma [66]. Multi-locus sequencing typing (MLST) revealed that five Clonal Complexes (CC) of S. aureus were represented in this panel, including major complexes CC1 and CC8 (Table S1).

To minimise differences arising from laboratory adaptation, isogenic populations of each Staphylococcaceae strain had previously been isolated and stored in 25% glycerol at −80°C. When required, isolates were cultured by inoculating 10 ml of high-salt LB Miller broth (Formedium) in a sterile 30 ml glass universal with a scraping of the frozen culture and incubating at 37°C, 180 rpm overnight. To ensure that any observed differences in virulence or susceptibility to ISP were not a function of bacterial density, calibration curves using optical density (OD) and colony-forming units (CFUs)/ml were generated and used to dilute or concentrate each strain to a final concentration of 1 × 1010 CFU/ml prior to use.

Inferring the host phylogeny

The methods used to infer the host phylogeny have been described in detail elsewhere [17]. Briefly, whole genome sequences were collected for 8 previously sequenced strains from NCBI (Table S1), and the remaining 56 sequences were obtained through whole genome sequencing. Library preparations and sequencing were performed by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK) and a core genome alignment of the isolates was constructed by identifying 102 orthologous genes shared between all 64 Staphylococcaceae isolates.

Ultrametric phylogenetic trees were constructed using BEAST v1.10 [67]. Sequence alignments were fitted to HKY substitution models using relaxed uncorrelated molecular clock models, gamma distributions of rate variation, and constant population size coalescent priors [67]. Separate substitution models and molecular clocks were fitted to 1st/2nd and 3rd codon positions to reflect differences in selective constraint [68]. Two independent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains were run until convergence was achieved, with a burn-in of <10%. Convergence of all parameters was checked using Tracer v1.6 [69].

Bacteriophage

An isolate of ISP was kindly provided by Jean-Paul Pirnay and Maya Merabishvili at the Queen Astrid Military Hospital (Brussels, Belgium). ISP was propagated on the S. aureus strain EOE35 (hereafter referred to as the ‘propagation host’) and extracted using chloroform. The number of infectious phage present was quantified using plaque assays performed as previously described [17].

Galleria mellonella

Final instar G. mellonella larvae were obtained from LiveFoods Direct (Sheffield, UK) and stored at 4°C in the dark to prevent pupation. Prior to injection, larvae were sorted into groups of 13 and stored in petri dishes at 4°C until required (maximum of 24 hours). Larvae with signs of injury, melanisation, or that were noticeably smaller or larger than average were excluded. The order in which individual larvae were assigned to each treatment was randomised to account for any subconscious biases in selection.

Body size has been shown to influence infection outcomes in G. mellonella [70]. To provide a measure of body size while minimising handling stress, a pilot set of 120 larvae were weighed and imaged (as described below) to establish the relationship between larval mass and pixel area. A linear model revealed a strong positive relationship between pixel area and weight (Pearson’s r = 0.94, P < .001; Fig. S1). Experimental larvae were then assigned weights based on the average of their pixel areas across images taken at each experimental timepoint, and weight was included as a covariate in all subsequent analyses.

Inoculations

Bacteria were diluted to 1 × 1010 CFU/ml and phage to 1 × 1010 PFU/ml. For the without phage treatment, the appropriate bacterial strain was diluted 1:2 with LB Miller Broth to ensure an equivalent total injection volume and bacterial dose; 10 μL of the diluted bacteria was injected into the last left proleg of each larva using a 50 μL Hamilton syringe (Hamilton, Nevada, USA) for a final dose of 0.5 × 108 bacteria. For the with phage treatment, bacteria were diluted 1:2 with phage immediately prior to injection, for a final dose of 0.5 × 108 bacteria and 0.5 × 108 phage (multiplicity of infection; MOI of 1). These doses were chosen based on pilot data that showed sufficient continuous variation in bacterial virulence and phage efficacy across strains at these doses within an experimental timeframe that minimised censoring due to larval pupation (Fig. S2).

Thirteen larvae were injected for each treatment to account for excessive post-injection bleeding, which occurred in a subset of individuals, and could alter the received dose of bacteria or phage. Larvae were left to recover for 15 minutes on filter paper before the 12 showing the least bleeding were transferred to each well of a 12-well plate and incubated at 37°C in the dark. Mortality—defined here as larvae being sessile and non-responsive to stimuli—was measured once an hour from 0- to 12-hours post infection (hpi), and at a final additional timepoint of 24 hpi. To minimise block effects and reduce experimental noise, bacterial treatments were randomized across the 10-day injection schedule. For each bacterial strain, 3 replicate groups of larvae were prepared, and on each day, 20 randomised combinations of bacterial strain and replicate were selected for injection. Both with and without phage treatments were performed on the same day for a given replicate. All inoculations were performed by a single individual to avoid introducing inter-operator variability.

Melanisation was quantified by photographing each plate at each hourly timepoint using a Panasonic Lumix GH3 camera fitted with a G Vario 14–45 mm f/3.5–5.6 lens. The camera was fixed with a tripod at 50 cm vertically from the plate surface, and RAW images were taken at a fixed focal length of 35 mm. Plates were evenly lit by overhead diffusion lighting and imaged on an 18% neutral grey background, which provided a consistent reference for white balance and exposure correction during image analysis. The bottom of each plate well was covered with a matte green cardboard disc created using a 2.2 cm diameter hole punch (Hobbycraft, UK) to allow for the separation of each larva from the background image by chroma keying. White balancing, segmentation, and quantification of melanisation were performed using a custom image processing Python script described in the Supplementary Methods S1 (see Fig. S3 for an example processed plate image).

To ensure any experimental observations were not due to pre-existing illness, injection trauma, or inoculum contamination, no-injection and injection controls (LB Miller broth or ISP only) were included on each day of injections. Control plates throughout the experiment showed no detectable mortality and little evidence of melanisation (Fig. S4).

