Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2026 Aug 20;658(8134):103–112. doi: 10.1038/s41586-026-11043-z

Dialkyl ether synthesis through heteroatom homolytic substitution

Johannes J Großkopf 1,#, Johnny Z Wang 1,#, Jacqueline W Gu 1, Cheng Bi 2, Sarah N Dishman 3, Xiaoshen Ma 3, Yu-hong Lam 4, David W C MacMillan 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13626950  PMID: 42742172

Abstract

The modular and selective synthesis of dialkyl ethers, particularly sterically congested variants, remains a longstanding challenge in drug discovery and medicinal chemistry1,2. Hindered alkyl ethers are especially desirable given their prevalence in bioactive natural products and their favourable physicochemical properties3. Classically, dialkyl ether synthesis relies on nucleophilic substitution strategies; however, SN2 reactions are fundamentally limited by steric congestion at the transition state, whereas SN1 pathways proceed through promiscuous carbocation intermediates that are prone to elimination, rearrangement and loss of stereogenic information4–6. Here we report a radical-based paradigm for general dialkyl ether synthesis enabled by an underutilized heteroatom homolytic substitution (het-SH2) mechanism. This mechanistic paradigm overcomes the intrinsic limitations of classical polar substitution chemistry by leveraging carbon-centred radicals generated under mild conditions that are insensitive to steric congestion in the bond-forming transition state. Using a titanium-based catalytic platform in combination with visible-light photoredox catalysis, we demonstrate efficient coupling of carboxylic-acid-derived redox-active esters with alcohols across a broad range of substitution patterns, including 3°–2°, 3°–1°, 2°–2° and 2°–1° architectures. This strategy grants access to a dialkyl ether chemical space that is largely inaccessible through conventional approaches, including sterically demanding bicyclo[1.1.1]propane ether bioisosteres, and enables late-stage diversification of complex pharmaceutical scaffolds. This platform is expected to serve as a broadly applicable blueprint for radical-mediated heteroatom bond formation.

Subject terms: Photocatalysis, Synthetic chemistry methodology


A titanium-based platform for dialkyl ether synthesis inspired by natural cytochrome P450 enzyme catalysis overcomes the limitations of traditional approaches, potentially paving the way for construction of other inaccessible heteroatom bonds with pharmaceutical applications.

Main

Dialkyl ethers are ubiquitous structural motifs in natural products and serve as key building blocks in medicinal chemistry owing to their favourable physicochemical properties3. Despite the apparent simplicity of dialkyl ethers, their general and modular synthesis has remained a longstanding challenge, particularly for sterically congested architectures1,2. Classical substitution-based strategies have fundamental limitations: bimolecular nucleophilic substitution (SN2) reactions are highly sensitive to steric congestion during the transition state4–6, whereas unimolecular pathways (SN1) proceed through high-energy carbocation intermediates that are prone to rearrangement and elimination (Fig. 1a). Recent advances have expanded access to hindered dialkyl ethers through carbocation-based strategies7 and methods proceeding through intermediates with carbocation-like character8,9; however, substrates incompatible with such electrophilic intermediates, which include strained, rearrangement-prone and oxidatively sensitive intermediates, remain challenging to address generally.

Fig. 1. Reaction design.

Fig. 1

a, Challenges with using traditional substitution reactions for dialkyl ether synthesis. b, Metal-catalysed approaches have been underdeveloped for formation of dialkyl ethers. c, Biomimetic heteroatom SH2 inspired by cytochrome P450 radical rebound could forge hindered C–O bonds from radicals. d, Titanium-based catalysts possess the required properties for het-SH2. e, General access to dialkyl ethers enabled by titanium-catalysed het-SH2.

Inner-sphere cross-coupling approaches have likewise struggled to provide general solutions to C(sp3)–O bond formation en route to dialkyl ethers. The weak nucleophilicity of alcohols, the strong basicity of intermediate metal alkoxides and sluggish C(sp3)–O reductive elimination10–12 collectively limit the efficiency of these processes (Fig. 1b). Accordingly, a broadly applicable solution to dialkyl ether synthesis requires a fundamentally different mechanistic paradigm: one that forges C(sp3)–O bonds without invoking high-energy carbocations or slow inner-sphere reductive elimination and exhibits minimal sensitivity to steric congestion.

When considering this challenge, we were inspired by nature’s approach to C–O bond formation. Cytochrome P450 enzymes catalyse C–H oxidation through a radical pathway involving hydrogen atom abstraction followed by outer-sphere radical rebound to generate hydroxylated products13,14. Notably, this radical recombination step is mechanistically analogous to a heteroatom homolytic bimolecular substitution (het-SH2) event (Fig. 1c). This analogy suggests that a synthetically underexplored radical substitution paradigm could provide a general solution to the formation of substituted dialkyl ethers that would circumvent the intrinsic limitations of classical ionic substitution chemistry.

A biomimetic heteroatom SH2 reaction between an alkyl radical and a metal alkoxide would satisfy our design criteria for dialkyl ether formation. Such a mechanism would bypass high-energy carbocation intermediates and instead leverage carbon-centred radicals, which can be generated under mild conditions from a broad range of readily available feedstocks15 and are less susceptible to deleterious two-electron decomposition pathways16. Moreover, the outer-sphere heteroatom SH2 manifold would circumvent the sluggish inner-sphere reductive elimination that affects conventional cross-coupling, instead proceeding through a bond-forming transition state in which steric bulk is spatially distal from the site of C–O bond formation.

Central to the realization of this strategy was identification of a metal that was both highly oxophilic, enabling efficient alcohol binding and metal alkoxide formation, and capable of serving as an effective radical leaving group in the key heteroatom SH2 step (Fig. 1d). Here we introduce a titanium-based catalytic platform as a privileged system that enables the general synthesis of dialkyl ethers from alcohols and carboxylic-acid-derived redox-active esters (RAE) through a heteroatom SH2 pathway. The generality and functional group tolerance of this titanium-catalysed process are demonstrated through synthesis of dialkyl ethers spanning a wide range of substitution patterns, including 3°–2°, 3°–1°, 2°–2° and 2°–1° couplings, across more than 80 examples (Fig. 1e).

Reaction design

The construction of C(sp3)–O bonds beyond alcohols through radical intermediates represents a longstanding challenge in synthesis, as most radical C–O bond-forming platforms require a hydrogen atom transfer-active metal complex in a high oxidation state to generate the radical intermediate and the transferable oxygen fragment simultaneously; this mechanistic constraint couples radical generation and oxygen fragment delivery to the same oxidative event, thereby precluding the modular use of simple alcohols and rendering ether synthesis by means of this manifold inaccessible13. A more enabling approach would decouple these two functions: if an unactivated alcohol could be ligated directly to a redox-active metal centre, the resulting alkoxide complex could serve as a transferable leaving group upon interception by an exogenously generated radical through an SH2 mechanism. Mechanistically, this elementary step would constitute a heteroatom homolytic substitution (het-SH2) at the alkoxide oxygen and would fall in the broader framework of radical ligand transfer, in which a ligand is transferred from a metal centre to a carbon-centred radical17; we use the het-SH2 designation to specify the atom-level substitution mechanism that delivers the C–O bond. This concept is supported by work by our group18–20 and others21,22 demonstrating that iron complexes operating through SH2 pathways can simultaneously be intercepted by carbon-centred radicals and function as radical leaving groups with high efficiency. Despite these efforts, this reactivity has not been extended to the formation of C–heteroatom bonds in a catalytic fashion. Only one stoichiometric iron complex has been shown to coordinate methanol and permit radical interception23, and no general catalytic platform for direct alcohol engagement in this fashion has been reported24.

We identified titanium-based catalysts as candidates that might be capable of both facile alkoxide formation and participation in single-electron processes. Previous studies have shown that Cp2Ti(III)Cl reductively opens epoxides to generate alkyl radicals alongside Ti(IV) alkoxide intermediates, demonstrating the ability of titanium species to efficiently form alkoxides while supporting radical chemistry25–27. Although titanium catalysts have seen limited application as the organic radical generator in bimolecular cross-coupling28,29, a general cross-coupling platform that uses a titanium catalyst in the bond-forming step has been lacking. Isolated reports of titanium-mediated radical cyclizations leading to cyclic ethers have suggested potential relevance to heteroatom SH2 processes30. These precedents prompted us to evaluate whether bench-stable titanocene dichloride could be used in a photocatalytic, intermolecular heteroatom SH2 reaction.

Implementation of this transformation posed several fundamental challenges. The key SH2 step required a persistent population of Ti(IV) alkoxide intermediates, which are known to undergo photodecomposition through ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) pathways. In addition, Ti(III) and Ti(IV) oxidation states are redox non-innocent, which complicates control over catalytic speciation, whereas Ti(III) species exhibit strong coordination to Lewis-basic functionalities, often leading to unproductive substrate reduction and decomposition31.

Reaction development and mechanism

The proposed mechanism for the titanium-catalysed heteroatom SH2 reaction is outlined in Fig. 2a. Upon visible-light irradiation, organic photocatalyst 2,4,5,6-tetrakis(diphenylamino)isophthalonitrile (4DPAIPN) (1) is excited to a long-lived excited state (2)32. Stern–Volmer studies (see Supplementary Fig. 6.1 for further details) show that this excited state is sufficiently oxidizing (E1/2red(4DPAIPN*/4DPAIPN•−) = +1.10 V versus saturated calomel electrode (SCE) in MeCN)32 to oxidize Ti(III) (3) (E1/2red(TiIV/TiIII) = −0.76 V versus SCE in dichloroethane (DCE)) to Ti(IV) (4). The resulting Ti(IV) species subsequently binds to the alcohol (5) to form the corresponding Ti(IV) alkoxide (6). To close the photocatalytic cycle, the reduced-state 4DPAIPN radical anion (7) (E1/2red(4DPAIPN/4DPAIPN•−) = −1.52 V versus SCE in MeCN) reduces the RAE (8) (E1/2red(RAE/RAE•−) = −1.24 V (for RAE-H) or −1.31 V (for RAE-OMe) versus SCE in DCE) to generate an alkyl radical (9) upon rapid decarboxylation33. This alkyl radical (9) then engages the Ti(IV) alkoxide (6) in a heteroatom SH2 step, forging the C–O bond to deliver the dialkyl ether product (10) and regenerating Ti(III), thereby closing the titanium catalytic cycle.

Fig. 2. Mechanistic studies.

Fig. 2

a, Proposed mechanism. b, Ti–O LMCT suppression under cyan light irradiation. Cyan light irradiation avoids deleterious LMCT processes of the crucial titanium alkoxide species. c, Titanium-dependent diastereoselectivity. Effect of involvement of titanium in bond formation on the d.r. of the product and comparison with the carbocationic pathway. d, Intermediacy of titanium alkoxide species. Photo-NMR showed the formation and consumption of titanium alkoxide as the reaction progresses. e, Radical involvement in C–O bond formation. Stoichiometric studies demonstrated the capability of radicals to undergo het-SH2 with the titanium alkoxide to form the corresponding dialkyl ethers. f, Computational evidence for concerted het-SH2 step. Density functional theory studies (B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVPP basis set) demonstrated the thermodynamic feasibility of the radical ether formation, as well as the transition state of the het-SH2 step; NPhth, phthalimidyl; PC, photocatalyst.

Formation and persistence of a Ti(IV) alkoxide intermediate are central to the proposed mechanism. Initial optimization studies under blue-light irradiation generated the desired product in only modest yields. Simultaneously, combining the Ti(IV) precatalyst with an alcohol in the presence of base resulted in rapid development of a pale yellow–orange solution (Supplementary Information), consistent with formation of a titanium alkoxide species. We attributed this colour change to an LMCT band associated with a Ti(IV) alkoxide complex that absorbed in the blue region of the visible spectrum. While this study was in progress, independent work from the Lipshultz laboratory demonstrated that titanium alkoxide complexes are highly susceptible to light-induced LMCT followed by β-scission, a pathway that is deleterious under photoredox conditions34.

Ultraviolet–visible-light absorption spectra of the Ti(IV) alkoxide, compared with those of Cp2TiCl2 and photocatalyst 4DPAIPN, showed that although the alkoxide complex exhibited weak absorption in the blue region, it had negligible absorption at 505 nm (Fig. 2b). These data suggested that shifting the irradiation wavelength from blue (450 nm) to cyan (505 nm) would suppress undesired titanium-centred LMCT processes, thereby increasing the lifetime and steady-state concentration of the Ti(IV) alkoxide intermediate and favouring productive heteroatom SH2 reactivity. Consistent with this hypothesis, cyan light irradiation (505 nm) increased the yield of the desired dialkyl ether (10) from 54% to 81%. Moreover, LMCT-driven decomposition was suppressed at this wavelength, as evidenced by the near-complete absence of β-scission by-products (Supplementary Fig. 5.2).

We examined the influence of titanium on product diastereoselectivity to probe its involvement in the bond-forming step, as coordination to titanium was expected to introduce steric bias in the transition state and thereby affect the diastereomeric ratio (d.r.). Redox-active ester 11 and secondary alcohol 12 were coupled under standard conditions (Supplementary Information) (a) in the presence of titanium and zinc base, (b) in the absence of titanium with zinc base, (c) in the absence of titanium with sodium base, and (d) under reported electrochemical conditions7. Under standard conditions (a), 13 was obtained in 59% yield and 2.2:1 d.r. In the absence of titanium (b and c), the yield was substantially reduced (8–9%), and negligible diastereoselectivity was observed (1.1:1 d.r.), consistent with direct involvement of titanium in the bond-forming event. Moreover, the electrochemical reaction (d), which proceeds through a carbocationic intermediate, furnished 13 in 44% yield with essentially no diastereoselectivity (1.1:1 d.r.) (Fig. 2c). Furthermore, the key Ti(IV) alkoxide intermediate was observed by photo-NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy performed while the sample was irradiated in situ in the spectrometer) under standard irradiation conditions (Fig. 2d; see Supplementary Information for details).

A stoichiometric experiment was performed to evaluate the involvement of a radical species in the key C–O bond-forming step. We conducted parallel experiments using either a preformed, isolated titanium alkoxide (6) or a titanium alkoxide formed in situ from alcohol (5). Upon addition of RAE (8), trimethylsilyl chloride-activated zinc was introduced to establish strongly reducing conditions. Under these conditions, single-electron reduction of the RAE is expected to generate an alkyl radical through rapid decarboxylation33. Notably, the reducing environment precludes oxidation of the alkyl radical to a carbocation and disfavours formation of a carbanion, thereby biasing the reaction towards radical reactivity. Consistent with our hypothesis, the desired dialkyl ether (10) was formed in 6% and 13% yield, respectively, under stoichiometric conditions (Fig. 2e). Although these yields were modest, they provided evidence of direct engagement of an alkyl radical with a Ti(IV) alkoxide intermediate, consistent with C–O bond formation through a heteroatom SH2 pathway and formation of titanium alkoxide under our reaction conditions. Further discussion of this experiment and its mechanistic implications is provided in section 8 of the Supplementary Information.

To interrogate the feasibility of the proposed het-SH2 step, we performed density functional theory calculations on a model system comprising a tert-butyl radical and titanocene(IV) ethoxide Cp2Ti(Cl)(OEt) (Fig. 2f). A single transition state was located (ΔG‡ = 16.2 kcal mol−1), featuring a three-centre C···O···Ti arrangement with no direct metal–carbon contact; this suggested that the reaction proceeded in a single concerted step, consistent with a homolytic substitution at oxygen. The substitution was exergonic (ΔG = −10.6 kcal mol−1), reflecting the exchange of the weaker Ti–O bond for the stronger C–O bond of the ether (see the Supplementary Information for details).

Scope evaluation

We first examined the scope of the titanium-catalysed heteroatom SH2 reaction using tertiary carboxylic acids and primary alcohols to access 3°–1° substituted dialkyl ethers (Fig. 3). A broad range of primary alcohols (10 and 15–27) and tertiary acids (28–42) proved compatible, affording the desired ethers in good to high yields. Protic functionality was well tolerated on both coupling partners, including unprotected protic groups on both the alcohol substrate (20 and 27) and the carboxylic acid precursor (32). Despite the well-documented Lewis acidity of titanium complexes35,36, a variety of Lewis-basic functionalities were accommodated, including carbamates (10 and 15–22) and medicinally relevant heterocycles such as pyridines (23, 36), pyrimidines (35, 37) and pyrazoles (39)37. This functional group tolerance was consistent with a low steady-state concentration of Ti(III) under the reaction conditions and attenuated Lewis acidity of Ti(IV) following formation of titanium alkoxide.

Fig. 3. Tertiary–primary ether scope.

Fig. 3

All yields were isolated. See the Supplementary Information for detailed experimental conditions. NPhth(OMe), 4-methoxyphthalimidyl.

The reaction efficiently converted biomass-derived alcohols, including citronellol (25), d-galactopyranose (26) and serine (27), to the corresponding dialkyl ether scaffolds. Aryl bromides (41), which provide a reactive handle for subsequent derivatization, were likewise tolerated. Notably, strained cyclic radicals (42), for which carbocation-based pathways are inaccessible (see the Supplementary Information for a comparison with established carbocation-based strategies), readily participated in the heteroatom SH2 reaction, furnishing the corresponding ethers in good yields.

We next evaluated the use of secondary alkyl radicals to access 2°–1° and 2°–2° ether motifs (Fig. 4). Secondary radicals derived from both cyclic (44–46) and acyclic (43 and 47) substrates reacted efficiently to afford a range of 2°–1° ethers, including stable hemiaminals (43) and β-lactam-containing products bearing silyl-protected alcohols (47). Notably, this method provided access to highly sought-after 2°–2° dialkyl ethers, which typically undergo sluggish SN2 reactions. A wide range of diverse ring-size combinations were efficiently formed under the reaction conditions (48–57). In addition, stable acetal motifs (56 and 57), including an ether (57) derived from (+)-galacturonic acid, were obtained in good yield.

Fig. 4. Modular construction of dialkyl ethers with varying substitution.

Fig. 4

All yields were isolated. Reactions were performed using 4DPAIPN (5 mol% or 10 mol%), Cp2TiCl2 (10 mol% or 20 mol%), Zn3(PO4)2 (0.75 equiv.) or [ZnCO3]2·[Zn(OH)2]3 (0.5 equiv.), RAE (RAE-H or RAE-OMe; 1.0 or 3.0 equiv.), alcohol (1–3 equiv.) in DCE (0.2 M or 0.1 M) under cyan light irradiation. See Supplementary Information for detailed experimental conditions. TBDMS: tert-butyldimethylsilyl.

Coupling of tertiary carboxylic acids and secondary alcohols to form 3°–2° dialkyl ethers represents a significant challenge owing to severe steric congestion around the oxygen centre. Using our titanium-based catalytic platform, we could access these motifs efficiently through heteroatom SH2 reactivity. A broad range of secondary alcohols, including linear (58, 59, 68 and 72) and cyclic (60–67 and 69–71) substrates, proved to be compatible, enabling entry into chemical space that would be largely inaccessible through classical substitution strategies. Notably, alcohols bearing α-stereogenic centres underwent coupling without racemization (58–60 and 72) to afford dialkyl ethers with preserved stereochemical integrity.

Cyclic secondary alcohols, including four-membered (61–64), five-membered (65 and 66) and six-membered (67 and 69–71) as well as spirocyclic systems, coupled efficiently with a variety of cyclic tertiary carboxylic acids to deliver the corresponding ethers in high yields. Both linear (70 and 71) and strained (72) tertiary radicals also participated efficiently. Notably, the functional group tolerance of this approach was further demonstrated by compound 70, which bears a primary alkyl chloride that would typically be susceptible to substitution under basic SN2 conditions.

In substrates containing multiple alcohol functionalities, classical SN1-based etherification would be expected to proceed with minimal site selectivity. By contrast, the titanium-catalysed heteroatom SH2 manifold exhibited pronounced diol site selectivity, favouring etherification at the less substituted alcohol. This selectivity arose from preferential binding of the less substituted alcohol to titanium, combined with the sensitivity of the heteroatom SH2 step to steric bulk. Together, these factors biased product formation towards the less substituted ether. Consistent with this rationale, diols bearing primary and tertiary alcohols afforded exclusively the ether derived from reaction at the primary alcohol (73 and 74). When primary and secondary alcohols were present, modest but reproducible selectivity in favour of the primary alcohol-derived ether (75) was observed (1.8:1). Finally, diols comprising secondary and tertiary alcohols yielded exclusively the ether arising from functionalization at the secondary alcohol (76).

Given the interest of our group in developing bioisosteric replacements for prevalent motifs in drug discovery38,39, we sought to apply the heteroatom SH2 platform to the synthesis of bicyclo[1.1.1]propane (BCP)-substituted ethers. These sp3-rich phenol ether bioisosteres have garnered increasing attention in medicinal chemistry owing to their favourable physicochemical properties40. Although recent advances have expanded the synthetic accessibility of BCP derivatives41,42, the installation of sterically demanding substituents remains challenging owing to a lack of general functional-group-tolerant strategies. In particular, direct etherification of BCP alcohols through SN2 or cationic SN1 pathways remains problematic, as these substrates are unstable under basic conditions, undergo rapid decomposition through the corresponding alkoxide and exhibit low nucleophilicity43. Under the mild conditions of our titanium-catalysed heteroatom SH2 protocol, we observed efficient formation of the desired BCP ethers when engaging tertiary alkyl radicals. This strategy enabled synthesis of a diverse array of sterically hindered BCP ethers in good yields (77–81), highlighting the capacity of this platform to access sp3-rich bioisosteric ether architectures that would be difficult to obtain using conventional approaches.

Given the mild reaction conditions and high functional group tolerance of this protocol, we anticipated that it could be used to incorporate ether linkages into functionality-dense drug-like scaffolds (Fig. 5a). To evaluate its applicability in complex late-stage settings, we examined the reaction across a range of heterocycle-rich building blocks and structurally complex pharmaceutical substrates. Owing to the intrinsic value and limited availability of these advanced intermediates, the more elaborate coupling partner, either the alcohol or the carboxylic acid, was used as the limiting reagent. Efficient C(sp3)–O bond formation was observed across diverse molecular architectures, including cases in which the alcohol served as the limiting substrate. This enabled synthesis of a broad array of complex ethers, encompassing sugars and sugar-like motifs (82 and 83), as well as scaffolds bearing Lewis-basic heterocycles such as pyrimidines (84, 87 and 89), pyridines (85), pyrazoles (86) and triazoles (88). Notably, even highly elaborated drug derivatives proved to be compatible with the reaction conditions, allowing late-stage etherification of compounds including alogliptin (90), losartan (91), empagliflozin (92), RU-58841 (93), febuxostat (94) and lumacaftor (95) (Fig. 5b). Collectively, these results demonstrate the broad functional group tolerance of this protocol and its utility for late-stage diversification.

Fig. 5. Complex scope and high-throughput experimentation.

Fig. 5

a, Complex and drug-like examples. b, Pharmacologically active compounds. c, Chemical space expansion by means of high-throughput experimentation (HTE). All yields were isolated. See the Supplementary Information for detailed experimental conditions. Trt, trityl; UPLC, ultra-performance liquid chromatography.

To further assess the breadth of this reaction platform, we benchmarked the evaluated substrates against the chemical space of commercially available alcohols (Fig. 5c). We analysed the Enamine alcohol library, which comprises more than 55,000 compounds (SMILES strings for alcohols in the Enamine catalogue were retrieved from the Enamine website https://enamine.net/building-blocks/functional-classes (version dated 7 October 2025))44, using Morgan fingerprints (2,048-bit) followed by dimensionality reduction to generate a representative chemical space map (see the Supplementary Information for details)45,46. Projection of the experimentally tested alcohols onto this map revealed broad coverage across diverse regions of alcohol chemical space. Nevertheless, we identified several underrepresented areas, from which we selected representative substrates for further evaluation. To efficiently interrogate these regions, we implemented high-throughput experimentation to accelerate data acquisition and enable matrix-style screening relevant to medicinal chemistry47. Of the eight previously unexplored alcohols selected from underrepresented regions, seven delivered the desired ether products in synthetically useful yields; an imidazole-containing alcohol was the sole exception. Evaluation of a 48-well matrix library further demonstrated broad compatibility, with 40 of 48 substrate combinations affording yields exceeding 30%. These results indicate the suitability of this platform for rapid library synthesis and medicinal chemistry screening.

Outlook

The development of a general and modular strategy for dialkyl ether synthesis has remained a longstanding challenge in synthetic organic chemistry. Here we introduce a titanium-catalysed heteroatom SH2 reaction that provides a general solution to this problem under mild and functional-group-tolerant conditions. This transformation enables access to sterically demanding dialkyl ether architectures that would be inaccessible or inefficient using classical substitution pathways. More broadly, this work establishes heteroatom SH2 reactivity as a general mechanistic framework for controlled radical–heteroatom bond formation. We expect this mechanistic paradigm to inform the development of new catalytic platforms for construction of other challenging heteroatom linkages and to further broaden the scope of radical substitution chemistry.

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11043-z.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (42.4MB, pdf)

This Supplementary Information file contains sections 1–15 and supplementary figures, tables and references.

Peer Review File (2.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Lambert for assistance in preparing this manuscript; and L. Harstad and D. Morgan, as well as Y. Boyko, C. Huck and C. Le at Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, for helpful scientific discussions.

Author contributions

J.J.G. and D.W.C.M. conceived the work. J.J.G. and J.Z.W. optimized the reaction. J.J.G., J.Z.W. and J.W.G. designed and performed the experiments. J.J.G. and Y.-h.L. performed the computational studies. J.J.G., J.Z.W. and D.W.C.M. prepared the manuscript with input from J.W.G., C.B., S.N.D., X.M. and Y.-h.L.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (R35GM134897), the Princeton Catalysis Initiative and Merck. J.J.G. thanks the Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (LPDS2023–03) for financial support, and J.W.G. acknowledges Princeton University for a first-year fellowship. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIGMS.

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.

Competing interests

D.W.C.M. declares an ownership interest in the Penn PhD photoreactor, which was used to irradiate reactions in this work. C.B., S.N.D., X.M., and Y.-h.L. are employed by Merck & Co., Inc. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Johannes J. Großkopf, Johnny Z. Wang

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11043-z.

References

  • 1.Armstrong, H. M. et al. Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.9, 2089–2094 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chao, J., Israiel, M., Zheng, J. & Aki, C. A two-step procedure for the preparation of mono-protected bis-N-heterocyclic alkyl ether systems. Tetrahedron Lett.48, 791–794 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roughley, S. D. & Jordan, A. M. The medicinal chemist’s toolbox: an analysis of reactions used in the pursuit of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem.54, 3451–3479 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.DeTar, D. F., McMullen, D. F. & Luthra, N. P. Steric effects in SN2 reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.100, 2484–2493 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rablen, P. R., McLarney, B. D., Karlow, B. J. & Schneider, J. E. How alkyl halide structure affects E2 and SN 2 reaction barriers: E2 reactions are as sensitive as SN2 reactions. J. Org. Chem.79, 867–879 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.DePuy, C. H., Gronert, S., Mullin, A. & Bierbaum, V. M. Gas-phase SN2 and E2 reactions of alkyl halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc.112, 8650–8655 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xiang, J. et al. Hindered dialkyl ether synthesis with electrogenerated carbocations. Nature573, 398–402 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shibutani, S. et al. Organophotoredox-catalyzed decarboxylative C(sp3)–O bond formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 1211–1216 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nakagawa, M., Matsuki, Y., Nagao, K. & Ohmiya, H. A triple photoredox/cobalt/Brønsted acid catalysis enabling Markovnikov hydroalkoxylation of unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 7953–7959 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Le Vaillant, F., Reijerse, E. J., Leutzsch, M. & Cornella, J. Dialkyl ether formation at high-valent nickel. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 19540–19550 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang, S.-Y. et al. Efficient alkyl ether synthesis via palladium-catalyzed, picolinamide-directed alkoxylation of unactivated C(sp3)–H and C(sp2)–H bonds at remote positions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134, 7313–7316 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pangia, T. M. et al. Mechanistic investigation of oxygen rebound in a mononuclear nonheme iron complex. Inorg. Chem.58, 9557–9561 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huang, X. & Groves, J. T. Beyond ferryl-mediated hydroxylation: 40 years of the rebound mechanism and C–H activation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.22, 185–207 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zaragoza, J. P. T. et al. Direct observation of oxygen rebound with an iron-hydroxide complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 13640–13643 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chan, A. Y. et al. Metallaphotoredox: the merger of photoredox and transition metal catalysis. Chem. Rev.122, 1485–1542 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gibian, M. J. & Corley, R. C. Organic radical-radical reactions. Disproportionation vs. combination. Chem. Rev.73, 441–464 (1973). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nemoto, D. T., Bian, K.-J., Kao, S.-C. & West, J. G. Radical ligand transfer: a general strategy for radical functionalization. Beilstein J. Org. Chem.19, 1225–1233 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu, W., Lavagnino, M. N., Gould, C. A., Alcázar, J. & MacMillan, D. W. C. A biomimetic SH2 cross-coupling mechanism for quaternary sp3-carbon formation. Science374, 1258–1263 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gould, C. A., Pace, A. L. & MacMillan, D. W. C. Rapid and modular access to quaternary carbons from tertiary alcohols via bimolecular homolytic substitution. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 16330–16336 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pace, A. L., Xu, F., Liu, W., Lavagnino, M. N. & MacMillan, D. W. C. Iron-catalyzed cross-electrophile coupling for the formation of all-carbon quaternary centers. J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 32925–32932 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gan, X. et al. Carbon quaternization of redox active esters and olefins by decarboxylative coupling. Science384, 113–118 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kong, L., Gan, X., Van Der Puyl Lovett, V. A. & Shenvi, R. A. Alkene hydrobenzylation by a single catalyst that mediates iterative outer-sphere steps. J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 2351–2357 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pangia, T. M. et al. Observation of radical rebound in a mononuclear nonheme iron model complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 4191–4194 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fernandes, A. J. & Katayev, D. Bimolecular homolytic substitution (SH2) and radical ligand transfer (RLT): emerging paradigms in radical transformations. ACS Cent. Sci.11, 1812–1827 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gansäuer, A., Pierobon, M. & Bluhm, H. Catalytic, highly regio- and chemoselective generation of radicals from epoxides: titanocene dichloride as an electron transfer catalyst in transition metal catalyzed radical reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.37, 101–103 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gansäuer, A. et al. Catalysis via homolytic substitutions with C−O and Ti−O bonds: oxidative additions and reductive eliminations in single electron steps. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 16989–16999 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu, X., Chang, Y. & Lin, S. Titanium radical redox catalysis: recent innovations in catalysts, reactions, and modes of activation. Chem.8, 1805–1821 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Parasram, M., Shields, B. J., Ahmad, O., Knauber, T. & Doyle, A. G. Regioselective cross-electrophile coupling of epoxides and (hetero)aryl iodides via Ni/Ti/photoredox catalysis. ACS Catal.10, 5821–5827 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wu, X. et al. Ti-catalyzed radical alkylation of secondary and tertiary alkyl chlorides using Michael acceptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 14836–14843 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gansäuer, A. et al. A radical tandem reaction with homolytic cleavage of a Ti−O bond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.42, 3687–3690 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Unkrig-Bau, M. A., Leijendekker, S. L. & Streuff, J. Exploring dinuclear titanium complexes in titanium(III) catalysis. ChemCatChem17, e202401337 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Luo, J. & Zhang, J. Donor–acceptor fluorophores for visible-light-promoted organic synthesis: photoredox/Ni dual catalytic C(sp3)–C(sp2) cross-coupling. ACS Catal.6, 873–877 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salgueiro, D. C., Chi, B. K., Guzei, I. A., García-Reynaga, P. & Weix, D. J. Control of redox-active ester reactivity enables a general cross-electrophile approach to access arylated strained rings. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202205673 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shah, J. A. et al. Degradative alcohol functionalization by titanocene photocatalysis. ACS Catal.15, 15315–15323 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Larsen, A. O., White, P. S. & Gagné, M. R. Acid−base adducts of catalytically active titanium(IV) Lewis acids. Inorg. Chem.38, 4824–4828 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kamigaito, M., Sawamoto, M. & Higashimura, T. Alkoxy-substituted titanium(IV) chlorides as Lewis acid activators for living cationic polymerization of isobutyl vinyl ether: control of Lewis acidity in the design of initiating systems. Macromolecules28, 5671–5675 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Marshall, C. M., Federice, J. G., Bell, C. N., Cox, P. B. & Njardarson, J. T. An update on the nitrogen heterocycle compositions and properties of U.S. FDA-approved pharmaceuticals (2013–2023). J. Med. Chem.67, 11622–11655 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mao, E., Prieto Kullmer, C. N., Sakai, H. A. & MacMillan, D. W. C. Direct bioisostere replacement enabled by metallaphotoredox deoxydifluoromethylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 5067–5073 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Großkopf, J. J., Morgan, D. C., Clarke, A. K. & MacMillan, D. W. C. A general metallaphotoredox platform for N-alkylated sulfoximines as bioisosteric building blocks. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 35995–36006 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Subbaiah, M. A. M. & Meanwell, N. A. Bioisosteres of the phenyl ring: recent strategic applications in lead optimization and drug design. J. Med. Chem.64, 14046–14128 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bai, Z., Lansbergen, B. & Ritter, T. Bicyclopentylation of alcohols with thianthrenium reagents. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 25954–25961 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sujansky, S. J., Burgess, S. A. & Ma, X. A practical solution to achieve the elusive etherification of bicyclo[1.1.1]pentyl alcohols. J. Org. Chem.90, 17051–17057 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yu, S. et al. Palladium-catalyzed stagewise strain-release-driven C−C activation of bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanyl alcohols. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202200052 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Building Blocks by Functionshttps://enamine.net/building-blocks/functional-classes (Enamine, accessed 12 December 2025).
  • 45.Landrum, G. et al. rdkit/rdkit: 2025_03_6 (Q1 2025) Release. Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.16996017 (2025). [DOI]
  • 46.McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. J. Open Source Softw.3, 861 (2018).
  • 47.Mennen, S. M. et al. The evolution of high-throughput experimentation in pharmaceutical development and perspectives on the future. Org. Process Res. Dev.23, 1213–1242 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (42.4MB, pdf)

This Supplementary Information file contains sections 1–15 and supplementary figures, tables and references.

Peer Review File (2.1MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.


Articles from Nature are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES