Abstract
Various bacterial species are capable of producing highly modified fatty acid derivatives with conjugated triple bonds, which play important ecological roles as antifungals and toxins in mutualistic and pathogenic interactions. Furthermore, the terminal polyyne moiety is of interest as pharmacophore and as tag in bioorthogonal chemistry and live imaging. To gain insight into the assembly of these highly reactive natural products, we investigated tetrayne (caryoynencin and protegencin) biosynthesis genes (cay and pgn) from Trinickia caryophylli and Pseudomonas protegens. Pathway dissection and reconstitution in the heterologous host Burkholderia graminis revealed the genes minimally required for polyyne formation. Mutational analyses and biochemical assays demonstrated that polyyne biosynthesis is thiotemplated, involving a fatty acyl‐AMP ligase, a designated acyl carrier protein, and a thioesterase. Heterologous expression of point‐mutated desaturase genes showed that three desaturases work synergistically to introduce four triple bonds. These findings point to an intricate desaturase complex and provide important information for future bioengineering experiments.
Keywords: alkynes, biosynthesis, fatty acids, natural products, polyynes
The bacterial biosynthesis of polyyne fatty acids such as protegencin proceeds in a thiotemplated manner and involves a designated fatty acyl‐AMP ligase (PgnD), acyl carrier proteins (ACP, PgnG), and a thioesterase (PgnH). While anchored to the ACP, fatty acids undergo polyunsaturation by means of a specialized desaturase triad (PgnEFH) and a redox donor (PgnI). These findings have implications for bioengineering and genome mining.

Introduction
Bacterial polyynes comprise a structurally intriguing family of highly modified fatty acid metabolites. Owing to the conjugated and terminal triple bonds, these compounds are highly reactive, and thus extremely unstable. Cepacin A (1) from the human pathogen Burkholderia cepacia and the biopesticidal bacterium Burkholderia ambifaria, [1] the antifungal antibiotic Sch 31828 (2) from Microbispora sp. SCC 1438, [2] and the antifungal collimonins (3–6) from the fungus‐feeding bacterium Collimonas fungivorans, [3] are examples of hexadecanoids with two or three triple bonds. Octadecanoids with four triple bonds include the phytotoxic and antifungal caryoynencin (8) from the plant and mushrooms pathogens T. caryophylli and B. gladioli, [4] and the recently identified protegencin (7, syn. protegenin [5] ) from Pseudomonas protegens [6] (Figure 1A). Their versatile ecological functions in protective symbioses[ 1b , 4b ] and their involvement in plant/algal, [6b] and mushroom [7] diseases have prompted the analyses of bacterial polyyne biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). [6a] These BGCs harbor conserved core genes coding for a fatty acyl‐AMP ligase, three desaturases, an acyl carrier protein (ACP), a thioesterase, and an electron transport component such as rubredoxin (Figure 1B). In addition, the BGC may encode additional enzymes for modifications, such as the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CayG, which has been shown to introduce an allylic alcohol moiety. [8]
Figure 1.

Examples of bacterial polyynes, and genetic basis for tetrayne biosynthesis. A) Structures of selected bacterial polyynes with terminal alkyne groups. B) Architectures of the protegencin (7) and caryoynencin (8) biosynthesis gene clusters.
Because of the high potential for bioprospecting, [9] as antifungals, [10] and for bio‐orthogonal chemistry [11] and in vivo imaging[ 6b , 7 ] there is high interest in understanding the biochemical basis for microbial alkyne and polyyne formation. Although various in silico and genetic analyses have been performed,[ 1b , 3 , 5 , 6 , 8a , 9 ] bacterial polyyne fatty acid biosynthesis is still little understood. Here, we provide insight into tetrayne octadecanoid biosynthesis by heterologous reconstitution, mutagenesis, and in vitro studies. We show the gene sets minimally required for polyyne biosynthesis, provide experimental evidence for a thiotemplated polyyne formation, and show that a desaturase triad works synergistically to produce four triple bonds.
Results and Discussion
To gain insight into the minimal set of genes required for polyyne fatty acid production, we cloned and heterologously expressed conserved caryoynencin and protegencin biosynthesis genes. Specifically, we created pRANGER‐BTB3 [12] ‐based expression plasmids containing genes cayABCD, coding for three desaturases and a fatty acyl‐AMP ligase, cayABCDE, also containing a gene for an acyl carrier protein (ACP), and cayABCDEF, which contains an additional thioesterase gene, downstream of the pBAD promoter. We also generated constructs additionally containing ferritin, cayK, and/or rubredoxin, cayL, genes. The expression plasmids were introduced into Burkholderia graminis, which naturally does not produce polyyne fatty acids. The transformants were incubated in potato dextrose broth (PDB) medium at 30 °C for 2 days, gene expression was initiated by adding 1 mM arabinose, and metabolite production was monitored by HPLC with HRMS and UV detection (Figure 2A). Furthermore, we observed browning of bacterial colonies on agar plates, indicating the formation of unstable polyyne compounds (Figure 2B). When cayABCD(E) were heterologously expressed, no polyyne compounds could be detected (Figure 2A, traces b and g). When coexpressing the thioesterase gene, cayF, (cayABCDEF), a small peak corresponding to protegencin (7) was detected in the HPLC trace (Figure 2A, trace c). Coexpression of ferritin, cayK, and/or rubredoxin, cayL, genes markedly increased the production of protegencin (7) (Figure 2A, traces d–f), likely because the gene products are required for electron transfer. Alongside with protegencin (7), we detected a congener (9) with a secondary alcohol group at C17 in lieu of the terminal alkyne, a shunt product previously observed in the wild type. [8a] Incomplete gene sets did not give rise to polyynes, irrespective of coexpression of cayK (cayABCDK/cayABCDEK/cayADEFK) (Figure 2A, traces h–j).
Figure 2.
Heterologous reconstitution and mutational analysis of polyyne fatty acid biosynthesis. A) HPLC‐DAD profiles (λ=220–400 nm) of ethyl acetate extracts from heterologous expression of pRNAGER‐BTB3 vector with a) empty (control), b) cayABCDE, c) cayABCDEF, d) cayABCDEFK, e) cayABCDEFL, f) cayABCDEFKL, g) cayABCD, h) cayABCDK, i) cayABCDEK and j) cayADEFK in B. graminis incubated in PDB medium at 30 °C for 2 days, k) and l) are standards of compound 9 and 7, respectively. B) Incubation of above‐mentioned strains in PDA plates under same condition. C) Model of the biosynthetic pathways to protegencin (7) and caryoynencin (8).
Analogous expression experiments with pgn genes gave the same results. The heterologous expression of either pgnDEFGH or pgnDEFGHI in B. graminis led to the production of protegencin (7) and compound 9 (Figure S1, traces b–c). In the absence of one or two desaturase and thioesterase genes (pgnDEFG, pgnDGH) and fatty acyl‐AMP ligase/ACP (pgnEFH), no polyynes were formed (Figure S1, traces d–f). The presence of rubredoxin gene, pgnI, increased the amount of protegencin (1).
From these results we concluded that the biosynthesis of the polyynes is initiated by the ligase‐catalyzed activation and loading of a fatty acid onto an ACP, followed by desaturation, which requires three desaturases and support by ferritin or rubredoxin. Finally, thioesterase releases the polyyne fatty acid from the ACP (Figure 2C).
To investigate the ACP (CayD/PgnG) – fatty acyl‐AMP ligase (CayA/PgnD) system for fatty acid activation and loading, we performed in vitro assays. Therefore, we heterologously produced the N‐His6‐ variants in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). Whereas N‐His6‐ or C‐His6‐tagged CayA were always located in inclusion body as an insoluble form, we succeeded in isolating N‐His6‐tagged CayD, N‐His6‐tagged PgnD and N‐His6‐tagged PgnG. The phosphopantetheinyl transferase Sfp (P39135) from Bacillus subtilis [13] was used to transform apo‐CayD and apo‐PgnD into the corresponding holo‐forms (Figure 3A).
Figure 3.
In vitro analysis of the thiotemplate system. A) Ligase‐mediated loading of fatty acids onto ACP. General scheme and MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry spectra of ACP‐bound substrates. a) PgnG alone, b) PgnG and SFP, c) PgnG, SFP and PgnD with myristic acid, d) same with palmitic acid, e) palmitoleic acid, f) stearic acid, g) oleic acid, h) elaidic acid, i) vaccenic acid, j) linoleic acid and k) linoelaidic acid. B) Phylogenetic tree of ACP family proteins. ACPs retrieved from the ThYme database are highlighted as gray clades. The clade of CayD homologues is highlighted in orange. The scale bar indicates amino acid substitutions per site. C) Scheme of thioesterase (CayF)‐mediated hydrolysis of thioester surrogate 10. HPLC‐DAD profiles (λ=200–400 nm) of enzyme reaction a) at T=0 min, b) at T=30 min. Asterisks indicate peaks of Z‐isomers.
Using the in vitro system and MALDI‐TOF analysis of the ACPs (CayD and PgnG) we tested a variety of fatty acids as substrates. We noted that fatty acyl‐AMP ligase PgnD is capable of loading a range of unsaturated and saturated fatty acids, such myristic acid (C14H28O2), palmitic acid (C16H32O2), palmitoleic acid (C16H30O2, cis‐Δ9), stearic acid (C18H36O2), oleic acid (C18H34O2, cis‐Δ9), elaidic acid (C18H34O2, trans‐Δ9), vaccenic acid (C18H34O2, trans‐Δ11), linoleic acid (C18H32O2, cis,cis‐Δ9,Δ12), and linoelaidic acid (C18H32O2, trans,trans‐Δ9,Δ12)) onto the cognate ACPs (Figure 3A for PgnD, Figure S2 for CayD).
Since the C18 protegencin and caryoynencin are the major products in the cultivation of P. protegens and T. caryophylli, respectively, one would expect octadecanoid fatty acids to be the primary substrates for PgnG and CayD. Nonetheless, we also noted polyyne tetradecanoid and hexadecanoid fatty acids in P. protegens Pf‐5, which suggested that either shorter chain lengths are accepted as substrates by the polyyne biosynthesis enzymes, or that the C18 products are shortened by β‐oxidation. [8b] The ACP loading experiments demonstrate that there is some flexibility with regard to chain length in the ligase‐ACP system, and further substrate control is likely during the downstream processes. The predicted tertiary structures of CayD and PgnG obtained by AlphaFold2 [14] revealed that these proteins possess a typical ACP fold with three main α‐helixes that run parallel to each other (Figure S3). Interestingly, the phylogenetic analysis of ACP family proteins from the ThYme [15] (Thioester‐active enzYmes) database suggests that bacterial polyyne ACPs belong to a new clade. Their closest relatives are ACP domains (clade ACP6) in PKSs involved in mycobacterial lipids biosynthesis (Figure 3B, S4–6, Table S7). [16]
In order to confirm that a thioesterase catalyzes hydrolysis of thioester bond to release protegencin from ACP at the final step of protegencin biosynthetic pathway, C‐His6‐tagged CayF was produced in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) and tested with a coenzyme A surrogate, [17] the N‐acetyl cysteamine (SNAC) thioester of protegencin (10). [8b] The in vitro assay of CayF with 10 in buffered solution (pH 8.0) showed that this enzyme readily hydrolyzes the thioester bond to produce protegencin (Figure 3C). [8b]
Gene cluster comparisons along with gene deletion and heterologous expression experiments suggested that bacterial polyyne fatty acid BGCs harbor three conserved genes for membrane‐bound fatty acid desaturases (cayB, cayC, and cayE; pgnE, pgnF, and pgnH) (Table S3 and Figure S7–S10).[ 6a , 8a ] Bioinformatics indicated that desaturase genes cayB/pgnE and cayC/pgnF are related to jamB, which is involved in the formation of the terminal alkyne moiety of jamaicamide B in marine cyanobacteria. [18] Notably, JamB has been shown to act on a short‐chain fatty acid bound to an ACP associated to a polyketide synthase. [18b] The gene products of CayE/PgnH are similar to delta 12 fatty acid desaturases. [8a] Like typical desaturases, the deduced products of the cay/pgn desaturase genes have conserved histidine regions (HXXHH/QXXHH) that coordinate di‐iron centers at the active site. [19] From the expected topologies of the desaturases, the conserved histidine regions are located inside and outside the cytosol (Figure S7–S10). To confirm the proposed roles of the desaturases and to potentially detect biosynthetic intermediates, we individually mutated two histidine residues in two active centers into two leucine residues (HXXHH→HXXLL and QXXHH→QXXLL) in each desaturase (cay genes in Figure S11 and pgn genes in Figure S12A). Then, we individually replaced each point‐mutated desaturase gene in the functional polyyne fatty acid biosynthesis gene cassettes (cayABCDEFK/pgnDEFGH) and expressed these in B. graminis. Metabolic profiling showed that single point mutations in the active centers in each desaturase fully abolished polyyne production (Figure 4, traces b–g for cay genes, and Figure S12B, traces b–g for pgn genes). These observations indicate that a set of three fully functional desaturases is required for polyyne formation and provides a rationale for the intriguing pattern of three desaturase genes in bacterial polyyne fatty acid BGCs.
Figure 4.

Functional analysis of the desaturase triad responsible for tetrayne formation. Point mutation of desaturases; sequences of point mutated a) cayB1, b) cayB2, c) cayC1, d) cayC2, e) cayE1 and f) cayE2. B) HPLC‐DAD profiles (λ=220–400 nm) of ethyl acetate extracts from heterologous expression of cay genes with point‐mutated desaturase genes (cayB, cayC and cayE) in pRANGER‐BTB3 in B. graminis incubated in PDB medium at 30 °C for 2 days.
Conclusion
The heterologous expression and functional analyses of polyyne biosynthesis genes from two different bacterial strains teach important lessons on the bacterial synthesis of highly unsaturated fatty acids. First, the expression and heterologous reconstitution studies identified the minimal set of genes that are required and sufficient for polyyne biosynthesis. These gene cassettes should minimally code for a fatty acyl‐AMP ligase, an ACP, three desaturases, and a thioesterase. An additional component for electron transport markedly increases polyyne production. Second, in contrast to the plant‐derived alkyne fatty acids, which derive from free fatty acids, the formation of bacterial polyyne fatty acids is thiotemplated. It is a prerequisite for bacterial polyyne formation that the fatty acid is loaded onto a designated ACP, and eventually the furnished product is released by a thioesterase. Finally, the most remarkable finding is that three desaturases are capable of producing four triple bonds, and that it is essential for alkyne formation that this enzyme triad is intact. This finding contrasts with the individually acting acetylenases that introduce triple bonds into fatty acids in specialized plant and basidiomycete metabolism. [20] Insight into this peculiar bacterial polyyne assembly line provides important information for future bioengineering experiments. Beyond the heterologous production of highly instable, hard‐to‐synthesize polyyne compounds, this work may also set the basis for future analyses of an intricate desaturase complex.
Experimental Section
For experimental details, see the Supporting Information.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1.
Supporting information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Perner for LC HR‐MS measurements, H. Heinecke for NMR measurements, and T. Kindel and A. Komor for MALDI measurements. Financial support by the Pakt für Forschung und Innovation and InfectoOptics (iTag) is gratefully acknowledged. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
H. J. Kim, K. Ishida, C. Hertweck, ChemBioChem 2022, 23, e202200430.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- 1.
- 1a. Parker W. L., Rathnum M. L., Seiner V., Trejo W. H., Principe P. A., Sykes R. B., J. Antibiot. 1984, 37, 431–440; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1b. Mullins A. J., Murray J. A. H., Bull M. J., Jenner M., Jones C., Webster G., Green A. E., Neill D. R., Connor T. R., Parkhill J., Challis G. L., Mahenthiralingam E. M., Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 996–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Patel M., Conover M., Horan A., Loebenberg D., Marquez J., Mierzwa R., Puar M. S., Yarborough R., Waitz J. A., J. Antibiot. 1988, 41, 794–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kai K., Sogame M., Sakurai F., Nasu N., Fujita M., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3536–3540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.
- 4a. Kusumi T., Ohtani I., Nishiyama K., Kakisawa H., Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 29, 3981–3984; [Google Scholar]
- 4b. Flórez L. V., Scherlach K., Gaube P., Ross C., Sitte E., Hermes C., Rodrigues A., Hertweck C., Kaltenpoth M., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Murata S. M., Kai K., ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.1c00276. [Google Scholar]
- 6.
- 6a. Mullins A. J., Webster G., Kim H. J., Zhao J., Petrova Y. D., Ramming C. E., Jenner M., Murray J. A. H., Connor T. R., Hertweck C., Challis G. L., Mahenthiralingam E., mBio 2021, 12, e00715–00721; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6b. Hotter V., Zopf D., Kim H. J., Silge A., Schmitt M., Aiyar P., Fleck J., Matthäus C., Hniopek J., Yan Q., Loper J., Sasso S., Hertweck C., Popp J., Mittag M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2107695118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dose B., Thongkongkaew T., Zopf D., Kim H. J., Bratovanov E. V., García-Altares M., Scherlach K., Kumpfmüller J., Ross C., Hermenau R., Niehs S., Silge A., Hniopek J., Schmitt M., Popp J., Hertweck C., ChemBioChem 2021, 22, 2901–2907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.
- 8a. Ross C., Scherlach K., Kloss F., Hertweck C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7794–7798; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 7928–7932; [Google Scholar]
- 8b. Kim H., Ishida K., Ishida-Ito M., Hertweck C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202203264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Petrova Y. D., Zhao J., Webster G., Mullins A. J., Williams K., Alswat A. S., Challis G. L., Bailey A. M., Mahenthiralingam E., Microb Biotechnol. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lin C.-C., Hoo S. Y., Ma L.-T., Lin C., Huang K.-F., Ho Y.-N., Sun C.-H., Lee H.-J., Chen P.-Y., Shu L.-J., Wang B.-W., Hsu W.-C., Ko T.-P., Yang Y.-L., Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Porterfield W. B., Poenateetai N., Zhang W., iScience 2022, 23, 100938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lynch M. D., Gill R. T., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 94, 151–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Quadri L. E. N., Weinreb P. H., Lei M., Nakano M. M., Zuber P., Walsh C. T., Biochemistry 1998, 37, 1585–1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jumper J., Evans R., Pritzel A., Green T., Figurnov M., Ronneberger O., Tunyasuvunakool K., Bates R., Zidek A., Potapenko A., Bridgland A., Meyer C., Kohl S. A. A., Ballard A. J., Cowie A., Romera-Paredes B., Nikolov S., Jain R., Adler J., Back T., Petersen S., Reiman D., Clancy E., Zielinski M., Steinegger M., Pacholska M., Berghammer T., Bodenstein S., Silver D., Vinyals O., Senior A. W., Kavukcuoglu K., Kohli P., Hassabis D., Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cantu D. C., Chen Y., Lemons M. L., Reilly P. J., Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D342–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Marrakchi H., Laneélle M.-A., Daffé M., Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 67–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Franke J., Hertweck C., Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 1179–1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.
- 18a. Edwards D. J., Marquez B. L., Nogle L. M., McPhail K., Goeger D. E., Roberts M. A., Gerwick W. H., Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 817–833; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18b. Zhu X., Liu J., Zhang W., Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 115–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shanklin J., Whittle E., Fox B. G., Biochemistry 1994, 33, 12787–12794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.
- 20a. Li X., Lv J.-M., Hu D., Abe I., RSC Chem. Biol. 2021, 2, 166–180; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20b. Blacklock B. J., Scheffler B. E., Shepard M. R., Jayasuriya N., Minto R. E., J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 28442–28449; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20c. Minto R. E., Blacklock B. J., Prog. Lipid Res. 2008, 47, 233–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.