In vitro measures of phage efficacy

To compare phage efficacy measured in vivo and in vitro, optical density assays were used as a measure of bacterial growth suppression by phage under controlled in vitro conditions as previously described [17]. Briefly, each Staphylococcaceae isolate was incubated for 24 hours at 37°C in the presence or absence of bacteriophage ISP. Phage-treated cultures had final concentrations of 5 × 104 CFU/ml bacteria and 2.5 × 103 PFU/ml phage (MOI of 0.05), while control cultures contained bacteria only. The MOI used for the in vitro infections was lower than that used for the in vivo assays but was chosen based on a previous study that showed sufficient continuous non-saturating variation in phage efficacy across strains at these doses [17]. Three biological replicates were performed for each treatment condition. Following incubation, optical density was measured at 600 nm using a MultiSkan Sky Microplate Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). In vitro phage efficacy was quantified as the proportional reduction in bacterial growth over 24 hours due to phage exposure, calculated as:

graphic file with name DmEquation1.gif

Statistical analysis

To allow for the joint analysis of mortality and melanisation—which show different non-linear relationships with time—non-linear least squares models were used to provide summary parameter estimates that could be used as response variables in phylogenetic mixed models. These models were fitted separately to data from each plate of 12 larvae, yielding n = 3 independent replicates (plates) for each unique combination of bacterial isolate and ISP. Mortality data followed typical survival curve dynamics, but with curves frequently seen to reach a plateau below 100% mortality within the observational window (Fig. S5), indicating the presence of surviving individuals (i.e. a ‘cure fraction’). In some cases, mortality was low or absent during the 0–12 hour window but present at 24 hours, giving rise to two equally plausible survival curves: one in which the observed 24-hour mortality represents the upper asymptote of mortality (referred to here as the ‘cured’ assumption), and one in which it marks the onset of a larger, unobserved increase in mortality beyond the observational window (referred to here as the ‘unobserved’ assumption). All results and analyses presented below use parameter estimates inferred under the cured assumption, and parallel analyses performed using the unobserved assumption yielded qualitatively similar results. Melanisation tended to increase rapidly in the first few hours of infection, then slow to a plateau by the end of the observation window (Fig. S6). Michaelis–Menten curves were chosen to summarize these temporal dynamics, as they provide two parameters analogous to those of survival curves. In both cases, the fitted models provided estimates of an upper asymptote (maximum mortality or melanisation) and a T50 describing the time to half-maximal response. For both melanisation and mortality, the fitted models provided a close description of the observed data (Fig. S7).

Phylogenetic generalised linear mixed models were then used to investigate the extent to which the evolutionary relationships between bacteria could explain variation in the maximum and T50 parameter values for mortality and melanisation, and the change in these values due to the inclusion of ISP. A full description of the structure of these models, their run conditions, and equations used to calculate phylogenetic heritability and repeatability can be found in the Supplementary Methods S1. This two-stage approach allows phylogenetic patterns in mortality and melanisation dynamics to be analysed using specified non-linear curve forms, but does not propagate uncertainty in the within-plate estimates of maximum response and T50 into the downstream phylogenetic mixed models. This approach therefore assumes that uncertainty in these plate-level curve fits is small relative to the biological variation among strains, phage treatments, and biological replicates. All scripts and data used in this analysis are available at https://github.com/Sarah-K-Walsh/2026-In-Vivo-Phage-Efficacy.

Results

Bacterial virulence in G. mellonella is a phylogenetically heritable trait

To investigate whether the evolutionary relationships between bacteria could explain variation in their in vivo virulence and susceptibility to phage, we experimentally infected 4,608 G. mellonella larvae with 64 Staphylococcaceae isolates in the presence or absence of bacteriophage ISP and recorded mortality and melanisation over the following 24 hours (129,024 total observations).

G. mellonella larvae showed considerable variation in their mortality and melanisation rates across the bacterial strains tested (Figs 1 and 2, respectively). Some bacterial strains caused mortality in all hosts within 8 hpi (e.g. S. aureus B142S1 and DEU2) while for other strains, a subset of hosts consistently survived infection beyond the observational window (e.g. S. aureus ASARM74 and EOE003). Similarly, some strains induced high levels of melanisation with either a rapid (e.g. Mammaliicoccus sciuri) or gradual onset (e.g. S. schleiferi spp coagulans) and others caused little melanisation (e.g. S. aureus EOE041 or S. aureus SaTPS3072).

Figure 1.

Heatmaps show mortality trajectories for 64 Staphylococcaceae strains infecting Galleria mellonella larvae, ordered by bacterial phylogeny. Mortality varies substantially among strains, with some causing rapid near-complete mortality and others causing limited mortality. Co-inoculation with bacteriophage ISP generally reduces mortality and delays mortality onset across strains, although the magnitude of this effect varies. Phage-associated changes in mortality show some clustering among related bacterial strains across the phylogeny.

Mortality of G. mellonella larvae following Staphylococcaceae infection with and without co-inoculation of ISP. Heatmaps show percentage mortality over time (‘Without phage’ and ‘With phage’ panels) and change in percentage mortality with ISP (‘Effect of phage’ panel) for 64 Staphylococcaceae strains infecting G. mellonella larvae. Values shown are means across 3 biological replicates (plates of 12 individuals). A maximum clade credibility bacterial phylogeny is shown on the left, with a scale bar indicating substitutions-per-site.

Figure 2.

Heatmaps show melanisation trajectories for 64 Staphylococcaceae strains infecting Galleria mellonella larvae, ordered by bacterial phylogeny. melanisation varies substantially among strains, with some inducing rapid, extensive melanisation and others causing weaker responses. Co-inoculation with bacteriophage ISP generally reduces melanisation across strains, although the magnitude of this effect varies and some strains subtly increase in melanisation with phage treatment across timepoints. Similar phage-associated changes in melanisation are observed among some closely related bacterial strains, forming clusters across the phylogeny.

Melanisation in G. mellonella larvae following Staphylococcaceae infection with and without co-inoculation of ISP. Heatmaps show percentage melanisation over time (‘Without phage’ and ‘With phage’ panels) and change in percentage melanisation with ISP (‘Effect of phage’ panel) for 64 Staphylococcaceae strains infecting G. mellonella larvae. Values shown are means across 3 biological replicates (plates of 12 individuals). A maximum clade credibility bacterial phylogeny is shown on the left, with a scale bar indicating substitutions-per-site.

