Skip to main content
The ISME Journal logoLink to The ISME Journal
. 2026 Jul 29;20(1):wrag201. doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrag201

Spatial microbiome and synthetic community analyses reveal Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. promotes sclerotia mortality of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

Zong-Han Shie 1, Hao-Xun Chang 2,3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC13615538  PMID: 42523014

Abstract

Bulk microbiome analysis obscures the spatial heterogeneity of microbial communities, limiting the understanding of bacterial distribution inside fungal sclerotia, which are the survival structures of the plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Although studies have profiled microbiomes of different fungal structures, sclerotia microbiome remains largely unexplored. We applied bulk microbiome using PacBio full-length 16S rRNA sequencing, synthetic community (SynCom), and 10× Genomics Xenium platform to resolve the spatiotemporal contribution of soil bacteria to sclerotia mortality. In the bulk microbiome, the relative abundance of soil bacteria such as Massilia and Trinickia were enriched when sclerotia mortality increased under flooding conditions. Twelve enriched sclerotia-associated bacteria were assembled into a SynCom to study their causality for sclerotia mortality. Spatial microbiome analysis revealed the temporal dynamics and distribution pattern of each SynCom member. Among them, Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. type strain MC (TsMC) was found to reach the most interior sclerotia and its relative abundance coincided with sclerotia mortality. TsMC exhibited the highest importance in four antagonistic assays and SynCom drop-out test. Whole genome sequencing confirmed TsMC as a novel species with antifungal potential. Collectively, we document a novel bacterium for sclerotia mortality and demonstrate the advantage of spatiotemporal distribution in microbiome research.

Keywords: 10× Genomics Xenium, bacteria–fungi interactions, plant pathogen, spatial microbiome, synthetic community (SynCom)

Introduction

Bulk microbiome research in recent years has articulated a sustainable future of agriculture from diverse aspects, including plant disease management [1, 2], and many studies have shown the capacity of bulk microbiome in discovering antagonistic bacteria to counteract plant pathogenic fungi [3]. Although these studies have demonstrated the success of bulk microbiome, few have elucidated the dynamic movement of a microbial community in the antagonistic bacteria–fungi interaction. Similar research constraints used to be found in bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, or metabolomics, for which the experimental procedures average out signals from different cell types spatially distributed in a tissue, limiting the resolution of understanding gene, protein, or metabolite functions [4]. With the advent of single-cell and spatial technologies on multi-omics, many studies have advanced the mechanistic insights into not only medical diseases [5] but also plant diseases [6, 7]. However, one of the multi-omics lagging behind in this wave of technology breakthrough is microbiome, in which bacteria are the major targets of interest. One pioneer study embraced the power of the sequencing-based Visium platform by customizing a 16S/18S/ITS/poly-d(T) multimodal array to simultaneously detect both bacterial and fungal microbiome, together with Arabidopsis gene expression [8]. This study provides a proof-of-concept in the spatial correlation of microbes and plant defense-related gene PR1, but the discontinuity of this multimodal array by the manufacturer limits the broad application to explore spatial microbiome. A fortunate alternative strategy is the hybridization-based platform such as 10× Genomics Xenium and Vizgen MERSCOPE [9, 10], which allow in situ detection for the RNA of interest. Yet, the application has not been validated for spatial microbiome.

Instead of the spatial distribution of microbes, the strategic breakthrough on bulk microbiome in the past years was focused on the utilization of synthetic community (SynCom) to resolve the causality of microbes that cause symptoms or diseases [11, 12]. One of the classic SynCom studies uncovered the mechanism of Arabidopsis immune-related gene rbohD in handling dysbiosis and the opportunistic pathogen Xanthomonas strains [13]. Another classic study demonstrated the dysbiotic SynCom derived from Arabidopsis mfec mutant can lead to foliar chlorosis due to hyperdominant Pseudomonadota [14]. In contrast to the success of plant-associated SynCom, there are few examples of fungi-associated SynCom to tackle the causality in research. Another breakthrough on bulk microbiome was the adaptation of full-length 16S rRNA sequencing to replace the sequencing of short variable regions, for the better taxonomic resolution at species level [15, 16]. However, few bulk microbiome research in fungi has adopted the advantages of SynCom or full-length 16S rRNA. Although many studies have reported the bacterial biodiversity on fungal tissues such as mycelia [17], mushrooms [18], sporocarps [19], and perithecia [3], the fungal microbiome remains fragmented considering the integrative methodologies being applied to human and plant microbiomes.

One of the agriculturally important and specialized fungal tissues is sclerotium (pl. sclerotia), which can tolerate environmental stresses and persist in infected plants or infested soil for a long period and become the primary inoculum of a new farming season. Eliminating fungal sclerotia, via host genetic resistance [20], fungicides [21], biocontrol agents [22, 23], or agronomic practices such as flooding or tillage [24, 25], has been considered as a vital part of integrative disease management. Although several studies have identified antagonistic bacteria that can reduce the overall fungal growth or propagation, few have evaluated the microbial effect on sclerotia mortality. Therefore, this study integrates the PacBio full-length 16S rRNA sequencing, coupled with the fungi-associated SynCom and the Xenium platform for spatial microbiome, to illuminate the spatiotemporal dynamics of antagonistic bacteria invading sclerotia. The results discover bacteria with antagonistic potentials and demonstrate the feasibility and power of spatial microbiome in uncovering the antagonistic bacteria–fungi interactions.

Material & methods

Soil and fungal materials

Soil samples were collected from a rice–soybean rotation field at Taoyuan (24.96°N, 121.04°E) in Taiwan. The soil was processed by passing through a four-mesh sieve to remove debris and unify particle sizes. A portion of the soil was autoclaved at 121°C for two times, each time for 1 h with a 1-day interval, to eliminate most microbes. Both autoclaved soil and nonautoclaved soil were stored at room temperature before the experimental setup. Sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolate 1980 [26] were utilized as inoculum. The fungal isolate was routinely maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (STBIO MEDIA, New Taipei City, Taiwan) and incubated at 25°C for 2 weeks to promote sclerotia formation. Mature sclerotia were harvested and desiccated for 2 days under sterile conditions in a laminar flow hood.

Mortality assay

All materials used in the 3-month mortality assay, including plastic containers, lids, nonwoven fabric tea bags, and tissues, were sterilized by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min. For heat-sensitive items, sterilization was conducted by UV-C irradiation for 30 min. Each experimental unit consisted of a plastic container with a nonwoven fabric tea bag, filled with a 1.25 ml teaspoon of sclerotia (~50 sclerotia). These sclerotia in a tea bag were buried in: (i) nothing as control (CK); (ii) autoclaved soil (AS); (iii) autoclaved soil with flooding (ASF); (iv) nonautoclaved soil (S); or (v) nonautoclaved soil with flooding (SF), with 5 cm of soil in depth, and maintained at 25°C for up to three months before evaluating their mortality rates (Fig. S1A). The soil treatment received 150 g of nonautoclaved or autoclaved soil, and the flooding treatment was supplemented with 50 ml of ddH₂O to achieve maximum water capacity. There were eleven burial timepoints, including 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, 14-, 21-, 28-, 45-, 60-, 75-, and 90-day. Instead of repeated sampling from the same plastic container, there were five independent biological replicates (i.e. plastic containers) prepared for each timepoint under each treatment. Collectively, a total of 275 experimental units (5 treatments × 11 timepoints × 5 biological replicates) were placed following the Latin square design in a growth chamber at 25°C. At each timepoint, the sclerotia were retrieved from the tea bag. To remove most soil and contaminants, the sclerotia were washed with 10 ml of ddH₂O by vortex mixing (15 s), sonication (15 s), and additional vortex mixing (15 s), before drying on sterile tissue papers. This cleaning procedure was repeated twice, and then 30 sclerotia were assessed for mortality rate whereas the remaining sclerotia were stored at −80°C for subsequent DNA extraction.

For the mortality assay, the 30 sclerotia were evenly distributed into three water agar (WA) plates supplemented with antibiotics (0.1% rifampicin, streptomycin, and ampicillin) to inhibit bacterial contaminants. These WA plates were incubated at 25°C for 5 days, and the mycelia germinated from sclerotia were collected for molecular identification using the S. sclerotiorum-specific primers SSFWD and SSREV [27] (Fig. S1B). The presence of the correct amplicon served as the evidence of survived sclerotia, and the mortality rate (%) was calculated as:

graphic file with name DmEquation1.gif

For each biological replicate (i.e. a plastic container), the mortality rate was averaged from three WA plates as technical replicates. Mortality rates across the five treatments (CK, AS, ASF, S, and SF) and 11 timepoints were statistically analyzed to evaluate the effects of autoclaving, flooding, and their interaction at each timepoint.

Microbiome analysis

For each biological replicate, five to six sclerotia were ground using a sterilized stainless-steel mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. Total DNA of sclerotia was extracted using the Presto™ gDNA Bacteria Advanced Kit (Geneaid Biotech, New Taipei City, Taiwan). The DNA quality and quantity were initially assessed by gel electrophoresis and the Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Bacterial full-length 16S rRNA was amplified by the primers 27F and 1492R from the PacBio library preparation kit. After excluding 5 low-quality samples, 65 samples in the ASF and SF groups at seven timepoints (1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, 14-, 21-, and 28-day) were sequenced using the PacBio Sequel IIe platform (BioTools, New Taipei City, Taiwan).

Raw sequences were processed with PacBio SMRT Link to generate HiFi reads (≥  Q30), which were filtered, trimmed, dereplicated, and denoised by the “DADA2” package v1.32.0 [28] to generate ASV (Fig. S1C). Chimeric ASVs identified by DADA2 and sequences not matching bacterial 16S rRNA sequences in the SILVA 16S database v138.2 [29] were removed. The remaining ASVs were aligned to the NCBI 16S RefSeq database using the BLAST+ v2.15.0, with a threshold at an E-value of 10−5. The top hit was selected following the lowest E-value, the highest Bit-score, and the highest identity [30]. The resulting taxonomy IDs were annotated by the “taxize” package v0.10.0 [31]. The ASVs were aligned using MAFFT v7.525 [32], and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using the IQ-TREE2 v2.2.2.7 with the best-fit model (GTR + F + I + G4) [33]. Branch support was assessed with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates.

The ASV table, taxonomy table, and phylogenetic tree were integrated by the “phyloseq” package v1.52.0 [34]. Samples were excluded if sequence depths <2000 reads [35] or insufficient coverage according to rarefaction curves estimated by the “vegan” package v2.7-1. All samples were rarefied to 5000 reads. For α-diversity, the Shannon Index was calculated using the “phyloseq” package. For β-diversity, NMDS were performed using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and the effects of timepoints and treatments were estimated by PERMANOVA using the “vegan” package. To visualize the microbial composition, the ASVs with average abundance <0.5% in the detected samples and occupancy <10% within each treatment (i.e. fewer than four samples) were filtered out, and all samples were normalized to the median sequencing depth. The relative abundances were plotted in a bar plot at the genus level and in a heatmap at the species level using the “plot_bar” function of the “microbiome” package. For differential abundance analysis between the ASF and SF treatments at each timepoint, all samples were normalized and analyzed using the “ANCOM” packages v2.10.0 [36] and “DESeq2” v1.48.1 [37].

SynCom assembly and mortality assay of SynCom-inoculated sclerotia

The SF 5-day sclerotia were retrieved, cleaned, and ground with 2 ml of ddH2O. The ground aliquots were serially diluted with ddH2O and spread on different media, including Nutrient agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), 10% Tryptic soy agar (TSA) (STBIO MEDIA), Reasoner’s 2A agar (R2A) (HiMedia), and modified Pseudomonas cepacia azelaic acid tryptamine medium [38]. After culturing at 25°C for 7 days, morphologically distinct colonies were isolated and the full-length 16S rRNA sequences were Sanger-sequenced (Genomics Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan). After the BLASTn searching against the database constructed by the SF 5-day microbiome ASVs (Fig. S1D), bacteria with 16S rRNA sequence identities over 97.0% were considered present in the microbiome. Subsequently, the full-length 16S rRNA sequences were BLASTn against the NCBI 16S rRNA RefSeq database, and taxonomic assignments were based on the top hit with ≥98.7% identity [39]. Strains with <98.7% identity were further compared against the broader NCBI nt database to infer their putative taxonomy. Twelve strains representing those bacterial genera enriched in differential abundance analyses were selected to assemble a SynCom mimicking the 5-day SF microbiome. Species-level identities were resolved using maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees built from concatenated 16S rRNA–gyrB–recA sequences (for Caballeronia, Cupriavidus, Paraburkholderia, Ralstonia, and Trinickia strains) or concatenated 16S rRNA–gyrB–lepA sequences (for Massilia strains).

Bacterial suspensions of each SynCom member were harvested at OD600 = 0.5 and adjusted to 106 CFU/ml with ddH₂O. Eight drop-out designs were assembled following a 23 factorial scheme based on the presence or absence of three groups: (i) Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. type strain MC (TsMC), (ii) Massilia sp. strain R20 together with Massilia sp. strain TB221 (2-Massilia), and (iii) the remaining nine SynCom members (9-member). The full SynCom was composed of equal volume of 12 bacteria members (1 × 106 CFU/ml). In the drop-out test, each bacterium contributed 1/12 × 106 CFU/ml, and the excluded proportion was replaced with an equal volume of ddH₂O. Ten sclerotia were co-cultured in 5 ml of these eight drop-out designs at 25°C in a 10 ml culture tube without shaking. After 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 14-day, the sclerotia were retrieved for measuring mortality rate. The presence of germinating hyphae after incubation on WA for 5 days serves as evidence of survived sclerotia. The initial full SynCom assay was independently repeated three times, each with three biological replicates, and the following drop-out tests were independently repeated two times, each with three biological replicates.

Sample processing for Xenium in situ platform

The control and the SynCom-treated sclerotia were co-cultured and harvested at 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 14-day following an incubation for 5 days on WA plates. Subsequently, sclerotia were embedded in the Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) within an aluminum mold, frozen in isopentane precooled by liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −20°C. Sections were cut at a thickness of 6 μm using the CryoStar NX50 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at −10°C, mounted onto the capture area of Xenium slides, and subsequently stored at −80°C. This study included 29 SynCom-treated samples (n = 4, 6, 6, 6, and 7 biological replicates for 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 14-day, respectively) and 2 control samples (n = 2 for 7-day).

A customized panel for the Xenium in situ single-cell spatial imaging platform v1 (10× Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, USA) was designed using the 10× Genomics Custom Panel Designer. The panel comprises 28 specific bacterial padlock probes targeting the 16S rRNA, gyrB, recA, and lepA gene transcripts across 12 SynCom members. To ensure binding specificity, all probe sequences underwent rigorous computational screening according to the supervision of 10× Genomics manufacturer to optimize the sequence of detection codewords, reduce cross-hybridization and off-target among SynCom members and S. sclerotiorum. Subsequently, sections were incubated at 37°C for 1 min, fixed in paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min, and permeabilized using 1% SDS for 2 min followed by 70% methanol on ice for 60 min. Target-specific padlock probes were hybridized overnight at 50°C, followed by ligation (37°C, 2 h) and rolling circle amplification (30°C, 2 h) to generate high-density DNA nanoballs, following the manufacturer’s protocols. To mitigate background fluorescence, slides were treated with an autofluorescence quenching reagent before nuclei were counterstained with DAPI.

For Xenium data acquisition, slides were processed on the Xenium Analyzer, where regions of interest (ROIs) were defined based on the DAPI scan to cover the entire sclerotia section. The analyzer then executed cyclical rounds of fluorescently labeled oligo hybridization to the amplified DNA probes, followed by imaging and probe removal. This cyclic process generated unique optical signatures specific to each gene barcode, which were subsequently converted into gene identities. Transcript decoding was performed by mapping optical signatures to the custom panel design file (.json) using Xenium Onboard Analysis v4.0. A Q-Score threshold of 20 was applied to filter low-quality transcripts from the raw data.

Spatial microbiome analysis for Xenium platform

Post-Xenium slides were stained to visualize the bacteria distribution. Stored slides were washed in 1X PBS-T buffer, and the fluorescence quencher was removed using 10 mM NaHS. After methanol fixation (10 min), slides were treated with crystal violet (7 g/L) and iodine solution, then decolorized with an isopropanol–acetone (1:1) mixture to achieve high contrast between bacteria and the tissue background. Stained sections were mounted in glycerol and scanned using an EasyScan Pro 6 whole-slide scanner (Motic Digital Pathology, Hong Kong, China).

Xenium data and crystal violet images were co-visualized using Xenium Explorer v4.1.0. The ROI tool was employed to manually delineate the sclerotia tissue boundaries, and the corresponding coordinates were exported. These coordinates were mathematically divided into five concentric zones of equal area, ranging from the sclerotia core (layer 1) to the periphery (layer 5) by the R package “sf” v1.0-24 [40]. The coordinates of these stratified zones were imported back into Xenium Explorer to extract the signal density (transcripts/mm2) for each target bacteria. To correct off-target noise, bacterial gene signal densities were corrected by subtracting the maximum signal density observed across the two noninoculated control replicates. Lastly, bacterial genes with a signal density below a threshold of 2 transcripts/mm2 were excluded. The bacteria gyrB gene was selected as the representative due to its high spatial concordance with bacterial aggregates visualized by crystal violet staining. The relative abundance of gyrB was plotted to illustrate the spatial microbiome over different time points (1–14 dpi) in five layers.

Antagonistic assays

The antagonistic abilities of the 12 SynCom members and a reference bacterium Escherichia coli were evaluated using four phenotypes: (i) mycelia inhibition, (ii) germination inhibition, (iii) sclerotia-derived mycelia inhibition, and (iv) mycophagy, according to the following formulas.

To evaluate (i), a 5 mm mycelial plug from the actively growing margin of S. sclerotiorum was placed at the center of a plate. Each bacterium was precultured for 2 days and streaked 25 mm away from the mycelial plug on two sides. Colony diameter was measured on 1/10 PDA at 72 h postinoculation (hpi) and 1/10 TSA at 65 hpi.

graphic file with name DmEquation2.gif (1)

To quantify (ii), (iii), and (iv), bacterial suspensions were harvested at OD600 = 0.5 and adjusted to 108 colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter. A final concentration of 106 CFU/ml in a 10 ml culture tube was co-cultured with 10 sclerotia without shaking. The controls of (ii) and (iii) were co-cultured without bacterial suspension. After 5 days of co-culture at 25°C, sclerotia were retrieved, dried by sterilized tissue, and cultured on WA plates for 5 days to evaluate the germination rate.

graphic file with name DmEquation3.gif (2)
graphic file with name DmEquation4.gif (3)

As for (iv), 100 μl of bacterial suspension after being co-cultured for 5 days was serially diluted on plates for quantifying CFU. The controls consisted of 10 sterile glass beads instead of sclerotia. All these four assays were independently repeated three times, and each time had three biological replicates.

Whole genome sequencing and analyses for Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. MC

Total genomic DNA of TsMC was extracted by Presto gDNA Bacteria Advanced Kit (Geneaid), followed by size selection with the Short Read Eliminator XS kit (PacBio) to remove DNA fragments smaller than 10 kb. DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and fragment size distribution was assessed with the Qsep 100™ system (BiOptic Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan). Long-read sequencing libraries were constructed using a transposase-based method using the Rapid Barcoding Kit 96 V14 (SQK-RBK114.96) (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom), followed by adapter attachment with a rapid adapter, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA libraries were then purified using short fragment buffer washes to enrich fragments larger than 1 kb. Sequencing was performed on a FLO-PRO114M flow cell (R10.4.1) using the ONT PromethION 24 platform. The raw sequencing data were processed using Dorado’s super-accurate basecalling model (400 bps, v7.6.8). The sequencing results were verified using NanoPlot [41] to validate the read length profile. Next, the raw reads were assembled into primary contigs using Flye [42]. The quality of the fully polished contigs was assessed using QUAST [43], whereas the completeness of the genome was evaluated using BUSCO [44]. Prokka [45] with default settings was used to predict open reading frames and locate tRNA and rRNA regions. Additionally, gene annotation was performed by aligning the sequences against the Refseq, eggNOG, KOfam, CARD [46–48] databases using DIAMOND [49] and HMMER [50]. Secondary metabolite biosynthesis-related gene clusters (BGCs) were predicted by the antiSMASH 7.0 [51]. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were built for TsMC, together with other Trinickia species, using concatenated 16S rRNA-gyrB-recA gene sequences, and 120 621 polymorphic sites from 302 core genes identified with Panaroo v1.3.4 [52] and recombination-filtered with Gubbins v3.4.3 [53]. Sequences were aligned with MAFFT and constructed with IQ-TREE, assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates. For sequence identity, average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between TsMC and other Trinickia species were calculated using FastANI v1.34 [54] and the GGDC web server v3.0 [55], respectively.

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed in the R version 4.5.1. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Q–Q plots, and homogeneity of variance was assessed using the Levene’s test. Parametric data were analyzed using the t-tests or ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. For data violating these assumptions, the Yeo–Johnson transformation (or arcsine transformation for percentage data) was applied. For other data that still failed to satisfy normality or homoscedasticity, nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn’s post hoc test were performed. For the mortality rates of sclerotia, which contained a high frequency of 0 and 1 values, the aligned rank transform procedure [56] was applied to factorial ANOVA at each timepoint, followed by the Tukey’s HSD post hoc test for each treatment, and the effect size of each factor was calculated as the proportion of variance explained, utilizing the F statistic–based weighting approach [57].

Results

Microbial effects contribute to sclerotia mortality

To understand the microbial effect on sclerotia mortality, a 3-month burial experiment in the autoclaved soil (AS) or conventional soil (S) with flooding or not (ASF or SF, respectively) was performed. Sclerotia mortality remained lower than 10.0% for the nonflooding groups (AS and S) (Fig. 1A). In contrast, under flooding condition, sclerotia mortality of the ASF and SF groups gradually increased to 100.0% when sclerotia were buried for 5-day to 28-day, with visible slough of the melanized rind and shattering of sclerotia (Fig. 1C). Specifically, sclerotia mortality of the SF group exhibited an earlier increase, starting from burial time 5- to 7-day; whereas sclerotia mortality of the ASF group increased when sclerotia were buried for 14-day to 21-day. This temporal delay due to the autoclaving treatment suggests that soil microbes play roles in enhancing the sclerotia mortality under flooding condition, particularly for soil bacteria that colonize sclerotia during the burial time between 5-day and 7-day (Fig. 1B; Table S1). Collectively, these findings suggest that the flooding treatment alone substantially contributes to sclerotia mortality, and the presence of soil microbes would synergistically accelerate sclerotia mortality.

Figure 1.

Microbial effect on sclerotia mortality became evident on 5-day and 7-day, when sclerotia began to slough and sclerotia microbiome showed difference in bacterial diversity.

Microbial and flooding effects on sclerotia mortality. (A) Sclerotia mortality over 3 months in the treatment of control, autoclaved soil (AS), soil (S), autoclaved soil with flooding (ASF), and soil with flooding (SF). (B) Explained variance of the microbial, flooding, and interaction effects on sclerotia mortality. The microbial effect became apparent when sclerotia were buried for 5-day and 7-day. (C) Sclerotia morphology under different treatments. Sclerotia under flooding conditions (both ASF and SF) began to slough, and in the presence of microbes (SF), the slough of sclerotia can be observed when sclerotia were buried for 7-day. (D) PacBio full-length 16S rRNA sequencing for profiling the microbial composition of sclerotia. Autoclaving drastically reduced microbial diversity of sclerotia, and anaerobic bacteria became predominant over time. In contrast, SF exhibited diverse microbial composition that was potentially associated with sclerotia mortality when sclerotia were buried for 5-day and 7-day. Dot indicates the mean of sclerotia mortality for each biological replicate, and asterisk indicates low quality samples that were not passed for sequencing.

To identify the sclerotia-associated bacteria that contribute to sclerotia mortality, we applied PacBio full-length 16S rRNA sequencing and bulk microbiome analysis to elucidate the temporal dynamics of the sclerotia microbiome. A total of 4029 ASVs were obtained from 65 samples, with 3574 ASVs matched at the genus level (≥94.5% identity) and 1575 ASVs assigned at the species level (≥98.7% identity) according to the NCBI 16S RefSeq database. In the analyses of α-diversity, the Shannon Index for burial time from 5-day to 14-day were significantly lower in the ASF group than in the SF group (Fig. 2A; Table S2). In terms of β-diversity, the NMDS and PERMANOVA revealed two discernible clusters for the ASF and SF groups, as well as distinct temporal trajectories within each group (Fig. 2B; Table S3). The total variance explained by the microbial effect, incubation time, and their interaction was 9.9%, 18.0%, and 13.9%, respectively. Collectively, these results indicate that both microbial effect and burial time could influence the structure of the sclerotia microbiome.

Figure 2.

alpha-Diversity and beta-Diversity of sclerotia microbiome showed difference between autoclaved soil with flooding (ASF) and soil with flooding (SF). Several Pseudomonadota species were present in SF but not ASF.

Diversity and abundance analyses of sclerotia microbiome. (A) α-Diversity according to the Shannon Index. (B) β-Diversity based on NMDS using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. (C) Microbial abundance showing by heatmap in the treatment of autoclaved soil with flooding (ASF) and soil with flooding (SF). The orange blocks highlight the microbes that are visually deficient in the ASF (dashed lines) and abundant in the SF (solid lines) when sclerotia were buried for 5-day and 7-day. (D) Maximum likelihood phylogeny of all sclerotia-associated bacteria of the ASF and SF treatments.

Microbial diversity and differential abundance analyses of sclerotia microbiome

In addition to the temporal dynamics, the taxonomic composition of the sclerotia microbiome was also different between the ASF and SF groups. Focusing on core ASVs (average abundance >0.5% & occupancy >10%), there were 252 ASVs assigned to 26 genera and 59 species (Fig. 2C). The ASF group (151 ASVs) harbored 10 genera and 28 species, and the SF group (174 ASVs) harbored 24 genera and 53 species (Fig. 2D). For the overall bacterial diversity, Bacillota was dominant at 96.0% in the ASF group, compared to 60.3% in the SF group. Conversely, Pseudomonadota was higher in the SF group at 35.6% than in the ASF group at 1.3%. Minor differences were observed in Actinomycetota (2.6% in ASF vs. 2.3% in SF) and Bacteroidota (0.0% in ASF vs. 1.7% in SF). At the class level, the ASF group was dominated by Clostridia (60.3%) and Bacilli (35.8%). As for the SF group, Clostridia (58.6%) was also the most prevalent class, followed by Betaproteobacteria (27.6%), Gammaproteobacteria (4.6%), and Alphaproteobacteria (3.4%).

Relative abundance analysis showed that the autoclaving treatment eliminated the majority of bacteria and enriched the thermotolerant Bacillota from sclerotia in the ASF group (Fig. 1D). Specifically, Neobacillus dominated for burial time 1-day (96.5%) but was gradually superseded by Clostridium starting from 3-day, indicating a shift toward anoxic conditions. In contrast, the sclerotia microbiome of the SF group displayed greater diversity and more sophisticated community shifts. Although Clostridium comprised 100.0% of the community for burial time 1-day, three genera (Massilia, Paraburkholderia, and Trinickia) within Pseudomonadota became dominant with prolonged burial time (Fig. 3A). The microbial dynamics in the SF group for burial time 5-day to 7-day aligned with the acceleration of sclerotia mortality, and the enriched ASVs based on the ANCOM-BC2 identified 17 ASVs belonging to six genera and 12 species (Fig. 3B), including Caballeronia, Frateuria, Massilia, Paraburkholderia, Ralstonia, and Trinickia. Overall, the results uncovered the temporal dynamics of the sclerotia microbiome and pointed out that the enriched bacteria genera coincided with the rapid increase of sclerotia mortality.

Figure 3.

Differential abundance analysis identified candidate antagonistic bacteria on 3-day and 5-day. SynCom was assembled to mimic 5-day SF microbiome, and SynCom can accelerate sclerotia mortality.

Differential abundance analysis and SynCom assembly. (A) Sclerotia mortality in the treatment of autoclaved soil with flooding (ASF) and soil with flooding (SF) over time. Values indicate the averaged mortality ± standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant difference in mortality when sclerotia were buried for 5-day and 7-day. The bar panels of ASF and SF were colored by the proportion of microbial diversity. (B) Differential abundance analysis based on ANCOM-BC2. There are significantly enriched ASVs when sclerotia were buried for 3-day and 5-day but not 7-day. Because the sclerotia mortality of 3-day was not yet significantly different between ASF and SF, the increase of ASVs when sclerotia were buried for 3-day and 5-day may contribute to the mortality of 5-day and 7-day. Collectively, the 5-day SF sclerotia microbiome was the target of mimicry. (C) A SynCom of 12 bacteria was assembled to mimic not only the microbial composition (taxonomically) but also the antagonistic potentials (functionally). The SynCom includes one Caballeronia sp., one Cupriavidus sp., four Massilia spp., four Paraburkholderia spp., one Ralstonia sp., and one Trinickia sp. (D) The SynCom-treated sclerotia exhibited higher mortality rate over time, and none survived after being co-cultured for 14 days.

Twelve bacteria were isolated from sclerotia for SynCom assembly

To investigate causality between the enriched bacteria and sclerotia mortality, we assembled a SynCom to mimic the 5-day SF microbiome. A total of 165 morphologically distinct bacterial strains were isolated from sclerotia in the SF group at the 5-day burial timepoint. Based on Sanger sequencing of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences, 52 strains matched the microbiome ASV dataset at the genus level (≧94.5% identity), and 40 strains matched at the species level (≧98.7% identity). Among these strains, 12 strains matching nine enriched ASVs (≧97.0% identity) based on the ANCOM-BC2 and DESeq2 at 5-day were selected for SynCom assembly, including Caballeronia zhejiangensis N8 (ASV75), Cupriavidus sp. N4 (ASV113), Massilia sp. R20 (ASV249), Massilia sp. TB221 (ASV49), Massilia sp. RB201 (ASV249), Massilia sp. RB202 (ASV249), Paraburkholderia sp. I59 (ASV2), Paraburkholderia phenoliruptrix TB211 (ASV2), Paraburkholderia phymatum R7 (ASV51), Paraburkholderia sp. T17 (ASV178), Ralstonia sp. R4 (ASV55), and Trinickia sp. MC (ASV69) (Fig. S2; Table S4). At the genus level, the SynCom comprises six genera accounting for 93.4% of total community abundance (Fig. 3C); at the species level, the SynCom comprises 11 species (≥98.7% 16S rRNA identity to a described species) accounting for 56.3% of total abundance (Table S5), comparable to coverage reported in previous SynCom studies [58, 59]. When sclerotia were inoculated with the SynCom, sclerotia mortality was significantly increased after 1-day co-culture with the SynCom, gradually reaching 100.0% mortality by 14-day co-culture, whereas the control remained fully viable throughout (Fig. 3D).

Spatial microbiome uncovers the invasion pattern of SynCom

To visualize and quantify the spatiotemporal association between bacterial invasion and sclerotia mortality (Fig. 4A), we applied the 10× Xenium in situ spatial platform, together with crystal violet staining to SynCom-treated sclerotia (Fig. 4B). After 1-day co-culture, bacteria were detected only on the most exterior sclerotia layer (layer 5), with Massilia sp. TB221 as the predominant SynCom member. By 3-day co-culture, Massilia sp. TB221 and Massilia sp. R20 had reached the interior sclerotia (layer 1–4) (Fig. 4C), and small numbers of Cupriavidus sp. N4, Ralstonia sp. R4, and Trinickia sp. MC were also detected in exterior sclerotia (layer 4–5) at low relative abundance. At 5- to 7-day co-culture, the relative abundance of Ralstonia sp. R4 and Trinickia sp. MC increased progressively in the interior layers, coinciding with the stage at which mortality of SynCom-treated sclerotia increased sharply (Fig. 3D). Although the relative abundance of most Paraburkholderia spp. increased inside sclerotia, they did not reach layer 1 and 2. By 14-day co-culture, when sclerotia viability was completely suppressed, the relative abundance of Trinickia sp. MC exceeded that of all other SynCom members simultaneously across layer 1–5. Collectively, Xenium spatial analysis uncovered the spatiotemporal invasion pattern of the SynCom, revealing the distinct spatial distribution and antagonistic potential of each SynCom member.

Figure 4.

Spatiotemporal microbiome using 10x Genomics Xenium platform revealed the distribution of Trinickia sp. strain MC (TsMC) coincided with sclerotia mortality.

Spatiotemporal distribution of SynCom members within sclerotia. (A) The averaged relative abundance of SynCom members in different layers of sclerotia. Few bacteria were detected in the interior layer 1–4, suggesting the bacterial invasion was not yet progressive when sclerotia were co-cultured for only 1-day. Subsequently, Massilia spp. were the leading species that reach to the core of sclerotia although the sclerotia mortality remained low when sclerotia were co-cultured for 3-day. Cupriavidus sp. N4, Ralstonia sp. R4, and Trinickia sclerotiorum MC (TsMC) spread toward the interior layers when sclerotia were co-cultured for 5-day and 7-day, which was the stage that sclerotia mortality began to increase. (B) After sclerotia were co-cultured for 14-day, no sclerotia remained viable and the abundance of TsMC increased drastically over other SynCom members, indicating its importance to sclerotia mortality. (C) Schematic diagram of five concentric zones with equal area on a sclerotium, ranging from the interior core (layer 1) to exterior periphery (layer 5).

Individual antagonistic assays and SynCom drop-out test confirmed that Trinickia sp. MC is the key bacteria for sclerotia mortality

To evaluate the individual potential of these 12 SynCom members for fungal antagonism, we further conducted four different antagonistic assays (Table S6). In the mycelia inhibition assay, only Trinickia sp. MC produced clear inhibition zones, regardless of the culture media used. In the germination inhibition and sclerotia-derived mycelia growth assays, Trinickia sp. MC demonstrated complete inhibition, exhibiting robust antagonistic power. The remaining 11 bacteria showed no significant germination inhibition, even though some of them could suppress the sclerotia-derived mycelia growth. Lastly, 10 bacteria (except for Massilia sp. R20 and P. phenoliruptrix TB211) increased their population in the mycophagy assay, suggesting that most strains were capable of utilizing sclerotia as a nutrient source (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.

Four antagonistic assays and drop-out test confirmed the contribution of Trinickia sp. strain MC (TsMC).

Four antagonistic assays and SynCom drop-out test. (A) Antagonistic abilities of the 12 SynCom members and a reference bacterium, Escherichia coli, were evaluated across four assays. Mycelia inhibition measured on 1/10 TSA was shown. (B) Sclerotia were treated with different combinations of SynCom members based on the presence or absence of three groups: Trinickia sclerotiorum MC (TsMC) alone, Massilia sp. R20 together with Massilia sp. TB221 (2-Massilia), and the remaining nine SynCom members (9-member). Treatments with (right) and without (left) TsMC are shown in separate line charts. The number in brackets of each label indicates the number of bacterial species included in the treatment.

Because Massilia sp. R20 and Massilia sp. TB221 (2-Massilia) were the earliest colonizers inside sclerotia, and Trinickia sp. MC (TsMC) has the strongest antagonistic capability and it was the colonizer closely coincided with sclerotia mortality according to the spatiotemporal microbiome (Fig. 4A), 2-Massilia and TsMC were dropped from the full SynCom to validate their contributions to sclerotia mortality (Fig. 5B). The result showed that TsMC was the most dominant contributor to sclerotia mortality (Table S7) because dropping TsMC significantly decreased mortality and its mono-inoculation alone could accelerate sclerotia mortality (Fig. 5B). In contrast, 2-Massilia caused no difference at early stages and a lower mortality after 14 days. Also, the combination of 2-Massilia and TsMC did not show synergism or attenuation to the effect of TsMC. While the remaining bacteria of the full SynCom (9-member) exhibited weaker antagonism along the timeline, the 9-member could attenuate the antagonistic effect of TsMC when treated together. These observations suggested that bacteria–bacteria interactions in the SynCom together contributed to overall sclerotia mortality and TsMC is the apparent key species.

Genome analyses and species identification for Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov

To reveal the species identity and explore the antifungal properties of TsMC, we completed the whole genome sequencing via the platform of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Fig. S3). Phylogenetic analysis based on 302 core genes placed TsMC in a clade distinct from all 13 known Trinickia species. In addition, the comparison of ANI values between TsMC and other Trinickia species ranged from 80.7% to 81.8%, and the comparison of dDDH values ranged from 22.3% to 23.4% (Table S8). These results indicate TsMC does not belong to any known Trinickia species and thus we describe this strain as a new species, Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. type strain MC. Genome mining of TsMC discovered biosynthetic gene clusters associated with antimicrobial properties such as ornibactin and rhizomides (Table S9), pointing to possible antagonistic mechanisms and its potential as a novel biocontrol agent.

Discussion

Sclerotia are produced by a broad range of fungi, including at least 45 genera in the Ascomycota and 40 genera in the Basidiomycota [60]. These dormant fungal structures are rich in polysaccharides, and their compact architecture confers exceptional tolerance to environmental stresses, enabling long-term nutrient storage and survival. Among these, the ascomycete S. sclerotiorum is a major sclerotia-forming plant pathogen responsible for annual agricultural losses of up to $200 million in the USA and $600 million in the Canadian canola industry [61, 62]. The sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum are encased in a hard, melanized rind, rendering them highly resistant to ultraviolet radiation, adverse environmental conditions, and chemical treatments [63]. Under favorable conditions, sclerotia can germinate either myceliogenically or carpogenically, enabling direct host infection or long-distance dispersal to new fields [64]. Previous studies have identified flooding as a critical factor influencing sclerotia survival [25, 65, 66]; however, the role of microbial activity under flooding conditions has received comparatively little attention. Some studies have proposed that reduced sclerotia survival under warm and wet conditions resulted from enhanced microbial decomposition [67]. Similarly, it has been reported that water exposure caused nutrient leakage from sclerotia, thereby facilitating microbial colonization [68]. Other studies also demonstrated that soil microbes can produce antifungal compounds that suppress sclerotia survival specifically under anoxic conditions [25, 69]. In this study, we evaluated the flooding and microbial effects, and the results showed that sclerotia mortality was significantly accelerated in the presence of soil bacteria.

Our results showed that the sclerotia microbiome was dominated by Pseudomonadota, particularly members of the Oxalobacteraceae and Burkholderiaceae families, with their enrichment coinciding with sclerotia mortality. Burkholderiaceae are well known for their antifungal activities [70]. Members of Burkholderia sensu lato, including Caballeronia, Paraburkholderia, and Trinickia, are frequently isolated from fungal tissues [71], and several Burkholderiaceae taxa have been reported to proliferate in soils amended with sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum [72]. Likewise, Oxalobacteraceae members such as Massilia are consistently enriched in the hyphosphere and are recognized as keystone taxa in the fungal-associated microbial communities [73]. Beyond inhibiting mycelial growth, bacteria from both families have been shown to exhibit mycophagous behavior, enabling them to directly exploit fungal biomass [74, 75]. Collectively, the enrichment of Burkholderiaceae and Oxalobacteraceae within the sclerotia microbiome supports the likelihood of these bacteria in driving sclerotia mortality. Nevertheless, bulk microbiome analyses alone cannot resolve whether this effect arises from the collective activity of the microbial community or from a few key species.

The 10× Genomics Xenium in situ platform has been extensively validated for spatial gene expression analysis in human [76], mouse [77], and plant tissues [78]; however, its application to fungal tissue or bacterial detection has not previously been demonstrated. Here, we applied Xenium-based spatial detection of a bacterial SynCom within fungal sclerotia as a proof-of-concept. We described a newly identified species, Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. type strain MC (TsMC), which colonized the most interior sclerotia, concomitant with the highest sclerotia mortality rate (Fig. 4). TsMC was further identified as the primary member driving sclerotia mortality via the SynCom drop-out test, and it also has the strongest antagonistic capability across all four antagonistic assays (Fig. 5, Table S6). Genome mining of TsMC revealed biosynthetic gene clusters associated with antifungal properties, consistent with previous reports suggesting that Trinickia species can produce antifungal compounds [79] and display mycophagous behavior toward chlamydospores of the mycorrhiza-like fungus Serendipita indica [80]. In contrast, although two Massilia members (Massilia sp. R20 and Massilia sp. TB221) were detected in the sclerotia core earlier than TsMC, their contribution to sclerotia mortality appeared limited. Moreover, although the remaining SynCom 9-member could increase sclerotia mortality over time, their relative abundance and spatiotemporal distribution were more limited inside sclerotia. The treatment of 9-member together with TsMC even attenuated the antagonistic effect of TsMC. Nonetheless, the 9-member and 11-member SynCom could eventually reach the same level of sclerotia mortality with extended time. Accordingly, under a field condition, biocontrol application with a single strong antagonistic species may benefit from a fast efficacy in a short window of exposure, and a complex community of multiple weak antagonistic species may still reach the same effect if the time of exposure is allowed. As our SynCom represents only 56.3% species-level bacterial abundance of 5-day SF microbiome, higher level of the complexity in the bacteria–bacteria interaction may not be captured in this study and should be aware for consideration.

In summary, our findings confirmed the participation of soil bacteria and described a novel species, Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. type strain MC, for sclerotia mortality. By integrating the advantages of bulk microbiome using PacBio full-length 16S rRNA sequencing, SynCom, and 10× Genomics Xenium, the comprehensive framework presented in this study broadens current understanding of microbial ecology in a spatiotemporal perspective, providing a vital stepping stone toward studying bacteria-fungi interactions and exploring novel biocontrol agents.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_material_wrag201

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Mr. Shian-Pin Hu at the PharmiGene Company for introducing the 10× Genomics Xenium technology. We acknowledge Dr. Jing-Yuan Chen at the Animal Resource Center (National Taiwan University) for guiding the cryostat operation. We acknowledge Dr. Kate Hua, Ms. Wan-Chun Chang, Dr. Chih-Sin Hsu, and Mr. Bingxiu Guo at the Cancer and Immunology Research Center (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University) for the technical services on the 10× Genomics Xenium platform. We acknowledge Dr. Quy Xiao Xuan Lin at 10× Genomics for consulting Xenium panel design and data analyses. We thank Dr. Chih-Hang Wu at Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology (Academia Sinica) for proofreading and editorial suggestions.

Contributor Information

Zong-Han Shie, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology. National Taiwan University. Taipei 106319, Taiwan.

Hao-Xun Chang, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology. National Taiwan University. Taipei 106319, Taiwan; Master Program for Plant Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan; Center for Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan.

Author contributions

Z.-H.S. and H.-X.C. quantified the sclerotia mortality in the timeline experiment. Z.-H.S. conducted the bulk microbiome study, bacteria isolation and antagonistic characterization, and SynCom assembly, as well as spatial microbiome analyses. Z.-H.S. and H.-X.C. prepared the manuscript, figures, and tables. H.-X.C. conceptualized and supervised the project.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

This project is mainly funded by the Career Development Project (115 L7867) of National Taiwan University and partially funded by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan (The Yushan Young Scholar Program: MOE-113-YSFAG-0003-003-P2) to H.-X.C.

Data availability

All sequence data, including the PacBio sequencing data of the sclerotia microbiome, and the whole-genome sequence of Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. MC, are available in the NCBI database under BioProject PRJNA1475221 and Harvard Dataverse https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DEERTV.

References

  • 1. Compant  S, Cassan  F, Kostić  T, et al.  Harnessing the plant microbiome for sustainable crop production. Nat Rev Microbiol  2025;23:9–23. 10.1038/s41579-024-01079-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Copeland  C, Schulze-Lefert  P, Ma  K-W. Potential and challenges for application of microbiomes in agriculture. Plant Cell  2025;37:koaf185. 10.1093/plcell/koaf185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Xu  S, Liu  YX, Cernava  T, et al.  Fusarium fruiting body microbiome member Pantoea agglomerans inhibits fungal pathogenesis by targeting lipid rafts. Nat Microbiol  2022;7:831–43. 10.1038/s41564-022-01131-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barmukh  R, Garg  V, Liu  H, et al.  Spatial omics for accelerating plant research and crop improvement. Trends Biotechnol  2025;43:1904–20. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Su  Z-F, Wu  CZ, Ding  HR, et al.  Spatially resolved multiomics reveals the self-enforcing property of the leading-edge multicellular ecosystem of head and neck cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2026;123:e2519474123. 10.1073/pnas.2519474123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nobori  T. Immune cell states: critical building blocks of the plant immune system. Cell Host Microbe  2025;33:1227–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhu  J, Lolle  S, Tang  A, et al.  Single-cell profiling of Arabidopsis leaves to Pseudomonas syringae infection. Cell Rep  2023;42:112676. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Saarenpää  S, Shalev  O, Ashkenazy  H, et al.  Spatial metatranscriptomics resolves host–bacteria–fungi interactomes. Nat Biotechnol  2024;42:1384–93. 10.1038/s41587-023-01979-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nobori  T. Exploring the untapped potential of single-cell and spatial omics in plant biology. New Phytol  2025;247:1098–116. 10.1016/j.chom.2025.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lim  HJ, Wang  Y, Buzdin  A, et al.  A practical guide for choosing an optimal spatial transcriptomics technology from seven major commercially available options. BMC Genomics  2025;26:47. 10.1186/s12864-025-11235-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Northen  TR, Kleiner  M, Torres  M, et al.  Community standards and future opportunities for synthetic communities in plant–microbiota research. Nat Microbiol  2024;9:2774–84. 10.1038/s41564-024-01833-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Xu  X, Dinesen  C, Pioppi  A, et al.  Composing a microbial symphony: synthetic communities for promoting plant growth. Trends Microbiol  2025;33:738–51. 10.1016/j.tim.2025.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pfeilmeier  S, Werz  A, Ote  M, et al.  Leaf microbiome dysbiosis triggered by T2SS-dependent enzyme secretion from opportunistic Xanthomonas pathogens. Nat Microbiol  2024;9:136–49. 10.1038/s41564-023-01555-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chen  T, Nomura  K, Wang  X, et al.  A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere. Nature  2020;580:653–7. 10.1038/s41586-020-2185-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Buetas  E, Jordán-López  M, López-Roldán  A, et al.  Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing by PacBio improves taxonomic resolution in human microbiome samples. BMC Genomics  2024;25:310. 10.1186/s12864-024-10213-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhang  H, Wang  X, Chen  A, et al.  Comparison of the full-length sequence and sub-regions of 16S rRNA gene for skin microbiome profiling. mSystems  2024;9:e00399–24. 10.1128/msystems.00399-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Thomas  VE, Antony-Babu  S. Core hyphosphere microbiota of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Environ Microbiome  2024;19:14. 10.1186/s40793-024-00558-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Gohar  D, Põldmaa  K, Tedersoo  L, et al.  Global diversity and distribution of mushroom-inhabiting bacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep  2022;14:254–64. 10.1111/1758-2229.13045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Maurice  S, Arnault  G, Nordén  J, et al.  Fungal sporocarps house diverse and host-specific communities of fungicolous fungi. ISME J  2021;15:1445–57. 10.1038/s41396-020-00862-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gordon  A, McCartney  C, Knox  RE, et al.  Genetic and transcriptional dissection of resistance to Claviceps purpurea in the durum wheat cultivar Greenshank. Theor Appl Genet  2020;133:1873–86. 10.1007/s00122-020-03561-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Huang  X, Luo  J, Song  YF, et al.  Favorable bioactivity of the SDHI fungicide benzovindiflupyr against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum mycelial growth, sclerotial production, and myceliogenic and carpogenic germination of sclerotia. Plant Dis  2019;103:1613–20. 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0729-RE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tomah  AA, Khattak  AA, Aldarraji  MH, et al.  Sclerotia degradation by Trichoderma-mycoparasitic; an effective and sustainable trend in the drop lettuce disease control caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Arch Microbiol  2024;206:286. 10.1007/s00203-024-04014-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zeng  W, Wang  D, Kirk  W, et al.  Use of Coniothyrium minitans and other microorganisms for reducing Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Biol Control  2012;60:225–32. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.10.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Duncan  RW, Dilantha Fernando  WG, Rashid  KY. Time and burial depth influencing the viability and bacterial colonization of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Soil Biol Biochem  2006;38:275–84. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sanabria-Velazquez  AD, Testen  AL, Khadka  RB, et al.  Anaerobic soil disinfestation reduces viability of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and S. minor sclerotia and root-knot nematodes in muck soils. Phytopathology  2020;110:795–804. 10.1094/PHYTO-10-19-0386-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Amselem  J, Cuomo  CA, van Kan  JAL, et al.  Genomic analysis of the necrotrophic fungal pathogens Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea. PLoS Genet  2011;7:e1002230. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Reich  JD, Alexander  TW, Chatterton  S. A multiplex PCR assay for the detection and quantification of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea. Lett Appl Microbiol  2016;62:379–85. 10.1111/lam.12566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Callahan  BJ, Wong  J, Heiner  C, et al.  High-throughput amplicon sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene with single-nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res  2019;47:e103. 10.1093/nar/gkz569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Quast  C, Pruesse  E, Yilmaz  P, et al.  The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res  2013;41:D590–6. 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wu  P-H, Chang  H-X. Colonization compatibility with Bacillus altitudinis confers soybean seed rot resistance. ISME J  2024;18:wrae142. 10.1093/ismejo/wrae142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chamberlain  SA, Szöcs  E. taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Res  2013;2:191. 10.12688/f1000research.2-191.v2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Katoh  K, Rozewicki  J, Yamada  KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform  2019;20:1160–6. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, et al.  IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol Biol Evol  2020;37:1530–4. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. McMurdie  PJ, Holmes  S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One  2013;8:e61217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Caporaso  JG, Lauber  CL, Walters  WA, et al.  Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2011;108:4516–22. 10.1073/pnas.1000080107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lin  H, Peddada  SD. Multigroup analysis of compositions of microbiomes with covariate adjustments and repeated measures. Nat Methods  2024;21:83–91. 10.1038/s41592-023-02092-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Love  MI, Huber  W, Anders  S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol  2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Carrión  VJ, Cordovez  V, Tyc  O, et al.  Involvement of Burkholderiaceae and sulfurous volatiles in disease-suppressive soils. ISME J  2018;12:2307–21. 10.1038/s41396-018-0186-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yarza  P, Yilmaz  P, Pruesse  E, et al.  Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol  2014;12:635–45. 10.1038/nrmicro3330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Pebesma  E. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R J  2018;10:439–46. 10.32614/RJ-2018-009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. De Coster  W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, et al.  NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics  2018;34:2666–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kolmogorov  M, Yuan  J, Lin  Y, et al.  Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol  2019;37:540–6. 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gurevich  A, Saveliev  V, Vyahhi  N, et al.  QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics  2013;29:1072–5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Seppey  M, Manni  M, Zdobnov  EM. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. In: Kollmar  M. (ed.), Gene Prediction: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1962. Humana Press, New York, NY. Springer, 2019, 227–45. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Seemann  T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics  2014;30:2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Pruitt  KD, Tatusova  T, Maglott  DR. NCBI reference sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res  2007;35:D61–5. 10.1093/nar/gkl842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Huerta-Cepas  J, Szklarczyk  D, Forslund  K, et al.  eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res  2016;44:D286–93. 10.1093/nar/gkv1248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Jia  B, Raphenya  AR, Alcock  B, et al.  CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res  2017;45:D566–73. 10.1093/nar/gkw1004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Buchfink  B, Xie  C, Huson  DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods  2015;12:59–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Mistry  J, Finn  RD, Eddy  SR, et al.  Challenges in homology search: HMMER3 and convergent evolution of coiled-coil regions. Nucleic Acids Res  2013;41:e121. 10.1093/nar/gkt263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Blin  K, Shaw  S, Augustijn  HE, et al.  antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res  2023;51:W46–50. 10.1093/nar/gkad344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Tonkin-Hill  G, MacAlasdair  N, Ruis  C, et al.  Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol  2020;21:180. 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Croucher  NJ, Page  AJ, Connor  TR, et al.  Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res  2015;43:e15. 10.1093/nar/gku1196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Jain  C, Rodriguez-R  LM, Phillippy  AM, et al. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun  2018;9:5114. 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Auch  AF, Klenk  H-P, Göker  M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci  2010;2:142–8. 10.4056/sigs.541628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Wobbrock  JO, Findlater L, Gergle D, et al. The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only Anova Procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘11. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 2011, 143–6. 10.1145/1978942.1978963 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Lakens  D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol  2013;4:863. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Armanhi  JSL, de Souza  RSC, Damasceno  NB, et al.  A community-based culture collection for targeting novel plant growth-promoting bacteria from the sugarcane microbiome. Front Plant Sci  2018;8:2191. 10.3389/fpls.2017.02191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Niu  B, Paulson  JN, Zheng  X, et al.  Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2017;114:E2450–9. 10.1073/pnas.1616148114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Smith  ME, Henkel  TW, Rollins  JA. How many fungi make sclerotia?  Fungal Ecol  2015;13:211–20. 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.08.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Derbyshire  MC, Newman  TE, Khentry  Y, et al.  The evolutionary and molecular features of the broad-host-range plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol Plant Pathol  2022;23:1075–90. 10.1111/mpp.13221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. O'Sullivan  CA, Belt  K, Thatcher  LF. Tackling control of a cosmopolitan phytopathogen: Sclerotinia. Front Plant Sci  2021;12:707509. 10.3389/fpls.2021.707509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Butler  MJ, Gardiner  RB, Day  AW. Melanin synthesis by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mycologia  2009;101:296–304. 10.3852/08-120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Aldrich-Wolfe  L, Travers  S, Nelson  BD  Jr. Genetic variation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum from multiple crops in the north Central United States. PLoS One  2015;10:e0139188. 10.1371/journal.pone.0139188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Matheron  ME, Porchas  M. Impact of summer flooding on viability of Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum sclerotia in soil. Plant Health Prog  2018;19:15–8. 10.1094/PHP-06-17-0034-RS [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Wu  BM, Subbarao  KV, Liu  Y-B. Comparative survival of sclerotia of Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum. Phytopathology  2008;98:659–65. 10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Niem  JM. Effects of Flooding on Survival of Sclerotinia and Verticillium in Potato Field Soils of Western Washington. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. 2011. https://hdl.handle.net/2376/100673 [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Smith  AM. Nutrient leakage promotes biological control of dried sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Soil Biol Biochem  1972;4:125–9. 10.1016/0038-0717(72)90002-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Mahalingam  T, Rajapakse  CSK, Somachandra  KP, et al.  Carbon source dependent-anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) mitigates the sclerotial germination of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Trop Plant Pathol  2020;45:13–24. 10.1007/s40858-019-00315-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Stopnisek  N, Zühlke  D, Carlier  A, et al.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the close association between soil Burkholderia and fungi. ISME J  2016;10:253–64. 10.1038/ismej.2015.73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Nguyen  NH. Fungal hyphosphere microbiomes are distinct from surrounding substrates and show consistent association patterns. Microbiol Spectrum  2023;11:e04708–22. 10.1128/spectrum.04708-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Mehmood  MA, Zhao  H, Cheng  J, et al.  Sclerotia of a phytopathogenic fungus restrict microbial diversity and improve soil health by suppressing other pathogens and enriching beneficial microorganisms. J Environ Manag  2020;259:109857. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Sun  N, Wang  L, Feng  G. Host-dependent roles of hyphosphere keystone Massilia in organic phosphorus mineralization and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal growth. J Exp Bot  2025;eraf339. 10.1093/jxb/eraf339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Estoppey  A, Vallat-Michel  A, Chain  PS, et al.  Impact of oxalic acid consumption and pH on the in vitro biological control of oxalogenic phytopathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J Fungi  2025;11:191. 10.3390/jof11030191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Leveau  JHJ, Preston  GM. Bacterial mycophagy: definition and diagnosis of a unique bacterial–fungal interaction. New Phytol  2008;177:859–76. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02325.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Wang  Z, Zeng  Y, Tan  Z, et al.  A unified framework for identification of cell-type-specific spatially variable genes in spatial transcriptomic studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2025;122:e2503952122. 10.1073/pnas.2503952122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Chen  S, Liu  R, Mo  CK, et al.  Multi-omic and spatial analysis of mouse kidneys highlights sex-specific differences in gene regulation across the lifespan. Nat Genet  2025;57:1213–27. 10.1038/s41588-025-02161-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Wu  H, Zhang  R, Niklas  KJ, et al.  Multiplexed transcriptomic analyzes of the plant embryonic hourglass. Nat Commun  2025;16:802. 10.1038/s41467-024-55803-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Kim  HJ, Ishida  K, Hertweck  C. Thiotemplated biosynthesis of bacterial polyyne fatty acids by a designated desaturase triad. ChemBioChem  2022;23:e202200430. 10.1002/cbic.202200430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. del Barrio-Duque  A, Samad  A, Nybroe  O, et al.  Interaction between endophytic Proteobacteria strains and Serendipita indica enhances biocontrol activity against fungal pathogens. Plant Soil  2020;451:277–305. 10.1007/s11104-020-04512-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_material_wrag201

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data, including the PacBio sequencing data of the sclerotia microbiome, and the whole-genome sequence of Trinickia sclerotiorum sp. nov. MC, are available in the NCBI database under BioProject PRJNA1475221 and Harvard Dataverse https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DEERTV.


Articles from The ISME Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES