Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2026 Sep 10:rs.3.rs-10207669. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10207669/v1

Microbial transmission and ecology of human and environmental microbial communities in childcare centers

Di Chen 1,2,3, Ya Wang 1,3,4, Daniel M Portik 5, Jacob Nearing 1,3,4, William A Nickols 1,3, Jeremy E Wilkinson 5, David C Christiani 2,6, Long H Nguyen 1,8,9, Eric A Franzosa 1,3,4, John D Spengler 2, Curtis Huttenhower 1,3,4,7,*, Kelsey N Thompson 1,3,4
PMCID: PMC13622856  PMID: 42818523

Abstract

Background:

Early-life microbial exposures profoundly impact lifelong health trajectories by shaping immune maturation and modulating disease risk, e.g. as described by the "hygiene hypothesis." Childcare facilities represent a critical yet understudied source of microbial exposures where preschool-aged children spend 7-10 hours daily during key developmental periods. This study presents the first multi-omic and multi-kingdom investigation of microbial transmission and community ecology across childcare environments, integrating microbiome samples from both high-touch and low-touch surfaces with children's nasal and oral microbiomes, using full-length 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) amplicon sequencing paired with short-read (SR) and long-read (LR) metagenomic sequencing. This combination provides enhanced species-level taxonomic resolution and improved recovery of genomes and genomic elements compared to conventional short-read approaches.

Results:

Our findings revealed distinct microbial signatures across environments, with human-associated microorganisms predominating in high-touch areas, while greater taxonomic diversity characterizes low-touch areas. Specifically, on high-touch surfaces, several bacterial and fungal species were shared between host and environmental communities, such as food-associated Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus, suggesting defined transmission routes via host shedding, environmental exposures, and food consumption. With improved genomic resolution and reconstruction from paired SR and LR metagenomics, we identified novel lateral gene transfer (LGT) events enriched for mobile elements, DNA-interacting domains, and adaptive elements such as antibiotic resistance and virulence factors. These methods also shed light on viral ecology, such as Caudoviricetes bacteriophages ubiquitous across host and environmental communities with phylogenetically-differentiated niche- and bacterial host-specific lineages. The positive relationship between the host prediction frequency and its community relative abundance suggested host abundance (availability)-driven phage-bacteria population dynamics.

Conclusions:

This work highlights previously understudied components of early-life microbial exposures in childcare environments with enhanced resolution and provides methods for identifying potential pathogen reservoirs, tracking transmission routes, and developing targeted interventions.

Keywords: Early-life microbiome, Childcare microbiome, Built environment, Microbial transmission, Long-read metagenomics, Mobile genetic elements, Lateral gene transfer, Phage ecology

Introduction

Microbial communities in the built environment (BE) encompass the diverse assemblages of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other microorganisms that inhabit human-made structures. These often low biomass, but dynamic ecosystems are shaped by complex interactions between architectural parameters, environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, ventilation), and human activity patterns [1]. They play a critical role in the development of human health, with microbial exposures having been linked to immune system modulation, allergy development, and susceptibility to infectious diseases through their influence on indoor air quality, surface microbiomes, and pathogen transmission dynamics [1,2]. Among various BEs relevant to early-life microbial exposure, childcare facilities represent a critical, high-traffic ecosystem. Young children spend significant time in these densely occupied spaces during key developmental periods. Their behaviors – such as hand-to-mouth contact, floor crawling, and frequent sharing of objects and surfaces – facilitate microbial exchange. Because the nature of these environments amplifies microbial impact, several studies have examined microbial composition in childcare settings [3,4,5,6,7]. However, the genomics of BE (including childcare) microbiomes remain largely understudied, leaving open questions surrounding how these microbial communities are shaped through forces such as selection, evolution, and lateral gene transfer.

Microbial exposures during early life, among other environmental exposures, significantly impact children's developing immune systems and long-term health trajectories [8]. Early life is a crucial period for microbiome establishment and immune maturation (usually defined as 2-3 years), beyond which rapid gut microbiota change decelerates [9]. Specifically, the host’s immune system develops in dialogue with microbial exposures [8], requiring diverse and appropriate microbial encounters to establish proper immune tolerance and response mechanisms [8]. Disruptions or perturbations to these early-life microbial exposures in turn can inflate the risk of disease development later in life [8]. This relationship aligns with the "hygiene hypothesis," which postulates that early life microbial exposures are essential for proper immune development [10,11], with evidence suggesting that routine microbial exposure in childcare environments may be protective against allergies [12], asthma [13], and type 1 diabetes [14], among other immune-mediated disorders. Therefore, gaining a comprehensive understanding of microbial exposures in childcare environments is essential for developing evidence-based strategies that create healthier facilities – both minimizing infectious disease transmission and supporting the beneficial development of children's microbiomes and immune systems during this critical developmental period.

Limited studies on the childcare microbiome observe that microbial communities in these particular environments are distinct from residential settings (e.g. home), specifically observing a higher overall diversity and abundance of human-associated bacteria [4,15]. This suggests that childcare facilities could serve as a distinct reservoir for microbial exchange and potential transmission of both beneficial and pathogenic organisms. However, the majority of previous studies have focused on either the indoor airborne [5,16] or floor dust communities [17,18] and have relied predominantly on SR amplicon sequencing [3,5,17,18,19,20]. This is largely due to the low biomass nature of environmental microbiome samples, which often yields insufficient genetic materials for metagenomic sequencing. Using SR amplicons, consequently, often restricts taxonomic resolution to the genus level and hinders detailed analysis of microbial transmission patterns. Moreover, due to the inherent limitations of using a bacterial or fungal specific marker gene, current approaches predominantly overlook important nonbacterial and nonfungal components of these microbial communities. Indeed, members such as viruses and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) also play important roles in shaping microbial ecology [21]. To our knowledge, only a few shotgun metagenomic studies [15,16] have been conducted in childcare settings, and these focused exclusively on airborne bacterial and viral profiling. While previous studies have primarily addressed "who is there" in childcare environments, comprehensive understanding of these microbiomes requires investigation of genomic and functional elements to provide insights beyond taxonomic identification. These limitations leave critical gaps in our understanding of microbial transmission patterns and functional elements that shape community structure and dynamics in these important environments.

Here, we comprehensively investigated microbial ecology of childcare microbial communities integrating multi-platform data from SR and PacBio LR sequencing. The study combines host and environmental microbial community data, using full-length bacterial and fungal amplicons (16S and ITS) and paired SR and LR shotgun metagenomics, which in combination provide enhanced taxonomic resolution and the ability to assess functional elements and evolutionary signatures across environments. We specifically investigated microbial transmission patterns, mobile genetic elements and their biochemical and regulatory functionality, lateral gene transfers, and phage-host interactions. This study is thus the first to elucidate previously understudied components of early-life microbial exposures in childcare environments and offers a more comprehensive view of microbial diversity and functional potential within these communities. This work also provides methods for identifying potential pathogen reservoirs, tracking transmission routes, and developing targeted interventions in childcare settings.

Results

High-resolution taxonomy of childcare microbiomes by combining multiple sequencing platforms and techniques

We collected a total of 177 environmental and host microbial community samples from two university-affiliated childcare centers (Fig. 1A). Host samples (n = 68) were cross-sectionally collected by swabbing the oral and nasal cavities of 34 children aged 2 to 4 years. Environmental samples (n = 109) were collected from eight classrooms from a variety of BE types of different touch frequencies, including doorknobs, desks, chairs, toys, carpets, infiltration areas, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, sinks, drains, outdoor air, and soil (Methods; Additional files 1 and 3). Sample types were further grouped into two categories based on touch frequency: drain, sink, HVAC, outdoor air, and soil were classified as “low-touch” environments, whereas all other surfaces were classified as “high-touch” environments. We generated full-length 16S rRNA gene (FL-16S) and internal transcribed spacer (FL-ITS) sequence data using PacBio amplicon sequencing for bacterial and fungal community profiling. A subset of samples with sufficient biomass – comprising two individual drain samples, a pooled oral sample, and a pooled soil sample (n = 4) – were subjected to both SR (SR-MGX) and LR shotgun metagenomic sequencing (LR-MGX). Per-sample-type counts are summarized in Additional file 1, and full per-sample metadata are available in Additional file 2.

Figure 1: Bacterial compositions across host body sites, high-touch, and low-touch environments.

Figure 1:

A) Study overview. Samples were collected from children's oral and nasal cavities and various environmental surfaces at two different childcare facilities. We employed full-length (FL) amplicon sequencing for bacterial and fungal characterization, along with short read (SR) and long read (LR) shotgun metagenomics to analyze functional elements. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showing sample clustering based on B) Bray-Curtis dissimilarities and C) weighted UniFrac phylogenetic distances in microbial community composition across sample types. D) Species-level taxonomic resolution, measured as the fraction of ASVs assigned at species level, comparing FL and in silico 16S V4 amplicons. E) Taxonomic profiles of the most abundant bacteria (29 species representing the union of the 5 most abundant OTUs per sample type). Columns (OTUs) are hierarchically clustered using Euclidean distances. Column annotations indicate key metadata features including sample type and touch frequency. Row annotations denote the phylum-level assignment and the lowest taxonomic assignment level for each OTU.

We identified 22,455 bacterial amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) from the FL-16S sequencing (Additional file 3) and 1,097 fungal ASVs from FL-ITS (Additional file 3), yielding 583 bacterial and 414 fungal species assignments. The unusually high number of ASVs appeared to be a product of current published full-length amplicon pipelines being overly permissive for low-frequency sequence variants, given the inherent intragenomic diversity of FL-16S and ITS sequences. To mitigate this, we clustered ASV sequences at 97% identity, yielding 4,381 bacterial (Additional file 3) and 745 fungal (Additional file 3) species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (see Methods).

Even after this additional quality control, the full-length amplicons achieved improved taxonomic resolution when compared to typical short marker gene amplicons, especially in environmental microbial samples. Compared to in silico extracted 16S V4 amplicons (the most commonly used SR target regions), full-length amplicons showed comparable resolution at higher taxonomic levels but increased the ability to assign taxa from the family level and below (Fig. S1). For species-level assignment, full-length 16S amplicons resolved 35.9% of total ASVs, compared to only 6.0% by the V4 amplicons. The improvement was greater in environmental samples (median, 36.6%) than in host samples (median, 17.4%) (Fig. 1D), aligning with previous evaluations that sequencing the entire 16S rRNA gene provides substantial advantages over targeting subregions [22]. This improvement was particularly beneficial in our mixed human/BE for capturing species diversity more accurately and identifying underrepresented taxa.

Distinct microbial communities identified across human-association gradients

Collection source heavily influenced community diversity and structure, as expected. Alpha diversity of bacterial communities differed significantly among sample types (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001) and was highest in soil samples (median Shannon index = 6.99), followed by oral, infiltration, and drain samples (Fig. S2A). Most high-touch environments showed moderate bacterial diversity, with toy samples presenting the lowest within-sample diversity (median Shannon index = 1.90). In contrast, fungal biomass was generally low in indoor settings, with only 61 of 177 samples yielding sufficient DNA for amplification and sequencing. Among these, soil samples showed the highest fungal diversity, followed by carpets - which are a significant reservoir of indoor fungi [23] - while the lowest diversity was observed in sink and drain samples. Since outdoor air is the primary source of indoor fungi [24], the overall limited fungal detection is likely due to mechanical ventilation in both sampling facilities, which filtered out most outdoor fungi from incoming air [24]. However, all of our HVAC samples failed to amplify sufficient DNA for sequencing, not allowing us to test this hypothesis. Bacterial taxonomy showed the greatest dissimilarity between nasal, oral, and environmental communities (Fig. 1B; Bray-Curtis PERMANOVA R2 = 0.43; p = 0.01). Notably, incorporating phylogenetic distance (weighted UniFrac) revealed that nasal and oral communities were most similar to high-touch environmental samples (Fig. 1C; Bray-Curtis PERMANOVA R2 = 0.25; p = 0.01), which we hypothesized indicated that these communities contained more host-associated bacteria compared to low-touch environments.

Microbial community composition revealed distinct patterns across environments that were driven primarily by the degree of human contact. Host-associated communities were unsurprisingly dominated by well-characterized human commensals: nasal samples contained typical inhabitants including Staphylococcus sp. (OTU68: mean abundance, 36.1%), Dolosigranulum pigrum (OTU4: 20.1%), and Corynebacterium sp. (OTU1168: 9.8%), while oral samples harbored characteristic microbiota such as Streptococcus spp. (OTU21 and OTU41: 19.3% and 12.5%, respectively), Haemophilus sp. (OTU22: 10.3%), and Rothia mucilaginosa (OTU384: 8.0%). High-touch surfaces exhibited the predicted dual signature of human and environmental microbes, harboring skin commensals likely transmitted through direct contact – including Cutibacterium sp. (OTU2850: prevalence, 45.2%) and Micrococcus luteus (OTU157: prevalence, 19.4%) – alongside prevalent environmental taxa, such as chloroplast sequences from Cyanobacteria (OTU1128 and OTU1962: mean abundance, 12.3% and 5.7%, respectively) possibly from indoor plants or outdoor sources, and Friedmanniella sp. (OTU889: 3.4%), and Pseudomonas sp. (OTU555: 9.6%), both generalists with diverse metabolic capabilities [25].

In contrast, low-touch environments showed minimal human influence and were instead dominated by niche-specific environmental communities. Drain and sink samples, sharing similar biochemical conditions, were co-dominated by methylotrophic Alphaproteobacteria including Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum species (OTU1805 and OTU174: >40% prevalence) and hydrocarbon-degrading Sphingomonas paucimobilis (OTU9) and related Sphingomonadaceae (OTU1135: >35% prevalence). Soil samples contained distinct core community members essential for nutrient cycling, including Solirubrobacterales 67-14 (OTU244), Burkholderiales SC-I-84 (OTU117), Devosia (OTU435), and Hyphomicrobium (OTU1497). Among samples that had equivalent metagenomes – including two drain, one pooled oral, and one pooled soil sample – about one-third of species detected in amplicon data were also identified by shotgun metagenomics (11-32% shared species) (Fig. S3). This overlap is likely substantially underestimated, however, due to differences in the taxonomic systems available between amplicon and shotgun reference databases. This will disproportionately affect these samples, which are enriched for undercharacterized and often unnamed clades. Nevertheless, this concordance allowed for genome-resolved investigations of these microbes.

Unique phylogenetic distribution of bacteria and fungi across host and environments indicative of transmission patterns

To explore the taxonomic diversity and relationships between microbial communities in various environments, we reconstructed phylogenetic relationships from full-length 16S and ITS representative ASV sequences (Fig. 2A). This revealed distinct phylogenetic distribution patterns that mirror transmission dynamics. Among 22,455 FL-16S ASVs, 1,229 (5.5%) and 11,658 (51.9%) were identified in nasal and oral samples, respectively, and 1331 (5.9%) and 9,179 (40.9%) ASVs were detected in high-touch and low-touch environments. Host-associated communities presented bacterial membership consistent with previously characterized nasal and oral microbiota [26], dominated by Firmicutes (nasal: 46%; oral: 52%), Proteobacteria (nasal: 30%; oral: 20%), Actinobacteria (nasal: 12%; oral: 14%), and Bacteroidota (nasal: 7%; oral: 8%). Low-touch environments exhibited higher diversity, with ASVs largely distinct from host samples. These environments were primarily dominated by Proteobacteria (55%) and Actinobacteria (16%), alongside the phyla Planctomycetota (10%), Myxococcota (3%), Acidobacteriota (2%), and Chloroflexi (2%), all of which are microbes ubiquitously found in natural habitats. In contrast, high-touch environments closely resembled host-associated community structures, with an additional presence of Cyanobacteria (3%) likely due to deposition and transportation from indoor plants.

Figure 2: Phylogenetic trees reconstructed from FL-16S and FL-ITS ASVs.

Figure 2:

Phylogenetic relationships of A) 22,455 full-length 16S ASV sequences representing 4,381 bacterial species and B) 1,097 full-length ITS ASV sequences representing 735 fungal species. Tree leaves are colored according to phylum-level taxonomic assignment, with bacterial phyla containing fewer than 40 tips grouped as "Other." The inner four rings (rings 1-4) indicate the prevalence of each ASV in respective habitats: high-touch environment, low-touch environment, oral cavity, and nasal cavity. Triangles in the outer two rings (rings 5-6) highlight ASVs shared between host sampling sites (oral/nasal) and environmental surfaces (high-touch or low-touch).

The fungal phylogenetic tree based on FL-ITS ASVs (Fig. 2B) contained fewer tips due to the limited detection of fungal taxa across samples, with the greatest fungal diversity concentrated in environmentally derived communities. Among 1,097 full-length ITS ASVs, 189 fungal ASVs were identified in nasal samples and 28 in oral samples, while 432 and 615 ASVs were detected in high-touch and low-touch environments, respectively. Nasal and oral communities shared similar fungal phyla, predominantly represented by Ascomycota (nasal: 61.9%; oral: 46.4%), Basidiomycota (nasal: 28.6%; oral: 17.9%), and Chytridiomycota (nasal: 4.8%; oral: 3.6%). Both Ascomycota and Basidiomycota contain known human-associated yeasts such as the genera Candida and Malassezia, respectively; whereas Chytridiomycota are primitive zoosporic fungi commonly found in water and soils, suggesting exposure via inhalation of aerosolized spores and/or direct contact. The distribution in high-touch environments closely resembled nasal fungal communities but with greater ASV diversity within each phylum, suggesting combined contributions from host-associated fungi and those of environmental origin.

In low-touch environments, we identified eight fungal phyla, with Ascomycota and Basidiomycota remaining the most abundant, followed by Chytridiomycota (9%), Rozellomycota (4%), and Mucoromycota (2%). Rozellomycota (also referred to as Cryptomycota) are known as the “dark matter” of fungi; despite being ubiquitous and abundant in various aquatic and soil habitats, the strain diversity, let alone the functions of this group remains poorly understood [27]. This is evident in our study, where the majority of Rozellomycota ASVs were classified mostly as Rozellomycota cls Incertae sedis and a few as Rozellomycotina cls Incertae sedis, and their lower-level taxonomy remains unknown. Together, the phylogenetic distribution of bacterial and fungal communities directly reflects the degree of human-environment interactions in the childcare setting, distinguishing high-touch surfaces as human microbiome reservoirs from low-touch surfaces dominated by environmental taxa.

Transmission of microbes from hosts to surrounding environments

Next, we searched for ASVs that were shared between host and environmental samples, thus indicative of potential transmission events (Fig. 2, Additional file 4). Within the 16S data, 201 bacterial ASVs from oral communities and 177 from nasal communities were shared in high-touch environments (Fig. S4), suggesting possible transmission of human-associated bacteria to indoor surfaces through frequent and repetitive contact. In contrast, low-touch environments only shared 41 and 92 bacterial ASVs with oral and nasal communities, respectively, likely due to limited human contact.

Bacteria shared across host and environmental samples appeared to be either host- or food-associated species, with their highest abundance in host or high-touch samples (Fig. 3A, Additional file 5). Bacterial species most abundant in host samples were largely body-site-specific ASVs, but a few human skin and upper respiratory tract commensals, including Cutibacterium acnes (25.0%), Lautropia mirabilis (11.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (7.1%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (5.6%), had a notable proportion of ASVs universally shared across environmental communities. In contrast, most species with a higher proportion of universally shared ASVs (27% to 70%) were most frequently found in high-touch environments, including Lactococcus lactis (66.7%), Rothia dentocariosa (33.3%), and Streptococcus thermophilus (27.3%). Sphingomonas echinoides and Bradyrhizobium japonicum were also observed to be highly prevalent and shared across samples, although they may be laboratory contaminants, as previously reported [28]. Species lacking shared ASVs in high-touch environments included Bifidobacterium adolescentis, a gut anaerobe occasionally found in probiotic functional foods (Additional file 5), along with various environmental organisms. Finally, bacterial species most abundant in low-touch environments were almost exclusively environmental ASVs.

Figure 3: Microbial sharing patterns between hosts and environments reveal potential transmission routes.

Figure 3:

Stacked bar plot of the relative contribution of ASVs across A) 28 bacterial and B) 23 fungal species. These species represent the union of the 5 most prevalent species per touch frequency group and the 2 most abundant species per sample type. For each species, bars represent the relative proportion of ASVs detected exclusively in host (“Oral only” or “Nasal only”) or environmental (“Env only”) samples, or shared between any two niches ("Env and Nasal", "Env and Oral", or "Oral and Nasal"), or detected across all sample types (“Shared by all”). This distribution pattern provides insights into potential microbial exchange between children and the childcare environment. C) Phylogenetic analysis of S. thermophilus (left) and L. lactis (right), two species with substantial ASV sharing between hosts and environments. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using representative ASV sequences from this study and reference FL-16S sequences previously isolated from food and non-food sources (retrieved from the NCBI nucleotide database). Phylogenies showed that shared sequences identified in our dataset exhibit closer evolutionary relationships with food-associated reference sequences than with non-food-associated lineages, suggesting dietary sources for the deposited microbes.

Two lactic acid bacteria found in high-touch environments - Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus - are both facultative anaerobes commonly used in food fermentation, such as in dairy products and fermented vegetables. To investigate the potential source of these food-associated organisms, we compared their ASV sequences against reference sequences from dairy products, fermented foods, and non-food-associated environments. The phylogenetic analyses revealed greater similarity to sequences isolated from food sources, including dairy and non-dairy fermented foods, than to non-food-associated ones (L. lactis: mean distance to food 0.01 vs. non-food 0.03, Wilcoxon rank sum test p < 0.001; S. thermophilus: 0.02 vs. 0.05, p = 0.12) (Fig. 3C). This finding suggests that food consumption, alongside direct contact and host shedding, may be a key route of microbial transmission in the childcare environment.

Fungal ASVs were primarily shared between nasal and environmental communities, with 65 ASVs overlapping in high-touch environments and 41 in low-touch environments, while minimal overlap was observed with oral communities. These findings suggest that fungal transmission is likely driven by nasal inhalation of airborne microorganisms from indoor and outdoor sources, whereas oral transmission, whether through droplets or other means, appears less frequent – possibly reflecting the greater capacity of the nasal cavity to harbor diverse environmental fungi as the primary site of airborne spore deposition [29,30] (Fig. 3B). Aureobasidium pullulans, a generalist fungus found in various environments like soil, water, and air, was the only species universally shared across host and environmental communities. Most shared species were observed between nasal communities and environmental samples, with the proportion of shared ASVs ranging from 5% up to 100%, while minimal overlap was observed with the limited oral samples. Many of these fungi are common mold species previously identified in indoor environments, including Penicillium (P. oxalicum, P. corylophilum), Mucor fragilis, Cladosporium (C. herbarum, C. halotolerans), Aspergillus (A. fumigatus, A. penicillioides), and Alternaria (A. tenuissima), likely transmitted via inhalation and fomite interactions [23]. Additionally, several species of Malassezia (M. restricta, M. globosa), common on human skin, were shared between nasal and environmental samples. Other detected fungi included Paecilomyces variotii and Filobasidium magnum, common environmental contaminants previously found in indoor air and house dust [20]. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (associated with baked goods and fruit skins) and Agaricus campestris (a mushroom species), were detected across host, high-touch, and sink samples, likely reflecting their link to food consumption. Lastly, Malassezia pachydermatis, a zoophilic commensal yeast commonly found on canine skin, was abundant in high-touch environments, suggesting potential transport from household pets.

LR shotgun metagenomes improve genomic recovery and resolution

We next assessed the LR metagenomes generated for a subset of samples, specifically two drain samples, one pooled oral sample, and one pooled soil sample. Sample pooling was necessary in some cases to obtain sufficient high molecular weight DNA for LR-MGX. In combination with paired SR metagenomes, these are particularly amenable to MGX assembly, in many cases yielding high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). SR and LR sequencing depth was comparable across platforms for all samples except for Drain 7, which required an additional DNA repair step for PacBio HiFi sequencing, resulting in lower read recovery for this sample’s long reads (Table 1). After this, we obtained a mean of 7.6 Gb (59.4M reads) of short-read and 5.2 Gb (0.75M reads) of long-read sequence data per sample, with long reads averaging 7,164 bp in length (range: 5,076–9,313 bp).

Table 1:

Summary of paired SR and LR metagenomic sequence data.

Short reads Long reads
Illumina
reads
(M)
Total
data
(Gb)
Mean
length
(bp)
Max.
length
(bp)
Min.
length
(bp)
HiFi
reads
(M)
Total
data
(Gb)
Mean
length
(bp)
Max.
length
(bp)
Min.
length
(bp)
Drain2 76.37 10.24 134 151 46 2.07 14.85 7,183 24,774 93
Drain7 116.31 14.45 124 151 46 0.1 0.93 9,313 27,449 84
Oral 13.47 1.87 121 151 20 0.45 2.27 5,076 29,157 83
Soil 31.56 3.8 139 151 74 0.37 2.63 7,083 30,566 78

We compared multiple assembly strategies for the joint SR/LR data, including SR-only, LR-only, and hybrid approaches. We used two types of hybrid assembly approaches: SR-first assemblers (OPERA-MS [31], Table 2, and hybridSPAdes [32]) and LR-first assembly followed by SR polishing using Polypolish (Additional file 6). As expected, at comparable sequencing depths, SR alone assembles more but shorter contigs (fewer contigs ≥ 10 and 50 kbp; Table 2). SR-first hybrid assemblies generated contig size distributions intermediate between SR and LR assemblies (Fig. 4A, Additional file 6), again expected based on first generating high quality SR contigs before extending with long reads [31,33,34]. Polishing of LR assemblies with short reads, on the other hand, showed minimal improvement over LR alone, as individual contig accuracy as reported by Polypolish consistently exceeded 99%. These also had substantially higher N50, lower L50 values, and the largest individual contigs across all four samples compared to SR and hybrid approaches. Alignment of short reads back to each set of assembled contigs revealed substantially higher alignment rates for both LR and hybrid assemblies, indicating improved assembly quality. These results support prior results for PacBio LR sequencing [35,36], suggesting that it can provide complementary high-quality information alongside FL amplicons even in low-biomass communities.

Table 2:

Assembly statistics of contigs produced by SR, LR, and hybrid assemblers.

Short-read assembly Long-read assembly Hybrid assembly
Drain
2
Drain
7
Oral Soil Drain
2
Drain
7
Oral Soil Drain
2
Drain
7
Oral Soil
# contigs 203,003 209,960 213,559 167,573 5,050 1,324 4,758 2,174 159,916 247,180 196,500 132,719
# contigs ≥ 2,500 bp 14,754 16,629 6,022 110 5,049 1,324 4,758 2,174 8,153 14,130 5,934 1,677
# contigs ≥ 10 kbp 3,363 3,763 256 0 5,007 1,323 4,418 2,164 3,519 3,381 2,027 410
# contigs ≥ 50 kbp 353 467 0 0 963 269 467 110 715 394 213 20
Largest contig (Mbp) 0.34 0.60 0.05 0.01 9.50 5.09 2.35 2.74 3.81 1.64 0.28 0.12
N50 3,003 3,513 812 445 296,938 58,084 43,906 29,622 53,210 2,758 2,022 446
L50 12,057 11,200 43,405 60,084 101 209 564 610 671 12,483 6,781 34,138
Total length (Mbp) 267.60 299.97 149.07 77.20 374.36 69.20 159.00 67.25 314.05 299.00 155.16 69.96
Total length of contigs ≥ 10 kbp (Mbp) 89.00 108.85 3.72 0 374.01 69.19 156.23 67.17 219.25 106.09 55.47 8.58
Total length of contigs ≥ 50 kbp (Mbp) 29.86 39.60 0 0 272.78 37.85 74.98 15.66 159.34 44.92 18.25 1.42
% short reads mapped to contigs (≥ 2,500 bp) 90.16% 91.98% 49.35% 0.17% 96.28% 78.75% 83.71% 11.21% 95.30% 87.49% 82.22% 5.39%

Figure 4: Assembly performance and MAG characteristics from SR and LR assemblies of four metagenomes.

Figure 4:

A) Contig length distribution (kbp) across different assembly approaches: SR assembly (MEGAHIT), LR assembly (hifiasm-meta), SR-first hybrid assembly (hybridSPAdes and OPERA-MS), and LR-first hybrid assembly/polishing (hifiasm-meta + Polypolish). These were run on two individual drain samples, one pooled oral sample (n = 8 individuals), and one pooled soil sample (n = 4 locations). B) Number of low-, medium-, and high-quality MAGs recovered from SR and LR assemblies, as defined by CheckM2 [37] completeness and contamination metrics (high-quality: >90% completeness, <5% contamination; medium-quality: >50% completeness, <10% contamination). C) Phylogenetic tree of medium and high-quality MAGs recovered from SR and LR assemblies. The phylogeny was reconstructed using PhyloPhlAn 3 from 123 medium and high-quality MAGs obtained from both SR and LR assemblies. MAGs are assigned to a known (kSGB, kGGB, or kFGB) genome bin when possible vs. unknown (uSGB, uGGB, or uFGB), i.e. knowns containing at least one taxonomically assignable genome. Triangles on the outermost ring highlight novel species recovered from metagenomic assemblies that were not identified in the FL-16S data from this study.

We continued analysis using 123 medium- and high-quality MAGs from the joint SR/LR assemblies, specifically SR assemblies using MEGAHIT and LR assemblies using hifiasm-meta (Fig. 4B). These included 63 medium- and 60 high-quality MAGs from four samples that clustered into 85 unique genome bins: 62 species-level genome bins (SGBs) (42 known, 20 unknown), 20 genus-level genome bins (GGBs) (13 known, 7 unknown), and 3 known family-level genome bins (FGBs) (Fig. 4C, Additional file 6). Notably, 57 out of 123 MAGs assigned to the same SGBs (spanning 25 SGBs with more than one genome bin) likely represent diversity below the species level, suggesting that populations within these distinct environments harbor intraspecies genomic variation that may reflect niche adaptation or distinct transmission sources.

The taxonomic distribution of MAGs varied by sampled environment. Drain samples were dominated by Proteobacteria (n = 29) and Actinobacteria (n = 26), while the oral sample yielded mainly Actinobacteria (n = 9), followed by Firmicutes (n = 4), Proteobacteria (n = 4), and Bacteroidota (n = 3). From the soil sample, only 4 MAGs were recovered from LR assembly and classified as unknown genera within the family Conexibacteraceae (phylum Actinobacteria). Among 42 MAGs assigned to kSGBs, we identified 13 unique species that were either undetected or not resolved to the species level using 16S sequencing. This highlights the added resolution of shotgun metagenomics in capturing taxonomic diversity that amplicon-based approaches may miss. Together, these results demonstrate that LR metagenomics substantially improved both assembly contiguity and genomic resolution, recovering high-quality genomes that enable investigation of functional genomic features beyond the scope of amplicon-based methods.

Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) reveal LGT-enriched molecular functions

MGEs - including plasmids, laterally transferred genes, and other mobilizable elements - are key drivers in bacterial evolution, as they accelerate adaptation and reshape community dynamics, with significant implications for human health [38]. MGEs can transfer antibiotic resistance genes, virulence factors, and metabolic capabilities across microbial communities [38]. To better understand their ecological roles in these communities, we first examined plasmids by classifying contigs as chromosomal, plasmid, or viral based on gene content (viralVerify [39]; Additional file 7).

MGEs were more confidently annotated in LR assemblies, with >55% of contigs receiving definitive annotations (primarily chromosomal), compared to <20% for SR assemblies (Fig. 5A). Comparison of Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) [40] functional annotations revealed distinct functional profiles between plasmid and chromosomal contigs (Fig. 5B), and these were consistent between the confidently-annotated subsets of both SR and LR assemblies. As such, subsequent analysis considers both technologies together.

Figure 5: Mobile genetic elements in childcare microbiome assemblies.

Figure 5:

A) Classification of contigs assembled from SR and LR metagenomes as bacterial chromosomal, plasmid, viral, or uncertain based on gene content using viralVerify [39]. B) Molecular functions associated with plasmid contigs. Genes from chromosomal and plasmid contigs were annotated by Prokka [45] using COG functional categories [40]. The proportion of contigs annotated in each dataset was normalized by COG category size to account for inherent heterogeneity of the COG database. Functional enrichment significance was determined using Fisher's exact test with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction for multiple testing. C) Rates of undirected and directed lateral gene transfer (LGT) events across four metagenomes profiled by WAAFLE [41], normalized to total assembly size per 1,000 genes. For each sample, both directed events (where donor and recipient clades were clearly identifiable from gene adjacency) and undirected events (where donor and recipient clades were unknown) are shown. D) Molecular functions associated with LGT events. Fold enrichments for Pfam [46] domains in LGT-containing contigs relative to non-LGT contigs (those without detected LGT events). Significance testing was performed as in panel B). The top 10 significantly enriched domains (FDR < 0.05) by mean log2 fold enrichment are displayed. E) Representative LGT events from oral and drain metagenomes. Top: An inter-order phage-mediated transfer of a multidrug resistance gene from Gemella haemolysans to an unknown Streptococcus species. Bottom: An intra-genus acquisition of a DNA-binding domain of resolvase by Agrobacterium tumefaciens positioned between Type IV secretion system components, suggesting conjugation-facilitated gene transfer. WAAFLE has high precision for intra-genus and more distant transfer events (<0.5% overall false positives), supporting these detections [41].

Notably, the resulting total set of plasmid contigs contained a much higher proportion of proteins annotated as hypothetical (SR: 74.0%; LR: 71.0%) compared to chromosomal contigs (SR: 40.0%; LR: 47.6%). This likely reflects a combination of factors: the rapid evolution of plasmid-encoded genes carrying novel adaptive functions, and the underrepresentation of plasmids in reference databases due to their historically lower sequencing and study relative to chromosomal DNA. Despite this high proportion of uncharacterized genes, annotated plasmid-associated functions revealed clear functional specialization. Genes associated with cell motility, the mobilome, and intracellular trafficking/secretion/vesicular transport were significantly enriched in plasmid contigs relative to chromosomal counterparts (Fig. 5B). The observed distinction in functional landscape between plasmid and chromosomal sequences highlight the specialized role of plasmids in mediating genetic exchange and adaptation in these microbial communities.

We next investigated chromosomal lateral gene transfer (LGT) events as another type of genetic mobilization in these communities. We first quantified LGT rates across the four metagenomes using WAAFLE [41] to assess the extent of genetic exchange. Environmental samples (soil and drains) showed similar LGT rates: 0.3-0.5 total events per thousand genes, for which ~25% could determine directionality (Fig. 5C, Additional file 8). In contrast, the oral metagenome exhibited substantially higher LGT rates, in agreement with prior reports of increased HGTs in human-associated communities. This is thought to arise from the close physical proximity of microbes within host-associated niches, particularly structured biofilms like those found in the oral cavity that promote frequent cell-to-cell interactions, with genetic compatibility among closely related host-associated taxa further enhancing successful genetic exchange [42,43].

To characterize LGT mobilized functions, we examined protein domain enrichments in LGT-containing contigs relative to all contigs in each metagenome (Fig. 5D). As expected, LGT-associated genes were strongly enriched for mobile element-related functions. Transposases were among the most consistently enriched functions. Additional mobile element-associated domains included a resolvase N-terminal domain (PF00239), an integrase core domain (PF00665), and a phage integrase family (PF00589). Various DNA-interacting domains were also enriched, including several helix-turn-helix (HTH) variants and transposition-associated ATPases. HTH domains commonly function as DNA-binding transcriptional regulators that control mobile element gene expression, while transposition-associated ATPases provide the energy required for DNA strand separation and recombination during transposition [44]. The enrichment of these regulatory and catalytic functions is consistent with their essential roles in mediating horizontal gene transfer.

Interestingly, we also observed niche-specific molecular functions enriched in individual environments (Fig. 5D). For example, the 'cold-shock' DNA-binding domain (PF00313) helps bacterial cells acclimate to colder growth conditions and was significantly enriched in the soil metagenome. Soil bacteria experience substantial diurnal and seasonal temperature fluctuations [47], and cold-shock proteins enable rapid transcriptional reprogramming in response to temperature stress [48], providing a selective advantage in thermally variable environments. In the oral metagenomes, we found enrichment of lactate/malate dehydrogenase domain (PF02866), suggesting a link to the prevalent fermentative metabolism in oral biofilms. These enzymes are essential for fermentative energy metabolism in the oxygen-limited oral environment and contribute to acidification implicated in dental caries [49], indicating that LGT may disseminate metabolic adaptations among oral bacteria. The drain metagenome enriched several proteins and domains of unknown function. Drain biofilms are expected to experience selective pressures uncommon in well-studied environments, such as chronic low-level biocide exposure from cleaning products, oligotrophic conditions punctuated by nutrient pulses, and colonization of synthetic polymer surfaces [50], thus these unknown functions may reflect genuine genetic innovation. Collectively, these niche-specific functional enrichments suggest that horizontal gene transfer is not stochastic but is instead shaped by local selective pressures, with each environment leaving a distinct ecological imprint on its mobile gene pool.

While antibiotic resistance and virulence factors were not among the most common enriched functions, we did observe a number of specific domains involved in LGT events, including small multidrug resistance proteins (PF00893) and BacA (PF02673), along with multiple secretion system domains that are specialized for the transport of virulence factors in oral and drain metagenomes (Additional file 9). An example oral LGT event (Fig. 5E, top) represents an acquisition of a small multidrug resistance gene flanked by a phage integrase and two other elements of unknown function by a Streptococcus species from Gemella haemolysans, suggesting a phage-mediated transfer. In a second example from a drain metagenome, the helix-turn-helix domain of a resolvase characterized from Agrobacterium sp. ATCC 31749 was detected in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens genome, where it integrated between TrbL/VirB6 and VirB8 structural proteins of the Type IV secretion systems that mediate bacterial conjugation and regulatory elements (TraM repressor and LuxR family) [51,52]. This strategic positioning of a DNA-binding domain from site-specific recombinases likely facilitates resolution of DNA intermediates during conjugation, enhancing plasmid transfer and integration efficiency that may confer a selective advantage to recipient organisms in the specific environment.

Habitat-structured viral diversity and phage-host relationships across environments

Finally, we used geNomad [53] to classify viral contigs from SR and LR assemblies, allowing us to investigate phage-bacterial relationships as another mechanism of genetic mobilization. While the majority (>75%) of viral contigs remained taxonomically unclassified, the identifiable viruses were predominantly bacteriophages spanning four realms: Duplodnaviria, Monodnaviria, Varidnaviria, and Riboviria (Fig. 6A, Additional file 10). Most identifiable viruses belonged to class Caudoviricetes without further family classification. Comparison of viral profiles between environments revealed distinct compositional differences, predominantly corresponding to enrichments for different typical phage hosts: the oral cavity showed relative enrichment of Kyanoviridae (previously part of the morphology-based family Myoviridae) (0.19%) and the non-phage eukaryotic viral family Mimiviridae (0.15%), with unique enrichment of Herelleviridae (phages infecting bacteria in the phylum Firmicutes [54]) and Retroviridae (family of retroviruses including human endogenous viruses [54]) (both ~0.06%). In contrast, drain environments were enriched with phages from the viral families Inoviridae (0.21%) and Autographiviridae (an extensively studied family of virulent phages [55]) (0.17%), along with unique enrichment of Drexlerviridae (formerly part of the Siphoviridae) and Phycodnaviridae (algal viruses in aquatic environments). In all of these cases, viral communities were phage-dominated and corresponded to the most common bacterial hosts in each habitat. Human-associated eukaryotic viruses appeared only at low abundance and only in the oral metagenome, consistent with previous observations that most human-associated viromes are predominantly bacteriophage in environments such as the gut [56].

Figure 6: Viruses and phage-host relationships from assembled contigs.

Figure 6:

A) Viral contig classification across taxonomic levels. The left panel shows the complete classification distribution; the middle panel displays the taxonomic breakdown excluding the unclassified fraction (which represents the majority); the right panel shows the finer taxonomic resolution after excluding both unclassified contigs and those belonging to the predominant Caudoviricetes class. B) Phylogenetic reconstruction of Caudoviricetes phages based on viral contigs longer than 10 kb. Tree leaves and the outermost ring are colored according to sampling environment. The inner ring indicates predicted host taxonomy at class level (or higher taxonomic rank when class could not be resolved). C) Relationship between predicted phage-host associations and metagenomic host abundance across three environments. Each facet represents a distinct environment with dual visualization: bar plots showing the normalized frequency of bacterial genera predicted as phage hosts per 1,000 predictions, alongside dot plots indicating the corresponding relative abundance of each host genus from SR taxonomic profiling. For the two drain samples, relative abundances of genera were averaged. Absent dots represent genera predicted in phage-host predictions but not profiled in the metagenomic data.

Since the majority of identifiable viruses in our dataset belonged to Caudoviricetes - a class of tailed double-stranded DNA phages, one of the best-studied from the human gut [57] - we focused on these phages to analyze virus-host interaction dynamics. We constructed a phylogenetic tree of all sequences belonging to this class and predicted their putative bacterial hosts at the genus level using iPHoP [58] (Fig. 6B, Additional file 10). The tree showed phylogenetically-differentiated lineages across different source environments, suggesting habitat-dependent diversity. Caudoviricetes as a class is known to have a broad host range across different environments [59,60]. Based on the host prediction results - which were generally only confident to the phylum level - phages identified in drain environments predominantly targeted bacteria in Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria (mainly Alphaproteobacteria), whereas those in oral environments preferentially targeted Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Saccharibacteria, and Proteobacteria (primarily Gammaproteobacteria). As expected, we observed a strong positive correlation between the frequency of predicted hosts and their relative abundances (ρ = 0.60, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6C, Fig. S5, Additional file 11). These environment-specific host-phage associations, mirroring the relative abundances of the underlying bacterial communities, suggest that Caudoviricetes (and other common) phage diversity and host tropism are fundamentally shaped by the ecological context.

Discussion

This study reveals that childcare microbial communities are organized along a gradient of human contact, with distinct compositional, functional, and ecological signatures across host and environmental niches. We integrated full-length amplicon sequencing with paired short-read and long-read metagenomics, and we applied these across a spectrum of children's oral and nasal microbiomes and diverse environmental surfaces. This identified specific host-to-environment microbial transmission patterns, characterized the functional repertoire of mobile genetic elements (including lateral gene transfer events), and uncovered environment-specific phage ecology (notably strong joint persistence of phage with their hosts). Together, these findings provide the first comprehensive, multi-omic and multi-kingdom view of microbial community structure and ecological dynamics in childcare settings.

These results substantially extend the existing understanding of childcare microbiomes, which have generally focused either on host-associated aspects or airborne or floor dust environmental communities, both generally profiled with short-read amplicon sequencing [5,17,18]. By simultaneously characterizing microbial communities across diverse surface types and children's body sites, we demonstrate that human occupancy structures indoor microbial communities along a contact-frequency gradient. High-touch surfaces harbored a mixture of environmental and host-associated bacteria – including nasal, oral, and skin commensals – while low-touch and outdoor environments showed greater taxonomic diversity dominated by environmental taxa, a pattern confirmed by identifying a substantial proportion of high-touch surface communities to be host-associated commensals. These distinct community structures align with two recent childcare studies [4,15] that reported higher abundance of human-associated bacteria on frequently contacted surfaces.

Similar colonization patterns have been observed in other BEs, where studies of homes [61], elementary schools [62], and urban transit systems [63] have consistently shown that frequently touched surfaces harbor microbes characteristic of human-associated communities, whereas low-touch and outdoor environments maintain their own native community structure [64,65]. These parallel findings across different BEs suggest common principles governing microbial community assembly in human-occupied spaces. Fungal detection was comparatively limited in our study, likely reflecting low fungal biomass in indoor and host samples combined with known ITS amplification biases in certain Ascomycota lineages [66,67] and incomplete reference databases. We still identified common indoor molds including Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Cladosporium across environments, consistent with observations in residential homes and particularly dependent on cleaning and moisture exposure patterns [20,68]. Together, these observations raise the question of whether the human-contact gradient reflects active microbial deposition and differential survival on surfaces, or environmental filtering, and what hypotheses might be tested regarding the role of specific surface materials, cleaning regimens, or occupancy patterns in modulating these community structures.

While environmentally-mediated microbial transmission in childcare settings has traditionally been studied from an infection control perspective, understanding nonpathogenic microbial transmission is also important for informing preventive practices that support a healthy environment for children. The only prior study to sample both childcare environments and occupants identified co-occurrence clusters between children's palms and frequently handled objects but did not resolve which species are likely transmitted [15]. By tracking exact 16S sequence variants shared between host and environmental samples, we identified specific transmission signatures: universally shared bacteria were predominantly host- or food-associated, with skin and upper respiratory commensals such as Cutibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis showing notable proportions of ASVs shared across environmental communities. Food-associated lactic acid bacteria, including Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus, were phylogenetically closer to dairy-derived than non-food reference sequences, suggesting that food handling and consumption represent a more significant microbial transmission route in childcare settings than previously recognized [69,70]. These patterns align with growing evidence that shared physical environments are major conduits for microbial transmission, interpersonal routes for which have now been deeply studied [71]. The distinction between universally shared versus environment-specific taxa suggests that certain microbes are more transmissible or persistent on surfaces than others, information that could guide targeted hygiene strategies that reduce pathogen exposure without disrupting beneficial microbial encounters [72,73].

Long-read metagenomic sequencing allowed us to move beyond taxonomic profiling and to address open questions about the ecological forces shaping these microbial communities at the level of mobilized functional elements and evolutionary dynamics. A question of interest in BE microbiology is whether microbial communities on different surfaces simply reflect passive deposition, or whether local selective pressures actively shape community function and evolution. Our analysis of mobile genetic elements provides evidence for the latter: LGT events were not only enriched for canonical mobility functions such as transposases [41] but also carried niche-specific adaptive functions – cold-shock response domains in soil, fermentative metabolism genes linked to oral biofilm acidification, and heavy metal resistance in drains. This pattern of environment-specific functional enrichment suggests that horizontal gene transfer in these communities is shaped by local selective pressures, enabling rapid microbial adaptation to distinct microenvironments within the same building. Plasmid-borne genes were predominantly uncharacterized (~71-74% hypothetical, compared to ~40-48% on chromosomes), consistent with plasmids serving as reservoirs for rapidly evolving, potentially novel adaptive functions that have yet to be catalogued. Although antibiotic resistance and virulence-associated domains were not the most commonly transferred functions, their presence in LGT events – including a phage-mediated acquisition of a multidrug resistance gene by Streptococcus sp. from Gemella haemolysans in the oral cavity – raises important questions about whether childcare environments may facilitate the horizontal spread of clinically relevant genes among commensal bacteria in close contact with young children.

Several limitations should be noted. Shared ASVs between host and environmental samples are indicative of, but do not confirm, active transmission events – future studies with strain-level resolution and longitudinal sampling will be needed to distinguish ongoing transmission from transient environmental deposition. Additionally, our shotgun metagenomic analysis was restricted to four samples due to the low biomass characteristic of environmental microbiomes, limiting the generalizability of MGE, LGT, and phage findings across the full range of sampled environments. Finally, limited fungal detection across sample types constrained our ability to fully characterize eukaryotic transkingdom interactions in these communities; improved full-length ITS amplification protocols, combined with deeper metagenomic sequencing, will be essential for understanding how fungal, bacterial, and viral communities interact and co-shape the childcare microbiome.

In conjunction with other published investigations, this work advances our understanding of the "childcare microbiome" through novel integration of short- and long-read metagenomics with high-resolution amplicon sequencing and incorporation of host microbial features alongside environmental sampling. Our study bridges environmental and human-associated microbial ecology, revealing important insights into how these microbial communities are formed, maintained, and transferred within childcare settings. Our cross-sectional study focused on university-affiliated childcare centers with stringent sustainability policies and demographically homogeneous populations, providing valuable baseline information about microbial dynamics in these crucial early-life environments.

Future longitudinal studies should expand to diverse childcare settings and demographic groups, incorporating comprehensive sampling of centers, staff, and home environments to further illuminate the complex interactions between human and environmental microbiomes. Such investigations will help identify viable resident microbes and their transmission mechanisms, ultimately informing evidence-based strategies for creating healthier childcare environments given their significant role in early-life microbial exposure.

Methods

Sample collection

Two university-affiliated childcare centers participated in this study, with sampling conducted on July 22, 2022. We collected paired nasal and oral microbiome samples from 34 children aged two to four years old across eight classrooms (n = 68). Children were excluded from participation if they had received oral or intravenous antibiotics or chemotherapy within 9 months, reported acute infectious diseases, used topical antibiotics or antifungal applications in the nose or mouth within 1 week, had open wounds in the nose or mouth, experienced infections within 1 week, or underwent surgery involving the nasal or oral cavity within 9 months (excluding routine dental procedures) at the time of sampling. Demographic and health information was collected through parent questionnaires, including children's age, sex, race/ethnicity, early-life factors (breastfeeding, mode of delivery), household characteristics (presence of pets), medical history (antibiotic use prior to age one, medications, respiratory and oral illnesses, hospitalizations), and lifestyle factors (diet, probiotic use, oral hygiene practices). The study protocol and all research activities involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (IRB# 22-0579).

Environmental samples (n = 109) were collected from various indoor and outdoor sources across both childcare centers. Indoor samples included doorknobs, desks, chairs, carpet, sinks, drains, infiltration sites (window sills), and HVAC ducts. For infiltration and HVAC duct sampling, 3-10 petri dishes (depending on available space) were placed to collect settling dust and were subsequently pooled. Outdoor samples were collected from two locations per center and included air and soil samples. Outdoor air was sampled using cassettes with 0.45-μm pore-sized MCE filters mounted on tripods 1.5 m above ground, positioned away from pedestrian traffic. Air samplers operated with a vacuum pump at 24 L/min for 24 hours. Soil samples of 0.2 grams of soil were collected from two playground locations per center. All remaining surfaces were sampled using pre-moistened FLOQ swabs (Copan) in autoclaved 0.85% saline, with each surface swabbed thoroughly for one minute. All environmental sampling was conducted on the same day as the collection of children's microbiome samples. All samples were stored on ice for no more than 1 hour before transfer to a central location, where they were stored on dry ice until permanent storage at −80°C.

Sample extraction and sequencing

DNA was extracted following standardized protocols as described by Comeau et al. [74] and updated by Comeau and Kwawukume (https://www.protocols.io/workspaces/integrated-microbiome-resource-imr/publications) using the AllPrep PowerFecal DNA/RNA Kit (Qiagen). All samples underwent full-length 16S rRNA gene and ITS amplification with PacBio barcode-incorporating primers. The complete 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal bacterial primers 27F (AGRGTTYGATYMTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (RGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT), while the complete ITS region was amplified using fungi-specific primers ITS1FKYO2 (TAGAGGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAA) and ITS4KYO1 (TCCTCCGCTTWTTGWTWTGC). HiFi sequencing of amplified libraries was performed on the PacBio Sequel IIe system.

A subset of samples (n = 4), comprising two individual drain samples, one pooled oral sample (n = 8 individuals), and one pooled soil sample (n = 4 locations), underwent both Illumina SR and PacBio LR shotgun metagenomic sequencing. SR libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with 2 × 150 bp paired-end configuration, and HiFi sequencing of LR libraries was performed on the PacBio Revio system. Negative controls including a blank swab and a blank filter (at the time of sampling), saline (at the time of sampling), lab air, and reagent control during extraction, were included for contamination identification. Sequencing data from controls that yielded sufficient reads are deposited in the NCBI SRA under BioProject PRJNA1476686; controls that failed to yield detectable DNA are not included.

Amplicon data processing

Raw full-length 16S data was processed using the HiFi-16S-workflow pipeline (v0.7) (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/HiFi-16S-workflow.git), which generates high-quality ASVs from PacBio HiFi full-length 16S data and assigns taxonomy using QIIME 2 [75] and DADA2 [76]. Full-length ITS data was processed similarly using the DADA2 ITS pipeline workflow with parameters optimized for full-length amplicons [77]. After quality control, samples with low depth (<200 full-length reads) were excluded, resulting in 109 16S samples (host: n = 61, environmental: n = 48) and 61 ITS samples (host: n = 14, environmental: n = 47) for downstream analysis. ASV feature tables were constructed for both datasets, with taxonomy assigned using the SILVA v138 database [78] for bacteria and the UNITE database (25.07.2023 release) [79] for fungi. ASV frequencies were then sum-normalized to relative abundances (Additional file 3).

After quality control and excluding samples that either failed sequencing (3 FL-16S and 116 FL-ITS) due to insufficient biomass or had low sequencing depth (<200 full-length reads), 109 FL-16S samples (61 host and 48 environmental) and 61 FL-ITS samples (14 host and 47 environmental) were analyzed. Initial processing identified 22,455 bacterial ASVs and 1,097 fungal ASVs, corresponding to 583 and 414 unique bacterial and fungal species, respectively. We observed unusually high ASV diversity across samples; specifically, 83% of 16S ASVs were detected in only a single sample, with relative abundances ranging from <1% to 30%. These singleton ASVs collectively can account for up to 85% of per-sample composition, with similar patterns observed in ITS data. This overestimation of sample diversity was likely due to DADA2 defaults for PacBio amplicons were likely permissive for low-frequency sequences and/or the intragenomic heterogeneity of the multi-copy 16S rRNA gene overestimating sample diversity. To allow more robust between-sample community comparisons while maintaining species-level resolution, we subsequently clustered ASVs into 4,381 bacterial and 745 fungal OTUs at 97% similarity (Additional file 3).

Amplicon data analyses

Alpha diversity was calculated using the Shannon diversity index implemented in the R package 'vegan' (v2.7.1) [80]. Ordinations were calculated using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on both Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of OTU tables and weighted UniFrac distances of ASVs. Environmental samples were categorized by touch frequency into low-touch (drain, sink, soil) and high-touch (remaining surfaces) environments. For phylogenetic analysis, we performed multiple sequence alignment (MSA) on 16S and ITS ASV sequences separately using MAFFT (v7.515) with default parameters, followed by tree construction using FastTree (v2.1.11) [81]. The resulting phylogenetic trees were visualized using GraPhlAn v1.1.4 [82].

To compare bacterial composition across samples, we plotted the relative abundance of the most abundant and prevalent species by sample type using the R package ComplexHeatmap (v2.24.1) [83]. The resulting subset of species shown in Fig. 1E is the union of the top 5 most abundant and prevalent species identified in each sample type. To estimate ASV contribution for each species, we quantified the presence of ASVs for each species across environmental, oral, and nasal samples, calculating their proportional distribution across these sources. Species shown in Fig. 3A and 3B represent the union of the top 5 most abundant species (per sample type) and most prevalent species (across environmental, oral, or nasal samples).

For the comparison of taxonomic resolution between full-length 16S and the V4 subregion, we generated V4 amplicons by directly trimming the targeted region from the full-length ASV sequences using forward primer 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and the reverse primer 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) using mothur (v1.48.0) [84] pcr.seqs function. The trimmed V4 amplicons were called ASVs and assigned taxonomy using the same DADA2 methodology as above.

SR metagenomic assembly and MAG construction

We assembled SR metagenomes from the subset samples following the bioBakery workflow (v3.1.0) protocols [85] with a pipeline previously established for SGB construction [86]. Briefly, raw sequencing reads were first processed through KneadData v0.7.7 [87] for quality control, removing adapters, low-quality sequences, and host contamination using the human reference genome hg37 prior to assembly. Following quality control, we assembled reads into contigs (minimum length 2,500 bp) using MEGAHIT 1.2.9 [88]. SR contigs were subsequently grouped into metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) using MetaBAT v2.15, based on their GC content and read depth patterns [89]. We then assessed MAG quality using CheckM2 1.0.0 [37], categorizing them as high-quality (>90% completeness, <5% contamination), medium-quality (>50% completeness, <10% contamination), or low-quality (<50% completeness, >10% contamination). After excluding low-quality MAGs, we assigned the remaining high- and medium-quality MAGs into taxonomic groups using PhyloPhlAn 3.0 [90] with the “SGB.Jun23” database. Following previously established thresholds [86], MAGs were assigned to species-level genome bins (SGBs), genus genome bins (GGBs), or family genome bins (FGBs) based on Mash distances of <5%, <15%, or <30%, respectively [86].

LR metagenomic assembly and MAG construction

LR metagenomes were assembled using hifiasm-meta (v0.6.0) [91] with default settings. MAGs were obtained using HiFi-MAG-Pipeline v2.1.0 (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pb-metagenomics-tools/tree/master/HiFi-MAG-Pipeline), which employs a completeness-aware strategy. The pipeline first identifies and bins long contigs >500kb individually, assessing their completeness using CheckM2 [37]. Those with >93% completeness are retained as final MAGs, while <93% complete long contigs are pooled with shorter contigs for further binning using MetaBat2 and SemiBin2 (with LR settings). The bin set is then merged and dereplicated using DAS_Tool, and the final combined set of bins and long complete contigs is evaluated using CheckM2, with quality categories and taxonomy assigned using the same criteria and method as SR MAGs. Additionally, bins containing more than 50 contigs are excluded from further analysis.

Hybrid metagenomic assembly

We performed hybrid assembly using three complementary approaches: 1) OPERA-MS and 2) hybridSPAdes, which utilize a SR-first strategy by scaffolding SR contigs with long reads, and 3) Polypolish, a SR polishing tool adapted for the LR-first strategy to correct potential small-scale errors in LR assemblies using Illumina reads. Specifically, we used hybridSPAdes [32] 4.0.0 with parameters --meta --pacbio and OPERA-MS [31] v0.9.0 with default settings, and we used Polypolish [92] v0.6.0 in --careful mode to polish the LR assembly with short reads. Assembly quality was evaluated using Quast v5.2.0 [93] across all three assembly types (SR, LR, and hybrid), comparing metrics including total assembly size, contig numbers, largest contig length, N50, and L50. Short reads were mapped to the assemblies using bowtie2 v2.2.3 [94] with --very-sensitive-local mode to assess assembly accuracy.