Non-linear least squares models were used to summarise the dynamics of both mortality and melanisation over time, describing them in terms of their maximum (upper asymptote) and T50 (time to one-half of maximum). Across bacterial strains, mean maximum mortality was 92.6% (95% CIs: 54%–100%) with a mean T50 of 10.2 hours (95% CIs: 9.3–10.9 hours), suggesting that Staphylococcaceae infections are, in general, highly virulent in G. mellonella. Concurrently, the mean across-strain maximum melanisation was high (67.7%, 95% CIs: 25%–100%) with a mean T50 of 2.1 hours (95% CIs: 0.2–4 hours) indicating a rapid onset of the melanisation response. When these parameters were further analysed in phylogenetic mixed models, all four showed evidence of phylogenetic structure across Staphylococcaceae, with significant estimates of phylogenetic heritability detected for maximum mortality, maximum melanisation, and melanisation T50 (Fig. 3 ‘Without phage’ and Table S2). A significant estimate of repeatability, but not phylogenetic heritability, was detected for mortality T50 (Fig. 3 ‘Without phage’ and Table S2). Together, this suggests that a large proportion of the variation in virulence across Staphylococcaceae in G. mellonella larvae can be explained by the bacterial phylogeny.

Figure 3.

Point estimates and 95% credible intervals from phylogenetic mixed models summarizing fixed effects, repeatability, and phylogenetic heritability for mortality and melanisation traits across Staphylococcaceae strains. Mortality and melanisation parameters show high repeatability among strains. Maximum mortality, maximum melanisation, and melanisation T50 exhibit significant phylogenetic heritability, indicating that closely related bacterial strains tend to have similar virulence. In contrast, the effects of ISP on mortality and melanisation show no detectable phylogenetic heritability.

Estimates of fixed effects, repeatability, and phylogenetic heritability for mortality and melanisation parameters across Staphylococcaceae strains. Panels show the posterior means (points) and 95% CI intervals (lines) for phylogenetic mixed model estimates of inter-strain means (fixed effects), repeatability, and phylogenetic heritability of four virulence parameters: maximum mortality (%), mortality T50 (hours), maximum melanisation (%), and melanisation T50 (hours). Phylogenetic heritability estimates are taken from models of structure (1), while fixed effect and repeatability estimates are taken from models of structure (2). Dotted lines are used to highlight 0 (fixed effects) and 0.05 (repeatability, phylogenetic heritability). Significant (credible) estimates, whose 95% CI intervals do not contain these values, are highlighted in black.

Phage efficacy varies in vivo but shows no detectable phylogenetic heritability

Co-inoculation of bacteria and ISP generally led to a decrease in both mortality (Fig. 1) and melanisation (Fig. 2), although considerable between-strain variation was again evident, with some strains showing large changes in infection dynamics with phage (e.g. S. aureus USFL020 and S. kloosii) and others appearing largely unaffected (e.g. S. aureus 8325-4 and S. napaliensis). When comparing the across-strain means with and without phage treatment, the 95% CI intervals of most mortality and melanisation parameters overlapped (Fig. 3 and Table S2). However, when analysed as a change in parameter value with the addition of phage (in effect treating the data as paired), significant across-strain mean effects of phage treatment were detected for all four parameters. These estimates suggest that, on average, the inclusion of ISP caused a 15.2% decrease in maximum mortality (95% CIs: 1%–27%), an increase of 3.2 hours to mortality T50 (95% CIs: 2.5–3.8 hours), a decrease in maximum melanisation of 10.1% (95% CIs: 4%–16.4%), and a decrease of 0.29 hours to melanisation T50 (95% CIs: 0.03–0.53 hours).

The phylogenetic heritability in bacterial virulence remained consistent with the addition of phage (Fig. 3, ‘With phage’ and Table S2), with little change in the rank-order of virulence among bacterial strains in the presence or absence of ISP (Fig. 4). The addition of phage led to a small increase in phylogenetic variance for all tested parameters (Tables S3 and S4); however, this was not significant. In contrast, we found no detectable phylogenetic heritability for the effect of ISP on any mortality or melanisation parameters (Fig. 3, ‘Effect of phage’ and Table S2) with all estimates having broad credible intervals spanning much of the possible 0–1 range: maximum mortality (0.53, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.93), mortality T50 (0.40, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.96), maximum melanisation (0.32, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.82), and melanisation T50 (0.73, 95% CI: 0.04, 1.00). The phage-induced change in three of these parameters did show significant estimates of repeatability: maximum mortality (0.88, 95% CIs: 0.61–0.99), maximum melanisation (0.76, 95% CIs: 0.08–1.00), and melanisation T50 (0.91, 95% CIs: 0.44–1.00). Together, these results indicate that ISP efficacy is consistent within strains, but that any phylogenetic component of this variation was poorly estimated and not credibly distinguishable from zero in this dataset.

Figure 4.

Scatter plots show relationships between mortality and melanisation parameters measured with and without ISP co-inoculation for 64 Staphylococcaceae strains. All four traits exhibit strong positive inter-strain correlations, with strains that are highly virulent without phage generally remaining relatively virulent with phage. These results indicate that ISP reduces virulence overall but causes little change in the rank order of bacterial virulence across strains.

Inter-strain correlations between mortality and melanisation parameters in the presence and absence of ISP. Plots show the inter-strain correlations of the ‘With phage’ and ‘Without phage’ treatments for each mortality and melanisation parameter, with points indicating the mean value of each Staphylococcaceae strain. Trendlines, correlation coefficients, and slopes are taken from phylogenetic mixed models of structure (1), with trendlines whose coefficient and slope estimates do not include zero highlighted in blue.

Staphylococcaceae virulence traits are correlated across-strains

To investigate whether mortality and melanisation parameters were correlated across Staphylococcaceae strains, inter-strain correlations were estimated for each pair of parameters using phylogenetic mixed models (Fig. 5). Positive correlations were detected between maximum melanisation and melanisation T50 (R = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.16–0.81), and between maximum melanisation and maximum mortality (R = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.16–0.81), indicating that infections that induce greater endpoint melanisation tend to also induce longer melanisation responses and have higher endpoint mortality rates. Negative correlations were also detected between mortality T50 and maximum melanisation (R = −0.40, 95% CI: −0.04, −0.75), and between mortality T50 and maximum mortality (R = −0.51, 95% CI: −0.19, −0.80), suggesting that infections which cause rapid mortality are often also those with the highest endpoint mortality rates and melanisation responses. There were no detectable correlations between maximum mortality and melanisation T50 (R = 0.19, 95% CI: −0.26, 0.56), or between mortality T50 and melanisation T50 (R = −0.25, 95% CI: −0.63, 0.13), although the wide credible intervals indicate that weak-to-moderate associations cannot be excluded. The strength of all detected correlations remained consistent in the presence of ISP (Fig. S8).

Figure 5.

Scatter plots show correlations among mortality and melanisation parameters across 64 Staphylococcaceae strains in the absence of ISP. Strains with higher maximum mortality tend to exhibit higher maximum melanisation and shorter mortality T50 values, indicating that more virulent infections generally cause stronger melanisation responses and progress more rapidly. Maximum melanisation is also positively associated with melanisation T50, while other trait pairs show weak or no detectable relationships.

Inter-strain correlations between mortality and melanisation parameters in the absence of ISP. Plots show the inter-strain correlations of each pair of mortality and melanisation parameters, with points indicating the mean value of each Staphylococcaceae strain. Trendlines, correlation coefficients, and slopes are taken from phylogenetic mixed models of structure (1), with trendlines whose coefficient and slope estimates do not include zero highlighted in blue.

No detectable correlation in ISP efficacy in vivo and in vitro

Finally, we investigated whether ISP efficacy in vivo—measured as changes in mortality and melanisation parameters with phage treatment—showed any detectable correlation with efficacy in vitro, using optical density assays. We detected no detectable correlations between in vivo measures of ISP efficacy and in vitro OD-based efficacy (Fig. S9) with wide credible intervals spanning much of the possible correlation coefficient range. This indicates that any relationship between these measures was not strong enough to be detected in this dataset, consistent with the host environment altering the relative susceptibility of Staphylococcaceae strains to phage treatment.

Discussion

Here, we examined whether Staphylococcaceae evolutionary relatedness explained variation in virulence and ISP phage susceptibility in an in vivo G. mellonella infection model. We found that bacterial virulence varied across strains and that the Staphylococcaceae phylogeny could explain a large proportion of this variation. Co-inoculation of ISP significantly reduced the maximum mortality, speed of mortality, and maximum melanisation experienced during infection, demonstrating that ISP was able to reduce bacterial virulence across a wide range of Staphylococcaceae isolates in vivo. However, there was no detectable phylogenetic heritability in in vivo phage efficacy and no correlation between phage efficacy in vitro and in vivo. This mismatch is consistent with genotype-by-environment interactions, whereby the host environment alters phage efficacy in a bacterial strain-specific way, weakening or obscuring the phylogenetically structured susceptibility observed in vitro.

Previously, we showed that the evolutionary relationships between staphylococcal hosts can explain variation in susceptibility to phage infection in vitro [17]. However, here we have shown that, in vivo, the relationship between bacterial relatedness and susceptibility to phage is less pronounced. This suggests that conditions within the G. mellonella host environment—such as immunity, local pH, or nutrient availability—interact with bacterial genotype to alter relative phage susceptibility across strains. These genotype-by-environment interactions may weaken or obscure the phylogenetic signal detected in vitro. Estimates of in vivo heritability and repeatability that were not detectably different from zero often had wide credible intervals, spanning much of the possible 0–1 range. This suggests that our dataset had limited power to differentiate weak from genuinely zero effects of phylogeny. However, because comparable models detected phylogenetic heritability for virulence in the present study and for in vitro phage susceptibility previously [17], any undetected phylogenetic component of in vivo phage efficacy is likely to be weaker than these effects.

Correspondingly, no inter-strain correlations were detected between any in vivo and in vitro metrics of phage efficacy, indicating that the host environment can act as a strong source of variation that disrupts in vitro phylogenetic heritability. In applied settings, phage are typically selected using in vitro screens of bacterial growth suppression (often complemented by plaque-based or molecular readouts), an approach that implicitly assumes laboratory efficacy will translate to performance in vivo. Notably, in previous work, we observed strong positive correlations between OD assays and both qPCR and plaque assays (recorded as a binary trait) [17], suggesting that these approaches capture broadly consistent aspects of phage efficacy in vitro. However, because we did not directly compare these alternative in vitro assays with the in vivo outcomes measured here, we cannot exclude the possibility that other assays would show different relationships with in vivo susceptibility. Nevertheless, over-reliance on individual in vitro assays to select phage for therapy may explain some of the observed inconsistency in in vivo phage efficacy, with phage showing highly variable success rates in treating similar infections [34].

Phylogenetic approaches have shown that evolutionary relatedness among both hosts and pathogens can explain variation in infection traits [7–16]. However, although bacterial virulence has been associated with particular phylogenetic clades [71–73], including within S. aureus [74–76], formal tests quantifying how much variation in virulence is explained by bacterial phylogeny remain rare. Here, we find that the evolutionary relationships between bacteria can explain a considerable proportion of their virulence in vivo, with closely related strains of bacteria tending to show similar levels of virulence. This similarity in virulence among close relatives is likely underpinned by shared genetic determinants of infection, including variation in within-host persistence and replication, virulence factor repertoires, and regulation of virulence expression (e.g. quorum sensing) [77–79]. Conversely, we do observe some instances where closely related species show large differences in their virulence (e.g. the S. aureus strains EOE041, EOE023, and EOE003), suggesting that there are instances where Brownian evolutionary processes alone cannot explain variation in virulence. This may reflect evolutionarily recent changes in the genetic components that influence virulence (e.g. single-nucleotide polymorphisms in virulence factors [80, 81]) or the loss or gain of genetic components in a non-vertically inherited way (e.g. horizontal gene transfer leading to the acquisition of a novel virulence factor [82, 83]). Improving our understanding of how the relatedness of bacterial strains can explain their virulence, and the taxonomic scales at which this relationship breaks down, may improve our ability to predict bacterial virulence, disease outcome, and manage treatment plans in a clinical setting.

The mechanisms by which ISP reduces mortality caused by some bacterial strains during co-inoculation remain uncertain. Notably, as ISP and bacteria were administered simultaneously, the effects described here should be interpreted as phage-associated changes during infection establishment rather than treatment of an established infection. These effects could plausibly reflect bacterial killing, delayed bacterial growth, altered expression of virulence traits, altered host immune activation, differences in phage persistence or clearance, or the emergence of phage-resistant bacteria during infection. Similarly, phage-associated changes in melanisation may reflect changes in bacterial burden, virulence expression, immune activation, or exposure to bacterial products released during lysis. Previous studies have shown that phage-mediated bacterial lysis can increase host damage by releasing immunostimulatory PAMPs [48], and the increased melanisation observed for a minority of strains following ISP co-inoculation may suggest that similar processes contribute to infection outcome in this system. Future work should seek to resolve these mechanisms, particularly given the continued development of ISP as a standardized therapeutic phage [34].

Host immune responses can influence bacterial populations and, by extension, phage dynamics, through various mechanisms including direct effects on bacterial or phage survival, and indirect effects on bacterial susceptibility to phage infection [84, 85]. The innate immune system has been shown to play a role in the clearance of bacteriophage in vivo [86, 87], including neutralisation by the complement system [88, 89] or phagocytosis [87, 90]. In our data, we see several instances in which the addition of phage led to a marked early increase in G. mellonella survival compared to the no-phage treatment, with no corresponding improvement in endpoint survival (e.g. S. aureus DAR06181LC1), a pattern that may be consistent with phage clearance within 24 hours of inoculation. Repeated or sustained dosing could modify these dynamics by maintaining phage densities above thresholds required for productive infection and in situ amplification, consistent with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic work on density-dependent phage amplification and clearance [91, 92]. However, it has also been observed that repeated dosing of phage can lead to lower serum phage titres and increased host immune clearance [93, 94]. In this system, repeated dosing was not explored because it would require multiple injections per larva, which introduces injection-related mortality and confounds survival outcomes in G. mellonella.

Together, our results demonstrate that the Staphylococcaceae phylogeny is a strong predictor of bacterial virulence in vivo. Furthermore, we highlight that in vivo ISP efficacy shows no detectable correlation with an in vitro measure of ISP efficacy, suggesting alternative approaches may be required to predict phage treatment outcome. While G. mellonella provides a scalable and experimentally tractable animal infection model, it is not a direct surrogate for mammalian host environment. Although larvae can be incubated at 37°C, temperature can influence both bacterial physiology and insect immune responses, and the Galleria immune system differs substantially from mammalian immunity, including the absence of adaptive antibody-mediated immune responses and differences in phage clearance mechanisms. The patterns observed here should therefore be interpreted as evidence that host-associated environments can alter bacteria–phage outcomes, but their direct relevance to mammalian therapy will require validation in mammalian infection models. More broadly, it remains unclear whether bacterial phylogeny and in vitro measures of phage susceptibility can predict bacteria–phage interactions in other complex natural environments, including soils, aquatic systems, and polymicrobial communities. Resolving this question will be important for understanding how phages contribute to changes in microbial community composition and function across environments. Future work should therefore test the predictive value of bacterial phylogeny and in vitro assays across a wider range of environmental contexts, while also resolving the mechanisms by which ISP alters bacterial virulence in vivo.

Supplementary Material

V011_Galleria_SupplementaryMaterials_Clean_ycag232

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Daniel Padfield and Pauline D. Scanlan for useful discussion and comments.

Contributor Information

Sarah K Walsh, Medical Research Council-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G611QH, United Kingdom; Centre for Ecology and Conservation; Faculty of Environment, Science, and Economy; Biosciences, University of Exeter; Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, United Kingdom.

Ryan M Imrie, Medical Research Council-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G611QH, United Kingdom; Centre for Ecology and Conservation; Faculty of Environment, Science, and Economy; Biosciences, University of Exeter; Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, United Kingdom.

Angus Buckling, Centre for Ecology and Conservation; Faculty of Environment, Science, and Economy; Biosciences, University of Exeter; Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, United Kingdom; Environment and Sustainability Institute; Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter; Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, United Kingdom.

Ben Longdon, Centre for Ecology and Conservation; Faculty of Environment, Science, and Economy; Biosciences, University of Exeter; Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, United Kingdom.

Author contributions

Sarah K. Walsh (Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Ryan M. Imrie (Methodology, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Angus Buckling (Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—review & editing), and Ben Longdon (Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—review & editing)

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

S.K.W. was supported by a studentship funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) South West Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership (BB/M009122/1). R.M.I. and B.L. were supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (109356/Z/15/Z). A.B. is supported by NERC (NE/S000771/1) and NSF-NERC (DEB-1556444). The authors would also like to acknowledge funding from the MRC to Edward Hutchinson at the MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research [MC_UU_00034/1] for computational resources. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CCBY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Data availability

All of the datasets and scripts used for these analyses are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/Sarah-K-Walsh/2026-In-Vivo-Phage-Efficacy).

References

  • 1. Koskella  B, Brockhurst  MA. Bacteria–phage coevolution as a driver of ecological and evolutionary processes in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev  2014;38:916–31. 10.1111/1574-6976.12072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Castledine  M, Buckling  A. Critically evaluating the relative importance of phage in shaping microbial community composition. Trends Microbiol  2024;32:957–69. 10.1016/J.TIM.2024.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lopez Pascua  L, Gandon  S, Buckling  A. Abiotic heterogeneity drives parasite local adaptation in coevolving bacteria and phages. J Evol Biol  2012;25:187–95. 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2011.02416.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Poullain  V, Gandon  S, Brockhurst  MA, et al.  The evolution of specificity in evolving and coevolving antagonistic interactions between a bacteria and its phage. Evolution  2008;62:1–11. 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2007.00260.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Alseth  EO, Pursey  E, Luján  AM, et al.  Bacterial biodiversity drives the evolution of CRISPR-based phage resistance. Nature  2019;574:549–52. 10.1038/S41586-019-1662-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Freckleton  RP, Harvey  PH, Pagel  M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat  2002;160:712–26. 10.1086/343873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Imrie  RM, Roberts  KE, Longdon  B. Between virus correlations in the outcome of infection across host species: evidence of virus by host species interactions. Evol Lett  2021;5:472–83. 10.1002/evl3.247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Imrie  RM, Walsh  SK, Roberts  KE, et al.  Investigating the outcomes of virus coinfection within and across host species. PLoS Pathog  2023;19:1–23. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Longdon  B, Hadfield  JD, Webster  CL, et al.  Host phylogeny determines viral persistence and replication in novel hosts. PLoS Pathog  2011;7:e1002260. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sun  H, Hanson  MA, Walsh  SK, et al.  Varying phylogenetic signal in susceptibility to four bacterial pathogens across species of Drosophilidae. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci  2025;292:20242239. 10.1098/rspb.2024.2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Alizon  S, von Wyl  V, Stadler  T, et al.  Phylogenetic approach reveals that virus genotype largely determines HIV set-point viral load. PLoS Pathog  2010;6:e1001123. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1001123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Guth  S, Visher  E, Boots  M, et al.  Host phylogenetic distance drives trends in virus virulence and transmissibility across the animal-human interface. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci  2019;374:20190296. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Streicker  DG, Turmelle  AS, Vonhof  MJ, et al.  Host phylogeny constrains cross-species emergence and establishment of rabies virus in bats. Science  2010;329:676–9. 10.1126/science.1188836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Blanquart  F, Wymant  C, Cornelissen  M, et al.  Viral genetic variation accounts for a third of variability in HIV-1 set-point viral load in Europe. PLoS Biol  2017;15:e2001855. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Laabei  M, Recker  M, Rudkin  JK, et al.  Predicting the virulence of MRSA from its genome sequence. 2014;24:839–49. 10.1101/gr.165415.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hodcroft  E, Hadfield  JD, Fearnhill  E, et al.  The contribution of viral genotype to plasma viral set-point in HIV infection. PLoS Pathog  2014;10:e1004112. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1004112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Walsh  SK, Imrie  RM, Matuszewska  M, et al.  The host phylogeny determines viral infectivity and replication across staphylococcus host species. PLoS Pathog  2023;19:e1011433. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1011433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Martiny  AC, Treseder  K, Pusch  G. Phylogenetic conservatism of functional traits in microorganisms. ISME J  2013;7:830–8. 10.1038/ISMEJ.2012.160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Louis  P, O’Byrne  CP. Life in the gut: microbial responses to stress in the gastrointestinal tract. Sci Prog  2010;93:7–36. 10.3184/003685009X12605525292307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Brown  SA, Palmer  KL, Whiteley  M. Revisiting the host as a growth medium. Nat Rev Microbiol  2008;6:657–66. 10.1038/NRMICRO1955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Krulwich  TA, Sachs  G, Padan  E. Molecular aspects of bacterial pH sensing and homeostasis. Nat Rev Microbiol  2011;9:330–43. 10.1038/NRMICRO2549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Thänert  R, Goldmann  O, Beineke  A, et al.  Host-inherent variability influences the transcriptional response of Staphylococcus aureus during in vivo infection. Nat Commun  2017;8:14268. 10.1038/ncomms14268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Fang  FC, Frawley  ER, Tapscott  T, et al.  Bacterial stress responses during host infection. Cell Host Microbe  2016;20:133–43. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Villamizar  SH, Chica Cárdenas  LA, Morales Mancera  LT, et al.  Anaerobiosis, a neglected factor in phage-bacteria interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol  2023;89:e01491–23. 10.1128/AEM.01491-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Broniewski  JM, Chisnall  MAW, Høyland-Kroghsbo  NM, et al.  The effect of quorum sensing inhibitors on the evolution of CRISPR-based phage immunity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME J  2021;15:2465–73. 10.1038/s41396-021-00946-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hadas  H, Einav  M, Fishov  I, et al.  Bacteriophage T4 development depends on the physiology of its host Escherichia coli. Microbiology (Reading)  1997;143:179–85. 10.1099/00221287-143-1-179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Popescu  M, Van Belleghem  JD, Khosravi  A, et al.  Bacteriophages and the immune system. Annu Rev Virol  2021;8:415–35. 10.1146/ANNUREV-VIROLOGY-091919-074551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jończyk  E, Kłak  M, Międzybrodzki  R, et al.  The influence of external factors on bacteriophages--review. Folia Microbiol (Praha)  2011;56:191–200. 10.1007/S12223-011-0039-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wenner  N, Bertola  A, Larsson  L, et al.  The intestinal environment potentiates bacteriophage adaptation in response to phenotypic resistance in Salmonella Typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2025;122:e2507909122. 10.1073/PNAS.2507909122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gaborieau  B, Debarbieux  L. The role of the animal host in the management of bacteriophage resistance during phage therapy. Curr Opin Virol  2023;58:101290. 10.1016/J.COVIRO.2022.101290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Naghavi  M, Vollset  SE, Ikuta  KS, et al.  Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet  2024;404:1199–226. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Murray  CJ, Ikuta  KS, Sharara  F, et al.  Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet  2022:6736. 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02724-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Simpkin  VL, Renwick  MJ, Kelly  R, et al.  Incentivising innovation in antibiotic drug discovery and development: progress, challenges and next steps. Nat Publ Group  2017;70:1087–96. 10.1038/ja.2017.124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Pirnay  JP, Djebara  S, Steurs  G, et al.  Personalized bacteriophage therapy outcomes for 100 consecutive cases: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective observational study. Nat Microbiol  2024;9:1434–53. 10.1038/s41564-024-01705-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Castledine  M, Padfield  D, Sierocinski  P, et al.  Parallel evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage resistance and virulence loss in response to phage treatment in vivo and in vitro. Elife  2022;11:e73679. 10.7554/ELIFE.73679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sarker  SA, Sultana  S, Reuteler  G, et al.  Oral phage therapy of acute bacterial Diarrhea with two coliphage preparations: a randomized trial in children from Bangladesh. EBioMedicine  2016;4:124–37. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.12.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Abedon  ST. Use of phage therapy to treat long-standing, persistent, or chronic bacterial infections. Adv Drug Deliv Rev  2019;145:18–39. 10.1016/J.ADDR.2018.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Morello  E, Saussereau  E, Maura  D, et al.  Pulmonary bacteriophage therapy on Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis strains: first steps towards treatment and prevention. PLoS One  2011;6:e16963. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0016963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Borin  JM, Avrani  S, Barrick  JE, et al.  Coevolutionary phage training leads to greater bacterial suppression and delays the evolution of phage resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2021;118:e2104592118. 10.1073/PNAS.2104592118/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.2104592118.SAPP.PDF [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Rossitto  M, Fiscarelli  EV, Rosati  P. Challenges and promises for planning future clinical research into bacteriophage therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis an argumentative review. Front Microbiol  2018;9:775. 10.3389/FMICB.2018.00775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ashworth  EA, Wright  RCT, Shears  RK, et al.  Exploiting lung adaptation and phage steering to clear pan-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in vivo. Nat Commun  2024;15:1547. 10.1038/S41467-024-45785-Z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Cheung  GYC, Bae  JS, Otto  M, et al.  Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence  2021;12:547–69. 10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Foster  TJ, Geoghegan  JA, Ganesh  VK, et al.  Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol  2014;12:49–62. 10.1038/NRMICRO3161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Finlay  BB, Falkow  S. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev  1997;61:136–69. 10.1128/MMBR.61.2.136-169.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Gómez-Ochoa  SA, Pitton  M, Valente  LG, et al.  Efficacy of phage therapy in preclinical models of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe  2022;3:e956–68. 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00288-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xu  M, Chen  S, Pei  H, et al.  Engineering bacteriophages for gut health: precision antimicrobials and beyond. J Nanobiotechnology  2026;24:62. 10.1186/S12951-026-04038-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Liew  JH, Norman  A, Illouz  M, et al.  Smooth-to-rough morphotype switching, a mechanism of phage resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2026;123:e2531197123. 10.1073/PNAS.2531197123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Matsuda  T, Freeman  TA, Hilbert  DW, et al.  Lysis-deficient bacteriophage therapy decreases endotoxin and inflammatory mediator release and improves survival in a murine peritonitis model. Surgery  2005;137:639–46. 10.1016/j.surg.2005.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Flores-Mireles  AL, Walker  JN, Caparon  M, et al.  Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol  2015;13:269–84. 10.1038/NRMICRO3432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Eltwisy  HO, Twisy  HO, Hafez  MHR, et al.  Clinical infections, antibiotic resistance, and pathogenesis of staphylococcus haemolyticus. Microorganisms  2022;10:1130. 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS10061130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Nguyen  MTT, Ahern  NR, Train  MK. Staphylococcus schleiferi diabetic foot osteomyelitis and bacteraemia in an immunocompromised host. BMJ Case Rep  2020;13:e238302. 10.1136/BCR-2020-238302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Swe  T, Naing  AT, Baqui  AAMA, et al.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans infection in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep  2016;4:1–3. 10.1177/2324709616671148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Lee  AS, De Lencastre  H, Garau  J, et al.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Prim  2018;4:1–23. 10.1038/nrdp.2018.33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Cong  Y, Yang  S, Rao  X. Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review of case updating and clinical features. J Adv Res  2020;21:169. 10.1016/J.JARE.2019.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Merabishvili  M, Pirnay  JP, Verbeken  G, et al.  Quality-controlled small-scale production of a well-defined bacteriophage cocktail for use in human clinical trials. PLoS One  2009;4:4944. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0004944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Tsai  CJY, Loh  JMS, Proft  T. Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence  2016;7:214–29. 10.1080/21505594.2015.1135289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Insua  JL, Llobet  E, Moranta  D, et al.  Modeling Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenesis by infection of the wax moth galleria mellonella. Infect Immun  2013;81:3552–65. 10.1128/IAI.00391-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Campos-Silva  R, Brust  FR, Trentin  DS, et al.  Alternative method in galleria mellonella larvae to study biofilm infection and treatment. Microb Pathog  2019;137:103756. 10.1016/J.MICPATH.2019.103756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Sheehan  G, Dixon  A, Kavanagh  K. Utilization of galleria mellonella larvae to characterize the development of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Microbiology (Reading)  2019;165:863–75. 10.1099/MIC.0.000813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Admella  J, Torrents  E. Investigating bacterial infections in Galleria mellonella larvae: insights into pathogen dissemination and behavior. J Invertebr Pathol  2023;200:107975. 10.1016/J.JIP.2023.107975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lázár  V, Snitser  O, Barkan  D, et al.  Antibiotic combinations reduce Staphylococcus aureus clearance. Nature  2022;610:540–6. 10.1038/S41586-022-05260-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Kaskatepe  B, Ozturk  S. Assessment of synergistic activity of rhamnolipid and linezolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in-vitro and in-vivo with Galleria mellonella larvae model. Microb Pathog  2023;174:105945. 10.1016/J.MICPATH.2022.105945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Materazzi  A, Bottai  D, Campobasso  C, et al.  Phage-based control of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a galleria mellonella model of implant-associated infection. Int J Mol Sci  2022;23:14514. 10.3390/IJMS232314514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Tkhilaishvili  T, Wang  L, Tavanti  A, et al.  Antibacterial efficacy of two commercially available bacteriophage formulations, staphylococcal bacteriophage and PYO bacteriophage, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: prevention and eradication of biofilm formation and control of a systemic infection of galleria mellonella larvae. Front Microbiol  2020;11:110. 10.3389/FMICB.2020.00110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ngassam-Tchamba  C, Duprez  JN, Fergestad  M, et al.  In vitro and in vivo assessment of phage therapy against Staphylococcus aureus causing bovine mastitis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist  2020;22:762–70. 10.1016/J.JGAR.2020.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Kumar  S, Suleski  M, Craig  JM, et al.  TimeTree 5: an expanded resource for species divergence times. Mol Biol Evol  2022;39:msac174. 10.1093/molbev/msac174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Drummond  AJ, Suchard  MA, Xie  D, et al.  Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol  2012;29:1969–73. 10.1093/molbev/mss075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Shapiro  B, Rambaut  A, Drummond  AJ. Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding sequences. Mol Biol Evol  2006;23:7–9. 10.1093/molbev/msj021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Rambaut  A, Suchard  M, Xie  D, et al. Tracer v1.6. 2014.
  • 70. Hesketh-Best  PJ, Mouritzen  MV, Shandley-Edwards  K, et al.  Galleria mellonella larvae exhibit a weight-dependent lethal median dose when infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathog Dis  2021;79. 10.1093/FEMSPD/FTAB003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Manning  SD, Motiwala  AS, Springman  AC, et al.  Variation in virulence among clades of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with disease outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2008;105:4868–73. 10.1073/PNAS.0710834105/SUPPL_FILE/10834TABLE5.PDF [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Litrup  E, Torpdahl  M, Malorny  B, et al.  Association between phylogeny, virulence potential and serovars of Salmonella enterica. Infect Genet Evol  2010;10:1132–9. 10.1016/J.MEEGID.2010.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Picard  B, Garcia  JS, Gouriou  S, et al.  The link between phylogeny and virulence in Escherichia coli extraintestinal infection. Infect Immun  1999;67:546. 10.1128/IAI.67.2.546-553.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Cai  H, Li  X, Zhang  C, et al.  Molecular characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus in school-age children in Guangzhou: associations among agr types, virulence genes, sequence types, and antibiotic resistant phenotypes. BMC Microbiol  2023;23:1–7. 10.1186/S12866-023-03126-Y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Shettigar  K, Murali  TS. Virulence factors and clonal diversity of Staphylococcus aureus in colonization and wound infection with emphasis on diabetic foot infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis  2020;39:2235. 10.1007/S10096-020-03984-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Wang  X, Lin  D, Huang  Z, et al.  Clonality, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from blood in Shandong, China. BMC Microbiol  2021;21:281. 10.1186/S12866-021-02344-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Howden  BP, Giulieri  SG, Wong Fok Lung  T, et al.  Staphylococcus aureus host interactions and adaptation. Nat Rev Microbiol  2023;21:380–95. 10.1038/s41579-023-00852-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Abdulateef  SA, Owaif  HAA, Hussein  MH. Importance of virulence factors in bacterial pathogenicity: a review. Int J Med Sci Clin Res Stud  2023;3:765–9. 10.47191/IJMSCRS/V3-I4-35. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. León-Félix  J, Villicaña  C. The impact of quorum sensing on the modulation of phage-host interactions. J Bacteriol  2021;203:11, e00687-20. 10.1128/jb.00687-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Sanson  M, O’Neill  BE, Kachroo  P, et al.  A naturally occurring single amino acid replacement in multiple gene regulator of group a streptococcus significantly increases virulence. Am J Pathol  2015;185:462–71. 10.1016/J.AJPATH.2014.10.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Ko  D, Choi  SH. Comparative genomics reveals an SNP potentially leading to phenotypic diversity of salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Microb Genom  2021;7:5. 10.1099/MGEN.0.000572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Betley  MJ, Mekalanos  JJ. Staphylococcal enterotoxin A is encoded by phage. Science  1985;229:185–7. 10.1126/SCIENCE.3160112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Vandenesch  F, Naimi  T, Enright  MC, et al.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis  2003;9:978–84. 10.3201/EID0908.030089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Abedon  ST, Kuhl  SJ, Blasdel  BG, et al.  Phage treatment of human infections. Bacteriophage  2011;1:66–85. 10.4161/BACT.1.2.15845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Górski  A, Miedzybrodzki  R, Borysowski  J, et al.  Phage as a modulator of immune responses: practical implications for phage therapy. Adv Virus Res  2012;83:41–71. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394438-2.00002-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Dąbrowska  K. Phage therapy: what factors shape phage pharmacokinetics and bioavailability? Systematic and critical review. Med Res Rev  2019;39:2000–25. 10.1002/MED.21572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Hodyra-Stefaniak  K, Miernikiewicz  P, Drapała  J, et al.  Mammalian host-versus-phage immune response determines phage fate in vivo. Sci Rep  2015;5:1–13. 10.1038/srep14802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Da  K, Miernikiewicz  P, Piotrowicz  A, et al.  Immunogenicity studies of proteins forming the T4 phage head surface. J Virol  2014;88:12551–7. 10.1128/JVI.02043-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Hájek  P. The elimination of bacteriophages ΦX 174 and T2 from the circulating blood of newborn precolostral pigs. Folia Microbiol (Praha)  1970;15:125–8. 10.1007/BF02880095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Inchley  CJ. The activity of mouse Kupffer cells following intravenous injection of T4 bacteriophage. Clin Exp Immunol  1969;5:173–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Międzybrodzki  R, Kasprzak  H, Letkiewicz  S, et al.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic obstacles for phage therapy from the perspective of clinical practice. Clin Infect Dis  2023;77:S395–400. 10.1093/CID/CIAD516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Chae  D. Phage-host-immune system dynamics in bacteriophage therapy: basic principles and mathematical models. Transl Clin Pharmacol  2023;31:167–90. 10.12793/TCP.2023.31.E17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Tan  X, Chen  K, Jiang  Z, et al.  Evaluation of the impact of repeated intravenous phage doses on mammalian host-phage interactions. J Virol  2024;98:e01359-23. 10.1128/JVI.01359-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Champagne-Jorgensen  K, Luong  T, Darby  T, et al.  Immunogenicity of bacteriophages. Trends Microbiol  2023;31:1058–71. 10.1016/j.tim.2023.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

V011_Galleria_SupplementaryMaterials_Clean_ycag232

Data Availability Statement

All of the datasets and scripts used for these analyses are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/Sarah-K-Walsh/2026-In-Vivo-Phage-Efficacy).


Articles from ISME Communications are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES