Skip to main content
Asian Journal of Andrology logoLink to Asian Journal of Andrology
. 2026 May 29;28(5):603–612. doi: 10.4103/aja2025114

Proteomic insights into azoospermia: protein differences in testicular tissue between non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia patients

Zhi Wang 1,2,3,*, Xiao-Dong Li 4,5,*, Wei-Min Shao 6, Dong-Xuan Zheng 7, Xiao-Qiang Xiang 3, Heng-Qing An 4,5,✉, Jian-Hua Yang 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13623337  PMID: 42210639

Abstract

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and obstructive azoospermia (OA) are the main classifications of severe male infertility, but the molecular mechanism of NOA remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers and pathological mechanisms by comparing the proteomic differences in testicular tissues of NOA and OA patients. Through proteomic analysis based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of testicular samples from 5 NOA patients and 5 OA patients, we identified 5264 proteins, among which 717 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were found between the two groups (242 upregulated and 475 downregulated in NOA). Bioinformatics analysis indicated that these DEPs were significantly associated with reproductive development, gametogenesis, and cell structural stability. On the basis of this, six candidate proteins, including dysferlin (DYSF), myoferlin (MYOF), mitsugumin 53 (MG53), cluster of differentiation 63 (CD63), caveolin-3 (CAV3), and calpain-3 (CAPN3), were selected from the DEPs and verified in an expanded sample set (37 NOA cases and 28 OA cases) through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blot, confirming their dysregulation in NOA. These findings provide new proteomic insights into NOA, highlighting the disruption of membrane repair and structural pathways, and offer potential biomarkers for understanding its pathogenesis.

Keywords: biomarkers, differentially expressed proteins, non-obstructive azoospermia, obstructive azoospermia, proteomics

INTRODUCTION

Azoospermia, the most severe form of male infertility, is classified into non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and obstructive azoospermia (OA).1 Worldwide statistics indicate that approximately 15% couples of reproductive age experience infertility, and male factors account for more than half of these cases, a proportion that is increasing.2 NOA typically results from defects in spermatogenic cell development or testicular dysfunction and accounts for 60%–80% of azoospermia cases. Conversely, OA stems from structural blockages in the reproductive tract, which resulted in the absence of spermatozoa and spermatogonia in the semen and post-ejaculation urine.3 While OA patients can often be treated with methods such as microdissection or testicular sperm extraction,4 the lack of clear pathological mechanisms for NOA complicates the development of effective treatments.5,6 Investigating the molecular mechanisms of NOA is crucial for identifying diagnostics targets, with proteomics serving as a potent tool for analyzing biomarkers and elucidating potential pathogenic mechanisms in these two main forms of azoospermia.

Proteomics, which uses high-throughput analysis techniques, comprehensively investigates the differential protein expression linked to azoospermia, thereby elucidating its role in spermatogenesis.7 The current research indicates that numerous proteins are crucial in spermatogenesis, maturation, and function.8 In azoospermic patients, the expression of these proteins may be significantly altered.9 Compared with seminal plasma proteomics, testicular tissue proteomics offers superior insights into early spermatogenic damage and holds more substantial potential for azoospermia research.8 Consequently, by analyzing the protein profile differences between NOA and OA patients, specific biomarkers for NOA can be identified.

This study explores the protein differences between NOA and OA through proteomic analysis. Initially, we collected testicular tissue samples from patients diagnosed with two types of azoospermia, conducted analyses of serum hormones and tissue pathology, and then employed proteomic analysis. This was followed by a bioinformatics analysis of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). We screened out DEPs with P < 0.05, carried out relevant literature research, and finally selected six DEPs. These selected DEPs were confirmed through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blot techniques. This research is expected to provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying NOA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients and clinical samples

A total of 42 patients with NOA and 33 with OA were recruited from August 2024 to March 2025 from The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Urumqi, China). Among patients diagnosed with NOA, spermatogenic arrest constituted 64.3% of cases, while Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS) accounted for the remaining 35.7%. The participants underwent serum hormone measuring and open testicular biopsy. Patients with genetic abnormalities, inflammatory conditions of the reproductive system, varicocele, or testicular torsion were excluded. There were no statistically significant differences in age (P = 0.4416) or body mass index (BMI; P = 0.9161) between the groups. Prior to biopsy, a definitive diagnosis of azoospermia was confirmed through semen analysis performed at least three times, demonstrating the absence of spermatozoa in two consecutive ejaculates. The semen analysis adhered to the 5th edition of the World Health Organization manual (normal semen concentration ≥15 × 106 ml−1).10 NOA patients underwent testicular biopsy after at least two semen analyses confirmed the absence of spermatozoa. This study received approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Urumqi, China; Ethics Approval No. K202408-07). Written informed consent for the surgery, biopsy, and further investigation was obtained from all participants, which included permission to publish the anonymized data.

Testicular tissue procurement and processing were performed as follows. During the biopsy procedure, an incision was made in the tunica albuginea, and a small portion of protruding testicular parenchyma was excised with surgical microscissors. Half of the tissue was subsequently immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C, whereas the other half was fixed in 10% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). All diagnoses were made according to the WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation, Diagnosis, and Management of the Infertile Male.11 The basic parameters of the patients included in the study are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Basic parameters of the NOA and OA patients

Characteristic NOA (n=42) OA (n=33) a P
Age (year) 33.2±5.0 34.1±5.0 0.4416
BMI (kg m−2) 26.0±4.4 25.9±3.6 0.9161
TV (left), ml 8.909±6.001 17.488±6.577 <0.05
TV (right), ml 10.141±6.748 18.391±7.835 <0.05

The values are presented as the mean±s.d. TV: testis volume; NOA: non-obstructive azoospermia; OA: obstructive azoospermia; BMI: body mass index; s.d.: standard deviation

Chemicals and reagents

Antibodies against dysferlin (DYSF; monoclonal, rabbit, A19572, 1:1000), myoferlin (MYOF; polyclonal, rabbit, A15427, 1:1000), cluster of differentiation 63 (CD63; polyclonal, rabbit, A5271, 1:300), caveolin-3 (CAV3; monoclonal, rabbit, A4891, 1:1000), and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG; rabbit, As014, 1:5000) were obtained from Wuhan Abotech Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Antibodies against calpain 3 (CAPN3; polyclonal, rabbit, 10492-1-AP, 1:1000) and cluster of differentiation 63 (CD63; polyclonal, rabbit, 22151-1-AP, 1:6000) were obtained from Wuhan Sanying Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The antibody against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; polyclonal, rabbit, 10494-1-AP, 1:10 000) was purchased from Proteintech Group, Inc. (Manchester, UK). The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein detection kit was supplied by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST), transfer buffer (pH 8.4), and electrophoresis buffer (pH 8.4) were purchased from Servicebio (Wuhan, China). The complementary DNA (cDNA) reverse transcription kit and TRIzol reagent were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (batch No. 91258333 and 98597501); the qRT-PCR kits were provided by Nanjing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China; batch No. 027E2260IA). Other reagents and supplies were acquired from Biosharp (Shanghai, China).

Serum hormone assay (reproductive hormone test)

Between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., 4 ml of fasting venous blood was collected from the cubital vein, allowed to stand for 1 h, and then centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min using a Sorvall ST 16R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The supernatants were harvested, and the levels of serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), and estrogen (E2) were analyzed via a fully automated, high-efficiency microparticle chemiluminescent immunoassay analyzer with reagents provided by Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL, USA).

Histological analysis

For H&E staining, fixed testicular tissue was collected and rinsed, followed by immersion in alcohol and a clear xylene wash. The samples were immersed in wax within a culture dish and then cooled and solidified to form wax blocks. The paraffin blocks were sliced into approximately 4-μm thick sections and stored at 4°C. The paraffin sections were treated with xylene, anhydrous ethanols, graded ethanol, and distilled water for dewaxing and hydration. The mitochondria and nuclei were subsequently stained with hematoxylin staining solution and 1% hydrochloric acid – methanol, followed by thorough washing with running water. The sections were placed in eosin stain for cytoplasmic staining, washed and processed through graded ethanol and xylene, and finally sealed with neutral gum. Quantitative histological assessment was performed on H&E-stained sections. The number of spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes, and round/elongated spermatids per seminiferous tubule cross-section was manually counted. Only tubules with nearly circular cross-sections were assessed to minimize counting bias. A minimum of 100 such tubular cross-sections were evaluated for each sample by two independent observers blinded to the group assignment.

Proteomic analysis and bioinformatics of testis

For proteomic analysis, we selected five NOA and five OA samples from the total cohort of 42 NOA and 33 OA patients. Baseline characteristics of these NOA patients were as follows: age (range: 26–37 years; mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]: 31.4 ± 4.9 years); BMI (range: 20–27 kg m−2; mean ± s.d.: 21.4 ± 3.0 kg m−2); left testicular volume range: 5.15–11.96 ml; mean ± s.d.: 7.994 ± 2.588 ml); and right testicular volume (range: 4.12–9.29 ml; mean ± s.d.: 6.034 ± 2.026 ml). Regarding the etiological classification, five cases of idiopathic NOA were included. All patients were histologically confirmed by testicular biopsy to have either spermatogenic arrest or SCOS, and none had received prior hormone therapy or surgical intervention. Testicular tissue samples from each five NOA and OA patients were homogenized in liquid nitrogen, lysed, and sonicated. Two groups were selected based on matched baseline characteristics (such as age and BMI) to minimize confounding factors. Samples were sonicated on ice using a VCX750 ultrasonic cell disruptor with a microtip (Sonics & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA), operating at 200 W, with a protocol of 5 bursts of 10 s each and 30 s of cooling between bursts to prevent overheating. After centrifugation at 12 000g for 10 min at 4°C using a Thermo high-speed refrigerated centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific), supernatants were collected, and protein concentrations were quantified via bicinchoninic acid (BCA). For liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), proteins were reduced (10 mmol l−1 dithiothreitol [DTT], 37°C), alkylated (20 mmol l−1 iodoacetamide, dark), digested with trypsin (50 ng μl−1, 1:50 ratio, 37°C, overnight), and desalted using C18 columns. Peptides were separated on a C18 analytical column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a 91-min gradient (5%–35% Buffer B: 0.1% formic acid and 84% acetonitrile) at 300 nl min−1. Mass spectrometry (Q Exactive, Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated in positive ion mode with data-dependent top 20 HCD fragmentation (300–1800 m z−1). Raw data were processed via MaxQuant software (version 1.6.14; Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany) to identify DEPs (P < 0.05, fold change [FC] ≥1.5). Bioinformatics analyses included domain annotation using InterProScan (EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, UK), Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment (adjusted P < 0.05) based on the GO and KEGG databases. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was performed using the STRING database (https://string-db.org/, last accessed on 2025 Feb 06) and Cytoscape software (The Cytoscape Consortium, San Diego, CA, USA). Key modules were extracted via Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE; score ≥20) for pathway mapping. Detailed methodology is described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

RT-qPCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from testicular tissue using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quality and concentration of total RNA were assessed in a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by reverse transcription into cDNA with the Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cDNA was then amplified by the Quant Studio 1 Plus quantitative PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in combination with the 2× Universal SYBR Green Fast qPCR Mix Kit (Abclonal, Wuhan, China). The qRT-PCR amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 34 s. The relative expression levels of target genes were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method and normalized to the expression of GAPDH in each sample. No reverse transcription controls were performed for all samples to exclude genomic DNA contamination. All primer sequences and RefSeq numbers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1 (Xinjiang Youkang Biological, Urumqi, China).

Supplementary Table 1.

Primers used for polymerase chain reaction amplification

Gene name Forward Primer Reverse Primer RefSeqs
homo-DYSF AAGAACAGCGTGAACCCTGTA CCTCTCGGAGTGGGACCTT NM_001130455.2
homo-MYOF TAATTGGCACGGCGACTGTAG GGAGATCAGCTTGTACGGCAG NM_013451.4
homo-CAV3 GACCCCAAGAACATTAACGAGG GGACAACAGACGGTAGCACC NM_001234.5
homo-CAPN3 GTCCTTAACACAGTCGTGAACA TGAGCGCAATCATGCTACGG NM_000070.3
homo-MG53 GAGGTGGATGTTGGCGACAA CCGAAGCTCAGGTAAAGGC NM_001008274.4
homo-CD63 CAGTGGTCATCATCGCAGTG ATCGAAGCAGTGTGGTTGTTT NM_001257389.2
homo-GAPDH GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG NM_001256799.3

Western blot analysis

Testicular tissue protein extracts were prepared using a tissue lysis buffer composed of 98% radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer supplemented with 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and 1% phosphatase inhibitor (both from Solarbio, Beijing, China). Tissue homogenization was performed using a tissue disruptor (Servicebio). The homogenates were incubated at 4°C for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 20 390g for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected. Protein concentration was quantified by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal amounts of protein from each sample were mixed with protein loading buffer and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), thoroughly vortexed, and denatured at 100°C for 10 min. Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes under ice-bath conditions. The PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk in TBST for 2 h at room temperature, washed three times with TBST, and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. Following incubation, the membranes were washed three times with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, immunoreactive bands were visualized by Image Lab Chemiluminescence Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein expression levels were quantified in Quantity One software and normalized to GAPDH as an internal loading control.

Statistical analyses

In addition to the proteomics data, other experimental results were expressed as the mean ± s.d. Statistical analysis and visualization were conducted using GraphPad Prism software (version 9.0, GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA). For normally distributed data, mean ± s.d. was used with Student’s t-test; for skewed data, median (interquartile range [IQR]) was used with Mann–Whitney U test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Serum hormone measurement

Compared with the OA group, the NOA group exhibited elevated levels of LH and FSH (both P < 0.05), suggesting the dysregulation of hypothalamic–pituitary hormones; however, there was no significant difference in T and E2 levels between patients with NOA and OA (both P > 0.05; Figure 1a). Serum sex hormone assays confirmed the distinctions in serum sex hormones between patients with NOA and OA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Serum sex hormone levels and testicular pathology in NOA and OA patients. (a) Comparison of serum sex hormone levels between patients with NOA and OA. (b) Representative images of testicular tissue histopathology in NOA and OA groups using H&E staining; the red boxes indicate regions magnified 2 times. Statistical data are presented as mean ± s.d. **P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the NOA and OA groups (one-way ANOVA). NOA: non-obstructive azoospermia; OA: obstructive azoospermia; LH: luteinizing hormone; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; T: testosterone; E2: estradiol; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; s.d.: standard deviation; ANOVA: analysis of variance.

Morphological results

The results of testicular H&E staining indicated that spermatogenesis was absent in the NOA group, which was characterized by Sertoli cell proliferation and notable thickening of the basement membrane surrounding the seminiferous tubules. In contrast, the OA group exhibited preserved spermatogenesis, with various stages of spermatogenic cells and mature spermatozoa present within the seminiferous tubules (Figure 1b).

Identification and quantification of protein differences

We conducted a proteomic analysis of ten testicular tissue samples (five NOA and five OA) using label-free LC-MS/MS. A total of 5264 proteins were identified via mass spectrometry, as shown in Figure 2a and Supplementary Table 2. Additionally, Figure 2b shows a Venn diagram depicting the distribution of proteins identified among the intergroup samples.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Proteomic analysis of testicular tissues in NOA and OA. (a) Bar graph depicting protein identification and quantification. (b) Venn diagram illustrating the overlap of proteins identified in different groups. (c) Bar graph showing the number of upregulated and downregulated DEPs. (d) Volcano plot representing DEPs; the horizontal axis represents FC (log2 transformed) and the vertical axis represents the statistical significance (-log10[P-value]). (e) Hierarchical clustering analysis and heatmap of DEPs. Color scale indicates relative protein abundance (z-score). (f) Pie chart showing the predicted subcellular localization of DEPs. NOA: non-obstructive azoospermia; OA: obstructive azoospermia; DYSF: dysferlin; MYOF: myoferlin; FC: fold change; DEPs: differentially expressed proteins.

Supplementary Table 2.

Differentially Expressed Proteins

Protein Protein Name Gene Name Coverage NOA/OA t test P Up or down
O75923 Dysferlin DYSF 9.3 22.15101249 0.010068804 Up
Q3SY77 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 3A2 UGT3A2 24.7 12.51880217 6.6257E-06 Up
Q14643 Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1 ITPR1 8 8.481499028 0.00879053 Up
P09488 Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1 GSTM1 82.6 7.285687899 0.004220275 Up
P23946 Chymase CMA1 51.4 6.791698951 0.003837369 Up
P15088 Mast cell carboxypeptidase A CPA3 28.3 6.657346388 0.004276478 Up
P01911 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DRB1 beta chain HLA-DRB1 35.7 5.983847852 0.03158362 Up
Q7Z3B1 Neuronal growth regulator 1 NEGR1 32.8 5.892678186 0.017218306 Up
Q9HB40 Retinoid-inducible serine carboxypeptidase SCPEP1 21.7 5.729595314 0.003253053 Up
P46439 Glutathione S-transferase Mu 5 GSTM5 75.7 5.702837228 0.002589247 Up
Q12797 Aspartyl/asparaginyl beta-hydroxylase ASPH 22.7 5.124353738 2.99221E-05 Up
Q9NZM1 Myoferlin MYOF 14.1 4.571770403 0.002264913 Up
P22676 Calretinin CALB2 80.8 4.481827283 1.73016E-06 Up
P08311 Cathepsin G CTSG 47.8 4.379833436 0.003523685 Up
P14207 Folate receptor beta FOLR2 29.8 4.37855995 0.002764425 Up
P20231 Tryptase beta-2 TPSB2 27.3 4.361374734 0.009784155 Up
P48681 Nestin NES 11.4 4.287500318 0.000261988 Up
P10620 Microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 MGST1 43.2 4.279617156 0.000667954 Up
Q9BXN1 Asporin ASPN 34.7 4.196230005 0.004368449 Up
Q6UWT4 Uncharacterized protein C5orf46 C5orf46 21.8 4.18681138 0.001104344 Up
P51460 Insulin-like 3 INSL3 26 3.88785144 3.30159E-05 Up
P02511 Alpha-crystallin B chain CRYAB 45.7 3.798525099 0.000276849 Up
Q9UHJ6 Sedoheptulokinase SHPK 33.3 3.777412022 0.000131443 Up
Q9H9L3 Interferon-stimulated 20 kDa exonuclease-like 2 ISG20L2 3.4 3.7702778 0.002294245 Up
Q687X5 Metalloreductase STEAP4 STEAP4 42.5 3.759425715 0.000198349 Up
Q86VB7 Scavenger receptor cysteine-rich type 1 protein M130 CD163 20.3 3.733105285 0.006271017 Up
P04839 Cytochrome b-245 heavy chain CYBB 13 3.710081239 0.014292928 Up
Q58EX7 Puratrophin-1 PLEKHG4 2.6 3.701616623 0.000127726 Up
P11908 Ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase 2 PRPS2 73.3 3.658944609 0.000172048 Up
Q63HR2 Tensin-2 TNS2 14 3.613771175 0.018854769 Up
P31146 Coronin-1A CORO1A 20.6 3.559257766 0.001162247 Up
Q15493 Regucalcin RGN 26.1 3.506473228 0.031343924 Up
Q9P0K7 Ankycorbin RAI14 11.7 3.449502714 0.023774932 Up
Q14112 Nidogen-2 NID2 9.7 3.443019984 0.000911222 Up
O14684 Prostaglandin E synthase PTGES 19.1 3.43690149 0.003024627 Up
Q06278 Aldehyde oxidase AOX1 35.9 3.433445248 2.68816E-06 Up
P53634 Dipeptidyl peptidase 1 CTSC 32.2 3.409026631 0.000388894 Up
Q14956 Transmembrane glycoprotein NMB GPNMB 4.7 3.400708007 0.000242471 Up
P50135 Histamine N-methyltransferase HNMT 39.7 3.366728556 0.005507671 Up
P08519 Apolipoprotein (a) LPA 14 3.358814336 0.035720091 Up
Q15800 Methylsterol monooxygenase 1 MSMO1 12.6 3.323215251 0.000230279 Up
O14495 Phospholipid phosphatase 3 PLPP3 26.4 3.219758284 0.005170332 Up
P45381 Aspartoacylase ASPA 32.9 3.180089257 0.01136327 Up
Q5VZ89 DENN domain-containing protein 4C DENND4C 8.7 3.157977716 0.003161024 Up
P98172 Ephrin-B1 EFNB1 14.7 3.154315166 2.14255E-05 Up
Q01484 Ankyrin-2 ANK2 4.1 3.133729912 0.000441969 Up
Q7Z7G0 Target of Nesh-SH3 ABI3BP 11.6 3.132331918 0.044980516 Up
Q15293 Reticulocalbin-1 RCN1 57.7 3.10470093 0.000149217 Up
Q14141 Septin-6 SEPTIN6 56.5 3.098671689 0.002496972 Up
Q8WTV0 Scavenger receptor class B member 1 SCARB1 5.8 3.095731789 0.005601485 Up
Q8IVN8 Somatomedin-B and thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing protein SBSPON 30.7 3.089764808 0.00027588 Up
P42330 Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3 AKR1C3 64.1 3.062287766 0.01203855 Up
P31949 Protein S100-A11 S100A11 82.9 3.042828642 2.29093E-05 Up
Q96AQ6 Pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor-interacting protein 1 PBXIP1 30.9 3.026401485 0.000225749 Up
Q5JTB6 Placenta-specific protein 9 PLAC9 33 3.017086015 0.002854403 Up
Q9HBK9 Arsenite methyltransferase AS3MT 45.3 3.016134595 0.000569048 Up
A8MSI8 LYR motif-containing protein 9 LYRM9 24.4 2.995823532 0.02190614 Up
O60701 UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase UGDH 32.6 2.977827015 2.45419E-05 Up
P36269 Glutathione hydrolase 5 proenzyme GGT5 19.5 2.973561317 0.000129018 Up
P25391 Laminin subunit alpha-1 LAMA1 41.7 2.956419364 0.013935545 Up
P08962 CD63 antigen CD63 7.6 2.949590676 0.00038823 Up
Q15125 3-beta-hydroxysteroid-Delta (8), Delta (7)-isomerase EBP 16.5 2.933766589 6.17397E-05 Up
P20292 Arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein ALOX5AP 8.1 2.931124964 0.007373119 Up
P13611 Versican core protein VCAN 6.2 2.901304003 9.95848E-07 Up
P29966 Myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate MARCKS 19 2.878588584 0.009873774 Up
O76062 Delta (14)-sterol reductase TM7SF2 TM7SF2 13.4 2.866115828 0.000192659 Up
P55268 Laminin subunit beta-2 LAMB2 57.7 2.853536694 0.002182529 Up
O95340 Bifunctional 3-phosphoadenosine 5-phosphosulfate synthase 2 PAPSS2 46.9 2.847175191 0.00167524 Up
Q15738 Sterol-4-alpha-carboxylate 3-dehydrogenase, decarboxylating NSDHL 42.9 2.817465608 6.49053E-05 Up
P22694 cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit beta PRKACB 50.7 2.814683725 0.001877677 Up
P05543 Thyroxine-binding globulin SERPINA7 24.3 2.807433336 0.017395074 Up
Q15847 Adipogenesis regulatory factor ADIRF 78.9 2.797299258 0.008531109 Up
P05093 Steroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase CYP17A1 56.9 2.783178352 2.17584E-06 Up
O14756 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 6 HSD17B6 53.6 2.772198411 0.002784164 Up
Q03013 Glutathione S-transferase Mu 4 GSTM4 83.9 2.768296757 0.014783642 Up
P60903 Protein S100-A10 S100A10 35.1 2.763630542 0.001057702 Up
P51530 DNA replication ATP-dependent helicase/nuclease DNA2 DNA2 0.8 2.732870585 0.049842463 Up
O15217 Glutathione S-transferase A4 GSTA4 40.5 2.726197947 1.82021E-05 Up
Q15274 Nicotinate-nucleotide pyrophosphorylase [carboxylating] QPRT 27.3 2.726097737 6.51704E-05 Up
P07686 Beta-hexosaminidase subunit beta HEXB 24.5 2.719699126 1.62684E-06 Up
P28062 Proteasome subunit beta type-8 PSMB8 17.4 2.717171858 0.001894891 Up
P22897 Macrophage mannose receptor 1 MRC1 19.5 2.714457509 3.56698E-05 Up
Q14315 Filamin-C FLNC 12.7 2.710552651 0.034323402 Up
Q96IY4 Carboxypeptidase B2 CPB2 11.3 2.709193021 0.000543424 Up
P30711 Glutathione S-transferase theta-1 GSTT1 42.5 2.685344934 0.01748719 Up
P11047 Laminin subunit gamma-1 LAMC1 51.5 2.678821554 0.00395102 Up
Q9Y2S2 Lambda-crystallin homolog CRYL1 22.3 2.665185964 0.020938202 Up
O15230 Laminin subunit alpha-5 LAMA5 13.6 2.660073194 0.004276851 Up
Q8TDB4 Protein MGARP MGARP 21.7 2.655544215 0.009994312 Up
Q9UN36 Protein NDRG2 NDRG2 45 2.650188801 0.000576631 Up
Q9C0J1 N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 4 B3GNT4 4.5 2.631432354 0.000164217 Up
P20962 Parathymosin PTMS 22.5 2.630027689 0.000534848 Up
Q16850 Lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase CYP51A1 55.2 2.622345587 0.002604726 Up
P98082 Disabled homolog 2 DAB2 10.5 2.600314716 0.005334114 Up
P51857 Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member D1 AKR1D1 5.2 2.598021189 0.000545034 Up
Q9Y3Q0 N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase 2 NAALAD2 27.7 2.583736399 0.000317807 Up
P55899 IgG receptor FcRn large subunit p51 FCGRT 25.8 2.577977896 0.021136253 Up
P35555 Fibrillin-1 FBN1 43.7 2.571422897 2.37606E-06 Up
A0FGR8 Extended synaptotagmin-2 ESYT2 14.9 2.549231556 0.005023726 Up
Q7Z4H8 Protein O-glucosyltransferase 3 POGLUT3 19.5 2.540040205 0.013758225 Up
Q96DG6 Carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog CMBL 43.7 2.539935136 9.16998E-07 Up
Q96F85 CB1 cannabinoid receptor-interacting protein 1 CNRIP1 53.7 2.532583772 0.000524496 Up
Q15392 Delta (24)-sterol reductase DHCR24 48.6 2.528973835 0.004085548 Up
Q9H8H3 Putative methyltransferase-like protein 7A METTL7A 43 2.517484909 2.93458E-07 Up
O14558 Heat shock protein beta-6 HSPB6 91.9 2.502736614 0.003976763 Up
P21980 Protein-glutamine gamma-glutamyltransferase 2 TGM2 40.6 2.499870701 0.01160932 Up
P08138 Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 16 NGFR 20.4 2.498032659 0.0045797 Up
P47895 Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A3 ALDH1A3 48.8 2.486104299 0.001947793 Up
P01903 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DR alpha chain HLA-DRA 12.2 2.478933491 0.010748205 Up
Q7Z3C6 Autophagy-related protein 9A ATG9A 3.9 2.469010975 0.011772909 Up
P23141 Liver carboxylesterase 1 CES1 23.8 2.462986156 0.01283673 Up
P05090 Apolipoprotein D APOD 34.9 2.462106864 0.001189149 Up
Q04828 Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C1 AKR1C1 70.3 2.458094324 0.002133544 Up
Q9ULZ3 Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD PYCARD 13.3 2.456258384 0.00905741 Up
Q7L775 EPM2A-interacting protein 1 EPM2AIP1 23.4 2.445934714 7.91371E-05 Up
Q9UIJ7 GTP:AMP phosphotransferase AK3, mitochondrial AK3 69.6 2.444463741 3.80862E-05 Up
P05108 Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme, mitochondrial CYP11A1 61 2.442332136 4.50395E-05 Up
P08571 Monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 CD14 22.4 2.439328384 0.001971696 Up
P29622 Kallistatin SERPINA4 28.3 2.413232086 0.000290721 Up
Q9H6R3 Acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 3, mitochondrial ACSS3 11.7 2.412515084 0.00042797 Up
P07099 Epoxide hydrolase 1 EPHX1 69.2 2.40596147 7.3206E-08 Up
Q5SRE7 Phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain-containing protein 1 PHYHD1 24.4 2.405817675 0.002822638 Up
P49675 Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, mitochondrial STAR 39.3 2.403797509 0.006123882 Up
P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin B2M 37.8 2.402662167 0.004343873 Up
Q6UXB8 Peptidase inhibitor 16 PI16 7.3 2.40163004 0.015068072 Up
Q96T51 RUN and FYVE domain-containing protein 1 RUFY1 16.7 2.401216194 0.009120119 Up
O95865 N(G), N(G)-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 DDAH2 64.6 2.39845173 0.000845002 Up
Q9Y6K9 NF-kappa-B essential modulator IKBKG 16.2 2.384972825 0.01434853 Up
Q8N688 Beta-defensin 123 DEFB123 23.9 2.377874746 0.019543026 Up
O14498 Immunoglobulin superfamily containing leucine-rich repeat protein ISLR 14.5 2.37323361 0.001541033 Up
Q13449 Limbic system-associated membrane protein LSAMP 28.1 2.36927757 0.013556231 Up
P52789 Hexokinase-2 HK2 37.5 2.36880359 2.68961E-07 Up
P29590 Protein PML PML 20.4 2.3583807 0.000887604 Up
Q13228 Methanethiol oxidase SELENBP1 83.9 2.352370375 0.000668265 Up
Q9UBM7 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase DHCR7 16.2 2.349606108 2.93259E-05 Up
O00469 Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2 PLOD2 2.7 2.346144342 0.032111625 Up
P16444 Dipeptidase 1 DPEP1 63 2.34406104 0.001494447 Up
Q96C23 Galactose mutarotase GALM 59.9 2.337614703 0.006904346 Up
Q9UH62 Armadillo repeat-containing X-linked protein 3 ARMCX3 33.2 2.323494904 0.00221108 Up
P07355 Annexin A2 ANXA2 77 2.318347764 0.00033188 Up
Q08380 Galectin-3-binding protein LGALS3BP 37.6 2.312787746 0.000192185 Up
Q86TX2 Acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 1 ACOT1 65.8 2.312158301 0.00259344 Up
P06703 Protein S100-A6 S100A6 84.4 2.306723351 8.87406E-07 Up
P17900 Ganglioside GM2 activator GM2A 19.7 2.306689715 3.18003E-05 Up
Q9NT22 EMILIN-3 EMILIN3 13.7 2.302887715 0.026314708 Up
O95834 Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 2 EML2 27 2.296053199 0.006211069 Up
Q9UM47 Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3 NOTCH3 0.4 2.288626744 0.010614898 Up
P41218 Myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen MNDA 25.1 2.286624733 0.003187007 Up
P01714 Immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-19 IGLV3-19 8 2.285565859 0.000253755 Up
P08263 Glutathione S-transferase A1 GSTA1 71.6 2.278360551 2.97776E-05 Up
Q9UBG0 C-type mannose receptor 2 MRC2 23 2.276153708 0.000645949 Up
P10321 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, C alpha chain HLA-C 29 2.26529352 0.025731202 Up
O76070 Gamma-synuclein SNCG 29.9 2.256636274 0.041185901 Up
P06280 Alpha-galactosidase A GLA 22.1 2.256447304 0.000329584 Up
Q8N6C5 Immunoglobulin superfamily member 1 IGSF1 7.3 2.253202585 0.039771571 Up
P62834 Ras-related protein Rap-1A RAP1A 80.4 2.252573942 0.002405228 Up
P14384 Carboxypeptidase M CPM 18.5 2.25233927 0.000135339 Up
O00264 Membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 1 PGRMC1 62.1 2.251980851 0.000239605 Up
Q06187 Tyrosine-protein kinase BTK BTK 1.7 2.251755984 0.01087733 Up
Q96PE7 Methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase, mitochondrial MCEE 5.1 2.248283291 0.001081136 Up
Q9Y6K5 2-5-oligoadenylate synthase 3 OAS3 7 2.243646973 0.009528171 Up
O60568 Multifunctional procollagen lysine hydroxylase and glycosyltransferase LH3 PLOD3 18.7 2.241426263 0.013245266 Up
Q30154 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DR beta 5 chain HLA-DRB5 26.3 2.237669542 0.01187185 Up
Q01581 Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, cytoplasmic HMGCS1 26 2.235067377 0.002869843 Up
Q9NZ08 Endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1 ERAP1 24.5 2.234502886 0.006814031 Up
Q8N690 Beta-defensin 119 DEFB119 56 2.233702266 0.005424923 Up
Q13907 Isopentenyl-diphosphate Delta-isomerase 1 IDI1 44.1 2.229169784 2.18349E-05 Up
P05111 Inhibin alpha chain INHA 21.6 2.215042385 0.001623241 Up
Q9BVC6 Transmembrane protein 109 TMEM109 12.8 2.205507131 0.000500836 Up
Q13885 Tubulin beta-2A chain TUBB2A 51 2.203382511 0.001025919 Up
Q8N5I4 Dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member on chromosome X DHRSX 5.2 2.191556171 0.009960087 Up
Q96LZ7 Regulator of microtubule dynamics protein 2 RMDN2 15.9 2.189188221 0.008074223 Up
Q8IV08 5-3 exonuclease PLD3 PLD3 13.1 2.187147877 2.54066E-06 Up
O14907 Tax1-binding protein 3 TAX1BP3 39.5 2.184448158 1.90391E-05 Up
P00167 Cytochrome b5 CYB5A 49.3 2.183298305 3.82094E-05 Up
Q567U6 Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 93 CCDC93 13.2 2.176193076 0.025152597 Up
Q96DC8 Enoyl-CoA hydratase domain-containing protein 3, mitochondrial ECHDC3 35.6 2.174385368 0.000279549 Up
Q9P2B2 Prostaglandin F2 receptor negative regulator PTGFRN 18.2 2.169898067 0.002860972 Up
O94919 Endonuclease domain-containing 1 protein ENDOD1 20.6 2.164111327 0.00416032 Up
P04083 Annexin A1 ANXA1 72.5 2.153126125 0.002829872 Up
P84157 Matrix-remodeling-associated protein 7 MXRA7 34.8 2.1517992 8.27786E-05 Up
P09455 Retinol-binding protein 1 RBP1 84.4 2.149557547 6.85529E-05 Up
P10109 Adrenodoxin, mitochondrial FDX1 37.5 2.147812127 0.000574948 Up
P13796 Plastin-2 LCP1 63 2.143845807 0.00082712 Up
Q8N2G8 GH3 domain-containing protein GHDC 8.3 2.141999835 0.005844194 Up
P48059 LIM and senescent cell antigen-like-containing domain protein 1 LIMS1 54.2 2.141511597 0.000928089 Up
Q8NF91 Nesprin-1 SYNE1 4.9 2.139429462 0.001626654 Up
Q96S66 Chloride channel CLIC-like protein 1 CLCC1 15.1 2.137023557 2.72093E-05 Up
P17252 Protein kinase C alpha type PRKCA 29.2 2.133937515 5.25394E-05 Up
Q10589 Bone marrow stromal antigen 2 BST2 13.9 2.13078082 0.003299634 Up
Q9BQE5 Apolipoprotein L2 APOL2 13.1 2.129349182 0.001816201 Up
Q96AC1 Fermitin family homolog 2 FERMT2 46.6 2.124507736 0.000501717 Up
O75828 Carbonyl reductase [NADPH] 3 CBR3 37.2 2.120066847 0.002648797 Up
Q6NUK4 Receptor expression-enhancing protein 3 REEP3 14.5 2.113801441 0.044218604 Up
Q9BYF1 Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 ACE2 45.2 2.109494103 0.006631997 Up
A1X283 SH3 and PX domain-containing protein 2B SH3PXD2B 9.1 2.109125706 2.10787E-05 Up
O95479 GDH/6PGL endoplasmic bifunctional protein H6PD 42.5 2.10733377 0.000764414 Up
P52566 Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 ARHGDIB 53.2 2.107044674 0.004677214 Up
P02545 Prelamin-A/C LMNA 78.5 2.102308322 0.000208715 Up
Q07507 Dermatopontin DPT 50.7 2.101649817 0.030633703 Up
Q8TBC5 Zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 18 ZSCAN18 5.3 2.099426617 0.015502218 Up
P15291 Beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 1 B4GALT1 9.8 2.098127864 0.047764228 Up
Q9Y646 Carboxypeptidase Q CPQ 38.3 2.096349382 9.89222E-05 Up
O15162 Phospholipid scramblase 1 PLSCR1 9.4 2.09170715 0.000201543 Up
O14773 Tripeptidyl-peptidase 1 TPP1 30.6 2.089914013 0.0003027 Up
P30536 Translocator protein TSPO 9.5 2.089824597 0.002637516 Up
Q9UNH6 Sorting nexin-7 SNX7 16.3 2.083653165 0.000364453 Up
P17813 Endoglin ENG 30.7 2.083417813 0.00477215 Up
Q969X1 Protein lifeguard 3 TMBIM1 4.5 2.070490129 0.000571581 Up
Q6UX71 Plexin domain-containing protein 2 PLXDC2 8.9 2.070171372 0.000599733 Up
Q96FQ6 Protein S100-A16 S100A16 76.7 2.066940832 2.52776E-06 Up
Q15165 Serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 2 PON2 56.8 2.065882972 0.005348223 Up
P23470 Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase gamma PTPRG 5.6 2.060622413 0.013486364 Up
Q7Z2W4 Zinc finger CCCH-type antiviral protein 1 ZC3HAV1 11.1 2.059595016 0.003712838 Up
Q9HA72 Calcium homeostasis modulator protein 2 CALHM2 5.3 2.056105336 0.016581305 Up
P26447 Protein S100-A4 S100A4 36.6 2.054829393 0.012759466 Up
P49327 Fatty acid synthase FASN 46.3 2.048173466 1.2937E-06 Up
P35754 Glutaredoxin-1 GLRX 37.7 2.047984367 3.80049E-05 Up
Q5T3F8 CSC1-like protein 2 TMEM63B 5.6 2.04572023 0.01746895 Up
Q04760 Lactoylglutathione lyase GLO1 84.8 2.041396088 7.18081E-05 Up
P04792 Heat shock protein beta-1 HSPB1 84.9 2.037669582 0.001857901 Up
Q07954 Prolow-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 LRP1 18.5 2.03749488 0.000742918 Up
Q8WUP2 Filamin-binding LIM protein 1 FBLIM1 7 2.03588918 0.006047999 Up
Q9H2D6 TRIO and F-actin-binding protein TRIOBP 6.2 2.034573207 0.0103673 Up
P06865 Beta-hexosaminidase subunit alpha HEXA 32.5 2.034348284 3.28935E-05 Up
O75369 Filamin-B FLNB 63.7 2.033079665 0.00010003 Up
Q9Y5L3 Ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2 ENTPD2 30.9 2.030493326 0.027289881 Up
P07357 Complement component C8 alpha chain C8A 37.7 2.027820676 0.029644735 Up
O95302 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP9 FKBP9 21.9 2.027477013 0.024156301 Up
Q9BZG1 Ras-related protein Rab-34 RAB34 36.3 2.025791639 0.005459912 Up
Q16270 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 IGFBP7 29.4 2.025428917 1.15609E-05 Up
P14543 Nidogen-1 NID1 42.7 2.020529614 0.001260172 Up
O43175 D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase PHGDH 43.7 2.019293078 0.012347872 Up
A0A0C4DH31 Immunoglobulin heavy variable 1-18 IGHV1-18 23.9 2.017969035 0.007487443 Up
Q6PIU2 Neutral cholesterol ester hydrolase 1 NCEH1 10.5 2.009978535 0.005388546 Up
P61225 Ras-related protein Rap-2b RAP2B 31.1 2.009018025 0.015626115 Up
P62328 Thymosin beta-4 TMSB4X 88.6 2.009003529 2.6132E-05 Up
Q96NT0 Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 115 CCDC115 27.8 2.008922579 0.021884128 Up
Q09666 Neuroblast differentiation-associated protein AHNAK AHNAK 68.1 2.007028267 0.000596916 Up
Q96TA1 Protein Niban 2 NIBAN2 24.4 2.005036864 0.006355774 Up
Q9BSJ8 Extended synaptotagmin-1 ESYT1 31.5 2.004112351 0.000259808 Up
P09211 Glutathione S-transferase P GSTP1 69.5 2.001444737 0.000553715 Up
P16949 Stathmin STMN1 72.5 0.499491089 0.000158672 Down
Q13573 SNW domain-containing protein 1 SNW1 25.9 0.49948264 0.000848428 Down
P30566 Adenylosuccinate lyase ADSL 53.5 0.49859897 0.005171556 Down
Q16629 Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 7 SRSF7 28.6 0.498057419 0.00023949 Down
Q9C0J8 pre-mRNA 3 end processing protein WDR33 WDR33 5.3 0.497651341 0.007062596 Down
P41250 Glycine--tRNA ligase GARS1 43.3 0.496580682 4.78285E-05 Down
Q15717 ELAV-like protein 1 ELAVL1 38.3 0.496316339 3.87182E-05 Down
Q9UEW8 STE20/SPS1-related proline-alanine-rich protein kinase STK39 25.5 0.49616375 0.000583571 Down
P52594 Arf-GAP domain and FG repeat-containing protein 1 AGFG1 14.1 0.495963428 0.002489623 Down
O15355 Protein phosphatase 1G PPM1G 28.8 0.494744762 0.000940386 Down
O43427 Acidic fibroblast growth factor intracellular-binding protein FIBP 21.2 0.494609356 0.001041152 Down
Q15819 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 variant 2 UBE2V2 71.7 0.494212388 1.90409E-05 Down
Q9Y4E8 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 15 USP15 23.9 0.493615097 1.90516E-05 Down
P16402 Histone H1.3 H1-3 35.3 0.493508357 0.006666079 Down
Q9BV86 N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1 NTMT1 52.5 0.493425646 1.69963E-05 Down
P40818 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 8 USP8 14.8 0.492002849 0.001369846 Down
P29084 Transcription initiation factor IIE subunit beta GTF2E2 8.9 0.491675022 0.002190876 Down
P33121 Long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 ACSL1 37 0.4908907 7.13367E-05 Down
Q9NPJ3 Acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 13 ACOT13 62.1 0.490383979 8.4726E-05 Down
Q9GZP4 PITH domain-containing protein 1 PITHD1 63.5 0.490322465 0.000780089 Down
Q9UNZ2 NSFL1 cofactor p47 NSFL1C 65.7 0.489947689 0.000152628 Down
Q8TF09 Dynein light chain roadblock-type 2 DYNLRB2 60.4 0.48879374 0.000193145 Down
P40937 Replication factor C subunit 5 RFC5 7.9 0.4887073 0.001152819 Down
Q9H3K6 BolA-like protein 2 BOLA2B 80.2 0.487452539 0.000280417 Down
Q9HD15 Steroid receptor RNA activator 1 SRA1 24.6 0.487450569 0.001130535 Down
P13861 cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II-alpha regulatory subunit PRKAR2A 64.1 0.487291022 6.84148E-06 Down
Q9NSD9 Phenylalanine--tRNA ligase beta subunit FARSB 46.3 0.48661651 5.14828E-06 Down
O95347 Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 2 SMC2 10.6 0.486441754 0.008175888 Down
Q92615 La-related protein 4B LARP4B 5.7 0.486257738 0.004739077 Down
O95777 U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm8 LSM8 54.2 0.485765614 0.012552329 Down
O60884 DnaJ homolog subfamily A member 2 DNAJA2 48.1 0.4850164 0.000233156 Down
Q9BR61 Acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 6 ACBD6 29.1 0.484637996 8.05263E-05 Down
Q15046 Lysine--tRNA ligase KARS1 61.6 0.484491728 2.31573E-05 Down
P62312 U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm6 LSM6 56.2 0.484381488 0.002759072 Down
P55809 Succinyl-CoA: 3-ketoacid coenzyme A transferase 1, mitochondrial OXCT1 46.5 0.48205312 0.000141376 Down
Q01844 RNA-binding protein EWS EWSR1 15.1 0.480872582 5.29787E-06 Down
Q8IYB8 ATP-dependent RNA helicase SUPV3L1, mitochondrial SUPV3L1 16.2 0.480456381 0.000262402 Down
Q86TU7 Actin-histidine N-methyltransferase SETD3 27.8 0.48032471 0.000196012 Down
Q9H3G5 Probable serine carboxypeptidase CPVL CPVL 26.3 0.479864861 0.000324761 Down
Q8IZ07 Ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 13A ANKRD13A 7.5 0.478015305 0.002925762 Down
P41567 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 EIF1 77 0.477417946 0.010358368 Down
P36915 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein-like 1 GNL1 31.5 0.47682055 7.82222E-06 Down
O75886 Signal transducing adapter molecule 2 STAM2 13.1 0.476545713 3.18687E-05 Down
Q86Y56 Dynein axonemal assembly factor 5 DNAAF5 10.4 0.476544876 0.000854356 Down
P18583 Protein SON SON 9.1 0.476511669 0.000469974 Down
Q9NPQ8 Synembryn-A RIC8A 30.9 0.476364502 0.000575886 Down
O00422 Histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP18 SAP18 52.9 0.476189296 3.95782E-05 Down
Q13243 Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 5 SRSF5 25.4 0.475659938 5.7638E-06 Down
Q8IXT5 RNA-binding protein 12B RBM12B 3.3 0.474993261 0.00551334 Down
Q99567 Nuclear pore complex protein Nup88 NUP88 30.5 0.474931061 9.05437E-05 Down
O43813 Glutathione S-transferase LANCL1 LANCL1 52.4 0.474836665 1.13113E-05 Down
P53367 Arfaptin-1 ARFIP1 29.2 0.474328989 0.002163962 Down
Q8WUK0 Phosphatidylglycerophosphatase and protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1 PTPMT1 22.9 0.474270993 0.002100266 Down
Q9UJC3 Protein Hook homolog 1 HOOK1 13.9 0.473764396 0.014062054 Down
P46459 Vesicle-fusing ATPase NSF 58.7 0.473703735 1.45753E-05 Down
Q04323 UBX domain-containing protein 1 UBXN1 39.1 0.472394162 4.07635E-05 Down
Q9Y285 Phenylalanine--tRNA ligase alpha subunit FARSA 39.2 0.470795738 6.10441E-06 Down
O60264 SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily A member 5 SMARCA5 31.7 0.469152233 0.000179646 Down
Q9Y6C9 Mitochondrial carrier homolog 2 MTCH2 49.2 0.469101876 4.05319E-05 Down
P16333 Cytoplasmic protein NCK1 NCK1 26.3 0.468136474 0.008596153 Down
Q9BRK5 45 kDa calcium-binding protein SDF4 26 0.467951382 0.000507018 Down
A6NDG6 Glycerol-3-phosphate phosphatase PGP 48.3 0.467574211 0.000463735 Down
Q9Y2L1 Exosome complex exonuclease RRP44 DIS3 14.4 0.467427289 5.9731E-05 Down
Q8WXF7 Atlastin-1 ATL1 9.7 0.46691227 0.002618682 Down
Q8N7H5 RNA polymerase II-associated factor 1 homolog PAF1 7.2 0.466900839 0.000176737 Down
O60610 Protein diaphanous homolog 1 DIAPH 1 13 0.46668272 0.001150039 Down
P16219 Short-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial ACADS 50.5 0.466123011 0.001876422 Down
Q9UBE0 SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 1 SAE1 79.2 0.465048871 0.000446159 Down
P49427 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 R1 CDC34 9.3 0.463979014 0.019674188 Down
Q9Y4Y9 U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm5 LSM5 82.4 0.463603096 0.003100836 Down
P31689 DnaJ homolog subfamily A member 1 DNAJA1 59.2 0.463447936 3.03908E-05 Down
Q9P2X3 Protein IMPACT IMPACT 23.8 0.462451854 7.93802E-05 Down
Q9Y259 Choline/ethanolamine kinase CHKB 21.8 0.46151149 0.000120652 Down
Q8IUR0 Trafficking protein particle complex subunit 5 TRAPPC5 13.8 0.461051594 5.95011E-05 Down
Q9NV35 Nucleotide triphosphate diphosphatase NUDT15 NUDT15 22.6 0.460062891 0.000669945 Down
P11940 Polyadenylate-binding protein 1 PABPC1 67.6 0.459769186 1.52219E-05 Down
P40227 T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta CCT6A 71.2 0.459604806 7.52056E-05 Down
Q8N1F7 Nuclear pore complex protein Nup93 NUP93 47 0.458994463 2.28378E-05 Down
Q9UQ35 Serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2 SRRM2 11.3 0.458956143 9.12701E-05 Down
Q96N06 Spermatogenesis-associated protein 33 SPATA33 37.4 0.458756383 0.000319251 Down
Q13185 Chromobox protein homolog 3 CBX3 42.6 0.456828726 2.53431E-05 Down
Q9NR28 Diablo IAP-binding mitochondrial protein DIABLO 62.3 0.453568851 0.000118002 Down
P49750 YLP motif-containing protein 1 YLPM1 7.9 0.453470417 0.004369863 Down
Q5BJF6 Outer dense fiber protein 2 ODF2 21.6 0.451429632 0.005560371 Down
Q8IYB3 Serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 SRRM1 4.8 0.450781365 0.002060011 Down
P35658 Nuclear pore complex protein Nup214 NUP214 20.8 0.449811792 0.000914096 Down
Q9Y587 AP-4 complex subunit sigma-1 AP4S1 22.9 0.449483177 0.000149127 Down
P57105 Synaptojanin-2-binding protein SYNJ2BP 57.9 0.449100352 1.98128E-05 Down
Q96IW7 Vesicle-trafficking protein SEC22a SEC22A 3.3 0.448517306 0.008330977 Down
Q9NP58 ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 6 ABCB6 15.7 0.448113351 0.000231689 Down
O60684 Importin subunit alpha-7 KPNA6 29.5 0.447868802 0.000207246 Down
Q5RI15 Cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein COX20, mitochondrial COX20 22 0.445814422 0.02846798 Down
Q8IYS2 Uncharacterized protein KIAA2013 KIAA2013 8.5 0.444776095 0.002871166 Down
P17096 High mobility group protein HMG-I/HMG-Y HMGA1 37.4 0.443700418 0.014145836 Down
O60841 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B EIF5B 30.1 0.443392178 4.49976E-06 Down
Q96CW5 Gamma-tubulin complex component 3 TUBGCP3 29 0.443183658 0.009113094 Down
Q0VDG4 Secernin-3 SCRN3 2.6 0.442815721 0.036995413 Down
O95081 Arf-GAP domain and FG repeat-containing protein 2 AGFG2 2.5 0.441308773 0.003527605 Down
Q9H583 HEAT repeat-containing protein 1 HEATR1 5.1 0.440955746 0.004701934 Down
Q9Y3E0 Vesicle transport protein GOT1B GOLT1B 26.1 0.439322153 0.005125653 Down
Q9Y3I1 F-box only protein 7 FBXO7 18.8 0.436487747 0.038994597 Down
Q9HAU5 Regulator of nonsense transcripts 2 UPF2 12.3 0.43621937 0.006882007 Down
Q9Y277 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3 VDAC3 61.8 0.435970777 3.51393E-05 Down
Q8NHR9 Profilin-4 PFN4 20.2 0.435273028 0.025621013 Down
P61962 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 7 DCAF7 27.5 0.435191116 6.54035E-05 Down
Q8NEY8 Periphilin-1 PPHLN1 5.7 0.434895443 0.000217933 Down
Q96PK6 RNA-binding protein 14 RBM14 34.8 0.434505421 8.26789E-05 Down
Q9UK76 Jupiter microtubule associated homolog 1 JPT1 78.6 0.43284444 0.000277025 Down
Q9BTD8 RNA-binding protein 42 RBM42 5.8 0.432384149 5.08042E-05 Down
Q9BRP4 Proteasomal ATPase-associated factor 1 PAAF1 21.4 0.43172089 0.005986637 Down
Q8NG31 Kinetochore scaffold 1 KNL1 2 0.431182988 0.018290115 Down
Q71DI3 Histone H3.2 H3C13 58.8 0.430575872 0.000284478 Down
P78406 mRNA export factor RAE1 RAE1 65.2 0.428860882 0.000271559 Down
Q9Y570 Protein phosphatase methylesterase 1 PPME1 38.1 0.427756336 0.000194852 Down
P22492 Histone H1t H1-6 49.8 0.427738411 0.000250865 Down
P52597 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F HNRNPF 64.3 0.427199773 6.90867E-05 Down
Q07617 Sperm-associated antigen 1 SPAG1 15 0.426155805 0.009312983 Down
O15027 Protein transport protein Sec16A SEC16A 10.7 0.42597325 0.000504098 Down
P60510 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit PPP4C 27 0.424743135 0.003822054 Down
Q92598 Heat shock protein 105 kDa HSPH 1 52.2 0.423822247 0.000388846 Down
Q9Y6G9 Cytoplasmic dynein 1 light intermediate chain 1 DYNC1LI1 44.7 0.42368996 0.000633882 Down
Q8N163 Cell cycle and apoptosis regulator protein 2 CCAR2 39 0.423279805 6.56569E-05 Down
Q96I25 Splicing factor 45 RBM17 16.5 0.423102853 0.000797334 Down
P47224 Guanine nucleotide exchange factor MSS4 RABIF 29.3 0.422149862 0.031021626 Down
P18754 Regulator of chromosome condensation RCC1 43.9 0.420414342 4.34735E-05 Down
Q6IPR1 Electron transfer flavoprotein regulatory factor 1 ETFRF1 30 0.41984958 8.98162E-05 Down
P43246 DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 MSH2 22.9 0.419518428 0.000632401 Down
P49840 Glycogen synthase kinase-3 alpha GSK3A 20.7 0.418534487 0.012137556 Down
Q9UPU5 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 24 USP24 3.8 0.418425173 0.026220459 Down
Q9NTJ3 Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 4 SMC4 11.9 0.41781414 0.00153283 Down
Q15424 Scaffold attachment factor B1 SAFB 26.3 0.417353754 0.000308457 Down
Q13595 Transformer-2 protein homolog alpha TRA2A 22.7 0.415789511 0.000106986 Down
Q92797 Symplekin SYMPK 13.6 0.415602439 0.000376227 Down
Q96F86 Enhancer of mRNA-decapping protein 3 EDC3 8.1 0.415149441 0.000150686 Down
Q9H267 Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 33B VPS33B 16.5 0.41476727 0.014173918 Down
P52788 Spermine synthase SMS 43.2 0.414030546 0.000445505 Down
Q8WXF1 Paraspeckle component 1 PSPC1 31.5 0.413912884 0.000147182 Down
Q9Y4P3 Transducin beta-like protein 2 TBL2 51.9 0.41381574 9.04529E-05 Down
Q9Y530 ADP-ribose glycohydrolase OARD1 OARD1 55.9 0.412075846 0.011064635 Down
Q5TD97 Four and a half LIM domains protein 5 FHL5 49.6 0.411546618 0.001846944 Down
Q6P1J9 Parafibromin CDC73 18.3 0.411293389 0.00042838 Down
P29144 Tripeptidyl-peptidase 2 TPP2 40.7 0.411047424 7.5648E-05 Down
Q9Y371 Endophilin-B1 SH3GLB1 52.1 0.409061013 1.12285E-05 Down
Q9UBN7 Histone deacetylase 6 HDAC6 14 0.40881008 2.28629E-05 Down
P16401 Histone H1.5 H1-5 29.2 0.408617224 0.002495189 Down
Q9UII4 E3 ISG15--protein ligase HERC5 HERC5 27.1 0.408453299 0.000540607 Down
Q16563 Synaptophysin-like protein 1 SYPL1 27.8 0.408382433 0.000433978 Down
Q9UBU9 Nuclear RNA export factor 1 NXF1 21.3 0.408299887 0.003626649 Down
P53041 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 5 PPP5C 45.7 0.407249434 0.000126221 Down
P23381 Tryptophan--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic WARS1 45.6 0.406427178 1.39652E-05 Down
Q8WVY7 Ubiquitin-like domain-containing CTD phosphatase 1 UBLCP1 49.1 0.406145048 0.000115865 Down
Q9UPN7 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 1 PPP6R1 10.4 0.405418106 0.005750472 Down
O60271 C-Jun-amino-terminal kinase-interacting protein 4 SPAG9 28.2 0.404633436 3.33294E-08 Down
P49589 Cysteine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic CARS1 33.8 0.403898061 0.000388498 Down
P49368 T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma CCT3 67 0.403161303 1.50685E-05 Down
Q68CQ7 Glycosyltransferase 8 domain-containing protein 1 GLT8D1 16.2 0.402968832 0.003151998 Down
Q7L2E3 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX30 DHX30 16.9 0.400892196 0.001834938 Down
Q99615 DnaJ homolog subfamily C member 7 DNAJC7 31.6 0.400356917 0.002853159 Down
O60763 General vesicular transport factor p115 USO1 50.9 0.400350731 2.28067E-05 Down
Q9Y295 Developmentally-regulated GTP-binding protein 1 DRG1 32.2 0.39881203 1.28993E-05 Down
Q99598 Translin-associated protein X TSNAX 66.6 0.397707465 0.00018759 Down
P16455 Methylated-DNA--protein-cysteine methyltransferase MGMT 28.5 0.397586826 0.002915344 Down
Q9UQE7 Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 3 SMC3 50.7 0.397213021 0.000117099 Down
Q9BRJ7 Tudor-interacting repair regulator protein NUDT16L1 63.5 0.396859342 0.000669888 Down
Q9H0C8 Integrin-linked kinase-associated serine/threonine phosphatase 2C ILKAP 18.4 0.396683688 0.001761075 Down
P17987 T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha TCP1 74.6 0.396311084 5.50623E-06 Down
P31948 Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1 STIP1 67.4 0.396034073 0.000329834 Down
P61221 ATP-binding cassette sub-family E member 1 ABCE1 45.1 0.395594615 6.5106E-07 Down
P82979 SAP domain-containing ribonucleoprotein SARNP 42.4 0.394122422 9.51272E-05 Down
P50990 T-complex protein 1 subunit theta CCT8 82.1 0.393624254 6.70842E-06 Down
Q15435 Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 7 PPP1R7 58.9 0.393485303 4.97471E-05 Down
Q12996 Cleavage stimulation factor subunit 3 CSTF3 29.1 0.393400219 4.17121E-05 Down
Q96IV0 Peptide-N (4)-(N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminyl) asparagine amidase NGLY1 15.3 0.393172365 0.000170423 Down
Q9H910 Jupiter microtubule associated homolog 2 JPT2 29.5 0.390610532 0.006857749 Down
Q99832 T-complex protein 1 subunit eta CCT7 82.5 0.390348994 1.40512E-05 Down
Q6BCY4 NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 2 CYB5R2 69.9 0.390182511 0.000233873 Down
Q8TF05 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 regulatory subunit 1 PPP4R1 6.6 0.389813815 0.002487042 Down
O14737 Programmed cell death protein 5 PDCD5 61.6 0.388842858 0.000465812 Down
Q6IA69 Glutamine-dependent NAD(+) synthetase NADSYN1 17 0.387210238 0.012983034 Down
P50991 T-complex protein 1 subunit delta CCT4 72.5 0.387164078 2.66155E-05 Down
O60942 mRNA-capping enzyme RNGTT 5.7 0.386496734 0.000613236 Down
Q3SXM0 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 4-like protein 1 DCAF4L1 30.1 0.386208268 0.049479982 Down
Q96FZ2 Abasic site processing protein HMCES HMCES 20.9 0.384542706 0.001148648 Down
Q13618 Cullin-3 CUL3 49.1 0.38432817 1.86274E-05 Down
Q9P270 SLAIN motif-containing protein 2 SLAIN2 11.7 0.382837697 0.000816411 Down
Q9BSJ2 Gamma-tubulin complex component 2 TUBGCP2 32.3 0.382768939 4.13166E-05 Down
O75928 E3 SUMO-protein ligase PIAS2 PIAS2 5.5 0.38250814 0.000643013 Down
P21127 Cyclin-dependent kinase 11B CDK11B 14.7 0.382426375 9.70334E-05 Down
Q6UN15 Pre-mRNA 3-end-processing factor FIP1 FIP1L1 16.5 0.382369367 2.98042E-05 Down
Q96D96 Voltage-gated hydrogen channel 1 HVCN1 24.9 0.381470289 0.044046122 Down
Q15185 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 PTGES3 54.4 0.380231977 0.000142668 Down
O94829 Importin-13 IPO13 5.1 0.379923566 0.021903049 Down
Q9Y5B8 Nucleoside diphosphate kinase 7 NME7 18.1 0.378758354 0.002283413 Down
O75475 PC4 and SFRS1-interacting protein PSIP1 37 0.375345439 0.000109475 Down
Q14966 Zinc finger protein 638 ZNF638 8.9 0.375332524 7.38359E-05 Down
Q8N806 Putative E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR7 UBR7 9.2 0.375124543 0.005350465 Down
P43487 Ran-specific GTPase-activating protein RANBP1 68.7 0.374223081 8.35462E-05 Down
O14545 TRAF-type zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 TRAFD1 12 0.373666398 0.005152338 Down
Q01658 Protein Dr1 DR1 37.5 0.373199528 0.000330686 Down
Q9UKU0 Long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 6 ACSL6 36.9 0.370567494 0.000148664 Down
Q15386 Ubiquitin-protein ligase E3C UBE3C 18.8 0.369997809 0.000318821 Down
Q9NTJ4 Alpha-mannosidase 2C1 MAN2C1 18.4 0.369868382 5.80136E-05 Down
O75190 DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 6 DNAJB6 21.5 0.367790909 0.002729214 Down
P06746 DNA polymerase beta POLB 30.1 0.366984106 0.005369402 Down
P48643 T-complex protein 1 subunit epsilon CCT5 78.6 0.366763671 2.35593E-06 Down
Q9NXV6 CDKN2A-interacting protein CDKN2AIP 25 0.366386855 0.000182844 Down
Q86V81 THO complex subunit 4 ALYREF 46.7 0.366249608 5.45271E-05 Down
P30519 Heme oxygenase 2 HMOX2 65.8 0.366161352 2.42499E-05 Down
Q9HB71 Calcyclin-binding protein CACYBP 74.6 0.36489396 8.40862E-05 Down
Q8NBX0 Saccharopine dehydrogenase-like oxidoreductase SCCPDH 66.9 0.364776188 1.83142E-05 Down
P23258 Tubulin gamma-1 chain TUBG1 48.6 0.364630889 8.53438E-06 Down
P23921 Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase large subunit RRM1 13.5 0.364005741 0.007472791 Down
P51784 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 11 USP11 22 0.363882563 0.001499893 Down
Q15785 Mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM34 TOMM34 71.2 0.363874937 1.76524E-05 Down
O96019 Actin-like protein 6A ACTL6A 56.6 0.362860061 4.73625E-06 Down
Q6P2P2 Protein arginine N-methyltransferase 9 PRMT9 9.8 0.362800108 0.002061298 Down
Q9H9P8 L-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial L2HGDH 13.8 0.361852416 0.007143871 Down
P83916 Chromobox protein homolog 1 CBX1 34.6 0.361545502 0.001378869 Down
Q9Y5L0 Transportin-3 TNPO3 30.4 0.360681643 0.001643691 Down
P78371 T-complex protein 1 subunit beta CCT2 75.1 0.359619108 1.3882E-05 Down
Q13099 Intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog IFT88 17.2 0.359186094 0.006299303 Down
Q6JEL2 Kelch-like protein 10 KLHL10 23 0.359163835 0.029579751 Down
Q9UNX4 WD repeat-containing protein 3 WDR3 6.8 0.359025436 0.019893951 Down
Q9BPY3 Protein FAM118B FAM118B 8.5 0.356305801 0.002719425 Down
P51114 RNA-binding protein FXR1 FXR1 48.5 0.353534899 5.57111E-06 Down
Q8NHU6 Tudor domain-containing protein 7 TDRD7 16.9 0.352309038 0.01009721 Down
A6NHR9 Structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain-containing protein 1 SMCHD1 19.4 0.351691033 8.32637E-06 Down
Q05048 Cleavage stimulation factor subunit 1 CSTF1 29.5 0.348047088 0.001878489 Down
Q9BXF6 Rab11 family-interacting protein 5 RAB11FIP5 14.5 0.347596974 0.03268072 Down
O00410 Importin-5 IPO5 63.6 0.347553719 8.16274E-07 Down
Q9UGI8 Testin TES 59.9 0.346599076 0.000434806 Down
Q01469 Fatty acid-binding protein 5 FABP5 71.1 0.346173811 0.000208161 Down
Q96A08 Histone H2B type 1-A H2BC1 52.8 0.345364122 5.99485E-05 Down
Q9Y2Z0 Protein SGT1 homolog SUGT1 63.8 0.34067434 0.000196122 Down
Q9NVI1 Fanconi anemia group I protein FANCI 11.2 0.339603103 0.004671103 Down
Q9P2I0 Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor subunit 2 CPSF2 15.7 0.339182212 0.000555614 Down
Q9NWH9 SAFB-like transcription modulator SLTM 13.5 0.338972829 0.000549594 Down
Q9NRY5 Protein FAM114A2 FAM114A2 46.5 0.336907715 5.16099E-06 Down
P39748 Flap endonuclease 1 FEN1 31.1 0.336883896 0.008196008 Down
Q9BS86 Zona pellucida-binding protein 1 ZPBP 33.6 0.335743889 0.007764577 Down
O95473 Synaptogyrin-4 SYNGR4 9.8 0.333940439 0.033843904 Down
Q15631 Translin TSN 71.9 0.333042982 5.46083E-05 Down
Q8N9F7 Lysophospholipase D GDPD1 GDPD1 38.2 0.331213322 0.001675591 Down
Q8WW22 DnaJ homolog subfamily A member 4 DNAJA4 29.5 0.330231295 6.30042E-05 Down
Q9H9Q2 COP9 signalosome complex subunit 7b COPS7B 35.6 0.32863735 0.00047379 Down
Q96RL1 BRCA1-A complex subunit RAP80 UIMC1 13.2 0.328123736 0.007934527 Down
Q9P2K5 Myelin expression factor 2 MYEF2 35.2 0.327597117 1.13931E-05 Down
Q96HA9 Peroxisomal membrane protein 11C PEX11G 15.8 0.324578422 0.00311432 Down
Q9UNN5 FAS-associated factor 1 FAF1 14.6 0.323585881 1.41051E-05 Down
Q86WT1 Tetratricopeptide repeat protein 30A TTC30A 15.6 0.322956811 0.006431236 Down
P60520 Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor-associated protein-like 2 GABARAPL2 48.7 0.322395108 0.000165406 Down
Q9Y265 RuvB-like 1 RUVBL1 75.9 0.321748765 1.57355E-05 Down
Q08752 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase D PPID 56.2 0.318761555 0.005459018 Down
Q9Y217 Myotubularin-related protein 6 MTMR6 28.5 0.318518209 0.000451739 Down
Q58FF6 Putative heat shock protein HSP 90-beta 4 HSP90AB4P 11.7 0.318291349 0.009965339 Down
Q9Y4L1 Hypoxia up-regulated protein 1 HYOU1 50.2 0.312545107 2.22166E-05 Down
Q6PJT7 Zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 14 ZC3H14 20.2 0.309518309 0.00670567 Down
Q6X784 Zona pellucida-binding protein 2 ZPBP2 22.8 0.308533434 0.000409678 Down
O15084 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory ankyrin repeat subunit A ANKRD28 13.8 0.307268036 0.006581804 Down
Q6FI81 Anamorsin CIAPIN1 67.6 0.304302209 9.30556E-06 Down
O15479 Melanoma-associated antigen B2 MAGEB2 28.5 0.302748549 0.001852571 Down
P07900 Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha HSP90AA1 63.4 0.302670146 4.14959E-05 Down
Q9BV44 tRNA (guanine (6)-N2)-methyltransferase THUMP3 THUMPD3 26.2 0.30208967 2.5727E-06 Down
Q14C86 GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1 GAPVD1 19.4 0.301819783 9.73063E-05 Down
Q15102 Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase IB subunit alpha1 PAFAH1B3 70.1 0.301761078 0.003274367 Down
Q13619 Cullin-4A CUL4A 46.5 0.301316375 0.003194908 Down
Q9Y3B8 Oligoribonuclease, mitochondrial REXO2 34.6 0.300480568 0.001293145 Down
Q9NP61 ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein 3 ARFGAP3 18.8 0.297044436 0.00032937 Down
P49321 Nuclear autoantigenic sperm protein NASP 53.6 0.296239676 3.23854E-05 Down
P68431 Histone H3.1 H3C12 58.8 0.295619925 0.00029078 Down
Q99447 Ethanolamine-phosphate cytidylyltransferase PCYT2 36.2 0.294221422 6.43744E-05 Down
Q7Z2X7 P antigen family member 2 PAGE2 48.6 0.294178668 0.012980856 Down
P22090 40S ribosomal protein S4, Y isoform 1 RPS4Y1 42.6 0.294168813 0.000412985 Down
Q5JVF3 PCI domain-containing protein 2 PCID2 38.3 0.293956167 1.40065E-06 Down
Q5SRE5 Nucleoporin NUP188 NUP188 13.9 0.292468789 0.000601071 Down
P08174 Complement decay-accelerating factor CD55 26.5 0.291548563 0.045322254 Down
Q9Y266 Nuclear migration protein nudC NUDC 51.7 0.289316479 0.000135121 Down
Q5W111 SPRY domain-containing protein 7 SPRYD7 33.2 0.286630029 0.003682965 Down
O43291 Kunitz-type protease inhibitor 2 SPINT2 17.5 0.28585972 2.26014E-05 Down
Q96S59 Ran-binding protein 9 RANBP9 12.6 0.285806135 0.012813262 Down
Q8NEL9 Phospholipase DDHD1 DDHD1 11.2 0.2821922 0.004282644 Down
Q96RS6 NudC domain-containing protein 1 NUDCD1 25.2 0.281930198 0.001677238 Down
Q9BW83 Intraflagellar transport protein 27 homolog IFT27 44.6 0.280508886 3.65024E-05 Down
P58340 Myeloid leukemia factor 1 MLF1 15.3 0.27944123 0.000130747 Down
Q8TDY3 Actin-related protein T2 ACTRT2 21.8 0.277725757 0.026504197 Down
Q14257 Reticulocalbin-2 RCN2 61.2 0.275546712 0.000615076 Down
Q9Y230 RuvB-like 2 RUVBL2 73.9 0.275347519 3.60614E-06 Down
P55060 Exportin-2 CSE1L 60.1 0.274882715 4.50061E-05 Down
O00139 Kinesin-like protein KIF2A KIF2A 17.8 0.274207569 0.034353732 Down
Q9H4F8 SPARC-related modular calcium-binding protein 1 SMOC1 29.3 0.273961671 7.67541E-05 Down
O43924 Retinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit delta PDE6D 33.3 0.273093626 0.000105776 Down
P41236 Protein phosphatase inhibitor 2 PPP1R2 37.6 0.272930395 8.79823E-06 Down
Q9UBU8 Mortality factor 4-like protein 1 MORF4L1 39 0.271060539 0.018038315 Down
P34896 Serine hydroxymethyltransferase, cytosolic SHMT1 46.6 0.270974811 0.00012223 Down
Q9HB07 MYG1 exonuclease MYG1 38.8 0.270464329 7.68885E-05 Down
Q9BWU0 Kanadaptin SLC4A1AP 12.4 0.270325117 0.000675729 Down
Q6ZP01 RNA-binding protein 44 RBM44 15.5 0.268749184 0.000616262 Down
O75525 KH domain-containing, RNA-binding, signal transduction-associated protein 3 KHDRBS3 24 0.267662507 5.02622E-06 Down
Q9HCD5 Nuclear receptor coactivator 5 NCOA5 44.2 0.263495932 0.000991713 Down
Q6P2E9 Enhancer of mRNA-decapping protein 4 EDC4 28.7 0.263389813 0.000206495 Down
P49736 DNA replication licensing factor MCM2 MCM2 35 0.262439038 0.024010117 Down
Q9H6S0 3-5 RNA helicase YTHDC2 YTHDC2 17 0.262120223 9.99402E-07 Down
O76003 Glutaredoxin-3 GLRX3 54.3 0.261717071 3.39553E-05 Down
Q9NRP2 COX assembly mitochondrial protein 2 homolog CMC2 53.2 0.259003395 6.76039E-06 Down
Q9UKF6 Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor subunit 3 CPSF3 17.5 0.258842054 0.001226184 Down
P52701 DNA mismatch repair protein Msh6 MSH6 25 0.257172453 0.000397356 Down
Q6P996 Pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase domain-containing protein 1 PDXDC1 35.8 0.256454186 8.90901E-05 Down
O14929 Histone acetyltransferase type B catalytic subunit HAT1 11.7 0.256233336 0.000155219 Down
Q12926 ELAV-like protein 2 ELAVL2 25.3 0.254522797 0.005366316 Down
Q96ER3 Protein SAAL1 SAAL1 9.7 0.254113725 0.003671349 Down
Q86W34 Archaemetzincin-2 AMZ2 9.7 0.250733984 2.5728E-05 Down
P0DJD4 RNA-binding motif protein, Y chromosome, family 1 member C RBMY1C 30 0.25065812 0.030919587 Down
Q9HD26 Golgi-associated PDZ and coiled-coil motif-containing protein GOPC 37.7 0.250462117 6.71233E-05 Down
Q8WW43 Gamma-secretase subunit APH-1B APH 1B 7.8 0.249218459 1.10967E-05 Down
P12821 Angiotensin-converting enzyme ACE 15.9 0.248352167 7.35379E-05 Down
Q8WYA0 Intraflagellar transport protein 81 homolog IFT81 19.8 0.247510504 0.007531799 Down
Q12798 Centrin-1 CETN1 24.4 0.243329496 8.66879E-05 Down
Q9BYZ2 L-lactate dehydrogenase A-like 6B LDHAL6B 23.9 0.242406834 0.022485587 Down
Q7L8S5 OTU domain-containing protein 6A OTUD6A 37.2 0.242234275 0.001586538 Down
Q9NTM9 Copper homeostasis protein cutC homolog CUTC 46.5 0.241219895 0.00262825 Down
Q9H0L4 Cleavage stimulation factor subunit 2 tau variant CSTF2T 29.9 0.238838408 1.67218E-06 Down
Q8IX01 SURP and G-patch domain-containing protein 2 SUGP2 39.9 0.238726807 0.000193222 Down
Q7Z4H3 5-deoxynucleotidase HDDC2 HDDC2 80.4 0.238302592 0.000105534 Down
Q8TBP5 Membrane protein FAM174A FAM174A 4.7 0.238257468 0.000241223 Down
P59282 Tubulin polymerization-promoting protein family member 2 TPPP2 22.4 0.237255249 0.003280082 Down
Q96EP5 DAZ-associated protein 1 DAZAP1 36.4 0.236431879 2.28668E-06 Down
Q9BZE9 Tether containing UBX domain for GLUT4 ASPSCR1 25 0.235350101 5.81943E-05 Down
Q9UJT2 Testis-specific serine kinase substrate TSKS 28.9 0.234258199 0.006295102 Down
O00148 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX39A DDX39A 63.9 0.233222017 0.00542937 Down
Q5T8P6 RNA-binding protein 26 RBM26 12.3 0.232151873 0.000968347 Down
O95456 Proteasome assembly chaperone 1 PSMG1 51.7 0.231965364 3.12612E-05 Down
Q9NXZ2 Probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX43 DDX43 27.8 0.231719453 0.012103066 Down
P29803 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, testis-specific form, mitochondrial PDHA2 28.6 0.228859628 0.000154751 Down
Q8IYF3 Testis-expressed protein 11 TEX11 14.9 0.223694275 0.005973299 Down
Q01534 Testis-specific Y-encoded protein 1 TSPY1 20.5 0.222527876 0.001695804 Down
O94788 Retinal dehydrogenase 2 ALDH1A2 42.1 0.22228691 0.01488603 Down
P26583 High mobility group protein B2 HMGB2 37.3 0.221333758 3.1935E-05 Down
Q5QJ74 Tubulin-specific chaperone cofactor E-like protein TBCEL 27.1 0.221269535 1.74217E-05 Down
Q5T160 Probable arginine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial RARS2 25.4 0.220912106 0.000675141 Down
Q53H82 Endoribonuclease LACTB2 LACTB2 58 0.220646924 6.83956E-06 Down
P22681 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL CBL 17.2 0.21540205 0.000234835 Down
Q8IYS8 Biorientation of chromosomes in cell division protein 1-like 2 BOD1L2 32.6 0.208856806 0.000138992 Down
P51157 Ras-related protein Rab-28 RAB28 27.6 0.208587327 0.000123183 Down
Q13439 Golgin subfamily A member 4 GOLGA4 12.4 0.207833352 0.000670746 Down
P16989 Y-box-binding protein 3 YBX3 43.5 0.207502541 1.55363E-05 Down
Q9UJ98 Cohesin subunit SA-3 STAG3 12.7 0.200341036 0.033087297 Down
Q96G97 Seipin BSCL2 14.6 0.198851975 0.001889958 Down
Q969U7 Proteasome assembly chaperone 2 PSMG2 30.3 0.19783139 0.000123756 Down
P38432 Coilin COIL 11.6 0.195813414 1.51471E-05 Down
P11388 DNA topoisomerase 2-alpha TOP2A 48.4 0.195237171 0.000217213 Down
Q8IWB6 Inactive serine/threonine-protein kinase TEX14 TEX14 16 0.194613723 0.014556939 Down
Q86VY4 Testis-specific Y-encoded-like protein 5 TSPYL5 48.4 0.193537196 0.000509055 Down
P36969 Phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase GPX4 53.8 0.192889493 1.473E-05 Down
Q99417 c-Myc-binding protein MYCBP 73.8 0.190980962 4.79706E-06 Down
Q9UJ83 2-hydroxyacyl-CoA lyase 1 HACL1 31.1 0.190482465 0.001578318 Down
P22732 Solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 5 SLC2A5 8.2 0.188850997 0.004979908 Down
Q9BXT4 Tudor domain-containing protein 1 TDRD1 12.5 0.186467962 0.008240926 Down
Q86VQ6 Thioredoxin reductase 3 TXNRD3 14.3 0.186132393 0.001928466 Down
O75602 Sperm-associated antigen 6 SPAG6 27.9 0.185449729 0.003727954 Down
Q96M93 Adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 ADAD1 31.8 0.1849367 9.16556E-05 Down
P07311 Acylphosphatase-1 ACYP1 67.7 0.184166769 4.30942E-06 Down
Q9NX58 Cell growth-regulating nucleolar protein LYAR 35.4 0.183644209 3.0121E-05 Down
Q8TC59 Piwi-like protein 2 PIWIL2 39.6 0.18353431 0.011463061 Down
P43358 Melanoma-associated antigen 4 MAGEA4 36.3 0.180181224 0.006411925 Down
O95749 Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase GGPS1 19 0.180127729 0.005571598 Down
Q02539 Histone H1.1 H1-1 43.3 0.179275703 0.000757662 Down
Q96QG7 Myotubularin-related protein 9 MTMR9 30.1 0.177349454 0.000863179 Down
Q9NT62 Ubiquitin-like-conjugating enzyme ATG3 ATG3 36.9 0.17397001 0.000192648 Down
Q02790 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP4 FKBP4 76.9 0.172467548 3.49987E-05 Down
P51854 Transketolase-like protein 1 TKTL1 74.5 0.170795111 0.00027854 Down
P52292 Importin subunit alpha-1 KPNA2 54.4 0.169574072 6.68963E-05 Down
O95757 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4L HSPA4L 75.4 0.167756354 2.1699E-06 Down
Q9UG01 Intraflagellar transport protein 172 homolog IFT172 15.6 0.167269543 0.000481112 Down
Q9NZL4 Hsp70-binding protein 1 HSPBP1 25.9 0.167159062 2.30489E-06 Down
Q9NU22 Midasin MDN1 9.7 0.161861268 0.000115977 Down
Q14566 DNA replication licensing factor MCM6 MCM6 34 0.160410349 0.000725784 Down
Q8NEZ3 WD repeat-containing protein 19 WDR19 17.4 0.159937479 0.005124219 Down
P30154 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 65 kDa regulatory subunit A beta isoform PPP2R1B 46.9 0.158769494 0.000613386 Down
O43432 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 EIF4G3 16.9 0.157455968 0.000532645 Down
Q86X27 Ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS2 RALGPS2 29.7 0.156785479 0.001108182 Down
Q6NXR0 Interferon-inducible GTPase 5 IRGC 31.7 0.155653231 0.000640226 Down
Q14997 Proteasome activator complex subunit 4 PSME4 18.1 0.155393666 4.10949E-06 Down
Q8IY45 Protein AMN1 homolog AMN1 27.5 0.152665144 3.63113E-05 Down
Q9HBV2 Sperm acrosome membrane-associated protein 1 SPACA1 23.8 0.152582283 2.53304E-06 Down
Q8IVD9 NudC domain-containing protein 3 NUDCD3 32.4 0.150971293 0.001275078 Down
Q9UHL0 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX25 DDX25 24 0.148743382 0.009178572 Down
Q8TAA3 Proteasome subunit alpha-type 8 PSMA8 52 0.148287333 0.000343316 Down
Q86YB8 ERO1-like protein beta ERO1B 21 0.142724964 0.00179529 Down
Q9NZW5 Protein PALS2 PALS2 37.6 0.141827596 0.000273506 Down
Q9BXU1 Serine/threonine-protein kinase 31 STK31 57.4 0.139980957 0.00026899 Down
Q5JQC4 Cancer/testis antigen 47A CT47A12 28.5 0.138041739 0.02629752 Down
Q9HBG6 Intraflagellar transport protein 122 homolog IFT122 31.9 0.135832886 0.000668641 Down
Q9UKA9 Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 2 PTBP2 52 0.133785651 0.000247815 Down
Q9BVM2 Protein DPCD DPCD 55.7 0.133737904 0.000297606 Down
Q9HAV4 Exportin-5 XPO5 22.8 0.130958636 8.95771E-06 Down
Q9UI38 Probable threonine protease PRSS50 PRSS50 24.4 0.130104727 0.001343991 Down
Q9BTE6 Alanyl-tRNA editing protein Aarsd1 AARSD1 51.2 0.129547571 0.002555728 Down
Q9H9A5 CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 10 CNOT10 12.2 0.128899158 0.000179706 Down
O43379 WD repeat-containing protein 62 WDR62 24.6 0.128757461 0.00325907 Down
Q9NQI0 Probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX4 DDX4 54.8 0.128154751 5.65704E-06 Down
Q14676 Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 MDC1 16.1 0.12783743 9.2104E-05 Down
Q8TEX9 Importin-4 IPO4 34.8 0.127827888 0.000103567 Down
P25205 DNA replication licensing factor MCM3 MCM3 39.2 0.125998937 2.82878E-05 Down
O00519 Fatty-acid amide hydrolase 1 FAAH 28.5 0.125956733 0.000982134 Down
P0DPH 7 Tubulin alpha-3C chain TUBA3C 70.4 0.12585703 0.00190099 Down
Q14669 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIP12 TRIP12 15.7 0.125404079 6.06622E-05 Down
Q99543 DnaJ homolog subfamily C member 2 DNAJC2 25.9 0.123319798 0.0001146 Down
P57678 Gem-associated protein 4 GEMIN4 12.9 0.121238983 0.010462678 Down
Q15645 Pachytene checkpoint protein 2 homolog TRIP13 53 0.118948796 5.25452E-05 Down
Q9NQ48 Leucine zipper transcription factor-like protein 1 LZTFL1 59.9 0.118703722 1.70505E-05 Down
Q15506 Sperm surface protein Sp17 SPA17 58.9 0.117925561 0.000215012 Down
Q13416 Origin recognition complex subunit 2 ORC2 9 0.116141304 0.004585538 Down
Q9UHD1 Cysteine and histidine-rich domain-containing protein 1 CHORDC1 47.9 0.115728777 0.000131359 Down
Q9H892 Tetratricopeptide repeat protein 12 TTC12 20 0.115212867 0.002007926 Down
Q7L266 Isoaspartyl peptidase/L-asparaginase ASRGL1 53.9 0.113312495 0.001653855 Down
P33992 DNA replication licensing factor MCM5 MCM5 33 0.109440832 0.000628039 Down
O43805 Microtubule nucleation factor SSNA1 SSNA1 55.5 0.109236745 0.003754853 Down
Q9NQ86 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM36 TRIM36 34.9 0.107908768 0.000341585 Down
Q5RHP9 Glutamate-rich protein 3 ERICH3 13.1 0.107844065 0.001594893 Down
P54652 Heat shock-related 70 kDa protein 2 HSPA2 82.5 0.106510489 1.68723E-06 Down
Q96RL7 Intermembrane lipid transfer protein VPS13A VPS13A 27.9 0.105606874 2.91425E-05 Down
P33991 DNA replication licensing factor MCM4 MCM4 30.8 0.104852818 6.54176E-05 Down
Q5TGJ6 Hepatoma-derived growth factor-like protein 1 HDGFL1 20.3 0.104705627 0.000110035 Down
P07864 L-lactate dehydrogenase C chain LDHC 75.3 0.104449403 7.5415E-05 Down
Q96IC2 RNA exonuclease 5 REXO5 32.4 0.104043398 0.008532066 Down
Q96LB3 Intraflagellar transport protein 74 homolog IFT74 35.2 0.103523865 0.00073919 Down
Q0VDF9 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 14 HSPA14 53.2 0.101979582 1.64115E-05 Down
A3KN83 Protein strawberry notch homolog 1 SBNO1 18.9 0.10110776 0.002146545 Down
Q99986 Serine/threonine-protein kinase VRK1 VRK1 35.6 0.100067615 3.64907E-05 Down
Q92526 T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta-2 CCT6B 56 0.098598337 2.12163E-05 Down
Q01813 ATP-dependent 6-phosphofructokinase, platelet type PFKP 46.8 0.098232272 1.18992E-05 Down
Q3V6T2 Girdin CCDC88A 14.3 0.097209737 0.001339317 Down
Q9BY14 Testis-expressed protein 101 TEX101 29.3 0.096876382 0.000203199 Down
Q8N9W5 Dynein axonemal assembly factor 3 DNAAF3 20.3 0.096862852 0.02086332 Down
Q99965 Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 2 ADAM2 29.3 0.096398668 2.88995E-05 Down
O14556 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, testis-specific GAPDHS 50.2 0.095675497 0.003175785 Down
Q6ZNB6 NF-X1-type zinc finger protein NFXL1 NFXL1 25.8 0.094640452 0.002204154 Down
Q9HCN8 Stromal cell-derived factor 2-like protein 1 SDF2L1 43.4 0.094369175 0.00024962 Down
Q9H0I9 Transketolase-like protein 2 TKTL2 61.7 0.092771339 6.12943E-05 Down
Q96JY0 Protein maelstrom homolog MAEL 23.5 0.092506828 0.020881862 Down
Q9Y614 Actin-like protein 7B ACTL7B 37.1 0.089971919 0.004666833 Down
Q1ZYL8 Izumo sperm-egg fusion protein 4 IZUMO4 24.1 0.088499373 0.002100248 Down
Q8NDV3 Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 1B SMC1B 36.5 0.087471049 1.33318E-05 Down
P33993 DNA replication licensing factor MCM7 MCM7 36.2 0.085077693 3.66754E-06 Down
Q13508 Ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 ART3 37 0.081736849 0.000233612 Down
P10323 Acrosin ACR 37.3 0.07894371 8.17898E-05 Down
Q9P2L0 WD repeat-containing protein 35 WDR35 29.8 0.074438013 0.000227758 Down
P34931 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1-like HSPA1L 54.4 0.072082919 0.019382589 Down
Q68DQ2 Very large A-kinase anchor protein CRYBG3 21.9 0.071883227 1.45362E-05 Down
Q8NCM8 Cytoplasmic dynein 2 heavy chain 1 DYNC2H1 10.3 0.071414562 0.000356759 Down
Q96C74 Ropporin-1-like protein ROPN1L 40 0.068024771 0.005652977 Down
Q9H4B8 Dipeptidase 3 DPEP3 44.9 0.067216285 3.52383E-07 Down
O75526 RNA-binding motif protein, X-linked-like-2 RBMXL2 32.9 0.066089982 0.00299892 Down
Q9Y2T7 Y-box-binding protein 2 YBX2 64.8 0.065418133 0.002030736 Down
Q9H0C2 ADP/ATP translocase 4 SLC25A31 46 0.065234609 0.00347623 Down
Q15154 Pericentriolar material 1 protein PCM1 23.9 0.061712223 0.000645504 Down
Q96FT9 Intraflagellar transport protein 43 homolog IFT43 21.6 0.061380776 0.010673981 Down
Q8NDW8 Tetratricopeptide repeat protein 21A TTC21A 25.8 0.061028982 0.000333729 Down
O60522 Tudor domain-containing protein 6 TDRD6 19.1 0.057296164 2.98225E-05 Down
Q14410 Glycerol kinase 2 GK2 28.2 0.055624401 0.000418763 Down
Q6NUT2 Probable C-mannosyltransferase DPY19L2 DPY19L2 24.7 0.054915999 4.77744E-06 Down
O14967 Calmegin CLGN 52.1 0.051277734 0.000731137 Down
Q9UFC0 Leucine-rich repeat and WD repeat-containing protein 1 LRWD1 35.1 0.051261956 2.29904E-06 Down
Q8TDB8 Solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 14 SLC2A14 15.6 0.050359031 0.002729296 Down
O75800 Zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 10 ZMYND10 27.7 0.049547539 0.018457824 Down
Q8NA61 Protein chibby homolog 2 CBY2 48.2 0.036890965 2.21842E-06 Down
Q8NEB7 Acrosin-binding protein ACRBP 34.3 0.032955267 4.09348E-05 Down
Q96J94 Piwi-like protein 1 PIWIL1 49.6 0.032790149 2.60606E-06 Down
O75969 A-kinase anchor protein 3 AKAP3 51.8 0.026450492 0.00312269 Down
Q9BZQ2 Testicular spindle-associated protein SHCBP1L SHCBP1L 27.7 0.026354987 0.002102442 Down
Q96KC9 Calcium-binding and spermatid-specific protein 1 CABS1 45.1 0.025401913 0.006772622 Down
Q9H322 Variable charge X-linked protein 2 VCX2 13.7 0.024738418 0.014583729 Down
P07205 Phosphoglycerate kinase 2 PGK2 80.1 0.020074907 5.60505E-06 Down
Q9BZX4 Ropporin-1B ROPN1B 70.8 0.019408204 0.00095517 Down
Q5JQC9 A-kinase anchor protein 4 AKAP4 60.8 0.011723847 2.12378E-06 Down

A total of 4772 proteins were quantitatively identified, among which 717 exhibited differential abundance (false discovery rate [FDR] <5%); specifically, 242 proteins were upregulated, and 475 were downregulated in NOA patients (Figure 2c). To illustrate the significantly different protein abundances between the groups, a volcano plot based on the fold change and P value is displayed in Figure 2d. Hierarchical clustering analysis at the protein level revealed distinct protein clusters (Figure 2e).

Subcellular localization of all the DEPs was conducted using the prediction software CELLO,12 and the results are displayed in a pie chart (Figure 2f). Given that protein domains can alter fundamental protein functions, domain prediction was performed for these proteins (Figure 3a). The analysis revealed a predominant enrichment of domains associated with membrane repair and vesicular trafficking, such as C2 domains. These structural features provide a molecular basis for the involvement of DEPs in spermatogenesis and membrane organization.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Proteomic analysis of testicular tissue in NOA and OA. (a) Enrichment analysis of protein domains among DEPs. The red-framed boxes indicate the functional domains associated with the differentially expressed protein DYSF. (b) GO functional enrichment analysis of DEPs. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor (rich factor ≤1), which indicates the proportion of DEPs annotated to a GO term relative to all identified proteins annotated to that term. The y-axis shows the statistical results for each category. The bubble color represents the significance of enrichment (calculated based on the P-value from Fisher’s exact test). The color gradient indicates the magnitude of the significance (-log10[P-value]), with colors closer to red indicating a smaller P-value and higher significance. Red-framed boxes highlight biological processes associated with reproduction. (c) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEPs. Red-framed boxes highlight metabolic pathways associated with reproductive processes. NOA: non-obstructive azoospermia; OA: obstructive azoospermia; DEPs: differentially expressed proteins; GO: Gene Ontology; WD: WD repeat; TCP-1/cpn60 chaperonin: T-complex protein 1/chaperonin 60; CH: calponin homology; CS: CHORD and SGT1; Hsp70: 70-kilodalton heat shock protein; C2: protein kinase C conserved region 2; PH: pleckstrin homology; DEAD/DEAH: Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp/His; MCM2/3/5: minichromosome maintenance protein 2/3/5; EGF: epidermal growth factor; BP: biological process; CC: cellular component; MF: molecular function; MCM: minichromosome maintenance.

Bioinformatic analysis

To elucidate the observed alterations in protein expression, the GO annotation analysis was performed, focusing on biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF). Our findings suggested that NOA and OA are correlated with distinct functional profiles (Figure 3b). The most significantly enriched biological processes included binding of sperm to zona pellucida, sperm–egg recognition, cell–cell recognition, and spermatid development. Regarding cellular components, the DEPs were primarily localized to minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex, zona pellucida receptor complex, chaperonin-containing T-complex, and sperm principal piece. In terms of molecular functions, significant enrichments were observed in metallopeptidase activity, tripeptidyl-peptidase activity, steroid hydroxylase activity, and dipeptidase activity.

We also conducted the KEGG pathway annotation analysis to identify key metabolic and signal transduction pathways. The analysis revealed that 717 DEPs were enriched across various significant biological pathways (Figure 3c). The upregulated DEPs were predominantly associated with metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, ovarian steroidogenesis, steroid biosynthesis, chemical carcinogenesis-DNA adducts, and drug metabolism-cytochrome P450. These pathways were closely related to reproductive and hormonal regulation, corroborating the GO enrichment results. Conversely, the downregulated DEPs were primarily involved in mRNA surveillance pathway, cell cycle, nucleocytoplasmic transport, RNA degradation, and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis.

Confirmation of DEPs in the expanded sample size via qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis

To corroborate our proteomic findings and explore their functional implications, we selected a set of candidate proteins for confirmation based on the following criteria: (1) significant dysregulation (P < 0.05, FC > 2), (2) central roles in the membrane repair pathway as highlighted by KEGG/PPI analysis, and (3) documented relevance to reproductive or muscular disorders in the literature. This led us to focus on six core DEPs (DYSF, MYOF, CD63, CAV3, CAPN3, and MG53). These samples were further analyzed using qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis in expanded testicular tissue samples from individuals with NOA (n = 37) and OA (n = 28).

The qRT-PCR results revealed that, compared with those in the OA group, the mRNA expressions of DYSF, MYOF, MG53, and CD63 were significantly upregulated in the NOA group (all P < 0.05), whereas those of CAV3 and CAPN3 were significantly downregulated (both P < 0.05; Figure 4a). These findings align with those from the proteomics analysis. Similarly, Western blot analysis revealed that, relative to those in the OA group, the protein expression of DYSF, MYOF, MG53, and CD63 in the NOA group markedly increased (all P < 0.05), while the expressions of CAV3 and CAPN3 were significantly downregulated (both P < 0.05), corroborating the qRT-PCR results (Figure 4b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Confirmation experiments for DEPs in proteomics. (a) Quantitative mRNA analysis of DEPs. Intergroup comparisons were conducted via Student’s t-tests, and the statistical data are presented as mean ± s.d. **P < 0.05 denotes a significant difference between the NOA group and OA group. (b) Representative Western blot bands of DEPs and protein quantification analyses. Intergroup comparisons were conducted via Mann–Whitney U tests, and the statistical data are presented as median (IQR). **P < 0.05 denotes a significant difference between the NOA group and OA group. Differences among group means were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Mw: molecular weight; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; s.d.: standard deviation; IQR: interquartile range; DEPs: differentially expressed proteins; NOA: non-obstructive azoospermia; OA: obstructive azoospermia; DYSF: dysferlin; MYOF: myoferlin; ANOVA: analysis of variance; CAV3: caveolin-3; CAPN3: calpain-3; MG53: mitsugumin 53; CD63: cluster of differentiation 63.

DISCUSSION

NOA represents a prevalent and severe condition impairing male fertility, yet its etiology largely remains elusive, underscoring the necessity of enhancing our understanding of its underlying mechanisms.13 Recent progress in proteomics has substantially advanced our knowledge of protein dynamics in human cells, significantly contributing to the field of male infertility research. In this study, we embarked on a comprehensive proteomic analysis and confirmatory experiments of testicular tissue from patients with NOA and OA, which was grounded in the examination of disparities in their clinical characteristics. Our analysis revealed substantial differences in protein expression between the groups, offering new insights into the potential mechanisms underlying male infertility.

These molecular insights were consistently reflected in the distinct clinical phenotype of NOA patients. Our clinical observations indicate that men with NOA display markedly reduced testicular volume and elevated serum FSH and LH compared with those with OA. Histopathological analyses revealed an almost complete depletion of germ cells, accompanied by Sertoli cell-only patterns and thickened basement membranes, findings indicative of primary testicular failure. Together, these phenotypic features suggest that the proteomic alterations in NOA are likely attributable to intrinsic spermatogenic dysfunction. Independent evidence supports this conclusion. A recent study consistently shows that NOA patients have smaller testicular volumes and higher gonadotropin concentrations relative to OA, and these metrics are strongly correlated with the degree of spermatogenic impairment.14 Moreover, combined thresholds for testicular size and FSH concentration have proved highly predictive of NOA, facilitating its clinical differentiation from OA.15 Markedly elevated FSH, such as levels exceeding twice the upper normal limit, is also considered a reliable indicator of primary testicular failure and may obviate the need for diagnostic biopsy.16 Although a subset of NOA patients may have normal hormonal profiles,17 our cohort was deliberately selected to minimize such heterogeneity, thereby strengthening the association between clinical phenotype and proteomic findings. To elucidate the molecular basis of these clinical differences, we conducted a comprehensive proteomic comparison between NOA and OA.

On the basis of our proteomic comparisons, there are significant differences between NOA and OA. Pathological examinations revealed that about 35.7% of NOA patients exhibited SCOS, while the remaining patients presented spermatogenic arrest, whereas OA samples displayed normal spermatogenesis; thus, differences in cellular composition clearly affect the size and abundance of the proteome.18 However, we identified 717 DEPs, with 242 upregulated and 475 downregulated in NOA, a magnitude of change that exceeds what can be attributed solely to variations in cell composition. Evidence from the literature supports this view: compared with the OA group (approximately 1208 proteins) and the low spermatogenesis group (approximately 1076 proteins), the SCOS group has only approximately 839 detectable proteins, yet hundreds of proteins still differ in abundance between groups, mainly involving integrin signaling, inflammatory responses and cytoskeletal regulation pathways. In addition, microproteomic analysis of isolated Sertoli cells from SCOS and OA showed that cell-adhesion pathways are significantly downregulated and apoptosis-related proteins are upregulated in SCOS cells, consistent with our observation of numerous downregulated proteins and increased apoptotic signaling in whole tissue.19,20 Consistent with this, some studies report that even high extension and freezing treatments can alter sperm proteomes, leading to molecular redistribution.21 In contrast, other researchers argue that the differences between NOA and OA proteomes mainly reflect the loss of germ cells;22 however, the evidence above indicates that even when analyzing the same cell type, hundreds of DEPs can still be detected, suggesting that disease-related signaling pathways and changes in cellular functions are the primary drivers.23 Therefore, when interpreting proteomic differences between NOA and OA, one should consider not only cellular composition but also the deeper biological mechanisms related to Sertoli cell function, apoptosis and interactions with the extracellular matrix.

To move beyond interpreting DEPs solely as reflections of cellular composition differences, we performed GO and KEGG enrichment analyses to elucidate their functional implications. Downregulated DEPs in the NOA group were predominantly enriched in genetic material packaging, chaperone-mediated protein folding and catalytic activities, whereas upregulated DEPs included membrane-repair proteins such as DYSF and MYOF. These patterns suggest impaired protein folding and cell division, accompanied by activation of stress responses; rather, they indicate intrinsic testicular dysfunction. Independent comparative proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) testicular tissues has shown that proteins discriminating OA from NOA are highly enriched in integrin signaling, adherens junctions, and planar cell polarity pathways.19 These pathways govern cytoskeletal remodeling and cell–cell adhesion and thus corroborate our observations of disrupted cell division and extracellular–matrix interactions. Even within a defined cell population, numerous DEPs therefore reflect impaired adhesion and reduced survival, consistent with the upregulation of membrane-repair proteins in our dataset. Correspondingly, proteomic profiling of seminal plasma from azoospermic patients demonstrated that downregulated proteins in SCOS samples are enriched for protein folding, unfolded-protein binding and other chaperone functions.24 Collectively, these findings suggest that stress on protein-folding and chaperone systems underlies NOA, lending support to our hypothesis of defective protein processing. Although some reports attribute NOA–OA proteomic differences solely to germ cell loss, our functional annotations indicate that enrichment of protein-folding, cytoskeletal, and adhesion pathways is more likely to reflect disease-specific molecular alterations. DEPs should therefore be interpreted as indicators of intrinsic pathophysiological mechanisms rather than as simple reflections of residual cell populations.

Having established that the proteomic profile of NOA reflects intrinsic pathophysiological mechanisms, we next focused on a particularly salient finding: among the functionally enriched pathways, the dysregulation of membrane repair machinery emerged as a prominent feature. To confirm these proteomic findings and explore their mechanistic implications, we focused on a set of core repair proteins. Our proteomic data, corroborated by RT-qPCR and Western blot analyses, revealed that the membrane repair proteins (DYSF, MYOF, MG53, and CD63) were significantly upregulated in testicular tissue from patients with NOA, whereas CAV3 and CAPN3 were downregulated. This “up–down” expression profile implies that the membrane repair machinery is activated in a compensatory manner in NOA, while structural scaffolding and protease systems are diminished.25

The upregulated proteins suggest an activated, albeit potentially insufficient, membrane repair response. Within the core repair module, DYSF and MYOF belong to the ferlin family of multi-C2 domain proteins that sense Ca²+ and mediate vesicle fusion.26 DYSF is normally abundant in skeletal muscle, and cryo-EM studies show that its C2 domains bind AHNAK nucleoprotein (AHNAK), MG53 and CAV3 to form repair complexes.27 Although other ferlins, such as fer-1-like protein 5 (FER1L5), are known to be predominant in the testis,28 our data revealed a marked increase in DYSF in NOA. Single-cell transcriptomics show DYSF expression in meiosis-stage germ cells.29 Consequently, the observed upregulation likely suggests that DYSF is aberrantly expressed or activated in the remaining somatic cell populations. This hypothesis is consistent with reports that DYSF cooperates with AMPK to promote repair.30 MYOF, possessing seven C2 domains and a DYSF domain that interacts with CAV3,31 regulates endocytosis of receptors such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2).32 Single-cell data indicate MYOF is expressed in Sertoli and interstitial cells;28 its upregulation in NOA may reflect attempts to repair the blood–testis barrier, though excessive MYOF could disrupt receptor trafficking and signaling.25 MG53 is a muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase that is hardly detected in normal testis.33 It recognizes exposed phosphatidylserine to nucleate repair patches, and its interaction with CAV3 is critical for resealing.34 The aberrant activation of MG53 we observed in NOA may represent a response to oxidative stress, since MG53 deficiency increases reactive oxygen species (ROS) and germ cell apoptosis.35 CD63, a tetraspanin, does not directly repair membranes but marks and regulates biogenesis of extracellular vesicles.36 CD63-positive epididymal vesicles transfer regulatory factors to spermatozoa,37 and stem cell-derived CD63 vesicles can restore spermatogenesis in NOA models.38 Its upregulation in our data may indicate enhanced local intercellular communication, whereas reduced CD63 in seminal exosomes could impair spermatogenesis.39

In contrast, the downregulation of CAV3 and CAPN3 underscores deficits in structural scaffolding and proteolytic regulation. CAV3, a caveolin predominantly expressed in muscle,40 forms repair caps with DYSF and MG53; its absence causes these proteins to accumulate in the Golgi.41 CAPN3 is a muscle-specific Ca2+-dependent protease that cleaves AHNAK to regulate the DYSF complex and participates in acrosome formation and mitochondrial sheath assembly.42 Single-cell sequencing shows that CAPN3 is markedly downregulated in round spermatids.43 Our findings revealed a further reduction of CAPN3 in NOA. Given the clinical associations with acrosomal abnormalities, such insufficiency suggests that CAPN3 may impair sperm maturation. Single-cell sequencing shows CAPN3 is markedly downregulated in round spermatids; our findings of further reduction in NOA, together with clinical associations with acrosomal abnormalities, suggest CAPN3 insufficiency may impair sperm maturation.

Taken together, the upregulation of DYSF, MYOF, MG53, and CD63 in NOA likely reflects stress-induced activation of membrane repair and intercellular communication, whereas the downregulation of CAV3 and CAPN3 reveals a loss of structural support and proteolytic regulation. Future work should validate these findings in larger cohorts with single-cell resolution.

While our integrated approach provides important insights into NOA mechanisms, several limitations should be considered. First, the single-center design and modest sample size may affect generalizability, requiring confirmation in larger, multicentric cohorts. Second, our bulk tissue proteomics approach, while informative, cannot resolve cell type-specific contributions, a limitation that could be addressed in future studies using single-cell proteomics or spatial transcriptomics.44 Third, the focus on protein abundance does not capture potentially relevant post-translational modifications that regulate protein function in spermatogenesis.45 Finally, as with all LC-MS/MS-based workflows, the detection of low-abundance signaling proteins may be limited by dynamic range constraints and testicular lipid content, potentially underrepresenting key regulatory pathways. Despite these limitations, which are inherent to discovery-phase proteomic studies, our dataset provides a valuable resource for understanding molecular disruptions in spermatogenic failure.

In conclusion, our proteomic profiling not only confirms the expected protein landscape due to germ cell depletion in NOA but also, more importantly, unveils a distinct signature of dysregulation in testicular cells. This provides a fresh perspective on NOA pathophysiology, moving beyond the germ cell-centric view to consider the role of the testicular somatic environment. The identified DEPs, particularly DYSF, MYOF, and their interacting partners, warrant further investigation as potential biomarkers and contributors to the dysfunctional testicular microenvironment in NOA. Future studies are warranted to validate DEPs in larger cohorts and explore single-cell proteomics to delineate cell type-specific effects.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

JHY and HQA were responsible for conceptualization, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. ZW and XDL contributed equally to methodology, formal analysis, data curation, and writing original draft. ZW also handled software. XDL and WMS participated in investigation. WMS provided resources (clinical samples). DXZ and XQX were responsible for validation and visualization. JHY, HQA, and XQX contributed to writing, review, and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

COMPETING INTERESTS

All authors declare no competing interests. The authors declare that the technical services provided by Protein Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), do not constitute competing interests as the company had no role in the study design or data interpretation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the laboratory members for their help and support. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82160772), the Key Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No. 2022D01C260), Key Laboratory of Drug Clinical Research in Xinjiang (2025XJYW01), and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talent Project (2024). Acknowledgements are extended to Protein Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for their technical support and to the BioRender platform for granting drawing permissions. None of these entities were involved in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of results, or the writing and submission of the manuscript, and there are no potential competing interests related to the aforementioned support.

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Asian Journal of Andrology website.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND METHODS

1.1 PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS AND BIOINFORMATICS OF TESTIS

Protein Extraction

Five cases of NOA and OA testicular tissue samples were randomly selected for proteomic analysis. The samples were ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen and transferred to a 5 ml centrifuge tube, to which four volumes of lysis buffer were added. The mixture was sonicated three times using a high-intensity ultrasonic processor (Scientz, Ningbo, China) under ice-cold conditions and then centrifuged at 12 000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Manufacturer, City, Country), following the manufacturer's instructions.

Employ LC-MS/MS for Label-Free Proteomics Analysis

Before conducting the proteomic analysis, each sample was treated with a final concentration of 10 mM DTT, mixed at 40 ×g at 37°C for 1.5 h. After cooling to room temperature, 20 mM IAA was added to each sample to block the cysteine reduction residues, and the samples were incubated in the dark for 30 min. The samples were then transferred to filters and washed thrice with 100 μl of UA buffer, followed by two washes with 100 μl of 25 mM NH4HCO3 buffer. Subsequently, trypsin was added to the samples at a trypsin-to-protein (wt/wt) ratio of 1:50 and incubated at 37°C for 15–18 h (overnight). The resulting peptides were collected as filtrate and desalted using a C18 column (Empore™ SPE C18 (standard density), 7 mm diameter, 3 ml volume (Sigma)). After vacuum centrifugation, the peptides were resuspended in 40 μl of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. The peptide content was estimated based on the tryptophan and tyrosine frequency in vertebrate proteins, using an extinction coefficient of 1.1 for a 0.1% (g/l) solution at 280 nm.

LC-MS/MS analysis was conducted using a Q mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled with Easy nLC (Proxeon Biosystems, now Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were resuspended in Buffer A (0.1% formic acid, FA) and subjected to online desalting using a C18 reverse-phase separation column (2 cm × 150 μm, particle size 3 μm). Here, 0.5 μg of peptides were desalted at a flow rate of 3 μl/min, followed by loading onto a C18 trap column (15 cm × 150 μm, particle size 1.9 μm) with a gradient from 5% to 35% Buffer B (0.1% FA, 2% water, 97.9% ACN) at 400 nl/min over 91 minutes. Subsequent peptide separation was performed using a reverse-phase chromatography column (Thermo Scientific Easy Column, 10 cm length, 75 μm inner diameter, 3 μm resin) connected to a C18 reverse-phase analytical column (Thermo Scientific Acclaim PepMap100, 100 μm × 2 cm, nanoViper C18), employing a linear gradient of Buffer B (84% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode, and data were acquired using a data-dependent top 20 method, dynamically selecting the most abundant precursor ions for HCD fragmentation scanning (300-1800 m/z). Mass spectrometry raw data were analyzed using Maxquant software (version 1.6.14), with proteins identified as differentially expressed (DEPs) based on a P < 0.05 and a fold change (FC) ≥1.5. Further methodological details are available in the supplementary materials.

Bioinformatics Analysis of Proteins Associated with the Diagnosis of Azoospermia

Bioinformatics analysis was conducted using InterProScan software to search protein sequences and identify protein domain features from the Pfam database, a member of InterPro. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were analyzed with both the Gene Ontology (GO) database (http://geneontology.org/) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html); these analyses employed a P-adjustment and P < 0.05. Additionally, protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis and visualization were performed using the String database (http://string-db.org/) and Cytoscape software. Key modules in the PPI network were identified using Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) based on the criteria of an MCODE score ≥20, a degree cutoff of 2, a node score cutoff of 0.2, a maximum depth of 100, and a k-score of 2. Subsequent KEGG analysis focused on the proteins within this module.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Minhas S, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Cocci A, Corona G, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on male sexual and reproductive health: 2025 update on male infertility. Eur Urol. 2025;87:601–16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brannigan RE, Hermanson L, Kaczmarek J, Kim SK, Kirkby E, et al. Updates to male infertility: AUA/ASRM guideline (2024) J Urol. 2024;212:789–99. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Piechka A, Sparanese S, Witherspoon L, Hach F, Flannigan R. Molecular mechanisms of cellular dysfunction in testes from men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Nat Rev Urol. 2024;21:67–90. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00837-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brant A, Schlegel PN. Modern surgical treatment of azoospermia. Curr Opin Urol. 2023;33:39–44. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roshandel E, Mehravar M, Nikoonezhad M, Alizadeh AM, Majidi M, et al. Cell-based therapy approaches in treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia. Reprod Sci. 2023;30:1482–94. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01115-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mostafa T, Bocu K, Malhotra V. A review of testicular histopathology in nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl. 2025;27:370–4. doi: 10.4103/aja202454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parkes R, Garcia TX. Bringing proteomics to bear on male fertility: key lessons. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2024;21:181–203. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2024.2327553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Castillo J, de la Iglesia A, Leiva M, Jodar M, Oliva R. Proteomics of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:2312–20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Araujo SC, Bertolla RP. Protein markers of spermatogenesis and their potential use in the management of azoospermia. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2021;18:939–48. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2021.2010548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rowe PJ World Health Organization. WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation, Diagnosis, and Management of the Infertile Male. Cambridge: Published on Behalf of the World Health Organization by Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. p91. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins. 2006;64:643–51. doi: 10.1002/prot.21018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhao L, Yao C, Xing X, Jing T, Li P, et al. Single-cell analysis of developing and azoospermia human testicles reveals central role of sertoli cells. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5683. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19414-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ghafoori M, Moaddab M, Mahmoodi F, Soleymani S, Ghaed MA, et al. Use of volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient to distinguish between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: a case-control study. Med J Bakirkoy. 2024;20:225–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hubbard L, Rambhatla A, Colpi GM. Differentiation between nonobstructive azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia: then and now. Asian J Androl. 2025;27:298–306. doi: 10.4103/aja202475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kavoussi PK, Hudson K, Machen GL, Barsky M, Lebovic DI, et al. FSH levels and testicular volumes are associated with the severity of testicular histopathology in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:3015–8. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02313-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tao Y. Endocrine aberrations of human nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl. 2022;24:274–86. doi: 10.4103/aja202181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma M, Yang S, Zhang Z, Li P, Gong Y, et al. Sertoli cells from non-obstructive azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia patients show distinct morphology, Raman spectrum and biochemical phenotype. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1863–73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Davalieva K, Rusevski A, Velkov M, Noveski P, Kubelka-Sabit K, et al. Comparative proteomics analysis of human FFPE testicular tissues reveals new candidate biomarkers for distinction among azoospermia types and subtypes. J Proteomics. 2022;267:104686. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2022.104686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiang YT, Yang X, Li LL, Lv X, Wang RX, et al. Identification and verification of potential biomarkers in sertoli cell-only syndrome via bioinformatics analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13:12164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38947-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Du L, Cui YH, Chen W, Li CY, He ZP. Micro-proteomics reveals distinct protein profiles and SPARC/FGF2/CDH1 regulation of human Sertoli cells between Sertoli cell-only syndrome and normal men. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025;82:146. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-05678-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen ST, An G, Wang HS, Wu XL, Ping P, et al. Human obstructive (postvasectomy) and nonobstructive azoospermia – insights from scRNA-Seq and transcriptome analysis. Genes Dis. 2022;9:766–76. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cui L, Nie X, Guo Y, Ren P, Guo Y, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the human testis across the reproductive lifespan. Nat Aging. 2025;5:658–74. doi: 10.1038/s43587-025-00824-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fietz D, Sgaier R, O’Donnell L, Stanton PG, Dagley LF, et al. Proteomic biomarkers in seminal plasma as predictors of reproductive potential in azoospermic men. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024;15:1327800. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1327800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zha D, Wang S, Monaghan-Nichols P, Qian Y, Sampath V, et al. Mechanisms of endothelial cell membrane repair: progress and perspectives. Cells. 2023;12:2648. doi: 10.3390/cells12222648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Muriel J, Lukyanenko V, Kwiatkowski T, Bhattacharya S, Garman D, et al. The C2 domains of dysferlin: roles in membrane localization, Ca2+ signalling and sarcolemmal repair. J Physiol Lond. 2022;600:1953–68. doi: 10.1113/JP282648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang HL, Grandinetti G, Heissler SM, Chinthalapudi K. Cryo-EM structures of the membrane repair protein dysferlin. Nat Commun. 2024;15:9650. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53773-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morohoshi A, Miyata H, Tokuhiro K, Iida-Norita R, Noda T, et al. Testis-enriched ferlin, FER1L5, is required for Ca2+-activated acrosome reaction and male fertility. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eade7607. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347:1260419. doi: 10.1126/science.1260419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ono H, Suzuki N, Kanno S, Kawahara G, Izumi R, et al. AMPK complex activation promotes sarcolemmal repair in dysferlinopathy. Mol Ther. 2020;28:1133–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dong Y, Kang H, Liu H, Wang J, Guo Q, et al. Myoferlin, a membrane protein with emerging oncogenic roles. Biomed Res Int 2019. 2019:7365913. doi: 10.1155/2019/7365913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cretu C, Chernev A, Szabó CZ, Pena V, Urlaub H, et al. Structural insights into lipid membrane binding by human ferlins. EMBO J. 2025;44:3926–58. doi: 10.1038/s44318-025-00463-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang Y, Wu HK, Lv FX, Xiao RP. MG53: biological function and potential as a therapeutic target. Mol Pharmacol. 2017;92:211–8. doi: 10.1124/mol.117.108241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang YF, An ZY, Li JW, Dong ZK, Jin WL. MG53/TRIM72: multi-organ repair protein and beyond. Front Physiol. 2024;15:1377025. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1377025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li HC, Lin PH, Gupta P, Li XG, Zhao SL, et al. MG53 suppresses tumor progression and stress granule formation by modulating G3BP2 activity in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:118. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01418-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jankovicová J, Michalková K, Secová P, Horovská L, Antaliková J. The extracellular vesicle tetraspanin CD63 journey from the testis through the epididymis to mature bull sperm. Sci Rep. 2024;14:29449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81021-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Luo JW, Zhu SQ, Kang YF, Liu XY, Tan X, et al. Isolation of CD63-positive epididymosomes from human semen and its application in improving sperm function. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024;13:e70006. doi: 10.1002/jev2.70006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Deng CC, Xie Y, Zhang C, Ouyang B, Chen HC, et al. Urine-derived stem cells facilitate endogenous spermatogenesis restoration of busulfan-induced nonobstructive azoospermic mice by paracrine exosomes. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28:1322–33. doi: 10.1089/scd.2019.0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Morgan CP, Meadows VE, Marx-Rattner R, Cisse YM, Bale TL. HA-tag CD63 is a novel conditional transgenic approach to track extracellular vesicle interactions with sperm and their transfer at conception. Sci Rep. 2023;13:707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27898-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meng ZJ, Zhang Z, Zhao JL, Liu CH, Yao P, et al. Nitrative modification of caveolin-3: a novel mechanism of cardiac insulin resistance and a potential therapeutic target against ischemic heart failure in prediabetic animals. Circulation. 2023;147:1162–79. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pradhan BS, Prószynski TJ. A role for caveolin-3 in the pathogenesis of muscular dystrophies. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:8736. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bardakov SN, Sorochanu I, Mkrtchyan LA, Slesarenko YS, Tsargush VA, et al. Calpainopathy (limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type R1): clinical features, diagnostic approaches, and biotechnological treatment methods. J Neuromuscular Dis. 2025;12:594–618. doi: 10.1177/22143602251345967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen J, Yang XY, Cui MM, Yao ZK, Ouyang ZX, et al. Deciphering the regulatory networks of human male germline development from embryo to adulthood. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2025. 1871:167918. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2025.167918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Longo SK, Guo MG, Ji AL, Khavari PA. Integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics to elucidate intercellular tissue dynamics. Nat Rev Genet. 2021;22:627–44. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00370-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Onochie C, Evi K, O’Flaherty C. Role of redox-induced protein modifications in spermatozoa in health and disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 2025;14:720. doi: 10.3390/antiox14060720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Journal of Andrology are provided here courtesy of Editorial Office of AJA.

RESOURCES