Profiling and analysis of novel LGT events

We identified and analyzed novel LGT events from the LR metagenomes using WAAFLE (v1.0) [41]. LGT rates were calculated by normalizing the number of LGT events to the number of background genes in each sample, and events were characterized by their directedness (whether or not the transferring clades could be assigned as donor and recipient). For functional enrichment analysis, we first mapped UniRef90 gene assignments to Pfam domains using HUMAnN 2's utility mapping databases (v0.11.1) [95]. Within each sample, we then quantified the frequency of a given functional domain in both LGT-associated and background genes. The significance of functional enrichment was determined using Fisher's exact test, with the resulting two-tailed p-values corrected within-sample for multiple hypothesis testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.

Identification of metagenome-derived viruses and phage host prediction

Contigs from SR and LR assemblies were classified as plasmid, viral, or chromosomal sequences based on gene content using viralVerify v1.1, a module of metaviralSPAdes [39]. The identified genes from these contigs were additionally annotated with COG functional categories [96] using Prokka 1.14.6 [45].

Viral contigs were annotated using geNomad (v1.9.0) [53] with default parameters to classify viral contigs from SR and LR assemblies. Bacterial host of phages were predicted using iPHoP (v1.3.3) [58] with default parameters. To quantify the relationship between phage host prediction and host abundance, taxonomic profiles were obtained from the SR metagenomes using MetaPhlAn (v4.0.6) with the vOct22_fixed database [97].

A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree comprising Caudoviricetes contigs longer than 10kb was constructed using MAFFT (v7.515) and FastTree (v2.1.11) [81], as previously described in Amplicon data analysis section. The resulting phylogenetic trees were visualized using GraPhlAn v1.1.4 [82].

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere gratitude to Katy Donovan (Executive Director, Harvard's Campus Child Care, Inc.), Trecia Mayo (Director, Soldiers Field Park Children's Center), Barbara Carlson (Director, Radcliffe Child Care Center), and all center staff for their exceptional support and partnership throughout this research project. Their commitment was instrumental to our work. We are profoundly thankful to all participating children and their families for their willingness to contribute to this study. Special thanks to Ronnie Perdomo for his valuable assistance with sample collection.

Funding

This work was supported by the Harvard Chan-NIEHS Center for Environmental Health (NIH grant #P30ES000002) and Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Harvard Longwood Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol #IRB22-0579). Written informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians of all participating children prior to sample collection.

Consent for publication

All data generated from human participants are de-identified and linked only to coded sample identifiers; no individually identifiable information appears in this manuscript. Consent for publication of de-identified data was included in the parental/guardian consent form.

Availability of data and materials

Sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession PRJNA1476686 and will be publicly released upon publication. Amplicon data (full-length 16S rRNA gene and ITS) are provided as raw reads; shotgun metagenomic reads (short-read and long-read) were host-depleted prior to deposit. Processed feature tables, sample metadata, and intermediate analytic outputs are provided as Additional files 1-11. The complete WAAFLE contig classification and LGT profile output, including non-LGT background contigs that could not be included in Additional file 8 due to the journal's per-file size limit, is deposited on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.20673324). Analysis code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/marinachen/childcare-microbiome and archived on Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.20648916.

Competing interests

D.M.P. and J.E.W. are employees of Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., which provided sequencing support for this study. C.H. serves on the scientific advisory boards of Seres Therapeutics and Empress Therapeutics. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • [1].Bosch TCG, Wigley M, Colomina B, Bohannan B, Meggers F, Amato KR, et al. The potential importance of the built-environment microbiome and its impact on human health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(20):e2313971121. 10.1073/pnas.2313971121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Zampolli J, De Giani A, Rossi M, Finazzi M, Di Gennaro P. Who inhabits the built environment? A microbiological point of view on the principal bacteria colonizing our urban areas. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1380953. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1380953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Lee L, Tin S, Kelley ST. Culture-independent analysis of bacterial diversity in a childcare facility. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:27. 10.1186/1471-2180-7-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Beasley DE, Monsur M, Hu J, Dunn RR, Madden AA. The bacterial community of childcare centers: potential implications for microbial dispersal and child exposure. Environ Microbiome. 2022;17(1):8. 10.1186/s40793-022-00404-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Prussin AJ 2nd , Vikram A, Bibby KJ, Marr LC. Seasonal Dynamics of the Airborne Bacterial Community and Selected Viruses in a Children's Daycare Center. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151004. 10.1371/journal.pone.0151004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Ibfelt T, Engelund EH, Permin A, Madsen JS, Schultz AC, Andersen LP. Presence of Pathogenic Bacteria and Viruses in the Daycare Environment. J Environ Health. 2015;78(3):24–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Estensmo ELF, Morgado L, Maurice S, Martin-Sanchez PM, Engh IB, Mattsson J, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of the indoor mycobiome in daycare centers. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):220. 10.1186/s40168-021-01167-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science. 2016;352(6285):539–44. 10.1126/science.aad9378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Renz H, Skevaki C. Early life microbial exposures and allergy risks: opportunities for prevention. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(3):177–191. 10.1038/s41577-020-00420-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Azad MB, Konya T, Maughan H, Guttman DS, Field CJ, Sears MR, et al. Infant gut microbiota and the hygiene hypothesis of allergic disease: impact of household pets and siblings on microbiota composition and diversity. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013;9(1):15. 10.1186/1710-1492-9-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Hesselmar B, Hicke-Roberts A, Lundell AC, Adlerberth I, Rudin A, Saalman R, et al. Pet-keeping in early life reduces the risk of allergy in a dose-dependent fashion. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208472. 10.1371/journal.pone.0208472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Celedon JC, Wright RJ, Litonjua AA, Sredl D, Ryan L, Weiss ST, et al. Day care attendance in early life, maternal history of asthma, and asthma at the age of 6 years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(9):1239–43. 10.1164/rccm.200209-1063OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Celedon JC, Litonjua AA, Ryan L, Weiss ST, Gold DR. Day care attendance, respiratory tract illnesses, wheezing, asthma, and total serum IgE level in early childhood. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(3):241–5 10.1001/archpedi.156.3.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Borrego-Ruiz A, Borrego JJ. Early-life gut microbiome development and its potential long-term impact on health outcomes. Microbiome Res Rep. 2025;4(2):20. 10.20517/mrr.2024.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Lam T, Chew D, Zhao H, Zhu P, Zhang L, Dai Y, et al. Species-Resolved Metagenomics of Kindergarten Microbiomes Reveal Microbial Admixture Within Sites and Potential Microbial Hazards. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:871017. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.871017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Shin SK, Kim J, Ha SM, Oh HS, Chun J, Sohn J, et al. Metagenomic insights into the bioaerosols in the indoor and outdoor environments of childcare facilities. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126960. 10.1371/journal.pone.0126960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].McKay JA, Crown M, Bashton M, Pearce D, Entwistle JA, Sangal V. Environmental microbiome in the home and daycare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential risk of non-communicable disease in children. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2024;16(1):e13233. 10.1111/1758-2229.13233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Nygaard AB, Charnock C. Longitudinal development of the dust microbiome in a newly opened Norwegian kindergarten. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):159. 10.1186/s40168-018-0553-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Newman NS, Abbott CA, Brame JE, Cando-Dumancela C, Fickling NW, Liddicoat C, et al. Childcare centre soil microbiomes are influenced by substrate type and surrounding vegetation condition. Sci Total Environ. 2024;927:172158. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Estensmo ELF, Smebye Botnen S, Maurice S, Martin-Sanchez PM, Morgado L, Bjorvand Engh I, et al. The Indoor Mycobiomes of Daycare Centers Are Affected by Occupancy and Climate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88(6):e0211321. 10.1128/AEM.02113-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Turner SL, Bailey MJ, Lilley AK, Thomas CM. Ecological and molecular maintenance strategies of mobile genetic elements. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002;42(2):177–85. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb01007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Johnson JS, Spakowicz DJ, Hong BY, Petersen LM, Demkowicz P, Chen L, et al. Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5029. 10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Microbiomes of the Built Environment: A Research Agenda for Indoor Microbiology, Human Health, and Buildings. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2017. 10.17226/23647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Nevalainen A, Taubel M, Hyvarinen A. Indoor fungi: companions and contaminants. Indoor Air. 2015;25(2):125–56. 10.1111/ina.12182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Stackebrandt E, Schaal KP. The Family Propionibacteriaceae: The Genera Friedmanniella, Luteococcus, Microlunatus, Micropruina, Propioniferax, Propionimicrobium and Tessarococcus. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E, editors. The Prokaryotes. New York: Springer; 2006. 10.1007/0-387-30743-5_18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Lloyd-Price J, Mahurkar A, Rahnavard G, Crabtree J, Orvis J, Hall AB, et al. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2017;550(7674):61–66. 10.1038/nature23889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Quandt CA, Marino JA, Simmons DR, Davis WJ, Hassett BT, Picard KT, et al. Evaluating the diversity of the enigmatic fungal phylum Cryptomycota across habitats using 18S rRNA metabarcoding. Fungal Ecol. 2023;64:101248. 10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014;12:87. 10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Shin SH, Ye MK, Lee DW, Geum SY. Immunopathologic Role of Fungi in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3). 10.3390/ijms24032366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Perez-Losada M. Fungal Diversity and Interactions in the Nasal and Oral Cavities of Individuals with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and Healthy Controls. Microorganisms. 2025;13(6). 10.3390/microorganisms13061204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Bertrand D, Shaw J, Kalathiyappan M, Ng AHQ, Kumar MS, Li C, et al. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):937–944. 10.1038/s41587-019-0191-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):824–834. 10.1101/gr.213959.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Antipov D, Korobeynikov A, McLean JS, Pevzner PA. hybridSPAdes: an algorithm for hybrid assembly of short and long reads. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(7):1009–15. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005595. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Adler A, Poirier S, Pagni M, Maillard J, Holliger C. Disentangle genus microdiversity within a complex microbial community by using a multi-distance long-read binning method: example of Candidatus Accumulibacter. Environ Microbiol. 2022;24(4):2136–2156. 10.1111/1462-2920.15947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Tao Y, Xun F, Zhao C, Mao Z, Li B, Xing P, et al. Improved Assembly of Metagenome-Assembled Genomes and Viruses in Tibetan Saline Lake Sediment by HiFi Metagenomic Sequencing. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(1):e0332822. 10.1128/spectrum.03328-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods. 2023;20(8):1203–1212. 10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Crits-Christoph A, Hallowell HA, Koutouvalis K, Suez J. Good microbes, bad genes? The dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in the human microbiome. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1):2055944. 10.1080/19490976.2022.2055944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Antipov D, Raiko M, Lapidus A, Pevzner PA. Metaviral SPAdes: assembly of viruses from metagenomic data. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(14):4126–4129. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:41. 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Hsu TY, Nzabarushimana E, Wong D, Luo C, Beiko RG, Langille M, et al. Profiling lateral gene transfer events in the human microbiome using WAAFLE. Nat Microbiol. 2025;10(1):94–111. 10.1038/s41564-024-01881-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Smillie CS, Smith MB, Friedman J, Cordero OX, David LA, Alm EJ. Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature. 2011;480(7376):241–4. 10.1038/nature10571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Jeong H, Arif B, Caetano-Anolles G, Kim KM, Nasir A. Horizontal gene transfer in human-associated microorganisms inferred by phylogenetic reconstruction and reconciliation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5953. 10.1038/s41598-019-42227-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Hickman AB, Dyda F. Mechanisms of DNA Transposition. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(2):MDNA3-0034-2014. 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0034-2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D222–30. 10.1093/nar/gkt1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Hu A, Nie Y, Yu G, Han C, He J, He N, et al. Diurnal Temperature Variation and Plants Drive Latitudinal Patterns in Seasonal Dynamics of Soil Microbial Community. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:674. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Ivancic T, Jamnik P, Stopar D. Cold shock CspA and CspB protein production during periodic temperature cycling in Escherichia coli. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:248. 10.1186/1756-0500-6-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Walther C, Zumbulte S, Faerber CM, Wierichs RJ, Meyer-Lueckel H, Conrads G, et al. Analysis of relative bacterial activity and lactate dehydrogenase gene expression of caries-associated bacteria in a site-specific natural biofilm: an ex vivo study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(6):3669–3679. 10.1007/s00784-020-03691-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG, Rickard AH, et al. Microbial characterization of biofilms in domestic drains and the establishment of stable biofilm microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(1):177–85. 10.1128/AEM.69.1.177-185.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Christie PJ. The Mosaic Type IV Secretion Systems. EcoSal Plus. 2016;7(1). 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0020-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Fuqua C, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:727–51. 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Camargo AP, Roux S, Schulz F, Babinski M, Xu Y, Hu B, et al. Identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(8):1303–1312. 10.1038/s41587-023-01953-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Barylski J, Kropinski AM, Alikhan NF, Adriaenssens EM, Ictv Report Consortium. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Herelleviridae. J Gen Virol. 2020;101(4):362–363. 10.1099/jgv.0.001392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Turner D, Adriaenssens EM, Amann RI, Bardy P, Bartlau N, Barylski J, et al. Summary of taxonomy changes ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) from the Bacterial Viruses Subcommittee, 2025. J Gen Virol. 2025;106(7). 10.1099/jgv.0.002111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Avellaneda-Franco L, Dahlman S, Barr JJ. The gut virome and the relevance of temperate phages in human health. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1241058. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1241058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Adriaenssens EM. Phage Diversity in the Human Gut Microbiome: a Taxonomist's Perspective. mSystems. 2021;6(4):e0079921. 10.1128/mSystems.00799-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Roux S, Camargo AP, Coutinho FH, Dabdoub SM, Dutilh BE, Nayfach S, et al. iPHoP: An integrated machine learning framework to maximize host prediction for metagenome-derived viruses of archaea and bacteria. PLoS Biol. 2023;21(4):e3002083. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Zhu Y, Shang J, Peng C, Sun Y. Phage family classification under Caudoviricetes: A review of current tools using the latest ICTV classification framework. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1032186. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1032186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Du S, Tong X, Lai ACK, Chan CK, Mason CE, Lee PKH. Highly host-linked viromes in the built environment possess habitat-dependent diversity and functions for potential virus-host coevolution. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2676. 10.1038/s41467-023-38400-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Barberan A, Dunn RR, Reich BJ, Pacifici K, Laber EB, Menninger HL, et al. The ecology of microscopic life in household dust. Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282(1814). 10.1098/rspb.2015.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Park JH, Lemons AR, Roseman J, Green BJ, Cox-Ganser JM. Bacterial community assemblages in classroom floor dust of 50 public schools in a large city: characterization using 16S rRNA sequences and associations with environmental factors. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):15. 10.1186/s40168-020-00954-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Hsu T, Joice R, Vallarino J, Abu-Ali G, Hartmann EM, Shafquat A, et al. Urban Transit System Microbial Communities Differ by Surface Type and Interaction with Humans and the Environment. mSystems. 2016;1(3). 10.1128/mSystems.00018-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Hospodsky D, Qian J, Nazaroff WW, Yamamoto N, Bibby K, Rismani-Yazdi H, et al. Human occupancy as a source of indoor airborne bacteria. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34867. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Meadow JF, Altrichter AE, Kembel SW, Kline J, Mhuireach G, Moriyama M, et al. Indoor airborne bacterial communities are influenced by ventilation, occupancy, and outdoor air source. Indoor Air. 2014;24(1):41–8. 10.1111/ina.12047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Bhattacharya D, Lutzoni F, Reeb V, Simon D, Nason J, Fernandez F. Widespread occurrence of spliceosomal introns in the rDNA genes of ascomycetes. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17(12):1971–84. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Tedersoo L, Lindahl B. Fungal identification biases in microbiome projects. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2016;8(5):774–779. 10.1111/1758-2229.12438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Adams RI, Miletto M, Taylor JW, Bruns TD. The diversity and distribution of fungi on residential surfaces. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78866 10.1371/journal.pone.0078866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Flores GE, Bates ST, Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Leff JW, Knight R, et al. Diversity, distribution and sources of bacteria in residential kitchens. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15(2):588–96. 10.1111/1462-2920.12036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Adams RI, Bateman AC, Bik HM, Meadow JF. Microbiota of the indoor environment: a meta-analysis. Microbiome. 2015;3:49. 10.1186/s40168-015-0108-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Valles-Colomer M, Blanco-Miguez A, Manghi P, Asnicar F, Dubois L, Golzato D, et al. The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes. Nature. 2023;614(7946):125–135. 10.1038/s41586-022-05620-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Rook GA. Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: an ecosystem service essential to health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(46):18360–7. 10.1073/pnas.1313731110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].von Hertzen L, Beutler B, Bienenstock J, Blaser M, Cani PD, Eriksson J, et al. Helsinki alert of biodiversity and health. Ann Med. 2015;47(3):218–25. 10.3109/07853890.2015.1010226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Comeau AM, Douglas GM, Langille MG. Microbiome Helper: a Custom and Streamlined Workflow for Microbiome Research. mSystems. 2017;2(1). 10.1128/mSystems.00127-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):852–857. 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Callahan BJ, Wong J, Heiner C, Oh S, Theriot CM, Gulati AS, et al. High-throughput amplicon sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene with single-nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(18):e103. 10.1093/nar/gkz569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6. 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson KH, Taylor AFS, May TW, Froslev TG, et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other eukaryotes: sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(D1):D791–D797. 10.1093/nar/gkad1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.7-1. 2025. 10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26(7):1641–50. 10.1093/molbev/msp077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Asnicar F, Weingart G, Tickle TL, Huttenhower C, Segata N. Compact graphical representation of phylogenetic data and metadata with GraPhlAn. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1029. 10.7717/peerj.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(18):2847–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–41. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].McIver LJ, Abu-Ali G, Franzosa EA, Schwager R, Morgan XC, Waldron L, et al. bioBakery: a meta'omic analysis environment. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(7):1235–1237. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, Zolfo M, Karcher N, Armanini F, et al. Extensive Unexplored Human Microbiome Diversity Revealed by Over 150,000 Genomes from Metagenomes Spanning Age, Geography, and Lifestyle. Cell. 2019;176(3):649–662.e20. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco-Miguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S, et al. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife. 2021;10. 10.7554/eLife.65088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1674–6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359. 10.7717/peerj.7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Asnicar F, Thomas AM, Beghini F, Mengoni C, Manara S, Manghi P, et al. Precise phylogenetic analysis of microbial isolates and genomes from metagenomes using PhyloPhlAn 3.0. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2500. 10.1038/s41467-020-16366-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Feng X, Cheng H, Portik D, Li H. Metagenome assembly of high-fidelity long reads with hifiasm-meta. Nat Methods. 2022;19(6):671–674. 10.1038/s41592-022-01478-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Wick RR, Holt KE. Polypolish: Short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18(1):e1009802. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Antipov D, Gurevich A. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(13):i142–i150. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Franzosa EA, McIver LJ, Rahnavard G, Thompson LR, Schirmer M, Weingart G, et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat Methods. 2018;15(11):962–968. 10.1038/s41592-018-0176-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Galperin MY, Vera Alvarez R, Karamycheva S, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Landsman D, et al. COG database update 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53(D1):D356–D363. 10.1093/nar/gkae983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Blanco-Miguez A, Beghini F, Cumbo F, McIver LJ, Thompson KN, Zolfo M, et al. Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(11):1633–1644. 10.1038/s41587-023-01688-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES