Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit immunomodulatory and regenerative properties that have been extensively investigated in domestic species. However, knowledge of their biological characteristics in wildlife species remains limited and is critical for advancing translational research and conservation medicine. Thus, this study aimed to isolate, characterize, and evaluate the immunomodulatory and neuroregenerative potential of adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) from crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous). Subcutaneous adipose tissue samples were collected from five healthy adult animals during elective surgeries, following prior ethical approval. All procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional and national ethical guidelines. MSCs were isolated by enzymatic digestion, expanded in vitro, and characterized based on morphology, immunophenotype, and mesodermal multipotency. Cell viability was assessed following inflammatory stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and the gene expression of immunomodulatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors was evaluated by RT-qPCR. The cells displayed typical fibroblast-like morphology, plastic adherence, expression of mesenchymal markers CD90, CD29, and CD44, absence of hematopoietic markers CD14 and CD45, and successful differentiation into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages. LPS stimulation significantly upregulated the expression of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), as well as the neurotrophic and regenerative factors glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). These findings indicate that AT-MSCs derived from Cerdocyon thous possess immunomodulatory and neuroregenerative potential, supporting their relevance for translational research and future applications in conservation veterinary medicine, particularly in the context of inflammatory and neurological disorders.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-026-11542-4.
Keywords: Immunomodulation, Neuroregeneration, Conservation medicine, Wild animals
Introduction
Characterized by their self-renewal potential, specific immunophenotype, and fibroblastoid morphology, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) consist of adherent multipotent cells derived from tissues of mesenchymal origin, with the capacity for adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation. Additionally, studies in different species have demonstrated that MSCs also exhibit the potential for transdifferentiation into neural cells such as neural-like cells and Schwann-like cells (Echeverry et al. 2019; Villagrán et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2022).
MSCs can be isolated from various adult tissues, including bone marrow (Friedenstein et al. 1970), skin (Toma et al. 2001), liver (Götherström et al. 2003), synovium (Djouad et al. 2005), dental pulp (Perry et al. 2008), muscle (Kisiel et al. 2012), adipose tissue (Echeverry et al. 2020) and endometrium (Wang et al. 2022), as well as from perinatal tissues such as the umbilical cord and Wharton’s jelly (Ryu et al. 2012), fetal membranes (Andrzejewska et al. 2019) and placenta (Ha et al. 2026). Among these sources, adipose tissue stands out as one of the most promising, particularly in studies involving wild animals, as it allows the acquisition of large quantities of cells through minimally invasive methods or opportunistic collection during elective surgical procedures such as castration (Echeverry et al. 2019).
The therapeutic potential of MSCs is associated with multiple mechanisms of action, including the ability to migrate to injured tissues, differentiate, and interact with the local microenvironment, thereby contributing to tissue homeostasis (Liu et al. 2023). In addition, MSCs exert immunomodulatory effects via interactions with components of the immune system and the secretion of extracellular vesicles and soluble mediators, including cytokines with pro- or anti-inflammatory functions depending on the microenvironmental context (Alvites et al. 2022; Johnson 2024). Their regenerative potential is further supported by the paracrine release of neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) (Colbath et al. 2024). In addition, autocrine signaling contributes to MSC regenerative functions by regulating cellular processes such as migration, survival and differentiation (Hemmingsen et al. 2013; Hoseini and Montazeri 2025; Pelagalli et al. 2018).
Due to these properties, MSCs have been applied in the treatment of various diseases in domestic species, including cardiovascular, respiratory, immune-mediated and renal disorders (Johnson 2024). Similarly, they have been widely investigated as a therapeutic alternative for diseases affecting the nervous system. In equines, the use of MSCs has been explored for conditions of an inflammatory or degenerative nature, with a focus on immunomodulation, neuroprotection, and improvement of the neural microenvironment (Guest et al. 2008; Carrade et al. 2012; Dudhia and Guest 2014). In other domestic animals, their use has been reported in peripheral neuropathies, spinal cord injuries, intervertebral disc disease, meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin (MUO), encephalitis caused by the canine distemper virus, cognitive dysfunction, among others (Gonçalves et al. 2018; Pinheiro et al. 2019; Brunel et al. 2022; Altamirano-Samaniego et al. 2022; Johnson 2024; Amorim and Ferreira 2025).
The crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) is a Neotropical omnivorous mesocarnivore with predominantly crepuscular and nocturnal habits, and a wide distribution across South America. The species is considered a generalist and highly flexible in its use of habitat (Santos et al. 2024). Processes such as deforestation, agricultural expansion, habitat fragmentation, extinction of top predators, and chronic anthropogenic disturbances (increased human population density, grazing, wildfires, and road collisions) have altered the population dynamics of the species, favouring its approach to anthropogenic environments (Santos et al. 2024). This scenario intensifies the interaction between C. thous and domestic animals, especially dogs, increasing the exposure of wild populations to infectious and parasitic agents, with an elevated risk of spillover events, including those involving pathogens with tropism for the central nervous system (Curi et al. 2010).
Among the diseases described in C. thous, those involving neurological impairment stand out, particularly canine distemper (CDV). This disease can extensively affect the central nervous system, resulting in diffuse demyelination and a variety of clinical manifestations, such as ataxia, paralysis, plegia, muscle atrophy, hyperesthesia, myoclonus, tremors, and epileptic seizures (Brunel et al. 2022). Fadrique et al. (2025) reported a case of C. thous presenting with apathy, dehydration, bilateral purulent ocular discharge, and motor incoordination, in which haematological examinations revealed normocytic normochromic anemia, a degenerative left shift, leukopenia due to lymphopenia, monocytosis, and hypoalbuminemia. The diagnosis of canine distemper was confirmed using an immunochromatographic assay for the detection of viral antigens. Additionally, there are reports of the occurrence of canine distemper in other wild canids, such as the pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) (Hübner et al. 2010), hoary fox (Lycalopex vetulus) (Megid et al. 2010), maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (Furtado et al. 2016), and short-eared dog (Atelocynus microtis) (Jucá et al. 2022), reinforcing the relevance of this disease in the context of conservation.
Considering the immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative potential of MSCs, they represent a promising approach for treating neurological diseases in wild animals. However, although they have been widely characterized in domestic species, such as canines (Rashid 2021), sheep (Dar et al. 2021), swine (Garcia et al. 2022), equines (Arnhold et al. 2007), bovines (Merlo et al. 2022), and felines (Park and Song 2024), there is still a scarcity of information regarding the morphology, biological properties, and functions of MSCs in wild species (Pereira et al. 2018).
Despite the growing interest in regenerative medicine for wildlife species, to the best of our knowledge, there are currently no published studies describing or characterizing MSCs derived from the crab-eating fox (C. thous). In this context, the present study aimed to evaluate the anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and neuroregenerative potential of MSCs derived from the adipose tissue (AT-MSCs) of crab-eating foxes (C. thous), through their isolation, morphological, immunophenotypic, and multipotential characterization, assessment of cell viability, and analysis of gene expression associated with these processes.
Materials and methods
Isolation and culture of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)
Excisional collection of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue was performed from five C. thous, comprising three females and two males, all adults and clinically healthy, maintained under human care at the Center for Medicine and Research in Wild Animals of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu campus, São Paulo, Brazil, under approval of the Animal Ethics Committee (CEUA) – Protocol: 000.341. The study was conducted from March 2025 to March 2026. Briefly, the animals (n = 5) received pre-anesthetic medication consisting of ketamine (10 mg/kg, intramuscular [IM]), midazolam (0.3 mg/kg, IM) and methadone (0.2 mg/kg, IM). The animals were transferred to the surgical center, where anesthesia was induced with propofol (5 mg/kg, intravenous [IV]). Local anesthetic blockade was performed using lidocaine (3 mg/kg, subcutaneously) at the incision site. For postoperative analgesia, the animals received meloxicam (0.1 mg/kg, oral) and dipyrone (25 mg/kg, oral). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines.
Initially, at the Translational Nucleus of Regenerative Medicine (NUTRAMERE) of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu campus, the adipose tissue was fragmented into small pieces in a laminar flow hood and subjected to enzymatic digestion at 37 °C for 2 h using 0.1% Type I collagenase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) solution. After digestion, the material was inactivated with DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and centrifuged to remove the remaining lipid layer. The resulting cell pellet was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to ensure the complete removal of residual debris. Following washing, the cells were plated in T25 flasks with standard culture medium composed of 90% DMEM, 10% FBS, 1% penicillin–streptomycin, and 1% amphotericin B.
Morphological, immunophenotypic, and multipotency characterization
For morphological characterization, culture flasks were maintained in an incubator at 37 °C under a 5% CO₂ atmosphere until the cells reached 80–90% confluence over three passages (P3). Cell morphology was documented by optical microscopy using an inverted Nikon Eclipse microscope equipped with a Nikon D5100 digital camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Immunophenotypic characterization of MSCs was performed when P3 cultures reached 80–90% confluence. The surface antigen expression profile was assessed using the markers CD44⁺, CD90⁺, CD29⁺, CD14⁻, and CD45⁻. Cells were incubated with specific monoclonal antibodies: mouse anti-human CD90-APC (BD Pharmingen, New Jersey, USA), mouse anti-human CD14-APC (BD Pharmingen, New Jersey, USA), mouse anti-human CD29-APC (eBioscience, California, USA), rat anti-dog CD45-FITC (eBioscience, California, USA), and rat anti-mouse CD44-PE (BD Pharmingen, New Jersey, USA), according to manufacturer’s protocols. The assessment of antibody cross-reactivity was conducted using peripheral blood from Cerdocyon thous (following protocol with red blood cell lysis and subsequent washing). The positive staining with anti-CD45 and anti-CD14 (monocytes) antibodies confirmed the cross-reactivity of these antibodies with the species under study.
Briefly, 100 µL aliquots of the cell suspension (1 × 10⁶ cells/mL in PBS) were transferred to polystyrene tubes. A tube containing only cells was used as an autofluorescent control. The pre-titrated volume of each antibody was added to the remaining tubes. The samples were mixed by vortexing and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, protected from light. After incubation, 500 µL of PBS was added, followed by vortexing and centrifugation at 290 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were resuspended in 500 µL of PBS for data acquisition using a FACSCalibur® flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The acquisition and analysis of data was conducted using CellQuest™ and FlowJo™ software, employing the following analytical strategy: the MSC cell population was established based on morphological parameters [size (FSC) versus internal complexity (SSC)], with the initial selection (gate) defined by excluding the debris region. Autofluorescence negative controls were performed using unlabeled cells to serve as a reference for determining the phenotype of C. thous MSCs, using CD45 and CD14 as negative markers and CD44, CD90, and CD29 as positive markers.
To confirm the multipotent differentiation potential toward mesodermal lineages, previously cultured cells (P3) were induced to differentiate in vitro into chondrogenic, adipogenic, and osteogenic lineages using the StemPro Adipogenesis®, StemPro Chondrogenesis®, and StemPro Osteogenesis® kits (Invitrogen, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). After differentiation, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and subjected to lineage-specific staining: Alcian Blue for chondrogenic differentiation, Oil Red O for adipogenic differentiation, and Alizarin Red for osteogenic differentiation, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Morphological and cell viability assessment following in vitro inflammatory stimulation
AT-MSCs at P3 were assessed for viability using the Trypan Blue exclusion assay prior to plating. Briefly, cells were then plated in duplicate in 24-well plates (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) at a density of 1 × 10⁵ cells/well using standard culture medium composed of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin–streptomycin, and 1% amphotericin B. After 24 h to allow cell adhesion, baseline images were acquired using an inverted microscope (Leica DM IRB, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) immediately before stimulation (T0).
After initial imaging (T0), the culture medium was replaced according to the experimental conditions: control group (standard culture medium) and LPS group (standard culture medium supplemented with 10 ng/mL of lipopolysaccharide), using 500 µL of medium per well. After 24 h under the experimental conditions, a second set of images was acquired (T24). The LPS concentration (10 ng/mL) and the 24 h evaluation time point were selected based on previously established protocols in our research group (Kamura et al. 2026) and published studies demonstrating that these conditions induce inflammatory responses without causing significant cytotoxicity to MSCs (El Fajri et al. 2025; Kim et al. 2016; Yin et al. 2017).
Cells were then trypsinized, centrifuged, and resuspended in 3 mL of DMEM. Subsequently, 20 µL of each cell suspension was mixed with 20 µL of Trypan Blue and homogenized. Ten microliters of the mixture were loaded onto a Neubauer chamber for microscopic quantification of viable and non-viable cells, allowing calculation of their respective percentages.
Gene expression analysis of cytokines and neurotrophic factors
Gene expression analysis was performed by RT-qPCR in both the control and LPS groups to quantify the following cytokines and neurotrophic factors: interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), prostaglandin E synthase 2 (PTGES2), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A).
For RNA isolation, AT-MSCs were transferred in duplicate, lysed with 1 mL of Trizol®, and collected for subsequent analyses. Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was eluted in RNase-free water, quantified, and assessed by spectrophotometry using a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000, and the 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm absorbance ratios were evaluated to ensure the quality of the extracted material. cDNA synthesis was performed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit, following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Reverse transcription was carried out in a Veriti 96 Well Thermal Cycler under the following conditions: 10 min at 25 °C, 12 min at 37 °C, and 5 min at 85 °C. PCR reactions were performed in duplicate using the previously synthesized cDNA, PowerUp™ SYBR™ Green Master Mix, and RNase-free water. For data normalization, the reference genes hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT), ribosomal protein S5 (RPS5) and S19 (RPS19) were used. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed using the QuantStudio™ 12 K Flex Real-Time PCR System under the following amplification conditions: 50 °C for 2 min, followed by 95 °C for 2 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 1 s and 60 °C for 30 s. At the end of the amplification cycles, a dissociation (melting) curve was generated to verify the specificity of the amplified products.
Primer sequences for the assessment of cytokine and neurotrophic factor gene expression were selected based on homologous regions identified in Canis lupus familiaris (Table 1) because genomic data for Cerdocyon thous are not available. Sequence conservation among canid species supports the applicability of these primers for gene expression analysis in this species. Following amplification, melting-curve analysis was performed for each reaction to assess product specificity. All primer pairs generated single, sharp melting peaks in Cerdocyon thous samples, with no evidence of nonspecific amplification or primer-dimer formation. The corresponding melting curves are provided in Supplementary Material 1.
Table 1.
Sequences of primers utilized in RT-qPCR assays
| DNA-targets | 5’>3’ |
|---|---|
| IL-1β | (F)TGAAGTGCTGCTGCCAAGAC |
| (R)GCAACTGGATGCCCTCATCT | |
| IL-2 | (F)CAACTCCTGCCACAATGTACAAA |
| (R)TGCGACAAGTACAAGCGTCAGT | |
| IL-6 | (F)GACCACTCCTGACCCAACCA |
| (R) ATCCTGCGACTGCAAGATAGC | |
| BDNF | (F) GTGTCGAAAGGCCAACTGAAG |
| (R)CGTGTAACCCATGGGATTGC | |
| IDO | (F) TGTGGACCCAAGCACGTTTT |
| (R) AGTTGCCTTTCCAACCAGACA | |
| GDNF | (F) GGTTTGCTACAGCCAGCAGTT |
| (R) CGCACCATGTTCAAAATCCA | |
| PTGES2 | (F) GCCTGCAGCTGACCCTGTA |
| (R) CACGGACCTTGCTGCAGAA | |
| HGF | (F) ATGGTTCTTGGCGTCATTGTT |
| (R) AATGCCAGGACGATTTGGAA | |
| IL-10 | (F) CCCAGGATGGCAACTCTTCTC |
| (R) CGGGATGGTATTTTGCAGATC | |
| INF-Ƴ | (F)TCTCACCAAGATCCAACCTAAGG |
| (R) TGCGGCCTCGAAACAGA | |
| TNF-α | (F) TGGAATCATTGCCCTGTAAGG |
| (R) TGATCAAAGGGTCGGTTTGG | |
| RPS19 | (F) GGGTCCTCCAAGCCCTAGAG |
| (R) CGGCCCCCATCTTGGT | |
| HPRT | (F) CGGCTTGCTCGAGATGTGAT |
| (R) GCACACAGAGGGCTATGT | |
| RPS5 | (F) GAGGCCTCAGGCTGTCGAT |
| (R) AGCCAAATGGCCTGATTCAC |
IL-1β Interleukin-1 beta, IL-2 Interleukin-2, IL-6 Interleukin-6, IL-10 Interleukin-10, BDNF Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, GDNF Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, HGF Hepatocyte Growth Factor, HPRT Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase (1) IDO Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase, IFN-γ Interferon gamma, PTGES2 Prostaglandin E Synthase (2) RPS5 Ribosomal Protein S5, RPS19 Ribosomal Protein S19, TNF-α Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha
Statistical analysis
The experiment was performed using cells isolated from five independent animals (n = 5), with each experiment conducted in duplicate. Technical replicates were also used, where appropriate, for each analytical method. All data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Data were normally distributed and were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. Statistical analyses and graph generation were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 10.4.1 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Results
Isolation and culture of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)
The isolation and in vitro expansion of AT-MSCs from C. thous specimens were successfully performed. The obtained cell lines demonstrated cellular viability and maintained proliferative potential under controlled culture conditions, confirming the effectiveness of the established protocol.
Morphological, immunophenotypic, and multipotency characterization
During the in vitro expansion period, the cells exhibited a typical fibroblast-like morphology, characterized by an elongated shape, abundant cytoplasm, and adherent growth on the plastic surface, maintaining a homogeneous morphological pattern across all evaluated passages (Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1.

Morphological and immunophenotypic characterization of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) from Cerdocyon thous. (A) fibroblast-like morphology during in vitro expansion (20x magnification); (B) adipogenic differentiation stained with Oil Red O (20x magnification); (C) chondrogenic differentiation evidenced by Alcian Blue staining (20x magnification); (D) osteogenic differentiation stained with Alizarin Red (20x magnification); (E) FSC-H versus SSC-H dot plot showing a homogeneous cell population and the gating strategy used to define the mesenchymal stem cell population; (F) representative histograms demonstrating high expression of the mesenchymal markers CD90 and CD29 compared with their respective autofluorescent controls (blue curve), and minimal expression of the hematopoietic marker CD14; (G) histogram showing high expression of CD44; (H) histogram showing low expression of the hematopoietic marker CD45
The AT-MSCs from C. thous demonstrated multipotent differentiation capacity following in vitro induction, successfully differentiating into adipogenic (Fig. 1B), chondrogenic (Fig. 1C), and osteogenic lineages (Fig. 1D). Cultures subjected to adipogenic induction exhibited progressive accumulation of lipid droplets within the cellular cytoplasm (Fig. 1B). Chondrogenic differentiation resulted in the deposition of glycosaminoglycans in the intra- and extracellular matrix, a characteristic feature of the chondrocytic phenotype (Fig. 1C). Osteogenic differentiation led to the formation of a mineralized extracellular matrix (Fig. 1D). Taken together, these results confirm the mesodermal multipotency of the MSCs evaluated in this study.
Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the cell population exhibited a homogeneous profile, as shown in the FSC-H versus SSC-H dot plot (Fig. 1E), allowing precise gating of the mesenchymal stem cell population. Immunophenotypic evaluation demonstrated expression of the mesenchymal markers CD90 (98.02%) (Fig. 1F), CD29 (99.99%) (Fig. 1F), and CD44 (99.81%) (Fig. 1G). In contrast, absence of expression of the hematopoietic markers CD14 (1.60%) (Fig. 1F) and CD45 (1.81%) (Fig. 1H) was observed, with profiles overlapping their respective controls. These results provide further confirmation of the characteristic immunophenotypic profile of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the analyzed population. The cross-reactivity of anti-CD14 and anti-CD45 antibodies was confirmed using peripheral blood from C. thous.
Morphological and cell viability assessment following in vitro inflammatory stimulation
AT-MSCs from C. thous showed 99.9% viability prior to plating. After 24 h under control or LPS-stimulated conditions, high viability rates were maintained in both experimental groups, with no statistically significant differences observed (p = 0.1584), indicating that the inflammatory stimulus did not exert a cytotoxic effect on the AT-MSCs during the evaluation period (Fig. 2E). No morphological differences were observed between groups; cells maintained typical fibroblast-like appearance and adhered to the plastic surface throughout (Fig. 2A–D).
Fig. 2.

Morphology and cell viability of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) from Cerdocyon thous. Cell morphology was assessed at two time points: immediately before stimulation (T0) and 24 h post-stimulation (T24). (A) control group at T0; (B) control group at T24; (C) cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at T0; (D) cells stimulated with LPS at T24; (E) cell viability 24 h after stimulation. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t-test, showing no significant difference between groups (p = 0.1584). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation from five biological replicates (n = 5 animals)
Gene expression analysis of cytokines and neurotrophic factors
Melting-curve analysis showed a single, well-defined peak for each of the 12 target genes and three reference genes, supporting the amplification of single predominant products in Cerdocyon thous samples. A significant increase in GDNF expression was observed in cells stimulated with LPS (10 ng/mL) compared to the control group (p = 0.0004) (Fig. 3B). Similarly, HGF expression was significantly elevated after inflammatory stimulation (p = 0.0103) (Fig. 3C). No differences in BDNF expression were observed between the analyzed groups.
Fig. 3.

Relative gene expression of inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors in adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) from Cerdocyon thous 24 h after stimulation. Comparisons were made between control and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated groups. (A) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), (B) glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), (C) hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), (D) indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), (E) vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), (F) interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), (G) prostaglandin E synthase 2 (PTGES2), (H) tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), (I) interleukin-10 (IL-10), (J) interleukin-6 (IL-6), (K) interleukin-2 (IL-2), and (L) interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation from five independent animals (biological replicates; n = 5). Each biological replicate was analyzed in duplicate, and RT-qPCR reactions were performed in technical duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t-test. Statistical significance was defined as follows: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001
Analysis of immunological mediators revealed a marked and statistically significant increase in IDO gene expression in the LPS-stimulated group compared to the control group (p < 0.0001/Fig. 3D). Additionally, expression of the angiogenic factor VEGF-A was significantly elevated in LPS-stimulated cells relative to the control (p < 0.0001/Fig. 3E). In contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed in the expression of IL-10, IL-6, IL-2, IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF, or PTGES2 between the evaluated groups (Fig. 3F-L).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this study provides the first description and characterization of MSCs derived from Cerdocyon thous, expanding the current knowledge of stem cell biology in wild canids. AT-MSCs from C. thous exhibited morphological, immunophenotypic, and functional characteristics consistent with the minimal criteria established by the International Society for Cellular Therapy for defining of MSCs (Dominici et al. 2006). Cell adherence to plastic, fibroblast-like morphology, expression of mesenchymal markers, lack of hematopoietic marker expression, and capacity for adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation confirm that the analyzed cell population represents a multipotent mesenchymal lineage (Dominici et al. 2006). This aspect is essential to ensure that the responses observed following inflammatory stimulation can be attributed to the intrinsic properties of MSCs rather than to the presence of heterogeneous cell populations.
The response of AT-MSCs to LPS revealed a functional activation pattern more closely associated with immunomodulation than with classical inflammation (Cagliani et al. 2017). In many immune cells, LPS acts as a potent inducer of pro-inflammatory responses through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), particularly TLR4 (Luo et al. 2025). However, in MSCs, exposure to inflammatory signals can trigger the expression of regulatory mediators that suppress excessive immune activation rather than amplifying it directly. Stimulation with LPS at 10 ng/mL resulted in significant upregulation of IDO and VEGF-A, whereas pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10, IL-6, IL-2, IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and PTGES2, remained unchanged. This pattern may reflect the relatively mild inflammatory stimulus provided by this concentration, as higher LPS doses (e.g., 100 ng/mL) have been reported to induce more robust cytokine responses in MSCs (Noh et al. 2016). Collectively, these findings highlight the adaptive immunomodulatory properties of MSCs, in which pro-inflammatory stimuli promote the expression of immunoregulatory molecules that act within the microenvironment to balance immune responses (Cagliani et al. 2017; Hoseinzadeh et al. 2025).
The maintenance of AT-MSC viability following inflammatory stimulation indicates that these cells can tolerate pro-inflammatory environments without compromising their cellular integrity. This behavior aligns with the concept of “inflammatory licensing” of MSCs (Krampera 2011), according to which exposure to inflammatory mediators does not exert cytotoxic effects but acts as a functional cue that modulates the secretory and immunological profile of these cells (Krampera 2011; Waterman et al. 2010). MSCs are relevant for applications in neurological disorders (Issa et al. 2025), as inflammatory licensing has been associated with increased secretion of neurotrophic factors such as BDNF, NGF, GDNF, and IGF-1, which play critical roles in neuroprotection, synaptic plasticity, and axonal regeneration (Crigler et al. 2006; Uccelli et al. 2008; Shi et al. 2018).
Among the mediators evaluated, the robust induction of IDO expression was a central component of the regulatory response of MSCs. IDO is a key enzyme involved in tryptophan catabolism via the kynurenine pathway, which can result in local tryptophan depletion and the production of metabolites that inhibit T lymphocyte proliferation and activation, thereby promoting immune tolerance and limiting the propagation of excessive inflammatory responses (Gao et al. 2016; Jiang and Xu 2020). Cagliani et al. (2017) demonstrated that, although IDO is not typically constitutively expressed in MSCs, its expression can be strongly induced by inflammatory signals, particularly IFN-γ, leading to relevant immunosuppressive effects in both experimental and clinical models. However, the contribution of IDO to MSC-mediated immunosuppression appears to be species-dependent. In domestic canine MSCs, functional studies have shown that inhibition of the IDO pathway does not significantly reverse T-cell suppression, suggesting that, unlike human MSCs, IDO is not the predominant immunoregulatory mechanism. Instead, canine MSCs appear to rely mainly on TGF-β, adenosine and cyclooxygenase/PGE₂ pathways to suppress T-cell responses (Chow et al. 2017). Therefore, the increased IDO expression observed following LPS stimulation in the present study should be interpreted as evidence of inflammatory priming and activation of MSCs rather than as evidence that IDO is the principal mediator of their immunosuppressive activity. Although functional studies in domestic canines suggest that IDO is not the predominant mechanism of MSC-mediated immunosuppression, whether this also applies to MSCs derived from wild canids remains unknown.
In the context of neural regeneration and tissue support, a significant increase in neurotrophic factors such as GDNF and HGF was observed, both recognized for their ability to promote neuronal survival and reparative properties. GDNF, which is essential for maintaining the integrity and development of dopaminergic neurons, is synthesized by microglial cells (Aldhshan et al. 2022) and enhances motor neuron survival, supports axonal regeneration and improves muscle reinnervation (Lavorato, 2021; Aldhshan et al. 2022). Similarly, HGF exerts mitogenic, anti-apoptotic, and tissue repair-promoting effects across various cellular models, including modulation of immune responses and expansion of regulatory cell populations, as demonstrated in human mesenchymal stem cells (Yen et al. 2013).
Furthermore, the increase in VEGF-A suggests an angiogenic component in the MSC response to LPS. VEGF-A is a key mediator of new blood vessel formation, contributing to improved tissue perfusion, removal of inflammatory metabolites, and support of a regenerative microenvironment. MSCs can secrete a range of pro-angiogenic and immunomodulatory factors in response to inflammatory or hypoxic stimuli, supporting the hypothesis that their therapeutic properties are largely mediated by their paracrine secretome rather than by direct differentiation (Madrigal et al. 2014).
Taken together, these findings suggest that AT-MSCs from C. thous not only act as modulators of the immune environment under pro-inflammatory stimulation but also express factors capable of shaping the microenvironment for tissue repair and neuroprotection, including molecules with proangiogenic, neurotrophic, and immunoregulatory activities. This combination aligns with the emerging paradigm that the MSC secretome represents a major mediator of their therapeutic potential, influencing neighboring cells and remodelling the local microenvironment (Gnecchi et al. 2008; Colbath et al. 2024).
From a translational perspective, the results of this study are further relevant because they were obtained from a wild species model. This is particularly notable given that studies involving MSCs in non-conventional species remain limited and are distributed across diverse vertebrate lineages. Previous investigations have described MSCs or MSC-like cells in amphibians (Xenopus laevis) (Otsuka-Yamaguchi, 2021), reptiles (Trachemys scripta) (Andreoli et al. 2025), and, more broadly, in placental mammals, including rodents (Ctenomys minutus) (Pereira et al. 2018), bats (Artibeus planirostris) (Carvalho et al. 2021), wild artiodactyls (Tayassu tajacu) (Argôlo Neto et al. 2016), aquatic mammals (Tursiops truncatus) (Griffeth et al. 2014), and large herbivores (Hippopotamus amphibius) (Wei et al. 2022) and omnivorous mammals (Ailurus fulgens) (Wang et al. 2022).
Within mammals, additional studies have included non-human primates (Kang et al. 2025) such as Macaca fascicularis (Rinendyaputri et al. 2026), Macaca mulatta (Poret et al. 2021) and Callithrix jacchus (Kanda et al. 2013), as well as representatives of the order Carnivora, including Leopardus guigna (Echeverry et al. 2019), Puma concolor (Echeverry et al. 2020), and Mustela lutreola (Calle and Ramírez 2022). Nevertheless, to our knowledge, no studies have systematically described the morphological behavior, functional properties, or immunomodulatory and neuroregenerative profiles of MSCs derived from C. thous. Demonstrating that these cells exhibit properties comparable to those reported in other species significantly expands the knowledge base necessary for future applications in conservation veterinary medicine and for the study of naturally occurring diseases in wild animal models.
Despite these promising findings, several important limitations must be considered. This study assessed only the gene expression of selected mediators without directly measuring protein levels or the ultimate functional effects of these factors. In addition, the inflammatory response was evaluated at a single time point (24 h), which may not fully capture the temporal dynamics of MSC responses to inflammatory stimulation. Future studies incorporating multiple evaluation time points, larger sample sizes, together with proteomic analyses, co-culture assays, injury models, and in vivo functional evaluations are essential to determine whether the observed expression patterns translate into consistent and biologically relevant effects.
Conclusion
Based on the results obtained, AT-MSCs from C. thous exhibit morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics consistent with MSCs, including fibroblast-like morphology, expression of mesenchymal markers, absence of hematopoietic markers, adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation capacity, and maintenance of viability following inflammatory stimulation. Furthermore, LPS exposure modulated the expression of genes associated with immunoregulatory and regenerative mechanisms, as evidenced by the significant upregulation of IDO and neurotrophic and angiogenic factors, such as GDNF, HGF, and VEGF-A. These findings provide the first characterization of AT-MSCs from C. thous and demonstrate their ability to respond to inflammatory stimulation in vitro by modulating the expression of genes associated with immunoregulatoy and neuroregenerative pathways. These results establish functional properties and potential applications of MSCs in conservation veterinary medicine, particularly for inflammatory and neurological disorders.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Grant No. 2024/22428-7).
Author contributions
J.V. C. A. and J.B.A.P: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. T.G.T: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing. L.V.d.O.F.: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing. A.M.M.B: Formal analysis, Methodology. M.A.G: Formal analysis, Methodology. M.d.C.: Formal analysis, Methodology. R.M.A.: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). This study was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) through a scholarship (Grant No. 2024/22428-7).
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Aldhshan MS, Jhanji G, Poritsanos NJ, Mizuno TM (2022) Glucose stimulates glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor gene expression in microglia through a GLUT5-independent mechanism. Int J Mol Sci 23:7089. 10.3390/ijms23137089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altamirano-Samaniego F, Enciso-Benavides J, Rojas N, Iglesias-Pedraz JM, Enciso N, Fossatti M, Enciso J (2022) First report of canine morbillivirus infection of adipose tissue-derived stem cells from dogs with distemper. Vet World 15:1835–1842. 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1835-1842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alvites R, Branquinho M, Sousa AC, Lopes B, Sousa P, Maurício AC (2022) Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells and Their Paracrine Activity-Immunomodulation Mechanisms and How to Influence the Therapeutic Potential. Pharmaceutics 14:381. 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amorim RM, Ferreira LVO (2025) Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for neurological disorders in dogs. In: Alvites, R.D., Maurício, A.C. (Eds.), Mesenchymal Stem Cells – Biology, Therapeutics, and Beyond. IntechOpen. 10.5772/intechopen.1012503 [DOI]
- Andreoli V, Vetere A, Conti V, Gavezzoli M, Berni P, Ramoni R, Basini G, Nardini G, Pelizzone I, Grolli S, Di Ianni F (2025) Mesenchymal stromal cell isolation from pond slider (Trachemys scripta) adipose tissue obtained during routine neutering: a model for turtle species. Front Vet Sci 12:1546091. 10.3389/fvets.2025.1546091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andrzejewska A, Lukomska B, Janowski M (2019) Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: from roots to boost. Stem Cells 37:855–864. 10.1002/stem.3016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Argôlo Neto NM, Feitosa MLT, Sousa SS, Fernandes PB, Pessoa GT, Bezerra DO, Almeida HM, Carvalho YKP, Rocha AR, Silva LMC, Carvalho MAM (2016) Isolation, expansion, differentiation and growth kinetics assay in mesenchymal stem cell culture from the bone marrow of collared peccaries (Tayassu tajacu). Acta Sci Vet 44:1–11. 10.22456/1679-9216.80850 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Arnhold SJ, Goletz I, Klein H, Stumpf G, Beluche LA, Rohde C, Addicks K, Litzke LF (2007) Isolation and characterization of bone marrow-derived equine mesenchymal stem cells. Am J Vet Res 68:1095–1105. 10.2460/ajvr.68.10.1095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brunel HSS, Villaroel CL, Dallago BSL, Pogue R, Malard PF (2022) Retrospective study of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in dogs with neurological complications resulting from infection by canine distemper virus. Braz J Sci 1:73–81. 10.14295/bjs.v1i11.191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cagliani J, Grande D, Molmenti EP, Miller EJ, Rilo HLR (2017) Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stromal cells and their clinical applications. J Stem Cell Regen Biol 3:126–139. 10.15436/2471-0598.17.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calle A, Ramírez MÁ (2022) Cryobanking European mink (Mustela lutreola) mesenchymal stem cells and oocytes. Int J Mol Sci 23:9319. 10.3390/ijms23169319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carrade DD, Lame MW, Kent MS, Clark KC, Walker NJ, Borjesson DL (2012) Comparative analysis of the immunomodulatory properties of equine adult-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Med 4:1–11. 10.3727/215517912X647217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho VS, Rissino JD, Nagamachi CY, Pieczarka JC, Noronha RCR (2021) Isolation and establishment of skin-derived and mesenchymal cells from South American bat Artibeus planirostris (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Tissue Cell 71:101507. 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chow L, Johnson V, Coy J, Regan D, Dow S (2017) Mechanisms of immune suppression utilized by canine adipose and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 26:374–389. 10.1089/scd.2016.0201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colbath AC, Goodrich L, Frye C, Dow S (2024) Review of cellular therapies provides new insights into the potential treatment of diverse neurologic diseases in horses and dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 262(S1):S121–S130. 10.2460/javma.23.12.0709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crigler L, Robey RC, Asawachaicharn A, Gaupp D, Phinney DG (2006) Human mesenchymal stem cells provide neurotrophic support to neurons. Exp Neurol 198:54–64. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curi NHA, Araújo AS, Campos FS, Lobato ZIP, Gennari SM, Marvulo MFV, Silva JCR, Talamoni SA (2010) Wild canids, domestic dogs and their pathogens in Southeast Brazil: disease threats for canid conservation. Biodivers Conserv 19:3513–3524. 10.1007/s10531-010-9911-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dar ER, Gugjoo MB, Javaid M, Hussain S, Fazili MR, Dhama K, Algahtani AM, Shah RA, Emran TB (2021) Adipose tissue- and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells from sheep: culture characteristics. Animals 11(8):2153. 10.3390/ani11082153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djouad F, Bony C, Häupl T, Uzé G, Lahlou N, Louis-Plence P, Apparailly F, Canovas F, Rème T, Sany J, Jorgensen C, Noël D (2005) Transcriptional profiles discriminate bone marrow-derived and synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R1304. 10.1186/ar1827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, Krause D, Deans RJ, Keating A, Prockop DJ, Horwitz EM (2006) Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotherapy 8:315–317. 10.1080/14653240600855905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dudhia J, Guest DJ (2014) Stem cells for equine musculoskeletal and nervous system disorders. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 30:191–213. 10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Echeverry DM, Asenjo PA, Rojas DM, Aguilera CJ, Rodríguez-Álvarez L, Castro FO (2020) Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue of a cougar (Puma concolor). Anim Reprod 17:e20190109. 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Echeverry DM, Rojas DM, Aguilera CJ, Veraguas DM, Cabezas JG, Rodríguez-Álvarez L, Castro FO (2019) Differentiation and multipotential characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue of an endangered wild cat (Leopardus guigna). Austral J Vet Sci 51:17–26. 10.4067/S0719-81322019000100104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- El Fajri FM, Yuhendri VM, Elmi E, Saputra NPK, Arfianti A (2025) Potential protection of mesenchymal stem cells against oxidative stress with hypoxia preconditioning and lipopolysaccharide exposure. Biomed Res Ther 12(4):7277–7285. 10.15419/bmrat.v12i4.969 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fadrique FHC, Buzatti A, Sagae AH, Daneze ER, França RT, Preuss JP (2025) Cinomose canina em cachorro-do-mato (Cerdocyon thous, Linnaeus, 1766) de vida livre no estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Med. Vet (Braz 19:1–8. 10.26605/medvet-v19n1-6981 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS (1970) The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Prolif 3:393–403. 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1970.tb00347.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Furtado MM, Hayashi EMK, Allendorf SD, Coelho CJ, Jácomo ATA, Megid J, Ramos Filho JD, Silveira L, Tôrres NM, Ferreira Neto JS (2016) Exposure of free-ranging wild carnivores and domestic dogs to canine distemper virus and parvovirus in the Cerrado of central Brazil. EcoHealth 13:549–557. 10.1007/s10393-016-1146-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao F, Chiu SM, Lalu DAL, Zhang Z, Chen L, Ji HL, Tse HF, Fu QL, Lian Q (2016) Mesenchymal stem cells and immunomodulation: current status and future prospects. Cell Death Dis 7:e2062. 10.1038/cddis.2015.327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia GA, Oliveira RG, Dariolli R, Rudge MVC, Barbosa AMP, Floriano JF, Ribeiro-Paes JT (2022) Isolation and characterization of farm pig adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells. Braz J Med Biol Res 55:e12343. 10.1590/1414-431X2022e12343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gnecchi M, Zhang Z, Ni A, Dzau VJ (2008) Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ Res 103:1204–1219. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonçalves DSV, Gomes MVS, Guterra VLP, Lucchi-Rodrigues AF, Mathias CHT, Maestri LFP, Argôlo-Neto NM, Monteiro BS (2018) Mesenchymal stem cell infusion for the treatment of neurological sequelae of canine distemper virus: a clinical study. Genet Mol Res 17:GMR18088. 10.4238/gmr18088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Götherström C, Ringdén O, Westgren M, Tammik C, Le Blanc K (2003) Immunomodulatory effects of human fetal liver-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Bone Marrow Transpl 32:265–272. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffeth RJ, García-Párraga D, Mellado-López M, Crespo-Picazo JL, Soriano-Navarro M, Martínez-Romero A, Moreno-Manzano V (2014) Platelet-rich plasma and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine-associated treatments in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). PLoS ONE 9:e108439. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guest DJ, Smith MRW, Allen WR (2008) Equine embryonic stem-like cells and mesenchymal stromal cells have different survival and proliferation responses to culture conditions. Stem Cells Dev 17:789–804. 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00112.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ha JH, Ahn JO, Choi JH, Kim SH, Chung JY (2026) Comparative analysis of the immunomodulatory effects of extracellular vesicles from canine placental and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Am J Vet Res 87:ajvr.25.12.0426. 10.2460/ajvr.25.12.0426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hemmingsen M, Vedel S, Skafte-Pedersen P, Sabourin D, Collas P, Bruus H, Dufva M (2013) The role of paracrine and autocrine signaling in the early phase of adipogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63638. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoseini SM, Montazeri F (2025) Cell origin and microenvironment: the players of differentiation capacity in human mesenchymal stem cells. Tiss Cell 93:102709. 10.1016/j.tice.2024.102709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoseinzadeh A, Esmaeili SA, Sahebi R, Melak AM, Mahmoudi M, Hasannia M, Baharlou R (2025) Fate and long-lasting therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stromal/stem-like cells: mechanistic insights. Stem Cell Res Ther 16:33. 10.1186/s13287-025-04158-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hübner SO, Pappen FG, Ruas JL, Vargas GD, Fischer G, Vidor T (2010) Exposure of pampas fox (Pseudalopex gymnocercus) and crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) from the southern region of Brazil to canine distemper virus, canine parvovirus and canine coronavirus. Braz Arch Biol Technol 53:593–597. 10.1590/S1516-89132010000300012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Issa EHB, Alghazo EM, Gharaibeh R, Momani NB, Taha DZ, Jaradat RJ, Alzubi A, Almahasneh FA, Abu-El-Rub E, Al-Zoubi RM (2025) Therapeutic potential and challenges of mesenchymal stem cells in neurological disorders: A concise analysis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 84:668–679. 10.1093/jnen/nlaf021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang W, Xu J (2020) Immune modulation by mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif 53:e12712. 10.1111/cpr.12712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson VA (2024) Review of current and potential applications of mesenchymal stem cells in exotic animal species. J Am Vet Med Assoc 262(1):S131–S134. 10.2460/javma.24.01.0034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jucá FM, Lima BMC, Chaves RN (2022) Cinomose em canídeos silvestres no Brasil. Ciênc Anim 32:136–148 [Google Scholar]
- Kamura BC, Ferreira LVO, Chimenes ND, Oliveira JPM, Rodriguez-Sanchez DN, Carvalho M, Amorim RM (2026) Cannabidiol-rich extract suppresses the activation of proinflammatory genes IL-1β and IL-6 in equine mesenchymal stem cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. Vet Res Commun 50(3):168. 10.1007/s11259-026-11105-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanda A, Sotomaru Y, Nobukiyo A, Yamaoka E, Hiyama E (2013) Characterization of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 51:292–299. 10.5603/FHC.2013.0040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang J, Kanugovi A, Stella MP, Frimand Z, Farup J, Urtasun A, Liu S, Clausen AS, Ishak H, Bui S, Kim S, Ezran C, Botvinnik O, Porpiglia E, Krasnow MA, Morree A, Rando TA (2025) In vivo self-renewal and expansion of quiescent stem cells from a non-human primate. Nat Commun 16:5370. 10.1038/s41467-025-58897-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim SH, Das A, Chai JC, Binas B, Choi MR, Park KS, Lee YS, Jung KH, Chai YG (2016) Transcriptome sequencing wide functional analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells in response to TLR4 ligand. Sci Rep 6:30311. 10.1038/srep30311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kisiel AH, McDuffee LA, Masaoud E, Bailey TR, Esparza Gonzalez BP, Nino-Fong R (2012) Isolation, characterization, and in vitro proliferation of canine mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, muscle, and periosteum. Am J Vet Res 73:1305–1317. 10.2460/ajvr.73.8.1305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krampera M (2011) Mesenchymal stromal cell licensing: a multistep process. Leukemia 25:1408–1414. 10.1038/leu.2011.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavorato A, Raimondo S, Boido M, Muratori L, Durante G, Cofano F, Vincitorio F, Petrone S, Titolo P, Tartara F, Vercelli A, Garbossa D (2021) Mesenchymal stem cell treatment perspectives in peripheral nerve regeneration: systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 22:572. 10.3390/ijms22020572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu P, An Y, Zhu T, Tang S, Huang X, Li S, Fu F, Chen J, Xuan K (2023) Mesenchymal stem cells: Emerging concepts and recent advances in their roles in organismal homeostasis and therapy. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13:1131218. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1131218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo R, Yao Y, Chen Z, Sun X (2025) An examination of the LPS-TLR4 immune response through the analysis of molecular structures and protein–protein interactions. Cell Commun Signal 23:142. 10.1186/s12964-025-02149-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madrigal M, Rao KS, Riordanm NH (2014) A review of therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell secretions and induction of secretory modification by different culture methods. J Transl Med 12:260. 10.1186/s12967-014-0260-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Megid J, Teixeira CR, Amorin RL, Cortez A, Heinemann MB, Antunes JMAP, da Costa LF, Fornazari F, Cipriano JRB, Cremasco A, Richtzenhain LJ (2010) First identification of canine distemper virus in hoary fox (Lycalopex vetulus): pathologic aspects and virus phylogeny. J Wildl Dis 46:303–305. 10.7589/0090-3558-46.1.303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merlo B, Gugole PM, Bronzetti E, Sandri P, Pauciullo A, Bonilauri P (2022) Mesenchymal stem cells in veterinary medicine: applications and perspectives. Animals 12:1956. 10.3390/ani12151956 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Noh MY, Lim SM, Oh KW, Cho KA, Park J, Kim KS, Lee SJ, Kwon MS, Kim SH (2016) Mesenchymal stem cells modulate the functional properties of microglia via TGF-β secretion. Stem Cells Transl Med 5:1538–1549. 10.5966/sctm.2015-0217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otsuka-Yamaguchi R, Kitada M, Kuroda Y, Kushida Y, Wakao S, Dezawa M (2021) Isolation and characterization of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in Xenopus laevis. Stem Cell Res 53:102341. 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park MK, Song KH (2024) Isolation and characterization of feline endometrial mesenchymal stem cells. J Vet Sci 25:e31. 10.4142/jvs.23267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pelagalli A, Nardelli A, Lucarelli E, Zannetti A, Brunetti A (2018) Autocrine signals increase ovine mesenchymal stem cells migration through Aquaporin-1 and CXCR4 overexpression. J Cell Physiol 233 (8), 6241–6249. 10.1002/jcp.26493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pereira MRJ, Pinhatti VR, Silveira MD, Matzenbacher CA, de Freitas TRO, Silva J, Camassola M, Nardi NB (2018) Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells from Ctenomys minutus. Genet Mol Biol 41:870–877. 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perry BC, Zhou D, Wu X, Yang FC, Byers MA, Chu TMG, Hockema JJ, Woods EJ, Goebel WS (2008) Collection, cryopreservation, and characterization of human dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells for banking and clinical use. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 14:149–156. 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinheiro LL, Lopes JP, Santos RAM, Lima AR, Martins DM, Oliveira EHC, Souza MPC, Miranda CMF, Beltrao-Braga PC, Russo FB, Pignatari GC, Filho ES, Branco E (2019) Mesenchymal stem cells in dogs with demyelinating leukoencephalitis as an experimental model of multiple sclerosis. Heliyon 5:e01857. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poret JM, Molina PE, Simon L (2021) Isolation, proliferation and differentiation of rhesus macaque adipose-derived stem cells. J Vis Exp 171e61732. 10.3791/61732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Rashid U, Yousaf A, Yaqoob M, Saba E, Moaeen-ud-Din M, Waseem S, Becker SK, Sponder G, Aschenbach JR, Sandhu MA (2021) Characterization and differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from multiple canine adipose tissue sources. BMC Vet Res 17:388. 10.1186/s12917-021-03100-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rinendyaputri R, Dany F, Mariya SS, Panjaitan NSD, Nikmah UA, Nareswara HA, Dumingan A, Sonny S, Sanjaya RH, Malik A, Tazkia RH, Idrus HH, Ayuningtyas W, Noverina R, Faried A (2026) Characterization of hypoxia-preconditioned umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived from Macaca fascicularis. J Med Primatol 55:e70056. 10.1111/jmp.70056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryu H-H, Kang B-J, Park S-S, Kim Y, Sung GJ, Woo H-M, Kim WH, Kweon OK (2012) Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells derived from fat, bone marrow, Wharton’s jelly, and umbilical cord blood for treating spinal cord injuries in dogs. J Vet Med Sci 74:1617–1630. 10.1292/jvms.12-0065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos T, Marinho PH, Venticinque EM, Fonseca CR (2024) Spatial and temporal ecology of Cerdocyon thous: a mesopredator canid coping with habitat loss, fragmentation, and chronic anthropogenic disturbances. Landsc Ecol 39:157. 10.1007/s10980-024-01913-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shi Y, Wang Y, Li Q, Liu K, Hou J, Shao C, Wang Y (2018) Mesenchymal stem cell-based immunomodulation: properties and clinical application. Cell Res 28:673–690. 10.1038/s41422-018-0029-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toma JG, Akhavan M, Fernandes KJL, Barnabé-Heider F, Sadikot A, Kaplan DR, Miller FD (2001) Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin. Nat Cell Biol 3:778–784. 10.1038/ncb0901-778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 8:726–736. 10.1038/nri2395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villagrán CC, Schumacher J, Donnell R, Dhar MS (2016) A Novel Model for Acute Peripheral Nerve Injury in the Horse and Evaluation of the Effect of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Applied In Situ on Nerve Regeneration: A Preliminary Study. Front Vet Sci 3:80. 10.3389/fvets.2016.00080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang D-H, Wu X-M, Chen J-S, Cai Z-G, An J-H, Zhang M-Y, Li Y, Li F-P, Hou R, Liu Y-L (2022) Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells from red panda (Ailurus fulgens styani) endometrium. Conserv Physiol 10:coac004. 10.1093/conphys/coac004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waterman RS, Tomchuck SL, Henkle SL, Betancourt AM (2010) A new mesenchymal stem cell paradigm: polarization into a pro-inflammatory MSC1 or an immunosuppressive MSC2 phenotype. PLoS ONE 5:e10088. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei J, Dong X, Wang B, Wu Y, Chen W, Hou Z, Wang C, Wang T (2022) Biological characteristics of two mesenchymal stem cell cultures isolated from the umbilical cord and adipose tissue of a neonatal common hippo (Hippopotamus amphibius). Tissue Cell 77:101862. 10.1016/j.tice.2022.101862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yen BL, Yen ML, Hsu PJ, Liu KJ, Wang CJ, Bai CH, Sytwu HK (2013) Multipotent human mesenchymal stromal cells mediate expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via hepatocyte growth factor/c-met and STAT3. Stem Cell Rep 1:139–151. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin K, Zhu R, Wang S, Zhao RC (2017) Low level laser (LLL) attenuates LPS-induced inflammatory responses in mesenchymal stem cells via the suppression of NF-κB signaling pathway in vitro. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0179175. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Not applicable.
